• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Marker-Assisted Introgression of Quantitative Resistance Gene pi21 Confers Broad Spectrum Resistance to Rice Blast

    2020-04-01 16:24:20RosalynANGELESSHIMVincentREYESMarilyndelVALLERubyLAPISJunghyunSHIMHidehikoSUNOHARAKshirodJENAMotoyukiASHIKARIKazuyukiDOI
    Rice Science 2020年2期

    Rosalyn B. ANGELES-SHIM , Vincent P. REYES Marilyn M. del VALLE Ruby S. LAPISJunghyun SHIM , Hidehiko SUNOHARA, Kshirod K. JENA Motoyuki ASHIKARI Kazuyuki DOI

    (1Plant Breeding Division, International Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, the Philippines; 2Bioscience and Biotechnology Center, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku Furo-cho, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8601, Japan; 3Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku Furo-cho, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8601, Japan; 4Department of Plant and Soil Science, College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409, USA)

    Abstract: The quantitative resistance gene pi21 from Sensho was introgressed to an indica breeding line IR63307-4B-13-2, a pyramiding line IRBB4/5/13/21, and a tropical japonica line Kinandang Patong by marker-assisted backcrossing. A total of 192 improved lines at the BC4F3 and BC4F4 generations were developed and confirmed to have the gene introgression via genotyping using a pi21-specific InDel marker. Thirteen randomly selected improved lines, representing all the three genetic backgrounds,demonstrated resistance against leaf blast composites in the field and a broader spectrum resistance against individual isolates compared to the recurrent parents in the glasshouse. Specifically, the tested lines exhibited pi21-acquired resistance against 11 leaf blast isolates that elicited susceptible reactions from the recurrent parents. All the tested lines maintained a comparative heading date, and similar or improved panicle length, number of primary branches per panicle and number of total grains per panicle relative to the recurrent parents. The physical grain characteristics of the recurrent parents were also maintained in the 13 lines tested, although variability in the amylose content and chalkiness degree was observed. The successful marker-assisted introgression of pi21 in diverse genetic backgrounds and the resulting broader spectrum resistance of improved lines against leaf blast indicate the potential of pi21 for deployment in cultivars grown across other rice growing regions in Asia.

    Key words: rice blast; pi21 gene; marker-assisted breeding; disease resistance

    Rice blast caused by Magnaporthe oryzae (anamorph Pyricularia grisea Sacc.) remains the most economically devastating disease of cultivated rice worldwide and is a major threat to rice production (Dean et al, 2005;Sharma et al, 2012; Yasuda et al, 2015). The incidence of the disease has been reported in 85 countries,particularly in the irrigated and rainfed lowlands of temperate and subtropical Asia, as well as in the uplands of tropical Asia, Latin America and Africa (Sharma et al,2012). Annual economic loss due to blast has been estimated to equal yields that can feed 60 million people (Zeigler et al, 1994; Scheuermann et al, 2012).

    Although various measures are available to control rice blast, breeding and cultivation of resistant rice cultivars remain the most efficient, economical and environmentally benign means to manage the disease,especially in resource-poor farmers’ fields (Séré et al,2007; Zeng et al, 2015). To date, more than 100 genes for blast resistance have been identified in rice,although less than 20 have been cloned (Sharma et al,2012; Yasuda et al, 2015). Host plant resistance through the expression of these genes has been generally classified as either qualitative or quantitative. Qualitative or complete resistance is often race-specific and is controlled by a single dominant or recessive R gene(Kou and Wang, 2012). In contrast, quantitative, partial or field resistance is usually non-race-specific and is controlled by quantitative trait loci (QTLs) or multiple genes.

