• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Spatial distribution of aloricate ciliates in the stratified water of the Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas in the Southern Ocean

    2022-02-07 07:05:44LIJingyuanLIHaiboWANGChaofengZHANGWuchangXIAOTian
    Advances in Polar Science 2022年4期

    LI Jingyuan, LI Haibo, WANG Chaofeng, ZHANG Wuchang& XIAO Tian

    Spatial distribution of aloricate ciliates in the stratified water of the Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas in the Southern Ocean

    LI Jingyuan1,2,3,4, LI Haibo1,2,3*, WANG Chaofeng1,2,3, ZHANG Wuchang1,2,3*& XIAO Tian1,2,3

    1CAS Key Laboratory of Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China;2Laboratory for Marine Ecology and Environmental Science, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266237, China;3Center for Ocean Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China;4University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

    Aloricate ciliates are the main component of microzooplankton. They play important roles in the circulation of materials and flow of energy in marine pelagic ecosystems. To determine the distribution pattern and structure of the aloricate ciliate community in vertically stratified waters of the Southern Ocean, we collected data on aloricate ciliates in the Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas during the 36th Chinese National Antarctic Research Expedition. The ranges of aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass were 5–3097 ind·L?1and 0.01–11.40 μg C·L?1, respectively. Vertically, the average abundance of aloricate ciliates decreased from the surface to 200 m, while biomass was highest in the 50-m layer. The importance of aloricate ciliates <20 μm increased along the depth gradient. Their contribution to total abundance increased from 13.04% in the surface layer to 73.71% in the 200-m layer. This is the first study to explore the distribution characteristics of the aloricate ciliate community in a stratified water column of the Southern Ocean. Our results will be helpful for understanding the variation in the pelagic community in waters of the Southern Ocean with intensified stratification.

    aloricate ciliates, spatial distribution, community structure, stratification, Southern Ocean

    1 Introduction

    Planktonic ciliates, which have a size range of 10–200 μm, are ubiquitous in all kinds of marine environments (Li et al., 2016, 2020, 2022; Yang et al., 2016; Monti-Birkenmeier et al., 2017; Liang et al., 2018). They are composed of aloricate ciliates and tintinnids, belonging to the subclasses Oligotrichia and Choreotrichia, respectively. Aloricate ciliates, the major component of planktonic ciliates, usually dominate the planktonic ciliate community and microzooplankton community in coastal waters (Zhang et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2016; Martínez-López et al., 2019), open seas (Gómez, 2007), and the polar regions (Ichinomiya et al., 2007; Garzio and Steinberg, 2013; Monti-Birkenmeier et al., 2017; Liang et al., 2018; Li et al., 2022). Aloricate ciliates are grazers of picoplankton and nanoplankton (Bernard and Rassoulzadegan, 1993) and prey of mesozooplankton (Stoecker and Capuzzo, 1990). Thus, aloricate ciliates are an important linkage between the microbial food web and the traditional food chain, and they play a crucial role in the functioning of marine ecosystems (Stoecker et al., 2017).

    Water-column stratification can result in distinct vertical, physical, and chemical properties and create distinct habitats for aloricate ciliates in the marine system (Basu and Mackey, 2018; Loick-Wilde et al., 2019; Romano et al., 2021). Compared with larger and more motile zooplankton, aloricate ciliates have a short life cycle and respond rapidly to environmental changes (Yang et al., 2021). Therefore, aloricate ciliates can form a stable community and quickly adapt to the surrounding seawaters in a stable marine environment, even if the stability only lasts for a short time (Sun et al., 2022).

    The upper water column of the Southern Ocean exhibits clear seasonal variation. During spring and summer time, surface water temperature increases, and the melting of sea ice induces water-column stratification (Rozema et al., 2017; Garcia et al., 2020). Global warming affects the polar regions more than other regions on the earth and causes the intense stratification of the Southern Ocean (Sarmiento et al., 2004). The intense stratification will influence the vertical distribution of the plankton community.

    The Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas are located in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean (East Antarctica). In austral summer, the upper water column of this region is well stratified (Li et al., 2022). Many studies have reported on planktonic ciliates in different environments of the Southern Ocean (Liang et al., 2018; Li et al., 2022). Li et al. (2022) reported on variations in the planktonic ciliate community in different water masses in the Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas. However, the spatial distribution, especially the vertical variation of the aloricate ciliate community in the stratified Southern Ocean, has never been reported before. In this study, we investigated the aloricate ciliate community at depths of 0 m to 200 m in the Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas. Our aims were to: (1) determine the vertical variation of aloricate ciliate community in different sampling layers, and (2) describe the abundance and biomass variations of aloricate ciliates in different size classes.

    2 Material and methods

    Cruise sampling in the Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas was conducted at 59 stations in 9 transects (Figure 1) onboard the icebreaker R/V, during the 36th Chinese National Antarctic Research Expedition (CHINARE, from November 2019 to January 2020). Water samples were collected using 10-L Niskin bottles on a rosette CTD carousel. One liter of seawater was collected from each sampling point (0, 25, 50, 100, and 200 m at each station). The samples were fixed with Lugol’s solution (1% final concentration) in a plastic bottle and kept in a cool and dark place until the time of analysis. A total of 291 samples were collected. Data on temperature, salinity, and chlorophyll-concentration (Chl) were provided by the National Arctic and Antarctic Data Center (http://www. chinare.org.cn).

