• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Evaluating the Importance of Environmental Variables on Spatial Distribution of Caspian cobra Naja oxiana (Eichwald,1831) in Iran

    2019-06-26 03:03:42ElmiraKAZEMIMohammadKABOLIRasoulKHOSRAVIandNematollahKHORASANI
    Asian Herpetological Research 2019年2期

    Elmira KAZEMI, Mohammad KABOLI, Rasoul KHOSRAVI and Nematollah KHORASANI

    1 Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Recources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    2 Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

    3 Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Engineering, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz,Iran

    Abstract Over recent years, the population of Caspian cobra Naja oxiana has declined in its distribution range in Iran due to habitat destruction and overhunting. Consequently, their small and isolated populations in fragmented landscapes are facing genetic and demographic threats. Evaluating the spatial distribution pattern of Naja oxiana, identifying core habitat patches and improving landscape connectivity among the patches have a significant role in the long-term survival of the species. This study predicts the spatial distribution map of the Caspian cobra considering the factors affecting the predictive power of the distribution models, including sampling bias in presence points, correct selection of background locations, and input model parameters. The sampling bias in presence points was removed using spatial filtering. Several models were run using 19 environmental variables that eventually led to the selection of the effective habitat variables and best MaxEnt distribution model. We also used an ensemble model (EM) of habitat suitability methods to predict the potential habitats of the species. Topographical roughness, shrublands, average annual precipitation, and sparse rangeland with a density of ≤ 20% had the most effect on the spatial distribution of Caspian cobra. The evaluation of models confirmed that the EM has more predictive performance than MaxEnt in predicting the distribution of Naja oxiana.

    Keywords Naja oxiana, MaxEnt, habitat suitability, landscape connectivity, distribution modelling

    1. Introduction

    Habitat fragmentation is one of the most important threats to biodiversity that leads to reduction in habitat area, increase in habitat isolation and reduction in ecological function of the remaining habitat patches(Ripple et al., 2014). In a fragmented landscape, the survival of small and isolated populations is affected by individual's movement between patches (Wiens, 2001;Niebuhr et al., 2015). Therefore, the conservation and monitoring of threatened and vulnerable species in a fragmented landscape requires maintaining the landscape connectivity between habitat patches. To improve landscape connectivity, managers need to have sufficient information about spatial patterns of species distribution and the effects of anthropogenic and landscape factors on the species distribution and dispersal. Landscape connectivity modelling can be improved by learning about how species interact between biotic and abiotic elements, as well as the spatial distribution of species in landscape (Bellamy et al., 2013). In addition, managing and preserving of landscape connectivity is affected by precise and reliable data of species distribution.

    Ecological niche models (ENMs) or spatial distribution models (SDMs; Warren and Seifert, 2011) are efficient tools in determining the factors affecting species presence, disease spread, and predicting the probable changes in the distribution range of invasive and nonnative species (Khanum et al., 2013). SDMs provide an accurate prediction of habitat suitability. Since accurate absence data for many species are scarce, in recent years,much progress has been made to improve and develop SDMs based on only presence data. Maximum Entropy(MaxEnt) have been introduced a powerful tool for mapping species distribution with a limited number of present data (Elith et al., 2006; Phillips et al., 2009).

    Although ENMs have high performance in ecological studies and conservation biology, these algorithms may suffer from over fitting and biased prediction. Such challenges may occur in modelling due to 1) sampling bias in presence data, 2) inaccurate selection of absence data,

    3) lack of sufficient data to assess the model accuracy, and

    4) false choice of spatial scale of environmental variables(Veloz, 2009; Barve et al., 2011). The application of ENMs using the biased presence points, especially data resulting from opportunistic observations can lead to a model over-fitting and reduce the accuracy and reliability of the model (Phillips et al., 2009; Boria et al., 2014). In addition to sampling bias in presence points, uncertainty in the predictions from these algorithms should be considered. Each algorithm has inherent limitations and errors that result in different levels of efficiency and accuracy in modelling (Araújo and New, 2007; Araújo et al., 2011). Developing ensemble models (EMs) is a valuable method to overcome the uncertainties of each model and increase the overall accuracy of predictions.In EMs, a landscape is suitable only if all algorithms in the EM classify it that way (Zarco-Gonzalez et al., 2013).Over the past few years, EMs have been used in many studies focusing on predicting species distribution and assessing landscape connectivity (Araújo et al., 2011;Kujala et al., 2011; Rodriguez-Soto et al., 2011; Abade et al., 2014).

