• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Depth of tumor invasion and tumor-occupied portions of stomach are predictive factors of intra-abdominal metastasis

    2017-07-18 11:01:15ZiyuLiZheminLiShuqinJiaZhaodeBuLianhaiZhangXiaojiangWuShuangxiLiFeiShanXinJiJiafuJi
    Chinese Journal of Cancer Research 2017年2期

    Ziyu Li, Zhemin Li, Shuqin Jia, Zhaode Bu, Lianhai Zhang, Xiaojiang Wu, Shuangxi Li, Fei Shan, Xin Ji, Jiafu Ji

    Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing),1Center of Gastrointestinal Surgery,2Center for Molecular Diagnostics, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China

    *These authors contributed equally to this work.

    Depth of tumor invasion and tumor-occupied portions of stomach are predictive factors of intra-abdominal metastasis

    Ziyu Li1*, Zhemin Li1*, Shuqin Jia2*, Zhaode Bu1, Lianhai Zhang1, Xiaojiang Wu1, Shuangxi Li1, Fei Shan1, Xin Ji1, Jiafu Ji1

    Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing),1Center of Gastrointestinal Surgery,2Center for Molecular Diagnostics, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China

    *These authors contributed equally to this work.

    Objective:Diagnostic laparoscopy is recommended for the pretherapeutic staging of gastric cancer to detect any unexpected or unconfirmed intra-abdominal metastasis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role and indications of diagnostic laparoscopy in the detection of intra-abdominal metastasis.

    Methods:Standard diagnostic laparoscopy with peritoneal cytology examination was performed prospectively on patients who were clinically diagnosed with primary local advanced gastric cancer (cT≥2M0). We calculated the rate of intra-abdominal metastases identified by diagnostic laparoscopy, and examined the relationship between peritoneal dissemination (P) and cytology results (CY). Split-sample method was applied to find clinical risk factors for intra-abdominal metastasis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis were performed in training set to find out risk factors of intra-abdominal metastasis, and then validate it in testing set.

    Results:Out of 249 cM0 patients, 51 (20.5%) patients with intra-abdominal metastasis were identified by diagnostic laparoscopy, including 20 (8.0%) P1CY1, 17 (6.8%) P0CY1 and 14 (5.6%) P1CY0 patients. In the training set, multivariate logistic regression analysis and ROC analysis showed that the depth of tumor invasion on computer tomography (CT) scan ≥21 mm and tumor-occupied ≥2 portions of stomach are predictive factors of metastasis. In the testing set, when diagnostic laparoscopy was performed on patients who had one or two of these risk factors, the sensitivity and positive predictive value for detecting intra-abdominal metastasis were 90.0% and 32.1%, respectively.

    Conclusions:According to our results, depth of tumor invasion and tumor-occupied portions of stomach are predictive factors of intra-abdominal metastasis.

    Gastric cancer; diagnostic laparoscopy; peritoneal dissemination; intra-peritoneal free cancer cells; pretherapeutic staging

    View this article at:https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2017.02.03

    Introduction

    Gastric cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide (1) and the third in China (2). Missed preoperative diagnosis of intra-abdominal metastases, including peritoneal dissemination and intraperitoneal free cancer cells, is among the leading cause of poor prognosis, surgical failure and futile laparotomy. Therefore, accurate preoperative staging, especially through improved diagnostic accuracy of peritoneal dissemination and intraperi-toneal free cancer cells, is particularly important for alternative treatment strategies and prognostic evaluations.

    As an alternative of laparotomy, diagnostic laparoscopy has been suggested to effectively detect peritoneal diseases and can be used to collect peritoneal lavage fluid for cytology examination with minimal invasion. However, diagnostic laparoscopy plays a currently undefined role in gastric cancer staging due to controversy regarding its indications. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend laparoscopic staging for patients with T3 and/or N+ if they are considered for surgical resection without preoperative therapy; European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines recommend laparoscopic staging for patients with IB-III gastric cancer; and Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) guidelines mention only laparoscopy prior to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (3-5). In China, most gastric cancer patients present with advanced disease stages; however, a consensus on the role of diagnostic laparoscopy still has not been established because of the lack of direct evidence (6).

