• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Investigating the influence of monosodium L-glutamate on brain responses via scalp-electroencephalogram (scalp-EEG)

    2022-06-23 07:22:44BenWuXiruiZhouImreBlnkYunLiu
    關(guān)鍵詞:外交家生平天主教

    Ben Wu, Xirui Zhou, Imre Blnk, Yun Liu,*

    a Department of Food Science & Technology, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China

    b Zhejiang Yiming Food Co., Ltd., Wenzhou 325400, China

    Keywords:

    Umami

    Taste

    Monosodium glutamate

    Electroencephalogram

    Brain

    A B S T R A C T

    As the relevance between left and right brain neurons when transmitting electrical signals of umami taste is unknown, the aim of this work was to investigate responsive regions of the brain to the umami tastant monosodium glutamate (MSG) by using scalp-electroencephalogram (EEG) to identify the most responsive brain regions to MSG. Three concentrations of MSG (0.05, 0.12, 0.26 g/100 mL) were provided to participants for tasting while recoding their responsive reaction times and brain activities. The results indicated that the most responsive frequency to MSG was at 2 Hz, while the most responsive brain regions were T4CzA2,F8CzA2, and Fp2CzA2. Moreover, the sensitivity of the brain to MSG was significantly higher in the right brain region. This study shows the potential of using EEG to investigate the relevance between different brains response to umami taste, which contributes to better understanding the mechanism of umami perception.

    1. Introduction

    Taste perception plays an important role in the nutritional balance in mammals. While sweet and umami tastes are associated with nutrition (carbohydrates for energy and proteins as source of essential amino acids), sour and bitter tastes are warning signals for spoilage and against toxicity. Umami taste is recognized as one of the 5 basic tastes, which is different from other taste sensations such as salty,sweet, bitter, and sour [1,2]. There are various compounds that can contribute to umami taste, such as MSG (monosodiumL-glutamate),IMP (disodium 5’-inosinate), GMP (disodium 5’-guanosinate) and succinic acid [3,4]. Moreover, there is a synergistic effect between these umami compounds which can enhance the umami taste [5]. At present, these umami compounds are widely used as food additives,enhancing umami taste and the palatability of foods. The umami taste is mediated by a family of proteins called G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) [6]. Taste signals are transmitted to cells through the recognition of taste molecules and extracellular T1R1+3 of type II taste cells, inducing a series of intracellular cascade reactions.Finally, taste afferent nerves reach the central nervous system of the cerebral cortex to generate taste perception [6,7]. Taste recognition and perception are related to the cortex of the brain, which adapts the signals transmitted from taste receptors [8,9]. It is noteworthy to mention that the response of umami taste in the mouth is delayed by approximately 2 s compared to salty taste, which may be explained by the rapid opening of Na+channels [10].

    Umami taste is considered to be a pleasant taste modality involved in psychophysics, which has received increasing attention.Currently, the methodologies of umami taste evaluation comprise sensory techniques, intelligent sensors (electronic tongue), biosensors and psychophysiological measurements. Sensory tests might be biased by the subjective judgments of the panelists. The present brain imaging techniques, including functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) [11,12], positron emission tomography (PET),magnetoencephalography (MEG), electroencephalogram (EEG) [13],and functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIR) [14], can noninvasively monitor the activity of taste areas in the human brain [10].However, they also show some limitations. As an example, fMRI can localize functional regions in the brain, but it is less suitable for quantification. On the other side, EEG can quantify response of the brain to tastants with higher precision leading to more objective results.

    Among the cerebral cortex, the anterior, frontal operculum and parietal cortex have been identified as primary taste areas that can respond to umami taste [15,16]. The study by Singh et al. [10]used fMRI to study the brain response to taste, and the results indicated that the response regions to salty and sweet taste were located in the center of the insula, and salty taste was activated only in the amygdala, which was in the ventral part of the central insula.Moreover, the response region to sweet taste and bitter taste were found in the central area of the brain. Despite that the umami taste has been discovered more than 100 years, its responsive area in the human brain is still poorly understood [2].