    The Caspian cobra Naja oxiana, also called the Central Asian cobra, is a member of the family Elapidae. It has the easternmost distribution for the Naja subgenus in the Palaearctic region. Naja oxiana lives in dry, rocky habitats and areas with sparse vegetation. Its distribution ranges from northern and north-eastern Iran to southern Turkmenistan, southern Uzbekistan, western Tajikistan,northern Pakistan, north and east Afghanistan, and northern India (Wüster and Thorpe, 1989; Wüster, 1990;Wallach et al., 2009). In recent years, the population of the species has dramatically declined in northern habitats due to illegal overhunting (Darvish and Rastegar-Pouyani, 2012). Moreover, declining population size as a result of habitat degradation and excessive exploitation for medical purposes such as experiments on anti-cancer compounds (Wüster et al., 2007; Pook et al., 2009)can put this species at risk of extinction. Also, drying up of some rivers and springs due to reduced rainfall has influenced the distribution of the species. Habitat fragmentation increases patch isolation and reduces the ecological suitability of the remnant patches and landscape connectivity between them. These changes may negatively affect gene flow among subpopulations in a metapopulation pattern (Young, 2000). Hence, assessing species distribution, identifying core habitat patches, as well as managing and preserving landscape connectivity among patches plays an important role in directing future research, conservation management programs and ensuring the long-term survival of the species.

    The present study was designed with the aim of using the EMs together with considering the factors affecting the performance of the models. We had three objectives:1) to determine the effects of environmental and human factors on the distribution pattern of Caspian Cobra; 2) to determine habitat patches and the landscape connectivity among patches; 3) to evaluate how the input parameters of predictive distribution models (i.e. regularization parameter, the number of input variables, and feature types) affect model performance.

    2. Material and Methods

    2.1. The study area and occurrence pointsThe present study was conducted in the distribution range of Caspian cobra in the north and northeast of Iran within the geographical range of 38°-30° N to 62°-51° E (480 000 km2; Figure 1). A total of 47 presence points were obtained from 2015-2016, based on direct observations and genetic sampling. The coordinates of all the presence points were recorded using a hand-held multi-channel Global Positioning System (GPS). The average annual precipitation of the area varies between 50 and 960 mm.The most important factors causing habitat fragmentation and landscape changes in the landscape include road network development, expansion of agricultural activities,and land use changes.

    2.2. Eco-geographical variablesNineteen ecological and ecogeographical variables were selected based on the literature review and were categorized in five main classes including topography, bioclimatic variables(Hijmans et al., 2005), anthropogenic, vegetation, and land cover (Table 1). Because of the high correlation (r >0.70) between bioclimatic variables, only five bioclimatic variables were used in this study including average annual temperature (Bio1), temperature seasonality(Bio4), maximum temperature of the warmest month(Bio5), average annual precipitation (Bio12), and precipitation seasonality (Bio15). Focal mean elevation,topographic roughness, and slope were extracted using a digital elevation map (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM elevation model; http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org) and the Surface Gradient and Geomorphometric

