• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Morphological diversity and correlation analysis of phenotypes and quality traits of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) core collections

    2019-05-10 06:13:32ZHANGDazhongRabiaBegumPanhwarLlUJiajiaGONGXiangweiLlANGJibaoLlUMinxuanLUPingGAOXiaoliFENGBaili
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2019年5期

    ZHANG Da-zhong , Rabia Begum Panhwar, LlU Jia-jia, GONG Xiang-wei, LlANG Ji-bao , LlU Minxuan, LU Ping , GAO Xiao-li, FENG Bai-li

    1 College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, P.R.China

    2 Agricultural Technology Promotion Center of Shenmu City, Shenmu 719000, P.R.China

    3 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.China

    Abstract Genetic diversity and comprehensive performance are the basis for the discovery and eff icient use of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) core collections. In this study, 386 proso millet core collections were used as materials to observe inf lorescence color, leaf phase, inf lorescence density, axis shape, branched spike length, panicle type, trichome, measured area of the top3 leaves, and chlorophyll content of the top3 leaves at f illing stage. These core collections were also used to record growth period, plant height, diameter of main stem, plant tiller number, branch number, panicle length, panicle number per plant, and panicle weight per plant at the maturation stage. Starch, fat, protein, and yellow pigment contents in the grain and 1 000-seed weight were also measured after harvest. Then, quantitative traits were used for diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of each collection. Correlations between all traits were also analyzed. Results showed that among the 8 quality traits, the Shannon index (H′) of hull color was the highest (1.588) followed by the H′ of inf lorescence density (0.984). However, inf lorescence color and axis shape were lower. The H′ of 16 quantitative traits were signif icantly higher than the quality traits with the following traits having the highest indices: fat content (2.092), 1 000-seed weight (2.073), top3 leaves area (2.070), main stem diameter (2.056), and plant height (2.052). Furthermore, all other traits had a diversity higher than 1.900. After a comprehensive evaluation of phenotypic traits, plant height, diameter of main stem, plant tiller number, leaf area of top3 leaves, and 1 000-seed weight were the biggest contributors to the principal components. Six high-fat and high-protein cultivars, including Nuoshu, A75-2, Zhiduoaosizhi, Panlonghuangmi, Xiaobaishu, and Xiaohongshu were also screened. Correlations between the quantitative traits were signif icant, including the correlation between quality traits and quantitative traits. In conclusion, the core collections can be used as basis for discriminating among proso millet cultivars based on related traits and for further studies on millet with rich genetic diversity, good representation, and signif icant collection between traits.

    Keywords: proso millet, phenotypic traits, quality, diversity, correlation, evaluation

    1. lntroduction

    Proso millet is one of the earliest cultivated crops in China with a short seed-to-seed cycle, and low requirements for water and fertilizer. It plays an important role in the Chinese diet and culture (Magness et al. 1971; Chen 1986). The cultivated acreage of proso millet is about 600 000 ha in China and is mainly distributed in the area along the Great Wall (Lin et al. 2002), indicating that proso millet is an important crop in arid and semiarid areas. Extensive geographical distribution and long-term domestication have led to a rich and varied germplasm resource of proso millet (Wang R Y et al. 2016). Currently, China, Russia, Ukraine, and other countries have collected and conserved more than 24 000 copies of proso millet germplasms with more than 8 700 copies being collected and preserved by China (Chai and Feng 2012). Research and comprehensive evaluation of agronomic and quality traits, richness, and diversity of genes, and correlations between these traits of the germplasms are not only conducive to conservation and further research of high quality germplasms but are also important for its genetic improvement. In the process of core collection and diversity assessment, Hu et al. (2012) evaluated rice core germplasms with genetic diversity index, standard deviation, frequency distribution, and variation coeff icient of phenotype. Liu et al. (2006) analyzed the diversity of mungbean (Vigna radiata) resources by calculating the distribution frequency of quality traits and the maximum, minimum, and mean values, standard deviation, and variation coeff icient of the quantitative traits. Hu et al. (2008) also used a similar method in proso millet.

