• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Global Freshwater Storage Capability across Time Scales in the GRACE Satellite Era

    2021-06-04 08:37:56EndaZHUandXingYUAN
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2021年6期

    Enda ZHU and Xing YUAN

    1Key Laboratory of Regional Climate-Environment for Temperate East Asia (RCE-TEA), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China

    2School of Hydrology and Water Resources, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

    3College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

    ABSTRACT

    Key words:freshwater, GRACE, land surface model, soil moisture, climate variability, storage capability

    1.Introduction

    Freshwater is widely viewed as a fundamental natural resource, yet it is threatened by human activities (Meybeck,2003). Over the last 50 years, water consumption has tripled due to global warming, population increase, and urbanization (Carbon Disclosure Project, 2010). Currently, nearly 80% of the global population and 65% of continents suffer from water scarcity (V?r?smarty et al., 2010). Water stress has become an inevitable obstacle to sustainable development, and freshwater security has been listed as one of the grand challenges in the coming decades by the World Climate Research Programme (Trenberth and Asrar, 2014). Terrestrial water storage (TWS) is the most ubiquitous source for high-quality freshwater which not only supports food and livestock production but also influences various aspects of the natural environment, such as affecting sea level(Pokhrel et al., 2012) and the rotation of the Earth (Kuehne and Wilson, 1991).

    The TWS can be divided into surface water, soil water,snow, and groundwater. Recently, due to the vital impacts of water on sustaining human society and ecosystems, its changes over land (e.g., streamflow and TWS) have been extensively investigated. For instance, the Yellow River streamflow displays a persistent decline, and climate factors can explain about 65% of the trend (Piao et al., 2010). For TWS, similar declining trends have been observed in southern and eastern Europe (Stahl et al., 2010), northwestern North America, and the Gulf of Mexico (Kalra et al., 2008).In contrast, a slight increase in streamflow is found over the Yangtze River (Piao et al., 2010) and the Amazon River(Scanlon et al., 2018). In the future, the river discharge is projected to increase over high northern latitudes, India, and Africa, and is expected to decrease in the Mediterranean region, Australia, and parts of North and South America under a high greenhouse gas emission scenario (Schewe et al., 2014). However, the ability of the global land to retain freshwater, which directly influences the freshwater fluxes,receives less attention due to the lack of appropriate methods and global-scale observations.

    McColl et al. (2017) introduced a new metric called,stored precipitation fraction, to quantify the ability of surface soil to retain a positive freshwater anomaly after hours to days during 2016, based on soil moisture observations from NASA’s Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission. It can be viewed as a measure of surface soil memory.They found that surface soils (depth of 0-5 cm) accounted for less than 0.001% of the global freshwater storage, but retained 14% of precipitation after three days and that this fraction decreases rapidly as time increases. Hence, for longer prediction, deeper soil moisture and other terrestrial water components should be considered as indicators of TWS. Land-atmosphere coupled modeling experiments have shown land surface conditions, including snow mass and deeper soil, are crucial sources of predictability on seasonal timescales (Koster et al., 2011). The TWS involving various kinds of water can be applied to improve seasonal fire forecasts (Chen et al., 2013), and the memory of TWS can provide additional information for long-term hydrological prediction (Yuan and Zhu, 2018; Zhu et al., 2019).Therefore, the storage capability of the land and its components, such as deeper soil layers, snow, river, lake, and canopy need further investigation, especially on longer time scales. Here, we modify the method proposed by McColl et al. (2017) to quantify the freshwater storage capability(FSC) for land and various TWS components and provide further analysis regarding the land surface storage capability and its hydrological dynamics at different time scales over global major river basins.

    The FSC is jointly controlled by complex factors such as land cover, precipitation, and potential evapotranspiration (PET). Investigating the spatiotemporal distribution of FSC provides implications for the global water balance in a changing climate. Based on the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellites (Tapley et al., 2004),large-scale terrestrial water storage change (TWSC) can be measured efficiently (Scanlon et al., 2012). In addition,TWSC can also be reasonably simulated by advanced land surface models (LSMs) (Lawrence et al., 2019). The spaceborne observations and state-of-the-art LSMs provide an opportunity to revisit the FSC of global land.

