• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A New Species of Glyphoglossus Günther,1869 (Anura:Microhylidae) from Western Yunnan,China

    2021-12-30 08:24:16DongruZHANGShuoLIULixiaZHANGHongHUIHengXIAOandDingqiRAO
    Asian Herpetological Research 2021年4期

    Dongru ZHANG ,Shuo LIU ,Lixia ZHANG ,Hong HUI ,Heng XIAO and Dingqi RAO*

    1 State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution,Kunming Institute of Zoology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Kunming 650223,Yunan,China

    2 College of Life Sciences,Yunnan University,Kunming 650091,Yunan,China

    3 Kunming Natural History Museum of Zoology,Kunming Institute of Zoology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Kunming 650223,Yunan,China

    4 Department of Ecology,College of Life Sciences,Henan Normal University,Xinxiang 453007,Henan,China

    5 Research Center for ecological management and protection of the Yellow River Basin,Xinxiang 453007,Henan,China

    Abstract A new species of microhylid frog of the genus Glyphoglossus Günther,1869 is described from Huadianba,Cangshan Mountain,Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture,Yunnan Province,China.Glyphoglossus huadianensis,new species,is compared with congeners from China and other parts of Southeast Asia,and was distinguished from the others by the following combination of characters:adult male body size up to 37.8 mm;pupil rounded;supratympanic fold distinct;tympanum concealed;toe tips obtuse;subarticular tubercles prominent and rounded;foot webbing extensive;outer metatarsal tubercle present;dorsum tuberculate,yellowish-brown/earth-yellow;and a pair of conspicuous large round spots in groin.The new species is the tenth species of Glyphoglossus to be described,and the second known from China.

    Keywords Glyphoglossus huadianensis sp.n.,taxonomy,morphology,China

    1.Introduction

    Currently,nine nominal species,which are known from Southeast Asia (Frost,2020),are recognized in the microhylid genus

    Glyphoglossus

    Günther,1869.Only one species is known in China,

    Glyphoglossus yunnanensis

    (Boulenger,1919).Owing to rare collection,little is known for most species except

    Glyphoglossus molossus

    Günther,1869,

    Glyphoglossus guttulatus

    (Blyth,1856) and

    Glyphoglossus yunnanensis

    .The systematics of

    Glyphoglossus

    were once very confusing for above reason,and several junior synonyms are on record:

    Calluella

    Stoliczka 1872,

    Colpoglossus

    Boulenger

    1905,

    Dyscophina

    van Kampen 1905,and

    Calliglutus

    Barbour and Noble 1916 (Frost,2020).The genus

    Glyphoglossus

    was designated to place

    Glyphoglossus molossus

    ,which was originally unassigned to any subfamily of Microhylidae (Frost

    et al

    .,2006),and was subsequently transferred to Microhylinae by Van Bocxlaer

    et al

    .(2006).Matsui

    et al

    .(2011) reported

    Calluella

    Stoliczka,1872,to be paraphyletic with respect to

    Glyphoglossus

    based on mtDNA phylogenetic analysis.Meanwhile,a sister-relationship of

    Glyphoglossus

    with

    Calluella

    was also suggested by Pyron and Wiens (2011).Based on denser samplings of

    Calluella

    ,Das

    et al

    .(2014) confirmed the placement of

    Glyphoglossus

    within

    Calluella

    .According to the law of priority,

    Calluella

    Stoliczka,1872 was recognized as a junior synonym of

    Glyphoglossus

    by Peloso

    et al

    .(2016).Based on extensive sampling and in-depth investigation into the phylogeographic structure of

    G.yunnanensis

    ,Zhang

    et al

    .(2020) discovered there were four main maternal lineages in this nominal species on base of 2154 bp concatenated mitochondrial gene fragments,one of which (lineage LD,Figure 1) occurs in western Yunnan,China and is deeply separated from the remaining lineages with an average divergence of 9.3% (LD/E,9.6%;LD/W,9.1%;and LD/C,9.2%.) (Figure 1).Lineage LD was also shown to be differentiated from other known congeners(Figure 1).Here we further investigate the identity of lineage LD and describe it as a new species.Morphological comparisons demonstrate that the new species is distinctive from

    G.yunnanensis

    and other known congeners and therefore warrants taxonomic recognition.

    2.Materials and Methods

    2.1.Sampling

    Seven specimens were collected in Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture,Yunnan,China (25°52’05’ N,100°01’05’E) in May,2010,and six in Lijiang,Yunnan,China (26°51’18’N,100°13’40’ E) in June,2010.Following Animal Use Protocols approved by the Kunming Institute of Zoology Animal Care and Ethics Committee,specimens were photographed in the field prior to euthanasia,and then fixed in 90% ethanol before being stored in 70% ethanol.A portion of liver or muscle tissues were preserved in 99% ethanol.Sexes of the type specimens were determined through checking vocal sac openings.Specimens and tissue samples were deposited at Kunming Institute of Zoology,Chinese Academy of Sciences(KIZA00252–KIZA00258,KIZ 2014005754,KIZ 2014005781–KIZ 2014005785).