    In recent years, the study of proso millet core collections has gradually increased, with studies mainly focused on phenotypic traits (Upadhyaya et al. 2011; Dikshit and Sivaraj 2013), quality traits (Wen et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2017), drought and salt resistance (Wang et al. 2007, 2015; Liu et al. 2015; He et al. 2016), and lodging, disease, and insect resistance (Wang et al. 2008; Wang L 2016). Studies at the molecular level increased rapidly (Hu et al. 2009; Hunt et al. 2011). Wang L et al. (2005), Upadhyaya et al. (2011), and Dikshit and Sivaraj (2013) analyzed the phenotypic and quality traits of core collections including 7-8 agronomic traits, such as growth period and plant height, which contribute greatly to variation, and then screened a number of high-quality resources. Wen et al. (2014) and Wang et al. (2017) measured protein, fat, and lysine contents in grains and other quality traits of more than 6 000 resources. Afterwards, they screened out 342 high-quality copies. Wang (2015) and He (2016) identif ied drought resistance of more than 500 resources and screened out 11 Grade I drought-resistant copies. Wang et al. (2007) and Liu et al. (2015) identif ied salt tolerance of over 6 000 proso millet resources and screened 22 salt-tolerant and 3 phosphite salt-tolerant copies. Wang L et al. (2016) screened out 71 resources with lodging-resistance from 1 192 varieties. Wang et al. (2008) identif ied resistance to head smut of more than 6 000 copies by investigating incidence and determining activity of defensive enzymes. Hu et al. (2009), Harriet et al. (2011), and Rajput and Santra (2016) analyzed the genetic diversity of proso millet using SSR markers.

    In summary, there are many reports on phenotypic diversity of proso millet core collections, but few studies on quality traits, especially on the relationships among the traits. In this study, 386 core germplasms were used to analyze the genetic diversity and the correlations between the traits by analyzing diversity of phenotypic traits, principal component analysis, and comprehensive evaluation of phenotypes, which is of great importance for the innovation, use, and genetic improvement of the core germplasms.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Germplasms and experimental condition

    A total of 386 core collections (Appendix A) were used as materials, including landraces and cultivars, of which 377 germplasms came from China and 9 germplasms came from foreign countries. All germplasms were provided by the Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences who constructed a primary core germplasm using the morphological indicator data recorded in the proso millet database and then used SSR molecular markers to analyze and construct the proso millet core collection. The study was conducted in Zhaojiagou Dryland Agricultural Demonstration Garden (110.53°E, 38.76°N), Shenmu City, Shaanxi Province, China. The plot size was 12 m2(4 m×3 m) and all plants were sown on June 8, 2016.

    2.2. Determination of phenotypic traits

    During each growth stage, the growing period, inf lorescence color, leaf phase, inf lorescence density, axis shape, branched spike length, panicle type, and trichome were recorded. At the f illing stage, the top3 leaves area (leaf length×leaf width×0.75) was measured with a ruler, and the chlorophyll contents were measured with a chlorophyll meter (SPAD-502Plus, Japan). Five plants were randomly selected from each variety to measure plant height, diameter of the main stem, plant tiller number, branch number, panicle length, panicle number per plant, and panicle weight per plant at maturity stage. After harvesting, seed color was observed, and 1 000-seed weight was measured. The quality traits were described according to the Descriptors and Data Standards for Broomcorn Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) (Wang and Wang 2006).

    2.3. Determination of quality traits

    Fat content determination was conducted based on GB/T 5512-2008 (2008). Starch content was determined using the dual wavelength method with a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Blue Star B, LabTech, China). Protein content was assayed by the Kjeldahl method with an automatic Kjeldahl apparatus (K9860, Hanon, China). Flavochrome content determination was conducted based on the ApproVed Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists (AACC) (Hentschel et al. 2002).

    2.4. Data analysis

    Excel 2007 and SPSS 22.0 were used to analyze data and cartography.

    3. Results

    3.1. Analysis of genetic diversity

    Core germplasm resources of proso millet showed abundant genetic diversity in phenotypic (Fig. 1) and grain traits (Fig. 2). From the perspective of ear type, the f irst 6 of the 16 genotypes shown in Fig. 1 are the scattered type, the 5 in the middle are the compact type, and the last 5 are the lateral type. The resources have numerous, clear differences in plant height, spike type, stem diameter, tiller number, and branch number. The grains also show rich diversity in terms of color, size, and shape (Fig. 2).

    Table 1 lists the Shannon indices (H′) of 24 major traits of proso millet resources, including 8 quality traits and 16 quantitative traits. The highest H′ of quality traits was for hull color (1.588), followed by inf lorescence density (0.984); those of inf lorescence color (0.590) and axis shape (0.580) were lower. H′ of 16 quantitative traits were signif icantly higher than quality traits, of which the highest were fat content (2.092), 1 000-seed weight (2.073), top3 leaves area (2.070), main stem diameter (2.056), plant height (2.052), and starch content (2.053).

