• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Ultrasonic Characteristics and Severity Assessment of Lung Ultrasound in COVID-19 Pneumonia:A Retrospective, Observational Study

    2021-07-08 03:42:46FngxuZhuXiujunZhoTiningWngZhnzhouWngFuzhngGuoHiynXuPnpnChngHnshngLingWntoNiYxinWngLiChnBoguoJing
    Engineering 2021年3期

    Fngxu Zhu , Xiujun Zho , Tining Wng , Zhnzhou Wng , Fuzhng Guo , Hiyn Xu ,Pnpn Chng , Hnshng Ling , Wnto Ni , Yxin Wng , Li Chn , Boguo Jing ,*

    a Trauma Center, Critical Care Medicine Department, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China

    b Trauma Center, Key Laboratory of Trauma and Neural Regeneration (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China c Anesthesiology Department, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China

    d Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Department, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China

    e Radiology Department, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China

    Keywords:

    ABSTRACT The clinical application of lung ultrasound (LUS) in the assessment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)pneumonia severity remains limited. Herein, we investigated the role of LUS imaging in COVID-19 pneumonia patients and the relationship between LUS findings and disease severity. This was a retrospective, observational study at Tongji Hospital, on 48 recruited patients with COVID-19 pneu-monia,including 32 non-critically ill patients and 16 critically ill patients. LUS was performed and the respiratory rate oxygenation (ROX) index, disease severity, and confusion, blood urea nitrogen, respira-tory rate,blood pressure, and age (CURB-65) score were recorded on days 0–7, 8–14, and 15–21 after symptom onset. Lung images were divided into 12 regions, and the LUS score (0–36 points) was calcu-lated. Chest computed tomography (CT) scores (0–20 points) were also recorded on days 0–7. Correlations between the LUS score, ROX index, and CURB-65 scores were examined. LUS detected COVID-19 pneumonia in 38 patients. LUS signs included B lines (34/38, 89.5%), consolidations (6/38, 15.8%), and pleural effusions(2/38, 5.3%). Most cases showed more than one lesion (32/38, 84.2%) and involved both lungs (28/38,73.7%). Compared with non-critically ill patients, the LUS scores of critically ill patients were higher (12(10–18) vs 2 (0–5), p < 0.001). The LUS score showed significant negative cor-relations with the ROX index on days 0–7 (r = -0.85, p < 0.001), days 8–14 (r = -0.71, p < 0.001), and days 15–21 (r = -0.76, p < 0.001)after symptom onset. However, the LUS score was positively correlated with the CT score (r = 0.82, p<0.001). The number of patients with LUS-detected lesions decreased from 27 cases (81.8%) to 20 cases(46.5%), and the LUS scores significantly decreased from 4 (2–10) to 0 (0–5)(p < 0.001) from days 0–7 to 17–21. We conclude that LUS can detect lung lesions in COVID-19 pneumo-nia patients in a portable, realtime, and safe manner. Thus, LUS is helpful in assessing COVID-19 pneu-monia severity in critically ill patients.

    1.Introduction

    On March 11,2020,the World Health Organization(WHO)declared the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2)outbreak a pandemic[1].Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection can develop coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19).As of 14 Aug 2020,more than 20 730 000 COVID-19 cases have been confirmed and more than 751 000 deaths have occurred worldwide[2].More than 89 600 COVID-19 cases have been confirmed in China;approximately 20% of these were severe cases,with a mortality rate of approximately 5.4%(as of 14 Aug 2020)[2].COVID-19 can lead to respiratory failure and secondary multiple organ failure,ultimately increasing mortality[3].At the same time,COVID-19 pneumonia can complicate and change the clinical situation rapidly. Therefore, it is important to diagnose, accurately assess the extent of the disease, and monitor lung lesions in a timely manner in real time without increasing the risk of contagion.

    Lung ultrasound (LUS) is an effective imaging method for diagnosing pleural and pulmonary lesions; it can be performed continuously, in real time, and with no radiation exposure, to evaluate disease severity [4]. The LUS score is a semi-quantitative scoring system that has been applied for diagnosing, progression monitoring, and prognosis predicting, in conditions such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pneumonia, hydrothorax, and pulmonary edema [5–8].