    As one of the noninvasive methods to investigate brain responses,EEG can record brain activity using electrophysiological indicators.It records the changes of electrical waves during brain activity, which can reflect the overall result of electrophysiological activity of brain neurons in the cerebral cortex or scalp. To date, the BIOPAC system for conducting EEG is very helpful for the diagnosis and treatment of various intracranial diseases, such as stroke, encephalitis, brain tumors, and metabolic encephalopathy. In addition, EEG has also been applied to study the relationship between sleep activity [13,17]and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [18], the treatment of children with respiratory system and Down’s syndrome [19], and the impact of visual complexity on consumer behavior [20]. Moreover, EEG can objectively reflect the actual taste perception in subjects by directly monitoring the electrophysiological signals in the related brain regions. Consequently, the availability of umami taste information from large-scale recordings may enable investigations of the time-frequency dynamics of cortical information in taste perception.It may help to obtain a better understanding of the sensory perception of umami taste and the relationship between oral perception and brain response for umami detection.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1 Participants

    Ten right-handed participants (8 females and 2 males), with good physical and mental conditions, who were familiar with umami taste,were recruited in this study [15]. They were particularly requested to avoid eating, drinking, and smoking 1 h prior to the test. Gender,age, height, and weight were collected from these participants. The experiments were carried out in an EEG test room, which was safe,quiet, odorless, with a suitable temperature of about (21 ± 1) °C. They were instructed by the researcher and asked to fill in a questionnaire for knowing the procedure, including if they already participated in EEG studies before, expected time period, and length. All participants in this study had given their consent for conducting the experiments.

    2.2 Selection of umami stimuli

    MonosodiumL-glutamate monohydrate (MSG, ≥ 99%,Sigma, St. Louis, USA) was used, as a typical umami substance.The concentrations of MSG solutions were selected based on a previous study [21], indicating that 3 concentrations of MSG solutions (0.05, 0.12, 0.26 g/100 mL) contributed to weak, moderate,and strong umami perception. The participants could detect and recognize the umami perception from those concentrations. MSG solutions were prepared freshly on the day when experiments were run ((25 ± 1) °C). In the experiments, ultra-pure water obtained by the NW10VF Water Purification System (Heal Force Development Ltd.,Hong Kong, China) was used as control.

    2.3 Training on EEG

    The instrument BIOPAC MP160 system was used with the CAP100C (CAP) electrode gel 100 EL254S (shielded 4 mm electrode, TP) and EL254 (unshielded 4 mm electrode, TP). The complete instrumental EEG setup was from BIOPAC System Inc.(California, USA). Subsequently, an EEG pretest was implemented for the participants to examine their EEG signals under various conditions, which included quiet state, shift of opening or closed eyes,swallowing, eye movement, smile, and inner emotional detection. The aim of this was to monitor participants by observing their resting state behavior and emotional fluctuation. In addition, the participants were trained to get familiar with the whole procedure in the preparation stage. In the formal experiment, the total detection process took about 12-13 s including the sample entering process requiring 2-3 s. The participants were asked to rest and stay calm until hearing the start instruction. In particular, participants were asked to keep their eyes closed [22]during the whole process of testing, without expectorating the sample until the instructor asked them to do so or when arriving at the end of the experiment.

    Prior to the EEG experiments, the participants were informed about the test name, samples (food grade) and to taste blindly [23].During the test period, the panelists were requested to comply with the instructions. It was important to avoid talking and moving, and to stay relaxed, having a homeostatic breathing and just focusing on the taste and what they are experiencing.

    2.4 Procedure of formal EEG experiment

    The whole detection device was installed according to the instructions. The subjects wore the CAP and were prepared in a resting state. They breathed deeply and exhaled slowly, at the same time maintaining emotional stability.

