• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Visible Light-Induced 3D Bioprinting Technologies and Corresponding Bioink Materials for Tissue Engineering: A Review

    2021-12-25 10:06:48ZizhuoZhengDavidEglinMauroAliniGeoffRihardsLingQinYuxiaoLai
    Engineering 2021年7期

    Zizhuo Zheng, David Eglin, Mauro Alini, Geoff R. Rihards, Ling Qin, Yuxiao Lai,e,*

    a Centre for Translational Medicine Research and Development, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China

    b Key Laboratory of Health Informatics, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China

    c AO Research Institute, Davos CH-7270, Switzerland

    d Musculoskeletal Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China

    e Guangdong Engineering Laboratory of Biomaterials Additive Manufacturing, Shenzhen 518055, China

    ABSTRACT

    Keywords:Medical additive manufacturing Bioink Tissue engineering 3D bioprinting

    1. Introduction

    With an alarming increase in the incidence of end-stage failure of vital organs,there is an urgent need for an innovative therapeutic approach that could effectively repair and restore damaged organs. In addition, the shortage of organs from optimal donors and matching difficulty are challenges confronting the field of organ transplantation.Recent notable achievements in tissue engineering for regenerating damaged tissue have gained considerable attention among transplant clinicians and researchers.Tissue engineering is recognized as a possible means to address the increasing demand for living organs and the limitations of living organs[1–4].Cells, scaffolds, and biological/biochemical factors are generally referred to as essential elements of the ‘‘building blocks” of tissue engineering-based regenerative medicine strategies[5–7].An ideal bioactive scaffold for tissue engineering would provide a platform to support the interaction among cells, bioactive factors, and surrounding tissue [4]. In addition, scaffolds provide the physical support for cells and control the release of factors.

    Charles W. Hull first proposed the concept of 3D printing technologies in 1986 [8]. Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a manufacturing process for constructing objects from computer-aided design models [5]. In contrast to traditional manufacturing, for example, casting and forging processes, 3D printing produces an object or scaffold by adding materials layer by layer and is one of the additive manufacturing technologies [1,3,5]. Bioprinting is becoming an increasingly attractive technology for designing①the microstructure of scaffolds and control cells and ②the distribution of bioactive factors,and thereby,fulfilling the demand for regenerated tissues. The printing material, cell, and printing equipment/method are considered the most important factors in the application of this technology.

    According to the American Society for Testing and Materials standard (F2792), 3D printing technologies are classified into photopolymerization, material jetting, material extrusion, powder bed fusion, binder jetting, sheet lamination, and direct energy deposition [9]. In terms of cell viability and printing capability,the printing methods based on photopolymerization exhibit many advantages over other types of bioprinting methods,such as rapid curing at room temperature,high printing fidelity,and gentle reaction process. The printing structure and speed can be controlled conveniently by adjusting the light intensity, exposure time, and illuminated area [7]. Four out of the various bioprinting methods are widely applied to photo-cured bioprinting: inkjet, extrusion,stereolithography, and digital light process.

    A bioink is a printing precursor in bioprinting and is typically based on thermosensitive or photopolymerization materials that contain cells[10].It functions as a cell carrier,ensures precise positioning, and plays an important role in the protection of the cells during the printing process and that of the microenvironment formed by the material after printing. Among the many printing materials, hydrogel is a class of 3D network polymers formed through chemical bonds or physical forces. These can swell in water, but not dissolve in it. A few hydrogels display a permeable structure that is similar to the natural extracellular matrix (ECM).This structure provides a remarkable 3D microenvironment for cell proliferation[11–15].Given these properties,many types of hydrogels can be applied to various areas of tissue engineering. Two types of crosslinking occur between polymer chains: chemical and physical crosslinking. The various crosslinking schemes affect the gelation kinetics and properties of hydrogels differently.Physically crosslinked hydrogels rely mostly on intermolecular van der Waals forces,hydrogen bonds,and other weak interaction forces. Chemically crosslinked hydrogels are formed by covalent bonds and are relatively stronger than physically crosslinked hydrogels [11]. Among the chemical crosslinking methods,photopolymerization has attracted considerable attention owing to its unique characteristics [16–18].

    Photopolymerization is a simple,clean,and convenient method for achieving covalently crosslinked hydrogels. Photopolymerization can effectively control the formation and structure of hydrogels spatially and temporally. At present, photopolymerization is implemented largely using ultraviolet (UV) light. This may cause cell damage during exposure [19]. In contrast, when UV light is replaced with visible light, the hydrogel system achieves higher cell compatibility and wider application prospects. In addition,visible light has a higher penetration depth, which results in a more uniform hydrogel structure [20]. Visible light crosslinkable hydrogels have been widely researched and applied in many fields such as tissue engineering [21], 3D cell encapsulation [22], and drug delivery [23].

    In this review, we briefly discuss the operating principles and specialities of 3D bioprinting technologies and devices that can be applied to visible light-induced bioprinting systems (Table 1[20,21,24–33]). Then, we systematically summarize visible lightcrosslinkable bioink, including the crosslinking mechanisms and visible light initiators, and highlight their biomedical applications.Finally, existing challenges in the bioprinting and visible light crosslinkable hydrogels are discussed, and future prospects and development directions are proposed.

    Table 1 Visible light-induced bioprinting methods.

