• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comparison of self- report and objective measures of male sexual dysfunction in a Japanese primary care setting: a cross- sectional, self- administered mixed methods survey

    2021-04-06 08:49:36YukiTakeuchiRyoheiOtsukaHajimeKojimaMichaelFetters
    Family Medicine and Community Health 2021年1期

    Yuki Takeuchi , Ryohei Otsuka, Hajime Kojima, Michael D Fetters

    ABSTRACT

    lNTRODUCTlON

    Male sexual dysfunction is defined as a clin—ically significant disturbance in a man’s ability to respond sexually or to experience sexual pleasure.1Erectile dysfunction (ED) is the most common problem of male sexual dysfunction and consid—ered primarily a problem of men older than 40 years of age.2Data from the 2015—2016 Nation Health and Well—ness Survey provide estimates of the global prevalence of ED in men aged 40—70 years old—overall 45.2%: Italy (52.5%), France (47.8%), China (47.4%), Spain (46.6%), Germany (46.1%), US (46,1%), UK (42.6%) and Brazil (42.1%).3A meta— analysis estimates that the prevalence of ED in Asia (Japan, Korea, China, Singapore) is 41.5% in men aged 40—49, 61.8% in men aged 50—59 and 69.6% in men aged 60—69.4In Japan, the reported prevalence of ED among at— risk age groups to be 63.7% in men aged 40—49 years, 78.2% in men aged 50—59 years and 90.3% in men aged 60—69 years.4ED is a common condition in the primary care setting and negatively affects quality of life (QOL).56

    Historically, treatment of sexual dysfunction was primarily psychosocial until the development of testos—terone replacement in 1970s.7Unfortunately, testosterone injections and patch formulations both have high rates of side effects, and compliance is difficult,8particularly with injected testosterone. Moreover, the Food and Drug Administration in the USA considers testosterone to be a controlled substance which poses a significant barrier to access.9In Japan, only testosterone injection is available, but testosterone replacement therapy is approved only for hypogonadism treatment.10

    The advent of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhib—itors created a new opportunity for treatment of ED. PDE5 inhibitors work by inhibiting guanosine 3',5'— cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) hydrolysis. The accumulation of cGMP leads to smooth— muscle relaxation in the corpus cavernosum and increased blood flow to the penis. Thus, an increase in cGMP in smooth muscle cells is respon—sible for prolonging an erection.11Four types of oral PDE5 inhibitors are available in the USA. In Japan, only sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil are available, and these three agents can be prescribed by any physician with a medical license including primary care physicians (PCPs). By extrapolating from the 2001—2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, it has been estimated that the cost associated with treatment of ED would be US$15 billion in the USA if all men affected with ED were to seek treatment.12However, global sales of PDE5 inhibitors were US$4.82 billion in 2017,13suggesting that many men afflicted with ED may be untreated. While not suggesting that all men should be treated for ED, this gap suggests that there may be many men who would benefit from treatment for ED as a component of an overall treat—ment strategy.

    Even though ED occurs commonly and effective treat—ment is available, many patients do not seek treatment for sexual dysfunction.14—17Previous international research on barriers to seeking treatment showed many patients were concerned there would be no treatment and doctors would dismiss their complaints.18Compared with men in western countries, men in East Asia (China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea and Japan) were the least likely to take any action.141517In one study, lack of perception of a problem and the belief that sexual dysfunction is not a medical issue were the most frequent reasons cited for not seeking medical help among East Asian men.17Embarrassment about having a sexual problem has also been found as a main reason in East Asian coun—tries.17Qualitative research in China showed patients perceived sexual dysfunction as embarrassing and poten—tially shameful, and that men preferred consultation with same gender and age PCPs.19A previous study in Korea showed only 2% of people with sexual dysfunction had talked to a medical doctor about their sexual prob—lems due to believing that the problem is not serious, not being bothered by the problem, not having access to medical care and lacking of awareness of available treat—ments.20A previous study conducted in Japan with PCPs identified the perception that the act of seeking sexual dysfunction treatment may be intensely embarrassing for Japanese men.21

    While many men may perceive that sexual dysfunction falls primarily in the scope of care of urologists, PCPs far outnumber urologists and are positioned to provide PDE5 inhibitor therapy for men desiring ED treatment. Previous research in China suggests patients view PCPs as the most appropriate professional with whom to discuss sexual problems.19However, Nicolosi et al estimated about 90% of East Asian people with some degree of sexual dysfunction had never talked about the problem with their PCPs.17As treatment could enhance the QOL of men with ED, PCPs need to better understand patient’s perspectives on sexual dysfunction.

