• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    “Wildness”Within Mobility in Shakespeare’s King Henry IV and Henry Ⅴ

    2021-02-19 10:39:28ZHANGHan
    Journal of Literature and Art Studies 2021年8期

    ZHANG Han

    In the past fifty years, scholars have examined fields of Englands politics in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries; however, the politics of mobility has not been extensively studied. This article addresses Prince Hal and King Henry Ⅴs wildness within mobility as an important role to the advancement of metaphorical wildness. King Henry Vs “wildness” is an element that is often discussed in Shakespeares Henry IV and Henry Ⅴ. Locating in Prince Hals wandering to uncertainty, unsettledness and changeability a potential to unveil the disguised aspects of the assumed politics, Shakespeare focuses on the interlocking aspect of wildness and mobility. He calls for exploring a recognition of ideal character and tactical figure into a transitional strategy of it. In reorganising civil culture, Shakespeare sees the possibility of re-configuring the approach from aimless roaming to communal mobility. It is the approach of these mobilities through ways of wildnes that permits us to explore between wildness as a strategy and as a metaphor, and to understand in the notion of early modern mobility that is as tactical in ambition as it is consequential in such contexts of Shakespeare.

    Keywords: wildness, mobility, Shakespeare, Prince Hal, King Henry IV, King Henry V

    Introduction

    Many critics referred to the many qualities of King Henry V. According to A. W. Schlegel (1808-9) in The New Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works, King Henry the fifth is “as endowed with every chivalrous and kingly virtue; open, sincere, affable, yet still disposed to innocent raillery”. William Hazlitt believes that King Henry V “was careless, dissolute, and ambitious;—idle, or doing mischief…h(huán)e seemed to have no idea of any rule of right and wrong, but brute force, glossed over with a little religious hypocrisy and archiepiscopal advice…there is he a very amiable monster” (Hazlitt, 1818, p. 20). Although most critics from the old generations have noticed Hals multi-faceted qualities, they took it as an adjective rather than discuss its formation under ocurring wildness in depth.

    I aim to discuss the specific manifestation of his civility and the condition which promotes Hals wildness into civility. Moreover, I will also explain that the interrelationship between his wildness and civility is related to his mobility. As I have stressed earlier that there are two kinds of mobility I would like to discuss in this article, the mobility of places and the mobility of ideas. What I intend to further illustrate is that Prince Hals mobility is transformed from aimless roaming into meaningful communal mobility, according to his transition between his wildness and civility. This article argues that Henry makes the transition from wildness to civility within mobility as a way of self-fashioning model. In the early modern period, the foreign trend of the state is gradually taking place from the exploration of individual or minority travellers to the people as a resolute community, which is a symbol of transition of the ever-changing early modern period.

    Two parts, patterns of Prince Hals wildness and mobility as a way of figuring wildness will be discussed in this paper. The first part is a brief introduction of the basic concepts about the Wild Man in different periods, as well as Hals wildness shaping his courtsey. And then my own understanding of the wildness in Henry IV and Henry V will be put forward. The second part will analyze in detail about Henry Vs wildness in mobility of places and in details about Henry Vs wildness through mobility of ideas. I intend to interpret the significance of mobility in wildness in Shakespeares these three historical plays. Wildness appears very frequently in Henry IV and Henry V. And the wildness is not deeply exploring in the description of the characters. Because these characters in the plays all agree that Henrys wildness has disappeared after Henry Vs accession naturally. Through the discussion in this paper, the wildness is worth exploring and the disappearance of the wildness may not necessarily be a good thing. Unlike The Tempest, the ideal society portrayed by Shakespeare in Henry IV and Henry V is the possibility that the wild man can be in every man. The wildness coexists within mobility. King Henry Vs metaphorical wildness may be a good way to study mobility in early modern England.