    2. Photo-induced 3D bioprinting methods

    2.1. Inkjet-based bioprinting

    Inkjet-based bioprinting originated from commercial 2D inkjet printing,which drops and deposits a cell-laden bioink into a predefined area to form a preset shape[34].The droplet,which is ejected from the nozzle to the substrate, is typically produced via thermal or piezoelectric actuation, as shown in Fig. 1 [24]. Thermal actuation generates droplets through heating elements that overheat the bioink in 2 μs, such that a high temperature (e.g., 300 °C) will not affect cell viability[9].Piezoelectric actuation adjusts the voltage rapidly to force the bioink to expel a droplet through the piezoelectric material. The gelation of bioink by physical and chemical processes can occur simultaneously with the printing process to guarantee printing fidelity. With the low volume of droplets (10–50 μm in diameter) and high throughput (up to 10 000 droplets per minite), inkjet-based printing ensures a high printing resolution (lower than 50 μm) and printing speed [24]. In addition, the cell viability after printing can exceed 80%. However, a drawback of inkjet-based bioprinting is that its application is limited to low-viscosity bioink because a high viscosity bioink tends to clog the nozzle and cause high shear stress [35]. Consequently, inkjetbased bioprinting limits the options of bioink materials and cell concentrations. Furthermore, it is challenging to form large and complex 3D structures. Acosta-Vélez et al. [25] developed a drug tablet that can be fabricated in 30 s by inkjet printing under exposure to visible light. The visible light system was used rather than UV because the latter affects drug stability [25].

    2.2. Extrusion-based bioprinting

    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of inkjet-based bioprinting. Reproduced from Ref. [24]with permission of Elsevier, ? 2018.

    Extrusion-based printing is one of the most common additive manufacturing methods used for fabricating scaffolds. The extrusion is controlled by pneumatic, piston-driven, and screw-driven systems[36].Unlike the case of inkjet-based printing,the pressure of the extrusion process can be conveniently controlled, and the viscosity of bioink can be within a wider range (30–6 × 107MPa.s).That is, the selection of materials can be more diverse, albeit with limitation in terms of viable cell support [37]. In accordance with the fundamental theory of the extrusion process, the major drawback of extrusion-based printing is the limited resolution and low printing speed,because of the size of the needles.The resolution of extrusion printing by current bioprinting applications can attain 100 μm [9]. The location of the optical device becomes critical when a photocrosslinkable bioink is applied to extrusion-based bioprinting. The photocuring process could be performed before(pre-crosslink), after (post-crosslink), or during (in-situ-crosslink)extrusion,as shown in Fig.2[38].Ouyang et al.[38]illustrated that pre-crosslinking resulted in high and inconsistent extrusion forces,heterogeneous printed structures, and low cell viability (about 47%). Although post-crosslinking could improve the cell viability and lower the extrusion force,the bioink flowed prior to stabilization and could not maintain the filament structure. The hydrogel could crosslink before deposition (in-situ-crosslink with UV or visible light) when the needle was replaced with a photo-permeable capillary. This yielded a high printing fidelity and relatively high cell viability (over 95%) after printing [38]. Through adjustments of the hydrogel concentrations, post-crosslink could achieve higher fidelity under visible light than under UV in extrusion-based bioprinting, and also ensure a high cell viability(over 90%) [39].

    2.3. Stereolithography and digital light process

    Stereolithography (SLA) and digital light processing (DLP) have similar molding mechanisms.

    SLA is one of the printing methods that use digital micromirror arrays to control the light intensity of each pixel for the printing areas [6]. During SLA printing, a laser light is applied to a liquid photosensitive material in a point-by-point manner to form a solidified layer. After the solidification of the first layer, the platform rises by a defined height, and a second layer is photocrosslinked. This is repeated until the complete shape is printed(Fig.3(a)).SLA does not require extrusion through a nozzle and is faster,more accurate,and has a higher resolution(<100 μm)than extrusion-based printing[40].In general,SLA bioprinting uses UV light as its light source.It induces cell damage during bioprinting, thereby limiting its use. Wang et al. [26] developed a visible light-induced SLA-based bioprinting process and used it with an eosin Y(EY)-based photoinitiator to fabricate a polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA) and gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) composite hydrogel. They achieved a resolution of 50 μm and high cell viability (85%) for at least five days [26].

    DLP bioprinting is similar to the SLA-based printing method,except that it uses a projector to project light onto photopolymerized materials for curing the layer image rather than a point [41–43] (Fig. 3(b)). The print speed of DLP is higher than that of SLA,particularly when printing larger objects. However, the printable area is reduced in comparison with that of SLA because of the constraints imposed by the project area and resolution of the digital light mirrors. Consequently, only small objects are generally printed. Lim et al. [39] explored the resolution of 3D DLP printing of silk fibroin(SF)hydrogel.They attained a resolution of 66 μm in the X-direction and 146 μm in the Z-direction. This indicates its capability of printing complex structures (e.g., Eiffel Tower) with high precision [39]. Lim et al. [39] developed a visible lightinduced DLP system.It achieved a resolution of 50 μm and cell viability of over 90%[27].DLP is a highly efficient method of layer-bylayer printing.Kelly et al.[44]presented a new method for manufacturing by rotating a photopolymer in a dynamically evolving light field(Fig.3(c)).It is based on the DLP method.This method is scalable to larger print volumes and is faster by several orders of magnitude than the common DLP method, under a wider range of conditions [44]. Bernal et al. [28] used visible light (405 nm)-induced volumetric bioprinting (Fig. 3(d)) to print complex centimeter-scale architectures(including anatomically correct trabecular bone models with embedded angiogenic sprouts and meniscal grafts).They achieved a high cell viability(>85%) in seconds to tens of seconds [28]. These methods are summarized in Table 1.

    Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of three extrusion-based bioprinting. Reproduced from Ref. [38] with permission of Wiley, ? 2017.

    Fig.3. Schematic diagram of(a)SLA and(b)DLP bioprinting method.(c)Schematic of the computed axial lithography system.(d)Volumetric bioprinting process showing the cell-laden gel-resin reservoir connected to a rotating platform. (a, b) Reproduced from Ref. [10] with permission of Elsevier, ? 2012; (c) reproduced from Ref. [44] with permission of Science, ? 2019; (d) reproduced from Ref. [28] with permission of Wiley, ? 2019.