    The aim of this study was to provide an assessment of the detection rate of intra-abdominal metastasis using diagnostic laparoscopy in gastric cancer patients, and investigate the clinical risk factors of intra-abdominal metastasis before exploratory operation to determine the indications of diagnostic laparoscopy for patients with gastric cancer in China.

    Materials and methods

    Design of study

    Between September 2011 and September 2013, a prospective study of pretherapeutic diagnostic laparoscopy was performed on consecutive gastric cancer patients in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery at the Peking University Cancer Hospital (Figure 1).

    Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled, and the following data were recorded: basic information, including age, gender, height, body weight and weight loss; and clinical information, including results of endoscopy, computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and result of blood test. More specifically, Borrmann type, proportion of the tumor in relation to circumference of the stomach (<1/4, 1/4 to <1/2, 1/2 to <3/4, and ≥3/4) and portions of stomach (cardia, fundus, body and antrum) were determined by endoscopy; T stage, N stage, tumor depth, basal diameter and basal area were from EUS; and serosal invasion, enlarged lymph node, and tumor depth were measured by CT. Tumor markers [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), CA72-4, and CA242] were determined by blood test.

    We adopted a CT criteria described by Jin Woong Kim to measure serosal invasion on CT. Specifically, when an irregular or nodular outer margin of the outer layer and/or a dense band-like perigastric fat infiltration was visualized, serosal invasion was suspected (7).

    Depth of invasion was measured using CT slices as shown inFigure 2. To maintain consistency of degree of distension, a gas distension method was used during CT scan (8).

    Measurement of the depth, the basal diameter and basal area are shown inFigure 3. Lymph nodes were considered positive for metastasis if they were equal to or larger than 8 mm in the short-axis diameter under EUS (9).

    Figure 1Basic algorithm for selection and treatment of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

    Figure 3Measurement of the depth, basal diameter and basal area using EUS. (A) Depth and basal diameter; (B) Basal area.

    Ethics approval

    This study is conducted in accordance with the“Declaration of Helsinki” and “Ethical Guidelines for Clinical Research”, and has been approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Peking University Cancer Hospital. Informed consent was obtained before surgery.

    Inclusion criteria&exclusion criteria

    The inclusion criteria included: 1) histologically confirmed diagnosis of primary gastric carcinoma; 2) abdominal enhanced spiral CT and EUS showed a clinical stage of cT2-4N0-3M0; 3) fit for radical gastrectomy or neoadjuvant treatment; and 4) agree to have diagnostic laparoscopy.

    The exclusion criteria included: 1) unfit for laparoscopic operation or general anesthesia (suspicious abdominal adhesions, severe cardiopulmonary disease, etc.); 2) underwent emergency surgery to relieve obstruction, bleeding or perforation; or 3) preoperative examination shows signs of metastasis, including peritoneal thickening, ascites, distant lymph node enlargement, etc.

    Laparoscopic staging technique

    Laparoscopy was performed under general anesthesia. The patient was placed in a supine position. A 10-mm disposable trocar (observing hole) was inserted into the sub-umbilicus, and a 30° telescope was used. Another 10-mm trocar and a 5-mm trocar (operating hole) were inserted into the right and left upper quadrants, respectively. Prior to any manipulation, 250 mL of warm normal saline was infused into the subphrenic space, subhepatic space, omentum, bilateral paracolic sulci and the pouch of Douglas. Care was taken to avoid direct contact of the irrigation with the primary tumor. At least 100 mL of fluid was aspirated from the subphrenic space, subhepatic space and pouch of Douglas. The fluid was immediately sent for centrifugation and cytological examination. Subsequently, a systematic inspection of the abdominal cavity was performed clockwise from the right quadrant. Any suspicious lesion was biopsied and sent for pathologic examination.

    Assessment of diagnostic laparoscopy and cytology results

    Patients without macroscopic peritoneal dissemination (P–) and with negative cytology results (CY–) were defined as having negative diagnostic laparoscopy results (DL–), which means there are no intra-abdominal metastases. And patients with peritoneal dissemination, which was confirmed by frozen pathology (P+) or free cancer cells in the peritoneal lavage (CY+), were defined as having positive diagnostic laparoscopy results (DL+).

