• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Assessing the relationship between the rumen microbiota and feed efficiency in Nellore steers

    2021-12-17 11:51:38borahRomaskevisGomesLopesrciodeSouzaDuarteAlexLaReauIbrahimZunigaChavesTiagoAntniodeOliveiraMendesEdenioDetmannCludiaBragaPereiraBentoMariaEugniaZerlottiMercadanteSarahFigueiredoMartinsBonilhaGarretSuenandHilrioCuqu

    Déborah Romaskevis Gomes Lopes,Márcio de Souza Duarte,Alex J.La Reau,Ibrahim Zuniga Chaves,Tiago Ant?nio de Oliveira Mendes,Edenio Detmann,Cláudia Braga Pereira Bento,Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante,Sarah Figueiredo Martins Bonilha,Garret Suenand Hilário Cuquetto Mantovani*

    Abstract

    Background:Ruminants rely upon a complex community of microbes in their rumen to convert host-indigestible feed into nutrients.However,little is known about the association between the rumen microbiota and feed efficiency traits in Nellore(Bos indicus)cattle,a breed of major economic importance to the global beef market.Here,we compare the composition of the bacterial,archaeal and fungal communities in the rumen of Nellore steers with high and low feed efficiency(FE)phenotypes,as measured by residual feed intake(RFI).

    Results:The Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio was significantly higher(P<0.05)in positive-RFI steers(p-RFI,low feed efficiency)than in negative-RFI(n-RFI,high feed efficiency)steers.The differences in bacterial composition from steers with high and low FE were mainly associated with members of the families Lachnospiraceae,Ruminococcaceae and Christensenellaceae,as well as the genus Prevotella.Archaeal community richness was lower(P<0.05)in p-RFI than in n-RFI steers and the genus Methanobrevibacter was either increased or exclusive of p-RFI steers.The fungal genus Buwchfawromyces was more abundant in the rumen solid fraction of n-RFI steers(P<0.05)and a highly abundant OTU belonging to the genus Piromyces was also increased in the rumen microbiota of highefficiency steers.However,analysis of rumen fermentation variables and functional predictions indicated similar metabolic outputs for the microbiota of distinct FE groups.

    Conclusions:Our results demonstrate that differences in the ruminal microbiota of high and low FE Nellore steers comprise specific taxa from the bacterial,archaeal and fungal communities.Biomarker OTUs belonging to the genus Piromyces were identified in animals showing high feed efficiency,whereas among archaea,Methanobrevibacter was associated with steers classified as p-RFI.The identification of specific RFI-associated microorganisms in Nellore steers could guide further studies targeting the isolation and functional characterization of rumen microbes potentially important for the energy-harvesting efficiency of ruminants.

    Keywords:Beef cattle,ITS1 region,Next-generation sequencing,RFI,Rumen microbiota,16S rRNA gene

    Background

    With the projected growth of the world’s population in the next decades,it is expected that meat production will have to double to meet the global demand for animal protein[1].Ruminants,which have a major role in ensuring sustainable food security,consume about 30% of the crops cultivated on Earth and occupy another 30% of the planet’s surface[2,3].Therefore,expanding herd size and land use to meet projected food demands is undesirable due to the environmental impacts associated with livestock production[3].In this context,there is an increasing interest in the use of feed efficiency(FE)indexes/markers in animal breeding programs to select for animals that produce more meat or milk while consuming less feed[4].In beef cattle,residual feed intake(RFI),which is the difference between observed dry matter intake(DMI)and expected DMI based on animal development metrics[5],has been widely used to calculate the FE of growing cattle.The expected DMI is determined from linear regression of measured feed intake versus developmental measures(such as mean daily weight gain)for a group of animals on the same diet.However,previous studies demonstrated that RFI has low to moderate heritability in cattle(h2=0.25,h2=0.39),which suggests that FE is also affected by non-genetic factors[6,7].

    The feed conversion in ruminants depends both on the ability of the rumen microbiota to ferment the components of their diet to produce volatile organic acids,and the ability of these animals to absorb and utilize these nutrients(genetic potential).Therefore,ruminal microorganisms play a fundamental role in providing energy to their hosts[8].Although feed efficiency is considered a multifactorial and complex trait in cattle involving multiple biological processes connected to the host[2,9],several published studies provide evidence for associations between the rumen microbiome and RFI phenotypes in both dairy cows[2,10–12]and beef cattle[13–19].It has been proposed that cows that are more efficient host a microbiome with lower richness and diversity,but produce higher abundances of important metabolites for the host[2].Most importantly,the functional analysis of the rumen microbiota indicates that differences in animals of high and low FE may be related to the genes involved in the digestion of fibrous and non-fibrous carbohydrates,synthesis of fatty acids and proteins,pathways for conservation of metabolic energy(e.g.,ATP production),and methane production[11].

    However,the ecological understanding of the rumen microbiome in Bos indicus cattle is still limited,especially the compositional dynamics of the rumen microbiome and its association with productivity traits of Nellore cattle[20,21],which accounts for more than 90% of Brazilian beef cattle herds and represents one of the most abundant sources of meat worldwide[1,22].Also,linear regression models predicting rumen bacterial features affecting feed efficiency indicated that the rumen microbiome likely explains approximately 20% of the variation in feed efficiency traits in beef steers[19].Therefore,research on the association between the rumen microbiota and feed efficiency traits(e.g.RFI)in Nellore(Bos indicus)cattle is needed to unveil the potential rumen microbial signatures in animals that are more efficient at feed utilization.

    To address this,we examined differences in the composition of the ruminal microbiota(Bacteria,Archaea,and Fungi)in the solid and liquid rumen contents of Nellore cattle showing high and low FE phenotypes(negative and positive RFI,respectively).This exploratory study aimed to determine if specific rumen microbes contribute to the feed efficiency phenotype in Nellore steers,a feature that could be relevant in evaluating the phenotypic variation of FE in Bos indicus cattle.The present study also provides the first systematic account of the bacterial,archaeal,and fungal communities colonizing the rumen of Nellore cattle showing distinct FE phenotypes.

    Materials and methods

    Animals,diets and sampling

    A cohort of 129 young Nellore bulls(7months of age,239±30.1 kg of initial body weight,BW)were fed a diet formulated to meet the requirements for 1 kg/d of BW gain during a growth period of 98 d[20,23,24].The diet was formulated without ionophore supplementation and the composition was:615 g/kg corn silage,33 g/kg Brachiaria hay,167 g/kg dry ground corn,163g/kg soybean meal,3.6g/kg urea,0.4g/kg ammonium sulfate,and 18 g/kg mineral mixture(on a dry matter basis).All animals had ad libitum access to water throughout the experiment.Before the beginning of the test period,all bulls were weighed,dewormed,vaccinated,and numbered with individual tags[20,23,24].