    3. Visible light crosslinkable materials

    3.1. Visible light initiators

    Most of the photocrosslinkable bioinks require the presence of photoinitiators. The type of photoinitiator and the duration of exposure to visible light can affect the cell viability and photoinitiation efficiency. Therefore, the selection of a visible light initiator requires the consideration of its absorption spectrum, water solubility, capability to generate free radicals, and stability.

    Visible light initiators can be classified into free radical and cationic photoinitiators based on the polymerized active species.However,cationic photoinitiators cannot be applied in the biomedical field because of the protonic acid produced when polymerization is initiated [7,16]. Therefore, visible light crosslinkable hydrogels rely mostly on visible light-initiated radical polymerization. Free radical photoinitiators can be divided into type I(one-component pyrolysis) and type II (photosensitizer/co-initiator photoinitiators) [45]. Type I photoinitiators absorb incident photons and divide them into two primary radicals upon exposure to light. However, less options are available in the visible region for a type I photoinitiator, and lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl phosphinate (LAP) is commonly used [46]. In contrast, there are considerably more and diverse alternatives for type II photoinitiators,which extract hydrogen from the co-initiator to generate secondary radicals. At present, the ruthenium pyridine complex, EY,and camphorquinone (CQ) are attracting significant attention and being widely applied in tissue engineering. In a visible light crosslinkable hydrogel system, the cytotoxicity and absorption spectrum of the initiator are particularly important for the encapsulated cells. The commonly used visible light initiators are listed in Table 2 [39,46–56].

    The CyQuant Direct Cell Proliferation Assay method reveals that the viability of human primary renal proximal tubule epithelial cells (hRPTECs) decreases marginally as the LAP concentration increases. However, it can still satisfy the biocompatibility standard [51]. In an early work, Lin et al. [57] introduced LAPinitiated GelMA hydrogel-encapsulated human bone marrowderived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) that exhibit long-term viability and proliferation(over 90 d)and good integrity.Although LAP can absorb the energy of near-UV blue light (405 nm) to produce free radicals,the cost of producing a bioprinting device with a similar blue light is high. Moreover, this type of device is not remarkably superior to the current UV bioprinting system.Furthermore, such strong near-UV blue light is hazardous to mammalian cells and disruptive to cellular processes [51]. CQ, fluorescein,and riboflavin (RF) have similar absorption spectra (between 400 and 500 nm) [52]. The methacrylated glycol chitosan (MeGC)hydrogels initiated by these types of initiators are tested. The results show that the hydrogel initiated by RF has the highest mechanical strength and lowest cytotoxicity. Moreover, thegelation time and cell exhibit a negative correlation[52].Donnelly et al.[54]developed an RF-initiated tyramine-substituted hyaluronate (HA-Tyr) hydrogel to coat TC-28a2 chondrocytes. It showed over 99% cells to be alive after one day.

    Table 2 Types of visible light initiators.

    Among visible light initiators, EY has many more advantages than others [2]. EY is highly water-soluble, and has an absorption peak at approximately 515 nm and low cytotoxicity [51]. EY and LAP exhibit a similar cytocompatibility for hepatic progenitor HepaRG cells. It is noteworthy that in contrast to LAP, the gelatin hydrogel initiated by EY marginally increases the degree of hepatic gene expression [58]. Gwon et al. [59] demonstrated that human adipose-derived MSCs grow and proliferate effectively in hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogel mortified with heparin (cell viability of 95%).Furthermore,the hydrogel can support 3D adipogenic differentiation of adipose-derived MSCs[59].Kerscher et al.[60]demonstrated that low-density GelMA hydrogels can be formed in 1 min by EY and that they facilitate high efficiency cardiac differentiation.On Day 8 of differentiation, the hydrogel initiated spontaneous contractions in conjunction with synchronicity, frequency,velocity, and appropriate temporal variations in the cardiac gene expression [60].

    Thetris(2,2?-bipyridyl)dichlororuthenium(II)hexahydrate([Ru(II)(bpy)3]2+)/sodium persulfate (SPS) system also displays unique strength. [Ru(II)(bpy)3]2+/SPS can alleviate the effect of oxygen inhibition during the polymerization, which affects the fidelity of 3D bioprinting in the vertical direction[39].3D bioprinting is widely adopted for printing complex structures that are to be implanted in vivo, wherein it is challenging to maintain the structure in the vertical direction and ensure precision in the horizontal direction. A few studies have revealed that the print fidelity of 3D bioprinting and the photopolymerized hydrogel structure are directly affected by oxygen inhibition. The presence of oxygen affects free radicals because these can react with oxygen and be converted into peroxyl radicals, which cannot react with unsaturated bonds. Meanwhile, peroxyl radicals reduce the number of protons in the system. This results in the formation of either hydroperoxides or alcohols that hinder the formation of covalent crosslinks. These reactions cause an incomplete or insufficient formation of hydrogels, thereby affecting the stack between layers and the printing fidelity in the vertical direction. To solve this problem, Lim et al. [39] applied the visible light +[Ru(II)(bpy)3]2+/SPS system. Unlike the UV + I2959 system, this system alleviates the effects of oxygen inhibition on porous biofabricated constructs (Fig. 4 [61]) and maintains a cell viability of over 85%in 21 d[39].Al-Abboodi et al.[55]developed a gelatinhydroxyphenylpropionic acid (Gtn-HPA) conjugate hydrogel initiated by[Ru(II)(bpy)3]2+/SPS.It shows good cell viability(over 85%).

