• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Predicting cholecystocholedochal fistulas in patients with Mirizzi syndrome undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

    2021-01-13 09:34:54ChiHuanWuNaiJenLiuChunNanYehShangYuWangYiYinJan
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020年40期

    Chi-Huan Wu, Nai-Jen Liu, Chun-Nan Yeh, Shang-Yu Wang, Yi-Yin Jan

    Abstract

    Key Words: Cholecystectomy; Cholecystocholedochal fistula; Common bile duct; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Mirizzi syndrome

    INTRODUCTION

    Mirizzi syndrome (MS) is defined as an extrinsic compression of the extrahepatic biliary system by an impacted stone in the gallbladder or the cystic duct, leading to obstructive jaundice. Cholecystectomy in a patient with MS and the presence of a cholecystocholedochal fistula is a complex and challenging procedure for a laparoscopic surgeon, making preoperative diagnosis important during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) examination.

    Pablo Mirizzi first described MS in 1948[1]. McSherryet al[2]classified this syndrome into two distinct types: Extrinsic compression of the common hepatic duct by the gallbladder and erosion of the gallstone from the gallbladder or the cystic duct into the common hepatic duct resulting in a cholecystocholedochal fistula. In 1989, Csendeset al[3]further proposed a new classification of patients with MS that also divided patients into two categories: External compression (Type 1) and fistulas from the gallbladder to the common bile or hepatic duct (Types 2-4). Laparoscopic surgery can be used to treat MS of the extrinsic compression type[4]. However, operating on patients with MS with cholecystocholedochal fistulas is still a challenge[5-8]. In such situations, the preoperative diagnosis of the cholecystocholedochal fistula is crucial. In previous studies, cholecystocholedochal fistulas were detected by intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy. Recently, ERCP has not only played a therapeutic-operative role but has also provided diagnostic perspectives before operation. The incidence of MS is estimated to be 1.07% in patients who underwent ERCP[9]. A typical cholangiography of MS consists of dilated intrahepatic ducts and pronounced narrowing of the common hepatic duct due to compression near the cystic duct or the gallbladder. ERCP may be useful in patients with MS in the retrieval of the common bile duct (CBD) stones after a sphincterotomy and placement of stents in the bile duct for drainage. This study is a retrospective analysis that aimed to investigate predictive factors for patients with MS with cholecystocholedochal fistulas during ERCP before laparoscopic surgery.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Study design and setting

    We conducted a retrospective study involving patients diagnosed with MS during preoperative ERCP examination. All patients underwent cholecystectomy at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, which is a tertiary care academic hospital. Data were collected from an extensive retrospective chart review.

    Patients and data collection

    From 2004 to 2018, all patients diagnosed with MS during ERCP were enrolled in this study. The diagnosis of MS with or without a cholecystocholedochal fistula was confirmed by intraoperative findings. Patients with associated malignancy or those who had already undergone cholecystectomy before ERCP were excluded from this study. Demographic data, clinical presentation information, and blood test results were recorded. The diagnosis of cholangitis was based on Tokyo Guidelines 2018 for cholangitis, which included acute inflammation, cholestasis, and imaging depicting bile duct dilation[10]. Endoscopic and cholangiographic findings during ERCP were also recorded and analyzed. Pus detected from the bile duct orifice at the papilla of Vater were defined as pus in the CBD. Contrast medium that filled the cystic duct or the gall bladder was defined as cystic duct or gall bladder opacification

    Ethical concerns

    The study was approved by the Chang Gung Medical Foundation Institutional Review Board (IRB number: 201801210B0). Data acquisition and analysis were carried out in accordance with guidelines and regulations. Due to the retrospective design of the study, consent was waived by the ethics committee for the entire study.

    Statistical analysis

    Continuous variables are presented as means ± SD, and categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages. The differences between patients with MS with or without cholecystocholedochal fistulas were compared using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Mann–WhitneyUtest for continuous variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to determine independent significant factors. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States). A two-sidedPvalue < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    RESULTS

    A total of 117 patients were suspected of having MS during ERCP; this was confirmed during operation between 2004 and 2018. The incidence of MS was 0.9% of all ERCP procedures (napproximately 13000) performed during the same period. Twenty-one patients with MS had a cholecystocholedochal fistula, and 96 patients with MS suffered only from external compression. The two groups of patients did not differ in age, sex, clinical findings, or laboratory data. The laboratory data included total bilirubin, serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, glutamic-pyruvic transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, and leukocyte counts (Table 1).

