• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Investigating the influence of monosodium L-glutamate on brain responses via scalp-electroencephalogram (scalp-EEG)

    2022-06-23 07:22:44BenWuXiruiZhouImreBlnkYunLiu
    關(guān)鍵詞:外交家生平天主教

    Ben Wu, Xirui Zhou, Imre Blnk, Yun Liu,*

    a Department of Food Science & Technology, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China

    b Zhejiang Yiming Food Co., Ltd., Wenzhou 325400, China

    Keywords:

    Umami

    Taste

    Monosodium glutamate

    Electroencephalogram

    Brain

    A B S T R A C T

    As the relevance between left and right brain neurons when transmitting electrical signals of umami taste is unknown, the aim of this work was to investigate responsive regions of the brain to the umami tastant monosodium glutamate (MSG) by using scalp-electroencephalogram (EEG) to identify the most responsive brain regions to MSG. Three concentrations of MSG (0.05, 0.12, 0.26 g/100 mL) were provided to participants for tasting while recoding their responsive reaction times and brain activities. The results indicated that the most responsive frequency to MSG was at 2 Hz, while the most responsive brain regions were T4CzA2,F8CzA2, and Fp2CzA2. Moreover, the sensitivity of the brain to MSG was significantly higher in the right brain region. This study shows the potential of using EEG to investigate the relevance between different brains response to umami taste, which contributes to better understanding the mechanism of umami perception.

    1. Introduction

    Taste perception plays an important role in the nutritional balance in mammals. While sweet and umami tastes are associated with nutrition (carbohydrates for energy and proteins as source of essential amino acids), sour and bitter tastes are warning signals for spoilage and against toxicity. Umami taste is recognized as one of the 5 basic tastes, which is different from other taste sensations such as salty,sweet, bitter, and sour [1,2]. There are various compounds that can contribute to umami taste, such as MSG (monosodiumL-glutamate),IMP (disodium 5’-inosinate), GMP (disodium 5’-guanosinate) and succinic acid [3,4]. Moreover, there is a synergistic effect between these umami compounds which can enhance the umami taste [5]. At present, these umami compounds are widely used as food additives,enhancing umami taste and the palatability of foods. The umami taste is mediated by a family of proteins called G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) [6]. Taste signals are transmitted to cells through the recognition of taste molecules and extracellular T1R1+3 of type II taste cells, inducing a series of intracellular cascade reactions.Finally, taste afferent nerves reach the central nervous system of the cerebral cortex to generate taste perception [6,7]. Taste recognition and perception are related to the cortex of the brain, which adapts the signals transmitted from taste receptors [8,9]. It is noteworthy to mention that the response of umami taste in the mouth is delayed by approximately 2 s compared to salty taste, which may be explained by the rapid opening of Na+channels [10].

    Umami taste is considered to be a pleasant taste modality involved in psychophysics, which has received increasing attention.Currently, the methodologies of umami taste evaluation comprise sensory techniques, intelligent sensors (electronic tongue), biosensors and psychophysiological measurements. Sensory tests might be biased by the subjective judgments of the panelists. The present brain imaging techniques, including functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) [11,12], positron emission tomography (PET),magnetoencephalography (MEG), electroencephalogram (EEG) [13],and functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIR) [14], can noninvasively monitor the activity of taste areas in the human brain [10].However, they also show some limitations. As an example, fMRI can localize functional regions in the brain, but it is less suitable for quantification. On the other side, EEG can quantify response of the brain to tastants with higher precision leading to more objective results.

    Among the cerebral cortex, the anterior, frontal operculum and parietal cortex have been identified as primary taste areas that can respond to umami taste [15,16]. The study by Singh et al. [10]used fMRI to study the brain response to taste, and the results indicated that the response regions to salty and sweet taste were located in the center of the insula, and salty taste was activated only in the amygdala, which was in the ventral part of the central insula.Moreover, the response region to sweet taste and bitter taste were found in the central area of the brain. Despite that the umami taste has been discovered more than 100 years, its responsive area in the human brain is still poorly understood [2].

