• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Significance of Belgian Legislation on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage as a Reference to the Amendment of China's Pertinent Regulations

    2019-01-26 18:59:05LINZhen
    中華海洋法學(xué)評論 2019年1期
    關(guān)鍵詞:國家文物局文化遺產(chǎn)中心

    LIN Zhen

    Abstract: Regulation of the People’s Republic of China Concerning the Administration of the Work for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Relics(hereinafter referred to as the “Regulation”) is currently being amended.Meanwhile, China is considering acceding to the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage (hereinafter referred to as the“Convention”). Amendments to the Regulation should therefore take the provisions under the Convention into account so as to conform to the spirit of the Convention as far as possible. There are 60 States Parties to the Convention to date. Among them, Belgium is one of the few States that have already reenacted relevant laws in accordance with the Convention upon accession. Although China has not yet joined the Convention, the influence that its provisions might have on the nation’s domestic legislation should be adequately accounted for when the Regulation is being amended. In this regard, it is important that China understand the adjustments that Belgium and other States Parties have made to their domestic legislations as well as the rationale of such adjustments.

    Key Words: Legislation of China; Underwater cultural heritage; Legislation of Belgium

    Following the amendment of the Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Protection of Cultural Relics, the Regulation of the People’s Republic of China Concerning the Administration of the Work for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Relics (hereinafter referred to as the “Regulation”) is also being revised.The Exposure Draft on the Revised Regulation was released on 11 February 2018.At the same time, China is considering acceding to the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage (hereinafter referred to as the“Convention”). In this perspective, amendments to the Regulation should therefore take the provisions under the Convention into account so as to conform to the spirit of the Convention to the maximum extent. In fact, after the adoption of the Convention, many countries, even those who have not yet joined, have taken pertinent provisions under the Convention into account when revising their relevant legislation.1For example, Malaysia’s National Heritage Act 2005 was greatly affected by the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage 2001 (hereinafter referred to as the “Convention”). National Heritage Act 2005, at http://www.hbp.usm.my/conservation/laws/nationalheritageact.htm, 30 September 2018.

    To date, there are 60 States Parties to the Convention, but not all of them have made amendment to relevant domestic legislation accordingly. Although they have already acceded to the Convention, some States Parties have not yet amended relevant domestic laws so as to be fully in conformity with the provisions under the Convention. Belgium is one of the few countries that have reenacted relevant national laws in accordance with the Convention. Belgium acceded to the Convention on 5 August 2013. Three months later, the Convention entered into force for Belgium, which then decided to abolish its 2007 Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks2Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks, the Kingdom of Belgium, at http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi_loi/loi_a.pl?imgcn.y=4&sql=dd+=+date%272007-04-09%27+and+nm+contains+%272007014194%27&language=fr&rech=&tri=dd+as+rank&numero=1&table_name=LOI&caller=image_a1&row_id=1&cn=2007040951&fromtab=loi&imgcn.x=61&DETAIL=2007040951/F&nm=2007014194&la=F&pdf_page=7&pdf_file=http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/mopdf/2007/06/21_1.pdf, 30 September 2018. (in French)and to draft a new law to implement the Convention.3At https://www.lachambre.be/kvvcr/pdf_sections/newsletter/53-131-plenum-laws15F.pdf,30 September 2018. (in French)The resultant Draft Law on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage was approved by the House and Senate of Belgium on 20 March, and 27 March 2014, respectively.4At http://www.lachambre.be/kvvcr/showpage.cfm?section=/flwb&language=fr&cfm=/site/wwwcfm/flwb/flwbn.cfm?legislat=53&dossierID=3397, 30 September 2018. (in French)On 18 April of the same year, the Law on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (hereinafter referred to as the “2014 Law”)was adopted by the Belgian government.5Law on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (hereinafter referred to as the “2014 Law”), at http://www.unesco.org/culture/natlaws/media/pdf/belgium/belg_loipatsub14_frorof, 30 September 2018. (in French)

    China has not yet joined the Convention. Nonetheless, it should consider the impact that the Convention will have on itself in the future. In this regard, a thorough examination of the adjustments that States Parties have made to their domestic legislation after acceding to the Convention, as well as the rationales underpinning such adjustments, will provide some guidance on how China can best amend the Regulation.

