• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Longitudinal decrease in platelet counts as a surrogate marker of liver fibrosis

    2020-12-10 04:08:18NetaGotliebNaamaSchwartzShiraZelberSagiGabrielChodickVardaShalevOrenShibolet
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020年38期

    Neta Gotlieb, Naama Schwartz, Shira Zelber-Sagi, Gabriel Chodick, Varda Shalev, Oren Shibolet

    Abstract

    Key Words: Cirrhosis; Platelets; Count; Trend; Prediction; Range

    INTRODUCTION

    Liver cirrhosis is an important public health concern and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The global prevalence of cirrhosis ranges from 4.5% to 9.5% of the general population and is likely to increase due to the aging of hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients and rise in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)[1,2]. In 2017, Cirrhosis caused more than 1.32 million deaths globally, compared with less than 899000 deaths in 1990. Most of the cases were secondary to decompensated liver disease[3]. Chronic liver disease (CLD) is usually indolent and asymptomatic early in its course, thus many cirrhotic patients are diagnosed late, when manifestations of portal hypertension (HTN) such as variceal bleeding, ascites or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) appear. Early diagnosis of cirrhosis is important in order to enroll patients into HCC surveillance programs and offer therapeutic interventions to halt or reverse disease progression. Nearly 1.5% of patients with cirrhosis remain undiagnosed throughout life, therefore, better diagnostics tools using laboratory and imaging modalities are needed[4].

    Patients with advanced liver disease and cirrhosis may present changes in laboratory values such as thrombocytopenia, hypoalbuminemia, abnormal clotting function, anemia, and changes in hepatocellular and cholestatic liver enzymes. Thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 150000/μL) is one of the most common abnormalities in patients with cirrhosis, seen in up to 78% of cirrhotic patients[5]. Thrombocytopenia carries important prognostic information in terms of the presence of cirrhosis, portal hypertensive complications, hepatocellular carcinoma, post-liver resection and the post-transplant course[6]. Indeed, there is a correlation between the degree of thrombocytopenia and the stage and severity of liver disease; severe thrombocytopenia (< 50000/μL) is a poor prognostic factor associated with significant morbidity, indicating an advanced liver disease with established portal HTN[7,8]. This strong association has been corroborated by a study indicating that liver diseases is the underlying cause of thrombocytopenia in 58% of outpatients from all hospital departments[9].

    The pathogenesis of thrombocytopenia in CLD and liver cirrhosis is multifactorial. Possible causes include splenic sequestration of platelets, suppression of platelet production in the bone marrow, decreased thrombopoetin production in the liver and an autoimmune mediated destruction[5]. Additionally, platelets actively participate in pathophysiologic processes in the liver, resulting in fibrosis and cirrhosis; previous studies including animal models showed that platelets have a major role in liver inflammationviainteractions with the hepatic sinusoidal endothelium and myeloid cells, inducing diverse hepatic processes ranging from liver repair and regeneration to necroinflammation and fibrosis[10,11]. Additionally, studies hypothesized that circulating platelet-neutrophil aggregates can induce neutrophil activation, thus driving end organ damage in patients with cirrhosis. Indeed, various liver diseases are associated with neutrophil recruitment; these include cholestatic liver injury, alcoholic hepatitis, drugs and chemical-induced injury[12].

    While the association between thrombocytopenia and cirrhosis is well-established, little is known about the association between subtle changes in platelet counts over time and the long-term risk of cirrhosis development. Few previous studies have shown that platelet counts may start to fall earlier in the course of NAFLD and HCV induced liver diseases[13,14]. Additionally, platelet counts have been incorporated into non-invasive tools for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Among others, these are the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score and NAFLD fibrosis score which are used to assess the presence of liver fibrosis[15,16]. However, the platelet values in the aforementioned scores and studies were taken as a single value at a single time point. No study has tested the association between platelet trends within the normal range and cirrhosis incidence. Current computerized systems allow the collection of big data sets and enable the detection of subtle platelet changes, decades prior to the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis. Subtle trends in laboratory results are now being incorporated in machine learning algorithms which utilize artificial intelligence to generate predictive models more effectively than conventional methods, through detection of hidden patterns within large data sets.

