• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Depth of tumor invasion and tumor-occupied portions of stomach are predictive factors of intra-abdominal metastasis

    2017-07-18 11:01:15ZiyuLiZheminLiShuqinJiaZhaodeBuLianhaiZhangXiaojiangWuShuangxiLiFeiShanXinJiJiafuJi
    Chinese Journal of Cancer Research 2017年2期

    Ziyu Li, Zhemin Li, Shuqin Jia, Zhaode Bu, Lianhai Zhang, Xiaojiang Wu, Shuangxi Li, Fei Shan, Xin Ji, Jiafu Ji

    Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing),1Center of Gastrointestinal Surgery,2Center for Molecular Diagnostics, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China

    *These authors contributed equally to this work.

    Depth of tumor invasion and tumor-occupied portions of stomach are predictive factors of intra-abdominal metastasis

    Ziyu Li1*, Zhemin Li1*, Shuqin Jia2*, Zhaode Bu1, Lianhai Zhang1, Xiaojiang Wu1, Shuangxi Li1, Fei Shan1, Xin Ji1, Jiafu Ji1

    Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing),1Center of Gastrointestinal Surgery,2Center for Molecular Diagnostics, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China

    *These authors contributed equally to this work.

    Objective:Diagnostic laparoscopy is recommended for the pretherapeutic staging of gastric cancer to detect any unexpected or unconfirmed intra-abdominal metastasis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role and indications of diagnostic laparoscopy in the detection of intra-abdominal metastasis.

    Methods:Standard diagnostic laparoscopy with peritoneal cytology examination was performed prospectively on patients who were clinically diagnosed with primary local advanced gastric cancer (cT≥2M0). We calculated the rate of intra-abdominal metastases identified by diagnostic laparoscopy, and examined the relationship between peritoneal dissemination (P) and cytology results (CY). Split-sample method was applied to find clinical risk factors for intra-abdominal metastasis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis were performed in training set to find out risk factors of intra-abdominal metastasis, and then validate it in testing set.

    Results:Out of 249 cM0 patients, 51 (20.5%) patients with intra-abdominal metastasis were identified by diagnostic laparoscopy, including 20 (8.0%) P1CY1, 17 (6.8%) P0CY1 and 14 (5.6%) P1CY0 patients. In the training set, multivariate logistic regression analysis and ROC analysis showed that the depth of tumor invasion on computer tomography (CT) scan ≥21 mm and tumor-occupied ≥2 portions of stomach are predictive factors of metastasis. In the testing set, when diagnostic laparoscopy was performed on patients who had one or two of these risk factors, the sensitivity and positive predictive value for detecting intra-abdominal metastasis were 90.0% and 32.1%, respectively.

    Conclusions:According to our results, depth of tumor invasion and tumor-occupied portions of stomach are predictive factors of intra-abdominal metastasis.

    Gastric cancer; diagnostic laparoscopy; peritoneal dissemination; intra-peritoneal free cancer cells; pretherapeutic staging

    View this article at:https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2017.02.03

    Introduction

    Gastric cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide (1) and the third in China (2). Missed preoperative diagnosis of intra-abdominal metastases, including peritoneal dissemination and intraperitoneal free cancer cells, is among the leading cause of poor prognosis, surgical failure and futile laparotomy. Therefore, accurate preoperative staging, especially through improved diagnostic accuracy of peritoneal dissemination and intraperi-toneal free cancer cells, is particularly important for alternative treatment strategies and prognostic evaluations.

    As an alternative of laparotomy, diagnostic laparoscopy has been suggested to effectively detect peritoneal diseases and can be used to collect peritoneal lavage fluid for cytology examination with minimal invasion. However, diagnostic laparoscopy plays a currently undefined role in gastric cancer staging due to controversy regarding its indications. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend laparoscopic staging for patients with T3 and/or N+ if they are considered for surgical resection without preoperative therapy; European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines recommend laparoscopic staging for patients with IB-III gastric cancer; and Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) guidelines mention only laparoscopy prior to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (3-5). In China, most gastric cancer patients present with advanced disease stages; however, a consensus on the role of diagnostic laparoscopy still has not been established because of the lack of direct evidence (6).

