• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comparison of self- report and objective measures of male sexual dysfunction in a Japanese primary care setting: a cross- sectional, self- administered mixed methods survey

    2021-04-06 08:49:36YukiTakeuchiRyoheiOtsukaHajimeKojimaMichaelFetters
    Family Medicine and Community Health 2021年1期

    Yuki Takeuchi , Ryohei Otsuka, Hajime Kojima, Michael D Fetters

    ABSTRACT

    lNTRODUCTlON

    Male sexual dysfunction is defined as a clin—ically significant disturbance in a man’s ability to respond sexually or to experience sexual pleasure.1Erectile dysfunction (ED) is the most common problem of male sexual dysfunction and consid—ered primarily a problem of men older than 40 years of age.2Data from the 2015—2016 Nation Health and Well—ness Survey provide estimates of the global prevalence of ED in men aged 40—70 years old—overall 45.2%: Italy (52.5%), France (47.8%), China (47.4%), Spain (46.6%), Germany (46.1%), US (46,1%), UK (42.6%) and Brazil (42.1%).3A meta— analysis estimates that the prevalence of ED in Asia (Japan, Korea, China, Singapore) is 41.5% in men aged 40—49, 61.8% in men aged 50—59 and 69.6% in men aged 60—69.4In Japan, the reported prevalence of ED among at— risk age groups to be 63.7% in men aged 40—49 years, 78.2% in men aged 50—59 years and 90.3% in men aged 60—69 years.4ED is a common condition in the primary care setting and negatively affects quality of life (QOL).56

    Historically, treatment of sexual dysfunction was primarily psychosocial until the development of testos—terone replacement in 1970s.7Unfortunately, testosterone injections and patch formulations both have high rates of side effects, and compliance is difficult,8particularly with injected testosterone. Moreover, the Food and Drug Administration in the USA considers testosterone to be a controlled substance which poses a significant barrier to access.9In Japan, only testosterone injection is available, but testosterone replacement therapy is approved only for hypogonadism treatment.10

    The advent of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhib—itors created a new opportunity for treatment of ED. PDE5 inhibitors work by inhibiting guanosine 3',5'— cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) hydrolysis. The accumulation of cGMP leads to smooth— muscle relaxation in the corpus cavernosum and increased blood flow to the penis. Thus, an increase in cGMP in smooth muscle cells is respon—sible for prolonging an erection.11Four types of oral PDE5 inhibitors are available in the USA. In Japan, only sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil are available, and these three agents can be prescribed by any physician with a medical license including primary care physicians (PCPs). By extrapolating from the 2001—2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, it has been estimated that the cost associated with treatment of ED would be US$15 billion in the USA if all men affected with ED were to seek treatment.12However, global sales of PDE5 inhibitors were US$4.82 billion in 2017,13suggesting that many men afflicted with ED may be untreated. While not suggesting that all men should be treated for ED, this gap suggests that there may be many men who would benefit from treatment for ED as a component of an overall treat—ment strategy.

    Even though ED occurs commonly and effective treat—ment is available, many patients do not seek treatment for sexual dysfunction.14—17Previous international research on barriers to seeking treatment showed many patients were concerned there would be no treatment and doctors would dismiss their complaints.18Compared with men in western countries, men in East Asia (China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea and Japan) were the least likely to take any action.141517In one study, lack of perception of a problem and the belief that sexual dysfunction is not a medical issue were the most frequent reasons cited for not seeking medical help among East Asian men.17Embarrassment about having a sexual problem has also been found as a main reason in East Asian coun—tries.17Qualitative research in China showed patients perceived sexual dysfunction as embarrassing and poten—tially shameful, and that men preferred consultation with same gender and age PCPs.19A previous study in Korea showed only 2% of people with sexual dysfunction had talked to a medical doctor about their sexual prob—lems due to believing that the problem is not serious, not being bothered by the problem, not having access to medical care and lacking of awareness of available treat—ments.20A previous study conducted in Japan with PCPs identified the perception that the act of seeking sexual dysfunction treatment may be intensely embarrassing for Japanese men.21

    While many men may perceive that sexual dysfunction falls primarily in the scope of care of urologists, PCPs far outnumber urologists and are positioned to provide PDE5 inhibitor therapy for men desiring ED treatment. Previous research in China suggests patients view PCPs as the most appropriate professional with whom to discuss sexual problems.19However, Nicolosi et al estimated about 90% of East Asian people with some degree of sexual dysfunction had never talked about the problem with their PCPs.17As treatment could enhance the QOL of men with ED, PCPs need to better understand patient’s perspectives on sexual dysfunction.

