• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Post-operative computed tomography scan-reliable tool for quality assessment of complete mesocolic excision

    2019-04-20 01:35:50CristianLivadaruStefanMorarasuTudorCristianFrunzaFlorinaGhitunElenaFlorinaPaiuSpiridonFlorinaSavaCristinaTerinteDanFerariuSorinelLuncaGabrielMihailDimofte

    Cristian Livadaru,Stefan Morarasu,Tudor Cristian Frunza,Florina A Ghitun,Elena Florina Paiu-Spiridon,Florina Sava,Cristina Terinte,Dan Ferariu,Sorinel Lunca,Gabriel Mihail Dimofte

    Cristian Livadaru,Florina A Ghitun,”Grigore T Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy,Iasi 700115,Romania

    Stefan Morarasu,Tudor Cristian Frunza,Sorinel Lunca,Gabriel Mihail Dimofte,2nd Clinic of Surgical Oncology,Regional Oncology Institute,“Grigore T Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy,Iasi 700115,Romania

    Elena Florina Paiu-Spiridon,Florina Sava,Department of Radiology,Regional Oncology Institute,“Grigore T Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy,Iasi 700115,Romania

    Cristina Terinte,Dan Ferariu,Department of Pathology,Regional Oncology Institute,“Grigore T Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy,Iasi 700115,Romania

    Corresponding author: Stefan Morarasu,MD,Surgeon,2nd Clinic of Surgical Oncology,Regional Oncology Institute,“Grigore T Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy,2-4 General Henri Mathias Berthelot St.,Iasi 700115,Romania.stefan.morarasu@hse.ie

    Telephone: +35-385-8760635

    Abstract

    Key words: Complete mesocolic excision;Central vascular ligation;Colon surgery;Arterial stump measurement;Computed tomography

    INTRODUCTION

    The surgical treatment of colon cancer is the only treatment with a curable visa.Complete mesocolic excision (CME),as Hohenbergeret al[1]initially presented it in 2009,is based on three principles.First and foremost,the mobilization of the colon needs to strictly respect the avascular plane of dissection;this ensures removal of the colonic tumour together with a sealed,embryologically-defined mesocolon,which contains all lymphovascular potential routes of tumour dissemination.The second principle refers to the central vascular ligation (CVL),which ensures vertical removal of the entire mesocolic root and apical lymph nodes (LNs).The third principle involves clearing the LNs in the pericolic station,with the advised longitudinal resection margin being up to 5 cm proximally and 10 cm distally from the tumour,depending on the feeding vessels[1,2].

    CME has proved to be a reliable technique for standardizing colon surgery;however,the debate on defining the recommended point of CVL has not reached unanimity[2-5].Studies that comparatively analysed CME with conventional surgery showed more surgical complications in CME.Although no randomized trials exist to support this,it seems that attempting a true central ligation causes extra risks,unlike the fascial plane dissection[6-8].Complete mesenterectomy at the root of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) poses danger for splanchnic nerves laceration,which will cause refractory diarrhoea[6].Significantly more injuries to the spleen and the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) have been correlated to central ligation[7],and the high variability of venous collaterals giving rise to the gastrocolic trunk of Henle has been shown to add further haemorrhagic risk[8,9].On the left side,ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in proximity to the aorta can ensue permanent urological disorders and faecal incontinence in some patients,while sexual dysfunction persists in most patients[2,10,11].

    Recently,the theory of tailoring central ligation to the crossing variations between the ileocolic artery (ICA) and SMV has been raised[12,13].Additionally,the recommendation of a 10 mm safe margin from the arterial origin has been put forward in the CME consensus[2];although,this stump length could also be obtained when performing a D2 lymphadenectomy,considering that the ICA runs in front of the SMV[13].Further insight was given by Japanese research groups,who stated that the lymphatic drainage of the right colon ends in front of the SMV,making dissection beyond it unwarranted.They advocate for a full clearance alongside the anterior aspect of the SMV,without reaching beyond it[2].

    Regardless of the continuing debate,some surgical societies have understood the value of standardization and implemented the central ligation as a guideline procedure;these include the French Society of Digestive Surgery[14]and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons[15,16].Furthermore,the Japanese recommend at least D2 resections for cT2 colon cancer[17].The Norwegian Health Directive expects a standard CME with complete D2 dissection to be performed on all interventions with curative intent and advises additional D3 lymphadenectomy whenever possible[18],by following the evidence on increased 5-year overall survival from 82.1% to 89.1% as reported by Hohenbergeret al[1].

    Nevertheless,if the surgery does not closely respect the embryologic cleavage plan,contamination with malign cytology through the disrupted mesocolon could render null any potential benefit of the central ligation[1].Consequently,analysing surgical specimens is crucial for evaluating the quality of CME.In this way,the integrity of the mesocolon and the number of LNs can be accurately measured for stratifying the survival outcomes,as the difference between mesocolic plane and muscularis propria planes of resection translates to a 27% increase in 5-year overall survival for stage III disease[19].Another indicator,proposed by Westet al[20,21],is measurement of the distance from the CVL to the bowel margin;however,this does not directly reflect the residual stump length and accompanying LNs because the main pedicle’s length is variable and thus the arterial stump may be longer than the pathologist suggests[22,23].

