• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Optimizing Sample Size for Assessing the Genetic Diversity in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Based on Start Codon Targeted (SCoT) Markers

    2022-06-02 02:01:52MAOPeiSHENShuhengPUJunLOUKekeZHOUQiangWANGZengyuSUNJuanLIUZhipeng
    草地學(xué)報(bào) 2022年5期

    MAO Pei, SHEN Shu-heng, PU Jun, LOU Ke-ke, ZHOU Qiang, WANG Zeng-yu,SUN Juan*, LIU Zhi-peng*

    (1. State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology,Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730020, China; 2. Grassland Agri-Husbandry Research Center, College of Grassland Science, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, Shandong Province 266109, China)

    Abstract:Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is one of the most economically valuable forage crops in the world. Due to its autotetraploidy and cross-pollination with a complex genome structure,genetic and breeding projects for alfalfa improvement have been significantly hindered. In the present study,six different germplasms of alfalfa including 600 individuals were used for sample size determination. The analysis of genetic diversity of alfalfa was performed with start codon targeted (SCoT) markers. From the PCR amplification,we selected 6 out of 56 primers that were used in previous studies. All analyzed markers were polymorphic,and 80 bands were identified,with 13.3 bands per locus detected. The percentage of polymorphic bands values were all 100%,which indicated that the markers were highly informative. The genetic diversity of alfalfa with 11 random sampling levels (10,15,20,30,40,50,60,70,80,90,and 100 genotypes) was compared in this study. When the sample size was increased to 40,there was a coverage of at least 95% genetic variation in the six germplasms. Additionally,based on the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA) and STRUCTURE analysis,each cultivar in this study could be distinguished from others by utilizing a sample size of 40 individuals. The results of the present study showed that these SCoT markers would benefit the alfalfa research community for genetics and breeding. Furthermore,this study also established the foundation for future cultivar identification,resequencing and evolution in the alfalfa.

    Key words:Medicago sativa;SCoT markers;Genetic diversity;Sample sizes

    Alfalfa (Medicagosativa) belongs to the Fabaceae family;it is grown in 80 million ha worldwide and is one of the most economically valuable crops in the world[1]. Alfalfa has been an important component of sustainable agricultural systems for many years due to several key biological and agricultural features[2-3]. It is not only of huge value as a livestock feed,but also important for water and soil conservation,grass field rotation and soil improvement. Besides its applications in agriculture and animal husbandry,alfalfa also can be used for paper and biofuel production because of its high fiber content biomass,which makes alfalfa a potentially unique bioenergy crop[4-5]. Alfalfa was derived from a species complex (M.sativaspecies complex) that includes diploid and tetraploid interfertile subspecies[6]. Cultivated alfalfa is a perennial species with high genetic complexity at individual and population levels due to its autotetraploidy (2n=4x=32) and cross-pollinated (allogamous)[7]. Moreover,since the tetraploid structure and severe selfing depression of alfalfa,the study of population genetics is also complicated[8].

    The genetic diversity ofM.sativahas been characterized by traditional morphological traits and molecular markers. Compared with conventional phenotyping assessment,molecular marker technology is an efficient supplement and alternative to morphological trait measurements,as the markers are easily detectable and stable in plant tissues regardless of environmental influences[9]. Various molecular assays have been successfully used to evaluate genetic diversity in alfalfa. These assays mainly focus on amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP)[10],random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)[11],inter-retrotransposon amplified polymorphism (IRAP)[12],sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP)[13],and simple sequence repeats (SSR)[14]. More recently,many new alternatives and promising molecular assays have emerged. Of these assays,start codon targeted (SCoT) markers are dominantly inherited,which has been developed based on the short conserved region flanking sequences of the adenine-thymine-guanine (ATG) start codon site[15]. SCoT markers display the following advantages:simple operation,low cost,high level of polymorphism,and high abundance in the genome[16]. SCoT markers open their way in various plant investigations:genetic diversity and structure analysis,identify cultivars,quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping,and DNA fingerprinting,including wild rye (Elymussibiricus)[17-18],dandelion (Taraxacumpieninicum)[19],barb goatgrass (Aegilopstriuncialis)[20],cowpea (Vignaunguiculata)[21],potato (Solanumtuberosum)[22],maize (Zeamays)[23]and persian oak (Quercusbrantii)[16]. Nevertheless,as a remarkable tool in detecting genetic diversity and targeting the functional gene of various plant species,the application of the SCOT marker system in alfalfa is still limited.