    Cattle were fed using a GrowSafe automated feeding system(GrowSafe Systems Ltd.,Airdrie,Canada).The RFI(kg/d)was calculated during the growth period as the error term of the following equation:DMI=β0+βP×BW0.75+βG×ADG+ε(RFI),where DMI is the dry matter intake observed during the test period,β0is the intercept of the equation,BW0.75is the mid-test metabolic live weight,ADG is the average daily gain in weight during the test,and βPand βGare the regression coefficients of BW0.75and ADG,respectively.ADG was estimated by the linear regression coefficient of live weight as a function of the number of days in the test.Mid-test metabolic live weight was calculated by the equation BW0.75=[α+β ×(DIT/2)]0.75,where α is the intercept of the regression equation corresponding to the initial live weight,β is the linear regression coefficient corresponding to the average daily gain,and DIT is the days in test[24].

    From the original group of 126 individuals,a cohort of 27 steers(12 with negative RFI and 15 with positive RFI)were selected based on a stratified sampling method for the finishing period to increase the statistical power[25].Individuals sampled in the first stage represented the 20% most efficient and the 20% least efficient steers of the cohort(P<0.0001,Supplementary Table S1),followed by random sampling of an equal number of individuals(n=9)belonging to the non-extreme RFI group.The RFI values were significantly different(P<0.05)between animals with negative(?0.93±0.17)or positive(0.87±0.14)RFI and the steers were separated into two FE groups:negative-RFI(n-RFI,more efficient steers)and positive-RFI(p-RFI,less efficient steers),respectively.The steers averaged 22.5±0.8 mo of age and 401±42kg of BW,were confined in individual pens(4m×2m)equipped with GrowSafe automated feeding systems(GrowSafe Systems Ltd.,Airdrie,Alberta,Canada)and had ad libitum access to the diet and water.The steers were adapted to the diets,facilities,and management for 22 d followed by a period of 103 d where they received the finishing diet,formulated to meet the requirements of 1.3 kg of daily gain with a target finishing weight of at least 550 kg[20,23,24].The finishing diet was composed of 333 g/kg corn silage,17 g/kg Brachiaria hay,465 g/kg dry ground corn,163 g/kg soybean meal,6 g/kg urea,4 g/kg ammonium sulfate,and 13 g/kg mineral mixture(dry matter basis).

    After slaughter,the ruminal contents were collected and filtered through four layers of cheese cloth to separate the liquid and solid fractions.Ruminal pH was measured in the liquid fraction using a portable pH meter(pH meter HI9124,Hanna Instruments,Woonsocket,Rhode Island,EUA).Aliquots from each fraction were stored in plastic containers at?20°C for further analysis.

    Ammonia and volatile fatty acids measurement

    Ammonia concentration was determined according to Chaney and Marbach[26].Absorbance was measured at 630nm in a Spectronic 20D spectrophotometer(Thermo Fisher Scientific,Madison,WI,USA)and ammonium chloride(NH4Cl)was used as the standard.

    Quantification of organic acids was performed using cell-free supernatants of the rumen fluid samples(2.0 mL)prepared as previously described[20].The VFAs were determined in a Dionex Ultimate 3000 Dual detector HPLC(Dionex Corporation,Sunnyvale,CA,USA)equipped with a Shodex RI-101 refractive index(RI)detector and a Phenomenex Rezex ROA column(300×7.8mm)(Phenomenex Inc.Torrance,CA,USA).Analyses were performed isocratically under the following conditions:mobile phase H2SO45mmol/L,flow rate 0.7 mL/min,column temperature 45°C and injection volume 20μL.Stock solutions of the external standards were prepared as previously described[20].

    DNA extraction and sequencing

    Total genomic DNA was extracted separately from the ruminal solids and liquids(n=54)of each animal following a mechanical disruption and phenol/chloroform extraction protocol as described by Stevenson and Weimer[27].Extracted genomic DNA was quantified using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer(Thermo Scientific,Wilmington,DE).The V4 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified using universal primers(F-GTGCCAGCMG CCGCGGTAA;R-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT)as described by Kozich et al.[28].Furthermore,the archaeal 16S rRNA was amplified using primers for the V6-V8 hypervariable region(Ar915aF-AGGAATTGGCGGGGGAGC AC,Ar1386R-GCGGTGTGTGCAAGGAGC)and fungal sequences were amplified with primers for the internal transcribed spacer 1(ITS1)region(MN100F-TCCTACCCTT TGTGAATTTG,MNGM2-CTGCGTTCTTCATCGTTG CG)as described by Kittelmann et al.[29].For Bacteria,PCR reactions consisted of 50ng template DNA,0.4μmol/L of each primer,1×Kapa Hifi HotStart Ready Mix(KAPA Biosystems,Cape Town,South Africa),and water to 25μL.For Archaea and Fungi,DNA input was increased to 100ng and primers to 1.6 μmol/L each.PCR was performed at 95 °C for 3min,95 °C for 30 s,55 °C for 30 s,72 °C for 30 s(25cycles for Bacteria and 35cycles for Archaea and Fungi),and a final extension step at 72°C for 5min[20,30,31].PCR products were purified using a PureLink Pro 96 PCR Purification Kit(Invitrogen,Carlsbad,CA,EUA)and a second PCR was performed to attach both the Illumina sequencing adapters(F - AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACAC;R-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGAT)and unique barcodes to facilitate multiplexing.The second PCR reaction was similar to that for the bacterial V4 regions,except that 5 μL of non-quantified PCR product was used as template DNA and 8 cycles were performed[20,30,31].PCR products were recovered by gel extraction in AquaPōr low-melt agarose(National Diagnostics,Atlanta,GA)using a Zymoclean Gel DNA Recovery Kit(Zymo Research,Irvine,CA,USA).Purified DNA was quantified using a Qubit fluorometer(Invitrogen)and equimolarly pooled to create a single sample at 1 × 109ng per μL[20,30,31].Sequencing was performed using an Illumina MiSeq Reagent Kit v2 kit for Bacteria(2×250 bp)and an Illumina MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 for Achaea and Fungi(2×300 pb)on an Illumina MiSeq(Illumina,Inc.,San Diego,CA,USA)following manufacturer’s guidelines.All DNA sequences have been deposited into the NCBI’s Sequence Read Archive(SRA)under BioProject accession number PRJNA512996.