    As a shorter arterial stump would imply fewer residual nodes,Hohenbergeret al[24]applied angiography to patients with local recurrence of colorectal cancer to visualize the residual IMA.Thus,they appreciated that long stumps illustrated an incomplete primary lymphadenectomy which had caused the local cancer recurrence[24].Recent studies,however,proposed a simpler technique to evaluate the point of CVL—by measuring the arterial stumps on post-operative computed tomography (CT)scans[22,25,26].Their results showed promise in evaluating the quality of colon resections,thus calling for further studies to be made for validation of the technique.

    Aim

    Our aim was to analyse the existing variation in the technique of radical colectomy and to demonstrate the utility of the arterial stump as a tool for evaluating surgical quality.Our first objective was to compare the arterial stump lengths from our own CME series without local recurrences[27],with a different series of conventional radical colectomies.Our second objective was to calculate the improvement potential in each group,by comparing the actual lengths with their theoretical best position of D2 and D3 predicted ligation levels (D2PLL and D3PLL respectively).

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Design and setting

    This study was designed as a retrospective analysis and conducted on a prospectively maintained database of patients treated at the Regional Oncology Institute (IRO) in Iasi,Romania.

    Patients

    The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the IRO,and patients had given consent for inclusion in the research database.

    Inclusion criteria

    Two groups of adult patients (groups A and B,see below) were included in consecutive order.All underwent surgery with curative intent for colon cancer (stages I-III UICC 7thedition) and had at least one post-operative good quality contrastenhanced CT scan that was available for re-evaluation.

    Group A patients were operated on at the 2ndSurgery Department of IRO between the dates of March 2012 and February 2018;all surgeries were performed by one surgical team.Group B patients were operated on in other surgical units between the dates of July 2007 and February 2018,and are currently being followed up at the Medical Oncology Outpatient Clinic in our institution.

    Exclusion criteria for both groups were stage IV colonic tumours,palliative colectomies,and tumours in the transverse colon.

    Surgical technique

    Colectomies in group A patients were performed according to CME principles with the following adjustments to the high vascular ligation site:(1) Ligation of the ICA at the right side of the SMV for right colectomies (D2 resection);(2) Ligation of the IMA at roughly 1 cm from its origin in left colectomies;or (3) Low ligation of the IMA in segmental sigmoidectomy,distal to the branching point of the left colic artery (LCA)but with subsequent LN dissection along the IMA trunk,up to its origin from the aorta (D3 lymphadenectomy).

    Group B colectomies were non-CME surgical procedures,but were performed with intent of oncological radicality.Surgeons involved in this group represent a heterogenous group working in district hospitals without a major interest in colonic cancer surgery.There was no additional selection,except for availability of the postoperative CT scan and curative intent of the surgical procedure.

    Data collection

    The individual data for group A patients were gathered from a prospectively maintained electronic database,containing all the patients who had undergone colectomies performed by the same surgical team.The individual data for group B patients were obtained from the registries of the Outpatient Clinic of Medical Oncology at IRO.All these patients were cross-referenced in the hospital’s electronic registry,for confirmation of data.Only patients with an available post-operative abdominal CT scan were included in the study and the images were retrieved from the Picture Archiving and Communication System (known as “PACS”) for analysis.

    Radiological examination protocol

    The majority of patients (n= 51) had undergone spiral CT scans in our radiology department,by means of a BrightSpeed 16SL scanner with 16 detectors (GE Healthcare,Waukesha,WI,United States).The protocol included 16 mm x 1.25 mm increment,pitch of 1.75,table speed of 35 mm/rot,120 kV and 260 mA,with slight variations according to patient particularities.Contrast media was injected (816.5 mg/mL of Iomeron 400?;Bracco Imaging,Milano,Italy) with a power injector at a rate of 2.5 mL/s.Scans were obtained in the arterial and venous phases,with an acquisition delay of 15 sec and 50 sec after the bolus threshold (150 HU).Datasets were reconstructed with a 1.25-3 mm section thickness,and the reconstruction interval varied between 1.3 mm and 5 mm.A minority of CTs (n= 7) originated in private radiology departments,but biases were minimised as the acquisition protocols and reconstruction intervals were similar and only the reconstructed thickness varied from 1.25 mm to 5 mm,accepted as standard for colorectal follow-up.

    Measurement technique

    No metal clips were used on the arterial stumps.We examined the CT scans from both groups using a dedicated radiology imaging software (RadiAnt DICOM Viewer v.4.2.1;Medixant,Poznan,Poland) with 3D reconstructions in multiple planes and a maximum intensity projection of 10 mm.Lengths were measured with the software’s dedicated ruler[28].

    On the right side,we only chose the ICA because it is the most constant collateral of the SMA[9].It was defined as the last vessel arising from the SMA to the right side,at the level of the 5thand 6thjejunal artery emergence,and its trajectory is anterior,inferior and to the right,thus always making an acute angle with the SMA stem[29].The IMA was defined as originating at the level of the 3rdlumbar vertebral body and descending on a discrete left trajectory[30].Arterial lumen continuity could be verified by applying negative contrast in different oblique planes,and the stumps were frequently identified through the presence of a granuloma on their tip[26].Additionally,the anatomical crossing of the ICA (anteriorly or posteriorly) in relation to the SMV was registered.

