• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comparative study of indocyanine green-R15, Child-Pugh score, and model for end-stage liver disease score for prediction of hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

    2021-02-05 03:36:18ZhongWangYiFanWuZhenDongYueHongWeiZhaoLeiWangZhenHuaFanYuZhangFuQuanLiu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2021年5期

    Zhong Wang, Yi-Fan Wu, Zhen-Dong Yue, Hong-Wei Zhao, Lei Wang, Zhen-Hua Fan, Yu Zhang, Fu-Quan Liu

    Abstract

    Key Words: Hepatic encephalopathy; Indocyanine green-R15; Child-Pugh score; Model for end-stage liver disease score; Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; Portal hypertention

    INTRODUCTION

    Portal hypertension (PHT) is a very common and serious complication of chronic liver disease that often causes variceal bleeding and refractory ascites[1]. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an important treatment option that has been shown to be efficacious in the management of PHT[2]. This procedure can alleviate portal hypertension by creating a large channel between the portal vein and hepatic vein[3]. Unfortunately, TIPS can cause severe complications such as heart failure, liver failure, and hepatic encephalopathy (HE). HE has a high incidence rate and is one of the most debilitating complications, which has a serious effect on the prognosis and survival of patients[4-6]. Although some risk factors are known, the identification of patients at risk of HE needs additional research. It is important to predict post-TIPS HE so that prevention and treatment measures can be implemented in high-risk HE patients to avoid adverse outcomes.

    The indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICG-R15), the Child-Pugh score (CPS), and the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score have been developed to assess liver function[7,8]. The ICG-R15 is a relatively non-invasive, quick, and inexpensive method that has been widely used in patients with end-stage liver disease[9]. Zipprichet al[10]reported that ICG is the most accurate predictor among quantitative liver function tests of the survival of patients with cirrhosis[10]. A recent retrospective study demonstrated that preoperative ICG clearance was predictive of the surgical prognosis in patients undergoing hepatectomy[11]. The CPS was developed to assess the severity of liver cirrhosis in the clinic. This scoring system includes the bilirubin level, the albumin level, the prothrombin time, HE, and ascites[12]. The MELD score is used to predict the survival of patients undergoing TIPS and to evaluate patients with severe liver disease prior to transplantation. It includes three objective variables: The total bilirubin level, the creatinine level, and the international normalized ratio (INR)[13]. However, there are limited data on the use of liver function tools, especially the ICG-R15, to predict post-TIPS HE. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the clinical value of the MELD score, CPS, and ICG-R15 for the prediction of post-TIPS HE in patients with PHT.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Shijitan Hospital of Capital Medical University. The need to obtain informed consent was waived due to its retrospective nature.

    Patients

    All patients who underwent TIPS between January 2018 and June 2019 in the interventional department of Beijing Shijitan Hospital were included in this study.

    The following inclusion criteria were set: (1) Patients between 18 and 70 years old; (2) Patients diagnosed with PHT; and (3) Patients who underwent TIPS using a polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent. The following exclusion criteria were set: (1) Preoperative HE; (2) Liver cancer; (3) Liver transplantation; (4) TIPS retreatment; (5) Non-cirrhotic PHT; (6) Surgical splenectomy; (7) Portal vein thrombosis; and (8) Urgent TIPS.

    Definitions

    PHT was defined as the radiological presence of significant splenomegaly, umbilical vein recanalization, and/or portosystemic shunts as well as a preoperative platelet count < 100 × 109/L. Portal pressure gradient values greater than or equal to 10 mmHg indicated clinically significant PHT[14].

    HE was defined as neuropsychiatric abnormalities ranging from mild neuropsychological dysfunction to deep coma and abnormal ammonia levels, after the exclusion of other possible causes of altered mental status by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging[15].

    Preoperative ICG-R15, CPS, and MELD score

    All patients included in this study underwent the ICG-R15 test with a dyedensitogram (DDG) analyser (Japan, NIHON KOHDEN, model DDG-3300K) and an ICG clearance rate test (Japan, NIHON KOHDEN, model A). Within 30 s after the injection of ICG (0.5 mg/kg) into the median cubital vein, plasma ICG concentrations were monitoredviaa sensor attached to the patients’ finger. The ICG-R15 was subsequently assessed by a computer. The CPS score can be divided into three grades depending on the total points: Grade A (5-6 points), B (7-9 points), and C (≥ 10 points). The MELD score was calculated based on the following formula: R = 3.8 × ln (bilirubin mg/dL) + 11.2 × ln (INR) + 9.6 ln (creatinine mg/dL) + 6.4 × aetiology (biliary and alcoholic 0, others 1)[8,16](Figure 1).