    As one of the noninvasive methods to investigate brain responses,EEG can record brain activity using electrophysiological indicators.It records the changes of electrical waves during brain activity, which can reflect the overall result of electrophysiological activity of brain neurons in the cerebral cortex or scalp. To date, the BIOPAC system for conducting EEG is very helpful for the diagnosis and treatment of various intracranial diseases, such as stroke, encephalitis, brain tumors, and metabolic encephalopathy. In addition, EEG has also been applied to study the relationship between sleep activity [13,17]and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [18], the treatment of children with respiratory system and Down’s syndrome [19], and the impact of visual complexity on consumer behavior [20]. Moreover, EEG can objectively reflect the actual taste perception in subjects by directly monitoring the electrophysiological signals in the related brain regions. Consequently, the availability of umami taste information from large-scale recordings may enable investigations of the time-frequency dynamics of cortical information in taste perception.It may help to obtain a better understanding of the sensory perception of umami taste and the relationship between oral perception and brain response for umami detection.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1 Participants

    Ten right-handed participants (8 females and 2 males), with good physical and mental conditions, who were familiar with umami taste,were recruited in this study [15]. They were particularly requested to avoid eating, drinking, and smoking 1 h prior to the test. Gender,age, height, and weight were collected from these participants. The experiments were carried out in an EEG test room, which was safe,quiet, odorless, with a suitable temperature of about (21 ± 1) °C. They were instructed by the researcher and asked to fill in a questionnaire for knowing the procedure, including if they already participated in EEG studies before, expected time period, and length. All participants in this study had given their consent for conducting the experiments.

    2.2 Selection of umami stimuli

    MonosodiumL-glutamate monohydrate (MSG, ≥ 99%,Sigma, St. Louis, USA) was used, as a typical umami substance.The concentrations of MSG solutions were selected based on a previous study [21], indicating that 3 concentrations of MSG solutions (0.05, 0.12, 0.26 g/100 mL) contributed to weak, moderate,and strong umami perception. The participants could detect and recognize the umami perception from those concentrations. MSG solutions were prepared freshly on the day when experiments were run ((25 ± 1) °C). In the experiments, ultra-pure water obtained by the NW10VF Water Purification System (Heal Force Development Ltd.,Hong Kong, China) was used as control.

    2.3 Training on EEG

    The instrument BIOPAC MP160 system was used with the CAP100C (CAP) electrode gel 100 EL254S (shielded 4 mm electrode, TP) and EL254 (unshielded 4 mm electrode, TP). The complete instrumental EEG setup was from BIOPAC System Inc.(California, USA). Subsequently, an EEG pretest was implemented for the participants to examine their EEG signals under various conditions, which included quiet state, shift of opening or closed eyes,swallowing, eye movement, smile, and inner emotional detection. The aim of this was to monitor participants by observing their resting state behavior and emotional fluctuation. In addition, the participants were trained to get familiar with the whole procedure in the preparation stage. In the formal experiment, the total detection process took about 12-13 s including the sample entering process requiring 2-3 s. The participants were asked to rest and stay calm until hearing the start instruction. In particular, participants were asked to keep their eyes closed [22]during the whole process of testing, without expectorating the sample until the instructor asked them to do so or when arriving at the end of the experiment.

    Prior to the EEG experiments, the participants were informed about the test name, samples (food grade) and to taste blindly [23].During the test period, the panelists were requested to comply with the instructions. It was important to avoid talking and moving, and to stay relaxed, having a homeostatic breathing and just focusing on the taste and what they are experiencing.

    2.4 Procedure of formal EEG experiment

    The whole detection device was installed according to the instructions. The subjects wore the CAP and were prepared in a resting state. They breathed deeply and exhaled slowly, at the same time maintaining emotional stability.

    In this experiment, eight brain regions were selected [24], i.e.(F3/Cz/A1) (F4/Cz/A2); (F7/Cz/A1) (F8/Cz/A2); (T3/Cz/A1) (T4/Cz/A2);(Fp1/Cz/A1) (Fp2/Cz/A2), to detect umami taste-evoked signals,and to analyze the effect of different regions on taste responses.These eight points selected for the EEG test pertained to the umami responsive regions from results of fMRI [15]. The participants were asked to sip 10 mL of pure water 3 times with recording and stabilize the baseline for less than 30 s. Signal stabilization prior to recording was achieved by an EOL2 placed under the eye for detection of the right eye movement. Then, they will in turn sip 10 mL of the 0.05, 0.12, or 0.26 g/100 mL MSG solution, without swallowing it.Each of the sample solution was kept in the mouth for 10 s, then expectorated [25]. After that, the mouth was rinsed with pure water for 30 s [14]with gentle gargling, which helped to reduce the persistence of taste, so that electrical signals were recorded back near the baseline. After obtaining the baseline stable, the participants would rest for 30 s before starting the next operation to stabilize the baseline [25]. Then, the experiment at each MSG concentration was repeated 10 times and the results were averaged to reduce errors.With this procedure, other positions were recorded for umami taste detection repeating the procedure described above.

