• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Ultrasonic Characteristics and Severity Assessment of Lung Ultrasound in COVID-19 Pneumonia:A Retrospective, Observational Study

    2021-07-08 03:42:46FngxuZhuXiujunZhoTiningWngZhnzhouWngFuzhngGuoHiynXuPnpnChngHnshngLingWntoNiYxinWngLiChnBoguoJing
    Engineering 2021年3期

    Fngxu Zhu , Xiujun Zho , Tining Wng , Zhnzhou Wng , Fuzhng Guo , Hiyn Xu ,Pnpn Chng , Hnshng Ling , Wnto Ni , Yxin Wng , Li Chn , Boguo Jing ,*

    a Trauma Center, Critical Care Medicine Department, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China

    b Trauma Center, Key Laboratory of Trauma and Neural Regeneration (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China c Anesthesiology Department, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China

    d Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Department, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China

    e Radiology Department, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China

    Keywords:

    ABSTRACT The clinical application of lung ultrasound (LUS) in the assessment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)pneumonia severity remains limited. Herein, we investigated the role of LUS imaging in COVID-19 pneumonia patients and the relationship between LUS findings and disease severity. This was a retrospective, observational study at Tongji Hospital, on 48 recruited patients with COVID-19 pneu-monia,including 32 non-critically ill patients and 16 critically ill patients. LUS was performed and the respiratory rate oxygenation (ROX) index, disease severity, and confusion, blood urea nitrogen, respira-tory rate,blood pressure, and age (CURB-65) score were recorded on days 0–7, 8–14, and 15–21 after symptom onset. Lung images were divided into 12 regions, and the LUS score (0–36 points) was calcu-lated. Chest computed tomography (CT) scores (0–20 points) were also recorded on days 0–7. Correlations between the LUS score, ROX index, and CURB-65 scores were examined. LUS detected COVID-19 pneumonia in 38 patients. LUS signs included B lines (34/38, 89.5%), consolidations (6/38, 15.8%), and pleural effusions(2/38, 5.3%). Most cases showed more than one lesion (32/38, 84.2%) and involved both lungs (28/38,73.7%). Compared with non-critically ill patients, the LUS scores of critically ill patients were higher (12(10–18) vs 2 (0–5), p < 0.001). The LUS score showed significant negative cor-relations with the ROX index on days 0–7 (r = -0.85, p < 0.001), days 8–14 (r = -0.71, p < 0.001), and days 15–21 (r = -0.76, p < 0.001)after symptom onset. However, the LUS score was positively correlated with the CT score (r = 0.82, p<0.001). The number of patients with LUS-detected lesions decreased from 27 cases (81.8%) to 20 cases(46.5%), and the LUS scores significantly decreased from 4 (2–10) to 0 (0–5)(p < 0.001) from days 0–7 to 17–21. We conclude that LUS can detect lung lesions in COVID-19 pneumo-nia patients in a portable, realtime, and safe manner. Thus, LUS is helpful in assessing COVID-19 pneu-monia severity in critically ill patients.

    1.Introduction

    On March 11,2020,the World Health Organization(WHO)declared the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2)outbreak a pandemic[1].Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection can develop coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19).As of 14 Aug 2020,more than 20 730 000 COVID-19 cases have been confirmed and more than 751 000 deaths have occurred worldwide[2].More than 89 600 COVID-19 cases have been confirmed in China;approximately 20% of these were severe cases,with a mortality rate of approximately 5.4%(as of 14 Aug 2020)[2].COVID-19 can lead to respiratory failure and secondary multiple organ failure,ultimately increasing mortality[3].At the same time,COVID-19 pneumonia can complicate and change the clinical situation rapidly. Therefore, it is important to diagnose, accurately assess the extent of the disease, and monitor lung lesions in a timely manner in real time without increasing the risk of contagion.

    Lung ultrasound (LUS) is an effective imaging method for diagnosing pleural and pulmonary lesions; it can be performed continuously, in real time, and with no radiation exposure, to evaluate disease severity [4]. The LUS score is a semi-quantitative scoring system that has been applied for diagnosing, progression monitoring, and prognosis predicting, in conditions such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pneumonia, hydrothorax, and pulmonary edema [5–8].

