• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Stand dynamics of the drought-affected floodplain forests of Araguaia River,Brazilian Amazon

    2017-10-17 08:31:20rgenHomeierDariuszKurzatkowskiandChristophLeuschner
    Forest Ecosystems 2017年3期

    Jürgen Homeier,Dariusz Kurzatkowski and Christoph Leuschner

    Stand dynamics of the drought-affected floodplain forests of Araguaia River,Brazilian Amazon

    Jürgen Homeier,Dariusz Kurzatkowski and Christoph Leuschner*

    Abstract

    Background:The floodplain forests of Araguaia River,a clear-water river in the southeastern Amazon(Tocantins State,Brazil),are characterized by seasonal flooding up to 3.5 m height,low nutrient levels in the water,and seasonal drought periods of 4–5 months.

    Methods:We studied the forest dynamics(tree diameter growth,tree mortality and recruitment)of this unique forest ecosystem over a 5-year period by repeated censuses in 12 permanent plots established along a flooding gradient.

    Results:The cumulative basal area in the plots increased by 0.84(±0.45)m2?ha–1?yr–1(mean ±SD)in the annually-flooded(AF)plots in lower terrain and by 0.69(±1.00)m2?ha–1?yr–1in the higher non-annually flooded(NAF)plots,corresponding to an aboveground biomass increase of 0.81(±0.57)and 0.69(±1.58)Mg?ha–1?yr–1in the AF and NAF plots,indicating a recent carbon sink in the biomass.Mean diameter growth rate was 1.8(±0.44)mm?yr–1in the AF and 2.0(±0.56)mm?yr–1in the NAF plots(corresponding to a coarse wood production of 1.53(±1.29)and 2.02(±0.52)Mg?ha–1?yr–1),indicating no flooding effect on radial growth.Mean mortality rates in the 5-year period were 1.9(±0.37)%?yr–1in the AF plots and 1.8(±0.87)%?yr–1in the NAF plots with no differences along the flooding gradient.Highest mortalities were registered in the AF plots for the 10–20 cm dbh class(2.4%?yr–1),likely as a consequence of flooding,and in the NAF plots for the 40–50 cm dbh class(3.0%?yr–1),probably mainly caused by ENSO-related droughts.

    Conclusions:We conclude that these drought-affected tropical floodplain forests have a lower standing biomass and aboveground productivity than central Amazonian floodplain forests in more humid climates,and the imprint of the flooding gradient on stand dynamics is relatively weak,which may result from the lower flooding height and the interaction of flooding with low nutrient supply and periodic drought.

    Keywords:Amazon,Diameter growth,Dry season,Flooding regime,Mortality rate,Productivity,Tree recruitment

    Background

    Amazonian freshwater floodplains cover an area of approximately 1.7 million km2(Junk et al.2011)and the majority of these wetlands are forested(Sch?ngart et al.2010;Wittmann et al.2010;Wittmann et al.2013).Many ecological processes in these unique semi-aquatic woodlands,such as nutrient cycling,decomposition and forest succession,are heavily influenced by the flood pulse,and plant species inhabiting these environments have developed specific morpho-anatomical and physiological adaptations to cope with the seasonal flooding(Junk 1989;Parolin et al.2004).The variable flooding regimes and differences in water and sediment chemistry determine tree species composition and forest dynamics in these systems(Junk 1989;Rosales et al.1999;Junk et al.2010;Wittmann et al.2010;Junk et al.2011).

    Forests inundated seasonally by black-or clear-water rivers are collectively known as igapó and cover ca.180 000 km2of the Amazon Basin(Melack and Hess 2010).These rivers(e.g.Rio Negro,Tapajós,Tocantins and Araguaia)originate in Precambrian formations,notably the Guiana Shield and Central Brazilian Shield,with deeply weathered soils and thus carry black water and clear water,respectively(Irion et al.2010),with a reduced load ofsuspended inorganiccompoundscompared to white-water rivers.The fertility of igapó floodplains is therefore much lower than that of floodplains which are inundated by sediment-rich white water rivers(várzea floodplains).

    The Araguaia floodplain covers the vast area of 58 600 km2in the southeast of the Amazon Basin(Melack and Hess 2010)and includes Bananal Island,the world’s largest fluvial island.This extended semi-aquatic landscape represents the fifth largest floodplain area in South America.Araguaia River is a clear-water river with large tracts of igapó(Junk et al.2011).The region is localized in the transition zone from the Amazonian moist lowland forest to the semi-humid to semi-arid Brazilian cerrado forest,two biomes with very high tree species richness.While the immediate study region is still covered by large tracts of natural forest vegetation wellpreserved in Cant?o State Park,the greater Araguaia floodplain is part of the so-called ‘Arc of deforestation’in southern Amazonia which is under heavy pressure by human expansion.

    The forests in the study region are exposed to seasonal flood levels of up to 3.5 m height,corresponding to a submersion of the trees for up to 150 days per year.In this part of Amazonia with an extended dry season,the floodplain forest is not only exposed to long-lasting inundation but also to seasonal drought.Thus,the river banks in the transition from high to low terrain are characterized by two opposing stress gradients,increasing anoxia in direction of the river during the flooding season,and decreasing drought exposure in the dry season.We expected that the combination of these two stressors(i)has a negative effect on forest productivity and standing biomass,and(ii)represents an effective environmental filter,which largely determines the species composition of the floodplain forests at different heights on the river banks.In support of our first assumption,a biomass inventory found that canopy height and aboveground live tree biomass(AGB)are indeed lower in the Araguaia floodplain forest than in the less seasonal floodplain forests of the central Amazon(Kurzatkowski et al.2015).

    In the present study,we measured tree radial growth and wood production and analyzed stand dynamics(tree mortality and recruitment)in the same plots along a flooding gradient in the Araguaia floodplain over a period of 5 years.We further expected(iii)that a higher flood level and longer inundation at the lowest sites should cause elevated tree turnover rates(greater mortality and also recruitment rates),while greater drought exposure at the highest sites should increase mortality at this end of the gradient as well but not recruitment.Our studies in this seasonally-dry tropical floodplain forest are among the first to analyze the dynamics of these unique forests.In the absence of comparable studies,we contrast our results with findings from floodplain forests in humid regions of Amazonia.

