• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    “Wildness”Within Mobility in Shakespeare’s King Henry IV and Henry Ⅴ

    2021-02-19 10:39:28ZHANGHan
    Journal of Literature and Art Studies 2021年8期

    ZHANG Han

    In the past fifty years, scholars have examined fields of Englands politics in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries; however, the politics of mobility has not been extensively studied. This article addresses Prince Hal and King Henry Ⅴs wildness within mobility as an important role to the advancement of metaphorical wildness. King Henry Vs “wildness” is an element that is often discussed in Shakespeares Henry IV and Henry Ⅴ. Locating in Prince Hals wandering to uncertainty, unsettledness and changeability a potential to unveil the disguised aspects of the assumed politics, Shakespeare focuses on the interlocking aspect of wildness and mobility. He calls for exploring a recognition of ideal character and tactical figure into a transitional strategy of it. In reorganising civil culture, Shakespeare sees the possibility of re-configuring the approach from aimless roaming to communal mobility. It is the approach of these mobilities through ways of wildnes that permits us to explore between wildness as a strategy and as a metaphor, and to understand in the notion of early modern mobility that is as tactical in ambition as it is consequential in such contexts of Shakespeare.

    Keywords: wildness, mobility, Shakespeare, Prince Hal, King Henry IV, King Henry V

    Introduction

    Many critics referred to the many qualities of King Henry V. According to A. W. Schlegel (1808-9) in The New Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works, King Henry the fifth is “as endowed with every chivalrous and kingly virtue; open, sincere, affable, yet still disposed to innocent raillery”. William Hazlitt believes that King Henry V “was careless, dissolute, and ambitious;—idle, or doing mischief…h(huán)e seemed to have no idea of any rule of right and wrong, but brute force, glossed over with a little religious hypocrisy and archiepiscopal advice…there is he a very amiable monster” (Hazlitt, 1818, p. 20). Although most critics from the old generations have noticed Hals multi-faceted qualities, they took it as an adjective rather than discuss its formation under ocurring wildness in depth.

    I aim to discuss the specific manifestation of his civility and the condition which promotes Hals wildness into civility. Moreover, I will also explain that the interrelationship between his wildness and civility is related to his mobility. As I have stressed earlier that there are two kinds of mobility I would like to discuss in this article, the mobility of places and the mobility of ideas. What I intend to further illustrate is that Prince Hals mobility is transformed from aimless roaming into meaningful communal mobility, according to his transition between his wildness and civility. This article argues that Henry makes the transition from wildness to civility within mobility as a way of self-fashioning model. In the early modern period, the foreign trend of the state is gradually taking place from the exploration of individual or minority travellers to the people as a resolute community, which is a symbol of transition of the ever-changing early modern period.

    Two parts, patterns of Prince Hals wildness and mobility as a way of figuring wildness will be discussed in this paper. The first part is a brief introduction of the basic concepts about the Wild Man in different periods, as well as Hals wildness shaping his courtsey. And then my own understanding of the wildness in Henry IV and Henry V will be put forward. The second part will analyze in detail about Henry Vs wildness in mobility of places and in details about Henry Vs wildness through mobility of ideas. I intend to interpret the significance of mobility in wildness in Shakespeares these three historical plays. Wildness appears very frequently in Henry IV and Henry V. And the wildness is not deeply exploring in the description of the characters. Because these characters in the plays all agree that Henrys wildness has disappeared after Henry Vs accession naturally. Through the discussion in this paper, the wildness is worth exploring and the disappearance of the wildness may not necessarily be a good thing. Unlike The Tempest, the ideal society portrayed by Shakespeare in Henry IV and Henry V is the possibility that the wild man can be in every man. The wildness coexists within mobility. King Henry Vs metaphorical wildness may be a good way to study mobility in early modern England.

