• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Toward Carbon-Neutral Water Systems: Insights from Global Cities

    2022-10-18 12:29:14LeungLmGngLiuAnneMriekeMoteliWgenrJnPetervnderHoek
    Engineering 2022年7期

    K Leung Lm, Gng Liu*, Anne Mrieke Moteli-Wgenr, Jn Peter vn der Hoek,d

    a Division of Natural and Applied Sciences, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan 215316, China

    bResearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China

    c Waternet,Amsterdam 1096 AC, Netherlands

    dDepartment of Water Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft 2628 CN, Netherlands

    Keywords:Urban water Greenhouse gas emissions Cities Climate change mitigation Carbon neutrality

    ABSTRACT Many cities have pledged to achieve carbon neutrality. The urban water industry can also contribute its share to a carbon-neutral future. Using a multi-city time-series analysis approach, this study aims to assess the progress and lessons learned from the greenhouse gas(GHG)emissions management of urban water systems in four global cities: Amsterdam, Melbourne, New York City, and Tokyo. These cities are advanced in setting GHG emissions reduction targets and reporting GHG emissions in their water industries.All four cities have reduced the GHG emissions in their water industries,compared with those from more than a decade ago (i.e., the latest three-year moving averages are 13%-32% lower), although the emissions have ‘‘rebounded” multiple times over the years. The emissions reductions were mainly due to various engineering opportunities such as solar and mini-hydro power generation,biogas valorization,sludge digestion and incineration optimization,and aeration system optimization.These cities have recognized the many challenges in reaching carbon-neutrality goals, which include fluctuating water demand and rainfall, more carbon-intensive flood-prevention and water-supply strategies, meeting new air and water quality standards, and revising GHG emissions accounting methods. This study has also shown that it is difficult for the water industry to achieve carbon neutrality on its own.A collaborative approach with other sectors is needed when aiming toward the city’s carbon-neutrality goal.Such an approach involves expanding the usual system boundary of the water industry to externally tap into both engineering and non-engineering opportunities.

    1. Introduction

    Cities have been recognized as central in fast-tracking and transformative action for global climate change mitigation [1],and many cities have pledged to achieve carbon neutrality [2].The urban water industry can contribute its share to a carbonneutral future by, for example, improving its energy efficiency,reducing direct emissions from wastewater treatment, improving water end-use efficiency, and recovering energy and nutrients[3,4]. Of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from urban water systems, a significant portion is associated with energy use [5]. A large body of literature has assessed these energy-related GHG emissions [6]. In the water industry, improving energy efficiency is often one of the easiest ways to reduce GHG emissions [7];moreover, there has been an increasing adoption of renewable energy sources [8,9] and anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge[10,11]. Many studies have evaluated the potential of achieving energy-neutral (or even energy-exporting) municipal wastewater treatment [12-15]. Energy-neutral operation can avoid energyrelated GHG emissions, while energy-exporting operation can offset direct GHG emissions from wastewater treatment.

    In addition to the energy-related Scope 2 GHG emissions(which mostly involve purchased electricity), Scope 1 direct GHG emissions (e.g., fuel combustion, nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, and methane emissions) are of concern for wastewater treatment[16,17]. A great deal of technical research has been conducted to understand the mechanism of N2O emissions [18,19], to measure and model N2O in full-scale treatment plants [20,21], and to develop control strategies for reducing N2O emissions[22].A body of literature has also assessed Scope 3 indirect GHG emissions(e.g.,chemical and material supply), typically using life cycle assessment and carbon footprint analysis of urban water infrastructure[23-25]. Beyond emissions from urban water infrastructure, few studies advocate for a broader system boundary that encompasses water-related GHG emissions management in water end use[26,27].

    Although a great deal of research on water-related GHG management (i.e., energy use, direct emissions, and Scope 3 emissions accounting) has been conducted, city-scale analyses for understanding the system-wide management of water-related GHGs remain limited. Furthermore, most city-scale studies on the GHG emissions of urban water systems are conducted for a single city or a snapshot of a year (e.g., Wu et al. [23], and Zhou et al. [28]).Few studies have taken a multi-city analysis approach or a timeseries analysis approach to assess GHG emissions in urban water systems.