    Some studies have evaluated the efficacy of LUS in the assessment of COVID-19 pneumonia severity. Sofia et al. [9] described ultrasonic and clinical findings at different clinical stages in COVID-19. Two articles reported that the LUS features of COVID-19 pneumonia/ARDS can be used to assess disease severity in 20 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia [10,11]. Two narrative reviews suggested that the LUS score could objectively grade COVID-19 associated lung injury [12,13]. However, the relationship between the LUS score and the disease severity of COVID-19 pneumonia is not clearly defined. This study investigated the LUS features of COVID-19 pneumonia and the relationship between LUS findings and COVID-19 pneumonia severity.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Study design and participants

    This retrospective, observational study was conducted at the Sino-French Xincheng Branch of Tongji Hospital of the Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The institu-tion is a tertiary teaching hospital responsible for the treatment of governmentreferred patients with COVID-19. The Aid Hubei Medical Team of Peking University People’s Hospital took over one of the wards at the Sino-French Xincheng Branch of Tongji Hospital on 7 February 2020 to care for patients with severe COVID-19. This study follows the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. [14].

    Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were consecutively recruited between 7 February 2020 and 8 March 2020. All patients were over 18 years old and met the WHO interim guidance diagnostic criteria for COVID-19 pneumonia [15]. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by a nucleic acid test with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests of a nasopharyngeal swab sample,in accordance with a previously protocol [16]. The exclusion criteria were as follows: pulmonary edema related to heart failure;chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPDs); severe hemodynamic instability and inability to change body position; severe thoracic deformity, extensive subcutaneous emphysema, and inability to undergo a LUS examination; and patients without LUS data of all 12 lung regions according to the LUS protocol.

    Based on the time interval between onset of symptoms and the LUS examination, we designated three groups of patients in our study: group 1 (LUS examination done 0–7 d after symptom onset); group 2 (LUS examination done 8–14 d after symptom onset); and group 3 (LUS examination done 15–21 d after symptom onset).

    Between 7 February 2020 and 8 March 2020, 60 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were recruited. Twelve patients were excluded because of incomplete LUS examination data (n = 6),the presence of COPDs (n = 5), or an interval between symptom onset and LUS examination greater than 21 d (n = 1). Finally, the data of 48 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were included.Based on the time interval between symptom onset and LUS examination,33 patients were assigned to group 1,40 to group 2,and 43 to group 3(Fig.1).

    This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Peking University People’s Hospital(2020PHB048-01).Informed consent was orally obtained from all patients.

    2.2.Data collection

    2.2.1.Clinical data

    The severity of COVID-19 pneumonia was defined according to the Chinese specific management guidelines(version 7.0)[17].Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were divided into two groups—critically ill and non-critically ill—according to the disease severity.Critically ill patients met one of the following conditions:①Respiratory failure had occurred and mechanical ventilation was required;②shock had occurred;or③other organ failure requiring intensive care unit(ICU)treatment had occurred.Of the 48 cases of COVID-19 pneumonia,32 were classified as non-critically ill and 16 as critically ill.Patient characteristics were retrieved from the electronic patient data management system.The collected baseline data included sex,age,comorbidities(hypertension,diabetes mellitus,coronary heart disease,and chronic renal failure),clinical symptoms(temperature>37.3 °C,cough,purulent expectoration,dyspnea,and thoracic pain),respiratory data(pulse oxygen saturation,respiratory rate,fraction of inspired oxygen(FiO2),the respiratory rate oxygenation(ROX)index,and invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation),the confusion,blood urea nitrogen,respiratory rate,blood pressure,and age(CURB-65)score,and laboratory indicators(SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test results,leukocyte and lymphocyte counts,C-reactive protein(CRP)levels,and interleukin-6(IL-6)levels).Changes in disease severity,CURB-65 score,and ROX index were recorded for groups 1,2,and 3 at the same time as the LUS examinations.

    The FiO2in nasal catheter patients was calculated according to the following formula:FiO2(%)=21+4×oxygen flow rate(in L?min-1)[18].A FiO2of 5–8 L?min-1by face mask was approximated as 50%,a FiO2of 8–10 L?min-1was approximated as 60%,and a FiO2above 10 L?min-1was approximated as 80%.The actual FiO2monitored by the ventilator was considered to be the FiO2of mechanical ventilation.The ROX index,defined as the ratio of oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry/FiO2to respiratory rate,was assessed as a clinical indicator of oxygenation[19].The objective was to maintain the pulse oxygen saturation above 93%.If the oxygen administered through a nasal catheter or face mask could not achieve the target pulse oxygen saturation,patients were provided with noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation.The CURB-65 score was calculated using confusion(C),blood urea nitrogen(U)>7 mmol?L-1,respiratory rate(R)>30 breaths per minute,blood pressure(B)(systolic pressure<90 mmHg(1 mmHg≈133.322 Pa)or diastolic pressure<60 mmHg),and age>65 years old[20].One point was allocated to each positive item,for a total score of up to 5 points.

