• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Post-operative computed tomography scan-reliable tool for quality assessment of complete mesocolic excision

    2019-04-20 01:35:50CristianLivadaruStefanMorarasuTudorCristianFrunzaFlorinaGhitunElenaFlorinaPaiuSpiridonFlorinaSavaCristinaTerinteDanFerariuSorinelLuncaGabrielMihailDimofte

    Cristian Livadaru,Stefan Morarasu,Tudor Cristian Frunza,Florina A Ghitun,Elena Florina Paiu-Spiridon,Florina Sava,Cristina Terinte,Dan Ferariu,Sorinel Lunca,Gabriel Mihail Dimofte

    Cristian Livadaru,Florina A Ghitun,”Grigore T Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy,Iasi 700115,Romania

    Stefan Morarasu,Tudor Cristian Frunza,Sorinel Lunca,Gabriel Mihail Dimofte,2nd Clinic of Surgical Oncology,Regional Oncology Institute,“Grigore T Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy,Iasi 700115,Romania

    Elena Florina Paiu-Spiridon,Florina Sava,Department of Radiology,Regional Oncology Institute,“Grigore T Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy,Iasi 700115,Romania

    Cristina Terinte,Dan Ferariu,Department of Pathology,Regional Oncology Institute,“Grigore T Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy,Iasi 700115,Romania

    Corresponding author: Stefan Morarasu,MD,Surgeon,2nd Clinic of Surgical Oncology,Regional Oncology Institute,“Grigore T Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy,2-4 General Henri Mathias Berthelot St.,Iasi 700115,Romania.stefan.morarasu@hse.ie

    Telephone: +35-385-8760635

    Abstract

    Key words: Complete mesocolic excision;Central vascular ligation;Colon surgery;Arterial stump measurement;Computed tomography

    INTRODUCTION

    The surgical treatment of colon cancer is the only treatment with a curable visa.Complete mesocolic excision (CME),as Hohenbergeret al[1]initially presented it in 2009,is based on three principles.First and foremost,the mobilization of the colon needs to strictly respect the avascular plane of dissection;this ensures removal of the colonic tumour together with a sealed,embryologically-defined mesocolon,which contains all lymphovascular potential routes of tumour dissemination.The second principle refers to the central vascular ligation (CVL),which ensures vertical removal of the entire mesocolic root and apical lymph nodes (LNs).The third principle involves clearing the LNs in the pericolic station,with the advised longitudinal resection margin being up to 5 cm proximally and 10 cm distally from the tumour,depending on the feeding vessels[1,2].

    CME has proved to be a reliable technique for standardizing colon surgery;however,the debate on defining the recommended point of CVL has not reached unanimity[2-5].Studies that comparatively analysed CME with conventional surgery showed more surgical complications in CME.Although no randomized trials exist to support this,it seems that attempting a true central ligation causes extra risks,unlike the fascial plane dissection[6-8].Complete mesenterectomy at the root of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) poses danger for splanchnic nerves laceration,which will cause refractory diarrhoea[6].Significantly more injuries to the spleen and the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) have been correlated to central ligation[7],and the high variability of venous collaterals giving rise to the gastrocolic trunk of Henle has been shown to add further haemorrhagic risk[8,9].On the left side,ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in proximity to the aorta can ensue permanent urological disorders and faecal incontinence in some patients,while sexual dysfunction persists in most patients[2,10,11].

    Recently,the theory of tailoring central ligation to the crossing variations between the ileocolic artery (ICA) and SMV has been raised[12,13].Additionally,the recommendation of a 10 mm safe margin from the arterial origin has been put forward in the CME consensus[2];although,this stump length could also be obtained when performing a D2 lymphadenectomy,considering that the ICA runs in front of the SMV[13].Further insight was given by Japanese research groups,who stated that the lymphatic drainage of the right colon ends in front of the SMV,making dissection beyond it unwarranted.They advocate for a full clearance alongside the anterior aspect of the SMV,without reaching beyond it[2].

    Regardless of the continuing debate,some surgical societies have understood the value of standardization and implemented the central ligation as a guideline procedure;these include the French Society of Digestive Surgery[14]and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons[15,16].Furthermore,the Japanese recommend at least D2 resections for cT2 colon cancer[17].The Norwegian Health Directive expects a standard CME with complete D2 dissection to be performed on all interventions with curative intent and advises additional D3 lymphadenectomy whenever possible[18],by following the evidence on increased 5-year overall survival from 82.1% to 89.1% as reported by Hohenbergeret al[1].

    Nevertheless,if the surgery does not closely respect the embryologic cleavage plan,contamination with malign cytology through the disrupted mesocolon could render null any potential benefit of the central ligation[1].Consequently,analysing surgical specimens is crucial for evaluating the quality of CME.In this way,the integrity of the mesocolon and the number of LNs can be accurately measured for stratifying the survival outcomes,as the difference between mesocolic plane and muscularis propria planes of resection translates to a 27% increase in 5-year overall survival for stage III disease[19].Another indicator,proposed by Westet al[20,21],is measurement of the distance from the CVL to the bowel margin;however,this does not directly reflect the residual stump length and accompanying LNs because the main pedicle’s length is variable and thus the arterial stump may be longer than the pathologist suggests[22,23].