    Some studies have evaluated the efficacy of LUS in the assessment of COVID-19 pneumonia severity. Sofia et al. [9] described ultrasonic and clinical findings at different clinical stages in COVID-19. Two articles reported that the LUS features of COVID-19 pneumonia/ARDS can be used to assess disease severity in 20 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia [10,11]. Two narrative reviews suggested that the LUS score could objectively grade COVID-19 associated lung injury [12,13]. However, the relationship between the LUS score and the disease severity of COVID-19 pneumonia is not clearly defined. This study investigated the LUS features of COVID-19 pneumonia and the relationship between LUS findings and COVID-19 pneumonia severity.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Study design and participants

    This retrospective, observational study was conducted at the Sino-French Xincheng Branch of Tongji Hospital of the Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The institu-tion is a tertiary teaching hospital responsible for the treatment of governmentreferred patients with COVID-19. The Aid Hubei Medical Team of Peking University People’s Hospital took over one of the wards at the Sino-French Xincheng Branch of Tongji Hospital on 7 February 2020 to care for patients with severe COVID-19. This study follows the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. [14].

    Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were consecutively recruited between 7 February 2020 and 8 March 2020. All patients were over 18 years old and met the WHO interim guidance diagnostic criteria for COVID-19 pneumonia [15]. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by a nucleic acid test with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests of a nasopharyngeal swab sample,in accordance with a previously protocol [16]. The exclusion criteria were as follows: pulmonary edema related to heart failure;chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPDs); severe hemodynamic instability and inability to change body position; severe thoracic deformity, extensive subcutaneous emphysema, and inability to undergo a LUS examination; and patients without LUS data of all 12 lung regions according to the LUS protocol.

    Based on the time interval between onset of symptoms and the LUS examination, we designated three groups of patients in our study: group 1 (LUS examination done 0–7 d after symptom onset); group 2 (LUS examination done 8–14 d after symptom onset); and group 3 (LUS examination done 15–21 d after symptom onset).

    Between 7 February 2020 and 8 March 2020, 60 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were recruited. Twelve patients were excluded because of incomplete LUS examination data (n = 6),the presence of COPDs (n = 5), or an interval between symptom onset and LUS examination greater than 21 d (n = 1). Finally, the data of 48 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were included.Based on the time interval between symptom onset and LUS examination,33 patients were assigned to group 1,40 to group 2,and 43 to group 3(Fig.1).

    This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Peking University People’s Hospital(2020PHB048-01).Informed consent was orally obtained from all patients.

    2.2.Data collection

    2.2.1.Clinical data

    The severity of COVID-19 pneumonia was defined according to the Chinese specific management guidelines(version 7.0)[17].Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were divided into two groups—critically ill and non-critically ill—according to the disease severity.Critically ill patients met one of the following conditions:①Respiratory failure had occurred and mechanical ventilation was required;②shock had occurred;or③other organ failure requiring intensive care unit(ICU)treatment had occurred.Of the 48 cases of COVID-19 pneumonia,32 were classified as non-critically ill and 16 as critically ill.Patient characteristics were retrieved from the electronic patient data management system.The collected baseline data included sex,age,comorbidities(hypertension,diabetes mellitus,coronary heart disease,and chronic renal failure),clinical symptoms(temperature>37.3 °C,cough,purulent expectoration,dyspnea,and thoracic pain),respiratory data(pulse oxygen saturation,respiratory rate,fraction of inspired oxygen(FiO2),the respiratory rate oxygenation(ROX)index,and invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation),the confusion,blood urea nitrogen,respiratory rate,blood pressure,and age(CURB-65)score,and laboratory indicators(SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test results,leukocyte and lymphocyte counts,C-reactive protein(CRP)levels,and interleukin-6(IL-6)levels).Changes in disease severity,CURB-65 score,and ROX index were recorded for groups 1,2,and 3 at the same time as the LUS examinations.

    The FiO2in nasal catheter patients was calculated according to the following formula:FiO2(%)=21+4×oxygen flow rate(in L?min-1)[18].A FiO2of 5–8 L?min-1by face mask was approximated as 50%,a FiO2of 8–10 L?min-1was approximated as 60%,and a FiO2above 10 L?min-1was approximated as 80%.The actual FiO2monitored by the ventilator was considered to be the FiO2of mechanical ventilation.The ROX index,defined as the ratio of oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry/FiO2to respiratory rate,was assessed as a clinical indicator of oxygenation[19].The objective was to maintain the pulse oxygen saturation above 93%.If the oxygen administered through a nasal catheter or face mask could not achieve the target pulse oxygen saturation,patients were provided with noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation.The CURB-65 score was calculated using confusion(C),blood urea nitrogen(U)>7 mmol?L-1,respiratory rate(R)>30 breaths per minute,blood pressure(B)(systolic pressure<90 mmHg(1 mmHg≈133.322 Pa)or diastolic pressure<60 mmHg),and age>65 years old[20].One point was allocated to each positive item,for a total score of up to 5 points.