    2.2.2.Lung ultrasound

    Three well-trained critical care physicians from the research team performed LUS on days 0–7,8–14,and 15–21.LUS was performed on the same day as the computed tomography(CT)scan.The ultrasonographers were trained according to the Chinese Critical Ultrasound Study Group(CCUSG)training course[21].Their experience ranged from one to three years.They were blinded to the patients’clinical details and CT findings,and did not contribute to the patients’diagnostic or treatment strategies.We primarily used an Esaote MyLab Alpha ultrasound machine(Esaote Europe B.V.,the Netherlands)with a 3.5–5.0 MHz convex ultrasound probe.A 7.5 MHz linear probe was occasionally used.LUS-related images included A lines,B lines,consolidations,pleural line changes,and pleural effusions.

    Fig.1.Flowchart showing the process of enrolment,exclusion,and assessment of recruited patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

    2.2.3.Lung ultrasound score

    The scanning protocol included the assessment of six lung regions in each lung(upper anterior,lower anterior,upper lateral,lower lateral,upper posterior,and lower posterior)[22].Each region was assigned a score as follows[22]:0 point for normal aeration;1 point for moderate loss of aeration(multiple spaced B lines,or coalescent B lines in less than 50%of the intercostal space examined in the transversal plane,or subpleural consolidations);2 points for severe loss of aeration(diffused coalescent B lines occupying the whole intercostal space);and 3 points for complete loss of lung aeration(lung consolidation).The most severe ultrasound pattern observed in one or several intercostal spaces was considered to be characteristic for the region of interest.All patients underwent LUS and had 12 lung regions examined.The final LUS score was the sum of the scores of the 12 regions(0–36 points).

    Inter-observer agreement was assessed in a random subset of the study population.We calculated that a sample size of 70 measurements would be required,according to a difference in overall agreement and a change probability of 0.6,with a 20%accepted relative error.Seventy LUS points were assessed to determine the inter-observer agreement.LUS images were analyzed independently by two researchers.Any disputes were resolved by consulting with a third researcher until an agreement was reached.LUS image readers were blinded to the patients’clinical details and CT findings.

    2.2.4.Chest computed tomography

    Chest CTs were performed on days 0–7 using a Siemens Sensation 64-row spiral CT machine(Siemens,Germany).The scanning parameters were as follows:tube voltage,120 kV;tube current,100–200 mA;slice thickness,5,1.0,or 1.25 mm for thin scanning;and high-resolution image reconstruction with soft-tissue and bone reconstruction algorithms.The acquired images were transferred to a workstation.The CT semi-quantitative analysis method was used to evaluate the pulmonary lesions,including groundglass opacities,consolidation shadows,reticulation/interlobular septal thickening,irregular solid nodules,fibrous stripes,and no related lesions[23].Each of the five lung lobes was assessed for degree of involvement to obtain the five-grade score[24]:0 point,no involvement;1 point,<25%;2 points,26%–50%;3 points,51%–75%;and 4 points,76%–100%.The total score was reached by summing the five lobes scores(ranging from 0 to 20).Chest-CT findings were analyzed by an experienced radiologist and a critical respiratory specialist,both of whom were blinded to the sonographic and clinical details.The consensus of both specialists was required for a CT-based diagnosis.

    2.3.Statistical analyses

    Continuous variables were tested for normality;the normally distributed variables were expressed as mean±standard deviation and the non-normally distributed continuous variables were expressed as median(interquartile range).Categorical variables were expressed as percentages.For between-group comparisons,a Student’s t-test was used for continuous variables,a nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test for non-normally distributed continuous variables,and Pearsonχ2test for categorical variables.The Pearson correlation test was used to compare the correlations of continuous variables,and the Spearman correlation test was used to compare the correlations of categorical variables.A receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was used to analyze the LUS score in order to determine the optimal threshold for predicting COVID-19 pneumonia severity.The area under the ROC curve(AUROC)was then calculated.The optimal cut-off value was defined as the point with the highest Youden’s index(sensitivity+specificity-1).The 95%confidence interval(CI)values were calculated.LUS data and clinical characteristics of different disease courses were compared with a generalized estimating equation for normally distributed variables and categorical variables,and a Friedman test for non-normally distributed continuous variables.A p value<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.Cohen’s kappa(κ)statistics were used to assess LUS inter-observer agreement.Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software package version 17.0(IBM,USA)and MedCalc version 19.0.7(MedCalc Software bvba,Belgium).