    Sequence analysis

    Bacterial,Archaeal and Fungal sequences were processed separately using mothur(v 1.43.0)[32].Any sequences shorter than 200 bp or longer than 500 bp for Bacteria and shorter than 200 bp or longer than 600 bp for Archaea and Fungi were removed.The V4 and V6-V8 sequences of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene,respectively,were aligned using the SILVA 16S rRNA gene reference database(release 138)[33].The fungal ITS1 sequences were aligned using the UNITE database version v8.2(2020-02-04)[34]and sequences that did not align to the correct location were removed[20].To reduce computational time and account for sequencing error, identical sequences were grouped using the unique.seqs command in mothur and sequences that were different by two or fewer base pairs were considered the same and grouped using pre.cluster command.Chimeric sequences[35]and singletons(sequences that occur once in the entire dataset)were removed as they provide little usable data and are often the result of sequencing error.All sequences were grouped into operational taxonomic units(OTUs)by uncorrected pairwise distance clustering using either the furthest neighbor(Bacteria and Archaea)or average neighbor(Fungi)method with a similarity cut-off of 97%.The bacterial and archaeal OTUs were classified using the SILVA database(release 138)and fungal OTUs were classified using the UNITE database v8.2(2020-02-04),with a bootstrap cut-off of 80.Sample coverage was assessed using Good’s coverage and the relative abundance(reads/total reads in a sample)of OTUs was determined.The OTU tables were normalized using the normalize.-shared command and method=totalgroup (relative abundance x lowest number of sequences per sample).Normalized OTU tables were used to determine alpha diversity indices(Chao1,Shannon’s and Simpson’s)and for beta diversity analyses.

    Statistical analysis

    Differences in the alpha diversity indices and the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio,as well as the concentration of ammonia and organic acids of rumen samples,according to each FE group,were assessed by t-test as performed in Minitab 17.1.0(Minitab,Inc.,Pennsylvania,USA)with P<0.05 being considered significant.

    Clustering of the steers according to the composition of rumen contents was visualized using Non-metric multidimensional scaling(NMDS)plots of the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity metric(beta diversity index),and non-parametric analysis of similarities(ANOSIM,number of permutation=10,000)were performed using the Past software package[36],with P-values<0.001 being considered significant.Differences in the taxonomic composition according to FE group were assessed by White’s non-parametric t-test using the Statistical Analysis of Taxonomic and Functional Profiles–STAMP v 2.1.3 software[37],with P-values<0.05 being considered significant.

    For determining biomarkers,the Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size–LEfSe[38]at the OTU level was performed using Galaxy Version 1.0(https://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/galaxy/).P-values<0.05 for the factorial Kruskal-Wallis test and the pairwise Wilcoxon test were considered significant.The threshold for the logarithmic linear discrimination analysis(LDA)scores of discriminative features was 2,and the strategy for multi-class analysis was “all-against-all”.

    Prediction of metabolic functions from the ruminal bacterial microbiota was performed using the CowPI/BeefPIE tool[39]that is used with an installation of the PICRUSt software package[40].This analysis was performed in the Galaxy platform Version 0.1)(https://sharegalaxy.ibers.aber.ac.uk/?tool_id=beefpie_rstep&version=0.1&__identifer=zb2ieybu7r) using normalized OTU tables of the bacterial composition for each steer and in addition to nucleotide sequence representatives of each OTU.Comparison of the relative abundances of the predicted metabolic categories according to FE group was assessed by White’s nonparametric t-test using STAMP v 2.1.3[37].

    The correlation network of liquid and solid bacterial OTUs and ruminal fermentation variables was determined based on sequences that were detected in at least 50% of the steers classified in each FE group(minimum of 7 steers to p-RFI group and 6 steers to n-RFI group)to avoid spurious findings due to between-animal variability.This criterion was based on previous observations indicating that different species of ruminal bacteria that exhibit a heritable component have a high presence(≥ 50%)across animals[41].Spearman’s rank correlation was calculated in R(v 3.4.1,corrr package)to assess the relationship of ammonia concentration,proportions of VFAs(acetic,succinic,propionic,valeric,isovaleric,isobutyric and butyric acid),total VFA concentration and acetate-to-propionate ratio against the relative abundance of bacterial OTUs.Significant correlations(P<0.05)were visualized as a network in Cytoscape v 3.2.1[42].The networks were built using sheets with shared and exclusives correlations of each FE group.

    Results

    Sequencing

    In total,3,201,058,1,202,160 and 2,415,859 raw sequences for Bacteria,Archaea and Fungi,respectively,were generated.After trimming,quality filtering and removal of chimeras,a total of 1,727,202 high-quality bacterial,251,013 archaeal,and 1,044,332 fungal sequences were obtained.The Good’s coverage before and after normalization was>95% for the bacterial community,>99% for the archaeal community and>94% for the fungal community,indicating sufficient coverage for comparisons of sequence abundance between samples and analysis of community shifts.The summary or sequence counts and OTUs that passed the quality filter,clean up and normalization are presented in Supplementary Table S2.

    Specific bacterial OTUs are associated with the p-RFI and n-RFI phenotypes

    Alpha diversity was measured using Chao1,Simpson’s,and Shannon’s diversity indices and demonstrated that the bacterial community of Nellore steers did not vary between RFI groups(t-test,P>0.05),regardless of the ruminal phase(Table 1).Beta diversity analysis showed that the Bray-Curtis dissimilarities of the bacterial communities differed according to the ruminal phase(solid or liquid fraction)(ANOSIM,P<0.001),whereas the dissimilarity in bacterial communities between p-RFI and n-RFI did not vary significantly in the ruminal contents(Fig.1a).These results demonstrate that microbial communities in the solid and liquid rumen phases are distinct and reinforce the need for separate analyses to evaluate the contributions of the feed-attached and planktonic ruminal microbiota to FE.

    Fig.1 Non-metric multidimensional scaling(NMDS)plots of the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index for bacterial(a)archaeal(b)and fungal(c)communities in the rumen of Nellore steers.Individual points represent a rumen sample and colors represent ruminal fractions and RFI groups

    Table 1 Alpha diversity of microbial communities in the rumen of steers according to RFI groupa

    Taxonomic analysis of the ruminal bacterial community of the liquids fraction revealed 3,672 unique OTUs(mean 1,073±SD 108 per sample after normalization)that were assigned to 20 phyla,38 classes,67 orders,110 families,and 237 genera.The rumen liquid(RL)bacterial community was dominated by the phyla Firmicutes(55.74±2.17%),Bacteroidetes(20.53±1.5%)(Supplementary Fig.S1).The most abundant families included the Ruminococcaceae(21.23±1.02%),Lachnospiraceae(15.87±1.6%),Prevotellaceae(10.16±1.26%),and Christensenellaceae(5.81±1.03%)(Supplementary Fig.S2).In the rumen solids(RS),3342 unique bacterial OTUs(mean of 962±132 OTUs per sample after normalization)were assigned to 18 phyla,32 classes,62 orders,97 families,and 209 genera.Members of the phyla Firmicutes(59.17±1.65%)and Bacteroidetes(20.58±1.60%)were also dominant in the RS bacterial community(Supplementary Fig.S1),while abundant families included the Ruminococcaceae(20.57±1.91%),Lachnospiraceae(20.18±1.30%),Prevotellaceae(10.17±1.20%)and Christensenellaceae(6.65±0.94%)(Supplementary Fig.S2).