    Methods

    Study area

    The study was conducted in the southern part of Cant?o State Park in the south-eastern Brazilian Amazon on the Araguaia river floodplain(Eiten 1985),that was already established in 1989.The region is located in Tocantins State,Brazil,in the transition zone between the Amazon forests in the west and the cerrado in the east(Fig.1).It is covered by large areas of intact moist forest and patches of cerrado on drier soil.

    The soils of the study sites are quite variable ranging from upland red–yellow and yellow Oxisols and red–yellow Ultisols to alluvial soils with hydromorphic lateritic and gleyic characteristics(Departamento Nacional de Produ??o Mineral,DNPM 1978).The soils on the floodplain are acid and nutrient-poor Dystrophic Plinthosols and Gleysols(Martins and Kardec 2006).

    The region has a hot,semi-humid tropical seasonal climate with 1755 mm average annual precipitation(Kurzatkowski et al.2015).The rainy period lasts from November to April/May,followed by a distinct dry season from May/June to September with monthly precipitation totals of 50 mm or less in these 4 to 5 months.Mean annual temperature is 26°C;the hottest months are August and September with means of 30°C,the coolest month is July(22°C).There is a strong interannual variability in the total amount and distribution of precipitation,and the year 2005 was particularly dry(Borma et al.2009).

    Study plots

    Twelve permanent plots of 0.25 ha size(50 m×50 m)were established in 2001 for studying forest dynamics processes in relation to variation in flood level height.The study plots are located on the right bank of Javaés River,a tributary of Araguaia river,in vicinity to Cangu?u Research Center(9°58′41′′S,50°02′12′′W)(Fig.1).The plots represent a gradient of flood levels and flooding duration with distances to Javaés River varying between 0.1 and 1.0 km.The distance between soil surface and the upper limit of the dark water mark visible on the tree trunks was used to define the maximum flood level in a plot.All plots were selected in forest areas without larger recent canopy gaps,thus avoiding patches with major disturbance or covered by early-successional stages.

    The 12 plots were assigned to two groups differing in flood level height(Kurzatkowski et al.2015).In annually flooded(AF)stands(n=5),flooding occurred every year,reaching maximum water heights of 1.5 to 3.5 m with inundation lasting for 2 to 5 months.The second group contains non-annually flooded(NAF)stands(n=7)with inundation occurring only irregularly for periods of up to 2 months;flood levels reached only 1.3 m at the most.

    Fig.1 Location of the study area.Study site in Brazil along the Javaes river in the Cant?o State Reserve,Tocantins(Brasil Visto do Espa?o,http://www.cdbrasil.cnpm.embrapa.br)

    Data collection and analysis

    A census of the tree populations in all plots was conducted in 2001 and repeated in 2006.The diameter at breast height(dbh)of all living trees with dbh≥5 cm was recorded at 1.3 m.Diameters of buttressed trees were measured immediately above the buttresses to avoid overestimation(Condit 1998).Tree heights were measured with a telescope pole of 15 m length;the heights of taller trees were estimated.Palms and lianas were not included in the inventory.Tree species identification was conducted by a local field assistant with knowledge of the tree flora.In addition,plant samples were collected and compared to herbarium collections at the Federal University of Tocantins in Palmas.Phylogenetic classification was based on Angiosperm Phylogeny Group III(AGP III,2009).The scientific species names were checked in the Tropicos database(www.tropicos.org).

    Following Bellingham and Sparrow(2009),we calculated annual rates of tree recruitment and mortality.The annualized tree mortality rate(M;in%)was derived from the expression:

    whereN1is the number of individuals in the first census,NSis the number of surviving individuals(excluding new recruits)in the second census,andtis the time in years.The annualized tree recruitment rate(R;in%)was calculated as:

    whereNRis the number of recruited trees(all trees that reached the 5 cm dbh threshold between 2001 and 2006)between censuses,andN2is the total number of live individuals(including new recruits)in the second census.

    Upright standing stems were considered dead,if their inner bark was dry and easily separated from the sapwood.For the 12 most common tree species on our plots,the rates of recruitment and mortality were also analyzed separately.

    To estimate aboveground coarse woody biomass(AGB),we applied the allometric equation for tropical wet forests proposed by Chave et al.(2005),with wood specific gravity(WSG),dbh and tree height as parameters.WSG data for the tree species were obtained from the Global Wood Density Database (http://datadryad.org/handle/10255/dryad.235)(Chave et al.2009;Zanne et al.2009).In cases where species-specific information was missing,we used means of WSG calculated from the values of the species of the same genus.For not identified trees we used the average of WSD of the respective plots.

    The aboveground coarse wood biomass production(WP)of all trees,which had survived in 2006,was calculated as the AGB difference between the censuses in 2006 and 2001.Means of parameters were compared withT-tests,using Statistica 12(StatSoft,Tulsa,OK,USA)and regression analyses were performed with Xact 8.0 software(SciLab,Hamburg,Germany).

    Due to the avoidance of large recent gaps or patches with early regrowth,we expect our AGB estimates to be in the upper range of forest biomass figures.On the other hand,our selection criteria should result in belowaverage tree growth rates and WP rates.

    Results

    Stem density,coarse wood production and forest dynamics

    In the surveyed area of the 12 plots(3 ha in total)in the Araguaia floodplain forest,average stem density(dbh≥5 cm)in 2001 was 1005(±155)(mean ±SD)ha–1in the NAF plots and 1182(±367)ha–1in the AF plots(Table 1).During the 5-year study period,we registered only marginal changes in stem density,as no major disturbance event apart from drought occurred.Stem density increased to 1007(±157)ha–1in the NAF plots and decreased to 1180(±361)ha–1in the AF plots.In 2001,basal area and tree aboveground biomass(AGB)means of 20.9(±3.4)m2?ha–1and 146.6(±43.9)Mg?ha–1were calculated for the NAF plots,while 17.1(±2.4)m2?ha–1and 100.5(±20.3)Mg?ha–1were recorded in the AF plots,respectively.