    Data analysis

    To determine the clinical risk factors as predictors for gastric cancer patients with intra-abdominal metastasis before exploratory operation, a split-sample method was applied. The patient cohort was divided randomly into 2 groups: 3/4 for a training set and 1/4 for a testing set. In the training set, the clinical characteristics of the DL– and DL+ patients were compared using the independent samples groupt-test and Chi-squared test. To determine the risk factors, all variables found to be significant by univariate analysis were assessed by binary logistic regression analysis (method: Backward Wald, probability for stepwise: 0.5 for entry, 1.0 for removal). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were used to determine sensitivity, specificity and corresponding cut-off values of each factor. In the testing set, all patients were classified according to their number of risk factors determined by training set, and the sensitivity and specificity of different combinations of factors were calculated to predict the metastasis. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were carried out using the IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 20.0; IBM Corp., New York, USA).

    Results

    Patient characteristics

    From September 2011 to September 2013, 249 patients with histologically confirmed gastric carcinoma underwent diagnostic laparoscopy with peritoneal cytology examination as a routine pretreatment workup, 70.7% of whom are males, with a median age of 57.6 (range: 29–81) years. On the basis of CT and EUS findings, 13 (5.2%) patients were found to have clinical stage I disease, 64 (25.7%) were stage II disease, and 172 (69.1%) were stage III disease. For T stage, 15 (6.0%) patients were T2, 65 (26.1%) were T3 and 169 (67.9%) were T4. As for N stage, 53 (21.3%) patients were N0, and 196 (78.7%) were N+.

    Results of diagnostic laparoscopy

    From the diagnostic laparoscopy findings, 14 (5.6%) of the 249 patients had visible peritoneal dissemination only, which was confirmed by frozen pathology, 17 (6.8%) had free cancer cells in the peritoneal lavage only and 20 (8.0%) had both metastases. In total, 51 (20.5%) patients were DL+ and 198 were DL–. Among the DL+ patients, 42 underwent hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) followed by palliative chemotherapy after diagnostic laparoscopy, and 9 underwent palliative surgery. Among the DL– patients, 101 underwent radical D2 gastrectomy, and 97 underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

    Comparison of clinical characteristics

    The split sample method was used, and the 249 patients were divided into two sets using random sampling: 3/4 (187 patients) as a training set for developing predictive factors of metastasis and 1/4 (62 patients) as a testing set for validating these factors.

    The clinical characteristics were compared between the DL+ and DL– patients (Table 1). In the training set, 38 (20.3%) patients were DL+, and 149 patients were DL–. CA72-4 expression, proportion of the tumor in relation to the circumference of the stomach, tumor-occupied stomach portions, Borrmann type, depth of tumor invasion on CT and depth of tumor invasion on EUS were found to be significant in our univariate analyses. Next, all these factors were evaluated by multivariate analysis. Among these factors, multivariate analysis indicated that the depth of tumor invasion on CT scan and tumor-occupied stomach portions are predictive factors of metastasis (Table 2).

    From an ROC curve (Figure 4, 5andTable 3), the highest Youden index (0.217 and 0.270, respectively) was obtained when the depth of tumor invasion on CT was cut off at 21 mm (AUC: 0.668, P<0.01) and tumor-occupying portions of the stomach were cut off between 1 and ≥2 (AUC: 0.676, P<0.01).

    In the testing set, 55 patients (among 62 patients) with complete clinical data included 10 (18.2%) DL+ patients and 45 DL– patients. All these patients were classified according to their number of independent risk factors for a DL+ status: 27 had no risk factors, 22 had only one risk factor and 6 had two risk factors. When the patients were divided into groups by those with no risk factors and those with at least one risk factor, the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) for detecting intra-abdominal metastasis were 90.0% and 32.1%, respectively. When the patients were divided into groups by those with no risk factors or only one risk factor and those with two risk factors, the sensitivity and PPV were 40.0% and 66.7%, respectively (Table 4).