    I. Major Provisions of the 2014 Law of Belgium

    Belgium’s underwater cultural heritage (hereinafter referred to as “UCH”)is mainly located in the North Sea. Although the Belgian coastline is relatively short, Belgium possesses a considerable number of underwater cultural relics near its shore, including about 280 shipwrecks lying in its territorial sea.6Draft Law on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage, Belgian House of Representatives, at http://www.lachambre.be/FLWB/PDF/53/3397/53K3397001.pdf, 30 September 2018. (in French)Historically,Antwerp and Ostend were two important international seaports. The Flanders Region was a major battlefield in the First and Second World Wars. For instance,the Zeebrugge Raid of the First World War took place in this region. As a result of these historical events, the waters of Belgium contain many ancient wrecked merchant freighters such as the ships of the Dutch East India Company7Ministerial Order on the Protection of the Wreck of the Wooden Vessel in Front of the Ostend Coast as Underwater Cultural Heritage, at http://www.etaamb.be/fr/arreteministeriel-du-30-septembre-2014_n2014014750.html, 30 September 2018; Ministerial Order on the Protection of the Wreck Site on the Buiten Ratel Sandbank as Underwater Cultural Heritage, at http://www.etaamb.be/fr/arrete-ministeriel-du-12-septembre-2016_n2016014316.html, 30 September 2018; Ministerial Order on the Protection of the Wreck of ‘t Vliegent Hart as Underwater Cultural Heritage, at http://www.etaamb.be/fr/arreteministeriel-du-12-septembre-2016_n2016014321.html, 30 September 2018. (in French)as well as a notable number of early and mid-twentieth century warships.8Ministerial Order on the Protection of the Wreck of the HMS Brilliant as Underwater Cultural Heritage, at http://www.etaamb.be/fr/arrete-ministeriel-du-12-septembre-2016_n2016014317.html, 30 September 2018; Ministerial Order on the Protection of the Wreck of the HMS Wakeful as Underwater Cultural Heritage, at http://www.etaamb.be/fr/arreteministeriel-du-13-mai-2014_n2014014608.html, 30 September 2018; Ministerial Order on the Recognition of Three Sunken Ships as Underwater Cultural Heritage, at http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi/article_body.pl?language=fr&caller=summary&pub_date=18-04-11&numac=2018011377, 30 September 2018. (in French)Belgium has demonstrated an emphasis on the importance of the protection of its UCH and,accordingly, has passed a series of laws and regulations to enhance it, including the aforesaid 2014 Law. This section will introduce the major provisions of the 2014 Law with regard to UCH’s definition, jurisdiction, ownership, warships and other State vessels, and international cooperation. Also, it will attempt to expose the rationales behind these provisions.

    A. Definitions

    Belgian government has changed considerably in its understanding of the term UCH. This shift can be easily noticed by comparing the terms employed by the 2007 Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks and the 2014 Law respectively. The 2007 Law defined “Protected Shipwrecks” as “all the wrecks and objects with historical or archaeological value in its territorial sea”.9Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks, the Kingdom of Belgium, Art. 16. (in French)This definition is narrower than the currently-used concept of “cultural heritage” in that it only mentions the protection of cultural relics themselves, putting the surrounding environment at a disadvantage, which however is equally of archaeological value.

    The definition of UCH in the 2014 Law is generally in conformity with the provisions of the Convention.10Art. 2 of the 2014 Law provides that: For the purposes of the application and execution of the present Law, “discoveries” mean any discovery of traces of human existence having a cultural, historical or archaeological character which have been partially or totally under water, periodically or continuously, such as: (a) sites, structures, buildings, artefacts and human remains, together with their archaeological and natural context; (b) vessels,aircraft, other vehicles or any part thereof, their cargo or other contents, together with their archaeological and natural context; and (c) objects of prehistoric character. If the person who has discovered any item listed above has good reason to believe that it is underwater cultural heritage and has not yet registered it in accordance with Article 7, such an item could be deemed as a “discovery” under the Law.The wording is basically consistent with Article 1(1)(a) of the Convention. However, it is noteworthy that Article 2 of the 2014 Law contains no provision concerning the criterion of 100 years under the Convention.11In accordance with the Convention, “underwater cultural heritage” means all traces of human existence having a cultural, historical or archaeological character which have been partially or totally under water, periodically or continuously, for at least one hundred years such as - (a) sites, structures, buildings, artefacts and human remains, together with their archaeological and natural context; (b) vessels, aircraft, other vehicles or any part thereof,their cargo or other contents, together with their archaeological and natural context; and(c) objects of prehistoric character. A careful comparison between the 2014 Law and the Convention tells that, the definition of UCH under Article 3 of the Law is very similar to the one under the Convention, with the sole difference lying in the time criterion of 100 years.According to Article 3 of the 2014 Law, the 100-year criterion applies only to all traces of human activities having a cultural, historical or archaeological character that are found in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) or on the continental shelf of Belgium. No such standard or requirement has been made under the 2014 Law concerning the UCH found within its territorial sea. Consequently, the traces which are discovered in its territorial waters do not have to be under water for at least 100 years to be classified as UCH.

    The rationale behind Article 3 of the 2014 Law could be found in Bill No.3397 passed by the Belgian House of Representatives.12At https://www.lachambre.be/kvvcr/pdf_sections/newsletter/53-131-plenum-laws15F.pdf,30 September 2018. (in French)A State enjoys sovereignty over its territorial sea. Any State has thus the right to enact laws to manage the UCH situated within its territorial sea. Accordingly, Belgium has the right to establish higher standards to enhance the protection of the UCH lying in its internal waters and territorial sea. In both sea areas, the UCH falling under the protection scope of the 2014 Law of Belgium is much more than those covered by the Convention, which is however consistent with the purpose of the Convention,i.e., to provide maximum protection to UCH. As of the traces found in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of Belgium, only those which have been submerged under water for not less than 100 years are deemed as UCH protected by the 2014 Law. However, considering that it does not have sovereignty over its EEZ or on its continental shelf, the Government of Belgium has reviewed its domestic laws so as not to conflict with existing international rules and domestic laws of other countries. In this regard, when drafting the 2014 Law, it also duly considered the potential impact that the provisions on the protection of UCH in the aforesaid areas would have on the interest of the international community.

    B. Jurisdiction

    The 2014 Law, with regard to the scope of its application, states that:

    The present law shall apply to: 1. articles discovered within the limits of the territorial sea of Belgium; 2. articles discovered in Belgium’s exclusive economic zone or on its continental shelf which have been submerged under water for not less than 100 years.

    As this provision shows, the 2014 Law is applicable to not only the UCH found in the territorial sea of Belgium but also to that found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf. However, with regard to the UCH discovered in its EEZ or on its continental shelf, the Law can only be applied to that UCH having been under water for at least 100 years. In contrast, the 2007 Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks only applies to the shipwrecks found in the territorial waters of Belgium.13Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks, the Kingdom of Belgium, Art. 2.Therefore, as compared with the 2007 Law, the 2014 Law has extended the jurisdiction of the Belgian government.

