• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Disability, psychiatric symptoms, and quality of life in infertile women: a cross-sectional study in Turkey

    2016-12-08 11:19:56HacerSEZGINCicekHOCAOGLUEmineSedaGUVENDAGGUVEN
    上海精神醫(yī)學(xué) 2016年2期
    關(guān)鍵詞:橫斷面精神病土耳其

    Hacer SEZGIN, Cicek HOCAOGLU*, Emine Seda GUVENDAG-GUVEN

    Disability, psychiatric symptoms, and quality of life in infertile women: a cross-sectional study in Turkey

    Hacer SEZGIN1, Cicek HOCAOGLU2,*, Emine Seda GUVENDAG-GUVEN3

    infertility; quality of life; disability; psychiatric symptoms; cross-sectional study; Turkey

    1. Introduction

    Infertility, defined as the failure to become pregnant despite regular sexual intercourse for one year, affects 10-15% of couples in the reproductive age group (18-45 years of age).[1]It often results in substantial negative social and psychological effects for the affected couple,particularly the woman.[2-4]There are many studies about the etiology and treatment of infertility[5-7]but relatively few about the psychological and social effects of infertility.

    One study of 112 women being treated for infertility in Taiwan[8]reported that 23% met diagnostic criteria for an anxiety disorder, 17% for major depressive disorder, and 10% for dysthymic disorder; thus over 40%had one of these common mental disorders, a much higher prevalence than the 10% to 12% reported in the general population. Nationally representative studies of community-dwelling women in the United States,[9]and in Finland[10]reported that infertility was associated with high rates of anxiety symptoms.

    Social factors influence attitudes about infertility and the lived experience of persons who are infertile.Thus, it is reasonable to expect that the prevalence of mental disorders in individuals with infertility will vary cross-culturally. The aim of this study was to compare the severity of anxiety, depression, and diminished quality of life between married women from one urban center in Turkey seeking treatment for infertility with that of fertile married women from the same community who are matched for age.

    2. Methods

    2.1. Participants

    As shown in Figure 1, this study enrolled married women treated in the outpatient clinic of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Rize Training and Research Hospital who had a diagnosis of infertility between March and September 2011.Participants met the following criteria: (a) 18 to 50 years of age; (b) currently married; (c) residents of Rize; (d) able to read at a level that made it possible to complete the questionnaires used in the study; (e)not menopausal; (f) did not have mental retardation,dementia, a psychotic disorder, or a history of substance abuse; (g) had not used psychoactive medication in the prior 3 months; and (h) provided written informed consent to participate in the study. The control group were healthy fertile women who were currently married and residents of Rize; they were identified from among hospital workers and relatives of the enrolled patients,matched for age with the identified patients, and provided written informed consent to participate in the study.

    2.2. Measurements

    All participants were administered a comprehensive demographic data form by the researcher, and selfcompleted three scales: the Turkish versions of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS),[11]the Brief Disability Questionnaire (BDQ),[12]and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36).[13]

    Figure 1. Flowchart of the study

    2.2.1 The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)[14]is a 14-item scale (7 about anxiety and 7 about depression)scored on 4-point Likert scales (ranging from 0 to 3)that assesses the severity of depressive and anxiety symptoms in the prior week. The total score for each of the two subscales, respectively) ranges from 0 to 21,with higher scores representing more severe depression or anxiety. Based on studies with the Turkish version of the scale,[11]individuals with scores of 8 or above on the depression subscale have clinically significant depression and individuals with scores of 11 or more on the anxiety subscale have clinically significant anxiety.

    2.2.2 The Brief Disability Questionnaire

    The Brief Disability Questionnaire (BDQ) is composed of 11 items about physical and social deficits in the prior month that were originally part of the MOS Short Form General Health Survey.[15]Items are scored on 3-point Likert scales (0 to 2), so the range in scores is from 0 to 22 with higher scores representing greater deficits:scores of 0 to 4 are classified as ‘no deficit’, 5 to 7 as ‘mild deficit’, 8 to 12 as ‘moderate deficit’, and 13 or higher as‘severe deficit’. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of BDQ have been assessed.[12]

    2.2.3 The Short Form Health Survey

    The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)[15]is a selfcompletion scale developed by the Rand Corporation to assess quality of life. The 36 items are subdivided into 8 subscales that assess physical functioning, physical role performance, pain, general health, vitality (energy),social functioning, emotional role-performance, and mental health. The crude subscale scores are converted to 0-to-100 point scales with higher scores representing better health status. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the scale has been assessed previously.[18]

    2.3 Statistical Analysis

    Data were assessed using the SPSS v16.0 statistical package. Demographic variables and the outcomes of the three clinical self-report scales used in the study in the infertile and fertile groups were compared using Chi-square tests for dichotomous variables, Mann-Whitney U tests for ranked variables, and t-tests for continuous variables from normal populations. Within the infertile group, the relationship of the demographic characteristics of the individuals with the outcomes of the three scales were assessed using correlation coefficients (for continuous variables), Chi-square tests,and the Mann-Whitney U test.

    The conduct of this study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee in the Faculty of Medicine at Recep Tayyip Erdogan University.