    2.2.2.Lung ultrasound

    Three well-trained critical care physicians from the research team performed LUS on days 0–7,8–14,and 15–21.LUS was performed on the same day as the computed tomography(CT)scan.The ultrasonographers were trained according to the Chinese Critical Ultrasound Study Group(CCUSG)training course[21].Their experience ranged from one to three years.They were blinded to the patients’clinical details and CT findings,and did not contribute to the patients’diagnostic or treatment strategies.We primarily used an Esaote MyLab Alpha ultrasound machine(Esaote Europe B.V.,the Netherlands)with a 3.5–5.0 MHz convex ultrasound probe.A 7.5 MHz linear probe was occasionally used.LUS-related images included A lines,B lines,consolidations,pleural line changes,and pleural effusions.

    Fig.1.Flowchart showing the process of enrolment,exclusion,and assessment of recruited patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

    2.2.3.Lung ultrasound score

    The scanning protocol included the assessment of six lung regions in each lung(upper anterior,lower anterior,upper lateral,lower lateral,upper posterior,and lower posterior)[22].Each region was assigned a score as follows[22]:0 point for normal aeration;1 point for moderate loss of aeration(multiple spaced B lines,or coalescent B lines in less than 50%of the intercostal space examined in the transversal plane,or subpleural consolidations);2 points for severe loss of aeration(diffused coalescent B lines occupying the whole intercostal space);and 3 points for complete loss of lung aeration(lung consolidation).The most severe ultrasound pattern observed in one or several intercostal spaces was considered to be characteristic for the region of interest.All patients underwent LUS and had 12 lung regions examined.The final LUS score was the sum of the scores of the 12 regions(0–36 points).

    Inter-observer agreement was assessed in a random subset of the study population.We calculated that a sample size of 70 measurements would be required,according to a difference in overall agreement and a change probability of 0.6,with a 20%accepted relative error.Seventy LUS points were assessed to determine the inter-observer agreement.LUS images were analyzed independently by two researchers.Any disputes were resolved by consulting with a third researcher until an agreement was reached.LUS image readers were blinded to the patients’clinical details and CT findings.

    2.2.4.Chest computed tomography

    Chest CTs were performed on days 0–7 using a Siemens Sensation 64-row spiral CT machine(Siemens,Germany).The scanning parameters were as follows:tube voltage,120 kV;tube current,100–200 mA;slice thickness,5,1.0,or 1.25 mm for thin scanning;and high-resolution image reconstruction with soft-tissue and bone reconstruction algorithms.The acquired images were transferred to a workstation.The CT semi-quantitative analysis method was used to evaluate the pulmonary lesions,including groundglass opacities,consolidation shadows,reticulation/interlobular septal thickening,irregular solid nodules,fibrous stripes,and no related lesions[23].Each of the five lung lobes was assessed for degree of involvement to obtain the five-grade score[24]:0 point,no involvement;1 point,<25%;2 points,26%–50%;3 points,51%–75%;and 4 points,76%–100%.The total score was reached by summing the five lobes scores(ranging from 0 to 20).Chest-CT findings were analyzed by an experienced radiologist and a critical respiratory specialist,both of whom were blinded to the sonographic and clinical details.The consensus of both specialists was required for a CT-based diagnosis.

    2.3.Statistical analyses

    Continuous variables were tested for normality;the normally distributed variables were expressed as mean±standard deviation and the non-normally distributed continuous variables were expressed as median(interquartile range).Categorical variables were expressed as percentages.For between-group comparisons,a Student’s t-test was used for continuous variables,a nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test for non-normally distributed continuous variables,and Pearsonχ2test for categorical variables.The Pearson correlation test was used to compare the correlations of continuous variables,and the Spearman correlation test was used to compare the correlations of categorical variables.A receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was used to analyze the LUS score in order to determine the optimal threshold for predicting COVID-19 pneumonia severity.The area under the ROC curve(AUROC)was then calculated.The optimal cut-off value was defined as the point with the highest Youden’s index(sensitivity+specificity-1).The 95%confidence interval(CI)values were calculated.LUS data and clinical characteristics of different disease courses were compared with a generalized estimating equation for normally distributed variables and categorical variables,and a Friedman test for non-normally distributed continuous variables.A p value<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.Cohen’s kappa(κ)statistics were used to assess LUS inter-observer agreement.Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software package version 17.0(IBM,USA)and MedCalc version 19.0.7(MedCalc Software bvba,Belgium).