    Considering that GRACE satellites only provide TWS anomaly (TWSA) observations on monthly time scale, we use GRACE TWSA and global precipitation observations to quantify the monthly FSC of the land (including storage within surface water bodies, soil, snow, and aquifers). Then,a state-of-the-art community land model (CLM5)(Lawrence et al., 2019) was applied to provide finer simulation for further analysis regarding the FSC features for TWS, snow, and different soil layers across multiple time scales. Lastly, the study investigates the decadal variability of FSC by connecting it with major modes of internal climate variability.

    2.Data and methods

    In an effort to reduce uncertainty, we apply three global precipitation datasets. These include products sourced from the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) (Udo et al., 2011), the Climatic Research Unit-National Centers for Environmental Prediction (CRU-NCEP) (Viovy, 2018),and the Precipitation Reconstruction over Land (PREC)(Chen et al., 2002). In addition, we use the PET dataset provided by the Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM), which maximizes the recovery of evaporation information contained in current satellite observations(Miralles et al., 2011; Martens et al., 2017), and the leaf area index (LAI) dataset which is based on Global Land Surface Satellite (GLASS) (Xiao et al., 2016) from 2001 to 2014.

    The mean of GRACE mascon products provided by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) (Swenson and Wahr, 2006;Landerer and Swenson, 2012; Swenson, 2012; Wiese et al.,2016), Center for Space Research (CSR) (Save et al., 2016),and German Research Centre For Geosciences (GFZ)(Dahle et al., 2012) is viewed as the global TWSA observation, which spans 14 years from 2003 to 2016. Furthermore,the SMAP soil moisture from 2015 to 2016 (Entekhabi et al., 2010) is used to validate the model simulation. Besides that, the CLM5 is applied to provide credible, long-term simulations of the TWS and its components, further noting that good model performance has been shown in previous studies (Niu et al., 2007; Xia et al., 2017). In this model, the TWS involves soil moisture, canopy water, snow, and surface water for rivers, lakes, and wetlands. It resolves the water and energy balance from the ground surface down to 8.6 m by dividing it into 20 hydrologically active layers(Lawrence et al., 2019). Compared with the previous models (i.e., CLM4 and CLM4.5), the CLM5 increased the vertical resolution of the soil layer, especially within the top 3 m, and removed unconfined aquifers (Lawrence et al.,2019). Meanwhile, the model is updated to account for spatial variations in soil thickness from a spatially explicit bedrock dataset (Brunke et al., 2016; Pelletier et al., 2016).When soil is below the bedrock, the soil moisture is close to or equal to zero. In this study, we used the biogeophysical part of CLM5, noting that the carbon-nitrogen processes were switched off. Two continuous centurial cycles (i.e., the first cycle ending acts as the initial condition of the second cycle) of CLM5 simulation, with a spatial resolution of onedegree, are carried out during 1901-2016 and were driven by the CRUNCEP observed meteorological forcing datasets (Piao et al., 2012). The last 66-year simulations during 1951-2016 in the second cycle are analyzed and the first 166-year simulations are regarded as land surface model spin-up, noting that the aquifer model needs a long time to reach the equilibrium (Yang et al., 1995).

