• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    National trends in total hip arthroplasty for traumatic hip fractures:An analysis of a nationwide all-payer database

    2020-01-16 06:28:24AnthonyBonielloAlexanderLieberKevinDenehyPriscillaCavanaughYehudaKerbelAndrewStar
    World Journal of Orthopedics 2020年1期

    Anthony J Boniello, Alexander M Lieber, Kevin Denehy, Priscilla Cavanaugh, Yehuda E Kerbel, Andrew Star

    Anthony J Boniello, Priscilla Cavanaugh, Andrew Star, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States

    Alexander M Lieber, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19123, United States

    Kevin Denehy, Bluegrass Orthopaedics, Lexington, KY 40509, United States

    Yehuda E Kerbel, Deparment of Orthopaedics, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania,Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States

    Abstract

    Key words: Hip fracture; Total hip arthroplasty; Hemiarthroplasty; Cost; Length of stay;National Inpatient Sample

    INTRODUCTION

    Femoral neck fractures represent a large proportion of orthopedic injuries requiring surgical intervention. It is estimated that by 2050, there will be over 700000 cases annually in North America[1]. Hemiarthroplasty (HA) has become the most common treatment modality for displaced femoral neck fractures[2,3]. Recently, total hip arthroplasty (THA) has gained popularity for treating displaced femoral neck fractures, particularly with active, healthy patients[4]. Over the last 15-20 years, THA as treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures has increased[5].

    Independent, ambulatory patients have poor functional results following HA compared to THA, particularly continued hip pain and a higher revision rate[6,7].Several investigators have used large administrative database analyses to track trends in the treatment of femoral neck fractures, with conflicting reports in the arthroplasty and trauma literature. While some studies report no significant change in the utilization of THAvsHA[5,8,9], others report a recent increase in THA usage[10,11].

    Our study utilizes the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2005-2014 to see trends in THAvsHA for femoral neck fractures. Our goal was not only to calculate the general trend over the past 10 years, but also determine what other factors influence treatment decisions.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    NIS data from 2005 to 2014 was used. The NIS is a large all-payer database of datat from the United States developed as part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Each NIS file comprises de-identified information from approximately eight million hospital records from about 1000 hospitals in 46 states, representing an approximate 20% sample of hospitals[12]. National estimates may be calculated from the data using available weighting factors. For each patient record, 100 clinical and nonclinical data elements are available including admission and discharge status, patient demographics,insurance type, hospital charges, length of stay (LOS), and hospital type in addition to diagnosis and procedural codes in International Classification of Disease-9thRevision-Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM)[13]. Recorded patient characteristics include gender,race, comorbidities and age. Given that the NIS database is sufficiently deidentified,this study was not subject to institutional review board review.

    For our study, we identified record of patients who had transcervical femoral neck fractures (ICD-9-CM 820.0). We used ICD-9 codes to exclusively look at patients treated with THA (81.51) and HA (81.52). We excluded pathologic fractures due to oncologic etiology. Recorded Hospital characteristics were ownership (public, not-forprofit, or private investor-owned), teaching status, Urban or rural Location, and region (Northeast, Midwest, South, or West). We analyzed patient insurance type(Medicare, Medicaid, private, or self-pay), and charges during the stay.

    Statistical analysis

    Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 23 (IBM Corporation, Armonk,New York), specifically SPSS complex samples procedure to model the strata,clustering (hospitals), and weighting of the NIS sample design. Chi-square tests were utilized for categorical variables andttests were employed for continuous variables.Categorical variables are presented as percentages and continuous variables as means.Yearly trends were analyzed using linear regression modeling.Pvalues of less than 0.05 were interpreted as statistically significant.