    In the laboratory, the supernatant of each water sample was gently siphoned out after being allowed to settle for at least 48 h. This process was repeated until each sample was concentrated to the final volume of 25 mL. Then, concentrated samples were sedimented in Uterm?hl counting chambers for at least 24 h, and aloricate ciliates were subsequently counted using an inverted microscope (Olympus IX 71, 100×, or 400×). If the high abundance of aloricate ciliates were found in the previous count, only a part of microscopy fields were counted, while aloricate ciliates with low abundances were counted completely to guarantee accuracy. The length and width of the aloricate ciliates were measured for at least (if possible) 20 individuals. The biovolume of each taxon was estimated from appropriate geometric shapes (e.g., cone, ball, and cylinder). The conversion factor of carbon biomass for aloricate ciliates used in this study was 0.19 pg C·μm?3(Putt and Stoecker, 1989). Aloricate ciliates were not classified into taxa, but into different size classes based on the equivalent spherical diameters. Aloricate ciliates were categorized into 10 size classes, with intervals of 10 μm (i.e., <20 μm, 20–30 μm, 30–40 μm, …, >100 μm). Univariate Spearman correlation analyses were carried out using the statistical program SPSS v16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

    Figure 1 Locations of sampling stations in the Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas.

    3 Results

    3.1 Hydrography

    Temperature and salinity were in the ranges of ?1.84–1.91°C and 33.27–34.69, respectively. Horizontally, the temperature decreased southward at each transect in each depth except for the 50-m depth, where the temperature was extremely low and relatively homogeneous. The temperature was lower in the middle region than in the eastern and western regions in the surface and 25-m layers, but higher in the 50-m, 100-m, and 200-m layers. The temperature was relatively low from 0 m to 200 m at several of the southeasternmost stations (Figure 2). The distribution pattern of salinity was opposite to that of temperature in the upper 50 m, but similar to the temperature distribution pattern at 100 m and 200 m (Figure 2). Chlwas in the range of 0–2.4 μg·L?1. In the upper 50 m, Chlwas high in the middle and northern stations of each transect. High values of Chlappeared in the offshore regions of Transects C4 and C9.

    Vertically, stratification in the water column was strong in the research area. Temperature and salinity exhibited obvious vertical gradients. Water temperature was lowest in the 50-m layer and increased both upward and downward. Meanwhile, salinity increased from the surface to 200 m at all stations. Chlwas high in the upper 50 m and decreased sharply from 50 m to 200 m (Figure 2).

    3.2 Aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass

    The ranges of aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass were 5–3097 ind·L?1and 0.01–11.40 μg C·L?1, respectively (Table 1). The highest abundance and biomass occurred in the 25-m depth of Station P1-07 and at 0 m of Station C9-01, respectively. Meanwhile, the lowest values of abundance and biomass occurred in 200 m of Station C9-10 and 0 m of Station C9-10, respectively (Figure 3, Table 1).

    Figure 2 Spatial distribution of temperature (a), salinity (b), and chlorophyll-concentration (Chl) (c) at each sampling layer.

    Figure 3 Spatial distribution of aloricate ciliate abundance (a) and biomass (b) at each sampling layer.

    Aloricate ciliates measuring 20–30 μm were the first contributor to total abundance, comprising 38.45% of the total abundance, followed by those measuring <20 μm (28.99%), 30–40 μm (16.78%), and 40–50 μm (8.35%). Aloricate ciliates in the 50–60-μm range only occupied 5.29% of total abundance. However, the biomass structure was clearly different from that of abundance: 50–60-μm aloricate ciliates were the main contributor (21.85%) to total biomass, followed by those measuring 40–50 μm (18.97%), 30–40 μm (17.98%), and 20–30 μm (16.27%). Aloricate ciliates measuring <20 μm had a high abundance proportion, but extremely low biomass proportion (2.47%) (Table 2).

    Table 2 Abundance proportion and biomass proportion of different size-class aloricate ciliates at each depth

    Notes: AP=abundance proportion; BP=biomass proportion

    Horizontally, the distribution of aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass exhibited different patterns in different layers. In the surface and 25-m layers, aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass were higher at the low-temperature and salinity regions. In the 50-m layer, both abundance and biomass were high in low-temperature regions. In the 100-m and 200-m layers, aloricate ciliate distribution was homogeneous in most regions of the research area (Figure 3).

    Vertically, the abundance and biomass distributions of aloricate ciliates were clearly different in different regions of the research area. In Transects C2 and C3, aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass increased from the surface to the 50-m layer, then decreased with depth. In other transects, the highest values of abundance and biomass mainly appeared in 0 m and 25 m, except for the two northernmost stations in Transect C9 (Figure 3). The average abundance of aloricate ciliates was highest in the surface layer. It decreased from the surface to 200 m. However, the average biomass of aloricate ciliates increased from the surface to the 50-m layer, then decreased sharply at 200 m (Figure 4).

    Figure 4 Vertical variation of aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass. The blue dots indicate the average values of each sampling layer, and the blue lines indicate the variation trends of those average values.

    Both the abundance and biomass of aloricate ciliates decreased with increasing temperature. The same variation trends were found along the salinity gradient. Aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass increased with the increase in Chland reached a plateau when Chlwas higher than 0.75 μg·L?1(Figure 5).

    Correlation analysis showed that aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass exhibited significantly negative correlations with temperature, salinity, and depth, but a significantly positive correlation with Chl(Table 3).