    3.Results

    The baseline characteristics of the two patient groups(16 critically ill vs 32 non-critically ill patients)were not significantly different(p>0.05),including gender(8 men(50.0%)vs 18 men(56.3%)),age((64.8±11.6)years vs(62.0±14.3)years),or comorbidities,such as coronary heart disease(four cases(25.0%)vs nine cases(28.1%)),diabetes mellitus(four cases(25.0%)vs seven cases(21.9%)).Symptoms such as cough(16 cases(100%)vs 25 cases(78.1%)),purulent expectoration(16 cases(100%)vs 21 cases(65.6%)),dyspnea(11 cases(68.8%)vs 6 cases(18.8%)),and thoracic pain(eight cases(50.0%)vs four cases(12.5%))were more frequent in critically ill patients than in non-critically ill patients(p<0.05).All six patients who required mechanical ventilation and all four patients who died were critically ill patients.Baseline patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

    3.1.LUS features of COVID-19 pneumonia

    Among the 48 patients who underwent LUS,38 patients were detected with COVID-19 pneumonia based on the following features:B lines,34 patients(89.5%);pleural line changes,ten patients(26.3%);consolidations,six patients(15.8%);and pleural effusions,two patients(5.3%).Among the ten patients with negative LUS,three patients were also negative on CT,six of the seven patients with positive CT had a CT score≤2,and one patient with a CT score of 6 had lung lesions far away from the pleura.The lesions were most frequently bilateral(28 cases,73.7%),and 32 patients(84.2%)had more than one lesion.The most common lesions were located at the bilateral lower lateral lung(55 regions,72.4%)and the bilateral lower posterior lung(62 regions,81.6%).Overall inter-observer agreement for LUS showed excellent agreement(κ=0.864,p<0.001).

    The LUS characteristics of 16 critically ill patients and 32 noncritically ill patients were analyzed.In critically ill patients,B lines were observed in 16 cases(100%),and consolidation in two cases(12.5%).In non-critically ill patients,B lines were observed in 18 cases(56.3%)and consolidation in four cases(12.5%).There were significantly more LUS-detected lesions in critically ill patients than in non-critically ill patients,both proportional in the two patient groups(16 cases(100%)vs 22 cases(68.8%),p=0.012)and region-wise(148 regions(77.1%)vs 103 regions(26.8%),p<0.001).Critically ill patients were more likely than noncritically ill patients to have bilateral LUS-detected lesions(15cases(93.8%)vs 13 cases(40.6%),p<0.001)and more than one lesion(16 cases(100%)vs 16 cases(50.0%),p=0.001).LUSdetected lesions were more frequently located in the bilateral lower lateral lung(30 regions(93.8%)vs 25 regions(39.1%),p<0.001)and lower posterior lung(32 regions(100%)vs 30 regions(46.9%),p<0.001)in critically ill patients than in noncritically ill patients.These results are shown in Fig.2.

    Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

    3.2.LUS score and disease severity

    3.2.1.Correlation between LUS score and indicators of disease severity

    The LUS score was significantly higher in critically ill patients than in non-critically ill patients(12(10–18)vs 2(0–5),p<0.001).In critically ill patients,the ROX index was significant lower((5.2±2.4)vs(10.5±2.6),p<0.001),and the CURB-65 score(3(2–3)vs 1(0–2),p<0.001)was significantly higher than those in non-critically ill patients(Table 1).From group 1 to group 3,the LUS score significantly decreased(4(2–10)vs 0(0–5),p<0.001),while the ROX index((9.3±3.4)vs(14.9±6.8),p<0.001)significantly increased.The LUS score showed significant negative correlations with the ROX index(r=-0.85,95% CI:–0.92 to–0.72,p<0.001),and significant positive correlations with disease severity(r=0.76,95% CI:0.56–0.88,p<0.001)and CURB-65 score(r=0.81,95% CI:0.64–0.90,p<0.001),in group 1(Fig.3).The LUS score showed significant negative correlations with the ROX index(r=-0.71,95%CI:–0.83 to–0.50,p<0.001),and significant positive correlations with disease severity(r=0.63,95% CI:0.39–0.79,p<0.001)and CURB-65 score(r=0.70,95% CI:0.50–0.83,p<0.001),in group 2.The LUS score showed significant negative correlations with the ROX index(r=-0.76,95% CI:–0.86 to–0.59,p<0.001),and significant positive correlations with disease severity(r=0.56,95%CI:0.31–0.74,p<0.001)and CURB-65 score(r=0.71,95% CI:0.53–0.84,p<0.001),in group 3.