    The recessive pi21 allele is a quantitative blast resistance gene that was isolated from the japonica rice cultivar Owarihatamochi on chromosome 4 (Fukuoka et al, 2009). Deletions in the proline-rich motifs of pi21 accelerate the defense response of the plant under blast attack, although the response is neither as strong nor as fast as that of a qualitative resistance gene. This type of non-specific, weaker response presumably contributes to the reduction of selective pressure for pathogens to overcome host resistance, rendering pi21 more durable and broad-spectrum (Fukuoka and Okuno, 2001; Fukuoka et al, 2009, 2012). Previous studies on the introgression of pi21, alone or in combination with other quantitative resistance genes in select Japanese rice cultivars confirmed the effectivity of pi21 in conferring durable resistance against blast isolates in Japan (Fukuoka et al, 2009, 2015; Yasuda et al, 2015; Horo et al, 2016). Combining pi21 with another quantitative resistance gene, Pi35, in the japonica rice cultivar Koshihikari, results in the resistant reaction of the cultivar against the Japanese blast isolate Ao-92-06-2. Even without Pi35, pi21 is able to significantly reduce the diseased leaf area caused by the blast isolate (Yasuda et al, 2015).Similarly, near-isogenic lines of pi21 in the japonica rice cultivar Aichiasahi exhibit significant reduction in leaf lesion size when challenged with nine Japanese blast isolates (Fukuoka et al, 2015). Although the results of these studies strongly indicate the efficiency of pi21 in conferring blast resistance in rice, the effects have only been assessed in the genetic background of temperate japonica cultivars against the blast isolates from Japan.

    The genetic diversity and evolution of fungal pathogens are spatially dependent on their native hosts.Because of this dependence, blast resistance genes have been reported to exhibit differential effectivity against fungal pathotypes from various geographical origins (Kiyosawa and Ling, 2001; Séré et al, 2007). It is likely, therefore, that both the spectrum and degree of resistance of pi21 against blast isolates from Japan will differ from those in different geographical sources. To establish the spatial suitability of pi21 for targeted deployment, its expression in different genetic backgrounds in response to diverse pathogen populations under multiple environments needs to be evaluated. The aim of this study was to introgress pi21 by marker-assisted backcrossing into indica and tropical japonica backgrounds, and assess the spectrum of resistance of the gene in these genetic backgrounds against blast isolates maintained at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in the Philippines.Preliminary evaluations of the effects of pi21 introgression on the agronomic performance and grain quality of the improved rice lines were also carried out.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Rice materials

    The Japanese upland rice cultivar Sensho shares the recessive pi21 allele of Owarihatamochi (Kawasaki-Tanaka and Fukuta, 2014; Yasuda et al, 2015) and has been shown to exhibit field resistance to blast isolates in Japan (Goto, 1970; Kato et al, 2002). In this study,Sensho was used as the donor of pi21, whereas an advanced breeding line IR63307-4B-13-2 (IR63307),a pyramiding line IRBB4/5/13/21 (IRBB) and a landrace Kinandang Patong (KP) were selected as breeding targets for leaf blast resistance improvement(Fig. 1-A). IR63307 is a medium-maturing indica line bred for salt tolerance at IRRI. IRBB is an indica pyramiding line bred to express Xa4, xa5, xa13 and Xa21 genes for bacterial blight resistance (Huang et al,1997). KP is a tropical japonica landrace (Uga et al,2013) from the Philippines with reported tolerance to drought (Yue et al, 2006; Uga et al, 2011, 2013) and is mostly grown in the uplands.

    Introgression of pi21 allele from Sensho to different genetic backgrounds by marker-assisted backcrossing (MAB)

    A graphical representation of the marker-assisted backcrossing scheme used to transfer pi21 to various genetic backgrounds is presented in Fig. 1-B. Initial crosses (F1) between Sensho and the recurrent parents,as well as early backcross populations in the backgrounds of IRBB and KP (BC1F1), and IR63307 (BC2F1), were generated at the Togo field of Nagoya University,Aichi, Japan, from 2011 to 2012. In January 2013,BC1F1and BC2F1seeds were exported to IRRI for further backcrossing and generation advance. Due to the limited number of seeds, only 12 and 24 BC1F1plants in the IRBB and KP backgrounds, respectively,and 48 BC2F1plants in the IR63307 background were grown during the initial planting of the materials in IRRI in the wet season of 2013. Ten plants that approximate the gross morphology of the recurrent parents were then selected from each population for blind backcrossing. During the following dry season(2014), a total of 240 BC2F1and 144 BC3F1plants were established in the field for marker-assisted selection (MAS) using an InDel marker (forward primer:GATCCTCATCGTCGACGTCTGGC and reverse primer: AGGGTACGGCACCAGCTTG) targeting the pi21 locus in Sensho. Seven plants from each cross combination that are heterozygous for the pi21 allele were selected for backcrossing to the recurrent parents.The rest of the plants that are segregating for the pi21 allele were tagged and allowed to self-pollinate. Each of 120 BC3F1plants in the backgrounds of IRBB and KP were genotyped for the pi21 introgression and 7 plants that are heterozygous for the target allele were again backcrossed to their respective recurrent parents.Sixty BC4F1plants each in the genetic backgrounds of IRBB, KP and IR63307 were advanced up to BC4F3generation by self-pollination following MAS. Because the breeding lines in the IR63307 background were already advance by one backcross generation upon exportation to IRRI, we were able to self them by one more generation (BC4F4). DNAs of all the materials used in the MAB were extracted following the method of Miura et al (2009), using a buffer composed of Tris-HCl, potassium chloride and EDTA salt. PCR analysis was carried out using a standard PCR profile for simple sequence repeats (Shim et al, 2015).