    For pre-operative diagnosis, all patients who underwent ultrasonography initially revealed stones in the gall bladder. Ninety patients further underwent computed tomography, and 85 patients revealed a dilated intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile duct before ERCP. Moreover, 24 patients underwent magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), 20 patients showed external compression of the hepatic ducts and were suspected to have MS. Among the 21 patients with MS with cholecystocholedochal fistula, MRCP was performed in four patients, but none of thepatients could be diagnosed with cholecystocholedochal fistula on MRCP.

    Table 1 Clinical presentation data

    Figure 1 shows the cholangiography during ERCP for patients with MS with and without a cholecystocholedochal fistula (Figure 1). The percentage of cystic duct opacification was similar between the two groups (10/21 patients (47.61%) with a fistulavs46/96 patients (47.92%) without a fistula;P= 0.81). However, patients with MS and cholecystocholedochal fistula had a significantly higher percentage of gallbladder opacification than those without (76.19%vs23.96%;P< 0.001).

    Other than the original purpose of ERCP, which was to reveal the relationship of the cystic duct, the gall bladder, and the CBD, some additional factors were obtained during the procedure. Stricture length at the CBD longer than 2 cm was more frequent in patients with MS without a cholecystocholedochal fistula than in those with a fistula (42.71%vs9.52%;P= 0.005). CBD stones are often found during ERCP and are important indications for ERCP. We retrieved as many CBD stones as possible during our routine practice. The incidence of CBD stone retrieval was similar in both groups (2/21 (9.52%) in patients with MS with a cholecystocholedochal fistula, and 28/96 (29.17%) in patients without;P= 0.09). However, both groups of patients had a much lower incidence of CBD stone retrieval compared with the patients in the routine ERCP examination group.

    Stress-related peptic ulcers were a common finding with bile duct obstruction, which was previously described in many studies, especially in animal models[11-14]. Six (28.57%) patients had duodenal ulcers found during ERCP in the group affected by MS with a cholecystocholedochal fistula, and 19 (19.79%) patients had duodenal ulcers in the group affected by MS without a cholecystocholedochal fistula. However, the difference between the two groups was not significant (P= 0.39). In contrast, pus formation in the CBD was seen frequently in patients with MS during ERCP (Figure 2). Further, patients with a cholecystocholedochal fistula had a higher percentage of pus in the CBD compared to patients without a cholecystocholedochal fistula (47.62%vs15.63%;P= 0.003) (Table 2).

    Logistic regression analysis was used to determine additional factors that could be predictive factors for the presence of a cholecystocholedochal fistula through endoscopic or cholangiography findings during ERCP (Table 3). Signi?cant predictors of a cholecystocholedochal fistula based on univariate analysis were pus in the CBD and stricture length > 2 cm at the CBD. Multivariate analysis with a multiple logistic regression model showed pus in the CBD had greater odds of predicting a cholecystocholedochal fistula in patients with MS (odds ratio (OR) 5.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.93-17.58,P= 0.002). Patients with MS with a stricture length longer than 2 cm at the CBD were less likely to have a cholecystocholedochal fistula (OR 0.12, 95%CI: 0.03-0.58,P= 0.008).

    All patients received bile duct drainage since they were referred for ERCP due to aclinically suspected bile duct obstruction (18 patients received endoscopic nasobiliary drainage, and 99 patients received endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage with 10 French or 8.5 French plastic stents). Three patients suffered from mild pancreatitis post ERCP and recovered in 1 wk.

    Table 2 Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography findings in patients with Mirizzi syndrome with or without cholecystocholedochal fistula formation, n (%)

    Table 3 Predictors of cholecystocholedochal fistulas in patients with Mirizzi syndrome

    Figure 1 Cholangiography of patients with Mirizzi syndrome. A: Patient without a cholecystocholedochal fistula. Eccentric compression (orange arrow) of the common bile duct is observed and a short part of the cystic duct is opacified; B: Patient with a cholecystocholedochal fistula (orange arrowhead). A contrast opacified gallbladder without the typical spiral and corkscrew-like cystic duct opacification is shown.

    DISCUSSION

    Figure 2 Endoscopic finding of pus in the common bile duct in patients with Mirizzi syndrome. A: The pus is extruding from the ampulla of Vater during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; B: The pus is observed from the ampulla of Vater after an endoscopic sphincterotomy.