    3.2. Mechanisms of photopolymerization and gelation

    There are two types of photopolymerization: photoinitiatorfreepolymerizationandphotoinitiatorpolymerization.Photoinitiator-free polymerization is directly initiated by UV light.Farkas et al.[6]developed a type of photoinitiator-free 3D scaffold.It is fabricated by excimer laser photocuring under light with a wavelength of 248 or 308 nm[6].It shows higher cell viability than those initiated by photoinitiators. However, this type of polymerization requires energy higher than that of the covalent bond of the monomer. Furthermore, it is challenging to satisfy this requirement in the visible range. Therefore, it is unlikely to be applied in the field of visible light-induced polymerization.Polymerization under visible light requires an initiator. Three types of gel mechanisms have been widely used in studies: free radical-initiated chain polymerization,thiol–ene‘‘click”reaction,and photo radical coupling reaction. The details of the gelation mechanisms are described below.

    3.2.1. Free radical-initiated chain polymerization

    The development and advancement of synthetic chemistry has enabled the modification and synthesis of functionalized monomers and macromolecular chains through various methods.Furthermore, photocrosslinkable bioinks can be prepared through free-radical polymerization (FRP). The process of FRP has three reaction stages, as shown in Fig. 5: chain initiation, propagation,and termination[14]. After a radical is generated via the exposure of an initiator to light,the radical reacts with a double bond to generate a new radical. This reacts further with a double bond on the monomer or forms oligomers, and propagates further until termination [7].

    Owing to the cytoxicity of the methacrylate monomers,bioinks amenable to FRP are produced by introducing a limited amount of methacryloyl groups using methacrylic anhydride [62], glycerol methacrylate [63], or methacryloyl chloride [24], into natural or synthetic macromolecular chains, and then selecting a suitable photoinitiators to produce water-based photocrosslinkable bioinks. The mechanisms of FRP and gelation are illustrated in Fig. 5.

    Fig. 4. Difference between UV- and visible light-polymerized GelMA/collagen constructs. Vis: visible light; Ru: [Ru(II)(bpy)3]2+. Reproduced from Ref. [61] with permission of American Chemical Society, ? 2016.

    3.2.2. Thiol–ene ‘‘click” reaction

    The thiol–ene‘‘click”reaction is a fast,highly selective,and versatile method for preparing photocrosslinkable hydrogels.Classical thiol–ene chemistry emerged when Charles Goodyear discovered the vulcanization of natural rubber (poly(cis-isoprene)) by sulfur in the mid-19th century. Since then, the mechanism, kinetic characteristics, and properties of sulfhydryl/vinyl polymerization have been studied extensively[64,65].The radical growth mechanism of sulfhydryl/radical photopolymerization is different from the growth mechanism of the free radical chains of vinyl.Furthermore,the sulfhydryl monomers correspond to crosslinkers [65]. The thiol–ene reaction is unaffected by oxygen inhibition in air and can achieve photopolymerization rapidly [66,67]. Therefore, a lesser amount of photoinitiator is used.Furthermore,the formation of thioether bonds can enhance the strength of materials.

    After the initiator is activated,protons are abstracted from sulfhydryl groups to form thiyl radicals. These then react with vinyl bonds. The reaction forms a thioether bond and another carboncentered radical that can generate another thiyl radical. The thiol–ene reaction propagates until the limiting moiety is depleted[64]. The reaction with an electron-rich vinyl monomer such as norbornene [68], acrylate, methacrylate, styrene, or conjugated diene [13,40] involves the homopolymerization reaction of vinyl monomers and the copolymerization reaction between the thiol and vinyl groups [65] (Fig. 6).

    3.2.3. Photo radical coupling reaction

    This type of reaction generally requires the presence of phenolic hydroxyl groups such as Tyr.Furthermore,ruthenium(Ru(II))or EY is commonly used as the visible light initiator. Different initiators display different initiation mechanism during the reaction.[Ru(II)(bpy)3]2+is photo-oxidized into [Ru(III)(bpy)3]3+by visible light. Then, the activated Ru(III) extracts an electron from the phenolic hydroxyl group (Fig. 7(a)). This yields a radical species that can then attack a wide variety of other groups [69], as shown in Fig. 7(b). However, the ground-state EY absorbs a photon is transformed to the first excited singlet state (1EO). It is then converted to a long-lived triplet state (3EO*) by intersystem crossing.Energy is transferred in the presence of oxygen to form singlet oxygen(1O2) [70]. Then, the singlet oxygen reacts with phenolic hydroxyl groups to yield radical species that sustain the crosslinking, as shown in Fig. 7(c). The commonly used strategy to achieve this reaction is to modify the polymer with molecules containing a phenolic hydroxyl group.Sakai et al.[33]successfully developed a type of bioink by modifying alginate with TYR. This ink could be gelled using a normal desktop lamp in 10 s [33].

    Fig. 5. Mechanism of FRP and gelation. hv: photon energy.

    Fig. 6. Mechanism of thiol–ene ‘‘click” reaction. hv: photon energy.

    Fig.7. The mechanism of photo radical coupling reaction.(a)Initiation mechanism of ruthenium;(b)initiation mechanism of EY;(c)the mechanism of photo radical coupling reaction.

    3.3. Visible light crosslinkable materials

    Photopolymerized materials are primarily categorized into nature-derived and synthetic materials.The most common method to achieve photopolymerization capability is to modify the specific side or terminal groups with compounds that contain a double bond, such as acrylate, methacrylate, styrene, conjugated diene,and Tyr. The common types of photopolymerized materials and modified methods are provided in Table 3 [23,27,33,46,51,55,71–85].

    3.3.1. Nature-derived materials

    Cells are reportedly incubated in the ECM,which is made up of complex structural and functional macromolecules. Natural materials are derived from organisms’ polysaccharides and proteins.Most of the nature-derived materials such as gelatin and collagen have superior cell response and cell adhesion,and can be degraded in vivo. In addition, nature-derived materials are inexpensive and renewable. However, these have a few limitations, for example,high degradation rate, complex purification process, and poor mechanical properties.