    Previous research conducted in East Asia showed lack of perception of sexual problems and belief that sexual dysfunction is not a medical issue as main reasons for not seeking medical help.17We hypothesised Japanese patients may not recognise their sexual dysfunction as a medical problem. Our secondary aims were to examine factors that would be barriers to consulting for treatment and gain a greater understanding qualitatively of partic—ipants’ perspectives on sexual dysfunction. Our mixed methods purpose was to integrate the quantitative and qualitative results by merging attitudinal factors with the qualitative perspectives.

    The purposes of this research were (1) to examine at— risk Japanese men’s awareness of ED by comparing a single item self— perception assessment of sexual dysfunc—tion with a five— item objective measure of ED, to assess their desire for treatment, and to gauge attitudes about treatment by PCPs, (2) to qualitatively elucidate partic—ipating men’s perspectives about their preferences for sexual dysfunction treatment based on written comments and (3) to merge both types of findings to gain an enhanced understanding of how the men’s awareness of ED, desire for treatment and barriers to access linked with their perspectives about ED using joint display anal—ysis and development of a model.

    METHODS

    Study design

    We conducted a cross— sectional, self— administered mixed methods paper survey22in a 7— week period from 5 November to 21 December 2018, and conducted a chart review of enroled patients to collect their demo—graphic and health information. Our research para—digm was based on pragmatism as we sought a practical and feasible approach requiring both quantitative and qualitative data collection.23This study was approved by a research ethics committee of Teine Keijinkai Hospital (ID 2018—166). All participants provided written informed consent for this study.

    Setting

    A suburban family medicine residency training programme clinic in Sapporo on the northern Island of Japan served as the research setting. This clinic is similar to many other primary care clinics in Japan, as the physicians deliver full— range primary care to the local population. Established in 2009, the clinic has 14 physicians, including 7 attendings, and 7 residents. The gender of physicians are 10 men and 4 women. The clinic provides a full range of primary care services including women’s healthcare, and care to patients with a wide spectrum of ages spanning from children in the first year of life to old— old adults with the eldest patient’s age in the practice currently at 103 years. The percentage of male patients in the age range of men at risk for ED is similar to the general population.

    Participants

    We used criterion sampling. The target population was middle— aged men presenting in a primary care setting for a health check— up. These criteria were chosen because middle— aged men who were in the age range of 40—69 are at high risk for ED.24Moreover, the results should reflect a setting informative for family doctors and other PCPs. Finally, the health check— up visit type was chosen as an encounter explicitly framed for opti—mising health. Of eligible participants, 464 patients came into the clinic for routine check— ups during clinic operations. The questionnaire was distributed to 78 men and 70 returned the instrument for a response rate of 90%. Four participants who did not answer the survey questions fully were deemed non— eligible resulting in a sample size of 66 men (full participation rate of 85%, 66/78). Patients deposited completed question—naires into a secure collection box in the lobby. Qual—itative comments were recorded by 32% (21/66) of participants.

    Data collection tools

    The 11— item survey comprised two sections (see online supplemental appendix). Section A of the question—naire addressed self— reported sexual dysfunction (one question), desire for treatment and open response for rationale (two questions), attitudes about treatment

    of sexual dysfunction by PCPs (3 questions, total of 9 items). Section B was the Japanese IIEF—5, a five— item multidimensional, self— administered question—naire developed in Japan for screening and classifying severity of ED.25Based on data collection with 1152 men (1036 with ED, 116 control), the validated IIEF—5 has been shown to have 98% sensitivity and 88% speci—ficity.26The Japanese IIEF—5 is a translation of this vali—dated tool.25The cut— off score is less than 22 points. ED severity is defined as follows: 17—21 points is mild; 12—16 points is mild— to— moderate; 8—11 points is moderate; and less than 8 points is severe.26The chart abstrac—tion protocol involved using the participant unique patient ID number and the recording of marital status, current and past medical history and social history as documented in the most recent regular check— up in the chart of participants.