    In this study, therefore, we draw on historical time-series GHG emissions inventory and information from multiple cities to gain insights into the GHG emissions management of urban water systems. A multi-city analysis can promote inter-city learning [29],support performance benchmarking [30], and offer insight into the impacts of geospatial characteristics [31]. Venkatesh et al.[31] evaluated the GHG emissions associated with the energy use of the urban water infrastructure in four cities:Nantes,Oslo,Turin,and Toronto. Mo et al. [32] quantified the GHG emissions impacts through 2030 of using different types of water supply sources in Tampa Bay and San Diego.

    Time-series GHG emissions analysis is useful for identifying trends, patterns, and potential drivers [33,34]. Van der Hoek et al. [35] explained that energy savings, process optimizations,and the use of renewable energy led to the reduction of GHG emissions between 1990 and 2013 for the urban water system of Amsterdam.Zhang et al.[24]reported on the increased GHG emissions from water utilities in Chinese cities between 2006 and 2012.

    This study aims to assess the progress and lessons learned from the GHG emissions management of urban water systems in four global cities: Amsterdam, New York City, Melbourne, and Tokyo.These cities were chosen because they have ①city-wide GHG emissions reduction targets,②routine reporting on the GHG emissions of their water industries,and ③time-series data beginning at least in the early 2000s. In this study, we do not aim to directly compare these four cities.Instead,our focus is on the development within each city’s water industry.

    2. Case study cities

    2.1. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam’s climate goals include a 55% reduction in GHG emissions by 2030 and a 95% reduction in GHG emissions by 2050,compared with 1990[36].Waternet,the public water utility for Amsterdam and surroundings, is responsible for all waterrelated activities, including the drinking water supply, sewerage,wastewater treatment, surface water management, groundwater management, flood protection, and control of the canals in Amsterdam [35]. It serves approximately 1.2 million people and is owned by the City of Amsterdam and the Regional Water Authority Amstel, Gooi and Vecht.

    2.2. New York City

    New York City’s target is carbon neutrality by 2050 [37]. The New York City Department of Environmental Protection manages the city’s water supply, sewer, and wastewater treatment, serving approximately 8.5 million people. Water is supplied by reservoirs from a watershed, mostly by gravity. Unlike the other three cities,New York City’s GHG emissions inventory for water supply and wastewater treatment is reported collectively with all other urban sectors (e.g., building, transportation, and solid waste) by the city government, instead of being reported by the water industry.

    2.3. Melbourne

    The state of Victoria, which has Melbourne as its state capital,has legislated a target of net-zero GHG emissions by 2050 in accordance with the Climate Change Act 2017[38].Melbourne Water is the state-owned utility for water supply catchments management,bulk water supply,and wastewater treatment in Melbourne.Water is distributed by three water retailers that serve approximately five million people. Melbourne Water has pledged to halve its emissions by 2025 and achieve net zero by 2030.The city of Melbourne has an interconnected system of reservoirs that supplies water mostly by gravity.An inter-basin water transfer pipeline and a seawater desalination plant were built in response to a decade-long drought in recent years[39].Both have a high energy consumption when operating during dry years.

    2.4. Tokyo

    Tokyo’s climate goals include a 30%reduction in GHG emissions by 2030, compared with 2000, and zero GHG emissions by 2050[40]. The Tokyo Metropolitan Government Bureau of Waterworks supplies water to approximately 13.6 million people, while the Bureau of Sewerage manages sewer and wastewater treatment.The Bureau of Sewerage’s target is a 30% reduction in GHG emissions by 2030, compared with 2020 [41].

    3. Material and methods

    3.1. Overview

    Time-series annual GHG emissions data of the water industries in these four cities were first collected and compiled (included in the Appendix A). In the analysis, we first discuss the progress of these cities toward carbon-neutral urban water systems, with reference to the GHG emissions reduction opportunities each city has implemented. We then discuss the lessons learned from the GHG emissions management of urban water systems in these four cities,and how these insights are relevant to other cities across the world that are aiming toward carbon-neutral water systems.