    2.2.Genetic distance

    Pairwise genetic distances (Kimura 2-parameter) among species of

    Glyphoglossus

    were calculated using MEGA 7 (Kumar

    et al

    .,2016) based on a concatenated data of 16S rRNA,CO1,and CYTB of Zhang

    et al

    .(2020).The GenBank accession numbers of specimen used in this study were compiled in Table S1.

    2.3.Morphology

    The morphological measurements were taken to the nearest 0.1 mm with digital calipers.Comparative data on the morphology and taxonomy of

    Glyphoglossus

    were obtained from previous publications:Barbour and Noble (1916),Blyth (1856),Boulenger (1904;1919),Das

    et al

    .(2004),Das

    et al

    .(2014),Fei

    et al

    .(1999),Günther (1869),Inger (1966),Kiew (1984),Liu (1950),Manthey and Grossmann (1997),Parker (1934),and Van Kampen (1905).Morphylogical terminology followed Das

    et al.

    (2004) and Das

    et al

    .(2014).Abbreviations used for measurements (in mm)and meristic characters are as follows:Snout-vent length (SVL,from tip of snout to vent);tibia length (TBL,distance between surface of knee and surface of heel,with both tibia and tarsus flexed);head length (HL,distance from tip of snout to angle of jaws);head width (HW,measured at angle of jaws);head depth(HD,greatest transverse depth of head,taken posterior of the orbital region);eye diameter (ED,horizontal diameter of the eyes);interorbital distance (IO,least distance between upper eyelids);internarial distance (IN,distance between nostrils);eye to snout distance (E-S,distance between anterior-most point of eyes and tip of snout);eye to nostril distance (E-N,distance between anterior-most point of eyes and nostrils);eye to tympanum distance (E-T,distance between posterior-most point of eye and anterior edge of tympanum);axilla to groin distance (A-G,distance between posterior edge of forelimb at its insertion to body to anterior edge of hindlimb at its insertion to body);body width (BW,greatest width of body);tympanum diameter (TD,vertical and horizontal);width of upper eyelid(UE,greatest width of upper eyelid).Webbing formula notation follows Savage and Heyer (1967) as modified by Myers and Duellman (1982).

    Figure 1 Simplified Bayesian inference (BI) tree of the species G.yunnanensis sensu lato reproduced from Zhang et al. (2020).Posterior probabilities (BEAST),Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP),and maximum parsimony (MP) bootstrap values (* >95%,** >99%) are shown for main clades.Vertical bars show clade assignment.

    With a correlation matrix of size-standardized measurements (all measurements divided by SVL),a multivariate principal component analysis (PCA) was performed.Scatter plots of the first two principal components scores were used to investigate the differences between the new species and

    G.yunnanensis

    .The significance of differences between the two species for sizecorrected values of measurements was tested by means of one-way ANOVA (

    P

    <0.01 as significant).Data were firstly tested for normality (using Shapiro-Wilk Test) and homogeneity (using Levene’s test).All analysis above mentioned were conducted in IBM SPSS Statistics 24 (IBM Corp).

    3.Results

    3.1.Genetic divergence

    Lineage LD was deeply separated from

    G.yunnanensis sensu stricto

    (lineage W+C+E) with a divergence of 8.9%,and from other known congeners 7.8%–20.0% (Table 1).

    Table 1 Estimates of Net Evolutionary Divergence between Glyphoglossus huadianensis sp.n.and other known congeners.

    3.2.Morphometric analysis

    Morphometric data of the new species and

    G.yunnanensis

    are summarized in Table 2.The first two principal components were retained,which had eigenvalues above 1.0 and cumulative contribution of variance accounted to 58.14% (Table 3).Loadings for PC1,which accounted for 46.95% of the total variance,were most heavily loaded (load factor >0.70) on HL,HD,TD,E-S,E-N,IO,and HW (Table 3).Differentiation was found along the PC 1 axis between

    G.yunnanensis

    and the new species (Figure 2).The second principal component (PC 2) accounted for 11.19% of the total variance (Table 3),but no clear separation was observedalong this axis between the new species and

    G.yunnanensis

    (Figure 2).

    Table 2 Measurements (in mm) of G.huadianensis sp.n. and G.yunnanensis. The specimens are all males.Abbreviations defined in text.

    Table 3 Factor loadings of the first two principal components of 14 sizeadjusted morphometric characteristics of males of Glyphoglossus huadianensis sp.n. and G.yunnanensis.Absolute values of loading greater than 0.70 in boldface.Abbreviations defined in text.