    In this study we aimed to explore whether platelet counts trajectories over time can advance the diagnosis of early liver disease and its predictive ability across the different etiologies of cirrhosis, in parallel to different fibrosis scores. In addition, we aimed to test the association between platelets decline and portal HTN complications (variceal bleeding, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, HCC) among cirrhotic patients.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Setting

    A nested case-control study with diagnosed cirrhosis patients and matched controls, utilizing the Maccabi Health Services (MHS) database was performed. MHS is a 2.3-million-member state-mandated health services organization, representing 25% of the local population of Israel[17]. MHS's data are automatically collected and include information regarding all diagnoses, comorbidities, hospitalizations, emergency department visits, physician visits, outpatient specialist visits, purchase of medications, laboratory tests and radiologic imaging results. MHS’s database was established and collects data from 1998, with a 99% members’ retention rate which enables a unique opportunity to assess the long-term trends in laboratory results. All biochemical assessments are performed by a single laboratory that maintains a quality management system, as required and using the same standard laboratory methods[18]. The data are automatically and continuously updated, and are not dependent on active reporting by physicians.

    Study population

    Cases included all cirrhotic patients aged 18 to 80 years diagnosed between 2001 and 2018 using the International Classification of Diseases, 9thRevision (ICD-9) codes (Supplementary table 1). The first diagnosis was defined as the index date.

    Controls were hepatic disease-free MHS members, matched for age, sex and birth country at a ratio of 1:3. Sampling date in the control group was matched to the cirrhosis diagnosis date. All study patients were required to have at least three PTC measurements prior to index date.

    Patients with known etiologies for thrombocytopenia other than cirrhosis (various diseases and medications), as indicated in the medical record, were excluded from analysis (ICD-9 codes in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3).

    Clinical data

    Cirrhosis etiology (viral, autoimmune/cholestatic, NAFLD) as well as data regarding the complications of cirrhosis and portal HTN (hepatocellular carcinoma, ascites, varices, hepatic encephalopathy, splenomegaly) were all based on ICD-9 codes (Supplementary Table 4). We calculated the longitudinal trends of PTC as well the following laboratory parameters throughout the preceding 20 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis compared to healthy controls: Complete blood count, bilirubin (total), liver enzymes [aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), gammaglutamyl transferase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase], coagulation tests [prothrombin time (PT/INR), aPTT] and albumin were recorded (normal ranges are presented in Supplementary Table 5). APRI and FIB-4 were calculated for each patient according to the previously described formulas[15].

    Ethical consideration

    The study was approved by the MHS institutional review board (IRB). Since this is a retrospective study in which we used coded (anonymized) administrative data from electronic medical records, exemption from informed consent was granted by the IRB committee.

    Statistical analysis

    The statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, United States). Significance was set atP< 0.05. Categorical variables are presented using frequencies and percent. Continuous variables are presented using mean (standard deviation) [median, interquartile range]. The non-parametric locally weighted scatterplot smoothing was used for the presentation of the PTC (as well as other laboratory measurements) throughout 15 years period. For the cirrhosis group, the measurements were prior to the cirrhosis diagnosis and for the control group, the measurements were prior to the sampling year of each individual. Multivariable logistic regression was performed using PROC GENMOD utilizing general estimation equation methodology for correlated data (i.e., several platelets measurements for each subject). The model included the platelets measurements, as well as the time gaps (in years) of each measurement from the diagnosis/sample year for the cirrhosis and control respectively. The number of measurements was also included in the model. Adjusted odds ratio as well as 95%CI were used to display the association between the study groups and the potential risk factors.

    RESULTS

    Characteristics of the study population

    Characteristics of study population are presented in Table 1. The mean age in both groups was 56 (SD 15.8) and 54% were females. Most patients (25.7%) were diagnosed with cirrhosis in the years 2009-2012 while the least (14%) were diagnosed earlier between 2001 to 2004. Co-morbid conditions are presented in Table 2. Cases were more likely to be smokers (OR = 1.5; 95%CI: 1.39-1.6) as well as to be diagnosed with diabetes (OR = 1.17; 95%CI: 1.02-1.33), chronic kidney disease (CKD, OR = 1.24; 95%CI: 1.09-1.4) and tended to have higher prevalence of HTN (OR = 1.15; 95%CI: 0.96-1.37).