    Patterns of Hals Wildness

    The disappearance of Prince Hals wildness has been discussed continually in Henry V. Hals wildness is not“barbarous” in the traditional sense. From the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), the word wildness means“uncivilized or uncultured state or character (of persons); savagery; barbarity; roughness of manners”,“uncultivated state (of a plant)” as in “Our vineyards, Fallowes, Meades, and Hedges, Defectiue in their natures, grow to wildnesse”, and also has comparably similarly meaning of “unstrained condition or quality”, especially“want of, resistance to, or freedom from restraint or control (with various shades of meaning)”.

    Most of these three historical plays talk about Prince Hal getting rid of his wildness, which I think is the opposite. Through the disguise of Prince Hals wildness in different identities, Prince Hal uses his disguised wildness as a political strategy to cope with his new identity, the King. In the past, he was uninhibited, wandering in the wild. After becoming a King, he well concealed his wildness in dealing with both domestic and foreign issues. The reason for this may be that being a monarch requires reliable quality for the sake of stability and loyalty. Prince Hal has inherited this “wildness” from his aristocratic father. Henry IVs expedition to the holy land was motivated by his own atonement, and then he confessed to his son that this was just a way to distract from domestic contradictions. This can be a manifestation of variable wildness.

    An anxious struggle between personal pursuit and royal expansionism lies at the heart of the motion of Hal. Though stressing the descriptive wildness that the patterns of wildness builds up, Leerssen basically differentiate wildness with patterns of motivation. Apart from this, Leerssen famously emphasized that wildness has a connotation of being “unruly, erratic, incomprehensible and surprising” (Leerssen, 1995, p. 31). Other than Prince Hals unruly quality, his surprising sides are more worth exploring. However, texts, even if Hal appreciate royal status in one civic culture, do not simply proceed of his own wandering. His motion to cut across political territories hinges on the region of court, politics and strategies and is thus related to a variety of potraits that are social, political and literary. Shakespeare stresses that power of politics generates considerable effect on patterns of Hals so-called wildness and may stimulate or oppose its ambitions.

    According to Hayden White, the Wild Man during the early modern period should be distinguished from“the Noble Savage”. Wildnesss latin form is “savagery”. The notion of wildness mainly contains barbarity and roughness. In part, concepts like “savagery” and “wildness” expressed this longing for completed ordered self-centered way of life in those regions of the world for setting up civilized fantasies. Before fatasies could begin perfecting nature, they needed the wilderness—the jungle, forest, desert, and mountains. The Myth of the Noble Savage advised readers to understand the idea that there is a native wildness in every man that had been poorly destroyed but offered little advice on how to release them properly. This description exposed one of the main contradictions underlying both civilized and primitive huamanity. The mans pressure on the depressed labor and lands implied that his desires and anxieties should be treated as equal. At the same time, the generation of myth and the transition to fiction myth emerging from the characterization without any construction seemed to attribute the existence of wild things. Yet although historic humanization might have seemed like mad man, it was not actually. As an achieved with unified and imperfect humanity organized, without a single group even civilized man was wild. Without the human wild actions advocated by native wildness, historical emotions of manking could come into the chaoes itself. Nontheless, the unified and imperfect humanity was clear that although all wild man required a division of humanity, the forms of humanity should acquire moral norms if possible. As the early modern realistic concentration asserted, early modern English people needed differentness. Reassuring English people that Shakespeares characters in plays resembled England reflected humanistic variations that human nature achieved it in the initial community.

    To be specific, King Henry is not the uncivilized man who lives in caves in the mountains or forest. And He does speak human language. Then where does his wildness come from? Peoples references to Prince Hals wildness is reflected in his character and casual way of life. In detail, Hal acts surprisingly for suppressing his personal desire as a king and later learn to build a community. To my way of thinking, in contrast to his wildness, his civility manifests itself in the correctness of his religious belief, his kindness and mercy towards his subordinates, his skills of speech, the change of his way of addressing somebody and his humour. As the Prince of Wales, he is away from the court and spends time with his unlettered, rude and shallow companions. After he became the King Henry, this way of self-centred life was replaced by his act of duty without any notice. As King Henry V, he is far away from his wildness and returns to his home as well as the court. His duty is well depicted through his civility and civilized manners. He turns into this calm, cautious, responsible, merciful, potent and tactical figure.

