Triplophysa xuanweiensissp.nov., a new blind loach species from the family Nemacheilidae, is described based on specimens collected from a subterranean river in Xuanwei City, Yunnan Province, China.The new species can be distinguished from all known congeners by a combination of the following characters: eyes absent, dorsal-fin origin anterior to pelvic-fin origin, tip of pelvic fin reaching anus, dorsal fin with 7–8 branched rays, caudal fin forked with 16–18 branched rays, body scaleless and colorless, lateral line complete, and posterior chamber of air bladder well developed and connected to anterior chamber by long, slender tube.Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis based on the cytochromeb(cytb) gene placedTriplophysa xuanweiensissp.nov.in a well-supported clade with seven other species of the genus, and three specimens of the new species formed a monophyletic group, consistent with morphological comparisons.
TriplophysaRendahl, 1933 is one of the largest genera in Cypriniformes, containing 147 valid species (Froese & Pauly,2021).Triplophysaspecies are distributed from the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau into North China, Central Asia, and the Himalayas (Li, 2018).Most fish in the genus inhabit high plateau or mountainous areas, with some species also exhibiting cave-dwelling behavior (Li, 2018; Ma et al., 2019).Triplophysais the largest genus of freshwater fish in China and includes 102 species (Zhang et al., 2020).Up to now, all identified cave-dwelling species ofTriplophysaare reported from China (Ma et al., 2019).
Caves are considered extreme environments for animals due to the lack of sunlight.As such, cave-dwelling fish have evolved a suite of morphological adaptations to cope with their extreme environment.These troglomorphic traits include reduction or loss of eyes, pigmentation, scales, and swim bladders, as well as enhancement of mechano- and chemosensation and elongation of fin rays (Zhao et al., 2011).Cavefish can thus be assigned into two morphological types,i.e., stygobite/typical and stygophile/atypical cavefish,according to the presence of troglomorphic characters (Zhao et al., 2011).
China has more than 148 cavefish species, half of which are classified as stygobites (Ma et al., 2019).There are 198 stygobite species worldwide, which are found on every continent but Antarctica (Niemiller et al., 2019).Nearly 40% of the total number of stygobiotic species are found in China,more than any other country (Ma et al., 2019; Niemiller et al.,2019).These cavefish are mainly distributed in the South China Karst region, which is the largest continuous karst area and one of the most spectacular examples of humid tropical to subtropical karst landscapes in the world (Zhao et al., 2011).Caves are the dominant habitat in the region, harboring a substantial diversity of organisms adapted to life underground,including distinctive cavefish.
In April 2018, 16 specimens of an undescribed blind loach were collected from a cave in Xinle Village, Tangtang Town,Xuanwei City, Yunnan Province, China, which is interconnected with the Beipan River system, a tributary of the Hongshui River in the Pearl River drainage.After comparing the morphological characters to all known closely-related species, we determined the specimens to be a new species within the genusTriplophysa.
Detailed information on comparative material is provided in Supplementary Text.Counts and proportional measurements followed Li (2018).All measurements were taken point-topoint with digital calipers to 0.1 mm.Morphometric and meristic data were tabulated and analyzed using Microsoft Excel.
Total DNA was extracted from tissues using a TIANamp Marine Animals DNA Kit (Tiangen, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocols.A fragment of the mitochondrialgene coding for cytbwas amplified following the method described by Huang et al.(2020).Polymerase chain reaction(PCR) mixtures contained 5 μL of PCR buffer (×10), 5 μL of 2 mmol/L deoxynucleotide triphosphate (dNTP), 2.5 μL of 2 μmol/L primers, 0.5 μL of Taq DNA polymerase, 1.0 μL of extracted DNA, and 36 μL of H2O.The PCR thermal cycle profile included: 5 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 45 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 54 °C, 1 min at 72 °C, and final extension of 7 min at 72 °C.
The mitochondrial cytbgene sequences of 15 other species in the genusBarbatulaLinck, 1 790 andTriplophysawere obtained from GenBank (Supplementary Table S1).Alignment of the mitochondrial cytbsequences was performed using the Clustal W algorithm in MEGA X (Kumar et al., 2018), along with manual checks for inconsistencies.Phylogenetic reconstructions were performed using maximum-likelihood(ML) with the General Time Reversible model (Nei & Kumar,2000), with 1 000 bootstrap replicates.
