• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A comparison between benthic gillnet and bottom trawl for assessing fish assemblages in a shallow eutrophic lake near the Changjiang River estuary*

    2018-05-07 06:07:54LIYalei李亞雷LIUQigen劉其根CHENLiping陳麗平ZHAOLiangjie趙良杰WUHao吳昊CHENLiqiao陳立僑HUZhongjun胡忠軍
    Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 2018年2期
    關(guān)鍵詞:吳昊三氯香型

    LI Yalei (李亞雷) , LIU Qigen (劉其根) , CHEN Liping (陳麗平) , ZHAO Liangjie (趙良杰) ,WU Hao (吳昊) , CHEN Liqiao (陳立僑) , HU Zhongjun (胡忠軍) ,

    1 Key laboratory of Freshwater Fishery Germplasm Resources, Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China

    2 Xinyang College of Agriculture and Forestry, Xinyang 464000, China

    3 Nanjing Institute of Environmental Science, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Nanjing 210042, China

    4 School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

    1 INTRODUCTION

    The attributes (e.g. species richness and composition, relative abundances and biomass, size structure) of fish assemblages are essential to and have been extensively utilized in the theoretical research and application practice, such as environmental assessment, ecological restoration,fishery management, ecological modelling, and food web study. It is a challenging task to unbiasedly estimate the attributes of a fish community in standing waters (Kube?ka et al., 2009; Olin et al., 2009)because all sampling methods display more or less selectivity (Bethke et al., 1999). Comparison of the attributes between fishing gears, especially between passive and active one, is most often recommended to gain a ‘true picture’ of lake fish stocks (Olin and Malinen, 2003; Lapointe et al., 2006; Er?s et al.,2009; Kube?ka et al., 2009; Olin et al., 2009;Rotherham et al., 2012; Clement et al., 2014).

    Trawl and gillnet are both extensively used as fishing tools throughout the world. Gillnet is a passive gear and its catching eff ectiveness is contingent on fish activity, size and morphology. The size distribution estimates are skewed because small individuals move less and when encounter the net are caught less effectively due to slower speed (Olin et al., 2009).However, catchability of active trawl can be relatively low for large individuals, which may avoid the trawl but not gillnets (Olin et al., 2009). To date, very few studies have dealt with inter-comparison of the two gears in freshwaters and none of them come from the Asian region (Olin and Malinen, 2003; Olin et al.,2009; Rotherham et al., 2012).

    In present study, we examine differences in species composition and size structure of fish assemblages sampled monthly with gillnets and bottom trawls in Dianshan Lake, a subtropical and estuarine shallow lake in China. Based on results of previous studies done elsewhere (Olin and Malinen, 2003; Olin et al.,2009; Rotherham et al., 2012), we predicted that: (i)gillnets and bottom trawls would give different pictures of species composition of fish assemblages;(ii) they would display different pictures of size distribution of fish assemblages, in which large- and small-sized fishes would be underestimated by trawls and gillnets, respectively. Furthermore, we also aimed to compare the effectiveness of trawl and gillnet in sampling species richness and to explore the relationship between catch per unit effort (CPUE) of trawl and gillnet.

    2 MATERIAL AND METHOD

    2.1 Study area

    Dianshan Lake (31°04′N–31°12′N, 120°54′E–121°01′E) in the lower reaches of Taihu Lake watershed is a tidal freshwater lake and located in the eastern part of Shanghai City, covering a surface water area of roughly 63 km2and having a mean water depth of 2.1 m (maximum water depth 3.6 m).It is connected with Changjiang River estuary through Huangpu River with a length of 113 km. Jishui Port and Dazhushe are the two main feeding tributaries of the lake, together contributing about 68% of the total inflow. Lanlu Port is the main drainage outlet,accounting for approximately 71% of the total outflow(Fig.1). Dianshan Lake has a subtropical monsoon climate, with an annual average air temperature of 15.5°C and mean rainfall amount of 1 037.7 mm.

    Fig.1 Map of Lake Dianshan showing sampling stations

    2.2 Sampling methods

    Trawling and gillnetting were carried out monthly from August 2009 to July 2010 excluding February 2010 in 6 stations of Dianshan Lake (Fig.1). At each station, one 150-m benthic multi-panel gill net was set at 03:30–05:30 a.m., and lifted 2 hours later to avoid excessive accumulation of fish in the nets (Er?s et al., 2009). Each gill net consisted of six 25-m panels with height of 1–1.5 m and stretch mesh sizes ranging (at 20-mm intervals) from 20 to 120 mm. The trawl was a benthic electric pair-trawl (24 V-Storage Battery, Eagles III TZH-2008 Inverter: 20 kW, DC 100 V/220 V/300 V, 300 V was adopted in the study)with a theoretical opening of 1.8 m× 1.4 m and stretch mesh size of 18 mm. Just after set-down of the gill net, the trawl was towed with a speed of 0.8 to 0.9 m/s nearby the gillnetting stations. And the distance between trawl and gillnet sites was about 600 m,which is believed to be safe relating the fish disturbance. Each of 53 station-month trawling collections (SMTC) had 3 replicate hauls, which of 11 SMTC had only 2 replicate hauls because of malfunction of the device of diesel engine or loss of the caught fish samples. Length of each replicate transect towed was approximately 270 m. The towed distance of the third replicate haul of the remaining 2 SMTC deviated greatly from the preseted length of 270 m.

    The catches of gillnet and trawl were sorted and counted by species. The total length (TL) and weight of each intact fish was measured to the nearest centimeter and gram, respectively. Fishes were collected at approximately the same time and location of Dianshan Lake using trawl and gillnet. Therefore,it could be assumed that the fish assemblage attributes were obtained by sampling the same fish populations(Bonar et al., 2009).

    2.3 Data analyses

    Similar to data reporting form of Prchalová et al.(2012), abundance and biomass are expressed as number per unit effort (NPUE) and biomass per unit effort (BPUE), respectively, reported as the number of individuals or grams per 1 000 m2of gillnets or 1 000 m2of open water sampled by trawl. According to habitat preference described by Chen (1998) and East China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, et al.(1990), all the fish species collected in Dianshan Lake were divided into two habitat guilds: benthic and nonbenthic (Er?s et al., 2009).

    Although it is difficult to standardize samples caught with an active and a passive fishing technique,the least-biased evaluation of differences in the number of species collected with the two techniques can be obtained through rarefaction analyses (Er?s et al., 2009). In present study, sample-based and individual-based rarefaction analysis is employed to make comparisons of the estimated species richness between gears (Er?s et al., 2009, and the references therein), which was represented by the average of three nonparametric statistical estimators: ACE, Chao 1 and Jack 1 (Colwell, 2013). The 90% of the asymptote of sample-based rarefaction curve (i.e.,species accumulation curve) was adopted as the desired minimum level of completeness of fish biodiversity (species richness) in Dianshan Lake(Moreno and Halff ter, 2000). The difference in species richness between trawling and gillnetting was tested using function c2cv() of R package “rich” with 1 000 randomized runs.

