• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Assessment of genetic effects on important breeding traits in reciprocal DH populations of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.)

    2018-01-04 02:04:27LaurencjaSzaTeresaCegielskaTarasElbietaAdamskaZygmuntKaczmarek
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2018年1期

    Laurencja Sza?a, Teresa Cegielska-Taras, El?bieta Adamska, Zygmunt Kaczmarek

    1 Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, National Research Institute, Poznań 60-479, Poland

    2 Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznań 60-479, Poland

    RESEARCH ARTICLE

    Assessment of genetic effects on important breeding traits in reciprocal DH populations of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.)

    Laurencja Sza?a1, Teresa Cegielska-Taras1, El?bieta Adamska2, Zygmunt Kaczmarek2

    1 Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, National Research Institute, Poznań 60-479, Poland

    2 Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznań 60-479, Poland

    Here we present a study on the genetic effects of agronomic and seed quality traits in double haploid (DH) populations,which were developed by microspore culture from reciprocal F1hybrids produced between cultivar Californium and DH W-15. Each of the populations consisted of 25 DH lines. The field experiments were conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replications during three growing seasons. Field observations were recorded on seed yield and its structure: the number of branches and pods per plant, the number of seeds per pod, the 1 000-seed weight, the content of fat in the seeds, and three unsaturated fatty acids (oleic, linoleic, linolenic) in the seed oil. In order to investigate the in fluence of cross direction on the studied traits, parental effects were evaluated on the basis of differences between reciprocal DH populations. The maternal effect was revealed on the number of seeds per pod and the effect of the paternal form on linolenic acid content. The occurrence of transgression effects also depended on the direction of crossing and this was particularly noticeable in terms of the number of seeds per pod. The use of multivariate statistical methods allowed for the simultaneous characterization and grouping of tested lines in terms of several traits. Graphic images of the distribution of DH lines in the space of the two first canonical variates showed a great variation between the two reciprocal populations,both in terms of yield and its components, as well as fat and those unsaturated fatty acids.

    DH line, reciprocal cross, oilseed rape, multivariate analysis, transgression

    1. Introduction

    In recent years, increased global interest in oilseed rape has focused on the widespread use of canola oil in different branches of industry. The dynamic development of the cultivation of oilseed rape was due to the enormous progress in breeding high quality varieties with a zero erucic acid and low-reduced glucosinolate content. Today, oilseed rape is not only a source of high nutritional quality oil with a balanced fatty acid composition, but also a valuable material for many other products ranging from methyl ester to industrial lubricants and hydraulic oils, tensides for detergent and soap production and biodegradable plastics (Friedt et al. 2007).

    Modern breeding programs use state-of-the art biotechnology techniques. The doubled haploid (DH)method in winter oilseed rape, with the use of an in vitro androgenesis process, has become a routine way to produce completely homozygous and genetically fully stable lines within one generation. The bene fits of the DH lines mainly lie both in the accelerated breeding process and in increasing the ef ficiency of selection in the early generations.

    Genetic information on the gene expression of quantitative traits in DH populations can help breeders to create an effective strategy for the development of new varieties of oilseed rape. Determination of the in fluence of the cytoplasmic and nuclear genetic maternal effects or the embryo effects for given traits allows the selection of the appropriate direction of crossing.

    Transgressive segregation is a common mechanism in plant hybrids (Rieseberg et al. 1999) and is the result of complementary gene action (De Vincente and Taksley 1993; Monforte et al. 1997; Rieseberg et al. 2003). The frequency of occurrence of transgressive genotypes depends on the genetic differentiation of parental components and phenotypic similarity. Phenotypically similar species are more likely to produce transgressive hybrid offspring than dissimilar species (Stelkens and Seehausen 2009). However, Kuczyńska et al. (2007)reported that the occurrence of transgressive segregants in barley in a homozygous population depended on several factors characterizing parental genotypes, such as gene distribution, phenotypic diversity and genetic distance.