    The bacterial taxonomic composition of the animals was similar,however,the abundance of some taxonomic categories varied according to the FE.More efficient animals(n-RFI)had higher abundances(White’s nonparametric t-test,P<0.05)of order Anaeroplasmatales and Lineage I(class Elusimicrobia),family ODP1230B8–23(order Halanaerobiales),and genera Lachnospiraceae NK3A20 group,Bacteroidales RF16 group,Lachnospiraceae ND3007 group and Bacteroidetes BD2–2 in the RL.Also,the genera Desulfovibrio,horsej-a03(family Oligosphaeraceae),and the Prevotellaceae UCG-001 were more abundant in the RS of n-RFI steers,when compared to the RS of p-RFI steers(Fig.2).

    Fig.2 Taxonomic groups showing significant differences(White’s nonparametric t-test,P<0.05)in relative abundance in liquid(a)and solid(b)ruminal fractions between p-RFI and n-RFI steers.The blue bars represent the p-RFI group and the red bars represent n-RFI group.Data are expressed as relative abundance mean and the standard error

    The Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes(F/B)ratio,an index previously reported as being associated with dysbiosis or differences in phenotypes in humans,rodents,and ruminants,was significantly higher(t-test,P<0.05)in p-RFI steers than in n-RFI steers(Fig.3).In the RL fraction,the average F/B ratio was 2.90±0.07 for the p-RFI steersand 2.67±0.04 for the n-RFI steers.In the RS fraction,the average ratio was 2.99±0.08 for the p-RFI and 2.75±0.05 for the n-RFI.

    Fig.3 The Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio in liquid(RL)and solid(RS)ruminal phase,according to the RFI group.White bars represent the p-RFI steers and grey bars represent the n-RFI steers.(*)Significantly different(P<0.05)by the t-test

    A Linear discriminant analysis of Effect Size(LEfSe)showed that 47 bacterial OTUs in the RL fraction of steers were associated with FE,of which 17 were increased or exclusive in the p-RFI steers(corresponding 0.37% of relative abundance to p-RFI and 0.042% to n-RFI),while 30 were increased or exclusive in the n-RFI steers(corresponding 1.32% of relative abundance to p-RFI and 3.54% to n-RFI)(Fig.4a and Table 2). Twenty-two biomarker OTUs were identified in the RS fraction,with 12 being enriched or unique of p-RFI steers(corresponding 2.43% of relative abundance to p-RFI and 1.65% to n-RFI),whereas 10 were enriched or unique of n-RFI steers(corresponding 0.43% of relative abundance to p-RFI and 1.24% to n-RFI)(Fig.4b and Table 2).Five bacterial OTU biomarkers (Otu00118, Otu00148,Otu00163,Otu00212,Otu00314)were common to both ruminal fractions(RL and RS)and all were increased in the most efficient animals(n-RFI)(Fig.4 and Table 2).Most of these biomarkers belonged to the order Bacteroidales,including the family Prevotellaceae and genus Prevotella,as well as members of the order Clostridiales order,including the families Lachnospiraceae,Ruminococcaceae and Christensenellaceae(Fig.4 and Table 2).

    Richness and specific OTUs of the Archaeal community are associated with the p-RFI and n-RFI phenotypes

    The alpha diversity analysis of RL and RS archaeal communities demonstrated that Simpson’s and Shannon’s diversity did not vary significantly in response to RFI group(t-test P>0.05),although the Chao1 richness of both rumen fractions from n-RFI steers(45.18±11.1)was significantly greater than that found in p-RFI steers(36.22±8.12)(Table 1).Beta diversity analysis,as summarized in NMDS plots of Bray-Curtis dissimilarities,showed differences between the RL and RS communities with both groups clustering separately(ANOSIM,P<0.001).However,no differences were observed in the RL and RS archaeal communities of p-RFI and n-RFI steers(Fig.1b).

    Table 2 Relative abundance of biomarker OTUs identified by LEfSe in the rumen of steers according to RFI(Continued)

    Table 2 Relative abundance of biomarker OTUs identified by LEfSe in the rumen of steers according to RFI(Continued)

    Table 2 Relative abundance of biomarker OTUs identified by LEfSe in the rumen of steers according to RFI

    Taxonomic composition analyses of the archaeal community revealed 78 unique OTUs in the rumen contents(liquid and solid phase)of Nellore steers.All OTUs were assigned to the phylum Euryarchaeota,with 82.26±0.47% of these classifying to the family Methanobacteriacea and 15.63±0.53% assigned to the family Thermoplasmatales Incertae Sedis.The less abundant groups of ruminal archaea accounted for 1.89±0.01% of thesequences and were classified to the family Methanosarcinaceae(Supplementary Fig.S3).

    We found that 17.43±5.82% and 16.27±4.41% of the OTUs in the RL and RS,respectively,could not be assigned at the genus level(Supplementary Fig.S4).The archaeal community in the ruminal contents were dominated by members of the genus Methanobrevibacter(77.23±6% in RS),followed by Methanosphaera(3.21±1.67%)and Methanimicrococcus(1.65±1.27%)(Supplementary Fig.S4).When considering FE groups,the relative abundance of Methanimicrococcus was,on average,two-fold higher in n-RFI steers than in p-RFI steers(White’s non-parametric t-test,P<0.05)(Fig.2).Archaeal biomarker OTUs in each FE group were identified only in the rumen liquid fraction by the LEfSe analysis.The three biomarker OTUs were classified as belonging to the genus Methanobrevibacter and were either increased or exclusive of p-RFI steers(2.82% of relative abundance to p-RFI and 0.24% to n-RFI)(Fig.5 and Table 2).

    Fig.5 Biomarker archaeal OTUs identified by Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size(LEfSe,P<0.05)in the liquid rumen fraction of Nellore steers showing low(p-RFI)or high(n-RFI)feed efficiency.Red bars represent enriched or exclusive OTUs in animals with low feed efficiency(p-RFI)

    Specific high abundance fungal OTU are associated with the p-RFI and n-RFI phenotypes

    The fungal intra-community diversity(alpha diversity)did not vary between RFI groups(t-test,P>0.05)(Table 1).Beta diversity analysis(Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index)represented on an NMDS plot showed that the fungal communities from the two efficiency groups(p-RFI and n-RFI)and ruminal fractions(RL and RS)were not significantly different(ANOSIM,P>0.001)(Fig.1c).

    Taxonomic composition analyses of the fungal community revealed 1,795 unique OTUs in the rumen contents(RL and RS).All OTUs classified were assigned to the family Neocallimastigaceae and nearly 25.46±10.35% and 16.21±4.55% of the OTUs in the RL and RS,respectively,could not be assigned to the genus level.In decreasing order of relative abundance,the assigned genera were Caecomyces,Piromyces,Orpinomyces,Cyllamyces,Neocallimastix,Anaeromyces,and Buwchfawromyces(Supplementary Table S3),with the Buwchfawromyces genus being almost five-fold higher in the RS fraction of n-RFI steers than in the p-RFI steers(White’s non-parametric ttest,P<0.05)(Fig.2).