    Previous research conducted in East Asia showed lack of perception of sexual problems and belief that sexual dysfunction is not a medical issue as main reasons for not seeking medical help.17We hypothesised Japanese patients may not recognise their sexual dysfunction as a medical problem. Our secondary aims were to examine factors that would be barriers to consulting for treatment and gain a greater understanding qualitatively of partic—ipants’ perspectives on sexual dysfunction. Our mixed methods purpose was to integrate the quantitative and qualitative results by merging attitudinal factors with the qualitative perspectives.

    The purposes of this research were (1) to examine at— risk Japanese men’s awareness of ED by comparing a single item self— perception assessment of sexual dysfunc—tion with a five— item objective measure of ED, to assess their desire for treatment, and to gauge attitudes about treatment by PCPs, (2) to qualitatively elucidate partic—ipating men’s perspectives about their preferences for sexual dysfunction treatment based on written comments and (3) to merge both types of findings to gain an enhanced understanding of how the men’s awareness of ED, desire for treatment and barriers to access linked with their perspectives about ED using joint display anal—ysis and development of a model.

    METHODS

    Study design

    We conducted a cross— sectional, self— administered mixed methods paper survey22in a 7— week period from 5 November to 21 December 2018, and conducted a chart review of enroled patients to collect their demo—graphic and health information. Our research para—digm was based on pragmatism as we sought a practical and feasible approach requiring both quantitative and qualitative data collection.23This study was approved by a research ethics committee of Teine Keijinkai Hospital (ID 2018—166). All participants provided written informed consent for this study.

    Setting

    A suburban family medicine residency training programme clinic in Sapporo on the northern Island of Japan served as the research setting. This clinic is similar to many other primary care clinics in Japan, as the physicians deliver full— range primary care to the local population. Established in 2009, the clinic has 14 physicians, including 7 attendings, and 7 residents. The gender of physicians are 10 men and 4 women. The clinic provides a full range of primary care services including women’s healthcare, and care to patients with a wide spectrum of ages spanning from children in the first year of life to old— old adults with the eldest patient’s age in the practice currently at 103 years. The percentage of male patients in the age range of men at risk for ED is similar to the general population.

    Participants

    We used criterion sampling. The target population was middle— aged men presenting in a primary care setting for a health check— up. These criteria were chosen because middle— aged men who were in the age range of 40—69 are at high risk for ED.24Moreover, the results should reflect a setting informative for family doctors and other PCPs. Finally, the health check— up visit type was chosen as an encounter explicitly framed for opti—mising health. Of eligible participants, 464 patients came into the clinic for routine check— ups during clinic operations. The questionnaire was distributed to 78 men and 70 returned the instrument for a response rate of 90%. Four participants who did not answer the survey questions fully were deemed non— eligible resulting in a sample size of 66 men (full participation rate of 85%, 66/78). Patients deposited completed question—naires into a secure collection box in the lobby. Qual—itative comments were recorded by 32% (21/66) of participants.

    Data collection tools

    The 11— item survey comprised two sections (see online supplemental appendix). Section A of the question—naire addressed self— reported sexual dysfunction (one question), desire for treatment and open response for rationale (two questions), attitudes about treatment

    of sexual dysfunction by PCPs (3 questions, total of 9 items). Section B was the Japanese IIEF—5, a five— item multidimensional, self— administered question—naire developed in Japan for screening and classifying severity of ED.25Based on data collection with 1152 men (1036 with ED, 116 control), the validated IIEF—5 has been shown to have 98% sensitivity and 88% speci—ficity.26The Japanese IIEF—5 is a translation of this vali—dated tool.25The cut— off score is less than 22 points. ED severity is defined as follows: 17—21 points is mild; 12—16 points is mild— to— moderate; 8—11 points is moderate; and less than 8 points is severe.26The chart abstrac—tion protocol involved using the participant unique patient ID number and the recording of marital status, current and past medical history and social history as documented in the most recent regular check— up in the chart of participants.