    All the improved lines generated in this study were part of the breeding project ‘Wonder Rice Initiative for Food Security and Health’ (WISH) and hence, are referred to hereinafter as ‘WISH’ lines.

    Screening of WISH lines for leaf blast resistance under nursery and glasshouse conditions

    Sensho, IR63307, IRBB and KP, along with 15 randomly selected WISH lines representing all the three recurrent backgrounds were screened for their resistance to natural blast composites in the uniform blast nursery (UBN) of IRRI, as well as to 20 virulent isolates of the pathogen in the glasshouse. The indica rice varieties Lijiangxintuanheigu (LTH) and CO39 were used as susceptible controls (Teleblanco-Yanoria et al, 2011; Vasudevan et al, 2014), whereas the cultivar IR72 and/or breeding line IR65482-4-136-2-2 were used as resistant controls during the course of evaluation. IR72 and IR65482-4-136-2-2 carry the blast resistance genes, Pib and Pi40, respectively(Fujita et al, 2009; Prahalada et al, 2017). Leaf blast screening of the parental and the WISH lines in UBN was carried out following the methods of Suh et al(2009). Seedlings of each line (40-50 plants) were planted in two replications in nursery beds during the dry season of 2016. Spreader rows composed of a mixture of cultivars (IR72, IR36, CO39, IR50 and IR42) with varying levels of resistance to leaf blast were planted around each replicate to maintain the diverse pathogen population. Alongside this, susceptible controls were planted in parallel fields. Leaf blastinfected seedlings of the susceptible controls were used as natural sources of inoculum. Ten days after sowing,controls exhibiting leaf lesions due to blast were uprooted from parallel fields and spread in between the experimental materials to allow natural infection by the pathogen. The nursery beds were watered 3-4 times a day and covered with a plastic sheet every afternoon(5:00 pm) to maintain the high humidity requirement for pathogen sporulation. Scoring of the test materials for leaf lesions due to blast was carried out at 14 (initial or spot reading) and 24 d after inoculation (final scoring). Lesion type was scored using the 0-9 scale of the standard evaluation system (SES) of IRRI where scores of 0-3 indicate resistance, 4-6 indicate moderate resistance (quantitative resistance), and 7-9 indicate susceptibility (IRRI, 2014).

    Isolate-specific screening for resistance to 20 known virulent blast isolates from the Philippines (Teleblanco-Yanoria et al, 2008; Selisana et al, 2017) was also carried out in two replicates in the glasshouse facility of IRRI during the dry season of 2016 following Jeung et al (2007) (Supplemental Table 1). The WISH lines(24 plants/line) were grown in plastic trays (10 rows ×2 columns) in 20 batches for inoculation with 20 blast isolates. Seedlings of each line (21-day-old) were spray-inoculated with 20 mL spore suspension (1.5 ×105spores/mL) of individual isolates. The inoculated plants were maintained in the glasshouse at 12 h day /12 h night photoperiod and 90% relative humidity for 7 d. One week before the assessment of the reaction, the plants were transferred to the incubation chamber set at 25 °C ± 2 °C. Scoring was carried out following the standards for leaf blast scoring of the Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (Hayashi et al,2009). Leaf lesion scores ranging from 0 to 2.9 were considered resistant, whereas scores of 3-5 were considered susceptible.

    Preliminary field evaluation of WISH lines for yield components

    Preliminary evaluation of the agronomic performance of the WISH lines with the pi21 introgression was carried out in a field experiment conducted in IRRI during the wet season of 2016. Seeds used for the agronomic testing came from the same lot used for leaf blast resistance screening. Twenty-four plants per line were grown to maturity in 2-row plots spaced at 20 cm × 20 cm following the standard agronomic practices in IRRI. Data on yield components including heading date, plant height, tiller number per plant,panicle length, number of primary branches per panicle,total number of grains per panicle, seed-setting rate,and 100-grain weight were recorded from five plants each line, as well as from the recurrent parents used to generate the introgression lines. Heading date was determined as the number of days from seeding until 50% of the plants per line were flowering. Seeds were air-dried in the glasshouse for 7 d or until seed moisture content reached 13%-14% and then weighed.

