Daniel Sobrido-Cameán, Antón Barreiro-Iglesias
Lampreys are one of the most ancient extant vertebrates and they have become an animal model of interest for the study of spontaneous axon regeneration after a traumatic central nervous system injury.Contrary to most mammals, lampreys recover locomotion after a complete spinal cord injury (SCI). During recovery from SCI, some of the descending axons in lampreys regenerate through the injury site and reinnervate caudal levels of the spinal cord. Interestingly, the brainstem of lampreys contains 36 giant descending neurons that can be identified individually and that show very different survival and regenerative abilities after a complete SCI (Jacobs et al., 1997; see Barreiro-Iglesias, 2015), even when their axons are found in similar locations in a spinal cord that is permissive for axonal regrowth.Some of these identifiable neurons are considered “good” regenerators (they regenerate their axon more than 55% of the times) and others are considered “bad”regenerators (they regenerate their axon less than 50% of the times) (Figure 1).This offers a model in which the intrinsic mechanisms regulating neuronal survival and axonal regrowth can be studiedin vivoand at the level of individual neurons.First, one can use this model to find genes showing differential expression between“good” and “bad” regenerator neurons,and then try to perform functional studies by manipulating their expression or their action. As in any other animal model, drugs can be used for this purpose(Fogerson et al., 2016; Romaus-Sanjurjo et al., 2018; Sobrido-Cameán et al., 2019,2020), but ideally genetic manipulations are also needed to confirm drug effects or to manipulate the expression of genes for which no drugs are available.
Unfortunately, lampreys, like the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus; which is the most commonly used lamprey species in SCI studies), have a very complex and long life cycle. Sea lampreys have a long filter-feeding larval stage in the river (5 to 7 years), a transformation and an adult parasitic stage in the sea before they return to the river to breed and die. This has precluded the generation of stable mutant or transgenic lampreys in the laboratory. Transient genetic knock down can be a good alternative to the use of permanent genetic manipulations for functional studies. So far, morpholinos(available from Gene Tools, LLC) are the only genetic tool that has been proven effective for SCI studies in mature larval lampreys (Zhang et al., 2015; Fogerson et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2017; Romaus-Sanjurjo et al., 2018;Sobrido-Cameán et al., 2019; Rodemer et al., 2020).
Morpholinos:Morpholinos are synthetic antisense oligonucleotides (around 20–25 nucleotides) that bind messenger RNAs(mRNAs). Morpholinos are different from natural nucleic acids, since they contain methylenemorpholine rings replacing the ribose or deoxyribose sugar moieties and non-ionic phosphorodiamidate linkages replacing the anionic phosphates. Each morpholine ring positions one of the standard DNA bases for pairing, so that a morpholino oligo specifically binds to its complementary target site. Morpholino binding blocks access of cell components to the mRNA target site. This allows to block mRNA translation (translationblocking morpholinos), mRNA splicing(splice-blocking morpholinos), inhibit micro-RNA action (or their targets) or block ribozyme activity (Moulton, 2016).
Morpholino studies after SCI in lampreys:Conveniently, when morpholinos are applied at the site of injury after a complete spinal cord transection in lampreys they are taken up by the axotomized descending axon and are retrogradely transported to the neuronal soma of neurons located in the brainstem.This retrograde transport has been proven by labeling morpholinos with fluorescent molecules (Zhang et al., 2015; Fogerson et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2017;Sobrido-Cameán et al., 2019; Rodemer et al., 2020). Application of morpholinos after SCI in lampreys has been mainly done by soaking the morpholino solution in a small piece of Gelfoam (available from Pfizer) that is then placed at the injury site (Zhang et al., 2015; Fogerson et al.,2016; Hu et al., 2016; Romaus-Sanjurjo et al., 2018; Rodemer et al., 2020). In some studies, the Gelfoam was left at the site of injury for only a couple of hours and it was then removed before returning the animals to the aquaria (Chen et al., 2017).However, fluorescent morpholino labeling has also shown that a morpholino solution directly applied to the rostral stump of the transected spinal cord allows for the retrograde transport of the morpholino(Sobrido-Cameán et al., 2019).