    RESULTS

    Of the total 502060 patients who underwent arthroplasty for a femoral neck fracture,51568 (10.3%) were THA. Between 2005 and 2014, the percentage of femoral neck fractures treated with THA rose from 8.3% to 13.7% (Figure 1). The HA group was generally less healthy, with higher rates of congestive heart failure (16.8%vs11.0%,P< 0.001), chronic lung disease (21.6%vs20.3%,P= 0.004), diabetes (17.0%vs15.3%,P< 0.001), hypertension (69.0%vs62.2%,P< 0.001), and renal failure (13.4%vs9.6%,P< 0.001). (Table 1) Hemiarthroplasty patients were on average older (81.1 yearsvs74.5 years,P< 0.001) (Figure 2). Private insurance accounted for a higher percentage of THA than HA (17.3%vs7.4%,P< 0.001) (Table 2). THA has increased most in urban teaching hospitals (7.9% to 14.7%) relative to urban non-teaching (mean 11.1%vs10.0%, OR = 1.05,P= 0.002) over the ten-year study period (Figure 3). The mean LOS was statistically different but clinically similar for HA (5.6 dvs5.5 d,P< 0.001). While the mean LOS decreased over time for both groups, the rate of decline was significantly greater for the THA cases (decrease of 1.1vs0.7 d,P< 0.0001) (Figure 4).The mean charges (adjusted to 2014 dollars) were less for HA ($49866vs$59826,P<0.0001), however they increased steadily for both groups (Figure 5). Overall, HA had a higher in-hospital mortality rate (2.3%vs1.4%,P< 0.001), however, after adjusting for age and comorbidities HA was not an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.998,P= 0.94). Multivariate analysis adjusting for demographics,comorbidities and age found private insurance (vsmedicare) to be an independent predictor of being treated with THA (OR = 1.46,P< 0.0001).

    DISCUSSION

    In recent years, the incidence of femoral neck fractures has continued to decline,however the associated economic burden remains enormous[14-17]. These fractures can be devastating to the patient and to the health care system because of the associated morbidity, mortality and cost[18]. Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly are commonly treated with HA. However, recent studies have demonstrated that THA may have superior post-operative function, pain relief and lower re-operation rates when compared to HA in the setting of displaced femoral neck fractures[6,7,19]. Despite these benefits, concerns for THA include longer operative time, increased surgical complexity, risk of postoperative dislocation, and higher initial cost[18]. THA has become the preferred treatment for the healthier, higher demand elderly patient,meanwhile, HA is reserved for low-demand patients with significant comorbidities.Interestingly, despite increasing evidence in support of THA for geriatric femoral neck fractures, only recently has the literature demonstrated an increasing use of THA over HA[6,7].

    The present study found a statistically significant increase in the percentage of femoral neck fractures treated with THA in the United States between 2005 and 2014.These findings support recent registry-based studies from the United States[19,20],Europe and Asia[11,19,21]. We found that patients treated with HA had more comorbidities and were on average older than patients that underwent THA. The greater complexity and longer operative time associated with THA are some of the main reasons why HA is often preferred for sicker patients that may not be able to tolerate THA. Additionally, dislocation risk has been noted as a significant factor influencing the selection of HAvsTHA in the elderly. Bekeromet al[22]conducted a randomized control trial comparing patients aged 70 years and older that underwent HAvsTHA for the treatment of femoral neck fractures and found a higher number of early and late dislocations in the THA group[22]. Overall, with patients above 70 years,the decision to treat with HA is multifactorial and includes severity of comorbidities,surgeon experience and pre-operative level of activity. Unfortunately, these clinical variables cannot be studied using current national databases, thus warranting further investigation.

    Table 1 Comparison of comorbidities between patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for a femoral neck fracture between 2005 and 2014

    Interestingly, patients with private insurance were more likely to undergo THA than patients with Medicare even after adjusting for differences in patient demographics and comorbidities. THA may yield better functional results and lower reoperation rates compared to HA[6,7,19]. However, given that THA incurs greater hospital costs than HA, the reasons for disparities between femoral neck fracture treatment options should be carefully examined. Notably, Schaireret al[23]found that patients with private insurance or worker’s compensation were more likely to undergo surgical management of isolated meniscal tears compared to payments with public or no insurance. However, these results contrast the findings of McGlastonet al[24]who found that rates of surgery of the upper extremity did not differ based on privatevspublic insurance. Further research should more clearly define the impact if any of patient insurance type on treatment choice for orthopedic procedures.