    The homogeneity of whole-species distribution in the gears was tested using contingency table analysis(CTA, species × gear) for the caught number of all species (Olin et al., 2009). Based on square-rootarcsine transformed relative abundance, we also used hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis (CA) and non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS),performed with the function hclust() and metaMDS()of R package “vegan”, respectively, to identify the difference in fish assemblage composition between the two gears (Er?s et al., 2009). The information from the CA was added to the NMDS ordination plot using the function metaMDS(). Average linkage technique in combination with Bray-Curtis distance was used in the CA and the distance was adopted in the NMDS as well. To produce robust results, samples from a certain station were pooled according to the collection technique utilized, and fish species with an overall relative abundance below 1% were combined into a single “rare species” group to prevent the number of variables ( i. e., species) from highly exceeding the number of objects (stations) (Er?s et al., 2009). Using the function cluster.stats() of R package “fpc”, two cluster-validation estimates such as the average silhouette width (ASW) and normalized gamma (NG) were calculated to determine the optimal number of clusters. The greatest values of ASW and NG indicate the most validated clustering (Halkidi et al., 2001; Aho et al., 2008). Bray-Curtis distance metric was further analyzed by ANOSIM (Analysis of Similarity) and MRPP (Multi-response Permutation Procedure) of R package “vegan” to determine if clustering solutions determined by the clustervalidation estimates were statistically significant.ANOSIM produces theRstatistic, indicating the degree of cluster separation;Rgenerally ranges between 0, representing no separation and 1,indicating complete separation. Concretely, valuesofR>0.75, ≈0.5, and <0.25 represent fish assemblage groupings either being completely separated,overlapping but noticeably different, or barely separable, respectively (Clarke and Gorley, 2001).MRPP generates the agreement statistic (A), which describes within-group homogeneity. Values ofAlarger than 0.1 can be used to reject the null hypothesis of no differences among groups (Zweig and Kitchens,2008). The species-specific differences between the gears were tested using Wilcoxon signed-rank test(WSRT) and indicator species analysis (ISA, Dufrêne and Legendre, 1997). ISA conducted using the function indval() of R package “l(fā)abdsv” produces an indicator value (INDVAL), ranging from 0 (no indication) to 1 (maximum indication) for each species. The significance of INDVAL was assessed with 1 000 permutations. Only those species with significant (P<0.05) INDVAL higher than 0.5 were perceived as indicators.

    Relative length distributions (percentage value of the NPUE of each 1-cm total length class to the total NPUE) were calculated for each gear. CTA (5-cm total-length class × gear) or WSRT was used to detect for the differences in size structure of 5-cm totallength class, relative frequencies of each of 5-cm total-length classes, and habitat guild between the two gears (Olin et al., 2009). The differences in means of total length and body weight of the whole assemblage and the main fish species between the two gears were detected using two independent samplest-test or Mann-WhitneyUtest.

    Using WSRT, we compared variability of CPUE estimates across sampling stations between gears by monthly calculating the sample coefficient of variation(CV=SD/mean) among stations because there was no replication within stations for gillnetting (Van Den Avyle et al., 1995). A gear that yields high values of CV provided relatively imprecise data. Based on the dataset of 53 SMTC, a two-way analysis of variance(ANOVA) was used to test for significant differences among the seasons and stations in the precision of trawling CPUE estimates computed separately for each station (spring=Mar., Apr., May; summer=Jun.,Jul., Aug.; autumn=Sep., Oct., Nov.; winter=Dec.,Jan.), and non-parametric Friedman test (multiple paired samples analysis) was conducted to examine differences in the CPUE among the three hauls. Bonar et al. (2009) recommended that comparison of samples collected with passive and active methods should be restricted to larger system-wide (e.g., whole lake) averages. Therefore, we used the stationaveraged NPUE to establish the relationship between trawling and gillnetting NPUE with curve estimation models, such as linear function, logarithmic function,exponential function, inverse function, power law function, quadratic polynomial function, and cubic polynomial function. Correlation analysis between the station-averaged NPUE of trawl and gillnet was also conducted to reveal their relationship. To remove the effect of temperature on their relationship as possible, 11 months were classified into 5 month groups, each with similar monthly mean air temperature. Subsequently, correlation analyses of the NUPE of the whole assemblages and the assemblages excluding the fishes with total length of smaller than 6 cm and larger than 20 cm were conducted between gears for each of the 5 month groups with different air temperatures. The change patterns of trawling and gillnetting NPUE with monthly mean air temperature (MMAT) were modelled with the above functions. The extraordinarily high trawling NPUE in November (c.274.4 ind./1 000 m2) was identified as outlier (Dixon’s test and Grubbs’ test,P<0.05 and <0.01, respectively) using the function dixon.test() and grubbs.test() of R package “outliers” and this outlier was not included in the regressions (Mehner and Schulz, 2002). The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Schwarz Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) were used to determine the best regression models. For both AIC and BIC, smallest values indicate better, more parsimonious, models (Quinn and Keough, 2002).According to the values of AIC and BIC of different regression models (Appendix Table A1), quadratic polynomial regression model was most suitable for describing the relationships between trawling and gillnetting NPUE and between gillnetting NPUE and MMAT. Likewise, a cubic polynomial function was most suitable for representing the relationship between the trawling NPUE and MMAT.

    All the CA, NMDS, ANOSIM, MRPP, clustervalidation estimates, and CTA indicated that the fish assemblage composition (CTA:χ2=13.081,df=9,P>0.05, the other results see Appendix Fig.A1, A2,A3 & Table A2) and relative length distribution (CTA:χ2=3.419,df=6,P>0.05) of trawling catch did not differ significantly between the first two haul data and the whole data with three hauls from the 53 SMTC.Moreover, no obvious differences were found in the expected species richness obtained with sample-based and individual-based rarefaction analyses between the 53 and 66 SMTC (Fig.4a, b). Furthermore,Friedman test indicated no differences in the trawling CPUE between different hauls (Section 3.5).Therefore, it is reasonable to use the whole dataset of 66 SMTC to participate in the analyses mentioned in the above paragraphs.

    Prior to the above parametric analyses, data were transformed using log, square root, or cube root functions to meet the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variances. If not yet met, the nonparametric aligned rank transform procedure was used in the two-way ANOVA. Meanwhile, other nonparametric methods such as WSRT and Mann-WhitneyUtest were applied when the sample size was small or the above assumptions were untenable.

    3 RESULT

    3.1 Species composition

    Fig.2 Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS)scatterplot obtained on the basis of relative abundance, with fish groups identified through cluster analysis superimposed

    A total of 40 fish species were caught by the two gears in Dianshan Lake, with 28 and 38 species harvested by gillnets and trawls, respectively. Of which, 26 fish species were shared by the two gears.There were several fish species that were caught exclusively in either gear.Hemiculter leucisculusandMegalobrama amblycephalawere only collected by gillnet, whereas 12 species were only caught by trawl.Collectively, trawl gave a more diversified picture of the fish community in this lake. The fish numerical composition of the whole survey year differed significantly between the gears (CTA:χ2=1 891.628,df=10,P<0.001, Table 1).