    The aim of this study was to provide an assessment of the detection rate of intra-abdominal metastasis using diagnostic laparoscopy in gastric cancer patients, and investigate the clinical risk factors of intra-abdominal metastasis before exploratory operation to determine the indications of diagnostic laparoscopy for patients with gastric cancer in China.

    Materials and methods

    Design of study

    Between September 2011 and September 2013, a prospective study of pretherapeutic diagnostic laparoscopy was performed on consecutive gastric cancer patients in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery at the Peking University Cancer Hospital (Figure 1).

    Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled, and the following data were recorded: basic information, including age, gender, height, body weight and weight loss; and clinical information, including results of endoscopy, computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and result of blood test. More specifically, Borrmann type, proportion of the tumor in relation to circumference of the stomach (<1/4, 1/4 to <1/2, 1/2 to <3/4, and ≥3/4) and portions of stomach (cardia, fundus, body and antrum) were determined by endoscopy; T stage, N stage, tumor depth, basal diameter and basal area were from EUS; and serosal invasion, enlarged lymph node, and tumor depth were measured by CT. Tumor markers [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), CA72-4, and CA242] were determined by blood test.

    We adopted a CT criteria described by Jin Woong Kim to measure serosal invasion on CT. Specifically, when an irregular or nodular outer margin of the outer layer and/or a dense band-like perigastric fat infiltration was visualized, serosal invasion was suspected (7).

    Depth of invasion was measured using CT slices as shown inFigure 2. To maintain consistency of degree of distension, a gas distension method was used during CT scan (8).

    Measurement of the depth, the basal diameter and basal area are shown inFigure 3. Lymph nodes were considered positive for metastasis if they were equal to or larger than 8 mm in the short-axis diameter under EUS (9).

    Figure 1Basic algorithm for selection and treatment of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

    Figure 3Measurement of the depth, basal diameter and basal area using EUS. (A) Depth and basal diameter; (B) Basal area.

    Ethics approval

    This study is conducted in accordance with the“Declaration of Helsinki” and “Ethical Guidelines for Clinical Research”, and has been approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Peking University Cancer Hospital. Informed consent was obtained before surgery.

    Inclusion criteria&exclusion criteria

    The inclusion criteria included: 1) histologically confirmed diagnosis of primary gastric carcinoma; 2) abdominal enhanced spiral CT and EUS showed a clinical stage of cT2-4N0-3M0; 3) fit for radical gastrectomy or neoadjuvant treatment; and 4) agree to have diagnostic laparoscopy.

    The exclusion criteria included: 1) unfit for laparoscopic operation or general anesthesia (suspicious abdominal adhesions, severe cardiopulmonary disease, etc.); 2) underwent emergency surgery to relieve obstruction, bleeding or perforation; or 3) preoperative examination shows signs of metastasis, including peritoneal thickening, ascites, distant lymph node enlargement, etc.

    Laparoscopic staging technique

    Laparoscopy was performed under general anesthesia. The patient was placed in a supine position. A 10-mm disposable trocar (observing hole) was inserted into the sub-umbilicus, and a 30° telescope was used. Another 10-mm trocar and a 5-mm trocar (operating hole) were inserted into the right and left upper quadrants, respectively. Prior to any manipulation, 250 mL of warm normal saline was infused into the subphrenic space, subhepatic space, omentum, bilateral paracolic sulci and the pouch of Douglas. Care was taken to avoid direct contact of the irrigation with the primary tumor. At least 100 mL of fluid was aspirated from the subphrenic space, subhepatic space and pouch of Douglas. The fluid was immediately sent for centrifugation and cytological examination. Subsequently, a systematic inspection of the abdominal cavity was performed clockwise from the right quadrant. Any suspicious lesion was biopsied and sent for pathologic examination.

    Assessment of diagnostic laparoscopy and cytology results

    Patients without macroscopic peritoneal dissemination (P–) and with negative cytology results (CY–) were defined as having negative diagnostic laparoscopy results (DL–), which means there are no intra-abdominal metastases. And patients with peritoneal dissemination, which was confirmed by frozen pathology (P+) or free cancer cells in the peritoneal lavage (CY+), were defined as having positive diagnostic laparoscopy results (DL+).