    We measured the presumed and actual arterial stump lengths on all the colectomies included in the study.In right colectomies,the actual arterial length was measured as the length from the origin of the ICA to the ligation point.The presumed arterial length was measured as the length from the origin of ICA to the right-hand side of the SMV,as this is the standard length for D2 ligation (Figure 1).In left-sided colectomies,the ligation point was analysed in relation to the IMA and the LCA.The actual stump length was measured from the origin of the IMA to the ligation point,while the presumed stump length was measured from the IMA origin to immediately distal to the LCA origin,as is done for standard D2 ligation with preservation of the LCA.The D2 improvement potential (D2IP) was defined as the difference between actual stump lengths and the D2PLL (Figure 1).When we compared this with the D3 central ligation,a value of 10 mm was considered as the presumed stump length in left colectomies[2].The D3 improvement potential (D3IP) was calculated only for the IMA and represents the difference between actual stump lengths and the 10 mm safe length (D3PLL) recommended by consensus[2](Figure 1).

    Measurements were performed by the main author (Livadaru C) and validated independently by two radiologists (Paiu-Spiridon EF and Sava F) from the Radiology Department of IRO,in order to access inter-observer variations.The quantitative parameter (arterial length) was expressed as the average between the three observers.

    Statistical analysis

    Statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS v20.0 (IBM Corp,Armonk,NY,United States).Descriptive statistics were performed on all collected data.For verifying the normal distribution of all the data,we used the Shapiro-Wilk test.Only homogenous data were averaged.The inter-observer agreement between the three sets of measurements was confirmed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.We applied the independent Student’st-test for comparing the mean arterial length between groups A and B.We used the pairedt-test to verify whether or not the actual residual lengths of the arteries differed from the D2 and D3 presumed lengths.Furthermore,by using the pairedt-test we calculated a specific value that quantified the potential for improvement of the ligation height (defined as the statistically significant difference between the mean actual and presumed stump length).By using the independentttest,we also compared the potentials for improvement found in each group.Levene’s test was used to compare the actual stump length variation between groups.Whenever the data showed a non-normal distribution,non-parametric tests such as the Kruskal-Wallis were used.AP-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all tests.

    RESULTS

    From the 124 consecutively registered patients in group A,29 colectomies were selected after applying the exclusion criteria.Similarly,for group B,the search in the Oncology Outpatient Clinic registries provided 69 consecutive cases,from which 29 colectomies were selected after applying the inclusion criteria (Figure 2).When stratified for type of colectomy,the stump measurements were normally distributed(Shapiro-Wilk’s test),but overall,when all measurements were considered for each group,they were non-normally distributed-a fact explained by the differences in category between the ICA and IMA.The median time from surgery to post-operative CT scan was 13.5 mo [inter-quartile range (IQR):6.0-27.0].The two groups had similar mean time intervals from surgery to the CT scan (18 movs27 mo;t =-1.23,P= 0.227).Patient demographics are listed in Table 1.

    Overall,there were a total of 22 ICA stumps,with the D2PLL median length of 9.97 mm (IQR:7.85-12.70),and a total of 36 IMA stumps,with the D2PLL mean ± SD length of 37.87 ± 8.22 (95%CI:35.09-40.65).The level of inter-observer agreement assessed for the three observers with the Kruskal-Wallis test revealed no significant difference between the sets (Table 2,P= 0.999) (Figure 3).

    Comparison between groups A and B

    Figure1 Representative cases of stump length measurement.A:Actual ICA stump after a group A right colectomy.The lengths measured on contrast-enhanced CT were 21.5 mm-actual length with granuloma (red line),13.0 mm-D2 predicted ligation level (green line),and 8.5 mm-D2 improvement potential (blue line);B:Actual IMA stump after a group A sigmoidectomy.The lengths measured on contrast-enhanced CT were 36.0 mm-actual length with granuloma (red line),30.5 mm-D2 predicted ligation level (green line),and 5.50 mm-D2 improvement potential (blue line);C:Reconstruction in 3D form,showing the actual inferior mesenteric artery stump after a group A high ligation.The measurements on contrast-enhanced CT were 13.0 mm-actual length (red line),10.0 mm-D3 predicted ligation level (green line),and 3.0 mm-D3 improvement potential (blue line).The scale bar illustrates the size of 1 cm.CT:Computed tomography;ICA:Ileocolic artery;IMA:Inferior mesenteric artery.

    Overall,the groups differed significantly (Table 2,P< 0.001) in actual stump length (-35.66±30.83 mm;P< 0.001) and in D2 improvement potential (-31.88±26.52 mm;P<0.001).The D2PLL was similar between the two groups (-3.79 ± 13.98 mm;P= 0.353),both overall (Table 3,Figure 4) and when stratified for type of colectomy (Tables 4,5 and 6).Levene’s test showed that the variances of actual stump lengths between the groups (204.5vs732.2) reached the level of statistical significance (P= 0.04).

    Right colectomies

    When we compared the actual ICA stumps between the two groups,thet-test showed that group A had significantly shorter stumps than group B,the difference being -32.96 ± 6.56 mm (mean ± SE) (Table 4,P =0.001).Furthermore,the D2IP was still significantly longer in group B,by almost 4 cm (Table 4,P< 0.001) (Figure 5).

