黃欣欣
(南京市婦幼保健院,江蘇 南京 210001)
羊水栓塞的研究進(jìn)展
黃欣欣
(南京市婦幼保健院,江蘇 南京 210001)
羊水栓塞是一種罕見且危重的產(chǎn)科并發(fā)癥,由羊水成分進(jìn)入母體循環(huán)造成。其典型癥狀為分娩時或產(chǎn)后突發(fā)的低氧血癥,低血壓或DIC等,發(fā)生羊水栓塞的孕產(chǎn)婦死亡率極高,主要死亡原因?yàn)榇蟪鲅?、休克、呼吸循環(huán)功能衰竭等。羊水栓塞主要依據(jù)典型臨床表現(xiàn)和排他法進(jìn)行診斷,確診則依賴肺血管內(nèi)檢測到羊水有形成分。羊水栓塞的病理生理機(jī)制尚未完全明確。研究已證實(shí)其發(fā)病機(jī)制不僅是肺循環(huán)機(jī)械性阻塞,全身免疫性炎癥反應(yīng)激活才是多臟器功能損傷的主要原因。本文將通過綜述病理學(xué)研究闡述羊水栓塞發(fā)病的病理生理機(jī)制。
羊水栓塞;研究;產(chǎn)科并發(fā)癥
羊水栓塞(Amnionic fluide mbolism,AFE)是分娩過程中羊水成分進(jìn)入母體循環(huán)引發(fā)的低氧血癥、低血壓、彌散性血管內(nèi)凝血(Disseminated intravascular coagulation,DIC)、臟器衰竭等一系列病理改變的產(chǎn)科并發(fā)癥。盡管產(chǎn)婦圍產(chǎn)期死亡率逐年下降,但AFE相關(guān)死亡率依然很高。發(fā)達(dá)國家AFE相關(guān)死亡率為0.5~1.7人/10萬人次分娩,發(fā)展中國家則高達(dá)1.8~5.9人/10萬人次分娩,發(fā)生AFE的產(chǎn)婦病亡率達(dá)到24%~80%[1]。
羊水栓塞的概念1926年由J.R.Meyer首次提出[2],1941年Steiner通過產(chǎn)婦肺部尸檢病理發(fā)現(xiàn),羊水成分機(jī)械性阻塞肺小動脈和毛細(xì)血管,奠定了AFE的診斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[3],但該診斷指標(biāo)存在爭議?!皺C(jī)械性梗阻學(xué)說”無法解釋AFE所有臨床表現(xiàn),正常產(chǎn)婦肺循環(huán)內(nèi)亦可檢測到羊水成分,而約1.4% AFE產(chǎn)婦肺循環(huán)內(nèi)未檢測到羊水成分。動物研究發(fā)現(xiàn),將大量羊水注入懷孕獼猴血循環(huán)內(nèi)并未發(fā)生AFE系列癥狀[4-5]。因此,AFE被認(rèn)為是一種全身免疫性炎癥反應(yīng),學(xué)者提出AFE應(yīng)該被稱為“妊娠過敏樣綜合征”[6],其發(fā)病需要兩個必要條件:(1)羊水成分進(jìn)入母體循環(huán);(2)羊水成分造成嚴(yán)重肺栓塞或誘發(fā)母體過敏樣反應(yīng)。
目前可將AFE分為兩型:心肺塌陷型和DIC型。心肺塌陷型僅占10%~15%,由胎兒成分進(jìn)入母體造成肺血管機(jī)械性阻塞,引起血流動力學(xué)障礙[7]。傳統(tǒng)病理診斷方式確診的AFE,屬于心肺塌陷型。阿利新藍(lán)與粘蛋白反應(yīng)也被用于檢測羊水有形成分;或胎兒鱗狀細(xì)胞成分角蛋白AE1/AE3染色和胎糞Zncp-1染色[8-9]。除了胎兒成分染色,可利用免疫組化進(jìn)行肺、子宮組織內(nèi)補(bǔ)體C5a受體染色以及肥大細(xì)胞檢測[8-10],證明補(bǔ)體活化和器官的過敏反應(yīng),即使少量羊水進(jìn)入肺循環(huán)也會出現(xiàn)AFE臨床特征的過敏反應(yīng),進(jìn)一步證實(shí)AFE是全身免疫性炎癥反應(yīng)的診斷。DIC型是由于過敏性反應(yīng)導(dǎo)致肺血管痙攣,活化白細(xì)胞、補(bǔ)體和血小板,被認(rèn)為是與羊水成分無關(guān)的病理狀態(tài)。通過檢測子宮血管內(nèi)胎兒成分認(rèn)為,DIC型AFE造成的低凝狀態(tài)和繼發(fā)性宮縮乏力,是部分病因不明的產(chǎn)后出血的主要因素[11-12]。上述病例中,肉眼見明顯水腫的子宮,鏡下見羊水成分進(jìn)入子宮組織內(nèi)引發(fā)過敏反應(yīng)正是導(dǎo)致子宮水腫的原因[7]。子宮血管內(nèi)阿利新藍(lán)染色可檢測到粘蛋白成分和胎糞衍生物Zncp-1[7],子宮肌層中免疫組化檢測到CD88+間質(zhì)干細(xì)胞、彈性蛋白酶陽性中性粒細(xì)胞、CD68+巨噬細(xì)胞數(shù)均增加,這與子宮間質(zhì)水腫和肌層腫脹有關(guān),預(yù)示著宮縮乏力與補(bǔ)體活化和炎癥激活相關(guān)[13]。羊水或胎兒成分觸發(fā)補(bǔ)體活化或非免疫介導(dǎo)的肥大細(xì)胞脫顆粒,子宮肌層內(nèi)的被激活的炎癥細(xì)胞、肥大細(xì)胞釋放大量的組胺、緩激肽、炎癥因子如白細(xì)胞介素-8,和促凝物質(zhì)導(dǎo)致內(nèi)皮細(xì)胞激活和大量的炎癥反應(yīng),最終使得子宮肌肉放松,變得水腫,導(dǎo)致子宮肌層的收縮失同步[14-16]。
AFE作為產(chǎn)科急危重癥,起病急、可迅速進(jìn)展導(dǎo)致凝血功能異常及全身多臟器功能衰竭,呈不可逆發(fā)展。羊水成分主要見于肺血循環(huán)內(nèi),其次為子宮肌層靜脈內(nèi)。AFE臨床表現(xiàn)更類似于栓塞和過敏反應(yīng)。組織病理檢測雖然是最可靠的診斷方法,但這僅是AFE診斷的必要條件之一,另一個必要條件是局部AFE的非特異性反應(yīng),產(chǎn)婦胎兒抗原與母胎生理屏障的破壞可能會導(dǎo)致急性炎癥反應(yīng)引起的促炎癥介質(zhì)激活。因此為AFE的免疫機(jī)制的假說提供科學(xué)依據(jù),開展新的實(shí)驗(yàn)室研究是有必要的,有待更深入的臨床與實(shí)驗(yàn)研究。