    《回憶與隨想》是曾經(jīng)作為外交家及天主教司鐸的陸徵祥晚年通過在比利時(shí)圣安德魯修道院的幾次演講,而對自己生平重要經(jīng)歷的回憶以及心路歷程的思考。

    2.5 Statistical analysis

    The results of brain signals were captured and processed by the AcqKnowledge 5.0 software. During data processing, the waveform of the original EEG signals was cleaned from the noise caused by eye movement by independent component analysis (ICA). Further data analysis [23]was carried out using SPSS statistic 23 (*P< 0.05,**P< 0.01, ***P< 0.001) to investigate the influence of frequency fromδ-γwaves (1-100 Hz), MSG concentrations. Positions on brain responses to umami were obtained by using three-way ANOVA with Bonferroni pairwise comparison, in which frequency, MSG concentrations and positions were treated as fixed factors. After this,different positions were grouped into left, middle and right area of the brain. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni pairwise comparison was used to analyze the influence of left, middle and right regions on brain responses to umami taste, where regions and concentrations of MSG were treated as fixed factors. The unit of results was 10 × nV2/Hz, and the significance was set at 0.05.

    3. Results and discussion

    3.1 Demographic information of participants

    Ten healthy right-handed participants (age: (24 ± 1) years old, 8 females and 2 males, average BMI: (21.3 ± 1.6) kg/m2) were recruited in the study. Written informed consent from all subjects were obtained before the experiment.

    3.2 Spectral analysis of frequency

    The spectral analysis results of the principal components and the frequency components (δ,θ,α,β,γwaves) within 1-100 Hz were obtained by applying the power spectral density (PSD) analysis [18,26]of the original data, as shown in Fig. 1a. The PSD results at different positions for one randomly selected participant are shown in the Supplementary data (Figs. S1-S8). However, it should be pointed out that the cumulated PSD results of all participants showed peak values at 1-4 Hz (δwave) and 4-8 Hz (θwave) occurring in the low frequency range of 1-100 Hz. The frequencies of the sections (α,β,γwaves) larger than 100 Hz were parallel to the frequencies of thex-axis(transverse axis).

    Fig. 1 The spectral analysis results of frequency. (a) An example of frequency bands in PSD analysis selected from one participant at Fp1CzA1.Different concentrations had different responsive activity. All results were related to the same frequency bands of 1-8 Hz, including δ wave (1-4 Hz)and θ wave (5-8 Hz). The peak value appears in the δ wave, which showed the most responsive activity in the brain. (b) Responsive variance differences between 1-4 Hz. The results were in mean ± standard error. Responsive activity from 1-4 Hz with a peak value at 2 Hz showed a significant difference (***P < 0.001) between 2 Hz and other frequencies, though not with 1.5 Hz.

    In this study, we collected umami response signals from 10 participants evoked by three different MSG solutions under the condition of single-electrode sampling system [27]. It turned out that,on the basis of the corresponding range of brain regions triggered by MSG, the signals obtained by different single electrodes can be analyzed from the EEG data [28]. The original results of 1-100 Hz frequency can be divided in five components, i.e.δ,θ,α,β,γwaves.Likewise, hand movement before EEG signal measurement also influenced the signals, as this brain area is also responsible for motor activity. The signal distribution of taste stimulation would be masked by the superposition of EEG signals generated by this part of the motor process. When the subjects received the “stop” command, the audition as noise would intervene with the signals in the recordings,so the “stop” command that the subjects heard was at low noise level. However, it was filtered in the processed signals subsequently.The signal superposition interference would also occur in the corresponding brain regions, so the previous signals of sample tasting was discarded and the 5-10 s signal in the middle range of the EEG signal result was extracted as the main analysis component.