    Gelatin is an animal protein that is isolated from animal tissues and prepared through the thermal denaturation of collagen[6,85],which is a heterogeneous aggregation of polypeptides that contain 18 amino acids [86]. Considering the gelatin construct, gelatin exhibits the potential to be modified with functional monomers without a significant reduction in its cytocompatibility. Lin et al.[85] introduced degradable gelatin hydrogel-encapsulated human bone marrow-derived MSCs. They exhibit long-term viability and proliferation(over 90 d)and good integrity.In 2000,Van Den Bulcke et al. [87] first developed and patented the photopolymerizable gelatin methacryloyl derivative, GelMA. It was obtained through the reaction of primary amines in the side chains of (hydroxy)-lysine and ornithine and methacrylic anhydride [47,48]. The GelMA precursor forms hydrogen bonds between the chains at a low temperature(<25°C) to increase the solution’s viscosity.This facilitates the attainment of the 3D printing process’ viscosity requirement.GelMA has been widely applied for bioprinting either as a standalone material or by being co-crosslinked with other materials to form a hydrogel. Several types of photocrosslinkable gelatin derivatives based on this conjugation method have been developed in addition to GelMA. Mazaki et al. [71] developed a furfurylamine-conjugated gelatin. It could crosslink by visible light,thereby supporting bone marrow-derived stromal cells chondrogenic differentiation in vitro [71].

    Chitosan is a polysaccharide that consists of randomly distributed β-(1–4) linked D-glucosamine and N-acetyl-Dglucosamine. It is prepared from the chitin shells of shrimp and other crustaceans, through chemical processing [75]. Given its antifungal and antibacterial activities,chitosan has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration(FDA)for medical wound dressing. With regard to its chemical properties, the presence of hydrogen bonds decreases chitosan’s solubility in water [88]. The abundant groups in chitosan, such as amidogen, provide many opportunities for modifying region properties. Chitosan can be reacted with methacrylate anhydride or glyceryl methacrylate to form a photopolymerizable chitosan derivative. This derivative can be used for bioactive carriers [23,75] and bioink [89].

    HA is a non-sulfated glycosaminoglycan with disaccharide unit repeats of D-glucuronic acid and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine [90,91].HA is distributed widely in connective, epithelial, and neural tissues, typically in an anionic form. Each monomer of HA has sites for modification with reactive groups [92]. Therefore, researchers have refined existing chemistries for synthesizing HA macromer derivatives such as methacryloyl HA [38] and norbornene functionalized HA[77].With regard to its roles in the ECM,HA exhibits high hydrophilicity and considerable cytocompatibility to support cell growth, migration, and differentiation [91]. Gwon et al. [59]demonstrated that human adipose-derived MSCs grow and proliferate well in HA hydrogel mortified with heparin. The production of several types of functional marker and their synergistic effects could be observed during the cell culture [82]. Hinton et al. [93]used methacrylated HA(MeHA),collagen,and other soft materials to test a new extrusion-based bioprinting method(freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels). It displayed substantial potential to be applied in bioprinting natural materials [93].

    SF is an insoluble protein that is present in silk produced by silk worms. It has three chains: light, heavy, and glycoprotein P25 chains. The heavy and light chains are linked by disulfide bonds.Moreover, these associate with P25 via noncovalent interactions[94]. Given its nontoxicity, low immunogenicity, and low degradation rate [95], SF can be applied to wound dressing,enzyme immobilization matrix, vascular prosthesis, and structural implant [79]. SF is also applied to bioprinting after modification. Kim et al. [79] developed a modified glycidyl methacrylated SF bioink. It enabled the construction of highly complex organ structures including the heart, vessel, brain,trachea, and ear with remarkable structural stability and reliable biocompatibility [79].

    Table 3 Photopolymerized materials characteristics and applications.

    Alginate is an anionic polysaccharide that consists of linear copolymers of β-(1–4) linked D-mannuronic acid and β-(1–4)-linked L-guluronic acid units obtained from brown seaweed [81].Alginate’s properties such as the superior biocompatibility, low toxicity, low cost, and convenient gelation ensure its applicability to bioprinting [96]. In general, the bioprinting process of alginate involves the addition of divalent cations(Ca2+,etc.)[97].However,the common alginate hydrogel lost these mechanical properties rapidly during in vitro culture (approximately 40% within nine days). Furthermore, they have inadequate cell adhesive sites [61].If the carboxyl of an alginate monomer reacts with 2-aminoethyl methacrylate (AEMA), the methacrylated alginate could become photocrosslinkable and improve its mechanical properties [80].Norbornene functionalized alginate enables printability at a lower concentration (2 wt%) and maintains a more stable 3D construct than pure ionic crosslinking printing [81].

    3.3.2. Synthetic materials

    Although synthetic materials have inadequate bioactivity compared with nature-derived materials, their chemical and mechanical properties are reproducible, consistent, and tunable owing to the control over the chemical and biological functional group presentation [15].

    Polyethylene glycol (PEG), also called polyethylene oxide or polyoxyethylene,is a linear synthetic polyether of ethylene glycol,which is hydrophilic.The terminal functional groups of PEG and its highly controllable molecular weight enable the modification of the terminal functional groups [98] and its synthesis into fourarms [99] or eight-arms [100], thereby increasing the diversity of materials.The major advantages of the application of PEG to tissue engineering include the adjustable structure and mechanical properties, biocompatibility, hydrophilicity, low cytotoxicity, and nonimmunogenicity [101]. Because PEG is nondegradable and has inadequate adhesion sites for cells, it is generally compounded with other materials or peptides to develop bioinks. Bal et al.[102] used several types of peptides to mortify PEG hydrogel(which is initiated by EY)to observe how the combination of MSCs and ligand in a hydrogel affects the insulin secretion of the pancreatic islets.