    3.2. Data collection and compilation

    We collected time-series annual GHG emissions data for the water industries in Amsterdam, Melbourne, New York City, and Tokyo. Each city has a different time-series range. A breakdown of GHG emissions by scope was compiled, where available. We used the data (i.e., when examining historical changes) as they were reported historically, except for those for New York City.Most of the water industries in these cities have not recalculated the GHG emissions figures reported in earlier years, when the accounting methods for GHG emissions were revised.Table 1 gives an overview of the four cities,including their GHG emissions data.

    The system boundary of each urban water system follows that of the local water industry. We consider only the GHG emissions associated with the water industries in these cities(i.e.,those from operating the water infrastructure). While we recognize the significant water-related GHG emissions from water end use [27],we do not include this fraction of emissions in our study due to a lack of data and of robust methods to estimate these emissions.

    The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard defines three scopes of GHG emissions for anorganization [42]. Scope 1 emissions comprise direct GHG emissions from sources controlled by the organization. Scope 2 emissions refer to indirect GHG emissions associated with the organization’s use of purchased electricity, steam, heat, and cooling. These emissions occur externally at utilities that generate and supply these energy commodities. Scope 3 emissions include all other indirect GHG emissions as a consequence of the activities of the organization.These emissions occur from sources not owned or controlled by the organization.For the urban water industry,for example, Scope 1 emissions include methane and nitrous oxide emissions at wastewater treatment facilities, Scope 2 emissions include process electricity use, and Scope 3 emissions include chemical use and building materials.

    Table 1 Overview of the four cities.

    3.3. Multi-city analysis

    In addition to compiling each city’s GHG emissions inventory,we reviewed the GHG emissions management plans from the water industries in these cities. In particular, we reviewed the GHG emissions reduction opportunities (both engineering and non-engineering) that have been implemented or are planned to be implemented. In combination with the historical time-series GHG emissions trends, these form the basis for discussing ①the lessons learned from the water industries of these four cities on managing water-related GHG emissions,and ②how these insights are relevant to other cities around the world that are aiming toward carbon-neutral water systems.

    4. Results and discussion

    4.1. GHG emissions trend of the water industries in global cities

    Fig. 1 shows the time-series GHG emissions trend of the water industries in the four global cities.All four cities show a reduction in the GHG emissions of their water industry compared with their first reported years, although the emissions appear to ‘‘rebound”multiple times over the years (mainly due to revised accounting methods or actual increased electricity use). The latest three-year moving averages are as follows: a 32% reduction for Amsterdam,17% for Melbourne, 18% for New York City, and 13% for Tokyo.The difference in the magnitude of GHG emissions across these four cities is mainly due to differences in population size, water supply mix, and the scope of GHG emissions being accounted for.There are large variations in GHG emissions in Amsterdam,Melbourne, and New York City over the years.

    Amsterdam(2016),Melbourne(2016),and Tokyo(2015)have a step increase in one year of their time-series. For Amsterdam, this was mainly due to a change in the method for estimating direct emissions from sewer and wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs)(i.e., Scope 1 emissions). For Melbourne, the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (NGER) system in Australia changed the guidelines for estimating emissions from wastewater treatment(i.e., Scope 1 emissions). For Tokyo, it was due to an increase in the GHG emissions factor of grid electricity (as a result of the reduced use of nuclear power), which is not being updated every year (i.e., Scope 2 emissions). In the cases of Amsterdam and Melbourne, even with the revised GHG emissions accounting method, the cities did not recalculate their historical values.

    Offsets are important instruments to reduce net GHG emissions.In this context,an offset is a reduction of GHG emissions achieved elsewhere (outside the three scopes of emissions by the water industry) to compensate for the emissions of the water industry.Different types of offsets were accounted for in three of the cities,such as upgraded biogas exporting (Amsterdam), exporting heat from sludge incineration (Amsterdam), purchase of Renewable Energy Certificates/Greenhouse Gas Abatement Certificates(Melbourne), and catchment forest management (Tokyo).

