• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Rice: Constraints and Possible Solutions

    2019-05-23 01:14:18SulaimanMohammedAzmanAbdSamadZaidahRahmat
    Rice Science 2019年3期

    Sulaiman Mohammed, Azman Abd Samad, Zaidah Rahmat

    ?

    -Mediated Transformation of Rice: Constraints and Possible Solutions

    Sulaiman Mohammed1, 2, Azman Abd Samad1, Zaidah Rahmat1

    (Department of Biotechnology and Medical Engineering, Faculty of Biosciences and Medical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor 81310, Malaysia; Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Gombe State University, Gombe PMB0127, Nigeria)

    Genetic transformation of rice (L.) by introducing beneficial traits is now a central research instrument in plant physiology and a practical tool for plant improvement.Many approaches are verified for stable introduction of foreign genes into the plant genome. The review examined the different constraints that limit the success of rice genetic transformation via-mediated approach and suggested possible solutions. Explant identification, gene transfer technique and construct to tailor the integration, transgene expression without collateral to genetic damage and transformant selection are among the technical challenges affecting the rice transformation. Despite the contests,-mediatedtransformation systemhas been a better option for producing transgenic rice varieties because of its exact T-DNA processing and simple integration of low copy-number transgene. This information is necessary for improving the transformation system for recalcitrant rice varieties.

    rice;-mediated transformation; tissue culture; gene transfer; T-DNA integration

    Genetic transformation occurs naturally in bacteria (Lorenz and Wackernagel, 1994;Laurenceauet al, 2013), whereas in other organisms such as plants, it is achieved by artificial mechanisms (Kozielet al, 1993; Tzfira and Citovsky, 2006). Horschet al (1984) proved the capacity to introduce a diverse foreign gene(s)into the plant organism. The successful regenerations of transgenic fruits (Yaoet al, 1995;Mulwaet al, 2015), vegetables (Zhang and Blumwald, 2001), medicinal and ornamental geophyte (Koetleet al, 2017) and crops such as rice (Zhanget al, 1988; Hieiet al, 1994; Saika and Toki, 2010; Manimaranet al, 2013; Fooket al, 2015) have been reported. Therefore, floral transformation is now a core research and a practical tool for cultivar improvement. There are well-established systems for stable and effective introduction of novel genes into the genomes of plant species (Ziemienowicz, 2014). The pioneered applied method to generate fertile transgenic plants (dicots and monocots) includes electroporation (Ou-Leeet al, 1986; Toriyamaet al, 1988), polyethylene glycol (PEG) mediated transformation (Dattaet al, 1990) and an electric discharge particle acceleration device (Christouet al, 1991).

    Conservatively, monocots are only transformed using the above-aforementioned direct gene transfer techniques (L?rzet al, 1985), while-mediated transformation system has been used for the transformation of dicots. Monocots are not the natural hosts ofspecies, and thus transformation of monocot is extremely tedious (Soodet al, 2011). The initial monocotyledons used to transform using the-mediatedapproach comprised rice, wheat and maize (Soodet al, 2011). In 1994, rice was strongly believed to be amenable to-transformation (Hieiet al, 1994). Progressively, due to the advent of molecular techniques and understanding of plant physiology, the incoming of super-binary vector construct and bacterial strains, the mediatedsystem is accepted and numerous monocots are transformed (Chenget al, 2004). However, transformation technology of rice is often hampered by lack of specific efficient method, defined explant(s), regeneration conditions as well as low cell competence.

    One of the technical challenges fronting the transformation toward producing stable transgenic rice ishow to produce high proportion of transformants with a predictable transgene expression without collateral to genetic damage. Despite the contests,transformation systemhas been a better option by troubleshooting the parameters that govern efficient transgene delivery and integration into the plant genome (Hieiet al, 1994; Izawa and Shimamoto, 1996; Gelvin, 2000; Xuet al, 2017). In this review, key problems, constraints impeding the research and development of rice transformation system, and key issues to be resolved in the practical application with more emphasis on-mediated transformation as the superlative method for rice genetic transformation are discussed. Such information is necessary for the biotechnological improvement of rice species.

    Importance of riceproduction

    The over-dependent on rice as staple diet remains unshakable over decades. Therefore, increasing rice yield remains one of the most important goals in plant science research, such as agriculture and crop production (Xueet al, 2008), especially in Asia and Africa nations (Karthikeyanet al, 2009). As reported by Karthikeyanet al (2009) and Buttimeret al (2017), there is an increase in the demand for rice due to over-growing of world population and it is essential to upsurge a domestic production for food security purpose. Hence, biotechnology intervention through tissue culture technology and genetic transformation is the solution (Azhakanandamet al, 2015).

    Importance of rice transformation

    With the advent of molecular techniques, plant transformation has become possible. The capacity to manipulate genetic material by introducing and expressing a specific novel-foreign gene(s) in plants provides a powerful new experimental tool, allowing direct testing of hypotheses in plant physiology that have become exceedingly difficult to resolve using conventional breeding or biochemical tests (Birch, 1997). The exciting examples include the molecular genetic analysis of cellular signals controlling the sexual reproduction in rice (Komiyaet al, 2008, 2009), and molecular mechanism of the roles of specific proteins, hormones and enzymes in plant metabolism and development(Kang and Turano, 2003; Liet al, 2006; Lee and An, 2015).

    The transformation approach might generate useful plants with special phenotypes that is unachievable by conventional breeding approach, rectify faults and improve physiological and agronomical traits in some cultivars more professionally (Birch, 1997). Interestingly,certain prospects have been met with the generation of commercial transgenic plant lines expressing transgenes conferring resistance to insects, pathogens, environmental stress and herbicides, or increasing grain yield and weight (Table 1). Another newly exciting event is the recent constructions of transgenic lines with useful product for pharmaceuticals (Arntzen, 2015; Maet al, 2015; Sacket al, 2015) and biodegradable plastic (Snell and Peoples, 2009; Wanget al, 2010; Hempelet al, 2011). Moreover, the extent to which additional commercial, practical or agronomically improved rice can be met totally depends on the efficiency of transformation protocol that can produce lines without any genetic damage. Such experiment requires a series of screening of the transformants expressing the desired transgene, as well avoid misleading result from unintended genetic alteration during the process.

    Agrobacterium-mediated transformation

    The genushas five species which are classified based on their mode of infection as follows:as an ‘a(chǎn)virulent’ species,causing hairy root disease,causing cane gall disease,causing crown gall/tumour disease andinducing galls on grape. Perhaps, a further reasonable system of classification has further divided the genusinto ‘Biovars’ based on the species metabolic characteristics and growth mode (Mafakheriet al, 2017). Genusis a Gram-negative, soil pathogenic bacterium which causes the formation of crown tumors near to infection sites in its host plant. The genuspossesses the ability to transferforeign DNA into the plant genome by horizontal gene transfer(Escobar and Dandekar, 2003).genes are required to establish tumorigenesis and to bring about opine biosynthesis. For example,during transformation, thespecies facilitates the delivery of transferred-DNA (T-DNA) into the host genome, as it possesses stable and efficient mechanism.-plant gene transfer can be categorized into five crucial steps,including induction ofvirulence system, generation of T-DNA complex, T-DNA transfer to the plant cell nucleus, integration of T-DNA into the plant genome and T-DNA gene expression by transformed plant (Ziemienowicz, 2014).

    Table 1. Rice genotypes, medium for explant culture and regeneration, and their improvements via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.

    MS, Murashige and Skoog medium; N6, N6 medium; YN, Yoshida nutrient.