    C. Ownership

    The Convention is silent on the question of who shall have the ownership over a piece of UCH. The 2014 Law of Belgium, instead, contains detailed provisions on the matter. Article 10 of the 2014 Law articulates that Belgium may claim ownership over any UCH that is found in its territorial waters, EEZ or on its continental shelf, without prejudice to the right of the original owner to claim ownership upon proof of identity.14The 2014 Law, Art. 10.Particularly, the ownership of warships and other State vessels would be accorded to their flag States.

    D. Warships and Other State Vessels

    Provisions laid down in Article 6(2), paragraph 2 of the 2014 Law are rather similar to those of the Convention. These provisions ensure that ownership over warships and other State vessels will be duly accorded to their flag States.Accordingly, the provisions oblige Belgium to conduct consultations with flag States Parties on the protection of such wrecks while reserving the right to take all the necessary measures to prevent any immediate danger, including looting,before consulting the flag States.15The 2014 Law, Art. 6(2), para 2.This provision of the 2014 Law is undoubtedly in conformity with Articles 7 and 10 of the Convention.16Art. 7(3) of the Convention provides: within their archipelagic waters and territorial sea,in the exercise of their sovereignty and in recognition of general practice among States,States Parties, with a view to cooperating on the best methods of protecting State vessels and aircraft, should inform the flag State Party to this Convention and, if applicable, other States with a verifiable link, especially a cultural, historical or archaeological link, with respect to the discovery of such identifiable State vessels and aircraft. And Art. 10(4) of the Convention states: without prejudice to the duty of all States Parties to protect underwater cultural heritage by way of all practicable measures taken in accordance with international law to prevent immediate danger to the underwater cultural heritage, including looting,the Coordinating State may take all practicable measures, and/or issue any necessary authorizations in conformity with this Convention and, if necessary prior to consultations,to prevent any immediate danger to the underwater cultural heritage, whether arising from human activities or any other cause, including looting. In taking such measures assistance may be requested from other States Parties.In comparison with previous legislation of Belgium,17Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks, Art. 7(2), para. 2, stipulates that, for a warship or a State vessel which at the time of sinking was used solely for government but not commercial purposes, the official in charge may allow salvage of such wrecks only after obtaining a special authorization directly from its flag State.the jurisdiction of Belgium, as a coastal State,has obviously been expanded to some extent in this regard.

    E. International Cooperation

    Article 8(1), paragraph 3 of the 2014 Law states that with respect to the UCH found within the EEZ or on the continental shelf of Belgium, the official in charge of UCH protection may, if necessary, consult the State that has made a declaration to Belgium in accordance with Article 9(5) of the Convention. And the Convention Article 9(5) provides:

    Any State Party may declare to the State Party in whose exclusive economic zone or on whose continental shelf the underwater cultural heritage is located its interest in being consulted on how to ensure the effective protection of that underwater cultural heritage. Such declaration shall be based on a verifiable link, especially a cultural, historical or archaeological link, to the underwater cultural heritage concerned.

    As these passages demonstrated, the relevant provisions of the 2014 Law are highly consistent with the principle of international cooperation as encouraged by UNCLOS Article 30318United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Art. 303(1), reads: States have the duty to protect objects of an archaeological and historical nature found at sea and shall cooperate for this purpose.and the Convention.

    In general, the 2014 Law demonstrates the commitment of the Belgian government to fulfilling its treaty obligations as a State Party to the Convention.In addition to the abovementioned Article 8(1), Belgium has established further provisions with the objective of abiding by the fundamental principles of the Convention, including the preservation in situ of UCH and prohibition of commercial exploitation.19Art. 6(1) of the 2014 Law provides that no excavation shall be carried out until permission is obtained from the official in charge of UCH protection. Article 15 prohibits the sale and possession of any UCH inconsistent with this law. Article 16 further provides that no Belgian vessel shall engage in any exploration or excavation of UCH in violation of the Convention. Article 8(3) also states that the protection of underwater cultural heritage through in situ preservation shall be considered as the first option. Where in situ preservation is impossible, activities directed at UCH shall be carried out following the provisions of the Annex to the Convention.From this perspective, it can be concluded that the law adopted by the Belgian government with regard to the protection of its UCH has been as truthful to the spirit of the Convention as practical in terms of adjusting some of its provisions to the country’s specific necessities, as illustrated by the 2014 Law’s deliberation on the matter of jurisdiction.

    II. Significance of the 2014 Law as a Reference to the Amendment of the Regulation of China

    China has a long history. It possesses rich cultural heritage, which includes ancient shipwrecks, cities, bridges, ports, hydrological stone carvings, modern warships and other submerged relics. Although the protection of UCH started late in China, it has developed rather rapidly into a system led by the central government.China has managed to conduct several major excavations by deploying underwater archaeology related resources with the assistance of local agencies. To date, this system has accomplished a series of significant achievements, most notably the extension of its operating area to the distant waters.20At http://www.uch-china.org/inchina.aspx, 15 July 2018. (in Chinese)Today, in line with the needs related to the construction of the “Twenty-First Century Maritime Silk Road”,China has established international cooperation with several States concerning UCH protection, which include joint archaeological excavations with Kenya and Saudi Arabia in their waters respectively.21At http://www.xinhuanet.com/world/2018-12/30/c_1123928294.htm, http://www.chnmuseum.cn/(S(2d4uwh55uyjqbg45tpah3ea1))/Default.aspx?TabId=1312&InfoID=9005 3&frtid=1243&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1, 15 July 2018. (in Chinese)In terms of legislation, China is one of the few East Asian States which have enacted specific domestic laws for UCH protection. For example, the Regulation was adopted in 1989 by the Chinese government and has played an important role till most recently.