    Cirrhosis etiology and complications

    Of the cases with known etiology (n= 2058), the most common etiology for liver disease was viral infection (48%) followed by alcoholic liver disease (ALD, 24%) and NAFLD (20%). A total of 2768 cases had complications of liver cirrhosis, includingsplenomegaly (14.5%), varices (10.5%), ascites (8.5%) and hepatic encephalopathy (5.6%). Portal vein thrombosis was documented in 1.3% of cases and 10 patients (0.19%) had HCC (Table 3).

    Table 1 Demographic characteristic of cases with cirrhosis and controls, n (%)

    Platelets trends along 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis and comparison to controls

    In both groups, the mean time gap between the first PTC and the diagnosis/sampling year was similar (7.57-7.68 years) and the mean number of platelets measurements increased gradually from 2.5 (SD 2.1) to 6.4 (SD 5.7) close to the diagnosis date.

    The platelets trends along the study years (total 250646 platelets measurements) stratified by the study groups are presented in Figure 1. The mean PTC in the cirrhosis group decreased from 240000/μL starting 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis to approximately 190000/μL close to the diagnosis date. In the control group, the PTC remained stable throughout the years (240-250000/μL). In addition, for each subject in both groups, the mean PTC was calculated per year; the difference in mean PTC per year between groups is presented in Supplementary Table 6.

    Males had lower baseline PTC in both groups (Supplementary figure 1). In the cirrhosis group, males had a mean PTC of 210000 decreasing to 170000/μLvsfemales, with a mean number of 250000 decreasing to 215000/μL. In the control group, the same pattern was observed: males had a mean PTC of 225-230000/μL compared to females with ranges of 250000/μL. However, despite the sex differences, the trend of gradual decrease in PTC prior the diagnosis of cirrhosis was seen in both sexes. Additional sub-grouping was performed in order to assess whether age had a modifying effect within each sex. Among younger patients (17-40), PTC was constantin both males and females throughout the years, while among older patients, a trend of gradual decrease in PTC was seen in both sexes prior to cirrhosis diagnosis.

    Table 2 Comparison between the number of platelets measurements and co-morbidities between cases with cirrhosis and controls, n (%)

    Table 3 Distribution of cirrhosis etiology and complications among cirrhotic patients (n = 5258)

    In contrast, there was no significant change in hemoglobin levels in both groups (range of 12.8-13.4 g/dL). But, there was a steep decrease in white blood cell (WBC) counts prior the diagnosis of cirrhosis compared to controls, which had an increase of these values (Supplementary figures 2 and 3).

    Platelets trends among cirrhosis patients by etiology and complications

    Figure 1 Trends in platelet counts across 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis among cases and controls (n total = 21032, 250646 platelets measurements). Done with locally weighted scatterplot smoothing trend. The mean platelet counts in the cirrhosis group decreased from 240000/μL to 190000/μL, starting 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis, compared to stable values in the control group.

    In the cirrhosis group, the trend in PTC was calculated and compared among the most common etiologies of liver cirrhosis in the cohort (viral and ALD). There was a gradual decrease in PTC prior to cirrhosis diagnosis, within the normal ranges in both etiologies. However, cirrhotic patients with ALD had lower mean platelets levels compared to those with viral liver disease, starting 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis (230-180000/μLvs200-170000/μL) (Supplementary figure 4A and B). Stratification of cases by complications of cirrhosis and portal HTN revealed a steeper decrease in PTC in cirrhotic patients who had esophageal varices, ascites and hepatosplenomegaly compared to cirrhotic patients with no such complications (Figure 2A and B).

    Trends of liver enzymes and other laboratory markers of liver function

    The trends of liver enzymes during the years prior to the diagnosis of cirrhosis (or sampling year for the control group) were calculated (Supplementary Figures 5-8). Compared to controls, whose enzymes levels remained stable and within the normal range, there was a gradual increase in both ALT and AST in cirrhotic patients during the 15 years preceding the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis, whose mean levels were both above the normal range: ALT increased from 50 U/L 15 years prior diagnosis to 75 U/L close to the diagnosis date; AST increased from 40 U/L to 70 U/L close to the diagnosis date.

    Similarly, a gradual increase in both cholestatic enzymes could be seen during the years prior to the diagnosis of cirrhosis: Alkaline phosphatase increased from 75 U/L 15 years prior diagnosis to 135 U/L close to the diagnosis dates; GGT increased from 60 U/L to 200 U/L close to the diagnosis date. As for the control group, there was a gradual mild increase in both enzymes over the years.