    3.3 The influence of frequency, MSG concentration and position on brain response to umami perception.

    3.3.1 Responsive variance analysis of frequency

    After frequency division (δ,θ,α,β,γwaves), the effect of different frequencies (1-4 Hz) on the response of EEG signals was analyzed (Fig. 1b). The results suggested that the frequency had significant impact on brain responses to umami taste (P< 0.001). In addition, there was a significant difference between 2 Hz with other frequencies (P< 0.001, except for 2 and 1.5 Hz (P= 0.2)). Here, the signal response had a maximum value at 2 Hz. Although 1.7 Hz or 1.8 Hz seemed the most responsive frequency, they were not selected without statistical significance (P= 0.2).

    Following PSD analysis and frequency spectral analysis,the response signals of umami taste elicited by taste stimulation were preliminarily explored. The results indicated that, compared with pure water (control group), the three concentrations of MSG produced strong energy spectral peaks in the low frequency band(1-8 Hz), while no obvious PSD peaks appeared in other frequency bands (8-100 Hz). It may be that the responsive signals of the taste mainly concentrate near theθandδwaves, which is consistent with the literature [29]that 1-4 Hz is involved in taste coding. The result was consistent with the reference in Table 1 [29-31]and it was reasonable to claim that theδandθwaves in the brain could be triggered by the umami taste evoked by MSG. Therefore, it was confirmed that the frequency range of 1-4 Hz [29]impacted the signals of brain response to umami taste evoked by MSG, which suggested 2 Hz to be most responsive to the activity of the brain in humans related to umami taste.

    Table 1Several wave forms of EEG signals and their corresponding coding characteristics.

    3.3.2 The influence of umami stimuli concentrations on brain responses to umami taste

    Fig. 2 indicates umami taste signals and the significant differences between MSG solutions of different concentrations at 2 Hz. There was a significant impact of MSG concentrations on brain responses to umami taste (P< 0.001). The brain response to water was significantly higher (P< 0.001) than the other three concentrations of MSG solution. In addition, with the increase of MSG concentration,the response signals showed a decreasing trend. There were significant differences found between 0.26 and 0.05 g/100 mL (P< 0.001), 0.26 and 0.12 g/100 mL (P< 0.001), 0.26 g/100 mL and water (P< 0.001),0.12 g/100 mL and water (P< 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between 0.05 and 0.12 g/100 mL (P= 1.0). It has to be pointed out, however, that signal increase or decrease does not mean directly emotional change, though it cannot be excluded that emotion would be affected by the taste sensation subsequently.The mechanism of correlation between emotion and taste needs to be studied further and EEG or other technique may contribute with valuable data to better understanding this phenomenon.

    Fig. 2 Responsive variance differences between different concentrations of MSG. The results were in mean ± standard error. Responsive activity showed a decreasing trend with increasing MSG concentrations. Subjects’ responses to water were significantly higher than that of the other three concentrations of MSG solution, and there were significant differences (***P < 0.001).

    In terms of response concentration and correlation of sampling points, we observed significant differences between 0.26 and 0.05 g/100 mL as well as 0.12 g/100 mL and water in brain response to umami perception. Moreover, the MSG solution with 0.12 g/100 mL resulted in the greatest responsive value in brain response to umami taste perception, which suggested that the 0.12 g/100 mL MSG solution could evoke stronger brain responses.These conclusions were supported by one-way ANOVA on the data shown in Fig. 2, with the factor samples. Fig. 2 displayed that the activation of brain response has significant difference between water and MSG considering the different concentrations, suggesting that the brain response was probably not solely ascribed to the tastant concentrations in the mouth. The activation produced by water in the various brain regions was differently affected, potentially depending on the effect of thirst [32]. In addition, the medial prefrontal cortex is strongly associated with emotional processing and left hemisphere’s role in negative emotion processing when MSG was as tastant solution in the mouth [33]. We inferred that the results might also be affected by subjects’ unconscious averse emotions with 0.26 g/100 mL MSG in the test. Also, individual differences on sensitivity or acceptability for taste or concentration of umami stimulation are to be considered. Figs. S3, S4, S6 are referring to the left, left, right region of brain, respectively. Regarding Figs. S3, S4, activation produced by water has no significant difference with other concentrations of MSG.Regarding Fig. S6, activation evoked by water in the mouth shows significant difference with other concentrations of MSG, but lower values than the other concentrations because it was probably affected by unconscious aversion of the concentrations of MSG, associated with an inhibited effect in the right brain region.