    The sample size of genotypes evaluated by each group plays an important role in the reliability of alfalfa population diversity research. The optimal sample size of each variety should be detected to achieve the optimum between reasonable labor and the reliability of the data set. While there are few reports on the variation of genetic diversity of different alfalfa varieties with the change of sample sizes. To establish an optimal sampling strategy,additional work regarding the optimal number of individual plants is needed. In the current study,the effectiveness of SCoT markers for the analysis of the genetic diversity of alfalfa and the genetic relationships among six alfalfa varieties were examined,with the goals of determining the appropriate number of individuals that should be sampled to reasonably represent the genetic diversity within a population. A focus on this point could be worthwhile to give a more complete judgment on the analysis by SCoT markers in alfalfa,and the detailed results provide an optimized sampling strategy,which is crucial for the genetic diversity investment of alfalfa for breeding purposes.

    1 MATERIAL AND METHODS

    1.1 Plant Materials and DNA Extraction

    In the present study,six alfalfa varieties (‘Archer’,‘BOJA’,‘CUF101’,‘Maverick’,‘Ranger’,and ‘Zhongmu No.1’) were used in the experiment (Table 1). All varieties from a total of 600 individuals were used for the present study. For each of the six populations,the DNA of 100 individuals per population was extracted from young leaves and analyzed with six SCoT markers. A revised cetyltrime thylammonium ammonium bromide (CTAB) method was used for DNA extraction[24]. Then,the DNA quality and concentration were determined using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Products,Wilmington,DE,USA). Eventually,the final concentration of each DNA sample was diluted to 50 ng·μL-1and stored at —20℃ for further study.

    Table 1 Medicago sativa varieties used in the study

    1.2 PCR Amplification

    In this study,the PCR reactions were all carried out in volumes of 10 μL,containing 50 ng DNA,5.0 μL 2× Power Taq PCR Master Mix (Bioteke,Beijing,China),1.0 μL primer (10 μM) and 2.0 μL double-distilled water. The PCR programs consisted of an initial denaturation at 94℃ for 4 min,followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 94℃,1 min at 50℃ and 2 min at 72℃,and the final extension at 72℃ for 7 min. After PCR amplification,fragments were separated in 1.4% agarose gel containing 0.14 μg·mL-1of Goldview through electrophoresis in 1× TBE buffer solution at 129 V for 2 h 15 min. DNA fragments were visualized under the ultraviolet (UV) light Gel Doc (TM) XR System (BioRad,Hercules,CA,USA),and photo documentation was obtained for each gel. Fifty-six SCoT primers from previous studies were selected[15,27],and the primers were tested and screened by agarose gel electrophoresis.

    1.3 Data Analysis

    First,the amplified bands of 6 SCoT markers were scored as present (1) or absent (0),and only reproducible bands were considered. Six hundred sampled individuals (one hundred genotypes from each variety) were used to analyze the genetic diversity of alfalfa using six SCoT markers. A series of random resampling of these data were made according to the 11 sample sizes (10,15,20,30,40,50,60,70,80,90,and 100 genotypes) chosen,with 20 replicates for each resampling. Then the genetic diversity parameters were calculated:Polymorphic information content (PIC) values were calculated according to the formula:PIC=1-p2-q2[28];wherepis the frequency of the present band andqis the frequency of the absent band. The Reserve Percentage (RP),which is an important indicator of the proportion of bands remaining in the sample population was calculated[29]. The resolving power of the primer (Rp) in each variety was measured by Rp=ΣIb[30]. In addition,the number of effective alleles (Ne),Shannon’s information index (I)[31]values,and the expected heterozygosity (He) were calculated with GenAlEx software 6.41[32].

    To display variety relationships with different sample sizes,a dendrogram was constructed by Jaccard’s genetic similarity matrix using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA),NTSYS version 2.11[33]. Furthermore,to visualize the population structure of the six alfalfa varieties,Bayesian cluster analysis using STRUCTURE v2.3.4 software[34],with the ‘a(chǎn)dmixture mode’,burn-in period of 10,000 iterations,and a run of 100,000 replications of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) after burn-in,were carried out. For each run,20 independent runs of STRUCTURE were performed with the number of clusters (K) varying from 1 to 10. Maximum likelihood and delta K values were used to determine the optimum number of groups[34,35],and the most likely value of K was computed using STRUCTURE HARVESTER (http://taylor0.biology.ucla.edu/structureHarvester/)[36].

