• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Existence and Multiplicity of Positive Solutions for a Coupled Fourth-Order System of Kirchhoff Type

    2021-04-20 13:54:40

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Henan University of Science and Technology,Luoyang 471023, China)

    Abstract: In this paper, we study a coupled fourth-order system of Kirchhoff type.Under appropriate hypotheses of Vi(x) for i=1,2, f and g, we obtained two main existence theorems of weak solutions for the problem by variational methods. Some recent results are extended.

    Keywords: A coupled fourth-order system of Kirchhoff type; Positive solutions; Lack of compactness; Variational methods

    §1. Introduction

    We study a coupled fourth-order system of Kirchhoff type as follows

    whereai>0,bi>0,λi>0 are constants for i=1,2,k>0 is a parameter,Vi(x)∈C(RN×R,R)fori=1,2,f ∈C(RN×R,R) andg ∈C(RN×R,R). In order to prove the existence and multiplicity of solutions for system (1.1), we make the following assumptions forVi(x) (i=1,2),fandg.

    (V1)whered1is a constant. This is a constantK1>0 such that the setis nonempty andwheremeasis the Lebesgue measure in RN.

    (V2)whered2is a constant. There exists a constantK2>0 such that the setis nonempty andwheremeasis the Lebesgue measure in RN.

    (A1)and|g(x,v)|≤C(1+|v|p?1), where 2?=2N/(N ?4) ifN>4 and 2?=∞ifN ≤4.

    (A2) For?x∈RN,|f(x,u)|=o(|u|) as|u|→0, and|g(x,v)|=o(|v|) as|v|→0.

    (A3) This isμ1>4 such thatμ1F(x,u)≤uf(x,u) for?(x,u)∈RN×R+and there existsμ2>4 such thatμ2G(x,v)≤vg(x,v) for?(x,v)∈RN×R+.

    (A4)

    (A5) There existsμ1>4 such thatis monotonically increasing on (0,+∞) and there existsμ2>4 such thatis monotonically increasing on (0,+∞).

    (A6)f(x,?u)=?f(x,u)for?(x,u)∈RN×R+andg(x,?v)=?g(x,v)for?(x,v)∈RN×R+.

    The biharmonic equation has been widely concerned by mathematicians and physicists.There are some interesting results can be found in [4,6,7,10,14,15]. In [14], using variational methods, Yin and Wu obtained the existence and multiplicity results for the following fourth order elliptic equations

    In [15], Zhang, Tang and Zhang studied equations (1.2) in asymptotically linear case and obtained the existence of ground state solutions. Ifa1=a2=1,b1=b2=0,λ1=λ2=1, andk=0, problem (1.1) is related to problem (1.2), which is used to describe the static deflection of an elastic plate in a fluid and the traveling wave in suspension bridge. In [7], by variational methods, Liu, Chen and Wu obtained the existence and multiplicity results for the following problem

    In [6], Liang, Zhang and Luo considered a class of singularly perturbed fourth order equations with critical nonlinearity and proved the existence and multiplicity of solutions. Ifk=0 andλ1=λ2=1, problem (1.1) is related to the following fourth order elliptic equations of Kirchhoff type

    In recent years, a lot of scholars were concerned about the problem (1.4). Some meaningful works can be seen in [9,11–13,16]. In [11], Song and Chen proved the multiplicity of solutions for equations (1.4) by using symmetric mountain pass theorem, whereN ≤7,a,b>0,V(x)∈C(RN,R)andf ∈C(RN×R,R)satisfies the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition. If ? is a bounded domain in RNandV(x)≡0, problem (1.4) can reduce to the following Kirchhoff type problem

    The system (1.5) is related to the stationary analogue of the Kirchhoff type problem

    Since it is considered as a good approximation for describing nonlinear vibrations of beams or plates (see [1,2]), problem (1.6) was concerned by some physics and engineering scholars. In [9],Ru and An considered the following a class of biharmonic equations of Kirchhoff type

    where ? is a bounded domain inandThey obtained existence and multiplicity of solutions by variational methods.

    Compared with problem (1.3), the nonlocal terms and couplings in problem (1.1) which will make it more difficult to overcome the lack of compactness and prove the (PS) condition. As we mentioned above, all results in the literatures are concerned the single equation. A natural question is can we extend the results to the system of fourth-order.

    Inspired by the works of these scholars, we aim to study the existence and multiplicity of positive solutions for problem (1.1). Our main results are as follows.

    Theorem 1.1.If(V1)?(V2)and(A1)?(A4)hold, there existsΛ?large enough such that problem (1.1) has at least one positive solution for all λ1,λ2>Λ?. In addition, if(A6)is satisfied, then problem (1.1) has infinitely many positive solutions.

    Theorem 1.2.If(V1)?(V2),(A1)?(A2)and(A4)?(A5)are satisfied, then there existsΛ?large enough such that problem (1.1) has at least one positive solution for all λ1,λ2>Λ?. In addition, if(A6)is satisfied, then problem (1.1) has infinitely many positive solutions.