    In Amsterdam, the increased Scope 1 emissions were driven by an underestimation of direct emissions from sewer and wastewater treatment plants (CH4and N2O) in earlier years. Scope 2 emissions have been minimized in recent years by sourcing electricity generated from renewable sources (i.e., directly included in Scope 2 emissions, instead of showing as an offset).Scope 3 emissions include residual materials transport and processing,chemicals production and transport,building materials and piping materials, sludge transport, and business travel. In terms of the contributions from individual system components,sewer and wastewater treatment respectively contributed 4% and 93%of the total Scope 1 emissions in 2020,while wastewater treatment contributed 100% of the total Scope 2 emissions. The major offset opportunities include heat export from waste sludge incineration, electricity export from solar energy generation, energy export from biogas generation, and the use of recovered materials(e.g., calcite, struvite, and reed) from water systems.

    For Melbourne, the breakdown of the time-series GHG inventory is presented by system component. In 2020, Scopes 1 and 2 emissions respectively accounted for 48.9% and 51.1% of the total emissions, while Scope 3 emissions were not included [43]. The energy use (and associated GHG emissions) of the water supply depends on the mix of water sources used, as the mix of gravityfed surface water, desalinated water, and inter-basin transferred water varies considerably between wet and dry years[39].In addition, the GHG emissions of wastewater treatment depend on the annual rainfall because of significant stormwater infiltration (i.e.,more rainfall in 2020 than in 2019).Moreover,carbon offsets have not been purchased since 2013,which could be related to the carbon pricing scheme in Australia being scrapped.

    Fig.1. Annual GHG emissions(broken down by scope and component)of the respective water industries in Amsterdam,Melbourne,New York City,and Tokyo.ktCO2eq:1000 tonnes CO2 equivalent.

    In New York City,there has been a long-term reduction of GHG emissions, especially from wastewater treatment facilities. The lower carbon intensity of grid electricity (i.e., a shift from coal to natural gas for electricity generation and the building of new,more efficient gas power plants)has contributed to this reduction,as has the reduction of fugitive and process emissions of nitrous oxide and methane from wastewater treatment [44]. Between 2008 and 2019, nitrous oxide and methane emissions decreased by 13% and 58%, respectively [37]. Similar to Melbourne, the gravity-fed water supply system in New York City is characterized by low Scope 2 emissions.

    In Tokyo, no reduction in GHG emissions can be seen between the first year and the last year of the time-series, although the relative contributions of different emission scopes have changed.Scope 2 emissions from electricity consumption have remained the main contributor. The positive impact of energy efficiency improvement has been cancelled out by the increased emissions intensity of grid electricity [45].

    4.2. Insights from global cities

    4.2.1. Role of engineering opportunities

    All four cities have implemented or planned to implement engineering opportunities to different extents in order to reduce the GHG emissions of their water systems. Here, ‘‘engineering opportunities” are opportunities that involve physical or operational changes to the water systems. These opportunities can be categorized as energy conservation, renewable energy generation, heat recovery, process optimization to reduce direct emissions, and fugitive emissions reduction. Local circumstances (e.g., climate for cold recovery to provide cooling in Amsterdam and a gravityfed system for mini-hydropower in Melbourne) influence the opportunities each city has implemented.

    In Amsterdam, the water industry has aimed for a 50 000 tonnes CO2equivalent (tCO2eq) GHG emissions reduction target through a portfolio of engineering and non-engineering opportunities (Fig. 2). Engineering opportunities include, for example, the optimization of sludge digestion at the wastewater treatment plant(WWTP) Amsterdam West, the installation of solar panels, more energy-efficient pumps in WWTPs and wastewater pumping stations,and exporting upgraded biogas.Collectively,these engineering opportunities contribute the majority of reductions toward the total reduction target.

    In Melbourne, biogas capture from the wastewater treatment process for electricity generation has been able to meet electricity needs for its two main WWTPs 80%of the Western Treatment Plant and 30% of the Eastern Treatment Plant [46]. Melbourne’s gravityfed water supply system also enables a high uptake of minihydropower generation [47].

    In New York City, the management of fugitive methane and nitrous oxide emissions contributed to a net reduction in GHG emissions for wastewater treatment [44] (Fig. 3). A decomposition of the drivers behind the net reduction between 2006 and 2015 reveals that the efficiency of grid electricity generation(i.e., an external factor) actually made the greatest contribution to emission reduction, by switching the fuel source for electricity generation from coal to natural gas and by the construction of higher efficiency natural gas power plants. These findings illustrate that the water industry does not have full control over its Scope 2 emissions, unless the electricity grid enables ‘‘green power” purchase or the water industry generates its own electricity.

