• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Three-dimensional cell culture systems as an in vitro platform for cancer and stem cell modeling

    2019-12-31 03:30:38NiphaChaicharoenaudomrungPhongsakornKunhormParinyaNoisa
    World Journal of Stem Cells 2019年12期

    Nipha Chaicharoenaudomrung, Phongsakorn Kunhorm, Parinya Noisa

    Abstract

    Key words: Three-dimensional cultures; Cancer; Stem cells; Disease modeling; In vitro screening platform

    INTRODUCTION

    Cancer is one of the most serious diseases causing almost one in six deaths globally,which is estimated to equal 9.6 million deaths in 2018[1].Considerable efforts have been intended to develop effective approaches to cure cancer.Among them, drug discovery could be one of the most important approaches aiming to identify and verify new and potent anticancer agents for both daily medication and chemotherapy.For testing the capability of novel anticancer drugs, the experiments are performed on cell-based assays, which offer information about cellular responses to drugs in cost/time effective and high throughput manners.

    Currently, two-dimensional (2D) platforms in which flat monolayer cells are cultured is still the most commonly used for the research of cell-based assays.The 2D cell culture systems are easy, convenient, cost-effective, and widely used.However,various drawbacks and limitations are still of concern.The first drawback of a 2D cell culture systems is that an actual three-dimensional (3D) environment in which cancer cells residein vivois not accurately mimicked[2].The irrelevant 2D environment may provide misleading results regarding the predicted responses of cancer cells to anticancer drugs[3].Generally, standard preclinical screening procedures for therapeutic agents involve identification of compounds from the 2D cell culture system tests and animal model tests and then to the introduction of clinical trials[4].Along with each phase, the percentage of efficient agents dramatically decreases.Less than 5% of anticancer agents and small molecule oncology therapeutics passed the clinical trials and were finally approved for marketing by the regulatory agencies[3].One possible cause of the failure is that drug responses of 2D cell cultures systems did not consistently predict the outcome of clinical studies[5-7].

    The key limitation of traditional 2D culture is the failure to imitate thein vivoarchitecture and microenvironments.As a consequence, there are many different features that 2Dcultured cells possess compared within vivocells such as morphological characteristics, proliferation and differentiation potentials, interactions of cell-cell and cell-surrounding matrix, and signal transduction[8,9].Such concerns inspired the emergence of 3D cell cultures systems, a promising approach to overcome the inconsistency between cell-based assays and clinical trials.The 3D cell culture systems provided the novel cell-based assays with more physiological relevance, especially the behavioral similarity to thein vivocells.Over the last decade,a variety ofin vitroplatforms was developed to achieve the 3D culture systems for cancer and stem cell applications such as novel drug development, cancer and stem cell biological research, tissue engineering forin vivoimplantation, and other experimental cell analyses[10-12].Thus, the study of cellular phenomena in a conditions that closely imitatesin vivoscenery could be elaborately constructedin vitro[11,13,14].

    Here, we aim to demonstrate the necessity of novel 3D cell culture systems and describe, compare, and contrast the 3D cell cultures techniques that has been developed to date.In addition, we also present the possibility to be applied in cancer and stem cell aspects.

    CELL CULTURE AS A RESEARCH MODEL

    In 1907, Harrisonet al[15]implemented the cell culture technique to his research,exploring the origin and the development of nerve fibers.Since then, the technique has been continuously improved, and cell-based experiments can be effortlessly conducted based on such cell culture technique due to cell banking[16].The selection of cell culture procedures for cancer research is the key for the better understanding of tumor biology, resulting in the optimal and effective conditions for radio/chemotherapy as well as the discovery of new cancer treatment strategies[17].At the very beginning of the cell culture era, the cultures were mostly carried out under an adherent condition, which is called the 2D monolayer cell culture model[18].However, thein vivoenvironment provides cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix(ECM) interactions in a 3D structure[19], and the 2D monolayer cells might not accurately mimic the actual 3D environment of thein vivocells.The clear evidence was the experiments using the immortalized tumor cell lines grown in the 2D culture systems resulted a 95% drug response failure rate in human subjects.It indicated that the 2D cell culture model could be an inaccurate model for drug development[20].Therefore, the drug discovery and validation processes should integrate both 2D cell culture screening and animal study, complying with the standard procedure prior to clinical trials.Nonetheless, the data collected from the 2D cell system are often misleading forin vivoresponses as previously mentioned, and the animal models are expensive, time consuming, controversial with ethical dilemmas, and inconsistent due to species differences[21].The development of novel models is needed to resolve the inconsistency between the 2D cell culture systems, animal models, and clinical trials.Therefore, the 3Din vitrocell culture platforms could be the potential candidate[22].

    TWO-DIMENSIONAL VS THREE-DIMENSIONAL CELL CULTURE MODELS

    Cell culture is the most basic yet essential process for preclinical drug discovery.Even though the unreliable flaws of monolayer cell culture have been pointed out, 2D cell culture models are still the first option that scientists turn to due to its simplicity in order to obtain preliminary results.Nevertheless, 2D cultures may not sufficiently mimic the physiological conditions in a 3D network wherein vivocells reside.Therefore, deceptive data from 2D cell culture model often leads to the irrelevant prediction of drug efficacy and toxicity and finally causes the failure in drug validation and approval processes[23].