    §2. Preliminaries

    andOnH, for any (u1,v1),(u2,v2)∈H, we define an inner product as follows

    and then the corresponding norm isLetX ?H. OnX, for all(u1,v1),(u2,v2)∈X, define its inner product be

    and the corresponding norm beLet

    with inner product and the norm

    DefineE=E1×E2with inner product

    and the corresponding norm isLetf ∈Lp(?) for 1≤p≤∞. Setf+=max{f,0}andf?=min{f,0}, thenf=f++f?. Denoteas theLp-norm off.LetLp(?)×Lp(?) be the Cartesian product [5] of the twoLp(?) spaces, andfor any (f,g)∈Lp(?)×Lp(?).

    Remark 2.1.Let the energy functional of equations (1.1) be

    Obviously, under the assumptions(V1),(V2)and(A1)?(A6), we obtain I ∈C1(E,R). Moreover,for any(?,ψ)∈E, we have

    Lemma 2.1.Under the assumptions(V1)and(V2), we obtain thatiscontinuous for any s∈[2,2?)if λ=min{λ1,λ2}≥1. Then, there exists a constant αs>0, whichis independent of λ, such thatfor each(u,v)∈E.

    Proof.For any (u,v)∈E, we have

    whereSdenotes the best Sobolev constant for the imbedding ofD2,2(RN) inL2?(RN),

    andβ=max{β1,β2}. Thus, these two norms are equivalent. Next, we showis equivalent to the standard product norm onH. For any (u,v)∈H, we have

    In fact,

    Obviously, we haveThen, the embeddingis continuous for anys∈[2,2?) andλ=min{λ1,λ2}≥1. Thus there exists a constantαs>0, which is independent ofλ, such thatfor each (u,v)∈E.

    Let’s first state two lemmas, and we’ll use them to prove our conclusions.

    Lemma 2.2.[8, Theorem 2.2] Let E be a real Banach space and I ∈C1(E,R). Moreover, I satisfies(PS)condition. Then I has a critical value η ≥α if I(0)=0and

    (I1)there exists constants ρ,α>0such that I?Bρ(0)≥α,

    (I2)there exists ansuch that I(e)≤0.

    Lemma 2.3.[8, Theorem 9.12] Let E be a infinite dimension Banach space. Let I(0)=0,I ∈C1(E,R)be even and satisfy(PS)condition. Suppose thatwhere V is finitedimensional. If I satisfies the following conditions:

    (I3)there are constants ρ,α>0such thatand

    (I4)for any finite dimensional subspacethere exists a positive constantsuch that

    Then I has an unbounded sequence of critical values.

    §3. Proof of main results

    In order to prove our main theorems, the following lemmas are given.

    Lemma 3.1.[3] Let??RN be an open set. Set the functional f ∈C(?×R,R)such that|f(x,u)|≤C3(|u|r+|u|s)for some C3>0and1≤r0and un(x)→u(x)a.e. in x∈?, where s≤p<∞, r ≤q<∞, q>1. Letbesuch that χ(t)=1for t≤1, χ(t)=0for t≥2,Rn is a positive constant sequence withRn →∞as n→∞. Set the space Lp(?)∩Lq(?)with the norm

    and the space Lp(?)+Lq(?)with the norm

    Then, there is a sequencein Lp(?)∩Lq(?), and

    Lemma 3.2.Ifin E, then we can take a subsequencesuch thatin E. And if {(un,vn)} is a(PS)c sequence, i.e.,

    then,

    Proof.Letbe such thatχ(t)=1 fort≤1,χ(t)=0 fort≥2, Rnis a positive constant sequence with Rn →∞asn→∞.IfinE, we may choose a subsequencesuch that, asn→∞,inE. In fact,from the definition of the cut-off functionχin Lemma 3.1,then?ε>0, there is an enough large integernsuch thatFor any (u,v)∈E,then there exists a constantρ1=ρ(ε)>0 such that

    and

    whereThen,

    Thus, asn→∞, we haveby Lebesgue dominated converge theorem.UsinginE, we obtain

    Using lower semi-continuity of the norm andwe get

    and

    ForinE, passing to a subsequence, we may suppose thatun →uinfor allt∈[2,2?) andun(x)→u(x) a.e. in RN. If (A1) and (A2) are satisfied, then for anyε1>0, there is a constantC(ε1)>0 such that

    and

    Setr=2,s=p, andq=2 in Lemma 3.1, then we get

    Similarly, we obtain

    Obviously,

    Sinceis bounded andonH2(RN), theninLq(RN).Similarly,inLq(RN). By, we have

    Thus,

    From (3.1)-(3.4) and (3.6)-(3.8), we haveNext, we will show

    for any (?,ψ)∈E. Therefore, for any (?,ψ)∈E, we get

    Based on the previous discussions, we have

    And, asn→∞,

    Thus, we getasn→∞.

    Lemma 3.3.Let(A1)?(A3)be satisfied. Thenforsomeand all(x,u)with |u| sufficiently large.

