• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Estimate of Hydrofluorocarbon Emissions for 2012-16 in the Yangtze River Delta, China

    2020-06-23 03:40:54JingjiaoPUHonghuiXUBoYAOYanYUYujunJIANGQianliMAandLiquCHEN
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2020年6期

    Jingjiao PU, Honghui XU, Bo YAO, Yan YU, Yujun JIANG,, Qianli MA, and Liqu CHEN

    1Zhejiang Meteorological Science Institute, Hangzhou 310008, China

    2Meteorological Observation Center of China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China

    3Zhejiang Lin'an Atmospheric Background National Observation and Research Station, Hangzhou 311307, China

    ABSTRACT

    Key words: hydrofluorocarbons, emissions, Yangtze River Delta, tracer ratio method

    1. Introduction

    Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), since containing no ozonedepleting chlorine or bromine, have been widely used in China as substitutes for ozone-depleting substances (ODSs),the production and use of which are being phased out under the Montreal Protocol. However, HFCs are also long-lived potent greenhouse gases with global warming potentials(GWPs) as high as ozone-depleting chlorofluorocarbons(CFCs) and halons (IPCC, 2005). Consequently, HFCs are regulated under both the 1997 Kyoto Protocol and the 2016 Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol (WMO, 2018).According to the Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment (AGAGE) network, the global surface mean mixing ratios of HFCs in the atmosphere increased from 2012 to 2016 by average rates of 1.6 parts per trillion (ppt) yr-1for HFC-32 (CH2F2), 2.1 ppt yr-1for HFC-125 (CHF2CF3), 5.6 ppt yr-1for HFC-134a (CH2FCF3), and 1.5 ppt yr-1for HFC-143a (CH3CF3), which were larger than the mean increases respectively reported for 2008—12 (WMO, 2018).As emission sources of HFCs are mainly from industrial sectors, such as foam blowing, household/commercial refrigeration, fire extinguishing, etc. (Fang et al., 2018), the increased mixing ratios of HFCs in the atmosphere can be attributed to anthropogenic emissions (Forster et al., 2007).Therefore, many recent studies have focused on estimating anthropogenic HFC emissions.

    Three methods are widely used to estimate the emissions of halocarbons including HFCs. The bottom-up method is based on the data of production and consumption from various sectors, as well as empirical emission factors(IPCC, 2005). China’s halocarbon emission inventories have been reported by using this approach, e.g., China’s historical emissions of ODSs until 2014 (Fang et al., 2018),HFC emissions in China for 2005—13 (Fang et al., 2016),China’s halocarbon emissions for 1995—2004 (Wan et al.,2009), and HFC-410A emissions from the room air-conditioning sector in China for 2006—17 (Liu et al., 2019). The topdown method combines atmospheric measurements and inverse models to simulate the potential sources to the measurement sites and geographic distribution of emission intensities. This approach has been used in estimating the HCFC and HFC emissions in East Asia for the year 2008 (Stohl et al., 2010), CFC-11 emissions from eastern Asia for 2008—17 (Rigby et al., 2019), and HFC and HCFC emissions from China for 2011—17 (Fang et al., 2019; Yao et al.,2019). The third method is the tracer ratio method, which is based on the ratios of measured halocarbons to selected tracers with known emissions, such as CO or HCFC-22. It has been used to infer halocarbon emissions in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) (Shao et al., 2011; Wu et al., 2014),HFC and PFC emissions from the North China Plain (Yao et al., 2012), and anthropogenic halocarbon emissions from China (Fang et al., 2012a).