    On 11 February 2018, in order to meet the current needs to protect underwater cultural relics, the National Cultural Heritage Administration of China released the Exposure Draft of Revised Regulation of the People’s Republic of China Concerning the Administration of the Work for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Relics (hereinafter referred to as the “Exposure Draft”).22Exposure Draft on the Revised Regulation of the People’s Republic of China Concerning the Administration of the Work for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Relics (hereinafter“Exposure Draft”), at http://www.sach.gov.cn/module/download/downfile.jsp?classid=0&fil ename=1802112038231995622.docx, 15 July 2018. (in Chinese)According to the notes penned by the National Cultural Heritage Administration, the amendments envisioned by the Exposure Draft have three main purposes: first, to revise the Regulation so that it matches with the changes made to the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Protection of Cultural Relics (hereinafter referred to as the “Law on Protection of Cultural Relics”); second, to cater to the needs of the new operations concerning the protection of underwater cultural relics; third, to improve the feasibility of the provisions under the Regulation.23Revision Explanations with Regards to the Exposure Draft, at http://www.sach.gov.cn/module/download/downfile.jsp?classid=0&filename=1802112038457578546.docx, 15 July 2018. (in Chinese)The revisions have also been influenced by the spirit and fundamental principles of the Convention.24Revision Explanations with Regards to the Exposure Draft, at http://www.sach.gov.cn/module/download/downfile.jsp?classid=0&filename=1802112038457578546.docx, 15 July 2018. (in Chinese)However, the Exposure Draft is still being discussed. Therefore, this section will explore the possible directions that the Exposure Draft might take by using the relevant Belgian legislation as a point of reference. This will be done by bearing in mind that, Belgium is a State Party to the Convention, whereas China has not yet acceded to the Convention. However, since the amendment to the Regulation has also the unstated purpose of respecting the standards established by the relevant international law, China cannot but take the provisions of the Convention into account so as to be well prepared for its accession. From this point of view, the amendment to the Regulation needs to be both forward-looking and consistent with the basic principles of the Convention while, at the same time, preserving some flexibility in the areas which have not yet been clearly specified in the Convention.Therefore, the flexible enforcement of the Convention by the Belgian government might provide some important guidance to China.

    A. Terms and Definitions

    As it can be shown from the legislative changes adopted by Belgium and other States, the concept of UCH is now increasingly used to replace old terms such as“underwater cultural relics”, “shipwrecks” and “sunken objects”. According to its definition in the Convention, UCH encompasses much more than those old terms.In this perspective, to align the country with what is now a common trend in the international community, China’s legislators could replace the conceptual term of“underwater cultural relics” with that of “underwater cultural heritage”. Of course,the prerequisite for doing so is to make adjustments to the Law on Protection of Cultural Relics and, accordingly, use the term “cultural heritage” instead of “cultural relics”. As a matter of fact, two Chinese organizations in charge of UCH protection,namely the National Cultural Heritage Administration (國家文物局) and the National Center of Underwater Cultural Heritage (水下文化遺產(chǎn)保護中心)have already used the term “cultural heritage”, instead of “cultural relics” in their English names. Otherwise, the term “cultural relics” could be retained but include certain components of the concept of cultural heritage such as the archaeological and natural context of the heritage, which are generally excluded from what is understood to be a “physical object”. Ideally, this adjustment should occur in the Law on Protection of Cultural Relics first.

    With respect to the definition of the underwater cultural relics, Article 2 of the Regulation states:

    The term “underwater cultural relics” referred to in the Regulation means any human cultural heritage having historical, artistic and scientific values that remain in the following waters:

    (1) all the cultural relics of Chinese origin, of unidentifiable origin, or of foreign origin that remain in Chinese internal or territorial waters;

    (2) cultural relics that are of Chinese origin or of unidentifiable origin that remain in sea areas outside the Chinese territorial waters but under Chinese jurisdiction according to Chinese laws;

    (3) cultural relics of Chinese origin that remain in the sea areas of any foreign State other than its internal and territorial waters, or in the high seas.

    The provisions in the preceding paragraphs shall not cover objects that have remained underwater since 1911 but have nothing to do with important historical events, revolutionary movements or renowned personages.

    The Exposure Draft did not make any changes to the abovementioned Article 2. As for the reasons, the National Cultural Heritage Administration explained that:“it is important to note that as China has not yet acceded to the Convention, no amendments have been made to the content of Articles 2 and 3 with regard to the scope of and the jurisdiction over underwater cultural relics.”25Revision Explanations with Regards to the Exposure Draft, at http://www.sach.gov.cn/module/download/downfile.jsp?classid=0&filename=1802112038457578546.docx, 15 July 2018. (in Chinese)This seems to admit the existence of a certain gap between China’s legislation and the Convention in the determination of the scope of cultural relics. All objects submerged after 1911 and before 1918 are protected by the Convention but not necessarily by the Regulation.It seems that the 100-year-criterion under the Convention was established without strict reasoning. In contrast, the critical date of 1911 under the Regulation was determined after careful consideration. It is said that this criterion was made for the purpose of excluding foreign warships that sank in China’s waters after 1911.26Cross-Strait Forum on Laws, Policies and Practices Relating to Underwater Cultural Heritage 2018, Keelung, 20-21 June 2018.However, as far as legislative means are concerned, it is entirely possible to use a separate article to make specific arrangements for such vessels (see Subsection D of this part for details).