    Coilia nasuswas the most abundant species both in gillnet and trawl catch. Its proportion by number and biomass did not significantly differ between gears,respectively, and the same was true forCarassius auratus(WSRT, Table 2). Similarly, no difference in the proportion by number ofAcheilognathus taenianaliswas found between the two gears, whereas its proportion by biomass in trawl catch was significantly larger than in gillnet catch.Correspondingly, the proportions by number and biomass ofTachysurus nitidusandR. giurinusin trawl catch, however, were significantly higher than in gillnet catch. By number of fish caught, gillnets had significantly higher proportion ofC. erythropterus,P. simoni,H. molitrix,Hypophthalmichthys nobilis,H. bleekeri, andCyprinus carpiocompared with trawls. The analogous patterns were detected by biomass proportion of the above fish species except forC.carpio.

    精密度和回收率參照韓秋珍、陳璐瑩、劉亞攀等[20-21]的方法,采用在空白樣品中添加標(biāo)準(zhǔn)溶液的方法,選擇常見的濃香型和兼香型兩個不同香型白酒酒樣及乙醇進(jìn)行三氯蔗糖檢測試驗(yàn),成品白酒1、白酒2和乙醇3的三氯蔗糖含量均為未檢出,并向兩個樣品中分別添加濃度為200 μg/L、400 μg/L的三氯蔗糖進(jìn)行回收率實(shí)驗(yàn),重復(fù)測定2次。共6組平行,12次檢測,結(jié)果表明,在重復(fù)性條件下獲得的兩次獨(dú)立測定結(jié)果的相對偏差小于2%,且回收率均在85%~105%范圍內(nèi),所以該方法的精密度和回收率均符合相關(guān)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)要求。

    Fig.3 The values of a selection of cluster-validation measures inspected in order to determine the most suitable number of clusters in the datasets

    The NMDS solution based on relative NPUE(stress=0.040; non-metric fit:R2=0.998; Fig.2) was significant. The NMDS result mirrored that of hierarchical clustering (Fig.2 and Appendix Fig.A4).Combined results of the ASW and NG suggested that two clusters were the best clustering solution for the dataset of relative NPUE (Fig.3). The MRPP(A=0.301,δ=0.196,P=0.006) and ANOSIM(R=0.828,P=0.003) both revealed significant and complete separation between the two clusters. The strong indicator species (Table 3) for the first division of the dendrogram based on relative NPUE at height of 0.274 (Appendix Fig.A4) wereC. erythropterus,H. molitrix,P. simoniandH. bleekeri(gillnet cluster)andR. giurinus(trawl cluster), suggesting that this division separated a gillnet-based fish community(gillnet cluster) from a trawl-based fish community(trawl cluster).

    3.2 Species richness

    The significantly higher species richness (P<0.001)was observed with trawling (38) than with gillnetting(28). Trawling was consistently more effective in detecting new species than gillnetting, although expected species richness increased with the number of samples for both gears (Fig.4a). However,gillnetting displayed its eff ectiveness in detecting new species comparable to trawling when number of individuals caught is lower than about 1 625 and the samples were standardized according to the number.Over that approximate threshold of the number of individuals, the eff ectiveness of gillnetting became lower than that of trawling (Fig.4b).

    Table 1 The relative abundance and relative biomass of each species in gillnet and trawl catches in Dianshan Lake from August 2009 to July 2010

    Table 2 The species-specific differences in relative abundance and biomass, total length, and body weight between gillnet and trawl.

    Fig.4 Estimated species richness as function of (a) number of samples and (b) number of individuals caught with gillnetting(open triangle) and trawling (open diamond and fork represent 66 and 53 station-month collections, respectively)

    3.3 Size distribution

    The overall range in fish length was 3.5–80.0 cm for the gillnet catch and 0.8–73.0 cm for the trawl catch. The total-length distributions differed clearly between the two gears (Fig.5, CTA:χ2=2348.6,df=6,P<0.001), whereas the mean total length and body weight for the whole assemblage in gillnet catch were significantly larger than in trawl catch (Mann-WhitneyUtest: 14.6±0.2 cm vs. 9.6±0.1 cm,Z=38.292,P<0.001; 56.7±5.6 g vs. 9.0±1.0 g,Z=50.142,P<0.001; data expressed as mean±SE),respectively. The relative frequencies of the two 5 cm size classes smaller than 10.0 cm in trawl catch were significantly higher than in gillnet catch (WSRT:Z=6.174,P<0.001 for 0–4.9 cm class;Z=6.427,P<0.001 for 5.0–9.9 cm class). The reverse was detectedfor the three 5 cm size classes ranging from 15.0 to 29.9 cm and the class larger than 29.9 cm (WSRT:Z=6.313, 5.681, 5.268 and 4.603 for the four increasing size classes, respectively, allP<0.001).The proportion of length class of 10.0–14.9 cm did not differ significantly between the gears (WSRT:Z=1.378,P=0.168).

    Table 3 Indicator values (INDVAL) for fish species with more than 1% of relative abundance averaged by gear

    Fig.5 Size distributions of gillnet and trawl catches in Dianshan Lake from August 2009 to July 2010

    Gillnets rarely caught the small-sized individuals<6 cm only comprising 0.65% by number of the gillnet catch, whereas individuals <6 cm comprised 23.82% of the trawl catch by number. More largesized individuals ≥ 20.0 cm were taken by gillnet than by trawl; they contributed 11.54% of the gillnet catch and 0.80% of the trawl catch by number, respectively.

    Gillnet caughtH.bleekeriandH.nobiliswith larger mean total length and body weight than trawl,but the significance of the differences between the gears was not tested because of the extremely low sample size in trawl catch. For the other 9 main fish species, the species-specific total length and body weight in gillnet catch were significantly larger than in trawl catch except forC.carpio. The body weight ofC.carpioin trawl catch, though not significant,was larger than in gillnet catch (two independent samplet-test or Mann-WhitneyUtest, Table 2).

    3.4 Benthic and non-benthic guilds

    Of the 40 fish species caught by the two gears, 26 belonged to benthic species and 14 non-benthic fish(Table 1). Twenty-five and 15 from the 26 benthic species were captured by trawl and gillnet,respectively, and 13 of the 14 non-benthic species were both captured by the two gears. Non-benthic species accounted for more than half in gillnet catch by number and biomass and there were significant differences in the proportions between non-benthic and benthic species (WSRT: 60.5% vs. 39.5%,Z=2.947,df=65,P<0.001 for the proportion by number; 61.0% vs. 39.0%,Z=3.282,df=65,P<0.001 for the proportion by biomass). In trawl catch,however, the proportions by number and biomass of benthic species were significantly higher than those of non-benthic species (WSRT: 52.9% vs. 47.1%,Z=3.469,df=65,P<0.001 for the proportion by number; 71.9% vs. 28.1%,Z=4.232,df=65,P<0.001 for the proportion by biomass).