Triplophysa xuanweiensisLu, Li, MaoetZhao, sp.nov.(Figure 1A–F; Supplementary Table S2)
Holotype:ASIZB 223816, 68.6 mm standard length (SL),Xinle Village, Tangtang Town, Xuanwei City, Yunnan Province, China, Beipan River system, a tributary of the Hongshui River; N26°32′44″, E104°08′01″, collected by Z.M.Lu, W.N.Mao, W.J.Lü, G.Huang, T.K.Xu, April 2018.
Paratypes:ASIZB 223817-223831 (15 specimens), 21.7–85.5 mm SL; same collection information as holotype.
Diagnosis:The new species, along withTriplophysa erythraeaLiu & Huang, 2019,T.fengshanensisLan, 2013,T.rosaChen & Yang, 2005,T.xiangxiensis(Yang, Yuan & Liao,1986),T.anshuiensisWu, Wei, Lan & Du, 2018,T.gejiuensis(Chu & Chen, 1979),T.langpingensisYang, 2013,T.shilinensis(Chu & Yang, 1992), andT.qiubeiensisLi & Yang,2008, differs from all other congeners by eyes absent (vs.eyes present).Among these blind loaches, the new species can be distinguished fromT.erythraeaandT.fengshanensisby dorsal-fin origin anterior to pelvic-fin origin (vs.dorsal-fin origin opposite to pelvic-fin origin), fromT.rosaandT.xiangxiensisby pectoral-fin not reaching pelvic-fin origin (vs.pectoral-fin reaching or beyond pelvic-fin origin), fromT.anshuiensisby 16–18 branched caudal-fin rays (vs.14), fromT.gejiuensisby pelvic fin reaching anus (vs.pelvic fin not reaching anus), fromT.langpingensisby adipose crest absent(vs.adipose crest well developed), and fromT.shilinensisandT.qiubeiensisby posterior chamber of air bladder well developed (vs.posterior chamber of air bladder degenerated).
Description:General body features in Figure 1A–D.Meristic and morphometric data for new species and comparative material are provided in Supplementary Table S2.
Body elongated and cylindrical, posterior portion gradually compressed from dorsal fin to caudal-fin base.Dorsal profile slightly convex from snout to dorsal-fin insertion, then straight from posterior portion of dorsal-fin origin to caudal-fin base.Ventral profile flat.Greatest body depth anterior of dorsal-fin origin.
Head slightly depressed and flattened, width greater than depth.Snout slightly pointed.Eyes absent.Anterior and posterior nostrils adjacently located, anterior nostril forming valve, end of valve elongated to form short barbel extending beyond posterior margin of posterior nostrils, posterior nostril round (Figure 1E).Mouth inferior and curved; mouth corner situated below anterior nostril, lips thick, upper lip smooth,lower lip with V-type median notch (Figure 1F).Three pairs of barbels; inner rostral barbel shortest, ~8.2%–29.4% of head length, outer rostral barbel longest, extending to mouth corner,maxillary barbel length ~8.2%–46.0% of head length.
Dorsal fin emarginated, origin closer to tip of snout than to caudal-fin base, anterior to vertical line at pelvic-fin origin; first branched ray longest, slightly shorter than head length.Analfin origin separated from anus by short distance, fin short with 5 branched rays.Pectoral fin moderately developed, tip reaching mid-point between pectoral and pelvic fin origins.Pelvic-fin origin posterior to dorsal-fin origin, vertically aligned with second branched ray of dorsal fin, pelvic-fin tip reaching to anus.Caudal fin forked, with 17–18 branched rays, upper lobe slightly longer than lower one, tips blunt.
Body entirely smooth and scaleless.Lateral line complete and straight, ending at caudal-fin base.Two air bladder chambers, posterior chamber of air bladder well developed and connected to anterior chamber by long, slender tube.