    Sigmoidectomies

    In Table 5,the comparison of IMA stumps between the two groups shows that,apart from D2PLL,all the parameters from group A were significantly shorter,as shown by the independentt-test.The actual difference (mean±SE) was -34.50 ± 9.28 mm (Table 5,P <0.001),and the D2IP difference was -29.57 ± 8.01 mm (Table 5,P= 0.001) while the D3IP difference was -34.50 ± 9.28 mm (Table 5,P <0.001) (Figure 6).

    Left colectomies

    This subgroup followed the same trend of significance,with shorter actual stumps in group A (by 33.33 ± 8.37 mm) (Table 6,P= 0.011).The D2IP appeared similar between the groups (P =0.056),but group A significantly surpassed the D2 level and achieved D3 as intended,with a D3IP difference of -33.33 ± 8.37 mm (Table 6,P= 0.011) (Figure 7).

    Table7 presents a summary of all the IMA stumps from this study,by taking sigmoidectomies and left colectomies together.Except for the D2PLL,all the parameters in group A are significantly shorter then group B (Table 7,P <0.001)(Figure 8).

    Comparison between actual arterial stumps and predicted ligation levels in group A

    For the 29 actual stumps in group A,the median length was 22.63 mm and the Kruskal-Wallis test showed no statistically significant D2 improvement potential(mean ± SD:0.26±12.18 mm;χ2= 0.005,P =0.944) (Table 3).

    In right colectomies,the actual ICA length (mean±SD) was 16.97 ± 4.77 mm.The mean difference between actual stump lengths and D2PLL was statistically significant,as determined by the pairedt-test,revealing a D2 improvement potential of 5.85±4.71 mm (Table 4,P =0.001).

    On the left side,there were a total of 17 residual IMAs examined;the mean length was 31.70 ± 15.71 mm for which the ligation had been done correctly at the D2 level in all colectomies,without any D2IP remaining (-3.68 ± 14.30 mm;P <0.304),as shown in Table 7.

    When stratified for type of colectomy,the pairedt-test revealed no D2IP for sigmoidectomies (0.27±12.90 mm) (Table 5,P =0.942) and left colectomies (-16.52 ±11.71 mm) (Table 6,P= 0.067).When we tested for the D3 ligation,only left colectomies reached this level (9.60 ± 9.21 mm) (Table 6,P= 0.129),whereas sigmoidectomies fell short of this objective (by 25.42 ± 15.62 mm) (Table 5,P= 0.001).

    Table1 Patient demographics

    Comparison between actual arterial stumps and predicted ligation levels in group B

    For the 29 actual stumps in group B,the median length was 61.27 mm,while the mean potential for improvement of 32.14±26.15 mm was statistically significant (χ2= 21.77,P< 0.001) (Table 3).

    In right colectomies,the actual ICA length (mean±SD) was 49.93±20.29 mm.The mean difference between actual stump lengths and D2PLL was statistically significant by the pairedt-test,revealing a D2IP of 42.13±21.50 mm (Table 4,P< 0.001).

    The mean IMA stump length from 19 left-sided colectomies (sigmoidectomies and left colectomies) was 67.24±28.71 mm.The pairedt-test showed a statistically significant difference between actual and presumed lengths,showing that in group B the ligation had been made lower than the D2 level,with a mean D2IP of 27.14±27.74 mm (Table 7,P< 0.01).

    When stratified for type of colectomy,the 16 sigmoidectomies had mean IMA stumps of 69.92±30.29 mm and statistically significant D2IP (29.84±28.67 mm) (Table 5,P< 0.01) and D3IP (59.92 ± 30.29 mm) (Table 5,P< 0.01).The subgroup of left colectomies was the only one to output no statistically significant D2IP (P= 0.38),but significant D3IP (42.93 ± 13.15 mm) (Table 6,P= 0.03).

    Correlations between arterial stump length and pathology

    In group A,the mean ± SD number of LNs harvested with the CME technique was 34.83 ± 16.75 and Spearman’s test showed moderate (rs= -0.40) inverse correlation with the stump lengths (Table 8,P= 0.032).Similarly,the significance persisted for the specimen length with moderate correlation (rs= -0.44);as such,the greater the specimen length was,the shorter the stump length (Table 8,P= 0.016).

    In group B,LNs were available in the Oncology outpatient registries only for 18 out of the 29 patients.The median number of LNs was 20 (IQR:10.75-26.50).Spearman’s correlation with the stump length was negligible (rs= -0.112) and without significance(P= 0.659).

    Figure2 Flow diagram of eligibility.CT:Computed tomography;PACS:Picture Archiving and communication system.

    Out of the 22 ileocolic stumps,the SMV was crossed posteriorly by the ICA in 68%of cases.In group A,surgeons preserved the LCA in 77% of sigmoidectomies,demonstrating a D2 ligation intent,whereas none of the left colectomies had a preserved LCA,showing D3 ligation intent.In group B,the LCA was present in 81%of sigmoidectomies and in all left colectomies,suggesting a D2 intent for sigmoidectomies and a questionable D2 intent for left colectomies.

    DISCUSSION

    As far as our research into the literature has shown,this is the first study to radiologically compare post-resectional stumps between two groups,of which one provides standard resection quality and the second study,after that of Munkedalet al[22],assessed both ileocolic and IMA stumps after CME.The retrospective setting of our study ensured that the surgical team operated based on their regular standard,without making efforts for achieving shorter stumps.In this sense,there is the advantage of reflecting our surgical practice in a more trustworthy manner.