    The patterns of Hals wildness employes to describe the figural motion in taverns and court differed, but the underlying emotions is not the same. There are two patterns concerning Hals wildness. One can be concluded to as a circle of court, and the other is a solution from a self-centered way of life to a community-oriented responsibility. The First Part of King Henry the Fourth, The Second Part of King Henry the Fourth and The Life of King Henry the Fifth, those Shakespeares history plays, explores the historically controversies between abundant internal and external changes in sixteenth and seventeenth century, an age which sees the initiating of mass-mobilizing to early modern England. Shakespeare for introducing Prince Hal combining the coming-of-age story of Hal, lowlife humanises, to express his more complete view of surroundings, promoting his struggles to stay in control of the situation that revolves around Hals personal interest. At the center of the story are Christian kings, self-doubtful soldiers, life-long companions, having full of doubts “I do not think a vraver gentleman, more active-valiant or more valiant-young, more daring or bold, is now alive to grace this latter age with noble deeds. For my part, I may speak it to my shame, I have a truant been to chivalry; and so I hear he doth account me too” (King Henry IV Part 1, 5.1: 89-95). Together with other, images of Henry, he struggles to cope with this“circle of court”. At first, Prince Hal is away from his fathers court as a discursively freeman in some way. And then he almost indulges himself in this wonderland of wildness with pretencious transformation. This can be viewed as a necessarily self-centered alteration. In such a context of Hals idleness, distance and reassurance, Shakespeares use of justifying fifures for both Henrys presence and heroic claims becomes an inventive means of shape of royal figure.

    The patterns of Hals wildness are the subject of this part is a process of unquestionable “journey of discovery”. I may now be allowed to observe the second pattern of Hals wildness, that is a reliable solution from a self-centered way of life to a community-oriented responsibility. In the first place, the returning of royal court and palace prior to the widespread acceptance are quite rare; and I believe the rivalries between Prince Hal and King Henry IV, between French and England in question is a specific situation of such attemption claiming to belong to the sixteenth century of Shakespeares age. Hals knowledge of kinship, we therefore see, was limited to two-faced civility. He states that “will awhile uphold the unyold humour of your idleness: yet herein will I imitate the sun, who doth permit the base contagious clouds to smother up his beauty from the world, that when he please again to be himself being wanted, he may be more wonderd at, by breaking through the foul and ugly mists of vapours that did seem to strangle him” (King Henry IV Part 1, 2.2: 217-225). Perhaps this is the point where I should observe the more I have to say citing behaviour of nobles, mentioned suspiciously also, as I have already observed in the beginning. The civility and nobility of its having been observed in the circling mobility of Hal clung to the conversion. It is described by King Henry V in “my father is gone wild into his grave” as “mingle with the state of floods and flow henceforth in formal majesty”. Readers of the play could naturally inquire about the monarch-based wildness. This wildness within wilderness has drastic advances of Hals later action and motivation.

    According to Hayden White, during the transitional period between medieval and the early modern ages, many viewers took a more ambivalent attitude, on both the desirability of both idealizing the Wild Man and also the possibility of escaping civilization. Speaking of Wild Man in Shakespeares plays, the most commonly discussed play is The Tempest. However, the spatialization of the Wild Man does not work out in Henry V as it in The Tempest. First of all, King Henry the fifth is not the Wild Man in the traditional sense. And then Henrys wildness is more like self-fashioning within mobility rather than a distanced fantasy world. The whole play, Henry V, is filled with characters constant discussions about Henrys vanishing disappearing wildness. This thesis argues that Henrys metaphorical wildness is under disguised by using different mobilities of places and of ideas as an innovative way of figuring early modern society. Mobility is no longer simply bad or good, but a more neutral attempt will be made to govern a kingdom.