    As a shorter arterial stump would imply fewer residual nodes,Hohenbergeret al[24]applied angiography to patients with local recurrence of colorectal cancer to visualize the residual IMA.Thus,they appreciated that long stumps illustrated an incomplete primary lymphadenectomy which had caused the local cancer recurrence[24].Recent studies,however,proposed a simpler technique to evaluate the point of CVL—by measuring the arterial stumps on post-operative computed tomography (CT)scans[22,25,26].Their results showed promise in evaluating the quality of colon resections,thus calling for further studies to be made for validation of the technique.

    Aim

    Our aim was to analyse the existing variation in the technique of radical colectomy and to demonstrate the utility of the arterial stump as a tool for evaluating surgical quality.Our first objective was to compare the arterial stump lengths from our own CME series without local recurrences[27],with a different series of conventional radical colectomies.Our second objective was to calculate the improvement potential in each group,by comparing the actual lengths with their theoretical best position of D2 and D3 predicted ligation levels (D2PLL and D3PLL respectively).

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Design and setting

    This study was designed as a retrospective analysis and conducted on a prospectively maintained database of patients treated at the Regional Oncology Institute (IRO) in Iasi,Romania.

    Patients

    The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the IRO,and patients had given consent for inclusion in the research database.

    Inclusion criteria

    Two groups of adult patients (groups A and B,see below) were included in consecutive order.All underwent surgery with curative intent for colon cancer (stages I-III UICC 7thedition) and had at least one post-operative good quality contrastenhanced CT scan that was available for re-evaluation.

    Group A patients were operated on at the 2ndSurgery Department of IRO between the dates of March 2012 and February 2018;all surgeries were performed by one surgical team.Group B patients were operated on in other surgical units between the dates of July 2007 and February 2018,and are currently being followed up at the Medical Oncology Outpatient Clinic in our institution.

    Exclusion criteria for both groups were stage IV colonic tumours,palliative colectomies,and tumours in the transverse colon.

    Surgical technique

    Colectomies in group A patients were performed according to CME principles with the following adjustments to the high vascular ligation site:(1) Ligation of the ICA at the right side of the SMV for right colectomies (D2 resection);(2) Ligation of the IMA at roughly 1 cm from its origin in left colectomies;or (3) Low ligation of the IMA in segmental sigmoidectomy,distal to the branching point of the left colic artery (LCA)but with subsequent LN dissection along the IMA trunk,up to its origin from the aorta (D3 lymphadenectomy).

    Group B colectomies were non-CME surgical procedures,but were performed with intent of oncological radicality.Surgeons involved in this group represent a heterogenous group working in district hospitals without a major interest in colonic cancer surgery.There was no additional selection,except for availability of the postoperative CT scan and curative intent of the surgical procedure.

    Data collection

    The individual data for group A patients were gathered from a prospectively maintained electronic database,containing all the patients who had undergone colectomies performed by the same surgical team.The individual data for group B patients were obtained from the registries of the Outpatient Clinic of Medical Oncology at IRO.All these patients were cross-referenced in the hospital’s electronic registry,for confirmation of data.Only patients with an available post-operative abdominal CT scan were included in the study and the images were retrieved from the Picture Archiving and Communication System (known as “PACS”) for analysis.

    Radiological examination protocol

    The majority of patients (n= 51) had undergone spiral CT scans in our radiology department,by means of a BrightSpeed 16SL scanner with 16 detectors (GE Healthcare,Waukesha,WI,United States).The protocol included 16 mm x 1.25 mm increment,pitch of 1.75,table speed of 35 mm/rot,120 kV and 260 mA,with slight variations according to patient particularities.Contrast media was injected (816.5 mg/mL of Iomeron 400?;Bracco Imaging,Milano,Italy) with a power injector at a rate of 2.5 mL/s.Scans were obtained in the arterial and venous phases,with an acquisition delay of 15 sec and 50 sec after the bolus threshold (150 HU).Datasets were reconstructed with a 1.25-3 mm section thickness,and the reconstruction interval varied between 1.3 mm and 5 mm.A minority of CTs (n= 7) originated in private radiology departments,but biases were minimised as the acquisition protocols and reconstruction intervals were similar and only the reconstructed thickness varied from 1.25 mm to 5 mm,accepted as standard for colorectal follow-up.

    Measurement technique

    No metal clips were used on the arterial stumps.We examined the CT scans from both groups using a dedicated radiology imaging software (RadiAnt DICOM Viewer v.4.2.1;Medixant,Poznan,Poland) with 3D reconstructions in multiple planes and a maximum intensity projection of 10 mm.Lengths were measured with the software’s dedicated ruler[28].

    On the right side,we only chose the ICA because it is the most constant collateral of the SMA[9].It was defined as the last vessel arising from the SMA to the right side,at the level of the 5thand 6thjejunal artery emergence,and its trajectory is anterior,inferior and to the right,thus always making an acute angle with the SMA stem[29].The IMA was defined as originating at the level of the 3rdlumbar vertebral body and descending on a discrete left trajectory[30].Arterial lumen continuity could be verified by applying negative contrast in different oblique planes,and the stumps were frequently identified through the presence of a granuloma on their tip[26].Additionally,the anatomical crossing of the ICA (anteriorly or posteriorly) in relation to the SMV was registered.