    After accession to the Convention, China can also use the Belgian legislation as a point of reference and, accordingly, set a limit of 100 years for the definition of UCH that is found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf while leaving the time criteria open ended with regard to the UCH discovered in its territorial sea. As a matter of fact, there is no need to artificially set any time limit for the UCH that is found in the territorial waters of a State, since its cultural and archaeological value should be the foremost criterion to determine whether it is worthy of protection.Conversely, for the UCH that is found in the EEZ and on the continental shelf,which does not fall within the territory of a given State, applicable international treaties should be considered so as to avoid potential conflicts. Lastly, since under the current Regulation, the article defining the term of underwater cultural relics includes both definition and application scope, it would be recommendable that the aforesaid article be divided into two articles, with one dedicated to definition, and the other to application scope.

    B. Jurisdiction

    Jurisdiction of States has always been a focus during discussions on legislative amendment. Article 3 of the current Regulation stipulates:

    The underwater cultural relics stipulated in Article 2(1)&(2) belong to the State (China), and the State exercises jurisdiction over them; the State shall have the right to identify the owner of the underwater cultural relics specified in Article 2(3).

    As mentioned above, on the ground that China has not yet joined the Convention, the Exposure Draft contains no amendment to the content of Articles 2 and 3 concerning the jurisdiction over underwater cultural relics. So, do the current provisions on jurisdiction in the Regulation of China conflict with the Convention?

    According to the UNCLOS, the rights of coastal States over their EEZ and continental shelf are limited to sovereign rights and corresponding jurisdiction over natural resources and, technically speaking, do not extend to underwater cultural heritage. The Convention designed a very complex mechanism of “Coordinating State” to address the issue of jurisdiction over UCH found in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of a State.27Art. 10(3) of the Convention reads: where there is a discovery of underwater cultural heritage or it is intended that activity shall be directed at underwater cultural heritage in a State Party’s exclusive economic zone or on its continental shelf, that State Party shall: (a) consult all other States Parties which have declared an interest under Article 9,paragraph 5, on how best to protect the underwater cultural heritage; (b) coordinate such consultations as “Coordinating State”, unless it expressly declares that it does not wish to do so, in which case the States Parties which have declared an interest under Article 9, paragraph 5, shall appoint a Coordinating State. And its Art. 10(4) states: without prejudice to the duty of all States Parties to protect underwater cultural heritage by way of all practicable measures taken in accordance with international law to prevent immediate danger to the underwater cultural heritage, including looting, the Coordinating State may take all practicable measures, and/or issue any necessary authorizations in conformity with this Convention and, if necessary prior to consultations, to prevent any immediate danger to the underwater cultural heritage, whether arising from human activities or any other cause, including looting. In taking such measures assistance may be requested from other States Parties. In accordance with Art. 10(5), the Coordinating State: (a) shall implement measures of protection which have been agreed by the consulting States, which include the Coordinating State, unless the consulting States, which include the Coordinating State,agree that another State Party shall implement those measures; (b) shall issue all necessary authorizations for such agreed measures in conformity with the Rules, unless the consulting States, which include the Coordinating State, agree that another State Party shall issue those authorizations; (c) may conduct any necessary preliminary research on the underwater cultural heritage and shall issue all necessary authorizations therefore, and shall promptly inform the Director-General of the results, who in turn will make such information promptly available to other States Parties. Art. 10(6) provides: in coordinating consultations, taking measures, conducting preliminary research and/or issuing authorizations pursuant to this Article, the Coordinating State shall act on behalf of the States Parties as a whole and not in its own interest. Any such action shall not in itself constitute a basis for the assertion of any preferential or jurisdictional rights not provided for in international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.On the one hand, the Convention seems reluctant to admit the extension of the jurisdiction of coastal States. On the other hand, it has to rely on coastal States for the management of UCH lying in such sea areas. This has resulted in significant differences in the provisions of different States Parties with regard to their jurisdiction over UCH discovered in their EEZ or on their continental shelf. Belgium, which has a large number of UCH of foreign origin in its waters, has therefore adopted the approach of expanding its jurisdiction while also acknowledging other States’ claims of rights as States of origin. This approach makes international cooperation possible for the protection of UCH in the waters of Belgium.

    On the basis of different legal principles, China exercises jurisdiction over the underwater cultural relics of Chinese or unidentifiable origin that are found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf. In the first case, jurisdiction is legitimated by the right attached to being the State of origin. In the second, jurisdiction is legitimated on the ground that, as a coastal State, China is in the best position to provide maximum protection to these relics. As for the relics of Chinese origin that are found in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of other States, China’s claim of right to identify their owners stems from its right as the State of origin.

    However, to date China has never claimed any rights over any underwater cultural relics of Chinese origin that have been found in other States’ waters. This has been the case in that the Regulation’s provisions for such an operation are hardly implementable. To overcome this issue, legislators may consider extending China’s jurisdiction to all the UCH found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf but also, following the Belgian case, reserve for the State of origin the right to provide consultation. On the basis of the principle of reciprocity, legislators could also reserve the same right for China with respect to the UCH of Chinese origin that is discovered in the EEZ or continental shelf of other States. China has a long history of prosperous international maritime trade, thus it cannot be excluded that there might be a certain amount of UCH of foreign origin lying in China’s EEZ or on its continental shelf. Likewise, it is very likely that some more pieces of UCH of Chinese origin are located in the EEZ or continental shelf of other States. This double reservation, if adopted, would also serve the prospective needs of UCH protection under the “Belt and Road Initiative” of China.