    With regards to hospital type, the use of THA for femoral neck fractures significantly increased in urban teaching and non-teaching hospitals. The sharpest increase was noted in urban teaching hospitals; meanwhile, rural hospitals showed a more modest increase in THA utilization during the study period. These results may reflect both a higher number of new surgeons willing to change traditional management of elderly femoral neck fractures and an increased exposure to recent literature favoring THA in academic settings. It is plausible that surgeons in academic settings are more familiar with the most current orthopedic research. However, this is not likely to fully explain differences between teaching and non-teaching centers, so further research is warranted. Notably, previous research has indicated that patients undergoing orthopedic procedures at teaching hospitals experience higher hospital costs, rates of complications, mortality, and longer LOS compared to non-teaching hospitals[25,26]. However, Silberet al[27]found that undergoing orthopedic surgery at a teaching hospital was protective for preventing in-hospital mortality.

    Length of hospital stay was shorter for the traumatic THA patients compared to HA patients. However, this difference was very small and may not be clinically significant. These findings may be consistent with a study of 82951 patients with femoral neck fractures treated with either THA or HA that found no significant difference in LOS between the two groups[28].

    Figure 1 Percentage of hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty performed for femoral neck fractures between 2005 and 2014.

    There is a paucity of literature evaluating the inpatient cost associated with treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the United States. Our study is unique in that it uses a large nationally representative database to compare total inpatient charges of femoral neck fractures in patients treated with either THAvsHA over a ten-year period. We found that both THA and HA in the setting of femoral neck fractures have been associated with gradually increasing charges. This is an interesting finding, as there has been a decrease in cost for elective THA noted during the same time period. The rise in the charges for traumatic THA may be secondary to an increase in implant costs and most importantly the inability to preoperatively prepare patients prior to surgery as compared to elective THA patients.Unfortunately, the database does not provide information regarding payments, so we are unable to make statements regarding the actual costs of care. Driving factors that explain the differences in traumatic THAvselective THA costs warrants further investigation.

    In-hospital mortality was not significantly higher in patients treated with a HA compared to THA when adjusted for comorbidities. These findings agree with a review article by Guyen[29]that found mortality rates were similar when comparing THA with HA for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. Instead of type of implant,patient comorbidities likely play a much more significant role in mortality risk. The significance of comorbidities in this femoral neck fracture population was highlighted by Macaulayet al[30]that found a 2.4 fold increase in risk of death for each additional comorbid condition. Furthermore, although the incidence of both HA and THA have steadily increased, mortality has not. This may suggest surgeons are successfully risk stratifying these patients, with THA being appropriately reserved for the healthier,lower risk patients.

    There were limitations to our study that are inherent to database studies. The NIS is a database that relies on codes intended for billing; therefore, we were unable to obtain data on the severity of comorbidities, prior functional status or extent of fracture displacement. This data as these factors likely play a significant role in a surgeon’s surgical preference independent of age or sex so the findings of our study should be interpreted with caution. Furthermore, the NIS database evaluates a single hospital admission during the index THA or HA surgeries so long-term follow up for complications, mortality, or conversion of THA to HA was not captured.Additionally, the NIS does not allow us to examine solely patients who underwent THA with the minimally invasive approach. Therefore, our patient population likely represents a more heterogeneous group.

    Despite these limitations, our study indicated that THA is increasing being utilized in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the United States. We found that traumatic THA is increasing most notably in urban hospitals, is increasing in charges, and is associated with a shorter LOS. Hemiarthroplasty is associated with older patients with significant comorbidities.

    Table 2 Comparison of demographics between patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for a femoral neck fracture between 2005 and 2014

    Figure 2 Age in years of hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty patients between 2005 and 2014.

    Figure 3 Percentage of total hip arthroplasty procedures performed for femoral neck fractures by hospital type (urban teaching hospitals, urban nonteaching, rural) between 2005 and 2014.

    Figure 4 Length of stay in days of hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty patients between 2005 and 2014.

    Figure 5 Mean charges (adjusted to 2014 United States dollars) for hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty patients between 2005 and 2014.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research background

    Femoral neck fractures despite decreasing steadily in incidence still represent a tremendous economic burden world-wide. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an increasingly utilized treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures especially for younger, healthier, ambulatory patients.Notably, multiple studies have demonstrated that THA has superior functional outcomes and results in less pain postoperative compared to hemiarthroplasty (HA).