    Modelling toolbox (Evans et al., 2014) in the ArcGIS.In addition, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index(NDVI) was obtained in 2012 at 250-m resolution using MODIS Vegetation Indices (MOD13) C5 User's Guide(Solano et al., 2010). NDVI layers were summarized into several important components using principal component analysis (PCA). Only the first two components were used in distribution model. We obtained a digital map of vegetation cover from the Iranian Forests, Rangeland and Watershed Management Organization (FRWMO, 2009)and reclassified it into five land cover (LULC) types,including sparse rangeland with a density of ≤ 20%,mixture of grassland-scrubland with a density of ≥ 25%,shrublands, forests, and barelands. To provide continuity for the extracted categories, the proportional extent of each land cover type was calculated within a 2 km × 2 km grid network by running the ArcMap Neighbourhood statistic tool. Furthermore, the density of agricultural land,rural areas, geographical distance to residential areas, and the distance to the roads were also used as anthropogenic variables. All nineteen layers were resampled to a 1-km2cell size.

    Table 1 Categories of 19 environmental variables used in the distribution modelling of Caspian cobra.

    Figure 1 The study area in the northeast and east part of Iran. The dashed polygons and black dots show protected areas (PAs) and presence points, respectively.

    2.3. Modelling

    2.3.1. Evaluation of sampling bias in presence points and selection of background points Given that many of the presence points were recorded during fieldwork or based on available reports of collected specimens, we eliminated the probable bias in the presence points using spatial filtering method in ArcGIS (SDMtoolbox; Brown,2014). The threshold of 500 meters was used as a spatial filter to remove spatial autocorrelation in occurrence points. We filtered presence points so that each point was at least 500-m away from other points, which resulted in 41 unique occurrence points with decreased spatial autocorrelation. Selecting appropriate background localities is another challenge that should be considered in ENMs. In this study, to avoid selecting background points from environmental conditions outside the range of the presence points, a buffer with a radius of 30 kilometres was considered around the presence points and only the background points that were located within this distance around presence points were used in the modelling.

    2.3.2. Optimization of distribution model's parameters and variables used for modelling The R package“MaxEntVariableSelection” was used to eliminate correlation between the environmental predictors and to prevent multicollinearity and achieve an accurate goodness of fit value (Jueterbock et al., 2016). The software provides the possibility to optimize the model's parameters, including the regularization parameter, the number of input variables in the model, and feature types.In this study, the regularization index was evaluated between two to four with an interval of 0.5. This software also applies a repeat process to remove variables with a significance level less than the defined threshold value,which will depend on the species of interest, as well as a defined threshold value for correlation between variables.The threshold of significance and threshold of correlation were selected as 2.0 and 0.7, respectively. Moreover, we used AUC-testand AICc to determine the most important variables affecting the species distribution, the best regularization parameter, and feature types.

    2.3.3. MaxEnt distribution model and ensemble modelling After selecting the most important variables affecting the distribution of Caspian cobra and optimizing the input parameters, the final distribution model was implemented using the MaxEnt algorithm in the R package “dismo” (Hijmans et al., 2016). The MaxEnt model was performed using the optimized regularization parameter, 4000 background localities, five runs, and 5000 replications. The evaluation of the MaxEnt model was done using AUC-test. Afterwards, distribution maps were converted to presence and absence map using the threshold “Maximum Training Sensitivity and Specificity(MTSS)” (Liu et al., 2013). In order to evaluate the predictive power of the model and increase the performance of the distribution model, in addition to the MaxEnt model, a second predictive species distribution model was conducted using ensemble modelling approach(Araújo and New, 2007). Hence, three algorithms were used to produce the EM: Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt),generalized linear model (GLM), and generalized boosted model (GBM). All three models were implemented using the important variables identified in the previous steps.The EM was calculated using the weighted average of the values of AUC obtained from each model and the method proposed by Marmion et al. (2009) and Rodriguez-Soto et al. (2011). All the three algorithms MaxEnt, GLM and GBM, as well as the EM were run in the R package“biomod2”. All models were calibrated by using the 75%of occurrence points as training data, and tested on the remaining 25% to assess model performance (see Ahmadi et al., 2017; Khosravi et al., 2018 for details). Evaluating the performance of all models and the EM was carrying out using the AUC index (Deleo, 1993).