    3.Results

    The baseline characteristics of the two patient groups(16 critically ill vs 32 non-critically ill patients)were not significantly different(p>0.05),including gender(8 men(50.0%)vs 18 men(56.3%)),age((64.8±11.6)years vs(62.0±14.3)years),or comorbidities,such as coronary heart disease(four cases(25.0%)vs nine cases(28.1%)),diabetes mellitus(four cases(25.0%)vs seven cases(21.9%)).Symptoms such as cough(16 cases(100%)vs 25 cases(78.1%)),purulent expectoration(16 cases(100%)vs 21 cases(65.6%)),dyspnea(11 cases(68.8%)vs 6 cases(18.8%)),and thoracic pain(eight cases(50.0%)vs four cases(12.5%))were more frequent in critically ill patients than in non-critically ill patients(p<0.05).All six patients who required mechanical ventilation and all four patients who died were critically ill patients.Baseline patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

    3.1.LUS features of COVID-19 pneumonia

    Among the 48 patients who underwent LUS,38 patients were detected with COVID-19 pneumonia based on the following features:B lines,34 patients(89.5%);pleural line changes,ten patients(26.3%);consolidations,six patients(15.8%);and pleural effusions,two patients(5.3%).Among the ten patients with negative LUS,three patients were also negative on CT,six of the seven patients with positive CT had a CT score≤2,and one patient with a CT score of 6 had lung lesions far away from the pleura.The lesions were most frequently bilateral(28 cases,73.7%),and 32 patients(84.2%)had more than one lesion.The most common lesions were located at the bilateral lower lateral lung(55 regions,72.4%)and the bilateral lower posterior lung(62 regions,81.6%).Overall inter-observer agreement for LUS showed excellent agreement(κ=0.864,p<0.001).

    The LUS characteristics of 16 critically ill patients and 32 noncritically ill patients were analyzed.In critically ill patients,B lines were observed in 16 cases(100%),and consolidation in two cases(12.5%).In non-critically ill patients,B lines were observed in 18 cases(56.3%)and consolidation in four cases(12.5%).There were significantly more LUS-detected lesions in critically ill patients than in non-critically ill patients,both proportional in the two patient groups(16 cases(100%)vs 22 cases(68.8%),p=0.012)and region-wise(148 regions(77.1%)vs 103 regions(26.8%),p<0.001).Critically ill patients were more likely than noncritically ill patients to have bilateral LUS-detected lesions(15cases(93.8%)vs 13 cases(40.6%),p<0.001)and more than one lesion(16 cases(100%)vs 16 cases(50.0%),p=0.001).LUSdetected lesions were more frequently located in the bilateral lower lateral lung(30 regions(93.8%)vs 25 regions(39.1%),p<0.001)and lower posterior lung(32 regions(100%)vs 30 regions(46.9%),p<0.001)in critically ill patients than in noncritically ill patients.These results are shown in Fig.2.

    Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

    3.2.LUS score and disease severity

    3.2.1.Correlation between LUS score and indicators of disease severity

    The LUS score was significantly higher in critically ill patients than in non-critically ill patients(12(10–18)vs 2(0–5),p<0.001).In critically ill patients,the ROX index was significant lower((5.2±2.4)vs(10.5±2.6),p<0.001),and the CURB-65 score(3(2–3)vs 1(0–2),p<0.001)was significantly higher than those in non-critically ill patients(Table 1).From group 1 to group 3,the LUS score significantly decreased(4(2–10)vs 0(0–5),p<0.001),while the ROX index((9.3±3.4)vs(14.9±6.8),p<0.001)significantly increased.The LUS score showed significant negative correlations with the ROX index(r=-0.85,95% CI:–0.92 to–0.72,p<0.001),and significant positive correlations with disease severity(r=0.76,95% CI:0.56–0.88,p<0.001)and CURB-65 score(r=0.81,95% CI:0.64–0.90,p<0.001),in group 1(Fig.3).The LUS score showed significant negative correlations with the ROX index(r=-0.71,95%CI:–0.83 to–0.50,p<0.001),and significant positive correlations with disease severity(r=0.63,95% CI:0.39–0.79,p<0.001)and CURB-65 score(r=0.70,95% CI:0.50–0.83,p<0.001),in group 2.The LUS score showed significant negative correlations with the ROX index(r=-0.76,95% CI:–0.86 to–0.59,p<0.001),and significant positive correlations with disease severity(r=0.56,95%CI:0.31–0.74,p<0.001)and CURB-65 score(r=0.71,95% CI:0.53–0.84,p<0.001),in group 3.