    Polyvinyl alcohol(PVA)is a hydrophilic linear synthetic ethanol homopolymer. The large number of side hydroxyl groups provide the attachment sites for biomolecules and opportunity for modification. The hydrogels prepared from PVA and its derivatives are widely used because of these adjustable chemical properties [5].Pure PVA hydrogel cannot afford long-term cell growth: The MSC cell viability decreases from 87% (Day 1) to 71% (Day 14). When it is combined with GelMA, the cell viability could be 92% on Day 14 [27].

    3.4. Visible light-induced 3D bioprinting applications

    3.4.1. Tissue engineering

    3D bioprinting is primarily used for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.The ultimate aim is to form artificial tissue substitutes and further, to construct artificial organs. However, at present,it is not possible to form a fully functional artificial tissue substitute to be used in vivo. Therefore, to achieve this ambitious goal, the leading research studies focus on fabricating models in vitro to mimic the in vivo conditions.

    To achieve the fabrication of models in vitro,researchers require a high printing resolution to simulate the complex structures of tissues in vitro. Wang et al. [26] developed a visible light-induced SLA-based bioprinting system to prepare PEGDA and GelMA hydrogels with EY.The resolution of the vertical 3D structure was 50 μm(Fig.8(a)),and the cell viability of NIH 3T3 fibroblast cells is 85%for at least five days[26].The work of Bertlein et al.[56]demonstrated that the visible light + [Ru(II)(bpy)3]2+/SPS system has higher fidelity(Figs.8(b)and(c))and longer-term(three weeks)cell viability than the UV + I2959 system. Lim et al. [27] also developed a cellladen methacrylated PVA(PVAMA)/GelMA bioink for DLP bioprinting. It enabled the bioprinting of complex structures with high resolutions(25–50 μm)(Fig.8(d)).It also enabled the encapsulated cells to survive up to 90% in 14 d [27].

    Apart from high resolution, it is important to also consider the state of cell proliferation, adhesion, and differentiation in printed construct.Wang et al.[103]also developed an EY/GelMA hydrogel system that forms a 3D cellular network inside the printed pattern on Day 5(which reveals the potential benefits of the research on cell growth morphology),as shown in Fig.9(a).Sakai et al.[33]revealed that Nanog, Oct-4, and Sox-2 genes were upregulated significantly(two-to three-fold from that on Day 1) after human adipose stem cells (hADSCs) were enclosed in tyrosinized HA/gelatin printing structure for 25 d. This indicated that the hADSCs maintained pluripotency[32].Lim et al.[27]demonstrated that PVAMA/GelMA hydrogel supported the osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs. Ouyang et al. [38] reported a norbornene-modified HA hydrogel for coating MSCs. Furthermore, histological analyses validated the production of both glycosaminoghycan(GAG)and collagen(COL)by encapsulated MSCs after 56 d of chondrogenic culture[104]. Petta et al. [48] recently introduced a double crosslinkable hyaluronan bioink crosslinked through enzymes and visible light.It exhibited flexible shear-thinning properties under low substitution during extrusion-based bioprinting[48].Moreover,it preserved the main structure and properties,thereby enabling human marrow stromal cells(hMSCs),chondrocytes,and human telomerase reverse transcriptase(hTERT)fibroblasts to be cultured and recover their 3D shape[20].

    The fabrication of multilayer constructs consisting of different cells and material compositions is a key requirement for mimicking the skin structure. DLP bioprinting can form hydrogelcontaining cells similar to the skin, layer by layer. Kwak et al.[105] developed SF/PEG composite hydrogel as an artificial skin model by visible light-induced DLP. Although it retained a high cell-survival rate in the early stages, a dense keratin layer formed on the hydrogel surface within six weeks, as shown in Fig. 9(b) [105].

    The heart is one of the most important organs of humans. The complex structure and interaction of multiple cells determine its function. Kumar et al. [72] used furfuryl-gelatin and RF to print multilayered sheets containing C2C12 myoblasts and STO fibroblasts, to study the interaction between cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts in vivo.During the culture and incubation,the different layers combined together owing to their interaction at the junction, rather than falling apart (Fig. 9(c)) [72]. Kumar et al.[106] also developed a fibrin–gelatin bioink for coculturing and coupling of cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts. In addition,the immunochemistry data demonstrated the heterocellular coupling between two types of cells via connexin43 adhesion junctions, which is critical for cell interactions [106].

    Fig.8. (a)Hydrogel patterns fabricated with visible light-induced SLA.(b)Biofabrication of GelMA/Col hydrogel constructs consisting of completely interconnecting 3D pore network. (c) Percentage (%) variation in thickness of GelMA/Col hydrogels with different initiators. Ru: [Ru(II)(bpy)3]2+. (d) Gyroid construct, showing its complex porous pattern.*:P<0.05. CAD:computer aided design.(a)Reproduced from Ref.[26]with permission of IOP Science,?2015;(b,c)reproduced from Ref.[39] with permission of American Chemical Society, 2016; (d) reproduced from Ref. [27] with permission of IOP Science, ? 2019.

    A fully functional artificial organ cannot live without a vascularized network. Bioprinting is an effective method for reconstruct vascular tubes. Sakai et al. [33] used [Ru(II)(bpy)3]2+/SPS induced Tyr-modified alginate bioink to print constructs that contain a smooth helical lumen with a diameter of 1 mm. It supplies a solution to construct a complex 3D cell-culture structure containing a vascular network in vitro, as shown in Fig. 9(d) [33].

