• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Longitudinal decrease in platelet counts as a surrogate marker of liver fibrosis

    2020-12-10 04:08:18NetaGotliebNaamaSchwartzShiraZelberSagiGabrielChodickVardaShalevOrenShibolet
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020年38期

    Neta Gotlieb, Naama Schwartz, Shira Zelber-Sagi, Gabriel Chodick, Varda Shalev, Oren Shibolet

    Abstract

    Key Words: Cirrhosis; Platelets; Count; Trend; Prediction; Range

    INTRODUCTION

    Liver cirrhosis is an important public health concern and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The global prevalence of cirrhosis ranges from 4.5% to 9.5% of the general population and is likely to increase due to the aging of hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients and rise in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)[1,2]. In 2017, Cirrhosis caused more than 1.32 million deaths globally, compared with less than 899000 deaths in 1990. Most of the cases were secondary to decompensated liver disease[3]. Chronic liver disease (CLD) is usually indolent and asymptomatic early in its course, thus many cirrhotic patients are diagnosed late, when manifestations of portal hypertension (HTN) such as variceal bleeding, ascites or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) appear. Early diagnosis of cirrhosis is important in order to enroll patients into HCC surveillance programs and offer therapeutic interventions to halt or reverse disease progression. Nearly 1.5% of patients with cirrhosis remain undiagnosed throughout life, therefore, better diagnostics tools using laboratory and imaging modalities are needed[4].

    Patients with advanced liver disease and cirrhosis may present changes in laboratory values such as thrombocytopenia, hypoalbuminemia, abnormal clotting function, anemia, and changes in hepatocellular and cholestatic liver enzymes. Thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 150000/μL) is one of the most common abnormalities in patients with cirrhosis, seen in up to 78% of cirrhotic patients[5]. Thrombocytopenia carries important prognostic information in terms of the presence of cirrhosis, portal hypertensive complications, hepatocellular carcinoma, post-liver resection and the post-transplant course[6]. Indeed, there is a correlation between the degree of thrombocytopenia and the stage and severity of liver disease; severe thrombocytopenia (< 50000/μL) is a poor prognostic factor associated with significant morbidity, indicating an advanced liver disease with established portal HTN[7,8]. This strong association has been corroborated by a study indicating that liver diseases is the underlying cause of thrombocytopenia in 58% of outpatients from all hospital departments[9].

    The pathogenesis of thrombocytopenia in CLD and liver cirrhosis is multifactorial. Possible causes include splenic sequestration of platelets, suppression of platelet production in the bone marrow, decreased thrombopoetin production in the liver and an autoimmune mediated destruction[5]. Additionally, platelets actively participate in pathophysiologic processes in the liver, resulting in fibrosis and cirrhosis; previous studies including animal models showed that platelets have a major role in liver inflammationviainteractions with the hepatic sinusoidal endothelium and myeloid cells, inducing diverse hepatic processes ranging from liver repair and regeneration to necroinflammation and fibrosis[10,11]. Additionally, studies hypothesized that circulating platelet-neutrophil aggregates can induce neutrophil activation, thus driving end organ damage in patients with cirrhosis. Indeed, various liver diseases are associated with neutrophil recruitment; these include cholestatic liver injury, alcoholic hepatitis, drugs and chemical-induced injury[12].

    While the association between thrombocytopenia and cirrhosis is well-established, little is known about the association between subtle changes in platelet counts over time and the long-term risk of cirrhosis development. Few previous studies have shown that platelet counts may start to fall earlier in the course of NAFLD and HCV induced liver diseases[13,14]. Additionally, platelet counts have been incorporated into non-invasive tools for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Among others, these are the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score and NAFLD fibrosis score which are used to assess the presence of liver fibrosis[15,16]. However, the platelet values in the aforementioned scores and studies were taken as a single value at a single time point. No study has tested the association between platelet trends within the normal range and cirrhosis incidence. Current computerized systems allow the collection of big data sets and enable the detection of subtle platelet changes, decades prior to the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis. Subtle trends in laboratory results are now being incorporated in machine learning algorithms which utilize artificial intelligence to generate predictive models more effectively than conventional methods, through detection of hidden patterns within large data sets.