    The Yangtze River Delta (YRD) is a fast-growing region in China with rapid urbanization and industrialization. The region accounted for 16.1% of China’s population and 23.5% of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) from 2012 to 2016 (National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2013a,2014a, 2015a, 2016a, 2017a). Rapid economic growth has been partly driven by the expanding manufacturing sector,including the fluorine chemical industry, production of electronics, air conditioners, refrigerators and automobiles,which would result in a large amount of HFC emissions. Previous studies have reported that HFC emissions from China grew rapidly since 2005 due to the phase-out of ODSs, and China has become a major producer and consumer of HFCs around the world (Zhang and Wang, 2014; Fang et al.,2016). Mixing ratios of HFCs have been reported in China,as well as in a few specific regions in China, including the YRD (Barletta et al., 2006; Fang et al., 2012b; Zhang et al.,2017). However, studies on China’s HFC emissions or their emission sources have mainly been conducted in the PRD(Wu et al., 2014), Yellow River Delta (Zheng et al., 2019),North China Plain (Yao et al., 2012), and the entire country(Yao et al., 2012, 2019), while few studies have been conducted in the YRD, an area that might contribute significantly to China’s total HFC emissions (Li et al., 2014). In this study, weekly flask measurements for 10 HFCs (HFC-23,HFC-32, HFC-125, HFC-134a, HFC-143a, HFC-152a,HFC-227ea, HFC-236fa, HFC-245fa and HFC-365mfc)were performed at Lin’an Regional Background (LAN) station in the YRD over the period 2012—16. The correlation between HFC and CO enhanced mixing ratios was analyzed and HFC emissions in the YRD were further inferred by the tracer ratio method. The results were compared with those derived by both the inverse modeling method (FLEXPART-model-based Bayesian inverse modeling) and bottom-up method. Finally, the contribution of HFCs in terms of CO2-equivalent emissions from the YRD to the national total was evaluated to inform understanding of the regional significance.

    2. Methods

    2.1. Sampling site

    The sampling site was at LAN station [(30.30°N,119.73°E), 138.6MSL, as shown in Fig. 1], which is located in the south of the YRD region and is about 60 km to the west of Hangzhou and about 195 km to the southwest of Shanghai. The station is well vegetated, surrounded by hilly lands, forest and farmland. The prevailing wind directions are northeasterly and southwesterly (seen in Fig. A1 in Appendix), with distinct meteorological characteristics of subtropical monsoon climate. According to previous studies,LAN station can represent the background circumstances well in the YRD region (Yan et al., 2012; Feng et al., 2015;Deng et al., 2018).

    The areas that might contribute significant emissions to LAN station were identified by backward trajectory calculations using the Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART (V9.01; Stohl et al., 2005). The model was driven by ECMWF (European Centre for Medium range Weather Forecasts) Operational Analysis Data, with a global resolution of 1° × 1° and regional resolution of 0.2° × 0.2° over eastern China. Ten-day air mass backward trajectories were calculated at the sampling time. The derived source receptor relationships (SRRs) (Seibert and Frank, 2004) demonstrated the sensitivity of the mixing ratio observations at LAN to emissions on the grid. The total SRR calculated for HFC pollution events at LAN station from 2012 to 2016 revealed that the potential source area with significant influence was concentrated in four provinces of the YRD (Anhui, Jiangsu,Shanghai and Zhejiang).

    2.2. Experimental method

    The sampling time was 1400—1430 LST, when the atmosphere was well mixed, every Wednesday, over the period 2012—16. The ambient air was drawn from the top of a 50-m-high tower and pressurized into two 3-L canisters that were connected in series. The air samples were shipped to the Greenhouse Gases Laboratory of the Meteorological Observation Center of the China Meteorological Administration (MOC/CMA) in Beijing, where the mixing ratios of the 10 HFCs (HFC-23, HFC-32, HFC-125, HFC-134a, HFC-143a, HFC-152a, HFC-227ea, HFC-236fa, HFC-245fa and HFC-365mfc) were measured by the Medusa GC-MS technique developed by AGAGE. The relative measurement precisions were typically < 3% for HFC-365mfc and < 1% for other HFCs. The system was calibrated by standards traced to AGAGE reference standards and the HFC mixing ratios were reported on the primary calibration scales developed at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. More detailed information on the sampling, instruments and quality control was provided in previous studies (Zhang et al., 2017;Yao et al., 2019).