    To quantify the ability of the land to store freshwater,we use a newly proposed metric called stored precipitation fraction (McColl et al., 2017). The FSC(t) represents the increasing water in land normalized by precipitation as follows,

    where

    where Pis the sum of precipitation in the ith time step,ΔVstands for the change of water for different components of TWS (or the change of TWS) in the ith time step, Δ Vrepresents the increase of water for TWS components (or the increase of TWS) at given time step, ΔTWSis the change of TWS in the ith time step, t is the analysis time step (from one day to one month in this study), and T represents the total time span (e.g., 2003-16). Considering that the change of soil moisture affects infiltration and capillarity, we choose ΔTWSas the only threshold to study the contributions of different TWS components to the total FSC.Because the GRACE data only provides monthly TWSA,the central difference method is applied to calculate the average change in TWS from one month to the other (Zhang et al., 2018),

    where Vis the volume of the ith TWS observation. For CLM5 simulation, we use the TWS value on the last day of the prescribed time step minus the one on the first day of the time step to get the TWSC. Note that McColl et al.(2017) used this precipitation fraction to analyze the surface soil moisture response to precipitation at three-day time scale, while here we use it to quantify the FSC for TWS and soil at different depths from daily to monthly time scales.

    In the water balance equation [d(TWSA)/dt = P - ET -R, where P is precipitation, ET is evapotranspiration, and R is runoff] the impact of runoff, including lateral flow, on the increase of TWS cannot be ignored especially for longer time scales and deeper soil at a given point. However, the precipitation is the only input for a river basin that normally retains water and allows no outflow to other basins (Fig. 1),and the positive change of TWS stands for the volume of precipitation that is retained in a basin. Hence, this study analyzes the FSC of land and soil columns at different depths over global major river basins (Yuan et al., 2015) rather than grids. The selected 194 river basins, based on the Global Energy and Water EXchanges (GEWEX) project,cover most of the land surface representing a broad range of climate and land cover conditions. In this regard, the FSC describes the proportion of precipitation falling on land that can be retained in the basin after a given time, which is closely linked with water security.

    The impacts of the uncertainty of the observations (e.g.,TWS and precipitation) are nontrivial. To estimate the influences of uncertainty in precipitation datasets, we calculate the standard deviations of three groups of FSC based on mean values of TWSA from different centers and the three precipitation datasets, respectively. Conversely, to estimate the influence of GRACE uncertainty, the standard deviations of three groups of FSC based on the mean precipitation and TWSA from different centers are calculated.

    Fig. 1. A schematic diagram of water exchange between different soil columns. TWS includes all the forms of storage,such as river, lake, canopy water, snow, ice, soil moisture, and groundwater.

    Lastly, to investigate the decadal variability of total land water-based FSC, 57 groups of 10-years of CLM5 simulation (i.e., 1951-60, 1952-61, 1953-62, …) are used to estimate FSC, respectively. We also calculate the anomaly correlation coefficient (ACC) between the decadal FSC and the climate indices (i.e., PDO, IPO, and AMO). The monthly climate indices are obtained at https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/climateindices/list, and they are aggregated into 10-year running mean values. In this study, the significances of ACC are determined by the student’s T-test.

    3.Results

    Figure 2 shows the FSC based on the average of GRACE TWS from different centers (i.e., CSR, JPL, and GFZ) and the average of precipitation datasets (i.e., GPCC,CRU-NCEP, and PREC). The weighted average of FSC across the global basins is 0.28, which means that 28% of precipitation can be retained by the land after one month.However, the distribution of FSC is spatially uneven over the globe. Generally, the lower FSC is mainly located in monsoonal regions, including southern and northeastern China,eastern North America, and parts of South America and Africa while FSC is large in arid basins, such as the Middle-East, parts of Africa, and the west coast of America. The larger value is indicative of a greater ability to retain a positive anomaly for a river basin, noting that a reliable estimate of FSC relies on the accuracy of observation. Regional differences do exist among different precipitation and TWSA datasets. Therefore, we show the standard deviation of FSC that is due to the uncertainty of TWS and precipitation (Fig. 3ab). We can see that larger standard deviations are mainly located over the arid or semi-arid regions, such as high-latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, the middle of Asia, parts of the Sahara, and the Arabian Peninsula (Fig. 3a), where a small observation error would exert a great influence on the estimates of FSC. Similarly, the influence of precipitation uncertainty is nontrivial over arid regions (Fig. 3b).However, the impact of precipitation uncertainty is relatively small, except in the Amazon, Congo, Middle East and high latitudes (Fig. 3c), where the in-situ observations are insufficient.