    Fig.6 The monthly changes in gillnet and trawl NPUE expressed as the number of individuals per 1 000 m 2 of gillnets or 1 000 m 2 of open water sampled by trawl

    3.5 The relationships between CPUE of the two gears and monthly mean air temperature

    The NPUE and BPUE both did not differed between three hauls (Friedman test, NPUE:χ2=1.895,df=2,P=0.388>0.05; BPUE:χ2=0.604,df=2,P=0.739>0.05) based on the dataset of 53 SMTC. The trawl catches had CV of 0.446±0.034 (SE) and 0.593±0.044 for NPUE and BPUE of the above dataset, respectively (Fig.6). The CVs did not differ between stations and seasons for both NPUE (season effect:F=0.847,P=0.480; station effect:F=2.040,P=0.102; season×station interaction:F=0.455,P=0.945) and BPUE (season effect:F=1.212,P=0.323; station effect:F=1.004,P=0.433;season×station interaction:F=0.723,P=0.743) of trawl catch. When the data of stations in each month were pooled according to gears, the CVs of NPUE and BPUE for gillnet were 0.739±0.057 ( SE) and 0.812±0.090, and those for trawl were 0.714±0.103 and 0.980±0.143, respectively (Fig.6). No significant differences in CV of NPUE (WSRT:Z=0.533,df=10,P=0.594) and BPUE (Z=1.156,df=10,P=0.248) were detected between gears.

    Fig.7 Change patterns of NPUE of gillnet and trawl with monthly mean air temperature (MMAT)

    Table 4 Correlation between NPUE of fish populations collected with gillnet and trawl.

    There were strong seasonalities in NPUE of gillnet and trawl. Generally, the relatively higher gillnet catch and lower trawl catch were recorded in warm months and the reverse patterns were found in cold months (Fig.6). Significantly negative correlation between trawl NPUE and MMAT was detected (r=-0.762,P=0.010,n=10). However, gillnet NPUE was significantly and positively correlated with MMAT(r=0.638,P=0.035,n=11). Regression models showed that trawl NPUE changed as a cubic polynomial function and gillnet NPUE varied as a quadratic polynomial function of MMAT (Fig.7). With increasing air temperature, gillnet NPUE increased gradually at temperatures below about 20.5°C and decreased monotonically at temperatures above about 20.5°C, and trawl NPUE declined greatly when temperatures were lower than about 15.1°C or larger than about 23.2°C and fluctuated largely at temperatures in-between (Fig.7).

    Fig.8 Regression relationship between trawl and gillnet NPUE

    Significant correlation between trawl and gillnet NPUE was detected only for the second month group(MGSAT2) among the five month groups, each with similar air temperature (MGSAT), and their relationship was positive (Table 4). No significant changes in their relationships were found when the fishes with total length of less than 6 cm and more than 20 cm were not included (Table 4). Totally, trawl NPUE was significantly and negatively correlated with gillnet NPUE (r=-0.656,P=0.040,n=10) when both of them in the 6 stations were averaged monthly and the pairwise NPUE data in November were excluded for the outlier of trawl NPUE in this month.The trawl NPUE varied as a quadratic polynomial function of gillnet NPUE, with minimum trawl NPUE at 90.2 ind./1 000 m2/h of gillnet NPUE. With increasing gillnet NPUE, trawl NPUE decreased when gillnet NPUE was lower than 90.2 ind./1 000 m2/h and increased when gillnet NPUE was larger than 90.2 ind./1 000 m2/h (Fig.8).

    4 DISCUSSION

    Our results showed that the assemblages in Dianshan Lake significantly differed in most of the structural features studied between trawling and gillnetting, including species richness, species numerical composition and size structure. different pictures of those characteristics between active and passive gear have often been reported by previous studies, such as gillnetting vs. electric fishing (Er?s et al., 2009), gillnetting vs. trawling (Olin and Malinen,2003; Olin et al., 2009; Rotherham et al., 2012),gillnetting vs. seining (Prchalová et al., 2008), and other combining use of passive and active gears(Clement et al., 2014). Results of present study also displayed that bottom trawl was more effective in detecting new species than sink gillnet, gillnet catches could serve as a proxy for density estimated from trawling under a monthly survey procedure or when surveys were conducted in months of March, April and November, and a hump-shaped relationship existed between gillnet catches and MMAT but trawl catches decreased with increasing MMAT both at low and high temperatures.

    In Dianshan Lake, the eff ectiveness of trawling and gillnetting in detecting new species depended largely on sampling effort (i.e., number of samples).Nevertheless, the species accumulation rates levelled off and the observed species richness was very close to or somewhat over 90% of the expected one for both gears, which indicate that the sample size (66 monthstation combinations) is appropriate (Moreno and Halff ter, 2000). The results also showed that active trawling produced much more species richness than passive gillnetting (Fig.4a), which is similar to other comparative studies of active vs. passive gears, such as electric fishing vs. gill netting (Growns et al., 1996;Er?s et al., 2009), but this pattern is not always consistent. Although active seine net and passive Windermere trap proved to be the most and least effective among four gears, active boat electrofishing was surpassed by passive hoop net in eff ectiveness of detecting new species (Lapointe et al., 2006). In Siitinselk? Lake, passive gillnets gave a more diversified picture of fish community than active seines (Jurvelius et al., 2011). There are few comparative studies on the eff ectiveness of detecting species richness between passive gillnetting and active trawling. Olin and Malinen (2003) and Olin et al. (2009) found that similar species numbers were collected by the two gears, which are inconsistent with our result. This disagreement may be due to the difference in trawl types. Pelagic trawls were used by Olin et al. (2009), whereas bottom ones were employed in our studied lake. Strict benthic species are not caught efficiently since their pelagic trawls were towed slightly above the bottom (Olin et al.,2009). difference between studies in Finland (Olin and Malinen, 2003; Olin et al., 2009) and results of this study is also in number of species present in sampled lakes. There is low fish species diversity in Finnish lakes, therefore both gears can successfully detect most of them. Species richness tends to increase with increasing collections (Lapointe et al., 2006, and the reference therein), which did so in Dianshan Lake.The species richness expected from individual-based rarefaction analysis was similar for trawling and gillnetting when the number of sampled individuals is lower than approximately 1 625, over which the eff ectiveness of trawling in detecting new species was higher than that of gillnetting; and finally the rarefaction curves of trawl and gillnet catches both gave saturation (Fig.4b). Those results from rarefaction curves indicate that trawl is a more effective gear than gillnet in assessing fish species richness in the lake.

    Body form and morphology can influence fish capture efficiencies (Bonar et al., 2009). For example,the probability of a fish to encounter and retain in a gillnet increases with discontinuities of body outline(Olin and Malinen, 2003). In Dianshan Lake, many rare species (total relative abundance <1%) were sampled only by trawl, includingAnguilla japonica,Cynogossus gracilis,Misgurnus anguillicaudatus,Monopterus albus, andRepomucenus olidus. They are strictly benthic inhabitants, with flattened- or rodshaped, or eel-like body form and smooth body due to the presence of large amounts of skin mucus, both making them more difficult to be caught by gillnets.Similarly, European eel (A. anguilla) is also not easy to catch by gillnets because of its smooth body and admirable motor abilities (Prchalová et al., 2013).Catchability of deep-bodied species like bream(Abramis brama) is relatively poor for gillnets compared with that for trawls (Hamley, 1975; Olin et al., 2009; ?mejkal et al., 2015).A. taenianalisis also a deep-bodied species. However, it was the second and third dominant species by number in the gillnet and trawl catches of Dianshan Lake, respectively, and no difference in its numerical proportion was detected between gears, which might be due to the relatively smaller body size of this species compared with that of bream.