    Our LEfSe showed that 14 fungal OTUs in the RL fraction of steers were associated with FE phenotype,of which 2 were increased in the p-RFI steers(corresponding to 1.50% of the relative abundance in p-RFI steers and 0.24% in n-RFI steers),while 12 were increased or exclusive to n-RFI steers(corresponding to 10.50% of the relative abundance in p-RFI steers and 20.94% in n-RFI steers)(Fig.6a and Table 2).In the RS phase,12 biomarker OTUs were identified,all enriched or unique to n-RFI steers(corresponding 8.08% of relative abundance to p-RFI and 22.11% to n-RFI)(Fig.6b and Table 2).Two biomarker fungal OTUs(Piromyces genus)were common to both ruminal fractions(RL and RS):Otu000004,which was among the most abundant OUT in the fungal community and was enriched in the n-RFI steers,and Otu000197,which was only detected in n-RFI steers(Fig.6 and Table 2).Among the 24 fungal biomarkers identified,7 belonged to the genus Piromyces,5 to unclassified Neocallimastigaceae,3 to Caecomyces communis,one to the Orpinomyces,and one to the Neocallimastix;7 OTUs could not be classified at any taxonomical level(Fungi unclassified)(Fig.6 and Table 2).

    Fig.6 Biomarker fungal OTUs identified by Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size(LEfSe,P<0.05)in the liquid(a)and solid(b)fractions of rumen contents from Nellore steers showing low(p-RFI)or high(n-RFI)feed efficiency.Red bars represent enriched or exclusive OTUs in animals with higher feed efficiency(n-RFI),while green bars represent enriched or exclusive OTUs in animals with lower feed efficiency(p-RFI)

    Functional prediction and correlations between the bacterial community and ruminal fermentation products

    To gain a better understanding of the functional role of the rumen bacterial community,as it relates to FE groups,we performed a prediction of metabolic functions for both solid and liquid phases and found 244 functional categories between the FE groups(Supplementary Table S4).No significant differences were detected for the predicted metabolic functions of Nellore steers with distinct FE phenotypes.These results are in agreement with the lack of differences in the quantification of rumen fermentation products between FE groups observed in this study.We also found that the molar proportion of acetic,propionic,succinic,butyric,isobutyric,valeric,and isovaleric acids,acetate-to-propionate ratio,total concentration of short-chain volatile fatty acids(VFA),ammonia concentration,and ruminal pH did not vary between the p-RFI and n-RFI steers(t-test,P>0.05)(Supplementary Table S5).

    However,our microbial-metabolite network analysis revealed significant associations(positive and negative)between the 638 bacterial OTUs in the RL fraction and the 544 OTUs in the RS fraction with ruminal fermentation products(e.g.,VFAs and ruminal NH3),which were represented by correlations(nodes connected by an edge)with specific fermentation products(Fig.7).In the RL phase,193 p-RFI steer OTUs,183 n-RFI steer OTUs,and 44 OTUs shared by both groups were positively associated with at least one ruminal fermentation product.The p-RFI steers had nearly two times more OTUs correlated to the concentration of acetic acid,isobutyric acid,and ruminal pH than the n-RFI steers.However,the opposite was observed for ammonia concentration and total VFA in the n-RFI steers,where the number of OTUs correlating with these parameters was higher compared to the OTUs in the RL phase of the p-RFI steers(Fig.7).In the RS phase 183 and 180 bacterial OTUs from the p-RFI and n-RFI steers,respectively,and 57 OTUs shared by both groups were positively associated with at least one ruminal variable.Isobutyric acid and ruminal pH were more correlated with OTUs from the p-RFI steers than the n-RFI steers,while ammonia concentration was more correlated with OTUs from n-RFI steers(Fig.7).

    Analysis of negative correlations between microbial taxa and ruminal fermentation products(e.g.,VFAs,NH3)revealed that 198 OTUs from p-RFI steers and 200 OTUs from n-RFI steers,as well as 39 OTUs shared by both groups,were negatively associated with at least one biochemical parameter.The concentration of propionic acid and total VFAs was more negatively correlated with OTUs in p-RFI steers,while a greater number of negative associations were observed for isovaleric acid and ruminal pH and taxa identified in n-RFI steers(Fig.7).In the solid fraction,there were 148 OTUs in p-RFI steers and 163 OTUs in n-RFI steers,in addition to 35 OTUs from both FE groups,associated with at least one ruminal fermentation parameter.Total VFA was negatively correlated with more OTUs in the p-RFI steers than in n-RFI steers,while ruminal pH was more negatively correlated with OTUs linked to the n-RFI steers(Fig.7).

    Fig.7 Correlation network between liquid and solid bacterial OTUs and ruminal fermentation variables according to each RFI group.The edges represent significant associations,as determined by Spearman’s rank correlation(P<0.05).These analyses were performed using OTUs that were shared by at least 50% of the steers in each feed efficiency group.Biochemical parameters:molar proportion of acetic,Ace;propionic,Prop;succinic,Suc;butyric,But;isobutyric,Isobut;valeric,Val;and isovaleric acids,Isoval;acetate-to-propionate ratio,Ace/Prop;total concentration of these volatile fatty acids,VFAt;ammonia concentration,NH3;and ruminal pH)

    Among the most abundant OTUs showing positive or negative correlations with fermentation parameters,we observed a predominance of OTUs from genera in the families Prevotellaceae,Ruminococcaceae,Rikenellaceae,Lachnospiraceae,and Christensenellaceae in the bacterial communities of both RL and RS phases(Supplementary Tables S6-S9).Taxonomic differences were also observed between the most abundant OTUs correlated with steers in the p-RFI or n-RFI groups.The most abundant OTUs that were positively correlated with total VFAs were classified to the genus Papillibacter,Treponema,and the families Bacteroidales, Ruminococcaceae, Prevotellaceae UCG-004,and unclassified Lachnospiraceae in the p-RFI steers,while in the n-RFI steers the most abundant OTUs were assigned to the order Bacteroidales BS1 and S24–7,the families Rikenellaceae RC9,Anaerolineaceae,Christensenellaceae R-7,Lachnospiraceae XPB1014,and the genera Prevotella,Phocaeicola,and Anaerotruncus(Supplementary Table S6).

    Discussion

    Here we investigated the composition of the ruminal microbial communities of high and low FE Nellore beef cattle raised under tropical conditions to identify if specific ruminal microbiota are correlated to FE.Although the steers in this study were classified into different FE groups based on their residual feed intake(RFI),a measure that has the advantage of being independent of animal growth and weight[43,44],we note that RFI has some limitations since it depends on the confinement of the herd for long periods(≥90d),requires daily recording of feed consumption and feed refusals,and weight assessments of the animals.In addition,if animals are housed in groups,individual feed intake can only be verified using specialized equipment(eg:GrowSafe).In tropical countries such as Brazil,limitations are accentuated by beef cattle that are raised predominantly on pasture and very few farmers have access to the infrastructure needed to measure RFI on a commercial scale.