    Data analysis

    To determine the clinical risk factors as predictors for gastric cancer patients with intra-abdominal metastasis before exploratory operation, a split-sample method was applied. The patient cohort was divided randomly into 2 groups: 3/4 for a training set and 1/4 for a testing set. In the training set, the clinical characteristics of the DL– and DL+ patients were compared using the independent samples groupt-test and Chi-squared test. To determine the risk factors, all variables found to be significant by univariate analysis were assessed by binary logistic regression analysis (method: Backward Wald, probability for stepwise: 0.5 for entry, 1.0 for removal). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were used to determine sensitivity, specificity and corresponding cut-off values of each factor. In the testing set, all patients were classified according to their number of risk factors determined by training set, and the sensitivity and specificity of different combinations of factors were calculated to predict the metastasis. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were carried out using the IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 20.0; IBM Corp., New York, USA).

    Results

    Patient characteristics

    From September 2011 to September 2013, 249 patients with histologically confirmed gastric carcinoma underwent diagnostic laparoscopy with peritoneal cytology examination as a routine pretreatment workup, 70.7% of whom are males, with a median age of 57.6 (range: 29–81) years. On the basis of CT and EUS findings, 13 (5.2%) patients were found to have clinical stage I disease, 64 (25.7%) were stage II disease, and 172 (69.1%) were stage III disease. For T stage, 15 (6.0%) patients were T2, 65 (26.1%) were T3 and 169 (67.9%) were T4. As for N stage, 53 (21.3%) patients were N0, and 196 (78.7%) were N+.

    Results of diagnostic laparoscopy

    From the diagnostic laparoscopy findings, 14 (5.6%) of the 249 patients had visible peritoneal dissemination only, which was confirmed by frozen pathology, 17 (6.8%) had free cancer cells in the peritoneal lavage only and 20 (8.0%) had both metastases. In total, 51 (20.5%) patients were DL+ and 198 were DL–. Among the DL+ patients, 42 underwent hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) followed by palliative chemotherapy after diagnostic laparoscopy, and 9 underwent palliative surgery. Among the DL– patients, 101 underwent radical D2 gastrectomy, and 97 underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

    Comparison of clinical characteristics

    The split sample method was used, and the 249 patients were divided into two sets using random sampling: 3/4 (187 patients) as a training set for developing predictive factors of metastasis and 1/4 (62 patients) as a testing set for validating these factors.

    The clinical characteristics were compared between the DL+ and DL– patients (Table 1). In the training set, 38 (20.3%) patients were DL+, and 149 patients were DL–. CA72-4 expression, proportion of the tumor in relation to the circumference of the stomach, tumor-occupied stomach portions, Borrmann type, depth of tumor invasion on CT and depth of tumor invasion on EUS were found to be significant in our univariate analyses. Next, all these factors were evaluated by multivariate analysis. Among these factors, multivariate analysis indicated that the depth of tumor invasion on CT scan and tumor-occupied stomach portions are predictive factors of metastasis (Table 2).

    From an ROC curve (Figure 4, 5andTable 3), the highest Youden index (0.217 and 0.270, respectively) was obtained when the depth of tumor invasion on CT was cut off at 21 mm (AUC: 0.668, P<0.01) and tumor-occupying portions of the stomach were cut off between 1 and ≥2 (AUC: 0.676, P<0.01).

    In the testing set, 55 patients (among 62 patients) with complete clinical data included 10 (18.2%) DL+ patients and 45 DL– patients. All these patients were classified according to their number of independent risk factors for a DL+ status: 27 had no risk factors, 22 had only one risk factor and 6 had two risk factors. When the patients were divided into groups by those with no risk factors and those with at least one risk factor, the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) for detecting intra-abdominal metastasis were 90.0% and 32.1%, respectively. When the patients were divided into groups by those with no risk factors or only one risk factor and those with two risk factors, the sensitivity and PPV were 40.0% and 66.7%, respectively (Table 4).