    CO was observed in-situ by a cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) analyzer (G2401, Picarro Inc., Califonia,USA). The air sample was collected from the same inlet as the HFC samples, and delivered to the analyzer by a membrane pump. After being filtered, the air samples were dried to a dew point of approximately -60°C. The precision of CO measured with this technique is < 2 parts per billion(ppb). The system was calibrated by standard gases that were traceable to WMO/GAW primary standards every 6 h.The observing method was described in detail in Fang et al.(2013). The 5-min average CO concentration closest to the HFC sampling time was chosen, and the time interval between the corresponding samples of the two observations should be no more than 1 h.

    2.3. Data analysis

    The mixing ratios of HFCs were distinguished as“baseline level” and “pollution level” by sequentially applying the “robust extraction of baseline signal” filter (REBS;Ruckstuhl et al., 2012) and a background wind sector method. Firstly, the REBS technique was applied to filter the observation data iteratively so as to fit a local regression curve, and the outliers outside the 1σ range around the current baseline were excluded iteratively until all the data were within the ± 1σ range of the baseline, which could be flagged as “background values”. Secondly, the pollution values were identified by a meteorological data filter, when the airflow came from polluted wind sectors. The background and polluted wind sectors were defined by local pollution sources and the characteristics of other tracers such as CO(Zhou et al., 2003, 2004). The filtered results can be seen in Fig. A2. Finally, the mixing ratio enhancements of HFCs were determined by the absolute value of the polluted mixing ratios minus the background mixing ratios. Considering the lack of background values at LAN, where anthropogenic emissions render significant influence, the background mixing ratios of HFCs in this study were employed via the measurements at Shangri-la (XGL) station[(28°01′N, 99°26′E), 3580.0 MSL], with similar latitude and located far away from human habitat. The air was sampled at XGL with the same method and analyzed with the same instrument type in the lab at MOC/CMA (Zhang et al.,2017; Yao et al., 2019). The background mixing ratio at XGL observed on the same date as that at LAN was chosen first, and if it was missing, the monthly average at XGL was used instead. In-situ CO concentrations were filtered by the REBS filter method (Ruckstuhl et al., 2012).

    2.4. Emissions estimation

    This study adopted the tracer ratio method, which has been widely used in estimating halocarbon emissions. CO was chosen as a tracer since its anthropogenic emissions could be better known than HCFC-22. Many previous studies have focused on CO emissions (Ohara et al., 2007;Zhang et al., 2009; Li et al., 2017; Zheng et al., 2018a,2018b). The CO emissions of the YRD (including Shanghai, Zhejiang, Jiangsu and Anhui provinces) were derived from the CO anthropogenic emissions inventory of MEIC(Multi-resolution Emissions Inventory for China) based on the years 2010 and 2016 (Li et al., 2017), with values of 22.4 and 19.6 Tg yr-1, respectively. The interannual trend of CO emissions in the YRD over the period 2012—15 was determined according to a -2% yr-1decrease in total Chinese CO emissions (Zheng et al., 2018a, 2018b) and the annual growth rate of smoke and dust emissions from the YRD (National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2013a, 2014a,2015a, 2016a, 2017a), resulting in annual CO emissions of 23.1, 24.5, 35.9 and 30.6 Tg yr-1from 2012 to 2015. Thus,the average CO emissions rate of the YRD was about 26.7 Tg yr-1over the period 2012—16. The uncertainty of CO emissions was assumed to be 35%, as reported in previous studies (Zhang et al., 2009; Li et al., 2017).