    To explore factors that influence the FSC, we analyze the distributions of the observed FSC which are conditional on the magnitude of the aridity index and LAI (Fig. 4). Previous works (McColl et al., 2017) found that the surface soil FSC is smaller in wet regions due to the significant increases in drainage which occurs when soil moisture increases. Here, we arrive at a similar conclusion that total land water-based FSC significantly increases with the increase of aridity (r = 0.92, p < 0.05) (Fig. 4a). Meanwhile,the impact of LAI on total land water-based FSC is significant and should be considered as well. It is found that FSC decreases with increasing LAI, which means that a greater LAI reduces the ability for land to retain water due to larger evapotranspiration. The correlation between them is?0.36 (p < 0.05) (Fig.4b).

    Due to the availability of GRACE, the simulation with CLM5 is a good choice to analyze FSC for land and its different components, such as soil at different depths and snow,at finer temporal resolution. Following Yuan and Zhu(2018), we utilize the CRU-NCEP dataset, in which precipitation is consistent with CRU at monthly time scale, as the atmospheric forcing for running the CLM5 simulation. We compared the seasonal TWSC from the GRACE and CLM5 simulations spanning the period from 2003 to 2016. The CLM5 simulation presents reasonable distributions of seasonal TWSC over the major global river basins (Fig. 5), and the ACCs between them are 0.66 (MAM), 0.92 (JJA), 0.77(SON), and 0.85 (DJF) (p < 0.05), respectively. Additionally, compared to the SMAP observation from 2015 to 2016, the CLM5 can simulate the climatological distribution of surface soil moisture (5 cm) reasonably well except over high-latitude and rainforest regions where both simulations and observations may have large uncertainties (Fig. 6).The ACC over 194 basins between the SMAP observations and CLM5 simulation is 0.69 (p < 0.01). Therefore, CLM5-simulated TWS and soil moisture are used for the FSC analysis in this study. Compared with the observation (Fig. 2),CLM5 reasonably captures the climatology of the FSC distribution of the land surface (Fig. 7a) in most river basins. The basin weighted average simulated FSC (0.26) is smaller than the observation (0.28), and the ACC between them is 0.45 (p < 0.05). Moreover, the simulated total land waterbased FSC shows obvious seasonal variations, especially at high-latitudes (not shown). It is large in fall (SON) and winter (DJF) (weighted means are 0.24 and 0.5, respectively) and small in spring (MAM) and summer (JJA) (0.10 and 0.07). The phenomena are closely related to freezing and melting processes because winter precipitation at northern latitudes will mostly remain on land as snow and ice until spring. However, it is noteworthy that the CLM5 simulation in this study does not include the impact of human activity, such as pumping, irrigation, and land cover change that are implicitly presented in the GRACE observation. So the differences between them, which are mainly located in North China and Central America, might be attributed to anthropogenic influences.

    Fig. 2. Global distribution of total land water-based freshwater storage capability (FSC). FSC is estimated by an average of GRACE observed terrestrial water storage (TWS) from three centers (i.e., CSR, JPL, and GFZ) and the ensemble means of precipitation observation datasets from GPCC, PREC, and CRUNCEP during 2003-16.

    Fig. 3. The uncertainty of FSC due to TWS observation (standard deviation σTWS) (a),precipitation observation (standard deviation σpr ) (b), and the ratio between the uncertainties( σpr/σ TWS) (c). (a) The uncertainty (standard deviation σTWS) of FSC due to different TWS observations is based on mean values of different precipitation datasets (PREC, GPCC, and CRU-NCEP) and GRACE TWSA from different centers (CSR, JPL, and GFZ) during 2003-16. (b) The uncertainty (standard deviation σpr ) of FSC due to different precipitation observations is based on mean values of TWS from the three centers and different precipitation datasets (PREC, GPCC, and CRU-NCEP) during 2003-16. (c) The standard deviationofFSCdueto precipitationobservations ( σpr) is divided by the standard deviation ofFSCdueto TWSobservations(σ TWS).