    We measured the presumed and actual arterial stump lengths on all the colectomies included in the study.In right colectomies,the actual arterial length was measured as the length from the origin of the ICA to the ligation point.The presumed arterial length was measured as the length from the origin of ICA to the right-hand side of the SMV,as this is the standard length for D2 ligation (Figure 1).In left-sided colectomies,the ligation point was analysed in relation to the IMA and the LCA.The actual stump length was measured from the origin of the IMA to the ligation point,while the presumed stump length was measured from the IMA origin to immediately distal to the LCA origin,as is done for standard D2 ligation with preservation of the LCA.The D2 improvement potential (D2IP) was defined as the difference between actual stump lengths and the D2PLL (Figure 1).When we compared this with the D3 central ligation,a value of 10 mm was considered as the presumed stump length in left colectomies[2].The D3 improvement potential (D3IP) was calculated only for the IMA and represents the difference between actual stump lengths and the 10 mm safe length (D3PLL) recommended by consensus[2](Figure 1).

    Measurements were performed by the main author (Livadaru C) and validated independently by two radiologists (Paiu-Spiridon EF and Sava F) from the Radiology Department of IRO,in order to access inter-observer variations.The quantitative parameter (arterial length) was expressed as the average between the three observers.

    Statistical analysis

    Statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS v20.0 (IBM Corp,Armonk,NY,United States).Descriptive statistics were performed on all collected data.For verifying the normal distribution of all the data,we used the Shapiro-Wilk test.Only homogenous data were averaged.The inter-observer agreement between the three sets of measurements was confirmed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.We applied the independent Student’st-test for comparing the mean arterial length between groups A and B.We used the pairedt-test to verify whether or not the actual residual lengths of the arteries differed from the D2 and D3 presumed lengths.Furthermore,by using the pairedt-test we calculated a specific value that quantified the potential for improvement of the ligation height (defined as the statistically significant difference between the mean actual and presumed stump length).By using the independentttest,we also compared the potentials for improvement found in each group.Levene’s test was used to compare the actual stump length variation between groups.Whenever the data showed a non-normal distribution,non-parametric tests such as the Kruskal-Wallis were used.AP-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all tests.

    RESULTS

    From the 124 consecutively registered patients in group A,29 colectomies were selected after applying the exclusion criteria.Similarly,for group B,the search in the Oncology Outpatient Clinic registries provided 69 consecutive cases,from which 29 colectomies were selected after applying the inclusion criteria (Figure 2).When stratified for type of colectomy,the stump measurements were normally distributed(Shapiro-Wilk’s test),but overall,when all measurements were considered for each group,they were non-normally distributed-a fact explained by the differences in category between the ICA and IMA.The median time from surgery to post-operative CT scan was 13.5 mo [inter-quartile range (IQR):6.0-27.0].The two groups had similar mean time intervals from surgery to the CT scan (18 movs27 mo;t =-1.23,P= 0.227).Patient demographics are listed in Table 1.

    Overall,there were a total of 22 ICA stumps,with the D2PLL median length of 9.97 mm (IQR:7.85-12.70),and a total of 36 IMA stumps,with the D2PLL mean ± SD length of 37.87 ± 8.22 (95%CI:35.09-40.65).The level of inter-observer agreement assessed for the three observers with the Kruskal-Wallis test revealed no significant difference between the sets (Table 2,P= 0.999) (Figure 3).

    Comparison between groups A and B

    Figure1 Representative cases of stump length measurement.A:Actual ICA stump after a group A right colectomy.The lengths measured on contrast-enhanced CT were 21.5 mm-actual length with granuloma (red line),13.0 mm-D2 predicted ligation level (green line),and 8.5 mm-D2 improvement potential (blue line);B:Actual IMA stump after a group A sigmoidectomy.The lengths measured on contrast-enhanced CT were 36.0 mm-actual length with granuloma (red line),30.5 mm-D2 predicted ligation level (green line),and 5.50 mm-D2 improvement potential (blue line);C:Reconstruction in 3D form,showing the actual inferior mesenteric artery stump after a group A high ligation.The measurements on contrast-enhanced CT were 13.0 mm-actual length (red line),10.0 mm-D3 predicted ligation level (green line),and 3.0 mm-D3 improvement potential (blue line).The scale bar illustrates the size of 1 cm.CT:Computed tomography;ICA:Ileocolic artery;IMA:Inferior mesenteric artery.

    Overall,the groups differed significantly (Table 2,P< 0.001) in actual stump length (-35.66±30.83 mm;P< 0.001) and in D2 improvement potential (-31.88±26.52 mm;P<0.001).The D2PLL was similar between the two groups (-3.79 ± 13.98 mm;P= 0.353),both overall (Table 3,Figure 4) and when stratified for type of colectomy (Tables 4,5 and 6).Levene’s test showed that the variances of actual stump lengths between the groups (204.5vs732.2) reached the level of statistical significance (P= 0.04).

    Right colectomies

    When we compared the actual ICA stumps between the two groups,thet-test showed that group A had significantly shorter stumps than group B,the difference being -32.96 ± 6.56 mm (mean ± SE) (Table 4,P =0.001).Furthermore,the D2IP was still significantly longer in group B,by almost 4 cm (Table 4,P< 0.001) (Figure 5).