    3.3.3 The analysis of responsive positions-electrodes points

    Fig. 3 illustrates the significant differences between the various responsive positions. The data indicate a significant impact of brain regions on brain response to umami taste (P< 0.001). In addition,significant differences were found between Fp1 and Fp2, between F3 and F4, between F7 and F8, between T3 and T4 (P< 0.001).Moreover, F8CzA2, Fp2CzA2 and T4CzA2 showed the greatest response to umami taste but there was no significant difference among F8, Fp2 and T4. This suggested that MSG could trigger stronger brain responses to umami taste at the positions of F8, Fp2 and T4.

    Fig. 3 Responsive variance differences between different positions(F8CzA2, Fp2CzA2, and T4CzA2). The results were in mean ± standard error.Responsive activity in different positions showed that the right side of brain was higher than the left side of brain between Fp1-T4. There were significant differences (***P < 0.001).

    Moreover, MSG could trigger diverse responses at different brain positions, and particularly stronger brain responses to umami taste at F8, Fp2 and T4. Thus, we found for the first time evidence for different activation responses of the general brain regions reported [15,34].The prefrontal cortex is a large brain region, in which most of the frontal lobes is covered. As far as emotions are concerned, the left hemisphere contributes to the processing of positive emotions, while the right-hemisphere counterparts are tangled in the processing of negative affective states [33]. Thus, it has been hypothesized that the positions at F8, Fp2 and T4 may be interlinked with the emotional processing systems, which need to be further studied in future work.Brain response and taste response are two different phenomena.Taking umami taste as example, the umami component as ligand is connected to the taste receptor of taste bud cells in the oral cavity,which is functioning as chemical sensor. Here, the signal of taste sensation triggered by the umami chemical was transmitted from taste bud cells to the central nerve system in the brain, then processed through taste cortex, some of which are related to emotional regions.The taste response regarding emotion effects needs to be studied further in order to better understand this phenomenon.

    3.4 The influence of left, middle and right brain region on brain responses to umami taste

    3.4.1 Impacts of regions

    According to the anatomical structure, the brain was divided into 3 brain regions, i.e. left, middle and right as shown in Fig. 4a, in order to analyze the differences in response signals between the three brain regions. Fig. 4b shows the results of the responsive signals between left, middle and right region. There were significant differences in response signals among the three regions (P< 0.001).

    Fig. 4 Impacts of brain regions on brain response to umami taste. (a) The region diagram of brain structure. Left region for F7, F3, T3; middle region for Fp1, Fp2; right region for F8, F4, T4. (b) Responsive variance differences between left, middle and right region. The results were in mean ± standard error. Responsive activity in different regions showed that the right region was higher than the middle and the left regions (***P < 0.001), while the middle region was higher than the left region (***P < 0.001).

    Particularly, the response signal increased significantly from the left-brain region to the right brain region (right brain area > middle brain area,P< 0.001; middle brain area > left brain area,P< 0.001;right brain area > left brain area,P< 0.001). Thus, these results suggest that the right brain was more responsive to umami signal than the left brain. So far, this phenomenon has rarely been studied directly to understand the effects of right brain activation on umami taste evoked by MSG. There was a significant interaction between MSG concentrations and brain regions in brain responses to umami taste (P< 0.001). There was no significant difference between different concentrations in the left-brain region (0.05vs0.12 g/100 mL,P= 0.5; 0.05vs0.26 g/100 mL,P= 1.0; 0.05 g/100 mLvspure water,P= 1.0; 0.12vs0.26 g/100 mL,P= 0.3; 0.12 g/100 mLvspure water,P= 0.8; 0.26 g/100 mLvspure water,P= 1.0).In the right brain area, significant differences in brain responses to umami taste were observed between different concentrations.There was a significant difference (P< 0.001) between pure water and 0.05, 0.12 and 0.26 g/100 mL, with pure water being the most responsive sample. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between 0.05 and 0.12 g/100 mL, but there existed a significant difference (P< 0.001) in brain responses to umami taste between pure water and 0.26 g/100 mL, of which the response caused by pure water was greater than that by 0.26 g/100 mL. The conclusion was supported by a two-way ANOVA on the data shown in Fig. 5, with brain regions being one factor and concentrations the other factor.As already hypothesized, brain regions where the activation was produced by water in the mouth might be differently affected by the level of satiation with water, i.e. feeling thirsty or fully satiated (no additional desire for water). Thus, in the mid-part of the right insula cortex, the oral delivery of water produced more pronounced effects when the desire for water was higher than the desire for food [32],which might have caused a higher activation of water as compared to 0.26 g/100 mL MSG. It is also possible, of course, that due to the left hemisphere’s role in negative emotion [33], an unconscious emotional aversion was triggered by 0.26 g/100 mL MSG.