    3.3 Vertical variation of aloricate ciliates in different size classes

    Aloricate ciliates measuring 20–30 μm were the most common size class. They appeared at all the sampling points, followed by aloricate ciliates measuring <20 μm and 30–40 μm and appeared at 288 and 283 sampling points, respectively. The occurrence frequency of aloricate ciliates larger than 30 μm decreased with the increase in ciliate size (Table 1).

    The variation trends of different size class aloricate ciliates along the depth gradient were diverse, but the same vertical trend was seen in the abundance and biomass of aloricate ciliates of the same size class (Figures 5, 6 and 7). The average abundance and biomass of aloricate ciliates measuring <20 μm increased from the surface to the 100-m layer with a very slight fluctuation at 50 m and then decreased until 200 m. Those of the 20–30-μm aloricate ciliates were the highest at the surface and decreased with depth. The vertical variation trend of aloricate ciliates measuring 30–40 μm was similar to those measuring 20–30 μm, but increased slightly at 50 m. Aloricate ciliates ranging from 40 μm to 70 μm had similar vertical distribution patterns. The highest values of aloricate ciliates sized 40–50 μm appeared in 25 m, while those of aloricate ciliates sized 50–60 μm and 60–70 μm appeared in 50 m (Figures 5, 6 and 7). The average abundance and biomass of <20-μm aloricate ciliates in 200 m were similar with those at the surface, while the values of other size classes of aloricate ciliates in 200 m were far less than those in the surface (Figures 5, 6, and 7). Aloricate ciliates in the 70–80-, 80–90-, and 90–100-μm size classes were restricted in the upper 50 m and disappeared in layers deeper than 50 m. Aloricate ciliates in the >100-μm size class occasionally appeared at 0, 25, 50, and 100 m and disappeared at 200 m (Figures 5, 6 and 7; Table 1).

    Correlation analysis revealed that the abundance and biomass of aloricate ciliates in most size classes had significantly negative correlations with temperature, salinity, and depth, and a significantly positive correlation with Chl. Aloricate ciliates in the <20-μm size class exhibited unique relationships with environmental factors. Their abundance and biomass were negatively correlated with temperature and significantly positively correlated with salinity and depth, but there was no significant correlation with Chl(Table 3).

    Figure 5 Variation of aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass along the temperature, salinity, and chlorophyll-concentration (Chl) gradient.

    Table 3 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient between environmental factors and aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass

    Notes:=temperature;=salinity; Chl=chlorophyll-concentration;=depth;*= Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2–tailed);**= Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2–tailed)

    Figure 6 Vertical variation of different size-class aloricate ciliate abundance. The blue dots indicate the average values of each sampling layer, and the lines indicate the variation trends of those average values.

    Figure 7 Vertical variation of different size-class aloricate ciliate biomass. The blue dots indicate the average values of each sampling layer, and the lines indicate the variation trends of those average values.

    3.4 Structure variation of aloricate ciliate community in different layers

    The abundance proportion of aloricate ciliates measuring <20 μm increased from the surface to 200 m. This was the most dominant size class at 100 m (49.28%) and 200 m (73.71%). Aloricate ciliates measuring 20–30 μm were dominant at the surface and in the 25-m layer, and their abundance proportion decreased from 54.34% at 0 m to 16.58% at 200 m. The abundance proportion of 30–40-μm aloricate ciliates was highest at 50 m (19.62%), followed by 0 m (17.87%), and the lowest value appeared at 200 m (5.74%). The variations in the vertical abundance proportions of aloricate ciliates measuring 40–70 μm were the same, increasing at first, then decreasing down to 200 m. However, the highest abundance proportion of aloricate ciliates sized 40–50 μm appeared at 25 m, while those of the other size class appeared at 50 m. The abundance proportion of aloricate ciliates measuring >70 μm were lower than 0.56% in all layers (Figure 8, Table 2).

    Figure 8 Average abundance (a), biomass (b), and proportion (c, d) of each size class of aloricate ciliates at each sampling layer.

    Although aloricate ciliates <20 μm had relatively higher abundance proportions in each layer, their biomass proportions were lower than 2.08% from the surface to 50 m and increased to 6.69% at 100 m and to 20.99% at 200 m. The biomass proportion of aloricate ciliates sized 20–30 μm decreased from the surface to 50 m and then increased down to 200 m. The biomass proportion of 30–40-μm aloricate ciliates was the lowest at 25 m (15.94%) and highest at 100 m (23.00%). The biomass proportions of aloricate ciliates measuring 40–50 μm were higher at 100 m and 200 m. With increased depth, the biomass proportions of aloricate ciliates measuring 50–60 μm and 60–70 μm increased at first and then decreased, with the highest values at 25 m and 50 m, respectively (Figure 8).

    4 Discussion

    4.1 Aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass

    Many studies have reported large ranges of aloricate ciliate abundance in the Southern Ocean. Aloricate ciliate abundance was in the range of 387–695 ind·L?1in the Atlantic sector (south of 60°S) of the Southern Ocean (Froneman and Perissinotto, 1996), 80–39969 ind·L?1in the Western Antarctic Peninsula (Garzio and Steinberg, 2013), 10–1900 ind·L?1in the Scotia Sea (Sushin et al., 1986; Garrison et al., 1993), 0–9000 ind·L?1in the Weddell Sea (Buck and Garrison, 1983; Garrison and Buck, 1989; Monti-Birkenmeier et al., 2017), 1262–2330 ind·L?1in the Ross Sea (Safi et al., 2012), and 1–2770 ind·L?1in the Prydz Bay (Liang et al., 2018). In our study, aloricate ciliate abundance (5–3097 ind·L?1) was in the lower end of previous data.