    Sigmoidectomies

    In Table 5,the comparison of IMA stumps between the two groups shows that,apart from D2PLL,all the parameters from group A were significantly shorter,as shown by the independentt-test.The actual difference (mean±SE) was -34.50 ± 9.28 mm (Table 5,P <0.001),and the D2IP difference was -29.57 ± 8.01 mm (Table 5,P= 0.001) while the D3IP difference was -34.50 ± 9.28 mm (Table 5,P <0.001) (Figure 6).

    Left colectomies

    This subgroup followed the same trend of significance,with shorter actual stumps in group A (by 33.33 ± 8.37 mm) (Table 6,P= 0.011).The D2IP appeared similar between the groups (P =0.056),but group A significantly surpassed the D2 level and achieved D3 as intended,with a D3IP difference of -33.33 ± 8.37 mm (Table 6,P= 0.011) (Figure 7).

    Table7 presents a summary of all the IMA stumps from this study,by taking sigmoidectomies and left colectomies together.Except for the D2PLL,all the parameters in group A are significantly shorter then group B (Table 7,P <0.001)(Figure 8).

    Comparison between actual arterial stumps and predicted ligation levels in group A

    For the 29 actual stumps in group A,the median length was 22.63 mm and the Kruskal-Wallis test showed no statistically significant D2 improvement potential(mean ± SD:0.26±12.18 mm;χ2= 0.005,P =0.944) (Table 3).

    In right colectomies,the actual ICA length (mean±SD) was 16.97 ± 4.77 mm.The mean difference between actual stump lengths and D2PLL was statistically significant,as determined by the pairedt-test,revealing a D2 improvement potential of 5.85±4.71 mm (Table 4,P =0.001).

    On the left side,there were a total of 17 residual IMAs examined;the mean length was 31.70 ± 15.71 mm for which the ligation had been done correctly at the D2 level in all colectomies,without any D2IP remaining (-3.68 ± 14.30 mm;P <0.304),as shown in Table 7.

    When stratified for type of colectomy,the pairedt-test revealed no D2IP for sigmoidectomies (0.27±12.90 mm) (Table 5,P =0.942) and left colectomies (-16.52 ±11.71 mm) (Table 6,P= 0.067).When we tested for the D3 ligation,only left colectomies reached this level (9.60 ± 9.21 mm) (Table 6,P= 0.129),whereas sigmoidectomies fell short of this objective (by 25.42 ± 15.62 mm) (Table 5,P= 0.001).

    Table1 Patient demographics

    Comparison between actual arterial stumps and predicted ligation levels in group B

    For the 29 actual stumps in group B,the median length was 61.27 mm,while the mean potential for improvement of 32.14±26.15 mm was statistically significant (χ2= 21.77,P< 0.001) (Table 3).

    In right colectomies,the actual ICA length (mean±SD) was 49.93±20.29 mm.The mean difference between actual stump lengths and D2PLL was statistically significant by the pairedt-test,revealing a D2IP of 42.13±21.50 mm (Table 4,P< 0.001).

    The mean IMA stump length from 19 left-sided colectomies (sigmoidectomies and left colectomies) was 67.24±28.71 mm.The pairedt-test showed a statistically significant difference between actual and presumed lengths,showing that in group B the ligation had been made lower than the D2 level,with a mean D2IP of 27.14±27.74 mm (Table 7,P< 0.01).

    When stratified for type of colectomy,the 16 sigmoidectomies had mean IMA stumps of 69.92±30.29 mm and statistically significant D2IP (29.84±28.67 mm) (Table 5,P< 0.01) and D3IP (59.92 ± 30.29 mm) (Table 5,P< 0.01).The subgroup of left colectomies was the only one to output no statistically significant D2IP (P= 0.38),but significant D3IP (42.93 ± 13.15 mm) (Table 6,P= 0.03).

    Correlations between arterial stump length and pathology

    In group A,the mean ± SD number of LNs harvested with the CME technique was 34.83 ± 16.75 and Spearman’s test showed moderate (rs= -0.40) inverse correlation with the stump lengths (Table 8,P= 0.032).Similarly,the significance persisted for the specimen length with moderate correlation (rs= -0.44);as such,the greater the specimen length was,the shorter the stump length (Table 8,P= 0.016).

    In group B,LNs were available in the Oncology outpatient registries only for 18 out of the 29 patients.The median number of LNs was 20 (IQR:10.75-26.50).Spearman’s correlation with the stump length was negligible (rs= -0.112) and without significance(P= 0.659).

    Figure2 Flow diagram of eligibility.CT:Computed tomography;PACS:Picture Archiving and communication system.

    Out of the 22 ileocolic stumps,the SMV was crossed posteriorly by the ICA in 68%of cases.In group A,surgeons preserved the LCA in 77% of sigmoidectomies,demonstrating a D2 ligation intent,whereas none of the left colectomies had a preserved LCA,showing D3 ligation intent.In group B,the LCA was present in 81%of sigmoidectomies and in all left colectomies,suggesting a D2 intent for sigmoidectomies and a questionable D2 intent for left colectomies.

    DISCUSSION

    As far as our research into the literature has shown,this is the first study to radiologically compare post-resectional stumps between two groups,of which one provides standard resection quality and the second study,after that of Munkedalet al[22],assessed both ileocolic and IMA stumps after CME.The retrospective setting of our study ensured that the surgical team operated based on their regular standard,without making efforts for achieving shorter stumps.In this sense,there is the advantage of reflecting our surgical practice in a more trustworthy manner.