    Data collection and entry procedures

    PCPs distributed the confidential survey to eligible patients at the end of their routine primary health check visits. PCPs recorded and linked in a tracking sheet the distributed questionnaire’s identification number with the receiving participants’ electronic chart unique identifier at each visit. A research assis—tant abstracted the patients’ medical information from their electronic charts by using the tracking sheet with the corresponding list of questionnaire identification numbers and electronic chart unique identifiers.

    Data analysis

    We calculated descriptive statistics on the quantitative data with the software Easy R (EZR V.1.37). Results of the IIEF—5 were expressed in terms of the severity and distri—bution among the subjects. We calculated the SD for the IIEF—5 scores, 95% CI for question answer rates and performed Mann— Whitney U test and Kruskal— Wallis test for IIEF—5 score comparison between each group. The logic of merging the qualitative and quantitative data was to obtain an enhanced understanding of both the survey and qualitative findings,27specifically to examine how patient perspectives reinforced or attenuated the three primary study domains of awareness, desire for treatment and barriers to access. We identified codes for organising the qualitative comments by looking for emerging themes using a template approach.28This involved an immersion/crystallisation process which involves multiple readings of the qualitative text, and development of a coding scheme reflecting the major constructs identified.29The mixed methods integration involved development of a model as a mixed methods joint display figure30that merged the mixed data find—ings. Specifically, we examined directionality of influ—ence, reinforcement or attenuation, of the qualitative findings when linked with the three key quantitative constructs of the survey, awareness, desire for treatment and barriers to treatment. We assessed the ‘fit’, that is, an interpretation of the two types of findings to lookfor convergence, complementarity, expansion or diver—gence and metainferences to be drawn based on the results.3132

    Table 1 Characteristics of 66 participants

    RESULTS

    Participants

    Table 1 shows the characteristics of the subjects. As 66 men completed the surveys, and there are 464 men of this age in the clinic, the sample represents about 14% of eligible male patients. As shown, the mean age of participants was 60 years old. Demographic data suggest 98% (65/66) of participants had some lifestyle diseases (hypertension, diabetes or dyslipidaemia) and the most common problem was hypertension (80%, 53/66).

    Awareness of sexual dysfunction

    Comparison of self-perceived sexual dysfunction and validated measure of ED

    Among the respondents, 39% (26/66) self— reported having sexual dysfunction (table 2). Of the 66 partici—pants, 92% (61/66) met ED criteria of the IIEF—5: mild (n=27), mild— to— moderate (n=15), moderate (n=7) or severe (n=12). The severe ED group includes four sexu—ally inactive participants. Figure 1 shows the distribution of self— reported sexual dysfunction and ED according to the IIEF—5 score.

    International Index of Erectile Function-5 scores in each group

    Table 3 displays the mean IIEF—5 scores in each group. IIEF—5 scores in the 60—69 year— old group were significantlylower than the scores in other groups (40s:60s, p=0.01. 50s:60s, p<0.01). There was no significant difference between 40—49 year— old group and 50—59 year— old group (p=1). IIEF—5 scores of participants self— reporting sexual dysfunction had significantly lower IIEF—5 scores than the no self— reported sexual dysfunction group. However, variations in responses by self— report and on the objec—tive IIEF—5 instrument as shown in figure 1 suggests ED severity was not the only factor contributing to awareness of their sexual dysfunction.

    Table 2 'Yes’ answer rates of Q1-Q2 among all participants

    Figure 1 ED distribution among males in a primary care clinic based on comparison of self- reported and objective measures of ED according to age groups and severity (n=66). ED, erectile dysfunction; JIIEF5, Japanese translation of the five- item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5); SD, sexual dysfunction.

    Desire for treatment

    Tables 2 and 4 illustrate participants’ responses to the inquiries about their views regarding ED. Of respondents, 48% (16/33) desired treatment (table 2). Of the partic—ipants indicating a desire for treatment, 75% (12/16) desired treatment by their PCPs, but only one participant had discussed sexual dysfunction with his PCP (table 4).