    TIPS

    Under fluoroscopic guidance, a standard TIPS procedure was performed by an experienced interventional radiologist. A pigtail catheter was inserted into the right internal jugular vein leading to the hepatic veins. After finding the portal vein through the superior mesenteric artery or splenic artery using indirect portal venography, a stent (7, 8, or 10 mm, Fluency, Bard, United States) was placed to create a channel between the hepatic vein and the portal vein. Afterward, the portal vein pressure was measured at least three times, and a pressure transducer system (Combitrans, Braun Melsungen, Germany) with a multichannel monitor (Sirecust, Siemens, Germany) was used to measure the haemodynamic parameters.

    Statistical analysis

    Clinical and laboratory characteristics were collected from the medical records. SPSS (version 20.0, SPSS Inc., United States) and MedCalc were used for the statistical analyses. Descriptive data are presented as the mean ± SD, and qualitative variables are presented as frequencies or percentages. Student'sttest or the Mann-WhitneyUtest was used to compare quantitative variables between groups, and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used for qualitative variables. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine HE-related risk factors after TIPS. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for the ICG-R15, CPS, and MELD score were evaluated. The non-parametric approach (Delong-Delong & Clarke-Pearson)[17]was used for pairwise comparison among AUCs of ICG-R15, CPS, and MELD score. Statistical significance was established atP< 0.05.

    Figure 1 Receive operating characteristic curve analyses of indocyanine green-R15, Child-Pugh score, and model for end-stage liver disease score to predict post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt hepatic encephalopathy. ICG: Indocyanine green; MELD: Model for end-stage liver disease.

    RESULTS

    Patients’ preoperative characteristics

    A total of 221 patients who underwent TIPS were included in this study. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study, data were collected from a total of 195 decompensated cirrhosis patients with PHT who underwent TIPS. The basic clinical characteristics are listed in Table 1. The study population comprised 140 men and 55 women, with a mean age of 51.2 ± 11.4 years. The indications included variceal bleeding in 118 (60.7%) patients, refractory ascites in 36 (18.5%), variceal bleeding combined with ascites in 27 (14.1%), and other (including pleural fluid and hepatorenal syndrome) in 14 (6.7%). The most common cause of cirrhosis was viral cirrhosis (60.7%), followed by alcoholic cirrhosis (15.9%), biliary cirrhosis (4.6%), and drug-induced and autoimmune hepatitis cirrhosis (4.6%). According to the CPS, 108 patients were classified as having grade A, 75 as having grade B and 12 as having grade C. The median MELD score and ICG-R15 were 7 (4.1, 10) and 38.4 (22, 50), respectively.

    Univariable and multivariable analyses of post-TIPS HE

    Of the 195 patients who underwent TIPS, 45 (23%) developed HE at the 12 mo followup. The factors associated with HE in univariable analysis included age, stent size, puncture site, ICG-R15, CPS, MELD score, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level, and NH3level (P= 0.006, 0.019, 0.006, 0.027, 0.022, 0.020, 0.025, and 0.044, respectively). As shown in Table 2, multivariate regression analysis identified the following variables as independent risk factors for post-TIPS HE: Older age, 10 mm stent size, puncture site in the right branch of the portal vein, high ICG-R15, high BUN level, high NH3level, high CPS, and high MELD score.

    Discriminatory power of the CPS, MELD score, and ICG-R15

    The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the ICG-R15 (AUC = 0.664, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.557-0.743,P= 0.0046) for the prediction of post-TIPS HE was larger than those of the CPS (AUC = 0.596, 95%CI: 0.508-0.679,P= 0.087) and the MELD score (AUC = 0.641, 95%CI: 0.554-0.721,P= 0.021). The nonparametric approach (Delong-Delong & Clarke-Pearson)[17]showed that there was no statistical significance in pairwise comparison between AUCs of ICG-R15 and MELD score (P= 0.0229). The cut-off value for the ICG-R15, which was determined by the maximum of Youden index, was 30, with a sensitivity of 86.96% and specificity of 56.25% for the prediction of post-TIPS HE (Table 3). Of the 126 patients with an ICGR15 > 30, 36 (28.5%) developed post-TIPS HE, while 9 (13%) of 69 patients with an ICG ≤ 30 developed post-TIPS HE.