    In Tokyo, engineering opportunities for reducing GHG emissions for water supply and wastewater treatment include:upgrading sludge incineration to reduce nitrous oxide emissions;renewable energy generation (i.e., mini-hydropower and solar photovoltaic);the installation of energy-efficient diffusers,pumps,and sludge dehydrators; waste heat utilization; aeration system optimization; and sludge carbonization [40,41,48].

    Fig 2. A portfolio of opportunities toward a 50 000 tCO2eq GHG reduction target in Amsterdam. WWTP: wastewater treatment plants; WPK: Weesperkarspel.

    Fig. 3. Drivers of changes in wastewater treatment GHG emissions in New York City between 2006 and 2015 [44].

    While many engineering opportunities are available, the water industry needs to select those that are cost effective [49] in order to minimize the impact on water customer bills [50]. However,the water industry is unlikely to have sufficient cost-effective engineering opportunities within its jurisdiction to achieve carbon neutrality. Supporting Scope 3 engineering opportunities to generate offset credits (e.g., thermal energy recovery and supply, waterefficient devices, and the co-digestion of sludge and food waste for biogas valorization) can be a viable pathway toward carbonneutral urban water systems.Although it may be easier to quantify the credits for generating and exporting excess renewable energy from the water industry to the electricity or gas grid,it is challenging to credit some other opportunities (e.g., electrifying hot water systems and installing water-efficient devices).

    4.2.2. Expanding the system boundary for GHG emissions reduction opportunities

    An important issue is where the water industry should draw the system boundary for managing water-related GHG emissions.Some types of water-related GHG emissions, such as reservoir methane emissions [51], surface water/peatland emissions [52],and water end-use emissions [5], can be more significant than emissions from the assets of the water industry. Although the water industry mostly does not have the statutory responsibility for managing these types of water-related GHG emissions, it is the entity with the most influence on and knowledge of managing these types of emissions.Thus,the water industry is the most suitable entity to play the role of filling these gaps in water-related GHG emissions management.

    The analysis of these four cities shows that, when the water industry expands its system boundary beyond water supply and wastewater treatment service providers, many ‘‘external” engineering opportunities can favorably contribute to a city’s carbonneutrality goal. For example, Amsterdam has demonstrated that cold recovery from drinking water can provide cooling capacity at a blood bank, which can then reduce the blood bank’s energy use and associated GHG emissions [53]. New York City has been exploring water end-use opportunities,such as low-flow water fixtures, utility-controllable electric hot water heaters for reducing peak demand, and electrified domestic hot water systems [37].These opportunities would require mechanisms to generate offsets credit [54].

    To expand the system boundary, it is necessary to embrace a systems approach for water-related GHG emissions management.Many engineering opportunities have wider systemic impacts.Therefore, it is preferable to assess opportunities based on their life-cycle impacts in order to avoid unintended GHG emissions consequences and better value these opportunities. For example,centralized softening of drinking water can reduce the GHG emissions of the water end user [55].

    4.2.3. GHG emissions accounting

    Revising the GHG emissions accounting method or the estimated GHG emissions reduction potential of opportunities (as new knowledge develops)can pose a challenge to achieving carbon neutrality within the originally planned timeframe. The reference baseline or business-as-usual baseline essentially ‘‘moves” when GHG emissions accounting methods are revised. This has been the case for Amsterdam, New York City, and Melbourne, particularly in quantifying Scope 1 direct emissions from sewer and wastewater treatment.

    Another important issue concerning GHG emissions accounting is whether the water industry should account for Scope 3 emissions or not (also see the discussion in Section 4.2.2). In the GHG protocol, Scope 3 emissions are ‘‘optional.” If every organization were able to achieve zero emissions for Scopes 1 and 2,then Scope 3 emissions would also be neutral.Nevertheless,including Scope 3 emissions does help the water industry to reduce its emissions more effectively by tapping into ‘‘external” opportunities (as discussed in Section 4.2.2); it also stimulates other organizations to reduce emissions.