    Barriers for men desiring treatment

    Figure 2 depicts the reasons provided by the subset of men who indicated they would like treatment from their PCPs. The most important barrier was feeling ashamed as reported by seven respondents. The second and third most common reasons given both related to knowledge about availability of treatment, lack of awareness that PCPs can provide treatment and lack of awareness about the availability of treatment. None of the participants chose the physician being a female as a barrier.

    Men’s perspectives about the desirability of treatment

    Qualitative results

    We identified six themes about participants’ perspec—tives on sexual dysfunction from their written comments. Themes included considering sexual dysfunction as normal ageing, attributing sexual dysfunction to decreased libido, importance of sexual activity for a healthy life, good rapport with PCPs, lack of knowledge about treatment and lack of intimate relationship with partner.

    Considering sexual dysfunction as normal ageing

    Several men shared their belief that sexual dysfunction is a normal part of ageing. For example, a male in his late sixties said, ‘Sexual problem is just caused by normal ageing’. Another male in his late 60s noted, ‘I consider sexual problem as ageing’. A male in his early 50s fatalis—tically concluded, ‘It can’t be helped because it’s ageing’. These perceptions prevented them from considering sexual dysfunction as a medical problem and unaware—ness based on a belief that ‘there was no treatment option for sexual problem’.

    Table 3 International Index of Erectile Function-5 scores in each age group

    Table 4 Response rate among participants who desired sexual dysfunction treatment

    Attributing sexual dysfunction to decreased libido

    Some patients considered sexual dysfunction in context of decreasing libido. For example, a male in his mid— 50s surmised his sexual dysfunction as thus, ‘I have sexual problem, but I think it is due to decreased libido’. A man in his late 60s recounted, ‘My libido has been decreasing as I became older’. A man in his mid— 60s confided, ‘I have become reluctant to have sex with females’. A male in his late 60s stated, ‘I don’t need treatment because I have graduated from sexual activities’.

    Importance of sexual activity for healthy life

    For some men, sexual activity was perceived as important for a healthy life and could be a form of motivation for treatment. Several responses from participants who were interested in sexual dysfunction illustrate this point. A man in his late 60s emphasised, ‘I want to have a vigorous life to keep myself healthy’. A man in his mid— 60s pointed out, ‘I want to become younger by treatment for sexual dysfunction’. A man in his mid— 40s lamented, ‘I have lost confidence due to my sexual problem’.

    Good rapport with primary care physicians

    The comments from participants indicate their trust in their PCPs. For example, a man in his late 50s shared, ‘My doctor understands my condition and situation well’. A man in his early 50s confided, ‘I trust my doctor because I see him regularly’. Another man in his late 50s reported, ‘I want treatment because my doctor is a good doctor’. These comments suggest that having good rapport with their PCPs can make them comfortable to discuss issues that may be conceived as shameful such as sexual dysfunction.

    Lack of knowledge about treatment

    Lack of knowledge about sexual dysfunction as a medi—cally treatable condition affected some patient’s attitudes towards sexual dysfunction treatment. For example, a man in his mid— 60s indicated, ‘I didn’t know sexual problems are treatable’. A male in his early 60s responded, ‘I want treatment for sexual problem if it is treatable’. A male in his late 50s disclosed, ‘I had no idea that sexual problem is medical problem’. These examples demonstrate that there are men who felt that if they had been knowledgeable about sexual dysfunction as a treatable medical condition, that they would have like to be treated.

    Lack of intimate relationship with partner

    Some patients attributed apathy about their sexual dysfunction treatment due to the lack of an intimate relationships with their partners. A male in his late 60s conveyed, ‘My wife hates having sex and even talking about sex’. Another man in his late 60s confided, ‘I and my wife sleep in different rooms. We have not had sex for 35 years’. A man in his early 60s wrote, ‘I have been sexless with my wife for a long time’. The lack of an intimate relationship with a partner not surprisingly negatively affected the patients’ desire for treatment.

    lntegration of the mixed data findings

    Figure 2 Barriers to seeking treatment for sexual dysfunction reported by participants who indicated they would like treatment from their PCP. PCPs, primary care physicians, PCP, primary care physician.

