• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Significance of Belgian Legislation on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage as a Reference to the Amendment of China's Pertinent Regulations

    2019-01-26 18:59:05LINZhen
    中華海洋法學(xué)評論 2019年1期
    關(guān)鍵詞:國家文物局文化遺產(chǎn)中心

    LIN Zhen

    Abstract: Regulation of the People’s Republic of China Concerning the Administration of the Work for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Relics(hereinafter referred to as the “Regulation”) is currently being amended.Meanwhile, China is considering acceding to the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage (hereinafter referred to as the“Convention”). Amendments to the Regulation should therefore take the provisions under the Convention into account so as to conform to the spirit of the Convention as far as possible. There are 60 States Parties to the Convention to date. Among them, Belgium is one of the few States that have already reenacted relevant laws in accordance with the Convention upon accession. Although China has not yet joined the Convention, the influence that its provisions might have on the nation’s domestic legislation should be adequately accounted for when the Regulation is being amended. In this regard, it is important that China understand the adjustments that Belgium and other States Parties have made to their domestic legislations as well as the rationale of such adjustments.

    Key Words: Legislation of China; Underwater cultural heritage; Legislation of Belgium

    Following the amendment of the Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Protection of Cultural Relics, the Regulation of the People’s Republic of China Concerning the Administration of the Work for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Relics (hereinafter referred to as the “Regulation”) is also being revised.The Exposure Draft on the Revised Regulation was released on 11 February 2018.At the same time, China is considering acceding to the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage (hereinafter referred to as the“Convention”). In this perspective, amendments to the Regulation should therefore take the provisions under the Convention into account so as to conform to the spirit of the Convention to the maximum extent. In fact, after the adoption of the Convention, many countries, even those who have not yet joined, have taken pertinent provisions under the Convention into account when revising their relevant legislation.1For example, Malaysia’s National Heritage Act 2005 was greatly affected by the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage 2001 (hereinafter referred to as the “Convention”). National Heritage Act 2005, at http://www.hbp.usm.my/conservation/laws/nationalheritageact.htm, 30 September 2018.

    To date, there are 60 States Parties to the Convention, but not all of them have made amendment to relevant domestic legislation accordingly. Although they have already acceded to the Convention, some States Parties have not yet amended relevant domestic laws so as to be fully in conformity with the provisions under the Convention. Belgium is one of the few countries that have reenacted relevant national laws in accordance with the Convention. Belgium acceded to the Convention on 5 August 2013. Three months later, the Convention entered into force for Belgium, which then decided to abolish its 2007 Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks2Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks, the Kingdom of Belgium, at http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi_loi/loi_a.pl?imgcn.y=4&sql=dd+=+date%272007-04-09%27+and+nm+contains+%272007014194%27&language=fr&rech=&tri=dd+as+rank&numero=1&table_name=LOI&caller=image_a1&row_id=1&cn=2007040951&fromtab=loi&imgcn.x=61&DETAIL=2007040951/F&nm=2007014194&la=F&pdf_page=7&pdf_file=http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/mopdf/2007/06/21_1.pdf, 30 September 2018. (in French)and to draft a new law to implement the Convention.3At https://www.lachambre.be/kvvcr/pdf_sections/newsletter/53-131-plenum-laws15F.pdf,30 September 2018. (in French)The resultant Draft Law on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage was approved by the House and Senate of Belgium on 20 March, and 27 March 2014, respectively.4At http://www.lachambre.be/kvvcr/showpage.cfm?section=/flwb&language=fr&cfm=/site/wwwcfm/flwb/flwbn.cfm?legislat=53&dossierID=3397, 30 September 2018. (in French)On 18 April of the same year, the Law on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (hereinafter referred to as the “2014 Law”)was adopted by the Belgian government.5Law on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (hereinafter referred to as the “2014 Law”), at http://www.unesco.org/culture/natlaws/media/pdf/belgium/belg_loipatsub14_frorof, 30 September 2018. (in French)

    China has not yet joined the Convention. Nonetheless, it should consider the impact that the Convention will have on itself in the future. In this regard, a thorough examination of the adjustments that States Parties have made to their domestic legislation after acceding to the Convention, as well as the rationales underpinning such adjustments, will provide some guidance on how China can best amend the Regulation.

    I. Major Provisions of the 2014 Law of Belgium

    Belgium’s underwater cultural heritage (hereinafter referred to as “UCH”)is mainly located in the North Sea. Although the Belgian coastline is relatively short, Belgium possesses a considerable number of underwater cultural relics near its shore, including about 280 shipwrecks lying in its territorial sea.6Draft Law on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage, Belgian House of Representatives, at http://www.lachambre.be/FLWB/PDF/53/3397/53K3397001.pdf, 30 September 2018. (in French)Historically,Antwerp and Ostend were two important international seaports. The Flanders Region was a major battlefield in the First and Second World Wars. For instance,the Zeebrugge Raid of the First World War took place in this region. As a result of these historical events, the waters of Belgium contain many ancient wrecked merchant freighters such as the ships of the Dutch East India Company7Ministerial Order on the Protection of the Wreck of the Wooden Vessel in Front of the Ostend Coast as Underwater Cultural Heritage, at http://www.etaamb.be/fr/arreteministeriel-du-30-septembre-2014_n2014014750.html, 30 September 2018; Ministerial Order on the Protection of the Wreck Site on the Buiten Ratel Sandbank as Underwater Cultural Heritage, at http://www.etaamb.be/fr/arrete-ministeriel-du-12-septembre-2016_n2016014316.html, 30 September 2018; Ministerial Order on the Protection of the Wreck of ‘t Vliegent Hart as Underwater Cultural Heritage, at http://www.etaamb.be/fr/arreteministeriel-du-12-septembre-2016_n2016014321.html, 30 September 2018. (in French)as well as a notable number of early and mid-twentieth century warships.8Ministerial Order on the Protection of the Wreck of the HMS Brilliant as Underwater Cultural Heritage, at http://www.etaamb.be/fr/arrete-ministeriel-du-12-septembre-2016_n2016014317.html, 30 September 2018; Ministerial Order on the Protection of the Wreck of the HMS Wakeful as Underwater Cultural Heritage, at http://www.etaamb.be/fr/arreteministeriel-du-13-mai-2014_n2014014608.html, 30 September 2018; Ministerial Order on the Recognition of Three Sunken Ships as Underwater Cultural Heritage, at http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi/article_body.pl?language=fr&caller=summary&pub_date=18-04-11&numac=2018011377, 30 September 2018. (in French)Belgium has demonstrated an emphasis on the importance of the protection of its UCH and,accordingly, has passed a series of laws and regulations to enhance it, including the aforesaid 2014 Law. This section will introduce the major provisions of the 2014 Law with regard to UCH’s definition, jurisdiction, ownership, warships and other State vessels, and international cooperation. Also, it will attempt to expose the rationales behind these provisions.