    Aloricate ciliates measuring <20 μm were the main contributor to total abundance in neritic waters (Lynn et al., 1991), the equatorial Pacific Ocean (Yang et al., 2004), and the Southern Ocean (Liang et al., 2018). Yang et al. (2004) found that the abundance of <20-μm aloricate ciliates accounted for 49.9% of the total abundance in the northeast equatorial Pacific Ocean. Liang et al. (2018) reported that <20-μm aloricate ciliates represented approximately 40% of total abundance in the Prydz Bay. In our study, <20-μm aloricate ciliates only contributed 28.99% to the total abundance, and this value was less than those in previous studies. Although <20-μm aloricate ciliates contributed a large part to total abundance, it only accounted for a small portion of aloricate ciliates biomass (Yang et al., 2004; Christaki et al., 2008). Our results were consistent with the following: the <20-μm aloricate ciliate biomass proportion was <10% from the surface to 100 m and approximately 20% at 200 m.

    Aloricate ciliates <30 μm contributed to 75.5%, 54.6%, and 56.7% of aloricate ciliate abundance in the tropical West Pacific, the Bering Sea, and the Arctic Ocean, respectively (Wang et al., 2020). Our results indicate that <20-μm and 20–30-μm aloricate ciliates made up 67.44% of the total abundance; this value was lower than that of the tropical West Pacific but higher than those of the Bering Sea and the Arctic Ocean.

    In stratified Arctic and sub-Arctic waters, mixotrophic ciliates usually dominate the ciliate community (Putt, 1990; Suzuki and Taniguchi, 1998; Levinsen et al., 2000). Meanwhile, <30-μm mixotrophic ciliates were the main contributor to total ciliate abundance (Romano et al., 2021). In the present study, the water column was well stratified, which was beneficial to the development of small mixotrophic ciliates (Romano et al., 2021). Therefore, we speculate that the <20-μm and 20–30-μm aloricate ciliates in our study are mainly composed of mixotrophic ciliates.

    4.2 Vertical variation of aloricate ciliate community structure

    Several studies have reported on the vertical distribution of the aloricate ciliate community structure in different marine environments (Wang et al., 2020, 2021, 2022). The abundance variation trends differ extremely between those in our study and those in tropical waters. In our study, aloricate ciliate abundance decreased from the surface to the 200-m layer, while the abundance showed bimodal patterns (i.e., the peaks occurred in the surface and the deep chlorophyll maximum (DCM) layers) along the vertical profiles in the tropical seamount regions (Wang et al., 2021). In the open tropical Pacific Ocean, the abundance of aloricate ciliates was relatively homogeneous in the upper 100-m depth, with a higher abundance near the surface (Gómez, 2007).

    The abundance proportion of <20-μm aloricate ciliates increased from the surface to 200 m in tropical seamount regions (Wang et al., 2021). It first decreased, then increased to the 200-m layer, before reaching the lowest values in the 75-m layer in the tropical Pacific and the Bering Sea and the 50-m layer in the Arctic Ocean (Wang et al., 2020).The vertical variation of the <20-μm aloricate ciliate abundance proportion in our study showed a similar but much sharper trend compared with that in the tropical seamount regions. In the seamount regions, the abundance proportion varied from approximately 40% in the surface water to approximately 55% in the 200-m layer (Wang et al., 2021). In our study, it increased from 12.37% in the surface to 63.25% in the 200-m layer.

    The variation trend in the abundance proportion of 20–30-μm aloricate ciliates along the depth gradient in our study was clearly different from that of previous studies. In this study, it decreased from 47.99% in the surface to 22.91% in the 200-m layer with a slight increase in the 50-m layer. In the tropical Pacific Ocean, tropical seamount regions, the Bering Sea, and the Arctic Ocean, the 20–30-μm size-class contribution rate was relatively constant along the depth gradient (Wang et al., 2020, 2021, 2022).

    Aloricate ciliates measuring <20 μm contributed to more than 40% of aloricate ciliate abundance and were the most abundant group from the surface to the 200-m depth in the tropical Pacific. However, in the Bering Sea and the Arctic Ocean, aloricate ciliates >30 μm were the dominant component in most layers except for the 200-m layer, where the aloricate ciliates <20 μm contributed to more than 40% aloricate ciliate abundance (Wang et al., 2020). In the tropical seamounts of Yap, Mariana, and Caroline, aloricate ciliates measuring <20 μm comprised more than 30% of aloricate ciliate abundance at each depth (Wang et al., 2021). In the present study, 20–30-μm aloricate ciliates were the most dominant group and <20-μm aloricate ciliates contributed to <30% of the total abundance from the surface to the 50-m layer.

    The abundance proportion of aloricate ciliates >30 μm in this study showed similar variation trends along the vertical profiles in the tropical West Pacific, the Bering Sea, and the Arctic Ocean (Wang et al., 2020). In both our study and Wang et al. (2020), the abundance proportion of aloricate ciliates >30 μm increased from the surface to the layers between 30–75 m, and then decreased to the 200-m layer.