    Our study demonstrates that Nellore steers with a lower FE harbor a ruminal microbiota with an increased Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes(F/B)ratio.Changes in the overall composition of the gut microbiota reflecting an increased F/B ratio have been implicated in certain animal phenotypes,including higher fat deposition in the blood and tissues of humans and mice[45]and increased milk fat in dairy cows[10].Nonetheless,differences in the F/B ratio can not be generalized across animal studies as relative abundances might be influenced by various factors,such as unbalanced sampling,sample processing methods,inter-individual variation,diet composition and feed additives,resulting in conflicting results[14,46,47].

    We also identified a higher relative abundance(0.13%)of bacteria within the family Peptostreptococcaceae(phylum Firmicutes)in the rumen of low efficient animals(p-RFI steers).Despite their low abundance in the rumen,members of this group have been associated with low nitrogen retention in Nellore steers[48].This family includes members of the hyper ammonia-producing bacteria(HAB)[49],which have exceptionally high deamination activity and are thought to contribute to ammonia overflow and inneficient nitrogen retention in ruminants[50].Although no differences in ruminal ammonia nitrogen were observed between the p-RFI and n-RFI steers in the current study,urinary N excretion and N retention deserve further investigation in future studies.

    Our results also revealed specific OTUs belonging to the families Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae and the genus Prevotella that are associated with both n-RFI(more efficient)and p-RFI(less efficient)steers(Table 2 and Supplementary Table S3).These taxa are among the most dominant bacteria in the rumen microbiome and show remarkable functional and genetic diversity,occupying various ecological niches in the rumen ecosystem[51,52].For example,the genus Prevotella is one of the most abundant taxa in the rumen of cattle and contains numerous metabolically versatile bacterial species that can grow on starch,protein,peptides,hemicellulose,and pectin[27].Our data support previous observations indicating that members of these microbial groups can be both positively and negatively correlated with FE in beef and dairy cattle[2,12,16,53].Importantly,bacteria in the family Lachnospiraceae appear to have greater relative abundance in Nellore steers with low nitrogen retention and in beef cattle showing p-RFI phenotype[48,54],and a significant negative correlation was also reported for the Ruminococcaceae in the microbiomes of inefficient Holstein cows[2].

    These findings indicate that some microbial taxa in the n-RFI animals may contribute more efficiently to the metabolism and energy utilization of dietary components.For example,Megasphaera elsdenii and Coprococcus catus were associated with greater production of butyrate and propionate in the rumen microbiome of efficient Holstein cows[2]and functional prediction of bacterial OTUs related to feed efficiency in beef steers indicated a higher abundance of transporters for the uptake of nutrients[19].In addition,studies that evaluated the rumen microbiota of Bos taurus reported that five Prevotella OTUs were more abundant in p-RFI cows and seven OTUs more abundant in n-RFI cows,suggesting that the effects on the host for these organisms are species/OTU-specific[12].Moreover,Chiquette et al.[55]demonstrated that inoculation of Prevotella into the rumen of dairy cows leads to decreased lactate production and increased milk fat yield.In contrast,Jami et al.[10]found a strong and significant negative correlation between the abundance of Prevotella and milk fat production in Israeli Holstein Friesian lactating cows.More recently,Brooke et al.[56]reported that Prevotella copri was the most highly enriched OTU in the fecal microbiota of high FE beef steers,accounting for 3.0% of the relative abundance in high-efficiency animals and only 0.14% relative abundance in low-efficiency steers.These results suggest that specific taxa might be positively correlated with rumen fermentation variables in highefficiency steers and could serve as potential biomarkers for FE in Nellore cattle,similar to the findings reported for Bos taurus cows.

    Although no differences were observed in the predicted functional profile of the rumen bacterial community,our analyses show that different bacterial OTUs are correlated with individual fermentation products for each FE group,and most of these OTUs belong to the same taxonomic groups.Previously,Guan and coworkers reported significantly higher concentrations of butyrate and valerate in the rumen of n-RFI steers,but these changes in VFA concentrations were not linked to specific rumen microbes[13].Taken together,these findings reinforce the idea that FE is a complex trait with specific ruminal bacteria potentially having different contributions to rumen metabolism and host physiology linked to the efficiency of feed utilization.Recent studies using culture-dependent and culture-independent(e.g.RNA-seq)methods have sought to improve the characterization of functional groups involved in ruminal fermentation,thus expanding our understanding of their role in this ecosystem[50,57,58].

    In addition to the complex bacterial community,which is responsible for hydrolyzing non-structural and structural carbohydrates,proteins,peptides,amino amides,and lipids into VFAs,ammonia,hydrogen,and CO2,the archaeal community also plays important a role in the energy retention balance in ruminants,serving as an electron sink that drives the direction of ruminal fermentation[59].Our results indicate that p-RFI Nellore steers exhibit a lower archaeal richness in their rumen,suggesting a more specialized archaeal community with different affinities for H2compared to the n-RFI steers.However,it is important to note that methane emissions were not measured in this study,and the alpha diversity indices(e.g.,Shannon,Simpson)did not differ between methanogenic communities in n-RFI and p-RFI steers.This is in contrast to published studies that report different outcomes for the compositional variation of methanogenic communities and the abundance of archaea in low and high FE cattle[9,14,15,59–61].The discrepancies among studies is likely because methane production is a complex process involving various members of the rumen microbial community(e.g.,bacteria,protozoa,fungi)that generate the main substrates for methanogenesis,such as H2and CO2[60].

    In agreement with results reported for Bos taurus[14,18],our findings reveal that Methanobrevibacter was the most abundant genus of archaea in the rumen of Nellore steers,followed by Methanosphaera and Methanimicrococcus.It is also significant that the genus Methanobrevibacter was increased in p-RFI steers.These methanogenic archaea use the hydrogenotrophic pathway for methane production and utilize H2or formic acid as electron donors[62].Although some ruminal archaea(e.g.members of the order Methanosarcinales and the genus Methanosphaera)that use the methylotrophic or the acetoclastic pathways were also found in our study,we are unable to speculate about the relationship between different methane production pathways and FE in the Nellore steers.

    The anaerobic fungi are long thought to play an important role in fiber degradation in the rumen and are recognized as one of the first colonizers of lignocellulosic substrates in ruminant diets[63].Because the fungal mycelia can penetrate and physically disrupt feed particles,more surface area is exposed for microbial colonization,thereby improving degradation of the plant biomass[64].Our analysis of the fungal community shows no differences in beta diversity between the solid and liquid fractions,indicating that the fungal populations attached to the feed particles are similar to those in the planktonic state.To our knowledge,this is the first work describing the structure and diversity of the anaerobic fungi community in the rumen solid and liquid fractions of Nellore cattle.