    -mediated transformation mechanism indicates that thecell transfers its T-DNA into the nuclear genome of the host plant. Normally, the T-DNA resides in the bacterial growth-inducing plasmid [tumor inducing (Ti) or root inducing (Ri)], and latersliced by virulence proteins (Gelvin, 2000; Bourraset al, 2015). The virulence genes (-genes) are mostly polar in nature that arelocated around the T-DNA borders of the plasmid. Therefore, thegenes play a critical role in generating T-strand or T-DNA by the bacterium, T-DNA transfer or formation of T-complex and its transportation into the plant cell via the T-pilus and T-DNA deliverance up to the actual plant genome as well as opines secretion (Gelvin, 2000).-mediated DNA transfer system offers unique advantages over direct gene transfer techniques as follows: ease of the gene transfer, precise foreign gene transfer and simple integration of the DNA sequence with defined ends, a linked transfer of selectable marker along with the gene, low copy number of the transgene, higher frequency of stable transformation, reasonably lower rate of transgene silencing and ability to transfer long stretches of T-DNA (up to 150kb) (Veluthambiet al, 2003).

    As reported by Soodet al (2011), due to the straightforwardness of theTi plasmid-based vector transformation and precise integration of single copy number of transgene into the plant genome, the technique continues to be the most used and the best method for rice transformation so far, and the bacterium species effectiveness is satisfactory (Manimaranet al, 2013). Previous findings expressed the competence oftowards achieving a successful production of transgenic rice (Endoet al, 2015),therefore, the genusis called ‘natural plant genetic engineer’ (Chandra, 2012; Hoffmannet al, 2017). However, certain factors such as genotype negatively influence the processes, and overcoming such constraints is noteworthy in genetic transformation of rice. A complete schematic representation of-mediated transformation of rice is shown in Fig. 1.

    Technological constraints

    Tissue culture and regeneration constraint

    The choice of transformation technique affects various secondary parameters such as tissue culture, transfer of gene, transgene integration and gene expression (Tanet al, 2017). Perhaps, the number of produced transgenic plants are usually the factor to define the functionality of a particular system (Birch, 1997). The most critical steps in the genetic transformation of the plant include identification of viable host tissue or cells, foreign DNA integration into the viable plant nuclear genome and regeneration of transgenic plant (Ziemienowicz, 2014;Rashidet al, 2017). Plant tissue culture technology presents an appropriate system for plant propagation through culture of diverse organs (explant) as means of genetic transformation and transgenic plant regain. Tissue culture is prerequisite for plant transformation as it is employed in almost all current transformation techniques to achieve a practical efficiency of foreign gene introduction and regeneration of transformants (Hellwiget al, 2004). Hence, this resourceful invention system serves as a mechanism for accelerating the genetic improvement via genetic transformation. With this technological approach, great improvements in monocot genetic manipulation including rice are accomplished (Chenget al, 2004; Ullahet al, 2007). The basic anatomy of such explants has been implicated to govern the response to the transformation infection (Soodet al, 2011). Riceimmature embryo, embryogenic callus or shoot apex are usually produced during tissue culture and used as host plant. The responses of explant cells primarily depend on the species genotype which serves as a major factor for determining a successful rice transformation (Sahooet al, 2011).

    Fig. 1. A complete schematic representation of-mediated transformation and recovery of transgenic rice adapted from Shrawat and L?rz (2006).

    Genotype dependence is key issue in ricetransformation, as it causes undesired change(s) during culture, for example, somaclonal variation. Due to such constraint, T-DNA fails to target the specific meristematic cells that are competent to dedifferentiate. According to Bhatiaet al (2017), differences in dicots and monocots cell wall chemistry are thought to determine the success intransgene infection. The dicot cell wall constitutes the glucuronoarabinoxylans, β-linked glucose residues with linking chains of β--xyloglucans and linear chains of β--xylose,which are characterized to interlock the polysaccharides in grass species (Grabber, 2005; Vogel, 2008). As an alternative of hydroxyproline-rich extensions that normally accumulate in the cell walls, threonine-rich proteins with sequences evocative of extension are observed during cellular differentiation in monocots (Xinget al, 2009; Soodet al, 2011). The monocotyledonous meristematic cells affect thepathogenicity ability which lower the function(s) of its-genes (Xing et al, 2019). For that, the cells would fail to exude the inducing compounds of such genes into the plant cells, losing the capacity to dedifferentiate at early stage of development (Loweet al, 2016; Mafakheriet al, 2017).

    Various explants have been used in rice transformation,namely embryogenic callus, immature embryo and shoot apex. The callus potential to regeneration after the genetic transformation is cumbersome and variety-dependent with limiting efficient.Whereas, immature embryos are available only at certain period and are difficult to handle (Deyet al, 2012). Therefore, the use of rice shoot apex for transformation and transgenic recovery via-mediated transformation is a possible solution. The merits with shoot apex transformation include being genotype-independence, direct regeneration of transformants due to developmental plasticity of the plant part, maintaining cultivar integrity and ease of handling (Fooket al, 2015;Clementet al, 2016).

    With respect to the above monocot inability toinfection, it is generally believed that the success of transformation depends on the explant physiological status (Birch, 1997; Danilovaet al, 2006; Lacroixet al, 2011; Koetleet al, 2015; Ithape et al, 2017; Rashidet al, 2017). Many rice cultivars are unable to dedifferentiate and produce tumor after transformation. To some extent, few varieties produce callus in high cell proliferation index (Pathiet al, 2013;Dinet al, 2016), but, determination of rice genotype with high embryogenecity and its specific explant for transformation are fiddly,which is another factor causing the poor transformation potential in rice (Soodet al, 2011). Remarkably, such defect has been revitalized by extensive optimization of the callus induction and transformation parameters (Chenget al, 2004; Saika and Toki, 2010; Mannet al, 2012; Shiet al, 2017). In contrast, embryogenic callus induction fromrice varieties fails to respond to the treatments such as plant growth regulators supplementation and media type,displaying less transformation efficiencies as recorded (Uzéet al, 2000;Tieet al, 2012).

    Media for tissue culture and regeneration affect the development of transgenic rice (Table 1), and their supplements can improve the transgenic plant recovery (Chenget al, 2004; Martinset al, 2015; Tanet al, 2017). Even explant medium replacements for post-transformation culture do enhance the efficiency of transformant rice recovery (Soodet al, 2011) which depend on the genotype. Therefore, success in transformation should be followed by identifying an appropriate explant/tissue with the maximumregeneration capacity, optimization of gene transfer system/parameters, tailoring regeneration, selection/screening analysis and recovery of transgenic plants as in Fig.2. In tissue culture system for rice transformation, the prerequisite is the discovery of embryogenic cells that are accessible to the gene transfer action and can retain the regeneration ability by cell proliferation and permit selection of the transformants. Whereas a high division ratio of cells from micropropagation does not automatically indicate regenerable cells.

    Gene transfer constraint

    Based on experimental experience on recalcitrant rice varieties, approaches to optimize transformation protocols have been suggested. It is significant to first optimize all tissue culture stages toward increasing the accessibility of cells prior to developing a state for non-lethal gene transfer system. Fortransformation and biolistic, it is significant to establish such culture and regenerable conditions for efficient gene integration, expression and final regeneration of transformant. With all that effort to optimize rice transgene integration, many species and their individual varieties are still less amenable to genetic engineering (Yookongkaewet al, 2007; Sahooet al, 2011). As suggested by Soodet al (2011) and Lianget al (2017), the unamenable status was due to the plant genome organization towards T-DNA transfer and it is not overruled. This limitation is due to the biological disparity of the plant genetic makeup as well as lesser understanding of the interaction proceeding the transfer processes. According to Birch (1997), it is advisable to perform histological analysis of the explant leading to the success of the event. Reports indicated that the use of optimal direct transformation parameters and/ordensity equally facilitate the T-DNA attachment to probable receptor proteins superficial rice explant (Hieiet al, 1994; Kumriaet al, 2001).

    Fig.2. Generalized strategy for tissue culture, transformation system and regeneration of transgenic rice.