    A. Definitions

    Belgian government has changed considerably in its understanding of the term UCH. This shift can be easily noticed by comparing the terms employed by the 2007 Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks and the 2014 Law respectively. The 2007 Law defined “Protected Shipwrecks” as “all the wrecks and objects with historical or archaeological value in its territorial sea”.9Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks, the Kingdom of Belgium, Art. 16. (in French)This definition is narrower than the currently-used concept of “cultural heritage” in that it only mentions the protection of cultural relics themselves, putting the surrounding environment at a disadvantage, which however is equally of archaeological value.

    The definition of UCH in the 2014 Law is generally in conformity with the provisions of the Convention.10Art. 2 of the 2014 Law provides that: For the purposes of the application and execution of the present Law, “discoveries” mean any discovery of traces of human existence having a cultural, historical or archaeological character which have been partially or totally under water, periodically or continuously, such as: (a) sites, structures, buildings, artefacts and human remains, together with their archaeological and natural context; (b) vessels,aircraft, other vehicles or any part thereof, their cargo or other contents, together with their archaeological and natural context; and (c) objects of prehistoric character. If the person who has discovered any item listed above has good reason to believe that it is underwater cultural heritage and has not yet registered it in accordance with Article 7, such an item could be deemed as a “discovery” under the Law.The wording is basically consistent with Article 1(1)(a) of the Convention. However, it is noteworthy that Article 2 of the 2014 Law contains no provision concerning the criterion of 100 years under the Convention.11In accordance with the Convention, “underwater cultural heritage” means all traces of human existence having a cultural, historical or archaeological character which have been partially or totally under water, periodically or continuously, for at least one hundred years such as - (a) sites, structures, buildings, artefacts and human remains, together with their archaeological and natural context; (b) vessels, aircraft, other vehicles or any part thereof,their cargo or other contents, together with their archaeological and natural context; and(c) objects of prehistoric character. A careful comparison between the 2014 Law and the Convention tells that, the definition of UCH under Article 3 of the Law is very similar to the one under the Convention, with the sole difference lying in the time criterion of 100 years.According to Article 3 of the 2014 Law, the 100-year criterion applies only to all traces of human activities having a cultural, historical or archaeological character that are found in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) or on the continental shelf of Belgium. No such standard or requirement has been made under the 2014 Law concerning the UCH found within its territorial sea. Consequently, the traces which are discovered in its territorial waters do not have to be under water for at least 100 years to be classified as UCH.

    The rationale behind Article 3 of the 2014 Law could be found in Bill No.3397 passed by the Belgian House of Representatives.12At https://www.lachambre.be/kvvcr/pdf_sections/newsletter/53-131-plenum-laws15F.pdf,30 September 2018. (in French)A State enjoys sovereignty over its territorial sea. Any State has thus the right to enact laws to manage the UCH situated within its territorial sea. Accordingly, Belgium has the right to establish higher standards to enhance the protection of the UCH lying in its internal waters and territorial sea. In both sea areas, the UCH falling under the protection scope of the 2014 Law of Belgium is much more than those covered by the Convention, which is however consistent with the purpose of the Convention,i.e., to provide maximum protection to UCH. As of the traces found in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of Belgium, only those which have been submerged under water for not less than 100 years are deemed as UCH protected by the 2014 Law. However, considering that it does not have sovereignty over its EEZ or on its continental shelf, the Government of Belgium has reviewed its domestic laws so as not to conflict with existing international rules and domestic laws of other countries. In this regard, when drafting the 2014 Law, it also duly considered the potential impact that the provisions on the protection of UCH in the aforesaid areas would have on the interest of the international community.

    B. Jurisdiction

    The 2014 Law, with regard to the scope of its application, states that:

    The present law shall apply to: 1. articles discovered within the limits of the territorial sea of Belgium; 2. articles discovered in Belgium’s exclusive economic zone or on its continental shelf which have been submerged under water for not less than 100 years.

    As this provision shows, the 2014 Law is applicable to not only the UCH found in the territorial sea of Belgium but also to that found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf. However, with regard to the UCH discovered in its EEZ or on its continental shelf, the Law can only be applied to that UCH having been under water for at least 100 years. In contrast, the 2007 Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks only applies to the shipwrecks found in the territorial waters of Belgium.13Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks, the Kingdom of Belgium, Art. 2.Therefore, as compared with the 2007 Law, the 2014 Law has extended the jurisdiction of the Belgian government.