    Selectivity of gears depends also on fish activity,which makes its catchabilities different between gears. For example, predatory fishes have more probabilities of encountering gillnets due to necessarily travelling more distance to seek prey and of escaping from catching by trawl because of having high swimming speed. Therefore, catchability of predatory species is more effective by gillnets than by trawls (Olin and Malinen, 2003), which can be supported by the strong indicator predatory speciesC. erythropterusin gillnet catch of Dianshan Lake(Table 2). The relative NPUE of this species in gillnet catch was significantly larger than in trawl catch(Table 1).

    The efficiency of most sampling methods is influenced by fish size and its associated activity.Particularly, gillnet and trawl produce high selectivity over fish size. Olin et al. (2009) and Jurvelius et al.(2011) found that gillnet underestimated small-sized fish species such as smelt and the density of <6 cm small-sized individuals compared with trawl. In Dianshan Lake, gillnet also underestimated smallsized fish compared with trawl, which was demonstrated by the significantly less relative frequencies of 5-cm total length classes smaller than 10 cm and relative NPUE ofR. giurinusin gillnet catch than in trawl catch. This unique strong indicator species of trawl catches has the smallest total length among the 40 caught species in the lake. Moreover,the percent of <6 cm individuals in gillnet catch was very low (0.65%), whereas the proportion in trawl catch was quite high (23.82%). Three factors might be ascribed to the underestimation of gillnet. First,small-sized individuals would swim through gillnet when their maximum perimeters were less than the perimeters of the mesh (Olin et al., 2009), which may do better because the mesh size (20 mm) of gillnet pane with minimum mesh size adopted by us is larger than that (5 mm, from knot to knot) used by Olin et al.(2009). Second, small-sized individuals have poor swimming ability and thus travel short distance,which may reduce their probabilities of encountering gillnets and thus their catchability by gillnets.However, active trawl has an advantage in catching small-sized species or individuals due to their poor activity and low swimming speed. Mechanic parameters of gillnet of different mesh sizes and thread are also important and often affect the catchability of gillnets (Prchalová et al., 2009).Furthermore, mesh obstruction may also be responsible for the difference in the numerical composition of small-sized individuals between gears. According to our observations, trawl meshes were usually clogged by detritus, submerged macrophyte, and dead or alive mollusks etc. during the process of trawling. As a result, even <1 cm individuals also could be caught by trawl. Thus, the subtle difference in mesh size between trawl (18 mm)and gillnet pane of minimum mesh (20 mm) is probable not the main reason for the difference in size structure between gears.

    Conversely, gillnet is prone to catch big-sized individuals or species. In Dianshan Lake, the eff ectiveness in catching fishes ≥ 20 cm was very low for trawl (0.80%) but relatively high for gillnet(11.54%). Meanwhile, the total length and/or body weight of the whole assemblages and most of the main species, and the relative frequencies of 5-cm total length classes larger than 15 cm in gillnet catch were significantly larger than in trawl catch. In addition, gillnet strong indicatorH. molitrix, a largesized species, was caught more eff ectively by gillnet than by trawl. Huse et al. (2000) showed that the mean length of cod in gillnet catch was bigger than in trawl catch. Big-sized individuals have a great chance to escape from the trawl and would be underestimated by trawl because they tend to have high swimming speed and strong activity, while they are easily caught by gillnet due to the high speed and thus large travelling distance (Bethke et al., 1999; Olin and Malinen, 2003; Olin et al., 2009; Prchalová et al.,2009). Besides, the relatively small opening size of our trawls could increase the chance of escape of large specimens. It could also be considered that benthic species are generally less active than pelagic species and thus are underestimated in gillnet catches.

    It is not easy to obtain reliable fish stock estimates even though different sampling methods are used(Dahm et al., 1992). Nevertheless, comparative studies still have been made largely since then. Most of these studies have focused on comparisons between gillnet catches and hydroacoustic estimates of a single, several fish species or fish assemblage, and only a few studies have correlated gillnet and trawl catches (Prchalová et al., 2012). On the whole, their correlation has not always been confirmed (Peltonen et al., 1999; Deceliere-Vergès and Guillard, 2008). No or weak correlations can be found in most comparative studies (Van Den Avyle et al., 1995; Deceliere-Vergès and Guillard, 2008, Jurvelius et al., 2011; Achleitner et al., 2012; Dennerline et al., 2012; Prchalová et al.,2012). In Dianshan Lake, a significant correlation between gillnet and trawl density estimates was only found for one of the five month groups with different temperatures (Table 4). Good correlations in some studies can be detected when the individuals with the smallest and/or largest body length were excluded(e.g. Van Den Avyle et al., 1995; Elliott and Fletcher,2001; Mehner and Schulz, 2002; Olin and Malinen,2003; Olin et al., 2009). However, correlation coefficients between gillnet and trawl catches in Dianshan Lake did not change significantly when we removed the smallest and largest fishes compared with no removal, as done by Olin et al. (2009)(Table 4). First, although it is generally accepted that the gillnet catch is dependent on a given fish density,enhanced gillnet catches are more related to increased fish activity than to the density recorded by trawling(Prchalová et al., 2012). Second, many factors such as net saturation, fish escapement, and avoidance of/attraction to a gillnet with already enmeshed fish play a significant role during every gillnet sampling (Olin et al., 2004; Prchalová et al., 2011), which do not cause gillnet catchability to inevitably vary linearly with fish density (Prchalová et al., 2012).

    Furthermore, sampling precision of density estimates may also be responsible for correlations of abundance estimates between the two gears used by us. Density estimates by trawl with mean CV of 0.446 in Dianshan Lake, similar to that (0.433) of trawl catches of threadfin in tropical reservoirs (Prchalová et al., 2012) and less than those of threadfin and gizzard shad in Texoma Lake ranging from 0.4 to 1.7(Van Den Avyle et al., 1995), can be considered to have adequate precision (Casado and Cutillas, 2011).Nevertheless, the CVs for trawl samples in Dianshan Lake ranged from 0.039 to 1.105, with 18 of the 53 stations towed three replicates having CVs of more than 0.5, which can be regarded as poor precision(Casado and Cutillas, 2011). The length of each mesh pane of a set of gillnet used by us is about ten times longer than that of European standardized multi-mesh gillnets (EN 14757). The CVs could not be calculated because no replicates for gillnetting at each station in each month were sampled. This shortcoming makes it impossible to reveal the accuracy of gillnet catches and compare it with that of trawl catches. Prchalová et al. (2012) found that sampling precision for gillnet catches of threadfin shad was significantly larger than that for trawl catches. Substantial variability of gillnet catches is thought to be caused by predators attacking threadfin shad enmeshed in gillnets and by uneven spatial distribution due to the schooling of shad, but trawl has the potential to reduce the natural variability caused by uneven distribution (Prchalová et al.,2012). Engraulid fishes includingC. nasus, a predominant fish in Dianshan Lake,have schooling behavior (Young et al., 1994). It is speculated that the accuracy of trawl catches would be larger than that of gillnet catches when sampling replicates were set and enough for both gears, even though the two gears had comparable mean CV when CVs were monthly calculated among stations in this study. Therefore, no correlations between gillnet and trawl catches for the four MGSAT (Table 4) could partially be explained by catch variability and adequate replicates for both gears in Dianshan Lake are needed to increase the accuracy of each sampling method. The CPUE often provides an index to fish density (Pope and Willis,1996). Our results showed that the correlation between NPUE data of fish populations caught by trawls and gill nets in Dianshan Lake was significant when data from stations were pooled. A relatively high goodness of fit was obtained when a quadratic polynomial function was used to describe their relationship.Those results indicate that the gillnet NPUE in the future investigation with the same sampling procedure as that in 2009–2010 has the potential to be transformed to absolute abundance of trawl and to provide an index to fish density if accuracies of the two gears would increase largely after adequate replicates were set up at each station. It is true especially for catching fish in the months with similar temperatures of March, April and November because of high correlation detected between NPUE of gillnet and trawl (Table 4).