    In this experiment, eight brain regions were selected [24], i.e.(F3/Cz/A1) (F4/Cz/A2); (F7/Cz/A1) (F8/Cz/A2); (T3/Cz/A1) (T4/Cz/A2);(Fp1/Cz/A1) (Fp2/Cz/A2), to detect umami taste-evoked signals,and to analyze the effect of different regions on taste responses.These eight points selected for the EEG test pertained to the umami responsive regions from results of fMRI [15]. The participants were asked to sip 10 mL of pure water 3 times with recording and stabilize the baseline for less than 30 s. Signal stabilization prior to recording was achieved by an EOL2 placed under the eye for detection of the right eye movement. Then, they will in turn sip 10 mL of the 0.05, 0.12, or 0.26 g/100 mL MSG solution, without swallowing it.Each of the sample solution was kept in the mouth for 10 s, then expectorated [25]. After that, the mouth was rinsed with pure water for 30 s [14]with gentle gargling, which helped to reduce the persistence of taste, so that electrical signals were recorded back near the baseline. After obtaining the baseline stable, the participants would rest for 30 s before starting the next operation to stabilize the baseline [25]. Then, the experiment at each MSG concentration was repeated 10 times and the results were averaged to reduce errors.With this procedure, other positions were recorded for umami taste detection repeating the procedure described above.

    《回憶與隨想》是曾經(jīng)作為外交家及天主教司鐸的陸徵祥晚年通過在比利時(shí)圣安德魯修道院的幾次演講,而對自己生平重要經(jīng)歷的回憶以及心路歷程的思考。

    2.5 Statistical analysis

    The results of brain signals were captured and processed by the AcqKnowledge 5.0 software. During data processing, the waveform of the original EEG signals was cleaned from the noise caused by eye movement by independent component analysis (ICA). Further data analysis [23]was carried out using SPSS statistic 23 (*P< 0.05,**P< 0.01, ***P< 0.001) to investigate the influence of frequency fromδ-γwaves (1-100 Hz), MSG concentrations. Positions on brain responses to umami were obtained by using three-way ANOVA with Bonferroni pairwise comparison, in which frequency, MSG concentrations and positions were treated as fixed factors. After this,different positions were grouped into left, middle and right area of the brain. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni pairwise comparison was used to analyze the influence of left, middle and right regions on brain responses to umami taste, where regions and concentrations of MSG were treated as fixed factors. The unit of results was 10 × nV2/Hz, and the significance was set at 0.05.

    3. Results and discussion

    3.1 Demographic information of participants

    Ten healthy right-handed participants (age: (24 ± 1) years old, 8 females and 2 males, average BMI: (21.3 ± 1.6) kg/m2) were recruited in the study. Written informed consent from all subjects were obtained before the experiment.

    3.2 Spectral analysis of frequency

    The spectral analysis results of the principal components and the frequency components (δ,θ,α,β,γwaves) within 1-100 Hz were obtained by applying the power spectral density (PSD) analysis [18,26]of the original data, as shown in Fig. 1a. The PSD results at different positions for one randomly selected participant are shown in the Supplementary data (Figs. S1-S8). However, it should be pointed out that the cumulated PSD results of all participants showed peak values at 1-4 Hz (δwave) and 4-8 Hz (θwave) occurring in the low frequency range of 1-100 Hz. The frequencies of the sections (α,β,γwaves) larger than 100 Hz were parallel to the frequencies of thex-axis(transverse axis).

    Fig. 1 The spectral analysis results of frequency. (a) An example of frequency bands in PSD analysis selected from one participant at Fp1CzA1.Different concentrations had different responsive activity. All results were related to the same frequency bands of 1-8 Hz, including δ wave (1-4 Hz)and θ wave (5-8 Hz). The peak value appears in the δ wave, which showed the most responsive activity in the brain. (b) Responsive variance differences between 1-4 Hz. The results were in mean ± standard error. Responsive activity from 1-4 Hz with a peak value at 2 Hz showed a significant difference (***P < 0.001) between 2 Hz and other frequencies, though not with 1.5 Hz.