    C. Ownership

    The Convention is silent on the question of who shall have the ownership over a piece of UCH. The 2014 Law of Belgium, instead, contains detailed provisions on the matter. Article 10 of the 2014 Law articulates that Belgium may claim ownership over any UCH that is found in its territorial waters, EEZ or on its continental shelf, without prejudice to the right of the original owner to claim ownership upon proof of identity.14The 2014 Law, Art. 10.Particularly, the ownership of warships and other State vessels would be accorded to their flag States.

    D. Warships and Other State Vessels

    Provisions laid down in Article 6(2), paragraph 2 of the 2014 Law are rather similar to those of the Convention. These provisions ensure that ownership over warships and other State vessels will be duly accorded to their flag States.Accordingly, the provisions oblige Belgium to conduct consultations with flag States Parties on the protection of such wrecks while reserving the right to take all the necessary measures to prevent any immediate danger, including looting,before consulting the flag States.15The 2014 Law, Art. 6(2), para 2.This provision of the 2014 Law is undoubtedly in conformity with Articles 7 and 10 of the Convention.16Art. 7(3) of the Convention provides: within their archipelagic waters and territorial sea,in the exercise of their sovereignty and in recognition of general practice among States,States Parties, with a view to cooperating on the best methods of protecting State vessels and aircraft, should inform the flag State Party to this Convention and, if applicable, other States with a verifiable link, especially a cultural, historical or archaeological link, with respect to the discovery of such identifiable State vessels and aircraft. And Art. 10(4) of the Convention states: without prejudice to the duty of all States Parties to protect underwater cultural heritage by way of all practicable measures taken in accordance with international law to prevent immediate danger to the underwater cultural heritage, including looting,the Coordinating State may take all practicable measures, and/or issue any necessary authorizations in conformity with this Convention and, if necessary prior to consultations,to prevent any immediate danger to the underwater cultural heritage, whether arising from human activities or any other cause, including looting. In taking such measures assistance may be requested from other States Parties.In comparison with previous legislation of Belgium,17Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks, Art. 7(2), para. 2, stipulates that, for a warship or a State vessel which at the time of sinking was used solely for government but not commercial purposes, the official in charge may allow salvage of such wrecks only after obtaining a special authorization directly from its flag State.the jurisdiction of Belgium, as a coastal State,has obviously been expanded to some extent in this regard.

    E. International Cooperation

    Article 8(1), paragraph 3 of the 2014 Law states that with respect to the UCH found within the EEZ or on the continental shelf of Belgium, the official in charge of UCH protection may, if necessary, consult the State that has made a declaration to Belgium in accordance with Article 9(5) of the Convention. And the Convention Article 9(5) provides:

    Any State Party may declare to the State Party in whose exclusive economic zone or on whose continental shelf the underwater cultural heritage is located its interest in being consulted on how to ensure the effective protection of that underwater cultural heritage. Such declaration shall be based on a verifiable link, especially a cultural, historical or archaeological link, to the underwater cultural heritage concerned.

    As these passages demonstrated, the relevant provisions of the 2014 Law are highly consistent with the principle of international cooperation as encouraged by UNCLOS Article 30318United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Art. 303(1), reads: States have the duty to protect objects of an archaeological and historical nature found at sea and shall cooperate for this purpose.and the Convention.

    In general, the 2014 Law demonstrates the commitment of the Belgian government to fulfilling its treaty obligations as a State Party to the Convention.In addition to the abovementioned Article 8(1), Belgium has established further provisions with the objective of abiding by the fundamental principles of the Convention, including the preservation in situ of UCH and prohibition of commercial exploitation.19Art. 6(1) of the 2014 Law provides that no excavation shall be carried out until permission is obtained from the official in charge of UCH protection. Article 15 prohibits the sale and possession of any UCH inconsistent with this law. Article 16 further provides that no Belgian vessel shall engage in any exploration or excavation of UCH in violation of the Convention. Article 8(3) also states that the protection of underwater cultural heritage through in situ preservation shall be considered as the first option. Where in situ preservation is impossible, activities directed at UCH shall be carried out following the provisions of the Annex to the Convention.From this perspective, it can be concluded that the law adopted by the Belgian government with regard to the protection of its UCH has been as truthful to the spirit of the Convention as practical in terms of adjusting some of its provisions to the country’s specific necessities, as illustrated by the 2014 Law’s deliberation on the matter of jurisdiction.

    II. Significance of the 2014 Law as a Reference to the Amendment of the Regulation of China

    China has a long history. It possesses rich cultural heritage, which includes ancient shipwrecks, cities, bridges, ports, hydrological stone carvings, modern warships and other submerged relics. Although the protection of UCH started late in China, it has developed rather rapidly into a system led by the central government.China has managed to conduct several major excavations by deploying underwater archaeology related resources with the assistance of local agencies. To date, this system has accomplished a series of significant achievements, most notably the extension of its operating area to the distant waters.20At http://www.uch-china.org/inchina.aspx, 15 July 2018. (in Chinese)Today, in line with the needs related to the construction of the “Twenty-First Century Maritime Silk Road”,China has established international cooperation with several States concerning UCH protection, which include joint archaeological excavations with Kenya and Saudi Arabia in their waters respectively.21At http://www.xinhuanet.com/world/2018-12/30/c_1123928294.htm, http://www.chnmuseum.cn/(S(2d4uwh55uyjqbg45tpah3ea1))/Default.aspx?TabId=1312&InfoID=9005 3&frtid=1243&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1, 15 July 2018. (in Chinese)In terms of legislation, China is one of the few East Asian States which have enacted specific domestic laws for UCH protection. For example, the Regulation was adopted in 1989 by the Chinese government and has played an important role till most recently.