    Diversity of quality traitsThere are signif icant differences in the frequency distribution of different phenotypic and quality traits (Fig. 3). For the 386 genotypes, hull color is mostly yellow (30.3%) and red (24.9%). In terms of inf lorescence density, the osculant type amounts to 62.2% of the total amounts, while the compact type is only 1.8%. As for the leaf phase, the proportion of drooping type, osculant type, and up turned type is 68.4, 24.9, and 6.7%, respectively. Majority of the corn collections have a bent spike principal axis (78.2%) and few are erect (1.6%). The branched spike length is mainly long type (51.6%) and osculant type (40.7%), while the short type was only 7.8%. Osculant type (48.7%) and dense type (47.7%) are main types of trichome. The lateral panicle accounts for a vast majority (76.9%), but the scattered and compact type has a proportion of only 19.4 and 3.6%, respectively. About 3/4 of the corn collections are green inf lorescence, thus 1/4 are purple ones.

    Diversity of quantitative traitsAs shown in Table 2,variation amplitude of growing period was 51 to 107 days with an average of 85.7 days; variation coeff icient was 13.51%, and the shortest was only 47% of the longest growing period. Variation amplitude of plant height was 63.6 to 174.9 cm, and 80% of the height among the corn collection was between 102.5 to 154.8 cm. Variation coeff icient of stem diameter was 14.62%, and the variation amplitude was 2.5 to 8.8 mm with an average of 6.3 mm. Stem node numbers were 3.7 to 9.1 with an average of 7.5, and most germplasms are 6-8 knots. As the variation amplitude was from 0 to 6.8, variation coeff icient of tiller number is higher (43.35%) with an average of 2.33. Variation coeff icient of branch number is the highest (69.23%) with an average of 16.3, while some corn collections had no branch. The variation coeff icient of panicle number per plant was also high (46.12%), where the spike length range was from 12.8 to 48.5 cm with an average of 34.78 cm. Thus, the longest ones are nearly 4 times the shortest ones. The variation coeff icient of panicle weight per plant was 45.97%, and the variation amplitude was 4.43 to 96.38 g with a difference of nearly 22 times between the extremums. 1 000-seed weight was between 3.96 to 9.71 g, and the most was between 5.7 and 8.6 g. In terms of the top3 leaf area, the biggest (317.76 cm2) was nearly 8 times the smallest (39.94 cm2). The top3 leaf chlorophyll content variation was only 7.41%. As for quality traits, variation coeff icient of starch content was the smallest (only 1.83%), but the variation coeff icient was relatively high (24.28%). Content of fat ranged from 1.10 to 4.70%, and the variation amplitude was between 10.20 to 16.10%. Flavochrome content ranged from 5.05 to 18.86 mg kg-1with an average of 13.78 mg kg-1.

    Fig. 1 The rich agronomic characters of proso millet germplasm resources. Scattered type: (1) Maimizi, (2) Huami, (3) Bendimizi, (4) Minlehongmizi, (5) 6, (6) Guanghehuangmi. Compact type: (7) Bamenghuangshuzi, (8) 2048, (9) Gaoliangshu, (10) 2096, (11) Mi. Lateral type: (12) Bairuanshu, (13) Xiaomaimizi, (14) Heiruanmi, (15) 790051 (India), (16) Yumi 2.

    Fig. 2 The rich grain color of proso millet germplasm resources.

    Table 1 The Shannon index (H′) of proso millet germplasm resources

    Fig. 3 The distribution frequency of each phenotype in quality traits. Hull color: a, gray; b, multiple; c, white; d, brown; e, red; f, yellow. Inf lorescence density: a, dense; b, sparse; c, slightly dense; d, osculant. Leaf phase: a, upturned; b, osculant; c, drooping. Axis shape: a, erect; b, slightly curved; c, bent. Panicle branch length: a, short; b, osculant; c, long. Trichome: a, sparse; b, dense; c, osculant. Panicle type: a, compact type; b, scattered type; c, lateral type. Inf lorescence color: a, purple; b, green.