    Comparative grain quality testing of WISH lines having pi21

    Each WISH line (24 plants) and the parents were planted in the field during the dry and wet seasons of 2017. The seeds came from the same lot were used for leaf blast resistance screening and agronomic testing.At harvest, seeds for each line were bulk-harvested,and 200 g seeds per line from each season were submitted to the Grain Quality and Nutrition Center of IRRI for comparative grain quality testing. All lines were screened for physicochemical properties including grain dimension and overall grain chalkiness degree using the CervitecTM1625 Grain Inspector (Foss,Denmark). Measurement of amylose content was conducted using the routine method of ISO6647(International Standardization Organization, 2007).

    Statistical analysis

    All agronomic data were analyzed using the Statistical Tool for Agricultural Research software v2.01 (STAR v2.01) (IRRI, 2013). Significant differences in the values of the parameters measured between the advanced generation lines relative to those of the recurrent parents were determined by one-way analysis of variance and post hoc comparison of means using the Tukey’s test at 95% confidence level (P < 0.05).

    RESULTS

    Development of WISH lines with pi21 introgression by MAB

    A total of 72 WISH lines in the background of IR63307 and 60 WISH lines each in the backgrounds of IRBB and KP having the pi21 allele for blast resistance from Sensho were generated as part of the WISH Breeding Project. Repeated backcrossing of the early breeding lines to their respective recurrent parents was carried out to recover as much as 95%(96.875% theoretically in BC4Fn) of the genome of the recurrent parent, as well as to increase the chances of recombination within the pi21 locus that will allow the dissociation of the latter from genes that negatively affect grain quality of rice. Backcross generations segregated into 1:1 ratio for the pi21 locus.

    Reaction of WISH lines to blast isolates

    Seedlings of two WISH lines in the KP background were damaged by pests during the blast screening in the field and hence were removed from the initial set of materials that were selected for leaf blast resistance screening and agronomic evaluation (Table 1).

    Sensho recorded resistance to the leaf blast composite in the field, with average resistant scores of 1.1 and 1.5 during the initial and final readings,respectively. The resistance scores of Sensho were comparable to those obtained for the resistant control,IR65482-4-136-2-2. Similarly, the recurrent parents IR63307 and KP exhibited resistant reactions to the naturally occurring leaf blast composite in the UBN,with final reading scores ranging from 0 to 0.5. IRBB showed moderate resistance, with average scores of 4.0 and 5.0 during the initial and final readings,respectively. All the WISH lines scored resistant to the leaf blast composite in the nursery, with average scores ranging from 0 to 3.5. The susceptible control,CO39 scored higher than 7 during both the initial and final readings, whereas LTH plants scored moderately resistant during the initial reading but died before the final reading.

    In the glasshouse, the donor line, the recurrent parents, as well as all the WISH lines exhibited differential reaction to the 20 leaf blast isolates tested(Supplemental Table 2). Sensho was resistant to 16 highly virulent leaf blast isolates and susceptible to 4 isolates namely V850256, BN209, BN111 and P06-6.The resistant scores of Sensho against the 16 virulent strains ranged from 0 to 2, whereas the susceptible scores against the remaining 4 strains ranged from 3 to 4. Although used as susceptible controls, CO39 and LTH exhibited resistance to isolate 43, with CO39 also recording resistance to isolate BZ64-1. However, the resistant controls IR65482-4-136-2-2 and IR72 showed susceptibility to isolates JMB8401 and M39-1-3-8-1,respectively. IR63307 exhibited susceptibility to only three isolates (51671, P06-6 and 9475-1-3), whereas IRBB exhibited susceptibility to nine isolates(JMB840610, V850256, M39-1-2-21-2, Pi9-G7-2K-1,JMB8401, IK813, P06-6, M64-1-3-9-1 and IK81-25),and KP also to nine isolates (V850256, V806010,BN209, BN111, Pi9-G7-2K-1, M101-1-2-9-1, 51671,M64-1-3-9-1 and 9475-1-3). Lesion scores caused by leaf blast isolates that elicited susceptible reactions from IR63307, IRBB and KP ranged from 3 to 5.