    3. Results

    After correcting the sampling bias in the presence points,41 points were used in the MaxEnt model. The AUC-testand AICc, showed that the optimal distribution model would be achieved with fewer variables. The number of environmental variables included in the final distribution model based on the AUC-testand AICc index was reduced to eight and five, respectively (Table 2). Moreover, the regularization parameter for the optimal model was three based on the AICc and two based on the AUC-test(Figure 2). The best species habitat suitability prediction was produced using average annual precipitation (BIO12),topographic roughness (ROUGH), sparse rangeland with a density of ≤ 20%, (SRD), density of agricultural fields(AGD), density of shrublands (SHR), distance to roads(ROD), distance to residential regions (URBD), and the first component of vegetation index (NDVI_1).

    Table 2 The best distribution model of Caspian cobra based on AICc and AUC-test in the MaxEnt model.

    Figure 2 The best regularization parameter in Caspian cobra predictive distribution model based on the AICc and AUC-test. The red circle shows the optimal regularization parameter.

    Evaluation of the final MaxEnt model using selected environmental variables based on the AUC-testshowed that MaxEnt had high predictive power in predicting the distribution and suitable habitats of Caspian cobra (AUC= 0.840). In Figure 3, the distribution map of suitable habitats is shown based on the suitability threshold.

    The highly suitable habitats for the species were more widely distributed in the north-eastern parts of Iran, which illustrates the importance of this region in protecting Naja oxiana across the study area. The most effective variables in the final MaxEnt model were identified in order of importance as 1) the density of shrublands, 2) sparse rangeland with a density of ≤ 20% and 3) topographical roughness. The suitable habitats map obtained from the MaxEnt model identified approximately 12% (58 610 km2) of the study area as suitable habitat for Naja oxiana.

    The response curves (Figure 4) of the most influential variables in the species distribution showed that density of shrublands provides highly suitable habitat for this species until a certain threshold (i.e. 0.2) after which it causes a negative effect on habitat suitability. Likewise, increasing the topographical roughness initially increases the habitat suitability, but after reaching a threshold, the habitat suitability decreases. The average annual precipitation has a strong, almost linear positive correlation with habitat suitability. The effect of sparse rangeland with a density of ≤ 20% indicated that it is equal probability of presence from 0 to approx. 0.75 and then steep decrease.

    3.1. Evaluation of Naja oxiana distribution using EM

    Figure 3 Potential distribution of Naja oxiana in northeastern Iran using MaxEnt. Predictions based on Average annual precipitation: BIO12(mm); Topographic roughness: ROUGH; Shrublands: SHR (%); Sparse rangeland with a density of ≤ 20%: SRD. The predicted probability of presence, with values ranging from 0 to 100, is depicted by colours.

    Figure 4 Response curves of the most influential predictors for distribution of Naja oxiana modelling with MaxEnt. (Average annual precipitation: BIO12 (mm); Topographic roughness: ROUGH; Shrublands: SHR (%); Sparse rangeland with a density of ≤ 20%: SRD).These curves show the mean response of the cross-validated models with 10 replicate runs (red) and the mean ± one standard deviation (blue).

    Figure 5 shows the distribution map of Caspian cobra obtained from the EM (MaxEnt, GLM, and GBM). The EM identified nearly 8% (42 574 km2) of the study area as suitable habitat for Naja oxiana, which had a relatively high overlap with the suitable habitats map derived from the MaxEnt. As was expected, the suitable habitat area in the EM was smaller than the MaxEnt model since the EM was an ensemble of three distribution algorithms and it produced a smaller suitable habitat area as compared to MaxEnt, which was based on only one algorithm. The evaluation of the three algorithms separately showed that all these three models have an efficient performance in predicting the distribution of Naja oxiana (MaxEntAUC=0.832; GLMAUC= 0.785; GBMAUC= 0.988). The GLM model was similar to MaxEnt, while the GBM showed better performance in predicting the distribution of the species. Additionally, the AUC index was calculated as 0.932 for the EM, which illustrates it had more power compared to the MaxEnt and GLM models. Assessing the most effective variables in the EM showed that four variables including sparse rangeland with a density of ≤20%, the first component of vegetation index, average annual precipitation and topographic roughness have the most impact on species habitat suitability.