    Table 1 Patients’ preoperative characteristics

    WBC, × 109/L3 3.27 (2.1, 4.6)3.1 (2.1, 4.4)3.3 (2.5, 5.7)0.26 Platelet count, × 109/L3 80 (58.3, 120)85 (61.2, 127.7)83 (63, 107)0.49 Hb, g/L1 97.4 ± 27.1 95.3 ± 25.5 98.1 ± 27.9 0.9 BUN, mmoL/L3 5.7 (4.3, 7.7)5.4 (4.2, 7.0)7.6 (5.4, 8.8)0.07 NH3, μg/Dl1 49.5 ± 19.5 46.6 ± 15.4 54.9 ± 23.8 0.037a APTT, s3 33.4 ± 4.4 33.8 ± 4.5 33.5 ± 4.2 0.76 INR1 1.4 ± 0.3 1.37 ± 0.3 1.32 ± 0.19 0.50 FIB, g/L1 2.17 ± 0.8 2.2 ± 0.8 2.3 ± 0.7 0.39 PT, s1 14.8 ± 2.5 14.7 ± 2.6 14.4 ± 2.0 0.69 1Values are the mean ± SD.2Values are n.3Values are medians (P25, P75).aP < 0.05.bP < 0.01. TIPS: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; HE: Hepatic encephalopathy; HVPG: Hepatic venous pressure gradient; PPG: Portal pressure gradient; MELD: Model for end-stage liver disease; ICG: Indocyanine green; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; AST: Aspartate transaminase; ALP: Alkaline phosphatase; Hb: Hemoglobin; BUN: Blood urea nitrogen; APTT: Active partial thromboplastin; INR: International normalized ratio; FIB: Fibrinogen; PT: Prothrombin time; WBC: White blood cells.

    Comparison of post-TIPS-HE incidence between patients with an ICG-R15 > 30% and < 30%

    The patients were divided into two groups according to the ICG-R15 cut-off value, 30%, determined by the maximal Youden index. Patients with an ICG-R15 > 30% had a higher incidence of HE than those with an ICG-R15 < 30% (13%vs28.5%;P= 0.014). There were significant differences in age, CPS, preoperative portal pressure gradient, NH3, albumin, aspartate transaminase, Cl, Na, white blood cells, active partial thromboplastin, or prothrombin time in patients with different ICG-R15 levels below and above 30% (Table 4).

    DISCUSSION

    TIPS has been widely used to treat complications of PHT, including varices and ascites, by creating a large channel between the hepatic vein and portal vein. This procedure changes the liver haemodynamics by shunting a fraction of the portal venous blood directly into the systemic circulation, which can lead to decreased liver blood supply and impaired liver function reserve. In addition, HE occurs because of an increase in the amount of natural toxins such as ammonia travelling to the brain as a result of the shunting of the blood directly from the portal vein to the hepatic vein[18]. HE can produce a spectrum of neurological/psychiatric syndromes ranging from subclinical alterations to coma. It remains one of the most common and worrisome complications of end-stage liver disease after TIPS[15].

    The ICG-R15 test is simple, fast, less invasive, and inexpensive, and can be performed in less than half an hour. The ICG-R15 retention trial was introduced as a relatively noninvasive tool for the classification of pediatric and adult patients with acute and chronic liver failure[19]. A particular advantage of the ICG-R15 test is that it is more suitable for pediatric patients. In addition, the trial appears to be an ideal way to assess the risks of surgical procedures such as liver resection. In addition to assessing the predictive value of varices and ascites, the results of some papers suggest that the ICG-R15 test may also predict mortality[20].