    Rollison believes that the centre of this universe leads to the “prince” and there is a “vast wall” which exudes power and authority surrounds his park. I agree with this spatial imagination to help to understand kingship(Rollison, 1999, p. 6). However, the princes road to the centre of the power isnt entirely roses all the way. For a long time, critics have long been studied King Henry Vs image as ditchotomy: “Henry as ideal ruler and brutal conqueror”; or as “a politically strong monarch and weak human being”; or “Harry as model ruler saddled with a nation sadly deficient in moral virtue”. The discussions of “wildness” runs through three plays. Here, Hals wildness not only marks his uncivil ways of lifestyle but also states his marginal political status. As I shall argue, Hals mobility is that of a carriage which, in early modern England, assisted him between his walls and his fields. In the discourse of politics, Hals wildness works as carriages wheels turning between the court and the wilderness. As Turner rightly suggests that many aspects of sociological theory are conceived by means of metaphor. “Metaphors enable images to be drawn, possibilities for understanding to be expanded and insights deepened” (Turner, 2010, p. 35).

    The purpose of the metaphor of the wildness builds on what was uncovered in Hals military intentions. Speaking of Hals later politeness and civility, there are still some ambivalence which combines pleasant behaviour with an intention to hide unpleasant intentions. As Peltonen says “civil courtesy and conversation made up a pleasing sociability whose purpose was to gain other peoples approval and respect” (Peltonen, 2003, p. 22). Henrys ambitions are hidden there. At first he is the prince Hal, and then he becomes the King Henry, Hals social mobility is not vertical but horizonal in nature. His social wildness seems tamed by his errand of civility and by means of social mobility converts what is wild into what exemplifies the status: its capacity to mobilize.

    Mobility as a Way of Figuring Wildness

    Henrys wildness varies according to his different roles in King Henry IV and King Henry V. To be specific, Henrys wildness is evident yet invisible when he was the Prince of Wales and later King Henry the fifth, respectively. As the Prince of Wales, Henry was young, passionate, free, tameless and evidently wild. As the King Henry the fifth, Henry was clearly far away from his wilder days and became this calm, cautious, responsible and tactical figure. Henry indeed inherited his “wildness” from his father. It was his father Henry IV who succeeded in ascending the throne through his own “wildness”. When it comes to wildness, it is completely different when you are a king. Henrys wildness in this new figure can be invisible to my way of thinking. His wildness is maintained within mobility. Thus, Mobility as a way of figuring wildness enriches the characteristics of Henry as a king in the early modern period.

    One meaning of the word mobility is the ability to move between different levels in society. Although Hals social status had not changed much, his political status is drastically inconsistent. He went from powerless to powerful. In this way, he is capable of controlling desires in political contexts. I intend to discuss how Hals wildness runs through as a metaphorical mobility. And I plan to explore Henry V from a new perspective to explain why this is a very favourite monarch with the English nation.

    There are two kinds of mobilities to be discussed in my thesis—mobility of places and mobility of ideas. The reason why I divide mobility into these two kinds is because of the meaning of the word “wildness”. Basically, wildness is the quality in feelings of being strong and hard to control. But “wildness” also contains the meaning of a place. As the Prince of Wales, Henry spent most of his time at public roads, camps, fields and mostly at Boars Head Tavern rather than palace. As the King Henry the fifth, Henry spent most of his time at English camps and the fields of battle rather than palace as well. Henrys wildness and ambition, whether as a prince or king, is performanced through places outside the palace. And then the second mobility of ideas as a way of figuring wildness. Henry, the Prince of Wales, is mingled with the crowd in Henry IV and become determined and thoughtful later as the King Henry the fifth. The evidence for Henrys disguised wildness is that he keeps on asking his ministers questions about all these affairs about his kingdom. This may be due to the disguise that he is learning to be a proper monarch. Through the analysis of Henrys ideas at different times, it is of great help to understand the mobility in his wildness.