    Proof.Suppose that (A1)?(A3) are satisfied, then there areCi>0,i=1,2 such thatfor all (x,u)∈RN×R+. Obviously, we haveforp∈(2,2?). For a fixedif|u|≥1, then|f(x,u)|≤(C1+C2)|u|p?1. Set R≥1 large enough such thatwhenever|u|≥R. Then,for|u|sufficiently large,Therefore, we get

    Remark 3.1.Similar to Lemma 3.3, if(A1)?(A3)hold, thenH?(x,v)for someand all(x,v)with |v| sufficiently large.

    Lemma 3.4.Suppose(V1)?(V2)and(A1)?(A3)are satisfied. Then there existsΛ?>0such that, for any c∈R, I satisfies(PS)c condition for all λ>Λ?.

    Proof.Let{(un,vn)}be a (PS)csequence, then, by (A3), fornsufficiently large, we get

    whereμ=min{μ1,μ2}. It means that{(un,vn)}is bounded inE. Passing to subsequence, we can assume thatAccording to Lemma 3.2, there existssuch that(u,v)in E. SetthenBy (V1) and (V2), we get

    Letwhereτhas been defined in Lemma 3.3, then 2

    whereaq>0. By Lemma 3.2, we obtain

    Sincenext, we showIn fact

    By (A3), we haveThus,

    By (3.10) and (3.11), we get

    Therefore, by Lemma 3.3 and H¨older’s inequality, we obtain

    Similarly, by Remark 3.1, we get

    Then, by (3.9),

    On the other hand,

    and

    Hence,

    Then,

    Thus, there is Λ?large enough such that

    for anyλ1>Λ?andλ2>Λ?. Then (ωn,τn)→0 inE, for allλ1,λ2>Λ?. Sincethus, we get (un,vn)→(u,v) inE.

    Proof of Theorem 1.1.Similar to the way to get (3.5), we obtain that there is a constantC(ε2)>0 such that

    for anyε2>0. By (3.5), (3.12) and Sobolev embedding theorem, forand smallρ>0, we get

    whereandC(ε)=max{C(ε1),C(ε2)}. Thus,

    By Lemma 2.1, we knowSinceL2(RN)×L2(RN) is a separable Hilbert space,Ehas a countable orthogonal basis{ej}. LetE=Ek ⊕Zk,whereEk=span{e1,e2,···,ek}andZk=(Ek)⊥. Obviously,Ekis a finite dimension space andI?Bρ(0)∩Zk ≥α>0. Ifis any subspace ofE, then there is a positive integermsuch thatBecause all norms are equivalent in a finite dimension space, there exists a constantη>0 such thatfor any (u,v)∈Em, whereμ=min{μ1,μ2}. According to (3.5) and (A3)?(A4), there isC(ε1)>0 such that

    Similarly, by (3.12) and (A3)?(A4), there existsC(ε2)>0 such that

    Thus,

    for each (u,v)∈Em. Sinceμ>4, there exists a large enough R>0 such thatI<0 onTherefore, we can find ane∈Esuch thatsuch thatI(e)<0. By (2.1), we haveI(0,0)=0. By Lemma 2.2 and Lemma 3.4, we obtain thatIhas a critical valueζ ≥α. In a word, the problem (1.1) has a nontrivial solution (u,v) inE. Since (u,v) solves

    by maximum principle, we getu>0 andv>0. We will give the proof of multiplicity of solutions for problem (1.1). According to (A1), (A2) and (A6),F(x,u) andG(x,v) both are even. From(2.1), we can obtainIis even. Thus, by Lemma 2.3, we get problem (1.1) has infinitely many positive solutions.

    Proof of Theorem 1.2.Similar to the proof in [7], we obtain that (A5) implies (A3). Thus we omit the proof. According to Theorem 1.1, Theorem 1.2 holds.

    §4. Conclusions

    In this article, we are concerned with the existence of solutions for problem (1.1). By using variational methods, we get two existence theorems of weak solutions for problem (1.1). First, if(V1), (V2) and (A1)?(A4) hold, we can obtain there exists Λ?large enough such that problem(1.1) has at least one positive solution for allλ1,λ2>Λ?. Moreover, if (A6) hold, then problem(1.1) has infinitely many positive solutions. Second, if (V1)?(V2), (A1)?(A2) and (A4)?(A5)hold, we can get there exists Λ?large enough such that problem (1.1) has at least one positive solution for allλ1,λ2>Λ?. In addition, if (A6) hold, then problem (1.1) has infinitely many positive solutions.

    汉沽区| 北碚区| 济宁市| 轮台县| 灌南县| 郑州市| 定兴县| 云梦县| 克山县| 淮安市| 沐川县| 新河县| 东乡族自治县| 夏河县| 普兰店市| 葫芦岛市| 阿荣旗| 台江县| 内江市| 贺兰县| 长葛市| 广东省| 文化| 盐边县| 类乌齐县| 和林格尔县| 山东省| 郑州市| 东海县| 江安县| 宣汉县| 监利县| 青海省| 远安县| 隆回县| 额敏县| 拉孜县| 肥城市| 绩溪县| 延边| 瓮安县|