    Gillnet NPUE of fish assemblage was significantly and positively correlated with MMAT in Dianshan Lake, which is consistent with the findings of previous studies on fish assemblage or a single fish species(Dennerline et al., 2012; Olin et al., 2016). However,in other reports no significant relationships were detected (Hansson and Rudstam, 1995; Tremain and Adams, 1995). Minimum gillnet NPUE was most often recorded in cold month, whereas maximum NPUE was rarely found in “hot month” but mostly observed in months with temperatures in-between(Neumann and Willis, 1995; Tremain and Adams,1995; Pope and Willis, 1996; Bobori and Salvarina,2010). In Dianshan Lake, minimum gillnet NPUE occurred in the coldest month (January); high temperatures did not always represent high gillnet NPUE and the opposite is true, which conform to the results of most of the above studies. The relationship between gillnet NPUE and MMAT was strengthened when a quadratic polynomial function was used to describe their relationship; gillnet NPUE rose first and then fell with increasing MMAT. The similar“hump-shaped” patterns were also observed for European perch (Perca fluviatilis) and roach (Rutilus rutilus) in six lakes of south-east Norway (Linl?kken and Haugen, 2006). Gillnet NPUE is a function of both fish abundance and catchability at the time of fishing (Hamley, 1975); water temperature can increase fish activity and thus its catchability in gillnets (Hansson and Rudstam, 1995; Tang and Boisclair, 1995; Olin et al., 2016). Therefore, positive correlation between gillnet NPUE and water temperature may be expected and has been found in previous investigations (Linl?kken and Haugen,2006; Olin et al., 2016). However, water temperature not only increases fish activity but also decreases it.For example, swimming speed rate of brook trout(Salvelinus fontinalis) tended to increase with water temperature up to 18℃ and decrease at 20.7℃ (Tang and Boisclair, 1995). Thus, high water temperatures may decrease the distance travelled by fishes during sampling period and thus reduce their catchability,which may be used to explain the second part of“hump-shaped” pattern between gillnet NPUE and temperature obtained by present study and Linl?kken and Haugen (2006). Some ecological factors such as water color, oxygen conditions, water clarity and real fish density also have effects on fish catchability in gillnets (Linl?kken and Haugen, 2006; Prchalová et al., 2010; Olin et al., 2016). They change seasonally like water temperature, which may complicate the interpretation of the relationship between gillnet NPUE and temperature found by us.

    A few relationships between trawl NPUE and water temperature have been reported; Tremain and Adams (1995) found a significantly positive association between trawl catches per haul and water temperature in their monthly sampling procedure. By contrast, significantly negative relationships between them were found in Dianshan Lake, which may be ascribed to the increased escape activity of fishes in months with higher water temperature.

    5 CONCLUSION

    The pictures of fish community including species richness, species numerical composition and size structure in Dianshan Lake shown by gillnet and trawl, respectively, are significantly different. Active trawling produces higher species richness than passive gillnetting when sampling size is enough.Bottom trawl is more effective for capturing benthic species than benthic gillnet in the shallow lake due to the fact that body form and morphology could influence fish capture efficiencies of different gears.

    The efficiencies of most sampling methods are influenced by fish size and its associated activity.Gillnet captures relatively less small-sized fish but overestimates large-sized fish compared with trawl.Moreover, gillnet NPUE of fish assemblage is significantly and positively correlated with monthly mean air temperatures (MMAT), but significantly negative relationship for trawl is found in Dianshan Lake.

    Actually single-gear-based survey (for instance,only gillnet or trawl is adopt) is often misleading in assessments of attributes of fish assemblages.Therefore, several sampling gears are recommended to be adopted jointly to assess the real picture of fish community scientifically and reasonably. According to our results, multi-mesh monofilament gillnets and benthic trawls may be a workable combination to reveal the attributes of fish assemblages in Dianshan Lake and similar lakes in Taihu Lake Basin such as shallow eutrophic lakes. Nevertheless, there is a lot of research work to do to standardize the procedures of each fishing gear.

    Achleitner D, Gassner H, Luger M. 2012. Comparison of three standardised fish sampling methods in 14 alpine lakes in Austria.Fish. Manage. Ecol.,19(4): 352-361.

    Aho K, Roberts D W, Weaver T. 2008. Using geometric and non-geometric internal evaluators to compare eight vegetation classification methods.J. Veg. Sci.,19(4): 549-562.

    Bethke E, Arrhenius F, Cardinale M, H?kansson N. 1999.Comparison of the selectivity of three pelagic sampling trawls in a hydroacoustic survey.Fish. Res.,44(1): 15-23.

    Bobori D C, Salvarina I. 2010. Seasonal variation of fish abundance and biomass in gillnet catches of an East Mediterranean lake: Lake Doirani.J. Environ. Biol.,31(6): 995-1 000.

    Bonar S A, Hubert W A, Willis D W. 2009. Standard Methods for Sampling North American Freshwater Fishes.American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.

    Casado P, Cutillas P R. 2011. A self-validating quantitative mass spectrometry method for assessing the accuracy of high-content phosphoproteomic experiments.Mol. Cell.Proteomics.,10(1): M110.003079.

    Chen Y Y. 1998. Fauna Sinica, Osteichthyes, Cypriniformes II.Science Press, Beijing, China. (in Chinese)

    Clarke K R, Gorley R N. 2001. PRIMER Version 5.0: User Manual/Tutorial. PRIMER-E Ltd, Plymouth, UK.

    Clement T A, Pangle K, Uzarski D G, Murry B A. 2014.Eff ectiveness of fishing gears to assess fish assemblage size structure in small lake ecosystems.Fish. Manage.Ecol.,21(3): 211-219.

    Colwell R K. 2013. EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9.User’s Guide and Application. Persistent URL<purl.oclc.org./estimates>.

    Dahm E, Hartman J, Jurvelius J, L?ffler H, V?lzke V. 1992.Review of the European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission (EIFAC) experiments on stock assessment in lakes.J. Appl. Ichthyol.,8(1-4): 1-9.

    Deceliere-Vergès C, Guillard J. 2008. Assessment of the pelagic fish populations using CEN multi-mesh gillnets:consequences for the characterization of the fish communities.Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.,389(4):1-16.

    Dennerline D E, Jennings C A, Degan D J. 2012. Relationships between hydroacoustic derived density and gill net catch:implications for fish assessments.Fish. Res.,123-124: 78-89.

    Dufrêne M, Legendre P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach.Ecol. Monogr.,67(3): 345-366.