    Figure 3 Factors and mechanisms affecting ED treatment in primary care. ED, erectile dysfunction; JIIEF5, Japanese translation of the 5- item version of the International Index of Erectile Function; PCPs, primary care physicians.

    The intent of merging the survey and qualitative findings was to obtain an enhanced understanding of the findings. Joint display analysis facilitated that process. Figure 3 is the resulting mixed methods joint display figure. It pres—ents an integrated mixed methods model of the factors and mechanisms affecting ED treatment in primary care that was developed by merging the quantitative survey results and qualitative themes. The quantitative findings showed ‘low— awareness of sexual dysfunction’. The themes of ‘considering sexual dysfunction as normal ageing’ and ‘attributing sexual dysfunction to decreased libido’ inhibits patients from viewing their sexual dysfunction as a medical condition. Patients with these misconceptions may not seek treatment because they do not consider sexual dysfunction as treatable. In contrast, the theme ‘importance of sexual activity for healthy life’ serves as motivation for patients to treat their sexual dysfunction. Importantly, a ‘lack of intimate relationship with partner’ may diminish men’s consideration of the ‘importance of sexual activity for healthy life’ and attenuate their desire for treatment. From quantitative survey results, the main barriers to access were ‘feeling ashamed’ and ‘lack of knowledge’. ‘Good rapport with PCPs’ can help patients confide with their doctors sensitive topics such as sexual dysfunction, and it could lead patients to receive treat—ment, a point reinforced by concordance with the quali—tative findings. ‘Lack of knowledge about treatment’ can preclude opportunities to access treatment. This integra—tion of the two types of findings for an overall interpreta—tion, so called metainferences,30revealed concordance in how the two types of data fit, confirmed the findings and supported the conclusions as being robust.

    DlSCUSSlON

    As hypothesised, we identified a gap between self— reported sexual dysfunction and an objective measure of ED. These data suggest that some patients are unaware or do not acknowledge their sexual dysfunction. Findings from the qualitative analysis suggest that some patients may consider sexual dysfunction as normal ageing, or attribute it to decreased libido. While the causes of sexual dysfunction are multifactorial, there are none—theless misconceptions that appear attributable to a lack of knowledge about sexual dysfunction. An East Asian societal stereotype of the ‘asexual older person’19may have led men to consider sexual dysfunction as a normal process of ageing. In fact, some participants resignedly shared their perspectives about sexual problems. From a clinical perspective, providing correct information is necessary to empower men to optimise their sexual health in primary care.

    Embarrassment was found to be the most frequent barrier to consultations among these men. Existing literature supports, particularly in East Asian countries, men feeling ashamed about seeking treatment for sexual dysfunction treatment and it poses a considerable barrier for men seeking treatment.16171920Western studies have found feeling ashamed to be a much less frequent reason than East Asian countries.1415East Asian societal percep—tions that sexual activities are not important for older people may reinforce feeling ashamed and reluctance to seek treatment.19The qualitative findings suggest good rapport with men’s PCPs may help them overcome this barrier. A previous qualitative study conducted in China also showed fostering good rapport was important to improve access to treatment.19

    In the qualitative comments, some participants empha—sised the importance of sexual activities as contributing to a healthy life. Previous research from China showed having a sexual problem was significantly associated with lower overall life satisfaction and that sexual satisfaction was also significantly associated with better overall life satis—faction and QOL.33The findings of our research suggest sexual activity is also an important factor of healthy life for some Japanese men, and it may be a source of motiva—tion for them to seek treatment. On the other hand, some participants mentioned the lack of an intimate relation—ship with a partner, a factor that would inhibit seeking treatment. Lack of emotional intimacy itself can cause sexual dysfunction.34Clinically, it will be prudent for PCPs to assess the presence and nature of relationships with partners for patients with sexual dysfunction.

    While a previous study conducted in China identified male preference for same gender PCPs,19no patients in this study volunteered having a female physician as a barrier. The female PCPs in this study, modern— trained family physicians, may have built good rapport with their patients through good communication skills and thus removed any concern about any gender differences. The possibility that men were too embarrassed to report concern about having a female provided cannot be excluded.

