• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Palaeogeographic reconstruction of a fluvio-marine transitional system in Narmada rift basin,India-Implications on Late Cretaceous global sea-level rise

    2021-03-19 08:00:48BiplabBhattacharyaSuparnaJhaandPrantikMondal
    Journal of Palaeogeography 2021年1期

    Biplab Bhattacharya,Suparna Jha and Prantik Mondal

    Abstract Rising sea-levels in tectonically active epicontinental basins often lead to varied depositional settings and palaeogeography, mostly influenced by the net accommodation resulting from mutual interference of the extent and nature of landward encroachment by the sea and the net sedimentation. The Cenomanian Nimar Sandstone Formation, Bagh Group, Narmada rift basin, uniquely portrays the effect of sea-level rise within an intra-cratonic setting and attributes to the corresponding palaeogeographic changes in west-central India. An integrated sedimentological-sequence-stratigraphic study of the broadly fining-upward Nimar Sandstone Formation (thickness~20-30 m) depicts the actual nature of changeover from a fluvial to a marine-dominated transitional depositional setting. Detailed sedimentological study reveals total seventeen facies, grouped in five facies associations, viz., the channel-fill facies association (FA-1), the overbank facies association (FA-2), the fluvial-dominated fluvio-tidal facies association (FA-3), the tide-dominated fluvio-tidal facies association (FA-4), and the shoreface facies association (FA-5). Overall facies architecture indicates a west-to-eastward marine encroachment, resulting in stacking of three distinct palaeo-depositional conditions: (i) an initial fluvial system with channel and overbank, changing into a tideinfluenced fluvial bay-head delta in the inner estuary, followed by (ii) marine encroachment leading to a tidedominated central estuary with inter- to sub-tidal settings, and finally, (iii) with further intense marine encroachments, a wave-reworked open shore condition in the outer estuary zone. The overall fining-up succession with a systematic change from fluvial to marine-dominated depositional systems points to a landward shift of the shoreline, signifying a major transgressive event correlated to the Cenomanian global sea-level rise. Characteristic stratal stacking patterns point to four coarsening- and fining-up hemicycles, embedded within the major transgressive succession. These high-frequency cycles attest to the varied interplay of sedimentation, tectonics and sea-level changes, and the resultant net accommodations. A palaeogeographic model is proposed based on the high-frequency transgressive-regressive hemicycles, which envisages the evolution of the depositional environments in relation to the Cenomanian eustatic rise in the intra-cratonic riftogenic fluvio-marine transitional basinal setup.

    Keywords: Late Cretaceous, Fluvial-estuary transition, Nimar Sandstone Formation, Bagh Group,Narmada rift basin,Transgressive-regressive cycles,Global sea-level

    1 Introduction

    The Late Cretaceous time interval is known for intense tectonic activities and significant changes in climatic conditions (Miller et al. 2005; Sames et al. 2016) accompanied by prolonged sea-level rises, leading to worldwide inundations of landmasses (Hancock and Kauffman 1979; F?rster et al. 1983; Hilbrecht et al. 1986; Haq et al.1987; Hallam 1992; R?per and Rothgaenger 1995; Miller et al. 2005; Haq 2014). Several parts of different continents were affected by transgressions during the Late Cretaceous time, including parts of Arctic Canada,Russia, western Europe, eastern Australia, parts of Africa, South America, India, Madagascar, and Borneo.Most of the subcontinents of the supercontinent Gondwanaland were fully or partially submerged at different time intervals during the Late Cretaceous, which led to the formation of shallow epicontinental seas in certain areas. Evidence of Cretaceous sea-level rise in the Indian subcontinent is recorded within thick sedimentary successions of the Cauvery Basin (Nagendra et al. 2011, 2013), Shillong Basin (Singh and Mishra 2000), Kutch Basin (Desai 2013), Bengal-Assam Basin,parts of the Himalayan fold belt, and the Narmada rift basin in west-central India (Acharya and Lahiri 1991;Banerjee et al. 2020).

    Such global eustatic changes generally manifest 1st-2ndorder sea-level cycles affecting most of the continents, which allow for their successful correlations.However, associated higher-frequency cycles (3rdorder,4thorder and beyond), included in the 2ndorder cycles,mostly depend on changes in relative sea-level and net accommodation caused by basin-scale tectonism, sedimentations and/or climatic/orbital forcings (Vail et al.1991; Gale et al. 2002; Haq 2014; Bhattacharya and Bhattacharya 2015). The Cenomanian Stage (98.9-93.5 Ma) provides a suitable window to study such changes,as high-resolution global correlations (100-400 kyr) in terms of sea-level changes and orbital cycles from marine successions revealed five major/minor eustatic events(KCe-1 to KCe-5 of Haq 2014). However, doubt persists regarding actual nature and effect of transgressions in shallow marine and continent-margin transitional depositional areas, and the role of climatic forcings, tectonism,and sedimentation in controlling palaeogeography and shaping resultant stratal stacking patterns (Bhattacharya et al. 2018). High-resolution sequence-stratigraphic study backed by detailed sedimentary facies analysis is useful to understand the appropriate transitional relationship between fluvial and marine processes in terms of major transgressive-regressive cycles in response to tectonoeustatic changes in such basins (Bhattacharya et al. 2018;Jaiswal et al.2018).

    History of sea-level fluctuations during the Cenomanian time in the southern part of the Indian subcontinent(Cauvery Basin) was documented by Sundaram et al.(2001), Skelton (2003), and Gale et al. (2002). However,the effects may vary significantly in fluvio-marine interactive systems depending on the prevalent tectonosedimentary equilibrium. Though attempts to understand the nature of the transition between fluvial and marine depositional systems are plenty in the literature (Dalrymple et al. 1992; Greb and Martino 2005; Dalrymple and Choi 2007; van den Berg et al. 2007; Bhattacharya et al. 2012;Bhattacharya and Banerjee 2015;Bhattacharya and Bhattacharya 2015; Bhattacharya et al. 2018; Richards and Bhattacharya 2018; Gugliotta et al. 2019; and references therein), gaps persist in the actual perception of basinscale facies architecture and stratal stacking pattern related to characteristic tectono-sedimentary attributes in shallow epicontinental basins.