    The tight distribution of arterial stump lengths from our series (group A) is proof of a uniform and disciplined surgical procedure (Figures 4,5 and 8).The argument behind this statement is the 0% locoregional recurrence at a minimum of 2 years for the 88 colectomies from which group A was extracted[27].By constantly performing the D2 ligation,rigorous harvesting of LNs with their corresponding mesocolons was achieved and,thus,contributed to a zero local recurrence rate in the larger cohort[27].The fact that group B did not use a standardized technique was also revealed by thesignificantly larger variation in stump size,as compared to group A (P= 0.04).This probably reflects an incomplete mesocolic excision because,theoretically,the mesocolic fascia leads up to the origin of the primary feeding vessels and would result in a short stump if completely excised.This presumption will be verified in the future,but a 60-mm stump is certainly representative of an incomplete resection.Other similar studies[20,26]showed that the wider the variation in stump length,the larger the variation in fascial plane of dissection.Hence,when we have the prerequisites for a large variance in technique (i.e.non-standardized surgery),there is a higher risk of having low quality surgery,which impacts correct staging,local recurrence,and overall survival[19,31-34].

    Table2 Comparison of arterial stump length between the three observers

    Although our results are comparable with the null loco-regional recurrence from the prospectively performed CME surgeries of Galiziaet al[35]and with the 3.6% from Hohenberger and colleague’s[1]series of 1329 CME colectomies with D3 CVL,the clear extra benefit of D3vsD2 ligation is controversial when compared to the benefit of pristine embryologic plane dissection[3,4,36,37].We believe that the foremost important factor for minimizing local recurrence is respecting the mesocolic plane,in order to prevent spillage of cancerous cells.Performing the central ligation in right colectomy at the D3 rather than the D2 level is not supported by any randomized trial yet[5],increasing peri-operative risks without major benefits for the general population.

    All the arterial stumps were shorter in group A than group B,not only overall but also when stratified for type of colectomy.We wanted to assess if this was caused by the variability in the ICA-SMV crossing lengths,on the right side,or the LCA emerging lower down from the IMA,on the left side.Hence,we also measured the personalized presumed lengths for true D2 ligation,in each group.By subtracting the actual stumps from the presumed stumps,the D2 potential for improvement was calculated as a personal quality measurement for the surgical team.These were significantly shorter in group A,proving that across group B colectomies,the standardized D2 level of ligation was systematically not reached (Tables 4,5,6 and 7).The only exception was the subgroup of left colectomies that showed statistical similarity at the D2 level,even though this did not reflect similar ligation intents.Group A surgeons intended and significantly reached D3 (P= 0.129),whereas in group B,the D3 potential was not reached (P= 0.03) (Table 6).

    The right colectomy subgroup from group A had slightly longer stumps than expected for D2 (by 5.80 mm),but they were still the shortest CT-evaluated postcolectomy stumps in the literature[22,25,26](Table 9).Moreover,by calculating the potentials for improvement for left-sided colectomies performed in our department(0.27 mm),we determined that they are correctly realised at the D2 level (P= 0.94).In contrast to other similar studies[21],our experience showed no excess IMA stumps compared to pre-determined vascular and anatomical boundaries for the D2 ligation(Table 10).The left colectomy subgroup was the only one in which the D3 level had been achieved in all cases (9.60 mm;P= 0.129).

    The LN yield is considered to be a very important independent prognostic factor for colon cancer survival[32-34,38].Using our D2 CME technique,we harvested a mean number of 34.8 LNs,which proved to be superior to the number of LNs reported through the employment of CME with D3 CVL from Erlangen:a median of 32 LNs reported in the first series[1]and of 30 LNs reported in a subsequent series[20].The length between the origin of the IMA and the departure of the LCA was 37.87 ± 8.22 mm (mean ± SD) in our study,and this segment of artery alone was previously shown to harbour up to 10 LNs[39].Rosiet al[40]demonstrated that up to 22% of patients with sigmoid tumours had positive LNs at a distance of 10 to 30 mm from the origin of the IMA,thus showing that the ligation height impacted survival.Since we showed that LNs inversely correlate to the feeding stump length,their prognostic value could be transferred to some extent onto the stump length.These results aid the arguments for considering the measurement of post-colectomy arterial stumps as an additional marker for surgical quality evaluation,with the potential to impact survival.

    Figure3 Comparison of arterial stump lengths between the three observers.CL:Cristian livadaru;EFPS:Elena florina paiu-spiridon;FS:Florina sava.

    One similar study[22]that reported longer stumps found no correlations between node count and stump length.In that sense it supports the argument that,a more central ligation provides a more realistic correlation with harvested LNs,assuming that a dedicated pathology department counted the LNs[27].This impacts a more accurate staging[41]and could theoretically transfer an under-staged patient from stage II to III,in order to provide benefit not just from the adjuvant chemotherapy but also from the additional prognostic factor.Additionally,the advantage of a surgical technique that comprehensively retrieves the mesocolon ensures that significantly more of the newly described tumour deposits are being included in the specimen,when comparing CME specimens to classic colectomy specimens[35].The prognostic capability of tumour deposits in the mesocolon is analogous to that of positive LNs,with node-negative patients in stages I or II requiring adjuvant chemotherapy[38].