    Hals wildness in Henry IV and Henry V is more metaphorical and political. I am going to discuss the“wildness” through political discourse. The so-called uncultivated, unhabited, inhospitable region and undesirable status have specific innate qualities especially when discussing it in political context. Obviously, from the text, when Henry V was the prince, he was full of wildness with “his companies unletterd, rude, and shallow” and “his hours filld up with riots, banquets, sports”, “and never noted in him any study, any retirement, any sequestration from open haunts and popularity” (Henry V, 1.1: 56-59). According to Hotspur, Prince Hal was the nimble-footed madcap Prince of Wales in Act 4 of Henry IV Part 1. In addition, Henry IV believed Prince Hal had “such inordiant and low desires, such poor, such bare, such lewd, such mean attempts, such barren pleasures, rude society” (Henry IV Part 1, 3.2: 12-14). On the one hand, these words, such as rude, poor, bare and barren, are closely related to the natural wildness. On the other hand, it implies Prince Hals marginal political status. In addition to these words mentioned above, many other words used in King Henry IV and King Henry V were related to natural wildness. At this time, Prince Hal was margianlized and was excluded from the political centre and power centre. Prince Hal was not recognized by the monarch and the aristocracy. Like the civilized man and the barbarian, the chosen man of god and the lost lamb, Prince Hal was something between because of his contradictory identity. He was raised as a prince but defined as a savage who deviated from the course of his life.

    Of course, it is conceivable that he has to choose where he belongs to avoid a crisis of kingship. The death of Henry IV is the turning point. After the death of King Henry IV, Henry V says “that I have turnd away my former self, so will I those that kept me company” (Henry IV Part 2, 5.5: 63-64), what followed was a credible monarch. However, everything happened naturally. What about those recurring doubts about King Henry Vs wildness? Here I dont think that Prince Hal is always wild just as King Henry V is always civil. Hals “wildness”is disguised and fucnctional. Prince Hal made it clear that he uses his wild behaviours as a means to prove himeself later. As you can see that he says “Ill so offend to make offense a skill; redeeming time when men think least I will” (Henry IV Part 1, 1.2: 238-239). Here he is either willful or tactical. He cannot be defined one-sidedly. Whether as the Prince Hal or King Henry V, he still keeps in the habit of enjoying a moment alone, he also lacks displine or restraint as he enjoys to disguise himself as a common man. He is regarded as “a most princely hypocrite” (Henry IV Part, 2 2.2: 61). Prince Hal made a promise to King Henry IV, “I shall hereafter, my thrice gracious lord, be more myself” (Henry IV Part 1, 3.2: 92-93). This “myself” is anything but defined by others. King Henry IV once drew an analogy between Hal and Richard II, Henry IV and Henry Percy, “for all the world, as thou art to this hour was Richard then when I from France set foot at Ravenspurgh and even as I was then is Percy now” (Henry IV Part 1, 3.2: 94-96). However, this “myself” differs from Prince Harry, differs from Richard II, differs from the old King Henry IV. This “myself” a new Kings self. King Henry Vs identity is multiple, contradictory yet harmonious. His wildness is disguised and metaphorical.

    Various contexts work meanwhile have supported the above discussions. King Henry the fifth questions“May I with right and conscience make this claim?” (Henry V, 1.2: 96). Though his subjects answer their new kings doubts with persuasive assumptions and evidences. King Henry V seems to be assured but still keeps doubting inside his subconscious. He keeps mentions words as “barbarous” “wilder” from “and we understand him well, how he comes oer us with our wilder days, not measuring what use we made of them. We never valued this poor seat of England; and therefore, living licence, did give ourself to barbarous licence; as tis ever common that men are merriest when they are from home” (Henry V, 1.2: 266-272). A similar statement concerning “give furtherance to our expedition” finds a place in “therefore let every man now task his thought, that this fair action may on foot be brought (King V, 1.2: 309-310)”. This notice is clearly the testimony of figuring wildness.