    Fig. 4. (a-b) The relationship between FSC and aridity index/LAI over 194 major river basins. In (a) and (b), the anomaly correlation coefficients are 0.92 and ?0.36 (p < 0.05),respectively.

    Land surface water is stored as various components including snow, surface water, canopy water, and soil moisture at different depths. Therefore, the total land waterbased FSC is controlled by a series of complicated land hydrological dynamic processes (e.g., internal drainage, capillary effect). Due to the lack of large-scale and long-term observations of these components, LSMs are widely used to provide spatiotemporal continuous estimations in practical applications. Although more water is stored in deep soil(below 3 m), the snow and soil at the top 3 m play nontrivial roles in the land FSC. Here, we investigate the temporal and spatial characteristics of FSC for various depths of soil and snow based on the CLM5 simulation. To analyze the FSC for surface and deep layer soil, we divide the soil column into three layers including depths of 0-0.1 m (surface soil), 0.1-1 m (middle soil), and 1-3 m (deep soil). It is worth noting that the bedrock depth is less than 3 m, or even 1 m in some areas, and the soil moisture most often is equal to 0 when the soil is below the bedrock, while the averaged depth in most basins is over 3 m. Therefore, in this study,the soil moisture in the 1-3 m (0.1-1 m) column over basins represents the total soil water from 1 m (0.1 m) to 3 m (1 m)or bedrock. In the simulation, the global basins weighted averaged FSC for them are 0.04, 0.11, and 0.03 at monthly time scale, respectively (Figs. 7b?7d). Although a large proportion of TWS is stored in deep soil layers over most river basins, the middle soil column (0.1-1 m) contributes to about 40% of the land FSC, especially in arid or semi-arid regions (Fig. 7c). In addition, the impact of snow should be emphasized in high latitudes where more precipitation is stored as snow instead of soil moisture in the middle soil layer, which is closely related to the large land FSC over these regions (Fig. 7e). Therefore, besides the surface soil water that can be measured by microwave remote sensing(McColl et al., 2017), the middle soil layer and snow should also be considered in the FSC analysis, especially at longer time scales.

    For the global basins, using the CLM5 simulation, we calculate the weighted mean FSC for land, the three layers of soil columns, and snow from day 1 to day 30 (Fig. 8a-b),respectively. In general, total land water-based FSC has decreased by about 38% in 30 days (Fig. 8a). The results based on the CLM5 simulation show that the surface soil FSC rapidly decreases during the first week (Fig. 8a) due to the combined effects of evaporation and internal drainage.The middle soil FSC also decreases from 0.16 to 0.11, but a slight increase in deep soil FSC is noted from 1 day to 30 days, due to the slow water movement. In addition, the decreasing trend of snow FSC is small as well, which contributes more than 20% to the land FSC after three days (Fig. 8b).Despite the large decrease of middle soil FSC across time scales, this layer contributes about 40% to the global total land water-based FSC at various time scales (Fig. 8b). We further note that the contribution by the surface soil is nontrivial at short intervals, but the storage of freshwater by snow plays a more important role than the surface soil after five days (Fig. 8b).

    Fig. 5. Validation of CLM5-simulated (left) seasonal mean terrestrial water storage change (TWSC) against GRACE satellite retrievals (right) averaged over 194 river basins during 2003-16.

    With the time step increasing, the decrease of FSC can be observed globally, especially in monsoonal regions such as western America, southern China, India, and parts of Africa (Fig. 9a-9o). Compared with the work of McColl et al. (2017), the distribution of the surface soil FSC at 3 days(Fig. 9b) is similar, with higher FSC mainly located in arid and semiarid regions, such as parts of the Middle East, central Asia, and northwestern China, where the water cycle at the interface of the atmosphere and the land surface overturns at a slower rate. For the global basins in this study, the weighted averaged FSC for surface soil at three days is 0.09, which is smaller than the value of 0.14 found by McColl et al. (2017), noting that our surface column is thicker than the SMAP observation (5 cm). The middle soil column contributes most to the total land water-based FSC,especially in semi-arid regions such as central Asia, western America, and the Middle East (Figs. 9c, h, m), and the change of deep soil FSC is not obvious. Despite the major impacts of the middle soil layer (Fig. 8b), the impact of snow is comparable to the middle soil in some basins, especially in high latitudes (Fig. 9e), even at short time scales.