    The correlations of mixing ratio enhancements between specific HFCs and CO were analyzed in order to assess the applicability of the tracer ratio method to estimate HFC emissions, because a reliable tracer should have significant correlation with most other compounds (Wang et al., 2014). The emissions of the target HFC, Ex(Gg yr-1), can be calculated by its mixing ratio enhancement (ΔCx) and the mixing ratio enhancement of CO (ΔCCO) as follows:

    where Exand ECOrepresent the total emissions of target HFC and that of CO, respectively. Mxand MCOare the molecular weight of the target HFC and CO, respectively.The uncertainty of the emissions estimate was calculated by error propagation, as below:

    where b is the mixing ratio enhancement slope; and σband σEcoare the uncertainties of b and ECO, respectively. Finally,the HFC CO2-equivalent emissions were calculated using the emissions of each HFC multiplied by their 100-yr GWPs (Forster et al., 2007), to evaluate the contribution of the greenhouse effect of HFC emissions in the YRD to that of China.

    3. Results and discussion

    3.1. HFC mixing ratios

    The mixing ratios of HFCs at LAN from 4 January 2012 to 28 December 2016 are illustrated in Table 1 (except for the observation of HFC-365mfc, which started from 6 August 2014), and five-year time series for HFC mixing ratios are presented in Fig. A2. The background mixing ratios of both HFC-23 and HFC-32 accounted for less than 5%, while the background values of HFC-125, HFC-134a,HFC-152a and HFC-245fa took percentages of 10%—20%.Therefore, the background mixing ratios of all 10 HFCs at XGL were instead considered. The relative errors between the background mixing ratios of HFCs at LAN and at XGL were 3.8% (HFC-23), 23.0% (HFC-32), 3.9% (HFC-125),5.2% (HFC-134a), 6.0% (HFC-143a), 31.8% (HFC-152a),0.0% (HFC-227ea), 7.1% (HFC-236fa), 10.3% (HFC-245fa) and 10.6% (HFC-365mfc), which could be mainly explained by the asynchronous sampling time of the background samples at these two stations. Also, they were muchlower than the relative differences between background mixing ratios and pollution mixing ratios of HFCs at LAN,except for HFC-152a, for the mixing ratio of HFC-152a probably has a non-negligible latitudinal gradient (Zhang et al.,2017). Overall, it was feasible to employ the background mixing ratios of HFCs at XGL to represent those at LAN to calculate the mixing ratio enhancements.

    Table 1. Mixing ratios of HFCs measured at LAN and XGL during 2012—16.

    The pollution mixing ratios of HFCs at LAN were much higher than the background values observed at XGL over the period 2012—16. The enhancements between mixing ratios measured at these two stations were 30%—50%(HFC-23, HFC-134a, HFC-143a, HFC-245fa and HFC-365mfc), 61% (HFC-125), 87% (HFC-227ea), 102% (HFC-152a), 179% (HFC-32) and 931% (HFC-236fa).

    3.2. Interspecies correlations of HFCs and CO

    The interspecies correlations of enhanced mixing ratios of the 10 HFCs versus CO are shown in Table 2 and Fig. 2.HFC-23, HFC-32, HFC-125, HFC-152a and HFC-245fa presented significant correlations with the tracer CO (p<0.001), showing Pearson correlation coefficients larger than 0.31. HFC-134a and HFC-227ea also displayed significant but slightly worse correlations (p <0.025), with the correlation coefficients between 0.22 and 0.23. The enhanced mixing ratios of HFC-143a, HFC-236fa and HFC-365mfc did not significantly correlate with those of CO, which might be partly explained by less polluted samples compared to other HFCs (Table 2), and China’s emissions of these three HFCs were relatively small among all HFCs in previous studies(Kim et al., 2010; Yao et al., 2019). Therefore, the emissions of HFC-143a, HFC-236fa and HFC-365mfc are not discussed in this paper.

    3.3. HFC emissions of the YRD

    As listed in Table 3, the estimated total emissions of HFCs in the YRD from 2012 to 2016 were 2.4±1.4 Gg yr-1for HFC-23, 2.8±1.2 Gg yr-1for HFC-32, 2.2±1.2 Gg yr-1for HFC-125, 4.8±4.8 Gg yr-1for HFC-134a, 0.9±0.6 Gg yr-1for HFC-152a, 0.3±0.3 Gg yr-1for HFC-227ea and 0.3±0.2 Gg yr-1for HFC-245fa, respectively. As shown in Fig. 3,among these seven HFCs, HFC-134a, HFC-32, HFC-23 and HFC-125 were the four main HFCs in the YRD, with propor-tions of 35%, 21%, 18% and 16%, respectively, while the total emissions of the other three HFCs shared less than 11%.