    Fig.2.LUS characteristics according to disease severity.Stacked bars show the proportion of patients with LUS-detected lesions in six regions of unilateral lung according to disease severity.

    Fig.3.Correlation of LUS score with disease severity on days 0–7.(a)LUS score and disease severity;(b)LUS score and CURB-65;(c)LUS score and ROX index;(d)LUS score and CT score.

    3.2.2.LUS score versus CT score in assessing disease severity

    All 48 patients underwent CT on days 0–7,and 45 patients were CT-positive.The CT scores of critically ill patients were significantly higher than those of non-critically ill patients(12(9–18)vs 6(2–8),p<0.001).The CT score was negatively correlated with ROX index(r=-0.70,95% CI:–0.84 to–0.47,p<0.001),and positively correlated with CURB-65 score(r=0.62,95% CI:0.35–0.79,p<0.001)and disease severity(r=0.60,95% CI:0.32–0.79,p<0.001).

    The LUS score was positively correlated with the CT score(r=0.82,95%CI:0.66–0.91,p<0.001)(Fig.3).The correlation coefficient between the LUS score and the ROX index was compared with the correlation coefficient between the CT score and the ROX index(r=-0.85 vs–0.70),with no statistical difference(p>0.05).This indicates that LUS may be an alternative to CT in evaluating disease severity.

    3.2.3.LUS cut-off value in assessing critically ill patients

    The AUROC of the LUS score assessing critically ill patients was 0.96(95% CI:0.88–0.99),with a cut-off value of 7,a sensitivity of 80.8%(95% CI:60.6%–93.4%),and a specificity of 95.8%(95% CI:85.7%–99.5%)(Fig.4).

    3.3.LUS and different disease courses

    Fig.4.ROCs for LUS score predicting the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia.AUC:area under curve.

    In group 1,27 out of 33 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were detected by LUS;in group 2,26 out of 40 patients were detected by LUS;and in group 3,20 out of 43 patients were detected by LUS.From group 1 to group 3,disease remission was demonstrated by LUS.From group 1 to group 3,the number of patients with LUSdetected lesions decreased from 27(81.8%)to 20(46.5%)(p=0.001).The number of patients with B lines decreased from 27(81.8%)to 20(46.5%)(p=0.001).The number of patients with more than one lesion decreased from 27(81.8%)to 19(44.2%)(p<0.001).The number of patients with bilateral lesions declined from 20(60.6%)to 17(39.5%)(p=0.001)(Table 2 and Fig.5).

    4.Discussion

    After the outbreak of COVID-19,there has been a global pandemic,and the number of COVID-19 patients continues to rise[1].In patients with comorbidities or complications[25],the hospitalization and intensive care unit admission rates increase significantly[26].The development of quick and convenient methods to assess COVID-19 pneumonia severity will improve triage decisionmaking and diagnosis,as well as the choice for subsequent therapy.Currently,studies on COVID-19 severity and prognosis have mainly focused on clinical features and risk factors analysis.Zhou et al.[3]found that older age,a high sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA)score,and D-dimer levels greater than 1μg?mL-1were associated with a higher rate of in-hospital deaths.Thus far,other methods of examination for pneumonia have shortcomings.X-ray cannot predict the mortality and prognosis of ARDS[27].Furthermore,a chest CT requires patients to be moved to the CT room,which increases the risk of virus exposure and nosocomial outbreaks,and a CT cannot be repeated and performed at any moment.Point-of-care LUS can reduce the risks associated with moving patients and virus spreading in critically ill patients.LUS is a fast,accurate,and portable examination that can be performed in real time with no radiation exposure,to evaluate lung lesions.However,only a few studies have reported employing LUS to assess COVID-19 pneumonia severity[28–30],and these were mainly descriptive studies or narrative reviews.A study found that LUS was performed to assess the severity of respiratory failure in six patients with COVID-19[28].Another study that recruited ten patients with COVID-19 suggested that LUS score monitoring seemed to reflect disease progression[29].A narrative review indicated that LUS may be used to identify areas of poor lung aeration and to monitor recruitment maneuvers on lung aeration in the ICU[30].Whereas the present study focused on assessing the value of LUS in patients with critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia and monitoring the disease changes.This study demonstrated a good correlation between LUS score and disease severity,which indicated that the LUS score could be used to distinguish disease severity in COVID-19 pneumonia.