    The tight distribution of arterial stump lengths from our series (group A) is proof of a uniform and disciplined surgical procedure (Figures 4,5 and 8).The argument behind this statement is the 0% locoregional recurrence at a minimum of 2 years for the 88 colectomies from which group A was extracted[27].By constantly performing the D2 ligation,rigorous harvesting of LNs with their corresponding mesocolons was achieved and,thus,contributed to a zero local recurrence rate in the larger cohort[27].The fact that group B did not use a standardized technique was also revealed by thesignificantly larger variation in stump size,as compared to group A (P= 0.04).This probably reflects an incomplete mesocolic excision because,theoretically,the mesocolic fascia leads up to the origin of the primary feeding vessels and would result in a short stump if completely excised.This presumption will be verified in the future,but a 60-mm stump is certainly representative of an incomplete resection.Other similar studies[20,26]showed that the wider the variation in stump length,the larger the variation in fascial plane of dissection.Hence,when we have the prerequisites for a large variance in technique (i.e.non-standardized surgery),there is a higher risk of having low quality surgery,which impacts correct staging,local recurrence,and overall survival[19,31-34].

    Table2 Comparison of arterial stump length between the three observers

    Although our results are comparable with the null loco-regional recurrence from the prospectively performed CME surgeries of Galiziaet al[35]and with the 3.6% from Hohenberger and colleague’s[1]series of 1329 CME colectomies with D3 CVL,the clear extra benefit of D3vsD2 ligation is controversial when compared to the benefit of pristine embryologic plane dissection[3,4,36,37].We believe that the foremost important factor for minimizing local recurrence is respecting the mesocolic plane,in order to prevent spillage of cancerous cells.Performing the central ligation in right colectomy at the D3 rather than the D2 level is not supported by any randomized trial yet[5],increasing peri-operative risks without major benefits for the general population.

    All the arterial stumps were shorter in group A than group B,not only overall but also when stratified for type of colectomy.We wanted to assess if this was caused by the variability in the ICA-SMV crossing lengths,on the right side,or the LCA emerging lower down from the IMA,on the left side.Hence,we also measured the personalized presumed lengths for true D2 ligation,in each group.By subtracting the actual stumps from the presumed stumps,the D2 potential for improvement was calculated as a personal quality measurement for the surgical team.These were significantly shorter in group A,proving that across group B colectomies,the standardized D2 level of ligation was systematically not reached (Tables 4,5,6 and 7).The only exception was the subgroup of left colectomies that showed statistical similarity at the D2 level,even though this did not reflect similar ligation intents.Group A surgeons intended and significantly reached D3 (P= 0.129),whereas in group B,the D3 potential was not reached (P= 0.03) (Table 6).

    The right colectomy subgroup from group A had slightly longer stumps than expected for D2 (by 5.80 mm),but they were still the shortest CT-evaluated postcolectomy stumps in the literature[22,25,26](Table 9).Moreover,by calculating the potentials for improvement for left-sided colectomies performed in our department(0.27 mm),we determined that they are correctly realised at the D2 level (P= 0.94).In contrast to other similar studies[21],our experience showed no excess IMA stumps compared to pre-determined vascular and anatomical boundaries for the D2 ligation(Table 10).The left colectomy subgroup was the only one in which the D3 level had been achieved in all cases (9.60 mm;P= 0.129).

    The LN yield is considered to be a very important independent prognostic factor for colon cancer survival[32-34,38].Using our D2 CME technique,we harvested a mean number of 34.8 LNs,which proved to be superior to the number of LNs reported through the employment of CME with D3 CVL from Erlangen:a median of 32 LNs reported in the first series[1]and of 30 LNs reported in a subsequent series[20].The length between the origin of the IMA and the departure of the LCA was 37.87 ± 8.22 mm (mean ± SD) in our study,and this segment of artery alone was previously shown to harbour up to 10 LNs[39].Rosiet al[40]demonstrated that up to 22% of patients with sigmoid tumours had positive LNs at a distance of 10 to 30 mm from the origin of the IMA,thus showing that the ligation height impacted survival.Since we showed that LNs inversely correlate to the feeding stump length,their prognostic value could be transferred to some extent onto the stump length.These results aid the arguments for considering the measurement of post-colectomy arterial stumps as an additional marker for surgical quality evaluation,with the potential to impact survival.

    Figure3 Comparison of arterial stump lengths between the three observers.CL:Cristian livadaru;EFPS:Elena florina paiu-spiridon;FS:Florina sava.

    One similar study[22]that reported longer stumps found no correlations between node count and stump length.In that sense it supports the argument that,a more central ligation provides a more realistic correlation with harvested LNs,assuming that a dedicated pathology department counted the LNs[27].This impacts a more accurate staging[41]and could theoretically transfer an under-staged patient from stage II to III,in order to provide benefit not just from the adjuvant chemotherapy but also from the additional prognostic factor.Additionally,the advantage of a surgical technique that comprehensively retrieves the mesocolon ensures that significantly more of the newly described tumour deposits are being included in the specimen,when comparing CME specimens to classic colectomy specimens[35].The prognostic capability of tumour deposits in the mesocolon is analogous to that of positive LNs,with node-negative patients in stages I or II requiring adjuvant chemotherapy[38].