    In this study we aimed to explore whether platelet counts trajectories over time can advance the diagnosis of early liver disease and its predictive ability across the different etiologies of cirrhosis, in parallel to different fibrosis scores. In addition, we aimed to test the association between platelets decline and portal HTN complications (variceal bleeding, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, HCC) among cirrhotic patients.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Setting

    A nested case-control study with diagnosed cirrhosis patients and matched controls, utilizing the Maccabi Health Services (MHS) database was performed. MHS is a 2.3-million-member state-mandated health services organization, representing 25% of the local population of Israel[17]. MHS's data are automatically collected and include information regarding all diagnoses, comorbidities, hospitalizations, emergency department visits, physician visits, outpatient specialist visits, purchase of medications, laboratory tests and radiologic imaging results. MHS’s database was established and collects data from 1998, with a 99% members’ retention rate which enables a unique opportunity to assess the long-term trends in laboratory results. All biochemical assessments are performed by a single laboratory that maintains a quality management system, as required and using the same standard laboratory methods[18]. The data are automatically and continuously updated, and are not dependent on active reporting by physicians.

    Study population

    Cases included all cirrhotic patients aged 18 to 80 years diagnosed between 2001 and 2018 using the International Classification of Diseases, 9thRevision (ICD-9) codes (Supplementary table 1). The first diagnosis was defined as the index date.

    Controls were hepatic disease-free MHS members, matched for age, sex and birth country at a ratio of 1:3. Sampling date in the control group was matched to the cirrhosis diagnosis date. All study patients were required to have at least three PTC measurements prior to index date.

    Patients with known etiologies for thrombocytopenia other than cirrhosis (various diseases and medications), as indicated in the medical record, were excluded from analysis (ICD-9 codes in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3).

    Clinical data

    Cirrhosis etiology (viral, autoimmune/cholestatic, NAFLD) as well as data regarding the complications of cirrhosis and portal HTN (hepatocellular carcinoma, ascites, varices, hepatic encephalopathy, splenomegaly) were all based on ICD-9 codes (Supplementary Table 4). We calculated the longitudinal trends of PTC as well the following laboratory parameters throughout the preceding 20 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis compared to healthy controls: Complete blood count, bilirubin (total), liver enzymes [aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), gammaglutamyl transferase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase], coagulation tests [prothrombin time (PT/INR), aPTT] and albumin were recorded (normal ranges are presented in Supplementary Table 5). APRI and FIB-4 were calculated for each patient according to the previously described formulas[15].

    Ethical consideration

    The study was approved by the MHS institutional review board (IRB). Since this is a retrospective study in which we used coded (anonymized) administrative data from electronic medical records, exemption from informed consent was granted by the IRB committee.

    Statistical analysis

    The statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, United States). Significance was set atP< 0.05. Categorical variables are presented using frequencies and percent. Continuous variables are presented using mean (standard deviation) [median, interquartile range]. The non-parametric locally weighted scatterplot smoothing was used for the presentation of the PTC (as well as other laboratory measurements) throughout 15 years period. For the cirrhosis group, the measurements were prior to the cirrhosis diagnosis and for the control group, the measurements were prior to the sampling year of each individual. Multivariable logistic regression was performed using PROC GENMOD utilizing general estimation equation methodology for correlated data (i.e., several platelets measurements for each subject). The model included the platelets measurements, as well as the time gaps (in years) of each measurement from the diagnosis/sample year for the cirrhosis and control respectively. The number of measurements was also included in the model. Adjusted odds ratio as well as 95%CI were used to display the association between the study groups and the potential risk factors.

    RESULTS

    Characteristics of the study population

    Characteristics of study population are presented in Table 1. The mean age in both groups was 56 (SD 15.8) and 54% were females. Most patients (25.7%) were diagnosed with cirrhosis in the years 2009-2012 while the least (14%) were diagnosed earlier between 2001 to 2004. Co-morbid conditions are presented in Table 2. Cases were more likely to be smokers (OR = 1.5; 95%CI: 1.39-1.6) as well as to be diagnosed with diabetes (OR = 1.17; 95%CI: 1.02-1.33), chronic kidney disease (CKD, OR = 1.24; 95%CI: 1.09-1.4) and tended to have higher prevalence of HTN (OR = 1.15; 95%CI: 0.96-1.37).

    Cirrhosis etiology and complications

    Of the cases with known etiology (n= 2058), the most common etiology for liver disease was viral infection (48%) followed by alcoholic liver disease (ALD, 24%) and NAFLD (20%). A total of 2768 cases had complications of liver cirrhosis, includingsplenomegaly (14.5%), varices (10.5%), ascites (8.5%) and hepatic encephalopathy (5.6%). Portal vein thrombosis was documented in 1.3% of cases and 10 patients (0.19%) had HCC (Table 3).