    The cumulative basal area in the plots increased by 0.84(±0.45)and 0.69(±1.00)m2?ha–1?yr–1in the AF and NAF plots,corresponding to an AGB increase of 0.81(±0.57)Mg?ha–1?yr–1in the AF plots and 0.69(±1.58)Mg?ha–1?yr–1in the NAF plots.The surviving trees had a mean diameter growth of 1.8(±0.44)(AF plots)and 2.0(±0.56)mm?yr–1(NAF plots)in the 5 years,summing up to a coarse wood production(WP)of 1.53(±0.20)in the AF plots and 2.02(±0.52)Mg?ha–1?yr–1in the NAF plots during the period 2001–2006(Fig.2).

    Mean tree mortality rates in the 5-year period were 1.9%in the AF plots and 1.8%in the NAF plots,corresponding to a dead wood production of 1.01(±0.34)and 1.57(±1.29)Mg?ha–1?yr–1.Highest mortality rates were registered in the AF plots for the 10–20 cm dbh class with 2.4%,and in the NAF plots for the 40–50 cm class(3.0%,Fig.3).The mean recruitment rates were 1.8%in the AF plots and 2.0%in the NAF plots,resulting in a mean ingrowth of 0.29(±0.17)in the AF plots and 0.23(±0.09)Mg?ha–1?yr–1in the NAF plots.

    None of the means of aboveground coarse wood production(p=0.06),mortality(p=0.37)and recruitment(p=0.39)differed significantly atp<0.05 between the two forest types.Neither mortality nor recruitment rate showed significant linear correlations with the maximum flood level height observed in the study plots(Fig.4).

    Fig.2 Biomass dynamics in permanent plots.Fractions of biomass of trees with dbh≥5 cm in annually flooded forest(AF;five plots)and non-annually flooded forest(NAF;seven plots)during the study period from 2001–2006.Shown are means(±SE)of coarse wood production(WP),production of dead tree mass(mortality),tree recruitment and the net change in live biomass(total;WP+recruitment–mortality).The two forest types show no significant differences

    Table 1 Maximum flood levels and changes in stem density,biomass and growth for all permanent plots

    Fig.3 Tree mortality.Annual tree mortality rates in different diameter classes in the two forest categories AF(annually flooded,black bars)and NAF(non-annually flooded,white bars)during the study period from 2001–2006.Of the 3224 stems registered in 2001(AF:1465,NAF:1759)285 died during the 5-year period until 2006(AF:132,NAF:153)

    Fig.4 Annual mortality and recruitment in permanent plots.Annual tree mortality rate(a)and annual tree recruitment rate(b)in relation to the maximum flooding level of the study plots.None of the relations were significant at p<0.05

    Population dynamics of selected species

    The 12 most abundant tree species in the study plots,all present with stem densities >15 ha–1,were included in a species-specific demographic analysis(Table 2).The most frequently occurring species in the AF plots(all with more than 147 stems?ha–1)wereAlibertia edulis,Inga marginataandMouriri guainensisand in the NAF plots(>91 stems?ha–1)Protium heptaphyllum,Brosimum rubescensandProtium paniculatum.

    While 11 of the 12 species occurred in both forest types and could be compared with respect to flooding tolerance,Cordia sellowianawas abundant in the NAF plots but completely absent from the AF plots.Alibertia edulis,Piranhea trifoliateandSaccellium brasiliensehad significantly higher densities in the AF plots,whereasProtium heptaphyllumwas more common in the NAF plots.

    Average annual mortality and recruitment of the 12 species during the 5-year study period varied markedly between species and forest types.The highest annual mortality rates in the NAF plots were observed forCombretum leprosum,Inga marginata,Protium heptaphyllumandXylopia frutescens(2.1–2.6%).In the annually flooded plots,the species with highest mortality rates wereProtium paniculatum,Combretum leprosum,Xylopia frutescensandProtium heptaphyllum(3.5–21.4%).The same four tree species with highest mortality had also the largest recruitment rates in the AF plots(4.0–22.9%).

    When the tree species were grouped by their forest type preference(Fig.5),the five AF species showed almost no differences in dynamic properties between forest types;they had slightly higher mortality rates than recruitment rates in both forest types.In contrast,the seven NAF species had higher recruitment than mortality rates in both forest types.The average recruitment rates as well as the mortality rates of the latter species were conspicuously higher in the AF plots than in the NAF plots.Mean stem diameter growth rates typically varied between 1.23 and 1.97 mm?yr–1in the AF and NAF plots and were relatively uniform among the species(Table 2).Particularly high growth rates were recorded in both forest types for the pioneer treeXylopia frutescens(1.94 mm?yr–1in AF and 2.44 mm?yr–1in NAF plots).OnlyCombretum leprosumand the twoProtiumspecies showed higher growth rates in the AF than in the NAF plots.

    Discussion

    The two stand inventories in 2001 and 2006 produced the unexpected result that mean stem diameter growth was very similar in the annually-flooded and nonannually flooded plots(1.8 and 2.0 mm?yr–1)and thus apparently independent of flooding height and duration.Cumulative basal area in the plots increased on average by 0.69 m2?ha–1?yr–1in the NAF plots,and byeven 0.84 m2?ha–1?yr–1in the AF plots(difference not significant).This related to an average aboveground biomass increase of 2.02 and 1.53 Mg?ha–1?yr–1in the NAF and AF plots.As with stem radial growth,aboveground productivity apparently was not reduced by higher and longer flooding.This matches the biomass inventory data,which also showed no effect of flood height and duration on the standing aboveground biomass stocks(Kurzatkowski et al.2015).

    Table 2 Abundant species'mortality and recruitment

    Fig.5 Mortality and recruitment of species grouped by habitat preference.Mean annual mortality and recruitment rates of the twelve common tree species(see Table 2)in the AF and NAF plots.The species are categorized according to their forest type preference into AF-species(Alibertia edulis,Inga marginata,Mouriri guianensis,Piranhea trifoliata and Saccelium brasiliense)and NAF-species(Albizia hassleri,Brosimum rubescens,Combretum leprosum,Cordia sellowiana,Protium heptaphyllum,Protium paniculatum and Xylopia frutescens).There are no significant differences between compared species groups or between forest types

    The apparently low effect of flooding height and duration on tree diameter growth in our plots comes as a surprise.Other studies found a negative relation between diameter growth and the height and duration of annual inundations,e.g.in the igapó forests along Rio Negro(Sch?ngart et al.2010),Amazonian várzea forests(Nebel et al.2001a,2001b;Sch?ngart et al.2010)and riparian forests in the Brazilian Pantanal(Wittmann et al.2008;Sch?ngart et al.2011).Worbes(1997)confirmed with dendrochronological methods that the floodplain trees typically reduce wood growth during the aquatic phase and then remain in a state of cambial dormancy.Flooding height and duration perhaps were in the Araguaia system not as extreme as in other floodplain studies,where closed forest occurs up to inundation depths of 9 m(black water rivers)or 7.5 m(white water rivers)(Junk et al.2011).In addition,the relatively extreme environment(low fertility and seasonal drought)could have masked a flooding effect on cambial activity in this region.