    In this study, several novel endoscopic findings were identified to predict cases of MS complicated with cholecystocholedochal fistulas. MS is a rare complication of gallstone disease, with a reported incidence ranging from 0.06% to 5.7% in patients undergoing cholecystectomy[15,16]. In 1942, Puestow reported a series of 16 patients who had a spontaneous internal biliary fistula between the gallbladder and CBD[17]. McSherryet al[2]and Csendeset al[3]further described patients with MS and a cholecystocholedochal fistula. MS without a cholecystocholedochal fistula can initially be treated laparoscopically[18-21]. However, the surgical treatment of MS with a cholecystocholedochal fistula is more difficult, and laparotomy cholecystectomy was often used. Sometimes a T-tube may be placed in the CBD, away from the fistulous site, to prevent future stricture or worsening of the fistula, or a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy should be performed[3,5-8,22,23]. Hence, predicting a cholecystocholedochal fistula before cholecystectomy could help the surgeon make more precise surgical plans.

    Based on the above findings, the preoperative diagnosis of a biliary fistula is crucial. Abdominal ultrasound has a 96% sensitivity for gallstone detection[24]. Computed tomography can demonstrate the level of obstruction and is also able to exclude neoplastic lesions located at the hepatic hilum or the liver in patients with MS[25,26]. However, neither tool is ideal for diagnosing cholecystocholedochal fistulas. MRCP is as good as ERCP in diagnosing and delineating the details of biliary strictures. However, compared with ERCP, MRCP does not offer simultaneous therapeutic stenting[27]. Although intraoperative cholangiography can be performed on patients with MS during cholecystectomy, ERCP provides a cholangiogram and illustrates the relationship between the CBD, the cystic duct, and the gallbladder preoperatively.

    First, a higher percentage of opacification of the gallbladder is seen during ERCP examination in patients with MS with a cholecystocholedochal fistula. In most patients with MS, the stones wreck the walls of the bile duct. As time passes, the stone can gradually migrate into the bile duct, causing necrosis of the duct, leading to a cholecystocholedochal fistula[25,28]. The elevated gallbladder pressure due to the cystic duct or the gallbladder neck obstruction in patients without a cholecystocholedochal fistula makes contrast difficult to enhance the gallbladder. The gallbladder pressure is then released after formation of the cholecystocholedochal fistula. Taken together, this could explain the higher percentage of opacification of the gallbladder during ERCP in this study.

    Second, a stricture length longer than 2 cm at the CBD is another important endoscopic finding in patients with MS without a fistula. Interestingly, the stone size in patients with MS with a cholecystocholedochal fistula was larger (median 2.25 cm) than in those without a cholecystocholedochal fistula (median 1.5 cm)[29]. Theoretically, the stricture length of the CBD is longer in patients with MS with a cholecystocholedochal fistula. Contrary to our analysis, we hypothesized that the longer stricture of the CBD might be related to the compression of the distended gallbladder or the cystic duct rather than the direct compression by the stone itself. After cholecystocholedochal fistula formation, the gallbladder and cystic duct decompress, and the stricture of the CBD may result from the direct compression by the stone, shortening the stricture length (Figure 3).

    ERCP also provides extra information in endoscopic findings not typically seen using intraoperative cholangiography. CBD stone is the most frequent finding during ERCP in patients with gallstones. In our series, we retrieved as many CBD stones as possible but only 10%-30% of patients had CBD stones in each of our groups, which is a much lower rate than in the regular patient population undergoing ERCP[30,31]. In MS, most of the bile duct obstruction is caused by external compression. Even in patients with a cholecystocholedochal fistula, only a small part of the stone eroded into the CBD, making it difficult to retrieve the stone. Previous studies have reported that stones causing MS are not always amenable to removal by ERCP methods[32]. This could explain the low retrieval rate of CBD stones in patients with MS.

    Figure 3 Stricture length in common bile duct in patients with Mirizzi syndrome. A: One 2.7-cm gall bladder stone caused a cholecystocholedochal fistula. The stricture length is only 1.7 cm, which is less than the actual size of the stone; B and C: One 1.4-cm gall bladder stone compressed the common bile duct. However, the stricture of common bile duct is 3.3 cm in length. Computerized tomography after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography revealed that the plastic biliary stent was close to the stone (orange arrow).

    The last novel endoscopic finding was that pus in the CBD was more frequently found in patients with MS with cholecystocholedochal fistulas, presenting as an independent predictive factor, as demonstrated by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The incidence of pus in the CBD was up to 50% in patients with MS with a cholecystocholedochal fistula and only 15% in patients with MS without a fistula. Pus in the bile duct, or suppurative cholangitis, caused by calculus obstruction of the CBD and superimposed infection involving the entire biliary tract is associated with increased intraluminal pressure of the CBD[33]. As mentioned before, we consider MS with a cholecystocholedochal fistula as a progressive disease. Patients with impacted stones at the neck of the gallbladder or the cystic duct have elevated gallbladder pressure. The stones lead to repeated inflammation and necrosis of the gallbladder wall, resulting in a cholecystocholedochal fistula. The pressure in the gallbladder is released, but intraductal pressure of the CBD increases due to stone migration, causing serious bile duct obstruction and suppurative cholangitis. This endoscopic finding has been previously confirmed by intraoperative findings[3].