    Regarding markers of the synthetic functions of the liver, a gradual increase in bilirubin levels occurred within the normal range, in the cirrhosis group compared to controls. Albumin levels decreased in both groups, but remained within the normal range (Supplementary Figure 9).

    Trends in fibrosis scores

    We calculated FIB-4 and APRI for both cirrhotics and controls. In the preceding years before cirrhosis diagnosis, FIB-4 and APRI increased gradually, ranging from 1.3 to 3 and 0.48 to 0.93 respectively, compared to controls whose scores either increased minimally or remained stable respectively throughout the years (Figure 3A and B).

    Association between PTC and cirrhosis in multivariate analysis

    Since cases were matched with controls by age, gender, birth country and time period (i.e.cirrhosis diagnosis year and the sampling year for the control group), these factors were adjusted by selection. After adjusting for the platelet’s measurements time points and the number of measurements, we found that for every 50 units decrease in the platelets, the odds of cirrhosis increase by 1.3-fold (95%CI: 1.25-1.35).

    Figure 2 Trends in platelet counts across 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis among cases and controls, stratified by cirrhosis complications A: Varices (n = 551) and B: Ascites (n = 450), both done with locally weighted scatterplot smoothing for trend. In patients with complications of portal hypertension (varices and ascites), platelet counts decline is steeper compared to those with no such complications.

    DISCUSSION

    Based on a large, well-characterized cohort, the results of this nested case-control study indicate that liver cirrhosis is characterized by a longitudinal decrement in platelet counts, within the normal limits, that may start 15 years prior to diagnosis. This trend is consistent regardless of sex, etiology of liver disease and observed after the age of 40.

    In the cirrhosis group, more patients had diabetes mellitus (DM), CKD, a tendency for HTN and were smokers compared to controls. The relationship between these metabolic factors and CLD or cirrhosis is well established. However, their effect on PTC is unclear. We did not find a clear relationship between the presence of DM or HTN and lower PTC in the literature. The exact pattern of PTC in patients with CKD is controversial but several studies revealed a decrease in PTC and platelets dysfunction in renal failure[19-21]. The trend of PTC decrease was consistent in both sexes although males had generally lower PTC values compared to females among both cases and controls. The literature on thrombocytopenia in liver disease does not show clear gender predominance so we can assume that this difference, in both groups, is physiological[22-25].

    Figure 3 Trends in fibrosis-4 and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index scores across 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis among cases and controls. Trends in A: Fibrosis-4 and B: Aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index scores, both done with locally weighted scatterplot smoothing trend. There is a gradual increase in both scores in the cirrhosis group compared to controls, ranging from 1.3 to 3 and 0.48 to 0.93 respectively.

    We compared other laboratory parameters that are related to CLD and portal HTN and examined the trends in the years prior to the diagnosis of cirrhosis. ALT, AST and GGT where above the upper normal limit (UNL) in the years preceding the diagnosis of cirrhosis, markedly so in the last two years before diagnosis, compared to controls in which liver enzymes were in the normal range. In both groups, there was a slight gradual increase in bilirubin and a slight decrease in albumin. These laboratory changes are probably physiological; several studies show small but incremental increases in bilirubin and a fall in serum albumin concentration that occurs with increasing age[26-29]. There was no change in the hemoglobin levels, while WBC decreased in cirrhotics compared to controls.

    Due to the nature of the study we cannot ascertain why specific blood tests were taken and if liver disease was suspected by the treating physician which triggered more laboratory testing. Compared to the liver enzymes that were above to UNL and should have theoretically alerted the treating physician to the presence of liver disease, at any given time or visit, the PTC during this period decreased within the normal range and were thus easy to miss.

    The most common etiologies for cirrhosis in our cohort were viral hepatitis, ALD and NAFLD. The trend of decrease in PTC in our study was consistent regardless the etiology of liver cirrhosis. It was previously suggested, that different etiologies may be associated with different hepatic damage mechanisms relating to platelets which play a role in the induction of hepatic fibrosis[30,31]. A previous study in NAFLD, showed that PTC were decreased in cirrhotics over a 5 year follow up compared to healthy controls[14]. Additionally, a negative correlation between the PTC and the severity of liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients has been demonstrated; a linear decrease of the PTC was correlated with increasing histological fibrosis stage. A similar trend occurs in chronic HBV and HCV infection; previous studies showed that liver fibrosis in HCV patients, assessed by biomarkers and FibroScan?, was negatively correlated with PTC. Moreover, patients with advanced liver fibrosis had significantly lower PTC[32-36].