    In this study, only one patient volunteered as he had discussed sexual dysfunction with his PCP. Previous research showed the percentages of patients with sexual dysfunction who had talked with their PCPs were 11% in China, 9% in Japan and 3% in South Korea. Reported reasons for not consulting PCPs were lack of percep—tion of a problem, the belief that sexual dysfunction is not a medical issue or embarrassment. A problem with access to medical care was also a main barrier in China.17Although a small sample, in this research, lack of aware—ness that PCPs can provide treatment was the second most frequent barrier following by embarrassment. Conceiv—ably, patients’ perspectives about the role of PCPs may be different between China and Japan. Patients in China viewed PCPs as the most appropriate professional with whom to discuss sexual problem, though some patients were unaware of any other sources of help.19Meanwhile, many patients in Japan may be unaware that PCPs can treat sexual dysfunction. As general medicine/family medicine has been recognised officially as a specialty only in 2017, patients may not know the breadth of care their general medicine/family physician can provide in Japan. For many decades back to the 1950s, an emphasis on subspecialisation in the healthcare system35has compelled patients to see subspecialists for even common problems. This historical context may continue to impel them to believe care for sexual dysfunction should be within the purview of urology even though modern family physicians are trained in the common problems of men’s health including the medical and psychosocial aspects of treatment for sexual dysfunction.

    In the population of men between the ages of 40 and 69, there may be as many as 19 million men with ED in Japan, and about 11 million men who are unaware of being afflicted with sexual dysfunction and that treat—ment is available and should they desire it.436For such a common problem, there is insufficient urologist capacity to see all eligible men. It naturally follows that ED treat—ment must fall within the scope of PCPs. Patients have far more visits with PCPs than urologists, and PCPs serve as the first contact of care for general medical problems. They are in the position to provide access to treatment to the very large number of men afflicted with ED that they encounter. The training of the modern family physi—cian also to recognise and treat many psychosocial prob—lems, including those associated with sexual dysfunction, further emphasises the potential and value of PCPs eluci—dating a history of sexual dysfunction and offering treat—ment to men who desire it. These findings thus suggest that development of systematic approaches to identifying men at risk, increasing awareness about ED, addressing misperceptions and fostering good rapport are important needs in the primary care setting.

    A mixed methods approach in this study is evidenced by the use of pragmatism as the worldview guiding the work.23The mixed methods study rationale was to merge attitudinal findings with perspectives on treatment37and obtain an enhanced understanding.27Joint display anal—ysis and presentation were used to facilitate drawing of overall interpretations or metainferences about the study.38Consideration of both types of findings provided a more nuanced perspective on primary study domains of awareness of ED, desire for treatment and barriers to treat—ment. An integrated rhetorical approach was followed through explanation of the findings in the text.39

    This research provides a methodological contribution to the literature through the use of a mixed methods joint display figure that integrates the quantitative and qualita—tive findings.4041This approach provides an alternative to the use of a table as a joint display. While Bustamante has published a highly elaborate example of joint displays as figure,42there remains relatively few joint display figure examples in the literature. One challenge with a mixed methods joint display figure is the difficulty of including direct metainferences in the joint display figure. In the current study, we have addressed this by drawing metain—ferences and addressing fit through discussion in the text.

    Limitations

    This research was conducted with a small sample size in a single family medicine multiphysician centre. An important risk of selection bias could be that men with the greatest interest in sexual health may have been the most inclined to volunteer to participate in this research. As physicians in the clinic recruited in the midst of patient care in a busy clinic, the sample was not systematically collected and this could also have introduced selection bias. Thus, precaution is necessary in interpreting gener—alisability and representativeness, especially relative to the proportions and prevalence of attitudes. Importantly, the study was not designed to assess the prevalence of the ED and the proportion of men who want treatment more broadly. However, we do believe the issues identi—fied transfer to the reality of the primary care setting.43While we cannot suggest from these data how many men would desire treatment, we believe these issues to be real and the findings to accurately represent the attitudes and circumstances of the men who participated. Additionally, qualitative data collected through open responses do not have the richness and depth of other primary qualitative data collection strategies. While this choice of data collec—tion was made based on feasibility considerations, it may limit interpretations regarding credibility and confirma—bility of the findings. The authors did not engage in an advanced reflexivity process, though the mixed methods findings suggest the conclusions are nonetheless robust. Prescribing medication for ED is only one strategy of many treatment approaches to address the multifac—eted challenge of sexual dysfunction.44Future research could further elucidate the reasons underlying the gap between self— reporting and the objective measure of sexual dysfunction, and lead to a better understanding of patients’ perspectives about the impact of sexual dysfunc—tion on their lives.