    The Nimar Sandstone (Cenomanian) Formation, the lowermost litho-unit within the Bagh Group (Late Cretaceous), bears signatures of the contemporary global sea-level rise in west-central India (Jha et al. 2017). Signatures of the Late Cretaceous marine transgression in the Bagh Group are evident and agreed well in terms of different proxies such as sedimentary attributes, palaeontological data, ichnological data, micropalaeontological data and palaeobotanical data (Murty et al. 1963;Chiplonkar and Ghare 1975; Raiverman 1975; Badve and Ghare 1980; Singh and Srivastava 1981; Jafar 1982; Bose and Das 1986; Ganguly and Bardhan 1993; Sanganwar and Kundal 1997; Khosla et al. 2003; Smith 2010; Jaitly and Ajane 2013; Bhattacharya and Jha 2014; Jha et al.2017; Bansal et al. 2019; and many others). But, a comprehensive sequence stratigraphic model enumerating the actual nature of coastal onlap and the fluvial-marine interaction has not been attempted and is long overdue.The objective of the present paper is to document the palaeogeographic changes under the fluvio-marine interactive depositional system in the light of high-frequency transgressive-regressive (T-R) cycles. The proposed model will help to understand the effects of higherfrequency sea-level fluctuations in fluvio-marine transitional systems within a global eustatic rise condition.

    2 Geological setting

    The deposition of the Bagh Group (Late Cretaceous) was started within the Narmada rift basin during the Cenomanian time, directly overlying the Proterozoic Bijawar Group.The Bagh Group is constituted of three litho-units(formations), namely, the lowermost Cenomanian Nimar Sandstone Formation, followed by the Turonian Nodular Limestone Formation,and Coniacian Coralline Limestone Formation at the top(Table 1).In the Narmada rift basin,the Bagh Group is overlain by the Lameta Formation and the Deccan Traps,both of Late Cretaceous age.The presence of various sedimentary facies, ichnofabrics, andvaried palaeontological attributes within the Bagh Group manifests distinct changes in the depositional environment.The rocks are exposed along the northern flank of the Narmada rift basin and occur in patches (Fig. 1). Rocks of the Nimar Sandstone Formation are well exposed in several sections including the Man River near Awaldaman,Sitapuri,Bagh River,Rampura,Bagh Cave,Jobat,and other areas (detail of locations is given in Fig. 1). The Nimar Sandstone Formation is characterized by conglomerate,arenaceous to arkosic sandstone, sandstone-mudstone heteroliths, and mudstone. In the study area, the general strike of beds is N15°E-S15°W to N-S with a dip of 8°-10°. The depositional age of the Nimar Sandstone Formation is considered as Cenomanian (Jaitly and Ajane 2013),which has been determined mostly based on biostratigraphic records preserved in the upper part of the succession (Table 2). However,data depicting the absolute age of deposition of the Nimar Sandstone Formation is lacking till date.

    Table 1 Generalized lithostratigraphy of the study area (modified after Singh and Srivastava 1981; Jaitly and Ajane 2013)

    Fig. 1 a Map of India showing location of the Narmada rift basin; b Geological map of the study area (modified after Jaitly and Ajane 2013),showing distribution of the Bagh Group. Black points marked with numbers (1-15) indicate locations/areas of exposed rock sections from where respective vertical sedimentary lithologs were prepared: 1-Phata; 2-Ghoda; 3-Chikapoti; 4-Dhursal; 5-Akhara; 6-Rampura; 7-Baghini Temple; 8-Bagh;9-Neemkheda; 10-Dam;11-Raisinghpura; 12-Ratitalai;13-Baria; 14-Man River;15-Sitapuri

    Table 2 Inferred depositional age of the Nimar Sandstone Formation based on biostratigraphic studies

    3 Material and methods

    Unmetamorphosed, undeformed siliciclastic rocks of the Nimar Sandstone Formation are well exposed in and around the Bagh area (Fig. 1) in the western part of the state of Madhya Pradesh, central India. Well-exposed,long sections are available in the field for detailed sedimentological study. Altogether 15 sections were studied,distributed in three zones in the study area: (i) Awaldaman, Ratitalai, Sitapuri, Baria, etc. in the eastern part, (ii)Bagh, Rampura, Raisinghpura, etc. in the central part,and (iii) Chikapoti, Akhara, Phata, Ghoda, etc. in the western part.

    The sedimentological study is primarily based on (i)facies analysis, which includes descriptions andinterpretations of facies types and facies associations in the frame of prevalent process-response models and mechanisms of deposition, and (ii) preparation of lithologs from different parts and their correlation to understand the spatio-temporal distribution of different facies types and the depositional conditions.

    Table 3 Brief descriptions and interpretations of the facies types within the channel-fill facies association(FA-1)

    The sequence-stratigraphic study is primarily based on the identification and interpretation of different stratal stacking patterns, viz., coarsening-up (progradational)and fining-up (retrogradational), in the correlated sections, followed by the interpretation of sediment packages (cycles) of different frequencies.

    4 Results

    4.1 Sedimentological facies architecture

    Sedimentologically, the siliciclastic succession of the Nimar Sandstone Formation (average ~20-30 m thick)is represented by seventeen facies types grouped in five distinct facies associations (FA-1-FA-5). Brief descriptions and interpretations of the facies types in different facies associations are depicted in Tables 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7,respectively. Representative photographs of the facies types of different facies associations (FA-1-FA-5) are represented in Figs. 2, 3, 4,5 and 6, respectively.