    Fig.2.LUS characteristics according to disease severity.Stacked bars show the proportion of patients with LUS-detected lesions in six regions of unilateral lung according to disease severity.

    Fig.3.Correlation of LUS score with disease severity on days 0–7.(a)LUS score and disease severity;(b)LUS score and CURB-65;(c)LUS score and ROX index;(d)LUS score and CT score.

    3.2.2.LUS score versus CT score in assessing disease severity

    All 48 patients underwent CT on days 0–7,and 45 patients were CT-positive.The CT scores of critically ill patients were significantly higher than those of non-critically ill patients(12(9–18)vs 6(2–8),p<0.001).The CT score was negatively correlated with ROX index(r=-0.70,95% CI:–0.84 to–0.47,p<0.001),and positively correlated with CURB-65 score(r=0.62,95% CI:0.35–0.79,p<0.001)and disease severity(r=0.60,95% CI:0.32–0.79,p<0.001).

    The LUS score was positively correlated with the CT score(r=0.82,95%CI:0.66–0.91,p<0.001)(Fig.3).The correlation coefficient between the LUS score and the ROX index was compared with the correlation coefficient between the CT score and the ROX index(r=-0.85 vs–0.70),with no statistical difference(p>0.05).This indicates that LUS may be an alternative to CT in evaluating disease severity.

    3.2.3.LUS cut-off value in assessing critically ill patients

    The AUROC of the LUS score assessing critically ill patients was 0.96(95% CI:0.88–0.99),with a cut-off value of 7,a sensitivity of 80.8%(95% CI:60.6%–93.4%),and a specificity of 95.8%(95% CI:85.7%–99.5%)(Fig.4).

    3.3.LUS and different disease courses

    Fig.4.ROCs for LUS score predicting the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia.AUC:area under curve.

    In group 1,27 out of 33 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were detected by LUS;in group 2,26 out of 40 patients were detected by LUS;and in group 3,20 out of 43 patients were detected by LUS.From group 1 to group 3,disease remission was demonstrated by LUS.From group 1 to group 3,the number of patients with LUSdetected lesions decreased from 27(81.8%)to 20(46.5%)(p=0.001).The number of patients with B lines decreased from 27(81.8%)to 20(46.5%)(p=0.001).The number of patients with more than one lesion decreased from 27(81.8%)to 19(44.2%)(p<0.001).The number of patients with bilateral lesions declined from 20(60.6%)to 17(39.5%)(p=0.001)(Table 2 and Fig.5).

    4.Discussion

    After the outbreak of COVID-19,there has been a global pandemic,and the number of COVID-19 patients continues to rise[1].In patients with comorbidities or complications[25],the hospitalization and intensive care unit admission rates increase significantly[26].The development of quick and convenient methods to assess COVID-19 pneumonia severity will improve triage decisionmaking and diagnosis,as well as the choice for subsequent therapy.Currently,studies on COVID-19 severity and prognosis have mainly focused on clinical features and risk factors analysis.Zhou et al.[3]found that older age,a high sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA)score,and D-dimer levels greater than 1μg?mL-1were associated with a higher rate of in-hospital deaths.Thus far,other methods of examination for pneumonia have shortcomings.X-ray cannot predict the mortality and prognosis of ARDS[27].Furthermore,a chest CT requires patients to be moved to the CT room,which increases the risk of virus exposure and nosocomial outbreaks,and a CT cannot be repeated and performed at any moment.Point-of-care LUS can reduce the risks associated with moving patients and virus spreading in critically ill patients.LUS is a fast,accurate,and portable examination that can be performed in real time with no radiation exposure,to evaluate lung lesions.However,only a few studies have reported employing LUS to assess COVID-19 pneumonia severity[28–30],and these were mainly descriptive studies or narrative reviews.A study found that LUS was performed to assess the severity of respiratory failure in six patients with COVID-19[28].Another study that recruited ten patients with COVID-19 suggested that LUS score monitoring seemed to reflect disease progression[29].A narrative review indicated that LUS may be used to identify areas of poor lung aeration and to monitor recruitment maneuvers on lung aeration in the ICU[30].Whereas the present study focused on assessing the value of LUS in patients with critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia and monitoring the disease changes.This study demonstrated a good correlation between LUS score and disease severity,which indicated that the LUS score could be used to distinguish disease severity in COVID-19 pneumonia.