    On 11 February 2018, in order to meet the current needs to protect underwater cultural relics, the National Cultural Heritage Administration of China released the Exposure Draft of Revised Regulation of the People’s Republic of China Concerning the Administration of the Work for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Relics (hereinafter referred to as the “Exposure Draft”).22Exposure Draft on the Revised Regulation of the People’s Republic of China Concerning the Administration of the Work for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Relics (hereinafter“Exposure Draft”), at http://www.sach.gov.cn/module/download/downfile.jsp?classid=0&fil ename=1802112038231995622.docx, 15 July 2018. (in Chinese)According to the notes penned by the National Cultural Heritage Administration, the amendments envisioned by the Exposure Draft have three main purposes: first, to revise the Regulation so that it matches with the changes made to the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Protection of Cultural Relics (hereinafter referred to as the “Law on Protection of Cultural Relics”); second, to cater to the needs of the new operations concerning the protection of underwater cultural relics; third, to improve the feasibility of the provisions under the Regulation.23Revision Explanations with Regards to the Exposure Draft, at http://www.sach.gov.cn/module/download/downfile.jsp?classid=0&filename=1802112038457578546.docx, 15 July 2018. (in Chinese)The revisions have also been influenced by the spirit and fundamental principles of the Convention.24Revision Explanations with Regards to the Exposure Draft, at http://www.sach.gov.cn/module/download/downfile.jsp?classid=0&filename=1802112038457578546.docx, 15 July 2018. (in Chinese)However, the Exposure Draft is still being discussed. Therefore, this section will explore the possible directions that the Exposure Draft might take by using the relevant Belgian legislation as a point of reference. This will be done by bearing in mind that, Belgium is a State Party to the Convention, whereas China has not yet acceded to the Convention. However, since the amendment to the Regulation has also the unstated purpose of respecting the standards established by the relevant international law, China cannot but take the provisions of the Convention into account so as to be well prepared for its accession. From this point of view, the amendment to the Regulation needs to be both forward-looking and consistent with the basic principles of the Convention while, at the same time, preserving some flexibility in the areas which have not yet been clearly specified in the Convention.Therefore, the flexible enforcement of the Convention by the Belgian government might provide some important guidance to China.

    A. Terms and Definitions

    As it can be shown from the legislative changes adopted by Belgium and other States, the concept of UCH is now increasingly used to replace old terms such as“underwater cultural relics”, “shipwrecks” and “sunken objects”. According to its definition in the Convention, UCH encompasses much more than those old terms.In this perspective, to align the country with what is now a common trend in the international community, China’s legislators could replace the conceptual term of“underwater cultural relics” with that of “underwater cultural heritage”. Of course,the prerequisite for doing so is to make adjustments to the Law on Protection of Cultural Relics and, accordingly, use the term “cultural heritage” instead of “cultural relics”. As a matter of fact, two Chinese organizations in charge of UCH protection,namely the National Cultural Heritage Administration (國家文物局) and the National Center of Underwater Cultural Heritage (水下文化遺產(chǎn)保護中心)have already used the term “cultural heritage”, instead of “cultural relics” in their English names. Otherwise, the term “cultural relics” could be retained but include certain components of the concept of cultural heritage such as the archaeological and natural context of the heritage, which are generally excluded from what is understood to be a “physical object”. Ideally, this adjustment should occur in the Law on Protection of Cultural Relics first.

    With respect to the definition of the underwater cultural relics, Article 2 of the Regulation states:

    The term “underwater cultural relics” referred to in the Regulation means any human cultural heritage having historical, artistic and scientific values that remain in the following waters:

    (1) all the cultural relics of Chinese origin, of unidentifiable origin, or of foreign origin that remain in Chinese internal or territorial waters;

    (2) cultural relics that are of Chinese origin or of unidentifiable origin that remain in sea areas outside the Chinese territorial waters but under Chinese jurisdiction according to Chinese laws;

    (3) cultural relics of Chinese origin that remain in the sea areas of any foreign State other than its internal and territorial waters, or in the high seas.

    The provisions in the preceding paragraphs shall not cover objects that have remained underwater since 1911 but have nothing to do with important historical events, revolutionary movements or renowned personages.

    The Exposure Draft did not make any changes to the abovementioned Article 2. As for the reasons, the National Cultural Heritage Administration explained that:“it is important to note that as China has not yet acceded to the Convention, no amendments have been made to the content of Articles 2 and 3 with regard to the scope of and the jurisdiction over underwater cultural relics.”25Revision Explanations with Regards to the Exposure Draft, at http://www.sach.gov.cn/module/download/downfile.jsp?classid=0&filename=1802112038457578546.docx, 15 July 2018. (in Chinese)This seems to admit the existence of a certain gap between China’s legislation and the Convention in the determination of the scope of cultural relics. All objects submerged after 1911 and before 1918 are protected by the Convention but not necessarily by the Regulation.It seems that the 100-year-criterion under the Convention was established without strict reasoning. In contrast, the critical date of 1911 under the Regulation was determined after careful consideration. It is said that this criterion was made for the purpose of excluding foreign warships that sank in China’s waters after 1911.26Cross-Strait Forum on Laws, Policies and Practices Relating to Underwater Cultural Heritage 2018, Keelung, 20-21 June 2018.However, as far as legislative means are concerned, it is entirely possible to use a separate article to make specific arrangements for such vessels (see Subsection D of this part for details).