    To investigate the decadal variability of global FSC,Figs. 10a-c display the spatial distributions of the ACC between climate indexes (i.e., PDO, AMO, and IPO) and the 10-year moving average of FSC for land from 1951-2016, based on a CLM5 simulation. The total land waterbased FSC of Eastern Australia and parts of the mid-and high-latitudes of Asia presents a positive correlation with the PDO, while the ACCs for most basins in Africa and North America are negative (Fig. 10a). The AMO plays a major role in the Amazon and Sahara where the FSC is large when the AMO is positive, while its impact on Australia is the opposite (Fig. 10b). In addition, the spatial pattern of the ACC between IPO and FSC is similar to that of the PDO, except in the Amazon and Mississippi River basins (Fig. 10c).

    Fig. 6. The climatological distribution of surface soil moisture (5 cm) based on (a)SMAP observation and (b) CLM5 simulation from June, 2015 to December, 2016.

    Fig. 7. The FSC of land (a), soil columns at different depths (b-d), and snow (e). The TWS, soil moisture at different depths and snow are simulated by CLM5 over river basins during 2003-16.

    Fig. 8. (a) The weighted averaged FSC for land, snow, and different soil columns at various depths across time scales for global river basins. (b) The contributions of snow and soil moisture at different depths to the total land water-based FSC. All statistics are based on the data during 2003-16.

    Fig. 9. Distribution of FSC for land, different soil columns, and snow over global river basins for 3-day (a-e), 10-day (f-j),and 20-day (k-o) time scales based on CLM5 simulations during 2003-16.

    Fig. 10. (a-c) Anomaly correlation coefficients between CLM5-simulated total land waterbased FSC and the climate indices (PDO, IPO, and AMO) during 1951-2016.

    4.Conclusions

    This study applies a state-of-the-art method to measure FSC over global major river basins and investigates the associated hydrological dynamics through observations and land model simulations. Based on the retrievals of GRACE satellites and multisource precipitation observations, the estimated land FSC on a monthly time scale is over 0.35 for 25%of the river basins, especially in parts of the Middle East, central Asia, and high-latitude regions. In terms of weighted average, over one-fourth of the rainfall can be retained in basins after one month. Although the simulated total land waterbased FSC is smaller than observations, the correlation between them is significant. In addition, the climate condition and land cover exert great influences on the FSC, with significant positive (negative) correlation between FSC and the aridity index (LAI).

    The GRACE satellites provide valuable measurements for an integrated estimation of global FSC on monthly time scale, and the CLM5 land model simulations can be used to separate the contributions of different TWS components to the FSC across multiple time scales. Although the TWS can be divided into different components, the globally averaged TWS changes can be mainly partitioned between the change of soil moisture and snow (Syed et al., 2008). Similarly, we find that a large proportion of water is stored in the deeper soil, but the middle soil column (0.1-1 m) has the largest impact on the storage capability, especially in some basins,like Western Europe. Although the aquifer is another crucial component of TWS, we were not able to analyze its impacts on FSC because the CLM5 removed the unconfined aquifer module. The aquifer is recharged mainly by the water infiltration through the lower boundary, but we think the impact of aquifer on basin-scale land FSC is relatively small on monthly time scale due to the long residence times of groundwater. Nevertheless, the impacts of groundwater on longer time scales at specific regions need to be further analyzed through appropriate observations and quantification methods. Surface soil contributes more than 25% to the FSC at short time scales especially in arid regions, but it declines quickly over time, noting that snow gradually plays a more important role, especially in high-latitude regions.Therefore, middle soil moisture and snow should be considered in the analysis of the global FSC, especially at longer time scales.