    A limit of our study could be the small population size,but we used strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and analysed a single surgical team with unchanging practice of surgical technique to determine the accuracy of stump measurement.Seven scans originated in different radiology departments;hence,for these,the acquisition protocols varied slightly in terms of slice reconstruction interval,but we do not believe this produced a sizeable difference.The presence of metal clips on the stump would have accelerated the identification process,but from our radiologists’viewpoint,they tend to add measuring artefacts.The first author (Livadaru C),who measured and interpreted the quantitative and qualitative parameters,is not a radiologist,but all the data were validated by two independent radiologists (Paiu-Spiridon EF and Sava F) and the inter-observer agreement test showed no statistically significant difference between the measurements of the actual stump lengths.This strong correlation between observers indicates that there is high feasibility of performing the arterial stump evaluation on follow-up contrast CTs by nonradiological observers,regardless of metal clips.Pre-operative CT scans paired with the follow-up scans would have aided the stump identification but we do not consider pre-operative scans essential,as a member of the surgical team would be able to clearly identify the desired artery based on familiarity with anatomical landmarks from the operating field.

    Regarding the time interval from surgery to the post-operative CT,other authors have already shown that the stumps are clearly visible more than 2 years after surgery[26].Even if the residual arteries could be affected by post-resectional retraction over this time,the two groups in our study had statistically similar time intervals from operation to CT scan (P= 0.227),precluding it from having a major influence on our comparison.

    The CME consensus study group advises a 10 mm safety stump when performing the CVL[2].However,a recent systematic review and meta-analysis on mesentericvessels variations determined the mean distance from the origin of the ICA to the right side of the SMV to be 15.2 mm[9];our study also showed a median of 9.97 mm.Although these values correspond to a D2 ligation,they are comparable with the safety margin of 10 mm proposed for the central ligation.Thus,it would not be wrong to state that a CME with D2 ligation could be equivalent to a CME with CVL in the cases when the crossing distance is less or equal to 10 mm,thus sparing the patient from unnecessary haemorrhagic risks that dissection under the SMV would entail.The original work of Spasojevicet al[13]shows a benefit of five to six LNs when the D2 ligation properly includes the vertical compartment situated lateral to the SMV.Furthermore,as they showed the LN distribution is dependent to anterior or posterior ICA crossing patterns,they emphasised tailoring the central ligation with respect to these anatomical variants.Hence,a correct D3 lymphadenectomy could be performed without dissecting behind the SMV in 42.6% of the reported cases,where the ICA ran in front of the SMV (calculated from a recent pooled analysis of 6090 ileocolic arteries[9]) and the retrieved nodal compartment would additionally yield a mean of three LNs[13].Whether these three LNs would make a substantial difference in the outcomes remains unknown.

    Table3 All colectomies:Comparison between groups A and B

    Most importantly,we showed both significantly longer stumps and greater spread of results upon comparing non-standardized colectomies with CME.We believe that measuring the arterial stump after colectomies is a simple and reproducible tool for controlling surgical quality and does not require a specialist radiologist.The fact that it quantifies the potential for improving the ligation allows for the surgical technique to be monitored and improved accordingly.In order to ensure the best survival outcomes for each patient,this instrument should be associated with the pathologist’s evaluation of fascial plane stratification[19].With these two instruments of standardization,standardized interventions can be promoted amongst surgeons and the learning curve for D2 CME could grow in non-tertiary surgical centres.

    Conclusion

    We put forward now the feasibility of performing accurate arterial stump evaluation by non-radiologist interpreters.The tight distribution of arterial stumps reflects the constancy and quality of a disciplined surgery.The retrospective setting offers insurance that stumps had not been ligated shorter for the sake of comparison,as their length reflects only strong adherence to the oncological principles of CME.As the mesocolic root inserts high on the mesenteric vessels,longer stumps would inherently be surrounded by residual mesocolic tissue which allows risk of local recurrence.Measuring arterial stumps could be an additional tool for a surgical team’s personal quality measurement.As we showed it to significantly correlate with a major prognostic factor (LN yield),this straightforward and reproducible tool may similar potential to predict outcomes.Considering that no serious risks are added when attempting a D2 vascular ligation,it is recommendable that all surgeons apply D2-CME as standardized technique for colon cancer,in order to maximize benefits for their patients.

    Table4 Right colectomies:lleocolic artery stump comparison between groups A and B

    Table5 Sigmoidectomies:lnferior mesenteric artery stump comparison between groups A and B

    Table6 Left colectomies:lnferior mesenteric artery stump comparison between groups A and B

    Table7 Left colectomies and sigmoidectomies:Overview of all the inferior mesenteric artery stumps between groups A and B

    Table8 Group A:Correlation of lymph node count and specimen length with stump length

    Table9 Computed tomography evaluated ileocolic artery stumps in the literature

    Table10 Computed tomography evaluated inferior mesenteric artery stumps in the literature

    Figure4 Comparison of all the actual stumps between groups with horizontal reference to D2 predicted ligation levels.D2PLL:D2 predicted ligation level.

    Figure5 Comparison of ileocolic artery actual stump from right colectomies between groups,with horizontal reference to D2 predicted ligation levels.D2PLL:D2 predicted ligation level;ICA:Ileocolic artery.