    In this study, we collected umami response signals from 10 participants evoked by three different MSG solutions under the condition of single-electrode sampling system [27]. It turned out that,on the basis of the corresponding range of brain regions triggered by MSG, the signals obtained by different single electrodes can be analyzed from the EEG data [28]. The original results of 1-100 Hz frequency can be divided in five components, i.e.δ,θ,α,β,γwaves.Likewise, hand movement before EEG signal measurement also influenced the signals, as this brain area is also responsible for motor activity. The signal distribution of taste stimulation would be masked by the superposition of EEG signals generated by this part of the motor process. When the subjects received the “stop” command, the audition as noise would intervene with the signals in the recordings,so the “stop” command that the subjects heard was at low noise level. However, it was filtered in the processed signals subsequently.The signal superposition interference would also occur in the corresponding brain regions, so the previous signals of sample tasting was discarded and the 5-10 s signal in the middle range of the EEG signal result was extracted as the main analysis component.

    3.3 The influence of frequency, MSG concentration and position on brain response to umami perception.

    3.3.1 Responsive variance analysis of frequency

    After frequency division (δ,θ,α,β,γwaves), the effect of different frequencies (1-4 Hz) on the response of EEG signals was analyzed (Fig. 1b). The results suggested that the frequency had significant impact on brain responses to umami taste (P< 0.001). In addition, there was a significant difference between 2 Hz with other frequencies (P< 0.001, except for 2 and 1.5 Hz (P= 0.2)). Here, the signal response had a maximum value at 2 Hz. Although 1.7 Hz or 1.8 Hz seemed the most responsive frequency, they were not selected without statistical significance (P= 0.2).

    Following PSD analysis and frequency spectral analysis,the response signals of umami taste elicited by taste stimulation were preliminarily explored. The results indicated that, compared with pure water (control group), the three concentrations of MSG produced strong energy spectral peaks in the low frequency band(1-8 Hz), while no obvious PSD peaks appeared in other frequency bands (8-100 Hz). It may be that the responsive signals of the taste mainly concentrate near theθandδwaves, which is consistent with the literature [29]that 1-4 Hz is involved in taste coding. The result was consistent with the reference in Table 1 [29-31]and it was reasonable to claim that theδandθwaves in the brain could be triggered by the umami taste evoked by MSG. Therefore, it was confirmed that the frequency range of 1-4 Hz [29]impacted the signals of brain response to umami taste evoked by MSG, which suggested 2 Hz to be most responsive to the activity of the brain in humans related to umami taste.

    Table 1Several wave forms of EEG signals and their corresponding coding characteristics.

    3.3.2 The influence of umami stimuli concentrations on brain responses to umami taste

    Fig. 2 indicates umami taste signals and the significant differences between MSG solutions of different concentrations at 2 Hz. There was a significant impact of MSG concentrations on brain responses to umami taste (P< 0.001). The brain response to water was significantly higher (P< 0.001) than the other three concentrations of MSG solution. In addition, with the increase of MSG concentration,the response signals showed a decreasing trend. There were significant differences found between 0.26 and 0.05 g/100 mL (P< 0.001), 0.26 and 0.12 g/100 mL (P< 0.001), 0.26 g/100 mL and water (P< 0.001),0.12 g/100 mL and water (P< 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between 0.05 and 0.12 g/100 mL (P= 1.0). It has to be pointed out, however, that signal increase or decrease does not mean directly emotional change, though it cannot be excluded that emotion would be affected by the taste sensation subsequently.The mechanism of correlation between emotion and taste needs to be studied further and EEG or other technique may contribute with valuable data to better understanding this phenomenon.

    Fig. 2 Responsive variance differences between different concentrations of MSG. The results were in mean ± standard error. Responsive activity showed a decreasing trend with increasing MSG concentrations. Subjects’ responses to water were significantly higher than that of the other three concentrations of MSG solution, and there were significant differences (***P < 0.001).