    WISH lines in the IR63307 background were resistant to all the 20 isolates despite the susceptibility of both donor and recurrent parent lines to isolate P06-6. All the IRBB-derived lines were resistant to 15 isolates and completely susceptible to 2 isolates(P06-6 and M64-1-3-9-1). WISH48:1-3-2-1 in the genetic background of IRBB was resistant to leaf blast isolate V850256, which elicited a susceptible reaction from both IRBB and Sensho. All WISH lines in the background of KP were resistant to 19 leaf blast isolates, 8 of which elicited a susceptible reaction from KP. Resistances to V850256, BN209 and BN111 of WISH lines derived from KP were observed despite the susceptibility of both Sensho and KP to theseisolates. All the 18 WISH lines were resistant to 8 blast isolates namely JMB840610, M39-1-2-21-2,BN209, BN111, M101-1-2-9-1, JMB8401, IK81-3 and 5167-1, despite the susceptibility of either parents to some of the isolates (Supplemental Table 2).

    Table 1. Reaction of WISH lines to natural leaf blast infection in the field based on SES scores (IRRI, 2014).

    Agronomic performance of improved lines with pi21 for blast resistance

    The WISH lines resembled their respective recurrent parent for most of the agronomic traits examined,although a few lines recorded significantly different values for specific agronomic traits. For example, WISH lines in the genetic background of IR63307 exhibited significantly higher plants (WISH110:1-1-11-12-1,WISH110:1-1-11-5-4 and WISH110:2-5-2-1-1), longer panicles (WISH110:2-5-2-1-1), more number of primary branches per panicle and total grain number per panicle(WISH110:1-1-11-5-4 and WISH110:2-5-2-1-1), higher seed-setting rate (WISH110:1-1-11-12-1 and WISH110:2-5-2-1-1), and significantly lower 100-grain weight(WISH110:2-5-2-12-1) compared to the recurrent parent (Fig. 2). All WISH lines in the background of IRBB recorded a significantly lower values for at least one agronomic trait compared to the recurrent parent.Only WISH48:1-3-20-1 exhibited a significantly higher value for total grain number per panicle compared to IRBB (Fig. 2). All WISH lines in the KP background approximated the gross morphology of the recurrent parent except for one line (WISH40:1-3-7-7)that exhibited significantly lower plant height (Fig. 2).Heading dates in all WISH lines were similar to those of the respective recurrent parents.

    Grain quality of improved lines having pi21 allele

    Analysis of variance showed no significant differences in the brown and cooked grain length and width, and grain shape of the WISH lines compared to their respective recurrent parents (Supplemental Table 3).However, variation in the chalkiness degree in the grains was observed across the WISH lines tested regardless of the genetic background and season (Fig.3). A lower grain chalkiness degree was recorded for all the WISH lines in the genetic background of IR63307 compared to the recurrent parent (Fig. 3-B).

    IRBB recorded 0.3%-0.4% chalkiness degree, whereas the WISH lines derived from IRBB recorded chalkiness degree ranging from 0.3%-7.9% during both seasons(Fig. 3-C and Supplemental Table 3). Similarly, KPderived WISH lines recorded variable chalkiness degrees that ranged from 6.6% to 17.0% compared to the 7.5%-8.5% chalkiness degree of the recurrent parent during both seasons (Fig. 3-D). WISH lines derived from IR63307 and KP had comparable amylose content with those of the recurrent parents. Grains of WISH lines in the IRBB background recorded a generally higher range of amylose content (15.3% to 21.0%)compared to that of the recurrent parent (12.9%-13.0%) during the dry and wet seasons (Supplemental Table 3).

    DISCUSSION

    The differential response of the same blast resistance genes to fungal pathotypes from various geographical origins has been attributed to the spatial dependence of the pathogen to its native hosts (Kiyosawa and Ling,2001; Séré et al, 2007). To establish the spatial suitability of a resistance gene such as pi21 for targeted deployment, it needs to be evaluated for disease response under multiple environments, preferably in the target location, using diverse races of the pathogen.

    In this study, pi21 was introgressed by MAB into three different rice backgrounds that are preferentially grown by farmers for favorable traits inherent in each line. Disease screening established the resistance of the pi21 donor cultivar, Sensho, to leaf blast composites in field nurseries, as well as to 16 out of 20 leaf blast isolates in the glasshouse. Similarly, IRBB, KP and IR63307 recorded varying levels of resistance to blast composites in the field and against individual isolates.