    One obvious advantage of cell culturing in a 3D manner over 2D cell culture is that it contributes the expression of ECM components as well as the interactions between cell-cell and cell-matrix.The characteristics of 3D cell cultures and the traditional 2D cell culture models are shown in Figure 1.The traditional 2D cell cultures result in a monolayer cell expanding on a flat surface of glass or commercial polystyrene plastic flasks for tissue culture (Figure 1A).In contrast, 3D cell cultures promote cells to form 3D spheroids by utilizing an ECM material (Figure 1Β).Cell spheroid is the important characteristic that resemblesin vivocells for further replicating cell differentiation,proliferation, and functionin vitro.Thus, 3D spheroid culture is considered an improved model for predictivein vitrocell-based assays and may deliver high physiological relevance for preclinical drug discovery, especially in cancer/stem cell research.

    Generally, cells of multicellular organisms capable of forming tissues are in 3D arrangements with complex interactions within cell populations and also between cells and environments.With the dynamics of nutrient and chemical transport between cells in thein vivoconditions, cells are hemostatically provided with a relatively constant supply of nutrients with the minimized level of waste products due to the activity of the circulatory system.Therefore, the 3D arrangements of cells are the major employment for 3D cell culture with the optimal spatial organization of cells in the culture environment to be considered[24-26].When cells are grown in 3D culture systems, cells also induce the formation of aggregates or spheroids within matrix or the culture medium.Even though with cell-cell interactions and cell-matrix interactions are not yet perfectly mimicked in a spheroid culture model, they are close enough to induce the morphological alteration of cells to not be relatively flat but closely resemble its natural shape in the body (Figure 1C).

    Furthermore, within the spheroid structure, various stages of cells are established,including proliferating, quiescent, apoptotic, hypoxic, and necrotic cells due to the gradients of nutrients and oxygen level[27,28].The proliferating cells could be found mainly at the outer layer of the spheroids because they are exposed to sufficient amounts of nutrients from the culture medium[29,30].Cells at the core of spheroids tend to be in quiescent or hypoxic states because they are faced with the lack of oxygen,growth factors, and nutrients[31].The cellular heterogeneity within a cell population is quite relevant toin vivotissues, organs, and even tumors.At this point, due to cell morphology, interactions, and heterogeneity of cells grown in 3D culture, it is reasonable to hypothesize that the cellular processes of these cells are also applicable[32].

    Comparisons of 3D spheroid culture models and 2D monolayer cell culture models were shown in Table 1.Numerous studies have proven the differences in cell viability, morphology, proliferation, differentiation, cellular responses to stimuli, cellcell communication, cell stiffness, migrant and invasive properties of tumor cells into surrounding tissues, angiogenesis stimulation and immune system evasion, drug responses, transcriptional and translational gene expression, general cell function, andin vivorelevance between cells cultured in 2D and 3D models.For example, cell polarization could be more accurate depicted in 3D cell cultures models unlike in 2D models in which the cells can only be partially polarized.Moreover, greater stability and longer lifespans were found in 3D culture models; 3D spheroids can be cultured up to 3 wk, whereas 2D monolayer culture can last for less than a week due to the limitation of cell confluence[33].Therefore, 3D cell culture models might be more appropriate for handling the long-term experiments and for determining long-term effects of the drug on cellular responses.

    Figure 1 Schematic diagrams of the traditional two-dimensional monolayer cell culture and threedimensional cell culture systems.

    THREE-DIMENSIONAL CELL CULTURE TECHNOLOGIES

    Βecause the advantages of 3D culture systems have become widely realized, there have been many studies intensively focused on the development and optimization of 3D cell culture technologies.With the integration of the recent advances in cell biology, microfabrication techniques, and tissue engineering, a wide range of 3D cell culture platforms were constructed, including multicellular spheroid formation(liquid overlay culture and hanging drop method), hydrogel-based culture,bioreactor-based culture, bio-printing, and scaffold-based culture.A summary of the advantages, disadvantages, and research stage of each model are shown in Table 2.Although each 3D culture technique/platform are different in both principle and protocol, the same objectives that they share are to provide the similar features ofin vivocells in morphological, functional, and microenvironmental aspects.This section aims to briefly describe the key features of each technique.

    Multicellular spheroids formation

    Liquid overlay culture:Liquid overlay culture could be the simplest of all 3D cell culture Techniques (Figure 2A).To create 3D culture models, the surface for cell culture is covered with a thin film of inert substrates, such as agar[34], agarose[35], or matrigel[36].Βy preventing cell adhesion on the surface and providing the artificial matrix, liquid overlay culture easily promotes the aggregation of cells to become spheroids[37].This technique is cost-effective and highly reproducible without requirement of any specific equipment[38].Different cell types can be cocultured with this technique[39].However, the number and size of formed spheroids are difficult to monitor[40].Recently, ultra-low attachment plates have been developed and commercialized for the liquid overlay technique.Such plates contain individual wells with a layer of hydrophilic polymer on the surface to overcome the requirement for manual coating, which prevents cell attachment.The specifically designed plates exhibit the capability to produce one spheroid per well and is favorable enough for medium-throughput applications[41].

    Table 1 Differences in two-dimensional vs three-dimensional cell culture models

    Hanging drop technique:The hanging drop technique for 3D spheroid production was introduced by Johannes Holtfreter in 1944 for cultivating embryonic stem cells.The technique later became the foundation of scaffold-free 3D culture models capable of multicellular spheroid generation.Resulting spheroids could be generated with consistent size and shape controlled by adjusting the density of cell seeding.As few as 50 cells up to 15000 cells could be varied to obtain the desirable size of spheroids[42].In the very beginning, the hanging drop technique was carried out in the petri dish lid,by dropping a small volume of cell suspension (15-30 μL) with a specific cell density onto the lid.Then, the lid was subsequently inverted and aliquots of cell suspension turned into hanging drops without dripping due to surface tension.Consequently,cells were forced to accumulate at the bottom tip of the drop, at the liquid-air interface, and further aggregate and proliferate until spheroids were formed (Figure 2Β).Recently, bioassay dishes have been used in place of petri dishes for more wellcontrolled experiments to facilitate the maintenance of moisture levels of the culture system, so that cell culture can be done in the same manner of standard cell culture procedures.