    Facies association FA-1 (Fig. 2) consists of four facies types, viz., the clast-supported conglomerate (facies 1A),the matrix-supported conglomerate(facies 1B),the pebbly sandstone(facies 1C)and the trough cross-stratified sandstone (facies 1D) (see Table 3). All the facies types are characterized by a very coarse-grained immature nature with an abundance of pebbles. Facies types mostly conform to large channel geometries with occasional sharp erosional basal contacts. The sediment fill pattern in individual channel geometries depicts an abundance of pebbles near the basal part often associated with large trough cross-strata, changing to smaller trough cross-strata in coarse-grained sandstone in the upper part. Overall facies architecture of FA-1 indicates a channel-fill facies association where sedimentation took place as channel-filling basal lag to point bar in a low-sinuosity meandering stream of relatively high energy.

    The facies association FA-2 (Table 4; Fig. 3) is characterized by relatively fine-grained rocks. It is consisted of interbedded sandstone-mudstone (facies 2A) and planelaminated sandstone (facies 2B). The facies types are characterized by an overall sheet-like geometry with alternations of thin-bedded, plane-laminated to ripple cross-stratified sandstone grading to mudstone. Such geometry and the close association of this facies association with channel-fill facies association (FA-1) indicate deposition of FA-2 sediments in overbank areas of channels.

    The facies types in the facies association FA-3(Table 5; Fig. 4) include the large-scale trough crossstratified sandstone (facies 3A) and the planar crossstratified sandstone (facies 3B), which characteristically bear mud-draped foresets,and lateral accretion of ripple cross-sets with reactivation surfaces within channel-fill cross-stratified sandstone beds. Such signatures indicate tidal influence (Bhattacharya et al. 2015, 2018) within a fluvial-dominated fluvio-tidal depositional setting.

    The facies association FA-4 (Table 6; Fig. 5) consists of five different facies types, namely, the heterolithic sandstone-mudstone (facies 4A), the mud-clast-bearing conglomerate (facies 4B), the plane-laminated sandstone(facies 4C), the bioturbated sandstone (facies 4D) and the green sandstone (facies 4E). Abundant bi-directional ripple and climbing ripple cross-strata with mud-draped foresets, presence of glauconite in sandstone, trough cross-strata in sandstone with abundant mud, and an abundance of marine invertebrate trace fossils, etc. all indicate a strong tidal control within the fluvial system during the sedimentation of the tide-dominated fluviotidal facies association (FA-4).

    The facies association FA-5 (Table 7; Fig. 6) is represented by the fossil-bearing sandstone (facies 5A), the

    Thalassinoides-Ophiomorpha-bearing thinly-laminated sandstone-mudstone (facies 5B), the wave-ripplebearing sandstone (facies 5C) and the massive mudstone(facies 5D). The abundance of symmetrical wave ripples, presence of marine invertebrate fossils and trace fossils, and the prevalence of both sand and mud are the characteristics of this facies association, whichtogether indicate a significant amount of wave influence during deposition of the shoreface facies association (FA-5).

    Table 4 Brief descriptions and interpretations of facies types within the overbank facies association (FA-2)

    Table 5 Brief descriptions and interpretation of facies types within the fluvial-dominated fluvio-tidal facies association (FA-3)

    Table 6 Brief descriptions and interpretation of facies types under the tide-dominated fluvio-tidal facies association (FA-4)

    Table 7 Brief descriptions and interpretation of facies types under the shoreface facies association (FA-5)

    Fig. 2 Field photographs. a Clast-supported conglomerate (facies 1A) showing angular to sub-angular clasts of basement gneissic rock, exposed in the Rampura section. Length of pen is 14.5 cm. b Matrix-supported conglomerate (facies 1B), exposed in Bagh section. Arrows indicate occurrence of mud clasts. Diameter of coin is 2.5 cm. c Pebbly sandstone (facies 1C) showing alternate pebble-rich and pebble-free sandstone beds, exposed in the Neemkheda section. Length of pen is 15 cm. d Trough cross-stratified sandstone (facies 1D), exposed along the river bank of Baria section.Length of hammer is 30.5 cm

    Fig. 3 a Field photograph of interbedded sandstone-mudstone (facies 2A), near Raisinghpura. b Field photograph of the plane-laminated sandstone (facies 2B), Man River section. Length of pen is 14.5 cm. c Cross-section of the plane-laminated sandstone facies showing welldeveloped plane beds.Length of pen is 15 cm

    Detailed vertical sedimentary logs, showing the occurrence of facies types and facies associations in the 15 sections, from the western, central, and eastern parts of the study area are presented in Figs. 7, 8 and 9, respectively. These logs reveal that —

    i) the lower part of the succession is mostly comprised of immature sediments of FA-1and FA-2,and is overlain by

    ii) sediments of the fluvial-dominated fluvio-tidal facies association (FA-3), gradually changing vertically and laterally into sediments of the tide-dominated fluviotidal facies association (FA-4), commonly occupying the middle part of the succession and,finally,

    Fig. 4 a Field photographs of large-scale trough cross-stratified sandstone(facies 3A)along the western bank of the Man River section.Arrows show lateral accretion surfaces.b Field photograph of planar cross-stratified sandstone(facies 3B),Man River section.Length of hammer is 30.5 cm

    Fig. 5 Field photographs. a Heterolithic sandstone-mudstone (facies 4A) showing presence of mud drapes and poorly-developed bidirectional cross-strata, Man River section. The arrows indicate apparent orientation of the foresets in adjacent cross-strata sets. Diameter of coin is 2.5 cm. b Interference ripples with bifurcation of crest line (yellow arrows) on the sandstone bedding surface of facies 4A, Man River section. Length of pen (encircled) is 14.5 cm. c Lenticular and wavy bedding developed within facies 4A, preserved in Bagh Cave. d Inclined heterolithic strata developed within facies 4A, Man River section. e Mud-clast-bearing conglomerate (facies 4B) showing angular mud clasts (arrows), Man River section. Length of pen is 14.5 cm. f Plane-laminated sandstone (facies 4C), Ratitalai section. Length of the pen is 14.5 cm. g Bioturbated sandstone (facies 4D), Akhara section. Diameter of coin is 2.5 cm. h Green sandstone facies (4E), exposed in Ghoda area. Length of hammer is 30.5 cm

    iii) sediments of the shoreface facies association (FA-5)predominate along with tide-dominated facies associations(mostly FA-4)in the upper part of the succession.