    The breeding programs of many plant species have found a parallel improvement in a number of features that take into account both aspects of productivity, as well as the quality of the crop. The starting materials are evaluated for many of these traits in the early stages of the plant breeding process. Multivariate statistical methods provide a comprehensive assessment of breeding lines,while considering many important characteristics from an agronomic point of view. They also allow for the separation of groups of similar genotypes in respect to many traits and the identi fication of groups of varieties of high value. Analyses of this type are widely used for the characterization of germplasm collections of cultivated plants (Nassir and Ariyo 2007; Tucak et al. 2009) and in the search for parents in the breeding of many species of plants. Multivariate analysis of variance has been applied to the culture, for example, of peppers (Lahbib et al. 2013)and barley (Setotaw et al. 2010) or soybean resistance breeding (Gravina et al. 2004). In a study of oilseed rape,multivariate statistical methods were applied by Kaczmarek et al. (2005) for evaluation of the DH lines in terms of the content of five fatty acids, while Adamska et al. (2007)evaluated the combining ability of DH lines in terms of the characteristics of yield and fat content and Shara fiet al.(2015) assessed 28 winter oilseed cultivars for genetic variation and investigated relationships between 11 agromorphological characters. Based on a multi-trait analysis,Bocianowski et al. (2016) assessed the genetic crossing potential of eight inbred lines of the spring oilseed rape.

    In the present study, univariate and multivariate statistical methods were used to estimate the effect of cross direction on the seed yield and the yield structure, the fat content as well as three fatty acids. This estimation was based on the differences between two reciprocal DH populations without the F1generation, and on the frequency of occurrence of transgressive DH lines in the reciprocal populations.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Plant materials

    The materials consisted of two DH populations obtained from F1hybrids of reciprocal crosses between cultivar Californium and DH W-15 line derived from cultivar Wotan and the parental forms. The population, marked as CW, consisted of 25 DH lines and was derived from a F1hybrid, cultivar Californium×DH W-15. The population marked as WC also consisted of 25 DH lines and was derived from a F1hybrid, DH W-15×cultivar Californium.

    2.2. Experimental conditions

    This study was performed in the growing seasons of 2010-2011, 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 at the Experimental Station of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Cerekwica near Poznań, Poland. The soil type at Cerekwica is sandy clay. Mean temperature for the growing season at the experimental site was 9.2, 8.5 and 7.0°C for the first, the second and the third years, respectively. Precipitation was 442.8 mm from August 2010 to July 2011, 354.5 mm from August 2011 to July 2012, and 303.1 mm from August 2012 to July 2013. Full chemical protection of plants was applied.Other agronomical practices were similar to the commercial planting in the area.

    Field experiments including 50 DH lines and parental forms were conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replications and a plot size of 1.2 m×5.0 m.The following observations and evaluations of seed yield and its structure were performed: the number of branches and pods per plant, the number of seeds per pod and the 1 000-seed weight and the content of fat in the seeds and of the three unsaturated fatty acids with 18-carbon atoms in the seed oil.

    Approximately three weeks before harvesting, five plants were randomly selected from each plot to record data of the number of branches and pods per plant. Twenty- five welldeveloped pods were taken from the middle main stems of each material to measure the number of seeds per pod.Two months after the harvest, the 1 000-seed weight was calculated as the average of five replicate samples from the mixed seeds for each plot.

    The fat content in dry seeds (about 5% moisture)was determined via pulsed nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR, 7005 MOA Oxford Instruments, UK). The fatty acid composition of the oil was determined by gas chromatography (GC, Agilent Technologies 6890N, USA).

    2.3. Statistical analysis

    The experimental data were analyzed with uni- and multivariate statistical methods (Morrison 1976; Gomez and Gomez 1984). Two-factor analysis of variance was carried out to test the hypotheses of no differences between genotypes and between years. The F-statistic was used to compare the average value for traits between the populations and the parental forms for an examination of the direction crossing effect on given traits. Each DH line from the CW and WC populations was compared with both parents to identify those DH lines with advantageous and signi ficant effects of transgression for the studied traits. For seed yield, yield structure and fat content, positive effects of transgression were sought as well as for oleic and linoleic acid, and negative transgression effects were investigated for linolenic acid content.

    Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to study the differences and interrelations between genotypes and to formulate the characteristics of the DH lines of both studied populations in terms of two sets of traits. The first set consisted of yield and its components, and the second consisted of the content of fat and the three fatty acids: oleic, linoleic and linolenic acid. Canonical variate analysis enabled the creation of a graphical representation on a plane of the location of the CW and WC DH lines and their relation to parental forms. In order to determine the characteristics with the most powerful discrimination in the study, the simple correlation coef ficients between the first two canonical variates and the values of the individual original traits were calculated.

    3. Results

    3.1. Mean values of characteristics of the DH populations and parental forms

    The mean values of the studied characteristics of the parental forms (cultivar Californium and DH W-15), and the two populations of the DH lines (CW and WC) are presented in Table 1. The general hypothesis of no difference between genotypes was rejected for all traits at least P=0.05. The effect of years on the expression on these traits turned out to be signi ficant as well, except for the number of seeds per pod and fat content. Hypotheses concerning no genotype by year interaction were rejected only for yield of seeds,number of pods per plant and number of seeds per pod.