    Discussion

    The highest rates of gastric cancer in the world occur in Eastern Asia, and China accounts for approximately 40% of the worldwide gastric cancer burden. The modern treatment modality for gastric cancer involves comprehensive treatment guided by staging. Thus, the accuracy of clinical staging is crucial. In the present study, 20.5% of cM0 gastric cancer patients were identified to have peritoneal dissemination or free cancer cells by diagnostic laparoscopy. This finding suggests that pretherapeutic diagnostic laparoscopy with cytology examination should be strongly recommended for gastric cancer patients, especially those with related risk factors.

    Sarelaet al. (10) performed diagnostic laparoscopy on 657 patients with minimal symptoms and no definite M1 disease, and M1 disease was detected in 23% of patients with this method. In this study, only 65 patients were examined by high-quality spiral CT scans for staging. Although all the patients were examined by high-quality spiral CT scans in our study, the metastasis detection rate was not much different. Therefore, diagnostic laparoscopy cannot be replaced by high-quality imaging techniques. Kaiseret al. (11-13) also reported similar metastasis detection rates for resectable M0 gastric cancer patients (20.6%, 24.7% and 23.0%, respectively). It is widely accepted that peritoneal dissemination spreads from thetumor to the serosa, but in our 51 DL+ patients, we also found 2 cT2N0 patients who had free cancer cells, 3 cT3N0 patients who had free cancer cells and 2 cT3N0 patients who had visible peritoneal dissemination.

    Table 1 Clinicopathologic features of DL+ and DL– patients (univariate analysis, training set)

    Table 1(continued)

    Table 2 Predictive factors of metastasis (multivariate analysis, training set)

    Figure 4ROC for the prediction of intra-abdominal metastasis by the depth of tumor invasion found by CT scans.

    Figure 5ROC for the prediction of intra-abdominal metastasis by the tumor occupying portions of stomach.

    Table 4 Indications for diagnostic laparoscopy based on the number of independent risk factors (testing set) (%)

    Compared with laparotomy, laparoscopy has various advantages. Tsuchidaet al. (14) and Osorioet al. (13) reviewed patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy and laparotomy in the same period, respectively, and showed that there was no significant difference in the rate of intra-abdominal metastasis (45.2%vs. 35.5%, P=0.299; 20.6%vs. 20.8%, P=0.977). Haoet al. (15) demonstrated that the collection of peritoneal lavage fluid for cytology during laparoscopy has the same value as its collection during laparotomy. Osorioet al. (13) compared the results of patients who underwent either diagnostic laparoscopy or laparotomy and were not submitted to any additional surgical procedure due to intra-abdominal spread. The patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy had a lower morbidity (11.8%vs. 50.0%), lower mortality (0%vs. 16.7%), shorter hospital stay (6.3 dvs. 15.3 d), greater chance for recovery until fit for chemotherapy (64.7%vs. 33.3%) and longer survival (11.6 monthsvs. 4.8 months). Consequently, diagnostic laparoscopy and laparotomy exploration have similar contributions to the assessment of intra-abdominal metastasis and peritoneal lavage cytology. However, in diagnostic laparoscopy, the entire abdominal cavity can be magnified and easily accessed. Thus, it is easier to find any tiny peritoneal nodules that are located in the subphrenic space or pouch of Douglas’, areas that are difficult to evaluate even by laparotomy.

    However, a low detection rate is a problem for diagnostic laparoscopy. From our present results, almost 80% of cases would be expected to have a negative examination. Researchers are trying to identify proper indications to narrow the potential candidates for diagnostic laparoscopy.