    The sizecorrected values of measurements follow the normal distribution (Table S2).The results of homogeneity of variables showed that

    P

    -value of HD,IO,and E-N were less than 0.01,rejecting null hypothesis (Table S3).One-way ANOVA test show significant difference for 9 characters at 99% significant level (Table S4),i.e.,TBL,HL,HW,HD,IO,E-S,E-N,A-G,and TD.Both Brown-Forsythe and Welch test further reveal significant difference between the new species and

    G.yunnanensis

    in HD,IO,and E-N (Table S5).Genetically and morphologically,the newly identified matriline differed from the species

    G.yunnanensis

    .Thus,we describe the new species of the genus

    Glyphoglossus

    below.

    3.3.Taxonomic account

    sp.n.

    (Figures 3,4,5;Table 2)

    Holotype:

    KIZA00254,an adult male,collected on 2 May 2010 from Huadianba (25°52’05’ N,100°01’05’ E,2920 m elevation,Cangshan Mountain,Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture,Yunnan,China.

    Paratypes:

    Twelve adult males,all from Yunnan,China:from the type locality,KIZA00253,KIZA00255–KIZA00258 collected on 2 May 2010,and KIZA00252 on 27 May 2010;from Lijiang City (26°51’18’ N,100°13’40’ E),KIZ 2014005754,KIZ 2014005781–KIZ 2014005785 collected in June 2010.

    Figure 2 Scatterplot of principal components 1 and 2 of size-adjusted morphometric data for males of G.huadianensis sp.n. and G.yunnanensis sensu stricto.

    Figure 3 Photographs of holotype of G.huadianensis sp.n.(KIZA00254)in life and its habitat,showing (A) dorsal view,(B) lateral view,(C) be in the wild,and (D) habitat.Photographs by Hong HUI.

    Etymology:

    The name

    huadianensis

    refers to Huadianba,the locality where the new species was first found.Its Chinese common name is“huā diàn xiǎo xiá kǒu wā”(花甸小狹口蛙).

    Diagnosis:

    The new species of

    Glyphoglossus

    is medium-sized(average SVL 36.5 mm in adult males;body size of taxa of

    Glyphoglossus

    ranges from 26.9 ± 3.3 mm to 61.3 ± 0.7 mm;Table 4),and shares the following combination of characters with its congeners:flattened body;wide head;short snout;small eyes;maxillary and vomerine teeth present;paired dermal folds across palate;a crescentic,inner metatarsal tubercle present(Inger,1966;Manthey and Grossmann,1997;Parker 1934).

    The new species can be diagnosed from other congeners by the combination of the following characters:adult male body size larger than 34 mm (SVL range of 34.8–37.8 mm);pupil rounded;supratympanic fold distinct;tympanum concealed;toe tips obtuse;subarticular tubercles prominent and rounded;webbing between toes extensive,extending up to the second subarticular tubercle on toe IV;outer metatarsal tubercle present;dorsum tuberculate;and a pair of conspicuous large round spots in groin.

    Description of holotype

    (adult male) (measurements in mm):A medium-sized species of

    Glyphoglossus

    ,SVL 37.3 mm;body stout ;head much broader than long (HW/HL ratio 1.42);snout rounded,projecting slightly beyond mandible in ventral view;canthus rostralis indistinct;loreal region oblique;nostrils rounded,upward positioned,slightly closer to tip of snout than to eye (E–N/E–S ratio 0.63);internarial distance slightly greater than eye to nostril distance (IN/E–N ratio 1.03);eye small (ED/HL ratio 0.38),its diameter greater than eye to nostril distance(ED/E–N ratio 1.59);interorbital distance broader than upper eyelid width (IO/UE ratio 1.26);maxillary teeth present;a feeble‘W’-shaped notch (=symphysial knob) on the anterior margin of mandible;mouth extends to posterior corner of eye;choanae visible;vomerine teeth present,positioning on two slightly sloping straight transverse ridges behind choanae;tongue oval,smooth,not nicked apically,free for approximately one third of its length;pupil rounded;tympanum concealed;single subgular vocal sac.

    Forelimbs more than half of body size (20.1 mm vs 37.3 mm);fingers free of web;inner three fingers (I,II,III) with skin fringes;relative length of fingers (measurements in parentheses,in mm):III (7.6) >II (3.8) >I (3.1) >IV (2.6);finger tips blunt;nuptial pads absent on fingers;subarticular tubercles prominent and rounded,subarticular tubercle formula:1:1:2:2;three metacarpal tubercles,distinct blade-like inner metacarpal tubercle longer than the outer,median smallest.