    In our study,a significant flooding effect was however detected on wood density,which increased significantly with increasing flood height and duration,and for maximum tree height of the stands,which decreased significantly in direction of the river.We interpret these relationships as a hint that the flooding regime and associated soil anoxia acted as an environmental filter selecting for more flood-tolerant tree species with higher wood density close to the river.The production of wood with higher density compensated for the smaller maximum tree height in the AF stands with the consequencethat standing biomass and also biomass production were not lower than in the NAF plots.Thus,the productivity data suggest that higher wood density was not related to lower diameter growth in our species sample.With respect to the causes of these patterns,our dbh and tree height data suggest that the average AF tree must either be shorter-lived or grow slower in height than the average NAF tree.As trees with dbh>50 cm were more abundant in the NAF plots,we assume that the greater maximum tree height in these stands is a consequence of greater age and not intrinsically higher height growth rates.In two of the three highly flooded plots,the mortality rate in the five study years was indeed high with >2%?yr–1,which may suggest that trees in the AF plots do no reach larger sizes and ages due to reduced survival under high floods.

    Except for two plots,the net woody biomass change was positive in the period 2001–2006 in the AF and NAF plots,indicating that the Araguaia floodplain forests function currently as a carbon sink with a net storage of 0.81 and 0.69 Mg?ha–1?yr–1in the AF and NAF plots.In secondary floodplain forests in humid Amazonia,Lucas et al.(2014)found an average net biomass increase of 6.4 Mg?ha–1?yr–1,for old-growth Amazonian forests Phillips et al.(2009)estimated a mean biomass increase for the trees with dbh ≥10 cm of 0.90 ± 0.66 Mg?ha–1?yr–1.Baker et al.(2004)gave a mean long-term biomass increase for Amazonian lowland forests of 1.21 ± 0.43 Mg?ha–1?yr–1.This is slightly higher than our values,but may easily be explained by the more stressful conditions(more pronounced dry season combined with low nutrient availability)in the igapó floodplains and the lower canopy height.A long-term biomass increase in recent decades has also been found in other tropical forests,e.g.in those of Africa(Lewis et al.2009),but studies reporting no biomass change in recent decades do also exist(Laurance et al.2004;Chave et al.2008).The causes of an apparent long-term forest biomass increase in the tropics are debated and refer to climate change or recovery from past disturbances(Clark 2002;Wright 2005;K?rner 2006,Chave et al.2008;Lewis 2006,Lewis et al.2009;Fisher et al.2008).Since we do not have soil carbon inventory data,it remains unclear whether the ecosystem C balance in Araguaia floodplain is also positive or not.

    The Araguaia floodplain forest differs from other Amazonian igapó forests by its extended dry season which may represent an additional stressor for the trees.While plot-level tree diversity was not markedly lower than in central or western Amazonian várzea and igapó forests,mean stand-level basal area(19.4 m2?ha–1)and aboveground biomass(117 Mg?ha–1)were markedly smaller than in other Neotropical floodplains,including fertility of the clear waters of Araguaia river and the 4–5 months of dry season.While mean stem diameter growth was apparently not negatively affected by temporal water shortage in the NAF plots on higher terrain,we found a particularly high mortality rate,mostly of larger trees,in the highest NAF plots.A likely explanation is the extended drought in 2005(Phillips et al.2009),which may have killed several of the larger trees especially in the NAF plots.It appears that drought affected the AF plots less severely,probably because of the higher ground water level in the dry season.Even in nonflooded terra firme forests of moister tropical regions,diameter growth was found to be strongly related to the seasonality of precipitation(Brienen and Zuidema 2005)and severe droughts negatively affect forest dynamics,decreasing wood biomass productivity and increasing tree mortality(Phillips et al.2009;Corlett 2011;Lewis et al.2011).

    Stand dynamics(recruitment and mortality)

    The mortality rates observed in our study(averages of 1.93%?yr–1in the AF and 1.83%?yr–1in the NAF plots)are comparable or lower than values reported from other floodplains in the Amazon(Brazil:1.56–1.99%,Campbell et al.1992;Ecuador:3.01,Korning and Balslev 1994;Peru:1.79–3.16,Gentry and Terborgh 1990;Phillips et al.1994;Nebel et al.2001a,2001b).In terra firme forests near Manaus,Rankin-de-Merona et al.(1990)reported lower values of 1.13%and Korning and Balslev(1994)calculated values of 1.04–1.88%for Ecuadorian terra firme forests.Elevated average mortality rates in floodplain forests as compared to terra firme stands are to be expected,but our record is too short to draw sound conclusions.