    Aloricate ciliates measuring >50 μm were more abundant in the upper 85 m than below in the ice-edge zone of the Weddell and Scotia Seas during the austral winter, and they were not found in samples from 190 m and 200 m (Gowing and Garrison et al., 1992). In our study, aloricate ciliates measuring >50 μm were more abundant in the upper 50 m, accounting for more than 10% of total abundance, and only accounting for <5% and about 1% at 100 m and 200 m, respectively.

    4.3 Impact of water-column stratification on the distribution of aloricate ciliates

    In this study, the water column was well stratified. Water-column stratification is essential for phytoplankton development and governs phytoplankton succession (Rozema et al., 2017; Garcia et al., 2019). The stratification of the water column favors the development of small eukaryotic algae and thus affects the ciliate community (Garcia et al., 2019; Romano et al., 2021). In the Red Sea, the ciliate community was clearly affected by water-column stratification, as both abundance and biomass declined strongly along the vertical profile during summer stratification, with the highest average values in the surface layer (Claessens et al., 2008). The average abundance decreased along the depth gradient in this study, which was consistent with the results of Claessens et al. (2008). But the highest value of average biomass appeared in the 50-m layer in our study.

    During the stratification period in the oligotrophic Eastern Mediterranean, very small (<18 μm) and small (18–30 μm) ciliates were distributed throughout the water column, whereas the species measuring >50 μm were found only above the 50-m layer (Romano et al., 2021). In the seamount regions of the tropical Pacific Ocean, aloricate ciliates measuring >50 μm contributed less than 10% to the total abundance in the 200-m layer (Wang et al., 2020). In the present study, the abundance proportion of aloricate ciliates measuring >50 μm decreased sharply in the 100-m and 200-m layers, which is consistent with the results of Romano et al. (2021) and Wang et al. (2020).

    The stratification will hinder the exchange of nutrients between the upper and lower waters (Cerme?o et al., 2008), causing oligotrophic conditions in the deep waters of the euphotic layer. The oligotrophic conditions favor the small ciliates that feed on pico-bacterioplankton (Romano et al., 2021). Thus, the importance of small ciliates increases with the depth gradient in the euphotic layer. The aloricate ciliate community structure in our study is a universal phenomenon in the Antarctic and perhaps other stratified waters around the world. In the Southern Ocean, water-column stratification becomes more obvious with increased global warming. The input of fresh and iron-rich melting ice water will enhance vertical stratification (Sarmiento et al., 2004; Kim and Kim, 2021). Thus, we predict that the importance of small aloricate ciliates will increase with ongoing global warming.

    5 Conclusion

    The aloricate ciliate distribution and community structure were studied in the Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas of the Southern Ocean. In a well-stratified water column, the aloricate ciliate community structure changed dramatically along the depth gradient, and the smaller aloricate ciliates became more important from the surface to the 200-m layer. We clarified the distribution pattern of the aloricate ciliate community in a well-stratified water column of the Southern Ocean. Our results are important for predicting trends in microzooplankton community variation, along with the intensified stratification of the Southern Ocean.

    Acknowledgements This work was supported by the National Polar Special Program “Impact and Response of Antarctic Seas to Climate Change” (Grant no. IRASCC 01-02-01D) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 41706192, 41806178). We are thankful to the 36th CHINARE for providing logistical support and environmental data. We thank the crew on the R/Vfor their support and assistance during sampling.We are deeply grateful to the Associate Editor and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions, which substantially improved the manuscript.

    Basu S, Mackey K. 2018. Phytoplankton as key mediators of the biological carbon pump: their responses to a changing climate. Sustainability, 10(3): 869, doi:10.3390/su10030869.

    Bernard C, Rassoulzadegan F. 1993. The role of picoplankton (cyanobacteria and plastidic picoflagellates) in the diet of tintinnids. J Plankton Res, 15(4): 361-373, doi:10.1093/plankt/15.4.361.

    Buck K R, Garrison D L. 1983. Protists from the ice-edge region of the Weddell Sea. Deep Sea Res A Oceanogr Res Pap, 30(12): 1261-1277, doi:10.1016/0198-0149(83)90084-5.

    Cerme?o P, Dutkiewicz S, Harris R P, et al. 2008. The role of nutricline depth in regulating the ocean carbon cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 105(51): 20344-20349, doi:10.1073/pnas.0811302106.

    Christaki U, Obernosterer I, Van Wambeke F, et al. 2008. Microbial food web structure in a naturally iron-fertilized area in the Southern Ocean (Kerguelen Plateau). Deep Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr, 55(5-7): 706-719, doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.12.009.

    Claessens M, Wickham S A, Post A F, et al. 2008. Ciliate community in the oligotrophic Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea. Aquat Microb Ecol, 53: 181-190, doi:10.3354/ame01243.

    Froneman P, Perissinotto R. 1996. Microzooplankton grazing in the Southern Ocean: implications for the carbon cycle. Mar Ecol, 17(1/3): 99-115, doi:10.1111/j.1439-0485.1996.tb00493.x.

    Garcia M D, Dutto M S, Chazarreta C J, et al. 2020. Micro- and mesozooplankton successions in an Antarctic coastal environment during a warm year. PLoS One, 15(5): e0232614, doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0232614.

    Garcia M D, Severini M D, Spetter C, et al. 2019. Effects of glacier melting on the planktonic communities of two Antarctic coastal areas (Potter Cove and Hope Bay) in summer. Reg Stud Mar Sci, 30: 100731, doi:10.1016/j.rsma.2019.100731.