    C. Ownership

    There is no specific provision on the issue of UCH ownership in the Convention. To put it differently, the Convention may intentionally leave it blank to guarantee States Parties’ right to amend their national laws according to their interpretation of the Convention. Following accession to the Convention, Belgium passed a law to claim that the UCH found in its territorial sea, EEZ or on its continental shelf belong to Belgium, demonstrating that this provision does not violate its obligations under the Convention.

    China’s current legislation merely provides that it claims ownership over the underwater cultural relics that are found in its territorial waters, as well as the relics of Chinese or unidentifiable origin which are located in its EEZ or on its continental shelf. Currently, the Exposure Draft has made no amendment to this provision, which does not conflict with the Convention and may therefore be retained even after accession to the Convention. However, the portion of Article 3 of the Regulation that concerns the right to identify the owner of the cultural relics that are of Chinese origin but located in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of other States needs to be further clarified. As mentioned above, China has never claimed ownership over the relics located in other States’ waters, thus this provision has never been implemented. In practice, this right to identify the owner differs from jurisdiction and ownership. This right is, in fact, closer to those enjoyable by the State of origin as defined in Articles 9 and 10 of the Convention.28Art. 9(5) of the Convention: any State Party may declare to the State Party in whose exclusive economic zone or on whose continental shelf the underwater cultural heritage is located its interest in being consulted on how to ensure the effective protection of that underwater cultural heritage. Such declaration shall be based on a verifiable link, especially a cultural, historical or archaeological link, to the underwater cultural heritage concerned.Art. 10(3) states that where there is a discovery of underwater cultural heritage or it is intended that activity shall be directed at underwater cultural heritage in a State Party’s exclusive economic zone or on its continental shelf, that State Party shall: (a) consult all other States Parties which have declared an interest under Article 9, paragraph 5, on how best to protect the underwater cultural heritage; (b) coordinate such consultations as“Coordinating State”, unless it expressly declares that it does not wish to do so, in which case the States Parties which have declared an interest under Article 9, paragraph 5, shall appoint a Coordinating State.Unlike natural resources, UCH comprises artificially produced objects. In light of this distinction,the rights of the States of origin, as creators of UCH, are explicitly recognized in the Convention. However, as far as the Convention Articles 9 and 10 are concerned,the rights of States of origin are clearly exercisable by the States Parties, whereas their application for non-States Parties is not set in stone. After acceding to the Convention, China can further clarify its relevant rights by directly referring to Articles 9 and 10 of the Convention. Before that, however, the exercise of such rights may depend on the principle of reciprocity. Therefore, linking back the above discussion on jurisdiction, China could refer to Belgium’s legislation to claim ownership over all the UCH that is found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf, with the exception of State vessels and aircraft of foreign origin. On this basis, China can accommodate the rights of other States, as identifiable countries of origin, to the UCH that is found in the EEZ or continental shelf of China (such as the right to participate in protection and research), in order to guarantee China’s corresponding rights to the UCH that is found in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of other States.

    D. Warships and Other State Vessels

    A considerable number of foreign warships sank in the waters of Belgium in the First and Second World Wars and have been under water since then. As a result, Belgian domestic legislation contains detailed provisions for sunken warships and other State vessels that meet the definition of UCH. However, China has adopted a rather vague attitude towards this issue and, accordingly, has not set out any pertinent provision in its domestic laws.29LIN Zhen, Legal Status of Sunken Warships That Meet the Definition of Underwater Cultural Heritage in Territorial Waters: Legislations of China and ASEAN States, China Oceans Law Review, No. 2, 2018.This must change, given that a considerable number of foreign warships that meet the definition of UCH under the Convention are also lying in the waters of China. The legal status of these warships should be clearly defined in the pertinent Chinese legislation so as to spare administrative headache for all those whose work is in connection with UCH.

    According to the existing legislation of China, China claims rights over: (a)all the cultural relics that are found in its internal waters and territorial sea; (b)the cultural relics of Chinese or unidentifiable origin that are located in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of China, and (c) the cultural relics of Chinese origin that are located in the sea areas of any foreign State other than its internal and territorial waters, or in the high seas. On the former two, China claims ownership and jurisdiction. Notably, China does not claim rights over sunken foreign warships that are found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf, which is consistent with the provisions of the Convention. Conversely, China claims ownership over the sunken warships and other State vessels that meet the definition of underwater cultural relics and are found in its territorial waters, regardless of their flag States. This principle has never been applied in practice since, to date, China has never carried out any archaeological excavation directed at a foreign State vessel.

    Similarly, the Exposure Draft has not made any provision for foreign State vessels or aircraft. As discussed above, it is not a tenable solution to exclude foreign warships from the scope of underwater cultural relics by using the year 1911 as a time criterion to define underwater cultural relics. In the perspective of the author, to create an article specifying the legal status of sunken warships and other State vessels that meet the definition of underwater cultural relics would otherwise be feasible, which will provide practical guidance to those whose work is in connection with UCH. Moreover, the Convention does provide a viable solution:coastal States and flag States should cooperate in order to ensure the adequate protection of this particular category of UCH. China may also refer to Belgium’s domestic laws, which guarantee the protection of such vessels by means of consultation with the flag States while reserving the right for protective measures to be unilaterally taken in case of immediate danger.

    E. International Cooperation

    With regard to international cooperation, Belgium directly incorporated the relevant provisions of the Convention into its legislation. Considering the UCH protection efforts undergoing currently in China, international cooperation is inevitable. And such cooperation seems necessary and welcome to the protection of both the UCH of foreign origin that is located in China’s EEZ or on its continental shelf and the UCH of Chinese origin that is located in other States’ EEZ or continental shelf.