    In terms of response concentration and correlation of sampling points, we observed significant differences between 0.26 and 0.05 g/100 mL as well as 0.12 g/100 mL and water in brain response to umami perception. Moreover, the MSG solution with 0.12 g/100 mL resulted in the greatest responsive value in brain response to umami taste perception, which suggested that the 0.12 g/100 mL MSG solution could evoke stronger brain responses.These conclusions were supported by one-way ANOVA on the data shown in Fig. 2, with the factor samples. Fig. 2 displayed that the activation of brain response has significant difference between water and MSG considering the different concentrations, suggesting that the brain response was probably not solely ascribed to the tastant concentrations in the mouth. The activation produced by water in the various brain regions was differently affected, potentially depending on the effect of thirst [32]. In addition, the medial prefrontal cortex is strongly associated with emotional processing and left hemisphere’s role in negative emotion processing when MSG was as tastant solution in the mouth [33]. We inferred that the results might also be affected by subjects’ unconscious averse emotions with 0.26 g/100 mL MSG in the test. Also, individual differences on sensitivity or acceptability for taste or concentration of umami stimulation are to be considered. Figs. S3, S4, S6 are referring to the left, left, right region of brain, respectively. Regarding Figs. S3, S4, activation produced by water has no significant difference with other concentrations of MSG.Regarding Fig. S6, activation evoked by water in the mouth shows significant difference with other concentrations of MSG, but lower values than the other concentrations because it was probably affected by unconscious aversion of the concentrations of MSG, associated with an inhibited effect in the right brain region.

    3.3.3 The analysis of responsive positions-electrodes points

    Fig. 3 illustrates the significant differences between the various responsive positions. The data indicate a significant impact of brain regions on brain response to umami taste (P< 0.001). In addition,significant differences were found between Fp1 and Fp2, between F3 and F4, between F7 and F8, between T3 and T4 (P< 0.001).Moreover, F8CzA2, Fp2CzA2 and T4CzA2 showed the greatest response to umami taste but there was no significant difference among F8, Fp2 and T4. This suggested that MSG could trigger stronger brain responses to umami taste at the positions of F8, Fp2 and T4.

    Fig. 3 Responsive variance differences between different positions(F8CzA2, Fp2CzA2, and T4CzA2). The results were in mean ± standard error.Responsive activity in different positions showed that the right side of brain was higher than the left side of brain between Fp1-T4. There were significant differences (***P < 0.001).

    Moreover, MSG could trigger diverse responses at different brain positions, and particularly stronger brain responses to umami taste at F8, Fp2 and T4. Thus, we found for the first time evidence for different activation responses of the general brain regions reported [15,34].The prefrontal cortex is a large brain region, in which most of the frontal lobes is covered. As far as emotions are concerned, the left hemisphere contributes to the processing of positive emotions, while the right-hemisphere counterparts are tangled in the processing of negative affective states [33]. Thus, it has been hypothesized that the positions at F8, Fp2 and T4 may be interlinked with the emotional processing systems, which need to be further studied in future work.Brain response and taste response are two different phenomena.Taking umami taste as example, the umami component as ligand is connected to the taste receptor of taste bud cells in the oral cavity,which is functioning as chemical sensor. Here, the signal of taste sensation triggered by the umami chemical was transmitted from taste bud cells to the central nerve system in the brain, then processed through taste cortex, some of which are related to emotional regions.The taste response regarding emotion effects needs to be studied further in order to better understand this phenomenon.

    3.4 The influence of left, middle and right brain region on brain responses to umami taste

    3.4.1 Impacts of regions

    According to the anatomical structure, the brain was divided into 3 brain regions, i.e. left, middle and right as shown in Fig. 4a, in order to analyze the differences in response signals between the three brain regions. Fig. 4b shows the results of the responsive signals between left, middle and right region. There were significant differences in response signals among the three regions (P< 0.001).

    Fig. 4 Impacts of brain regions on brain response to umami taste. (a) The region diagram of brain structure. Left region for F7, F3, T3; middle region for Fp1, Fp2; right region for F8, F4, T4. (b) Responsive variance differences between left, middle and right region. The results were in mean ± standard error. Responsive activity in different regions showed that the right region was higher than the middle and the left regions (***P < 0.001), while the middle region was higher than the left region (***P < 0.001).