    4.2.4. A collaborative approach toward carbon-neutral cities

    It is difficult for the urban water industry to achieve carbon neutrality on its own. To reach the city’s carbon-neutrality goal at the scale and pace that climate science demands, the water industry must collaborate with other sectors, such as the energy sector [56], agricultural sector [52], and food processing sector[47]. In the case of Amsterdam, the city’s water industry has partnered with business sectors, who are the ‘‘end users” of recovered resources;for example,it provides cooling capacity(from drinking water) to a blood bank [53] and sells recovered raw materials(from drinking water and wastewater) and their derived products[57]. This collaborative approach has contributed more than half of the GHG emissions reductions made toward meeting the reduction target of the water industry (Fig. 2). In the case of New York City, the city’s water industry has partnered with National Grid(an investor-owned electricity and gas utility company) to produce pipeline-quality biomethane from the anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge and food wastes diverted from landfills [37].This partnership enables the city to grant National Grid a concession license to clean and sell biomethane as a regulated natural gas utility [56].

    4.3. Implications for water-related GHG emissions management globally

    The water industries in all four cities and beyond have recognized the many challenges in reaching carbon-neutrality goals.These challenges include fluctuating water demand and rainfall[40,43], the need to implement more carbon-intensive floodprevention strategies [41], the need to utilize more energyintensive water supply sources during dry years [58], meeting new air and water quality standards [44], regulatory barriers for implementing distributed energy sources [56], and revising GHG emissions accounting methods(Section 4.2.3).Other cities will also need to overcome some of these challenges on their pathways toward carbon-neutral water systems.

    Cities around the world can build up their capacity to manage water-related GHG emissions. First, it is essential for any city to quantify a reference or business-as-usual baseline of waterrelated GHG emissions.A robust baseline is needed in order for carbon neutrality to have a real target.Second,countries can establish national accounting, benchmarking, and reporting systems that enable annual reporting of GHG emissions by the water industry,such as the National Performance Report in Australia [59]. Intraannual data can be particularly informative and actionable [60].Third, official up-to-date emission factors for local grid electricity must be provided to the water industry(and to any other urban sectors) to allow them to accurately track their Scope 2 emissions,which are significant in all four cities and beyond.Fourth,the significance of Scope 2 emissions implies that the water industry must invest in renewable energy sources or purchase Renewable Energy Certificates in order to reduce its Scope 2 emissions more proactively, considering the likely slow decarbonization progress of the whole electric system.Fifth,a collaborative approach(Section 4.2.4)is needed to identify more optimized opportunities for each city as a whole,rather than only for its water industry.

    Many local contexts can influence an urban water system’s pathway toward carbon neutrality. For example, biogas recovery from the anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge or co-digestion with organic feedstock is a significant engineering opportunity, but its success is dependent on many local factors.The economic feasibility of utilizing biogas is generally limited by the size of WWTPs[47].In European countries,banning organic waste in landfills has been perceived as an important influencing policy to develop a biogas market [9]. In China, low organic content in waste sewage sludge makes anaerobic digestion for biogas valorization unfavorable[61].

    Another example of local context concerns the decentralized components of urban water systems. In Australia, household rainwater tanks have gained popularity through the Millennium Drought. The water supplied by these tanks can be more energy intensive than centralized water sources, yet this energy use and related GHG emissions are not accounted for by the water industry [62].In China,booster pumps are commonly used for the water supply in high-rise buildings[63]and could be responsible for a large portion of the energy used for the urban water supply. In Tokyo,the water industry promotes ‘‘direct water supply” for high-rise buildings,in which drinking water is supplied to residents directly from water distribution networks(booster pumps may be needed)instead of from rooftop tanks(which are being phased out)[40].

    As shown in the progress of the four cities analyzed here, engineering opportunities alone(especially when limited to within the water industry) are unlikely to effectively guide urban water systems toward carbon neutrality. Non-engineering opportunities can be as important as engineering ones, and these cities have explored many non-engineering opportunities. In Amsterdam,the water industry used a CO2shadow price to assess GHG emissions reduction opportunities, in line with the price of the municipality of Amsterdam[64]. In Melbourne,it has been shown that water demand-side management can provide GHG emissions reduction potential [39,65]. This approach better values all GHG emissions reduction opportunities.