    East China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fisheries Science, Shanghai Fisheries Research Institute. 1990. The Fishes of Shanghai Area. Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, Shanghai. (in Chinese)

    Elliott J M, Fletcher J M. 2001. A comparison of three methods for assessing the abundance of Arctic charr,Salvelinus alpinus, in Windermere (northwest England).Fish. Res.,53(1): 39-46.

    Er?s T, Specziár A, Bíró P. 2009. Assessing fish assemblages in reed habitats of a large shallow lake—a comparison between gillnetting and electric fishing.Fish. Res.,96(1):70-76.

    Growns I O, Pollard D A, Harris J H. 1996. A comparison of electric fishing and gillnetting to examine the effects of anthropogenic disturbance on riverine fish communities.Fish. Manage. Ecol.,3(1): 13-24.

    Halkidi M, Batistakis Y, Vazirgiannis M. 2001. On clustering validation techniques.J. Intell. Inf. Syst.,17(2-3): 107-145.

    Hamley J M. 1975. Review of gillnet selectivity.Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada,32(11): 1 943-1 969.

    Hansson S, Rudstam L G. 1995. Gillnet catches as an estimate of fish abundance: a comparison between vertical gillnet catches and hydroacoustic abundances of Baltic Sea herring (Clupea harengus) and sprat (Sptattus sptattus).Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.,52(1): 75-83.

    Huse I, L?kkeborg S, Soldal A V. 2000. Relative selectivity in trawl, longline and gillnet fisheries for cod and haddock.ICES. J. Mar. Sci.,57(4): 1 271-1 282.

    Jurvelius J, Kolari I, Leskel? A. 2011. Quality and status of fish stocks in lakes: gillnetting, seining, trawling and hydroacoustics as sampling methods.Hydrobiologia,660(1): 29-36.

    Kube?ka J, Hohausová E, Matěna J, Peterka J, Amarasinghe U S, Bonar S A, Hateley J, Hickley P, Suuronen P,Tereschenko V, Welcomme R, Winfield I J. 2009. The true picture of a lake or reservoir fish stock: a review of needs and progress.Fish. Res.,96(1): 1-5.

    Lapointe N W R, Corkum L D, Mandrak N E. 2006. A comparison of methods for sampling fish diversity in shallow off shore waters of large rivers.NorthAm. J. Fish.Manage.,26(3): 503-513.

    Linl?kken A, Haugen T O. 2006. Density and temperature dependence of gill net catch per unit effort for perch,Perca fluviatilis, and roach,Rutilus rutilus.Fish. Manage.Ecol.,13(4): 261-269.

    Mehner T, Schulz M. 2002. Monthly variability of hydroacoustic fish stock estimates in a deep lake and its correlation to gillnet catches.J. Fish. Biol.,61(5): 1 109-1 121.

    Moreno C E, Halff ter G. 2000. Assessing the completeness of bat biodiversity inventories using species accumulation curves.J. Appl. Ecol.,37(1): 149-158.

    Neumann R M, Willis D W. 1995. Seasonal variation in gillnet sample indexes for northern pike collected from a glacial prairie lake.NorthAm. J. Fish.Manage.,15(4):838-844.

    Olin M, Kurkilahti M, Peitola P, Ruuhij?rvi J. 2004. The effects of fish accumulation on the catchability of multimesh gillnet.Fish. Res.,68(1-3): 135-147.

    Olin M, Malinen T. 2003. Comparison of gillnet and trawl in diurnal fish community sampling.Hydrobiologia,506(1-3): 443-449.

    Olin M, Malinen T, Ruuhij?rvi J. 2009. Gillnet catch in estimating the density and structure of fish community—comparison of gillnet and trawl samples in a eutrophic lake.Fish. Res.,96(1): 88-94.

    Olin M, Tiainen J, Kurkilahti M, Rask M, Lehtonen H. 2016.An evaluation of gillnet CPUE as an index of perch density in small forest lakes.Fish. Res.,173: 20-25.

    Peltonen H, Ruuhij?rvi J, Malinen T, Horppila J. 1999.Estimation of roach (Rutilus rutilus(L.)) and smelt(Osmerus eperlanus(L.)) stocks with virtual population analysis, hydroacoustics and gillnet CPUE.Fish. Res.,44(1): 25-36.

    Pope K L, Willis D W. 1996. Seasonal influences on freshwater fisheries sampling data.Rev. Fish. Sci.,4(1): 57-73.

    Prchalová M, Kube?ka J, ?íha M, Litvín R, ?ech M, Frouzová J, Hladík M, Hohausová E, Peterka J, Va?ek M. 2008.Overestimation of percid fishes (Percidae) in gillnet sampling.Fish. Res.,91(1): 79-87.

    Prchalová M, Kube?ka J, ?íha M, Mrkvi?ka T, Va?ek M, J?za T, Kratochvíl M, Peterka J, Dra?tík V, K?í?ek J. 2009. Size selectivity of standardized multimesh gillnets in sampling coarse European species.Fish. Res.,96(1): 51-57.

    Prchalová M, Mrkvi?ka T, Kube?ka J, Peterka J, ?ech M,Mu?ka M, Kratochvíl M, Va?ek M. 2010. Fish activity as determined by gillnet catch: a comparison of two reservoirs of different turbidity.Fish. Res.,102(3): 291-296.

    Prchalová M, Mrkvi?ka T, Peterka J, ?ech M, Berec L,Kube?ka J. 2011. A model of gillnet catch in relation to the catchable biomass, saturation, soak time and sampling period.Fish. Res.,107(1-3): 201-209.

    Prchalová M, Neal J W, Mu?oz-Hincapié M, J?za T, ?íha M,Peterka J, Kube?ka J. 2012. Comparison of gill nets and fixed-frame trawls for sampling threadfin shad in tropical reservoirs.Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.,141(4): 1 151-1 160.

    Prchalová M, Kube?ka J, ?íha M, ?ech M, J?za T, Ketelaars H A, Kratochvíl M, Mrkvi?ka T, Peterkaa J, Va?eka M,Wagenvoort A J. 2013. Eel attacks—a new tool for assessing European eel (Anguilla anguilla) abundance and distribution patterns with gillnet sampling.Limnologica,43(3): 194-202.

    Quinn G P, Keough M J. 2002. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge University Press,Cambridge.

    Rotherham D, Johnson D D, Kesby C L, Gray C A. 2012.Sampling estuarine fish and invertebrates with a beam trawl provides a different picture of populations and assemblages than multi-mesh gillnets.Fish. Res.,123-124: 49-55.

    ?mejkal M, Ricard D, Prchalová M, ?íha M, Mu?ka M,Blabolil P, ?ech M, Va?ek M, J?za T, Monteoliva Herreras A, Encina L, Peterka J, Kube?ka J. 2015. Biomass and abundance biases in European standard gillnet sampling.PLoS One,10(3): e0122437.

    Tang M, Boisclair D. 1995. Relationship between respiration rate of juvenile brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), water temperature, and swimming characteristics.Can. J. Fish.Aquat.Sci.,52(10): 2 138-2 145.

    Tremain D M, Adams D H. 1995. Seasonal variations in species diversity, abundance, and composition of fish communities in the northern Indian River Lagoon,Florida.Bull. Mar. Sci.,57(1): 171-192.