    Patterns of Hals Wildness

    The disappearance of Prince Hals wildness has been discussed continually in Henry V. Hals wildness is not“barbarous” in the traditional sense. From the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), the word wildness means“uncivilized or uncultured state or character (of persons); savagery; barbarity; roughness of manners”,“uncultivated state (of a plant)” as in “Our vineyards, Fallowes, Meades, and Hedges, Defectiue in their natures, grow to wildnesse”, and also has comparably similarly meaning of “unstrained condition or quality”, especially“want of, resistance to, or freedom from restraint or control (with various shades of meaning)”.

    Most of these three historical plays talk about Prince Hal getting rid of his wildness, which I think is the opposite. Through the disguise of Prince Hals wildness in different identities, Prince Hal uses his disguised wildness as a political strategy to cope with his new identity, the King. In the past, he was uninhibited, wandering in the wild. After becoming a King, he well concealed his wildness in dealing with both domestic and foreign issues. The reason for this may be that being a monarch requires reliable quality for the sake of stability and loyalty. Prince Hal has inherited this “wildness” from his aristocratic father. Henry IVs expedition to the holy land was motivated by his own atonement, and then he confessed to his son that this was just a way to distract from domestic contradictions. This can be a manifestation of variable wildness.

    An anxious struggle between personal pursuit and royal expansionism lies at the heart of the motion of Hal. Though stressing the descriptive wildness that the patterns of wildness builds up, Leerssen basically differentiate wildness with patterns of motivation. Apart from this, Leerssen famously emphasized that wildness has a connotation of being “unruly, erratic, incomprehensible and surprising” (Leerssen, 1995, p. 31). Other than Prince Hals unruly quality, his surprising sides are more worth exploring. However, texts, even if Hal appreciate royal status in one civic culture, do not simply proceed of his own wandering. His motion to cut across political territories hinges on the region of court, politics and strategies and is thus related to a variety of potraits that are social, political and literary. Shakespeare stresses that power of politics generates considerable effect on patterns of Hals so-called wildness and may stimulate or oppose its ambitions.

    According to Hayden White, the Wild Man during the early modern period should be distinguished from“the Noble Savage”. Wildnesss latin form is “savagery”. The notion of wildness mainly contains barbarity and roughness. In part, concepts like “savagery” and “wildness” expressed this longing for completed ordered self-centered way of life in those regions of the world for setting up civilized fantasies. Before fatasies could begin perfecting nature, they needed the wilderness—the jungle, forest, desert, and mountains. The Myth of the Noble Savage advised readers to understand the idea that there is a native wildness in every man that had been poorly destroyed but offered little advice on how to release them properly. This description exposed one of the main contradictions underlying both civilized and primitive huamanity. The mans pressure on the depressed labor and lands implied that his desires and anxieties should be treated as equal. At the same time, the generation of myth and the transition to fiction myth emerging from the characterization without any construction seemed to attribute the existence of wild things. Yet although historic humanization might have seemed like mad man, it was not actually. As an achieved with unified and imperfect humanity organized, without a single group even civilized man was wild. Without the human wild actions advocated by native wildness, historical emotions of manking could come into the chaoes itself. Nontheless, the unified and imperfect humanity was clear that although all wild man required a division of humanity, the forms of humanity should acquire moral norms if possible. As the early modern realistic concentration asserted, early modern English people needed differentness. Reassuring English people that Shakespeares characters in plays resembled England reflected humanistic variations that human nature achieved it in the initial community.

    To be specific, King Henry is not the uncivilized man who lives in caves in the mountains or forest. And He does speak human language. Then where does his wildness come from? Peoples references to Prince Hals wildness is reflected in his character and casual way of life. In detail, Hal acts surprisingly for suppressing his personal desire as a king and later learn to build a community. To my way of thinking, in contrast to his wildness, his civility manifests itself in the correctness of his religious belief, his kindness and mercy towards his subordinates, his skills of speech, the change of his way of addressing somebody and his humour. As the Prince of Wales, he is away from the court and spends time with his unlettered, rude and shallow companions. After he became the King Henry, this way of self-centred life was replaced by his act of duty without any notice. As King Henry V, he is far away from his wildness and returns to his home as well as the court. His duty is well depicted through his civility and civilized manners. He turns into this calm, cautious, responsible, merciful, potent and tactical figure.