    Hind limbs short (TBL/SVL ratio 0.42),and tibiotarsal articulation reaches up to angle of the jaw when extended forward along the body;heels untouched each other when legs at right angle to body;dorsal surfaces of thigh and tibia tuberculate;relative length of toes:IV >III >V >II >I;toes obtuse;webbing between toes extensive,webbing formula:I 0–1 II 0–1 III 0–1 IV 1–0 V,and the absent-web sides of phalanges have dermal fringe;subarticular tubercles distinct and rounded,subarticular tubercle formula:1:1:2:2:2;a large (~3.2 mm),crescentic inner metatarsal tubercle,that is longer than Toe I (2.0 mm),and an outer metatarsal tubercle small and compressed.

    Table 4 Mensural and meristic data for Glyphoglossus huadianensis sp.n.,compared with congeneric species (adapted from Das et al.(2014) based on published descriptions of currently recognized species of Glyphoglossus).Characters:1.Male SVL (maximum,unless range given,in mm);2.Female SVL (maximum,unless range given,in mm);3.Supratympanic fold indistinct (0) or distinct (1);4.Dorsum smooth or granular (0) or tuberculate (1);5.Foot webbing absent(0),basal (1) or extensive (2);6.Lateral fringes on toes absent (0) or present (1);7.Outer metatarsal tubercle absent (0) or present (1);8.Pupil shape vertical (0),horizontal (1) or rounded (2);9.Tips of toes obtusely rounded (0) or expanded (1);10.Interorbital fold absent (0),indistinct (1) or distinct (2);11.Dorsum ground colour olive (0),yellow (1) or brown (2);12.Dorsum unpatterned (0),with small spots (1) or large dark central area (2);13.Flanks unpatterned (0),with dark blotches (1) or with red bars (2).In addition,'?' denotes an unknown character state;'/' denotes a multistate character;* denotes unknown sex;# denotes there is no sexual dimorphism in terms of size and shape for G.molossus.

    Dorsum covered with slender tubercles or granules edged with black border,also small granules scattered over the head,and limbs;an indistinct and interrupted dark lateral band from the posterior of eye to middle of torso,which extend forward to canthus rostralis;supratympanic fold extending from posteriormost point of eye to angle of jaws;abdomen and inner side of limbs smooth.

    Color of holotype in life:Dorsal surface yellowish-brown;supratympanic fold with an interrupted pale-edged dark line;loreal and tympanic region pale yellowish-brown,mottled with dark brown spots or patches on edge of upper jaw;flanks light yellow,mottled with brown patches;reticular markings on posterior of thighs and region around vent with a yellow background and brown border;one or two indistinct dark stripes on fore limb and tibia dorsally;a pair of conspicuous large round black spots in groin (4.6 mm × 3.7 mm),with yellow border.

    Figure 4 Views of holotype of G.huadianensis sp.n. (KIZA00254) in preservative:dorsal (A),ventral view (B),lateral (C),posterior of thighs and region around vent (D),tympanum (E),mandible (F),vomerine teeth (G),features of dorsal skin (H),ventral view of hand (I) and foot (J).

    Figure 5 Vocal sac view of G.huadianensis sp.n. and G.yunnanensis:ventral view of gular skin (A) and anatomical structure of vocal sac (B)of G.yunnanensis; ventral view of gular skin (C) and anatomical structure of vocal sac (D) of G.huadianensis sp.n.

    Variations:

    Morphometric variation of the type series is shown in Table 2.Because type series are all males,sexual dimorphism of the new species could not be determined.Paratypes are generally similar to the holotype in body proportions,with only slight variation observed in three aspects.Firstly and most obviously,specimens from the type locality are differentiated from those from Lijiang City in the following respects (Figure S1):dorsal colouration (yellowish-brown

    vs.

    earth yellow);shape of the dorsal pattern (irregular marking

    vs.

    regular dotted stripes);pattern of posterior side of thighs and region around vent (with reticular markings

    vs.

    no reticular markings);and webbing formula:(I 0–1 II 0–1 III 0–1 IV 1–0 V

    vs.

    I 0–1 II 0–1 III 0–1IV 1–0 V).Also,there is 0.1% genetic divergence (p-distance,based on COI gene,Genebank accession number in Table S1) between these two populations.Secondly,there are only two metacarpal tubercles in four paratypes (KIZ 2014005781,KIZ 2014005784,KIZ 2014005754,KIZA00255).Thirdly,the subarticular tubercle formula of three paratypes (KIZA00252,KIZA00253,KIZA00256) is:1:1:2:3:2.

    Distribution and ecology:

    So far,the new species is known from two localities:the type locality,Huadianba,Cangshan Mountain,Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture,Yunnan Province,and Lijiang City,Yunnan Province.At the type locality,tracked their call,the new species was found in puddles in meadows(Figure 3).No females,tadpoles or eggs were found.