    Data collection and entry procedures

    PCPs distributed the confidential survey to eligible patients at the end of their routine primary health check visits. PCPs recorded and linked in a tracking sheet the distributed questionnaire’s identification number with the receiving participants’ electronic chart unique identifier at each visit. A research assis—tant abstracted the patients’ medical information from their electronic charts by using the tracking sheet with the corresponding list of questionnaire identification numbers and electronic chart unique identifiers.

    Data analysis

    We calculated descriptive statistics on the quantitative data with the software Easy R (EZR V.1.37). Results of the IIEF—5 were expressed in terms of the severity and distri—bution among the subjects. We calculated the SD for the IIEF—5 scores, 95% CI for question answer rates and performed Mann— Whitney U test and Kruskal— Wallis test for IIEF—5 score comparison between each group. The logic of merging the qualitative and quantitative data was to obtain an enhanced understanding of both the survey and qualitative findings,27specifically to examine how patient perspectives reinforced or attenuated the three primary study domains of awareness, desire for treatment and barriers to access. We identified codes for organising the qualitative comments by looking for emerging themes using a template approach.28This involved an immersion/crystallisation process which involves multiple readings of the qualitative text, and development of a coding scheme reflecting the major constructs identified.29The mixed methods integration involved development of a model as a mixed methods joint display figure30that merged the mixed data find—ings. Specifically, we examined directionality of influ—ence, reinforcement or attenuation, of the qualitative findings when linked with the three key quantitative constructs of the survey, awareness, desire for treatment and barriers to treatment. We assessed the ‘fit’, that is, an interpretation of the two types of findings to lookfor convergence, complementarity, expansion or diver—gence and metainferences to be drawn based on the results.3132

    Table 1 Characteristics of 66 participants

    RESULTS

    Participants

    Table 1 shows the characteristics of the subjects. As 66 men completed the surveys, and there are 464 men of this age in the clinic, the sample represents about 14% of eligible male patients. As shown, the mean age of participants was 60 years old. Demographic data suggest 98% (65/66) of participants had some lifestyle diseases (hypertension, diabetes or dyslipidaemia) and the most common problem was hypertension (80%, 53/66).

    Awareness of sexual dysfunction

    Comparison of self-perceived sexual dysfunction and validated measure of ED

    Among the respondents, 39% (26/66) self— reported having sexual dysfunction (table 2). Of the 66 partici—pants, 92% (61/66) met ED criteria of the IIEF—5: mild (n=27), mild— to— moderate (n=15), moderate (n=7) or severe (n=12). The severe ED group includes four sexu—ally inactive participants. Figure 1 shows the distribution of self— reported sexual dysfunction and ED according to the IIEF—5 score.

    International Index of Erectile Function-5 scores in each group

    Table 3 displays the mean IIEF—5 scores in each group. IIEF—5 scores in the 60—69 year— old group were significantlylower than the scores in other groups (40s:60s, p=0.01. 50s:60s, p<0.01). There was no significant difference between 40—49 year— old group and 50—59 year— old group (p=1). IIEF—5 scores of participants self— reporting sexual dysfunction had significantly lower IIEF—5 scores than the no self— reported sexual dysfunction group. However, variations in responses by self— report and on the objec—tive IIEF—5 instrument as shown in figure 1 suggests ED severity was not the only factor contributing to awareness of their sexual dysfunction.

    Table 2 'Yes’ answer rates of Q1-Q2 among all participants

    Figure 1 ED distribution among males in a primary care clinic based on comparison of self- reported and objective measures of ED according to age groups and severity (n=66). ED, erectile dysfunction; JIIEF5, Japanese translation of the five- item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5); SD, sexual dysfunction.

    Desire for treatment

    Tables 2 and 4 illustrate participants’ responses to the inquiries about their views regarding ED. Of respondents, 48% (16/33) desired treatment (table 2). Of the partic—ipants indicating a desire for treatment, 75% (12/16) desired treatment by their PCPs, but only one participant had discussed sexual dysfunction with his PCP (table 4).