    Figure6 Comparison of inferior mesenteric artery actual stumps from sigmoidectomies between groups,with horizontal reference to D2 predicted ligation levels and D2 predicted ligation levels.D2PLL:D2 predicted ligation level;D3PLL:D3 predicted ligation level;IMA:Inferior mesenteric artery.

    Figure7 Comparison of inferior mesenteric artery actual stumps from left colectomies between groups,with horizontal reference to D2 predicted ligation levels and D3 predicted ligation levels.D2PLL:D2 predicted ligation level;D3PLL:D3 predicted ligation level;IMA:Inferior mesenteric artery.

    Figure8 Comparison of inferior mesenteric artery actual stumps from sigmoidectomies and left colectomies between groups,with horizontal reference to D2 predicted ligation levels and D3 predicted ligation levels.D2PLL:D2 predicted ligation level;D3PLL:D3 predicted ligation level;IMA:Inferior mesenteric artery.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research background

    Surgery has witnessed a paradigm shift in colon cancer management ever since prominent researchers have proposed complete mesocolic excision (CME) as the optimal surgical technique.CME specimens have been demonstrated as superior to standard resections,and patient outcomes have significantly improved.Despite this,adoption among surgeons is still not clear because quality criteria are not well defined.On this basis,researchers have proposed various quality markers-lymph node yield,mesocolon area,distance from central vascular ligation(CVL) to colon margin,etc.

    Research motivation

    Because quality criteria in colon surgery are not yet defined,CME adoption is still behind total mesorectal excision.A consensus is needed to group already-proven pathological quality markers with newly-advocated radiological markers and to establish standards in colon surgery.The value of measuring arterial stumps on post-operative computed tomography (CT) scans has been previously analysed,but never in a comparative study between CME and standard specimens.

    Research objectives

    In our advent to better define quality criteria for colon resections,we sought to analyse the value of measuring arterial stumps on post-operative CT scans in a comparative setting between CME and non-CME specimens,for the first time.By testing our hypothesis that arterial stumps are shorter in the CME group and are correlated with prognosis,we aimed to establish arterial stumps as tools to assess CME surgery.

    Research methods

    This study was designed as a retrospective analysis and conducted on a prospectively maintained database.Two groups of adult patients were included in consecutive order.All underwent surgery with curative intent for colon cancer (stages I-III UICC 7thedition) and had at least one post-operative good quality contrast-enhanced CT scan that was available for reevaluation.Group A were operated based on standard CME principles whereas group B underwent conventional colectomy.Measurements of arterial stumps were done by three observers.Shapiro-Wilk test was used to verify normal distribution of data.Kruskal-Wallis test confirmed inter-observer correlation.Stump measurements were analysed comparatively using Student’st-test.Paired and independentt-test was used to quantify potential for improvement of the ligation height and to compare potentials for improvement between the two groups.Nonnormal distribution and non-parametric data was analysed using Kruskal-Wallis test.

    Research results

    From 193 consecutive patients,58 patients were selected after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria (29 in CME group,29 in non-CME group).After comparatively analyzing stump length in both groups,Shorter lengths were obtained in group A,by a mean difference of 35.66 mm (χ2= 27.38,P< 0.001),which was significant for all types of colectomies.Ligations from group A significantly reached their potential height (0.26 ± 12.18 mm from D2PLL;χ2= 0.005,P=0.944) in comparison with group B were the overwhelming majority failed to reach D2PLL,by a mean difference of 32.14 ± 26.15 mm (χ2= 21.77,P< 0.001).Moreover,improvement potentials were far shorter in group A than group B (χ2=22.13,P< 0.001).Significant more variability was found in resections of group B (P= 0.004).No significant difference was found when measurements of three different observers were analysed (P= 0.866).Stump length was statistically correlated with specimen length and lymph node yield (P= 0.018 andP= 0.008 respectively).

    Research conclusions

    Measuring arterial stumps is a simple and standard tool for defining surgical quality of colon resections.It may be,as well,a straightforward prognostic factor given its correlation with lymph node yield.

    Research perspectives

    Our study is a step forward in refining quality criteria for colon surgery.Further research is needed on larger cohorts to compare the value of stump measurement to specimen measurements such as CVL distance or mesocolon surface area.The threshold for CVL should be further analysed,as D3 dissection may not aid in significantly better surgical specimens and outcomes.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    We would like to express our gratitude to Mrs.Oana Frunza for illustrating the statistical data into graphical forms.