    A limit of our study could be the small population size,but we used strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and analysed a single surgical team with unchanging practice of surgical technique to determine the accuracy of stump measurement.Seven scans originated in different radiology departments;hence,for these,the acquisition protocols varied slightly in terms of slice reconstruction interval,but we do not believe this produced a sizeable difference.The presence of metal clips on the stump would have accelerated the identification process,but from our radiologists’viewpoint,they tend to add measuring artefacts.The first author (Livadaru C),who measured and interpreted the quantitative and qualitative parameters,is not a radiologist,but all the data were validated by two independent radiologists (Paiu-Spiridon EF and Sava F) and the inter-observer agreement test showed no statistically significant difference between the measurements of the actual stump lengths.This strong correlation between observers indicates that there is high feasibility of performing the arterial stump evaluation on follow-up contrast CTs by nonradiological observers,regardless of metal clips.Pre-operative CT scans paired with the follow-up scans would have aided the stump identification but we do not consider pre-operative scans essential,as a member of the surgical team would be able to clearly identify the desired artery based on familiarity with anatomical landmarks from the operating field.

    Regarding the time interval from surgery to the post-operative CT,other authors have already shown that the stumps are clearly visible more than 2 years after surgery[26].Even if the residual arteries could be affected by post-resectional retraction over this time,the two groups in our study had statistically similar time intervals from operation to CT scan (P= 0.227),precluding it from having a major influence on our comparison.

    The CME consensus study group advises a 10 mm safety stump when performing the CVL[2].However,a recent systematic review and meta-analysis on mesentericvessels variations determined the mean distance from the origin of the ICA to the right side of the SMV to be 15.2 mm[9];our study also showed a median of 9.97 mm.Although these values correspond to a D2 ligation,they are comparable with the safety margin of 10 mm proposed for the central ligation.Thus,it would not be wrong to state that a CME with D2 ligation could be equivalent to a CME with CVL in the cases when the crossing distance is less or equal to 10 mm,thus sparing the patient from unnecessary haemorrhagic risks that dissection under the SMV would entail.The original work of Spasojevicet al[13]shows a benefit of five to six LNs when the D2 ligation properly includes the vertical compartment situated lateral to the SMV.Furthermore,as they showed the LN distribution is dependent to anterior or posterior ICA crossing patterns,they emphasised tailoring the central ligation with respect to these anatomical variants.Hence,a correct D3 lymphadenectomy could be performed without dissecting behind the SMV in 42.6% of the reported cases,where the ICA ran in front of the SMV (calculated from a recent pooled analysis of 6090 ileocolic arteries[9]) and the retrieved nodal compartment would additionally yield a mean of three LNs[13].Whether these three LNs would make a substantial difference in the outcomes remains unknown.

    Table3 All colectomies:Comparison between groups A and B

    Most importantly,we showed both significantly longer stumps and greater spread of results upon comparing non-standardized colectomies with CME.We believe that measuring the arterial stump after colectomies is a simple and reproducible tool for controlling surgical quality and does not require a specialist radiologist.The fact that it quantifies the potential for improving the ligation allows for the surgical technique to be monitored and improved accordingly.In order to ensure the best survival outcomes for each patient,this instrument should be associated with the pathologist’s evaluation of fascial plane stratification[19].With these two instruments of standardization,standardized interventions can be promoted amongst surgeons and the learning curve for D2 CME could grow in non-tertiary surgical centres.

    Conclusion

    We put forward now the feasibility of performing accurate arterial stump evaluation by non-radiologist interpreters.The tight distribution of arterial stumps reflects the constancy and quality of a disciplined surgery.The retrospective setting offers insurance that stumps had not been ligated shorter for the sake of comparison,as their length reflects only strong adherence to the oncological principles of CME.As the mesocolic root inserts high on the mesenteric vessels,longer stumps would inherently be surrounded by residual mesocolic tissue which allows risk of local recurrence.Measuring arterial stumps could be an additional tool for a surgical team’s personal quality measurement.As we showed it to significantly correlate with a major prognostic factor (LN yield),this straightforward and reproducible tool may similar potential to predict outcomes.Considering that no serious risks are added when attempting a D2 vascular ligation,it is recommendable that all surgeons apply D2-CME as standardized technique for colon cancer,in order to maximize benefits for their patients.

    Table4 Right colectomies:lleocolic artery stump comparison between groups A and B

    Table5 Sigmoidectomies:lnferior mesenteric artery stump comparison between groups A and B

    Table6 Left colectomies:lnferior mesenteric artery stump comparison between groups A and B

    Table7 Left colectomies and sigmoidectomies:Overview of all the inferior mesenteric artery stumps between groups A and B

    Table8 Group A:Correlation of lymph node count and specimen length with stump length

    Table9 Computed tomography evaluated ileocolic artery stumps in the literature

    Table10 Computed tomography evaluated inferior mesenteric artery stumps in the literature

    Figure4 Comparison of all the actual stumps between groups with horizontal reference to D2 predicted ligation levels.D2PLL:D2 predicted ligation level.

    Figure5 Comparison of ileocolic artery actual stump from right colectomies between groups,with horizontal reference to D2 predicted ligation levels.D2PLL:D2 predicted ligation level;ICA:Ileocolic artery.