    Highest mortality was observed in large trees(dbh class> 40–50 cm)of the NAF plots on higher terrain.As large trees were hit most,we assume that the severe ENSO-related 2005 drought in the Amazon may have contributed to the elevated death rate(Williamson et al.2000;Condit et al.2004;van Nieuwstadt and Sheil 2005),as it has been reported by Phillips et al.(2009)from other regions of the Amazon basin.The 2005 drought was also detected in the study region and resulted in strongly reduced soil moisture in the upper 2 m of soil during the dry season(Borma et al.2009).In the course of climate change,Olivares et al.(2015)documented extended drought periods at the margins of the Amazon basin.While the growth response to climate change may be quite difficult to detect,increased mortality due to more severe droughts can have rapid and conspicuous effects on stand structure through the death

    Tree species differences in growth and mortality

    Kubitzki(1989)assumed that many Amazonian floodplain tree species are ecotypes of taxa originating from the surrounding terra firme forests.When the species immigrate into the floodplains,they gradually develop adaptations to the periodic inundation.From the overall registered 54 tree species in the 12 plots,we classified 12 species by their habitat preference:seven could be categorized as species preferring the NAF forest due to higher stem densities here,and five as AF species.This suggests that the species differed in their degree of adaptation to this extreme environment.As an example of an AF species,Inga marginatahad four times higher stem densities in the AF forest than in the NAF plots.This observation supports the assumption that this species colonizes low-lying,highly flooded river margins and uses the water for seed dispersion.However,this species likely has its ancestors not in the semi-deciduous drier forests of the south-eastern Amazon surrounding the Araguaia floodplain,but it probably has migrated along the large rivers from the central Amazon.Yet,other species likely have colonized the floodplain from the surrounding drier forests.For example,Protium heptaphyllumis an abundant species in semi-deciduous forests and the cerrado,which was three times more frequent in the NAF plots.Cordia sellowianais a typical element of the Cerrado vegetation;it occurred exclusively in the NAF plots.This suggests that these species from higher terrain do not yet have developed adequate adaptations to the high flood levels in the AF plots or,alternatively,may physiologically not be capable of doing so because they have adapted to drought.However,the majority of species found in these floodplain forests seems to have closer relations to the more humid central Amazon.

    The species with NAF plot preference can indeed be considered as more flooding-sensitive,as their mortality rate was four times larger in the AF plots than that of the co-occurring AF species(Fig.5).In contrast,both tree categories had similar mortalities in the drier NAF plots.This indicates that the AF species are rarer in the drier NAF plots due to other reasons than a particularly high drought sensitivity.In fact,abundance in a plot,mortality rate and diameter growth in the two forest categories were in most species not related to each other(see Table 2).This excludes a simple ecophysiological explanation for the presence or absence of certain species along the flooding gradient.

    While a decline in tree species richness with increasing flooding height and duration seems to be typical for manyAmazonian floodplain forests(Terborgh and Andresen 1998;Nebel et al.2001a,2001b;Parolin et al.2004),we found only a very slight(non-significant)increase in plot-level species numbers from the AF to the NAF plots(Kurzatkowski et al.2015).The missing diversity gradient in the Araguaia floodplain may again be a consequence of the low nutrient concentration of the clear waters and the action of drought in this region.

    In Central Amazonian floodplain forests,Worbes et al.(1992)found a clear differentiation of the average diameter growth rate among the dominant trees according to their successional status:pioneer species(9.4 mm?yr–1)> earlysecondary species(4.3 mm?yr–1) > late-secondary species(3.0 mm?yr–1) > climax species(2.0 mm?yr–1).Our species had in most cases growth rates < 2 mm?yr–1.This,however,does not necessarily classify them all as climax species.Comparing the average diameter increment of three commercial tree species in igapó and várzea floodplain forests,Sch?ngart et al.(2005)measured significantly lower rates in the igapó forests,which may explain our relatively low rates.

    The natural seasonal flood pulse is a critical mediator of tree regrowth,as floods facilitate seed dispersal,deposit sediments and promote the connectivity between different forest sites(Ward and Wiens 2001)which could enhance tree regeneration.However,we found no systematic difference in recruitment rates between AF and NAF plots,and for the 12 most abundant species no clear pattern emerged indicating a more successful offspring establishment in the plot category which was preferred by the adults.This suggests that other factors than flooding regime which affect seedling establishment and survival,must be equally important in our stands.

    Conclusions

    Ourforestdynamicsdata from the seasonally-dry Araguaia floodplain show that the standing aboveground biomass and ANPP are relatively low compared to central Amazonian várzea floodplain forests,in support of our first assumption.In contrast to other Amazonian igapó and várzea floodplains,the flooding gradient imprinted only weakly on most stand-level structural and dynamic properties,while it influenced mean wood density and maximum stand height.As expected,tree mortality rates were relatively high in both annually and not-annually flooded plots,probably due to different causes.The high mortality observed in large NAF plot trees likely is a consequence of ENSO-related droughts which may threaten seasonally-dry floodplain forests at the edge of the Amazon more than in the humid regions of central Amazonia.Contrary to our expectation,we found no decrease in recruitment rate from low to high terrain suggesting that flooding is only one factor controlling tree regeneration in these floodplain forests.We conclude that the seasonally-dry floodplain forests of Araguaia are unique forest ecosystems which are at many places threatened by transformation.When intact they still seem to function as a net carbon sink,but this may change with increasing severity of climate warming-related droughts.

    Acknowledgements

    We are grateful for support to the Instituto Ecológica,Palmas,and the Federal University of Tocantins(UFT).We thank Antonio Morales for tree identification and numerous students from UFT for assistance with field work.

    Funding

    This research was conducted as a component in the“Carbon Sequestration Project in Bananal Island”sponsored by AES Barry Foundation.DK received scholarships from CNPq(Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development)and from KAAD(Catholic Academic Exchange Service,Germany)which is gratefully acknowledged.

    Availability of data and materials

    After acceptance data will be made publicly available as an additional supporting file.

    Authors’contributions

    JH,DK and CL developed the concept of the study;DK recorded field data;JH&DK analyzed the data;JH,DK&CL wrote the manuscript.All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Baker TR,Phillips OL,Malhi Y,Almeida S,Arroyo L,Di Fiore A,Erwin T,Higuchi N,Killeen TJ,Laurance SG,Laurance WF,Lewis SL,Monteagudo A,Neill DA,Vargas Nunez P,Pitman NCAN,Vasquez Martinez R(2004)Increasing biomass in Amazonian forest plots.P Roy Soc Lond B Bio B 359:353–365

    Bellingham PJ,Sparrow AD(2009)Multi-stemmed trees in montane rain forests:their frequency and demography in relation to elevation,soil nutrients and disturbance.J Ecol 97:472–483

    Borma LDS,Da Rocha HR,Cabral OM,Von Randow C,Collicchio E,Kurzatkowski D,Brugger PJ,Freitas H,Tannus R,Oliveira L,Rennó CD,Artaxo P(2009)Atmosphere and hydrological controls of the evapotranspiration over a floodplain forest in the Bananal Island region.Amazonia.J Geophys Res 114,G01003