    The patterns of Hals wildness employes to describe the figural motion in taverns and court differed, but the underlying emotions is not the same. There are two patterns concerning Hals wildness. One can be concluded to as a circle of court, and the other is a solution from a self-centered way of life to a community-oriented responsibility. The First Part of King Henry the Fourth, The Second Part of King Henry the Fourth and The Life of King Henry the Fifth, those Shakespeares history plays, explores the historically controversies between abundant internal and external changes in sixteenth and seventeenth century, an age which sees the initiating of mass-mobilizing to early modern England. Shakespeare for introducing Prince Hal combining the coming-of-age story of Hal, lowlife humanises, to express his more complete view of surroundings, promoting his struggles to stay in control of the situation that revolves around Hals personal interest. At the center of the story are Christian kings, self-doubtful soldiers, life-long companions, having full of doubts “I do not think a vraver gentleman, more active-valiant or more valiant-young, more daring or bold, is now alive to grace this latter age with noble deeds. For my part, I may speak it to my shame, I have a truant been to chivalry; and so I hear he doth account me too” (King Henry IV Part 1, 5.1: 89-95). Together with other, images of Henry, he struggles to cope with this“circle of court”. At first, Prince Hal is away from his fathers court as a discursively freeman in some way. And then he almost indulges himself in this wonderland of wildness with pretencious transformation. This can be viewed as a necessarily self-centered alteration. In such a context of Hals idleness, distance and reassurance, Shakespeares use of justifying fifures for both Henrys presence and heroic claims becomes an inventive means of shape of royal figure.

    The patterns of Hals wildness are the subject of this part is a process of unquestionable “journey of discovery”. I may now be allowed to observe the second pattern of Hals wildness, that is a reliable solution from a self-centered way of life to a community-oriented responsibility. In the first place, the returning of royal court and palace prior to the widespread acceptance are quite rare; and I believe the rivalries between Prince Hal and King Henry IV, between French and England in question is a specific situation of such attemption claiming to belong to the sixteenth century of Shakespeares age. Hals knowledge of kinship, we therefore see, was limited to two-faced civility. He states that “will awhile uphold the unyold humour of your idleness: yet herein will I imitate the sun, who doth permit the base contagious clouds to smother up his beauty from the world, that when he please again to be himself being wanted, he may be more wonderd at, by breaking through the foul and ugly mists of vapours that did seem to strangle him” (King Henry IV Part 1, 2.2: 217-225). Perhaps this is the point where I should observe the more I have to say citing behaviour of nobles, mentioned suspiciously also, as I have already observed in the beginning. The civility and nobility of its having been observed in the circling mobility of Hal clung to the conversion. It is described by King Henry V in “my father is gone wild into his grave” as “mingle with the state of floods and flow henceforth in formal majesty”. Readers of the play could naturally inquire about the monarch-based wildness. This wildness within wilderness has drastic advances of Hals later action and motivation.

    According to Hayden White, during the transitional period between medieval and the early modern ages, many viewers took a more ambivalent attitude, on both the desirability of both idealizing the Wild Man and also the possibility of escaping civilization. Speaking of Wild Man in Shakespeares plays, the most commonly discussed play is The Tempest. However, the spatialization of the Wild Man does not work out in Henry V as it in The Tempest. First of all, King Henry the fifth is not the Wild Man in the traditional sense. And then Henrys wildness is more like self-fashioning within mobility rather than a distanced fantasy world. The whole play, Henry V, is filled with characters constant discussions about Henrys vanishing disappearing wildness. This thesis argues that Henrys metaphorical wildness is under disguised by using different mobilities of places and of ideas as an innovative way of figuring early modern society. Mobility is no longer simply bad or good, but a more neutral attempt will be made to govern a kingdom.