    3.2. Maternal and paternal effects

    The estimation and the results of testing of the means for yield and yield components between CW and WC populations and parental forms are presented as contrasts(Table 2). Signi ficant contrast values were found for all the studied traits, except for the number of branches. CW and WC populations did not differ signi ficantly from one another in terms of yield, number of branches or 1 000-seed weight.A signi ficantly higher number of pods per plant and fewer seeds per pod characterized the CW population compared to the WC population, but the direction of crossing revealed an in fluence of maternal effects only on the number of seeds per pod.

    Among traits of the second set, signi ficant values for the contrast between the studied DH populations were obtained for the contents of linoleic acid and linolenic acid (Table 3). The estimates for the CW population were signi ficantly positive in terms of the results of the contrast with the WC population for linoleic acid content, while they were signi ficantly negative for the results of the contrast with the WC population for linolenic acid content. CultivarCalifornium contained more linoleic acid than the line DH W-15, and therefore linolenic acid content continued to be signi ficantly in fluenced by the paternal parent.

    Table 1 Mean values of studied traits for cultivar Californium, DH W-15, and CW and WC populations

    Table 2 Estimates and results of testing the contrast estimation among CW and WC populations, cultivar Californium, and DH W-15 for yield and yield components

    Table 3 Estimates and results of contrasts test between each pair of CW and WC populations, cultivar Californium, and DH line W-15 for fat and three fatty acid contents

    3.3. Transgression effects

    Each DH from the CW and WC populations was compared with the better parent to identify the transgressive DH lines(Table 4). Among the traits of yield structure, the most transgressive lines were found in terms of the 1 000-seed weight, seven out of the 50 DH lines tested. In the case of the number of pods per plant, six DH lines with positive effects of transgression were found. For the number of seeds per pod, six transgressive DH lines were also recorded. In terms of yield, only three DH lines signi ficantly exceeded their better parent (DH W-15). The direction of crossing played a certain role in the frequency of transgression effects; this was particularly so in the case of the number of seeds per pod. Positive effects of transgression were observed only in the WC population where the female parent contained more seeds per pod. The in fluence of maternal effects was also revealed in the case of the 1 000-seed weight. Out of the seven transgressive lines demonstrating this effect, five belonged to the CW population, where the maternal form was cultivar Californium.

    Among the biochemical traits, 13 DH lines showed positive effects of transgression on the content of linoleic acid, eight DH lines belonged to the CW population, and five to the WC population. Signi ficantly lower linolenic acid content was found in two DH lines, one from each population.The increase in linoleic acid and reduction in linolenic acid content, although statistically signi ficant, did not lead to any important change in the fatty acid pro file in the tested lines from the point of view of the breeding. Five DH lines were characterized by signi ficantly increased fat content.

    In the analyzed DH populations, two lines can be particularly distinguished, line WC-53 with the effects of transgression on yield, fat content and the 1 000-seed weight and line CW-36, in which there were positive effects of transgression in terms of yield, number of pods per plant,fat and linoleic acid content simultaneously.

    3.4. Simultaneous multitrait evaluation of DH populations

    Using multivariate statistical analysis, the tested DH lines and their parental forms were simultaneously characterized in terms of several traits.

    The first set of traits included yield and yield structure.The first canonical variate (V1) and the second canonical variate (V2) explained 77.81 and 13.57% of the total variation, respectively. The first two canonical variates explained jointly 91.38% of the total variation of the studied traits, allowing for the arrangement of DH on the planewith only minimal loss of information. The values of the correlation coef ficients between the analyzed characteristics of the first two canonical variates (Table 5) indicate that V1 was highly positively correlated with the 1 000-seed weight(r=0.992***) and signi ficantly negatively correlated with the number of branches (r=-0.423**), number of pods per plant(r=-0.422**) and number of seeds per pod (r=-0.398**).However, V2 was in fluenced by the number of seeds per pod(r=0.681**) and slightly lower and negatively by the number of branches (r=-0.484**) and the number of pods per plant(r=-0.381*). Graphic presentation of the distribution of lines CW (Fig. 1) and WC (Fig. 2) according to the first two canonical variates indicated more diverse CW lines than WC lines in terms of the 1 000-seed weight. However, in the population of WC, variation in the number of seeds per pod was greater than that in the CW population.