    Table 2 Ultrasonic features and clinical and laboratory findings at days 0–7,8–14,and 15–21 after symptom onset in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

    The main findings of our study are as follows:①The LUS signs of COVID-19 pneumonia are mainly B lines,most lesions on bilateral lesions,more than one lesion,and most lesions located in the bilateral lower lateral lung and the bilateral lower posterior lung,and critically ill patients have more LUS-detected lesions and a higher LUS score than non-critically ill patients;②the LUS score can assess the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia,and LUS is an alternative modality to a CT scan to evaluate disease severity;and③the LUS score significantly decreased with improvement of the disease condition.These findings indicate that during outbreaks of COVID-19 pneumonia,LUS can be an effective method to assess disease severity.

    The LUS signs of COVID-19 pneumonia were pulmonary edema(B lines in 89.5% of the patients)and consolidation(15.8%).Most cases showed multiple lesions(84.2%)and were bilateral(73.7%).From days 0–7 to days 15–21 after symptom onset,there was a significant reduction in the percentage of patients with LUS-detected lesions(81.8%vs 46.5%),and the percentage of patients with more than one lesion decreased from 81.8% to 44.2%.

    Shi et al.[31]demonstrated chest-CT findings of bilateral,subpleural,and ground-glass opacities,as well as ill-defined boundary lesions,in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia,similar to the lung lesions distribution in our study.An autopsy pathology of COVID-19 showed that the exfoliation reaction was more evident than that in severe acute respiratory syndrome(SARS),while pulmonary fibrosis and consolidation were not as serious as those observed in SARS[32].Moreover,common radiologic findings of SARS are ground-glass opacities and mixed lesions of ground-glass opacities with irregular consolidation[33].This is consistent with the findings of this study,in that there were more B lines and less consolidations(15.8%vs 45.5%)[33].The results of our study indicate that,although there is a wide lesion range in COVID-19 pneumonia,the incidence of interstitial fibrosis may be lower in the later stages of the disease,and the subsequent prognosis may be relatively good.

    The LUS score has been widely used in recent years to quantitatively evaluate the severity and prognosis of lung lesions[5–8].The number of lung regions and the number of ultrasound scores are mainly used to calculate the total score and to quantify the aeration area of the lungs:the smaller the aeration area,the higher the LUS score.In our study,lung lesions were assessed using the universally acknowledged 12-region LUS scoring method.

    One study has found that the LUS score can assess the disease severity of ARDS[5],and two other studies have found that the LUS score can assess the prognosis of ARDS[6,7].A study indicated that the LUS score seemed to reflect disease progression in ten patients with COVID-19[29].The CURB-65 score has been found to assess the severity of pneumonia[20].In our study,the LUS score was negatively correlated with the ROX index and positively correlated with the CURB-65 score.The ROX index was used to predict the risk of intubation in patients with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy[19].In this study,we adopted the ROX index to assess the degree of hypoxia of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.Thus,the LUS score could assess the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia.

    We also analyzed the correlation between the LUS score and the CT score,and found that the correlation coefficient between the LUS score and the CT score was 0.82,indicating that the LUS could be an alternative modality to the CT scan for evaluating disease severity.Similar findings were previously reported in ARDS patients.Chiumello et al.[34]reported that the average global agreement between LUS and CT scan was 0.775 in ARDS patients.Recently,another study on ARDS patients found that the overall agreement of LUS findings with the correlating lobe on CT was 87%[35].However,LUS is fast,portable,and noninvasive,and can be conducted in real time,which can reduce the risk of infection spreading during outbreaks of COVID-19.Thus,LUS is more suitable for the assessment of COVID-19 pneumonia severity than the CT scan.