    At different stratigraphic levels in the middle part of the studied succession, layers with various soft-sediment deformation structures (SSDS), e.g., convoluted laminae,pseudo-nodules, load and flame structures, synsedimentary faults, slumps, and sand dykes, have been recorded by Jha et al. (2017).

    Fig. 6 Field photographs. a Fossil-bearing sandstone (facies 5A) showing gastropod (G) and bivalve shells (B) on sandstone bedding plane, near Akhara.Length of pen is 14.5 cm. b Ostrea shells in facies 5A,occurring near the Bagh-Akhara road.Diameter of coin is 2.5 cm. c Symmetrical flattopped wave ripples with small-scale ladder-back ripples in facies 5A, preserved near Akhara. Length of pen is 14.5 cm. d Thalassinoides-Ophiomorpha-bearing thinly-laminated sandstone-mudstone (facies 5B) showing well-preserved vertical burrows (arrows). The section is exposed near Sitapuri. Length of hammer is 30.5 cm.e Wave-ripple-bearing sandstone (facies 5C) showing symmetrical wave ripples with bifurcating crests(arrows), exposed in the Dam section. Length of pen is 14.5 cm. f Massive mudstone (facies 5D) overlain by white-coloured Nodular Limestone Formation,north of Sitapuri.The contact is marked by dashed yellow line. Man for scale is 170 cm tall

    Alternate fluvial (FA-1 and FA-2) and fluvialdominated tidally-influenced sediments (FA-3)followed by tide-dominated wave-reworked sediments(FA-4 and FA-5) constitute distinct depositional cycles within a mixed fluvio-marine depositional setting.Cyclic occurrences of the tidally-influenced sediments of FA-4, overlain by the wave-dominated sediments of FA-5 in the middle-upper part of the succession indicate repeated changes in water-depth over short intervals under a tidal to wave interactive system as a product of periodic marine inundations and intercalations. Such repetitive fining-up cycles indicate the inundation of fluvio-tidal channels by marine waters within a typical estuarine setting (Nichols 2009). In the study area, overall dominance of tidal features over wave features points to a tide-dominated waveinfluenced estuary (Jha et al. 2017).

    The overall fining-up character, increasing marine dominance up-section, and prevalence of landward palaeocurrent directions indicate an estuarine setting.Within the fluvio-marine interactive setting, three major sub-environments are envisaged:

    i) A fluvial-dominated zone initially, with the transition from fluvial channels (FA-1) to floodplain(FA-2), with few tide-affected fluvial deposits(FA-3) in the basal part of the succession, mainly prevails in the eastern and central part of the study area.

    ii) A mixed-energy central estuary zone in the middle-upper part of the succession, which consists of transitional fluvio-tidal channels (FA-3) and tidal flats associated with tidal channels and bars(FA-4) overlying the fluvial systems in the study area.

    Fig. 7 Lithologs from the western part of the study area (sections 1-5) showing lateral and vertical distribution of various facies types and their associations.For section locations see Fig.1.Legend is the same for Figs.7, 8 and 9

    iii) A wave-dominated shore environment in the outer estuary zone (top part of FA-4 with FA-5), occupying the upper part of the succession, occurs dominantly in the west and central part and gradually diminishes towards the eastern part of the study area.

    Fig. 8 Lithologs from the central part of the study area (sections 6-11) showing lateral and vertical distribution of various facies types and their associations.For section locations see Fig.1;for legend see Fig.7

    The distinct layers with abundant SSDS have been interpreted as seismites by Jha et al. (2017). The seismite layers mark phases of a substantial shift in depositional conditions from fluvial-dominated to a transgressive tidal- and wave-influenced estuarine system related to basinal subsidence caused by reactivation of the Son-Narmada South Fault during sedimentation of the Nimar Sandstone Formation(Jha et al. 2017).

    4.2 Stratal stacking patterns and T-R cycles

    Vertical and lateral distributions of the litho-units depict an overall fining-upward retrogradational cycle for the entire Nimar Sandstone Formation. Four section correlations are made: (i) in the Akhara-Phata area, the westernmost of the basin, incorporating sections 1-5(Fig. 10); (ii) in the Bagh area, the central of the basin,incorporating sections 6-11 (Fig. 11); (iii) in the Man River-Ratitalai area, the easternmost of the study area,including sections 12-15 (Fig. 12); and (iv) along a nearly dip-parallel section over the whole study area(Fig. 13), incorporating, from west to east, logs of Chikapoti, Akhara, Bagh, Raisinghpura, and Sitapuri.The correlations provide clear evidence of stratal stacking patterns along the length (W-E) and width (NS) of the basin, and reflect the dominance of marineinfluenced facies types in the western logs in comparison to the easternmost ones. Similarly, a gradual diminishing abundance of channel-fill facies types (mostly FA-1) is observed from east to west in the study area. Within the overall fining-up trend, high-frequency alternate coarsening-up (progradational) and fining-up (retrogradational) hemicycles a are visible in almost all the lithologs (Figs. 10,11,12 and 13).

    The overall retrogradational pattern with the gradual changeover from dominant fluvial systems in the lower part, followed by mixed fluvial-tidal systems in the middle part and mixed tidal- and wave-dominated open marine systems in the upper part of the studied succession points to the overall transgressive nature of the succession. The transgressive succession is also evident from the systematic change in abundance of fluvial to marine facies from east to west, which signifies a westto eastward marine incursion controlling the sedimentation at different areas. The smaller coarsening- and fining-up hemicycles embedded within this major transgressive cycle manifest high-frequency changes in base level and accommodation.