    A major limitation of our study is its retrospective nature. In addition, the number of patients with MS with cholecystocholedochal fistulas were relatively small. The factors that were found in our study should also be verified in future clinical studies.

    CONCLUSION

    In conclusion, it is important to establish the preoperative diagnosis of a cholecystocholedochal fistula by ERCP to optimize planning for the surgical procedure in patients with MS. In our series, ERCP provided a predictive factor for cholecystocholedochal fistulas, both endoscopically and by cholangiography. Gall bladder opacification is more frequent is patients with cholecystocholedochal fistula. Pus in the CBD during ERCP is more likely to predict an adverse event with a cholecystocholedochal fistula in patients with MS. However, a stricture longer than 2 cm at the CBD is less likely to predict a cholecystocholedochal fistula in these patients.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research motivation

    Our study revealed that gall bladder opacification is more frequent in patients with cholecystocholedochal fistula. Pus in the common bile duct is a predictive factor for the diagnosis of MS with cholecystocholedochal fistulas, and stricture length of the common bile duct longer than 2 cm is a protective factor for cholecystocholedochal fistulas in patients with MS.

    Research objectives

    This study is a retrospective analysis that aimed to investigate predictive factors for patients with MS with cholecystocholedochal fistulas during ERCP before laparoscopic surgery.

    Research methods

    Patients with associated malignancy or those who had already undergone cholecystectomy before ERCP were excluded. In total, 117 patients with MS diagnosed by ERCP were enrolled in this study. The clinical data, cholangiography, and endoscopic findings during ERCP were recorded and analyzed.

    Research results

    Gallbladder opacification on cholangiography is more frequent in patients with MS complicated by cholecystocholedochal fistulas. Pus in the common bile duct and stricture length of the common bile duct longer than 2 cm were two additional independent factors associated with MS, as demonstrated by multivariate analysis

    Research conclusions

    It is important to establish the preoperative diagnosis of a cholecystocholedochal fistula by ERCP to optimize planning for the surgical procedure in patients with MS. Gall bladder opacification is more frequent is patients with cholecystocholedochal fistula.

    Research perspectives

    The number of patients with MS with cholecystocholedochal fistulas were relatively small. The factors that were found in our study should also be verified in future clinical studies.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    The authors would like to thank Professor Teng W for reviewing the result of statistical analysis in this study.