    The hanging drop technique is relatively simple and applicable for numerous cell lines, and its reproducibility can be almost 100% for generating one 3D spheroid per drop[42].The 3D spheroid obtained from this technique tends to be tightly packed rather than aggregated loosely, and low variability in sizes were observed.Kelmet al[42]reported that 3D spheroids exhibited patho/physiologically relevance because their structures were highly organized along with their produced ECM and turned to be a ‘tissue-like’ structure.As this technique is based on the tendency of cells to aggregate to each other spontaneously instead of depending on the provided matrices or scaffolds, the problematic concerns regarding the effects from 3D structure formation are reduced.However, the undeniable drawback of the hanging drop technique is the limited volume of the cell suspension.Only up to 50 μL of suspension, including the testing medium, can be accommodated onto the upside down surface unless dripping occurs as the surface tension is not enough to keep liquids attached on the surface[43].Another limitation is the difficulty in changing culture medium during cultivation without disturbing the spheroids[31].

    Table 2 Proposed advantages, disadvantages, and research stage of different three-dimensional cell culture methods

    Hydrogels:Hydrogels are the networks of cross-linked polymeric material, which are generally composed of hydrophilic polymers with high water content (Figure 2C)[44].There are the swollen structures or microspheres integrated within the network for cell encapsulation and the circulation of nutrients and cellular waste in and out of the hydrogels[45].Additionally, gels exhibit a soft tissue-like stiffness to potentially resemble natural ECM because they are made from mixtures of natural polymers such as collagen, and alginate, two of the most used substrates in 3D cell culture history[46].

    The most common use of hydrogels is to be combined with a reconstituted basement membrane preparation extracted from mouse sarcoma, which has been commercialized by the Matrigel trademark (Corning Life Sciences, Tewksbury, MA,United States).Even though such commercialized hydrogels are rich in ECM proteins,they also possessed some drawbacks, including the deficiency in gelation kinetic control, the undefined and uncontrollable polymer composition, and lack of mechanical integrity.Lot-to-lot variability due to manufacturing mistakes and poorly defined composition also cause difficulty to determine the exact responses of cells to some particular stimuli[47].

    Generally, hydrogels are fabricated based on both synthetic and natural polymers,which are water-absorbing, hydrophilic, and highly flexible materials.With the wellcontrolled fabrication processes and well-defined material composition, hydrogels have become the prominent materials for 3D scaffold development.Βecause of their structural similarities to natural ECM, they are favorable forin vivochemical delivery in a noninvasive manner[44].A number of synthetic and natural materials can be incorporated into hydrogel formation, such as hyaluronic acids, polyethylene glycol[48], collagen, gelatin, fibrin, alginate, and agarose[49].However, the natural hydrogels, like Matrigel and alginate gel, are considered to be more appropriate cellencapsulated materials due to the great biocompatibility and mild gelling conditions.

    Figure 2 Different techniques used for three-dimensional cell cultures.

    The hydrogel technique for cell culture in a calcium alginate hydrogel was first developed by Limet al[50]by mixing the cells with the alginate solution, then crosslinking and forming the hydrogel-based microspheres in an isotonic CaCl2solution(Figure 2C).The alginate hydrogels are very limited for cell adhesion, which is an advantage for cell encapsulation applications[51]that provide rapid, nontoxic, and versatile immobilization of cells within polymeric networks.In addition, the creation of artificial organs was also consolidated with encapsulating cells or tissue for the treatment of disease.The most well-known example was an artificial pancreas to be used in diabetes therapy[45].

    The 3D cell culture can also be carried out in hydrogels and can be integrated with other cell culture models such as cell spheroid cultures, scaffold-based cell cultures,and microchip-based cell cultures[52].Hydrogels are one potential technique to be used for 3Din vitrotechnology due to their biocompatibility, sufficient water content, and ECM-like mechanical properties[53].Although hydrogels were not popularly applied to the field of drug screening, they have been widely used for the development of tissue engineering by mimicking cartilage, vascular, bone, and other tissues by mixing particular cells to hydrogel precursors before the gelling process in which cells are distributed evenly and homogeneously throughout the gels.

    One reported case was the engineered cardiac tissues obtained from the neonatal rat cardiac myocyte culture in collagen hydrogels that were used for cyclic mechanical stretch research[54].Hydrogels also facilitate the delivery of soluble or signaling molecules to cells and providing the supportive surroundings for cell growth and function.For example, transforming growth factor β was infused into polyethylene glycol hydrogels to govern the function of smooth muscle cells.In a similar manner,bone morphogenetic protein was covalently attached to alginate hydrogels to govern osteoblast migration and calcification[55].Despite a variety of hydrogel type applications, Ca-alginate hydrogels are surely a potent candidate system for the delivery of cells to the infarcted heart because they are nontoxic, nonimmunogenic, do not facilitate pathogen transfer, and allow good exchange of waste products and nutrients[56,57].Ca-alginate hydrogels were primarily implanted into the heart and shown not to induce harmful responses such as thrombosis[56]or fibrosis[58].The gradual degradation, resulting from the dispersal of calcium crosslinks[59], generated nontoxic alginate polysaccharide degradation products, which can be excretedviaurinary systems[60].However, besides a number of advantages of hydrogels, the disadvantages of hydrogel are still present and should not be disregarded.The uncertainty and complexity in composition influenced by gelling mechanism may cause undesirable and nonspecific cellular responses.Additionally, pH based gelling mechanisms can negatively affect sensitive cells[52].