    The platelets decrease trend in our study was most pronounced in patients with complications of liver cirrhosis and portal HTN with the steepest decline in patients who had varices. Studies show that together with liver and spleen stiffness measurements, PTC correlates with significant portal HTN and particularly in the presence of varices. The risk of having varices increases with decreasing PTC and have been used to assess the presence of varices non-invasively[37-40].

    Our results suggest for the first time that the platelets trends can be used for the prediction of liver cirrhosis regardless the underlying etiology. In multivariate regression analysis, we found that for every 50 units decrease in the PTC, the odds of cirrhosis were 1.3 times higher. When looking at the normal range of PTC, a gradual decrease in PTC, still within the normal range, from 380 to 180 over time would signify 5.2- fold increase in the risk of being diagnosed with cirrhosis compared to individuals with no change in the PTC. Indeed, the progression to cirrhosis usually takes years to develop and may be missed due to lack of clinical symptoms or laboratory aberrations before significant portal HTN appears.

    Diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis are vital part of the clinical management of CLD of any etiology as it is associated with poor outcomes. Although liver biopsy is recommended as the gold standard for the diagnosis and staging of fibrosis, due to its invasive nature and other disadvantages, indirect assessments of liver fibrosis have been developed and are widely used. These include blood-based biomarkers (APRI, FIB-4, enhanced liver fibrosis, Fibro Test) and image-based techniques (US, transient elastography, shear wave elastography, Magnetic resonance elastography) as well as innovative methods that uses combined modalities including advanced magnetic resonance imaging sequences like diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and genetic testing[41,42].

    Fibrosis risk scores have been developed based on readily available clinical and laboratory parameters that are simple to use at point of care, and can be implemented into computerized medical systems. However, current risk scores have several limitations; they incorporate PTC in the formulation, however, they do not consider progressive, longitudinal changes in PTC and use a single platelets value each time they are used[15,16,43-45].

    Among others, FIB-4 have been most extensively studied and validated in diverse populations for the prediction of advanced fibrosis. Two cut-off values were defined; FIB-4 score ≤ 1.3 can be regarded as having a low risk for advanced fibrosis while score > 3.25 represents advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. It was published previously, that intermediate FIB-4 values of 1.45–3.25 have negative predictive value of 89% for excluding advanced fibrosis and patients in this range would require a liver biopsy to assess the fibrosis stage. Thirty to forty percent of patients have an indeterminate score, and in these cases, additional testing is needed[35,46].

    In our study, we show that along with the increase in AST (above the ULN) and age, a longitudinal PTC decrease before the diagnosis of cirrhosis, still within the normal range was associated in high FIB-4 and APRI scores, which were mostly in the range of 1.4-3.25, reaching values compatible with advanced fibrosis. Together with the intermediated values of FIB-4, the longitudinal PTC decrease, even within the normal levels, may reflect progressing fibrosis and can predict cirrhosis development. These combined changes may be picked up by computers and alert the treating physician of an ongoing liver disease before advanced fibrosis takes place, enabling therapeutic and preventing measures.

    We acknowledge several limitations of this study. The main limitation is the retrospective nature of the study, with its built-in weaknesses of data collection and selection bias. Due to the nature of the study, we could not know why specific data was ordered/collected; especially which circumstances have led to the diagnosis of cirrhosis. Additionally, clinical events may have been missed or only partly followed up, so that the diagnosis of cirrhosis could have been missed or not recorded. Additionally, we could not look at radiology or endoscopic results of each patient in order to identify signs of CLD, cirrhosis and portal HTN. All diagnoses were made exclusively according to ICD-9 codes. However, although we might have missed a large number of undiagnosed cirrhotic patients, our sample is large and representative enough to offer sound observations.

    The number of platelets measurements and distribution in the preceding years before cirrhosis/sampling date was not equal. Cirrhotic patients had more PTC generally with the highest platelets measurements close to the diagnosis date. We hypothesize that there was a recognizable change in the medical condition of the patient which lead to more frequent tests. Due to the nature of this study, this information is not available. However, adjustment for the number and timing of testing did not attenuate the association.

