Mar?al Vilar
The amyloid hypothesis of Alzhemer’s disease (AD) postulates that the generation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide from the amyloid precursor protein(APP) by the action of the γ-secretase complex is one of the principal causes of AD. This idea is supported by the identification of several hereditary mutations in theAPPgene or in thePSEN1andPSEN2genes that encode Presenilin-1 and Presenilin-2, the catalytic component of the γ-secretase complex. The assumption at that time was that familial AD (FAD), mutations lead to a gain of function phenotype,increasing the ratio between the levels of the toxic Aβ1–42, and the less toxic Aβ1–40peptide (Kuperstein et al., 2010).Actually, the ratio Aβ1–42/Aβ1–40is the principal cause of the toxic effect as some FAD mutations in APP decrease the levels of Aβ1–40without changing the total levels of Aβ1–42(Ancolio et al., 1997). Pharmaceutical companies started the race to design new highly specific γ-secretase inhibitors (GS?s)with good pharmacological properties to jump into the clinic. The reduction of the circulating levels of Aβ1–42in AD mouse models rapidly supported this approximation, and one of the lead compounds, Semagacestat (Lilly),entered the phase III clinical trials.However, results were not as good as initially expected, and the appearance of several skin cancer problems and a reduction, rather than an improvement,in the cognitive performance of the patients lead the FDA to stop the clinical trials. Meanwhile, it was reported that inhibition of the γ-secretase could lead to skin problems in the mice (Li et al.,2007), and that FAD mutations are actually the loss of function mutations(Chávez-Gutiérrez et al., 2012). The molecular mechanism of γ-secretase activity showed that FAD mutations alter its proteolytic processing leading to an increase in the long toxic peptides Aβ1–42and a reduction of the shorter Aβ1–37species (Chávez-Gutiérrez et al.,2012). Nowadays, it is clear that the goal is to increase the processing with the identification of new γ-secretase modulators.
Although the tumorigenic potential of GSIs in the skin could be explained by the inhibition of the NOTCH pathway that plays a tumor suppressor role in mice (Li et al., 2007), the molecular mechanism why GSIs lead to a worsening cognitive scenario is still unclear and several hypotheses have been formulated.
NOTCH is expressed in some neuronal stem cells and inhibition of the NOTCH pathway could lead to neurogenesis problems, however, adult neurogenesis is quite impaired in older adults (Díaz-Moreno et al., 2013), so other protein pathways and players could be behind this phenotype. In this sense, some have suggested that the increased levels of APP-CTF (also called C99) by the use of GSIs could be behind this toxic effects (Checler et al., 2021).Mice with a deletion in the APH-1 component of the γ-secretase complex accumulate more than 10-fold the levels of the membrane-bound CTF fragments of several substrates and showed signs of cortical atrophy,neuronal loss, and gliosis (Acx et al.,2017). This was associated with non-AD neurodegeneration and probably cognitive decline, but APP-CTF seems not responsible, as deletion of APP did not rescue that phenotype (Acx et al.,2017). This could be explained by the fact that in addition to APP and NOTCH,γ-secretase has several other substrates and some of them could contribute to the toxic effects after γ-secretase inhibition.
One of these substrates is the p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR) (Kraemer et al., 2014). Two things make p75NTRa suspect, one is its implication in developmental neuronal cell death, and the second is its high expression in the basal forebrain cholinergic neurons.Cholinergic synapses are ubiquitous in the human central nervous system.Acetylcholine plays an important role in memory function and has been implicated in aging-related dementia.Cholinergic neurons densely innervate the hippocampus and the cortex,suggesting that cholinergic transmission is likely to be critically important for memory, learning, attention, and other brain functions. Based on this, the basal forebrain cholinergic neurons (BFCNs)constitute one important target to study the action of GS?s.
The proteolysis of p75NTRhas been suggested important for its proapoptotic activity. Recently, the increased levels of the p75-CTF in hippocampal and cerebral neurons by the use of γ-secretase inhibitors showed an increase in cell death in those neuronal populations (Vicario et al., 2015). A similar result was described earlier in sensory neurons (Underwood et al., 2008). The consequence of the inhibition of the γ-secretase complex on the BFCNs was studied recently in our labratory (Franco et al., 2021).The outcome was quite different from hippocampal and cereberal neurons,in the sense that the inhibition of the γ-secretase with GS?s, although it increased the levels of p75-CTF, does not induce cell death of the BFCNs.In the search for the mechanism of this result, we choose the cell lines PC12 cells (that express both p75 and TrkA) and a specific clone PC12-nnr5 cells (that express p75 but not TrkA).We found that GSIs induced the cell death of PC12nnr5 cells, and not PC12,indicating that TrkA activation may have a role in the survival of BFCNs. Actually when the primary cultures of BFCNs are incubated with GSIs plus a TrkA kinase inhibitor there was a significant cell death (Franco et al., 2021). This result suggests that the formation of p75-CTFper seis not indicative of a pro-death signal if TrkA is active, and that in the absence of TrkA signaling, p75-CTF is able to trigger cell death. The molecular mechanism proposed suggests that in the presence of GSIs, the levels of p75-CTF increased at the plasma membrane inducing its oligomerization and causing cell death by activation of TRAF6 and JNK/p38 pathways (Frgure 1). Finally we showed that TrkA induced an increase in the internalization of p75-CTF and a reduction of p75-CTF oligomerization at the plasma membrane, proposing this as the main mechanism by which TrkA protects cholinergic neurons from GSIinduced cell death.
How this could be related to the worsening of the cognitive decline in AD patients treated with GS?s? Although in aging the levels of p75 do not increase,the levels of TrkA decrease during healthy and pathological aging resulting in less pro-survival signaling (Ginsberg et al., 2006).
Figure 1|Model of the mechanism of p75-CTF induced cell death.
?n summary, although other possibilities exist, the data presented in Franco et al. (2021) supports the role of p75 in a worsening of the cognitive decline in old AD patients treated with GSIs,suggesting that the use of NGF agonists potentiating the activation of TrkA, could alleviate or help in the treatment of degenerating diseases.
This work was supported by the Spanish Minister of Economy and Competitiveness grant SAF2017-84096-R and by the Generalitat Valenciana 2018-55, to MV.
?nstituto de Biomedicina de València del CS?C,València, Spain
*Correspondence to:Mar?al Vilar, PhD,mvilar@ibv.csic.es.https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9376-6544(Mar?al Vilar)
Date of submission:June 15, 2021
Date of decision:July 14, 2021
Date of acceptance:July 29, 2021
Date of web publication:December 10, 2021
https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.330607
How to cite this article:Vilar M (2022)Neurotrophin receptors, gamma-secretase inhibitors, and neurodegeneration of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons. Neural Regen Res17(7):1493-1494.
Copyright license agreement:The Copyright License Agreement has been signed by the author before publication.
Plagiarism check:Checked twice by iThenticate.
Peer review:Externally peer reviewed.
Open access statement:This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.