    Fig. 5 Responsive variance differences with concentrations between left,middle and right region. The results were in mean ± standard error. Responsive activity in different regions showed no significant differences in the left region.In the right region, significant differences existed between water and 0.05, 0.12,0.26 g/100 mL (***P < 0.001) and water was the maximum value. There was no significant difference between 0.05 and 0.12 g/100 mL, but significant differenceswere observed between 0.05, 0.12 and 0.26 g/100 mL (***P < 0.001).

    Our results indicate that there are certain regions in the brain which are responsible for umami taste [15], including the insula (primary gustatory area) and the orbitofrontal cortex (secondary gustatory area) [29]. With different concentrations of MSG, different responsive brain regions can be activated to a different extent. It seems that the responsive activity triggered by MSG at higher concentrations was inhibited (P< 0.001), suggesting it might be a different pattern tuned to sense umami taste in the human brain. Moreover, the brain response to the umami taste evoked by MSG from the left to right region was increasingly significant (P< 0.001), which might be linked with subcortical structures regulating reward and feeding behavior, as well as to somatosensory and visceral areas [29].

    3.4.2 Analysis of lateral advantage

    In addition, from the brain region point of view, the data suggested a certain degree of laterality. From left to right, the sensitivity of the brain to different concentrations of MSG significantly increased, and the right brain region was particularly sensitive to these concentration changes (Fig. 5). To the best of our knowledge, the result obtained in our study reveals for the first time the relationship between activation of brain response and MSG concentrations.

    Interestingly, the right insula brain response to the change of concentrations was more sensitive than the left brain. It was investigated that the results of fMRI in the thalamic region showed bilateral activation following MSG stimulation, with a predominance of ipsilateral processing [35]. Thus, it could stress the neuronal connection specifically related to ipsilateral activation produced by MSG at insula cortex and thalamic cortex. Moreover, there was neither a significant effect of umami taster × training interaction nor effect of training alone on brain activation to umami taste [36].Therefore, the laterality of right brain response to different concentrations was not affected by training in the mouth. To the best of our knowledge, these findings provide further evidence of the role of right brain laterality in the umami taste information coding in human.

    There were some limitations in this study. During the whole study, participants associated the 0.05 g/100 mL sample with the umami taste which seemed to be a recognition threshold of MSG.Above this concentration, the samples tested by different participants could be easily distinguished; below this concentration, the taste of low concentration MSG solution described by different participants at the end of the experiment was not obvious to recognize umami or salty. The participants even described it as umami or faintly sweet. If the conscious exclusion method is neglected, and the only thing that need to be taken into account is their perception when tasting umami at low concentrations, participants tend to be preconceived in their scoring process in the traditional sensory tests [37], which may affect the final experimental results. However, if combined with the results of EEG experiments, the analysis error can be reduced. In addition,compared to the responsive signal of pure water, it can be observed that some of the response signals produced in various brain regions with water as reference sample are even larger than those produced by MSG solutions. This may be due to the perception deviation of MSG:when MSG solution is relatively low the concentration does not reach its perceptible concentration level.

    It is noteworthy to mention that no professional emotional assessment was conducted in this study, the participants were only asked to complete the experiment in a relaxed and calm state.Consequently, the results might be affected by the emotional processing effect due to an unconscious negative emotional status.Also, the participants were told that the reagent was safe, but the name of the reagent was kept secret temporarily during the test to prevent cognitive involvement until the end of all the experiments. Furthermore,the time period for the EEG test was conducted after 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. to ensure that the panelists avoid the effect of overlapping cortical representation [38]of gustatory signals and satiety [34]associated with negative experimental emotion on test results.