    Rollison believes that the centre of this universe leads to the “prince” and there is a “vast wall” which exudes power and authority surrounds his park. I agree with this spatial imagination to help to understand kingship(Rollison, 1999, p. 6). However, the princes road to the centre of the power isnt entirely roses all the way. For a long time, critics have long been studied King Henry Vs image as ditchotomy: “Henry as ideal ruler and brutal conqueror”; or as “a politically strong monarch and weak human being”; or “Harry as model ruler saddled with a nation sadly deficient in moral virtue”. The discussions of “wildness” runs through three plays. Here, Hals wildness not only marks his uncivil ways of lifestyle but also states his marginal political status. As I shall argue, Hals mobility is that of a carriage which, in early modern England, assisted him between his walls and his fields. In the discourse of politics, Hals wildness works as carriages wheels turning between the court and the wilderness. As Turner rightly suggests that many aspects of sociological theory are conceived by means of metaphor. “Metaphors enable images to be drawn, possibilities for understanding to be expanded and insights deepened” (Turner, 2010, p. 35).

    The purpose of the metaphor of the wildness builds on what was uncovered in Hals military intentions. Speaking of Hals later politeness and civility, there are still some ambivalence which combines pleasant behaviour with an intention to hide unpleasant intentions. As Peltonen says “civil courtesy and conversation made up a pleasing sociability whose purpose was to gain other peoples approval and respect” (Peltonen, 2003, p. 22). Henrys ambitions are hidden there. At first he is the prince Hal, and then he becomes the King Henry, Hals social mobility is not vertical but horizonal in nature. His social wildness seems tamed by his errand of civility and by means of social mobility converts what is wild into what exemplifies the status: its capacity to mobilize.

    Mobility as a Way of Figuring Wildness

    Henrys wildness varies according to his different roles in King Henry IV and King Henry V. To be specific, Henrys wildness is evident yet invisible when he was the Prince of Wales and later King Henry the fifth, respectively. As the Prince of Wales, Henry was young, passionate, free, tameless and evidently wild. As the King Henry the fifth, Henry was clearly far away from his wilder days and became this calm, cautious, responsible and tactical figure. Henry indeed inherited his “wildness” from his father. It was his father Henry IV who succeeded in ascending the throne through his own “wildness”. When it comes to wildness, it is completely different when you are a king. Henrys wildness in this new figure can be invisible to my way of thinking. His wildness is maintained within mobility. Thus, Mobility as a way of figuring wildness enriches the characteristics of Henry as a king in the early modern period.

    One meaning of the word mobility is the ability to move between different levels in society. Although Hals social status had not changed much, his political status is drastically inconsistent. He went from powerless to powerful. In this way, he is capable of controlling desires in political contexts. I intend to discuss how Hals wildness runs through as a metaphorical mobility. And I plan to explore Henry V from a new perspective to explain why this is a very favourite monarch with the English nation.

    There are two kinds of mobilities to be discussed in my thesis—mobility of places and mobility of ideas. The reason why I divide mobility into these two kinds is because of the meaning of the word “wildness”. Basically, wildness is the quality in feelings of being strong and hard to control. But “wildness” also contains the meaning of a place. As the Prince of Wales, Henry spent most of his time at public roads, camps, fields and mostly at Boars Head Tavern rather than palace. As the King Henry the fifth, Henry spent most of his time at English camps and the fields of battle rather than palace as well. Henrys wildness and ambition, whether as a prince or king, is performanced through places outside the palace. And then the second mobility of ideas as a way of figuring wildness. Henry, the Prince of Wales, is mingled with the crowd in Henry IV and become determined and thoughtful later as the King Henry the fifth. The evidence for Henrys disguised wildness is that he keeps on asking his ministers questions about all these affairs about his kingdom. This may be due to the disguise that he is learning to be a proper monarch. Through the analysis of Henrys ideas at different times, it is of great help to understand the mobility in his wildness.