    3.4.2. Drug delivery

    3D bioprinting, particularly inkjet-based printing, has been used in drug delivery for therapeutic applications. 3D bioprinting offers a viable alternative to traditional tablet manufacturing techniques:Personalized dosage forms customized to the genomic and pathophysiological profile are fabricated. Moreover, it is convenient to design the tablet’s shape by bioprinting, so that the drug release can be controlled. Pharmaceutical tablets were made from UV-crosslinked PEGDA and N-vinylpyrrolidone (NVP) using 3D inkjet printing to control the release of carvedilol, a drug used to treat hypertension and heart failure[107].However, UV can affect the stability of active pharmaceutical ingredients. Visible lightinduced inkjet bioprinting is a more effective here. Acosta-Vélez et al. [29] used inkjet bioprinting to develop a visible light crosslinkable norbornene-modified HA tablet containing hydrophilic ropinirole, to treat Parkinson’s disease and restless legs.Furthermore, ropinirole released 60% within 15 min under acidic condition, which is suitable for oral medicines [29]. Acosta-Vélez et al. [25] developed a PEGDA tablet containing naproxen cured by EY, which controls the release based on the percent of PEGDA in the formulation and the light exposure time for curing the bioinks [25].

    4. Conclusion, challenge, and outlook

    The expansive field of photopolymerized hydrogel has been researched extensively. In this review, we presented the present status of visible light-curing 3D bioprinting methods and photopolymerized hydrogel initiated by visible light. We summarized the types of initiators and their activation mechanisms.Direct and indirect light-induced strategies ranging from radical polymerization to thiol–ene ‘‘click” reaction were investigated. We also reviewed several common biomedical applications of visible light crosslinkable hydrogels in tissue engineering in recent years.Nonetheless, visible light-induced 3D bioprinting systems and the corresponding hydrogels have many more potential areas of application.

    During the past several years, considerable progress has been achieved in 3D bioprinting. Given its development potential and application diversity, light-cured 3D bioprinting has been widely researched and is rapidly expanding. The evolution trend of light-cured 3D bioprinting is remarkable. A few common challenges in bioprinting must be addressed. These are with regard to ①printing device, particularly the printing resolution, printing fidelity, and microstructure reproduction; ②cell viability, which involves cellular nutrition and oxygen supply;and ③bioink property,including the physical strength and biocompatibility.Furthermore, in the area of visible light-induced 3D bioprinting, we must also address the challenge of the photopolymerization speed and print structure fidelity. These can be developed by improving the property of the photopolymerized hydrogels.

    Fig.9. (a)Confocal fluorescence microscopy images of a junction in 3D-bioprinted cellular networks.(b)Formation of keratin layer on 3D-printed SF/PEG hydrogel containing fibroblast cells.(c)STO fibroblasts cocultured with C2C12 myoblasts cells.MyoD1:myogenic regulatory protein.(d)Blueprint and printed rectangular prism-shaped hydrogel containing a perfusable helical lumen(1 mm in diameter)structure.FITC:fluorescein 5-isothiocyanate.(a)Reproduced from Ref.[103]with permission of American Chemical Society,?2018;(b)reproduced from Ref.[105]with permission of Elsevier,?2019;(c)reproduced from Ref.[94]with permission of Wiley,?2019;(d)reproduced from Ref.[33] with permission of American Chemical Society, ? 2018.

    Visible light crosslinkable materials exhibit better properties and higher application potential than the photopolymerized hydrogel induced by UV. Although visible light exhibits a lower cytotoxicity than UV light, it has limitations. The activation of the common visible-light initiators generally requires the presence of co-initiators and co-monomers. For example, EY activation requires triethanolamine as a co-initiator and NVP as a comonomer.Because these are required at relatively high concentrations and because of the co-initiator’s cytotoxicity, their application is limited. Research should be performed to overcome this disadvantage by improving the gelation efficiency without increasing the cytotoxicity.One of the methods to solve this problem is to improve the light intensity or mortify the chains with more multifunctional groups. After these challenges are overcome successfully, visible light-induced 3D bioprinting can be integrated effectively into tissue engineering.

    Considerable progress has been achieved in 3D bioprinting and tissue engineering in terms of methods and materials.Visible light crosslinkable hydrogels can be photopolymerized as rapidly as UV crosslinkable hydrogels to achieve the appropriate mechanical strength and the desired construct in a spatiotemporal manner.Thereby, these have emerged as versatile biomaterial platforms for 3D bioprinting and tissue engineering. Recent advancements have imparted numerous advantages to visible light crosslinkable hydrogels, such as high cytocompatibility with different types of cells, tunable structure for strength, and cheaper crosslinking device. Moreover, there are many potential application areas for visible light-induced bioprinting, such as disease models and drug screening. The dynamic behavior of cell communication in 3D space can be observed more conveniently in vitro by 3D bioprinting than by culturing in a Petri dish.Hydrogel mimics the composition of ECM to accurately simulate dynamic variations in vivo as well as the function of natural tissues [78]. In addition, it is more convenient to design and adjust the microstructure of a photopolymerized hydrogel in a spatial layout. Overall, visible light-induced bioprinting has high value for future regenerative and biomedical engineering.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2019B010941001), the Shenzhen Double Chain Project for Innovation and Development Industry supported by the Bureau of Industry and Information Technology of Shenzhen (201908141541), Shenzhen Fundamental Research Foundation (GJHZ20170314154845576 and GJHS201703 14161106706).

    Compliance with ethics guidelines

    Zizhuo Zheng, David Eglin, Mauro Alini, Geoff R Richards, Ling Qin, and Yuxiao Lai declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.

    侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 亚洲国产精品999| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片 | 久久ye,这里只有精品| 操美女的视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 九草在线视频观看| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 久久国产精品影院| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索 | 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 在线天堂中文资源库| 国产成人欧美| 老司机靠b影院| 宅男免费午夜| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| av视频免费观看在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 一本久久精品| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产av精品麻豆| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 国产精品免费大片| 老司机影院成人| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 久久这里只有精品19| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 老司机影院成人| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 一区二区三区精品91| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| tube8黄色片| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 日本五十路高清| 999久久久国产精品视频| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 一区二区三区激情视频| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 久久人人爽人人片av| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 国产av精品麻豆| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 99久久人妻综合| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| av一本久久久久| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 捣出白浆h1v1| 在线看a的网站| 久9热在线精品视频| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | a级毛片黄视频| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 亚洲精品一二三| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 国产在视频线精品| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 亚洲成人手机| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 老熟女久久久| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 亚洲精品在线美女| www.av在线官网国产| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 天天影视国产精品| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 国产成人影院久久av| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 曰老女人黄片| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 免费观看人在逋| 性少妇av在线| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 宅男免费午夜| 中国美女看黄片| 在线av久久热| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 成人国产一区最新在线观看 | 亚洲av片天天在线观看| av一本久久久久| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 中文欧美无线码| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| av片东京热男人的天堂| 不卡av一区二区三区| av网站在线播放免费| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | av国产精品久久久久影院| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| www.av在线官网国产| 亚洲国产av新网站| 欧美日韩精品网址| 91精品三级在线观看| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 天堂8中文在线网| av线在线观看网站| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 免费少妇av软件| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 欧美黑人精品巨大| 青草久久国产| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 99久久人妻综合| 亚洲九九香蕉| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 黄色一级大片看看| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| a级毛片黄视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 日韩伦理黄色片| 99九九在线精品视频| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 日韩av免费高清视频| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 丝袜喷水一区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 欧美大码av| 不卡av一区二区三区| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 日本a在线网址| 在线av久久热| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 天堂8中文在线网| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 午夜免费观看性视频| 香蕉丝袜av| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 国产视频首页在线观看| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 老熟女久久久| 亚洲人成电影观看| 久久久久网色| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 日本wwww免费看| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 最黄视频免费看| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 赤兔流量卡办理| 最黄视频免费看| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| av欧美777| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 日日夜夜操网爽| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 久久久久久久精品精品| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| bbb黄色大片| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 少妇人妻 视频| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 国产视频首页在线观看| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 久久久欧美国产精品| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 久久狼人影院| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美网| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 成年动漫av网址| 观看av在线不卡| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| www.精华液| av在线app专区| 18在线观看网站| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 成人国产av品久久久| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产高清videossex| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 香蕉丝袜av| 美女福利国产在线| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产高清videossex| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 日本色播在线视频| 在线观看www视频免费| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 久久草成人影院| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 制服诱惑二区| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 99re在线观看精品视频| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产1区2区3区精品| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| av视频在线观看入口| 成人精品一区二区免费| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| www.www免费av| 超碰成人久久| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 91字幕亚洲| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 97碰自拍视频| 久99久视频精品免费| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| or卡值多少钱| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 久久中文看片网| 欧美大码av| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2 | 不卡av一区二区三区| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| av天堂在线播放| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 大型av网站在线播放| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| av在线天堂中文字幕| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲五月天丁香| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 成人精品一区二区免费| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 天堂动漫精品| 精品第一国产精品| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 午夜久久久久精精品| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产精品 国内视频| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 亚洲九九香蕉| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 久久精品91蜜桃| 国产精品 国内视频| 超碰成人久久| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 精品国产亚洲在线| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 在线观看日韩欧美| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 欧美日本视频| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 变态另类丝袜制服| 看免费av毛片| 极品教师在线免费播放| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 窝窝影院91人妻| 在线免费观看的www视频| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 中文资源天堂在线| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 人人澡人人妻人| 在线视频色国产色| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 香蕉久久夜色| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 在线播放国产精品三级| www.自偷自拍.com| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 久久人妻av系列| 国产三级在线视频| a级毛片在线看网站| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 伦理电影免费视频| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 色在线成人网| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 国产片内射在线| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 色av中文字幕| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产av不卡久久| 香蕉久久夜色| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 热re99久久国产66热| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 亚洲九九香蕉| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 国产成人影院久久av| 精品电影一区二区在线| av福利片在线| av天堂在线播放| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| svipshipincom国产片| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 中文字幕久久专区| 亚洲九九香蕉| 成年版毛片免费区| 又大又爽又粗| 精品人妻1区二区| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 黄色 视频免费看| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲第一av免费看| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产精品九九99| 欧美日本视频| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 97碰自拍视频| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播 | 久久人妻av系列| 88av欧美| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三 | 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 岛国在线观看网站| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 99re在线观看精品视频| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 欧美日本视频| 黄片播放在线免费| 国产在线观看jvid| 制服诱惑二区| 在线视频色国产色| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久 | 最近在线观看免费完整版| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 看片在线看免费视频| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲成人久久性| 国产视频内射| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久 | 一进一出抽搐动态| 最好的美女福利视频网| 日本一本二区三区精品| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 美女大奶头视频| 男女那种视频在线观看| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 亚洲色图av天堂| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| xxx96com| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 午夜老司机福利片| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 日韩欧美三级三区| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 又大又爽又粗| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 欧美大码av| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 在线国产一区二区在线| 久久亚洲真实| 日本五十路高清| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 在线国产一区二区在线| 一夜夜www| 一区二区三区激情视频| 一区二区三区精品91| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 久99久视频精品免费| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产成人av教育| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 男人舔奶头视频| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产野战对白在线观看| 操出白浆在线播放| 精品久久久久久,| www国产在线视频色| 搡老岳熟女国产| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 欧美午夜高清在线| 制服人妻中文乱码| 变态另类丝袜制服| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| videosex国产| 亚洲国产欧美网|