    Table 2. Pearson correlation coefficient (R) and regression slope (S) of mixing ratio enhancements between HFCs and CO, with 95%confidence bounds, over the period 2012—16.

    Fig. 2. Correlation coefficient matrix between observed CO and HFC mixing ratio enhancements (a), and regression plots of mixing ratio enhancement of HFC-32 and CO as an example (b).

    Fig. 3. HFC emission proportions in the YRD over the period 2012—16: (a) mass emissions; (b) CO2-equivalent emissions.

    In terms of CO2-equivalent emissions, HFC-23 contributed about two thirds to the total CO2-equivalent emissions due to its high GWP (GWP100=14800) among all 10 of the HFCs in this study. The contribution of HFC-125 or HFC-134a to total CO2-equivalent HFC emissions exceeded 10%,and HFC-32 emissions contributed 3.6%, while the other three HFCs in total contributed less than 3%. Thus, the major HFC compounds in the YRD were HFC-134a, HFC-23, HFC-125 and HFC-32, with both largest mass emissions and CO2-equivalent emissions, and HFC-23 was the primary HFC considering CO2-equivalent emissions. The total CO2-equivalent emissions of HFCs reached 53 Gg yr-1in the YRD, accounting for 2.3% of the CO2emissions without landuse, land-use change and forestry in this region(CCGGWP, 2019).

    HFC emissions in this study were also compared with results reported by previous studies using the bottom-up method, as listed in Table 3. The HFC emissions of the whole of China are listed because studies of the YRD are limited. HFC-23 and HFC-134a emissions in this study and those using the bottom-up method (CCGGWP, 2019)differed relatively little, at 4.2% and 14.5%, respectively.HFC-23 is mainly emitted as a byproduct of HCFC-22 production (Miller et al., 2010). There are nine fluorine chemistry plants producing HCFC-22 in the YRD, of which three are located in Jiangsu Province (contributing 18% of HFC-23 emissions) and six in Zhejiang Province (contributing 82%of HFC-23 emissions). HFC-134a is mainly used as a substitute for CFC-12 in the automobile air-conditioning sector(Hu et al., 2010). Over the period 2012—16, the HFC-134a emissions in the YRD derived from the tracer ratio method comprised 18.6% of those in China by the inverse modeling method, which was consistent with the percentage(approximately 20%) of vehicle numbers in the YRD of the whole country (National Bureau of Statistics of China,2013a, 2014a, 2015a, 2016a, 2017a). There were understandable differences in HFC-125 and HFC-32 emissions between this study and those using the bottom-up method(CCGGWP, 2019) because only their consumption as mixed-blend HFC-410A from the room air-conditioning sector was considered by the bottom-up method. Besides their primary usage, HFC-125 and HFC-32 are also used as R-32 or other mixed blends, such as R-404a and R-507a (Li et al.,2011). The ratios of HFC-410A emissions (sum of HFC-32 emissions and HFC-125 emissions) by the bottom-up method (CCGGWP, 2019) to the sum of HFC-32 and HFC-125 emissions by the tracer ratio method or top-down method were all around 0.5, both in the YRD and at the national scale, indicating that half of HFC-32 and HFC-125 might be used as HFC-410A in the room air-conditioning sector in China.

    It should be noted that up-to-date HFC emissions in China have been reported by a few different studies in the past two years (MEE, 2018; CCGGWP, 2019; Yao et al.,2019). However, there were significantly large differences(as large as 2 to 90 times, depending on specific HFC species) among the different studies, which could hardly be explained by their different time scales. Further studies are needed to reduce these discrepancies.