    CONCLUSlON

    In this Japanese primary care setting, while the vast majority of male patients met ED criteria on the 5— item version of the International Index of Erectile Function for sexual dysfunction, many did not self— report having sexual dysfunction. Clinicians may need to reframe ques—tioning about specifics rather than use a more general question. From the qualitative analysis, some patients were found to consider sexual dysfunction as normal ageing or attribute it to decreased libido. A mixed methods analysis delineated how patients’ misconceptions about sexual dysfunction can lead to low awareness on sexual dysfunc—tion and pose a barrier to access treatment. We conclude PCPs should routinely inquire about sexual dysfunction to facilitate recognition and treatment to improve men’s health in Japanese primary care.

    AcknowledgementsThe authors express with great gratitude to Dr Mariko Shimazu and Ms Rania Ajilat for their assistance with this research. We would like to thank the members of Teine Family Medicine Clinic for their hospitality during this research study, where the main results of this paper were obtained.

    ContributorsYT, RO contributed to the concept of the study. YT, RO, HK and MDF contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data. YT and MDF contributed to the drafting of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript and approved the final version for publication and took responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of the study.

    FundingMDF participation in this research was made possible through his work in the Mixed Methods Program supported by the Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan.

    Competing interestsNone declared.

    Patient consent for publicationNot required.

    Ethics approvalThis study was approved by a research ethics committee of Teine Keijinkai Hospital (ID 2018-166).

    Provenance and peer reviewNot commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    Data availability statementData are available upon reasonable request. Deidentified data are available through the corresponding author.

    Supplemental materialThis content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer- reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

    Open accessThis is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY- NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non- commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non- commercial. See: http:// creativecommons. org/ licenses/ by- nc/ 4. 0/.