    Discussion

    The highest rates of gastric cancer in the world occur in Eastern Asia, and China accounts for approximately 40% of the worldwide gastric cancer burden. The modern treatment modality for gastric cancer involves comprehensive treatment guided by staging. Thus, the accuracy of clinical staging is crucial. In the present study, 20.5% of cM0 gastric cancer patients were identified to have peritoneal dissemination or free cancer cells by diagnostic laparoscopy. This finding suggests that pretherapeutic diagnostic laparoscopy with cytology examination should be strongly recommended for gastric cancer patients, especially those with related risk factors.

    Sarelaet al. (10) performed diagnostic laparoscopy on 657 patients with minimal symptoms and no definite M1 disease, and M1 disease was detected in 23% of patients with this method. In this study, only 65 patients were examined by high-quality spiral CT scans for staging. Although all the patients were examined by high-quality spiral CT scans in our study, the metastasis detection rate was not much different. Therefore, diagnostic laparoscopy cannot be replaced by high-quality imaging techniques. Kaiseret al. (11-13) also reported similar metastasis detection rates for resectable M0 gastric cancer patients (20.6%, 24.7% and 23.0%, respectively). It is widely accepted that peritoneal dissemination spreads from thetumor to the serosa, but in our 51 DL+ patients, we also found 2 cT2N0 patients who had free cancer cells, 3 cT3N0 patients who had free cancer cells and 2 cT3N0 patients who had visible peritoneal dissemination.

    Table 1 Clinicopathologic features of DL+ and DL– patients (univariate analysis, training set)

    Table 1(continued)

    Table 2 Predictive factors of metastasis (multivariate analysis, training set)

    Figure 4ROC for the prediction of intra-abdominal metastasis by the depth of tumor invasion found by CT scans.

    Figure 5ROC for the prediction of intra-abdominal metastasis by the tumor occupying portions of stomach.

    Table 4 Indications for diagnostic laparoscopy based on the number of independent risk factors (testing set) (%)

    Compared with laparotomy, laparoscopy has various advantages. Tsuchidaet al. (14) and Osorioet al. (13) reviewed patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy and laparotomy in the same period, respectively, and showed that there was no significant difference in the rate of intra-abdominal metastasis (45.2%vs. 35.5%, P=0.299; 20.6%vs. 20.8%, P=0.977). Haoet al. (15) demonstrated that the collection of peritoneal lavage fluid for cytology during laparoscopy has the same value as its collection during laparotomy. Osorioet al. (13) compared the results of patients who underwent either diagnostic laparoscopy or laparotomy and were not submitted to any additional surgical procedure due to intra-abdominal spread. The patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy had a lower morbidity (11.8%vs. 50.0%), lower mortality (0%vs. 16.7%), shorter hospital stay (6.3 dvs. 15.3 d), greater chance for recovery until fit for chemotherapy (64.7%vs. 33.3%) and longer survival (11.6 monthsvs. 4.8 months). Consequently, diagnostic laparoscopy and laparotomy exploration have similar contributions to the assessment of intra-abdominal metastasis and peritoneal lavage cytology. However, in diagnostic laparoscopy, the entire abdominal cavity can be magnified and easily accessed. Thus, it is easier to find any tiny peritoneal nodules that are located in the subphrenic space or pouch of Douglas’, areas that are difficult to evaluate even by laparotomy.

    However, a low detection rate is a problem for diagnostic laparoscopy. From our present results, almost 80% of cases would be expected to have a negative examination. Researchers are trying to identify proper indications to narrow the potential candidates for diagnostic laparoscopy.

    Sarelaet al. (10) reported that tumor location [gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) or whole stomach] and a lymphadenopathy of ≥1 cm were independent, significant risk factors for M1, and M1 was not detected in any patient with neither risk factor. Tsuchidaet al. (14) reported that tumor location involving three stomach portions; macroscopic types 3, 4 or 5; and positive lymph node metastasis to all three factors are significantly correlated with either peritoneal metastasis or positive cytology. Our study also found similar risk factors: tumor-occupied ≥2 portions of stomach and depth of tumor invasion on CT ≥21 mm (measurements of stomach wall thickness were made when the stomach was well distended during the CT scan). Kuritaet al. (16) also showed similar results in their study of 236 gastric cancer patients. In our testing set, only one M1 disease was detected in patients with neither risk factor. For the patients who had at least one of these two identified independent risk factors, the sensitivity, PPV and negative predictive value were 90.0%, 32.1% and 96.3%, respectively. According to these results, if we performed diagnostic laparoscopy with cytology examination for the selected patients according to the risk factors, the detection rate would be increased by up to 10%, and only approximately 2% of patients would be missed in preoperative diagnosis of intra-abdominal metastases. However, we continue to recommend diagnostic laparoscopy with cytology examination for all advanced gastric cancer patients.