    3.2. Phenotype evaluation

    Princ ip al c omp onent analysis and evaluation of phenotypic traitsPrincipal component analysis was used to evaluate the genotypes of phenotypic traits. Results (Table 3) show that the cumulative contribution rate of the f irst 4 principal components is 81.26%, indicating that these principal components contain the most genetic information of the phenotypic traits and can be used for comprehensive evaluation of core collections. The contribution rate of the f irst principal component was 37.52%, and the power vector of plant height, top3 leaf area, and stem diameter were greater than for other characters, indicating that the f irst principal component consisted of these 3 characters. Contribution rate of the second principal component was 18.81%, and the power vectors of stem node number and 1 000-grain weight were the largest. Moreover, the power vector of the panicle number per plant was the highest in the third principal component, showing that the third principal component was a comprehensive response of panicle number. Contribution of the 4th principal component was 10.69%, of which the panicle length was signif icantly higher than the other coeff icients. This means that panicle length had the largest contribution to the 4th principal component.The composite score (F) was calculated for each germplasm based on standardized values of 10 phenotypic traits, normalized scores of the 4 principal components, and the calculated principal component weighting coeff icients (0.461, 0.232, 0.175, 0.132). Higher F values indicate more comprehensive phenotypes. Among the 386 germplasms, the best 10 germplasms came from Shaanxi Province, including Hongruanmi, Bairuanmi, Hongyingmi, Hongmizi, Huangmizi (shu), Huangmizi, Dahongpao, Zigaitouhuangmi, Heiruanmi (shu), and Baiyingmi. The worst 10 were from Heilongjiang and Inner Mongolia, including Balinzuogedashu, Xiaobaishu, Huangmizi, 2096, Anchunwei, Yimengliang 56-2, Baimizi, Jan-55, Eheitou, and Maimizi.

    Evaluation of quality traitsAmong 386 germplasms,217 were non-waxy germplasms and 169 were waxy germplasms. The content of amylose was between 1.57 and 45.61%, of which Neimi 5 was the highest and Zhengninghongnian was the lowest. The average content of grain protein was 12.3%, and amplitude was 10.2 to 16.1%, of which 19 germplasms are above 14%, including Noushu, Helanerhuang, 2048, Maimizi, Heimizi, Bamenghuangshuzi, 6, A75-2, Anchunwei, Aoduoaosizhi, Dahuangmi, Linghehongnianmi, 15, Panlonghuangmi, Xiaobaishu, Yemizi, Xiaohongshu, Hongmizi, and Nianfeng 5. The amplitude of fat content was 1.1 to 4.7% with an average content of 3.1%, and 61 genotypes were higher than 4%. Above all, there were 6 germplasms with both high protein (more than 14%) and high fat content (more than 4%), including Nuoshu, A75-2, Aoduoaosizhi, Panlonghuangmi, Xiaobaishu, and Xiaohongshu. Average of f lavochrome content was 13.78 mg kg-1, and the amplitude was 5.05 to 18.68 mg kg-1. Hejianbaishuzi, Liaomi 56, Gumi 21, Hongruanmi, Bairuanmi, and Xiaotoumi had a content of f lavochrome above 18 mg kg-1.

    Table 2 The variation distribution of quantitative traits

    Table 3 Power vector (PV), eigenvalues (E), contribution rate (CR), and cumulative contribution rate (CCR) of the f irst 4 principal components based on 10 phenotypic traits

    3.3. Correlations between traits

    Table 4 shows the correlations between the 5 major and 13 representative quantitative traits. The ways to describe the correlation of quality and quantitative traits are different, so 3 categories were created: correlation between quantitative traits, correlation between quality traits, and correlation between quality and quantitative traits. Correlation between the quality traits was not signif icant, except that leaf phase and spike branch length were signif icantly correlated. Therefore, the following sections only describe the correlations between quantitative traits and correlations between quality and quantitative traits.