    Particularly, the response signal increased significantly from the left-brain region to the right brain region (right brain area > middle brain area,P< 0.001; middle brain area > left brain area,P< 0.001;right brain area > left brain area,P< 0.001). Thus, these results suggest that the right brain was more responsive to umami signal than the left brain. So far, this phenomenon has rarely been studied directly to understand the effects of right brain activation on umami taste evoked by MSG. There was a significant interaction between MSG concentrations and brain regions in brain responses to umami taste (P< 0.001). There was no significant difference between different concentrations in the left-brain region (0.05vs0.12 g/100 mL,P= 0.5; 0.05vs0.26 g/100 mL,P= 1.0; 0.05 g/100 mLvspure water,P= 1.0; 0.12vs0.26 g/100 mL,P= 0.3; 0.12 g/100 mLvspure water,P= 0.8; 0.26 g/100 mLvspure water,P= 1.0).In the right brain area, significant differences in brain responses to umami taste were observed between different concentrations.There was a significant difference (P< 0.001) between pure water and 0.05, 0.12 and 0.26 g/100 mL, with pure water being the most responsive sample. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between 0.05 and 0.12 g/100 mL, but there existed a significant difference (P< 0.001) in brain responses to umami taste between pure water and 0.26 g/100 mL, of which the response caused by pure water was greater than that by 0.26 g/100 mL. The conclusion was supported by a two-way ANOVA on the data shown in Fig. 5, with brain regions being one factor and concentrations the other factor.As already hypothesized, brain regions where the activation was produced by water in the mouth might be differently affected by the level of satiation with water, i.e. feeling thirsty or fully satiated (no additional desire for water). Thus, in the mid-part of the right insula cortex, the oral delivery of water produced more pronounced effects when the desire for water was higher than the desire for food [32],which might have caused a higher activation of water as compared to 0.26 g/100 mL MSG. It is also possible, of course, that due to the left hemisphere’s role in negative emotion [33], an unconscious emotional aversion was triggered by 0.26 g/100 mL MSG.

    Fig. 5 Responsive variance differences with concentrations between left,middle and right region. The results were in mean ± standard error. Responsive activity in different regions showed no significant differences in the left region.In the right region, significant differences existed between water and 0.05, 0.12,0.26 g/100 mL (***P < 0.001) and water was the maximum value. There was no significant difference between 0.05 and 0.12 g/100 mL, but significant differenceswere observed between 0.05, 0.12 and 0.26 g/100 mL (***P < 0.001).

    Our results indicate that there are certain regions in the brain which are responsible for umami taste [15], including the insula (primary gustatory area) and the orbitofrontal cortex (secondary gustatory area) [29]. With different concentrations of MSG, different responsive brain regions can be activated to a different extent. It seems that the responsive activity triggered by MSG at higher concentrations was inhibited (P< 0.001), suggesting it might be a different pattern tuned to sense umami taste in the human brain. Moreover, the brain response to the umami taste evoked by MSG from the left to right region was increasingly significant (P< 0.001), which might be linked with subcortical structures regulating reward and feeding behavior, as well as to somatosensory and visceral areas [29].

    3.4.2 Analysis of lateral advantage

    In addition, from the brain region point of view, the data suggested a certain degree of laterality. From left to right, the sensitivity of the brain to different concentrations of MSG significantly increased, and the right brain region was particularly sensitive to these concentration changes (Fig. 5). To the best of our knowledge, the result obtained in our study reveals for the first time the relationship between activation of brain response and MSG concentrations.

    Interestingly, the right insula brain response to the change of concentrations was more sensitive than the left brain. It was investigated that the results of fMRI in the thalamic region showed bilateral activation following MSG stimulation, with a predominance of ipsilateral processing [35]. Thus, it could stress the neuronal connection specifically related to ipsilateral activation produced by MSG at insula cortex and thalamic cortex. Moreover, there was neither a significant effect of umami taster × training interaction nor effect of training alone on brain activation to umami taste [36].Therefore, the laterality of right brain response to different concentrations was not affected by training in the mouth. To the best of our knowledge, these findings provide further evidence of the role of right brain laterality in the umami taste information coding in human.