    So how should China legislate to ensure the protection of the cultural heritage mentioned above through international cooperation? Ever since 1989 when the Regulation was enacted, no underwater archaeological survey or excavation in cooperation with any other country has ever been conducted in China’s waters.Nonetheless, the revisions reflected in the Exposure Draft, essentially, would facilitate international cooperation, as Article 10(3) stipulates:

    Foreign States, international organizations and foreign legal persons or natural persons, if they intend to conduct exploration or excavation activities in the waters under Chinese jurisdiction, shall do so in cooperation with the Chinese side, and shall submit their application therefor to the competent authorities under the State Council for approval.

    Compared to the current Regulation,30Article 7(2) of the Regulation: foreign States, international organizations and foreign legal persons or natural persons that are to conduct archaeological exploration or excavation activities in the waters under Chinese jurisdiction shall do so in cooperation with the Chinese side, and shall submit their application therefor to the National Cultural Heritage Administration, which shall further submit it to the State Council of the People’s Republic of China for special approval.the abovementioned application process has been simplified. Specifically, a special permission by the State Council is no longer required. These changes reflect the willingness of China’s organizations or entities in charge of UCH protection to cooperate with their counterparts in other States.

    However, further arrangements are needed to carry out international cooperation on a practical level. In this regard, it must be noted that the current provisions of the Regulation are only concerned with the protection of the underwater cultural relics found in the waters of China. No provisions have been made with regard to the protection of relics of Chinese origin that are located in the waters of other States. Since China has not yet acceded to the Convention, it cannot directly invoke the provisions of the Convention on international cooperation.Nevertheless, the Exposure Draft may add a separate article to support the rights of States of origin, including China’s right to identify the owner of the UCH of Chinese origin that is located in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of other States;in this way, international cooperation would be possible based on the principle of reciprocity.

    III. Conclusion

    While China is considering acceding to the Convention, the amendment of the Regulation has been underway with the intent to make it consistent with the fundamental principles of the Convention. In this regard, Belgium represents a very good example to follow, since Belgium is one of the few States to have enacted new laws in line with the Convention after accession. By conducting a thorough study and analysis of Belgium’s newly-adopted law on UCH protection, it was found that it is not an exact duplicate of the Convention. Rather, it presents several ad hoc modifications. On the one hand, the basic principles of the Convention, such as the principles of preservation in situ, prohibition of commercial exploitation and encouragement of international cooperation, are strictly adhered to. On the other hand, Belgium’s provisions on the matters of jurisdiction and ownership appear to be more focused on the preservation of its national interests, so as to provide maximum protection to UCH.

    The Exposure Draft has made some adjustments to best deal with the newly emerging challenges and strengthen the feasibility of the Regulation. These changes appear to be respectful of the general principles of the Convention and would promote the protection of UCH in China. However, there is still room for improvement, especially in the provisions concerning the definition of UCH,jurisdiction, State vessels and aircraft meeting the definition of “UCH” and, lastly,international cooperation.

    In the Exposure Draft, Articles 2 and 3 have remained the same as in the Regulation. They may possibly be amended in the future. In the current version of the Regulation, both the provision concerning the application scope and the one regarding the definition of the term “underwater cultural relics” are placed under Article 2. The study here conducted recommends for these provisions to be divided into two separate articles. As to Article 2, it is not recommended setting a time limit for all the underwater cultural relics that are located in China’s territorial waters. However, it is advisable to apply the Convention’s criterion of 100 years to the cultural relics that are situated in China’s EEZ or on its continental shelf.Furthermore, with reference to Belgium’s legislation, China may decide to extend its jurisdiction and ownership to cover all the UCH that is found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf (excluding State vessels and aircraft), while also reserving the rights of States of origin to provide consultation and participate in relevant discussions, therefore to create possibility for future cooperation. In line with the principle of reciprocity, China can claim right to the same with regards to UCH of Chinese origin that is located in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of other States. Lastly, the Exposure Draft should consider adding one more article that clearly defines the legal status of State vessels and aircraft of foreign origin that meet the definition of “underwater cultural relics” under the Regulation. Based on the lessons drawn from Belgium, the new article should ensure that China consults with the flag States over the effective protection of such vessels and aircraft,cooperates with them accordingly but also reserves the right to act unilaterally in cases of emergency.