    After accession to the Convention, China can also use the Belgian legislation as a point of reference and, accordingly, set a limit of 100 years for the definition of UCH that is found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf while leaving the time criteria open ended with regard to the UCH discovered in its territorial sea. As a matter of fact, there is no need to artificially set any time limit for the UCH that is found in the territorial waters of a State, since its cultural and archaeological value should be the foremost criterion to determine whether it is worthy of protection.Conversely, for the UCH that is found in the EEZ and on the continental shelf,which does not fall within the territory of a given State, applicable international treaties should be considered so as to avoid potential conflicts. Lastly, since under the current Regulation, the article defining the term of underwater cultural relics includes both definition and application scope, it would be recommendable that the aforesaid article be divided into two articles, with one dedicated to definition, and the other to application scope.

    B. Jurisdiction

    Jurisdiction of States has always been a focus during discussions on legislative amendment. Article 3 of the current Regulation stipulates:

    The underwater cultural relics stipulated in Article 2(1)&(2) belong to the State (China), and the State exercises jurisdiction over them; the State shall have the right to identify the owner of the underwater cultural relics specified in Article 2(3).

    As mentioned above, on the ground that China has not yet joined the Convention, the Exposure Draft contains no amendment to the content of Articles 2 and 3 concerning the jurisdiction over underwater cultural relics. So, do the current provisions on jurisdiction in the Regulation of China conflict with the Convention?

    According to the UNCLOS, the rights of coastal States over their EEZ and continental shelf are limited to sovereign rights and corresponding jurisdiction over natural resources and, technically speaking, do not extend to underwater cultural heritage. The Convention designed a very complex mechanism of “Coordinating State” to address the issue of jurisdiction over UCH found in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of a State.27Art. 10(3) of the Convention reads: where there is a discovery of underwater cultural heritage or it is intended that activity shall be directed at underwater cultural heritage in a State Party’s exclusive economic zone or on its continental shelf, that State Party shall: (a) consult all other States Parties which have declared an interest under Article 9,paragraph 5, on how best to protect the underwater cultural heritage; (b) coordinate such consultations as “Coordinating State”, unless it expressly declares that it does not wish to do so, in which case the States Parties which have declared an interest under Article 9, paragraph 5, shall appoint a Coordinating State. And its Art. 10(4) states: without prejudice to the duty of all States Parties to protect underwater cultural heritage by way of all practicable measures taken in accordance with international law to prevent immediate danger to the underwater cultural heritage, including looting, the Coordinating State may take all practicable measures, and/or issue any necessary authorizations in conformity with this Convention and, if necessary prior to consultations, to prevent any immediate danger to the underwater cultural heritage, whether arising from human activities or any other cause, including looting. In taking such measures assistance may be requested from other States Parties. In accordance with Art. 10(5), the Coordinating State: (a) shall implement measures of protection which have been agreed by the consulting States, which include the Coordinating State, unless the consulting States, which include the Coordinating State,agree that another State Party shall implement those measures; (b) shall issue all necessary authorizations for such agreed measures in conformity with the Rules, unless the consulting States, which include the Coordinating State, agree that another State Party shall issue those authorizations; (c) may conduct any necessary preliminary research on the underwater cultural heritage and shall issue all necessary authorizations therefore, and shall promptly inform the Director-General of the results, who in turn will make such information promptly available to other States Parties. Art. 10(6) provides: in coordinating consultations, taking measures, conducting preliminary research and/or issuing authorizations pursuant to this Article, the Coordinating State shall act on behalf of the States Parties as a whole and not in its own interest. Any such action shall not in itself constitute a basis for the assertion of any preferential or jurisdictional rights not provided for in international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.On the one hand, the Convention seems reluctant to admit the extension of the jurisdiction of coastal States. On the other hand, it has to rely on coastal States for the management of UCH lying in such sea areas. This has resulted in significant differences in the provisions of different States Parties with regard to their jurisdiction over UCH discovered in their EEZ or on their continental shelf. Belgium, which has a large number of UCH of foreign origin in its waters, has therefore adopted the approach of expanding its jurisdiction while also acknowledging other States’ claims of rights as States of origin. This approach makes international cooperation possible for the protection of UCH in the waters of Belgium.

    On the basis of different legal principles, China exercises jurisdiction over the underwater cultural relics of Chinese or unidentifiable origin that are found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf. In the first case, jurisdiction is legitimated by the right attached to being the State of origin. In the second, jurisdiction is legitimated on the ground that, as a coastal State, China is in the best position to provide maximum protection to these relics. As for the relics of Chinese origin that are found in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of other States, China’s claim of right to identify their owners stems from its right as the State of origin.

    However, to date China has never claimed any rights over any underwater cultural relics of Chinese origin that have been found in other States’ waters. This has been the case in that the Regulation’s provisions for such an operation are hardly implementable. To overcome this issue, legislators may consider extending China’s jurisdiction to all the UCH found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf but also, following the Belgian case, reserve for the State of origin the right to provide consultation. On the basis of the principle of reciprocity, legislators could also reserve the same right for China with respect to the UCH of Chinese origin that is discovered in the EEZ or continental shelf of other States. China has a long history of prosperous international maritime trade, thus it cannot be excluded that there might be a certain amount of UCH of foreign origin lying in China’s EEZ or on its continental shelf. Likewise, it is very likely that some more pieces of UCH of Chinese origin are located in the EEZ or continental shelf of other States. This double reservation, if adopted, would also serve the prospective needs of UCH protection under the “Belt and Road Initiative” of China.

    C. Ownership

    There is no specific provision on the issue of UCH ownership in the Convention. To put it differently, the Convention may intentionally leave it blank to guarantee States Parties’ right to amend their national laws according to their interpretation of the Convention. Following accession to the Convention, Belgium passed a law to claim that the UCH found in its territorial sea, EEZ or on its continental shelf belong to Belgium, demonstrating that this provision does not violate its obligations under the Convention.