    Fig. 9 Lithologs from the eastern part of the study area (sections 12-15) showing lateral and vertical distribution of various facies types and their associations.For section locations see Fig.1;for legend see Fig.7

    The Nimar Sandstone Formation is conformably overlain by the Nodular Limestone Formation without any visible break in sedimentation. The Nodular Limestone Formation has been interpreted as a restricted shallow marine platform-tidal flat deposit (Ruidas et al. 2018;Bansal et al. 2019). Thus, it remains inconclusive at this stage whether the major transgressive event that affected the entire Nimar Sandstone Formation succession also continued during the deposition of the overlying limestone units.

    4.3 High-frequency T-R cycles

    Four distinct high-frequency hemicycles (Figs. 10, 11, 12,13, 14 and 15) are observed within the major transgressive cycle: (i) the lowermost coarsening-up hemicycle(named as L-C), followed up by (ii) a fining-up hemicycle (named as L-F) in the lower-middle part of the succession, (iii) another coarsening-up hemicycle(named as U-C) in the middle-upper part of the succession, and (iv) an upper fining-up hemicycle (named as UF)occurring near the top of the entire succession.

    Fig. 10 Correlation of lithologs in the western part of the study area (see Fig. 1 for location), showing transgressive-regressive (T-R) cycles of different orders. U-C: Upper coarsening-up hemicycle; U-F: Upper fining-up hemicycle; L-C: Lowermost coarsening-up hemicycle; L-F: Lower finning-up hemicycle.Legends are the same for Figs.10, 11, 12 and 13

    The lowermost coarsening-up (progradational) hemicycle (L-C) is most prevalent in the central and eastern part of the area (Figs. 11, 12) and depict a stratal stacking pattern formed by the lateral and vertical amalgamation of channel-fill deposits (FA-1), intermittently separated by overbank deposits (FA-2). Overall, FA-1 sediments are much more abundant than FA-2 sediments.

    A fining-up (retrogradational) hemicycle (L-F) commonly overlies the L-C hemicycle and occupies the lower to middle part of the succession in the central and eastern parts of the study area (Figs. 11, 12 and 13). However, in the western part,the L-C hemicycle is absent and the succession starts with the L-F hemicycle (Fig. 10). This fining-up succession shows a stratal stacking pattern formed predominantly by overbank deposits (FA-2) with isolated, detached units of channel-fill sediments (FA-1).Overall, the overbank deposits are more abundant than the channel-fill sediments within this hemicycle.

    Both L-C and L-F are overlain by another coarsening-up (progradational) hemicycle (U-C),mostly occupying the middle to upper part of the succession. The stratal architecture within this hemicycle depicts a progradational stacking pattern with successively stacked fluvial-dominated fluvio-tidal deposits (FA-3) and intermittent finer-grained tidedominated fluvio-tidal deposits (FA-4) (Fig. 15). Both the channel and the overbank deposits are characterized by abundant tidal signatures. Preserved tidal signatures help to differentiate this hemicycle from earlier hemicycles apart from the change in stacking pattern from fining-up below to coarsening-up above.The coarsening-up stacking pattern is produced by the local amalgamation of tide-affected fluvial channels in the middle and upper part of the U-C hemicycle.

    Fig. 11 Correlation of lithologs in the central part of the study area (see Fig. 1 for location), showing different-order T-R cycles. For abbreviations see Fig.10

    The topmost fining-up hemicycle (U-F) caps the earlier hemicycles throughout the entire area. A fining-up,retrogradational stratal stacking pattern is observed with an abundance of FA-4 facies types accompanied by FA-5 facies types. Marine depositional signatures are most prevalent within this hemicycle in comparison to all other hemicycles, which include sheet sandstone bodies with abundant wave-produced features, heterolithic units with shallow-marine invertebrate fossils and trace fossils, and thick- to thin-bedded tidal heteroliths. Evidence of fluvial sedimentary processes in terms of facies types of FA-1, FA-2 or FA-3 are lacking or absent within this hemicycle. The thickness of the sediment package of U-F also varies significantly, with maximum thickness and sand-rich composition in the western part, and a gradually diminishing thickness and change to a mudrich composition towards the east. This hemicycle is directly overlain by the Nodular Limestone Formation.

    5 Discussion

    5.1 Interpretation of the high-frequency T-R cycles

    The lowermost coarsening-upward hemicycle (L-C),characterized by highly amalgamated channel-fill units and a high channel/overbank sediment ratio, signifies deposition in unconfined fluvial channels without any connection to marine processes. Lateral and vertical shifts in channel stacking pattern and amalgamation indicate frequent channel avulsion with a significantly low rate of aggradation of overbank deposits. The overall stratal stacking pattern points to a high-amalgamation systems tract (HAST) developed in a lowaccommodation, upstream-controlled fluvial depositional system (Catuneanu 2017).

    The overlying fining-up hemicycle (L-F), characterized by stacking pattern dominated by overbank deposits and a low channel/overbank sediment ratio, signifies deposition in confined isolated channels with a low rate of channel avulsion or migration and a high rate of overbank aggradation. Such a stratal stacking pattern is identified as a low-amalgamation systems tract (LAST)(Catuneanu 2017), indicating high accommodation due to basinal subsidence and raised river profile leading to flooding and deposition of finer overbank deposits over the earlier sand-depositing areas. This led to a fining-up retrogradational succession (FA-2 over FA-1) in most areas. The predominance of mud-rich floodplain deposits manifests rising base level conditions, leading to:(i) raising of the river profile, (ii) more deposition than the incision, and (iii) low channel avulsion and aggradation. Such rising of the base level can be considered as an indirect effect of the rising and encroaching sea,which was not far away. Close overlap of this hemicycle by the overlying tide-dominated facies association supports this interpretation.

    The stratal stacking pattern and the associated facies architecture in the overlying hemicycles (U-C and U-F)indicate clear signatures of marine influence. Thus, a shift in the depositional conditions from an upstreamcontrolled fluvial setting to a downstream-controlled,marine-influenced transitional setting can be envisaged at the boundary of the L-F hemicycle and the U-C hemicycle. Significant marine influence, in association with basinal tectonics and sediment supply controlled the creation of net accommodation and the resultant stratal stacking patterns. SSDS-bearing beds both above and below the said transition are interpreted as seismites(Jha et al. 2017), which signifies strong control of the basinal tectonism caused by reactivation of faults and basinal sagging in controlling the accommodation and sedimentation (Bhattacharya et al. 2016; Bhattacharya and Saha 2020).