    2 RESULTS

    2.1 SCoT analysis

    Examples of SCoT amplifications were shown in Fig.1,representing band patterns obtained with primers SCoT26. Primers producing banding patterns that were difficult to score and those with inconsistent amplification in all individuals were excluded. Only if the primers can produce clear and repeatable bands can they be used for further study (Fig.1). Finally,six of these primers were chosen for the analysis of genetic diversity parameters in six alfalfa varieties. The oligonucleotide sequences of the 6 SCoT primers were summarized in Table 2. As a result,a total of 80 bands were generated with the six SCoT primers ranging from 6 (SCoT10) to 19 (SCoT3 and SCoT6) with an average number of 13.3 bands per primer in the 600 genotypes of the six alfalfa varieties. The size of the amplified products ranged from 200 bp to 3 500 bp (Table 2). The percentage of polymorphic bands (PPB) of six SCoT primers were all 100%,indicating that the primers had high specificity in these populations. Meanwhile,the resolving power (Rp) of the 6 SCoT primers ranged from 1.89 (SCoT10) to 8.67 (SCoT3). The polymorphic information content (PIC) of six SCoT primers ranged from 0.30 to 0.49,with an average of 0.43. The primer SCoT6 had the lowest PIC (0.30),while the highest PIC was found in primer SCoT37 (0.49) (Table 2). The primers with higher PIC and Rp values have greater potential to investigate more individuals or sampling sites with a small number of primers.

    The number of polymorphic bands,the percentage of polymorphic bands,the observed number of bands,the number of effective alleles,the expected heterozygosity,and Shannon’s Information index were calculated for each variety (Table 3). The number of polymorphic bands for varieties ranged from 52 (variety RA) to 70 (variety CU). The highest percentage of polymorphic bands was 100% for variety AR,while the lowest was 94.59% for variety CU. The observed number of bands ranged from 1.325 to 1.800. The number of effective alleles varied from 1.236 to 1.392. The highest Shannon’s Information index was recorded for variety CU (0.364) and the lowest for variety RA (0.232).

    Fig.1 PCR-amplified band pattern generated in SCoT analysis by primers SCoT26 on DNA of 23 alfalfa individuals:molecular marker (100~5 000 bp) (M)

    Table 2 Information for the six SCoT primers used in the genetic diversity analysis in six alfalfa varieties

    Table 3 Genetic variability within six alfalfa varieties detected by six SCoT markers

    2.2 The Genetic Diversity Analysis of SCoT Markers at different sampling size

    Understanding the genetic diversity and variation among and within varieties is of great significance for the selection of an effective strategy for conservation and sampling management[37]. As shown in Figure 2,the primers that we selected for this study had high PIC values in different sampling sizes under random strategy in each accession. Furthermore,the analysis results showed that with an increase of the sample size,the TB,Ne,He,and I of the six varieties increased gradually. However,when the sample size increased to a certain number,the value of the genetic diversity of the six germplasms did not increase (Tables 4~7). The Ne value of the six germplasms in different sampling sizes represented more than 95% of the genetic diversity in the total population when the sample size was 10 (Table 5). The I and He parameters increased with an increase in the sample size,and more than 95% of the genetic diversity per population was covered when the sample size exceeded 30 and 40 individuals (Tables 6 and 7,respectively). When the sample size increased up to 40 individuals,the RP value of the six germplasms represented more than 90% genetic diversity (Table 4).

    Fig.2 Polymorphism Information Content of the six accessions with different sampling sizes under random strategyNote:(a) ‘ARCHER’;(b) ‘BOJA’;(c) ‘CUF101’;(d) ‘Maverick’;(e) ‘Ranger’;(f) ‘Zhongmu No.1’

    Table 4 The total number of bands (TB) and the Reserve Percentage (RP) with different sampling sizes (n) under random strategy in each variety

    Table 5 The Number of Effective Alleles (Ne) and the Percentage of Genetic diversity capture (GC) with different sampling sizes (n) under random strategy in each accession

    Table 6 The Shannon information index (I) and the Percentage of Genetic diversity capture (GC) with different sampling sizes (n) under random strategy in each variety

    Table 7 The Expected Heterozygosity (He) and the Percentage of Genetic diversity capture (GC) with different sampling sizes (n) under random strategy in each variety

    2.3 Cluster and Population Structure Analysis

    To investigate the relationships between the different sampling levels,the software of Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) and STRUCTURE 2.3.4 was used in this study. The cluster analysis carried out by the UPGMA method based on Jaccard’s genetic similarity,using arithmetic averages cluster analysis,showed that the sampling level of 40 individuals was consistent with that of 100 individuals,where 240 (Fig.3a) and 600 genotypes (Fig.3b) from six varieties were clustered into three major clusters (A-C). Cluster A was further divided into four subgroups. Among the six varieties of alfalfa,‘Archer’,‘BOJA’,‘Maverick’,and ‘Zhongmu No.1’ were assigned to Cluster A. Cluster B included one variety of Ranger,and the remaining variety,‘CUF101’,was assigned to cluster C (Fig.3).