    Table 1 Demographic characteristic of cases with cirrhosis and controls, n (%)

    Platelets trends along 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis and comparison to controls

    In both groups, the mean time gap between the first PTC and the diagnosis/sampling year was similar (7.57-7.68 years) and the mean number of platelets measurements increased gradually from 2.5 (SD 2.1) to 6.4 (SD 5.7) close to the diagnosis date.

    The platelets trends along the study years (total 250646 platelets measurements) stratified by the study groups are presented in Figure 1. The mean PTC in the cirrhosis group decreased from 240000/μL starting 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis to approximately 190000/μL close to the diagnosis date. In the control group, the PTC remained stable throughout the years (240-250000/μL). In addition, for each subject in both groups, the mean PTC was calculated per year; the difference in mean PTC per year between groups is presented in Supplementary Table 6.

    Males had lower baseline PTC in both groups (Supplementary figure 1). In the cirrhosis group, males had a mean PTC of 210000 decreasing to 170000/μLvsfemales, with a mean number of 250000 decreasing to 215000/μL. In the control group, the same pattern was observed: males had a mean PTC of 225-230000/μL compared to females with ranges of 250000/μL. However, despite the sex differences, the trend of gradual decrease in PTC prior the diagnosis of cirrhosis was seen in both sexes. Additional sub-grouping was performed in order to assess whether age had a modifying effect within each sex. Among younger patients (17-40), PTC was constantin both males and females throughout the years, while among older patients, a trend of gradual decrease in PTC was seen in both sexes prior to cirrhosis diagnosis.

    Table 2 Comparison between the number of platelets measurements and co-morbidities between cases with cirrhosis and controls, n (%)

    Table 3 Distribution of cirrhosis etiology and complications among cirrhotic patients (n = 5258)

    In contrast, there was no significant change in hemoglobin levels in both groups (range of 12.8-13.4 g/dL). But, there was a steep decrease in white blood cell (WBC) counts prior the diagnosis of cirrhosis compared to controls, which had an increase of these values (Supplementary figures 2 and 3).

    Platelets trends among cirrhosis patients by etiology and complications

    Figure 1 Trends in platelet counts across 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis among cases and controls (n total = 21032, 250646 platelets measurements). Done with locally weighted scatterplot smoothing trend. The mean platelet counts in the cirrhosis group decreased from 240000/μL to 190000/μL, starting 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis, compared to stable values in the control group.

    In the cirrhosis group, the trend in PTC was calculated and compared among the most common etiologies of liver cirrhosis in the cohort (viral and ALD). There was a gradual decrease in PTC prior to cirrhosis diagnosis, within the normal ranges in both etiologies. However, cirrhotic patients with ALD had lower mean platelets levels compared to those with viral liver disease, starting 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis (230-180000/μLvs200-170000/μL) (Supplementary figure 4A and B). Stratification of cases by complications of cirrhosis and portal HTN revealed a steeper decrease in PTC in cirrhotic patients who had esophageal varices, ascites and hepatosplenomegaly compared to cirrhotic patients with no such complications (Figure 2A and B).

    Trends of liver enzymes and other laboratory markers of liver function

    The trends of liver enzymes during the years prior to the diagnosis of cirrhosis (or sampling year for the control group) were calculated (Supplementary Figures 5-8). Compared to controls, whose enzymes levels remained stable and within the normal range, there was a gradual increase in both ALT and AST in cirrhotic patients during the 15 years preceding the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis, whose mean levels were both above the normal range: ALT increased from 50 U/L 15 years prior diagnosis to 75 U/L close to the diagnosis date; AST increased from 40 U/L to 70 U/L close to the diagnosis date.

    Similarly, a gradual increase in both cholestatic enzymes could be seen during the years prior to the diagnosis of cirrhosis: Alkaline phosphatase increased from 75 U/L 15 years prior diagnosis to 135 U/L close to the diagnosis dates; GGT increased from 60 U/L to 200 U/L close to the diagnosis date. As for the control group, there was a gradual mild increase in both enzymes over the years.

    Regarding markers of the synthetic functions of the liver, a gradual increase in bilirubin levels occurred within the normal range, in the cirrhosis group compared to controls. Albumin levels decreased in both groups, but remained within the normal range (Supplementary Figure 9).