    Brienen RJW,Zuidema PA(2005)Relating tree growth to rain-fall in Bolivian rain forests:a test for six species using tree ring analysis.Oecologia 146:1–12

    Campbell DG,Stone JL,Rosas A(1992)A comparison of the phytosociology and dynamics of three floodplain(Várzea)forests of known ages,Rio Juruá,western Brazilian Amazon.Bot J Linn Soc 108(3):213–237

    Chave J,Andalo C,Brown S,Cairns MA,Chambers JQ,Eamus D,Folster H,Fromard F,Higuchi N,Kira T,Lescure JP,Nelson BW,Ogawa H,Puig H,Riera B,Yamakura T(2005)Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests.Oecologia 145:87–99

    Chave J,Condit R,Muller-Landau H,Thomas S,Ashton P,Bunyavejchewin S,Co L,Dattaraja H,Davies S,Esufali S,Ewango C,Feeley K,Foster R,Gunatilleke N,Gunatilleke S,Hall P,Hart T,Hernandez C,Hubbell S,Itoh A,Kiratiprayoon S,LaFrankie J,Lao S,Makana J,Noor M,Rahman Kassim A,Samper C,Sukumar R,Suresh H,Tan S,Thompson J,Tongco M,Valencia R,Vallejo M,Villa G,Yamakura T,Zimmerman J,Losos E(2008)Assessing evidence for a pervasive alteration in tropical tree communities.PLoS Biol 6,e45

    Chave J,Coomes DA,Jansen S,Lewis SL,Swenson NG,Zanne AE(2009)Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum.Ecol Lett 12(4):351–366

    Clark DA(2002)Are tropical forests an important carbon sink?Reanalysis of the long-term plot data.Ecol Appl 12:3–7

    Condit R(1998)Tropical Forest Census Plots:Methods and Results from Barro Colorado Island,Panama and a Comparison with other Plots.Springer,Berlin

    Condit R,Aguilar S,Hernandez A,Perez R,Lao S,Angehr G,Hubbell SP,Foster RB(2004)Tropical forest dynamics across a rainfall gradient and the impact of an El Nino dry season.J Trop Ecol 20:51–72

    Coomes DA,Burslem DF,Simonson WD(2014)Forests and Global Change Cambridge University Press

    Corlett RT(2011)Impact of warming on tropical lowland forests.Trends Ecol Evol 26:606–613

    Departamento Nacional de Produ??o Mineral,DNPM(1978)Projecto RADAMBRASIL.Folha SC.20 Porto Velho;geologia,geomorfologia,pedologia,vegeta??o e uso potencial da terra.Anexo:Analise estistitica de dados(Vegetac?o).Departamento Nacional de Produ??o Mineral,Rio de Janeiro

    Eiten G(1985)Vegetation near Santa Teresinha,NE Mato Grosso.Acta Amazon 15(3/4):275–301

    Fisher JB,Tu KP,Baldocchi DD(2008)Global estimates of the land–atmosphere water flux based on monthly AVHRR and ISLSCP-II data,validated at 16 FLUXNET sites.Remote Sens Environ 112(3):901–919

    Gentry AH,Terborgh J(1990)Composition and dynamics of the Cocha Cashu mature floodplain forest.In:Gentry AH(ed)Four Neotropical Rainforests.Yale University Press,New Haven and London,pp 542–563

    Irion G,de Mello JASN,Morais J,Piedade MTF,Junk WJ,Garming L(2010)Development of the Amazon valley during the Middle to Late Quaternary:sedimento-logical and climatological observations.In:Junk WJ,Piedade MTF,Wittmann F,Sch?ngart J,Parolin P(eds)Central Amazonian floodplain forests:ecophysiology,biodiversity and sustainable management.Springer,Berlin,pp 27–42

    Junk WJ(1989)Flood tolerance and tree distribution in central Amazonian floodplains.In:Holm-Nielsen LB,Nielsen IC,Balslev H(eds)Tropical Forests:Botanical Dynamics.Speciation and Diversity.Academic Press,London,pp 47–64

    Junk WJ,Piedade MTF,Wittmann F,Sch?ngart J,Parolin P(2010)Amazonian Floodplain Forests:Ecophysiology,biodiversity and sustainable management.Springer,Berlin,Ecological Studies,Vol.210.pp 62–101

    Junk WJ,Piedade MTF,Sch?ngart J,Cohnhaft M,Adeney JM,Wittmann F(2011)A classification of major naturally occurring Amazonian lowland wetlands.Wetlands 31:623–640

    K?rner C(2006)Forests,biodiversity and CO2:surprises are certain.Biologist 53:82–90

    Korning J,Balslev H(1994)Growth and mortality of trees in Amazonian tropical rain forest in Ecuador.J Veg Sci 4:77–86

    Kubitzki K(1989)The ecogeographical differentiation of Amazonian inundation forests.Plant Syst Evol 162:285–304

    Kurzatkowski D,Leuschner C,Homeier J(2015)Effects of flooding on trees in the semi-deciduous transition forests of the Araguaia floodplain,Brazil.Acta Oecol 69:21–30

    Laurance WF,Oliveira AA,Laurance SG,Condit R,Nascimento HEM,Sanchez-Thorin AC,Lovejoy TE,Andrade A,D’Angelo S,Ribeiro JE,Dick CW(2004)Pervasive alteration of tree communities in undisturbed Amazonian forests.Nature 428:171–175

    Lewis SL(2006)Tropical forests and the changing earth system.P Roy Soc Lond B Bio B 361:195–210

    Lewis SL,Lopez-Gonzalez G,Sonké B(2009)Increasing carbon storage in intact African tropical forests.Nature 477:1003–1006

    Lewis SL,Brando P,Phillips OL,van der Heijden GMF,Nepstad D(2011)The 2010 Amazon drought.Science 331:554

    Lucas CMJ,Sch?ngart J,Sheikh P,Wittmann F,Piedade MT,McGrath DG(2014)Effects of land-use and hydroperiod on aboveground biomass storage and productivity in secondary Amazonian floodplain forests.Forest Ecol Manag 319:116–127