    Furthermore,to verify the feasibility of the proposed random sampling results,the genetic structure of the six populations was analyzed using STRUCTURE software based on maximum likelihood and delta K (DK) values for each k,calculated by STRUCTURE HARVESTER according to the DK method of Evanno et al. for 20 simulations[35-36]. The result showed that 240 samples could be divided into three main clusters,which indicated that all 6 varieties were divided into three subpopulations,corresponding to Cluster A,B and C with a few admixed lines,which was consistent with clustering based on genetic distance (Fig.4). Meanwhile,the sampling level of 40 individuals was consistent with that of 100 individuals (Fig.4).

    Fig.3 The Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) dendrogram of alfalfa based on Jaccard’s genetic similarityNote:(a) 240 individuals from six germplasms;(b) 600 individuals from six germplasms

    Fig.4 STRUCTURE analysis of the genetic structure of the six alfalfa varietiesNote:Each structure was described by using two graphics of the process to detect the optimum K value. One on the left side was the mean LnP(K) over 20 runs for each K value (1~10),another on the right side was the maximum delta K values used to determine the uppermost level of structure for K ranging from 2 to 9. (a) The genetic structure of 40 individuals for each of the six varieties as inferred by STRUCTURE with the SCoT markers data set;(b) The genetic structure of 100 individuals for each of the six varieties as inferred by STRUCTURE with the SCoT markers data set

    3 DISCUSSION

    In recent years,DNA-based molecular markers have developed rapidly,and have become a versatile tool in various fields like genetic engineering,plant breeding,and genetic diversity[38]. The SCoT marker system in the present investigation has also been used previously as an effective method of assessing genetic diversity in various plant species. ForE.sibiricusgenetic diversity analysis by using SCoT markers,10.8 bands per primer were generated,89.0% of which were polymorphic[18];Five SCoT markers generated 122 products,what in average gave 24.4 bands per primer. Moreover,the Percentage of Polymorphic Bands (PPB) of the primers were all 100%[27]. Similar observations have also been found in our study,six SCoT primers were used to generate 13.3 bands per primer,and a 100% PPB was obtained across 6 varieties of alfalfa (Table 2);The PPB values (100%) was higher than the previous studies of ISSR variation (PPB=78%)[39],RAPD variation (PPB=82.69%)[40],IRAP variation (PPB=79.73%)[12],and SRAP variation (PPB=49.22%)[41]. Additionally,SCoT markers were applied to alfalfa because of several advantages to other marker assays:lower cost than AFLP,easier development of species-specific primers than SSR,and higher reproducibility than RAPD[42-43]. The results of this study indicated that SCoT markers have enough power to detect the genetic structure and diversity of alfalfa. Meanwhile,the primers showed polymorphisms among six alfalfa varieties,which indicated that this type of molecular marker can distinguish six alfalfa varieties well.

    The sample size is an important factor to consider for a reliable investigation of the diversity and differentiation of different plant species. Zhu et al. studied the population sampling strategy ofGlycinesoja,and found that the level of genetic diversity represented 95% of the population when the sample size reached 27 by using He and I like the response criteria. However,when TB was used as the evaluation indicator,the sample size needed to be increased to 52 to achieve 95% of the population’s genetic diversity[44]. In microsatellite studies that assess the genetic diversity ofMelospizamelodia,Pruett and Winker recommend that at samples of less than 40,the number of bands per locus is a poor measure of diversity[45]. These previous researches indicated that there are significant differences in genetic information among different species and the corresponding sample sizes. However,due to its cross-pollination and autotetraploid,the genome structure of alfalfa is very complicated[7,46]. In addition,alfalfa belongs to a species complex (M.sativaspecies complex) that includes diploid and tetraploid interfertile subspecies[6,47],and there is extensive gene flow between these subspecies[48]. Therefore,sampling strategies for self-pollinated and diploid plants,such asG.sojaandViciasativa,cannot provide a reference for alfalfa.