    Trends in fibrosis scores

    We calculated FIB-4 and APRI for both cirrhotics and controls. In the preceding years before cirrhosis diagnosis, FIB-4 and APRI increased gradually, ranging from 1.3 to 3 and 0.48 to 0.93 respectively, compared to controls whose scores either increased minimally or remained stable respectively throughout the years (Figure 3A and B).

    Association between PTC and cirrhosis in multivariate analysis

    Since cases were matched with controls by age, gender, birth country and time period (i.e.cirrhosis diagnosis year and the sampling year for the control group), these factors were adjusted by selection. After adjusting for the platelet’s measurements time points and the number of measurements, we found that for every 50 units decrease in the platelets, the odds of cirrhosis increase by 1.3-fold (95%CI: 1.25-1.35).

    Figure 2 Trends in platelet counts across 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis among cases and controls, stratified by cirrhosis complications A: Varices (n = 551) and B: Ascites (n = 450), both done with locally weighted scatterplot smoothing for trend. In patients with complications of portal hypertension (varices and ascites), platelet counts decline is steeper compared to those with no such complications.

    DISCUSSION

    Based on a large, well-characterized cohort, the results of this nested case-control study indicate that liver cirrhosis is characterized by a longitudinal decrement in platelet counts, within the normal limits, that may start 15 years prior to diagnosis. This trend is consistent regardless of sex, etiology of liver disease and observed after the age of 40.

    In the cirrhosis group, more patients had diabetes mellitus (DM), CKD, a tendency for HTN and were smokers compared to controls. The relationship between these metabolic factors and CLD or cirrhosis is well established. However, their effect on PTC is unclear. We did not find a clear relationship between the presence of DM or HTN and lower PTC in the literature. The exact pattern of PTC in patients with CKD is controversial but several studies revealed a decrease in PTC and platelets dysfunction in renal failure[19-21]. The trend of PTC decrease was consistent in both sexes although males had generally lower PTC values compared to females among both cases and controls. The literature on thrombocytopenia in liver disease does not show clear gender predominance so we can assume that this difference, in both groups, is physiological[22-25].

    Figure 3 Trends in fibrosis-4 and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index scores across 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis among cases and controls. Trends in A: Fibrosis-4 and B: Aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index scores, both done with locally weighted scatterplot smoothing trend. There is a gradual increase in both scores in the cirrhosis group compared to controls, ranging from 1.3 to 3 and 0.48 to 0.93 respectively.

    We compared other laboratory parameters that are related to CLD and portal HTN and examined the trends in the years prior to the diagnosis of cirrhosis. ALT, AST and GGT where above the upper normal limit (UNL) in the years preceding the diagnosis of cirrhosis, markedly so in the last two years before diagnosis, compared to controls in which liver enzymes were in the normal range. In both groups, there was a slight gradual increase in bilirubin and a slight decrease in albumin. These laboratory changes are probably physiological; several studies show small but incremental increases in bilirubin and a fall in serum albumin concentration that occurs with increasing age[26-29]. There was no change in the hemoglobin levels, while WBC decreased in cirrhotics compared to controls.

    Due to the nature of the study we cannot ascertain why specific blood tests were taken and if liver disease was suspected by the treating physician which triggered more laboratory testing. Compared to the liver enzymes that were above to UNL and should have theoretically alerted the treating physician to the presence of liver disease, at any given time or visit, the PTC during this period decreased within the normal range and were thus easy to miss.

    The most common etiologies for cirrhosis in our cohort were viral hepatitis, ALD and NAFLD. The trend of decrease in PTC in our study was consistent regardless the etiology of liver cirrhosis. It was previously suggested, that different etiologies may be associated with different hepatic damage mechanisms relating to platelets which play a role in the induction of hepatic fibrosis[30,31]. A previous study in NAFLD, showed that PTC were decreased in cirrhotics over a 5 year follow up compared to healthy controls[14]. Additionally, a negative correlation between the PTC and the severity of liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients has been demonstrated; a linear decrease of the PTC was correlated with increasing histological fibrosis stage. A similar trend occurs in chronic HBV and HCV infection; previous studies showed that liver fibrosis in HCV patients, assessed by biomarkers and FibroScan?, was negatively correlated with PTC. Moreover, patients with advanced liver fibrosis had significantly lower PTC[32-36].