    In this study, univariate and multivariate logistic analyses showed that 10 mm stent size, puncture site in the right branch of the portal vein, age, ICG-R15, BUN level, NH3level, CPS, and MELD score were predictors of post-TIPS HE in patients with portal hypertension. Patients with puncture sites in the right portal vein had a high incidence of post-TIPS HE. This is related to the right branch of the portal vein contains more poisons mainly received from the superior mesenteric vein[21-23]. It was reported that choosing the left branch of the portal vein as the puncture site during the placement of TIPS may decrease the incidence of HE significantly[24,25]. HE occurs more often in patients with a stent diameter of 10 mm than in those with smaller-diameter stents. Alarger stent can effectively reduce portal vein pressure, but at the same time, more blood that has not been detoxified by the liver directly enters the systemic circulation, which can further impair liver function and lead to HE. However, some studies showed that the incidence of post-TIPS HE was unrelated to stent diameter[26]. Liet al[27]also found that age and Child-Pugh classification were independent risk factors for early post-TIPS HE[27], which was in accord with previous studies[28,29]. Fonioet al[4]demonstrated that the MELD grade was a risk factor for post-TIPS HE; the results of this study support this finding[4]. Normally, ammonia is detoxified by conversion to urea by Krebs-Henseleit buffer or the urea cycle in the liver. In total, 40% to 60% of the urea nitrogen in the primary urine is absorbed in the renal tubules and collecting tubes. A high incidence of HE was found in patients with high BUN levels, which is related to the aggravation of liver function involving the kidneys, renal decompensation, and azotaemia[30].

    Table 2 Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses of post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt hepatic encephalopathy

    Table 3 Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of indocyanine green rentention rate of 15 min, Child-Pugh score, and model for end-stage liver disease score

    Table 4 Characteristics of patients with an indocyanine green rentention rate at 15 min ≤ 30% and > 30%

    Hiwatashiet al[31]found that a higher ICG-R15 was significantly correlated with surgical complications and liver dysfunction after surgical resection and chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer[31]. Wanget al[32]demonstrated that the ICG-R15 could more accurately predict preoperative liver reserve function than the Child-Pugh and MELD scores in patients who suffered from liver cancer[32]. Another study showed that the ALICE scoring system (including serum albumin and ICG-R15) could simply and effectively predict the prognosis of liver cancer patients undergoing surgery[33]. In this study, we analysed and compared the areas under the ROC curves for the ICG-R15, CPS, and MELD score. The results were as follows: AUCICG-R15> AUCMELD> AUCCPS, and there was statistical significance in pairwise comparison between AUCs of ICG-R15 and MELD score. This suggests that the ICG-R15 has clinical equivalent value to predict post-TIPS HE compared to MELD score. The CPS is relatively restricted because it includes two subjective variables (HE and severity of ascites)[12], and the limited values ranging from 5 to 15 make it imprecise. The boundary values for the five parameters were chosen empirically and have not been formally validated[34]. In some situations, the predictive value of MELD may be reduced. Malabsorption of vitamin K secondary to cholestasis can cause an increase in the INR; starvation and infection can increase the level of bilirubin; and the use of diuretics can increase the level of creatinine[35]. As a quantitative assessment, the ICGR15 is a simple and practical way to assess liver function and is widely used in patients undergoing liver surgery. The ICG-R15 may play a role in predicting post-TIPS HE; consequently, it may be useful for identifying high-risk patients.

    The optimal ICG-R15 cut-off value in our study was 30%, and it divided the patients into two groups with different risks of post-TIPS HE. This difference was highly significant (P= 0.014), which implies that TIPS patients with an ICG-R15 > 30% should be given special care during perioperative management. However, we did not compare the role of the CPS, MELD score, and ICG-R15 for predicting the survival of patients after TIPS, which needs further study. In addition, future studies should analyse the incidence of complications and survival between different ICG-R15 groups. A small number of patients with Child-Pugh C cirrhosis and the low median MELD score were limitations of this study. Since this may be related to the small sample size, we will increase the amount of the sample in the future.

    In summary, the ICG-R15 can be used for predicting post-TIPS HE in patients with PHT. We propose using the ICG-R15 to evaluate the risk of HE in PHT patients undergoing TIPS.