    The GRACE data is able to represent the impact of human activities, but the CLM5 simulations in this study ignored anthropogenic influences. Although the impact of human intervention does not contribute much to the total water storage change in large parts of the world, it should be significant and thus accounted for in areas where human activities are intensive (Haddeland et al., 2014). The difference between FSC based on observation and simulation could partly be attributed to the influence of humans, and the issue deserves more attention in some specific regions,such as North China, India, and North America. Besides that, inter-basin water transfers also need more attention,which is common in many countries such as China, America, India, and Australia (Allison and Meselhe, 2010).

    Due to the long residence time, the variation in TWS containing previous climate information can affect the subsequent weather and climate through a series of complicated land-atmosphere feedback processes. Therefore, the memory from TWS, which can be measured with FSC, is a non-negligible source of climate predictability (Reager and Famiglietti, 2009). Though the memory is always viewed as a stationary feature of TWS or other components, we find that the internal climate variability or external climate forcings can alter the land memory time scale. Here, we show the response of the FSC to decadal climate variability. Our work represented the variability of FSC to climate indexes,such as the PDO, AMO, and IPO. Besides the internal climate variability, human interventions, such as land use/land cover change, and the management of water resources (e.g.,reservoir regulation, irrigation, and groundwater exploitation), are also critical factors directly affecting regional or local FSC, where the analysis of LAI provides a good example. The capability to comprehend such anthropogenic pathways would in turn influence many aspects of hydrology and agriculture such as the water cycle, crop yield, and so on. Therefore, separating the influence of human activities on the changes in FSC is worthy of comprehensive research.

    Acknowledgements. This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFA0606002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41875105), and the Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of NUIST(2018r078). The CRUNCEP forcing data are available on the UCAR website (https://svn-ccsm-inputdata.cgd.ucar.edu/trunk/inputdata/atm/datm7/). The GPCC precipitation datasets are available at https://www.dwd.de/EN/ourservices/gpcc/gpcc.html and the PREC datasets are available at ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/precip/50yr/land_ocean/. The CLM5 is available at CESM website (http://www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/cesm2/). The GRACE data can be downloaded from NASA website (https://grace.jpl.nasa.gov/).