    Correlation between quantitative traitsAs seen in Table 4, growing period and plant height, stem node number, panicle length, panicle weight per plant, 1 000-seed weight, top3 leaves area, grain protein, and starch content had highly signif icant correlations. Plant height, stem node number, panicle length, branch length, panicle weight, 1 000-seed weight, and top3 leaves area were all positively correlated with growing period, while grain protein content and number of panicle per plant were negatively correlated with growing period. Correlations between top3 leaves chlorophyll, fat, and f lavochrome contents were not signif icant. Plant height had signif icantly positive correlations with stem node number, panicle length, panicle weight, top3 leaves area, and 1 000-seed weight. Remarkably, plant height had a negative correlation with panicle number and grain protein content, and no signif icant correlation with top3 leaves chlorophyll, fat, starch, or f lavochrome contents. There were clear, negative correlations between stem node and panicle number per plant and top3 leaves chlorophyll and protein content. A signif icant positive correlation between panicle weight and top3 leaves area was also seen. There was a positive correlation between 1 000-seed weight and starch content, but it was not signif icant. Spike length had signif icantly positive correlations with panicle weight, top3 leaves area, and 1 000-seed weight but was not correlated with panicle number, top3 leaves chlorophyll content, or quality traits. In terms of panicle number per plant, remarkable positive correlations were seen with panicle weight, top3 leaves chlorophyll, and protein content, all of which were signif icant, and there was a clear and negative correlation with top3 leaves area and 1 000-seed weight. Panicle weight per plant was signif icantly and positively correlated with top3 leaves chlorophyll content, top3 leaves area, starch content, and 1 000-seed weight, but negatively correlated with grain protein content. Chlorophyll content was signif icantly and positively correlated with top3 leaves area and grain protein content, and signif icantly negatively correlated with starch content. Compared to protein content, starch content and 1 000-seed weight were signif icantly positively correlated with top3 leaves area. A signif icant positive correlation between grain fat and protein content was also seen, and both had obvious negative correlations with other quality traits. Starch content was signif icantly and positively correlated with 1 000-seed weight and f lavochrome content. Flavochrome content and 1 000-seed weight also had a signif icant positive correlation.

    Correlation between quality traits and quantitative traitsAs shown in Table 4, 4 quality traits, including leaf phase, hull color, inf lorescence color, and panicle type, had highly signif icant correlations with many quantitative traits. The following is the detailed analysis of correlations between the quality and quantitative traits.

    Different frequency distributions of the quantitative traits were seen for 3 leaf phase genotypes (Fig. 4). As shown in Fig. 4-A, the growth period of the drooping type was longer than that of the osculant and upturned types with the upturned type having the shortest growth period with an average of 76.5 days, shorter than the dropping type by 12.2 days. Top3 leaves area of the dropping type was 30% higher than that of the upturned type with an average of 205 cm2(Fig. 4-B). Grain protein and top3 leaves chlorophyll content of drooping and osculant genotypes were higher than that of the upturned type (Fig. 4-C and D). The dropping germplasms have the highest 1 000-seed weight and f lavochrome content with 1 000-seed weight being 20% higher than in the upturned type (Fig. 4-E and F).

    The red genotypes had the highest 1 000-seed weight (Fig. 5) with an average of 7.61 g and amplitude of 4.64 to 9.50 g, followed by the gray type between 4.75 and 8.83 g with an average of 7.42 g. Other genotypes are as follows: brown (amplitude of 4.80 to 8.94 g with an average of 7.11 g), yellow, and multi colored (amplitude of 4.31 to 9.52 g with an average of 6.88 g). As shown in Fig. 5-B, f lavochrome content was also the highest in red seeds with an average of 14.5 mg kg-1, followed by gray, brown, yellow, and multi colored seed, while in white seed the f lavochrome content was the lowest (13.1 mg kg-1).

    Fig. 6 shows that inf lorescence color was signif icantly correlated with the growing period and f lavochrome content. The purple germplasms had a long growing period with an average of 89.1 days and the green germplasms had an average of 84.4 days. The green germplasms had an average f lavochrome content of 13.95 mg kg-1, which was higher than the purple germplasms (13.34 mg kg-1).

    As shown in Fig. 7-A, lateral germplasms had a longer growth period with an average of 87 days and amplitude of 60 to 107 days. Compact and scattered types had the same average growing period of 81 days but with different amplitudes, ranging from 68 to 100 days and 51 to 101 days, respectively. The lateral type had the largest top3 leaves area (Fig. 7-B) with an average of 200 and amplitude of 102 to 317 cm2, followed by the compact and scattered types with average values of 175 and 167 cm2and amplitudes of 40 to 295 cm2and 118 to 236 cm2, respectively. The 1 000-seed weight of lateral type germplasms had an amplitude range of 3.96 to 9.71 g with an average of 7.28 g, that was 14.3 and 30.7% higher than scattered and compact germplasms, respectively (Fig. 7-D). Grain protein content of compact and scattered germplasms were both about 12.7%, which was signif icantly higher than that of lateral germplasms at 12.2% (Fig. 7-D).

    Table 4 Correlation coefficients of traits

    Fig. 4 Frequency distribution of quantitative traits with different leaf phase genotypes. a, drooping type; b, osculant type; c, upturned type.