    Figure 5 Potential distribution of Naja oxiana in northeastern Iran using ensemble modelling. Predictions based on Average annual precipitation: BIO12 (mm); Topographic roughness: ROUGH; Shrublands: SHR (%); Sparse rangeland with a density of ≤ 20%: SRD. The predicted probability of presence, with values ranging from 0 to 100, is depicted by colours.

    4. Discussion and Conclusion

    In this study, the habitat suitability and potential distribution map of Caspian cobra was predicted using the most effective variables based on an optimized modelling framework. In addition to considering environmental variables, other factors to increase model accuracy were addressed, including sampling bias in presence points,correct selection of backgrounds, and optimizing the input parameters. These factors have a significant role in the precision and accuracy of the ENMs. Considering that in most studies of species distribution modelling, recorded presence points are used from opportunistic observations,the bias in collecting and recording these points can affect the performance of prediction models (Fourcade et al.,2014). In this study, the spatial filtering method was used to eliminate the sampling bias. Studies show that reducing the number of presence points using spatial filtering is an effective technique in reducing sampling bias in presence points (Kramer-Schadt et al., 2013; Boria et al., 2014;Kittle et al., 2018). Furthermore, the results showed that the use of this method improves the final distribution model and reduces the probability of overfitting. Although the method used in this study to reduce the effect of sampling bias in presence points decreased the number of presence points, this method increased the reliability of the results.

    Ensemble models provide a better representation of species distribution patterns for many species. Until now, EMs have been used in many studies, including to assess the effects of climate changes, identify protected areas, and predict species distribution (Kujala et al.,2011; Carroll et al., 2010; Khosravi et al., 2018). Our results showed that the EM (AUC = 0.932) compared to MaxEnt model (AUC = 0.840) had more efficiency and power in predicting the distribution of Caspian Cobra in north and north-eastern Iran. This result was consistent with previous studies (Marmion et al., 2009;Rodriguez-Soto et al., 2011; Abade et al., 2014). In an EM, areas are predicted as suitable habitat only if all algorithms in the ensemble model have reached the same and stable prediction. Therefore, EMs in most cases show more efficiency compared to individual models(Zarco-Gonzalez et al., 2013). Generally, the area of suitable habitats predicted by EMs is smaller than the area predicted by a single algorithm (e.g. MaxEnt).Consequently, using EM in the case of dealing with data obtained from opportunistic observation (for example reptiles) is an effective approach to predict species distribution.

    Field studies show that Naja oxiana inhabits mostly stony and rocky habitats covered by bushes in dry and semi-arid climate and altitudes up to 3 000 meters (WCH Clinical Toxinology Resource, 2012). Therefore, it can be expected that annual precipitation and elevation play an important role in distribution and habitat suitability of Naja oxiana. The results of this study confirm the importance of these variables in the distribution and habitat suitability of the species. Based on the output of the EM, the behaviour pattern of the species to changes in habitat variables shows clearly a close correlation of the habitat selection behaviour of the species with its habitat elements. The study of the importance of variables based on EM determined that sparse rangeland with a density of ≤ 20%, average annual precipitation and topographic roughness have the greatest impact on the distribution of this species. Human variables in comparison with environmental variables showed less impact on species distribution.