    Upon making inquiries at mobilities, I found the boundaries between wildness and civility had been melted from Henrys insights. Hostess of the Boardd Head Tavern has marked that “The king has killed his heart (Henry V, 2.1: 92)”. There is some other aspect in connection with Henrys politics of place which has been offered previously. Henry, as a King, is fierce but sophiscated in many obvious talks, to have been discussed by all kinds of characters; and his house of monarchy is still indicated in his detour of motion, which stands for the constant determinations on his quest both to restrain his wildness and to his pursuit of own historical achievement. It is thus a not spontaneous growing-up among his companions off the court. Being an expected and appropriate ruler, it is probable that the past might have been placed under his subconscious in the grevious and dangerous environment. That King Henry himself acts as a wholesome male to his people, is of course a resolute policy; in fact, it would appear, his obscure mobility as a model. From the above we learn that “The king is a good king; but it must be as it may; he passes some humours and careers (Henry V, 2.2: 133)”. It can be marked that Henry as a King needed the support from identically himeself as a growing monarch, which we have heard were metaphors of the military situations at battlefield. There is also a claim of difficulties in his mobility. Under a disguised and sophiscated of the barbarous habits he rebels more than one time would be appointed to link this previous state, and approves the attemptations are the fileds for his motivation.

    The perfect character of King Henry the fifth have put up a fight to try to ward ogg his inner beast. He claims:“Now, fie upon my false French! ……yet my blood begins to flatter me that thou dost, notwithstanding the poor and untempering effect of my visage! He was thinking of civil wars when he got me: Therefore was I created with a stubborn outside, with an aspect of iron, that, when I come to woo ladies I fright them” (Henry V, 5.2: 235-239). If this analysis of wildness and civility by the means of language usage is credible, there will find more textuals to support the idea. According to William Fulwood (1568), “polite conversations and discourse had come to be regarded as a key social activity, loaded with implications for the prestige of participants” (p. 13). He distinguishes between superlative terms of respect required in addressing superioes, the “familiar reverence” to be emplyed with equals, and the plainness reserved for inferiors. In King Henry IV Act 1, Falstaff uses the plainness for Prince Hal, such as “now, Hal, what time of day is it, lad?”. He considers Hal as equals at least. If this fits Hals wildness at that time, the situation does not become better when Hal becomes the King. In early modern period, “the most obvious element in verbal deference was the use of formal titles in salytation and discourse.” People should greet a superior or stranger with his proper title, and also to repeat the title at intervals during the exchang. However, in King Henry V, nobleman like the Archbishop of Canterbury only addresses King Henry V as decent as “full of grace and fair regard (Henry V, 1.1)” only few times. The second time he addresses in the same scence King as “this King”. From the following conversations, it is clearly to find out that the Canterbury directly address King Henry V as pronouns, such as “his hours”, “his youth”, “he seems”. In sixteenth and seventeenth century, “Clamorousness, the swallowing of words, stammering, and uncertainty in delivery were all considered to show a vulgar subjection to impulse and personal eccentricity inconsistent with the self-mastery of the ‘civil gentleman.” Most of the characters at beginning in King Henry V shows uncertainty toward the disappearance of King Henry Vs wildness. I suppose this is the mirroring of King Henry Vs social wildness. Prince Hal is swaying from side to side.

    In detail, Hal acts surprisingly for suppressing his personal desire as a king and later learn to build a community. To my way of thinking, in contrast to his wildness, his civility manifests itself in the correctness of his religious belief, his kindness and mercy towards his subordinates, his skills of speech, the change of his way of addressing somebody and his humour. It is uplifting to come into ambition, as it were, with his great potentials, whose whole existence was intensifying. His mobility invests with improvement everything with which he has been reframed.

    Conclusion

    As proverb in early modern period, the wild man is lurking within every man. Prince Hal and King Henrys wildness is a dimensional object in Shakespeares these three history plays and is used in a mobile way to emphasize the dubious monarch. The two patterns types King shortly as an imprudent and ambitious king. Both patterns explain largely consistent actions by his main identities which characterize, or, reframe them, and through struggles with his wildness in the wilderness of settlements. In any case great entanglement is maintained between every line of the play. And it is especially in this shifting mobility between, on the one hand, Hals wildness, on the other, King Henrys mobility as way of figuring wildness, that the deliberate, ordered, rational powers of a Wild Man in early modern stage are uncovered. As there is a native wildness in every man, and there is a social model in every society.