    Genes for leaf blast resistance have not been directly identified from IR63307 and IRBB although the pedigrees of each cultivar hint on the origin of their resistance to the blast isolates used in the study.IR63307, for example, is a product of a cross between a somaclonal variant of the salt-tolerant landrace Pokkali and the breeding line IR51511-B-B-34-B.IR51511-B-B-34-B was selected from crosses between the breeding line IR8909 and the cultivar IR34. The resistance genes Pib, Pik-s, Piz-t and Pia that have been identified in IR34 (Imbe et al, 1998) may have provided the inherent resistance of IR63307 to 17 leaf blast isolates tested in the study. However, because Pib, Pik-s, Piz-t and Pia have not been reported to exhibit resistance to all isolates used in this study, the resistant reaction of IR63307 to 17 leaf blast isolates may also be attributed to the presence of other unidentified genes (Fukuta et al, 2004; Teleblanco-Yanoria et al, 2011). Likewise, IRBB benefits from having the genetic background of the rice cultivar IR24, which is a product of multi-crossing of at least 28 landraces (Li and Yuan, 1985). Previous studies showed that IR24 has resistance to the Philippine blast isolates BN209, V850196, BN111 and B9002 as conferred by the Pib, Pik-s, Pi20t and Pia genes,respectively (Imbe et al, 1997, 1998; Sallaud et al,2003). In the present study, IRBB also exhibited resistance to BN209 and BN111, indicating the probable presence of Pib and Pi20t in the cultivar. The presence of other undetermined genes from IR24,alone or in combination with Pib and Pi20t, and possibly Pia and Pik-s, may account for the resistance of IRBB to 11 Philippine blast isolates. KP is a landrace that is highly adapted to the Philippines uplands. It has been reported to exhibit weak resistance to both upland and lowland blast isolates(Bonman et al, 1986). Isolate-specific screening of KP in the glasshouse demonstrated the resistance of the landrace to 11 out of 20 blast isolates, confirming previous reports of blast resistance in KP.

    Given the inherent resistance of the recurrent parents used in the study, the resistant scores of the WISH lines against the field leaf blast composites may be attributed to either the action of pi21 from Sensho, alone or in combination with the unidentified or putative resistance genes present in the background of the recurrent parents. Under glasshouse conditions,pi21 introgression provided resistance to a wider range of leaf blast isolates in the WISH lines compared to the recurrent parents. Differences in the response of the WISH lines to the pathogen under field and glasshouse conditions may be attributed to the absence of isolates that elicited susceptible reactions from the WISH lines under glasshouse conditions in the composites of the pathogen that are present in the field. Identification of the individual isolates that comprise the blast composite in the field would be necessary to confirm such assumption.

    The acquired resistance of the WISH lines to specific isolates showed that pi21 can confer a broader spectrum of resistance against blast isolates coming from geographically different origins. Conversely, the observed resistance of WISH lines to isolates that elicited susceptible reactions from Sensho substantiates the presence of inherited blast resistance genes in IR63307 and IRBB, and the presence of unidentified resistance gene in KP. The isolate-specific resistance of IR63307, IRBB and KP indicated their potential as sources of new genes/QTLs conferring resistance to blast disease.

    Incidentally, the WISH lines recorded resistance to specific blast isolates that elicited susceptible reactions from both the donor and the recurrent parents.Transgressive segregation for biotic stress resistance has been commonly reported in plants. In fact, susceptible parental lines producing highly resistant progenies have been reported in various crops including tomato,cotton, wheat and barley (Vega and Frey, 1980;Wallwork and Johnson, 1984; Cherif and Harrabi,1993; de Vicente and Tanksley, 1993; Wang et al, 2012).Classical genetic studies have provided evidences for the role of rare recessive alleles, non-additivity of allelic effects within (over-dominance) and between(epistasis) loci and complementary action of additive alleles to explain transgressive segregation in crops(Rick and Smith, 1953; Vega and Frey, 1980).Marker-based QTL analysis in tomato has shown that different species or parental lines are often fixed for sets of alleles with opposing effects (de Vicente and Tanksley, 1993). The recombination of alleles with opposing effects in the crosses in this study might have brought together complementary alleles in the WISH lines that conferred resistance to specific blast isolates(Rieseberg et al, 1999).