Coloration:Live fish semi-translucent and pale pink, without skin pigment, all fins hyaline (Figure 1D).Whole body yellowish white after fixation in alcohol, fins yellowish and translucent.
Distribution:The new species is known only from a cave located in Xinle Village, Tangtang Town, Xuanwei City, Beipan River system, a tributary of the Hongshui River (Figure 1H).
Etymology:The species name is derived from the city,Xuanwei, where the cave is located.The Chinese common name for this species is “宣 威 盲 高 原 鰍 ”, which means Xuanwei blind high-plateau loach.
Genetic comparisons:ML phylogenetic analysis (Figure 1G)based on the mitochondrial cytbgene showed thatTriplophysa xuanweiensissp.nov.and 10 other cavedwelling species ofTriplophysaformed a clade with 100%bootstrap support, which was sister to the group composed of four non-cave-dwelling species ofTriplophysa.Three specimens of the new species formed a monophyletic group,consistent with morphological comparisons.Furthermore, the interspecific genetic distances for cytbbetweenTriplophysa xuanweiensissp.nov.and its congeners were all greater than 12% (Supplementary Table S3).Therefore, we confirmedTriplophysa xuanweiensissp.nov.as a new species of the genusTriplophysa.
Figure 1 Photos, distribution, and phylogenetic position of Triplophysa xuanweiensis sp.nov.
Remarks:Li (2018) reviewed all nemacheilid cavefish from China and placedTriplophysa dongganensisYang, 2013,T.huanjiangensisYang, Wu & Lan, 2011,T.jiarongensisLin, Li& Song, 2012,T.lihuensisWu, Yang & Lan, 2012,T.lingyunensis(Liao, Wang & Luo, 1997), andT.longibarbatus(Chen, Yang, Sket & Algancic, 1998) into the genusTroglonectes, which was followed by Huang et al.(2020) and Zhao et al.(2021).With the new species described herein,Triplophysacurrently contains 29 cave-dwelling species, 13 of which are classified as stygophile/atypical type as they do not show any troglomorphic traits, includingT.baotianensisLi, Li,Liu & Li, 2018,T.guizhouensisWu, He, Yang & Du, 2018,T.huapingensisZheng, Yang & Chen, 2012,T.longipectoralisZheng, Du, Chen & Yang, 2009,T.longliensisRen, Yang &Chen, 2012,T.nandanensisLan, Yang & Chen, 1995,T.nasobarbatulaWang & Li, 2001,T.sanduensisChen & Peng,2019,T.tianxingensisYang, Li & Chen, 2016,T.wulongensisChen, Sheraliev, Shu & Peng, 2021,T.xiangshuingensisLi,2004,T.yunnanensisYang, 1990, andT.zhenfengensisWang & Li, 2001.However, the new species can be assigned to the stygobite/typical type based on a series of troglomorphic characteristics, such as loss of eyes, pigmentation, and scales.
There are 16 stygobite species ofTriplophysa(Supplementary Table S4):Triplophysa xuanweiensissp.nov.,T.aluensisLi & Zhu, 2000,T.anshuiensis,T.erythraea,T.fengshanensis,T.gejiuensis,T.langpingensis,T.luochengensisLi, Lan Chen & Du, 2017,T.macrocephalaYang, Wu & Yang, 2012,T.qiubeiensis,T.rosa,T.shilinensis,T.tianeensisLi, Li, Lan & Du, 2004,T.tianlinensisLi, Li, Lan & Du, 2017,T.xiangxiensis, andT.xichouensisLiu,Pan, Yang & Chen, 2017.Among them,T.aluensis,T.luochengensis,T.macrocephala,T.tianeensis,T.tianlinensis,andT.xichouensishave small eyes or eye-dots.Therefore,Triplophysaxuanweiensissp.nov.can be easily distinguished from the above species by its lack of eyes.