    国产在线视频一区二区| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 午夜两性在线视频| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产精品免费大片| av片东京热男人的天堂| 久久这里只有精品19| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 一本大道久久a久久精品| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 午夜影院在线不卡| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 丝袜美足系列| 人人澡人人妻人| 中文欧美无线码| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 97在线人人人人妻| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 777米奇影视久久| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 男女边摸边吃奶| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 免费不卡黄色视频| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 久久精品国产综合久久久| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 在线 av 中文字幕| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三 | 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 日韩视频在线欧美| 久久久久久人人人人人| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 老司机影院成人| 美女福利国产在线| 两个人看的免费小视频| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 超色免费av| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 国产精品成人在线| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 久久香蕉激情| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 18禁观看日本| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 制服人妻中文乱码| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 18在线观看网站| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 丁香六月天网| av天堂久久9| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 亚洲全国av大片| 免费av中文字幕在线| videosex国产| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| tocl精华| 午夜影院在线不卡| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 男人操女人黄网站| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 国产av国产精品国产| av网站免费在线观看视频| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 深夜精品福利| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 精品福利观看| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 久久久久久久国产电影| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 五月天丁香电影| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 国产激情久久老熟女| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 黑人操中国人逼视频| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 午夜久久久在线观看| 777米奇影视久久| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 亚洲国产欧美网| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 亚洲成人手机| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 老司机影院成人| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 91av网站免费观看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 中国美女看黄片| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面 | 久久热在线av| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国产av国产精品国产| 久久 成人 亚洲| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 一级毛片精品| 午夜91福利影院| 国产在视频线精品| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 午夜两性在线视频| 黄色 视频免费看| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 精品人妻1区二区| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 午夜免费观看性视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三 | 免费看十八禁软件| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 国产区一区二久久| 成人三级做爰电影| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 欧美另类一区| 日日夜夜操网爽| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 咕卡用的链子| a级毛片黄视频| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| av线在线观看网站| 久热这里只有精品99| 91精品三级在线观看| 久久中文字幕一级| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| bbb黄色大片| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国产高清视频在线播放一区 | 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 香蕉国产在线看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 制服诱惑二区| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 精品国产一区二区久久| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区 | 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 男女免费视频国产| 久久性视频一级片| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产野战对白在线观看| 9热在线视频观看99| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 午夜影院在线不卡| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 亚洲av男天堂| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 日韩欧美免费精品| 精品久久蜜臀av无| a级毛片黄视频| videos熟女内射| 1024香蕉在线观看| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 日本a在线网址| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 高清欧美精品videossex| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 免费av中文字幕在线| 精品国产国语对白av| 久久久久网色| 中文字幕制服av| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 日本wwww免费看| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 热re99久久国产66热| a级毛片黄视频| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 久久久久国内视频| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 一本大道久久a久久精品| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 91字幕亚洲| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 色94色欧美一区二区| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 国产av又大| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| av电影中文网址| 在线观看人妻少妇| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 午夜福利在线观看吧| 日本a在线网址| cao死你这个sao货| 中文欧美无线码| av福利片在线| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 高清在线国产一区| 亚洲国产欧美网| 国产精品免费视频内射| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 久久影院123| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 超碰97精品在线观看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 韩国精品一区二区三区| www.999成人在线观看| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 久久国产精品影院| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 亚洲人成电影观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 色播在线永久视频| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 成人国产av品久久久| 69av精品久久久久久 | 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 午夜免费观看性视频| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区 | 超色免费av| 一级片'在线观看视频| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 1024香蕉在线观看| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 久久久久久久精品精品| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 搡老岳熟女国产| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产麻豆69| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 黄色 视频免费看| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 国产成人精品无人区| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 久热爱精品视频在线9| avwww免费| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久 | 日韩欧美免费精品| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 国产麻豆69| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 满18在线观看网站| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| h视频一区二区三区| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 午夜福利视频精品| av天堂在线播放| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 嫩草影视91久久| 满18在线观看网站| 久久影院123| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 男女免费视频国产| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 丝袜喷水一区| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| av片东京热男人的天堂| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 一个人免费看片子| 69av精品久久久久久 | 久久久久视频综合| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久九九热精品免费| 丁香六月欧美| 丝袜喷水一区| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| www.精华液| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 久久久久网色| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区 | 国产一区二区在线观看av| www日本在线高清视频| 久热这里只有精品99| 91国产中文字幕| 亚洲成人手机| 美女中出高潮动态图| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 丝袜喷水一区| 久久精品成人免费网站| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 国产麻豆69| www日本在线高清视频| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 一区二区av电影网| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| av视频免费观看在线观看| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 一区在线观看完整版| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 多毛熟女@视频| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 91av网站免费观看| 亚洲综合色网址| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产精品成人在线| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 亚洲中文av在线| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| av电影中文网址| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 久久久精品区二区三区| 日韩欧美免费精品| 人人澡人人妻人| 日韩视频在线欧美| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 一级片免费观看大全| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 久久久欧美国产精品| 成人国产av品久久久| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 久久久国产精品麻豆| svipshipincom国产片| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 中国美女看黄片| 国产av国产精品国产| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 亚洲第一av免费看| 热99re8久久精品国产| 婷婷成人精品国产| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 美女中出高潮动态图| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 国产成人欧美| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| videosex国产| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 国产精品免费大片| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 性色av一级| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲全国av大片| 制服诱惑二区| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡 | 最黄视频免费看| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 岛国在线观看网站| 大型av网站在线播放| 美国免费a级毛片| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 中国国产av一级| kizo精华| 电影成人av| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 丁香六月欧美| avwww免费| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 国产1区2区3区精品| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 美女午夜性视频免费| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 久久精品成人免费网站| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 国产成人精品无人区| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 91av网站免费观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 久久热在线av| 亚洲精品一二三| 欧美大码av| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 少妇的丰满在线观看| av在线app专区| 性少妇av在线| 国产精品影院久久| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区 | 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| a级毛片在线看网站| 曰老女人黄片| 在线看a的网站| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 欧美在线一区亚洲| a 毛片基地| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 99热国产这里只有精品6| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 国产一区二区在线观看av| av天堂在线播放| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 成年动漫av网址| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 日韩电影二区| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 男女国产视频网站| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 国产精品九九99| 一级毛片精品| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 久久久久久人人人人人| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片|