    5. Conclusions

    We conducted a time-series analysis of the GHG emissions management of urban water systems in four global cities:Amsterdam, Melbourne, New York City, and Tokyo. These cities are relatively advanced in setting GHG emissions reduction targets.This city-scale analysis can complement existing research on the energy and GHG management of specific water and wastewater infrastructure. The key insights of our analysis are as follows:

    ·All four cities have reduced the GHG emissions in their water industry, compared with more than a decade ago, and their latest three-year moving averages are 13%-32% lower. The emissions appear to ‘‘rebound” multiple times over the years due to revised accounting methods or actual increased electricity use.

    ·The majority of the GHG emissions reduction in the four cities was contributed by various engineering opportunities such as solar and mini-hydropower generation, biogas valorization,sludge digestion and incineration optimization, and aeration system optimization.

    ·The four cities have recognized the many challenges in reaching carbon-neutrality goals, which include fluctuating water demand and rainfall, more carbon-intensive floodprevention and water-supply strategies, meeting new air and water quality standards, and revising GHG emissions accounting methods.

    ·Cities around the world can build up their capacity to manage water-related GHG emissions by, for example, quantifying a business-as-usual baseline of water-related GHG emissions in order to set a reduction target and establishing national accounting, benchmarking, and reporting systems to enable annual reporting of GHG emissions by the water industry.

    · It is difficult for the urban water industry to achieve carbon neutrality on its own with engineering opportunities that are limited to its system boundary.The industry must collaborate with other sectors to tap into external engineering and non-engineering opportunities.

    · Future research can ①review the GHG emissions accounting frameworks used in the water industries around the world,②develop an inventory of engineering and non-engineering GHG emissions reduction opportunities for the water industry, and ③investigate how to establish an enabling environment for the water industry to support the management of‘‘unaccounted-for” water-related emissions such as reservoir methane emissions, surface water/peatland emissions, and water end-use emissions.

    Acknowledgments

    The present work has been financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFE0204100).

    Compliance with ethics guidelines

    Ka Leung Lam,Gang Liu,Anne Marieke Motelica-Wagenaar,and Jan Peter van der Hoek declare that they have no conflicts of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.

    Appendix A. Supplementary data

    Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2022.04.012.