    Garrison D L, Buck K R, Gowing M M. 1993. Winter plankton assemblage in the ice edge zone of the Weddell and Scotia Seas: composition, biomass and spatial distributions. Deep Sea Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap, 40(2): 311-338, doi:10.1016/0967-0637(93) 90006-O.

    Garrison D L, Buck K R. 1989. Protozooplankton in the Weddell Sea, Antarctica: abundance and distribution in the ice-edge zone. Polar Biol, 9(6): 341-351, doi:10.1007/BF00442524.

    Garzio L M, Steinberg D K. 2013. Microzooplankton community composition along the Western Antarctic Peninsula. Deep Sea Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap, 77: 36-49, doi:10.1016/j.dsr.2013.03.001.

    Gómez F. 2007. Trends on the distribution of ciliates in the open Pacific Ocean. Acta Oecologica, 32(2): 188-202, doi:10.1016/j.actao.2007.04. 002.

    Gowing M M, Garrison D L. 1992. Abundance and feeding ecology of larger protozooplankton in the ice edge zone of the Weddell and Scotia Seas during the austral winter. Deep Sea Res A Oceanogr Res Pap, 39(5): 893-919, doi:10.1016/0198-0149(92)90128-G.

    Ichinomiya M, Honda M, Shimoda H, et al. 2007. Structure of the summer under fast ice microbial community near Syowa Station, eastern Antarctica. Polar Biol, 30(10): 1285-1293, doi:10.1007/s00300-007- 0289-8.

    Kim S U, Kim K Y. 2021. Impact of climate change on the primary production and related biogeochemical cycles in the coastal and sea ice zone of the Southern Ocean. Sci Total Environ, 751: 141678, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141678.

    Levinsen H, Turner J T, Nielsen T G, et al. 2000. On the trophic coupling between protists and copepods in Arctic marine ecosystems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 204: 65-77, doi:10.3354/meps204065.

    Li H B, Chen X, Denis M, et al. 2020. Seasonal and spatial variation of pelagic microbial food web structure in a semi-enclosed temperate bay. Front Mar Sci, 7: 589566, doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.589566.

    Li H B, Xu Z Q, Mou W X, et al. 2022. Planktonic ciliates in different water masses of Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas (Indian sector of the Southern Ocean) during austral summer. Polar Biol, 45(6): 1059-1076, doi:10.1007/s00300-022-03057-w.

    Li H B, Xu Z Q, Zhang W C, et al. 2016. Boreal tintinnid assemblage in the Northwest Pacific and its connection with the Japan Sea in summer 2014. PLoS One, 11(4): e0153379, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153379.

    Liang C, Li H B, Dong Y, et al. 2018. Planktonic ciliates in different water masses in open waters near Prydz Bay (East Antarctica) during austral summer, with an emphasis on tintinnid assemblages. Polar Biol, 41(11): 2355-2371, doi:10.1007/s00300-018-2375-5.

    Loick-Wilde N, Fernández-Urruzola I, Eglite E, et al. 2019. Stratification, nitrogen fixation, and cyanobacterial bloom stage regulate the planktonic food web structure. Glob Chang Biol, 25(3): 794-810, doi:10.1111/gcb.14546.

    Lynn D H, Roff J C, Hopcroft R R. 1991. Annual abundance and biomass of aloricate ciliates in tropical neritic waters off Kingston, Jamaica. Mar Biol, 110(3): 437-448, doi:10.1007/BF01344362.

    Martínez-López A, Pérez-Morales A, Ayala-Rodríguez G A, et al. 2019. Abundance and seasonal variability of aloricate ciliates and tintinnids in a eutrophic coastal lagoon system of the Gulf of California, Mexico. Reg Stud Mar Sci, 32: 100814, doi:10.1016/j.rsma.2019.100814.

    Monti-Birkenmeier M, Diociaiuti T, Umani S F, et al. 2017. Microzooplankton composition in the winter sea ice of the Weddell Sea. Antarct Sci, 29(4): 299-310, doi:10.1017/s0954102016000717.

    Putt M. 1990. Abundance, chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rates of ciliates in the Nordic Seas during summer. Deep Sea Res A Oceanogr Res Pap, 37(11): 1713-1731, doi:10.1016/0198-0149(90)90073-5.

    Putt M, Stoecker D K. 1989. An experimentally determined carbon: volume ratio for marine “oligotrichous” ciliates from estuarine and coastal waters. Limnol Oceanogr, 34(6): 1097-1103, doi:10.4319/lo. 1989.34.6.1097.

    Romano F, Symiakaki K, Pitta P. 2021. Temporal variability of planktonic ciliates in a coastal oligotrophic environment: mixotrophy, size classes and vertical distribution. Front Mar Sci, 8: 641589, doi:10.3389/fmars. 2021.641589.

    Rozema P D, Biggs T, Sprong P A A, et al. 2017. Summer microbial community composition governed by upper-ocean stratification and nutrient availability in northern Marguerite Bay, Antarctica. Deep Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr, 139: 151-166, doi:10.1016/j.dsr2. 2016.11.016.

    Safi K A, Robinson K V, Hall J A, et al. 2012. Ross Sea deep-ocean and epipelagic microzooplankton during the summer-autumn transition period. Aquat Microb Ecol, 67(2): 123-137, doi:10.3354/ame01588.