    4. Discussion

    4.1. Diversity and evaluation of proso millet core collections

    Fig. 5 1 000-seed weight and f lavochrome content in different hull color genotypes. a, red; b, yellow; c, white; d, brown; e, gray; f, multiple.

    Fig. 6 Growing period and f lavochrome content of different inf lorescence color genotypes. a, green; b, purple.

    Results suggest that H′ of hull color in quality traits was the highest (1.588), and the predominant color was yellow and red (55.2%), which is similar to the statistical results of 8 515 genotypes of proso millet resources (52.6%). Moreover, the distributions of each type of panicle and inf lorescence color are also similar to a previous study (Wang et al. 2005). H′ of the quantitative traits of core collections were generally higher compared to the study of Hu et al. (2008). The H′ of 1 000-seed weight and panicle weight per plant were 2.073 and 1.978 with variation coeff icients of 17.90 and 45.97, respectively. H′ of grain protein and fat content were 2.028 and 2.092 with ranges of 10.2 to 16.1% and 1.1 to 4.7%, respectively. Variation coeff icients and amplitudes of other traits were also high, indicating that the core collections had abundant variation and can accurately represent the genetic diversity of the proso millet resources as required by core germplasm construction (Upadhyaya et al. 2011) and genetic improvement of proso millet. At present, F-value analysis based on normalization of phenotypic data and principal component scores are mostly applied to the comprehensive evaluation of phenotypic traits of core collections (Dong et al. 2015). This method was also used in this study, and the 10 germplasms with the highest F-values came from Shaanxi Province, including Hongruanmi, Bairuanmi, Hongyingmi, Hongmizi, Huangmizi (shu), Huangmizi, Dahongpao, Zigaitouhuangmi, Heiruanmi (shu), and Baiyingmi. In addition, other resources with high F should also be attractive, for example, Zhiduoaosizhi from Russia that had good phenotypic and quality traits. Although the protein content of Hongruanmi and Hongyingmi is generally normal, fat content and comprehensive phenotypic traits were ranked in the top3. Nuoshu, A75-2, Panlonghuangmi, Xiaobaishu, and Xiaohongshu have excellent quality characteristics, which can be applied to the breeding of high quality varieties.

    4.2. Proso millet genetic improvement

    Fig. 7 Growing period, top3 leaves area, 1 000-seed weight, and protein content of different panicle genotypes. a, scattered type; b, lateral type; c, compact type.

    The analysis of more than 40 proso millet cultivars bred in recent years showed that the growing period is between 93.9 and 111.0 days, which is basically consistent with the growth period of high-yield genotypes in this study. The slight difference may be due to the differences of planting date and environment (Yang et al. 2017). The reason why plant height of these variants (120.4 to 175.1 cm) was generally higher than core collections (63.6 to 174.9 cm) may be because higher plant height was selected indirectly at high yield selections. However, if plant height of cultivars was higher than the range of 118 to 150 cm, it would be bad for resistance to lodging (Wang L et al. 2016), which may lead to diff iculties in mechanized harvesting. Spike length of varieties was 24.3 to 40.3 cm, and most of them were lateral type, which was consistent with this study. The average grain weight of cultivated varieties was 6.2 to 9.9 g, which was lower than that of high yield core collections (7.4 to 9.7 g). Fat and protein contents of these cultivars ranged from 1.7 to 5.6% and 9.64 to 15.72%, respectively, and content of some collections was high, but the average value was low. Compared with amylose content of landraces (1.6 to 45.6%), amylose content of the varieties was 2.24 to 38.67%, indicating that the selection of strong non-waxy and waxy varieties was not prominent. From the above results, we knew that though trait amplitudes of the varieties were small, the diversity within the cultivars was still high. Therefore, rich variations can still be seen. Thus, the selection pressure of proso millet breeding was not enough to reduce variation (Wang H G et al. 2016), and there still is great potential for optimizing plant shape traits and yield, and for improving quality.