    Figure6 Comparison of inferior mesenteric artery actual stumps from sigmoidectomies between groups,with horizontal reference to D2 predicted ligation levels and D2 predicted ligation levels.D2PLL:D2 predicted ligation level;D3PLL:D3 predicted ligation level;IMA:Inferior mesenteric artery.

    Figure7 Comparison of inferior mesenteric artery actual stumps from left colectomies between groups,with horizontal reference to D2 predicted ligation levels and D3 predicted ligation levels.D2PLL:D2 predicted ligation level;D3PLL:D3 predicted ligation level;IMA:Inferior mesenteric artery.

    Figure8 Comparison of inferior mesenteric artery actual stumps from sigmoidectomies and left colectomies between groups,with horizontal reference to D2 predicted ligation levels and D3 predicted ligation levels.D2PLL:D2 predicted ligation level;D3PLL:D3 predicted ligation level;IMA:Inferior mesenteric artery.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research background

    Surgery has witnessed a paradigm shift in colon cancer management ever since prominent researchers have proposed complete mesocolic excision (CME) as the optimal surgical technique.CME specimens have been demonstrated as superior to standard resections,and patient outcomes have significantly improved.Despite this,adoption among surgeons is still not clear because quality criteria are not well defined.On this basis,researchers have proposed various quality markers-lymph node yield,mesocolon area,distance from central vascular ligation(CVL) to colon margin,etc.

    Research motivation

    Because quality criteria in colon surgery are not yet defined,CME adoption is still behind total mesorectal excision.A consensus is needed to group already-proven pathological quality markers with newly-advocated radiological markers and to establish standards in colon surgery.The value of measuring arterial stumps on post-operative computed tomography (CT) scans has been previously analysed,but never in a comparative study between CME and standard specimens.

    Research objectives

    In our advent to better define quality criteria for colon resections,we sought to analyse the value of measuring arterial stumps on post-operative CT scans in a comparative setting between CME and non-CME specimens,for the first time.By testing our hypothesis that arterial stumps are shorter in the CME group and are correlated with prognosis,we aimed to establish arterial stumps as tools to assess CME surgery.

    Research methods

    This study was designed as a retrospective analysis and conducted on a prospectively maintained database.Two groups of adult patients were included in consecutive order.All underwent surgery with curative intent for colon cancer (stages I-III UICC 7thedition) and had at least one post-operative good quality contrast-enhanced CT scan that was available for reevaluation.Group A were operated based on standard CME principles whereas group B underwent conventional colectomy.Measurements of arterial stumps were done by three observers.Shapiro-Wilk test was used to verify normal distribution of data.Kruskal-Wallis test confirmed inter-observer correlation.Stump measurements were analysed comparatively using Student’st-test.Paired and independentt-test was used to quantify potential for improvement of the ligation height and to compare potentials for improvement between the two groups.Nonnormal distribution and non-parametric data was analysed using Kruskal-Wallis test.

    Research results

    From 193 consecutive patients,58 patients were selected after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria (29 in CME group,29 in non-CME group).After comparatively analyzing stump length in both groups,Shorter lengths were obtained in group A,by a mean difference of 35.66 mm (χ2= 27.38,P< 0.001),which was significant for all types of colectomies.Ligations from group A significantly reached their potential height (0.26 ± 12.18 mm from D2PLL;χ2= 0.005,P=0.944) in comparison with group B were the overwhelming majority failed to reach D2PLL,by a mean difference of 32.14 ± 26.15 mm (χ2= 21.77,P< 0.001).Moreover,improvement potentials were far shorter in group A than group B (χ2=22.13,P< 0.001).Significant more variability was found in resections of group B (P= 0.004).No significant difference was found when measurements of three different observers were analysed (P= 0.866).Stump length was statistically correlated with specimen length and lymph node yield (P= 0.018 andP= 0.008 respectively).

    Research conclusions

    Measuring arterial stumps is a simple and standard tool for defining surgical quality of colon resections.It may be,as well,a straightforward prognostic factor given its correlation with lymph node yield.

    Research perspectives

    Our study is a step forward in refining quality criteria for colon surgery.Further research is needed on larger cohorts to compare the value of stump measurement to specimen measurements such as CVL distance or mesocolon surface area.The threshold for CVL should be further analysed,as D3 dissection may not aid in significantly better surgical specimens and outcomes.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    We would like to express our gratitude to Mrs.Oana Frunza for illustrating the statistical data into graphical forms.