    Table 2 Ultrasonic features and clinical and laboratory findings at days 0–7,8–14,and 15–21 after symptom onset in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

    The main findings of our study are as follows:①The LUS signs of COVID-19 pneumonia are mainly B lines,most lesions on bilateral lesions,more than one lesion,and most lesions located in the bilateral lower lateral lung and the bilateral lower posterior lung,and critically ill patients have more LUS-detected lesions and a higher LUS score than non-critically ill patients;②the LUS score can assess the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia,and LUS is an alternative modality to a CT scan to evaluate disease severity;and③the LUS score significantly decreased with improvement of the disease condition.These findings indicate that during outbreaks of COVID-19 pneumonia,LUS can be an effective method to assess disease severity.

    The LUS signs of COVID-19 pneumonia were pulmonary edema(B lines in 89.5% of the patients)and consolidation(15.8%).Most cases showed multiple lesions(84.2%)and were bilateral(73.7%).From days 0–7 to days 15–21 after symptom onset,there was a significant reduction in the percentage of patients with LUS-detected lesions(81.8%vs 46.5%),and the percentage of patients with more than one lesion decreased from 81.8% to 44.2%.

    Shi et al.[31]demonstrated chest-CT findings of bilateral,subpleural,and ground-glass opacities,as well as ill-defined boundary lesions,in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia,similar to the lung lesions distribution in our study.An autopsy pathology of COVID-19 showed that the exfoliation reaction was more evident than that in severe acute respiratory syndrome(SARS),while pulmonary fibrosis and consolidation were not as serious as those observed in SARS[32].Moreover,common radiologic findings of SARS are ground-glass opacities and mixed lesions of ground-glass opacities with irregular consolidation[33].This is consistent with the findings of this study,in that there were more B lines and less consolidations(15.8%vs 45.5%)[33].The results of our study indicate that,although there is a wide lesion range in COVID-19 pneumonia,the incidence of interstitial fibrosis may be lower in the later stages of the disease,and the subsequent prognosis may be relatively good.

    The LUS score has been widely used in recent years to quantitatively evaluate the severity and prognosis of lung lesions[5–8].The number of lung regions and the number of ultrasound scores are mainly used to calculate the total score and to quantify the aeration area of the lungs:the smaller the aeration area,the higher the LUS score.In our study,lung lesions were assessed using the universally acknowledged 12-region LUS scoring method.

    One study has found that the LUS score can assess the disease severity of ARDS[5],and two other studies have found that the LUS score can assess the prognosis of ARDS[6,7].A study indicated that the LUS score seemed to reflect disease progression in ten patients with COVID-19[29].The CURB-65 score has been found to assess the severity of pneumonia[20].In our study,the LUS score was negatively correlated with the ROX index and positively correlated with the CURB-65 score.The ROX index was used to predict the risk of intubation in patients with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy[19].In this study,we adopted the ROX index to assess the degree of hypoxia of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.Thus,the LUS score could assess the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia.

    We also analyzed the correlation between the LUS score and the CT score,and found that the correlation coefficient between the LUS score and the CT score was 0.82,indicating that the LUS could be an alternative modality to the CT scan for evaluating disease severity.Similar findings were previously reported in ARDS patients.Chiumello et al.[34]reported that the average global agreement between LUS and CT scan was 0.775 in ARDS patients.Recently,another study on ARDS patients found that the overall agreement of LUS findings with the correlating lobe on CT was 87%[35].However,LUS is fast,portable,and noninvasive,and can be conducted in real time,which can reduce the risk of infection spreading during outbreaks of COVID-19.Thus,LUS is more suitable for the assessment of COVID-19 pneumonia severity than the CT scan.