    猜你喜歡
    國家文物局文化遺產(chǎn)中心
    剪掉和中心無關(guān)的
    中宣部、文旅部、國家文物局發(fā)布重要文件
    客家文博(2022年1期)2022-08-22 06:30:54
    在打造“兩個中心”中彰顯統(tǒng)戰(zhàn)擔(dān)當作為
    華人時刊(2021年15期)2021-11-27 09:16:42
    與文化遺產(chǎn)相遇
    小讀者(2021年6期)2021-07-22 01:49:46
    酌古參今——頤和園文化遺產(chǎn)之美
    非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)欣賞
    ——圍棋
    別讓托養(yǎng)中心成“死亡中心”
    北上廣操心“副中心”
    博客天下(2015年17期)2015-09-15 14:55:10
    國家文物局將9件周代青銅器劃撥上海博物館
    文化遺產(chǎn)保護
    江蘇年鑒(2014年0期)2014-03-11 17:09:53
    日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 国产在视频线精品| 亚洲不卡免费看| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 国产乱来视频区| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆 | 欧美日韩在线观看h| 一级毛片电影观看 | www.av在线官网国产| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说 | 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 色综合色国产| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 成年av动漫网址| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 欧美bdsm另类| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 日日啪夜夜撸| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 99热这里只有是精品50| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 久久午夜福利片| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 大香蕉久久网| 黄片wwwwww| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| a级毛色黄片| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 国产三级中文精品| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 99热这里只有是精品50| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| av在线播放精品| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 91狼人影院| 午夜福利在线在线| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 超碰97精品在线观看| av在线亚洲专区| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 黄色配什么色好看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 免费观看在线日韩| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 国产美女午夜福利| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 秋霞伦理黄片| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 国产在视频线精品| 欧美潮喷喷水| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 免费看日本二区| 九草在线视频观看| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 日本三级黄在线观看| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 国产亚洲最大av| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产老妇女一区| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 国产单亲对白刺激| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 国产老妇女一区| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 在线免费十八禁| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| av国产免费在线观看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 欧美潮喷喷水| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 日本一二三区视频观看| 亚洲在久久综合| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 精品久久久久久久久av| 国产一级毛片在线| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 男女国产视频网站| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 国产乱人视频| 六月丁香七月| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 99热这里只有是精品50| 只有这里有精品99| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看 | 长腿黑丝高跟| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 99热全是精品| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 日韩欧美三级三区| 春色校园在线视频观看| 免费观看精品视频网站| .国产精品久久| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 国产成人91sexporn| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 精品酒店卫生间| 精品人妻视频免费看| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 精品久久久久久久末码| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 如何舔出高潮| 欧美人与善性xxx| 只有这里有精品99| 在线免费观看的www视频| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 美女高潮的动态| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 久久精品夜色国产| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 亚洲最大成人av| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国产极品天堂在线| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区 | 色网站视频免费| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 级片在线观看| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o | 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | 国产精品久久久久久久电影| av在线播放精品| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 国产在线男女| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 日本熟妇午夜| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 午夜福利在线在线| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 观看美女的网站| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 级片在线观看| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 在现免费观看毛片| 一级黄色大片毛片| 欧美成人a在线观看| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 日韩视频在线欧美| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 深夜a级毛片| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 免费在线观看成人毛片| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 97超碰精品成人国产| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产91av在线免费观看| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 日本免费在线观看一区| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | av国产免费在线观看| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 简卡轻食公司| 永久免费av网站大全| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 国产成人aa在线观看| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 成年版毛片免费区| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 黑人高潮一二区| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 日本wwww免费看| 中文字幕制服av| 国产精品无大码| 一级黄片播放器| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 少妇高潮的动态图| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 久久精品国产自在天天线| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 午夜福利在线在线| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 只有这里有精品99| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 韩国av在线不卡| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 乱系列少妇在线播放| 身体一侧抽搐| 欧美色视频一区免费| 日本黄大片高清| 国产精华一区二区三区| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 午夜免费激情av| 在线天堂最新版资源| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| av福利片在线观看| 日韩高清综合在线| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 色网站视频免费| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 久久精品91蜜桃| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | av在线观看视频网站免费| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 日本黄色片子视频| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 久久久成人免费电影| 国产在线一区二区三区精 | 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 日本三级黄在线观看| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 久久久成人免费电影| 国产在视频线在精品| 七月丁香在线播放| 日韩视频在线欧美| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 成年版毛片免费区| 春色校园在线视频观看| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 国产一级毛片在线| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 高清在线视频一区二区三区 | 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 久久人妻av系列| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 搞女人的毛片| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 麻豆成人av视频| 国产精品一及| 成年av动漫网址| 丝袜喷水一区| 九九在线视频观看精品| 亚洲av一区综合| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 91av网一区二区| 亚洲四区av| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| av在线老鸭窝| 99热网站在线观看| a级毛色黄片| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 亚洲av福利一区| 久久人妻av系列| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| av免费观看日本| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 97超碰精品成人国产| 久久久久久久久大av| 久久久色成人| 免费av不卡在线播放| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 日本五十路高清| 欧美性感艳星| 国产在视频线在精品| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 91久久精品电影网| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 黄色配什么色好看| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 秋霞伦理黄片| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 色视频www国产| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 精品久久久噜噜| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| av线在线观看网站| 日本wwww免费看| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 久久精品人妻少妇| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 久久精品人妻少妇| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产三级中文精品| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 全区人妻精品视频| 性色avwww在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 免费av不卡在线播放| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生 | 亚洲美女视频黄频| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 日本五十路高清| 精品酒店卫生间| av卡一久久| 在线a可以看的网站| 久久午夜福利片| 插逼视频在线观看| 国产在视频线精品| 日本黄大片高清| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 久久久国产成人免费| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 午夜精品在线福利| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 久99久视频精品免费| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 日本五十路高清| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 一级爰片在线观看| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 免费大片18禁| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 日本一本二区三区精品| 一夜夜www| 永久免费av网站大全| 久久久久久久国产电影| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 免费av不卡在线播放| 久久人人爽人人片av| 久久久久久久久大av| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 丝袜喷水一区| 免费观看性生交大片5| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产91av在线免费观看| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 午夜激情欧美在线| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 成人综合一区亚洲| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 欧美区成人在线视频| 美女高潮的动态| 亚洲av成人av| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 1024手机看黄色片| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 国产极品天堂在线| 99热这里只有是精品50| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 日韩强制内射视频| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 男女国产视频网站| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 欧美3d第一页| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 三级经典国产精品| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 长腿黑丝高跟| 一级黄色大片毛片| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产一级毛片在线| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 全区人妻精品视频| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 乱人视频在线观看| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 中文天堂在线官网| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 欧美成人午夜免费资源|