    Table 4 Transgression effects in the CW and WC populations

    In the second set of traits, characterized jointly for fat and three fatty acid contents, V1 explained 50.14% of the total variation, and V2 explained 33.11%, V1 and V2 both explaining together 83.25% of the total variability of this set of features. V1 was highly positively correlated with the fat content, r=0.940***(Table 6). There was also a positive correlation between this variate and the content of linolenic acid (r=0.334*) and a negative correlation with the content of linoleic acid (r =–0.334*). In the case of V2, the greatest in fluence on the distribution of genotype objects was shown by linoleic acid (r=–0.568**) and linolenic acid(r=0.533**) in oil, with a smaller effect in fat (r=–0.324*). Thus,both variates simultaneously depend on the same traits.Linolenic acid content had a positive effect, linoleic acid had a negative effect, and oleic acid had no signi ficant effect on either variate. The dominant in fluence on the distribution of the tested lines on the graph was shown by fat content level, whereby on the right side of the graph were lines of the highest fat content, with the left-hand lines indicating the lowest content of this compound. Multivariate assessment including fat and three fatty acids simultaneously indicated a slightly different arrangement of the DH lines from the CW population (Fig. 3) compared to DH lines from the WC population (Fig. 4) in terms of the parental forms in the system of the first two canonical variates.

    Table 5 Correlation coef ficients between two first canonical variates (V1 and V2) and yield and yield components

    Fig. 1 Distribution of double haploid (DH) lines from CW population (consisted of 25 DH lines and was derived from a F1 hybrid,cultivar Californium×DH W-15) characterised by yield and its components in the space of the two first canonical variates (V1 and V2).

    Fig. 2 Distribution of double haploid (DH) lines from WC population (consisted of 25 DH lines and was derived from a F1 hybrid, DH W-15×cultivar Californium) characterised by yield and its components in the space of the two first canonical variates (V1 and V2).

    Table 6 Correlation coef ficients between the two first canonical variates (V1 and V2) for fat and three fatty acid contents

    4. Discussion

    Fig. 3 Distribution of double haploid (DH) lines from CW population (consisted of 25 DH lines and was derived from a F1 hybrid,cultivar Californium×DH W-15) characterised by fat and three fatty acid contents in the space of the two first canonical variates(V1 and V2).

    Fig. 4 Distribution of double haploid (DH) lines from WC population (consisted of 25 DH lines and was derived from a F1 hybrid,DH W-15×cultivar Californium) characterised by fat and three fatty acid content in the space of the two first canonical variates (V1 and V2).

    Based on the obtained results, an estimation was made of the effect of the cross on yield, its components and some biochemical characteristics. In order to conduct such an estimation, note had to be taken of both the signi ficant variation between parental forms in the trait, and the fact that the basis for inferences about the in fluence of maternal or paternal effects was the statistically signi ficant differences between the mean values of the DH lines of the two populations. Both the pair of parental forms and the pair of DH line populations revealed signi ficant differences in the number of seeds per pod, and linolenic acid content.Maternal effects have been revealed for only the number of seeds per pod. Xing et al. (2014) showed that the number of seeds per pod is controlled by maternal genotype,as well as the 1 000-seed weight. They also detected paternal inheritance of pods per plant and seed yield using the contribution ratio of maternal and paternal general combining ability (GCA) variance as well as correlations between GCA and heterosis levels. However, there are few reports about the in fluence of the direction of crossing on the expression of yield and yield components. Rameah et al. (2003) observed signi ficant maternal effects for yield and yield components, except for pod length. Therefore,they considered the direction of crosses to be important for these traits and in crosses with signi ficant negative reciprocal effects. However, the results of the study by Sincik et al. (2011) indicated that the direction of crossing did not in fluence the number of seeds per pod, seed yield per plant or 1 000-seed weight. The yield is a complex trait controlled by multiple genes, also strongly subject to the in fluence of the environment. In a study of genotype by environment interaction for seed yield in oilseed rape conducted by Nowosad et al. (2016), the sum of squares for environment as the main effect represented up 69.82% of the total variation, while the differences between genotypes explained only 13.67% of the total yield variation. It is possible that this is why it is dif ficult to determine the genetic effects for this trait from field trial data.