    China’s current legislation merely provides that it claims ownership over the underwater cultural relics that are found in its territorial waters, as well as the relics of Chinese or unidentifiable origin which are located in its EEZ or on its continental shelf. Currently, the Exposure Draft has made no amendment to this provision, which does not conflict with the Convention and may therefore be retained even after accession to the Convention. However, the portion of Article 3 of the Regulation that concerns the right to identify the owner of the cultural relics that are of Chinese origin but located in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of other States needs to be further clarified. As mentioned above, China has never claimed ownership over the relics located in other States’ waters, thus this provision has never been implemented. In practice, this right to identify the owner differs from jurisdiction and ownership. This right is, in fact, closer to those enjoyable by the State of origin as defined in Articles 9 and 10 of the Convention.28Art. 9(5) of the Convention: any State Party may declare to the State Party in whose exclusive economic zone or on whose continental shelf the underwater cultural heritage is located its interest in being consulted on how to ensure the effective protection of that underwater cultural heritage. Such declaration shall be based on a verifiable link, especially a cultural, historical or archaeological link, to the underwater cultural heritage concerned.Art. 10(3) states that where there is a discovery of underwater cultural heritage or it is intended that activity shall be directed at underwater cultural heritage in a State Party’s exclusive economic zone or on its continental shelf, that State Party shall: (a) consult all other States Parties which have declared an interest under Article 9, paragraph 5, on how best to protect the underwater cultural heritage; (b) coordinate such consultations as“Coordinating State”, unless it expressly declares that it does not wish to do so, in which case the States Parties which have declared an interest under Article 9, paragraph 5, shall appoint a Coordinating State.Unlike natural resources, UCH comprises artificially produced objects. In light of this distinction,the rights of the States of origin, as creators of UCH, are explicitly recognized in the Convention. However, as far as the Convention Articles 9 and 10 are concerned,the rights of States of origin are clearly exercisable by the States Parties, whereas their application for non-States Parties is not set in stone. After acceding to the Convention, China can further clarify its relevant rights by directly referring to Articles 9 and 10 of the Convention. Before that, however, the exercise of such rights may depend on the principle of reciprocity. Therefore, linking back the above discussion on jurisdiction, China could refer to Belgium’s legislation to claim ownership over all the UCH that is found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf, with the exception of State vessels and aircraft of foreign origin. On this basis, China can accommodate the rights of other States, as identifiable countries of origin, to the UCH that is found in the EEZ or continental shelf of China (such as the right to participate in protection and research), in order to guarantee China’s corresponding rights to the UCH that is found in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of other States.

    D. Warships and Other State Vessels

    A considerable number of foreign warships sank in the waters of Belgium in the First and Second World Wars and have been under water since then. As a result, Belgian domestic legislation contains detailed provisions for sunken warships and other State vessels that meet the definition of UCH. However, China has adopted a rather vague attitude towards this issue and, accordingly, has not set out any pertinent provision in its domestic laws.29LIN Zhen, Legal Status of Sunken Warships That Meet the Definition of Underwater Cultural Heritage in Territorial Waters: Legislations of China and ASEAN States, China Oceans Law Review, No. 2, 2018.This must change, given that a considerable number of foreign warships that meet the definition of UCH under the Convention are also lying in the waters of China. The legal status of these warships should be clearly defined in the pertinent Chinese legislation so as to spare administrative headache for all those whose work is in connection with UCH.

    According to the existing legislation of China, China claims rights over: (a)all the cultural relics that are found in its internal waters and territorial sea; (b)the cultural relics of Chinese or unidentifiable origin that are located in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of China, and (c) the cultural relics of Chinese origin that are located in the sea areas of any foreign State other than its internal and territorial waters, or in the high seas. On the former two, China claims ownership and jurisdiction. Notably, China does not claim rights over sunken foreign warships that are found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf, which is consistent with the provisions of the Convention. Conversely, China claims ownership over the sunken warships and other State vessels that meet the definition of underwater cultural relics and are found in its territorial waters, regardless of their flag States. This principle has never been applied in practice since, to date, China has never carried out any archaeological excavation directed at a foreign State vessel.

    Similarly, the Exposure Draft has not made any provision for foreign State vessels or aircraft. As discussed above, it is not a tenable solution to exclude foreign warships from the scope of underwater cultural relics by using the year 1911 as a time criterion to define underwater cultural relics. In the perspective of the author, to create an article specifying the legal status of sunken warships and other State vessels that meet the definition of underwater cultural relics would otherwise be feasible, which will provide practical guidance to those whose work is in connection with UCH. Moreover, the Convention does provide a viable solution:coastal States and flag States should cooperate in order to ensure the adequate protection of this particular category of UCH. China may also refer to Belgium’s domestic laws, which guarantee the protection of such vessels by means of consultation with the flag States while reserving the right for protective measures to be unilaterally taken in case of immediate danger.

    E. International Cooperation

    With regard to international cooperation, Belgium directly incorporated the relevant provisions of the Convention into its legislation. Considering the UCH protection efforts undergoing currently in China, international cooperation is inevitable. And such cooperation seems necessary and welcome to the protection of both the UCH of foreign origin that is located in China’s EEZ or on its continental shelf and the UCH of Chinese origin that is located in other States’ EEZ or continental shelf.