    Hals wildness in Henry IV and Henry V is more metaphorical and political. I am going to discuss the“wildness” through political discourse. The so-called uncultivated, unhabited, inhospitable region and undesirable status have specific innate qualities especially when discussing it in political context. Obviously, from the text, when Henry V was the prince, he was full of wildness with “his companies unletterd, rude, and shallow” and “his hours filld up with riots, banquets, sports”, “and never noted in him any study, any retirement, any sequestration from open haunts and popularity” (Henry V, 1.1: 56-59). According to Hotspur, Prince Hal was the nimble-footed madcap Prince of Wales in Act 4 of Henry IV Part 1. In addition, Henry IV believed Prince Hal had “such inordiant and low desires, such poor, such bare, such lewd, such mean attempts, such barren pleasures, rude society” (Henry IV Part 1, 3.2: 12-14). On the one hand, these words, such as rude, poor, bare and barren, are closely related to the natural wildness. On the other hand, it implies Prince Hals marginal political status. In addition to these words mentioned above, many other words used in King Henry IV and King Henry V were related to natural wildness. At this time, Prince Hal was margianlized and was excluded from the political centre and power centre. Prince Hal was not recognized by the monarch and the aristocracy. Like the civilized man and the barbarian, the chosen man of god and the lost lamb, Prince Hal was something between because of his contradictory identity. He was raised as a prince but defined as a savage who deviated from the course of his life.

    Of course, it is conceivable that he has to choose where he belongs to avoid a crisis of kingship. The death of Henry IV is the turning point. After the death of King Henry IV, Henry V says “that I have turnd away my former self, so will I those that kept me company” (Henry IV Part 2, 5.5: 63-64), what followed was a credible monarch. However, everything happened naturally. What about those recurring doubts about King Henry Vs wildness? Here I dont think that Prince Hal is always wild just as King Henry V is always civil. Hals “wildness”is disguised and fucnctional. Prince Hal made it clear that he uses his wild behaviours as a means to prove himeself later. As you can see that he says “Ill so offend to make offense a skill; redeeming time when men think least I will” (Henry IV Part 1, 1.2: 238-239). Here he is either willful or tactical. He cannot be defined one-sidedly. Whether as the Prince Hal or King Henry V, he still keeps in the habit of enjoying a moment alone, he also lacks displine or restraint as he enjoys to disguise himself as a common man. He is regarded as “a most princely hypocrite” (Henry IV Part, 2 2.2: 61). Prince Hal made a promise to King Henry IV, “I shall hereafter, my thrice gracious lord, be more myself” (Henry IV Part 1, 3.2: 92-93). This “myself” is anything but defined by others. King Henry IV once drew an analogy between Hal and Richard II, Henry IV and Henry Percy, “for all the world, as thou art to this hour was Richard then when I from France set foot at Ravenspurgh and even as I was then is Percy now” (Henry IV Part 1, 3.2: 94-96). However, this “myself” differs from Prince Harry, differs from Richard II, differs from the old King Henry IV. This “myself” a new Kings self. King Henry Vs identity is multiple, contradictory yet harmonious. His wildness is disguised and metaphorical.

    Various contexts work meanwhile have supported the above discussions. King Henry the fifth questions“May I with right and conscience make this claim?” (Henry V, 1.2: 96). Though his subjects answer their new kings doubts with persuasive assumptions and evidences. King Henry V seems to be assured but still keeps doubting inside his subconscious. He keeps mentions words as “barbarous” “wilder” from “and we understand him well, how he comes oer us with our wilder days, not measuring what use we made of them. We never valued this poor seat of England; and therefore, living licence, did give ourself to barbarous licence; as tis ever common that men are merriest when they are from home” (Henry V, 1.2: 266-272). A similar statement concerning “give furtherance to our expedition” finds a place in “therefore let every man now task his thought, that this fair action may on foot be brought (King V, 1.2: 309-310)”. This notice is clearly the testimony of figuring wildness.