    Barriers for men desiring treatment

    Figure 2 depicts the reasons provided by the subset of men who indicated they would like treatment from their PCPs. The most important barrier was feeling ashamed as reported by seven respondents. The second and third most common reasons given both related to knowledge about availability of treatment, lack of awareness that PCPs can provide treatment and lack of awareness about the availability of treatment. None of the participants chose the physician being a female as a barrier.

    Men’s perspectives about the desirability of treatment

    Qualitative results

    We identified six themes about participants’ perspec—tives on sexual dysfunction from their written comments. Themes included considering sexual dysfunction as normal ageing, attributing sexual dysfunction to decreased libido, importance of sexual activity for a healthy life, good rapport with PCPs, lack of knowledge about treatment and lack of intimate relationship with partner.

    Considering sexual dysfunction as normal ageing

    Several men shared their belief that sexual dysfunction is a normal part of ageing. For example, a male in his late sixties said, ‘Sexual problem is just caused by normal ageing’. Another male in his late 60s noted, ‘I consider sexual problem as ageing’. A male in his early 50s fatalis—tically concluded, ‘It can’t be helped because it’s ageing’. These perceptions prevented them from considering sexual dysfunction as a medical problem and unaware—ness based on a belief that ‘there was no treatment option for sexual problem’.

    Table 3 International Index of Erectile Function-5 scores in each age group

    Table 4 Response rate among participants who desired sexual dysfunction treatment

    Attributing sexual dysfunction to decreased libido

    Some patients considered sexual dysfunction in context of decreasing libido. For example, a male in his mid— 50s surmised his sexual dysfunction as thus, ‘I have sexual problem, but I think it is due to decreased libido’. A man in his late 60s recounted, ‘My libido has been decreasing as I became older’. A man in his mid— 60s confided, ‘I have become reluctant to have sex with females’. A male in his late 60s stated, ‘I don’t need treatment because I have graduated from sexual activities’.

    Importance of sexual activity for healthy life

    For some men, sexual activity was perceived as important for a healthy life and could be a form of motivation for treatment. Several responses from participants who were interested in sexual dysfunction illustrate this point. A man in his late 60s emphasised, ‘I want to have a vigorous life to keep myself healthy’. A man in his mid— 60s pointed out, ‘I want to become younger by treatment for sexual dysfunction’. A man in his mid— 40s lamented, ‘I have lost confidence due to my sexual problem’.

    Good rapport with primary care physicians

    The comments from participants indicate their trust in their PCPs. For example, a man in his late 50s shared, ‘My doctor understands my condition and situation well’. A man in his early 50s confided, ‘I trust my doctor because I see him regularly’. Another man in his late 50s reported, ‘I want treatment because my doctor is a good doctor’. These comments suggest that having good rapport with their PCPs can make them comfortable to discuss issues that may be conceived as shameful such as sexual dysfunction.

    Lack of knowledge about treatment

    Lack of knowledge about sexual dysfunction as a medi—cally treatable condition affected some patient’s attitudes towards sexual dysfunction treatment. For example, a man in his mid— 60s indicated, ‘I didn’t know sexual problems are treatable’. A male in his early 60s responded, ‘I want treatment for sexual problem if it is treatable’. A male in his late 50s disclosed, ‘I had no idea that sexual problem is medical problem’. These examples demonstrate that there are men who felt that if they had been knowledgeable about sexual dysfunction as a treatable medical condition, that they would have like to be treated.

    Lack of intimate relationship with partner

    Some patients attributed apathy about their sexual dysfunction treatment due to the lack of an intimate relationships with their partners. A male in his late 60s conveyed, ‘My wife hates having sex and even talking about sex’. Another man in his late 60s confided, ‘I and my wife sleep in different rooms. We have not had sex for 35 years’. A man in his early 60s wrote, ‘I have been sexless with my wife for a long time’. The lack of an intimate relationship with a partner not surprisingly negatively affected the patients’ desire for treatment.

    lntegration of the mixed data findings

    Figure 2 Barriers to seeking treatment for sexual dysfunction reported by participants who indicated they would like treatment from their PCP. PCPs, primary care physicians, PCP, primary care physician.