As indicated inAdditional Table 1,7 studies have used translation- (4 studies) or splice-blocking (3 studies)morpholinos to knock down the expression of 7 target mRNAs/pre-mRNAs in descending neurons of lampreys after a complete SCI. In these studies, control animals with an SCI received either a standard control morpholino supplied by Gene Tools or a custom-made 5-base mismatch morpholino. 5-Base mismatch morpholinos contain the same sequence of the active morpholino with changes in 5 of the bases (therefore, they should not bind the target mRNA). To confirm that the morpholinos knocked down the expression of the target mRNAs in brainstem neurons these different studies used Western Blot,in situhybridization and/or immunofluorescence techniques to reveal decreased expression of the target mRNA/protein (Additional Table 1).
The first study reporting the use of morpholinos in the lamprey model of SCI was published in 2015 by Zhang et al.These authors used translation-blocking morpholinos directed against the sea lamprey neurofilament subunit NF180 and showed that inhibition of neurofilament expression inhibits axon regeneration after SC?. ?nterestingly, NF180 morpholino application had no effect on the axon retraction that occurs initially after a complete SCI (Figure 1). This study provided functional data confirming that axonal regeneration in lampreys (and perhaps in the other vertebrates) probably depends on an internal protrusive force generated by the transport or assembly of neurofilaments in the distal axon instead of the canonical actin-dependent pulling mechanisms (Zhang et al., 2015).
Figure 1|Schematic drawing of lateral view of a larval sea lamprey (at the top) and schematic drawings of the larval brainstem and spinal cord from a dorsal view (at the bottom).
Fogerson et al. (2016) used a translation blocking morpholino against the sea lamprey gamma-synuclein to show that selective accumulation and aggregation of synuclein leads to neurodegeneration in bad survivor descending neurons after SCI. Synuclein morpholino knock down not only improved neuronal survival, but also increased the number of axons in the spinal cord after the SCI (Fogerson et al.,2016). Morpholino results were confirmed with the inhibitor of amyloidogenic protein aggregation CLR01, which also improved the survival of descending neurons in the brainstem (Fogerson et al., 2016).This study was the first to demonstrate,in any vertebrate model, that synuclein accumulation causes neurodegeneration after SCI as had been previously shown for neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson’s disease. Interestingly,recent work has shown that lentivirus downregulation of alpha-synuclein promotes functional recovery in rats after SCI (Zheng et al., 2019).
Application of translation-blocking morpholinos directed against the sea lamprey RhoA mRNA after a complete SC? caused a reduction in caspase activation in descending neurons, inhibited axon retraction in the rostral stump and increased axon regeneration through the injury site (Hu et al., 2017). Previous work in mammalian models of SCI had already shown the positive effects of RhoA inhibition after SC?. However, with results previously obtained in rodent models it was not clear whether the positive effects of RhoA inhibition were due to the promotion of true axon regeneration as opposed to collateral sprouting by spared axons. This study in the lamprey model shows that RhoA inhibition can enhance true axon regeneration and prevent retrograde apoptotic death after SCI (Hu et al., 2017).
Morpholino work has also allowed deciphering the role of the axon guidance receptor Neogenin during axonal regeneration (Chen et al., 2017, Chen and Shifman, 2019). Neogenin serves as a receptor for the repulsive guidance molecule.In situhybridization data showed that this receptor is preferentially expressed in bad regenerators of the sea lamprey brainstem (Chen et al.,2017). Concordantly, the application of a Neogenin splice-blocking morpholino at the time of spinal cord transection promoted the regeneration of identifiable descending neurons with low or intermediate regenerative capacity (Chen et al., 2017). The incomplete regeneration induced by the Neogenin morpholino could be explained by the expression of multiple axonal guidance receptors in descending neurons, including UNC5 or Plexins (Barreiro-Iglesias et al., 2012, Chen et al., 2017). Further work by the same group showed that application of the same morpholino promotes neuronal survival in descending neurons by inhibiting caspase activation (Chen and Shifman, 2019).Importantly, increased neuronal survival and axonal regeneration after Neogenin morpholino application lead to improved behavioral recovery after a complete SC? in lampreys (Chen and Shifman, 2019).