    国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 一进一出抽搐动态| 国产成人a区在线观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 国产成人福利小说| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产乱人视频| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 日本与韩国留学比较| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| h日本视频在线播放| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 看片在线看免费视频| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 精品国产三级普通话版| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 直男gayav资源| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 97在线视频观看| 成人av在线播放网站| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 久久久久久久久大av| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 韩国av在线不卡| 精品久久久久久成人av| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲av.av天堂| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 精品人妻视频免费看| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 99热6这里只有精品| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 嫩草影院入口| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 99热这里只有精品一区| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 老司机福利观看| 久久人人爽人人片av| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 午夜视频国产福利| 只有这里有精品99| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲图色成人| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 日韩av在线大香蕉| 老女人水多毛片| 黄色一级大片看看| 插逼视频在线观看| 欧美区成人在线视频| 黄色一级大片看看| 永久网站在线| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产三级在线视频| 22中文网久久字幕| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 成年av动漫网址| 免费观看精品视频网站| 特级一级黄色大片| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 午夜激情欧美在线| 成年版毛片免费区| 亚洲av.av天堂| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 99热这里只有是精品50| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 色综合色国产| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲四区av| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 成年av动漫网址| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 1024手机看黄色片| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 日本色播在线视频| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 亚洲四区av| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产成人影院久久av| 欧美3d第一页| 亚洲无线观看免费| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 国产真实乱freesex| 欧美潮喷喷水| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 伦精品一区二区三区| 日本色播在线视频| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 国产高清三级在线| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 91久久精品电影网| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 在线播放国产精品三级| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 色综合色国产| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 一级黄片播放器| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 国产成人影院久久av| 成人欧美大片| 午夜a级毛片| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 22中文网久久字幕| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 99热这里只有精品一区| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 国产成人91sexporn| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 久久久色成人| 国产色婷婷99| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 精品久久久噜噜| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | 日本av手机在线免费观看| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 草草在线视频免费看| 久久久国产成人免费| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 精品久久久久久久末码| 国内精品宾馆在线| 精品日产1卡2卡| 伦精品一区二区三区| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产三级中文精品| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 久久6这里有精品| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| av在线观看视频网站免费| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 国产午夜精品论理片| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 熟女电影av网| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 日本一本二区三区精品| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 成人av在线播放网站| 免费看光身美女| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 毛片女人毛片| 久久久久国产网址| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 97超视频在线观看视频| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 午夜精品在线福利| av天堂中文字幕网| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 久久久久久伊人网av| 国产日本99.免费观看| 一级黄色大片毛片| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 黄片wwwwww| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| www.av在线官网国产| 国产成人精品婷婷| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 久久久久九九精品影院| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 日本成人三级电影网站| 久久99热这里只有精品18| videossex国产| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 成年免费大片在线观看| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 老司机福利观看| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 精品久久久久久久末码| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 国产在视频线在精品| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 成年版毛片免费区| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| av专区在线播放| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 深夜精品福利| 99久久人妻综合| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 日本免费a在线| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 国产视频首页在线观看| 看片在线看免费视频| 在线免费观看的www视频| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 乱系列少妇在线播放| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 69人妻影院| 18+在线观看网站| 长腿黑丝高跟| 精品久久久噜噜| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国产极品天堂在线| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 禁无遮挡网站| 在线a可以看的网站| 综合色av麻豆| 少妇的逼水好多| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 国产综合懂色| 国产成人91sexporn| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 简卡轻食公司| 国产高潮美女av| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 日本熟妇午夜| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产成人一区二区在线| 我要搜黄色片| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 99热精品在线国产| 精品久久久久久久久av| 99热这里只有是精品50| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 国产av不卡久久| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 中文资源天堂在线| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 91狼人影院| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 久久久色成人| 久久人人爽人人片av| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| ponron亚洲| 欧美成人a在线观看| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产高潮美女av| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 1024手机看黄色片| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 熟女电影av网| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 99热精品在线国产| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 久久久久网色| 1000部很黄的大片| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 1000部很黄的大片| 成人av在线播放网站| 久久热精品热| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 一本久久中文字幕| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说 | 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 三级毛片av免费| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 午夜福利高清视频| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说 | 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 精品日产1卡2卡| 久久这里只有精品中国| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 成人三级黄色视频| 如何舔出高潮| 热99在线观看视频| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 搞女人的毛片| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 在线天堂最新版资源| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产乱人视频| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 欧美3d第一页| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 日韩成人伦理影院| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 内地一区二区视频在线| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 一级毛片我不卡| 不卡一级毛片| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 深夜a级毛片| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 波多野结衣高清作品| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 日本免费a在线| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频 | 人体艺术视频欧美日本| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 色视频www国产| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 性欧美人与动物交配| 精品一区二区免费观看| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| av视频在线观看入口| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 一级黄片播放器| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 国产成人a区在线观看| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 禁无遮挡网站| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 国产成人91sexporn| 成人欧美大片| 69av精品久久久久久| 不卡一级毛片| 性欧美人与动物交配| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 欧美zozozo另类| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产日本99.免费观看| 美女国产视频在线观看| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 看黄色毛片网站| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 不卡一级毛片| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 一区福利在线观看| 高清毛片免费看| 草草在线视频免费看| 亚洲不卡免费看| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 成人二区视频| av免费观看日本| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 内地一区二区视频在线| 在线观看一区二区三区| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 18禁在线播放成人免费| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国产精品,欧美在线| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | 亚洲国产色片| 悠悠久久av| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 日本免费a在线| 搞女人的毛片| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 亚洲成人久久性| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 久久久久久伊人网av| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 老女人水多毛片| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | 亚洲在线观看片| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| av.在线天堂| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 久久中文看片网| 九草在线视频观看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 亚洲无线观看免费| 成人av在线播放网站| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 日韩成人伦理影院| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 久久这里只有精品中国| 伦精品一区二区三区| 久久久色成人| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 国产成人影院久久av| 日本色播在线视频| 午夜视频国产福利| 欧美zozozo另类| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 黄色视频,在线免费观看|