    So how should China legislate to ensure the protection of the cultural heritage mentioned above through international cooperation? Ever since 1989 when the Regulation was enacted, no underwater archaeological survey or excavation in cooperation with any other country has ever been conducted in China’s waters.Nonetheless, the revisions reflected in the Exposure Draft, essentially, would facilitate international cooperation, as Article 10(3) stipulates:

    Foreign States, international organizations and foreign legal persons or natural persons, if they intend to conduct exploration or excavation activities in the waters under Chinese jurisdiction, shall do so in cooperation with the Chinese side, and shall submit their application therefor to the competent authorities under the State Council for approval.

    Compared to the current Regulation,30Article 7(2) of the Regulation: foreign States, international organizations and foreign legal persons or natural persons that are to conduct archaeological exploration or excavation activities in the waters under Chinese jurisdiction shall do so in cooperation with the Chinese side, and shall submit their application therefor to the National Cultural Heritage Administration, which shall further submit it to the State Council of the People’s Republic of China for special approval.the abovementioned application process has been simplified. Specifically, a special permission by the State Council is no longer required. These changes reflect the willingness of China’s organizations or entities in charge of UCH protection to cooperate with their counterparts in other States.

    However, further arrangements are needed to carry out international cooperation on a practical level. In this regard, it must be noted that the current provisions of the Regulation are only concerned with the protection of the underwater cultural relics found in the waters of China. No provisions have been made with regard to the protection of relics of Chinese origin that are located in the waters of other States. Since China has not yet acceded to the Convention, it cannot directly invoke the provisions of the Convention on international cooperation.Nevertheless, the Exposure Draft may add a separate article to support the rights of States of origin, including China’s right to identify the owner of the UCH of Chinese origin that is located in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of other States;in this way, international cooperation would be possible based on the principle of reciprocity.

    III. Conclusion

    While China is considering acceding to the Convention, the amendment of the Regulation has been underway with the intent to make it consistent with the fundamental principles of the Convention. In this regard, Belgium represents a very good example to follow, since Belgium is one of the few States to have enacted new laws in line with the Convention after accession. By conducting a thorough study and analysis of Belgium’s newly-adopted law on UCH protection, it was found that it is not an exact duplicate of the Convention. Rather, it presents several ad hoc modifications. On the one hand, the basic principles of the Convention, such as the principles of preservation in situ, prohibition of commercial exploitation and encouragement of international cooperation, are strictly adhered to. On the other hand, Belgium’s provisions on the matters of jurisdiction and ownership appear to be more focused on the preservation of its national interests, so as to provide maximum protection to UCH.

    The Exposure Draft has made some adjustments to best deal with the newly emerging challenges and strengthen the feasibility of the Regulation. These changes appear to be respectful of the general principles of the Convention and would promote the protection of UCH in China. However, there is still room for improvement, especially in the provisions concerning the definition of UCH,jurisdiction, State vessels and aircraft meeting the definition of “UCH” and, lastly,international cooperation.

    In the Exposure Draft, Articles 2 and 3 have remained the same as in the Regulation. They may possibly be amended in the future. In the current version of the Regulation, both the provision concerning the application scope and the one regarding the definition of the term “underwater cultural relics” are placed under Article 2. The study here conducted recommends for these provisions to be divided into two separate articles. As to Article 2, it is not recommended setting a time limit for all the underwater cultural relics that are located in China’s territorial waters. However, it is advisable to apply the Convention’s criterion of 100 years to the cultural relics that are situated in China’s EEZ or on its continental shelf.Furthermore, with reference to Belgium’s legislation, China may decide to extend its jurisdiction and ownership to cover all the UCH that is found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf (excluding State vessels and aircraft), while also reserving the rights of States of origin to provide consultation and participate in relevant discussions, therefore to create possibility for future cooperation. In line with the principle of reciprocity, China can claim right to the same with regards to UCH of Chinese origin that is located in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of other States. Lastly, the Exposure Draft should consider adding one more article that clearly defines the legal status of State vessels and aircraft of foreign origin that meet the definition of “underwater cultural relics” under the Regulation. Based on the lessons drawn from Belgium, the new article should ensure that China consults with the flag States over the effective protection of such vessels and aircraft,cooperates with them accordingly but also reserves the right to act unilaterally in cases of emergency.