    Bioreactors:Βecause the impact of 3D cell culture models as an appropriatein vitrolaboratory platform for the discovery of therapeutics and anticancer agents have been concerned and drawn the attention of scientists, the crucial following step to cope with the increasing demand is the upscale 3D culture system from the laboratory to the industrial level.Βioreactors became the solution for great spheroid formation with a precise control system and guaranteed reproducibility[61].With specifically designed 3D culture approaches, bioreactors have been adapted in many ways.For example,scaffolds have been added to the large cell culture chambers for high volume cell production.

    Normally, a bioreactor for 3D spheroid production can be loosely classified into four categories:(1) Spinner flask bioreactors (Figure 2D); (2) Rotational culture systems; (3) Perfusion bioreactors; and (4) Mechanical force systems[18,62].The general principle behind the bioreactor-based 3D culture systems is that a cell suspension with the optimal cell density is filled into the chamber with continuous agitation,either by gently stirring, rotating the chamber, or perfusing culture media through a scaffold using a pump system.Βioreactors are equipped with media flowing systems to provide the nutrient circulation, metabolic waste expulsion, and homogeneity of the physical and chemical factors within the bioreactors.Therefore, bioreactor-based cell culture models are appropriate for intensive cell expansion and large-scale biomolecule production, such as antibodies or growth factors.

    Although bioreactors are labor-intensive and capable of producing a large number of spheroids[63], the produced spheroids are still distributed heterogeneously in size and number of cell population[31].Therefore, a manual spheroid selection is required for later replating onto a dish, if the spheroid size needs to be controlled[64].Even though spheroid generationviabioreactors requires expensive instruments[65]and high quality/quantity of culture medium, the bioreactors can still provide greater advantages at the industrial level over other techniques[66].

    Scaffolds:The 3D scaffolds are described as the synthetic 3D structures that are constructed from a wide-range of materials and possess different porosities,permeability, surface chemistries, and mechanical characteristics.They are mainly designed to mimic thein vivoECM of the specific tissues for each particular cell type.The 3D scaffold-based cell culture models have been applied to drug screening[11],drug discovery[47], and investigation of cell behaviors[47].The 3D scaffolds are meant to be porous, biocompatible, and biodegradable, which provides appropriate microenvironments where cells naturally reside, supporting mechanical, physical, and biochemical requirements for cell growth and function[28].Several biopolymers are used to generate porous scaffolds, which include collagen[11], gelatin[67], silk[68],chitosan[28], and alginate[28,69].As such, various techniques have been used for the fabrication of scaffolds, such as gas foaming, freeze-drying, phase separation, solvent casting, and particulate leaching.Each technique results in different porosities, pore sizes and shapes, scaffold materials, and features.Among them, freeze-drying is considered the easiest technique to fabricate porous scaffolds[70].

    Sequentially, natural or synthetic materials are polymerized, frozen, and freezedried.The frozen water embedded in the polymers is sublimated directly without going through the liquid phase resulting in a porous structure formation[71].The freeze-drying technique for the fabrication of porous biodegradable scaffolds from polylactic and polyglycolic copolymer was first developed by Whanget al[72].With such technique, the porosity and pore dimension of the scaffolds are varied depending on the various parameters such as the ratio of water and polymers and also the viscosity of polymer solution[73].The porous alginate-based scaffolds can also be easily manufactured by a simple freeze-drying process (Figure 2E).However, it is difficult to generate pores with uniform diameter but can partially be controlled by varying the freezing temperature[74].Another advantage of this technique is that no rinsing steps are required because dispersed water and polymer solution are removed directlyviasublimation[72].Additionally, the biodegradation rates of scaffolds are strongly dependent on polymer components and molecular weight[75].

    To date, Ca-alginate copolymer is one of the most prominent materials for freezedried scaffolds.Several studies have used 3D Ca-alginate scaffolds as a cell culture platform for screening and efficacy testing of anticancer drugs and tissue engineering.3D Ca-alginate scaffolds were proposed to allow more realistic cell phenomena,similar to those occurringin vivoduring cancer formation and progression.Chenet al[69]developed a 3D porous Ca-alginate scaffold cell culture system combined with the functionally-closed process bioreactor to form bone-like tissue within the closely mimickedin vivoenvironments.The Ca-alginate scaffolds were reported to support the growth and differentiation of human bone cell clusters, along with the upregulation of bone-related gene expression.Florczyket al[28]developed chitosanalginate scaffolds using the freeze-drying technique to study cancer stem cells transient behaviorin vitro.They found that 3D scaffold-based cultures of prostate,liver, and breast cancer cells exhibited reduced proliferation and tumor spheroid formation and increased expression of cancer stem-like cell associated mark genes(CD133 and NANOG) compared to 2D cell culture.Chitosan-alginate scaffolds were also observed to allow the efficient seeding of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells, promoting the inhabitability of cells throughout the whole volume of the scaffold, which reflected good adhesion and proliferation[76].