    Cell-cell recognition i.e.attachment to plant cell surface is the primary crucial step in gene transfer. Apart from the pathogen-host receptors, thechromosomal encoded products are required for the streamline attachment. Lack of receptor protein(s) from either site may result in failure of the attachment processes and regulation activation of the foreign gene (Lippincott and Lippincott, 1978). Low attachment frequency is obtained in cereals as a result of improper binding function of the receptors (Hieiet al, 2014; Tanet al, 2017). The parameter condition or bacterial density varies from flora to flora and variety to variety. It is necessary to use optimum condition or concentration ofin the recalcitrant plant likerice to enhance T-DNA transfer by activating the-genes (Zaidiet al, 2006; Sahooet al, 2011; Zuniga-Sotoet al, 2015). In contrast, reports indicated the demerit of higher density towards lowering the plant recovery by damaging the plant cells and diminishing stable transformation. However, little information on the DNA forms that may upsurge the stable transformation frequency is available.

    Opine producing ability of thestrains (Table 2) is paramount in transgene integration course. Naturally, the T-DNA on Ti plasmid contains oncogenes, octopine and opine catabolism that activates its expression in plant cells, suggesting that plant cell transformation byis feasible after the development of opine-producing gall tumours (Binns and Campbell, 2001). The superiority of infectivity of nopaline producing strains over the others (octopine and the non-opine producing strains) based on the diverse role of-genes on the plasmidhas been reported (Hansenet al, 1994, 1997; Parket al, 2015). Equally, chemotactic movement oftowards-gene inducers is also a factor of consideration and well debated. Both dicots and monocotsare shown to exude chemoattractant, though susceptible cell recognition, chemotaxis and attachment may not be the actual limiting factors in rice-mediated transformation. In addition, suitable choice of Ti plasmid for specific gene transfer is a valuable gadget in rice transformation analysis (Ashbyet al, 1987). The vector is an important instrument with features that aid in the integration and expression of the novel gene(s) during mediated transformation. The Ti plasmid and its components plays a crucial role in gene transfer and transformant development (Hieiet al, 1994). Irrespective of transformation technique, the use of monocot-specific promoter(s), reporter and selectable marker genes by insertion of intron into the specific coding region of the plasmid are essential approaches, which enhances the efficacy of the transformation system (Chenget al, 2004; Streatfield, 2007; Mannet al, 2012). Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S (CaMV 35S) promoter, β-glucuronidase () reporter gene andphosphotransferase () marker are desired trait or characteristic of plasmid for gene transfer in rice (Houet al, 2015). Additional promoters are equally used to advance the transfer of gene including enhanced 35S (), rice actin () and ubiquitin (),which also enhances the transgene expression (Soodet al, 2011; Koetleet al, 2017).

    Transgene integration and its expression constraint

    In monocots, many blocks prevent the T-DNA integration (Bundock and Hooykaas, 1996; Chenget al, 2004). The application ofis generally believed to produce a simpler integration prototype than direct gene transfer. Although both strategies result in a similar array of integration incidents, the copy number and frequency distributions differ (van der Graaffet al, 1996; Gelvin, 2000). Upon theattachment to plant cell, signal transduction and-genes as well as transcriptional activation pathways regulate the infection activity and remain the factors influencing the gene insertion. In addition, certain secondary metabolites and growth regulators during-infection period activate or inhibit the transgene integration.

    Table 2. Transgenic rice generated via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system (2010–2017), along with the bacterium strain, the vector’s promoter and selectable marker used.

    The apparent T-DNA integration targeting a specific region has continued to be an important tool for subsequent transgene expression, but it is still indecipherable to date. As a result, many transformed plants produce mutant phenotype due to disruption of transcription units because of T-DNA insertion. Therefore, integration of transgene is necessary to be directed to a transcribed or even specific region without interruption of established genes (Soodet al, 2011; Koetleet al, 2015; Svitashevet al, 2015).gene activation for transgene integration in rice is extremely challenging. Enhancing the process simply by optimization using phenolic compounds like acetosyringone (AS) orinducing chemical in rice transformation has been reported (Sarangiet al, 2011; Manimaranet al, 2013; Tanet al, 2017). In contrast, lower efficiency of rice transformations has been obtained in the absence of such chemical compounds. Thus, the mechanism guiding the chemical’s role toward gene integration is yet to be fully understood. This is also another restraint factor causing the inefficiency of rice genetic transformation.

    Initially, the inability of plant transcriptional machinery to recognize and express foreign genes is resolved by exploiting some control sequences isolated from virus (cauli flower mosaic) (Fanget al, 1989) and bacteria () (Koncz and Schell, 1986), which are known to be transcribed in plant cells. Continuous characterization and analyses involving either transient or stable expression of foreign genes construct in the plant have offered an insight into useful features for regulated transgene expression in plants. The typical features considered in preparation of any constructs include transcriptional promoter and enhancer, transcriptional terminator and 3-enhancer, polyadenylation signals, introns, codon usage, untranslated 5-leader and 3-trailer sequences (Birch, 1997). The pattern and level of expression generally differ to some extent even between rice sub-species and among varieties. Whereas, the variation with respect to the expression of the transgene may generate newly transformed lines which by chance have useful expression network or vise-versa. Such lucky or unlucky phenomenon as well as unpredictable phenotype loss in some transformed rice varieties have been recorded due to silencing of the transgene,which is always detected immediately after the transformation or from transformants field test(Matzke and Matzke, 1995). The transgene gene silencing or inactivation affects rice genetic transformation attempt leading to waste of time and resources. For that, much is needed to learn about the causes of such silencing or transient expression model. Thus, a multicopy number of transgenes have been recognized as a probable cause, signifying the demerit of direct gene transfer technique in monocot transformation (Soodet al, 2011).

    Furthermore, some of promoter-promoter constructsare silenced, whereas some are invariably stably expressed (Birchet al, 1995). Therefore, it will be significant to identify the sequences within the constructs that inhibit or trigger the silencing and further develop a system to avoid the silence in transgenic rice plants. Thepromoter shows maximum expression mechanism in some monocotyledons compared to ordinary(Soodet al, 2011; Koetleet al, 2017). In rice transformation, the-foreign gene expression is improved by thepromoter. Other promoters such as,andare also reported to be a factor for reporter gene and transgene expression in transgenic cereals (Schoonbeeket al, 2015).protein-complex interaction to monocot cytoplasm and/or nucleus is still incompletely understood. Similarly, the correlation between transient and/or stable expression of the transgene has not been thoroughly researched or comprehended. To produce positive outcome after any transformation approach by recovering the transgenic rice variety is highly encouraging, but it can only be actualized when the parameters affecting thegene activation, T-DNA integration and expression are well understood.

    Transformants screening and selection constraint

    In transformation systems that generate a substantial number of nonchimeric transformants, genes conferring a phenotype allowing physical or visual screening or resistance-conferring genes are almost all utilized to recover rice positive transformants (Hieiet al, 1994; Saharanet al, 2004; Loweet al, 2016). However, chimeric transformants generally necessitate screening rather than lethal selection to retrieve the primary transformants (Christou and McCabe, 1992). Screening together with selection is expensive and remains a necessary requirement for determining the transformation success and efficiency. Similarly, the recovery fold differs among selection procedures. For example, visual screening normally gives lower fold than the antibiotic selection because antibiotic chemicals provide a continued benefit to transformed cells (Birch, 1997). Due to the chemical resistance ability of the transgenic cells, they might have a higher proportion of multiplication and regeneration as well as facilitating the transformants recognition.