    Our fungal taxonomic analysis identified the genus Buwchfawromyces as being more highly distributed in the RS fraction of the more FE steers.Buwchfawromyces is a new genus of anaerobic fungi belonging to the order Neocallimastigales(phylum Neocallimastigomycota)that was isolated from fecal samples of buffalo,sheep,cattle,and horses[65].This fungus produces a monocentric thallus,spherical to ovoid sporangia,and shows an extensive rhizoidal system.However,little information is available about its physiology and further studies are warranted to investigate the metabolic potential of the isolated strains.

    A more detailed analysis of the fungal OTUs revealed that the Otu000004,classified to the Piromyces genus,was present in high proportions(varying on average from 4.42% to 18.73%)in the RL and RS fractions in both FE groups,and was significantly more abundant in the high efficient steers(n-RFI),relative to low efficient steers(p-RFI).Wang et al.[66]observed that inoculation of Piromyces sp.CN6 CGMC C 14449,isolated from the rumen of Xinong Saanen dairy goats,increased the in vitro digestibility of dry matter,neutral detergent fiber,and acid detergent fiber in maize silage.This emphasizes the need for continued efforts aiming at isolating and characterizing rumen anaerobic fungi that could be associated with FE in beef cattle,including in Nellore steers.These fungal populations could help improve the utilization of insoluble substrates,especially in ruminants fed forage-rich diets[63],such as the Nellore cattle that are raised mostly on grasses in the tropics.

    Conclusions

    The findings reported here provide insights into the specific differences in the bacterial,archaeal,and fungal ruminal communities of Nellore steers with high and low FE phenotypes.Individuals with a larger relative abundance of Bacteroidetes and lower relative abundance of Firmicutes and metanogenic archaea were more efficient at feed utilization.We have identified some candidate biomarkers representing important functional groups involved in the ruminal fermentation of dietary compounds.However,due to the intrinsic inter-and intraindividual variation in microbiota and the complexity of animal traits such as feed efficiency,follow-up validation using larger cohorts of cattle will be needed to corroborate these findings.Future studies,including analysis of the genetic and functional capabilities of rumen microorganisms using approaches such as metagenomics,metatranscriptomics,metaproteomics,and metabolomics can provide a greater understanding of the relationship between the ruminal microbiota and FE.In addition,efforts targeting the isolation,characterization,and quantification of ruminal strains that vary in abundance and diversity between n-RFI and p-RFI Nellore steers will be of value to understand the metabolic attributes and ecological functions of microorganisms with potential causal roles in the FE of beef cattle.

    Abbreviations

    ADG:Average daily gain;BW:Body weight;FE:Feed efficiency;CEUAP/UFV:Universidade Federal de Vi?osa Ethics Committee on Production Animal Use;CEUA-IZ:Instituto de Zootecnia Ethics Committee on Animal Use;DMI:Dry matter intake;F/B:Firmicutes to bacteroidetes;ITS1:Internal transcribed spacer 1;LDA:Logarithmic Linear Discrimination Analysis;LEfSe:Linear discriminant analysis effect size;NMDS:Non-metric multidimensional scaling;n-RFI:Negative-RFI;OTU:Operational taxonomic unit;PICRUSt:Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States;p-RFI:Positive-RFI;RFI:Residual feed intake;RL:Rumen liquid;RS:Rumen solids;SD:Standard deviation;SRA:Sequence Read Archive;STAMP:Statistical Analysis of Taxonomic and Functional Profiles;VFA:Volatile fatty acids

    Supplementary Information

    The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00599-7.

    Additional file 1.Supplementary Table S1.Residual feed intake(RFI)of the 129 Nellore steers evaluated in this study.Supplementary Table S2.Summary of sequencing data(Bacteria,Archaea and Fungi)derived from ruminal contents of Nellore steers according to ruminal phase and RFI group.Supplementary Fig.S1.Ruminal bacterial composition at the phyla level of rumen liquids and rumen solids samples.Supplementary Fig.S2.Ruminal bacterial composition at the family level of rumen liquids and rumen solids samples.Supplementary Fig.S3.Composition of the ruminal archaea at the class,order and family levels.Supplementary Fig.S4.Ruminal archaeal composition at the genus level of rumen liquids and rumen solids samples.Supplementary Table S3.Ruminal fungal composition at genus-level according to RFI group.Supplementary Table S4.Relative abundance(%)of the functional categories predicted for the bacterial microbiota in liquid and solid ruminal fractions of Nellore steers showing high(n-RFI)and low(p-RFI)feed efficiency.Supplementary Table S5.Fermentation profile of the ruminal liquid of Nellore steers according to RFI group.Supplementary Table S6.Relative abundance of the most abundant bacterial OTUs showing positive correlation with ruminal fermentation parameters in p-RFI steers.Supplementary Table S7.Relative abundance of the most abundant bacterial OTUs showing positive correlation with ruminal fermentation parameters in n-RFI steers.Supplementary Table S8.Relative abundance of the most abundant bacterial OTUs showing negative correlation with ruminal fermentation parameters in p-RFI steers.Supplementary Table S9.Relative abundance of the most abundant bacterial OTUs showing negative correlation with ruminal fermentation parameters in n-RFI steers.

    Acknowledgments

    We thank the IZ staff for their support and help to handle the animals and Joseph Skarlupka(Suen laboratory)for his supporting laboratory/sequencing analysis.We also thank Sofia M.Moreira,Letícia Elisa Rossi and Helena Santiago Lima for technical assistance with data analysis and figure formatting.

    Authors’contributions

    DRGL,GS,ED,and HCM,conceived,and designed the experiments.GS,MEZM,SFMB,ED,MSD,and HCM provided experimental and laboratory resources.DRGL,MSD and HCM conducted sample collection and DNA extraction.DRGL,CBPB,and AJL performed library construction and sequencing.DRGL,TAOM,AJL,IZC,GS,and HCM conducted data analyses and interpretation of results.DRGL and HCM wrote the manuscript.AJL,GS,MSD,and ED reviewed and edited the manuscript.All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Funding

    This study was supported by Funda??o de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais–FAPEMIG[grant number APQ-02171-15],Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico –CNPq[grant number PVE 313792/2014–3],Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior–CAPES/Proex PPGMBA/UFV[grant number 0001]and the Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia de Ciência Animal– INCT-CA.This work was also supported by a traineeship from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health[grant number T32AI55397]to ALR.

    Availability of data and materials

    All DNA sequences have been deposited in the NCBI’s Sequence Read Archive(SRA-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra)under BioProject accession number PRJNA512996.