    Fig.5.A typical case of a COVID-19 pneumonia patient.(a)B lines at the right lower lateral lung reflecting pneumonia on day 6;(b)B lines at the left lower lateral lung reflecting pneumonia on day 6;(c)chest CT showing multiple infiltrations in both lungs on day 6;(d)B lines at the right lower lateral lung reflecting pneumonia on day 13;(e)B lines at the left lower lateral lung reflecting pneumonia on day 13;(f)B lines at the right lower lateral lung reflecting pneumonia on day 17;(g)LUS showing no lesion at the left lower lateral lung on day 17;(h)B lines decreased at the right lower lateral lung on day 24;(i)LUS showing no lesion at the left lower lateral lung on day 24;(j)chest CT showing that the infiltration in both lungs was significantly reduced on day 21.

    The LUS score can also be used to differentiate between various degrees of COVID-19 pneumonia severity.Our results showed that the cut-off value of LUS in the assessment of critically ill patients was 7 points.Li et al.[36]found that,in patients with ARDS,the 12-region LUS score can predict the severity of the disease,with 7 being mild,11 moderate,and 18 severe.During the global pandemic of COVID-19,a large number of patients may present in a short period of time,leading to a shortage of medical supplies and assessment equipment.LUS could be used for the quick assessment of disease severity and to recognize critically ill patients in early stages,thereby providing a reference for triage,diagnosis,and treatment.

    Our study has several limitations.First,this study took place in a single ward with critically ill patients and a small patient sample size.A larger sample size and prospective studies are needed to further evaluate the clinical value of LUS in COVID-19 pneumonia.Second,in our study,patients were treated in the infectious disease ward,but the partial pressure of oxygen(pO2)in the majority of patients was not detected due to limited conditions;thus,the correlation between LUS score and pO2/FiO2ratio could not be verified.Finally,all patients recruited in our study were inpatients with COVID-19 pneumonia.However,LUS may also be used in the screening of suspected COVID-19 pneumonia cases.

    5.Conclusions

    LUS can assess lung lesions in COVID-19 pneumonia in a portable,real-time,and safe manner.Furthermore,LUS can conveniently and safely assess the disease severity in critically ill COVID-19 patients.Thus,LUS can be an alternative to CT scans in the assessment of COVID-19 pneumonia severity.Prospective cohort studies or randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the role of LUS in severity assessment and treatment guidance in COVID-19.

    Acknowledgements

    We acknowledge all healthcare workers involved in the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 patients in Wuhan.This work was supported by the Michigan Medicine-Peking University Health Science Center Joint Institute for Translational and Clinical Research(BMU20160527),Peking University Clinical Scientist Program supported by‘‘the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities”(BMU2019LCKXJ005),and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(81971808).

    Compliance with ethics guidelines

    Fengxue Zhu,Xiujuan Zhao,Tianbing Wang,Zhenzhou Wang,Fuzheng Guo,Haiyan Xue,Panpan Chang,Hansheng Liang,Wentao Ni,Yaxin Wang,Lei Chen,and Baoguo Jiang declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.