    Other limitations should also be noted. A relatively large proportion of patients in the cirrhosis group had missing data regarding the etiology of cirrhosis. However, this should not have an effect on the general observation.

    This study also holds important strengths. We present longitudinal changes in PTC, compared to previous studies in which PTC were presented as a single measurement in a certain point of time. By using continuous and repeated measurements for the same individual, this method represented dynamic changes in laboratory data that indicated a trend before the diagnosis of cirrhosis. This method could potentially be used for longitudinal assessment of fibrosis regression following therapeutic interventions such as antiviral therapy or life style changes for NAFLD.

    The recent interest in Big Data Mining, which is aimed at identifying patterns that are often unrecognizable during routine clinical management, enabled us to use the MHS database which offers high-quality data from electronic medical records, automatic data capture, and a central laboratory. The large number of members in this insurance group enabled the inclusion of a large study population both overall and in matched groups during a long period of time. Patients with various diseases (hematological/viraletc) and medications that could affect the PCT were excluded from the study so that the change in PTC could be attributed with high probability to the ongoing liver disease. Furthermore, our cohort represents a cohort of cirrhotic patients in a community and likely avoids selection bias seen in cohorts from tertiary referral centers.

    CONCLUSION

    Years before the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis is made there is a progressive decline in platelet counts, within the normal range, matched to a gradual increase in fibrosis scores. These changes may be identified by machine learning algorithms and alert the treating physicians of an early liver disease and may enable early therapeutic and preventive interventions before serious complications occur.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research objectives

    To explore whether big data analysis of PTC trajectories over time, can predict advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis complications across the different etiologies of liver diseases.

    Research methods

    A nested case-control study with diagnosed cirrhosis patients and matched controls, utilizing the Maccabi Health Services database was performed. The trends of PTC, liver enzymes, bilirubin, international normalized ratio, albumin and fibrosis scores [fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index] throughout the preceding 20 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis were calculated and compared to healthy controls. The association between PTC, cirrhosis complications and fibrosis scores prior to cirrhosis diagnosis was investigated.

    Research results

    Cirrhosis cases (n= 5258) were compared to controls (n= 15744) matched for age and sex at a ratio of 1:3. The leading cirrhosis etiologies were viral, alcoholic and fatty liver disease. The mean PTC decreased from 240000/μL to 190000/μL up to 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis compared to controls who’s PTC remained stable around the values of 240000/μL. This trend was consistent regardless of sex, cirrhosis etiology and was more pronounced in patients who developed varices and ascites. Compared to controls whose values remained in the normal range, in the cirrhosis FIB-4 increased gradually from 1.3 to 3 prior to cirrhosis diagnosis. Additionally, in multivariable regression analysis, a decrease of 50 units in PTC was associated with 1.3 times odds of cirrhosis (95%CI: 1.25-1.35).

    Research conclusions

    This study indicates that a progressive decline in platelet counts, within the normal range, is associated with a gradual increase in fibrosis scores, starting up to 15 years before the diagnosis of cirrhosis.

    Research perspectives

    Progressive PTC decline in the preceding years before the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis, when still within the normal limits, may be identified by machine learning algorithms and alert the treating physicians of an early liver disease and may enable early therapeutic and preventive interventions before serious complications occur.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    The author is grateful to the staffs in Maccabi Health Services for their valuable assistance with this work.