    猜你喜歡
    國家文物局文化遺產(chǎn)中心
    剪掉和中心無關(guān)的
    中宣部、文旅部、國家文物局發(fā)布重要文件
    客家文博(2022年1期)2022-08-22 06:30:54
    在打造“兩個中心”中彰顯統(tǒng)戰(zhàn)擔(dān)當作為
    華人時刊(2021年15期)2021-11-27 09:16:42
    與文化遺產(chǎn)相遇
    小讀者(2021年6期)2021-07-22 01:49:46
    酌古參今——頤和園文化遺產(chǎn)之美
    非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)欣賞
    ——圍棋
    別讓托養(yǎng)中心成“死亡中心”
    北上廣操心“副中心”
    博客天下(2015年17期)2015-09-15 14:55:10
    國家文物局將9件周代青銅器劃撥上海博物館
    文化遺產(chǎn)保護
    江蘇年鑒(2014年0期)2014-03-11 17:09:53
    在线看三级毛片| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 人妻久久中文字幕网| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 久久久久久久久大av| 日韩欧美免费精品| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 18+在线观看网站| 1000部很黄的大片| 波多野结衣高清作品| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 内地一区二区视频在线| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 久久国产乱子免费精品| av在线播放精品| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产综合懂色| .国产精品久久| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 久久久久久久久久成人| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 尾随美女入室| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 99久久精品热视频| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 久久久色成人| 精品人妻视频免费看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 免费观看的影片在线观看| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 1024手机看黄色片| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 亚洲四区av| 久久人人爽人人片av| 如何舔出高潮| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 尾随美女入室| 精品福利观看| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 在线观看66精品国产| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 小说图片视频综合网站| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 熟女电影av网| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 色av中文字幕| av.在线天堂| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 18+在线观看网站| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产三级中文精品| 床上黄色一级片| 色播亚洲综合网| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 久久久成人免费电影| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 久久人妻av系列| 国产成人freesex在线 | 日韩高清综合在线| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 国产成人一区二区在线| 一级黄色大片毛片| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 黄片wwwwww| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 欧美性感艳星| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 国产精品永久免费网站| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国产精品野战在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 在线a可以看的网站| 嫩草影视91久久| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 天堂网av新在线| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 露出奶头的视频| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产成人91sexporn| videossex国产| 久久人妻av系列| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频 | 内射极品少妇av片p| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 色在线成人网| 亚洲内射少妇av| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说 | 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| or卡值多少钱| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 尾随美女入室| 老司机影院成人| 一本一本综合久久| 色视频www国产| 久久人妻av系列| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 嫩草影院精品99| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看 | 美女大奶头视频| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| av在线老鸭窝| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 国产精华一区二区三区| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 禁无遮挡网站| 级片在线观看| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 久久午夜福利片| 丝袜喷水一区| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 露出奶头的视频| 欧美3d第一页| 三级经典国产精品| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 免费高清视频大片| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 乱系列少妇在线播放| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 亚洲av熟女| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 成人午夜高清在线视频| 一区福利在线观看| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 亚洲色图av天堂| 少妇丰满av| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 日本黄大片高清| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 少妇高潮的动态图| 日本五十路高清| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 99热这里只有精品一区| 日日啪夜夜撸| 中国美女看黄片| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 成人二区视频| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 亚洲五月天丁香| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| av国产免费在线观看| 欧美色视频一区免费| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 亚洲国产色片| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 免费大片18禁| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 免费观看人在逋| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 免费看av在线观看网站| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 大香蕉久久网| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 1000部很黄的大片| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 成人三级黄色视频| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 免费av不卡在线播放| 日韩强制内射视频| 中文字幕久久专区| 亚洲av.av天堂| 国产亚洲欧美98| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 韩国av在线不卡| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 亚洲四区av| 日本三级黄在线观看| 看免费成人av毛片| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 久久久久国产网址| 搡老岳熟女国产| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 韩国av在线不卡| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产色婷婷99| 国产精品,欧美在线| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产精品久久视频播放| 日本熟妇午夜| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 午夜免费激情av| 少妇高潮的动态图| 久久6这里有精品| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 亚洲内射少妇av| 成人二区视频| 永久网站在线| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 欧美日本视频| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 色综合色国产| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 亚州av有码| 直男gayav资源| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 色av中文字幕| 国产不卡一卡二| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 精品久久久久久久久av| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 极品教师在线视频| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 久久久久久伊人网av| 一本久久中文字幕| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 97碰自拍视频| 色播亚洲综合网| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 欧美色视频一区免费| 色5月婷婷丁香| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 久久久欧美国产精品| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 成年免费大片在线观看| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 一区福利在线观看| 简卡轻食公司| 色5月婷婷丁香| 国产成人91sexporn| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 久久这里只有精品中国| 国产成人aa在线观看| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 久久精品影院6| 一级av片app| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 国产在视频线在精品| 此物有八面人人有两片| 国产精华一区二区三区| av在线亚洲专区| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 日韩成人伦理影院| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 精品福利观看| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 国内精品宾馆在线| 91久久精品电影网| 热99re8久久精品国产| 久久精品91蜜桃| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 精品福利观看| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 国产av在哪里看| 简卡轻食公司| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| av在线天堂中文字幕| 俺也久久电影网| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 小说图片视频综合网站| 嫩草影院新地址| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 91精品国产九色| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 午夜免费激情av| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 久久久精品94久久精品| 久久人妻av系列| avwww免费| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久中文看片网| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 成人av在线播放网站| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 观看免费一级毛片| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 日韩av在线大香蕉| 免费观看在线日韩| 一进一出抽搐动态| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 直男gayav资源| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 97超碰精品成人国产| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 色综合色国产| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 免费看日本二区| 色在线成人网| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 免费观看人在逋| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 美女黄网站色视频| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 简卡轻食公司| 1000部很黄的大片| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 91久久精品电影网| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 精品久久久久久久久av| 精品久久久久久久久av| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 少妇丰满av| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| av在线观看视频网站免费| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 久久精品人妻少妇| 久99久视频精品免费| 悠悠久久av| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| av.在线天堂| 成人无遮挡网站| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 六月丁香七月| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 热99在线观看视频| 99久久精品一区二区三区| av视频在线观看入口| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 欧美区成人在线视频| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 1000部很黄的大片| 色av中文字幕| 精品久久久久久久久av| 色综合色国产| 国产成人aa在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 欧美zozozo另类| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 99久国产av精品| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产av一区在线观看免费| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 国产黄片美女视频| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 尾随美女入室| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国产精品无大码| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 在线看三级毛片| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 久久久久久久久久成人| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲无线在线观看| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 色视频www国产| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 日本熟妇午夜| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 97超碰精品成人国产| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 久久久精品大字幕| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 国内精品宾馆在线| 少妇丰满av| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品 | 一级黄片播放器| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 亚洲国产色片| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| www日本黄色视频网| 成人欧美大片| 97热精品久久久久久| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 嫩草影院入口| 午夜福利18| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 久久6这里有精品| 午夜福利在线在线| 亚洲在线观看片| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 欧美三级亚洲精品| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 成年av动漫网址| 深爱激情五月婷婷| av在线蜜桃| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 亚洲成人久久性| 一本精品99久久精品77|