    There were some limitations in this study. During the whole study, participants associated the 0.05 g/100 mL sample with the umami taste which seemed to be a recognition threshold of MSG.Above this concentration, the samples tested by different participants could be easily distinguished; below this concentration, the taste of low concentration MSG solution described by different participants at the end of the experiment was not obvious to recognize umami or salty. The participants even described it as umami or faintly sweet. If the conscious exclusion method is neglected, and the only thing that need to be taken into account is their perception when tasting umami at low concentrations, participants tend to be preconceived in their scoring process in the traditional sensory tests [37], which may affect the final experimental results. However, if combined with the results of EEG experiments, the analysis error can be reduced. In addition,compared to the responsive signal of pure water, it can be observed that some of the response signals produced in various brain regions with water as reference sample are even larger than those produced by MSG solutions. This may be due to the perception deviation of MSG:when MSG solution is relatively low the concentration does not reach its perceptible concentration level.

    It is noteworthy to mention that no professional emotional assessment was conducted in this study, the participants were only asked to complete the experiment in a relaxed and calm state.Consequently, the results might be affected by the emotional processing effect due to an unconscious negative emotional status.Also, the participants were told that the reagent was safe, but the name of the reagent was kept secret temporarily during the test to prevent cognitive involvement until the end of all the experiments. Furthermore,the time period for the EEG test was conducted after 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. to ensure that the panelists avoid the effect of overlapping cortical representation [38]of gustatory signals and satiety [34]associated with negative experimental emotion on test results.

    In general, the information obtained from EEG studies so far is still not comprehensive enough, which requires additional scientific work. Based on our current results, it would be worth in the future studying the interactions between brain and food flavor using EEG.There will be results combining EEG with fMRI to develop the current techniques for quantification and localization. The knowledge about the most significant responsive area to umami taste in the brain that has been identified in this study lays the foundation for further research on the relationship between the intensity of umami taste stimulation and the response intensity [39], and also to better understand the synergistic effects between MSG and nucleotides.

    4. Conclusion

    In summary, we present evidence of activation in theδ-frequency range as an electrophysiological signal of umami taste evoked by MSG in humans. We observe response differences of brain regions to MSG using scalp-EEG, with the right brain being more responsive than the left region. This may help predicting perceptual decisions and brain response for a better understanding of the relationship between oral and brain sensitivity.

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

    Acknowledgement

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31972198, 31622042) and the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFD0400803, 2016YFD0401501).

    Appendix A. Supplementary data

    Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2022.04.019.