    CONCLUSION

    TIPS for PHT in patients with cirrhosis should be considered after careful selection based on patient characteristics and liver function. The ICG-R15 has appreciated clinical value for predicting the occurrence of post-TIPS HE and is a choice for evaluating the prognosis of patients undergoing TIPS.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research objectives

    The aim of this study was to explore whether ICG-R15 can be used as a predictor of post-TIPS HE and compared the clinical value of the ICG-R15, CPS, and MELD score for the prediction of post-TIPS HE in decompensated cirrhosis patients with PHT. According to the ICG-R15 value, appropriate and timely intervention can be implemented in patients with high-risk HE patients.

    Research methods

    We conducted a prospective study of 195 patients with PHT who underwent elective TIPS. All patients underwent the ICG-R15 test, CPS evaluation, and MELD scoring. According to whether they developed HE or not, the patients were divided into two groups: HE group and non-HE group. Descriptive data are presented as the mean ± SD, and qualitative variables are presented as frequencies or percentages. Student'sttest or the Mann-WhitneyUtest was utilized to compare quantitative variables between groups, and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used for qualitative variables. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine HE-related risk factors after TIPS. The prediction of one-year post-TIPS HE by ICG-R15, CPS, and MELD score was evaluated by the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs). Pairwise comparison of AUCs in three different function tools was analysed.

    Research results

    A total of 195 patients with PHT were included and 23% (45/195) of the patients developed post-TIPS HE. The ICG-R15 was identified as an independent predictor of post-TIPS HE. The AUCs for the ICG-R15, CPS, and MELD score for predicting post-TIPS HE were 0.664 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.557-0.743,P= 0.0046), 0.596 (95%CI: 0.508-0.679,P= 0.087), and 0.641 (95%CI: 0.554-0.721,P= 0.021), respectively. Molodianovitchet al[17]showed that there was statistical significance in pairwise comparison between AUCs of ICG-R15 and MELD score (P= 0.0229).

    Research conclusions

    TIPS for PHT in patients with cirrhosis should be considered after careful selection based on patient characteristics and liver function. The ICG-R15 has appreciated clinical value for predicting the occurrence of post-TIPS HE and is a choice for evaluating the prognosis of patients undergoing TIPS.

    Research perspectives

    We can learn from this study that monitoring patients who underwent TIPS with an ICG-R15 value above 30% can better prevent adverse outcomes. Future studies will focus on the incidence of complications and survival in terms of the value of ICG-R15 and randomized controlled trials are needed in order to verify our results.