[1]Fong A, Chau CT, Pan D, et al. Amniotic fl uidemblism: antepartum,intrapartum and demographic factors. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2015,28:793-798.
[2]Meyer JR. Embolia pulmonar amnio caseosa. Bra Med,1926,2:301-303.
[3]Steiner PE, Lushbaugh CC. Landmark article, Oct. 1941: Maternal pulmonary embolism by amniotic fl uid as a cause of obstetric shock and unexpected deaths in obstetrics. JAMA,1986,255(16):2187.
[4]Adamsons K, Mueller E, Myers RE, et al. The innocuousness of amniotic fl uid infusion in the pregnant rhesus monkey. Am J Obstet Gynecol,1971,109:977-984.
[5]Stolte L, van Kessel H, Seelen J. Failure to produce the syndrome of amniotic fl uid embolism by infusion of amniotic fl uid and meconium into monkeys. Am J Obstet Gynecol,1967,98:694-697.
[6]Turillazzi E, Neri M, Bello S. Amnioticfluid embolism: moving diagnosis through the time. From the mechanical pulmonary vascular occlusion until an immuno-in fl ammatory pathogenesis? Curr Pharm Biotechnol,2014,14:1179-1188.
[7]Kanayama N, Tamura N. Amniotic fl uidembolism: Pathophysiology and new strategies for management. J Obstet Gynaecol Res,2014,40:1507-1517.
[8]Fineschi V, Riezzo I, Cantatore S, et al. Complement C3a expression and tryptase degranulation as promising histopathological tests for diagnosing fatal amniotic fluid embolism. Virchows Arch,2009,454:283-290.
[9]Fineschi V, Gambassi R, Gherardi M, et al. The diagnosis of amniotic fl uid embolism: an immunohistochemical study for the quanti fi cation of pulmonary mast cell tryptase. Int J Leg Med,1998,111:238-243.
[10]Farhana M, Tamura N, Mukai M, et al. Histological characteristics of the myometrium in the postpartum hemorrhage of unknown etiology: a possible involvement of local immune reactions. J Reprod Immunol,2015,110:74-80.
[11]Courtney LD. Amniotic fluid embolism. Obstet Gynecol Surv,1974,29:169-177.
[12]Matsuda Y, Kamitomo M. Amniotic fl uid embolism: a comparison between patients who survived and those who died. J Int Med Res,2009,37:1515-1521.
[13]Tamura N, Nagai H, Maeda H, et al. Amniotic fluid embolism induces uterine anaphylaxis and atony following cervical laceration.Gynecol Obstet Invest,2014,78:65-68.
[14]Benson MD. A hypothesis regarding complement activation and amniotic fl uid embolism. Med Hypotheses,2007,68:1019-1025.
[15]Benson MD. Current concepts of immunology and diagnosis in amniotic fl uid embolism. Clin Dev Immunol,2012,2012:946576.
[16]Chen KB, Chang SS, Tseng YL, et al. Amniotic fluid induces platelet-neutrophil aggregation and neutrophil activation. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2013,208(4):318.e1-7.
R2714.46
B
ISSN.2096-2479.2017.44.183.02
本文編輯:張 鈺