    精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 日韩免费av在线播放| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 久久久久九九精品影院| 波多野结衣高清作品| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| www.精华液| 欧美日本视频| 久久香蕉精品热| 国产不卡一卡二| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 香蕉丝袜av| 香蕉国产在线看| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 国产精品野战在线观看| 黄色 视频免费看| 1024香蕉在线观看| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 久久香蕉精品热| 国产高清激情床上av| 日本免费a在线| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 午夜久久久久精精品| 日韩国内少妇激情av| av中文乱码字幕在线| 十八禁网站免费在线| 俺也久久电影网| 成人三级做爰电影| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 午夜影院日韩av| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 黄色视频不卡| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 国产日本99.免费观看| xxx96com| xxx96com| a在线观看视频网站| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 91老司机精品| 老司机靠b影院| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 亚洲五月天丁香| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 免费在线观看成人毛片| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| netflix在线观看网站| 日本五十路高清| 黄频高清免费视频| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 久久精品人妻少妇| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 在线天堂中文资源库| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 一区二区三区精品91| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 一夜夜www| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 欧美成人午夜精品| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 久久香蕉国产精品| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 免费看十八禁软件| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 欧美午夜高清在线| 欧美在线一区亚洲| www国产在线视频色| 在线国产一区二区在线| 亚洲成人久久性| 午夜免费观看网址| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 三级毛片av免费| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| a级毛片在线看网站| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三 | 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 午夜福利18| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 又大又爽又粗| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 国产精品影院久久| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 曰老女人黄片| 丁香欧美五月| 久久久久久大精品| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 精品第一国产精品| 日韩免费av在线播放| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产片内射在线| 精品电影一区二区在线| 69av精品久久久久久| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 国产精品久久视频播放| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| xxx96com| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 久久伊人香网站| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 色av中文字幕| 国产熟女xx| xxx96com| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 午夜影院日韩av| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 两性夫妻黄色片| 午夜免费鲁丝| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 精品国产国语对白av| 欧美日本视频| 在线观看66精品国产| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产99白浆流出| 十八禁网站免费在线| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 免费看日本二区| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 俺也久久电影网| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 精品国产亚洲在线| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 两性夫妻黄色片| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 免费高清视频大片| 伦理电影免费视频| 美女午夜性视频免费| 在线观看日韩欧美| 日本成人三级电影网站| 91av网站免费观看| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 精品日产1卡2卡| 999精品在线视频| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 免费看日本二区| 午夜视频精品福利| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久, | 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 午夜免费观看网址| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 国产精品久久视频播放| 观看免费一级毛片| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 天堂动漫精品| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 看片在线看免费视频| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 操出白浆在线播放| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 91成人精品电影| 1024手机看黄色片| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 一本精品99久久精品77| 老司机靠b影院| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 1024手机看黄色片| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 国产精品,欧美在线| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 在线免费观看的www视频| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 一区二区三区精品91| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 国产av不卡久久| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 亚洲全国av大片| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 校园春色视频在线观看| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 色综合婷婷激情| av在线播放免费不卡| 一区二区三区精品91| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 美国免费a级毛片| 丰满的人妻完整版| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 国产精品二区激情视频| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 午夜影院日韩av| 91国产中文字幕| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 嫩草影院精品99| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 级片在线观看| 在线免费观看的www视频| 级片在线观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 丰满的人妻完整版| 男女那种视频在线观看| 深夜精品福利| 免费观看精品视频网站| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 脱女人内裤的视频| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 精品高清国产在线一区| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 黄频高清免费视频| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| a级毛片在线看网站| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 免费看十八禁软件| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 身体一侧抽搐| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 91成人精品电影| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播 | 成人18禁在线播放| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 日本a在线网址| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 免费看十八禁软件| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 精品福利观看| 青草久久国产| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 成人国语在线视频| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 国产精品永久免费网站| 天堂动漫精品| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 精品国产亚洲在线| 99久久国产精品久久久| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线 | 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产区一区二久久| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产又爽黄色视频| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 国产日本99.免费观看| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 日本a在线网址| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 此物有八面人人有两片| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 久久精品成人免费网站| 无限看片的www在线观看| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 男女那种视频在线观看| av欧美777| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 91字幕亚洲| 香蕉国产在线看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国产成人系列免费观看| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 香蕉丝袜av| 成年版毛片免费区| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 此物有八面人人有两片| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 在线视频色国产色| 欧美大码av| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区 | 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 成人欧美大片| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 久久香蕉精品热| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 欧美大码av| av有码第一页| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 国产成人影院久久av| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 成年免费大片在线观看| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 中文字幕高清在线视频| cao死你这个sao货| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线 | 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 日本在线视频免费播放| 国产三级黄色录像| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 禁无遮挡网站| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 午夜视频精品福利| 成人三级做爰电影| 久久精品影院6| 国产免费男女视频| 两性夫妻黄色片| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 香蕉丝袜av| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 18禁观看日本| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 1024手机看黄色片| 身体一侧抽搐| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 手机成人av网站| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 国产av又大| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 亚洲最大成人中文| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 成人午夜高清在线视频 | 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 国产一区二区激情短视频| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 亚洲全国av大片| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 色综合站精品国产| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲国产看品久久| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产精品 国内视频| 男人舔奶头视频| 高清在线国产一区| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 久久香蕉精品热| 在线av久久热| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 国产不卡一卡二| 久久 成人 亚洲| 久久亚洲真实| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 欧美日韩黄片免| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 国产精品二区激情视频| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 很黄的视频免费| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 91国产中文字幕| www日本黄色视频网| 国产1区2区3区精品| 国产精品 国内视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 91老司机精品| 色播亚洲综合网| 日本五十路高清| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 大型av网站在线播放| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 精品电影一区二区在线| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 日本免费a在线| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 国产片内射在线| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 日韩免费av在线播放| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 日韩免费av在线播放| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 97碰自拍视频| 人人澡人人妻人| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 国产精品久久视频播放| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 看片在线看免费视频| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 午夜久久久在线观看| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 久久香蕉国产精品| 超碰成人久久| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 国产精品影院久久| 精品久久久久久成人av|