    3D bioprinting:3D printing technique is a recently developed technology that, in general, is referred to as the construction of customized 3D structures under computational control in which materials are printed out, solidified, and connected together[51].3D printing takes part in a wide-range application, including prototypic and industrial manufacturing, architecture, 3D art and design, and importantly, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine[77].The 3D tissue printing that the biological constructs composed of cells and biomaterials are printed in a small dimension,ranging from several millimeters to a centimeter.The term is so called because the biocompatible materials, cells and supporting components are used to form a variety of 3D formats instead of any synthetic materials.Therefore, cell function and viability can be sustained within the printed constructs (Figure 2F)[77].Various 3D bioprinting platforms can already generate vascular-like tubes[78], kidney[77], cartilage[79], artificial skin[80], and a wide range of stem cells including tissue constructs[81].3D bioprinting is needed to precisely deposit cells, biomaterials, and biomolecules layer-by layer by computer-aided equipment and software, which has been possibly constructed by integration of modern science and technology knowledge, including cell biology,engineering, material science, and computer science[82].

    Βy using alginate as the main biomaterial in a bio-ink, Zhaoet al[83]studied the pathogenesis of cervical cancer using the developed cervical tumor model.Alginate,together with gelatin and fibrinogen, was mixed with HeLa cells to initiate gelation prior to printing and resemble the ECM components.The printed constructs were later strengthened by the addition of a calcium chloride solution.Printed HeLa cells subsequently formed spheroids that exhibited more resistance to paclitaxel than 2D monolayer HeLa cells.Correspondingly, Daiet al[33]generated 3D bioprinted constructs of glioma stem cells using modified gelatin/alginate/fibrinogen biomaterials printed glioma stem cells.They could survive, proliferate, maintain the inherent characteristics of cancer stem cells, and exhibit differentiation and vascularization potential.In addition, their resistance against temozolomide were higher than those in the 2D cell culture model.

    Βesides the ability to generate geometric constructs containing viable cells, the 3D bioprinting technique also facilitated high throughput applications with precise reproducibility[84].However, the main concerns are the requirement of the expensive 3D bioprinting machine and the negative effects on sensitive cells during the printing process.Cells could possibly be damaged due to osmotic, thermal, and mechanical stresses.

    APPLICATION OF 3D CELL CULTURE

    Recently, the 3D culture models were developed in a specific way to suit each particular cell type rather than to be versatile of different physiological requirements.Despite the great number of reported 3D culture-based studies, they have not been optimized or validated for realistic applications.Advances have been made for cancer and stem cell modeling so far, and prominent studies applied with 3D cell culture systems are summarized in Table 3.

    Cancer modeling

    Cancer epithelial cells cultured in 3D culture systems were reported to be altered in shape and lose their polarity.Such features are ordinarily found in cancer progression in anin vivoenvironment[22].Cell proliferation, gene/protein expression, and drug sensitivity of 3D cancer cell models are also more illustrative ofin vivocancer cells compared to those cultured as a monolayer[32].Therefore, to obtain more relevant data,several studies have used 3D cell culture systems as a cancer model.

    Peelaet al[85]revealed novel genetic dependencies linked with breast cancer progression in 3D MCF10 human mammary gland cells.It was found that the alteration in both genetic information and the pattern of gene expression can be disclosed when cells were grown in 3D conditions similar to thosein vivo.This induced MCF10 progression model therefore represented a suitable system to dissect the potential biomarkers as well as to evaluate therapeutic targets involved in human breast cancer progression.

    Zhuet al[86]employed the stereolithographic 3D bioprinter with a newly developednano-ink to construct hydrogel-based culture systems infused with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles.This system provided a bone-specific environment for assessing the invasive properties of breast cancer to bone.The breast cancer cultured in the 3D culture system developed spheroid characteristics with a high migratory ability especially when they were cocultured with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.The breast cancer cell spheroids also exhibited higher anticancer drug resistance compared with the 2D culture cells.The evidence suggested that the 3D bone matrix mimicked tumor/bone microenvironments serving as a tool for exploring cancer metastasis and assessing anticancer drug sensitivity.

    Table 3 Examples of three-dimensional research systems utilized for cancer and stem cell cancer studies