    Declarations

    Ethics approval

    All animal work was approved by the Universidade Federal de Vi?osa Ethics Committee on Production Animal Use(CEUAP/UFV),under protocol 026/15 and by the Instituto de Zootecnia Ethics Committee on Animal Use(CEUAIZ),under protocol 213–15.All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Author details

    1Departamento de Microbiologia,Universidade Federal de Vi?osa,Vi?osa,MG 36570-900,Brazil.2Departamento de Zootecnia,Universidade Federal de Vi?osa,Vi?osa,Minas Gerais,Brazil.3Department of Bacteriology,University of Wisconsin-Madison,Madison,WI,USA.4Departamento de Bioquímia e Biologia Molecular,Universidade Federal de Vi?osa,Vi?osa,Minas Gerais,Brazil.5Instituto de Zootecnia,Centro APTA Bovinos de Corte,Sert?ozinho,S?o Paulo,Brazil.

    Received:29 December 2020 Accepted:7 May 2021

    色哟哟·www| 亚洲av福利一区| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 精品久久久久久久末码| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 男女国产视频网站| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 床上黄色一级片| 97超视频在线观看视频| 九色成人免费人妻av| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 亚洲内射少妇av| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 九色成人免费人妻av| 舔av片在线| 久久久久久大精品| 乱人视频在线观看| av在线天堂中文字幕| 免费av毛片视频| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 色哟哟·www| av在线播放精品| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 天美传媒精品一区二区| av在线播放精品| 欧美色视频一区免费| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 在现免费观看毛片| 久久久久网色| 成人二区视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 99热这里只有精品一区| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 男女那种视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 色5月婷婷丁香| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 美女国产视频在线观看| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 免费av毛片视频| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 免费观看人在逋| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 亚洲四区av| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 免费搜索国产男女视频| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 69人妻影院| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 欧美色视频一区免费| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 一级爰片在线观看| 看黄色毛片网站| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲av二区三区四区| h日本视频在线播放| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 欧美3d第一页| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| av黄色大香蕉| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 国产老妇女一区| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 国产精品一及| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 一本久久精品| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 色视频www国产| 久久人妻av系列| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 少妇高潮的动态图| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 日本午夜av视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 六月丁香七月| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 99热这里只有是精品50| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 精品人妻视频免费看| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产成人福利小说| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产精华一区二区三区| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 国产在线男女| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 两个人的视频大全免费| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产av不卡久久| 一夜夜www| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 久久久久久久午夜电影| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| av卡一久久| 国内精品宾馆在线| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 国产淫语在线视频| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| ponron亚洲| 中文天堂在线官网| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 一级毛片电影观看 | 国产在线一区二区三区精 | 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 老司机影院成人| 中文字幕制服av| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 黄色日韩在线| 全区人妻精品视频| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 黑人高潮一二区| 中国国产av一级| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| ponron亚洲| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 午夜日本视频在线| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 有码 亚洲区| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 岛国毛片在线播放| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 99热网站在线观看| 97超视频在线观看视频| 69人妻影院| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 午夜视频国产福利| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 国产三级中文精品| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 国产高清三级在线| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | a级毛色黄片| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 色综合色国产| 久久热精品热| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 韩国av在线不卡| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 一级黄片播放器| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 日韩成人伦理影院| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 黑人高潮一二区| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 欧美3d第一页| 日韩成人伦理影院| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 久久久久网色| 级片在线观看| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 国产三级在线视频| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 欧美成人a在线观看| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 色5月婷婷丁香| 日本与韩国留学比较| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 日韩视频在线欧美| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 亚洲av.av天堂| av在线天堂中文字幕| 久久精品夜色国产| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 免费看日本二区| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 精品午夜福利在线看| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 中文字幕制服av| 精品酒店卫生间| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 免费av不卡在线播放| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 69av精品久久久久久| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 久久99精品国语久久久| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 日本黄大片高清| 日韩欧美三级三区| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 亚洲图色成人| 久久久久久久久久成人| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 亚洲内射少妇av| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 美女国产视频在线观看| 好男人视频免费观看在线| a级毛色黄片| 内地一区二区视频在线| 黄色一级大片看看| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 全区人妻精品视频| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 美女大奶头视频| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产久久久一区二区三区| .国产精品久久| 精品久久久久久电影网 | 色5月婷婷丁香| 久久这里只有精品中国| 在现免费观看毛片| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久 | 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产极品天堂在线| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 黄片wwwwww| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 91精品国产九色| 熟女电影av网| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 热99re8久久精品国产| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| or卡值多少钱| 中文字幕制服av| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | 久久久久性生活片| 少妇的逼水好多| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合 | 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 永久网站在线| 久久久久久大精品| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 美女高潮的动态| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 99热全是精品| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产精品无大码| 亚洲av一区综合| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 简卡轻食公司| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 日本色播在线视频| 变态另类丝袜制服| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 99热全是精品| 免费观看精品视频网站| 日本熟妇午夜| 久久精品91蜜桃| 精品人妻视频免费看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 国产成人精品婷婷| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 久久人妻av系列| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 久久精品夜色国产| 中文字幕久久专区| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 变态另类丝袜制服| 直男gayav资源| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 99久久精品热视频| 一本一本综合久久| h日本视频在线播放| 亚州av有码| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 日韩中字成人| 一级毛片电影观看 | 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 免费看光身美女| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 黄色日韩在线| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 欧美人与善性xxx| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 久久久精品94久久精品| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| videos熟女内射| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | videos熟女内射| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 简卡轻食公司| 久久久久久久久久成人| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 国产老妇女一区| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 伦精品一区二区三区| 国产av不卡久久| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 亚洲av福利一区| 成年免费大片在线观看| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 久久这里只有精品中国| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 99热精品在线国产| 欧美+日韩+精品| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 国产91av在线免费观看| 精品久久久噜噜| 99久久精品热视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 亚洲性久久影院| 午夜a级毛片| 久久久久九九精品影院| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 国产成人freesex在线| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 一级毛片电影观看 | 精品久久久久久成人av| 麻豆成人av视频| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 免费观看人在逋| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 老司机影院毛片| 七月丁香在线播放| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 91av网一区二区| 色综合站精品国产| 欧美97在线视频| 日本色播在线视频| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 老司机影院成人| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 一本久久精品| 免费看光身美女| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 欧美3d第一页| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 日本熟妇午夜| 成人国产麻豆网| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 两个人的视频大全免费| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 欧美潮喷喷水| 黄片wwwwww| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 亚洲综合精品二区| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 欧美色视频一区免费| 伦精品一区二区三区| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 日韩成人伦理影院| 国产精品,欧美在线| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 久久久成人免费电影| 日本一二三区视频观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产av不卡久久| 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 99热这里只有精品一区| 永久网站在线| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 国产成人精品婷婷| 亚洲不卡免费看| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 嫩草影院新地址| 精品久久久噜噜| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 两个人的视频大全免费| 成人无遮挡网站| av.在线天堂| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 22中文网久久字幕| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 97在线视频观看| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 黄色配什么色好看| 国产视频首页在线观看| 日本熟妇午夜| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 国产真实乱freesex| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 久久精品91蜜桃|