    3.4. The YRD’s HFC emissions contribution to China

    The proportion of HFC emissions in the YRD to national totals reflects the regional significance. Here, the emissions using the top-down method for the same period(Yao et al., 2019) and HFC-23 emissions in 2015 by CCGGWP (2019) were chosen to represent national levels.Therefore, the HFC emissions in the YRD counted for 46%(HFC-23), 38% (HFC-32), 23% (HFC-125), 19% (HFC-134a), 18% (HFC-152a), 36% (HFC-227ea) and 27%(HFC-245fa) of national totals. The total CO2-equivalent emissions of these seven HFCs in the YRD contributed 34%of the total HFC emissions in China. In comparison with previous studies that were carried out in other regions of China,the HFC-134a in the PRD accounted for only about 8% of national total emissions in 2010 (Wu et al., 2014), and the per capita HFC-134a emissions rate was 12.5 g yr-1, which is much lower than that in the YRD at 18.7 g yr-1. Therefore, the YRD constitutes a significant emissions source of HFCs in China.

    Fig. 4. Comparison of total HFC CO2-equivalent emission intensities of the YRD, China and global levels from 2012 to 2016. National CO2-equivalent emissions of HFC-23 were derived from the bottom-up method (CCGGWP, 2019), and other HFC emissions were from the inverse modeling method(Yao et al., 2019). Global total CO2-equivalent emissions were based on emissions derived from observations at remote AGAGE stations (Rigby et al., 2014; Engel et al., 2018).

    The CO2-equivalent emission intensities of HFCs are illustrated in Fig. 4. Here, global total CO2-equivalent emissions were based on emissions derived from observations at remote AGAGE stations (Rigby et al., 2014; Engel et al.,2018), and the global population and GDP were derived from the International Statistical Yearbook (National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2013b, 2014b, 2015b, 2016b,2017b). The national population and GDP data were from the China Statistical Yearbook (National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2013a, 2014a, 2015a, 2016a, 2017a). Compared with either the national or global emissions intensity,the YRD displayed as a higher HFC emitter. The per capita HFC CO2-equivalent emissions intensity of the YRD was nearly twice the national or global levels, at 240 kg per capita per year. In terms of emissions per unit area, the emissions intensity of the YRD was about 24 times the global value and 8 times the national value, amounting to more than 150 Mg km-2yr-1. The emissions rate per million GDP in Chinese Yuan (CNY) was 3500 kg yr-1, twice the global value. In conclusion, the emissions intensity of HFCs in the YRD was notably high, whether in terms of per capita or per unit area or per unit GDP. It should be noted that HFC-23 emissions in the YRD contributed around two thirds to total HFC emissions in the YRD, or more than 1/5 to the national HFC emissions, in terms of CO2-equivalent.Hence, if HFC-23 emissions were totally eliminated, the emissions intensity of the YRD would be lower than national and global levels, and thus HFC-23 is the key HFC species when considering the mitigation potential of HFCs in the YRD, or even in China as a whole.

    4. Conclusions

    Based on co-located atmospheric measurements of 10 HFCs and CO at LAN in the YRD from 2012 to 2016, significant correlations were found between the enhanced mixing ratio of CO and those of seven HFCs, which were HFC-23, HFC-32, HFC-125, HFC-134a, HFC-152a, HFC-227ea and HFC-245fa. The emissions of these HFCs were estimated by the tracer ratio method. Among these seven HFCs,HFC-134a, HFC-23, HFC-32 and HFC-125 contributed more than 89% of the total emissions, while in terms of CO2-equivalent emissions, HFC-23 contributed approximately two thirds of all HFCs.

    HFC-23 and HFC-134a emissions in this study were estimated to be quite close to those using the bottom-up method. However, there were large discrepancies among different studies in terms of national-scale estimation.