    Selection of transformed rice tissue should be observed immediately after the transformation process, or a few days later. Generally,-infected rice tissue selection is observed few days after the infection. The reporter genes and selectable marker expression alongside transgene vary according to cultivars and varieties (Jianget al, 2003). Selection after co-cultivation of rice calli for few days reveals high expression of T-DNA and also simplifies the process (Manimaranet al, 2013). In addition, numerous selectable markers have been used in rice transformation systems. The gene for neomycin phosphotransferase (or) was earlier used in the direct transformation of rice. Theconfers resistance to amino-glycoside antibioticand can be equally used as a selective agent in protoplasts regeneration, but not embryogenic calli (Hieiet al, 1997; Chenget al, 2004).

    phosphotransferase () is the most common and effective plant selectable agent used for screening of rice positive transformants at present (Table 2). This confers resistance to aminoglycosideand allows for discrimination between non-transformed, negatively transformed and successfully transformed tissues (Veluthambiet al, 2003). The recent redesigning of Ti plasmids by inserting an intron into the coding region ofgene orreporter has really enhanced the transgene expression in transgenic rice, reducing the markers’ copy number in the transformants. The-intron marker enables appropriate control of growth ofafter the infection (Veluthambiet al, 2003;Soodet al, 2011). Whereas some selective markers are isolated and constructed to provide resistance to various commercially available herbicides. Using such markers under the control of,or ubiquitin constitutive promoter works efficiently for screening/selection after biolistic and-mediated transformation (Chenget al, 2004).

    Phosphomannose isomerase positive marker for screening after the-transformation of dicots has been shown to be effective in monocots including rice. However, the major limitation of such screening procedure is lack of universal efficiency across plantspecies (Opabode, 2006). A broadly applicable, sensitive and simple selection regime now exists for rice transgenes, viz.histochemical assay (Table 2),which requires less experimentation, time as well as selection agent.is expressed in the transformant cells, and releases benzyl-adenine, then supports tissue proliferation and regeneration (Joersbo and Okkels, 1996). This reporter gene has a major expression restriction when used intransformationdespite the use of plant promoters. Interestingly, the problem is overwhelmed by inserting intron (as mentioned above) or castor bean catalase gene intron(s) at thesite in the vector, which makes its activity limited to only transformed plant tissues and not detected inspecies (Veluthambiet al, 2003).

    Alternative reporter gene is found for immense application in positive selection of transgenic rice namely, green fluorescent protein gene () which visualize only in the living cells. Luciferase () reporter gene requires an externally added substrate for detection, while GFP fluorescence occurs with ultraviolet light and oxygen without any externally added substrate (Vain, 2007). GFP displays the following drawbacks including low solubility in cytoplasm and meddling of cytoplasm-accumulated GFP during shoot regeneration. Phospho-mannose isomerase gene isolated fromis also used as a selection agent in some cereals (Wrightet al, 2001;Veluthambiet al, 2003). Irrespective of transformation technique, use of specific promoter, apposite reporter gene and selectable marker would improve the technique efficiency as well as simplifying the positive selection procedure. Considering all the different selectable markers and reporter genes, to date, none has been chosen or unanimously agreed as the best towards appropriate positive transformants selection in rice genetic engineering. Each has advantages and disadvantages.

    Solution and future needs for rice transformation research

    The first constraint to be addressed by research into rice genetic engineering is the tissue culture strategy (especiallysub-species) to enrich regenerable tissue/cells that may be accessible to gene transfer. Development of a system for rightful explants (regenerable) selection is essential for achieving successful transformation. Routine embryogenic callus induction or ability to efficaciously establish micropropagation strategy is the fundamental requirement for achieving anplant regeneration and remains prerequisite for the genetic transformation, particularly in rice. Hence, the key to recalcitrant cultivars appears to be the development of a technique that will expose the abundant regenerable cells to a suitable gene integration treatment and expression. Events encompassing the gene transfer by bothand direct transfer approach should be clearly understood. But, there are lots of relevant questions surrounding the technique of direct gene transfer. This review suggested that many plant genes might be involved in both methods, and therefore, it is necessary to identify the plant factors contributing the T-DNA transfer and integration to better understand the underlying processes accounting for the susceptibility of rice cells toinfection.

    Nowadays, optimization of transformation efficiency including-infection, T-DNA transfer integration of transgene and regeneration of transgenic plants are the major concern in rice improvement technology. Another important goal is the development of new method(s) for predictable transgene expression without a collateral genetic damage to the plant genome. In the application of all plant transformation, the limiting process for cultivar improvement or plant physiology is usually not the transformant regeneration, but the selection requisite to eliminate the transgenic plants with collateral genetic damage (Birch, 1997). Indemnity of genetic damage and full recovery require more detailed investigation on the species cell physiology.

    Equally, identifying other bacterial species (non-)would be significant and might probably increase the transformation success of rice (Broothaertset al, 2005). Interest exists for the use of non-for rice genetic transformation due to freedom-to-operate subjects that remain withacross numerous jurisdictions.(OV14) bacterium for rice transformation exhibits maximum infection competences (Zuniga-Sotoet al, 2015). Further exploration of the-mediated transformation and its mechanism is paramount.-mediated transformation is suggested to be the next route for rice improvement due to its effectiveness, reliability and non-pathogenic (Wendtet al, 2012). Furthermore, research projects are undertaken with the possibility of producing valuable crops, commercially affordable and available, thus, researchers require support from industries. Similarly, scientists must unite in their goals and integrate legal, social, economic and practical issues for the research design.

    CONCLUSIONS

    Despite the less amenability displayed by different rice varieties and low efficiency of regeneration after-mediated transformation, it is still possible to transform almost all rice sub-species (Sahooet al, 2011; Sahoo and Tuteja, 2012; Zhaoet al, 2015). The identified critical factors influencing the rice improvement via-mediated transformation includes suitable and viable explant (callus/immature embryo/shoot apex) andregeneration capacity. Particularly, regeneration capacity is essential in determining the success of the experiment. Gene transfer through cell-cell recognition is the primary crucial step in genetic transformation. Foreign DNA integration into the viable plant nuclear genome as well as its expression has continued to be a major constrains. Correspondingly, selection of positive transformants and the improvement of the recovery fold remain important issues in transgenic rice screening.

    Alam M M, Tanaka T, Nakamura H, Ichikawa H, Kobayashi K, Yaeno T, Yamaoka N, Shimomoto K, Takayama K, Nishina H, Nishiguchi M. 2015. Overexpression of a rice heme activator protein gene () confers resistance to pathogens, salinity and drought, and increases photosynthesis and tiller number.,13(1): 85–96.

    Arntzen C. 2015. Plant-made pharmaceuticals: From ‘edible vaccines’ to ebola therapeutics.,13(8): 1013–1016.

    Ashby A M, Watson M D, Shaw C H. 1987. A Ti-plasmid determined function is responsible for chemotaxis oftowards the plant wound product acetosyringone.,41(2): 189–192.

    Azhakanandam K, Silverstone A, Daniell H, Davey M R. 2015. Recent Advancements in Gene Expression and Enabling Technologies in Crop Plants. Springer.

    Bhatia R, Gallagher J A, Gomez L D, Bosch M. 2017. Genetic engineering of grass cell wall polysaccharides for biorefining., 15(9): 1071–1092.

    Binns A, Campbell A. 2001.-Mediated Transformation of Plant Cells. John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0001492.

    Birch R G, Bower R, Elliott A, Potier B, Franks T, Cordeiro G. 1995. Expression of foreign genes in sugarcane: Proceedings of the International Society of Sugarcane Technologists XXII Congress. Cartegena,Springer: 368–373.

    Birch R G. 1997. Plant transformation: Problems and strategies for practical application.,48: 297–326.

    Bourras S, Rouxel T, Meyer M. 2015.gene transfer: How a plant pathogen hacks the nuclei of plant and nonplant organisms.,105(10): 1288–1301.

    Broothaerts W, Mitchell H J, Weir B, Kaines S, Smith L M A, Yang W, Mayer J E, Roa-Rodriguez C, Jefferson R A. 2005. Gene transfer to plants by diverse species of bacteria.,433: 629–633.