    Fig.5.A typical case of a COVID-19 pneumonia patient.(a)B lines at the right lower lateral lung reflecting pneumonia on day 6;(b)B lines at the left lower lateral lung reflecting pneumonia on day 6;(c)chest CT showing multiple infiltrations in both lungs on day 6;(d)B lines at the right lower lateral lung reflecting pneumonia on day 13;(e)B lines at the left lower lateral lung reflecting pneumonia on day 13;(f)B lines at the right lower lateral lung reflecting pneumonia on day 17;(g)LUS showing no lesion at the left lower lateral lung on day 17;(h)B lines decreased at the right lower lateral lung on day 24;(i)LUS showing no lesion at the left lower lateral lung on day 24;(j)chest CT showing that the infiltration in both lungs was significantly reduced on day 21.

    The LUS score can also be used to differentiate between various degrees of COVID-19 pneumonia severity.Our results showed that the cut-off value of LUS in the assessment of critically ill patients was 7 points.Li et al.[36]found that,in patients with ARDS,the 12-region LUS score can predict the severity of the disease,with 7 being mild,11 moderate,and 18 severe.During the global pandemic of COVID-19,a large number of patients may present in a short period of time,leading to a shortage of medical supplies and assessment equipment.LUS could be used for the quick assessment of disease severity and to recognize critically ill patients in early stages,thereby providing a reference for triage,diagnosis,and treatment.

    Our study has several limitations.First,this study took place in a single ward with critically ill patients and a small patient sample size.A larger sample size and prospective studies are needed to further evaluate the clinical value of LUS in COVID-19 pneumonia.Second,in our study,patients were treated in the infectious disease ward,but the partial pressure of oxygen(pO2)in the majority of patients was not detected due to limited conditions;thus,the correlation between LUS score and pO2/FiO2ratio could not be verified.Finally,all patients recruited in our study were inpatients with COVID-19 pneumonia.However,LUS may also be used in the screening of suspected COVID-19 pneumonia cases.

    5.Conclusions

    LUS can assess lung lesions in COVID-19 pneumonia in a portable,real-time,and safe manner.Furthermore,LUS can conveniently and safely assess the disease severity in critically ill COVID-19 patients.Thus,LUS can be an alternative to CT scans in the assessment of COVID-19 pneumonia severity.Prospective cohort studies or randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the role of LUS in severity assessment and treatment guidance in COVID-19.

    Acknowledgements

    We acknowledge all healthcare workers involved in the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 patients in Wuhan.This work was supported by the Michigan Medicine-Peking University Health Science Center Joint Institute for Translational and Clinical Research(BMU20160527),Peking University Clinical Scientist Program supported by‘‘the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities”(BMU2019LCKXJ005),and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(81971808).

    Compliance with ethics guidelines

    Fengxue Zhu,Xiujuan Zhao,Tianbing Wang,Zhenzhou Wang,Fuzheng Guo,Haiyan Xue,Panpan Chang,Hansheng Liang,Wentao Ni,Yaxin Wang,Lei Chen,and Baoguo Jiang declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.