    Van Den Avyle M J, Boxrucker J, Michaletz P, Vondracek B,Ploskey G R. 1995. Comparison of catch rate, length distribution, and precision of six gears used to sample reservoir shad populations.NorthAm. J. Fish. Manage.,15(4): 940-955.

    Young S S, Chiu T S, Shen S C. 1994. A revision of the family Engraulidae (Pisces) from Taiwan.Zool. Stud.,33(3):217-227.

    Zweig C L, Kitchens W M. 2008. effects of landscape gradients on wetland vegetation communities: information for large-scale restoration.Wetlands,28(4): 1 086-1 096.

    猜你喜歡
    吳昊三氯香型
    本期卷首
    中國白酒香型概念的提出及演化發(fā)展
    漲瘋了!碘漲50%,三氯漲超30%,溶劑漲超250%……消毒劑要漲價了
    僑領(lǐng)吳昊:傳遞中俄世代友好的接棒者
    華人時刊(2019年21期)2019-05-21 03:30:38
    吳昊、呂十鎖國畫作品
    歐盟食品安全局:三氯蔗糖無致癌風(fēng)險(xiǎn)
    三氯生對4種水生生物的急性毒性研究
    陳香型鐵觀音國家標(biāo)準(zhǔn)有望2015年發(fā)布
    芝麻香型白酒發(fā)酵過程中的動態(tài)探究
    河南科技(2014年1期)2014-02-27 14:04:13
    添加有機(jī)酸加速2,4,6-三氯酚的生物降解
    每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 日本三级黄在线观看| 不卡av一区二区三区| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 极品教师在线免费播放| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 嫩草影视91久久| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| tocl精华| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 大型av网站在线播放| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 亚洲av熟女| www国产在线视频色| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 精品电影一区二区在线| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 亚洲精品在线美女| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 三级毛片av免费| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| svipshipincom国产片| 夫妻午夜视频| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 一级毛片精品| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 精品国产亚洲在线| 色在线成人网| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 久久香蕉国产精品| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 成在线人永久免费视频| av片东京热男人的天堂| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 成人三级黄色视频| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 国产单亲对白刺激| 成人18禁在线播放| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 久久 成人 亚洲| 级片在线观看| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 一级毛片精品| 在线观看66精品国产| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 精品人妻1区二区| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 日韩有码中文字幕| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 老司机福利观看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 看片在线看免费视频| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影 | 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 亚洲激情在线av| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 满18在线观看网站| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 亚洲av成人av| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av | 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 色综合站精品国产| 悠悠久久av| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 久99久视频精品免费| 麻豆av在线久日| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 美女福利国产在线| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 美女大奶头视频| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 操出白浆在线播放| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 不卡av一区二区三区| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 性欧美人与动物交配| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 一本综合久久免费| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 搡老岳熟女国产| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 香蕉国产在线看| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| av天堂久久9| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 999精品在线视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 午夜精品在线福利| 夫妻午夜视频| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 精品国产亚洲在线| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 欧美成人午夜精品| 精品一区二区三卡| 日韩欧美免费精品| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 一区二区三区激情视频| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 黄频高清免费视频| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 看片在线看免费视频| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 在线观看日韩欧美| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 中文字幕高清在线视频| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| a级毛片在线看网站| 日日夜夜操网爽| 免费看a级黄色片| www.www免费av| 美女福利国产在线| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 我的亚洲天堂| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| a级毛片黄视频| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 天天影视国产精品| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 久久久久久大精品| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 日本五十路高清| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 中文欧美无线码| 国产片内射在线| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 国产区一区二久久| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 精品第一国产精品| 一级黄色大片毛片| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 精品福利观看| 色在线成人网| 亚洲九九香蕉| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 在线av久久热| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| www.999成人在线观看| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 久久精品影院6| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产高清激情床上av| 久久精品成人免费网站| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 最好的美女福利视频网| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 精品第一国产精品| 91字幕亚洲| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 少妇 在线观看| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 99香蕉大伊视频| av电影中文网址| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 国产av一区二区精品久久| www.www免费av| 国产1区2区3区精品| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 久久伊人香网站| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| xxx96com| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 美女福利国产在线| 美女午夜性视频免费| 久久久久九九精品影院| 91大片在线观看| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 满18在线观看网站| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产精品久久视频播放| 在线国产一区二区在线| 99re在线观看精品视频| 香蕉国产在线看| 不卡av一区二区三区| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 日韩欧美免费精品| 久久热在线av| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 91成人精品电影| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产熟女xx| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| av片东京热男人的天堂| 一级黄色大片毛片| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 99re在线观看精品视频| 国产成人av教育| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| svipshipincom国产片| 亚洲 国产 在线| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 两个人免费观看高清视频| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| www国产在线视频色| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲第一青青草原| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 看片在线看免费视频| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产在线观看jvid| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 91老司机精品| 99re在线观看精品视频| 大型av网站在线播放| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 天天添夜夜摸| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影 | 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| a在线观看视频网站| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 人人澡人人妻人| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 久久99一区二区三区| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 免费av毛片视频| 精品久久久久久成人av| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 亚洲色图av天堂| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| av中文乱码字幕在线| 久99久视频精品免费| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 成人三级做爰电影| 97碰自拍视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 久久国产精品影院| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 国产精品久久视频播放| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 亚洲精品一二三| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 亚洲av熟女| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 国产不卡一卡二| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸 | 一进一出抽搐动态| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 超碰97精品在线观看| 电影成人av| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 国产区一区二久久| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 精品久久久精品久久久| www.自偷自拍.com| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲片人在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 午夜老司机福利片| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 超色免费av| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| www.精华液| 天天影视国产精品| 国产成人av教育| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 黄色成人免费大全| a级毛片在线看网站| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 久久人妻av系列| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 在线av久久热| 最好的美女福利视频网| 中国美女看黄片| 成人手机av| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 日本欧美视频一区| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 午夜精品在线福利| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 91av网站免费观看| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 久久香蕉国产精品| 亚洲国产欧美网| 香蕉丝袜av| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| av电影中文网址| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 窝窝影院91人妻| 午夜视频精品福利| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 久久久久久久久中文| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 国产1区2区3区精品| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 最好的美女福利视频网| 午夜免费激情av| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 制服诱惑二区| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| svipshipincom国产片| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 制服人妻中文乱码| 国产成年人精品一区二区 | 免费高清视频大片| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 成人三级黄色视频| 大码成人一级视频| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 两个人看的免费小视频| 五月开心婷婷网| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 国产成人精品无人区| 午夜激情av网站| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产99白浆流出| 99香蕉大伊视频| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 亚洲精品一二三| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 制服诱惑二区| 免费看a级黄色片| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 成人影院久久| 88av欧美| 看免费av毛片| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲 国产 在线| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 久热这里只有精品99| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 久久性视频一级片| ponron亚洲| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 日本免费a在线| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产av在哪里看| www.精华液| 在线天堂中文资源库| 香蕉久久夜色| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 香蕉国产在线看| 最好的美女福利视频网| 国产精品永久免费网站| 黄片小视频在线播放| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 麻豆av在线久日| 999久久久国产精品视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 天天影视国产精品| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 丝袜美足系列| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| x7x7x7水蜜桃|