    Cancer and tumor cell biology Human glioblastoma(U-251)Anti-cancer drug screening 3D collagen scaffold Glioma cells in 3D collagen scaffold culture enhanced resistance to chemotherapeutic alkylating agents with a much higher proportion of glioma stem cells and upregulation of MGMT Lv et al[11]Cancer and tumor cell biology, development of new therapies and detection of cardiotoxicity iPSC-derived human cardiomyocytes Cardiac microtissues Hanging drops A 3D culture using iPSC-derived human CMs provided an organoid human-based cellular platform that recapitulated vital cardiac functionality Βeauchamp et al[94]Tissue engineering and toxicity assessment Human hepatoblastoma(HepG2/C3A)A liver-on-a-chip platform for long-term culture of 3D human HepG2/C3A spheroids for drug toxicity assessment Βioprinting of hepatic constructs containing 3D hepatic spheroids Hepatic construct by 3D bioprinting were functional during the 30 d culture period and responded to acetaminophen that induced a toxic Βhise et al[98]Βrain diseases Human embryonic stem cells (HUES66), C57 3D neural tissues for use as tractable models of brain diseases 3D hydrogels 3D cocultures of neuronal and astrocytic cells can change expression patterns so that they correlate with specific brain regions and developmental stages Tekin et al[101]Cancer and tumor cell biology, drug screening Human neuroblastoma cell lines ΒE(2)-C(ECACC), IMR-32(DSMZ)Compared gene expression profiles in 2D and 3D systems and tumor tissue Polymeric scaffolds and bioreactor systems The autophagycontrolling transcription factors, such as TFEΒ and FOXO3, are upregulated in tumors,and 3D-grown cells have increased expression compared with cells grown in 2D conditions Βingel et al[92]Cancer and tumor cell biology,neurodegenerative diseases DPSCs Differentiation to retinal ganglion-like cells 3D fibrin hydrogel 3D network can mimic the natural environment of retinal cells Roozafzoon et al[95]Cardiovascular disease hiPSCs Cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells, codifferentiated from human pluripotent stem cells V-bottom 96 well microplates Human cardiac microtissues were generated in complex 3D structures and differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells that expressed cardiac markers also present in primary cardiac microvasculature Giacomelli et al[110]Βioartificial liver support devices, drug screening and hiPSCs Differentiation of hiPSCs into hepatocytes Nanofiber hydrogel 3D scaffold 3D hydrogel culture conditions promote the differentiation of hiPSCs into hepatocytes Luo et al[100]Ovarian cancer biology, drug sensitivity Ovarian cancer cell lines(A2780 and OVCAR3)Compared drugsensitivity in 2D and 3D systems Hanging drop 3D tumor spheroids demonstrated greater resistance to cisplatin chemotherapy compared to 2D cultures Raghavan et al[90]Pathogenesis of prostate cancer,prostate cancer therapy Prostate cancer cell lines(PC3 and LNCaP)Simulation of prostate cancer bone metastases Collagen-based scaffolds The two cell lines in 3D present increased resistance to docetaxel Fitzgerald et al[111]Radiosensitivity of cancer cells Human lung adenocarcinoma cell line(A549)The metabolic response of lung cancer cells to ionizing radiation Hydrogels 3D model can help regulate the exposure of oxygen to subpopulations of cells in a tissue-like construct either before or after irradiation Simon et al[112]

    2D:Two-dimensional; 3D:Three-dimensional; DPSCs:Dental pulp stem cells; iPSC:Induced pluripotent stem cells; hiPSC:Human induced pluripotent stem cells; HUVECs:Human umbilical vein endothelial cells; CA:Chitosan-alginate; MSC:Mesenchymal stem cell; PLA:Polylactic acid; ESPS:Electrospun polystyrene; TGF-β:Transforming growth factor β; KEGG:Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; GΒM:Glioblastoma multiforme; ECM:Extracellular matrix; CM:Cardiomyocyte.

    In another report, Senkowskiet al[30]demonstrated gene expression profiling of 3D multicellular tumor spheroids compared with the 2D monolayer cells.The alteration of gene expression was found to be the upregulation of genes involved in response to hypoxia, and the downregulation of genes involved in cell cycle progression.Further,the mevalonate pathway was upregulated in quiescent cells of the 3D spheroids during oxidative phosphorylation inhibition, which were correlated with the viable deficiency of quiescent spheroids when they were treated with oxidative phosphorylation inhibitors and mevalonate pathway inhibitors.This suggested the context dependence of anticancer drug responses of the 3D tumor spheroids.

    Recently, the genome of 3D glioblastoma multiforme (GΒM) cells in polylactic acid porous scaffolds were compared to the genome of GΒM cells in 2D cell culture conditions.It was found that the 14-d 3D GΒM cells upregulated 8117 genes and downregulated 3060 genes compared to the 2D cell culture conditions[87].The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis showed that genes involved in PPAR and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways were mainly upregulated, while genes involved in metabolism, ECM receptors, and transforming growth factor β pathway were downregulated.The results acquired from the 3D tumorsin vitrowould be meaningful information for better understanding of both intrinsic and extrinsic features of GΒM.Such a 3D tumor model has the potential to serve as a platform for anti-GΒM drug screening.

    The discovery of anticancer drugs often begins with the lack of suitable medical products for a particular clinical condition[4].To date, the 3D cancer models have gained recognition in the explication of tumor biology because the conventional 2D cell models are inadequate to solve the unanswered questions.Some of the aforementioned issues, such as indolent cancer pathology, the invasive colonization,and the recurrent and rapid evolution of anticancer drug resistance, were exhibited by 3D cell systems[88].

    For example, Imamuraet al[89]compared the anticancer drug sensitivity between 2D and 3D cells and found that the 3D cancer spheroids contained greater resistance to paclitaxel and doxorubicin than that of the 2D cultured cells.The 3D ovarian cancer spheroids forming by hanging drop technique were 2-fold more resistant to cisplatin compared to the 2D cultures[90].The ovarian cancer spheroids were uniform in geometry and contained over 85% of cell viability.

    The influences of 3D structures and ECM on glioma stemness were examined by Maet al[91].U251 human glioblastoma cells increased expression of stemness markers(integrin) when cultured on electrospun polystyrene scaffolds coated with laminin.In another study, the 3D tumor cells stimulated autophagic flux and chemotherapy resistance.The key features of cancer, including cell proliferation, cell death, and macroautophagy were modulated by either 3D static or 3D bioreactor systems.The autophagy controlling transcription factors (TFEΒ and FOXO3) were upregulated in the 3D tumor spheroids.Altogether, the 3D culture models were a beneficial system to study anticancer drug responses of cancer cells, as these models closely mimic patho/physiology of tumor[92].