    Fig. 13 Correlation of lithologs along a dip section from west to east of the study area (see Fig. 1 for location), showing different-order T-R cycles.For abbreviations see Fig.10

    Fig. 14 A representative field section beside the Baghini Temple, near Bagh, showing four transgressive-regressive hemicycles (marked by L-C, LF,U-C and U-F).The person(encircled)is 172 cm tall.For key of abbreviations, see Fig.10

    The overlying coarsening-up hemicycle (U-C) in the middle to upper part of the succession, characterized by low to high tidal influence, shows a stacking pattern dominated by tide-reworked channel and overbank deposits (FA-3 and FA-4). Additional accommodation was available, as evident from high-accumulation of the tideaffected overbank deposits (FA-4) and low to high amalgamation of tide-influenced channels (FA-3). This net accommodation creation was controlled by a rising base level and landward encroaching sea, which was overpaced by a high rate of sedimentation led by both fluvial and tidal systems. The overall progradational stratal stacking pattern with less aggradation indicates a regressive condition, equivalent to a lowstand systems tract(LST) in the fluvio-marine transitional setting. In some areas (e.g., Bagh, Rampura, etc., Figs. 11, 13), particularly in places where the fluvial channels were strongly affected by tidal currents during this marine encroachment, tidally reworked coarser-grained clastics led to stacked, amalgamated thick channel-fill sandstone units(of FA-3). Such progradational stacking pattern confirms a lowstand condition, where a significant amount of sediment supplied by river was reworked by the encroaching tidal currents and was deposited as bayhead deltas and tidal bars in river mouth areas.

    Fig. 15 Conceptual sequence stratigraphic model of the Nimar Sandstone Formation along a west-east transect through the study area,showing stratal stacking patterns with four high-frequency coarsening-up and fining-up hemicycles embedded in a major fining-up transgressive succession. Abbreviations see Fig. 10. HAST: High-amalgamation systems tract; LAST: Low-amalgamation systems tract; LST: Lowstand systems tract;TST:Transgressive systems tract

    Fig.16 Schematic 3D palaeogeographic model of the deposition of Nimar Sandstone Formation in the Narmada rift basin

    The lowstand stratal package is overlain by the topmost fining-up hemicycle (U-F) with a retrogradational stratal stacking pattern formed by predominantly tideand wave-produced sediments of FA-4 and FA-5(Figs. 10, 11, 12 and 13). The prevalence of wave- and tide-controlled sedimentation with a low or rare signature of fluvial deposition suggests a coastal onlapping,which covered the earlier fluvial (HAST and LAST) and the fluvio-tidal (LST) deposits. A clear shift from pure fluvial depositional processes to open coastal depositional systems in different parts of the basin (Figs. 10,11, 12 and 13) undoubtedly attests to a landward shift of the shoreline. Thus,the fining-up retrogradational stratal package in U-F represents a transgressive systems tract(TST). Minor variations in the stacking pattern within this TST in different areas are caused by varying water energy in different parts of the basin during the marine flooding event, which led to varied depositions from (i)wave-reworked shoreface sands with marine bivalves,gastropods, and trace fossils in the western part (more open marine), to (ii) finer-grained clastics with abundant Ostrea, Turritella and trace fossils (Thalassinoides) of marginal marine affinity, characteristic of brackish water conditions in the eastern part (landward, sheltered estuary-like). The contact with the overlying Nodular Limestone Formation (Fig. 14) is considered as the end of transgression documented by the Nimar Sandstone Formation succession;however,demarcating any definite surface (e.g., the maximum flooding surface) is not feasible due to the relatively poor preservation of features in outcrops and restricted lateral continuity of features.

    5.2 Sequence stratigraphic architecture

    In absence of absolute age data of the Nimar Sandstone Formation (as mentioned in Table 2), the chronological attributes of bounding surfaces and major events become problematic in the study area. The major transgressive cycle encompassing the entire Nimar Sandstone Formation succession definitely indicates a transgression.Since the lower contact of the Nimar Sandstone Formation is fault-bound, the actual starting age of the deposition is difficult to determine. The top boundary with the overlying Nodular Limestone Formation is conformable and indicates inland continuation of marine sedimentation. Thus, we may consider the major fining-up cycle in the Nimar Sandstone Formation as part of a major, continuous transgressive event. So, assigning the proper status of this major transgressive cycle in terms of sequence elements (sequence or systems tracts) is tricky and is avoided here.

    The high-frequency T-R cycles resemble different systems tracts, viz., L-C as HAST, L-F as LAST, U-C as LST,and U-F as TST,depending on characteristic stratal stacking patterns with assemblages of different facies associations (discussed earlier). Nature of the transition between the HAST and the LAST is gradual, rendering no definite bounding surface between them in field exposures. The changeover from the LAST and the overlying LST is commonly marked by initiation of tidal influence within the channel deposits and the progradation of these channel systems over the underlying overbank deposits. Sharp channel bases are locally identified in individual exposures, but poor preservation quality with lack of lateral continuity restricts the identification of a definite bounding surface between the LAST and the LST. Similarly, the changeover from LST to the topmost TST is not marked by any distinct surface such as the maximum regressive surface (MRS) and is mostly identified by the gradual change in the stratal stacking pattern from coarsening-up (U-C) to fining-up (U-F).The facies architecture near the upper boundary of the TST is not uniform throughout the sections and,in turn,makes it difficult to demarcate a definite terminating surface such as the maximum flooding surface (MFS).However,the Nodular Limestone Formation overlies this topmost TST throughout the study area, and definitely indicates the culmination of the transgressive event within the Nimar Sandstone Formation succession. Such variations in the facies architecture, causing difficulty in lateral correlation and identification of bounding surfaces of the sequence/systems tracts are due to the complex sedimentary facies distribution in the evolving fluvio-estuarine system within the riftogenic basin.