    国产三级在线视频| 中文字幕久久专区| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产成人av教育| 在线观看日韩欧美| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 一区二区三区激情视频| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 大型av网站在线播放| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 午夜两性在线视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 亚洲第一电影网av| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 97碰自拍视频| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 夜夜爽天天搞| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 大型av网站在线播放| 成人手机av| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲成人久久性| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 美女免费视频网站| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 午夜a级毛片| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美 | 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 欧美3d第一页| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | a级毛片a级免费在线| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 青草久久国产| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 国产69精品久久久久777片 | 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 久久伊人香网站| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 十八禁网站免费在线| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 一本久久中文字幕| 国产成人系列免费观看| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久,| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国产黄片美女视频| 亚洲18禁久久av| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 国产精品野战在线观看| 午夜福利18| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 大型av网站在线播放| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 午夜激情av网站| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| or卡值多少钱| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 黑人操中国人逼视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 亚洲九九香蕉| 久久伊人香网站| 久久香蕉精品热| 在线免费观看的www视频| 午夜精品在线福利| 香蕉久久夜色| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 观看免费一级毛片| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 亚洲九九香蕉| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 成年版毛片免费区| 黄色女人牲交| 久99久视频精品免费| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 日韩免费av在线播放| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产成人aa在线观看| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 国产三级黄色录像| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 不卡av一区二区三区| 色综合婷婷激情| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 三级毛片av免费| 午夜精品在线福利| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 久久久国产成人免费| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 久久久久久大精品| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 在线观看日韩欧美| 国产亚洲欧美98| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 美女免费视频网站| 一个人免费在线观看电影 | 在线观看日韩欧美| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 黄色女人牲交| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 精品高清国产在线一区| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 男女那种视频在线观看| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 99国产精品99久久久久| 全区人妻精品视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 99热只有精品国产| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 久久久久性生活片| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 麻豆成人av在线观看| www日本黄色视频网| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 手机成人av网站| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| www国产在线视频色| 亚洲国产欧美网| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 一a级毛片在线观看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 舔av片在线| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 一本一本综合久久| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 成在线人永久免费视频| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 久久香蕉激情| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 国产99白浆流出| 日本三级黄在线观看| 精品高清国产在线一区| 午夜福利高清视频| 天天添夜夜摸| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| cao死你这个sao货| 毛片女人毛片| 国产69精品久久久久777片 | 国产日本99.免费观看| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 久久 成人 亚洲| 精品福利观看| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 日本五十路高清| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 免费在线观看日本一区| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 精品久久久久久,| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 手机成人av网站| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 日韩欧美 国产精品| ponron亚洲| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| a级毛片在线看网站| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 88av欧美| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 日本黄大片高清| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 在线观看www视频免费| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 美女大奶头视频| av视频在线观看入口| 两个人的视频大全免费| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 麻豆av在线久日| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 两个人的视频大全免费| 青草久久国产| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 999精品在线视频| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 宅男免费午夜| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 在线看三级毛片| 日本黄大片高清| 国产精品久久视频播放| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 大型av网站在线播放| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 91大片在线观看| 一区福利在线观看| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 日本五十路高清| 日韩有码中文字幕| 日韩免费av在线播放| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 成在线人永久免费视频| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | av天堂在线播放| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 午夜视频精品福利| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产片内射在线| 在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 午夜福利欧美成人| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 麻豆av在线久日| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 国产精品九九99| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 一本精品99久久精品77| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 黄色女人牲交| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 午夜免费观看网址| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 久久伊人香网站| 午夜a级毛片| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | av中文乱码字幕在线| 热99re8久久精品国产| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 精品电影一区二区在线| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 嫩草影视91久久| 热99re8久久精品国产| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 青草久久国产| 午夜视频精品福利| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 嫩草影视91久久| 热99re8久久精品国产| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 久久久久久人人人人人| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 18禁观看日本| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| bbb黄色大片| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 亚洲精华国产精华精| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 又大又爽又粗| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产成人aa在线观看| 亚洲 国产 在线| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 国产视频内射| 成人三级黄色视频| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 国产av不卡久久| 窝窝影院91人妻| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 91成年电影在线观看| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 曰老女人黄片| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| av福利片在线| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 校园春色视频在线观看| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲av成人av| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 特级一级黄色大片| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 国产熟女xx| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 久久久久九九精品影院| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 久久久久久久久中文| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 不卡av一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 一级黄色大片毛片| 成人av在线播放网站| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 亚洲片人在线观看| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 1024视频免费在线观看| ponron亚洲| 成人国语在线视频| 亚洲全国av大片| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 99re在线观看精品视频| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品 | 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 一级片免费观看大全| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 一进一出抽搐动态| 美女免费视频网站| 精品第一国产精品| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 岛国在线观看网站| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 国产av不卡久久| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲成人久久性| 国产69精品久久久久777片 | 毛片女人毛片| 最好的美女福利视频网| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 变态另类丝袜制服| 不卡av一区二区三区| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 国产乱人伦免费视频| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 免费看a级黄色片| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 免费高清视频大片| 国产午夜精品论理片| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 身体一侧抽搐| 免费看日本二区| 宅男免费午夜| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 精品国产亚洲在线| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 黄色女人牲交| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 色播亚洲综合网| 悠悠久久av| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 国模一区二区三区四区视频 | 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久 成人 亚洲| 色综合站精品国产| 99国产精品99久久久久| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 999久久久国产精品视频| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 午夜福利在线在线| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 久久热在线av| 黄色视频不卡| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| av欧美777| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 久久亚洲真实| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产片内射在线| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| xxxwww97欧美| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 精品电影一区二区在线| 成人18禁在线播放| 成在线人永久免费视频| 久久精品91蜜桃| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 亚洲av美国av| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 亚洲片人在线观看| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 国产精品久久视频播放| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 99热这里只有是精品50| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 曰老女人黄片| www.www免费av| 身体一侧抽搐| 一进一出抽搐动态| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 成年免费大片在线观看| av国产免费在线观看| svipshipincom国产片| 国产精品一及| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 国产日本99.免费观看| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 成人18禁在线播放| 免费高清视频大片| 国产免费男女视频| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 精品久久久久久久末码| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 日韩欧美免费精品| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 久久亚洲真实| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 亚洲第一电影网av| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 两个人的视频大全免费| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 丰满的人妻完整版| 国产精品野战在线观看| 欧美午夜高清在线| 久9热在线精品视频| 国产av在哪里看| 国产片内射在线| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了|