    References

    Bryson, A. (1998). From courtesy to civility: Changing codes of conduct in early modern England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Dudley, E., & Maximillian, E. (Eds.). (1972). The wild man within: An image in western thought from the renaissance to romanticism. London: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Fulwood, W. (1568). The enimie of idlenesse: Teaching the manner and stile how to endite, compose and write all sorts of epistles and letters. London: Leonard Maylard.

    Hazlitt, W. (1818). Characters of Shakespeares plays (2nd, ed.). London: Taylor and Hessey.

    Jucker, A. H. (2020). Politeness in the history of English: From the middle ages to the present day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Leerssen, J. (1995). wildness, wilderness, and Ireland: Medieval and early-modern patterns in the demarcation of civility. Journal of the History of Ideas, 56(1), 25-39.

    Peltonen, M. (2003). The duel in early modern England: Civility, politeness and honour. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Richards, J. (2003). Early modern civil discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.

    Rollison, D. (1999). Exploding England: The dialectics of mobility and settlement in early modern England. Social History, 24(1), 1-16.

    Shakespeare, W. (1943). The complete works of William Shakespeare. W. J. Craig (Ed.). London: Oxford University Press.

    Taylor, G., & Jowett, J. (Eds.). (2016). The New Oxford Shakespeare: The complete works modern critical edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Thomas, K. (2018). In pursuit of civility: Manners and civilization in early modern England. London: Yale University Press.

    Turner, C. (2010). Investigating sociological theory. London: Sage.

    “wildness, n.” OED Online, Oxford University Press, September 2020, Retrevided from www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/229017.