    The probability of distribution and habitat suitability of the species increased with increasing distance to roads. However, the observations of Naja oxiana in areas affected by human activities imply the extension of its range beyond its preferred habitats (Kularatne and Senanayake, 2014). Since Caspian cobra prefers habitats with little human disturbance, constructing major roads with high vehicle traffic would decrease the habitat suitability for the species. Roads are often associated with high levels of noise pollution, which can have a negative effect on vibration-sensitive species, in addition to the high percentage of road killings of wildlife, including Caspian cobra and other reptile species. In addition,new roads can facilitate urban expansion, which leads to an increase in human interactions with habitats and consequently habitat destruction and fragmentation. For this reason, it is not surprising that such habitats have lower suitability. As for topographical roughness, changes in the response curve showed that an increase in surface roughness initially increased the habitat suitability until its effect became negligible, after which additional increases reduced suitability. A high increase in habitat suitability of Caspian cobra with a slight increase of surface roughness can be attributed to the dependence of the species on stony and rocky areas. Both elevation and surface roughness are variables with a high impact on the distribution of many species (Hof et al., 2012; Ahmadi et al., 2017, Khosravi et al., 2018). The combination of changes of two variables, sparse rangeland with a density of ≤ 20% and roughness, shows that stony-rocky areas with a low degree of roughness and sparse vegetation are one of the most suitable habitat types for Caspian cobra. Although Caspian cobra avoids areas with dense vegetation, regions with sparse vegetation or low plant density in rocky areas play an important role providing shelter and hiding patches for the species.

    The results of the study can play a remarkable role in identifying Caspian cobra habitat patches as well as creating connectivity between identified patches.Evaluating the ecological and habitat needs of the species is the first step of conservation management plans, and thus plays an essential role in the species survival. In the other words, creating landscape connectivity between identified patches and protecting these habitat patches are important in facilitating the gene flow between the remaining populations and thereby decreasing the genetic threats caused by population's disconnection.

    AcknowledgementsOur sincere thanks go to Raheleh DEZFOULIAN and Ben GOTTESMAN for their great assistance on editing and constructive criticism of the manuscript. This study was permitted by the Iranian Department of Environment under permits No. 94/43027 and 94/17701.