    Sarelaet al. (10) reported that tumor location [gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) or whole stomach] and a lymphadenopathy of ≥1 cm were independent, significant risk factors for M1, and M1 was not detected in any patient with neither risk factor. Tsuchidaet al. (14) reported that tumor location involving three stomach portions; macroscopic types 3, 4 or 5; and positive lymph node metastasis to all three factors are significantly correlated with either peritoneal metastasis or positive cytology. Our study also found similar risk factors: tumor-occupied ≥2 portions of stomach and depth of tumor invasion on CT ≥21 mm (measurements of stomach wall thickness were made when the stomach was well distended during the CT scan). Kuritaet al. (16) also showed similar results in their study of 236 gastric cancer patients. In our testing set, only one M1 disease was detected in patients with neither risk factor. For the patients who had at least one of these two identified independent risk factors, the sensitivity, PPV and negative predictive value were 90.0%, 32.1% and 96.3%, respectively. According to these results, if we performed diagnostic laparoscopy with cytology examination for the selected patients according to the risk factors, the detection rate would be increased by up to 10%, and only approximately 2% of patients would be missed in preoperative diagnosis of intra-abdominal metastases. However, we continue to recommend diagnostic laparoscopy with cytology examination for all advanced gastric cancer patients.

    Another critical problem is the lack of an accepted treatment protocol after diagnostic laparoscopy. We now have a multimodal therapy plan that includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and HIPEC. Therefore, the request for improvement in the accuracy of treatment has been met. In our study, we choseHIPEC and systemic chemotherapy to treat the patients with peritoneal dissemination or free cancer cells in the peritoneal lavage. Seven of the 10 patients showed a negative metastasis after this preoperative treatment and then underwent gastrectomy. Nakagawaet al. (17) reported that preoperative chemotherapy induced the downstaging of gastric cancer in 11 (61.1%) of the 18 patients in their study, with positive cytology from diagnostic laparoscopy. Several studies (17-19) used diagnostic laparoscopy as a staging procedure prior to considering patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation. The selection of patients, proper treatment regimens, combination treatments with or without intraperitoneal chemotherapy and the type of surgery after chemotherapy remain controversial. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC are indicated for gastric cancer with peritoneal disease that is completely or significantly resectable (20). Staging laparoscopy is very useful in detecting unsuspected peritoneal seeding and in differentiating between localized peritoneal seeding and disseminated carcinomatosis. In Japan and Korea, CRS and HIPEC are used with palliative or curative intent and for prophylactic treatment in gastric cancer patients (21). However, the treatment of carcinomatosis from gastric cancer by peritonectomy and HIPEC has globally demonstrated worse long-term results than the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from other cancers (22).

    Conclusions

    Our preliminary data suggest that diagnostic laparoscopy is necessary for the clinical diagnosis of gastric cancer patients. Depth of tumor invasion and tumor-occupied portions of stomach are predictive factors of intraabdominal metastasis.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by grants supporting the research program of early diagnosis, standardized treatment and therapy effect evaluation of gastric cancer (No. D141100000414004) from Beijing Ministry of Science and Technology.

    Footnote

    Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

    1.Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136:E359-86.

    2.Chen W, Zheng R, Zuo T, et al. National cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2012. Chin J Cancer Res 2016;28:1-11.

    3.Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 2011;14:113-23.

    4.Zheng Y, Xu D, Bu Z. Chinese version of NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology officially authorized by NCCN. Chin J Cancer Res 2016;28:144-5.

    5.Waddell T, Verheij M, Allum W, et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2013;24 Suppl 6:vi57-63.

    6.Li Z, Ji J. Application of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer. Ann Transl Med 2015;3:126.

    7.Kim JW, Shin SS, Heo SH, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-section CT using CT gastrography in preoperative T staging of gastric cancer according to 7th edition of AJCC cancer staging manual. Eur Radiol 2012;22:654-62.

    8.Park HS, Lee JM, Kim SH, et al. Three-dimensional MDCT for preoperative local staging of gastric cancer using gas and water distention methods: a retrospective cohort study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:1316-23.

    9.Hwang SW, Lee DH, Lee SH, et al. Preoperative staging of gastric cancer by endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector-row computed tomography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;25:512-8.

    10.Sarela AI, Lefkowitz R, Brennan MF, et al. Selection of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma for laparoscopic staging. Am J Surg 2006;191:134-8.

    11.Kaiser GM, Sotiropoulos GC, Frühauf NR, et al. Value of staging laparoscopy for multimodal therapy planning in esophago-gastric cancer. Int Surg 2007;92:128-32.

    12.Nath J, Moorthy K, Taniere P, et al. Peritoneal lavage cytology in patients with oesophagogastricadenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2008;95:721-6.