    Rana shuchinae

    Liu,1950 was also encountered at the type locality.

    Comparisons:

    The new species,

    Glyphoglossus huadianensis

    sp.n.,has geographically and genetically closer relationship with

    G.yunnanensis

    than with other known congeners according to recent work (Zhang

    et al

    .,2020),but morphologically it can be significantly differentiated from

    G.yunnanensis

    (

    P

    <0.01) based on one-way ANOVA test (Tables S4,S5):larger body size,SVL of 36.5 ± 0.9 mm (34.8–37.8 mm) in adult males (

    n

    =13) (

    vs.

    26.9 ±3.3 mm (22.5–32.7 mm) in

    G.yunnanensis

    ,

    n

    =10);smaller ratios of head length (HL) (0.24

    vs.

    0.29),head width (HW) (0.34

    vs.

    0.37),head depth (HD) (0.19

    vs.

    0.22),interorbital distance (IO)(0.08

    vs.

    0.09),E-S (0.09

    vs.

    0.11),E-N (0.06

    vs.

    0.07),tibia length(TBL) (0.43

    vs.

    0.45),tympanum diameter (TD) (0.06

    vs.

    0.08) to body size (SVL);larger ratio of A-G (0.45

    vs.

    0.41) to body size(SVL).Also,

    G.huadianensis

    sp.n.

    differs from

    G.yunnanensis

    by having tuberculate dorsum (

    vs.

    dorsum smooth,except for some feebly raised glandular ridges which correspond with the outlines of the markings),having irregular markings/regular dotted stripe on dorsum (

    vs.

    dorsum with a symmetrical vaseshaped brown marking,edged with darker and lighter,from between the eyes to the sacral region),having an indistinct and interrupted dark lateral band from the posterior of eye to middle of torso (

    vs.

    a very distinct dark lateral band from the eye to the groin,bordered above by a series of more or less confluent black spots),having indistinct canthus rostralis(

    vs.

    canthus rostralis distinct),having prominent subarticular tubercles (

    vs.

    subarticular tubercles feeble prominent),having heels untouched each other when legs at right angle to body (

    vs.

    heels feebly overlapping).The new species from Yunnan Province,western China differs from all other congeners in Southeast Asia in morphology (Table 4).

    Glyphoglossus brooksii

    (Boulenger,1904),a Bornean endemic,distributed in western Sarawak (Malaysia),north-central and West Kalimantan (Indonesia) (IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group 2019,and references therein).The new species

    G.huadianensis

    sp.n.can be distinguished from

    G.brooksii

    by the following characters:smaller SVL of adult males 36.5 ± 0.9 mm (34.8–37.8 mm) (

    vs.

    51–55 mm in

    G.brooksii

    :Inger,1966;Parker,1934);supratympanic fold distinct (

    vs.

    indistinct);foot webbing extensive (

    vs.

    basal);outer metatarsal tubercle present (

    vs.

    absent);pupil round (

    vs.

    vertically elliptical);dorsum yellow-brown/earth yellow and no spots on the sides of the body (

    vs.

    dorsum yellow,with two dark stripes or rows of spots,and flanks with small black blotches).

    Glyphoglossus flavus

    (Kiew,1984) is distributed in Borneo,Gunung Mulu National Park (Sarawak),Danum Valley Conservation Area (Sabah),and Ulu Temburon National Park(Brunei) (IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group,2018,and references therein);

    G.huadianensis

    sp.n.differs from

    G.flavus

    by dorsum tuberculate (

    vs.

    smooth);foot webbing extensive (

    vs.

    basal);outer metatarsal tubercle present (

    vs.

    absent);tips of toes obtusely rounded (

    vs.

    expanded);dorsum yellow-brown/earth yellow and flanks without stripe (

    vs.

    orange-yellow,and flanks with black stripes).

    Glyphoglossus guttulatus

    (Blyth,1856) is distributed in Southern Myanmar,most of mainland Thailand,the Central Highlands of Vietnam,Laos and south-western Cambodia(Frost,2020);

    G.huadianensis

    sp.n.differs from

    G.guttulatus

    in the following characters:smaller SVL of adult males 36.5 ± 0.9 mm(34.8–37.8 mm) (

    vs.

    34.0–45.0 mm in

    G.guttulatus

    :Manthey and Grossmann,1997);foot webbing extensive,extending up to the second subarticular tubercle on toe IV (

    vs.

    basally webbed);outer metatarsal tubercle present (

    vs.

    absent);pupil round (

    vs.

    vertical);dorsum tuberculate (

    vs.

    dorsum smooth with distinct blackedged brown irregular markings).

    Glyphoglossus minutus

    (Das

    et al

    .,2004) is distributed in Peninsular Malaysia;

    G.huadianensis

    sp.n.differs from

    G.minutus

    in the following characters:larger SVL of adult males 36.5 ± 0.9 mm (34.8–37.8 mm) (

    vs.