    大型黄色视频在线免费观看| bbb黄色大片| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 免费av不卡在线播放| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 97热精品久久久久久| 成年免费大片在线观看| 日本一本二区三区精品| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 欧美午夜高清在线| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 成人欧美大片| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 亚洲激情在线av| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 国产精品永久免费网站| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 日韩欧美三级三区| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 精品久久久久久久久av| 一进一出抽搐动态| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 1000部很黄的大片| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 国产淫片久久久久久久久 | 欧美bdsm另类| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 国产精品永久免费网站| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 一进一出抽搐动态| 在线国产一区二区在线| 精品久久久久久,| 欧美性感艳星| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 午夜久久久久精精品| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 精品午夜福利在线看| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲精品在线美女| 久久这里只有精品中国| 欧美成人a在线观看| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 精品人妻视频免费看| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| av福利片在线观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 午夜激情欧美在线| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 亚洲五月天丁香| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 久久精品91蜜桃| 国产精品,欧美在线| 日韩高清综合在线| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产av不卡久久| 久久久色成人| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 久久久久国内视频| 脱女人内裤的视频| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 美女高潮的动态| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 成人无遮挡网站| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图 | 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 老女人水多毛片| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 欧美色视频一区免费| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 欧美3d第一页| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 一级av片app| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 性色avwww在线观看| 久久人妻av系列| 欧美日韩黄片免| 床上黄色一级片| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲激情在线av| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 久久6这里有精品| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 日本一二三区视频观看| netflix在线观看网站| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 国产av在哪里看| 欧美激情在线99| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 露出奶头的视频| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| av天堂中文字幕网| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 91麻豆av在线| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 亚洲av电影在线进入| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 色播亚洲综合网| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 99热这里只有精品一区| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 99热这里只有是精品50| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 最新中文字幕久久久久| bbb黄色大片| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 国产精品,欧美在线| 午夜激情欧美在线| 在线观看66精品国产| 床上黄色一级片| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图 | 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 亚洲综合色惰| 一级av片app| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 色5月婷婷丁香| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 午夜福利欧美成人| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 一夜夜www| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 精品国产三级普通话版| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 直男gayav资源| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区 | 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| www.www免费av| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 97超视频在线观看视频| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 欧美日韩黄片免| 69人妻影院| 国产成人a区在线观看| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 亚洲最大成人中文| 舔av片在线| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 91av网一区二区| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 麻豆成人av在线观看| a级毛片a级免费在线| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 九色成人免费人妻av| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 欧美日韩黄片免| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 一本精品99久久精品77| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 午夜久久久久精精品| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 久9热在线精品视频| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 天堂网av新在线| 午夜a级毛片| aaaaa片日本免费| 熟女电影av网| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 亚洲在线观看片| eeuss影院久久| 51国产日韩欧美| 九九在线视频观看精品| 精品久久久久久久末码| 少妇高潮的动态图| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 亚洲综合色惰| 日本在线视频免费播放| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 欧美成人a在线观看| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| ponron亚洲| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 免费大片18禁| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 九色成人免费人妻av| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 成人精品一区二区免费| 少妇的逼好多水| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 一a级毛片在线观看| 在线看三级毛片| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 国产熟女xx| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 一本精品99久久精品77| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 国产av在哪里看| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 国产老妇女一区| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 赤兔流量卡办理| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 久久精品人妻少妇| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 精品一区二区免费观看| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 久久精品人妻少妇| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 一本综合久久免费| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 亚洲经典国产精华液单 | 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 日本免费a在线| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 亚洲av美国av| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 在线免费观看的www视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 少妇丰满av| 国产单亲对白刺激| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 久久久国产成人免费| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 黄色配什么色好看| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 免费看光身美女| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 在线国产一区二区在线| 综合色av麻豆| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 色综合婷婷激情| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 欧美日本视频| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 日本黄大片高清| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 国产精华一区二区三区| 国产高潮美女av| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 悠悠久久av| bbb黄色大片| 此物有八面人人有两片| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 如何舔出高潮| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 欧美潮喷喷水| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 免费av不卡在线播放| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 午夜免费激情av| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 久99久视频精品免费| 久久热精品热| 国产亚洲欧美98| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 欧美午夜高清在线| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 午夜福利在线在线| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 精品国产三级普通话版| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 天堂动漫精品| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 小说图片视频综合网站| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 极品教师在线视频| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 午夜久久久久精精品| 亚洲av成人av| 赤兔流量卡办理| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 成人欧美大片| 欧美性感艳星| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 日韩免费av在线播放| 51国产日韩欧美| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 日本黄色片子视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 亚洲经典国产精华液单 | 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 丝袜美腿在线中文| 黄色一级大片看看| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 最好的美女福利视频网| 精品日产1卡2卡| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 99热这里只有是精品50| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 美女黄网站色视频| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 热99re8久久精品国产| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 欧美3d第一页| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图 | 国产精品三级大全| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 国产成人影院久久av| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产精品,欧美在线| 色综合婷婷激情| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 深夜精品福利| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区 | 国产高潮美女av| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国产熟女xx| 久久久久国内视频| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 亚洲av成人av| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 国产野战对白在线观看| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区 | 国产视频一区二区在线看| 51国产日韩欧美| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 99热这里只有是精品50| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 91麻豆av在线| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 国产成人福利小说| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 少妇丰满av| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 1000部很黄的大片| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单 | 日本 av在线| 成人欧美大片| 久久亚洲真实| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 国产精品永久免费网站| 舔av片在线| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 久久草成人影院| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 在线观看一区二区三区| 窝窝影院91人妻| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 国产在视频线在精品| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 久久精品91蜜桃| 99久国产av精品| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲av二区三区四区| aaaaa片日本免费| 日韩欧美三级三区| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 国产淫片久久久久久久久 | 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 国产成人影院久久av| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 成人三级黄色视频| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 99久久精品热视频| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 精品国产三级普通话版| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| www.999成人在线观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| www.www免费av| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 国产亚洲欧美98| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 黄色日韩在线| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 亚洲av美国av| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 国产亚洲欧美98|