    13.Osorio J, Rodríguez-Santiago J, Mu?oz E, et al. Outcome of unresected gastric cancer after laparoscopic diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Clin Transl Oncol 2008;10:294-7.

    14.Tsuchida K, Yoshikawa T, Tsuburaya A, et al. Indications for staging laparoscopy in clinical T4M0 gastric cancer. World J Surg 2011;35:2703-9.

    15.Hao YX, Yu PW, Qian F. Changes of peritoneal free gastric cancer cells and its significance in patients after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi (in Chinese) 2008;46:1784-9.

    16.Kurita N, Shimada M, Utsunomiya T, et al. Predictive factors of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2010;57:980-3.

    17.Nakagawa S, Nashimoto A, Yabusaki H. Role of staging laparoscopy with peritoneal lavage cytology in the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2007;10:29-34.

    18.Badgwell B, Cormier JN, Krishnan S, et al. Does neoadjuvant treatment for gastric cancer patients with positive peritoneal cytology at staging laparoscopy improve survival? Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:2684-91.

    19.Power DG, Schattner MA, Gerdes H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound can improve the selection for laparoscopy in patients with localized gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2009;208:173-8.

    20.Roviello F, Caruso S, Marrelli D, et al. Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: state of the art and future developments. Surg Oncol 2011;20:e38-54.

    21.Glehen O, Mohamed F, Gilly FN. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from digestive tract cancer: new management by cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia. Lancet Oncol 2004;5:219-28.

    22.Stewart JH 4th, Shen P, Levine EA. Intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy for peritoneal surface malignancy: current status and future directions. Ann Surg Oncol 2005;12:765-77.

    Cite this article as:Li Z, Li Z, Jia S, Bu Z, Zhang L, Wu X, Li S, Shan F, Ji X, Ji J. Depth of tumor invasion and tumoroccupied portions of stomach are predictive factors of intraabdominal metastasis. Chin J Cancer Res 2017;29(2):109-117. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2017.02.03

    10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2017.02.03

    Jiafu Ji, MD, PhD. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Center of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China. Email: jijiafu@hsc.pku.edu.cn.

    Submitted Jul 12, 2016. Accepted for publication Feb 23, 2017.

    亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 性欧美人与动物交配| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产不卡一卡二| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 国产成人aa在线观看| a级毛片a级免费在线| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 一本久久中文字幕| 色综合站精品国产| 亚洲全国av大片| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 久久香蕉激情| 大型av网站在线播放| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 91老司机精品| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 成人av在线播放网站| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 美女黄网站色视频| 久久精品人妻少妇| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 日韩高清综合在线| 香蕉av资源在线| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 午夜两性在线视频| 丁香六月欧美| 国产69精品久久久久777片 | 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| or卡值多少钱| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 日本三级黄在线观看| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 久久久久久大精品| 99re在线观看精品视频| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| www.www免费av| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 精品第一国产精品| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 午夜激情av网站| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 1024视频免费在线观看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 成年版毛片免费区| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 麻豆av在线久日| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 1024视频免费在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 午夜精品在线福利| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 久久这里只有精品中国| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 午夜久久久久精精品| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 深夜精品福利| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 日本一本二区三区精品| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 岛国在线观看网站| 成人国语在线视频| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 一级黄色大片毛片| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 久久伊人香网站| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 一级片免费观看大全| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 露出奶头的视频| 此物有八面人人有两片| 一本综合久久免费| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 成在线人永久免费视频| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 久久中文看片网| 悠悠久久av| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 九色国产91popny在线| 日韩有码中文字幕| 久久精品影院6| 国产三级在线视频| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 香蕉丝袜av| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 国产不卡一卡二| 亚洲色图av天堂| 男女那种视频在线观看| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| av福利片在线观看| 亚洲avbb在线观看| x7x7x7水蜜桃| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 成人精品一区二区免费| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 制服诱惑二区| 日韩欧美免费精品| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 中文字幕久久专区| 1024手机看黄色片| 亚洲国产欧美人成| a级毛片a级免费在线| 国产精品影院久久| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 国产精品九九99| 久久热在线av| 欧美色视频一区免费| av在线播放免费不卡| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 国产1区2区3区精品| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 男人舔奶头视频| 国产免费男女视频| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 在线观看www视频免费| 香蕉久久夜色| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| av有码第一页| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 岛国在线观看网站| 香蕉久久夜色| 久久热在线av| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 午夜激情av网站| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产成人影院久久av| 1024香蕉在线观看| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 免费高清视频大片| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 亚洲五月天丁香| 九色成人免费人妻av| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 成年免费大片在线观看| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| or卡值多少钱| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 午夜影院日韩av| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 手机成人av网站| 成年版毛片免费区| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 不卡一级毛片| av中文乱码字幕在线| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 久久中文字幕一级| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 免费观看精品视频网站| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 在线观看www视频免费| 精品久久久久久,| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 97碰自拍视频| 成人三级黄色视频| 日本 av在线| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品 | 亚洲黑人精品在线| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| avwww免费| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 久久精品成人免费网站| 88av欧美| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 成人国语在线视频| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 日本免费a在线| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 一级毛片精品| 国产99白浆流出| 在线视频色国产色| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 免费看a级黄色片| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 国产精品,欧美在线| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产黄片美女视频| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 91大片在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美98| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| www.精华液| 亚洲av熟女| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 舔av片在线| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| av欧美777| av欧美777| videosex国产| 国产精品一及| 在线免费观看的www视频| 日本 av在线| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 中文字幕高清在线视频| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 久久久国产成人免费| 九色成人免费人妻av| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 99热这里只有是精品50| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 十八禁网站免费在线| 在线免费观看的www视频| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 精品日产1卡2卡| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 九色国产91popny在线| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看 | 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 一本久久中文字幕| 国产真实乱freesex| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 制服诱惑二区| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 亚洲国产欧美网| 日本熟妇午夜| 美女大奶头视频| 香蕉丝袜av| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产1区2区3区精品| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 不卡一级毛片| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 午夜免费激情av| 99国产精品99久久久久| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 91成年电影在线观看| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 免费在线观看日本一区| 91在线观看av| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 久久草成人影院| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 正在播放国产对白刺激| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 一本一本综合久久| x7x7x7水蜜桃| av视频在线观看入口| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 午夜激情av网站| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| www国产在线视频色| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国产单亲对白刺激| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 久久这里只有精品中国| 俺也久久电影网| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 成人18禁在线播放| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| av在线播放免费不卡| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 18禁观看日本| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 一区福利在线观看| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 日本 av在线| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 日本a在线网址| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 999精品在线视频| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 操出白浆在线播放| 久久久久久久久中文| 丁香欧美五月| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品 | 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 天堂动漫精品| 国产精华一区二区三区| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 国产精品影院久久| 亚洲无线在线观看| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 成在线人永久免费视频| 国产片内射在线| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 999久久久国产精品视频| 69av精品久久久久久| 欧美3d第一页| 精品国产亚洲在线| 久久香蕉国产精品| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 亚洲五月天丁香| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 在线看三级毛片| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 中文资源天堂在线| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 精品日产1卡2卡| 久久久久久人人人人人| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 热99re8久久精品国产| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 亚洲国产欧美网| 99re在线观看精品视频| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 精品福利观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 国产精品影院久久| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 午夜福利高清视频| 国产精品,欧美在线| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 禁无遮挡网站| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 成人三级黄色视频| bbb黄色大片| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 日本一本二区三区精品| 午夜影院日韩av| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 亚洲中文av在线| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 国产99白浆流出| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 特级一级黄色大片| 不卡一级毛片| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 成在线人永久免费视频| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 久久久国产成人免费| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 久久精品成人免费网站| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 俺也久久电影网| 精品国产亚洲在线| 一本一本综合久久| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 日本一本二区三区精品| av欧美777| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 国产精品永久免费网站| 午夜福利在线在线| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 久久热在线av| 日本五十路高清| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 男人舔奶头视频| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 两个人的视频大全免费| 天天添夜夜摸| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 日本五十路高清| 在线观看日韩欧美| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国产av又大|