    Upon making inquiries at mobilities, I found the boundaries between wildness and civility had been melted from Henrys insights. Hostess of the Boardd Head Tavern has marked that “The king has killed his heart (Henry V, 2.1: 92)”. There is some other aspect in connection with Henrys politics of place which has been offered previously. Henry, as a King, is fierce but sophiscated in many obvious talks, to have been discussed by all kinds of characters; and his house of monarchy is still indicated in his detour of motion, which stands for the constant determinations on his quest both to restrain his wildness and to his pursuit of own historical achievement. It is thus a not spontaneous growing-up among his companions off the court. Being an expected and appropriate ruler, it is probable that the past might have been placed under his subconscious in the grevious and dangerous environment. That King Henry himself acts as a wholesome male to his people, is of course a resolute policy; in fact, it would appear, his obscure mobility as a model. From the above we learn that “The king is a good king; but it must be as it may; he passes some humours and careers (Henry V, 2.2: 133)”. It can be marked that Henry as a King needed the support from identically himeself as a growing monarch, which we have heard were metaphors of the military situations at battlefield. There is also a claim of difficulties in his mobility. Under a disguised and sophiscated of the barbarous habits he rebels more than one time would be appointed to link this previous state, and approves the attemptations are the fileds for his motivation.

    The perfect character of King Henry the fifth have put up a fight to try to ward ogg his inner beast. He claims:“Now, fie upon my false French! ……yet my blood begins to flatter me that thou dost, notwithstanding the poor and untempering effect of my visage! He was thinking of civil wars when he got me: Therefore was I created with a stubborn outside, with an aspect of iron, that, when I come to woo ladies I fright them” (Henry V, 5.2: 235-239). If this analysis of wildness and civility by the means of language usage is credible, there will find more textuals to support the idea. According to William Fulwood (1568), “polite conversations and discourse had come to be regarded as a key social activity, loaded with implications for the prestige of participants” (p. 13). He distinguishes between superlative terms of respect required in addressing superioes, the “familiar reverence” to be emplyed with equals, and the plainness reserved for inferiors. In King Henry IV Act 1, Falstaff uses the plainness for Prince Hal, such as “now, Hal, what time of day is it, lad?”. He considers Hal as equals at least. If this fits Hals wildness at that time, the situation does not become better when Hal becomes the King. In early modern period, “the most obvious element in verbal deference was the use of formal titles in salytation and discourse.” People should greet a superior or stranger with his proper title, and also to repeat the title at intervals during the exchang. However, in King Henry V, nobleman like the Archbishop of Canterbury only addresses King Henry V as decent as “full of grace and fair regard (Henry V, 1.1)” only few times. The second time he addresses in the same scence King as “this King”. From the following conversations, it is clearly to find out that the Canterbury directly address King Henry V as pronouns, such as “his hours”, “his youth”, “he seems”. In sixteenth and seventeenth century, “Clamorousness, the swallowing of words, stammering, and uncertainty in delivery were all considered to show a vulgar subjection to impulse and personal eccentricity inconsistent with the self-mastery of the ‘civil gentleman.” Most of the characters at beginning in King Henry V shows uncertainty toward the disappearance of King Henry Vs wildness. I suppose this is the mirroring of King Henry Vs social wildness. Prince Hal is swaying from side to side.

    In detail, Hal acts surprisingly for suppressing his personal desire as a king and later learn to build a community. To my way of thinking, in contrast to his wildness, his civility manifests itself in the correctness of his religious belief, his kindness and mercy towards his subordinates, his skills of speech, the change of his way of addressing somebody and his humour. It is uplifting to come into ambition, as it were, with his great potentials, whose whole existence was intensifying. His mobility invests with improvement everything with which he has been reframed.

    Conclusion

    As proverb in early modern period, the wild man is lurking within every man. Prince Hal and King Henrys wildness is a dimensional object in Shakespeares these three history plays and is used in a mobile way to emphasize the dubious monarch. The two patterns types King shortly as an imprudent and ambitious king. Both patterns explain largely consistent actions by his main identities which characterize, or, reframe them, and through struggles with his wildness in the wilderness of settlements. In any case great entanglement is maintained between every line of the play. And it is especially in this shifting mobility between, on the one hand, Hals wildness, on the other, King Henrys mobility as way of figuring wildness, that the deliberate, ordered, rational powers of a Wild Man in early modern stage are uncovered. As there is a native wildness in every man, and there is a social model in every society.