    Preliminary field evaluation showed that the WISH lines approximated the agronomic performance of the recurrent parents. These results validated previous findings that pi21 has no negative effects on the yield and yield-related traits of rice (Fukuoka et al, 2009).The observed variations in the agronomic performance of the WISH lines may be due to specific recombinations that can be eliminated by selection for target agronomic traits at earlier generations.

    Linkage drags that reduce the overall fitness of an individual have been commonly associated with breeding for disease resistance not only in rice but also in other cereals such as wheat and barley (Piffanelli et al,2002; Chen et al, 2016). Initial studies on the introgression of pi21 from Sensho to Koshihikari confirmed the strong association between blast resistance and poor eating quality in rice. However,grain quality evaluation of different recombinants showed that lines having the chromosome sequence of Koshihikari from a point less than 2.4 kb fragment downstream of pi21 has similar eating quality as that of the recurrent parent, whereas those having the chromosome fragment of Sensho upto 37 kb downstream of pi21 have poor eating quality. The gene Os04g0401400 located within this 37 kb region is associated with poor eating and grain quality(Fukuoka et al, 2009).

    In the present study, backcrossing of early breeding lines to their respective recurrent parents at least four times and selfing up to three times not only served to recover the overall gross morphology of the recurrent parents but also increase the chances of recombinations that can possibly dissociate pi21 with downstream genes causing poor grain quality.

    Rice grain chalkiness has low heritability and is highly affected by environmental factors such as high temperature during grain ripening and high moisture during harvesting (Ram and Mishra, 2010). The environmental differences during the wet and dry seasons most probably contributed to the seasonal variation in the chalkiness degree of the WISH lines.

    Selection for leaf blast resistance improvement was carried out using an InDel marker that tightly cosegregates with pi21. While marker selection ensured the identification of plants that are heterozygous for the pi21 locus from a minimum number (24 plants) of breeding materials for backcrossing, it also limited the number of sibs to select from for good grain quality. To ensure the recovery of the grain quality of the recurrent parents, grain quality testing in early backcross progenies,generation of a larger population of breeding lines or marker-assisted recombinant selection to dissociate pi21 from genes responsible for poor grain quality can be carried out.

    WISH lines carrying pi21 showed resistance to a wider range of blast isolates from outside of Japan,indicating the suitability of pi21 for targeted deployment outside of the country. To further establish the spectrum of resistance of pi21, screening for the resistance of the gene against more isolates would be necessary. The WISH lines also need to be tested in multiple environments for a prolonged duration to establish the durability of pi21 against the blast isolates. IR63307 and IRBB are adapted to the tropical rice ecosystems of Southeast Asia while KP is adapted to upland and rainfed ecosystems. Adoption of WISH lines with acquired resistance to the most number of isolates tested has the potential to reduce losses caused by blast disease, while benifitting from the favorable traits inherent to each background.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    The research was supported by the Japan International Cooperation Agency as part of the Wonder Rice Initiative for Food Security and Health (WISH) Project,and in part by the Canon Foundation and the SATREPS project entitled ‘Improvement in Productivity and Yield Stability of Rice under Kenya’s Biotic and Abiotic Stress Conditions Through Tailor-made Breeding and Development of Cultivation Methods’.

    SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

    The following materials are available in the online version of this article at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/16726308; http://www.ricescience.org.

    Supplemental Table 1. Twenty blast isolates from the Philippines used in the leaf blast isolate-specific screening of WISH lines carrying the pi21 allele.

    Supplemental Table 2. Reaction of WISH lines to twenty leaf blast isolates in the glasshouse.

    Supplemental Table 3. Grain quality of WISH lines having the pi21 allele for leaf blast resistance from Sensho measured during the dry (DS) and wet season (WS) of 2017.