    Differences in linolenic acid content between two reciprocal DH populations and parental forms show that paternal parents have in fluenced this trait. This indicates that nuclear genes may be the main factor controlling expression of this feature. Inheritance of linolenic acid in oilseed rape, however, has been a matter of controversy as the results obtained by different groups of researchers have varied (Rajcan et al. 2002). Pleines and Friedt (1989) noted that linolenic acid concentration is mainly under the control of the nuclear genes of the embryo. They found signi ficant differences in reciprocal F1, BC1, and BC2indicating maternal control, which is realized by interaction between maternal genotypes and nuclear genes of the embryo, but in F2no reciprocal differences were detectable. Similar results were obtained by Rajcan et al. (2002), who observed cytoplasmic effects in the inheritance of linolenic acid concentrations in two reciprocal DH populations based on signi ficant differences between them. However, they did not find any signi ficant differences between the means of this trait in recreated F2populations produced from the same pair of parents. The results of the present study suggested that maternal effects did not exert a distinct effect on the content of the analyzed fatty acid in reciprocal DH populations.Likewise, Coonrod et al. (2008) observed the lack of maternal effects for any of five long chain fatty acid contents in progeny obtained from two parental lines that differed in terms of erucic and oleic acid contents. However, in studies on the heredity of the oleic acid content of oilseed rape,Zhang et al. (2004) concluded that this was simultaneously controlled by diploid embryo nuclear, cytoplasmic and diploid maternal plant nuclear genes.

    The direction of the cross did not affect the percentage of oil. Thus, it can be concluded that nuclear genes, rather than extra nuclear determinants, condition the expression of this trait. Similar results have been reported by Rajcan et al. (2002), who compared two DH populations produced from reciprocal F1made between the cultivar Reston and line LL09. However, there are different models to explain the genetics of oil content in B. napus, because it is a typical quantitative trait controlled by multiple genes and in fluenced by various environmental factors (Si et al. 2003;Zhao et al. 2005; Delourme et al. 2006). Some studies have indicated that oil concentration in F1hybrid seeds is mainly controlled by the maternal genotype (Wang et al.2010). Using two oilseed rape lines with contrasting oil contents, Hua et al. (2012) described an important role of pod wall photosynthesis in the regulation of the oil content of F1seeds in terms of maternal effects. However, in the F2generation derived from reciprocal cross F1seeds, the difference in oil content disappeared. Also in the study by Xing et al. (2014), the contribution of the maternal parent was slightly higher than that of the paternal parent with regard to the fat content. Other studies have indicated that embryo genetic, cytoplasmic and maternal effects as well as genotype×environment interaction effects (Wu et al. 2006;Variath et al. 2010) simultaneously controlled oil content in oilseed rape.

    In both the studied populations, the highest number of transgressive segregants was observed for linoleic acid in oil. No transgressive line was detected for the number of branches per plant or oleic acid content. Average values for the number of branches as well as the oleic and linoleic acid contents of parental lines were similar. Therefore, in this case, the frequency of occurrence of transgressive lines did not depend on phenotypic similarity. The direction of crossing played a role in the frequency of transgression effects, and this was particularly so in terms of the number of seeds per pod. Positive transgression effects were observed only among the WC lines- in population, which forms the mother, there are more seeds per pod. The in fluence of maternal effects also manifested itself in relation to the 1 000-seed weight. Of the seven transgressive lines in terms of the features, five belonged to the CW population. Multidimensional estimation of the DH lines of winter oilseed rape was conducted in terms of two sets of features. On the basis of canonical variate analysis, it could be concluded that the feature which exerted a very large in fluence on the differentiation of multivariate genotypes of both populations in the first set was the 1 000-seed weight and this was negatively correlated with the number of seeds per pod. In the second set of traits, fat content had the most discriminative power and this was positively correlated with the content of linoleic acid. Multidimensional estimation of DH in terms of the parents showed their high variation in terms of the characteristics of each set. Graphical distribution lines in the system of the first two canonical variables showed recombinant variability, which appeared in the doubled haploid lines. The biggest difference in terms of the studied traits was shown by DH lines: CW-32 and CW-109, WC-3 and WC-64.

    5. Conclusion

    Populations DH lines created from reciprocal F1hybrids provided good material for the assessment of genetic effects associated with the direction of crossing using statistical methods. In our study, the statistical analysis of two reciprocal populations demonstrated the maternal effects on the number of seeds per pod and the paternal effect on the content of linolenic acid. Based on canonical variate analysis, it could be concluded that the 1 000-seed weight was the character which had most in fluence on multivariate variation of genotypes of both populations in the first set of traits, while the fat content was key in the second set of traits. Graphic images of the distribution of DH lines in the space of the two first canonical variates showed a greater differentiation between the lines in the CW population than in the WC population in terms of both sets of traits.This information may be useful for oilseed rape breeding programs. The direction of cross should be considered by oilseed rape breeders for developing genotypes with a large number of seeds per pod and a modi fied content of linolenic acid in Brassica napus L.