Recent work from our group using morpholinos has also revealed the role of classical neurotransmitters in the regulation of axonal regrowth and neuronal survival after a complete SCI in lampreys (Romaus-Sanjurjo et al.,2018; Sobrido-Cameán et al., 2019).These studies showed opposing roles for serotonin and GABA during axonal regeneration. The use of translationblocking morpholinos showed that endogenous serotonin inhibits axonal regeneration by activating 1A serotonin receptors present in brainstem descending neurons (Sobrido-Cameán et al. 2019).Activation of serotonin 1A receptors leads to a reduction in cyclic-AMP levels, which in turn could inhibit axonal regrowth(Sobrido-Caméan et al., 2019). In contrast,endogenous GABA acting through GABABreceptors expressed in identifiable descending neurons promotes both neuronal survival and axon regeneration in these neurons after SC? (Romaus-Sanjurjo et al., 2018). Interestingly, baclofen (a GABABagonist used as an anti-spasticity medication in SC? patients) could be a drug of interest to promote neuroprotection and recovery after SCI in mammals,including humans (see de Sousa et al.,2021).
Finally, a recent study has reported surprising results in which morpholino knock down of the chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans receptor PTPsigma in sea lampreys impaired axon regeneration and neuronal survival (Rodemer et al.,2020). These results were unexpected since expression data revealed that PTPsigma was predominantly expressed in bad regenerators after SCI in lampreys and chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans are known to inhibit axonal sprouting/regrowth after SCI in mammals. Future work should try to decipher the molecular mechanisms by which PTPsigma knock down leads to suppression of axon regeneration and neuronal survival in lampreys. One possibility already suggested by Rodemer and colleagues(2020) is that PTPsigma could be suppressing the activation of autophagy pathways, which could drive cell death and impair axon regeneration following morpholino knockdown.
Conclusions:All these studies from the last 6 years show that morpholino work in the lamprey model of SCI can provide interesting new insights on the role of different molecules and signaling pathways in axon regeneration and neuronal survival in vertebrates. This is also providing new molecular targets to promote recovery after SC? in mammalian models.
Recent transcriptomic data has provided new possible mRNA targets to be manipulated with morpholinos in the lamprey model of SCI (e.g., different kinases or KLF transcription factors;Herman et al., 2018; Sobrido-Cameán et al., 2020). So, future morpholino work could focus on these new genes. New studies could also attempt to target several mRNAs simultaneously to determine if combinatorial approaches can improve the results obtained with single morpholinos.Future methodological work should also attempt to develop new genetic tools to complement morpholino work in the lamprey model of SC?. Application of small interfering RNAs or CRISPR/Cas tools to giant descending neurons of lampreys could be an interesting way to confirm and complement morpholino work. This would provide robustness to morpholino studies in lampreys to control for possible offtarget effects of morpholinos.
Daniel Sobrido-Cameán?,Antón Barreiro-Iglesias*
Department of Functional Biology, Faculty of Biology, C?BUS, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coru?a,Spain (Sobrido-Cameán D, Barreiro-Iglesias A)?Current address: Department of Zoology,University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
*Correspondence to:Antón Barreiro-Iglesias, PhD,anton.barreiro@usc.es.https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8239-2965(Daniel Sobrido-Cameán);orcid.org/0000-0002-7507-080X(Antón Barreiro-Iglesias)
Date of submission:March 29, 2021
Date of decision:April 26, 2021
Date of acceptance:June 17, 2021
Date of web publication:December 10, 2021
https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.330597
How to cite this article:Sobrido-Cameán D,Barreiro-Iglesias A (2022) Morpholino studies shed light on the signaling pathways regulating axon regeneration in lampreys. Neural Regen Res 17(7):1475-1477.
Copyright license agreement:The Copyright License Agreement has been signed by both authors before publication.
Plagiarism check:Checked twice by iThenticate.
Peer review:Externally peer reviewed.
Open access statement:This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under theterms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Additional file:
Additional Table 1: Morpholino studies in the lamprey model of spinal cord injury.