    5.3 Palaeogeography

    The Late Cretaceous global sea-level rise led to significant marine transgressions that affected part of western and central India (Acharya and Lahiri 1991; Singh and Mishra 2000; Desai 2013). This led to seawater inundation of large areas of central Indian land, resulting in a shift in depositional conditions from pure continental to marine/marginal marine. One such example of marine transgressions and change in depositional conditions is well recorded in the Upper Cretaceous Bagh Group, preserved within the Narmada rift basin.

    Analysis of the Nimar Sandstone Formation succession in the light of transgressive-regressive cycles reveals a major transgressive event affecting the upper part of the succession. The initial fluvial system depicts an amalgamation of channel and overbank deposits under lowto-high accommodation conditions, mostly controlled by changing river equilibrium profile due to tectonic subsidence and varied sediment supply. This caused thick accumulation of channel-fill and overbank deposits in the lower part of the Nimar Sandstone Formation. An east-west flowing river system is reconstructed, with coarse sediments dominating in the east and fine sediments in the west. In the western part of the basin, the fluvial system was affected by tidal intermixing, indicating a significant marine encroachment and fluvio-tidal interference (Fig. 16). The effect of tidal influence is more pronounced in the upper transgressive hemicycle(U-C), which records prevalent drowning of the underlying fluvial system. The effect of this drowning was more dominant in the western part and less in the eastern part, indicating that the marine encroachment took place from west to east with the development of a tideinfluenced estuarine system in the west changing to more fluvial-dominated bay-head delta systems in the east. Overall facies architecture indicates that an initial fluvial depositional setting was engulfed by the development of a tide-influenced estuarine system (Fig. 16),where three distinct depositional zones can be deciphered, namely,

    i) a fluvio-tidal interactive inner estuary zone, developed in the eastern part of the basin, characterized by the tide-reworked thick channel-fill and overbank deposits,

    ii) a tide-dominated central estuary zone, developed in the central part of the basin, characterized by development of tidal sand bars and sand- and mud-flats based on the extent of inundations, mutual strength of tidal and fluvial systems, and type of net accommodation created, and.

    iii) a tidal- and wave-dominated outer estuary part, developed in the western part of the basin, characterized by more open marine tide- and wave-reworked sediments of shore environments.

    Successive stacking of high-frequency transgressiveregressive cycles was caused by fluctuations in the base level in response to the Cenomanian sea-level rise along with net sedimentation controlled by the basinal subsidence caused by reactivation of basin marginal faults in the Narmada rift basin (Jha et al.2017). During the late stage of the transgression,outer estuarine open marine conditions encroached further landwards inundating the entire basin, which led to shallow, low-energy conditions with deposition of the Nodular Limestone Formation as an apron covering the underlying Nimar Sandstone Formation.Thus, the shift in depositional conditions from fluvialdominated to a transgressive tidal- to wave-influenced estuarine system attests to significant tectonosedimentary changes accompanied by prolonged events of marine transgressions in the Narmada rift basin during the Late Cretaceous.

    6 Conclusions

    The detailed facies analysis and sequence stratigraphic analysis of the Cenomanian Nimar Sandstone Formation helps to sort out the facies architecture in the fluviomarine interactive estuarine system. Based on the present study, we can frame the following conclusive remarks:

    1) Detailed facies analysis records deposition of the lower part of the succession in a fluvial setting,which changed up-section into a transgressive fluvio-marine estuarine setting with: (i) a fluvialdominated inner estuary zone, with the transition from fluvial to tide-affected fluvial deposits, (ii) a transitional central estuary zone consisting of transitional fluvio-tidal channels and tidal flats, associated with tidal channels and bars, and (iii) a wavedominated shallow-marine outer estuary zone. This evolution is time-transgressive with a gradual shift of different depositional conditions in space and time.

    2) Reactivation of basin-marginal faults during the Cenomanian time caused sequential subsidence of the land part within the Indian Plate, which enhanced the effective landward incursion of seawater due to the Cenomanian sea-level rise.

    3) The major transgression is attributed to the Cenomanian global eustatic rise, whereas the highfrequency T-R cycles indicate systematic variation in net sediment supply, change in accommodation space related to tectonic subsidence, and base level fluctuations, resulting in characteristic stratal stacking patterns.

    4) The proposed tectono-sedimentary model based on the integrated sedimentological-sequence-stratigraphic study helps to reconstruct the palaeogeography in central India during the Late Cretaceous.Such a palaeogeographic model can be applied to similar transgressive fluvio-marine sedimentary successions formed in passive margin rift basins, where transgression is controlled by both eustatic changes and tectonic subsidence.

    Abbreviations

    HAST: High-amalgamation systems tract; IHS: Inclined heterolithic strata;LAST: Low-amalgamation systems tract; LST: Lowstand systems tract;MFS: Maximum flooding surface; MRS: Maximum regressive surface;SSDS: Soft-sediment deformation structures; T-R cycles: Transgressiveregressive cycles;TST: Transgressive systems tract

    Acknowledgements

    The authors like to thank IIT Roorkee for providing the research facilities. The authors gratefully acknowledge the thorough and critical reviews by two anonymous reviewers and the constructive comments of the editors of JoP.

    Authors’contributions

    BB participated in the field work, identified and interpreted the primary sedimentary structures and the facies types, conceptualized the problem,completed the correlation of facies and facies associations in 2-D and 3-D,prepared the sequence stratigraphic models and drafted the manuscript. SJ has carried out the detailed descriptions of facies types, prepared the logs,participated in the field work and drafted the manuscript. PM has participated in the field, assisted in acquiring data and in lab analysis and drafted the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

    Funding

    Authors are thankful to the Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India,for financial support in the form of Extra-Mural Research Project (Ref. No.MoES/P.O.(Geo)/142/2017).