    Adamska E, Sza?a L, Cegielska-Taras T, Kaczmarek Z.2007. Multidimensional GCA and SCA effects in doubled haploid lines of winter rape in the analysis of yield structure characteristics and oil content of F1line×tester crosses.Ro?liny Oleiste - Oilseed Crops,28, 97–108.

    Bocianowski J, Nowosad K, Bujak H, ?uczkiewicz T, Piesik D.2016. Evaluation of the breeding value of the spring oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) inbred lines based on a multi-trait analysis. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding,76, 284–289.

    Coonrod D, Brick M A, Byrne P F, DeBonte L, Chen Z. 2008.Inheritance of long chain fatty content in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Euphytica,164, 583–592.

    Delourme R, Falentin C, Huteau V, Clouet V, Horvais R, Gandon B, Specel S, Hanneton L, Dheu J E, Deschamps M, Margal E, Vincourt P, Renard M. 2006. Genetic control of oil content in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Theoretical Applied Genetics,113, 1331–1345.

    Friedt W, Snowdon R, Ordon F, Ahlemeyer J. 2007. Plant breeding: Assessment of genetic diversity in crop plants and its exploitation in breeding. Progress in Botany,168,152–177.

    Gomez K A, Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.

    de Gravina G A, Sediyama C S, Martins Filho S, Moreira M A, de Barros E G, Cruz C D. 2004. Multivariate analysis of combining ability for soybean resistance to Cercospora sojina Hara. Genetics and Molecular Biology,27, 395–399.

    Hua W, Li R J, Zhan G M, Li J, Wang X F, Liu G H, Wang H Z. 2012. Maternal control of seed oil content in Brassica napus: the role of silique wall photosynthesis. The Plant Journal,69, 432–444.

    Kaczmarek Z, Adamska E, Cegielska-Taras T, Sza?a L. 2005.Multivariate statistical methods used for evaluation of DH lines of winter oilseed rape on account of various fatty acid compositions. Ro?liny Oleiste - Oilseed Crops,26,325–334.

    Kuczyńska A, Surma M, Kaczmarek Z, Adamski T. 2007.Relationship between phenotypic and genetic diversity of parental genotypes and frequency of transgression effects in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Breeding,126, 361–368.

    Lahbib K, Bnejdi F, El Gazzah M. 2013. Selection of pepper parent from a collection of Capsicum annuum landraces based on genetic diversity. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science,5, 68–72.

    Monforte A J, Asins M J, Carbonell E A. 1997. Salt tolerance in Lycopersicon species. V. Does genetic variability at quantitative trait loci affect their analysis? Theoretical Applied Genetics,95, 284–293.

    Morrison D F. 1976. Multivariate Statistical Methods. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha Ltd., Tokyo.

    Nasir A L, Ariyo O J. 2007. Multivariate analysis of the variation of field-planted upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) in a tropical habitat. Malaysian Applied Biology,36, 47–57.

    Nowosad K, Liersch A, Pop?awska W, Bocianowski J. 2016.Genotype by environment interaction for seed yield in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model. Euphytica,208, 187–194.

    Pleines S, Friedt W. 1989. Genetic control of linolenic acid concentration in seed oil of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.).Theoretical Applied Genetics,78, 793–797.

    Rajcan I, Kasha K J, Kott L S, Beversdorf W D. 2002. Evaluation of cytoplasmic effects on agronomic and seed quality traits in two doubled haploid populations of Brassica napus L.Euphytica,123, 401–409.

    Rameah V, Rezai A, Saeidi G. 2003. Estimation of genetic parameters for yield, yield components and glucosinolate in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology,5, 143–151.

    Rieseberg L H, Archer M A, Wayne R K. 1999. Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity,83,363–372.

    Rieseberg L H, Widmer A, Arntz A M, Burke J M. 2003.The genetic architecture necessary for transgressive segregation is comma in both natural and domestical populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B,358, 1141–1147.

    Setotaw T A, dos Santos Diaz L A, Missio R F. 2010. Genetic divergence among barley accessions from Ethiopia. Crop Breeding and Applied Bioechnology,10, 116–123.

    Shara fiY, Majidi M M, Jafarzadeh M, Mirlohi A. 2015.Multivariate analysis of genetic variation in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology,17, 1319–1331.

    Si P, Mailer R J, Galwey N, Turner D W. 2003. In fluence of genotype and environment on oil and protein concentration of canola (Brassica napus L.) grow across southern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research,54,397–407.