    Martins A,Kardec E(2006)Rela??es solo-geoambiente em áreas de ocorrências de Ipucas na planície do Médio Araguaia-Estado de Tocantins.Rev árvore 30(2):297–310

    Melack JM,Hess LL(2010)Remote sensing of the distribution and extent of wetlands in the Amazon basin.In:Junk WJ,Piedade MTF,Wittmann F,Sch?ngart J,Parolin P(eds)Central Amazonian floodplain forests:ecophysiology,biodiversity and sustainable management.Springer,Berlin,pp 43–59

    Nebel G,Kvist LP,Vanclay JK,Christensen H,Freitas L,Ruíz J(2001a)Structure and floristic composition of flood plain forests in the Peruvian Amazon.I.Overstorey.Forest Ecol Manag 150:27–57

    Nebel G,Kvist LP,Vanclay JK,Vidaurre H(2001b)Forest dynamics in flood plain forests in the Peruvian Amazon:effects of disturbance and implications for management.Forest Ecol Manag 150(1):79–92

    Olivares I,Svenning JC,von Bodegan PM,Balsev H(2015)Effect of warming and drought on the vegetation and plant diversity in the Amazon basin.Bot Rev 81:42–69

    Parolin P,Ferreira LV,Albernaz AL,Almeida SS(2004)Tree species distribution in varzea forests of Brazilian Amazonia.Folia Geobotanica 39:371–383

    Phillips OL,Hall P,Gentry AH,Sawyer SA,Vasquez R(1994)Dynamics and species richness of tropical rain forests.P Natl Acad Sci USA 91:2805–2809

    Phillips OL,Aragao LE,Lewis SL,Fisher JB,Lloyd J,Lopez-Gonzalez G,Malhi Y,Monteagudo A,Peacock J,Quesada CA,van der Heijden G,Almeida S,Amaral I,Arroyo L,Aymard G(2009)Drought sensitivity of the Amazon rainforest.Science 323:1344–1347

    Rankin-de-Merona JMRW,Hutchings H,Lovejoy TE(1990)Tree mortality and recruitment over a five-year period in undisturbed upland rainforest of the central Amazon.In:Gentry AH(ed)Four Neotropical Forests,vol Chapter 29.Yale University Press,New Haven,pp 573–584

    Rosales J,Petts G,Salo J(1999)Riparian flooded forests of the Orinoco and Amazon basins:A comparative review.Biodiversity Conservation 8:551–586

    Sch?ngart J,Wittmann F,Piedade MTF,Junk WJ,Worbes M(2005)Wood growth patterns of Macrolobium acaciifolium(Benth.)Benth.(Fabaceae)in Amazonian black-water and white-water floodplain forests.Oecologia 145:454–461

    Sch?ngart J,Wittmann F,Worbes M(2010)Biomass and net primary production of Central Amazonian floodplains forests.In:Junk WJ,Piedade MTF,Wittmann F(eds)Amazonian floodplain forests:ecophysiology,biodiversity and sustainable management.Springer,Berlin,pp 347–388

    Sch?ngart J,Arieira J,Felfili Fortes C,Cezarine de Arruda E,Nunes da Cunha C(2011)Age-related and stand-wise estimates of carbon stocks and sequestration in the aboveground coarse wood biomass of wetland forests in the northern Pantanal,Brazil.Biogeosciences 8:3407–3421

    Terborgh J,Andresen E(1998)The composition of Amazonian forests:patterns at local and regional scales.J Trop Ecol 14:645–664

    Van Nieuwstadt MGL,Sheil D(2005)Drought,fire and tree survival in a Borneo rain forest,East Kalimantan,Indonesia.J Ecol 93:191–201

    Ward JV,Wiens JA(2001)Ecotones of riverine ecosystems:role and typology,spatio-temporal dynamics,and river regulation.Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 1:25–36

    Williamson GB,Laurance WF,Oliveira AA,Delamonica P,Gascon C,Lovejoy TE,Pohl L(2000)Amazonia tree mortality during the 1997 El Ni?o drought.Cons Biol 14:1538–1542

    Wittmann F,Zorzi BT,Tizianel FAT,Urquiza MVS,Faria RR,Sousa NM,Módena éS,Gamarra RM,Rosa ALM(2008)Tree species composition,structure and aboveground wood biomass of a riparian forest of the lower Miranda River,Southern Pantanal,Brazil.Folia Geobot 43:397–411

    Wittmann F,Junk WJ,Sch?ngart J(2010)Phytogeography,species diversity,community structure and dynamics of central Amazonian floodplain forests.In:Junk WJ,Piedade MTF,Parolin P,Wittmann F,Sch?ngart J(eds)Central Amazonian Floodplain forests:ecophysiology,biodiversity and sustainable management.Springer,Ecological Studies

    Wittmann F,Householder E,Piedade MTF,Assis RL,Sch?ngart J,Parolin P,Junk WJ(2013)Habitat specificity,endemism and the neotropical distribution of Amazonian white-water floodplain trees.Ecography 36:690–707

    Worbes M(1997)The forest ecosystem of the floodplains.In:Junk W(ed)The Central Amazon Floodplain:Ecology of a Pulsating System.Ecological Studies 126,Springer,Berlin

    Worbes M,Klinge H,Revilla JD,Martius C(1992)On the dynamics,floristic subdivision and geographical distribution of varzea forests in Central Amazonia.J Veg Sci 3:553–564

    Wright SJ(2005)Tropical forests in a changing environment.Trends Ecol Evol 20:553–560

    Zanne AE,Lopez-Gonzalez G,Coomes DA,Ilic J,Jansen S,Lewis SL,Miller RB,Swenson NG,Wiemann MC,Chave J(2009)Data from:Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum.Dryad Digital Repository.doi:10.5061/dryad.234

    *Correspondence:cleusch@gwdg.de

    Plant Ecology,Albrecht von Haller Institute for Plant Sciences,University of Goettingen,Untere Karspüle 2,37073 Goettingen,Germany

    ?The Author(s).2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

    International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/),which permits unrestricted use,distribution,and

    reproduction in any medium,provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s)and the source,provide a link to the Creative Commons license,and indicate if changes were made.