    猜你喜歡
    外交家生平天主教
    傅忠誠教授生平
    曾鞏生平
    美文(2018年20期)2018-10-23 05:52:30
    鄭鎮(zhèn)海:做中韓交流“民間外交家”
    金橋(2018年1期)2018-09-28 02:24:38
    包何生平考述
    什么天主教?
    天主教社會思想對社會正義的理解
    天主教新神學(xué)運(yùn)動中的現(xiàn)象學(xué)視野
    潑盡水墨是生平
    文史春秋(2017年12期)2017-02-26 03:16:19
    蘇秦“錐刺股”苦讀
    張騫通西域
    国产精华一区二区三区| 免费观看精品视频网站| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 国产精品国产av在线观看| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 夫妻午夜视频| www国产在线视频色| 成人国语在线视频| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 在线视频色国产色| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 成在线人永久免费视频| 免费少妇av软件| 免费不卡黄色视频| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 久久九九热精品免费| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| aaaaa片日本免费| 中文字幕色久视频| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 久久久久久久久中文| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 亚洲精品一二三| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 一进一出抽搐动态| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 久久久久久久久中文| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 深夜精品福利| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 亚洲中文av在线| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| a级毛片黄视频| 黄色成人免费大全| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 久久香蕉国产精品| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 成人国语在线视频| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 午夜两性在线视频| 黄色视频不卡| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 99re在线观看精品视频| 麻豆av在线久日| 高清在线国产一区| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产亚洲欧美98| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 很黄的视频免费| 亚洲国产欧美网| 精品人妻1区二区| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 91在线观看av| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 99久久国产精品久久久| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 青草久久国产| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 在线看a的网站| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 成人影院久久| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 国产精品影院久久| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 一区在线观看完整版| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 成在线人永久免费视频| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 黄色成人免费大全| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 一区二区三区激情视频| ponron亚洲| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲激情在线av| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 美女大奶头视频| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 看免费av毛片| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 很黄的视频免费| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 久久久久九九精品影院| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 久久狼人影院| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| netflix在线观看网站| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 嫩草影院精品99| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 欧美成人午夜精品| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 最好的美女福利视频网| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 青草久久国产| 国产成年人精品一区二区 | 夫妻午夜视频| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产不卡一卡二| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 99香蕉大伊视频| 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 亚洲人成电影观看| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 免费不卡黄色视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 美女福利国产在线| 亚洲第一青青草原| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 极品教师在线免费播放| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 午夜激情av网站| 久久香蕉国产精品| 我的亚洲天堂| 窝窝影院91人妻| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 久久中文字幕一级| av片东京热男人的天堂| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 国产在线观看jvid| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 一区福利在线观看| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| aaaaa片日本免费| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 亚洲第一av免费看| 成在线人永久免费视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 欧美成人午夜精品| 免费少妇av软件| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 三级毛片av免费| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 午夜两性在线视频| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 女警被强在线播放| 一级毛片精品| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 欧美大码av| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 高清在线国产一区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 久久性视频一级片| 久久 成人 亚洲| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 少妇 在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 在线观看日韩欧美| 国产免费男女视频| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| tocl精华| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 电影成人av| 黄片播放在线免费| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 人人澡人人妻人| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 天堂影院成人在线观看| av视频免费观看在线观看| 国产区一区二久久| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 丝袜在线中文字幕| 亚洲人成电影观看| 国产精品免费视频内射| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 91在线观看av| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 两个人看的免费小视频| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| a级毛片在线看网站| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| avwww免费| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 久久伊人香网站| 国产三级在线视频| 国产麻豆69| 精品国产亚洲在线| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 中文字幕色久视频| 搡老岳熟女国产| 视频区图区小说| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 99国产精品一区二区三区| videosex国产| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 久久久国产成人免费| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 日韩欧美免费精品| 女性被躁到高潮视频| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 久久伊人香网站| 亚洲片人在线观看| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 99re在线观看精品视频| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 午夜福利欧美成人| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 国产不卡一卡二| 老司机福利观看| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 国产片内射在线| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 宅男免费午夜| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 99香蕉大伊视频| 在线观看66精品国产| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 在线免费观看的www视频| 性少妇av在线| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 天堂动漫精品| 精品久久久久久成人av| 精品电影一区二区在线| 免费看十八禁软件| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 男人操女人黄网站| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 午夜两性在线视频| 久99久视频精品免费| 精品人妻1区二区| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 99国产精品99久久久久| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 一级毛片女人18水好多| av有码第一页| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产成人精品无人区| 精品福利观看| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av | 一a级毛片在线观看| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 在线看a的网站| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 大码成人一级视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 黄片小视频在线播放| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 国产免费男女视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 午夜视频精品福利| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 我的亚洲天堂| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 午夜激情av网站| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 18禁观看日本| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 久久久久久人人人人人| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 中文字幕色久视频| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 看免费av毛片| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产熟女xx| 麻豆av在线久日| 18禁观看日本| 国产单亲对白刺激| 日本 av在线| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 亚洲国产欧美网| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 久久草成人影院| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 1024视频免费在线观看| 午夜视频精品福利| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 咕卡用的链子| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 亚洲第一av免费看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 色在线成人网| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 黄色成人免费大全| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| videosex国产| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| xxx96com| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 亚洲自拍偷在线| a级毛片在线看网站| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 精品久久久久久,| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 免费看a级黄色片| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 身体一侧抽搐| 中国美女看黄片| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产高清激情床上av| 久久影院123| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 久久久久久久久中文| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 在线观看一区二区三区| 多毛熟女@视频| 日本欧美视频一区| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 色综合站精品国产| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 高清在线国产一区| 欧美在线黄色| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 69av精品久久久久久| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 久久香蕉激情| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 香蕉国产在线看| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 国产色视频综合| 在线观看一区二区三区| 午夜91福利影院| 国产色视频综合| 国产精品影院久久| 成人三级做爰电影| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 夜夜爽天天搞| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 久久热在线av| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 大码成人一级视频| 国产三级黄色录像| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 国产av又大| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 久久人人精品亚洲av|