    In general, the information obtained from EEG studies so far is still not comprehensive enough, which requires additional scientific work. Based on our current results, it would be worth in the future studying the interactions between brain and food flavor using EEG.There will be results combining EEG with fMRI to develop the current techniques for quantification and localization. The knowledge about the most significant responsive area to umami taste in the brain that has been identified in this study lays the foundation for further research on the relationship between the intensity of umami taste stimulation and the response intensity [39], and also to better understand the synergistic effects between MSG and nucleotides.

    4. Conclusion

    In summary, we present evidence of activation in theδ-frequency range as an electrophysiological signal of umami taste evoked by MSG in humans. We observe response differences of brain regions to MSG using scalp-EEG, with the right brain being more responsive than the left region. This may help predicting perceptual decisions and brain response for a better understanding of the relationship between oral and brain sensitivity.

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

    Acknowledgement

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31972198, 31622042) and the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFD0400803, 2016YFD0401501).

    Appendix A. Supplementary data

    Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2022.04.019.

    猜你喜歡
    外交家生平天主教
    傅忠誠教授生平
    曾鞏生平
    美文(2018年20期)2018-10-23 05:52:30
    鄭鎮(zhèn)海:做中韓交流“民間外交家”
    金橋(2018年1期)2018-09-28 02:24:38
    包何生平考述
    什么天主教?
    天主教社會思想對社會正義的理解
    天主教新神學(xué)運(yùn)動中的現(xiàn)象學(xué)視野
    潑盡水墨是生平
    文史春秋(2017年12期)2017-02-26 03:16:19
    蘇秦“錐刺股”苦讀
    張騫通西域
    欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 国产在视频线在精品| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 国产综合懂色| 九草在线视频观看| 国产乱来视频区| 欧美zozozo另类| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 欧美区成人在线视频| 中文资源天堂在线| 日本三级黄在线观看| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 免费看日本二区| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 久久这里只有精品中国| ponron亚洲| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 床上黄色一级片| av免费观看日本| 午夜福利高清视频| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产91av在线免费观看| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 亚洲av熟女| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 美女黄网站色视频| www日本黄色视频网| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 老司机福利观看| 1024手机看黄色片| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 日本黄大片高清| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 黄片wwwwww| 国产乱人视频| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 大香蕉久久网| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 午夜激情欧美在线| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 国产av不卡久久| 日韩大片免费观看网站 | 久久国产乱子免费精品| av在线蜜桃| 黄色日韩在线| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 久久久精品大字幕| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 人妻系列 视频| 97在线视频观看| 国产乱人视频| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 久久久精品94久久精品| 嫩草影院精品99| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 久久久色成人| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产av在哪里看| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 久久久久久久久久成人| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 床上黄色一级片| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 精品国产三级普通话版| 精品国产三级普通话版| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 22中文网久久字幕| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| av在线亚洲专区| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 午夜a级毛片| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 永久免费av网站大全| 永久网站在线| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 尾随美女入室| 18+在线观看网站| 秋霞伦理黄片| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 国产在线一区二区三区精 | 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 天堂网av新在线| 老女人水多毛片| 中文字幕制服av| 日韩视频在线欧美| 日本一本二区三区精品| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 欧美97在线视频| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 一级爰片在线观看| 直男gayav资源| 直男gayav资源| av线在线观看网站| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 色5月婷婷丁香| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 亚洲在久久综合| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲综合精品二区| 久久午夜福利片| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 亚洲五月天丁香| av卡一久久| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 成人无遮挡网站| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲av熟女| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 国产黄片美女视频| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 熟女电影av网| 永久网站在线| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 1024手机看黄色片| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 欧美色视频一区免费| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 一级黄片播放器| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 国产在线一区二区三区精 | 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产老妇女一区| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| www日本黄色视频网| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 六月丁香七月| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 青春草国产在线视频| 成年av动漫网址| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 尾随美女入室| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 免费观看在线日韩| 深夜a级毛片| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 99久久精品热视频| 97热精品久久久久久| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 黄色一级大片看看| 午夜福利高清视频| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 美女国产视频在线观看| 久久久精品94久久精品| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 精品人妻视频免费看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 在线免费观看的www视频| 九九在线视频观看精品| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆 | 能在线免费观看的黄片| 三级国产精品片| 亚洲图色成人| 久久久欧美国产精品| .