    Research motivation

    The motivation for this research study was to further characterize factors associated with patients undergoing THA or HA following displaced femoral neck fracture. This was done in the hopes of better understanding which patients are more likely to undergo THA and what factors may predict adverse in this patient population.

    Research objectives

    The research objectives in this study was to assess the incidence of patients undergoing THA and HA after displaced femoral neck fracture in the United States. Furthermore, we explored whether hospital length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and cost differed between patients undergoing THA or HA.

    Research methods

    This was a retrospective study which utilized the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2010 and 2014. We identified patients undergoing THA and HA for femoral neck fractures using Ninth Edition diagnosis and procedure codes. Chi-square tests were used to compare categorical variables andttests for continuous variables. Yearly trends were analyzed using linear regression modeling.Pvalues less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

    Research results

    Of the total 502060 patients who were treated for femoral neck fracture in our study, 51568(10.3%) underwent THA and the incidence of THA rose from 8.3% to 13.7%. Private insurance accounted for a higher percentage of THA than hemiarthroplasty. THA increased most in urban teaching hospitals relative to urban non-teaching hospitals. Mean LOS was longer for HA. The mean charges were less for HA, however charges decreased steadily for both groups. HA had a higher mortality rate, however, after adjusting for age and comorbidities HA was not an independent risk factor for mortality.

    Research conclusions

    Our study was consistent with previous research that the number of patients undergoing THA for femoral neck fractures has increased. Furthermore, we found that THA was more common in urban hospitals and in patients with private insurance. Both of these trends have been reported prior, however further research should better examine the etiology between these associations.We found no difference in mortality between patients undergoing HA and THA reflecting that mortality is more dependent on patient comorbidies than surgical technique.

    Research perspectives

    Future research most more closely examine the relationship between surgical choice of femoral neck fracture fixation and insurance type especially since we found increased cost for patients undergoing THA. Prospective studies are needed to effectively examine this research question.Additionally, randomized controlled studies are needed to better develop treatment algorithms to guide orthopedic surgeons on which patients may benefit most from THA compared to HA.