    男女国产视频网站| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 久热久热在线精品观看| 亚洲国产色片| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 亚洲av.av天堂| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 中文天堂在线官网| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| .国产精品久久| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 久久这里只有精品中国| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 99久久人妻综合| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 青春草国产在线视频| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 国产69精品久久久久777片| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 午夜激情欧美在线| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 国产91av在线免费观看| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| av在线亚洲专区| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产探花极品一区二区| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国产高潮美女av| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 亚洲综合色惰| xxx大片免费视频| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 久久久色成人| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 免费少妇av软件| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| av一本久久久久| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 精品久久久久久久末码| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 国产av不卡久久| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 综合色av麻豆| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 日本色播在线视频| 免费av毛片视频| 国产亚洲最大av| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 极品教师在线视频| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 黄色配什么色好看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 中文天堂在线官网| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 亚洲av一区综合| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 插逼视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久久末码| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 日本免费a在线| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 只有这里有精品99| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 国产精品无大码| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 七月丁香在线播放| 国产av不卡久久| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 免费av不卡在线播放| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 热99在线观看视频| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 亚洲综合精品二区| 久久久久九九精品影院| 亚洲av一区综合| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 高清av免费在线| 观看美女的网站| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 一区二区三区免费毛片| 美女高潮的动态| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 亚洲无线观看免费| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 七月丁香在线播放| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 国内精品宾馆在线| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 搡老乐熟女国产| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 色视频www国产| av在线老鸭窝| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 国产极品天堂在线| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 99热全是精品| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 日日啪夜夜撸| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 日本一二三区视频观看| 一级av片app| 97超碰精品成人国产| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 99热这里只有精品一区| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲国产av新网站| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 黄色一级大片看看| 午夜福利高清视频| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 欧美成人a在线观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 国产永久视频网站| 亚洲av成人av| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 日本av手机在线免费观看| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 精品人妻视频免费看| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 亚州av有码| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| av黄色大香蕉| 国产不卡一卡二| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 观看美女的网站| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 1000部很黄的大片| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 中文天堂在线官网| 久久午夜福利片| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 久久久久久伊人网av| 99热全是精品| 免费观看在线日韩| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 日本午夜av视频| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 91狼人影院| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 午夜激情欧美在线| 插逼视频在线观看| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 在线免费观看的www视频| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 日日啪夜夜撸| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 欧美激情在线99| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲综合色惰| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 日本一二三区视频观看| 欧美区成人在线视频| 国产综合精华液| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 热99在线观看视频| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 国产av在哪里看| av女优亚洲男人天堂| .国产精品久久| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 久久久国产一区二区| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 51国产日韩欧美| 在线a可以看的网站| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 国产成人91sexporn| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 三级毛片av免费| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| av在线播放精品| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 老女人水多毛片| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 国产美女午夜福利| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 毛片女人毛片| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 国产不卡一卡二| 超碰97精品在线观看| 日日啪夜夜撸| 亚洲精品第二区| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 一区二区三区免费毛片| h日本视频在线播放| 嫩草影院新地址| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 色5月婷婷丁香| 色综合站精品国产| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚州av有码| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 国产 亚洲一区二区三区 | 91精品国产九色| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 99热6这里只有精品| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| av福利片在线观看| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 国产成人精品福利久久| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 麻豆成人av视频| 国产视频首页在线观看| 日韩成人伦理影院| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 黄片wwwwww| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 久久精品人妻少妇| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 国产乱人视频| 久99久视频精品免费| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 黄色日韩在线| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 免费大片18禁| 91狼人影院| 国产综合精华液| 尾随美女入室| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 午夜视频国产福利| 一级毛片电影观看| 18+在线观看网站| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 在线播放无遮挡| 欧美性感艳星| 看免费成人av毛片| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 搞女人的毛片| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 嫩草影院新地址| 看免费成人av毛片| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 黄色配什么色好看| av卡一久久| av福利片在线观看| 亚洲四区av| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 国产av在哪里看| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产永久视频网站| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 黄片wwwwww| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 亚洲在线自拍视频| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 赤兔流量卡办理| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 成年版毛片免费区| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产永久视频网站| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 日本免费在线观看一区| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 直男gayav资源| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| av一本久久久久| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 三级经典国产精品| 亚洲四区av| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 色视频www国产| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 少妇的逼水好多| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 亚洲色图av天堂| videossex国产| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 成人综合一区亚洲| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 赤兔流量卡办理| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| av在线蜜桃| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产 一区精品| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 免费大片18禁| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 欧美bdsm另类| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 国产探花极品一区二区| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 午夜免费激情av| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 极品教师在线视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 永久网站在线| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 在线免费观看的www视频| 国产永久视频网站| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 久久久久久久久中文| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 日韩电影二区| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 1000部很黄的大片| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 欧美三级亚洲精品| 韩国av在线不卡| 亚洲国产av新网站| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 尾随美女入室| 性色avwww在线观看| 日日啪夜夜撸| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 夫妻午夜视频| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 久99久视频精品免费| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 中文字幕久久专区| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 91久久精品电影网| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产成人精品婷婷| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 亚洲综合精品二区| 午夜日本视频在线| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品三级大全| 黄色日韩在线| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 免费看不卡的av| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 高清毛片免费看| 精品久久久久久久久av| 三级经典国产精品| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲av男天堂| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 91久久精品电影网| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 综合色av麻豆| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 简卡轻食公司| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 69av精品久久久久久| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 在线观看一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久中文| 一本久久精品| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 观看免费一级毛片| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 成年av动漫网址| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 搞女人的毛片| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 日本色播在线视频| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 久久99精品国语久久久| 日本一本二区三区精品| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 日本一本二区三区精品| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 少妇丰满av| 免费看不卡的av| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 日本一二三区视频观看| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 免费看不卡的av| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 免费av观看视频| 禁无遮挡网站|