    Figure 3 Factors and mechanisms affecting ED treatment in primary care. ED, erectile dysfunction; JIIEF5, Japanese translation of the 5- item version of the International Index of Erectile Function; PCPs, primary care physicians.

    The intent of merging the survey and qualitative findings was to obtain an enhanced understanding of the findings. Joint display analysis facilitated that process. Figure 3 is the resulting mixed methods joint display figure. It pres—ents an integrated mixed methods model of the factors and mechanisms affecting ED treatment in primary care that was developed by merging the quantitative survey results and qualitative themes. The quantitative findings showed ‘low— awareness of sexual dysfunction’. The themes of ‘considering sexual dysfunction as normal ageing’ and ‘attributing sexual dysfunction to decreased libido’ inhibits patients from viewing their sexual dysfunction as a medical condition. Patients with these misconceptions may not seek treatment because they do not consider sexual dysfunction as treatable. In contrast, the theme ‘importance of sexual activity for healthy life’ serves as motivation for patients to treat their sexual dysfunction. Importantly, a ‘lack of intimate relationship with partner’ may diminish men’s consideration of the ‘importance of sexual activity for healthy life’ and attenuate their desire for treatment. From quantitative survey results, the main barriers to access were ‘feeling ashamed’ and ‘lack of knowledge’. ‘Good rapport with PCPs’ can help patients confide with their doctors sensitive topics such as sexual dysfunction, and it could lead patients to receive treat—ment, a point reinforced by concordance with the quali—tative findings. ‘Lack of knowledge about treatment’ can preclude opportunities to access treatment. This integra—tion of the two types of findings for an overall interpreta—tion, so called metainferences,30revealed concordance in how the two types of data fit, confirmed the findings and supported the conclusions as being robust.

    DlSCUSSlON

    As hypothesised, we identified a gap between self— reported sexual dysfunction and an objective measure of ED. These data suggest that some patients are unaware or do not acknowledge their sexual dysfunction. Findings from the qualitative analysis suggest that some patients may consider sexual dysfunction as normal ageing, or attribute it to decreased libido. While the causes of sexual dysfunction are multifactorial, there are none—theless misconceptions that appear attributable to a lack of knowledge about sexual dysfunction. An East Asian societal stereotype of the ‘asexual older person’19may have led men to consider sexual dysfunction as a normal process of ageing. In fact, some participants resignedly shared their perspectives about sexual problems. From a clinical perspective, providing correct information is necessary to empower men to optimise their sexual health in primary care.

    Embarrassment was found to be the most frequent barrier to consultations among these men. Existing literature supports, particularly in East Asian countries, men feeling ashamed about seeking treatment for sexual dysfunction treatment and it poses a considerable barrier for men seeking treatment.16171920Western studies have found feeling ashamed to be a much less frequent reason than East Asian countries.1415East Asian societal percep—tions that sexual activities are not important for older people may reinforce feeling ashamed and reluctance to seek treatment.19The qualitative findings suggest good rapport with men’s PCPs may help them overcome this barrier. A previous qualitative study conducted in China also showed fostering good rapport was important to improve access to treatment.19

    In the qualitative comments, some participants empha—sised the importance of sexual activities as contributing to a healthy life. Previous research from China showed having a sexual problem was significantly associated with lower overall life satisfaction and that sexual satisfaction was also significantly associated with better overall life satis—faction and QOL.33The findings of our research suggest sexual activity is also an important factor of healthy life for some Japanese men, and it may be a source of motiva—tion for them to seek treatment. On the other hand, some participants mentioned the lack of an intimate relation—ship with a partner, a factor that would inhibit seeking treatment. Lack of emotional intimacy itself can cause sexual dysfunction.34Clinically, it will be prudent for PCPs to assess the presence and nature of relationships with partners for patients with sexual dysfunction.

    While a previous study conducted in China identified male preference for same gender PCPs,19no patients in this study volunteered having a female physician as a barrier. The female PCPs in this study, modern— trained family physicians, may have built good rapport with their patients through good communication skills and thus removed any concern about any gender differences. The possibility that men were too embarrassed to report concern about having a female provided cannot be excluded.