    References

    Bryson, A. (1998). From courtesy to civility: Changing codes of conduct in early modern England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Dudley, E., & Maximillian, E. (Eds.). (1972). The wild man within: An image in western thought from the renaissance to romanticism. London: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Fulwood, W. (1568). The enimie of idlenesse: Teaching the manner and stile how to endite, compose and write all sorts of epistles and letters. London: Leonard Maylard.

    Hazlitt, W. (1818). Characters of Shakespeares plays (2nd, ed.). London: Taylor and Hessey.

    Jucker, A. H. (2020). Politeness in the history of English: From the middle ages to the present day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Leerssen, J. (1995). wildness, wilderness, and Ireland: Medieval and early-modern patterns in the demarcation of civility. Journal of the History of Ideas, 56(1), 25-39.

    Peltonen, M. (2003). The duel in early modern England: Civility, politeness and honour. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Richards, J. (2003). Early modern civil discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.

    Rollison, D. (1999). Exploding England: The dialectics of mobility and settlement in early modern England. Social History, 24(1), 1-16.

    Shakespeare, W. (1943). The complete works of William Shakespeare. W. J. Craig (Ed.). London: Oxford University Press.

    Taylor, G., & Jowett, J. (Eds.). (2016). The New Oxford Shakespeare: The complete works modern critical edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Thomas, K. (2018). In pursuit of civility: Manners and civilization in early modern England. London: Yale University Press.

    Turner, C. (2010). Investigating sociological theory. London: Sage.

    “wildness, n.” OED Online, Oxford University Press, September 2020, Retrevided from www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/229017.

