• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Formative and Alternative Reading of Scripture: IchijKaneyoshi’s Interpretation of the Nihon shoki in Fifteenth-Century Japan*

    2019-12-12 09:10:56TokumoriMakoto
    國際比較文學(中英文) 2019年4期

    Tokumori Makoto

    Abstract: The Nihon shoki,or Chronicles of Japan,was originally compiled in 720 as the official history of the origin of Japan and the imperial family.Since then,up to and including modern times,numerous recurring lectures and interpretations of the narrative have established it as an authoritative text.This paper focuses on Ichijō Kaneyoshi’s fifteenth-century interpretation of the text,titled Nihon shoki sanso.He provided a valuable contribution to the conception of the first two volumes of the Nihon shoki (named“The Age of the Gods”) as self-sufficient world scripture through comparison with discourses of Buddhism,Confucianism,and other texts.Nevertheless,the retrospective approach to interpreting scripture adopted by the eighteenth-century scholar of the classics,Motoori Norinaga,constituted the mainstream approach to the Kojiki,another ancient narrative compiled in 712,as well as to the Nihon shoki.Kaneyoshi’s comparative reading of scripture remains unorthodox in studies of the Nihon shoki.

    Keywords: Ichijō Kaneyoshi;interpretation;intertextuality;Kojiki;Nihon shoki;Nihon shoki sanso;Motoori Norinaga

    1.Introduction

    This paper deals with the history of interpretations of the early Japanese narrative the

    Nihon shoki

    (《日本書紀》),or Chronicles of Japan.The

    Nihon shoki

    was compiled and presented to the emperor in 720,originally as a history of the origin of Japan and the imperial family.The first two volumes describe the Age of the Gods: the creation of heaven and earth,the emergence of the gods,the descent of the Sun Goddess’s grandson,and the era of his two successors,who were descendants of a god.The following twenty-eight volumes of this book present the history of the subsequent reigns of the emperors who succeeded them until the end of the seventh century,the period just prior to the compilation of the work.Ever since the

    Nihon shoki

    was compiled,for a long time,it has intermittently been the subject of lecture series and been given numerous interpretations to be an authoritative text,first within the imperial court,and later in temples and shrines as well.And after the text was published in woodblock printed editions and circulated widely in the mid-seventeenth century,private scholars came to play a major role in its interpretation.With these explications made in each historical period,the

    Nihon shoki

    has been influential up to present.A notable example in modern times is found in the

    Dainihon teikoku kenpō gige

    (《大日本帝國憲法義解》),or

    Commentaries on the Constitution of the Empire of Japan,

    edited by drafters of the Constitution in 1889.The drafters referred to the mythological narratives of the

    Nihon shoki

    and another ancient text that was presented eight years prior,the

    Kojiki

    (《古事記》),or

    An Account of Ancient Matters

    ,especially on the articles concerning the emperor as sovereign.Take for example Article 1 of Chapter 1,“The Emperor,”and a part of the commentary on it:

    第一條 大日本帝國ハ萬世一系ノ天皇之ヲ統(tǒng)治ス

    (...)本條首メニ立國ノ大義ヲ掲ケ、我カ日本帝國ハ一系ノ皇統(tǒng)ト相依テ終始シ、古今永遠ニ亙リ、(...)統(tǒng)治ハ大位ニ居リ、大権ヲ統(tǒng)ヘテ國土及臣民ヲ治ムルナリ。古典ニ天祖ノ勅ヲ挙ケテ「瑞穂國是吾子孫可王之地、宜爾皇孫就而治焉」ト云ヘリ。又神祖ヲ稱ヘタテマツリテ「始御國天皇」ト謂ヘリ。日本武尊ノ言ニ「吾者纏向ノ日代宮ニ坐テ大八島國知ロシメス大帯日子淤斯呂和気天皇ノ御子」トアリ(...)

    [ARTICLE 1 The Empire of Japan shall be reigned over and governed by a line of Emperors unbroken for ages eternal.]

    [At the outset,this Article states the great principle of the Constitution of the country,and declares that the Empire of Japan shall,to the end of time,identify itself with the Imperial dynasty unbroken in lineage,and that the principle has never changed in the past and will never change in the future,even to all eternity....By“reigned over and governed,”it is meant that the Emperor on His Throne combines in Himself the sovereignty of the State and the government of the country and of His subjects.An ancient record mentions a decree of the Heavenly Ancestor saying“The Country of Goodly Grain is a State,over which Our descendants shall become Sovereigns: You,Our descendant,go and govern it.”And the Divine Ancestor was also called“Emperor governing the country for the first time”(Hatsukuni-shirasu Sumera-mikoto).A Prince named Yamato-take-no-Mikoto said,“I am a son of the Emperor Otarashi-hiko-Oshiro-Wake,who resides in the palace of Hishiro at Makimuku,and who governs the Country of Eight Great Islands.”]

    To lay the foundation for the emperor’s sovereignty,the drafters of the Constitution referred to the mythical ordinance of the goddess of heaven (天祖Heavenly Ancestor),who compels her grandson to govern the country in the narrative of the

    Nihon shoki

    .The name of the first emperor that follows (神祖;Divine Ancestor) is also cited from the

    Nihon shoki

    as proof of the observance of this decree.The prince’s words cited from the

    Kojiki

    serve the same purpose.This is evidence that the

    Nihon shoki

    performed a politically vital function in modern Japan’s period of nation-state formation.And it shows that the recurring interpretations of the

    Nihon shoki

    over roughly one thousand years have effectively elevated the early-eighth-century text to the level of scripture in modern times.One point to clarify here is that the present paper refers to the history of interpretations of the

    Nihon shoki

    in a broader sense that includes interpretations of the

    Kojiki

    .After the two books were compiled in the early eighth century,while the

    Nihon Shoki

    had been valued highly as the first of the official histories,the

    Kojiki

    had long been considered the most valuable reference book for the study of the

    Nihon shoki

    until MOTOORI Norinaga’s (本居宣長) voluminous commentary of the

    Kojiki

    emerged at the end of the eighteenth century.As we will see later,we can consider that Norinaga also studied the

    Kojiki

    from the perspective of interpreting the

    Nihon shoki

    ——and in fact,his interpretations of the

    Nihon shoki

    played an essential role in his annotation of the

    Kojiki

    .These facts enable us to consider Norinaga’s commentary as a work that helps to shift the weight from the

    Nihon shoki

    to the

    Kojiki

    within the long tradition of interpretations of the

    Nihon shoki

    .Returning to the main topic,in order to establish how the narrative came to be considered as scripture,we can focus on ICHIJō Kaneyoshi’s (一條兼良) interpretation of the

    Nihon shoki

    in the mid-fifteenth century.He took up the first two volumes of the

    Nihon Shoki

    ,named“The Age of the Gods”(神代),and produced a comprehensive interpretation of that whole narrative.His interpretation sheds light on the designation of the text as scripture in the long history of studies of the

    Nihon shoki

    .Kaneyoshi was a high-ranking aristocrat who had held the position of regent twice in the imperial court during a turbulent age that preceded a period of political chaos,and he was also a distinguished scholar once called“a man of talent outstanding in five hundred years.”by his contemporary.He was familiar with Japanese classical literature,Chinese classics and Buddhism,and was said to have unparalleled knowledge of the practices and customs of the ancient imperial court.He gave lectures on the

    Nihon shoki

    at the imperial court,and compiled a commentary of the

    Nihon shoki

    based on these lectures titled

    Nihon shoki sanso

    (《日本書紀纂疏》);Collected Commentaries on the

    Nihon shoki

    (hereafter cited as

    Sanso

    ) in 1457.

    2.The Medieval Situation of the Nihon shoki

    In order to understand the characteristics of Kaneyoshi’s interpretation,let us survey the understanding of the

    Nihon shoki

    in medieval Japan from the eleventh to early fifteenth centuries.There were several commentaries on the text prior to Kaneyoshi’s.One of them is a voluminous and important work called

    Shaku Nihongi

    (《釈日本紀》;Interpreting Nihongi),completed by URABE Kanekata in the late thirteenth century.“Nihongi”(日本紀) is an alternative name for the

    Nihon shoki

    that

    prevailed in medieval times.Kanekata compiled the private records of lectures on the

    Nihon shoki

    held within the imperial court in the ninth and tenth centuries,and arranged them together with his and his father’s commentaries,which provided a valid basis for later studies and applications of the

    Nihon shoki

    .However,

    Shaku Nihongi

    ,as well as other commentaries,simply extract several words or phrases from the text,and provide commentaries to them.They have little intention of clarifying the relationships between each part and the whole,or the whole as a body made up of parts.This is what Kaneyoshi would go on to do.As far as the use of the

    Nihon shoki

    as a reference is concerned,it had always been considered the most authoritative source in the formation of new mythological discourses or commentaries on other classic texts,but it is actually rare that the

    Nihon shoki

    was directly referred to in these discourses.Most quotations from the

    Nihongi

    were actually not directly from the

    Nihon shoki

    .This is partly because it was difficult for most of these writers to gain access to the text of the

    Nihon shoki

    ,but it may probably be due even more to the fact that they did not necessarily need the text as such,but only the foundation of its authority in order to create their new texts.Here,for example,is a paragraph from a commentary on the Chinese preface to the first official anthology of the early tenth century,

    Kokin wakashū

    (《古今和歌集》,A Collection of Japanese Poems Ancient and Modern) written by Buddhist priest Shōmyō (勝命) in the mid-thirteenth century:

    (上略)然而神世七代、時質人淳、情欲無分

    國常立尊 陽神

    日本紀云、アメツチヒラクルハシメ、ウカヒタ丶ヨヘルナカニ、ヒトツノモノアリ、カタチアシカヒノコトクニシテ、神トナレリ、コレヲクニノトコタチノミコト丶マウス、神ノヨノハシメナリ、アシカヒハ、アシノツノクメルナルヘシ

    [But in the Seven Generations of the Age of the Gods the times were unsophisticated and people were simple.The realm of emotions was not distinguished.]

    【Commentary】Kuni-toko-tachi-no-mikoto,yang god Nihongi says,When heaven and earth began,there existed one thing in their floating about.It,in shape like a reed-shoot,became changed into a God.This is called Kuni-toko-tachi-no-mikoto.It is the beginning of the Age of the Gods.A reed-shoot is a reed sprouting forth.”

    Shōmyō states that this paragraph is quoted from the

    Nihongi

    but this is actually not so.The description is similar to the account of the beginning of the Age of the Gods in the

    Nihon shoki

    but different from it.It is cited from the editor’s explanatory notes on

    Nihongi kyōen waka

    (《日本紀竟宴和歌》),Japanese poems at celebratory banquets,for the completion of lectures on the

    Nihon shoki

    ,which is supposed to have been edited by FUJIWARA Akisuke (藤原顕輔) in the twelfth century.By attributing the note to the

    Nihongi

    and bringing it together with the other quotations (abbreviated here),Shōmyō creates a new Nihongi of his own,which could be disseminated and referred to as an authoritative account of the beginning of the Age of the Gods in the commentaries that followed.Returning to the topic of the

    Nihon shoki

    in the medieval period,it should be added that even when part of the actual

    Nihon shoki

    was referred to,it was usually mixed with Buddhist and Chinese classical discourses to construct new texts,which are thus deeply connected with the religious movements in the same period.Under their hegemonic Buddhist discourses,the Buddhist priests tried not to suppress indigenous gods of Shintō (神道),but to subsume them as the manifestations of the Buddhist deities.On the other hand,the doctrines of Shintō creeds were formulated with a strong stimulus,mainly from Buddhist schools,and later a movement also developed to subsume Buddhist deities and discourses into an integral Shintō doctrine.Thus from either Buddhism or Shintō’s point of view,the

    Nihon shoki

    ’s narrative of the indigenous gods became the one to be supplemented by Buddhist discourses.Some examples will be taken below.

    3.Kaneyoshi’s Attempt to Interpret the Nihon shoki

    In this context,Ichijō Kaneyoshi arguably turned the

    Nihon shoki

    into a kind of world scripture,which he thought it should be.The features and significance of Kaneyoshi’s attempt to interpret the

    Nihon shoki

    are classified into the following two points.Firstly,one of the features of his attempt is to grasp the significance of the narrative of the Age of the Gods as a whole.He did so by segmenting the text into sentences as units,giving headings to every unit and mentioning the multilayered relationships among the units in order to interpret the whole narrative as a multilayered and consistent composition.This method is not unique to Kaneyoshi.It is rather a common one used by Buddhist scholars to analyze the sutras.That Kaneyoshi applied this method to the

    Nihon shoki

    suggests that he was trying to establish this ancient text as a kind of scripture,just like the sutras.It is his working hypothesis that the

    Nihon shoki

    ,at least the narrative of the Age of the Gods,is a consistent and complete text;the

    Sanso

    itself is an attempt to demonstrate that this hypothesis is true.As mentioned above,such a claim had never been made in any preceding commentaries on the

    Nihon shoki

    .With respect to the preceding analysis,it is also idiosyncratic that Kaneyoshi established the attitude of concentrating on the literary Chinese text of the

    Nihon shoki

    as such.That may sound strange,but most previous interpreters were prone to attributing less value to the text itself than to the supposed proto-narrative over or behind the text.This is an important problem with the Japanese scripture,one that is related to the status of writing.The

    Nihon shoki

    is written in literary Chinese.Nevertheless,it had been thought that the primary narrative had been given orally in Japanese and was later transcribed in literary Chinese.The project of inferring the proto-narrative in Japanese language from the present text in Chinese characters had thus been one of the main concerns in interpreting the

    Nihon shoki

    .In the

    Sanso

    Kaneyoshi rejects this idea of a proto-oral text.It is true that he admits that expressions of the

    Nihon shoki

    are clearly based on Japanese language.But he also points out that other expressions are reasonably taken as coming from Chinese originally.That means that the present text itself is the original

    Nihon shoki

    as a whole.Thus Kaneyoshi never inquires about a proto-

    Nihon shoki

    in the

    Sanso

    .He is the first to take this approach to the

    Nihon shoki

    ,an approach that is deeply connected to his thorough analysis of the composition of the

    Nihon shoki

    as a whole.Secondly,another outstanding feature of the

    Sanso

    is that Kaneyoshi tries to present correspondences between the

    Nihon shoki

    narrative and Buddhist,Confucian and Taoist discourses.As mentioned earlier,there were many kinds of new syncretic Shintō and Buddhist discourses in Kaneyoshi’s period.And in other commentaries on the

    Nihon shoki

    ,that narrative tended to be complemented with those discourses.We can say generally that Kaneyoshi’s attempt to relate passages and sentences of the

    Nihon shoki

    with the writings of the other religious or metaphysical teachings is another product of this syncretism.But,to be more exact,in this cultural climate Kaneyoshi actually excludes any syncretic understanding of the

    Nihon shoki

    .Rather he tries to distinguish the

    Nihon shoki

    from the other discourses and show correspondences among them.Let us take one scene from the

    Nihon shoki

    as an example.This is a scene in which two gods begin to create the world:

    伊奘諾尊·伊奘冉尊、立於天浮橋之上、共計曰、底下豈無國歟、廼以天之瓊矛、指下而探之。是獲滄溟。其矛鋒滴瀝之潮、凝成一嶋。名之曰磤●馭慮嶋。

    [Izanagi no Mikoto and Izanami no Mikoto stood on the floating bridge of Heaven,and held counsel together,saying:“Is there not a country beneath?”Thereupon they thrust down the jewel-spear of Heaven,and groping about therewith found the ocean.The brine which dripped from the point of the spear coagulated and became an island which received the name of Ono-goro-jima.]

    One Buddhist scholar of the early fifteenth century provided a commentary on the word滄溟(the ocean),as follows:

    滄溟者、大海之惣名也。當初伊奘諾尊、滄溟ヲミクタシ給ニ、大日如來ノ印文アリ。天ノサカホコヲ指下サクリ給フニ、前ニサワル物更ニ無シ。其ノホコヲ引上給ニ、其ホコノ滴リ一ノ嶋ト成レリ。ヲノコロ嶋ト云也。

    [滄溟 is the general name of the ocean.In the beginning,when Izanagi no Mikoto looked down at the ocean,in it he found a sign of The Great Sun Buddha (大日如來).Therefore,he thrust down the spear of Heaven and groped about,but there was nothing to touch.Thereupon,when he drew up the spear,a drop from the spear became one island.We call it Ono-goro-jima.]

    Properly speaking,this is not a commentary.Instead it provides a new syncretic description by adding the image of The Great Sun Buddha,which never appears in the

    Nihon shoki

    .Taking one more example,an essay supposed to have been written in the late fifteenth century says:

    伊奘諾、伊奘冉二尊、天御中主尊ノ宣命ヲ受テ、天ノ浮橋ノ上ニ竚ンデ共ニ計テ曰、豈此下ニ國土無カランヤトテ、天瓊矛ヲ指下探リ給ニ、滄溟ヲ獲タリ。又海底ニ大日ノ印文在テ光ヲ放ス。矛ノ滴彼印文ノ光ト和合テ一ノ嶋ト成ル。大日ノ本國ナル故、大日本國ト號ス。

    [Izanagi and Izanami,two gods,obeyed Ame-no-Minaka-nushi’s order and stood on the floating bridge of Heaven,and held counsel together,saying:“Is there not a country beneath?”Thereupon they thrust down the jewel-spear of Heaven,and groping about therewith found the ocean.And at that bottom there was a sign of the Great Sun [Buddha] shining.The drop from the point of the spear was mixed with the light of that sign and became an island.This is the main land (本國) of The Great Sun (大日).Therefore we call it Dai-Nihon-koku (大日本國).]

    This story is almost the same as the

    Nihon shoki

    ,but here too the image of the Great Sun Buddha is added.In this case,the discourse connected with that image even covers the origin of the name of Japan.Now we can contextualize Ichijō Kaneyoshi’s interpretation in this trend of syncretism.Kaneyoshi also introduces Buddhist discourses to his commentaries on the

    Nihon shoki

    .Nevertheless,his way of introducing them in the

    Sanso

    is different from these two texts.

    In Kaneyoshi’s interpretation,Buddhist discourses also play an important role: he relates the spear of the gods of heaven with an esoteric Buddhist indestructible mallet,and he finds parallels between the creation of Ono-goro-jima from the brine and part of the Buddhist cosmological process.Kaneyoshi also refers to Chinese yin-yang theory in his commentaries.On the other hand,it is also clear that he ignores the common syncretic narrative of the sign of the Great Sun Buddha.He therefore refuses that syncretic trend of the period.He does not integrate the

    Nihon shoki

    with Buddhist discourses and Chinese classic ones,but he points out the correspondences among them.Why does he do so against the syncretic current? Let us ascertain a decisive reason for this.In the

    Sanso

    ,to answer how Shintoists can know about the Age of Gods when there was no letter to record,he answers in the following manner:

    上古無文字、然結縄刻木、且為之約、吾邦開闢之事、幽明之跡、自古神聖相授、或託人宣言、而其所説、自莫不符合三教之理

    [In ancient times there were no letters.Therefore by knotting rope and carving in wood we made promises.Matters about the beginning of our country and evidence of people and gods were handed down from sage to sage since ancient times,or entrusted to people for making a declaration.Therefore these statements have no disagreement in principle with any discourses of three teachings (Confucianism,Taoism and Buddhism).]

    Kaneyoshi talks about how to establish the credibility of the writings about the Age of Gods.He mentions that oral transmission has the potential for narrating antiquity.Nevertheless,in his opinion,we cannot find any text that has a factual relationship with the reality of the prehistoric age.Therefore he insists that what is important for credibility of the text is the concordance in principle (理) between the

    Nihon shoki

    and the discourses of the three teachings about the same prehistoric age.According to Kaneyoshi,in that sense,it is concordance among them that actually provides the

    Nihon shoki

    with its credibility as a text about the Age of Gods.As we have seen,he did not necessarily seek literal overlaps among those discourses,but rather,as he specifically wrote,he sought for concordance in principle,or structural equivalences among them.For example,regarding the relationship with Buddhist cosmological discourses,Kaneyoshi refers to at least six Buddhist descriptions of the creation stage of the universe in commentaries on particular passages of the

    Nihon shoki

    .It is true that it is not so easy to accept each concordance in those relations,but the series of those correspondences between them provides a sense of structural equivalence,which is arguably what Kaneyoshi wanted to show the reader.That Kaneyoshi’s interpretation is so full of remarks on those equivalences is itself clearly a verification of his hypothesis about the credibility of the

    Nihon shoki

    .Through these analyses Kaneyoshi tried to demonstrate that the

    Shoki

    as a text is a comprehensive world scripture.To make this clear,let us compare his attempt with that of KITABATAKE Chikafusa (北畠親房).Chikafusa was also an aristocrat close to the emperor and wrote the

    Jinnō-Shōtōki

    (《神皇正統(tǒng)記》;A Chronicle of Gods and Sovereigns),a book about the origin and succession of the imperial family and the political legitimacy of the emperor more than one hundred years before the

    Sanso

    appeared.In this work,he states:

    同世界ノ中ナレバ、天地開闢ノ初ハイヅクモカハルベキナラネド、三國ノ説各コトナリ。

    [Although the creation of heaven and earth,having occurred within the same universe [同世界],must have been the same everywhere,there are nonetheless differences in the traditional accounts of creation in three countries [India,China,and Japan]].

    Chikafusa already had a deep understanding of not only the

    Nihon shoki

    ’s narrative but also the Buddhist and Confucian cosmological discourses.However,unlike Kaneyoshi,Chikafusa admits that there are differences among them.Moreover,the above remark also shows that his acceptance of difference is supported by his conviction of the reality of“the same universe ”(同世界),though this concept of the universe (世界) itself is Buddhist one.In this book,Chikafusa does not provide a commentary on the

    Nihon shoki

    .Rather,he edits and modifies the

    Nihon shoki

    ,sometimes by supplementing it with other texts in order to make new narrative.His main purpose was to clarify the unparalleled principle of direct succession to the throne from the god of heaven in Japan.His conviction of the agreement of the real world with his faith in that principle enabled him to make use of differing discourses as sources.Compared with Chikafusa,Kaneyoshi did the opposite in his

    Sanso

    .He had no

    a priori

    conviction of the reality of the world shared with people of the other countries.Instead he had faith in the

    Nihon shoki

    as scripture.Through his comparative analyses,he tried to prove that his faith was true,and he wanted to be convinced of the reality of the same world with the support of his own world scripture.

    4.After Kaneyoshi

    To clarify the historical significance of Kaneyoshi’s work,let us review the development of interpretations of the

    Nihon shoki

    after his attempt.Kaneyoshi’s interpretation had a direct influence on subsequent Shintō scholars including YOSHIDA Kanetomo (吉田兼?zhèn)? and his son,the Confucian scholar KIYOHARA Nobukata (清原宣賢).Kanetomo formulated the religious dogmas and institutions of Shintō,which gave a solid foundation to various Shintō schools that followed.He also studied Kaneyoshi’s interpretations in the

    Sanso

    thoroughly to make his own interpretation of the

    Nihon shoki

    .Nobukata compiled comprehensive commentaries on the

    Nihon shoki

    based on Kaneyoshi’s interpretations as well as his father’s.Kanetomo and Nobukata gave lectures on the

    Nihon shok

    i energetically,not only in the imperial court,but also in temples,and Nobukata even gave lectures to local warlords at the beginning of the warlike age in the early sixteenth century.When Kanetomo and Nobukata’s commentaries on the

    Nihon shoki

    were prepared for publication in 1664,the

    Sanso

    was included with them in the same book.Thereafter,the

    Sanso

    ,solely or together with Kanetomo and Nobukata’s commentaries,became widely read in the early modern Japan

    .

    Nevertheless,we need to pay attention to the fact that those who followed restored the idea of a proto-

    Nihon shoki

    written in Japanese.Kaneyoshi had dismissed that idea because he could not have faith in anything but the actual

    Nihon shoki

    for his reasoning,and he knew that the actual text was established within the knowledge of the Chinese classics shared in East Asia.But presumably after subsequent scholars accepted the universal perspective and the idea of the

    Nihon shoki

    as world scripture that Kaneyoshi provided,the actual

    Nihon shoki

    in literary Chinese came to look like a simulacrum of their own scripture to them.They had faith in the imagined existence of a proto-

    Nihon shoki

    and the original Japanese words which are supposed to compose that text.A representative figure of this tendency is Motoori Norinaga mentioned above,an outstanding scholar of classics in the eighteenth century.He states the following:

    抑意と事と言とは、みな相稱へる物にして、上代は、意も事も言も上代、(中略)書紀は、後代の意をもて、上代の事を記し、漢國の言を以て、皇國の意を記されたる故に、あひかなはざわること多かるを、此記は、いさゝかもさかしらを加へずて、古より云伝たるまゝに記さたれば、その意も事も言も相稱て、皆上代の実なり、是もはら古の語言を主としたるが故ぞかし

    [Spirit,event and word are all things which are consistent with one another.In the world of the ancients,there were the spirit,events,and words of the ancients....In the

    Nihon shoki

    the events of the ancients are recorded with the spirit of the later ages and the spirit of our imperial country is recorded by the language of China.Therefore there are many things which are not in correspondence with one another.The

    Kojiki

    contains not a bit of posturing,and since it has recorded things just as they have been transmitted from ancient times,in the

    Kojiki

    spirit,event and word are in accord with one another,and what is represented there is the true nature of the ancient age.This is precisely because they have concentrated on using only the language of ancient times.]Like Kaneyoshi,Norinaga eagerly pursues world scripture and,as this statement shows,he agrees with Kaneyoshi that the actual

    Nihon shoki

    is the product of the shared culture of literary Chinese in East Asia.But for precisely this reason,the

    Nihon shoki

    is no longer a primary scripture and is inconsistent in many ways for Norinaga.He admires the

    Kojiki

    ,which preserves Japanese words of ancient times.This does not mean that he repudiates the previous studies of the

    Nihon shoki

    from medieval times;rather,his statement about the

    Kojiki

    also shows that the image of the proto-

    Nihon shoki

    functions in Norinaga’s perspective.The higher priority he places on the

    Kojiki

    can be considered a reflection of his view of it as an embodiment of the proto-

    Nihon shoki

    .As for the credibility of the text,while Kaneyoshi sought for the intertextual relationships among literary Chinese discourses,Norinaga foregrounds his faith in the transparent relationship between ancient words and the reality of antiquity.This faith led him to thorough interpretations of the

    Kojiki

    and the

    Nihon shoki

    based on linguistic and philological analysis,which have established a lasting influence on the studies of them up to present.However,while Norinaga’s retrospective approach to the texts can demonstrate originality of scripture,we must not overlook the fact that it cannot demonstrate the universality that should be inherent in world scripture.This implies that,contrary to his self-consciousness,Norinaga’s research on the

    Kojiki

    as world scripture was founded only on the corroboration that Kaneyoshi reached through his intertextual explication of the

    Nihon shoki

    .

    5.Conclusion

    The retrospective manner of interpreting scripture represented by Norinaga is the mainstream approach to understanding the

    Kojiki

    and

    Nihon shoki

    .Returning to the 1889

    Commentaries on the Constitution of the Empire of Japan

    ,we not only see a modern regeneration of the

    Nihon shoki

    ,but also hear an echo of the manner of interpretation practiced by Norinaga.To confirm the legitimacy of the emperor’s sovereignty,the commentators exclusively looked back to ancient words demonstrating his indigenous origin,which is clearly similar to Norinaga’s pursuit of ancient words conveying the reality of antiquity.Both sought originality,not universality.On the other hand,Kaneyoshi’s approach to the

    Nihon shoki

    is obviously different.In the case of his commentary on the description of the descent of the Sun Goddess’s grandson by her command in the

    Nihon shoki

    ,cited as the first example in the 1889

    Commentaries

    ,Kaneyoshi tries to demonstrate the meaning of the three treasures that the Sun Goddess gave to her grandson by Confucian and Buddhist concepts,and explains the significance of the grandson’s descent,with those treasures from the Buddhist perspective.Moreover,concerning the textual fact in the

    Nihon shoki

    that after the death of the eldest son,the Goddess selected not the eldest son’s son,but a son born out of wedlock as the descending god,Kaneyoshi takes as precedent the examples of ancient China: Taiwang (太王) selected not his eldest son Taibo (太伯) but Jili (季歴) as a successor,and Wenwang (文王) selected not Boyikao (伯邑考) but Wuwang (武王) in the Zhou (周) dynasty.These commentaries characteristically show that Kaneyoshi aims to validate the specific text from the perspective of universal values that are shared throughout the world.Kaneyoshi’s approach to the

    Nihon shoki

    might not have succeeded after Norinaga’s work emerged.In modern scholarship,the

    Sanso

    has been considered to be full of forced analogies with discourses of Buddhism,Confucianism,and other texts,based on medieval fallacy.Studies of the

    Nihon Shoki

    have thus accorded it insufficient attention.Our perception of these medieval discourses is now drastically changing as a result of advances in studies of medieval Japan,as well as the recent appearances of several important studies on the

    Sanso

    .But the significance of the medieval commentary on the history of interpretation of the

    Nihon shoki

    has not been clearly understood.In that long history,Kaneyoshi provided a valuable contribution to the conception of the

    Nihon shoki

    as self-sufficient world scripture through his comparative analyses,and his attempt in the

    Sanso

    remains an alternative reading of the

    Nihon shoki

    .

    Bibliography參考文獻

    Aston,W.G.,trans.

    Nihongi,Chronicles of Japan from the Earliest Times to A.D.697

    .Tokyo: Charles E.Tuttle,1972.

    Felt,Matthieu A.J.“Rewriting the Past: Reception and Commentary of Nihon shoki,Japan’s First Official History.”PhD diss.,Columbia University,2017.ProQuest (1896955647).

    Norinaga,Motoori.

    Kojiki-den,Book 1

    .Translated by Ann Wehmeyer.Ithaca: Cornell University East Program,1997.Rodd,Laurel Rasplica,and Mary Catherine Henkenius,trans.

    Kokinshū A Collection of Poems Ancient and Modern

    .Princeton: Princeton University Press,1984.Scheid,Bernhard.“Two modes of secrecy in the

    Nihon shoki

    transmission.”In

    The Culture of Secrecy in Japanese Religion

    .Edited by Bernhard Scheid and Mark Teeuwen.London: Routledge,2006.Varley,H.Paul,trans.

    A Chronicle of Gods and Sovereigns: Jinnō shōtōki of Kitabatake Chikafusa.

    New York: Columbia University Press,1980.Yasumaro,ō no.

    The Kojiki: An Account of Ancient Matters

    .Translated by Gustav Heldt.New York: Columbia University Press,2014.

    市古貞次:《塵荊鈔(下)》,《古典文庫》,東京:古典文庫,1984年。

    [ICHIKO,Teiji.

    Jinkeishō (Dustlike and Rasping Excerpts)

    .Vol.2.In

    Koten bunko

    (Classical Library).Tokyo: Koten bunko,1984.]

    稲田正次:《明治憲法成立史》下巻,東京:有斐閣,1962年。

    [INADA,Shōji.

    Meiji kenpō seiritsushi

    (History of Establishment of Meiji Constitution).Vol.2.Tokyo: Yūhikaku,1962.]

    伊藤聡:《神道とは何か:神と仏の思想史》,東京:中央公論社,2012年。

    [ITō,Satoshi.

    Shintō towa nanika: Kami to hotoke no nihonshi

    (What is Shintō: Intellectual History of Gods and Buddha).Tokyo: Chūō kōronsha,2012.]

    金沢英之:《神話と歴史》,《巖波講座:日本の思想》第6巻,東京:巖波書店,2013年。

    [KANAZAWA,Hideyuki.“Shinwa to rekishi”(Myth and History).In

    Iwanami kōza nihon no shisō

    (Iwanami Course on Japanese Thought)

    .

    Vol 6.Tokyo: Iwanami shoten,2013.]

    北畠親房:《神皇正統(tǒng)記》,巖佐正等校注:《神皇正統(tǒng)記 増鏡》,《日本古典文學大系》,東京:巖波書店,1965年。

    [KITABATAKE,Chikafusa.

    Jinnō shōtō ki

    (Chronicles of the Authentic Lineages of the Divine Emperors).In

    Nihon koten bungaku taikei

    (An Anthology of Japanese Classical Literature)

    .

    Edited by Iwasa Tadashi et al.Tokyo: Iwanami shoten,1965.]

    神野志隆光:《古事記と日本書紀:「天皇神話」の歴史》,東京:講談社,1999年。

    [KOHNOSHI,Takamitsu.

    Kojiki to Nihon shoki: shinwa no rekishi

    (

    Kojiki

    ※ROMAN

    Nihon shoki

    : History of Myth of Tennō).Tokyo: Kodansha,1999.]

    ——:《平安期における日本紀―勝命古今序注をめぐって》,《日本文學》1998年,第45—47頁。

    [——.“Heianki ni okeru Nihongi: Shōmyō Kokin jochū o megutte”(Nihongi in Heian period: Concerning Shōmyō

    Kokin jochū

    ).

    Nihon bungaku

    (1998): 45-47.]

    宮川葉子:《一條兼良の『日本書紀纂疏』成立前後:成仁親王元服との関連を中心に》,《ぐんしょ》44,1999年。

    [MIYAGAWA,Yōko.“Ichijō Kaneyoshi no Nihon shoki sanso seiritsu zengo: Fusahito shinnō genpuku tono kanren wo chūshin ni”(Before and After Appearance of

    Nihon shoki sanso

    : Centering on the Relation to a Ceremony to Mark Prince Fusahito’s Coming-of-Age).In

    Gunsho

    ,vol.44,1999.]

    本居宣長:《古事記伝》,《本居宣長全集》第9巻,東京:筑摩書房,1968年。

    [MOTOORI,Norinaga.

    Kojiki den

    (A Commentary on the Kojiki).In

    Motoori Norinaga zenshū

    (Complete Works of Motoori Norinaga).Vol.9.Tokyo: Chikuma shobō,1968.]

    永島福太郎:《一條兼良》,東京:吉川弘文館,新裝版,1988年。

    [NAGASHIMA,Fukutarō.

    Ichijō Kaneyoshi

    .New Edition.Tokyo: Yoshikawa kōbunkan,1988.]

    《日本書紀纂疏·日本書紀抄》,《天理図書館善本叢書》,東京:八木書店,1977年。

    Nihon shoki sanso

    /

    Nihon shoki shō

    (Collected Commentaries on the

    Nihon Shoki /

    Notes for Lectures on the

    Nihon Shoki

    )

    .

    In

    Tenri toshokan zenpon sōsho

    (Rare Book Collection in Tenri Library).Tokyo: Yagi shoten,1977.]

    西宮一民:《日本上代の文章と表記》,東京:風間書房,1970年。

    [NISHIMIYA,Kazutami.

    Nihon jōdai no bunshō to hyōki

    (Composition and Writing in Early Japan).Tokyo: Kazama Shobō,1970.]

    二藤京:《『日本書紀纂疏』の「三種神器」論》,《國語と國文學》2007年3月號。

    [NITō,Miyako.“Nihon shoki sanso no sanshu no jingi ron”(Theory of Three Treasures in

    Nihon shoki sanso

    ).

    Kokugo to Kokubungaku

    3 (2007).]

    坂本太郎等校注:《日本書紀(上)》,《日本古典文學大系》,東京:巖波書店,1967年。

    [SAKAMOTO,Tarō et al.,eds.

    Nihon shoki

    (The Chronicles of Japan).Vol.1.In

    Nihon koten bungaku taikei

    (An Anthology of Japanese Classical Literature).Tokyo: Iwanami shoten,1967,81.]

    勝命:《古今和歌集序注》,小島憲之、新井栄蔵校注:《古今和歌集》,《新日本古典文學大系》,東京:巖波書店,1989年。

    [Shōmyō.“Kokin wakashū jochū”(Commentaries on Chinese Preface to

    A Collection of Japanese Poems Ancient and Modern

    ).In

    Kokin wakashū

    .Collated and annotated by Kojima Noriyuki and Arai Eizō.In

    Shin nihon koten bungaku taikei

    (New Anthology of Japanese Classical Literature).Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten,1989.]

    春瑜:《日本書紀私見聞》,《神宮叢書影印叢刊》之《古事記·日本書紀(下)》,東京:八木書店,1982年。

    [Shunyu.

    Nihon shoki shikenbun

    (My Personal Observation on the

    Nihon shoki

    ).In

    Jingū sōsho eiin sōkan: Kojiki,Nihon shoki

    .Vol.2.Tokyo: Yagi shoten,1982.]

    徳盛誠:《清原宣賢『日本書紀抄』試論:『日本書紀纂疏』との連関から》,新川登亀男,早川萬年編,《史料としての『日本書紀』―津田左右吉を読み直す》,東京:勉誠出版,2011年。

    [TOKUMORI,Makoto,“Kiyohara Nobukata Nihon shoki shō shiron: Nihon shoki sanso tono kanren kara”(An Essay on Kiyohara Nobukata’s

    Nihon shoki shō

    : Concerning Its Relationship with

    Nihon shoki sanso

    ),in

    Shiryo toshite no Nihon shoki: Tsuda Sōkichi wo yominaosu

    (

    Nihon shoki

    as a Historical Material: Rereading Tsuda Sōkichi’s Works).Edited by Shinkawa Tokio and Hayakawa Mannen.Tokyo: Bensei Shuppan,2011.]

    義江彰夫:《神仏習合》,東京:巖波書店,1996年。

    [YOSHIE,Akio.

    Shinbutsu shūgō

    (Syncretic Fusion of Shintoism and Buddhism).Tokyo: Iwanami shoten,1996.]

    成人国语在线视频| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲中文av在线| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 久久人妻av系列| 国产在视频线精品| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 91av网站免费观看| 成人国语在线视频| av电影中文网址| 嫩草影视91久久| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 亚洲精品在线美女| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区 | 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 制服诱惑二区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 亚洲av美国av| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 精品一区二区三卡| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 手机成人av网站| 国产又爽黄色视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 亚洲第一青青草原| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 老司机影院毛片| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 国产精品影院久久| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 免费看a级黄色片| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区 | 丝袜在线中文字幕| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 免费高清在线观看日韩| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 午夜福利,免费看| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 黄频高清免费视频| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 午夜免费观看网址| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线 | 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 宅男免费午夜| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 国产1区2区3区精品| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 久久狼人影院| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 成人18禁在线播放| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区 | 免费观看人在逋| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 一区在线观看完整版| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 在线天堂中文资源库| 曰老女人黄片| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 午夜视频精品福利| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线 | 99热网站在线观看| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 久久狼人影院| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产精品成人在线| 一区二区三区精品91| 国产区一区二久久| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 窝窝影院91人妻| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 男女免费视频国产| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| av天堂久久9| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 中文字幕色久视频| 亚洲精品在线美女| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 亚洲综合色网址| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 午夜激情av网站| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 欧美色视频一区免费| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区 | 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 精品久久久久久,| 一级片免费观看大全| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| cao死你这个sao货| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 精品福利观看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 久久久国产一区二区| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 黄色视频不卡| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 99香蕉大伊视频| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线 | 五月开心婷婷网| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 亚洲人成电影观看| www.精华液| 亚洲国产欧美网| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 久久久精品区二区三区| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 亚洲av熟女| 国产成人影院久久av| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 午夜91福利影院| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 三级毛片av免费| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 国产三级黄色录像| 日韩欧美在线二视频 | 成人三级做爰电影| www.自偷自拍.com| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 久久中文字幕一级| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 精品国产一区二区久久| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 免费av中文字幕在线| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 久久中文字幕一级| 热re99久久国产66热| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线 | 国产一区二区三区视频了| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 日本a在线网址| 久久青草综合色| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 日韩有码中文字幕| 婷婷成人精品国产| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 国产又爽黄色视频| 成人国语在线视频| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线 | 精品电影一区二区在线| 超色免费av| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 精品国产亚洲在线| 中国美女看黄片| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 91大片在线观看| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 黄频高清免费视频| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产精品九九99| 91大片在线观看| 成年动漫av网址| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 久9热在线精品视频| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 我的亚洲天堂| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 美女午夜性视频免费| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 超色免费av| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 成人影院久久| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 超碰成人久久| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 亚洲全国av大片| 国产av又大| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 中文欧美无线码| 久久香蕉精品热| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 精品福利永久在线观看| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 国产成人精品无人区| 无限看片的www在线观看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| av电影中文网址| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 在线国产一区二区在线| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 天天添夜夜摸| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院 | 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 岛国毛片在线播放| 一级毛片精品| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 香蕉丝袜av| 一本综合久久免费| 满18在线观看网站| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 手机成人av网站| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产成人av教育| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 很黄的视频免费| 亚洲伊人色综图| 久久这里只有精品19| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 99re在线观看精品视频| 国产精品永久免费网站| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 热re99久久国产66热| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 欧美日韩av久久| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 国产成人欧美| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 色播在线永久视频| а√天堂www在线а√下载 | 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 午夜影院日韩av| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 999精品在线视频| 99久久国产精品久久久| 搡老岳熟女国产| svipshipincom国产片| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 极品教师在线免费播放| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 91成年电影在线观看| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| cao死你这个sao货| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 极品教师在线免费播放| 精品福利观看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 午夜影院日韩av| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 91精品三级在线观看| 看黄色毛片网站| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 国产精品免费视频内射| 在线观看日韩欧美| 色在线成人网| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| av有码第一页| www日本在线高清视频| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 国产区一区二久久| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| videosex国产| 9热在线视频观看99| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 久久久国产一区二区| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 咕卡用的链子| 在线观看午夜福利视频| www.自偷自拍.com| 国产男女内射视频| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 9191精品国产免费久久| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 在线国产一区二区在线| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 91字幕亚洲| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 天堂√8在线中文| 一本综合久久免费| 一区二区三区精品91| av天堂在线播放| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产一区二区激情短视频| www日本在线高清视频| 国产精华一区二区三区| 精品亚洲成国产av| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 男人操女人黄网站| 日本欧美视频一区| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 电影成人av| 久久久久久久国产电影| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 在线天堂中文资源库| 岛国在线观看网站| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| av国产精品久久久久影院| 在线看a的网站| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | 后天国语完整版免费观看| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 不卡一级毛片| 成人三级做爰电影| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 欧美日韩av久久| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 老司机靠b影院| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 国产精品.久久久| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 精品久久久久久电影网| 亚洲精品一二三| 高清欧美精品videossex| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产又爽黄色视频| 久久 成人 亚洲| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 精品电影一区二区在线| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 亚洲九九香蕉| 身体一侧抽搐| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 中文字幕色久视频| 大香蕉久久网| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 黑人操中国人逼视频| 大香蕉久久成人网| 99re在线观看精品视频| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 国产成人系列免费观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 精品福利永久在线观看| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| av网站免费在线观看视频| 乱人伦中国视频| 制服人妻中文乱码| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 日本a在线网址| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 男人操女人黄网站| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 搡老岳熟女国产| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 99香蕉大伊视频| 亚洲精品一二三| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 精品久久久久久电影网| 十八禁网站免费在线| 少妇 在线观看| 精品久久蜜臀av无|