    The platelets decrease trend in our study was most pronounced in patients with complications of liver cirrhosis and portal HTN with the steepest decline in patients who had varices. Studies show that together with liver and spleen stiffness measurements, PTC correlates with significant portal HTN and particularly in the presence of varices. The risk of having varices increases with decreasing PTC and have been used to assess the presence of varices non-invasively[37-40].

    Our results suggest for the first time that the platelets trends can be used for the prediction of liver cirrhosis regardless the underlying etiology. In multivariate regression analysis, we found that for every 50 units decrease in the PTC, the odds of cirrhosis were 1.3 times higher. When looking at the normal range of PTC, a gradual decrease in PTC, still within the normal range, from 380 to 180 over time would signify 5.2- fold increase in the risk of being diagnosed with cirrhosis compared to individuals with no change in the PTC. Indeed, the progression to cirrhosis usually takes years to develop and may be missed due to lack of clinical symptoms or laboratory aberrations before significant portal HTN appears.

    Diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis are vital part of the clinical management of CLD of any etiology as it is associated with poor outcomes. Although liver biopsy is recommended as the gold standard for the diagnosis and staging of fibrosis, due to its invasive nature and other disadvantages, indirect assessments of liver fibrosis have been developed and are widely used. These include blood-based biomarkers (APRI, FIB-4, enhanced liver fibrosis, Fibro Test) and image-based techniques (US, transient elastography, shear wave elastography, Magnetic resonance elastography) as well as innovative methods that uses combined modalities including advanced magnetic resonance imaging sequences like diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and genetic testing[41,42].

    Fibrosis risk scores have been developed based on readily available clinical and laboratory parameters that are simple to use at point of care, and can be implemented into computerized medical systems. However, current risk scores have several limitations; they incorporate PTC in the formulation, however, they do not consider progressive, longitudinal changes in PTC and use a single platelets value each time they are used[15,16,43-45].

    Among others, FIB-4 have been most extensively studied and validated in diverse populations for the prediction of advanced fibrosis. Two cut-off values were defined; FIB-4 score ≤ 1.3 can be regarded as having a low risk for advanced fibrosis while score > 3.25 represents advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. It was published previously, that intermediate FIB-4 values of 1.45–3.25 have negative predictive value of 89% for excluding advanced fibrosis and patients in this range would require a liver biopsy to assess the fibrosis stage. Thirty to forty percent of patients have an indeterminate score, and in these cases, additional testing is needed[35,46].

    In our study, we show that along with the increase in AST (above the ULN) and age, a longitudinal PTC decrease before the diagnosis of cirrhosis, still within the normal range was associated in high FIB-4 and APRI scores, which were mostly in the range of 1.4-3.25, reaching values compatible with advanced fibrosis. Together with the intermediated values of FIB-4, the longitudinal PTC decrease, even within the normal levels, may reflect progressing fibrosis and can predict cirrhosis development. These combined changes may be picked up by computers and alert the treating physician of an ongoing liver disease before advanced fibrosis takes place, enabling therapeutic and preventing measures.

    We acknowledge several limitations of this study. The main limitation is the retrospective nature of the study, with its built-in weaknesses of data collection and selection bias. Due to the nature of the study, we could not know why specific data was ordered/collected; especially which circumstances have led to the diagnosis of cirrhosis. Additionally, clinical events may have been missed or only partly followed up, so that the diagnosis of cirrhosis could have been missed or not recorded. Additionally, we could not look at radiology or endoscopic results of each patient in order to identify signs of CLD, cirrhosis and portal HTN. All diagnoses were made exclusively according to ICD-9 codes. However, although we might have missed a large number of undiagnosed cirrhotic patients, our sample is large and representative enough to offer sound observations.

    The number of platelets measurements and distribution in the preceding years before cirrhosis/sampling date was not equal. Cirrhotic patients had more PTC generally with the highest platelets measurements close to the diagnosis date. We hypothesize that there was a recognizable change in the medical condition of the patient which lead to more frequent tests. Due to the nature of this study, this information is not available. However, adjustment for the number and timing of testing did not attenuate the association.

    Other limitations should also be noted. A relatively large proportion of patients in the cirrhosis group had missing data regarding the etiology of cirrhosis. However, this should not have an effect on the general observation.

    This study also holds important strengths. We present longitudinal changes in PTC, compared to previous studies in which PTC were presented as a single measurement in a certain point of time. By using continuous and repeated measurements for the same individual, this method represented dynamic changes in laboratory data that indicated a trend before the diagnosis of cirrhosis. This method could potentially be used for longitudinal assessment of fibrosis regression following therapeutic interventions such as antiviral therapy or life style changes for NAFLD.