    Bundock P, Hooykaas P J J.1996. Integration ofT-DNA in thegenome by illegitimate recombination.,93: 15272–15275.

    Buttimer C, McAuliffe O, Ross R P, Hill C, O’Mahony J, Coffey A. 2017. Bacteriophages and bacterial plant diseases.,8: e33227.

    Chakraborty M, Reddy P S, Narasu M L, KrishnaG, Rana D. 2016.-mediated genetic transformation of commercially elite rice restorer line usinggene as a plant selection marker.,22(1): 51–60.

    Chandra S. 2012. Natural plant genetic engineerrhizogenes: Role of T-DNA in plant secondary metabolism.,34(3): 407–415.

    Cheng M, Lowe B A, Spencer T M, Ye X D, Armstrong C L. 2004. Factors influencing-mediated transformation of monocotyledonous species.,40(1): 31–45.

    Christou P, Ford T L, KofronM. 1991. Production of transgenic rice (L.) plants from agronomically importantandvarieties via electric discharge particle acceleration of exogenous DNA into immature zygotic embryos.,9(10): 957–962.

    Christou P, McCabe D E. 1992. Prediction of germ-line transformation events in chimeric Rotransgenic soybean plantlets using tissue-specific expression patterns.,2(3): 283–290.

    Clement W K F, Lai K S, Wong M Y, Maziah M. 2016. Heat and hydrolytic enzymes treatment improved the-mediated transformation of recalcitrantrice (L.).,,125(1): 183–190.

    Danilova S A, da Silva J A T, Kusnetsov V V. 2006. Novel approaches for-mediated transformation of maize and ornamental grasses.,, 2: 66–69.

    Datta K, Baisakh N, Ganguly M, Krishnan S, Yamaguchi Shinozaki K, Datta S K. 2012. Overexpression ofand rice stress genes’ inducible transcription factor confers drought and salinity tolerance to rice.,10(5): 579–586.

    Datta S K, Peterhans A, Datta K, Potrykus I. 1990. Genetically engineered fertile-rice recovered from protoplasts.,8(8): 736–740.

    Dey M, Bakshi S, Galiba G, Sahoo L, Panda S K. 2012. Development of a genotype independent and transformation amenable regeneration system from shoot apex in rice (spp.) using TDZ.,2(3): 233–240.

    Din A R J M, Ahmad F I, Wagiran A, Samad A A, Rahmat Z, Sarmidi M R. 2016. Improvement of efficientregeneration potential of mature callus induced from Malaysian upland rice seed (cv. Panderas).,23(1): S69–S77.

    Endo M, Mikami M, Toki S. 2015. Multigene knockout utilizing off-target mutations of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in rice.,56(1): 41–47.

    Escobar M A, Dandekar A M. 2003.as an agent of disease.,8(8): 380–386.

    Fang RX, Nagy F, Sivasubramaniam S, Chua NH. 1989. Multiple cis regulatory elements for maximal expression of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter in transgenic plants.,1: 141–150.

    Fook C W K, SongL K, Wong Y M, Mahmood M. 2015. Efficient regeneration and-mediated transformation protocol for recalcitrantrice (L.).,27(11): 837–848.

    Gelvin S B. 2000.and plant genes involved in T-DNA transfer and integration.,51(1): 223–256.

    Grabber J H. 2005. How do lignin composition, structure, and cross-linking affect degradability? A review of cell wall model studies.,45(3): 820–831.

    Han S H, Yoo S C, Lee B D, An G, Paek N C. 2015. Rice FLAVIN-BINDING, KELCH REPEAT, F-BOX 1 () promotes flowering independent of photoperiod.,,38(12): 2527–2540.

    Hansen G, Das A, Chilton MD. 1994. Constitutive expression of the virulence genes improves the efficiency of plant transformation by.,91(16): 7603–7607.

    Hansen G, Shillito R D, Chilton MD. 1997. T-strand integration in maize protoplasts after codelivery of a T-DNA substrate and virulence genes., 94: 11726–11730.

    Hellwig S, Drossard J, Twyman R M, Fischer R. 2004. Plant cell cultures for the production of recombinant proteins.,22(11): 1415–1422.

    Hempel F, Bozarth A S, Lindenkamp N, Klingl A, Zauner S, Linne U, Steinbüchel A, Maier U G. 2011. Microalgae as bioreactors for bioplastic production.,10(1): 81.

    Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T. 1994. Efficient transformation of rice (L.) mediated byand sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA.,6(2): 271–282.

    Hiei Y, Komari T, Kubo T. 1997. Transformation of rice mediated by.,35: 205–218.

    Hiei Y, Ishida Y, Komari T. 2014. Progress of cereal transformation technology mediated by.,5: 628.

    Hoffmann MC, Pf?nder Y, Tintel M, Masepohl B. 2017. Bacterial PerO permeases transport sulfate and related oxyanions.,199(14): 83–117.

    Horsch R B, Fraley R T, Rogers S G, Sanders P R, Lloyd A, Hoffmann N. 1984. Inheritance of functional foreign genes in plants.,223: 496–498.

    Hou C X, Lv T, Zhan Y H, Peng Y Y, Huang Y Y, Jiang D A, Weng X Y. 2015. Overexpression of the RIXI xylanase inhibitor improves disease resistance to the fungal pathogen,, in rice.,,120(1): 167–177.

    Isikgor F H, Becer C R. 2015. Lignocellulosic biomass: A sustainable platform for the production of bio-based chemicals and polymers.,6: 4497–4559.

    Ithape D M, Maharana M, Tripathy Swapan K. 2017. Scope of genetic transformation in Sugarcane: A review.,8(1): 1–7.

    Izawa T, Shimamoto K. 1996. Becoming a model plant: The importance of rice to plant science.,1(3): 95–99.

    Jiang H M, Doerge R W, Gelvin S B. 2003. Transfer of T-DNA and vir proteins to plant cells byinduces expression of host genes involved in mediating transformation and suppresses host defense gene expression.,35(2): 219–236.

    Joersbo M, Okkels F T. 1996. A novel principle for selection of transgenic plant cells: Positive selection.,16: 219–221.

    Kang J M, Turano F J. 2003. The putative glutamate receptor 1.1 (AtGLR1.1) functions as a regulator of carbon and nitrogen metabolism in.,100(11): 6872–6877.

    Karthikeyan A, Pandian S T K, Ramesh M. 2009. High frequency plant regeneration from embryogenic callus of a popularrice (L.)., 15(4): 371–375.

    Koetle M J, Finnie J F, Balázs E,van Staden J. 2015. A review on factors affecting the-mediated genetic transformation in ornamental monocotyledonous geophytes.,98: 37–44.

    Koetle M J, Baskaran P, Finnie J F, Soos V, Balázs E,van Staden J. 2017. Optimization of transientexpression of-mediated transformation inHilliard using sonication and.,111: 307–312.

    Komiya R, Ikegami A, Tamaki S, Yokoi S, Shimamoto K. 2008.andare essential for flowering in rice.,135(4): 767–774.

    Komiya R, Yokoi S, Shimamoto K. 2009. A gene network for long-day flowering activatesencoding a mobile flowering signal in rice.,136(20): 3443–3450.

    Koncz C, Schell J. 1986. The promoter of TL-DNA genecontrols the tissue-specific expression of chimaeric genes carried by a novel type ofbinary vector.,204(3): 383–396.

    Koziel M G, Beland G L, Bowman C, Carozzi N B, Crenshaw R, Crossland L, Dawson J, Desai N, Hill M, Kadwell S, Launis K, Lewis K, Maddox D, McPherson K, Meghji M R, Merlin E, Rhodes R, Warren G W, Wright M, Evola S V. 1993. Field performance of elite transgenic maize plants expressing an insecticidal protein derived from.,11(2): 194–200.