    ORClD iDYuki Takeuchi http:// orcid. org/ 0000- 0003- 4095- 0230

    每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 制服人妻中文乱码| 免费看十八禁软件| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 亚洲av美国av| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 免费av中文字幕在线| 日本三级黄在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 成人三级黄色视频| 成人三级黄色视频| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 日本wwww免费看| netflix在线观看网站| 久久九九热精品免费| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 99香蕉大伊视频| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 欧美成人午夜精品| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 91精品国产国语对白视频| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸 | 国产麻豆69| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 丁香欧美五月| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 日本 av在线| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 天天添夜夜摸| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 丁香六月欧美| 日韩免费av在线播放| 深夜精品福利| 一区在线观看完整版| 我的亚洲天堂| 老司机靠b影院| 88av欧美| 久久香蕉精品热| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 国产av在哪里看| 91成年电影在线观看| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 99香蕉大伊视频| cao死你这个sao货| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 深夜精品福利| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 黑人操中国人逼视频| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 国产成人av教育| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 香蕉丝袜av| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 国产成人精品无人区| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 国产成人影院久久av| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 国产99白浆流出| netflix在线观看网站| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 亚洲色图av天堂| 超碰97精品在线观看| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 中文欧美无线码| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 亚洲黑人精品在线| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 露出奶头的视频| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 精品第一国产精品| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 18禁观看日本| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| av在线播放免费不卡| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 99国产综合亚洲精品| cao死你这个sao货| 国产成人精品无人区| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 久久久久国内视频| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 一区福利在线观看| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 欧美日韩av久久| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 亚洲欧美激情在线| 天天影视国产精品| 亚洲av成人av| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产单亲对白刺激| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 丁香欧美五月| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 两性夫妻黄色片| 在线播放国产精品三级| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 国产三级黄色录像| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| aaaaa片日本免费| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 亚洲精品一二三| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| videosex国产| 夫妻午夜视频| 91字幕亚洲| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 级片在线观看| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 国产成人欧美| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 又大又爽又粗| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 色在线成人网| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 一进一出好大好爽视频| av网站免费在线观看视频| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 亚洲精品一二三| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 精品一区二区三卡| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 9色porny在线观看| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 久久中文字幕一级| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 制服人妻中文乱码| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 欧美中文综合在线视频| a级毛片黄视频| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸 | 久久久久久久久中文| 两个人免费观看高清视频| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| bbb黄色大片| 多毛熟女@视频| 美女福利国产在线| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 国产精品永久免费网站| 在线观看66精品国产| 黄片小视频在线播放| 青草久久国产| 久久热在线av| 国产成人欧美| 露出奶头的视频| 日韩有码中文字幕| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸 | bbb黄色大片| av免费在线观看网站| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 校园春色视频在线观看| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 长腿黑丝高跟| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 日本免费a在线| www.精华液| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| av有码第一页| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 亚洲av成人av| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 视频区图区小说| 美国免费a级毛片| 91字幕亚洲| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 国产免费男女视频| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 91av网站免费观看| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 十八禁网站免费在线| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| www国产在线视频色| 亚洲伊人色综图| 久9热在线精品视频| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 日韩国内少妇激情av| av有码第一页| 美女福利国产在线| 色综合站精品国产| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| av国产精品久久久久影院| 亚洲第一青青草原| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 久久久久久人人人人人| 香蕉国产在线看| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产成人影院久久av| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 亚洲色图av天堂| 69av精品久久久久久| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 高清欧美精品videossex| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 看黄色毛片网站| 国产精品九九99| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 我的亚洲天堂| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 国产成人影院久久av| 看片在线看免费视频| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 精品人妻1区二区| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 少妇 在线观看| 黄色视频不卡| av网站在线播放免费| 999精品在线视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 在线永久观看黄色视频| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 黄色成人免费大全| 日韩高清综合在线| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 18禁观看日本| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 久久精品影院6| av国产精品久久久久影院| 黄色视频不卡| 精品国产国语对白av| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 超碰97精品在线观看| 久9热在线精品视频| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 久久青草综合色| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 久久久久久久久中文| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 在线av久久热| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 亚洲av美国av| 热re99久久国产66热| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 午夜精品在线福利| 99久久人妻综合| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| avwww免费| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产野战对白在线观看| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 黄频高清免费视频| 人人澡人人妻人| 亚洲国产看品久久| av福利片在线| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 大型av网站在线播放| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 久久香蕉精品热| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 亚洲伊人色综图| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 日韩高清综合在线| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 曰老女人黄片| 青草久久国产| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 夫妻午夜视频| 黄色视频不卡| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 久久久久国内视频| www.自偷自拍.com| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 欧美午夜高清在线| 丁香六月欧美| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 日本 av在线| 怎么达到女性高潮| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 午夜激情av网站| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 高清av免费在线| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 亚洲成人久久性| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| ponron亚洲| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 99久久国产精品久久久| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 女警被强在线播放| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 露出奶头的视频| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 我的亚洲天堂| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲精品在线美女| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 深夜精品福利| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 香蕉国产在线看| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 亚洲精华国产精华精| 精品电影一区二区在线| 多毛熟女@视频| 久久久国产精品麻豆| av免费在线观看网站| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 丁香六月欧美| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 热re99久久国产66热| 1024视频免费在线观看| av中文乱码字幕在线| 制服人妻中文乱码| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 精品人妻1区二区| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 久久久国产一区二区| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 久久中文看片网| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 久久人妻av系列| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 黄色视频不卡| 少妇 在线观看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| www.999成人在线观看| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | av视频免费观看在线观看| 在线国产一区二区在线| 久久久久国内视频| 在线视频色国产色| 一级毛片精品| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 在线视频色国产色| 国产精品野战在线观看 | 嫩草影视91久久| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| svipshipincom国产片| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 精品国产亚洲在线| 大码成人一级视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 一级片'在线观看视频| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 国产精品久久视频播放| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 窝窝影院91人妻| www.www免费av| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 一a级毛片在线观看| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 99香蕉大伊视频|