    Sincik M, Goksoy A T, Turan Z M. 2011. The heterosis and combining ability of diallel crosses of rapeseed inbred lines. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca,39, 242–248.

    Stelkens R, Seehausen O. 2009. Genetic distance between species predicts novel trait expression in their hybrids.Evolution,63–64, 884–897.

    Tucak M, Popovi? S, ?upi? T, ?imi? G, Gantner R, Megli? V. 2009. Evaluation of alfalfa germplasm collection by multivariate analysis based on phenotypic traits. Romanian Agricultural Research,26, 47–52.

    Variath M T, Wu J, Li Y, Chen G, Shi C. 2010. Temporal patterns of maternal, cytoplasmic and embryo genetics effects for thousand-seed weight and oil content in F1hybrid rapeseed(Brassica napus L.). Crop Pasture Science,61, 945–955.

    De Vincente M C, Tanksley S D. 1993. QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspeci fic tomato cross.Genetics,134, 585–596.

    Wang X, Liu G, Yang Q, Hua W, Liu J, Wang H. 2010. Genetic analysis on oil content in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.).Euphytica,173, 17–24.

    Wu J G, Shi C H, Zhang H Z. 2006. Partitioning genetic effects due to embryo, cytoplasm and maternal parent for oil content in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Genetic Molecular Biology,29, 533–538.

    Xing N, Fan C, Zhou Y. 2014. Parental selection of hybrid breeding based on maternal and paternal inheritance of traits in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). PLOS ONE,9,e103165.

    Zhang H, Shi C, Wu J, Ren Y, Li C, Zhang D, Zhang Y. 2004.Analysis of genetic and genotype×environment interaction effects from embryo, cytoplasm and maternal plant for oleic acid content of Brassica napus L. Plant Science,167, 43–48.

    Zhao J, Becker H C, Zhang D, Zhang Y, Ecke W. 2005. Oil content in a European×Chinese rapeseed population:QTL with additive and epistatic effects and their genotypeenvironment interactions. Crop Science,45, 51–59.

    9 December, 2016 Accepted 6 March, 2017

    Correspondence Laurencja Sza?a, Tel: +48-618-464237, Fax:+48-618-233721, E-mail: lszala@nico.ihar.poznan.pl