    精品亚洲成国产av| 午夜视频精品福利| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 热re99久久国产66热| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 露出奶头的视频| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 岛国毛片在线播放| 欧美在线黄色| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 成人国产av品久久久| 搡老乐熟女国产| 操美女的视频在线观看| 国产成人影院久久av| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 久9热在线精品视频| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 久热这里只有精品99| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 蜜桃在线观看..| 丁香欧美五月| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 考比视频在线观看| 岛国毛片在线播放| 大型av网站在线播放| 最黄视频免费看| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 久久热在线av| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 另类精品久久| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 久久亚洲真实| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| avwww免费| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 午夜福利欧美成人| 97在线人人人人妻| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 中文字幕制服av| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| av有码第一页| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 精品久久久久久电影网| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产精品 国内视频| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 精品亚洲成国产av| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 91老司机精品| 国产1区2区3区精品| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| a级毛片黄视频| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 久久热在线av| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 国产精品九九99| kizo精华| h视频一区二区三区| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 久久久国产成人免费| 亚洲中文av在线| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| av免费在线观看网站| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| av欧美777| 亚洲伊人色综图| 另类精品久久| 在线观看66精品国产| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 日本wwww免费看| 久久久久国内视频| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 深夜精品福利| 考比视频在线观看| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 久久亚洲真实| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 精品福利永久在线观看| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 成人手机av| 视频区图区小说| 久久久久视频综合| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 一级毛片电影观看| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 午夜福利视频精品| 一本久久精品| 黄色成人免费大全| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 97在线人人人人妻| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 国产精品二区激情视频| 亚洲第一青青草原| 国产三级黄色录像| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 国产色视频综合| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| av网站在线播放免费| 成人影院久久| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 色播在线永久视频| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 久久久欧美国产精品| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 制服诱惑二区| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 五月开心婷婷网| 久久香蕉激情| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 中文字幕色久视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 搡老乐熟女国产| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 国产又爽黄色视频| 999久久久国产精品视频| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 无限看片的www在线观看| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 免费av中文字幕在线| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 天天添夜夜摸| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 久久青草综合色| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 桃花免费在线播放| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 国产高清videossex| 成人18禁在线播放| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 99九九在线精品视频| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 丝袜美足系列| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| av不卡在线播放| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 丁香六月天网| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 制服诱惑二区| 香蕉国产在线看| av有码第一页| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线 | 女人精品久久久久毛片| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| av线在线观看网站| 在线观看www视频免费| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 日韩有码中文字幕| 久久这里只有精品19| 久久九九热精品免费| 国产精品成人在线| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 丁香六月欧美| 久久 成人 亚洲| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 窝窝影院91人妻| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 多毛熟女@视频| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 免费av中文字幕在线| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 午夜福利视频精品| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 亚洲成人手机| 丝袜美足系列| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 悠悠久久av| 国产成人欧美| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 精品久久久久久电影网| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 人人澡人人妻人| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 成人永久免费在线观看视频 | 日韩欧美三级三区| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| av线在线观看网站| 午夜福利欧美成人| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 一个人免费看片子| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 超色免费av| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 香蕉国产在线看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 女警被强在线播放| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 在线av久久热| 久久影院123| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 高清欧美精品videossex| 黄色成人免费大全| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 自线自在国产av| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 一区福利在线观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 国产三级黄色录像| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 日本a在线网址| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 另类精品久久| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 色综合婷婷激情| 9热在线视频观看99| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 亚洲 国产 在线| av欧美777| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 久久av网站| 99久久国产精品久久久| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 久久久精品区二区三区| av欧美777| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 在线观看人妻少妇| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 久久这里只有精品19| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| kizo精华| 国产av又大| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 大香蕉久久网| 无人区码免费观看不卡 | 日韩免费av在线播放| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 我的亚洲天堂| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| av网站在线播放免费| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 露出奶头的视频| 成人国产av品久久久| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 制服人妻中文乱码| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 天天添夜夜摸| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 9色porny在线观看| 18禁观看日本| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 久久久精品94久久精品| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 成人国产av品久久久| 亚洲色图av天堂| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 久久久久国内视频| 色综合婷婷激情| 丝袜喷水一区| a级毛片在线看网站| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 午夜福利欧美成人| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 超色免费av| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 亚洲伊人色综图| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| av天堂久久9| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 夫妻午夜视频| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 日本a在线网址| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 中国美女看黄片| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 搡老岳熟女国产| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 色播在线永久视频| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 热99re8久久精品国产| av电影中文网址| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 少妇 在线观看| 麻豆av在线久日| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| www日本在线高清视频| av欧美777| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 超色免费av| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 久久久久视频综合| 精品第一国产精品| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 91精品三级在线观看| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 在线天堂中文资源库| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区 | 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 91精品三级在线观看| 99香蕉大伊视频| av电影中文网址| 搡老岳熟女国产| 精品人妻1区二区| av有码第一页| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 欧美大码av| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 日本欧美视频一区| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 久久青草综合色| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 麻豆av在线久日| 高清欧美精品videossex| 色在线成人网| av网站免费在线观看视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 多毛熟女@视频| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 国产单亲对白刺激| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 午夜久久久在线观看| 在线观看www视频免费| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 精品人妻1区二区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 色综合婷婷激情| 乱人伦中国视频| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 日韩免费av在线播放| 一级片免费观看大全| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 国产成人精品无人区| 久9热在线精品视频| 岛国在线观看网站| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 丁香六月欧美| 日本五十路高清| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 99热网站在线观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 一本综合久久免费| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| bbb黄色大片| 久久 成人 亚洲| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 曰老女人黄片| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 美女福利国产在线| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 三级毛片av免费| 午夜91福利影院| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 深夜精品福利| av天堂久久9| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 国产区一区二久久| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 蜜桃在线观看..| 中文字幕色久视频|