    Krishnan S R, Priya A M, Ramesh M. 2013. Rapid regeneration and ploidy stability of ‘cv IR36’rice (L.) confers efficient protocol forcallus organogenesis andmediated transformation.,54: 47.

    Kumria R, Waie B, Rajam M.2001. Plant regeneration from transformed embryogenic callus of an eliterice via.,,67(1): 63–71.

    Lacroix B, Zaltsman A, Citovsky V. 2011. Host factors involved in genetic transformation of plant cells by.: Neal Stewart Jr C, Touraev A, Tzfira T. Plant Transformation Technologies. John Wiley & Sons: 1–29.

    Laurenceau R, Péhau-Arnaudet G, Baconnais S, Gault J, Malosse C, Dujeancourt A, Campo N, Chamot-Rooke J, Le Cam E, Claverys JP, Fronzes R. 2013. A type IV pilus mediates DNA binding during natural transformation in.,9(6): e1003473.

    Lee YS, An G. 2015.controls flowering time by modulating rhythmic flowering time regulators preferentially under short day in rice.,58(2): 137–145.

    Li J, Zhu S H, Song X W, Shen Y, Chen H M, Yu J, Yi K K, LiuY F, Karplus V J, Wu P, Deng X W. 2006. A rice glutamate receptor-like gene is critical for the division and survival of individual cells in the root apical meristem.,18(2): 340–349.

    Liang Z, Chen K L, Li T D, Zhang Y, Wang Y P, Zhao Q, Liu J X, Zhang H W, Liu C M, Ran Y D, Gao C X. 2017. Efficient DNA-free genome editing of bread wheat using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes.,8: 1–5.

    Lippincott J A, Lippincott B B. 1978. Cell walls of crown-gall tumors and embryonic plant tissues lackadherence sites.,199: 1075–1078.

    Liu J P, Zhang C C, Wei C C, Liu X, Wang M G, Yu F F, Xie Q, Tu J M. 2016. The RING finger ubiquitin E3 ligase OsHTAS enhances heat tolerance by promoting H2O2-induced stomatal closure in rice.,170(1): 429–443.

    Lorenz M G, Wackernagel W. 1994. Bacterial gene transfer by natural genetic transformation in the environment.,58(3): 563–602.

    L?rz H, Baker B, Schell J. 1985. Gene transfer to cereal cells mediated by protoplast transformation.,199(2): 178–182.

    Lowe K, Wu E, Wang N, Hoerster G, Hastings C, Cho MJ, Scelonge C, Lenderts B, Chamberlin M, Cushatt J, Wang L J, Ryan L, Khan T, Chow-Yiu J, Hua W, Yu M, Banh J, Bao Z M, Brink K, Igo E, Rudrappa B, Shamseer P M, Bruce W, Newman L, Shen B, Zheng P Z, Bidney D, Carl Falco S, Register J C, Zhao Z Y, Xu D P, Jones T, Gordon-Kamm W. 2016. Morphogenic regulators baby boom and Wuschel improve monocot transformation.,28(9): 1998–2015.

    Lucca P, Hurrell R, Potrykus I. 2001. Genetic engineering approaches to improve the bioavailability and the level of iron in rice grains.,102(2): 392–397.

    Ma J K C, Drossard J, Lewis D, Altmann F, Boyle J, Christou P, Cole T, Dale P, van Dolleweerd C J, Isitt V, Katinger D, Lobedan M, Mertens H, Paul M J, Rademacher T, Sack M, Hundleby P A C, Stiegler G, Stoger E, Twyman R M, Vcelar B, Fischer R. 2015. Regulatory approval and a first-in-human phase I clinical trial of a monoclonal antibody produced in transgenic tobacco plants.,13(8): 1106–1120.

    Mafakheri H, Taghavi S M, Banihashemi Z, Osdaghi E,Lamichhane J R. 2017. Pathogenicity, host range and phylogenetic position ofspecies associated with sugar beet crown gall outbreaks in Southern Iran.,147(3): 721–730.

    Manimaran P, Kumar G R, Reddy M R, Jain S, Rao T B, Mangrauthia S K, Sundaram R M, Ravichandran S, Balachandran S M. 2013. Infection of early and young callus tissues ofrice BPT5204 enhances regeneration and transformation efficiency.,20(6): 415–426.

    Mann D G J, LaFayette P R, Abercrombie L L, King Z R, Mazarei M, Halter M C, Poovaiah C R, Baxter H, Shen H, Dixon R A, Parrott W A, Neal Stewart Jr C. 2012. Gateway-compatible vectors for high-throughput gene functional analysis in switchgrass (L.) and other monocot species.,10(2): 226–236.

    Martins P K, Ribeiro AP, da Cunha B A D B, Kobayashi A K, Molinari H B C. 2015. A simple and highly efficient-mediated transformation protocol for.,6: 41–44.

    Matzke M A, Matzke A J. 1995. How and why do plants inactivate homologous (trans) genes?,107(3): 679–685.

    Mohanty A, Sarma N P, Tyagi A K. 1999.-mediated high frequency transformation of an eliterice variety Pusa Basmati 1 and transmission of the transgenes to R2progeny.,147(2): 127–137.

    Mulwa R M S, Norton M A, Farrand S K, Skirvin R M. 2015.-mediated transformation and regeneration of transgenicChancellorwine grape plants expressing thegene.,46(3): 110–115.

    Opabode J T. 2006.-mediated transformation of plants: Emerging factors that influence efficiency.,1(1): 12–20.

    Ou-Lee TM, Turgeon R, Wu R. 1986. Expression of a foreign gene linked to either a plant-virus or a Drosophila promoter, after electroporation of protoplasts of rice, wheat, and sorghum.,83(18): 6815–6819.

    Ozawa K, Wakasa Y, Ogo Y, Matsuo K, Kawahigashi H, Takaiwa F. 2012. Development of an efficient-mediated gene targeting system for rice and analysis of rice knockouts lacking granule-bound starch synthase (Waxy) and β1, 2-xylosyltransferase.,53(4): 755–761.

    Park S Y, Vaghchhipawala Z, Vasudevan B, Lee LY, Shen Y, Singer K, Waterworth W M, Zhang Z J, West C E, Mysore K S, Gelvin S B. 2015.T-DNA integration into the plant genome can occur without the activity of key non-homologous end-joining proteins.,81(6): 934–946.

    Pathi K M, Tula S, Huda K M K, SrivastavaV K, Tuteja N. 2013. An efficient and rapid regeneration via multiple shoot induction from mature seed derived embryogenic and organogenic callus of Indian maize (L.).,8(10): e25891.

    Prasad K, Kushalappa K, Vijayraghavan U. 2003. Mechanism underlying regulated expression of RFL, a conserved transcription factor, in the developing rice inflorescence.,120(4): 491–502.

    Purwestri Y A, Sari R D K, Anggraeni L N, Sasongko A B. 2015.mediated transformation of rolC:: Hd3a-GFP in black rice (L. cv. Cempo Ireng) to promote early flowering.,14: 469–473.

    Rahman Z A, Seman Z A, Basirun N, Julkifle A L, Zainal Z,Subramaniam S. 2011. Preliminary investigations of-mediated transformation inrice MR219 embryogenic callus usinggene.,10: 7805–7813.

    Rao K V, Rathore K S, Hodges T K, Fu X, Stoger E, Sudhakar D, Williams S, Christou P, Bharathi M, Bown D P, Powell K S, Spence J, Gatehouse A M R, Gatehouse J A. 1998. Expression of snowdrop lectin (GNA) in transgenic rice plants confers resistance to rice brown planthopper.,15(4): 469–477.

    Rashid B, Tariq M, Khalid A, Shams F, Ali Q, AshrafF, Ghaffar I, Khan M I, Rehman R, Husnain T. 2017. Crop improvement: New approaches and modern techniques.,8(3): 18–30.