    Another critical problem is the lack of an accepted treatment protocol after diagnostic laparoscopy. We now have a multimodal therapy plan that includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and HIPEC. Therefore, the request for improvement in the accuracy of treatment has been met. In our study, we choseHIPEC and systemic chemotherapy to treat the patients with peritoneal dissemination or free cancer cells in the peritoneal lavage. Seven of the 10 patients showed a negative metastasis after this preoperative treatment and then underwent gastrectomy. Nakagawaet al. (17) reported that preoperative chemotherapy induced the downstaging of gastric cancer in 11 (61.1%) of the 18 patients in their study, with positive cytology from diagnostic laparoscopy. Several studies (17-19) used diagnostic laparoscopy as a staging procedure prior to considering patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation. The selection of patients, proper treatment regimens, combination treatments with or without intraperitoneal chemotherapy and the type of surgery after chemotherapy remain controversial. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC are indicated for gastric cancer with peritoneal disease that is completely or significantly resectable (20). Staging laparoscopy is very useful in detecting unsuspected peritoneal seeding and in differentiating between localized peritoneal seeding and disseminated carcinomatosis. In Japan and Korea, CRS and HIPEC are used with palliative or curative intent and for prophylactic treatment in gastric cancer patients (21). However, the treatment of carcinomatosis from gastric cancer by peritonectomy and HIPEC has globally demonstrated worse long-term results than the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from other cancers (22).

    Conclusions

    Our preliminary data suggest that diagnostic laparoscopy is necessary for the clinical diagnosis of gastric cancer patients. Depth of tumor invasion and tumor-occupied portions of stomach are predictive factors of intraabdominal metastasis.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by grants supporting the research program of early diagnosis, standardized treatment and therapy effect evaluation of gastric cancer (No. D141100000414004) from Beijing Ministry of Science and Technology.

    Footnote

    Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

    1.Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136:E359-86.

    2.Chen W, Zheng R, Zuo T, et al. National cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2012. Chin J Cancer Res 2016;28:1-11.

    3.Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 2011;14:113-23.

    4.Zheng Y, Xu D, Bu Z. Chinese version of NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology officially authorized by NCCN. Chin J Cancer Res 2016;28:144-5.

    5.Waddell T, Verheij M, Allum W, et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2013;24 Suppl 6:vi57-63.

    6.Li Z, Ji J. Application of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer. Ann Transl Med 2015;3:126.

    7.Kim JW, Shin SS, Heo SH, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-section CT using CT gastrography in preoperative T staging of gastric cancer according to 7th edition of AJCC cancer staging manual. Eur Radiol 2012;22:654-62.

    8.Park HS, Lee JM, Kim SH, et al. Three-dimensional MDCT for preoperative local staging of gastric cancer using gas and water distention methods: a retrospective cohort study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:1316-23.

    9.Hwang SW, Lee DH, Lee SH, et al. Preoperative staging of gastric cancer by endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector-row computed tomography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;25:512-8.

    10.Sarela AI, Lefkowitz R, Brennan MF, et al. Selection of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma for laparoscopic staging. Am J Surg 2006;191:134-8.

    11.Kaiser GM, Sotiropoulos GC, Frühauf NR, et al. Value of staging laparoscopy for multimodal therapy planning in esophago-gastric cancer. Int Surg 2007;92:128-32.

    12.Nath J, Moorthy K, Taniere P, et al. Peritoneal lavage cytology in patients with oesophagogastricadenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2008;95:721-6.