    宅男免费午夜| 精品午夜福利在线看| 夫妻午夜视频| www日本在线高清视频| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 色吧在线观看| 咕卡用的链子| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 国产在线免费精品| 制服诱惑二区| 制服人妻中文乱码| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91 | 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 嫩草影视91久久| 久久av网站| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 亚洲在久久综合| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 两个人看的免费小视频| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 天天影视国产精品| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 国产精品二区激情视频| 国产精品成人在线| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 观看美女的网站| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| tube8黄色片| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 久久久国产一区二区| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 两个人看的免费小视频| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲伊人色综图| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 色播在线永久视频| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 又大又爽又粗| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| netflix在线观看网站| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 成年av动漫网址| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 国产精品av久久久久免费| av视频免费观看在线观看| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 亚洲人成电影观看| 国产激情久久老熟女| 99九九在线精品视频| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 岛国毛片在线播放| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 亚洲av福利一区| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 在线 av 中文字幕| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 国产成人精品福利久久| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 欧美另类一区| 久久久久久久精品精品| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 国产男女内射视频| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 精品福利永久在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 美女福利国产在线| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 亚洲在久久综合| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 日本av免费视频播放| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产1区2区3区精品| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 久热这里只有精品99| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 日本午夜av视频| 少妇人妻 视频| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 精品第一国产精品| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 97在线人人人人妻| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 久久免费观看电影| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 久久婷婷青草| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 一区二区三区精品91| 99热网站在线观看| av一本久久久久| 热re99久久国产66热| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 高清av免费在线| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 老司机影院成人| av在线app专区| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 日日啪夜夜爽| 黄色一级大片看看| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产精品免费视频内射| 欧美97在线视频| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 在线观看国产h片| 日日啪夜夜爽| 观看av在线不卡| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 日韩伦理黄色片| a级毛片黄视频| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| kizo精华| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 嫩草影视91久久| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 色播在线永久视频| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 另类精品久久| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 热re99久久国产66热| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 日本色播在线视频| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 七月丁香在线播放| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| h视频一区二区三区| 一区二区av电影网| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 国产精品 国内视频| av卡一久久| 亚洲第一青青草原| 国产男女内射视频| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 国产成人精品无人区| 久久影院123| 97在线人人人人妻| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 亚洲精品第二区| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 熟女av电影| 久久久久视频综合| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 七月丁香在线播放| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 青草久久国产| 国产 精品1| 99国产综合亚洲精品| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 久久性视频一级片| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 日本欧美视频一区| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 国产精品无大码| 国产 精品1| av.在线天堂| 美女福利国产在线| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 国产激情久久老熟女| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 午夜激情av网站| 久久久久网色| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 精品久久久精品久久久| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 国产男女内射视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 满18在线观看网站| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 国产成人av教育| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 亚洲 国产 在线| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 午夜a级毛片| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 免费看十八禁软件| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产色视频综合| 一本综合久久免费| 99热只有精品国产| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 一夜夜www| 人人澡人人妻人| 老司机靠b影院| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 午夜免费观看网址| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 人人澡人人妻人| 丁香欧美五月| 久久久国产成人免费| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 精品电影一区二区在线| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 欧美成人午夜精品| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 我的亚洲天堂| 免费看a级黄色片| 91国产中文字幕| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 嫩草影院精品99| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 日本五十路高清| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 国产精品免费视频内射| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 中文字幕久久专区| 999久久久国产精品视频| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| svipshipincom国产片| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 咕卡用的链子| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 日韩有码中文字幕| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产精品九九99| 欧美大码av| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 午夜免费观看网址| 级片在线观看| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 黄色女人牲交| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 又大又爽又粗| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 国产区一区二久久| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| avwww免费| 女警被强在线播放| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 亚洲中文av在线| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 中文字幕色久视频| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 两性夫妻黄色片| 成人国产综合亚洲| 日韩欧美免费精品| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| www.精华液| 国产又爽黄色视频| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 1024视频免费在线观看| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 黄色 视频免费看| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 午夜福利欧美成人| xxx96com| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲av成人av| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 久久这里只有精品19| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 无限看片的www在线观看| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 国产亚洲欧美98| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 色播亚洲综合网| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 88av欧美| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 免费高清视频大片| 9色porny在线观看| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 最好的美女福利视频网| 日本 av在线| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 天天添夜夜摸| 丝袜美足系列| 国产精品二区激情视频| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 精品久久久久久,| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 禁无遮挡网站| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 嫩草影院精品99| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 黄色视频不卡| 人人澡人人妻人| av视频免费观看在线观看| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 国产麻豆69| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 亚洲av熟女| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 999久久久国产精品视频| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 色在线成人网| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 美女午夜性视频免费| 在线播放国产精品三级| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 午夜免费鲁丝| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| a在线观看视频网站| 亚洲成人久久性| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 性欧美人与动物交配| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 18禁观看日本| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 天堂√8在线中文| netflix在线观看网站| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 一级黄色大片毛片| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 黄色视频不卡| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 黄片播放在线免费| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产精品二区激情视频| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 久久青草综合色| 天天添夜夜摸| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 久久精品影院6| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 国产野战对白在线观看| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 美女免费视频网站| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 一区在线观看完整版| 久久人人精品亚洲av|