    国产男人的电影天堂91| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 国产综合精华液| 一本一本综合久久| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 国产成人精品福利久久| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 国产色婷婷99| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 99热全是精品| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 少妇熟女欧美另类| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 午夜日本视频在线| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 一夜夜www| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 午夜免费观看性视频| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 在线免费观看的www视频| 97热精品久久久久久| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 免费av毛片视频| 美女主播在线视频| 热99在线观看视频| 国产精品一及| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 日日啪夜夜撸| 69人妻影院| 久久草成人影院| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 国产av不卡久久| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 日本一本二区三区精品| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 亚洲av一区综合| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 免费看不卡的av| 少妇高潮的动态图| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 有码 亚洲区| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 精品久久久久久久久av| 一夜夜www| 老司机影院成人| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 男女那种视频在线观看| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 色网站视频免费| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| av免费观看日本| 亚洲av成人av| 三级国产精品片| 麻豆成人av视频| 国产 一区精品| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产高清三级在线| freevideosex欧美| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 在线免费十八禁| 少妇的逼水好多| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 午夜福利视频精品| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产高潮美女av| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 黄色配什么色好看| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 51国产日韩欧美| 尾随美女入室| 热99在线观看视频| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 精品国产三级普通话版| 久久久久网色| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 欧美3d第一页| 熟女电影av网| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 亚洲性久久影院| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 欧美激情在线99| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产一级毛片在线| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 九九在线视频观看精品| 如何舔出高潮| 精品酒店卫生间| 国产精品一及| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 欧美+日韩+精品| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 三级经典国产精品| 一级毛片电影观看| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 免费av毛片视频| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 搞女人的毛片| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 春色校园在线视频观看| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| www.色视频.com| 久久久久网色| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| ponron亚洲| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 天堂网av新在线| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 免费av观看视频| 成年人午夜在线观看视频 | 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| av在线老鸭窝| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 欧美性感艳星| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产成人一区二区在线| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 91久久精品电影网| 高清av免费在线| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 天堂√8在线中文| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 在线观看人妻少妇| 欧美日韩在线观看h| videossex国产| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 久久草成人影院| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 午夜福利视频精品| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 国产乱来视频区| 免费av不卡在线播放| 床上黄色一级片| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 性色avwww在线观看| 在线播放无遮挡| 免费av毛片视频| a级毛色黄片| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 中国国产av一级| av黄色大香蕉| 国产极品天堂在线| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 特级一级黄色大片| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 六月丁香七月| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 99热这里只有是精品50| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 99热6这里只有精品| 全区人妻精品视频| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 国产精品久久视频播放| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 久久久久国产网址| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 午夜福利在线在线| 久久久久网色| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 日韩欧美 国产精品| 免费观看性生交大片5| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 男女那种视频在线观看| .国产精品久久| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 观看美女的网站| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 看黄色毛片网站| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产乱来视频区| 搞女人的毛片| 国产 一区精品| 嫩草影院入口| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 色网站视频免费| 草草在线视频免费看| 久久久久九九精品影院| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产老妇女一区| av免费观看日本| 毛片女人毛片| 国产成人一区二区在线| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 如何舔出高潮| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 色播亚洲综合网| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 精品久久久久久久久av| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| a级毛色黄片| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 青春草国产在线视频| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 色网站视频免费| 高清av免费在线| 三级国产精品片| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| av一本久久久久| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| kizo精华| 深夜a级毛片| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 亚洲精品视频女| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 国产极品天堂在线| 免费观看性生交大片5| 99久久人妻综合| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 两个人的视频大全免费| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲av.av天堂| 久99久视频精品免费| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 美女国产视频在线观看| 成年人午夜在线观看视频 | 精品酒店卫生间| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 特级一级黄色大片| 久久这里只有精品中国| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 亚洲在线观看片| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 插逼视频在线观看| 777米奇影视久久| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 日本与韩国留学比较| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 97超碰精品成人国产| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 欧美激情在线99| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 五月天丁香电影| 久久久久久久久中文| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 久久97久久精品| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 99热6这里只有精品| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 一级黄片播放器| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 一级黄片播放器| 久久99精品国语久久久| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| av免费观看日本| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 综合色av麻豆| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 观看美女的网站| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 免费观看精品视频网站| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 男女边摸边吃奶| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 日韩视频在线欧美| 中文天堂在线官网| 嫩草影院精品99| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 麻豆成人av视频| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 久久久久久久国产电影| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 欧美zozozo另类| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 中文欧美无线码| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 色综合色国产| 乱人视频在线观看| 日韩视频在线欧美| 久久这里只有精品中国| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 免费av观看视频| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 国产不卡一卡二| 三级毛片av免费| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 亚洲最大成人av| 99久久人妻综合| 午夜福利在线在线| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 精品午夜福利在线看| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 精品酒店卫生间| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 午夜日本视频在线| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 亚洲av免费在线观看| av专区在线播放| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| av福利片在线观看| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 国产精品无大码| 国产91av在线免费观看| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 观看美女的网站| 老司机影院毛片| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 亚洲最大成人av| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 七月丁香在线播放| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 黄片wwwwww| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 午夜激情欧美在线| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 欧美潮喷喷水| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 尾随美女入室| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 极品教师在线视频| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 久久6这里有精品| 永久网站在线| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 69人妻影院| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 精品久久久久久久末码| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 久久久久久久国产电影| 高清av免费在线| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 97超视频在线观看视频| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 国产91av在线免费观看| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲四区av| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 色网站视频免费| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| av在线亚洲专区| 久久久久九九精品影院| 中文欧美无线码| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 午夜福利视频精品| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 午夜视频国产福利| videossex国产| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲无线观看免费| 禁无遮挡网站| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| av福利片在线观看| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 色综合色国产| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 97超碰精品成人国产| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 美女大奶头视频| 日韩电影二区| 嫩草影院入口| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 七月丁香在线播放| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | a级毛色黄片| 日本wwww免费看| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 99久久人妻综合| 777米奇影视久久| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 成人av在线播放网站| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲av.av天堂| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国产综合精华液| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 午夜免费激情av| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 三级国产精品片| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 日日啪夜夜爽| 色综合站精品国产| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产 亚洲一区二区三区 | 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2|