    Rathus C, Bower R, Birch R G. 1993. Effects of promoter, intron and enhancer elements on transient gene expression in sugar-cane and carrot protoplasts.,23(3): 613–618.

    Ravikumar G, Manimaran P, Voleti S R, Subrahmanyam D, Sundaram R M, Bansal K C, Viraktamath B C, Balachandran S M. 2014. Stress-inducible expression oftranscription factor greatly improves drought stress tolerance in transgenicrice.,23(3): 421–439.

    Reddy S S S, Singh B, Peter A J, Rao T V. 2018. Production of transgenic local rice cultivars (L.) for improved drought tolerance usingmediated transformation.,25(8): 1535–1545.

    Reddy S S S, Singh B, Peter A J, Rao T V. 2019. Genetic transformation ofrice varieties involvinggene for improved abiotic stress tolerance., 26(2): 294–300.

    Sack M, Hofbauer A, Fischer R, Stoger E. 2015. The increasing value of plant-made proteins.,32: 163–170.

    Saharan V, Yadav R C, Yadav N R, Ram K. 2004. Studies on improved-mediated transformation in tworice (L.).,3(11): 572–575.

    Sahoo K K, Tripathi A K, Pareek A, Sopory S K, Singla-Pareek S L. 2011. An improved protocol for efficient transformation and regeneration of diverserice cultivars.,7: 49.

    Sahoo R K, Tuteja N. 2012. Development of-mediated transformation technology for mature seed-derived callus tissues ofrice cultivar IR64.,3(2): 123–128.

    Saidu H, Mohammed S. 2013. Plant response to abiotic stresses: From the perspectives of gene expression.,8(9):81–91.

    Saika H, Toki S. 2010. Mature seed-derived callus of the modelrice variety Kasalath is highly competent in-mediated transformation., 29(12): 1351–1364.

    Sarangi S, Ghosh J, Bora A, Das S, Mandal A B. 2011.-mediated genetic transformation ofrice varieties involving Am-SOD gene.,10(1): 9–18.

    Schoonbeek H J, Wang H H, Stefanato F L, Craze M, BowdenS, Wallington E, Zipfel C, Ridout C J. 2015.EF-Tu receptor enhances bacterial disease resistance in transgenic wheat.,206(2): 606–613.

    Shi J, Gao H, Wang H, Lafitte H R, Archibald R L, Yang M, Hakimi S M, Mo H, Habben J E. 2017. ARGOS8 variants generated by CRISPR-Cas9 improve maize grain yield under field drought stress conditions.,15(2): 207–216.

    Shrawat A K, L?rz H. 2006.-mediated transformation of cereals: A promising approach crossing barriers.,4(6): 575–603.

    Snell K D, Peoples OP. 2009. PHA bioplastic: A value-added coproduct for biomass biorefineries.,3(4): 456–467.

    Sood P, Bhattacharya A, Sood A. 2011. Problems and possibilities of monocot transformation.,55(1): 1–15.

    Streatfield S J. 2007. Approaches to achieve high-level heterologous protein production in plants.,5(1): 2–15.

    Svitashev S, Young J K, Schwartz C, Gao H R, Falco S C, Cigan A M. 2015. Targeted mutagenesis, precise gene editing and site-specific gene insertion in maize using Cas9 and guide RNA.,169: 931–945.

    Tabashnik B E, Gassmann A J, Crowder D W, Carriére Y. 2008. Insect resistance to Bt crops: Evidence versus theory.,26(2): 199–202.

    Tan L W, Rahman Z A, Goh HH, Hwang DJ, Ismail I, Zainal Z. 2017. Production of transgenic rice (cv. MR219) overexpressinggene through-mediated transformation.,46(5): 703–711.

    Thirumurugan T, Ito Y, Kubo T, Serizawa A, Kurata N. 2008. Identification, characterization and interaction of HAP family genes in rice.,279(3): 279–289.

    Tie W W, Zhou F, Wang L, Xie W B, Chen H, Li X H, Lin Y J. 2012. Reasons for lower transformation efficiency inrice using-mediated transformation: Lessons from transformation assays and genome-wide expression profiling.,78: 1–18.

    Toriyama K, Arimoto Y, Uchimiya H, Hinata K. 1988. Transgenic rice plants after direct gene transfer into protoplasts.,6(9): 1072–1074.

    Tripathi R, Bisht H, Singh R. 2010. Effect of acetosyringone and callus age on transformation for scutellum-derived callus of rice.,1(4): 163–170.

    Tzfira T, Li J, Lacroix B, Citovsky V. 2004.T-DNA integration: Molecules and models.,20(8): 375–383.

    Tzfira T, Citovsky V. 2006.-mediated genetic transformation of plants: Biology and biotechnology.,17(2): 147–154.

    Ullah H, Ullah I, Jadoon S A, Rashid H. 2007. Tissue culture techniques for callus induction in rice.,23(1): 81–86.

    Uzé M, Potrykus I, Sautter C. 2000. Factors influencing T-DNA transfer fromto precultured immature wheat embryos (L.).,28(2): 17–23.

    Vain P. 2007. Thirty years of plant transformation technology development.,5(2): 221–229.

    van der Graaff E, den Dulk-Ras A, Hooykaas P J J. 1996. Deviating T-DNA transfer fromto plants.,31(3): 677–681.

    Veluthambi K, Gupta A K, Sharma A. 2003. The current status of plant transformation technologies.,84(3): 368–380.

    Vogel J. 2008. Unique aspects of the grass cell wall.,11(3): 301–307.

    Wang C G, Hu Z L, Lei A P, Jin B H. 2010. Biosynthesis of poly-3-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) in the transgenic green alga.,46(2): 396–402.

    Wendt T, Doohan F, Mullins E.2012. Production of-resistant potato () utilisingOV14.,21(3): 567–578.

    Wright M, Dawson J, Dunder E, Suttie J, Reed J, Kramer C, Chang Y, Novitzky R, Wang H, Artim-Moore L. 2001. Efficient biolistic transformation of maize (L.) and wheat (L.) using the phosphomannose isomerase gene,, as the selectable marker.,20(5): 429–436.

    Wright T R, Shan G, Walsh T A, Lira J M, Cui C, Song P, Zhuang M, Arnold NL, Lin G, Yau K, Russell S M, Clcchillo R M, Peterson M A, Simpson D M, Zhou N, Ponsamuel J, Zhang Z. 2010. Robust crop resistance to broadleaf and grass herbicides provided by aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase transgenes.,107: 20240–20245.

    Xing SC, Li F, Guo QF, Liu DR, Zhao XX, Wang W. 2009. The involvement of an expansin genefrom wheat in regulating plant cell growth.,53(3): 429–434.

    Xu R F, Qin R Y, Li H, Li D D, Li L, Wei P C, Yang J B. 2017. Generation of targeted mutant rice using a CRISPR-Cpf1 system.,15(6): 713–717.

    Xue W Y, Xing Y Z, Weng X Y, Zhao Y, Tang W J, Wang L, Zhou H J, Yu S B, Xu C G, Li X H, Zhang Q F. 2008. Natural variation inis an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice.,40(6): 761–767.

    Yang Y, Peng Q, Chen GX, Li XH, Wu CY. 2013.is involved in circadian clock regulation for promoting flowering under long-day conditions in rice.,6(1): 202–215.

    Yao JL, Cohen D, Atkinson R, Richardson K, Morris B. 1995. Regeneration of transgenic plants from the commercial apple cultivar Royal Gala.,14(7): 407–412.

    Yaqoob U, Kaul T, Nawchoo I A. 2017. Development of an efficient protocol formediated transformation of some recalcitrantrice varieties.,22(3): 346–353.

    Yookongkaew N, Srivatanakul M, Narangajavana J. 2007. Development of genotype-independent regeneration system for transformation of rice (ssp.).,120(2): 237–245.