    国产国语露脸激情在线看| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 国产精品永久免费网站| av国产精品久久久久影院| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸 | 日本 av在线| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 在线免费观看的www视频| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲av美国av| 国产精品二区激情视频| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 长腿黑丝高跟| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 中出人妻视频一区二区| 一区在线观看完整版| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 在线播放国产精品三级| 午夜久久久在线观看| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 美国免费a级毛片| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| www.自偷自拍.com| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 悠悠久久av| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 自线自在国产av| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| bbb黄色大片| 在线av久久热| 国产高清videossex| 欧美大码av| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 日本免费a在线| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 女警被强在线播放| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 在线观看日韩欧美| 久久性视频一级片| 嫩草影视91久久| 日本五十路高清| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 免费av毛片视频| 黄色视频不卡| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 久久精品成人免费网站| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 视频区图区小说| 夫妻午夜视频| 国产精品野战在线观看 | 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产不卡一卡二| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 亚洲,欧美精品.| av有码第一页| 满18在线观看网站| 中文欧美无线码| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 久久中文字幕一级| 中国美女看黄片| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| netflix在线观看网站| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 多毛熟女@视频| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 亚洲第一av免费看| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 天天添夜夜摸| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 成人影院久久| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 自线自在国产av| 午夜福利,免费看| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| bbb黄色大片| 夫妻午夜视频| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 亚洲国产看品久久| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 99久久人妻综合| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 精品福利观看| 久久久久久人人人人人| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 美女福利国产在线| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 99久久人妻综合| 在线免费观看的www视频| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 女警被强在线播放| 91大片在线观看| 午夜91福利影院| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 视频区图区小说| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国产av又大| av福利片在线| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | ponron亚洲| 国产高清激情床上av| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 久99久视频精品免费| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 夜夜爽天天搞| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 怎么达到女性高潮| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 97碰自拍视频| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 免费在线观看日本一区| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 日本wwww免费看| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 亚洲激情在线av| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 97碰自拍视频| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 久久香蕉激情| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 午夜精品在线福利| 在线播放国产精品三级| 欧美性长视频在线观看| av中文乱码字幕在线| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 男人操女人黄网站| 成人影院久久| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 亚洲九九香蕉| 久久香蕉激情| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| a级毛片在线看网站| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 精品电影一区二区在线| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 天堂√8在线中文| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 久久香蕉精品热| 免费av毛片视频| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 自线自在国产av| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 99香蕉大伊视频| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 欧美午夜高清在线| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 中国美女看黄片| 制服人妻中文乱码| 在线观看www视频免费| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 欧美乱妇无乱码| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 亚洲av成人av| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 久久青草综合色| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 91成年电影在线观看| a级毛片在线看网站| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 午夜免费观看网址| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 午夜免费鲁丝| www.自偷自拍.com| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产不卡一卡二| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 人人澡人人妻人| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 咕卡用的链子| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 99久久国产精品久久久| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 午夜福利欧美成人| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 香蕉丝袜av| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 宅男免费午夜| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 亚洲国产欧美网| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 丁香六月欧美| 日本五十路高清| 在线看a的网站| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜 | 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 一a级毛片在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 精品日产1卡2卡| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜 | 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| www国产在线视频色| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| www国产在线视频色| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 欧美在线黄色| 91国产中文字幕| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 久久人妻av系列| 国产精品影院久久| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 国产又爽黄色视频| 国产色视频综合| 超碰成人久久| 亚洲av美国av| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 黄色成人免费大全| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 久久香蕉精品热| 日韩欧美免费精品| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| av中文乱码字幕在线| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 国产野战对白在线观看| 91国产中文字幕| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 免费av毛片视频| 国产成人av教育| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 大码成人一级视频| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 人人澡人人妻人| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| www国产在线视频色| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜 | 欧美午夜高清在线| 女警被强在线播放| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 级片在线观看| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 免费在线观看日本一区| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 成人三级做爰电影| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 一级毛片高清免费大全| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 窝窝影院91人妻| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 免费高清视频大片| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 国产av在哪里看| 久久久久九九精品影院| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 国产精品二区激情视频| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 国产精品二区激情视频| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 在线观看www视频免费| 在线看a的网站| 91在线观看av| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 成人三级做爰电影| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲人成电影观看| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产又爽黄色视频| 久久这里只有精品19| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 热re99久久国产66热| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 国产精品野战在线观看 | 日韩欧美在线二视频| av中文乱码字幕在线| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 国产av精品麻豆| 怎么达到女性高潮| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 999精品在线视频| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 黄片播放在线免费| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 一区二区三区精品91| 欧美日韩精品网址| 久久中文字幕一级| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 亚洲久久久国产精品| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 国产在线观看jvid| 在线av久久热| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 男人操女人黄网站| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 超碰成人久久| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 在线国产一区二区在线| 黄色视频不卡| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 色综合婷婷激情| 亚洲中文av在线| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 女警被强在线播放| 身体一侧抽搐| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 免费看十八禁软件| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 一夜夜www| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 午夜免费观看网址| 在线播放国产精品三级| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 成人国语在线视频| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 午夜老司机福利片| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 一区在线观看完整版| 欧美成人午夜精品| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 午夜激情av网站| 一级片免费观看大全| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 身体一侧抽搐| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 操出白浆在线播放| 18禁观看日本| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 日韩免费av在线播放| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 久久性视频一级片| 在线观看www视频免费| 久久性视频一级片| 身体一侧抽搐| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 亚洲 国产 在线| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 在线视频色国产色| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 午夜福利欧美成人| 国产激情久久老熟女| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 长腿黑丝高跟| 国产精品野战在线观看 | 亚洲国产欧美网| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 美女福利国产在线| 日本免费a在线| 9热在线视频观看99| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 国产成人系列免费观看| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 黄色女人牲交| 怎么达到女性高潮| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 97碰自拍视频| 性欧美人与动物交配| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| a级毛片在线看网站| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| xxx96com| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 国产免费现黄频在线看| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 久久亚洲真实| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产成人av教育| 国产成人系列免费观看| 高清av免费在线| 深夜精品福利| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 99re在线观看精品视频| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 日韩欧美免费精品| 亚洲专区字幕在线|