    In the current study,we explored the sampling strategy of alfalfa using SCOT markers,and the relationship between sample size and genetic diversity was studied. To our knowledge,this is the first survey on the genetic variability of cultivated tetraploid alfalfa with different sample sizes based on SCoT analysis. Our results showed that the increase in genetic diversity was strongly correlated with an increase in the number of randomly collected samples when TB and the RP values were used as the criterion to estimate the genetic diversity of the six alfalfa populations. As indicated in Table 4,90% of the genetic variation of the germplasms can be achieved by sampling 40 individuals because the rare bands (gene frequencies lower than 5%) accounted for about 13.51%~23.22% of the total bands in each of the varieties. Furthermore,95% of genetic variation of germplasms could be attained if the number of samples increased to 70 individuals. The optimal number of samples in a population should cover more than 95% of the bands with a gene frequency greater than 5%[44]. Therefore,a sample size of 30~40 genotypes could represent 95% of the genetic diversity of all six alfalfa varieties according to the values of I and He.

    Accurate genetic characteristics of alfalfa cultivars are necessary for plant breeders to distinguish between two cultivars,even closely related ones. Firstly,the results of UPGMA cluster analysis showed that the six alfalfa varieties could be clustered into three major groups. Cluster analysis with molecular data of 40 plant DNA samples divided the ecotypes into three groups that were consistent with 100 samples. Furthermore,this is also supported by the genetic clusters inferred from STRUCTURE analysis,wherein different varieties were grouped into three distinct clusters. The results showed that the sample size of 40 was sufficient to distinguish different alfalfa varieties.

    The accuracy of genetic diversity analysis increases with the samples size taken from the population. However,the cost of genetic analysis increases with the increase in the number of samples. Large scale experiments,cultivar identification in outcrossing heterogeneous species is crucial if a lower labor cost is the target. Based on our results,we can conclude that different sample sizes represent different genetic diversity,40 individual DNA samples is an adequate number to represent most of the genetic diversity within a population,and to differentiate various alfalfa populations. Although the sampling strategy in the present study is based on alfalfa,these results can also be recommended for diversity studies of other tetraploid plant,such as potato,strawberry,and sugarcane.

    4 CONCLUSIONS

    In summary,SCoT markers in the present study proved useful in evaluating the relationship among different alfalfa cultivars,which showed a high level of polymorphism. At different sample sizes,the genetic variation and genetic relationships among six populations of alfalfa were efficiently determined using SCoT markers. A sample size of 40 individuals can cover more than 95% of the variation of a sample of 100 individuals based on the data provided. Besides,the among population distinctiveness is more evident for the two varieties with opposite fall dormancy (Ranger in cluster B and CUF 101 in cluster C) and less clear cut in cluster A grouping varieties with intermediate fall dormancy coming from different geographical origin.