    午夜福利,免费看| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| av不卡在线播放| av卡一久久| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 永久免费av网站大全| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 亚洲无线观看免费| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 热re99久久国产66热| 嫩草影院入口| 久久97久久精品| 观看美女的网站| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡 | 精品视频人人做人人爽| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 99热全是精品| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 一级毛片我不卡| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 性色avwww在线观看| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产在线免费精品| 久久久国产精品麻豆| h日本视频在线播放| h日本视频在线播放| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 中国国产av一级| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 精品国产国语对白av| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 亚州av有码| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 老司机影院成人| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 一区二区三区免费毛片| av天堂久久9| 国产视频首页在线观看| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 777米奇影视久久| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 人人澡人人妻人| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 丝袜喷水一区| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 国产在线视频一区二区| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲综合色惰| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 国产一级毛片在线| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 乱人伦中国视频| 日韩视频在线欧美| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 成人免费观看视频高清| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 精品国产一区二区久久| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 久久久精品94久久精品| 嫩草影院新地址| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 韩国av在线不卡| 99热这里只有精品一区| 一级av片app| 日日啪夜夜爽| 午夜福利,免费看| 黄色配什么色好看| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 亚洲综合精品二区| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 日本91视频免费播放| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 国产在线视频一区二区| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 日本午夜av视频| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 多毛熟女@视频| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 99热6这里只有精品| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 精品少妇内射三级| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 精品国产一区二区久久| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 国产成人aa在线观看| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 亚洲成色77777| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 99久久综合免费| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 内地一区二区视频在线| h视频一区二区三区| 色94色欧美一区二区| 只有这里有精品99| 精品午夜福利在线看| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 亚洲在久久综合| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 岛国毛片在线播放| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 精品久久久精品久久久| 青春草国产在线视频| 成人综合一区亚洲| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 色哟哟·www| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 在线观看国产h片| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 久久久久久人妻| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 内射极品少妇av片p| 午夜日本视频在线| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 久久av网站| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 观看av在线不卡| 欧美另类一区| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 成人二区视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 天堂8中文在线网| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 日日啪夜夜爽| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 国产男女内射视频| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 国产在线免费精品| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 精品午夜福利在线看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 岛国毛片在线播放| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 三级国产精品片| 国产成人一区二区在线| 美女主播在线视频| 国产av国产精品国产| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产 精品1| 国产淫语在线视频| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 一个人免费看片子| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 久久久久视频综合| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 黄色一级大片看看| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 99热网站在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 久久久久久久久大av| 午夜91福利影院| 亚洲图色成人| www.av在线官网国产| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 久久久久久人妻| 亚洲无线观看免费| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 亚洲国产av新网站| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 天堂8中文在线网| 中文字幕制服av| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| av免费观看日本| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 性色av一级| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 高清毛片免费看| 在线看a的网站| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 精品亚洲成国产av| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 色哟哟·www| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 麻豆成人av视频| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 精品国产国语对白av| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 永久网站在线| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| videossex国产| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 一级毛片我不卡| 中文字幕久久专区| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 成年人免费黄色播放视频 | 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 免费看日本二区| 插逼视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久av| 成人二区视频| 九九在线视频观看精品| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 午夜视频国产福利| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 国产精品.久久久| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 成人免费观看视频高清| 桃花免费在线播放| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产成人freesex在线| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 六月丁香七月| 精品久久久噜噜| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 国产精品久久久久成人av| h视频一区二区三区| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 午夜福利视频精品| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产淫语在线视频| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 99九九在线精品视频 | 少妇人妻 视频| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 黄色配什么色好看| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 简卡轻食公司| 亚洲中文av在线| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产一级毛片在线| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 成人影院久久| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区 | 婷婷色综合www| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| av免费观看日本| 一级毛片我不卡| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 色视频www国产| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡 | 在线观看免费高清a一片| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| h视频一区二区三区| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 有码 亚洲区| 久久久久久人妻| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 久久久精品94久久精品| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 一级黄片播放器| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 日本wwww免费看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 如何舔出高潮| 永久免费av网站大全| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲精品一二三| 色哟哟·www| av黄色大香蕉| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 久久狼人影院| 最黄视频免费看| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 9色porny在线观看| h视频一区二区三区| 一级毛片 在线播放| 香蕉精品网在线| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 久久久久网色| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 欧美性感艳星| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 观看av在线不卡| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲成色77777| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 免费看不卡的av| 少妇的逼好多水| 老女人水多毛片| 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 少妇 在线观看| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 久久97久久精品| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 亚洲国产色片| 日本免费在线观看一区| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 国产探花极品一区二区| 午夜久久久在线观看| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 内地一区二区视频在线| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 在线看a的网站| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 国产 精品1| 免费观看av网站的网址| 一级毛片我不卡| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 六月丁香七月| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 九草在线视频观看| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 大码成人一级视频| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 久久久久精品性色| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 亚洲成人手机| 少妇高潮的动态图| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 岛国毛片在线播放| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 一级毛片电影观看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 一级a做视频免费观看| 久久狼人影院| 精品午夜福利在线看| 美女中出高潮动态图| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久热这里只有精品99| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 久久久久久久久大av| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 一区二区av电影网| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 在线 av 中文字幕| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 久久热精品热| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 深夜a级毛片| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 欧美3d第一页| 最黄视频免费看| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 久久久久久伊人网av| 亚洲第一av免费看| 国产精品免费大片| 在线播放无遮挡| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 少妇丰满av| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 午夜福利,免费看| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站 | 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂|