• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comparison of outcomes between complete and incomplete congenital duodenal obstruction

    2019-08-12 02:45:14StefanGfroererTillMartinTheilenHenningFiegelAnooshEsmaeiliUdoRolle
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2019年28期

    Stefan Gfroerer, Till-Martin Theilen, Henning C Fiegel, Anoosh Esmaeili, Udo Rolle

    Abstract

    Key words: Congenital duodenal obstruction; Duodenal atresia; Duodenal stenosis;Prenatal ultrasonographic detection rate; Clinical presentation; Preoperative diagnostics;Adverse events; Outcome

    INTRODUCTION

    Congenital duodenal obstruction (CDO) accounts for approximately one-half of all intestinal obstructions in newborns and is reported to occur in 1 of 2500 to 10000 births[1,2]. CDO represents a spectrum of congenital anomalies. Corresponding duodenal pathologies are subdivided into congenital duodenal anomalies with either complete or incomplete obstruction (Figure 1). Complete congenital duodenal obstruction (CCDO) originates from duodenal atresia type 1 to 3 and annular pancreas. Incomplete congenital duodenal obstruction (ICDO) occurs on the basis of a web (perforated diaphragm), Ladd′s bands, annular pancreas, preduodenal portal vein, superior mesenteric artery syndrome and duplication cyst. CCDO is diagnosed antenatally to a varying degree based on the detection of a characteristic double bubble sign. However, ICDO is most often missed during prenatal ultrasound examination[3]. The overall neonatal survival rate of patients with CDO has gradually increased over past few decades[4]. Survival is currently reported to be approximately 96%[5,6]. Mortality is primarily attributed to complex congenital heart disease (CHD)[4].Delayed transition to full enteral nutrition has been associated with CHD and prematurity[5]. In addition to CHD and prematurity influencing the postoperative course, there is limited evidence that the degree of duodenal obstruction may have an impact on postoperative outcome[7]. However, to date an outcome analysis comparing subgroups of patients with CCDO and ICDO is not yet available. The aim of this study was to clarify differences in clinical outcomes between CCDO and ICDO.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Figure 1 Radiographic images of complete and incomplete congenital duodenal obstruction. A: Complete congenital duodenal obstruction, the plain abdominal X-ray of a newborn infant with duodenal atresia type 1 displays a characteristic double bubble sign; B: Incomplete congenital duodenal obstruction, contrast study of a 2 month old infant with duodenal web (arrows).

    After approval of study protocols by the local institutional review board committee(number 85/17), we conducted a retrospective analysis of a series of 50 consecutive patients with CCDO or ICDO, as identified through International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10, Version 2017) codes, who underwent operative repair between January 2004 and January 2017 at our institution. Data including demographic data,preoperative clinical presentation and findings, pathologic findings, operative variables, postoperative outcomes and individual profile of postoperative adverse events, were retained in a database. Demographics included gender, gestational age at birth, age at operation, weight at operation and associated anomalies. Clinical presentations were specified and comprised vomiting, failure to thrive, intolerance of age-appropriate per oral intake, constipation, postprandial discomfort, acute lifethreatening event and intolerance to solid food. Failure to thrive was defined as a child′s weight being below the 5th percentile, a drop of more than 2 major percentile lines, or a weight for height being lower than the 5th percentile[8]. Constipation was defined according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Functional Constipation (Rome IV)[9].Preoperative diagnostics to indicate operative repair were plain abdominal X-ray,upper gastrointestinal (UGI) contrast study and gastroduodenoscopy. Pathologies of CCDO were allocated to diagnoses of atresia type 1 (membrane), atresia type 2(fibrous cord), atresia type 3 (gap)[10]and annular pancreas. The findings of ICDO were assigned to annular pancreas, web and Ladd′s bands. Additional intestinal pathologies were specified by the following diagnoses: Intestinal malrotation, second distal stenosis and Meckel′s diverticulum. Intestinal malrotation was present when the duodenal loop and the cecocolic loop lacked their normal 270° counterclockwise rotation. Operative variables included operative time (abdominal incision to close of the abdominal wound; including time for correction of additional abdominal pathologies), operative procedures and additional operative procedures. In cases of malrotation where the dorsal peritoneal mesenteric fixation appeared narrow and put the bowel at risk for the development of a volvulus, Ladd′s procedure was performed. The question of whether to proceed with an appendectomy was an individual decision of the surgeon. The attending senior surgeon determined the operative approach. Laparoscopic repair of CDO was performed by the first author in patients weighing > 1700 g at operation. The operative approach was implemented irrespective of preoperative radiologic findings or associated congenital anomalies.Open access for CDO repair was achieved via a transverse right upper quadrant incision. Laparoscopic CDO repair was performed using a transumbilically placed 5 mm 30° camera and two 3.5 mm working trocars, one placed in the upper left quadrant and the second in the right mid abdomen. For duodenoduodenostomy,predominantly diamond-shaped anastomoses were performed; simple oblique[11]and parallel anastomoses[12]were also recently used depending on the individual duodenal anatomy. Tapering duodenoplasty was not performed in either group. All open procedures were performed by, or under the direct supervision of, the first,third or last author. Details of postoperative outcomes included the following parameters: time from operation to initiation of feeds (day of initiation of feeds was the day on which feeding per orally or via nasogastric tube was initiated); time from operation to full feeds (day of achievement of full feeds was the day on which parenteral nutrition was ceased); length of postoperative hospital stay (not including the day of operation, but including the day of discharge); reoperation rate(reoperation was defined as a repetition of a surgical operation undertaken due to lack of success of the first attempt). All postoperative adverse events were recorded in detail per patient and scored according to Clavien-Dindo classification[13]. The Clavien-Dindo classification consists of 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V); it focuses on the therapeutic consequences of the single most severe complication occurring in a patient in a given episode. In addition the comprehensive complication index (CCI) was calculated. The CCI represents a sensitive measure of the overall morbidity in a single score achieved by inclusion of all complications after surgery[14].The CCI ranges from 0 (no complication) to 100 (death) and was calculated using the CCI calculator available online (www.assessurgery.com).

    Postoperative care and follow upA nasogastric tube was left postoperatively for gastric decompression. All patients with an enterotomy were allowed nothing by mouth on the day of operation and were allowed to receive enteral feeding on postoperative day 1. All patients without an enterotomy were allowed to receive enteral feeding on the day of operation. After commencement of enteral feeding, all patients received nutritional increments based on clinical observations, irrespective of the operative approach. Green gastric fluid postoperatively during preprandial routine aspiration of the nasogastric tube in an otherwise unremarkable clinical course was regarded as a normal finding due to the insufficient closure of the pyloric muscle, and feeding increments were continued.UGI contrast studies were not performed on a routine basis postoperatively. Patients underwent clinical outpatient follow-up within 4 wk after discharge. All patients were scheduled for regular follow-up at least once per year.

    Statistical analysisA biomedical statistician performed the statistical review of the study. For the summary of normal distributed continuous variables, the mean and standard deviation were calculated. For comparison, we used two-sample t-tests. Continuous data with another type of distribution or an unknown distribution are presented as median with range, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test was applied for comparison. We used Fisher’s exact test to compare categorical variables. Testing was done based on a 5% significance level. Median follow-up was calculated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier estimate. We used statistical software R version 3.4.0 for analysis, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (www.R-project.org).

    RESULTS

    A total of 50 patients underwent surgical repair of CDO. The patient cohort consisted of a group of 27 patients with CCDO and 23 patients with ICDO. Table 1 displays demographic data and the associated congenital anomalies of both groups. Patients with CCDO that underwent operative repair had a lower gestational age at birth,younger age and lower weight at operation, and had a higher rate of associated CHD.Figure 2 displays the absolute frequencies of operative repairs with the corresponding age at operation for 50 patients with CCDO or ICDO. Of the patients with ICDO, 48%(n = 11) were operated beyond the neonatal period. Patients′ diagnoses of this subgroup (n = 11) were Ladd′s bands (n = 6), duodenal web (n = 4) and annular pancreas (n = 1). Of the patients with ICDO, 13% underwent primary operative repair at 3.4 years or later. This late repair affected all pathologies of ICDO that were evident in this study. Table 2 compares the rates of prenatal ultrasonographic detections of CCDO and ICDO and lists preoperative diagnostics. Of patients with CDO, 49 of 50 had fetal ultrasound screening (98%). One pregnancy did not have prenatal maternal care. The overall prenatal detection rate of CDO was 49% (24 of 49 patients). For patients with CCDO, the prenatal detection rate was 88%; it was 4% for ICDO (Ρ ≤0.01). In all patients with CCDO, preoperative plain abdominal X-ray was sufficient to indicate operative repair. In contrast, all patients with ICDO received a diagnostic UGI contrast study in which 4 patients (17%) underwent an additional diagnostic gastroduodenoscopy to indicate operation. In all patients with prenatally unsuspected CDO (complete group n = 4; incomplete group n = 22), postnatal clinical presentations were studied. Vomiting was the most frequent recorded preoperative finding (n = 24,92%). All patients who vomited showed a yellow-greenish to green discoloration of the vomit at some point between birth and operation, as observed by parents or nursing staff. Table 3 displays intraoperative pathologic findings in the CCDO and ICDO group. Table 4 compares operative variables of the CCDO and ICDO group.Operative time was similar in both groups. Duodenoduodenostomy was the most frequent procedure in both the CCDO group (93%) and the ICDO group (35%, Ρ <0.01). Duodenal freeing from obstructive ligaments and the Ladd′s procedure were both performed as a single or an adjunct surgical maneuver. Table 5 shows variables of postoperative outcomes for patients with CCDO or ICDO. Durations from operation to initiation and completion of enteral feeds and length of hospital stay were longer in the CCDO group. Morbidity according to median (range) CCI was higher in the CCDO group [8.7 (0.0-100) vs 0.0 (0.0-33.7 in the ICDO group, Ρ<0.01)].In an attempt to reduce confounding a subgroup analysis was performed and outcome parameters were additionally calculated under exclusion of patients with CHD and prematurity. Subgroup analysis revealed a difference between the CCDO and ICDO groups with regard to the parameter time from operation to initiation of feeds. Table 6 lists all adverse events recorded during the entire individual follow-up period for 50 patients undergoing operative repair of CCDO or ICDO.

    DISCUSSION

    Our study suggests that outcomes of patients with CCDO and ICDO differ significantly. This article, to our knowledge, is the only paper focusing specifically on differences between patients with CCDO and ICDO. According to our results,patients with CCDO had a significantly higher prenatal detection rate, lower gestational age at birth and lower age and weight at operation. Operative repair in the CCDO group was indicated solely on the basis of a plain abdominal X-ray without the need for UGI contrast study. Patients with CCDO had a higher rate of associated CHD, had a longer duration from operation to both initiation and achievement of full feeds, had a longer hospital stay and had a higher morbidity according to Clavien-Dindo classification and CCI in comparison to patients in the ICDO group. In a subgroup of patients without associated CDH and prematurity patients with CCDO had a delayed initiation of enteral feeds in comparison with the ICDO group.

    Our study is the first to deliver a differentiated prenatal detection rate of CCDO and ICDO based on an analysis of patients who underwent operative repair. While the overall detection rate was 48% we found a significant difference between CCDO and ICDO (detection rate 88% vs 4% respectively). Previously, several authors have conducted studies analyzing prenatal ultrasonographic findings of CDO. However,data based on a wide spectrum of CDO pathologies are scarce. Savran et al[15]analyzed 15 patients with duodenal atresia that had undergone operative repair over a period of 6 years at a single center. In their retrospective analysis, the calculated prenatal detection rate was 67%. Only 12 of 15 (80%) pregnant women had a prenatal ultrasonographic screening; ICDO was not analyzed. A study by Kim et al[16]reported a prenatal detection rate of 81.4% based on 59 pregnant women and neonates that underwent surgical repair of CDO. A limiting factor of the latter study was the restriction of patients to neonatal age. Our current study included all patients undergoing surgical repair of CDO irrespective of their age in order to gain a more realistic prenatal ultrasonographic detection rate. Due to the long period of observation, our data revealed a substantial number of patients with ICDO (23/50,46%). The results of our present study suggest that a prenatal detection rate calculated on the basis of patients restricted to the neonatal period is likely to favor the depiction of CCDO. In our current case series, the proportion of patients with ICDO was slightly higher than previously reported (28%-37%)[1,5,17]. This may be attributed to the fact that in recent years, our surgical center has built up collaborations with regional pediatric hospitals, which do not employ pediatric surgeons.

    An important finding of our study was that patients with ICDO frequently suffered a considerable delay between birth and diagnosis of CDO. Nearly one half of patients(48%) in the ICDO group underwent operative repair of CDO beyond the neonatal period; 13% were corrected beyond 3 years of age. In the literature, there is rare reporting of children that underwent delayed operative repair of CDO[18]. The results of our retrospective analysis raise the question whether delayed diagnoses of ICDO might be underreported. Patients presenting with chronic vomiting with or without failure to thrive and intolerance of age-appropriate per oral intake need to be assessed with conscious awareness of possible yet undiagnosed ICDO. This is equally attributable both to undiagnosed congenital lesions and the wide spectrum of acquired lesions of the adults` duodenum[19,20,21].

    In our study, patients with CCDO had a lower gestational age at birth and lower age and weight at operation. In a previous study that compared duodenal atresia with duodenal web, age and weight at operation differed significantly, with those in the duodenal atresia group having the lowest age and weight and those with duodenal web having the highest age and weight[7]. However, no information was provided regarding differences in age and weight between the groups at birth.

    Our finding that UGI contrast-enhanced X-ray examinations are frequently necessary to diagnose ICDO is in line with previous studies[1,22]. However, statistical analysis between ICDO and CCDO had not been previously performed. Our assessment of associated congenital anomalies corresponds well to a large previous analysis of patients with duodenal atresia and stenosis[4]. In simplified terms,approximately 50% of patients with CDO have associated congenital anomalies, CHD in 40% and trisomy 21 in 30%. However, previous studies did not differentiatebetween complete and incomplete duodenal obstruction.

    Table 1 Demographic data for 50 patients with complete or incomplete congenital duodenal obstruction undergoing operative repair

    A recent study of patients with CDO revealed that CHD and prematurity are most commonly associated with delayed enteral nutrition[5]. Consequently, in our outcome analysis, we additionally analyzed the subgroup of patients without CHD and prematurity (gestational age ≥ 37 wk). Our subgroup analysis demonstrated significant differences between groups with respect to postoperative initiation of feeds. Achievement of full feeds, length of postoperative hospital stay and morbidity did not differ between CCDO and ICDO in this subgroup. It appears that CHD and prematurity are predominant factors that widely influence postoperative outcome,while in contrast the degree of duodenal obstruction is limited to impact time from operation to initiation of enteral feeding.

    The primary strength of this study was that it was based on data derived from a consecutive series of patients who underwent operative repair over a period of more than 13 years with a follow up period between 3.9 and 5.2 years. Duodenal pathologies of our series represented a wide spectrum of both CCDO and ICDO. Our analysis has several limitations, including the retrospective design of the study, small sample size, single institution and limited follow-up period. The difference of age at operation between groups may have influenced enteral feeding. Duodenoduodenostomy had different frequencies in both groups, however differential impact on groups may be minor because operative time between groups was equal. Our study highlights differences in prenatal detection and postnatal outcome of patients with CCDO and ICDO. Our results suggest that future stratified outcome analyses of CDO should be performed with special attention to CHD, prematurity and the degree of duodenal obstruction.

    In conclusion, our results indicate that outcome parameters between CCDO and ICDO differ significantly. Patients with CCDO have a longer postoperative hospital stay associated with more adverse events compared to ICDO. Patients with ICDO frequently suffer considerable delays to diagnosis and operative repair of their congenital malformation. Efforts should to be undertaken to improve pre- and postnatal detection of ICDO in order to reduce preoperative morbidity and the delay to operative repair.

    Table 2 Prenatal ultrasonographic detection rate and preoperative diagnostics for 50 patients with complete or incomplete congenital duodenal obstruction, and clinical presentations for 26 patients with prenatally unknown complete or incomplete congenital duodenal obstruction undergoing operative repair

    Table 3 Pathologic findings of 50 patients with complete or incomplete congenital duodenal obstruction undergoing operative repair

    Table 4 Operative variables and surgical procedures for 50 patients with complete or incomplete congenital duodenal obstruction undergoing operative repair

    Table 5 Postoperative outcomes for 50 patients with complete or incomplete congenital duodenal obstruction undergoing operative repair

    Table 6 Postoperative adverse events graded according to Clavien-Dindo classification for 50 patients with complete or incomplete congenital duodenal obstruction undergoing operative repair

    Figure 2 Absolute frequencies of operative repairs and corresponding age at operation for 50 patients with complete or incomplete congenital duodenal obstruction.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research backgroundCongenital duodenal obstruction (CDO) can be complete (CCDO) or incomplete (ICDO). To date there is no outcome analysis available that compares both subtypes.

    Research motivationAnatomically, CDO is subdevided into CCDO and ICDO. The clinical observation shows that outcomes between patients with CCDO and ICDO differ substantially.

    Research objectivesThe objective of this study was to analysis and compare the association between CCDO and ICDO with outcome parameters.

    Research methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent operative repair of CCDO or ICDO in our tertiary care institution between January 2004 and January 2017. The demographics, clinical presentation, preoperative diagnostics and postoperative outcomes of 50 patients were compared between CCDO (n = 27) and ICDO (n = 23).

    Research resultsCCDO was associated with a significantly higher prenatal ultrasonographic detection rate, lower gestational age at birth, lower age and weight at operation, higher rate of associated congenital heart disease, more extensive preoperative radiologic diagnostics, higher morbidity according to Clavien-Dindo classification and comprehensive complication index. The subgroup analysis of patients without congenital heart disease (CHD) and prematurity showed a longer time from operation to the initiation of enteral feeds in the CCDO group.

    Research conclusionsThis study showed that CCDO and ICDO differ with regard to prenatal detection rate,preoperative diagnostics, postoperative enteral feeds, length of hospital stay and morbidity according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and the comprehensive complication index. The degree of CDO in mature patients without CHD influences the postoperative initiation of enteral feeding.

    Research perspectivesEfforts should to be undertaken to improve pre- and postnatal detection of ICDO in order to reduce preoperative morbidity and the delay to operative repair.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    The authors would like to acknowledge Emilia Salzmann-Manrique and Martin Hutter, Biomedical Statisticians, Devision for Pediatric Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunology, Department for Children and Adolescents, University Hospital Frankfurt, for the statistical analysis.