    亚洲国产最新在线播放| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| av在线app专区| 一级毛片电影观看| 亚洲第一青青草原| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 观看av在线不卡| 赤兔流量卡办理| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 免费看av在线观看网站| 午夜福利视频精品| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| av免费观看日本| 丁香六月天网| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 国产精品一二三区在线看| 中国国产av一级| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 黄色 视频免费看| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 一区在线观看完整版| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 亚洲精品一二三| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 麻豆av在线久日| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 色网站视频免费| www.av在线官网国产| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 99热全是精品| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 亚洲在久久综合| avwww免费| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| av天堂久久9| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 亚洲av综合色区一区| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 午夜福利,免费看| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 久久久久视频综合| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 亚洲精品视频女| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 香蕉国产在线看| 免费观看av网站的网址| 久久婷婷青草| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 色播在线永久视频| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 一级毛片我不卡| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 色播在线永久视频| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产色婷婷99| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 午夜av观看不卡| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 777米奇影视久久| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| av福利片在线| 成人国产麻豆网| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 最黄视频免费看| tube8黄色片| 精品久久久精品久久久| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 999久久久国产精品视频| 美国免费a级毛片| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 免费不卡黄色视频| av福利片在线| 国产 一区精品| av网站免费在线观看视频| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| av电影中文网址| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 青草久久国产| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 亚洲精品视频女| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 七月丁香在线播放| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 久久久国产一区二区| 中国国产av一级| 一区在线观看完整版| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 成人影院久久| 91老司机精品| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 最黄视频免费看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 一级毛片电影观看| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| av在线播放精品| 1024视频免费在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国产一级毛片在线| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 午夜老司机福利片| 国产成人精品福利久久| 宅男免费午夜| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 99热网站在线观看| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 国产精品免费视频内射| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 人人澡人人妻人| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 超碰成人久久| 男女免费视频国产| 香蕉丝袜av| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产精品免费视频内射| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 丁香六月欧美| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 一级片免费观看大全| 丝袜喷水一区| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 久久青草综合色| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 成人影院久久| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 777米奇影视久久| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 在现免费观看毛片| 成年av动漫网址| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 国产精品 国内视频| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| avwww免费| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 欧美另类一区| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 亚洲精品第二区| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 99热国产这里只有精品6| www.精华液| 亚洲国产欧美网| 日韩一区二区三区影片| av在线老鸭窝| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 久久这里只有精品19| 国产片内射在线| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 国产成人欧美| 国产色婷婷99| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产精品无大码| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 免费看不卡的av| 午夜日本视频在线| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 在线看a的网站| 一级片'在线观看视频| www日本在线高清视频| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 9色porny在线观看| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| kizo精华| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 日韩伦理黄色片| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| tube8黄色片| 美女中出高潮动态图| 久久狼人影院| 亚洲国产精品999| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密 | 女性被躁到高潮视频| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 免费观看人在逋| 两性夫妻黄色片| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 在线天堂中文资源库| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 久久久久久久精品精品| 飞空精品影院首页| 深夜精品福利| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 操美女的视频在线观看| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 我的亚洲天堂| 91老司机精品| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 悠悠久久av| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| bbb黄色大片| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 欧美成人午夜精品| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 日本欧美视频一区| 免费观看av网站的网址| 国产麻豆69| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 久久久久久久精品精品| 99热全是精品| avwww免费| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密 | 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 国产 精品1| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 亚洲精品一二三| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 午夜老司机福利片| 午夜91福利影院| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 一级片'在线观看视频| 一级黄片播放器| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲第一av免费看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 少妇 在线观看| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 操出白浆在线播放| 午夜91福利影院| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线 | 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 亚洲在久久综合| 亚洲av男天堂| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 蜜桃在线观看..| 国产麻豆69| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 精品一区二区免费观看| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 在线天堂中文资源库| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 国产成人精品无人区| 两个人看的免费小视频| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 99热全是精品| 黄片小视频在线播放| 日本av免费视频播放| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 自线自在国产av| 国产极品天堂在线| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 一本久久精品| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 多毛熟女@视频| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 男女边摸边吃奶| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 国产成人91sexporn| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 人人澡人人妻人| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 国产精品免费大片| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 久久99精品国语久久久| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 九草在线视频观看| 精品一区在线观看国产| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 秋霞伦理黄片| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 99久久综合免费| 捣出白浆h1v1| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 美女中出高潮动态图| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 电影成人av| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 国产淫语在线视频| bbb黄色大片| 五月天丁香电影| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 成人国产av品久久久| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 老司机靠b影院| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 精品久久久精品久久久| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 9色porny在线观看| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 成人三级做爰电影| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 青草久久国产| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲av男天堂| 老熟女久久久| 日韩伦理黄色片| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 中文字幕制服av| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区 | av天堂久久9| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 大香蕉久久成人网| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 国产av精品麻豆| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 男女之事视频高清在线观看 | 亚洲成色77777| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产极品天堂在线| av卡一久久| 成年动漫av网址| 一级毛片 在线播放| av线在线观看网站| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 一区二区三区精品91| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 国产麻豆69| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 亚洲精品第二区| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| kizo精华| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 五月开心婷婷网| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产av国产精品国产| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 精品第一国产精品| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 婷婷成人精品国产| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 一区福利在线观看| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 熟女av电影| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频|