    Sarmiento J L, Gruber N, Brzezinski M A, et al. 2004. High-latitude controls of thermocline nutrients and low latitude biological productivity. Nature, 427(6969): 56-60, doi:10.1038/nature02127.

    Stoecker D K, Capuzzo J M. 1990. Predation on protozoa: its importance to zooplankton. J Plankton Res, 12(5): 891-908, doi:10.1093/plankt/ 12.5.891.

    Stoecker D K, Hansen P J, Caron D A, et al. 2017. Mixotrophy in the marine plankton. Ann Rev Mar Sci, 9: 311-335, doi:10.1146/annurev- marine-010816-060617.

    Sun P, Liao Y Y, Wang Y, et al. 2022. Contrasting community composition and co-occurrence relationships of the active pico-sized haptophytes in the surface and subsurface chlorophyll maximum layers of the Arctic Ocean in summer. Microorganisms, 10(2): 248, doi:10.3390/microorganisms10020248.

    Sushin V A, Samyshev E Z, Gaydamak A I. 1986. The significance of infusoria in Antarctic plankton communities. Oceanology, 26(6): 982-988.

    Suzuki T, Taniguchi A. 1998. Standing crops and vertical distribution of four groups of marine planktonic ciliates in relation to phytoplankton chlorophyll. Mar Biol, 132(3): 375-382, doi:10. 1007/s00227005 0404.

    Wang C F, Li H B, Dong Y, et al. 2021. Planktonic ciliate trait structure variation over Yap, Mariana, and Caroline seamounts in the tropical western Pacific Ocean. J Ocean Limnol, 39(5): 1705-1717, doi:10. 1007/s00343-021-0476-4.

    Wang C F, Li H B, Xu Z Q, et al. 2020. Difference of planktonic ciliate communities of the tropical West Pacific, the Bering Sea and the Arctic Ocean. Acta Oceanol Sin, 39(4): 9-17, doi:10.1007/s13131- 020-1541-0.

    Wang C F, Yang M Y, He Y, et al. 2022. Hydrographic feature variation caused pronounced differences in planktonic ciliate community in the Pacific Arctic region in the summer of 2016 and 2019. Front Microbiol, 13: 881048, doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.881048.

    Yang E J, Choi J K, Hyun J H. 2004. Distribution and structure of heterotrophic protist communities in the northeast equatorial Pacific Ocean. Mar Biol, 146(1): 1-15, doi:10.1007/s00227-004-1412-9.

    Yang E J, Jiang Y, Lee S H. 2016. Microzooplankton herbivory and community structure in the Amundsen Sea, Antarctica. Deep Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr, 123: 58-68, doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2015. 06.001.

    Yang J P, Chen Z J, Chen D X, et al. 2021. Spatial distribution of the microzooplankton communities in the northern South China Sea: insights into their function in microbial food webs. Mar Pollut Bull, 162: 111898, doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111898.

    Yu Y, Zhang W C, Feng M P, et al. 2016. Differences in the vertical distribution and response to freshwater discharge between aloricate ciliates and tintinnids in the East China Sea. J Mar Syst, 154: 103-109, doi:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2015.02.005.

    Zhang C X, Zhang W C, Ni X B, et al. 2015. Influence of different water masses on planktonic ciliate distribution on the East China Sea shelf. J Mar Syst, 141: 98-111, doi:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.09.003.

    : Li J Y, Li H B, Wang C F, et al. Spatial distribution of aloricate ciliates in the stratified water of the Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas in the Southern Ocean. Adv Polar Sci, 2022, 33(4): 313-325,

    10.13679/j.advps.2022.0017

    22 August 2022; accepted 28 December 2022; published online 30 December 2022

    10.13679/j.advps.2022.0017

    December 2022 Vol. 33 No. 4: 313-325

    Corresponding authors, Li Haibo, E-mail: haiboli@qdio.ac.cn; Zhang Wuchang, ORCID: 0000-0001-7534-8368, E-mail: wuchangzhang@qdio.ac.cn