    13.Osorio J, Rodríguez-Santiago J, Mu?oz E, et al. Outcome of unresected gastric cancer after laparoscopic diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Clin Transl Oncol 2008;10:294-7.

    14.Tsuchida K, Yoshikawa T, Tsuburaya A, et al. Indications for staging laparoscopy in clinical T4M0 gastric cancer. World J Surg 2011;35:2703-9.

    15.Hao YX, Yu PW, Qian F. Changes of peritoneal free gastric cancer cells and its significance in patients after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi (in Chinese) 2008;46:1784-9.

    16.Kurita N, Shimada M, Utsunomiya T, et al. Predictive factors of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2010;57:980-3.

    17.Nakagawa S, Nashimoto A, Yabusaki H. Role of staging laparoscopy with peritoneal lavage cytology in the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2007;10:29-34.

    18.Badgwell B, Cormier JN, Krishnan S, et al. Does neoadjuvant treatment for gastric cancer patients with positive peritoneal cytology at staging laparoscopy improve survival? Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:2684-91.

    19.Power DG, Schattner MA, Gerdes H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound can improve the selection for laparoscopy in patients with localized gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2009;208:173-8.

    20.Roviello F, Caruso S, Marrelli D, et al. Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: state of the art and future developments. Surg Oncol 2011;20:e38-54.

    21.Glehen O, Mohamed F, Gilly FN. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from digestive tract cancer: new management by cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia. Lancet Oncol 2004;5:219-28.

    22.Stewart JH 4th, Shen P, Levine EA. Intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy for peritoneal surface malignancy: current status and future directions. Ann Surg Oncol 2005;12:765-77.

    Cite this article as:Li Z, Li Z, Jia S, Bu Z, Zhang L, Wu X, Li S, Shan F, Ji X, Ji J. Depth of tumor invasion and tumoroccupied portions of stomach are predictive factors of intraabdominal metastasis. Chin J Cancer Res 2017;29(2):109-117. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2017.02.03

    10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2017.02.03

    Jiafu Ji, MD, PhD. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Center of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China. Email: jijiafu@hsc.pku.edu.cn.

    Submitted Jul 12, 2016. Accepted for publication Feb 23, 2017.