    30.9–32.7 mm in

    G.minutus

    );irregular markings/regular dotted stripe on dorsum (

    vs.

    a triangular mark,wide anteriorly in interorbital region,and a darker variegation and a large,dark,central area on dorsum);tympanum concealed (

    vs.

    present);loreal region oblique (

    vs.

    vertical);finger tips blunt (

    vs.

    pointed);relative length of fingers:III >II >I >IV (

    vs.

    III >II >IV >I);relative length of toes:IV >III >V >II >I (

    vs.

    IV >V >III >II >I).

    Glyphoglossus smithi

    (Barbour and Noble,1916) occurs in northern Sarawak and Sabah,Malaysia,and Sumatra,Indonesia;

    G.huadianensis

    sp.n.differs from

    G.smithi

    in the following characters:larger SVL of adult males 36.5 ± 0.9 mm (34.8–37.8 mm) (

    vs.

    33.0 mm in

    G.smithi

    :Manthey and Grossmann,1997);foot webbing extensive (

    vs.

    basally webbed);outer metatarsal tubercle present (

    vs.

    absent);toe tips obtusely rounded (

    vs.

    expanded);dorsum yellow-brown/earth yellow and tuberculate (

    vs.

    dorsum smooth and dark brownish grey);flanks without spots (

    vs.

    flanks with symmetrical black blotches,edged with pinkish);reticular markings around vent (

    vs.

    a red X-shaped spot above the vent).

    Glyphoglossus volzi

    (Van Kampen,1905) occurs in northwestern and south-eastern Sumatra,Indonesia;

    G.huadianensis

    sp.n.differs from

    G.volzi

    in the following characters:larger SVL of adult males 36.5 ± 0.9 mm (34.8–37.8 mm) (

    vs.

    31.3–34.0 mm in

    G.volzi

    );outer metatarsal tubercle present (

    vs.

    absent);toe tips obtusely rounded (

    vs.

    expanded);interorbital dermal fold absent(

    vs.

    distinct);dorsum yellow-brown/earth yellow and flanks without spots (

    vs.

    dorsum reddish-brown with black spots,and flanks with dark blotches).

    Glyphoglossus capsus

    (Das

    et al.

    ,2014) is distributed in Matang Range in Sarawak,Malaysia,and the upper reaches of Gunung Penrissen (the boundary between Sarawak (Malaysia) and Kalimantan (Indonesia)).

    G.huadianensis

    sp.n.differs from

    G.capsus

    in the following characters:supratympanic fold distinct(

    vs.

    indistinct);foot webbing extensive (

    vs.

    basally webbed);dorsum yellow-brown/earth yellow and flanks without spots(

    vs.

    dorsum olive with red spots and venter with a large area of red).

    Glyphoglossus molossus

    Günther,1869,a large,globose frog,is found in north-central Myanmar,most of mainland Thailand,Laos,and southern Vietnam;

    G.huadianensis

    sp.n.differs from

    G.molossus

    in the following characters:smaller SVL of adult males 36.5 ± 0.9 mm (34.8–37.8 mm) (

    vs.

    SVL 61.3 ± 0.7 mm (41.0–94.9 mm) in

    G.molossus

    ,Laojumpon

    et al.

    2012);dorsum yellowbrown/earth yellow and tuberculate (

    vs.

    dorsum brownish olive and smooth,with large dark central area);pupil round (

    vs.

    vertical);snout rounded (

    vs.

    an unusually truncate snout:snout very short and blunt covered by a leathery finely granular skin;the fleshy part of the lower jaw swollen,truncated in front,forming a semicircular disk).An additional species has been described in the genus-

    Calluella ocellata

    Liu (1950),from“Szekuaipa,Chaochiaohsien,Sikang,7800 feet”(currently,Sikuaiba,Zhaojue County,Sichuan Province,China).The study of Zhang

    et al

    .(2020) included samples from Yanziluo village,Jiefang township,Zhaojue County,Sichuan Province,China,3129 m,and discovered the morphological characteristics of these specimens were consistent with the original description of

    Calluella ocellata

    ,but they clustered together (member of lineage C),and were nested among specimens of

    G.yunnanensis

    .That is to say,the results supported Liu and Hu (1961):

    Calluella ocellata

    is a synonymy of

    G.yunnanensis

    Boulenger 1919.Moreover,

    G.huadianensis

    sp.n.(lineage LD) was deeply separated from lineages C with a divergence of 9.2% (Zhang

    et al

    .,2020).So,no further morphological comparison was conducted.