    The recent interest in Big Data Mining, which is aimed at identifying patterns that are often unrecognizable during routine clinical management, enabled us to use the MHS database which offers high-quality data from electronic medical records, automatic data capture, and a central laboratory. The large number of members in this insurance group enabled the inclusion of a large study population both overall and in matched groups during a long period of time. Patients with various diseases (hematological/viraletc) and medications that could affect the PCT were excluded from the study so that the change in PTC could be attributed with high probability to the ongoing liver disease. Furthermore, our cohort represents a cohort of cirrhotic patients in a community and likely avoids selection bias seen in cohorts from tertiary referral centers.

    CONCLUSION

    Years before the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis is made there is a progressive decline in platelet counts, within the normal range, matched to a gradual increase in fibrosis scores. These changes may be identified by machine learning algorithms and alert the treating physicians of an early liver disease and may enable early therapeutic and preventive interventions before serious complications occur.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research objectives

    To explore whether big data analysis of PTC trajectories over time, can predict advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis complications across the different etiologies of liver diseases.

    Research methods

    A nested case-control study with diagnosed cirrhosis patients and matched controls, utilizing the Maccabi Health Services database was performed. The trends of PTC, liver enzymes, bilirubin, international normalized ratio, albumin and fibrosis scores [fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index] throughout the preceding 20 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis were calculated and compared to healthy controls. The association between PTC, cirrhosis complications and fibrosis scores prior to cirrhosis diagnosis was investigated.

    Research results

    Cirrhosis cases (n= 5258) were compared to controls (n= 15744) matched for age and sex at a ratio of 1:3. The leading cirrhosis etiologies were viral, alcoholic and fatty liver disease. The mean PTC decreased from 240000/μL to 190000/μL up to 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis compared to controls who’s PTC remained stable around the values of 240000/μL. This trend was consistent regardless of sex, cirrhosis etiology and was more pronounced in patients who developed varices and ascites. Compared to controls whose values remained in the normal range, in the cirrhosis FIB-4 increased gradually from 1.3 to 3 prior to cirrhosis diagnosis. Additionally, in multivariable regression analysis, a decrease of 50 units in PTC was associated with 1.3 times odds of cirrhosis (95%CI: 1.25-1.35).

    Research conclusions

    This study indicates that a progressive decline in platelet counts, within the normal range, is associated with a gradual increase in fibrosis scores, starting up to 15 years before the diagnosis of cirrhosis.

    Research perspectives

    Progressive PTC decline in the preceding years before the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis, when still within the normal limits, may be identified by machine learning algorithms and alert the treating physicians of an early liver disease and may enable early therapeutic and preventive interventions before serious complications occur.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    The author is grateful to the staffs in Maccabi Health Services for their valuable assistance with this work.