    The total HFC CO2-equivalent emissions of the YRD contributed 34% of the national total, and the HFC emissions intensity of the YRD was much larger than the national or global level in terms of per capita, or per unit area, or per unit GDP. Therefore, the YRD region is a significant source area for HFC emissions in China, indicating the considerable mitigation potential that could be achieved by regulating HFC-23 in the YRD region.

    Acknowledgements. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.41575114 and 41730103), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. LY19D050002) and the Meteorological Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province(Grant No. 2019ZD12). We thank the station personnel who have supported canister sampling at XGL. We also thank the AGAGE network for its technical assistance and the Scripps Institution of Oceanography for help with the technique transfer, processing software and calibration standards.

    APPENDIX

    TIME SERIES of HFC MIXING RATIOS at LAN

    Figure A2 shows the time series of the HFC mixing ratios observed at LAN from 2012 to 2016. The progressive increase of eight HFC (HFC-23, HFC-32, HFC-125,HFC-134a, HFC-143a, HFC-227ea, HFC-245fa, and HFC-365mfc) mixing ratios at LAN can be seen, while the annual average mixing ratios of HFC-152a and HFC-236fa fluctuated without rapid increase at LAN from 2012 to 2016. Compared to the annual mean growth rates of HFCs observed at SDZ station in the North China Plain from 2010 to 2011 (Yao,et al, 2012), the values at LAN were much higher for HFC-23, HFC-32, HFC-125, and HFC-134a, but not HFC-152a.

    Fig. A1. Wind rose at LAN station from January 2012 to December 2016 based on hourly data.

    Fig. A2. Time series of HFC mixing ratios at LAN station from January 2012 to December 2016.