    Availability of data and materials

    The authors declare that the materials are available in open field area to be accessed by anyone. All data are collected by the authors themselves through fieldwork followed by laboratory analysis, and nothing has been supplied by any person or organization.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

    Author details

    1Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee 247667, India.2Geological Survey of India, Jabalpur 482003, India.

    Received: 6 March 2020 Accepted: 16 October 2020

    国产乱来视频区| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 日韩av免费高清视频| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 91精品三级在线观看| 永久免费av网站大全| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 久久久久久久精品精品| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| h视频一区二区三区| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 精品第一国产精品| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 日本午夜av视频| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 在线观看国产h片| a 毛片基地| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 久久99一区二区三区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密 | 视频区图区小说| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 91精品三级在线观看| 制服诱惑二区| 观看美女的网站| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 国产片内射在线| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 久久久欧美国产精品| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 老司机影院毛片| 日本wwww免费看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 男女边摸边吃奶| 中国三级夫妇交换| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 一级黄片播放器| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 国产成人系列免费观看| h视频一区二区三区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 亚洲成人手机| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 性色av一级| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 秋霞伦理黄片| 成人免费观看视频高清| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 国产激情久久老熟女| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 搡老岳熟女国产| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 亚洲精品视频女| 国产成人精品在线电影| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 日日啪夜夜爽| 97在线人人人人妻| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 日本欧美视频一区| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 91精品三级在线观看| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| a级毛片在线看网站| 久久这里只有精品19| 大码成人一级视频| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 宅男免费午夜| 中文天堂在线官网| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 久久久精品94久久精品| 久久久久久久精品精品| 亚洲精品在线美女| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 一级毛片电影观看| 黄频高清免费视频| 少妇 在线观看| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 老司机靠b影院| 成年av动漫网址| h视频一区二区三区| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 七月丁香在线播放| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 一个人免费看片子| 国产精品.久久久| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 大香蕉久久成人网| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 91国产中文字幕| 丁香六月欧美| 国产淫语在线视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 日韩电影二区| 国产精品无大码| svipshipincom国产片| 免费不卡黄色视频| 观看美女的网站| av在线app专区| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 在线观看www视频免费| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| av片东京热男人的天堂| 亚洲精品在线美女| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 18禁观看日本| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 少妇人妻 视频| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 免费少妇av软件| 久久性视频一级片| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 日本欧美视频一区| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 国产成人精品福利久久| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 久久av网站| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 中国国产av一级| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 欧美在线黄色| 一区在线观看完整版| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 在线观看人妻少妇| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 黄频高清免费视频| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 日韩电影二区| 色吧在线观看| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 街头女战士在线观看网站| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 女性生殖器流出的白浆| av免费观看日本| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 一级片免费观看大全| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 老司机影院成人| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 麻豆av在线久日| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 久热这里只有精品99| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 久久久欧美国产精品| 色吧在线观看| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 美国免费a级毛片| 尾随美女入室| 国产精品三级大全| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 黄频高清免费视频| 精品国产一区二区久久| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲第一av免费看| 国产成人精品无人区| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| av免费观看日本| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 欧美成人午夜精品| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 欧美在线黄色| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 日日啪夜夜爽| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲在久久综合| 欧美在线黄色| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 国产乱来视频区| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看 | 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 美女福利国产在线| www.自偷自拍.com| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | www日本在线高清视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 一个人免费看片子| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆 | 国产男人的电影天堂91| 午夜影院在线不卡| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 亚洲精品视频女| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| av在线播放精品| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 一级毛片 在线播放| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 午夜福利,免费看| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 男女免费视频国产| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 99香蕉大伊视频| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 18在线观看网站| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| netflix在线观看网站| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲在久久综合| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国产精品.久久久| 午夜久久久在线观看| 悠悠久久av| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产又爽黄色视频| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产在视频线精品| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 少妇人妻 视频| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产成人91sexporn| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆 | 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 国产麻豆69| 成年av动漫网址| 日本av免费视频播放| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 久久青草综合色| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| av线在线观看网站| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 曰老女人黄片| 大香蕉久久网| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 午夜福利,免费看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 久久婷婷青草| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 亚洲国产精品999| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 亚洲成人一二三区av| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 丁香六月欧美| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 18禁观看日本| 只有这里有精品99| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 国产视频首页在线观看| av视频免费观看在线观看| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 日本wwww免费看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产一级毛片在线| 国产精品无大码| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 男女边摸边吃奶| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 美女中出高潮动态图| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 免费看av在线观看网站| 电影成人av| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 一级片'在线观看视频| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 中文欧美无线码| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 一级爰片在线观看| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲精品视频女| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 免费观看av网站的网址| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 尾随美女入室| 色播在线永久视频| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 久久免费观看电影| 悠悠久久av| 性少妇av在线| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 一级爰片在线观看| 久久av网站| 成年动漫av网址| av片东京热男人的天堂| 99久久人妻综合| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 国产在视频线精品| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 美女午夜性视频免费| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 18禁观看日本| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 国产av国产精品国产| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 婷婷色综合www| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品 | 性色av一级| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 99热全是精品| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 欧美日韩av久久| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 曰老女人黄片| 精品福利永久在线观看| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 成人免费观看视频高清| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 另类精品久久| 超色免费av| 飞空精品影院首页| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 多毛熟女@视频| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产 精品1| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 国产野战对白在线观看| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 欧美成人午夜精品| 色吧在线观看| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 老司机靠b影院| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 如何舔出高潮| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 午夜福利视频精品| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 嫩草影院入口| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 高清欧美精品videossex| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 国产麻豆69| 一级爰片在线观看| svipshipincom国产片| 亚洲国产精品999| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 日韩电影二区| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 日本色播在线视频| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 亚洲伊人色综图| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| h视频一区二区三区| 久久热在线av| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 乱人伦中国视频| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 美女午夜性视频免费| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 美国免费a级毛片| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| av免费观看日本| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看 | 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产成人欧美|