    99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲中文av在线| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 午夜久久久在线观看| 制服诱惑二区| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 91麻豆av在线| 无人区码免费观看不卡 | 久久久久网色| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 看免费av毛片| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 久9热在线精品视频| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 免费少妇av软件| 天天影视国产精品| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产成人系列免费观看| av天堂在线播放| 18禁观看日本| 97在线人人人人妻| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 欧美成人午夜精品| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 手机成人av网站| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 国产1区2区3区精品| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 久久影院123| 在线播放国产精品三级| 成人国语在线视频| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 女警被强在线播放| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 亚洲免费av在线视频| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 精品久久久久久电影网| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区 | 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 黄色视频不卡| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 老司机影院毛片| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| cao死你这个sao货| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 极品教师在线免费播放| 大型av网站在线播放| 国产在线视频一区二区| 99re在线观看精品视频| av欧美777| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 一级黄色大片毛片| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 夫妻午夜视频| 操美女的视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久电影网| 91国产中文字幕| 99热网站在线观看| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 美国免费a级毛片| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 高清av免费在线| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| www日本在线高清视频| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 日本五十路高清| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 日韩欧美三级三区| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 18禁观看日本| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 色94色欧美一区二区| 国产成人精品无人区| 久久性视频一级片| 桃花免费在线播放| 国产激情久久老熟女| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| netflix在线观看网站| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 免费少妇av软件| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 男人操女人黄网站| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 电影成人av| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 国产在视频线精品| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 精品亚洲成国产av| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 一级毛片电影观看| 咕卡用的链子| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 国产不卡一卡二| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 色在线成人网| 国产在线免费精品| 电影成人av| 桃花免费在线播放| 怎么达到女性高潮| 一本综合久久免费| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 久久亚洲真实| 免费不卡黄色视频| 制服人妻中文乱码| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 1024香蕉在线观看| 满18在线观看网站| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 美国免费a级毛片| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产高清激情床上av| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 伦理电影免费视频| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 一级片免费观看大全| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产野战对白在线观看| av视频免费观看在线观看| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 精品久久久精品久久久| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 捣出白浆h1v1| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 9191精品国产免费久久| 精品国产亚洲在线| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 夜夜爽天天搞| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 天天影视国产精品| 大陆偷拍与自拍| av片东京热男人的天堂| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 婷婷成人精品国产| 十八禁网站免费在线| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 精品国产一区二区久久| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| av免费在线观看网站| 精品一区二区三卡| 免费观看人在逋| 国产麻豆69| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 久久人妻av系列| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| aaaaa片日本免费| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 国产av精品麻豆| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 欧美日韩av久久| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 中文欧美无线码| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 免费在线观看日本一区| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| av网站免费在线观看视频| 免费不卡黄色视频| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 日本av免费视频播放| 91大片在线观看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 91大片在线观看| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 一区二区三区精品91| 看免费av毛片| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 久久性视频一级片| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 操出白浆在线播放| 99九九在线精品视频| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| netflix在线观看网站| videos熟女内射| 五月开心婷婷网| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 美女福利国产在线| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 免费看a级黄色片| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 精品久久久久久电影网| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 一夜夜www| 777米奇影视久久| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 成人18禁在线播放| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 日韩免费av在线播放| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 不卡av一区二区三区| 久热这里只有精品99| 日本av免费视频播放| 亚洲国产欧美网| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 一级片免费观看大全| 91老司机精品| 日本五十路高清| 国产精品 国内视频| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区 | 国产又爽黄色视频| 麻豆av在线久日| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 99re在线观看精品视频| 超色免费av| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 色在线成人网| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产1区2区3区精品| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| a在线观看视频网站| 午夜福利视频精品| 亚洲国产看品久久| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 在线 av 中文字幕| 1024香蕉在线观看| 热99re8久久精品国产| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 久久热在线av| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 在线永久观看黄色视频| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 香蕉久久夜色| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 五月开心婷婷网| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 久久这里只有精品19| 一级黄色大片毛片| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 天堂8中文在线网| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| av有码第一页| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 不卡一级毛片| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 久久久精品94久久精品| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 久久精品成人免费网站| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 久久狼人影院| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 亚洲全国av大片| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产在视频线精品| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 亚洲 国产 在线| 又大又爽又粗| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 蜜桃在线观看..| 国产单亲对白刺激| 999精品在线视频| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 成年版毛片免费区| 大香蕉久久网| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 黄色成人免费大全| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 搡老岳熟女国产| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 无人区码免费观看不卡 | 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 人妻久久中文字幕网| videos熟女内射| av福利片在线| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 午夜福利免费观看在线| 看免费av毛片| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 日韩有码中文字幕| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| a在线观看视频网站| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 成人三级做爰电影| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 桃花免费在线播放| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 中文欧美无线码| 一级黄色大片毛片| cao死你这个sao货| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 丝袜美足系列| 色94色欧美一区二区| 国产1区2区3区精品| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 国产一区二区在线观看av| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 久9热在线精品视频| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 1024视频免费在线观看| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 丝袜喷水一区| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 女警被强在线播放| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 制服诱惑二区| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 宅男免费午夜| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 高清在线国产一区| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 午夜视频精品福利| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 悠悠久久av| 一区在线观看完整版| 欧美日韩黄片免| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 超碰97精品在线观看| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 成年版毛片免费区| 一级片免费观看大全| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 午夜视频精品福利| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 欧美午夜高清在线| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 亚洲第一av免费看| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 国产精品影院久久| 9色porny在线观看| 在线看a的网站| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 午夜激情av网站| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线 | 在线观看www视频免费| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区 | 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 香蕉国产在线看| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 热re99久久国产66热| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 黄色视频不卡| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 搡老乐熟女国产| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | av网站免费在线观看视频| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 一个人免费看片子| 久久影院123| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 麻豆国产av国片精品| www.自偷自拍.com| 午夜久久久在线观看| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 午夜福利,免费看| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 电影成人av| 成人av一区二区三区在线看|