    In this study, only one patient volunteered as he had discussed sexual dysfunction with his PCP. Previous research showed the percentages of patients with sexual dysfunction who had talked with their PCPs were 11% in China, 9% in Japan and 3% in South Korea. Reported reasons for not consulting PCPs were lack of percep—tion of a problem, the belief that sexual dysfunction is not a medical issue or embarrassment. A problem with access to medical care was also a main barrier in China.17Although a small sample, in this research, lack of aware—ness that PCPs can provide treatment was the second most frequent barrier following by embarrassment. Conceiv—ably, patients’ perspectives about the role of PCPs may be different between China and Japan. Patients in China viewed PCPs as the most appropriate professional with whom to discuss sexual problem, though some patients were unaware of any other sources of help.19Meanwhile, many patients in Japan may be unaware that PCPs can treat sexual dysfunction. As general medicine/family medicine has been recognised officially as a specialty only in 2017, patients may not know the breadth of care their general medicine/family physician can provide in Japan. For many decades back to the 1950s, an emphasis on subspecialisation in the healthcare system35has compelled patients to see subspecialists for even common problems. This historical context may continue to impel them to believe care for sexual dysfunction should be within the purview of urology even though modern family physicians are trained in the common problems of men’s health including the medical and psychosocial aspects of treatment for sexual dysfunction.

    In the population of men between the ages of 40 and 69, there may be as many as 19 million men with ED in Japan, and about 11 million men who are unaware of being afflicted with sexual dysfunction and that treat—ment is available and should they desire it.436For such a common problem, there is insufficient urologist capacity to see all eligible men. It naturally follows that ED treat—ment must fall within the scope of PCPs. Patients have far more visits with PCPs than urologists, and PCPs serve as the first contact of care for general medical problems. They are in the position to provide access to treatment to the very large number of men afflicted with ED that they encounter. The training of the modern family physi—cian also to recognise and treat many psychosocial prob—lems, including those associated with sexual dysfunction, further emphasises the potential and value of PCPs eluci—dating a history of sexual dysfunction and offering treat—ment to men who desire it. These findings thus suggest that development of systematic approaches to identifying men at risk, increasing awareness about ED, addressing misperceptions and fostering good rapport are important needs in the primary care setting.

    A mixed methods approach in this study is evidenced by the use of pragmatism as the worldview guiding the work.23The mixed methods study rationale was to merge attitudinal findings with perspectives on treatment37and obtain an enhanced understanding.27Joint display anal—ysis and presentation were used to facilitate drawing of overall interpretations or metainferences about the study.38Consideration of both types of findings provided a more nuanced perspective on primary study domains of awareness of ED, desire for treatment and barriers to treat—ment. An integrated rhetorical approach was followed through explanation of the findings in the text.39

    This research provides a methodological contribution to the literature through the use of a mixed methods joint display figure that integrates the quantitative and qualita—tive findings.4041This approach provides an alternative to the use of a table as a joint display. While Bustamante has published a highly elaborate example of joint displays as figure,42there remains relatively few joint display figure examples in the literature. One challenge with a mixed methods joint display figure is the difficulty of including direct metainferences in the joint display figure. In the current study, we have addressed this by drawing metain—ferences and addressing fit through discussion in the text.

    Limitations

    This research was conducted with a small sample size in a single family medicine multiphysician centre. An important risk of selection bias could be that men with the greatest interest in sexual health may have been the most inclined to volunteer to participate in this research. As physicians in the clinic recruited in the midst of patient care in a busy clinic, the sample was not systematically collected and this could also have introduced selection bias. Thus, precaution is necessary in interpreting gener—alisability and representativeness, especially relative to the proportions and prevalence of attitudes. Importantly, the study was not designed to assess the prevalence of the ED and the proportion of men who want treatment more broadly. However, we do believe the issues identi—fied transfer to the reality of the primary care setting.43While we cannot suggest from these data how many men would desire treatment, we believe these issues to be real and the findings to accurately represent the attitudes and circumstances of the men who participated. Additionally, qualitative data collected through open responses do not have the richness and depth of other primary qualitative data collection strategies. While this choice of data collec—tion was made based on feasibility considerations, it may limit interpretations regarding credibility and confirma—bility of the findings. The authors did not engage in an advanced reflexivity process, though the mixed methods findings suggest the conclusions are nonetheless robust. Prescribing medication for ED is only one strategy of many treatment approaches to address the multifac—eted challenge of sexual dysfunction.44Future research could further elucidate the reasons underlying the gap between self— reporting and the objective measure of sexual dysfunction, and lead to a better understanding of patients’ perspectives about the impact of sexual dysfunc—tion on their lives.