    久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 精品一区二区免费观看| 搡老乐熟女国产| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 午夜免费鲁丝| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 一级爰片在线观看| 国产av精品麻豆| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| videos熟女内射| 黄色配什么色好看| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 97在线视频观看| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 蜜桃在线观看..| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 中文字幕制服av| 欧美人与善性xxx| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 国产精品一国产av| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 男女免费视频国产| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 色5月婷婷丁香| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 精品亚洲成国产av| 国产成人精品在线电影| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 美女福利国产在线| 亚洲图色成人| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 亚洲国产av新网站| videossex国产| 高清毛片免费看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 美女主播在线视频| 国产av国产精品国产| 91精品国产九色| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 欧美性感艳星| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 久久影院123| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 熟女av电影| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 久久人人爽人人片av| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| www.色视频.com| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 熟女电影av网| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 午夜91福利影院| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产av精品麻豆| 成人国语在线视频| 国内精品宾馆在线| 久久狼人影院| 久久免费观看电影| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 精品视频人人做人人爽| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 国产一级毛片在线| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 国产男女内射视频| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 午夜福利视频精品| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 久久久久久久久大av| 高清欧美精品videossex| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 男女国产视频网站| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲无线观看免费| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 老熟女久久久| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 一个人免费看片子| 22中文网久久字幕| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 精品午夜福利在线看| 午夜激情av网站| 一级爰片在线观看| 久热久热在线精品观看| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| a级毛色黄片| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 久久久久国产网址| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 免费看av在线观看网站| 老司机影院毛片| 高清av免费在线| 韩国av在线不卡| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| av网站免费在线观看视频| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 午夜日本视频在线| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| av专区在线播放| 成人手机av| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 午夜日本视频在线| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| av视频免费观看在线观看| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 免费看不卡的av| 少妇人妻 视频| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 国产成人精品婷婷| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 久久久久久伊人网av| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| av视频免费观看在线观看| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 免费av中文字幕在线| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 性色avwww在线观看| 婷婷成人精品国产| 久热这里只有精品99| 亚洲中文av在线| 永久网站在线| 免费大片18禁| 999精品在线视频| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 国产综合精华液| 丝袜喷水一区| 日本色播在线视频| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 在线 av 中文字幕| 亚洲在久久综合| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 免费大片18禁| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 简卡轻食公司| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 老女人水多毛片| 只有这里有精品99| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 国产在线视频一区二区| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产极品天堂在线| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 99久久综合免费| 国产毛片在线视频| 国产男女内射视频| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 超色免费av| 国产综合精华液| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 少妇人妻 视频| 国产视频内射| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| av天堂久久9| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 黑人高潮一二区| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| freevideosex欧美| 老司机影院成人| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产综合精华液| 秋霞伦理黄片| 成人国语在线视频| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 黄片播放在线免费| 一级毛片 在线播放| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国产在线视频一区二区| 日韩av免费高清视频| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 99九九在线精品视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产永久视频网站| 久久影院123| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 久热久热在线精品观看| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 日韩av免费高清视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 色哟哟·www| 91精品国产九色| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 成人影院久久| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 亚洲天堂av无毛| av一本久久久久| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 久久久久国产网址| 亚洲精品视频女| 久久久久视频综合| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 午夜影院在线不卡| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 九色成人免费人妻av| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 免费少妇av软件| 成人手机av| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 尾随美女入室| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 国产成人aa在线观看| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| av视频免费观看在线观看| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 另类精品久久| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| videos熟女内射| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 多毛熟女@视频| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 久久精品夜色国产| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 日本av免费视频播放| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 成年av动漫网址| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| videos熟女内射| 亚州av有码| 国产色婷婷99| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 久久久欧美国产精品| 久久影院123| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 久久 成人 亚洲| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 精品亚洲成国产av| 国产精品免费大片| 亚洲国产精品999| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| .国产精品久久| 99九九在线精品视频| 免费观看av网站的网址| 亚洲国产色片| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 久久久久久伊人网av| 午夜影院在线不卡| av一本久久久久| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 18在线观看网站| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产精品无大码| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 欧美人与善性xxx| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 国产成人91sexporn| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 黄片播放在线免费| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| av在线老鸭窝| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 日韩成人伦理影院| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产综合精华液| 免费av不卡在线播放| 五月天丁香电影| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 9色porny在线观看| 亚洲中文av在线| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 色94色欧美一区二区| 亚洲综合精品二区| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 久久久久视频综合| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| a 毛片基地| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 伦理电影免费视频| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 日韩成人伦理影院| 成人无遮挡网站| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 日本黄大片高清| 日本黄色片子视频| 七月丁香在线播放| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 久久热精品热| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 午夜久久久在线观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 欧美bdsm另类| 久久婷婷青草| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 999精品在线视频| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 精品国产国语对白av| 男女边摸边吃奶| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产男女内射视频| 国产在线免费精品| 简卡轻食公司| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕 | 国内精品宾馆在线| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区 | .国产精品久久| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 成人国产麻豆网| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 精品一区二区免费观看| kizo精华| 一本久久精品| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 91精品国产九色| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 少妇高潮的动态图| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 一级毛片我不卡| 日本与韩国留学比较| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 少妇高潮的动态图| 少妇 在线观看| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 亚洲国产精品999| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 观看av在线不卡| 美女中出高潮动态图| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 制服人妻中文乱码| 免费观看在线日韩| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产精品免费大片| .国产精品久久| 国产乱来视频区| 七月丁香在线播放| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 午夜91福利影院| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 午夜福利视频精品| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 国产高清三级在线| 久久97久久精品| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 永久免费av网站大全| 18禁观看日本| 男女国产视频网站| av.在线天堂| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| av一本久久久久| 免费观看av网站的网址| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 97在线视频观看| 在线天堂最新版资源| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 免费av不卡在线播放| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 色哟哟·www| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 成人免费观看视频高清| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 久久久国产一区二区| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 香蕉精品网在线| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 天堂8中文在线网| a级毛片在线看网站| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频|