    Yoon D H, Lee S S, Park H J, Lyu J I, Chong W S, Liu J R, Kim BG, Ahn J C, Cho H S. 2015. Overexpression ofincreases tolerance to cold stress and enhances grain yield in rice ().,67(1): 69–82.

    Zaidi M A, Narayanan M, Sardana R, Taga I, Postel S, Johns R, McNulty M, Mottiar Y, Mao J, Loit E, Altosaar I. 2006. Optimizing tissue culture media for efficient transformation of differentrice genotypes.,4(2): 563–575.

    Zhang H M, Yang H, Rech E L, Golds T J, Davis A S, Mulligan B J, Cocking E C, Davey M R. 1988. Transgenic rice plants produced by electroporation-mediated plasmid uptake into protoplasts.,7(6): 379–384.

    Zhang HX, Blumwald E. 2001. Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit.,19(8): 765–768.

    Zhao J, Chen H Y, Ren D, Tang H W, Qiu R, Feng J L, Long Y M, Niu B X, Chen D P, Zhong T Y, Liu Y G, Guo J X. 2015. Genetic interactions between diverged alleles of() and()/() control differential heading and contribute to regional adaptation in rice ()., 208(3): 936–948.

    Zhao W N, Zheng S S, Ling HQ. 2011. An efficient regeneration system and-mediated transformation of Chinese upland rice cultivar Handao297.,,106: 475.

    Zhu YJ, Fan YY, Wang K, Huang DR, Liu WZ, Ying JZ, Zhuang JY. 2017. Rice flowering locusplays an important role in heading date influencing yield traits in rice.,7: 4918.

    Ziemienowicz A. 2014.-mediated plant transformation: Factors, applications and recent advances.,3(4): 95–102.

    Zuniga-Soto E, Mullins E, Dedicova B. 2015. Ensifer-mediated transformation: An efficient non-protocol for the genetic modification of rice.,4: 600.

    Copyright ? 2019, China National Rice Research Institute. Hosting by Elsevier B V

    This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

    Peer review under responsibility of China National Rice Research Institute

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2019.04.001

    15 May 2018;

    10 September 2018

    Zaidah Rahmat (zaidahrahmat@utm.my)

    (Managing Editor: Li Guan)

    不卡一级毛片| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 精品一区二区三卡| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 老司机福利观看| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 在线观看www视频免费| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产亚洲欧美98| 在线国产一区二区在线| 精品电影一区二区在线| 91成年电影在线观看| av福利片在线| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 免费高清视频大片| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 国产精品久久视频播放| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 高清av免费在线| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 午夜91福利影院| av免费在线观看网站| 色在线成人网| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 一级片'在线观看视频| 色综合婷婷激情| 不卡av一区二区三区| 18禁观看日本| 天天影视国产精品| 午夜福利欧美成人| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 天堂动漫精品| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 三级毛片av免费| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 少妇 在线观看| 日本 av在线| 69av精品久久久久久| 一级片'在线观看视频| 高清欧美精品videossex| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 久久影院123| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 美女福利国产在线| 免费少妇av软件| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 久久影院123| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | av中文乱码字幕在线| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 男人舔女人的私密视频| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 91大片在线观看| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 在线永久观看黄色视频| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 色在线成人网| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 99久久人妻综合| 日本免费a在线| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 国产成人欧美| av有码第一页| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 免费av毛片视频| 亚洲人成电影观看| 久久青草综合色| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 操美女的视频在线观看| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 欧美午夜高清在线| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 99久久国产精品久久久| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 国产亚洲欧美98| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| av网站在线播放免费| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 久久青草综合色| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 国产成人影院久久av| 久久青草综合色| 91成人精品电影| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 成人精品一区二区免费| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 一区在线观看完整版| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 黄色视频不卡| 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 天天添夜夜摸| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 亚洲五月天丁香| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 99久久国产精品久久久| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 午夜老司机福利片| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 人人澡人人妻人| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 1024视频免费在线观看| 看片在线看免费视频| 欧美在线黄色| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 少妇 在线观看| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 日本免费a在线| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 999精品在线视频| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 91国产中文字幕| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 亚洲精品一二三| 很黄的视频免费| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 国产av一区二区精品久久| 一进一出抽搐动态| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 欧美乱妇无乱码| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲第一青青草原| 香蕉国产在线看| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 国产亚洲欧美98| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 亚洲激情在线av| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜 | 丝袜美足系列| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 国产精品永久免费网站| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 亚洲精品在线美女| 日韩高清综合在线| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 久久香蕉国产精品| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 午夜福利,免费看| 午夜久久久在线观看| av天堂在线播放| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 级片在线观看| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 成人18禁在线播放| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久久国产一区二区| 免费看a级黄色片| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| cao死你这个sao货| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 久久性视频一级片| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 又大又爽又粗| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 欧美日韩精品网址| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 免费在线观看日本一区| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 午夜福利欧美成人| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 在线视频色国产色| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 精品久久久久久电影网| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 日韩免费av在线播放| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 久久久久国内视频| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产精品 国内视频| a级毛片黄视频| 一夜夜www| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 香蕉丝袜av| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| bbb黄色大片| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 大码成人一级视频| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 精品人妻在线不人妻| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 怎么达到女性高潮| 久久香蕉国产精品| netflix在线观看网站| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 91精品三级在线观看| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 久久久久久大精品| av电影中文网址| 免费观看人在逋| 高清欧美精品videossex| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 国产在线观看jvid| 两性夫妻黄色片| www日本在线高清视频| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 日韩欧美在线二视频| av在线播放免费不卡| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| www.999成人在线观看| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 日韩有码中文字幕| 午夜视频精品福利| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 成人免费观看视频高清| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 又大又爽又粗| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 女警被强在线播放| 色在线成人网| 夫妻午夜视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产精品野战在线观看 | 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 国产色视频综合| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 日韩有码中文字幕| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 两个人看的免费小视频| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 看黄色毛片网站| 极品教师在线免费播放| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 91国产中文字幕| ponron亚洲| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 搡老岳熟女国产| svipshipincom国产片| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 亚洲九九香蕉| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产精品影院久久| 校园春色视频在线观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 久久 成人 亚洲| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 中国美女看黄片| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 午夜a级毛片| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 满18在线观看网站| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av | 91成人精品电影| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 久久中文看片网| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久久中文字幕一级| 一级黄色大片毛片| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产在线观看jvid| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 操美女的视频在线观看| 久热这里只有精品99| 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 咕卡用的链子| 1024视频免费在线观看| 亚洲 国产 在线| 大码成人一级视频| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 中文字幕色久视频| 宅男免费午夜| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 麻豆av在线久日| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 1024香蕉在线观看| 色播在线永久视频| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 电影成人av| 午夜视频精品福利| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 超色免费av| 精品人妻1区二区| 国产精品永久免费网站| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 搡老岳熟女国产| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 国产免费男女视频| 香蕉国产在线看| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 美国免费a级毛片| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 超碰成人久久| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 悠悠久久av| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 国产精品成人在线| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲中文av在线| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 黄频高清免费视频| 久久香蕉精品热| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 大香蕉久久成人网| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 怎么达到女性高潮| cao死你这个sao货| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 一级片免费观看大全| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 国产三级黄色录像| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 精品久久久久久电影网| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 色综合婷婷激情| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 亚洲激情在线av| 国产免费男女视频| 在线观看日韩欧美| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 国产1区2区3区精品| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 怎么达到女性高潮| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 最好的美女福利视频网| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 黄片播放在线免费| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 久久影院123| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 91字幕亚洲| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 久久99一区二区三区| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 69av精品久久久久久| 精品人妻1区二区| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产精品 国内视频| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 两个人看的免费小视频| 欧美在线一区亚洲| av中文乱码字幕在线| 免费在线观看日本一区| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产野战对白在线观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 99re在线观看精品视频| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 香蕉国产在线看| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产精品久久久久成人av|