    高清毛片免费看| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 熟女电影av网| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 免费看不卡的av| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 少妇丰满av| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 97超碰精品成人国产| 久99久视频精品免费| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 日本免费在线观看一区| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 一级毛片 在线播放| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 岛国毛片在线播放| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 床上黄色一级片| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| ponron亚洲| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 一级毛片电影观看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网 | 日韩欧美精品v在线| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 免费观看精品视频网站| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 精品一区二区三卡| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 成人二区视频| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 成年版毛片免费区| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 精品国产三级普通话版| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 伦精品一区二区三区| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 国产高清三级在线| 免费观看在线日韩| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 久久久色成人| 简卡轻食公司| 一级av片app| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 18+在线观看网站| 三级经典国产精品| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | 丰满乱子伦码专区| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 成人二区视频| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 男女国产视频网站| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆 | 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 精品久久久久久久久av| 久久草成人影院| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国产在线男女| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 69人妻影院| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 成年av动漫网址| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 国产三级在线视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 99热这里只有是精品50| 亚洲色图av天堂| 男女边摸边吃奶| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 久久久精品94久久精品| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 欧美3d第一页| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 91久久精品电影网| 草草在线视频免费看| 色综合站精品国产| 五月天丁香电影| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 91狼人影院| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久大av| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 三级毛片av免费| 国产高清三级在线| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 欧美激情在线99| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久99久视频精品免费| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| av在线观看视频网站免费| 日本wwww免费看| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 久久热精品热| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| av黄色大香蕉| 黄色一级大片看看| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 日本一本二区三区精品| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 在线a可以看的网站| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 国产色婷婷99| 亚洲在线观看片| 国产综合懂色| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 国产av国产精品国产| 午夜福利视频精品| 性色avwww在线观看| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 精品久久久噜噜| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| av福利片在线观看| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 国产精品三级大全| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 成人综合一区亚洲| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 91av网一区二区| 国产av不卡久久| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 两个人的视频大全免费| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 一夜夜www| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 成年人午夜在线观看视频 | av专区在线播放| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 免费看日本二区| 国产色婷婷99| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 99热这里只有精品一区| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 亚洲av成人av| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| av专区在线播放| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲四区av| 日韩视频在线欧美| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 草草在线视频免费看| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 97超碰精品成人国产| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 日韩强制内射视频| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 美女黄网站色视频| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 91精品国产九色| 看免费成人av毛片| 日本色播在线视频| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 国产美女午夜福利| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 午夜日本视频在线| 三级经典国产精品| 美女大奶头视频| 嫩草影院精品99| 午夜免费激情av| 国产在视频线在精品| 大香蕉久久网| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 久久久国产一区二区| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| eeuss影院久久| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 免费观看性生交大片5| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 91久久精品电影网| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 热99在线观看视频| 色哟哟·www| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 青春草国产在线视频| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 免费看a级黄色片| av一本久久久久| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 国产在视频线在精品| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| freevideosex欧美| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 国产午夜精品论理片| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 国产成人福利小说| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 亚洲av男天堂| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 欧美97在线视频| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 国产成人一区二区在线| 久久这里只有精品中国| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 亚洲无线观看免费| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| av在线老鸭窝| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 久久久精品94久久精品| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 天堂√8在线中文| 午夜免费激情av| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 午夜激情欧美在线| 特级一级黄色大片| 免费看a级黄色片| 久久久精品94久久精品| 毛片女人毛片| 51国产日韩欧美| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 少妇的逼好多水| 美女黄网站色视频| 久久久久网色| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 99久国产av精品| h日本视频在线播放| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 欧美成人a在线观看| 中文字幕久久专区| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 精品久久久久久久末码| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 美女高潮的动态| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 日韩强制内射视频| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 精品国产三级普通话版| 51国产日韩欧美| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| av一本久久久久| 男女那种视频在线观看| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 久久6这里有精品| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 深夜a级毛片| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 极品教师在线视频| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 日韩伦理黄色片| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 中文字幕久久专区| 日本wwww免费看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 在线a可以看的网站| 精品一区在线观看国产| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产亚洲最大av| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| av在线播放精品| 少妇高潮的动态图| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 久久人人爽人人片av| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久久久久久久大av| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 午夜激情欧美在线| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 亚洲图色成人| xxx大片免费视频| 国产在线男女| 日本免费a在线| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 禁无遮挡网站| 亚洲精品视频女| 免费看日本二区| 精品久久久久久电影网| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 色综合站精品国产| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 熟女电影av网| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 九九在线视频观看精品| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 久久久国产一区二区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 欧美zozozo另类| 欧美区成人在线视频| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| eeuss影院久久| av在线老鸭窝| 乱人视频在线观看| 在线a可以看的网站| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 在线免费观看的www视频| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产探花极品一区二区| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| av播播在线观看一区| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 内射极品少妇av片p| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 1000部很黄的大片| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲国产av新网站| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 黄色日韩在线| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产成人精品一,二区| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 51国产日韩欧美| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 久久久成人免费电影| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 男人舔奶头视频| 亚洲图色成人| 亚洲最大成人av| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 在线免费十八禁| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 日本一本二区三区精品| 欧美另类一区| 大香蕉久久网| 在线 av 中文字幕| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| av网站免费在线观看视频 | 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 色网站视频免费| 人妻系列 视频| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产高潮美女av| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 一本一本综合久久| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 99久国产av精品| 少妇的逼好多水| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 简卡轻食公司| 久久这里只有精品中国| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲av.av天堂| 一级爰片在线观看| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 日本熟妇午夜| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 三级经典国产精品| 久久久久九九精品影院| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 午夜日本视频在线| 久热久热在线精品观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 国产淫语在线视频| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 男女那种视频在线观看| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 床上黄色一级片| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 日韩av免费高清视频| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 乱人视频在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 如何舔出高潮| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 人妻系列 视频| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 中文字幕制服av| 国产成人福利小说| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 亚洲av福利一区| 久久久久国产网址| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 热99在线观看视频| 久久久久久久久中文| 日本一二三区视频观看| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产av国产精品国产| 国产永久视频网站|