    CONCLUSlON

    In this Japanese primary care setting, while the vast majority of male patients met ED criteria on the 5— item version of the International Index of Erectile Function for sexual dysfunction, many did not self— report having sexual dysfunction. Clinicians may need to reframe ques—tioning about specifics rather than use a more general question. From the qualitative analysis, some patients were found to consider sexual dysfunction as normal ageing or attribute it to decreased libido. A mixed methods analysis delineated how patients’ misconceptions about sexual dysfunction can lead to low awareness on sexual dysfunc—tion and pose a barrier to access treatment. We conclude PCPs should routinely inquire about sexual dysfunction to facilitate recognition and treatment to improve men’s health in Japanese primary care.

    AcknowledgementsThe authors express with great gratitude to Dr Mariko Shimazu and Ms Rania Ajilat for their assistance with this research. We would like to thank the members of Teine Family Medicine Clinic for their hospitality during this research study, where the main results of this paper were obtained.

    ContributorsYT, RO contributed to the concept of the study. YT, RO, HK and MDF contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data. YT and MDF contributed to the drafting of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript and approved the final version for publication and took responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of the study.

    FundingMDF participation in this research was made possible through his work in the Mixed Methods Program supported by the Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan.

    Competing interestsNone declared.

    Patient consent for publicationNot required.

    Ethics approvalThis study was approved by a research ethics committee of Teine Keijinkai Hospital (ID 2018-166).

    Provenance and peer reviewNot commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    Data availability statementData are available upon reasonable request. Deidentified data are available through the corresponding author.

    Supplemental materialThis content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer- reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

    Open accessThis is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY- NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non- commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non- commercial. See: http:// creativecommons. org/ licenses/ by- nc/ 4. 0/.