    4.3. Correlation between the traits

    The correlation analysis of traits in this study was based on large samples. Although some correlation coeff icients were small, correlations were still signif icant or highly signif icant. The correlation between most quantitative traits was either signif icant or very signif icant. The growing period is clearly and positively correlated with plant height, diameter of main stem, top3 leaves area, and 1 000-seed weight, indicating that the genotypes with long growing periods are strong and have high yields. However, the yield will decrease because of the extremely long growing period, for example, the average 1 000-seed weight of genotypes with a growth period of more than 100 days is 6.5 g, which is lower than the 7.4 g of 80 to 90 days. The result is consistent with results of Lang et al. (2012) on rice and Yuan et al. (2016) on foxtail millet. A possible reason for this is the matter accumulation of the germplasms with short growing periods is less than medium germplasms. Also, germplasms with a long growth period are not conducive to grain f illing and maturity due to environmental factors, such as lower light and decreasing temperature during the latter growth period, which results in decreased yield (Yuan et al. 2016). Therefore, breeders can increase yields by modestly extending the growing days.

    Effects of growth period on quality traits were different. The content of grain fat and protein f irst decreased and then increased with the extension of the growing period. On the other hand, the content of starch and f lavochrome had an opposite trend, which may be related to the characteristics of germplasm accumulation in proso millet (Han 2017). There was a signif icant and positive correlation between characteristics of vegetative organs such as plant height, stem diameter, stem node number, panicle length, and top3 leaves area. Results of this study are consistent with the f inding of Upadhyaya et al. (2011) showing that in vegetative organs, growing period is consistently correlated with yield and quality traits. There is a marked positive correlation between grain fat and protein content, and they both have signif icantly negative correlations with 1 000-seed weight, indicating that high protein and fat are not contradictory and could be achieved in some varieties. In contrast, obtaining both high yield and high quality is diff icult. These f indings are consistent with Hou et al. (2001).

    The correlation between leaf phase and quantitative traits was the highest among quality traits. The correlation coeff icients between leaf phase and plant height, growing days, and 1 000-grain weight were -0.476, -0.378, and -0.318, respectively. Since leaf phase also is the key to optimizing plant shape (Jiao 2010), it is necessary to study further. Other quality traits and quantitative traits are also signif icantly related, but the correlation coeff icient was low, and the relationships need to be further studied.

    5. Conclusion

    The core collections had abundant variation. Therefore, they can accurately represent the genetic diversity of the proso millet resources as required by germplasm construction and can be used as basis for discriminating among proso millet cultivars based on related traits and for further studies on millet with rich genetic diversity, good representation, and signif icant correlation between traits.

    Acknowledgements

    Work in my lab was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31371529), the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-06-A26), and the National Key Technologies R&D Program of China during the 12th Five-Year Plan period (2014BAD07B03).

    Appendixassociated with this paper can be available on http://www.ChinaAgriSci.com/V2/En/appendix.htm

    亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91 | 999久久久国产精品视频| 日韩av免费高清视频| 久久婷婷青草| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 亚洲国产av新网站| 搡老岳熟女国产| 精品国产一区二区久久| 日韩电影二区| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 亚洲伊人色综图| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产 一区精品| 成人免费观看视频高清| 在线 av 中文字幕| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 免费观看av网站的网址| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 欧美日韩精品网址| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 69精品国产乱码久久久| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 1024香蕉在线观看| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 精品国产国语对白av| 日本色播在线视频| 丁香六月天网| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 中文字幕制服av| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 欧美另类一区| 男女边摸边吃奶| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 看免费成人av毛片| 丝袜喷水一区| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 搡老乐熟女国产| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 午夜影院在线不卡| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 在线 av 中文字幕| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 久久久久久久精品精品| 美女主播在线视频| 久久久久网色| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| av免费观看日本| 久久久久视频综合| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产精品免费大片| 天堂8中文在线网| 免费不卡黄色视频| 婷婷成人精品国产| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 9色porny在线观看| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 国产成人系列免费观看| 人人澡人人妻人| 在线观看三级黄色| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| av有码第一页| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 中文字幕色久视频| 99香蕉大伊视频| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 在线天堂中文资源库| 宅男免费午夜| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 日日啪夜夜爽| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 精品一区二区三卡| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区 | 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 成人国语在线视频| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 男人操女人黄网站| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 电影成人av| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 麻豆av在线久日| 男女免费视频国产| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 五月开心婷婷网| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 大码成人一级视频| 久久免费观看电影| 国产毛片在线视频| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 欧美成人午夜精品| 精品国产一区二区久久| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 黄色视频不卡| 亚洲精品在线美女| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 欧美日韩av久久| 免费观看性生交大片5| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 久久99精品国语久久久| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 免费观看人在逋| 色网站视频免费| 99久久人妻综合| 在线观看www视频免费| 婷婷色综合www| 嫩草影院入口| 我的亚洲天堂| 成人国产av品久久久| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 日韩电影二区| av不卡在线播放| 综合色丁香网| 成人三级做爰电影| 在线观看三级黄色| 精品久久久久久电影网| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 午夜91福利影院| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 精品一区在线观看国产| 久久影院123| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 日本午夜av视频| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 精品少妇内射三级| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 久久性视频一级片| 国产精品一国产av| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| kizo精华| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 悠悠久久av| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 高清不卡的av网站| 我的亚洲天堂| 精品第一国产精品| 两个人看的免费小视频| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 欧美另类一区| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 青春草视频在线免费观看| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 欧美黑人精品巨大| h视频一区二区三区| avwww免费| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 五月天丁香电影| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 久久人人爽人人片av| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| av免费观看日本| 国产麻豆69| 亚洲av福利一区| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 搡老乐熟女国产| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 免费少妇av软件| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 欧美日韩av久久| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 一级片'在线观看视频| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 午夜91福利影院| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| av在线app专区| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 婷婷成人精品国产| 国产成人系列免费观看| 亚洲伊人色综图| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 天天影视国产精品| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 在线 av 中文字幕| 日日啪夜夜爽| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 黄频高清免费视频| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 久久久欧美国产精品| 男女免费视频国产| 性少妇av在线| 久久青草综合色| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| videos熟女内射| 精品酒店卫生间| 只有这里有精品99| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 精品少妇内射三级| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 无限看片的www在线观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 另类精品久久| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 亚洲四区av| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 1024香蕉在线观看| 美国免费a级毛片| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 午夜影院在线不卡| 在线观看人妻少妇| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产亚洲最大av| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 嫩草影院入口| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 亚洲综合色网址| 91老司机精品| 在线 av 中文字幕| 91老司机精品| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆 | 99久国产av精品国产电影| 自线自在国产av| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 午夜av观看不卡| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 美女中出高潮动态图| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 咕卡用的链子| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 丁香六月欧美| av国产精品久久久久影院| 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产精品三级大全| 操美女的视频在线观看| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 久久av网站| 超碰97精品在线观看| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 桃花免费在线播放| 最黄视频免费看| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 国产精品.久久久| 国产男女内射视频| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 精品午夜福利在线看| 亚洲精品在线美女| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 伦理电影免费视频| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 七月丁香在线播放| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 久久这里只有精品19| 久久久久精品性色| 亚洲中文av在线| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 乱人伦中国视频| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 成人国产av品久久久| 午夜福利视频精品| 精品久久久久久电影网| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 日韩伦理黄色片| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产 一区精品| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 男女之事视频高清在线观看 | 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| av天堂久久9| 美女中出高潮动态图| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 亚洲在久久综合| 国产成人91sexporn| 不卡av一区二区三区| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 99香蕉大伊视频| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 日韩视频在线欧美| av在线观看视频网站免费| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 久久狼人影院| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产在线视频一区二区| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆 | 乱人伦中国视频| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 九草在线视频观看| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 超色免费av| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 成人影院久久| 18禁观看日本| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 丝袜美足系列| 国产毛片在线视频| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 丁香六月天网| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 日本欧美视频一区| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 婷婷成人精品国产| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 天天影视国产精品| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 一区二区三区激情视频| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 丝袜美足系列| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲国产精品999| 一级毛片电影观看| 日韩视频在线欧美| 男女边摸边吃奶| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 尾随美女入室| 成人三级做爰电影| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 超色免费av| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 秋霞在线观看毛片| a级毛片在线看网站| 在现免费观看毛片| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 无限看片的www在线观看| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 大香蕉久久网| 国产av国产精品国产| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 我的亚洲天堂| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 午夜福利视频精品| 国产精品.久久久| 国产1区2区3区精品| 在线天堂中文资源库| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 悠悠久久av| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 在线天堂中文资源库| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 日本午夜av视频| 欧美97在线视频| 久久97久久精品| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| av网站在线播放免费| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 丁香六月欧美| 中文天堂在线官网| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 777米奇影视久久| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| av福利片在线| 亚洲第一av免费看| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 免费av中文字幕在线| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| av视频免费观看在线观看| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| av网站在线播放免费| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 一级毛片电影观看| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 韩国av在线不卡| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 一级片'在线观看视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 日韩av免费高清视频| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 9色porny在线观看| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 视频区图区小说| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 看免费成人av毛片| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲图色成人| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 日本欧美国产在线视频|