国产精品久久| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲不卡免费看| av线在线观看网站| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| eeuss影院久久| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 一本久久精品| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 色综合站精品国产| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 久久久久网色| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 久久久久久久久中文| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 日韩大片免费观看网站 | 久久这里有精品视频免费| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 永久网站在线| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 久久久久久大精品| 毛片女人毛片| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 在线播放国产精品三级| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 少妇的逼水好多| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 69av精品久久久久久| 久久久久性生活片| 一级爰片在线观看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 99久久人妻综合| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 色哟哟·www| 一本久久精品| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 只有这里有精品99| 精品一区二区免费观看| 成人二区视频| 看片在线看免费视频| 在线播放国产精品三级| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 久久久久九九精品影院| 亚洲不卡免费看| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 免费大片18禁| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 国产69精品久久久久777片| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| av视频在线观看入口| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 小说图片视频综合网站| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 欧美激情在线99| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 日本黄大片高清| 美女黄网站色视频| 日韩高清综合在线| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 免费大片18禁| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 成人欧美大片| 22中文网久久字幕| 七月丁香在线播放| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 观看免费一级毛片| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产精品一及| 嫩草影院入口| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 国产精品久久视频播放| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 中文字幕久久专区| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | av在线天堂中文字幕| 久久久久性生活片| 在线播放无遮挡| 日本与韩国留学比较| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产色婷婷99| 中文天堂在线官网| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av.av天堂| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 国产老妇女一区| 99热网站在线观看| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 久久久久久大精品| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 99久国产av精品| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 美女大奶头视频| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 精品久久久久久电影网 | 三级经典国产精品| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 1024手机看黄色片| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 免费看a级黄色片| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 成年av动漫网址| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 七月丁香在线播放| 国产美女午夜福利| 内射极品少妇av片p| 热99在线观看视频| 久久久久网色| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国内精品宾馆在线| av在线亚洲专区| 午夜a级毛片| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 精品人妻视频免费看| 精品久久久久久久末码| 99热这里只有是精品50| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 久久久久久大精品| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产老妇女一区| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 91精品国产九色| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产三级在线视频| 美女内射精品一级片tv| av在线老鸭窝| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 老女人水多毛片| 免费看a级黄色片| 亚洲综合精品二区| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲国产色片| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 国产成人精品婷婷| 国产成人aa在线观看| 九草在线视频观看| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 国产乱来视频区| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产亚洲最大av| 欧美色视频一区免费| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲av男天堂| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 日日撸夜夜添| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 少妇的逼水好多| 亚洲综合色惰| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 99久久人妻综合| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 免费人成在线观看视频色| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 久久久国产成人精品二区| av天堂中文字幕网| av在线天堂中文字幕| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 一级毛片我不卡| 欧美人与善性xxx| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 国产综合懂色| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 精品久久久久久成人av| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 亚洲五月天丁香| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 99热精品在线国产| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产av不卡久久| 青春草国产在线视频| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 日韩中字成人| 69av精品久久久久久| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 日本午夜av视频| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆 | 三级毛片av免费| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 综合色av麻豆| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 成年版毛片免费区| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 全区人妻精品视频| 六月丁香七月| 欧美+日韩+精品| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 亚洲成色77777| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 色综合站精品国产| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| www.色视频.com| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 两个人的视频大全免费| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 亚洲成色77777| 69av精品久久久久久| 国产免费男女视频| 日本免费a在线| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产综合懂色| 久久久久久伊人网av| 国产精品永久免费网站| eeuss影院久久| 老司机福利观看| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 午夜福利高清视频| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 欧美zozozo另类| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 久久久欧美国产精品| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 高清av免费在线| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 美女国产视频在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合 | 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产av不卡久久| 国产探花极品一区二区| 男女国产视频网站| 97超碰精品成人国产| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 六月丁香七月| 看片在线看免费视频| 一级毛片我不卡| 黄色日韩在线| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| av福利片在线观看| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 熟女电影av网| 国产亚洲精品久久久com|