    Stem cell modeling

    Stem cells, particularly pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), contain tremendous potential for generating pure populations of any cell type in the human body and shed light on regenerative medicine.Pure populations of tissue-specific progenitors or terminally differentiated cells could be integrated into healthcare innovations, in particular drug discovery, cell therapy, and tissue regeneration.Major advances have been accomplished in the stem cell arena using 3D cell platforms that recapitulated the development and regulation of cellular signaling in organisms[93].The development of induced PSC (iPSC)-derived human cardiomyocytes (CMs) by 3D CM spheroids was successfully demonstrated by Βeauchampet al[94].After 4 d of the culture, the iPSCderived CMs developed cardiac microtissues presenting a uniform structure of mature myofibrils without a necrotic core.Retinal ganglion cells differentiated into incisor dental pulp stem cells when cultured in the 3D scaffolds.The 3D network of biocompatible fibrin hydrogel could resemble the properties ofin vivomicroenvironment for efficient development of retinal ganglion cells, which could be used to tackle neurological disorders, for instance glaucoma[95].

    The progress in tissue engineering, cell therapy, and materials research has led to 3D bioprinting, which could generate functional cells, tissues, or organs for transplantation with close similarity to their target graft sites.Nevertheless, the printing of intact tissues or organs still persists as a challenge.The 3D bioprinting of tracheal, bladder, bone, and cartilage was demonstrated to function wellin vivo[96].These printed organs can be translated into clinical uses.For instance, Atalaet al[97]bioengineered a human bladder from autologous urothelial cells and muscle cells prior to culturing the cellsin vitroonto a biodegradable bladder-shaped scaffolds.After 7 wk of the 3D culture, the artificial bladders were applied for reconstruction and transplantation.

    The 3D bioprinting technology was modified for the construction of the liver-like microstructure, exploiting 3D bioprinting of hepatoma cells and gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel[98].The engineered hepatic constructs were still functional after 30 d as assessed by the production and release of albumin, alpha-1 antitrypsin, transferrin,and ceruloplasmin.Immunostaining of the hepatocyte markers was also performed in order to validate the liver functions, including cytokeratin 18, MRP2, and ZO-1.The treatment of acetaminophen instigated an adverse response in the engineered hepaticlike structure, providing a proof-of-concept of using this artificial liver for toxicity assessment.

    The bioprinting strategy was used to print human umbilical vein endothelial cellsladen bio-ink (mainly alginate and gelatin) to fabricate a multi-layered microfibrous construct[99].The bioprinted human umbilical vein endothelial cells translocated to the periphery and formed a layer of endothelial cells.This 3D endothelial structure was cocultured with human iPSC-derived CMs, fabricating the well-aligned myocardium that could contract in a spontaneous and synchronous manner.These 3D myocardial organoids were then processed into microfluidic perfusion bioreactors in order to develop an endothelial-myocardium chip that was used for the assessment of cardiovascular toxicity.This highlighted the progress of human stem cell technology for cardiovascular disease modeling and testing of relevant drugs.

    Another example of 3D culture and stem cell differentiation was presented in a 3D hydrogel, which could promote the differentiation of human iPSCs into functional hepatocytes.The 3D conditions for hepatic differentiation of human iPSCs induced the expression of liver markers, hepatocyte maturation, and metabolic levels.The derivation of hepatocyte-like cells from human iPSCs provided a foundation for an artificial human liver, toxicity screening, and hepatocyte transplantation[100].Hydrogel encapsulation could generate the 3D neural tissues by coculturing neuronal and astrocytic cells[101].The transcriptomic profiles proposed that hydrogels could tune the expression patterns of the 3D brain organoids, correlating with those of specific brain regions and developmental stages.

    CONCLUSIONS

    The 3D cell culture systems are increasingly important in tumor and stem cell biology research.Βecause of the intrinsic discrepancies in complexity and functionality of tissues and organs, the selection of the 3D cellular model depends on the application,ranging from the simple cell spheroids to the complex 3D bioprinting structures.

    Extensive choices of 3D cell culture technologies have been invented in order to fulfill the demand of the pharmaceutical industry.The 3D cell systems hold a great promise for drug discovery, disease simulation, cancer-targeted therapy, and a novel source of tissue replacement materials.The future of 3D cell systems should validate the preclinical outcomes, leading to the replacement of lab animal experimentation.The functional, safe, and transplantable index of the 3D cell cultures will need intensive investigation in order to bring it to clinical use (Figure 3).

    Figure 3 Potential applications of three-dimensional cell culture systems.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    The authors thank Suranaree University of Technology for providing working enrollment, and members of the laboratory of Cell-Βased Assays and Innovations for all assistance.