    国产成人影院久久av| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 天堂√8在线中文| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 日本 av在线| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看 | 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 亚洲av美国av| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 久久6这里有精品| 性欧美人与动物交配| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 久久精品影院6| 久久久久九九精品影院| 亚洲在线观看片| 小说图片视频综合网站| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产免费男女视频| 精品国产三级普通话版| 久久久久九九精品影院| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 久久这里只有精品中国| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 亚洲av一区综合| 简卡轻食公司| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 成人二区视频| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 日韩强制内射视频| 久久草成人影院| 日本熟妇午夜| 香蕉av资源在线| 亚洲五月天丁香| 成年av动漫网址| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| www.色视频.com| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 美女黄网站色视频| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| av在线老鸭窝| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产成人a区在线观看| 在线天堂最新版资源| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 在线免费观看的www视频| 亚洲四区av| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 床上黄色一级片| 日韩高清综合在线| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 亚洲国产色片| 成年免费大片在线观看| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 午夜激情欧美在线| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 香蕉av资源在线| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 嫩草影院新地址| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 午夜福利18| 日韩欧美三级三区| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 综合色丁香网| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 成年免费大片在线观看| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 身体一侧抽搐| 嫩草影视91久久| 在线播放国产精品三级| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 久久久久性生活片| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 草草在线视频免费看| 乱人视频在线观看| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 99久国产av精品| 精品福利观看| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 日本成人三级电影网站| 午夜影院日韩av| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 久久九九热精品免费| 欧美3d第一页| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 久久久精品大字幕| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 黑人高潮一二区| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 嫩草影视91久久| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 搞女人的毛片| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产精品久久视频播放| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 精品国产三级普通话版| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 久久午夜福利片| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 赤兔流量卡办理| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 午夜福利18| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| a级毛色黄片| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 日本五十路高清| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 久久久精品大字幕| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 精品福利观看| 免费观看人在逋| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 在线观看66精品国产| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 黄色配什么色好看| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产成人a区在线观看| 深夜a级毛片| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国产午夜精品论理片| 久久中文看片网| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国产综合懂色| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 一级毛片电影观看 | 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 大香蕉久久网| 中国国产av一级| 国产高清三级在线| ponron亚洲| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 色播亚洲综合网| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看 | av中文乱码字幕在线| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 99热6这里只有精品| 99热这里只有是精品50| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 久久久久久久久大av| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 99热只有精品国产| 久久久色成人| 在线国产一区二区在线| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 丰满的人妻完整版| 久久久久九九精品影院| 亚洲图色成人| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 国产高清激情床上av| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 国产成人freesex在线 | 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| eeuss影院久久| videossex国产| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 日韩欧美三级三区| 国产精品久久视频播放| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 欧美日韩在线观看h| av视频在线观看入口| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| av天堂在线播放| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 国产成人freesex在线 | 亚洲图色成人| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 91av网一区二区| 99热全是精品| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 综合色丁香网| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 男人舔奶头视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 国产精品无大码| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 91精品国产九色| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产午夜精品论理片| 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 香蕉av资源在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 人人妻人人看人人澡| av国产免费在线观看| 一本久久中文字幕| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 色综合色国产| 国产 一区精品| 日本免费a在线| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 毛片女人毛片| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 久久热精品热| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产在线男女| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 如何舔出高潮| 小说图片视频综合网站| 亚洲无线在线观看| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 国产 一区精品| 国产单亲对白刺激| 搡老岳熟女国产| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 深夜a级毛片| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 免费看a级黄色片| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 最好的美女福利视频网| 国产单亲对白刺激| 一a级毛片在线观看| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 一级av片app| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 老司机福利观看| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 色av中文字幕| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 91久久精品电影网| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产三级中文精品| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 精品人妻视频免费看| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 国产综合懂色| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 免费观看人在逋| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| av在线播放精品| 黄色一级大片看看| 久久久久国内视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 久99久视频精品免费| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 国产高清激情床上av| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 三级经典国产精品| 嫩草影院入口| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| av在线天堂中文字幕| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 在线观看66精品国产| 国产精华一区二区三区| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 欧美3d第一页| 国产高清激情床上av| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 亚州av有码| 成人欧美大片| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 亚洲无线在线观看| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产乱人视频| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国产高潮美女av| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 黄色配什么色好看| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 美女高潮的动态| 欧美bdsm另类| 日本一本二区三区精品| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 久久久久九九精品影院| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 97超碰精品成人国产| 亚洲av熟女| 熟女电影av网| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 韩国av在线不卡| av国产免费在线观看| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| eeuss影院久久| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 97在线视频观看| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 一级毛片我不卡| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 国产精品,欧美在线| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 欧美激情在线99| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 天美传媒精品一区二区| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 午夜福利18| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 97在线视频观看| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国产三级中文精品| 高清毛片免费看| 久久精品影院6| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频 | 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 看片在线看免费视频| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 草草在线视频免费看| 成人欧美大片| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 91久久精品电影网| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 搞女人的毛片| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 亚洲最大成人av| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| av天堂在线播放| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 黄色配什么色好看| 在线免费十八禁| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| eeuss影院久久| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产精品,欧美在线| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 成人精品一区二区免费| 日韩强制内射视频| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 嫩草影院精品99| 搞女人的毛片| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 久久久久国产网址| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 日本黄大片高清| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 亚洲第一电影网av| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 亚洲无线观看免费| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 小说图片视频综合网站| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 国产高清激情床上av| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 波多野结衣高清作品| 午夜视频国产福利| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 久99久视频精品免费| 久久热精品热| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 一级av片app| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 日本成人三级电影网站| 成人二区视频| 变态另类丝袜制服| av福利片在线观看| 欧美3d第一页| 少妇的逼好多水| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 免费av毛片视频| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 在线天堂最新版资源| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 色在线成人网| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 国产美女午夜福利| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 日本一二三区视频观看| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 97超视频在线观看视频| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放|