• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Lower Bound Estimate of Blow Up Time for the Porous Medium Equations under Dirichlet and Neumann Boundary Conditions

    2021-05-25 07:15:30XUEYingzhen

    XUE Yingzhen

    School of Business,Xi’an International University,Xi’an 710077,China

    Abstract. In this paper, we establish the lower bounds estimate of the blow up time for solutions to the nonlocal cross-coupled porous medium equations with nonlocal source terms under Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions. The results are obtained by using some differential inequality technique.

    Key Words:Lower bounds;Blow up time;Nonlocal source terms;Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions.

    1 Introduction

    In this article,we consider the lower bound of blow up time for solutions of the nonlocal cross-coupled porous medium equations

    and continuous bounded initial values

    under Dirichlet boundary condition

    or Neumann boundary condition

    where ? ∈R3is a bounded region of?? with a smooth boundary, and satisfies thatp>m>1,q>n>1,υis the unit external normal vector in the external normal direction of??. There are many research achievements on the lower bound estimation of blow up time for the solution of a single porous media equation,see,e.g.,[1-3]. Liu,et al. [1]studied the following nonlocal porous equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions

    They have obtained the lower bound of the blow up time of the solution which

    and homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions,the lower bound of the blow up time of the solution which

    Liu[2]considered Eq. (1.6)with Robin boundary conditions,they have obtained the lower bound of the blow up time of the solution which

    Fang and Chai[3]studied Eq. (1.6)with Neumann boundary conditions

    the lower bound of the blow up time of the solution which

    whenl>0 of(1.5). The lower bound of the blow up time of the solution which

    whenl<0 of Eq.(1.5).

    To sum up, most of the existing results focus on a single equation,However,studies on the lower bound of blow up time for the equation set(1.1)-(1.5)have not been found.Blow-up at a finite time and lower bound of blowing up time of solution for the parabolic equations are studied in[4,5]. The lower bound of blowing up time for solutions of other similar equations or equation set is shown in[6-9].

    Inspired by[4-5], this paper studies the lower bound estimation of blowing up time for the solutions of the porous media equation set(1.1)-(1.5)with non-local source crosscoupling andm>1,n>1 with relevant formulas and some basic inequalities in[9].

    2 The some inequalities

    This part introduces some important inequalities used in this paper.

    Lemma 2.1.(Membrane inequality)

    where λ is the first eigenvalue of?ω+λω=0,ω>0,x∈?,and ω=0,x∈??.

    Lemma 2.2.([9])Let?be the bounded star region in RN,and N≥2. Then

    Lemma 2.3.(Special Young inequality)Let γ be an arbitrary constant,and0

    3 Lower bound of blow up time under Dirichlet boundary conditions

    The lower bound of blow up time for solutions of equations under Dirichlet boundary conditions is discussed below.

    Theorem 3.1.Defines auxiliary functions

    for s>max{1,p,q,m?1,n?1,3p?2,3q?2}.If(u,v)is a non-negative classical solution of equation set(1.1)-(1.5)and blow up occurs in the sense of measure J(t)at time t?,then the lower bound of t?is

    where,The normal number K1,K2,β1is given in the following proof.

    Proof.Note that

    When the equations takeDirichletboundary conditions of Eq.(1.4),Eq.(3.2)becomes

    where

    First,H?lder inequality is used to estimate the second term ofin Eq. (3.3),and it is obtained that

    according to Young inequality and equation above,it is obtained that

    Second,H?lder inequality is used to estimate the first term on the right side of Eq. (3.4),and it is obtained that

    from the second term on the right side of inequality sign of(3.5)and H?lder inequality,we can know

    from the first term on the right side of inequality sign of(3.5)and H?lder inequality,we can know

    using the following Sobolev inequality([10]):

    where,the second term of Eq.(3.7)can be simplified to

    by synthesizing Eqs.(3.7)and(3.8),we have

    based on Lemma 2.1,Eq.(3.9)becomes

    Combining Eqs.(3.6)and(3.10),Eq.(3.5)becomes

    where

    By synthesizing Eqs.(3.4)-(3.11),of Eq.(3.3)becomes

    Using the fundamental inequality

    Eq.(3.12)becomes

    The same derivation method is used to estimate theJ′

    2(t)term in Eq. (3.3):

    where

    In order to deal with the gradient terms in Eqs. (3.13)and(3.14),we setandFinally,by synthesizing Eqs.(3.13)and(3.14),we obtain

    Integrating(3.16)from 0 tot?,we obtain

    This completes the proof of the theorem.

    4 Lower bound of blow up time under Neumann boundary conditions

    The lower bound of blow up time for solutions of equations under the Neumann boundary conditions is discussed below.

    4.1 The case of l>0

    Theorem 4.1.Define the same measure as(3.1)and the same condition as s. If(u,v)is a nonnegative classical solution to the equation set(1.1)-(1.2)with(1.3)and(1.5),then the lower bound of t?is

    where,the normal number K1,K2,K3,K4,β1,β2is given in the followingproof.

    Proof.Lemma 2.2 is used to estimate two boundary terms in Eq. (3.2),then

    where

    From the second term on the right hand side of Eq.(4.1)and using H?lder inequality and Lemma 2.3,we can know

    wherer1is an arbitrary constant.

    The H?lder inequality is used to estimate the second term on the right hand side of Eq.(4.2). We then have

    Substituting(4.2)and(4.3)into Eq.(4.1),we get

    where

    Similarly,another boundary term in Eq.(3.2)is estimated as follows

    where,r2is an arbitrary constant.

    Substituting(3.16),(4.4)and(4.5)into Eq. (3.2),we get

    where

    The Eq.(4.6)becomes

    Integrating(4.7)from 0 tot?,we obtain

    4.2 The case of l ≤0

    Ifl≤0,then,according to Eq.(3.2),we obtain

    That is, the same measure relation is obtained with Eq. (3.3). Therefore, whenl≤0,the lower bound of blow up time of the equation set (1.1)-(1.2) with (1.3) and (1.5) is consistent with that of Eq. (3.17).

    Acknowledgments

    This work is supported by Natural Science Basic Research Project of Shaanxi Province(2019JM-534);Soft Science Project of Shaanxi Province(2019KRM169);Planned Projects of the 13th Five-year Plan for Education Science of Shaanxi Province(SGH18H544);Project on Higher Education Teaching Reform of Xi’an International University (2019B36), and the Youth Innovation Team of Shaanxi Universities. The author would like to deeply thank all the reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments.

    长岛县| 驻马店市| 禹州市| 六枝特区| 洞口县| 四川省| 太谷县| 聊城市| 莒南县| 祁阳县| 涪陵区| 遂宁市| 南澳县| 城步| 民丰县| 东城区| 安福县| 遂川县| 隆昌县| 临泽县| 米泉市| 忻城县| 澳门| 延长县| 恩平市| 卢氏县| 修水县| 尚志市| 老河口市| 富民县| 舟曲县| 卓尼县| 手游| 周口市| 兖州市| 太仓市| 汶川县| 武城县| 宁夏| 舞钢市| 江城|