    4.Discussion

    Zhang

    et al

    .(2020) investigated the geographical distribution and pattern of genetic variation of

    G.yunnanensis

    ,and discovered one of maternal lineages (LD) is deeply divergent from the remaining ones (W,C,E) (Figure 1),suggested it may be an undescribed species.In the study,morphological comparisons and genetic divergence clearly support this possibility and demonstrate that the lineage LD is a new species,named

    G.huadianensis

    sp.n.,and is distinctive from

    G.yunnanensis

    and other known congeners.Firstly,based on 2154 bp concatenated mitochondrial gene fragments,the genetic distance between

    G.huadianensis

    sp.n.and the

    G.yunnanensis sensu stricto

    (lineages W+C+E) was 8.9%,and the difference between

    G.huadianensis

    sp.n.and other known congeners was 7.8%–20.0% (Table 1).Secondly,the result of PCA and ANOVA indicates that

    G.huadianensis

    sp.n.differs from

    G.yunnanensis

    significantly.As well,

    G.huadianensis

    sp.n.separated from other known congeners by a series of morphometric characters(Table 4).One main factor probably hindered the discovery of the new species described here:there are obvious intraspecific variation in the color pattern and body size among populations of

    G.yunnanensis

    (personal observation)

    .

    G.huadianensis

    sp.n.was superficially morphologically similar with specimens from some populations of

    G.yunnanensis

    ,easily misleading the identifications if made without detailed morphological and genetic examination.In future investigations,data on advertisement calls and larvae may be particularly helpful in resolving the taxonomic uncertainty.In addition to

    G.yunnanensis

    ,the new taxa described herein is the second species known from Yunnan,China in the genus

    Glyphoglossus.

    The discovery of the new species indicates that the diversification of

    Glyphoglossus

    in China still needs further investigation.Moreover,the new species and

    G.yunnanensis

    were found to co-distribute in Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture and Lijiang City,which suggests that these regions may play an important role in the formation and evolution of species diversity of

    Glyphoglossus

    .Among specimens of

    G.huadianensis

    sp.n.,distinct morphological variation occurs between populations Dali and Lijiang in dorsal colouration,shape of the dorsal pattern,pattern of posterior side of thighs and region around vent,and webbing formula.But the genetic distance between them was 0.1%,which was much less than interspecific differentiation.These evidences indicated variation between them are only intraspecific differentiation.

    To date,the new species was only found in Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture and Lijiang City,and more research is needed on its life history information and distribution to determine its conservation level.

    Acknowledgements We would like to thank G.H.YU and J.S.WANG for their help in the initial study,and express sincerely appreciation to K.JIANG for his valuable help.We also thank the reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript,and J.Z.WANG and D.C.OUYANG for assistance in the field.This work was supported by grants from National Key Research and Development Program,Grant/Award Number:2017YFC0 505202;the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31301872 to D.R.ZHANG;31372165,31970404 and 31772424 to D.Q.RAO;31501870 and 31872216 to L.X.ZHANG);State Key Laboratory of Genetics Resources and Evolution (Grant No.GREKF17–08);and Biodiversity Survey,Monitoring and Assessment program of Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China (2019HB2096001006).

    Appendix

    Table S1 Information on Voucher No.,GenBank No.,and localities of specimens used in this study.

    (Continued Table S1)

    (Continued Table S1)

    (Continued Table S1)

    Table S2 Test of Normality based on Shapiro-Wilk Test (P <0.01).

    Table S3 Test of Homogeneity of Variances (P <0.01).

    Table S4 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) at one way.

    Table S5 Results of both Brown-Forsythe and Welch test.

    Figure S1 Photographs of individuals of G.huadianensis sp.n.from two localities:(A) dorsal view,(B) ventral view:the upper from Dali Bai Automotous Prefecture,and the lower from Lijiang City.

    一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 国产av精品麻豆| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 亚洲国产欧美网| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 级片在线观看| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 久久久国产一区二区| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 免费不卡黄色视频| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影 | 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 亚洲av熟女| 午夜福利在线观看吧| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 色综合婷婷激情| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| av天堂在线播放| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 欧美在线黄色| 在线天堂中文资源库| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 日韩有码中文字幕| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 高清av免费在线| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜 | 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 久99久视频精品免费| 免费观看精品视频网站| 欧美日韩黄片免| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 欧美日韩av久久| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 嫩草影院精品99| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 在线av久久热| 午夜91福利影院| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 国产高清激情床上av| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 午夜老司机福利片| 免费在线观看日本一区| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 久久中文字幕一级| av福利片在线| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 美国免费a级毛片| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| www.www免费av| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 国产av在哪里看| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 99香蕉大伊视频| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 天堂影院成人在线观看| 久久国产精品影院| 1024香蕉在线观看| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| cao死你这个sao货| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 国产在线观看jvid| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 午夜老司机福利片| 黄片播放在线免费| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 手机成人av网站| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 三级毛片av免费| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 午夜激情av网站| 国产三级在线视频| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 高清av免费在线| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 午夜免费鲁丝| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 久久久久九九精品影院| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 午夜激情av网站| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 超碰成人久久| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 久久精品成人免费网站| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 超碰97精品在线观看| 天堂动漫精品| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 免费在线观看日本一区| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 国产av在哪里看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 国产精品九九99| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 亚洲九九香蕉| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 国产高清激情床上av| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 免费高清视频大片| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 青草久久国产| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲第一青青草原| 久久性视频一级片| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 性少妇av在线| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 99香蕉大伊视频| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 日本免费a在线| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| netflix在线观看网站| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 999久久久国产精品视频| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 午夜久久久在线观看| 超碰成人久久| 亚洲激情在线av| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 久久人人精品亚洲av| cao死你这个sao货| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 黄色女人牲交| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 黄片小视频在线播放| 久久草成人影院| 欧美日韩黄片免| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 精品人妻1区二区| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | e午夜精品久久久久久久| 两个人看的免费小视频| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 热99re8久久精品国产| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲第一av免费看| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 免费观看人在逋| 级片在线观看| 一a级毛片在线观看| 国产麻豆69| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 国产成人系列免费观看| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 97碰自拍视频| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 悠悠久久av| 国产精品 国内视频| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 久久精品91蜜桃| 国产精品 国内视频| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 午夜91福利影院| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产不卡一卡二| 精品国产一区二区久久| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 午夜福利欧美成人| 国产区一区二久久| 乱人伦中国视频| 1024视频免费在线观看| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 久久精品成人免费网站| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 久久久久国内视频| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 在线播放国产精品三级| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 久久 成人 亚洲| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 成人18禁在线播放| 丰满的人妻完整版| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 成年版毛片免费区| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 一级片'在线观看视频| 自线自在国产av| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 免费观看精品视频网站| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 视频区图区小说| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产精品九九99| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 国产99白浆流出| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 高清欧美精品videossex| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 欧美日韩av久久| 久久久久久大精品| 91老司机精品| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品久久视频播放| 精品第一国产精品| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 国产三级黄色录像| 高清在线国产一区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 多毛熟女@视频| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 在线看a的网站| 脱女人内裤的视频| av欧美777| 男人操女人黄网站| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 视频区图区小说| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 国产精品九九99| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 免费少妇av软件| 久久性视频一级片| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 国产成人精品无人区| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 午夜免费观看网址| 99久久国产精品久久久| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 91老司机精品| 国产不卡一卡二| 午夜老司机福利片| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 久久中文字幕一级| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 日韩免费av在线播放| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 搡老岳熟女国产| 热99re8久久精品国产| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 91av网站免费观看| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产激情久久老熟女| 欧美在线黄色| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| av电影中文网址| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 成年版毛片免费区| 两性夫妻黄色片| 黄色 视频免费看| 日本wwww免费看| 成人三级黄色视频| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 久久精品91蜜桃| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 一区二区三区精品91| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 午夜免费激情av| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 18禁观看日本| www国产在线视频色| avwww免费| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 五月开心婷婷网| 咕卡用的链子| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 国产单亲对白刺激| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产又爽黄色视频| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 嫩草影院精品99| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 悠悠久久av| 成人国语在线视频| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 怎么达到女性高潮| 91av网站免费观看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 很黄的视频免费| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 午夜免费鲁丝| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 在线看a的网站| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 国产在线观看jvid| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 亚洲九九香蕉| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| av欧美777| 久久青草综合色| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 久久香蕉精品热| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲片人在线观看| 看免费av毛片| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 超碰97精品在线观看| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| av网站免费在线观看视频| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| av福利片在线| 免费看a级黄色片| 日本三级黄在线观看| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 国产三级在线视频| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 91av网站免费观看| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 999精品在线视频| 女警被强在线播放| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | www.精华液| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 美女福利国产在线| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 久久久久久人人人人人| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影 | 日本a在线网址| 美国免费a级毛片| 亚洲av熟女| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 制服诱惑二区| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 在线观看www视频免费| 青草久久国产| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 女人精品久久久久毛片| av欧美777| 多毛熟女@视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 在线看a的网站| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| a在线观看视频网站| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 香蕉久久夜色| 两性夫妻黄色片| 一a级毛片在线观看| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产成人影院久久av| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 脱女人内裤的视频| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| av中文乱码字幕在线| 我的亚洲天堂| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 国产精品九九99| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 性欧美人与动物交配| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产单亲对白刺激| 国产三级黄色录像| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 黑人操中国人逼视频| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产单亲对白刺激| av有码第一页| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 精品日产1卡2卡| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 天天添夜夜摸| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 午夜福利免费观看在线| 黄色成人免费大全| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片|