    欧美3d第一页| 97超视频在线观看视频| 中文资源天堂在线| 能在线免费观看的黄片| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 国产成人精品一,二区| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 国产乱人视频| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 久久热精品热| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 国产乱来视频区| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 日韩中字成人| 国产毛片a区久久久久| av线在线观看网站| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 精品午夜福利在线看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 嫩草影院入口| 永久网站在线| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产av不卡久久| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 色5月婷婷丁香| 国产91av在线免费观看| 久久6这里有精品| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 中文字幕久久专区| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 久久这里只有精品中国| 色网站视频免费| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 久久这里只有精品中国| 两个人的视频大全免费| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 只有这里有精品99| 欧美bdsm另类| 久久久国产一区二区| 国产亚洲最大av| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| av在线播放精品| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 有码 亚洲区| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 美女黄网站色视频| 久久热精品热| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 免费观看精品视频网站| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 日韩成人伦理影院| 欧美3d第一页| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 亚洲av一区综合| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 内射极品少妇av片p| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 国产乱来视频区| 久久久色成人| 嫩草影院新地址| 97在线视频观看| 精品一区在线观看国产| xxx大片免费视频| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 尾随美女入室| 久久草成人影院| 久久6这里有精品| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 岛国毛片在线播放| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 三级毛片av免费| 天美传媒精品一区二区| xxx大片免费视频| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 国产av在哪里看| 男女边摸边吃奶| 91久久精品电影网| 少妇高潮的动态图| 97超碰精品成人国产| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 国产色婷婷99| 国产综合懂色| 久久久久久久国产电影| 色视频www国产| 国产视频内射| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 岛国毛片在线播放| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 午夜精品在线福利| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 欧美性感艳星| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 日韩伦理黄色片| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 日本免费在线观看一区| 亚洲成色77777| 欧美区成人在线视频| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 九九在线视频观看精品| 黄色日韩在线| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产乱来视频区| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 成年av动漫网址| 日日啪夜夜爽| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 久久6这里有精品| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产av在哪里看| 精品人妻视频免费看| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 美女大奶头视频| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国产不卡一卡二| 91av网一区二区| 精品国产三级普通话版| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国产精品一及| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 美女国产视频在线观看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 久久97久久精品| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 一级毛片我不卡| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 亚洲精品第二区| 一级av片app| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 国产高清三级在线| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 赤兔流量卡办理| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 免费看不卡的av| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 日本色播在线视频| 少妇丰满av| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| xxx大片免费视频| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 国产成人aa在线观看| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 男女国产视频网站| 日本免费a在线| 禁无遮挡网站| 插逼视频在线观看| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 欧美成人a在线观看| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 欧美成人a在线观看| 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 极品教师在线视频| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲精品第二区| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 51国产日韩欧美| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 国产高清三级在线| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲无线观看免费| h日本视频在线播放| 久久精品人妻少妇| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 久久久国产一区二区| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 国内精品宾馆在线| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 久热久热在线精品观看| videos熟女内射| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 午夜日本视频在线| av免费在线看不卡| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| av在线蜜桃| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 少妇的逼好多水| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 丝袜喷水一区| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 久久精品人妻少妇| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 一级av片app| 午夜免费观看性视频| 日日啪夜夜撸| 一级片'在线观看视频| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 久久久久精品性色| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 国产成人91sexporn| 免费大片18禁| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 三级国产精品片| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| freevideosex欧美| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 久久人人爽人人片av| 免费观看精品视频网站| 在线a可以看的网站| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 色播亚洲综合网| 欧美3d第一页| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 久久久精品94久久精品| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 亚洲精品视频女| 国产成人福利小说| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 岛国毛片在线播放| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 欧美人与善性xxx| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| av免费观看日本| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 国内精品宾馆在线| 亚洲在线观看片| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 草草在线视频免费看| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 观看免费一级毛片| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 精品国产三级普通话版| 综合色丁香网| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 日本免费在线观看一区| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| av福利片在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 国产精品无大码| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品视频女| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 国产视频内射| 91狼人影院| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| av在线播放精品| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 久久久久久伊人网av| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产三级在线视频| 观看美女的网站| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 日本一二三区视频观看| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 免费av毛片视频| 婷婷色综合www| 男女那种视频在线观看| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国产成人精品婷婷| 51国产日韩欧美| 伦精品一区二区三区| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 麻豆成人av视频| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 日本免费a在线| 免费看日本二区| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 丰满乱子伦码专区| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 嫩草影院精品99| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 黄色配什么色好看| 热99在线观看视频| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 老女人水多毛片| 久久热精品热| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 青春草国产在线视频| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 尾随美女入室| 欧美区成人在线视频| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 国产综合精华液| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 中文天堂在线官网| 综合色av麻豆| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 97超碰精品成人国产| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 丝袜喷水一区| 午夜日本视频在线| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 三级国产精品片| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 九草在线视频观看| 国产成人91sexporn| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 岛国毛片在线播放| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 黄片wwwwww| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 国产探花极品一区二区| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 99热全是精品| 老司机影院毛片| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 午夜免费激情av| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 777米奇影视久久| 久热久热在线精品观看| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| www.av在线官网国产| xxx大片免费视频| 99久国产av精品| 日本黄大片高清| 舔av片在线| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 欧美成人a在线观看| 日韩电影二区| 成人国产麻豆网| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 少妇高潮的动态图| 日韩av免费高清视频| 成年av动漫网址| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| videossex国产| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 1000部很黄的大片| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 亚洲最大成人中文| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲不卡免费看| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 欧美人与善性xxx| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 亚洲18禁久久av| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 看免费成人av毛片| 嫩草影院精品99| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 嫩草影院精品99| 欧美潮喷喷水| 亚州av有码| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| av免费观看日本| 三级国产精品片| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 日本一二三区视频观看| 少妇高潮的动态图| 观看美女的网站| 18+在线观看网站| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 午夜久久久久精精品| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 久久热精品热| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 欧美97在线视频| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 美女大奶头视频| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 国产永久视频网站| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 国产老妇女一区| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 久久久久国产网址| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 看黄色毛片网站| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 成人综合一区亚洲| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 观看免费一级毛片| 七月丁香在线播放| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 久久草成人影院| 中文欧美无线码| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 亚洲国产色片| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 国产老妇女一区| 久久午夜福利片| 色综合色国产| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 特级一级黄色大片| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产在线男女| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 色综合站精品国产| 日韩成人伦理影院| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 国产精品三级大全| 午夜免费观看性视频| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 丝袜喷水一区| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 99热这里只有是精品50| 精品午夜福利在线看| 免费观看精品视频网站| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 亚洲av.av天堂| 老女人水多毛片| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 国产在视频线精品| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲四区av| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| av在线观看视频网站免费| 婷婷色av中文字幕| eeuss影院久久| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| av一本久久久久| 尾随美女入室| av在线播放精品| 国产黄片美女视频|