    ORClD iDYuki Takeuchi http:// orcid. org/ 0000- 0003- 4095- 0230

    国产黄a三级三级三级人| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 国产色婷婷99| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 69人妻影院| 99久久精品热视频| 男人舔奶头视频| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 在线a可以看的网站| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 亚洲第一电影网av| 久久久久久久久久久丰满 | 91精品国产九色| 久久午夜福利片| 九色成人免费人妻av| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 美女大奶头视频| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 波多野结衣高清作品| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 亚洲最大成人中文| 久久久久久久久久成人| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 在线免费观看的www视频| 免费观看在线日韩| 日本在线视频免费播放| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 99热只有精品国产| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 精品久久久久久,| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| avwww免费| www日本黄色视频网| 午夜影院日韩av| eeuss影院久久| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 日本熟妇午夜| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 免费观看人在逋| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 久久精品91蜜桃| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 内射极品少妇av片p| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 夜夜爽天天搞| 亚洲av一区综合| 日本五十路高清| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 波野结衣二区三区在线| av天堂中文字幕网| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| av天堂在线播放| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 午夜激情欧美在线| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 亚洲成人久久性| 国产三级中文精品| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| www日本黄色视频网| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 俺也久久电影网| 国产真实乱freesex| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 男女那种视频在线观看| 99热精品在线国产| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| av天堂中文字幕网| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 美女免费视频网站| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 99久久精品热视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 成人av在线播放网站| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 久久精品影院6| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 色播亚洲综合网| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 一进一出抽搐动态| 69人妻影院| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产视频内射| 国产单亲对白刺激| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 欧美区成人在线视频| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 日韩强制内射视频| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 老女人水多毛片| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 久久香蕉精品热| 精品久久久久久,| 亚洲内射少妇av| 日韩av在线大香蕉| bbb黄色大片| 内地一区二区视频在线| 天堂网av新在线| h日本视频在线播放| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 久久久成人免费电影| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 成人欧美大片| h日本视频在线播放| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 直男gayav资源| 极品教师在线视频| 99热这里只有是精品50| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 直男gayav资源| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 久久这里只有精品中国| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| www.www免费av| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 91麻豆av在线| 午夜视频国产福利| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 午夜影院日韩av| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 一夜夜www| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 亚洲性久久影院| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 1024手机看黄色片| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 欧美+日韩+精品| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 久久香蕉精品热| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 久久精品影院6| 国产精华一区二区三区| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 日韩强制内射视频| 性色avwww在线观看| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 国产免费男女视频| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 国产午夜精品论理片| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 88av欧美| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 禁无遮挡网站| 久久人妻av系列| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 69人妻影院| 免费看av在线观看网站| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 全区人妻精品视频| eeuss影院久久| 观看美女的网站| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| ponron亚洲| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 简卡轻食公司| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 亚州av有码| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 俺也久久电影网| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 午夜a级毛片| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 高清在线国产一区| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 国产精品,欧美在线| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 日本一本二区三区精品| 久久久久久久久久成人| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲av成人av| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 极品教师在线视频| 天堂网av新在线| 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 精品日产1卡2卡| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| .国产精品久久| 久久热精品热| 午夜福利欧美成人| 亚洲av美国av| www日本黄色视频网| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 久久香蕉精品热| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 91狼人影院| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 级片在线观看| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 一夜夜www| 国产日本99.免费观看| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 一a级毛片在线观看| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 一进一出抽搐动态| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 欧美潮喷喷水| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 亚洲av成人av| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 久久亚洲真实| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 日韩高清综合在线| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产三级中文精品| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 午夜激情欧美在线| 看黄色毛片网站| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 免费观看人在逋| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 窝窝影院91人妻| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 免费大片18禁| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 中文资源天堂在线| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 少妇丰满av| 十八禁网站免费在线| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 日本免费a在线| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 乱人视频在线观看| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 日本一二三区视频观看| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 一区福利在线观看| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 欧美色视频一区免费| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 久久这里只有精品中国| 国产精品久久视频播放| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 国产老妇女一区| 此物有八面人人有两片| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 91av网一区二区| 午夜免费激情av| 久久人妻av系列| 男人舔奶头视频| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 99热6这里只有精品| 久久香蕉精品热| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产综合懂色| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 日本与韩国留学比较| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 嫩草影院精品99| 国产真实乱freesex| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 国产真实乱freesex| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区 | 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 熟女电影av网| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 一级av片app| 欧美+日韩+精品| 久久久久久伊人网av| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| av专区在线播放| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 男女那种视频在线观看| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 成人综合一区亚洲| 免费av不卡在线播放| 床上黄色一级片| 老女人水多毛片| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 国产一区二区激情短视频| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 22中文网久久字幕| 久久午夜福利片| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 在线a可以看的网站| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 深夜a级毛片| 1000部很黄的大片| 91久久精品电影网| 成人国产综合亚洲| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 日本五十路高清| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 美女免费视频网站| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲18禁久久av| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| av天堂中文字幕网| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 日韩中字成人| 波多野结衣高清作品| av天堂在线播放| 综合色av麻豆| 日韩高清综合在线| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 日本在线视频免费播放| 国产在线男女| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 精品人妻1区二区| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产成人av教育| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 22中文网久久字幕| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 日韩欧美三级三区| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| av专区在线播放| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 一a级毛片在线观看| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| ponron亚洲| 精品人妻视频免费看| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 如何舔出高潮| 国产探花极品一区二区| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 色吧在线观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| videossex国产| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 天堂网av新在线| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 色在线成人网| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| av天堂中文字幕网| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 国产男人的电影天堂91| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 精品久久久噜噜| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 日本五十路高清| 一夜夜www| 国产色婷婷99| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 色哟哟·www| 51国产日韩欧美| 一级黄色大片毛片| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 1024手机看黄色片| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 91久久精品电影网| 色播亚洲综合网| 久久久久久久久久久丰满 | 91在线观看av| 免费看a级黄色片| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 免费大片18禁| 精品久久久噜噜| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| av国产免费在线观看| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 久久这里只有精品中国| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 亚洲无线观看免费| www.色视频.com| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 有码 亚洲区| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 久久久久久大精品| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激|