All remaining eyeless loaches, including the new species,share the following morphological characters: lateral line complete and body scaleless and colorless.However,Triplophysa xuanweiensissp.nov.differs fromT.erythraeaandT.fengshanensisby dorsal-fin origin anterior to pelvic-fin origin (vs.dorsal-fin origin opposite to pelvic-fin origin), fromT.erythraeaby anal-fin origin separated from anus (vs.anal-fin origin close to anus), and fromT.fengshanensisby smooth lips (vs.lips with shallow furrows).Triplophysa xuanweiensissp.nov.can be distinguished fromT.rosaandT.xiangxiensisby shorter pectoral fin (10.8%–21.7% of SL, not reaching pelvic-fin origin vs.24.7%–31.1% of SL, reaching pelvic-fin origin, and 23.1%–35.5% of SL, extending beyond pelvic fin origin, respectively).The new species can be distinguished fromT.anshuiensis,T.gejiuensis,T.langpingensis, andT.shilinensisby anterior nostril not forming barbel-like tube (vs.anterior nostril prolonged as barbel-like tube).The new species can be further distinguished fromT.anshuiensis by 16–18 branched caudal-fin rays (vs.14), fromT.gejiuensisby compressed pelvic-fin tip reaching anus (vs.tip of compressed pelvic fin not reaching anus), fromT.langpingensisby adipose crest absent (vs.adipose crests well developed on caudal peduncle), and fromT.shilinensisby developed posterior airbladder chamber (vs.posterior chamber degenerated).
Triplophysa qiubeiensisis the most similar species toTriplophysa xuanweiensissp.nov., and shares the following characteristics: body elongated, scaleless and colorless, eye absent, dorsal-fin origin anterior to pelvic-fin origin, tip of pelvic fin reaching anus, and anus separated from anal-fin origin by short distance.However, the new species differs fromT.qiubeiensisby having smooth lips (vs.lips with mastoids),posterior chamber of air bladder well developed (vs.degenerated), 10–12 branched pectoral-fin rays (vs.8–9), 6–8 branched pelvic-fin rays (vs.5), and 16–18 branched caudalfin rays (vs.15).
NOMENCLATURAL ACTS REGISTRATION
The electronic version of this article in portable document format will represent a published work according to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN),and hence the new names contained in the electronic version are effectively published under that Code from the electronic edition alone (see Articles 8.5–8.6 of the Code).This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN.The ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated information can be viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix http://zoobank.org/.Publication LSID:
urn: lsid: zoobank.org: pub: 1C73EFC4-1820-4294-A2EC-1DF5B4F99178
TriplophysaxuanweiensisLSID:
urn: lsid: zoobank.org: act: BFC02521-FF34-4871-BC56-FE26C74A01FB
SCIENTIFIC FIELD SURVEY PERMISSION INFORMATION
All field collections followed the Implementation Rules of Fisheries Law of the People’s Republic of China.All activities followed the Laboratory Animal Guidelines for the Ethical Review of Animal welfare (GB/T 35 892–2018).
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Supplementary data to this article can be found online.
COMPETING INTERESTS
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS
Y.H.Z.and W.N.M.designed the study.Z.M.L., W.N.M.,W.J.L., G.H., and T.K.X.contributed to fieldwork and collected data.X.J.L.and J.Q.H.performed data analyses.X.G.L.,Z.M.L., and Y.H.Z.wrote the manuscript with input from F.Q.Q., P.Y., and S.G.Y.Y.H.Z.revised the manuscript.All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Zong-Min Lu1,2,#, Xue-Jian Li1,3,#, Wen-Jian Lü4,#,Jin-Qing Huang5, Tian-Ke Xu4, Gang Huang2,Fen-Qiong Qian4, Peng Yang2, Shu-Guo Chen2,Wei-Ning Mao2,*, Ya-Hui Zhao1,*1Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution,Institute of Zoology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing100101,China
2Qujing Aquaculture Station,Qujing,Yunnan655099,China
3Shanghai Universities Key Laboratory of Marine Animal Taxonomy and Evolution,Shanghai Ocean University,Shanghai201306,China
4Xuanwei Fisheries Management Station,Xuanwei,Yunnan655499,China
5School of Basic Medical Sciences,Guilin Medical University,Guilin,Guangxi541001,China
#Authors contributed equally to this work
*Corresponding authors, E-mail:zhaoyh@ioz.ac.cn;105586938@qq.com