    小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 一级黄片播放器| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 黄色女人牲交| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 久久热精品热| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 美女大奶头视频| 深夜a级毛片| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 观看免费一级毛片| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 国产色婷婷99| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 在线看三级毛片| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 毛片女人毛片| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 亚洲av.av天堂| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产三级在线视频| ponron亚洲| av天堂中文字幕网| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 亚洲av成人av| 久久这里只有精品中国| 1000部很黄的大片| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 久久久久国内视频| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 韩国av在线不卡| 国产成人影院久久av| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 老司机福利观看| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国产色婷婷99| 老司机福利观看| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 在线观看66精品国产| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 九色国产91popny在线| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 亚洲av一区综合| 88av欧美| 黄片wwwwww| 精品人妻1区二区| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 久久久精品大字幕| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 久久久成人免费电影| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 精品久久久久久成人av| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 内地一区二区视频在线| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产成人影院久久av| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 国产精品永久免费网站| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 级片在线观看| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 在线国产一区二区在线| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 夜夜爽天天搞| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 欧美成人a在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 日本a在线网址| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 色综合站精品国产| 免费高清视频大片| 亚洲av美国av| 亚洲av成人av| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 久久久久久久久久成人| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办 | 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 88av欧美| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 久久久久久久久大av| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 我要搜黄色片| 极品教师在线免费播放| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 欧美成人a在线观看| 97热精品久久久久久| 国产成人影院久久av| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 97热精品久久久久久| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 日本 欧美在线| 日本免费a在线| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 九九在线视频观看精品| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 不卡一级毛片| 亚洲成人久久性| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区 | 夜夜爽天天搞| 久久久久国内视频| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲四区av| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 亚洲无线观看免费| 成人国产综合亚洲| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 在线天堂最新版资源| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 成人国产麻豆网| 在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美bdsm另类| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 国产精品野战在线观看| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 色哟哟·www| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 观看免费一级毛片| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 草草在线视频免费看| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 国产乱人视频| 免费av毛片视频| 精品久久久久久久久av| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 天堂动漫精品| 亚洲五月天丁香| 国产视频内射| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 床上黄色一级片| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| av.在线天堂| 日本色播在线视频| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 欧美人与善性xxx| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 色综合站精品国产| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 在线国产一区二区在线| 欧美区成人在线视频| 深夜a级毛片| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 香蕉av资源在线| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 成人三级黄色视频| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 国产成人影院久久av| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 日本 av在线| 黄色女人牲交| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 内地一区二区视频在线| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 热99re8久久精品国产| 在线播放国产精品三级| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 精品福利观看| 深夜a级毛片| 舔av片在线| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 男女那种视频在线观看| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 成人国产麻豆网| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 国产成人a区在线观看| 在线观看66精品国产| av国产免费在线观看| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 男女那种视频在线观看| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 欧美bdsm另类| 国内精品宾馆在线| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 长腿黑丝高跟| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 国产av一区在线观看免费| av福利片在线观看| 一a级毛片在线观看| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 亚洲图色成人| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 黄片wwwwww| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 久久久国产成人免费| 男女那种视频在线观看| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 一级av片app| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 99热这里只有精品一区| 国产黄片美女视频| 精品国产三级普通话版| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 日韩欧美三级三区| 国产亚洲欧美98| 在线观看66精品国产| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 97超视频在线观看视频| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 九色国产91popny在线| 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 变态另类丝袜制服| 91精品国产九色| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 成人二区视频| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 极品教师在线视频| 欧美日韩黄片免| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 国产三级中文精品| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 精品人妻1区二区| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 日韩欧美三级三区| xxxwww97欧美| 久久精品91蜜桃| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 欧美+日韩+精品| 久久久久久伊人网av| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 成人三级黄色视频| 亚洲国产色片| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 中文字幕高清在线视频| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 色视频www国产| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 级片在线观看| av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲四区av| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 午夜久久久久精精品| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 国产成人a区在线观看| 日韩中字成人| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 一区福利在线观看| 一级黄片播放器| 免费观看在线日韩| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 有码 亚洲区| 久久久久久久久久久丰满 | 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 日本三级黄在线观看| av天堂在线播放| 亚洲国产色片| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 久久久久久伊人网av| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 午夜a级毛片| 99热6这里只有精品| av天堂中文字幕网| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 日本三级黄在线观看| av国产免费在线观看| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| av在线亚洲专区| 有码 亚洲区| 国产色婷婷99| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 禁无遮挡网站| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 毛片女人毛片| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 极品教师在线视频| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 色综合婷婷激情| 长腿黑丝高跟| 国产色婷婷99| 亚洲av.av天堂| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 午夜福利18| 国产精品一区www在线观看 | 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| or卡值多少钱| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 在线播放国产精品三级| 一a级毛片在线观看| 性欧美人与动物交配| 此物有八面人人有两片| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 小说图片视频综合网站| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 特级一级黄色大片| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚州av有码| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 成人国产综合亚洲| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 精品人妻视频免费看| 久久香蕉精品热| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区 | 欧美色视频一区免费| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 观看美女的网站| 在线国产一区二区在线| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 男女那种视频在线观看| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 精品国产三级普通话版| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 国产亚洲欧美98| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 三级毛片av免费| 久久精品人妻少妇| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 一本一本综合久久| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 日本五十路高清| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 亚洲四区av| 国产老妇女一区| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产视频一区二区在线看| www.www免费av| av.在线天堂| 国产精华一区二区三区| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 一本一本综合久久| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| aaaaa片日本免费| 午夜影院日韩av| 99热这里只有精品一区| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 免费av毛片视频| 99热这里只有是精品50| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| av天堂中文字幕网| 日韩高清综合在线| 日本黄大片高清| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 九九在线视频观看精品| a在线观看视频网站| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| a在线观看视频网站| 1000部很黄的大片| 久久久久性生活片| 精品人妻视频免费看| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 在线观看一区二区三区| 色视频www国产| 22中文网久久字幕| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲色图av天堂| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 欧美日本视频|