    女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 日韩欧美三级三区| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产成人aa在线观看| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 此物有八面人人有两片| av福利片在线观看| 中文资源天堂在线| 亚洲无线观看免费| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 国产成人freesex在线 | 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 嫩草影院入口| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 日本色播在线视频| 99热只有精品国产| 一夜夜www| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 91精品国产九色| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 搞女人的毛片| .国产精品久久| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 精品久久久噜噜| 老女人水多毛片| 在线看三级毛片| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 久久久久国产网址| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 亚洲18禁久久av| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 嫩草影视91久久| 美女黄网站色视频| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 久久久国产成人免费| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 精品国产三级普通话版| 久久这里只有精品中国| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品 | 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 中国国产av一级| 一本一本综合久久| 69av精品久久久久久| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 亚洲四区av| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 1024手机看黄色片| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 久久精品人妻少妇| 欧美+日韩+精品| 久久草成人影院| 日韩欧美三级三区| 亚洲最大成人中文| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 日韩欧美免费精品| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 免费观看在线日韩| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 一级黄色大片毛片| 搞女人的毛片| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 老女人水多毛片| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 少妇高潮的动态图| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| a级毛色黄片| 亚洲四区av| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 午夜福利高清视频| 尾随美女入室| 一本精品99久久精品77| 国产美女午夜福利| 在现免费观看毛片| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 老司机影院成人| 亚洲五月天丁香| 十八禁网站免费在线| 久久这里只有精品中国| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 男女那种视频在线观看| 热99re8久久精品国产| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 国产乱人视频| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 精品久久久久久成人av| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 日本与韩国留学比较| 国产高清激情床上av| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 大香蕉久久网| 国产黄片美女视频| 三级经典国产精品| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 身体一侧抽搐| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 长腿黑丝高跟| 尾随美女入室| 伦精品一区二区三区| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 日本成人三级电影网站| 插逼视频在线观看| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | av视频在线观看入口| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| av国产免费在线观看| 伦精品一区二区三区| av在线亚洲专区| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 免费观看精品视频网站| 国产成人a区在线观看| 国产在视频线在精品| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 一进一出抽搐动态| 69人妻影院| 夜夜爽天天搞| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 我要搜黄色片| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 国产精品一及| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| videossex国产| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| av天堂在线播放| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 欧美成人a在线观看| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 久久精品国产自在天天线| av在线观看视频网站免费| 国产精品野战在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产高潮美女av| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 男人舔奶头视频| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 国产高清激情床上av| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 国产精品无大码| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 美女高潮的动态| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 一本精品99久久精品77| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 夜夜爽天天搞| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 亚洲av美国av| 精品日产1卡2卡| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| .国产精品久久| avwww免费| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 黄色一级大片看看| 久久这里只有精品中国| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 天堂网av新在线| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 日本 av在线| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 久久久色成人| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 美女黄网站色视频| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 国产日本99.免费观看| 日本在线视频免费播放| 国产在线男女| 97碰自拍视频| 99久久精品热视频| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 成年免费大片在线观看| 国产在线男女| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 亚洲18禁久久av| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看 | 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 日本黄大片高清| 亚洲av成人av| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 欧美zozozo另类| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 18+在线观看网站| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 在线观看一区二区三区| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 中国美女看黄片| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 色5月婷婷丁香| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 日本a在线网址| 校园春色视频在线观看| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 99久国产av精品国产电影| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 久久精品91蜜桃| 亚洲内射少妇av| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产91av在线免费观看| 身体一侧抽搐| 中国国产av一级| 在现免费观看毛片| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 一级毛片电影观看 | 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 极品教师在线视频| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 嫩草影视91久久| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 日韩欧美三级三区| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 黄片wwwwww| 亚洲五月天丁香| 亚洲图色成人| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 日韩欧美在线乱码| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 亚洲av一区综合| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 婷婷亚洲欧美| avwww免费| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 亚洲色图av天堂| 欧美bdsm另类| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 国产色婷婷99| 国产av在哪里看| 色播亚洲综合网| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 久久久精品大字幕| 久久精品91蜜桃| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 亚洲在线观看片| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 一本一本综合久久| 99热这里只有是精品50| 91久久精品电影网| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 午夜福利高清视频| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 日本 av在线| 久久午夜福利片| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 中国美女看黄片| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| av免费在线看不卡| 春色校园在线视频观看| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 伦精品一区二区三区| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 搞女人的毛片| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 日本在线视频免费播放| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国产av不卡久久| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 最好的美女福利视频网| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 高清毛片免费看| 一级av片app| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 一区福利在线观看| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 97在线视频观看| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 久久久久久久久中文| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 1000部很黄的大片| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 日本成人三级电影网站| 嫩草影院精品99| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 九色成人免费人妻av| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 色哟哟·www| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 日本a在线网址| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | av在线蜜桃| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 不卡一级毛片| 免费观看人在逋| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 午夜影院日韩av| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 免费av毛片视频| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 美女黄网站色视频| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 全区人妻精品视频| 日本免费a在线| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 日本一二三区视频观看| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 天堂动漫精品| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 成人二区视频| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 天堂√8在线中文| av在线老鸭窝| 精品一区二区免费观看| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 日本免费a在线| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 一区福利在线观看| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 插逼视频在线观看| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 亚洲图色成人| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 国产日本99.免费观看| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 欧美性感艳星| 99久久精品一区二区三区| www.色视频.com| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 欧美区成人在线视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 久久久久国内视频| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 精品久久久久久久久av| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 少妇丰满av| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 搞女人的毛片| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 亚洲四区av| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 亚洲精品国产av成人精品 | 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 悠悠久久av| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 九九在线视频观看精品| 波多野结衣高清作品| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 日韩中字成人| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 国产av在哪里看| 韩国av在线不卡| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 色视频www国产| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 身体一侧抽搐| 免费在线观看成人毛片| av在线蜜桃| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 久久人人爽人人片av| 国产乱人视频| 一级黄片播放器| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 亚洲五月天丁香| 在线天堂最新版资源| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 国产av在哪里看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| av中文乱码字幕在线| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 一本一本综合久久| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 永久网站在线| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产高潮美女av| 国产成人aa在线观看| 97碰自拍视频| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| av免费在线看不卡| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频|