    日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 一进一出抽搐动态| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 欧美zozozo另类| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 舔av片在线| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 高清在线国产一区| 高清在线国产一区| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 91麻豆av在线| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 久99久视频精品免费| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 久久久久九九精品影院| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 老司机福利观看| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 99热精品在线国产| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 久久草成人影院| 欧美3d第一页| 国产日本99.免费观看| 一本久久中文字幕| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 国产成人一区二区在线| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 色吧在线观看| 波多野结衣高清作品| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 成人午夜高清在线视频| videossex国产| 51国产日韩欧美| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 日本一本二区三区精品| av.在线天堂| 香蕉av资源在线| 中国美女看黄片| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 成年版毛片免费区| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 国产成人影院久久av| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品 | 岛国在线免费视频观看| 免费看日本二区| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| avwww免费| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 国产精品,欧美在线| www.www免费av| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 国产精品一及| 简卡轻食公司| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 亚洲最大成人中文| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 极品教师在线视频| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 欧美精品国产亚洲| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 性欧美人与动物交配| 免费看光身美女| 国产不卡一卡二| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区 | 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 欧美+日韩+精品| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| .国产精品久久| 日本三级黄在线观看| 午夜激情欧美在线| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 久久久久久久久久久丰满 | 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 免费看av在线观看网站| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 男人舔奶头视频| 免费高清视频大片| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| a级毛片a级免费在线| 久久久色成人| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| av福利片在线观看| 一区福利在线观看| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 久久精品影院6| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 亚州av有码| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 欧美色视频一区免费| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| av在线老鸭窝| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 性欧美人与动物交配| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 长腿黑丝高跟| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 免费大片18禁| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 在线天堂最新版资源| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 午夜激情欧美在线| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 欧美潮喷喷水| 国产高清激情床上av| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产日本99.免费观看| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 国产精品三级大全| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 简卡轻食公司| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 黄色一级大片看看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 有码 亚洲区| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 亚洲不卡免费看| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 22中文网久久字幕| 丰满的人妻完整版| 我要搜黄色片| 久久人妻av系列| 精品人妻1区二区| 精品久久久久久久末码| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 日日啪夜夜撸| 成人av在线播放网站| 黄色配什么色好看| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 久久精品91蜜桃| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 午夜久久久久精精品| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| eeuss影院久久| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 国产日本99.免费观看| 熟女电影av网| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 色5月婷婷丁香| 日本色播在线视频| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 黄色日韩在线| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 亚洲不卡免费看| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 在线免费观看的www视频| 亚洲四区av| 窝窝影院91人妻| 男人舔奶头视频| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 成人二区视频| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 深夜a级毛片| 69av精品久久久久久| 高清在线国产一区| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 波多野结衣高清作品| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 欧美性感艳星| 看黄色毛片网站| 亚洲av美国av| 极品教师在线视频| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 99久久精品热视频| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 草草在线视频免费看| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产老妇女一区| 99热只有精品国产| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 日本一本二区三区精品| 亚洲av中文av极速乱 | 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| av在线蜜桃| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| av天堂中文字幕网| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| bbb黄色大片| 欧美人与善性xxx| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 日本一本二区三区精品| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 久久午夜福利片| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 欧美性感艳星| 尾随美女入室| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 精品久久久久久久久av| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 久久久精品大字幕| 99热只有精品国产| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 日本与韩国留学比较| bbb黄色大片| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产成人av教育| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 久久香蕉精品热| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 欧美+日韩+精品| 乱人视频在线观看| 色5月婷婷丁香| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 91在线观看av| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 亚洲最大成人中文| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 黄色日韩在线| a在线观看视频网站| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 一本久久中文字幕| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 久久精品91蜜桃| 春色校园在线视频观看| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| .国产精品久久| 日本 欧美在线| 色综合色国产| 日本 欧美在线| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 欧美激情在线99| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 看免费成人av毛片| 嫩草影院入口| 国产老妇女一区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| a在线观看视频网站| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 国产精品久久视频播放| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 欧美色视频一区免费| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 精品久久久久久久末码| 一级黄色大片毛片| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲成人久久性| 国产精品一区www在线观看 | 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 精品一区二区免费观看| 久久久精品大字幕| 久久久久久大精品| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 亚洲最大成人中文| 中国美女看黄片| 一区二区三区激情视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产乱人视频| 色视频www国产| 搡老岳熟女国产| 99热这里只有精品一区| 丰满的人妻完整版| 中文字幕久久专区| 露出奶头的视频| 伦精品一区二区三区| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 欧美区成人在线视频| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 亚洲成人久久性| 热99re8久久精品国产| 午夜影院日韩av| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 精品久久久久久久久av| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 欧美zozozo另类| av福利片在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 日本五十路高清| 如何舔出高潮| 热99在线观看视频| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 露出奶头的视频| 免费看光身美女| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 免费观看在线日韩| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 校园春色视频在线观看| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产黄片美女视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 91精品国产九色| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 热99在线观看视频| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 日本免费a在线| 窝窝影院91人妻| 亚洲av.av天堂| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 很黄的视频免费| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 亚洲四区av| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 黄片wwwwww| 午夜激情欧美在线| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 性色avwww在线观看| 黄色日韩在线| 国产真实乱freesex| netflix在线观看网站| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 亚洲内射少妇av| 特级一级黄色大片| www.www免费av| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 在线免费观看的www视频| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 免费看日本二区| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 欧美三级亚洲精品| xxxwww97欧美| 香蕉av资源在线| 国产在线男女| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 亚洲av一区综合| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 成年版毛片免费区| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 在线国产一区二区在线| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 欧美日韩黄片免| 在现免费观看毛片| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 十八禁网站免费在线| 成人欧美大片| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚州av有码| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 久久久久久久久久成人| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 九九在线视频观看精品| 1024手机看黄色片| 两个人的视频大全免费| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 一级av片app| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 成人三级黄色视频| 久久久久久久久久久丰满 | x7x7x7水蜜桃| 日本色播在线视频| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 国产精品一及| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 69人妻影院| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 免费看a级黄色片| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 91精品国产九色| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 一本一本综合久久| 久久精品人妻少妇| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 久久亚洲真实| 免费观看在线日韩| 三级毛片av免费| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 日本 av在线| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 久久精品影院6| 国产成人一区二区在线| 久久亚洲真实| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 免费看av在线观看网站| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | av视频在线观看入口| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 极品教师在线视频| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 嫩草影视91久久| 如何舔出高潮| 深夜精品福利| 欧美日本视频| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 久久久久九九精品影院| 1000部很黄的大片| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 免费看av在线观看网站| 搡老岳熟女国产| 久久草成人影院| 精品午夜福利在线看| 色综合婷婷激情| 久久午夜福利片| 亚洲av中文av极速乱 | 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 国产亚洲精品av在线|