    久久婷婷青草| 亚洲内射少妇av| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 一级毛片电影观看| 久久99精品国语久久久| 久久av网站| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放 | 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产成人freesex在线| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 亚洲成人手机| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 夫妻午夜视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 欧美日韩av久久| 午夜久久久在线观看| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 青春草国产在线视频| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 欧美日韩av久久| 久久6这里有精品| 亚洲综合色惰| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 久热这里只有精品99| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| a级毛片在线看网站| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| av一本久久久久| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 久久99精品国语久久久| 色网站视频免费| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 久久久久久久精品精品| 黑人高潮一二区| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 成年人免费黄色播放视频 | 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 蜜桃在线观看..| av在线app专区| 国产成人aa在线观看| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 亚洲av.av天堂| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 乱人伦中国视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产精品无大码| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 观看免费一级毛片| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 国产亚洲最大av| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 香蕉精品网在线| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 亚州av有码| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 亚洲第一av免费看| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 婷婷色综合www| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| xxx大片免费视频| 日日撸夜夜添| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 日韩成人伦理影院| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 一级毛片我不卡| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 免费不卡黄色视频| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 中国美女看黄片| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| av视频免费观看在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 精品国产国语对白av| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 99香蕉大伊视频| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 成人免费观看视频高清| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 午夜激情av网站| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 成人三级做爰电影| 亚洲av男天堂| 99香蕉大伊视频| 制服诱惑二区| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 一级黄色大片毛片| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 色播在线永久视频| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 热re99久久国产66热| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久 | a 毛片基地| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 深夜精品福利| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 午夜激情av网站| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 国产在视频线精品| 9191精品国产免费久久| 久久久久久久精品精品| 9色porny在线观看| 精品一区在线观看国产| av天堂久久9| 中国国产av一级| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 中国国产av一级| 9色porny在线观看| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| cao死你这个sao货| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国产在线观看jvid| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 中文字幕制服av| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 不卡av一区二区三区| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 午夜福利视频精品| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 一级毛片电影观看| 高清在线国产一区| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 日日夜夜操网爽| 不卡av一区二区三区| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产1区2区3区精品| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品第二区| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 乱人伦中国视频| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 一进一出抽搐动态| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| av在线app专区| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 岛国毛片在线播放| 成人免费观看视频高清| 久久中文字幕一级| 国产成人精品无人区| 麻豆av在线久日| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 久久久精品94久久精品| av国产精品久久久久影院| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 精品亚洲成国产av| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 国产av又大| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 久久久久久人人人人人| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 大型av网站在线播放| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 无限看片的www在线观看| 999精品在线视频| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 69av精品久久久久久 | 久久99一区二区三区| av福利片在线| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| av有码第一页| a在线观看视频网站| 午夜老司机福利片| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | 国产精品国产av在线观看| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产成人av教育| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 99久久综合免费| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| av在线app专区| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 一进一出抽搐动态| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 午夜91福利影院| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 久久久国产成人免费| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 亚洲第一av免费看| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | www日本在线高清视频| 国产成人欧美| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 窝窝影院91人妻| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| av视频免费观看在线观看| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 一本综合久久免费| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| www.精华液| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 伦理电影免费视频| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 宅男免费午夜| 久久香蕉激情| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 精品亚洲成国产av| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区 | 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 成人国语在线视频| 无限看片的www在线观看| av在线老鸭窝| 五月开心婷婷网| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 亚洲 国产 在线| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 免费不卡黄色视频| 一本综合久久免费| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频 | 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 制服人妻中文乱码| 91字幕亚洲| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产在线免费精品| 亚洲国产av新网站| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 又大又爽又粗| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 在线av久久热| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 欧美成人午夜精品| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | videos熟女内射| av网站免费在线观看视频| 久久影院123| 中文字幕制服av| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 9热在线视频观看99| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 日日夜夜操网爽| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| cao死你这个sao货| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 在线观看www视频免费| 人妻一区二区av| 国产麻豆69| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲av美国av| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 成人影院久久| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 性色av一级| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 国产1区2区3区精品| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲成人手机| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 热99re8久久精品国产| www日本在线高清视频| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 国产麻豆69| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 不卡一级毛片| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 成年动漫av网址| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | kizo精华| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 国产色视频综合| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 捣出白浆h1v1| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 18禁观看日本| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 免费不卡黄色视频| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 免费观看人在逋| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 日本a在线网址| 日日夜夜操网爽| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 大码成人一级视频| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频 | a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 久久狼人影院| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 欧美日韩黄片免| a级毛片在线看网站| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 夫妻午夜视频| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 一进一出抽搐动态| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 永久免费av网站大全| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲人成电影观看| a 毛片基地| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 岛国毛片在线播放| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频 | 久久中文字幕一级| 国产高清videossex| 一区福利在线观看| 老司机福利观看| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产麻豆69| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 亚洲精华国产精华精| a级毛片黄视频| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 男女国产视频网站| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 少妇 在线观看| 久久免费观看电影| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 男女免费视频国产| 高清欧美精品videossex| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 91老司机精品| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 自线自在国产av| 国产av又大| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| a级毛片在线看网站| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 大型av网站在线播放| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 色播在线永久视频| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| av在线播放精品| 捣出白浆h1v1| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 午夜福利视频精品| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| av国产精品久久久久影院| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 久久久欧美国产精品| 精品一区在线观看国产| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 搡老乐熟女国产| 人妻一区二区av| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 大香蕉久久网| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 在线看a的网站| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| a在线观看视频网站| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 国产av又大| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 操美女的视频在线观看| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久|