    Received:1 March 2017 Accepted:24 June 2017

    九九爱精品视频在线观看| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 我的亚洲天堂| 男女国产视频网站| 欧美另类一区| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 中文字幕色久视频| 色吧在线观看| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 亚洲成色77777| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 欧美在线黄色| 天天影视国产精品| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产视频首页在线观看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 99热网站在线观看| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 日本av免费视频播放| 大香蕉久久成人网| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 久久免费观看电影| 只有这里有精品99| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 日本av免费视频播放| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 男女边摸边吃奶| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 亚洲综合精品二区| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 午夜激情av网站| 久久人人爽人人片av| 欧美成人午夜精品| 青春草国产在线视频| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 精品第一国产精品| 中文欧美无线码| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 18在线观看网站| 成人手机av| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 日韩伦理黄色片| 日日撸夜夜添| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 男女国产视频网站| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 视频区图区小说| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 国产视频首页在线观看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 国产毛片在线视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 宅男免费午夜| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 久久婷婷青草| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 亚洲中文av在线| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 一区在线观看完整版| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 国产激情久久老熟女| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 老司机影院毛片| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 久久婷婷青草| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 天堂8中文在线网| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| www.自偷自拍.com| 日韩电影二区| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 免费观看人在逋| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 日本av免费视频播放| xxx大片免费视频| 日日撸夜夜添| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 18禁观看日本| 精品一区二区三卡| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 满18在线观看网站| 操出白浆在线播放| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 悠悠久久av| 在线观看人妻少妇| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| av网站免费在线观看视频| 精品久久久久久电影网| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 国产精品免费视频内射| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 超碰97精品在线观看| avwww免费| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 只有这里有精品99| 日韩av免费高清视频| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 97在线人人人人妻| 久久av网站| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 久久久精品94久久精品| 亚洲国产欧美网| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 在线天堂最新版资源| 一区二区三区精品91| 色吧在线观看| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 天天添夜夜摸| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 丝袜美足系列| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 国产色婷婷99| videosex国产| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 成人三级做爰电影| 丝袜美足系列| 999精品在线视频| 久久婷婷青草| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 777米奇影视久久| 一本久久精品| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 久久av网站| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 一级黄片播放器| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 满18在线观看网站| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 日韩大片免费观看网站| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 少妇 在线观看| 日韩电影二区| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 成人影院久久| www日本在线高清视频| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 人妻一区二区av| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 日日啪夜夜爽| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 18在线观看网站| 伦理电影免费视频| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 国产成人精品福利久久| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 亚洲天堂av无毛| av天堂久久9| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 只有这里有精品99| 我的亚洲天堂| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 九草在线视频观看| 观看av在线不卡| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 精品酒店卫生间| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 黄色一级大片看看| 成人手机av| 精品第一国产精品| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 观看美女的网站| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 超色免费av| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 日本91视频免费播放| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| av在线播放精品| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线 | 热re99久久国产66热| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 岛国毛片在线播放| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| av不卡在线播放| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 多毛熟女@视频| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| av一本久久久久| 性色av一级| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 久久婷婷青草| 国产精品无大码| 看免费av毛片| av在线app专区| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 老司机靠b影院| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 一级毛片我不卡| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 日韩电影二区| 制服诱惑二区| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 考比视频在线观看| 日本wwww免费看| 久久人人爽人人片av| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 999精品在线视频| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线 | 婷婷色综合www| av视频免费观看在线观看| 午夜av观看不卡| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产又爽黄色视频| 又大又爽又粗| 热re99久久国产66热| 一区福利在线观看| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产av国产精品国产| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 自线自在国产av| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产看品久久| 青草久久国产| 一级毛片我不卡| 久久久欧美国产精品| 视频区图区小说| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产成人精品在线电影| 捣出白浆h1v1| 中国三级夫妇交换| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国产av国产精品国产| 日韩视频在线欧美| 青草久久国产| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| www日本在线高清视频| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 亚洲av男天堂| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产在线免费精品| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 国产精品三级大全| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 久久97久久精品| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 日本午夜av视频| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 9191精品国产免费久久| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 久久97久久精品| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产 精品1| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产精品免费大片| 自线自在国产av| 成人手机av| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 黄片播放在线免费| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 午夜av观看不卡| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 在线观看三级黄色| 老熟女久久久| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 一级毛片我不卡| 看免费成人av毛片| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 国产 一区精品| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 人人澡人人妻人| 欧美97在线视频| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 久久久精品94久久精品| 国产野战对白在线观看| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产1区2区3区精品| 蜜桃在线观看..| 桃花免费在线播放| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 国产 精品1| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 99久久人妻综合| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 韩国av在线不卡| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 性少妇av在线| 在线观看www视频免费| 1024视频免费在线观看| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 大码成人一级视频| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 久久影院123| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 久久性视频一级片| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 亚洲精品第二区| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 久热这里只有精品99| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 午夜av观看不卡| 国产乱来视频区| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 久久久久久人妻| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 一本久久精品| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 熟女av电影| 国产视频首页在线观看| 一区福利在线观看| 高清av免费在线| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 最黄视频免费看| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 1024香蕉在线观看| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 天天影视国产精品| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 日本91视频免费播放| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 中国三级夫妇交换| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲av男天堂| av在线app专区| 亚洲av男天堂| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 色吧在线观看| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 国产97色在线日韩免费| videos熟女内射| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 亚洲图色成人| 性少妇av在线| videos熟女内射| 成人国产av品久久久| 国产乱来视频区| 青草久久国产| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 18禁观看日本| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 97在线人人人人妻| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| av福利片在线| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 亚洲国产av新网站| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 一区二区av电影网| 一个人免费看片子| 成人三级做爰电影| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| av天堂久久9| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 捣出白浆h1v1| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 久久99精品国语久久久| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 视频区图区小说| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 一级片'在线观看视频| av视频免费观看在线观看| av一本久久久久| 国产成人一区二区在线| 午夜免费鲁丝| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 老熟女久久久| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 99九九在线精品视频| 国产成人精品无人区| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 一区二区三区精品91| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 少妇人妻 视频| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 电影成人av| 一级黄片播放器| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 一个人免费看片子| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 综合色丁香网| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 欧美日韩av久久| 中文欧美无线码| 在线观看人妻少妇| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 黄片小视频在线播放| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 亚洲欧美激情在线|