    ? 2018 CAAS. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61776-3

    Managing editor SHI Hong-liang

    国产精品久久久久成人av| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 两个人免费观看高清视频| av视频免费观看在线观看| 久久久久国产网址| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产精品 国内视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | www.色视频.com| 免费观看av网站的网址| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 老司机影院成人| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 观看美女的网站| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 日本与韩国留学比较| 亚洲av福利一区| 精品酒店卫生间| 免费av不卡在线播放| 久久久久国产网址| 日韩成人伦理影院| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 9色porny在线观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 一本久久精品| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 国产乱来视频区| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 蜜桃在线观看..| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 成人手机av| 亚洲精品视频女| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 欧美另类一区| 9色porny在线观看| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 两个人看的免费小视频| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 性色av一级| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 丝袜喷水一区| 久久久久国产网址| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| kizo精华| 久久久久久久国产电影| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 9色porny在线观看| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 少妇 在线观看| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 免费观看av网站的网址| 一区在线观看完整版| av天堂久久9| 久久久久网色| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产色婷婷99| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 日本wwww免费看| 美女福利国产在线| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 飞空精品影院首页| 国产淫语在线视频| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 男人操女人黄网站| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 国产成人精品婷婷| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 在现免费观看毛片| 高清不卡的av网站| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 中文欧美无线码| 多毛熟女@视频| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 美女中出高潮动态图| 免费少妇av软件| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 在线天堂中文资源库| 18+在线观看网站| 欧美+日韩+精品| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 成人国语在线视频| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 少妇人妻 视频| av免费观看日本| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 97在线视频观看| 午夜福利视频精品| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 欧美3d第一页| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 国产高清三级在线| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区 | 国产精品免费大片| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 国产精品免费大片| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 丝袜美足系列| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 熟女av电影| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 大香蕉久久成人网| 草草在线视频免费看| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| videos熟女内射| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 黄色配什么色好看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| av在线观看视频网站免费| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 国产毛片在线视频| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 久久久国产一区二区| 亚洲四区av| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 欧美97在线视频| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 婷婷色综合www| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 国产精品无大码| 草草在线视频免费看| 国产片内射在线| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 在现免费观看毛片| 如何舔出高潮| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 成年av动漫网址| 国产精品.久久久| 少妇人妻 视频| 精品午夜福利在线看| 夫妻午夜视频| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 高清不卡的av网站| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 精品第一国产精品| 性色av一级| 九草在线视频观看| 日本av免费视频播放| 久久青草综合色| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 香蕉丝袜av| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 免费av不卡在线播放| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 日韩av免费高清视频| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 日日啪夜夜爽| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 成年av动漫网址| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看 | 日日啪夜夜爽| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 久久久久视频综合| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 午夜福利,免费看| 大码成人一级视频| 超碰97精品在线观看| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 999精品在线视频| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 婷婷色综合www| 韩国精品一区二区三区 | 性色avwww在线观看| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 国产精品一国产av| 天堂8中文在线网| 三级国产精品片| 熟女av电影| 制服诱惑二区| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 成年动漫av网址| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 亚洲综合色惰| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 9色porny在线观看| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 乱人伦中国视频| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 全区人妻精品视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲精品一二三| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 男女边摸边吃奶| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 亚洲成色77777| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 在线观看三级黄色| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 少妇人妻 视频| 国产成人欧美| 91国产中文字幕| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 久久99一区二区三区| 99久久综合免费| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 久久久久久久精品精品| 97超碰精品成人国产| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 色5月婷婷丁香| 一区二区av电影网| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 亚洲伊人色综图| 全区人妻精品视频| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 桃花免费在线播放| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 99国产综合亚洲精品| xxx大片免费视频| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产xxxxx性猛交| av网站免费在线观看视频| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 男女边摸边吃奶| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 亚洲国产色片| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 美女福利国产在线| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 熟女av电影| av天堂久久9| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产精品三级大全| 午夜视频国产福利| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 午夜视频国产福利| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 丰满乱子伦码专区| kizo精华| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 在线观看国产h片| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 男女国产视频网站| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 亚洲在久久综合| 在线观看国产h片| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 制服人妻中文乱码| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 在线观看国产h片| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产视频首页在线观看| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 久久影院123| 人妻一区二区av| 国产综合精华液| 色5月婷婷丁香| 人人澡人人妻人| 亚洲国产精品999| 在线观看国产h片| 久久av网站| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 少妇的逼水好多| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 成人综合一区亚洲| 国产男女内射视频| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲中文av在线| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 久久精品国产综合久久久 | 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 男人操女人黄网站| 高清毛片免费看| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 香蕉国产在线看| 少妇 在线观看| 男女边摸边吃奶| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 成人国产麻豆网| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 日韩伦理黄色片| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 午夜av观看不卡| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 中国三级夫妇交换| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 天堂8中文在线网| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 国产成人精品婷婷| 免费看不卡的av| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 久久狼人影院| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 成人国产麻豆网| av在线老鸭窝| 国产亚洲最大av| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 三级国产精品片| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 黄色配什么色好看| 国产在视频线精品| 亚洲精品视频女| 黄色 视频免费看| 精品国产一区二区久久| 日韩电影二区| 久久热在线av| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 曰老女人黄片| 国产精品无大码| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 美女福利国产在线| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 全区人妻精品视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 天天影视国产精品| 国产综合精华液| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 9热在线视频观看99| 国产精品一国产av| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 精品酒店卫生间| 在现免费观看毛片| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 在线 av 中文字幕| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 在线观看人妻少妇| 欧美性感艳星| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 97在线人人人人妻| 精品国产一区二区久久| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| av在线播放精品| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 一级毛片电影观看| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 久久久欧美国产精品| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 欧美3d第一页| 久久久久视频综合| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 大香蕉久久成人网| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 有码 亚洲区| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 免费观看av网站的网址| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| av免费在线看不卡| 久久av网站| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件 | 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 精品第一国产精品| 永久网站在线| 黄色 视频免费看| 国产成人精品婷婷| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 69精品国产乱码久久久| h视频一区二区三区| av卡一久久| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 91成人精品电影| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在 | 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 欧美另类一区| 老司机影院毛片| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 久久久久视频综合| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 青春草国产在线视频| 久久久久久伊人网av| 亚洲在久久综合| 水蜜桃什么品种好| av片东京热男人的天堂| 亚洲在久久综合| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 伦精品一区二区三区| www日本在线高清视频| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 18+在线观看网站| av不卡在线播放| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 熟女av电影| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 午夜视频国产福利| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 国产又爽黄色视频| 在线观看免费高清a一片| av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 国产在线视频一区二区| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 亚洲av综合色区一区|