    3. Results

    In total, 100 infertile women and 100 healthy volunteers completed the study. Table 1 compares the demographic characteristics of the two groups. There were no significant differences in the level of education or family income between the infertile and fertile women, in the proportion who were currently employed, or in the proportions who reported a personal or family history of psychiatric treatment. The range in age of individuals in the infertile group was 21 to 47 and that of individuals in the control group was 22 to 52. The mean (sd) age of individuals in the infertile group was 29.7 (5.6) years and that in the fertile control group was 30.7 (5.5) years(t=1.27, p=0.204). There was, however, a significant difference in the duration of marriage between groups:the infertile group had been married for an average of 9.3 (6.3) years while the healthy control group had only been married for an average of 6.4 (3.4) years(t=4.05, p<0.001). Among the 8 women in the infertile group with a history of psychiatric illness, 5 had had major depression, 2 panic disorder, and 1 somatization disorder; the 11 women in the healthy control group with a history of a psychiatric disorder included 6 who had had major depression, 3 with generalized anxiety disorder, 2 with adjustment disorder, and 1 with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Comparison of the anxiety and depression subscale scores of the HADS, BDQ total scores, and SF-36 subscale scores between the two groups is shown in Table 2. The mean level of self-reported anxiety and depressive symptoms over the prior week was not significantly different between the two groups. However,the proportion of subjects who had clinically significant anxiety (i.e., HADS anxiety subscale score >11) was significantly higher in the infertile group than in the control group (31% v. 17%, X2=5.37, p=0.020) and the proportion who had clinically significant depression (i.e.,HADS depression subscale score >8) was also higher (but not significantly higher) in the infertile group than in the control group (43% v. 33%, X2=2.12, p=0.145).

    The severity of self-reported disability was significantly greater among infertile patients than among the fertile controls. The proportion of respondents in the infertile group classified as ‘no disability’, ‘mild’disability’, ‘moderate disability’ and ‘severe disability’were 5%, 15%, 63%, and 17%, respectively; the corresponding proportions in the fertile control group were 39%, 39%, 20% and 2%, respectively. (Z-value for the Mann-Whitney rank test=7.82, p<0.001).Comparison of the scores of the various measures assessed by the SF-36 show that 4 of the 8 subscales –general health, vitality, social functioning, and mental health – were significantly worse in the infertile group.

    Table 3 shows the association between different demographic characteristics of the infertile patients and the severity of their depressive and anxiety symptoms,their self-reported level of disability, and their scores on the four SF-36 subscales in which the infertilepatients were functioning at significantly lower levels than controls. There were several significant findings.AGE: somewhat unexpectedly, within this group of infertile women, self-reported disability decreased with age. EDUCATION: higher education was significantly associated with decreased self-reported depression and anxiety, and poorer self-reported social functioning.INCOME: higher family income was associated with less severe self-reported depression and anxiety, and better self-reported general health. DURATION OF MARRIAGE:infertile women married for less than 5 years reported significantly greater disability over the prior month than infertile women married for 5 years or more. CURRENT EMPLOYMENT: compared to employed infertile women,unemployed infertile women had less severe depressive and anxiety symptoms and reported better general health, vitality, and mental health. Neither a HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC ILLNESS nor a FAMILY HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC ILLNESS were significantly related to any of the outcome variables.

    Table 1. Comparison of socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of infertile female patients and healthy,fertile controls

    Table 2. Mean (sd) scores from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Brief Disability Questionnaire (BDQ), and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) of 100 infertile female patients and 100 fertile controls from Turkey

    Table 3. Association of demographic variables and scores of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales(HAD-D, HAD-A), the Brief Disability Questionnaire (BDQ), and three subscale scores of the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in 100 infertile female outpatients in Turkey

    4. Discussion

    4.1 Main findings

    Both self-report depressive symptoms and self-report anxiety symptoms on the HADS were more severe in infertile women than in fertile women, but the difference was not statistically significant for depressive symptoms and only statistically significant for anxiety symptoms when results were dichotomized into those with and without ‘clinically significant anxiety’.Infertile women reported greater disability on the BDQ and poorer functioning on 4 of the 8 components of quality of life assessed by the SF-36. We also found that compared to infertile women who were not employed,those that were employed reported more severe symptoms of depression and anxiety, greater disability,and poorer quality of life.

    In Turkey, infertile women who are not able to bear children are marginalized in the society and often harshly criticized by their husbands and inlaws. This environment would reasonably be expected to negatively affect the emotional status of infertile women, and, thus, lead to an increased prevalence of common mental disorders, such as depression or anxiety. Most international studies[8,9,16-19]support this hypothesized causal link between a chronic psychosocial stressor and emotional dysregulation: they report a significantly higher severity of depressive and anxiety symptoms and a significantly higher prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders among infertile women than among fertile women. There are, however,exceptions: similar to the results of the current study,two previous studies from Turkey[20,21]reported no significant difference in the level of depression and anxiety between infertile and fertile women. Previous reports have also had different findings about the association of age and the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms in infertile women; some studies confirm our finding of no relationship,[22,23]while other studies[17,19,20]report that depressive and anxiety symptoms increase with age. The reason for these differences are unknown, but the possible explanations include (a) high levels of depression and anxiety in all married Turkish women regardless of fertility status; (b)cross-cultural differences in the mechanism via which social stressors lead to emotional disturbances; and (c)methodological limitations of the study,

    Several studies have reported on the quality of life among infertile women.[24-35]Similar to our findings,most of the case control studies report substantially decreased quality of life among infertile women in several of the quality of life subscales.[31]However, unlike other studies, we did not find that decreased quality of life among infertile women was closely associated with increased symptoms of depression.[36-38]Thus the quality of life changes in our infertile patients in Turkey were not directly related to changes in the severity of their psychological symptoms.

    Our results related to self-reported disability in the month prior to the interview were quite robust. Both the mean score to the BDQ and the ranked classification of the results of the BDQ found that the infertile patient group reported significantly greater impairment than that reported by women of the same age and marital status who were not infertile. In the absence of differences in the level of depressive and anxiety symptoms between the groups, this suggests that social discrimination of women in Turkey who cannot fulfil this expected role directly affects their functioning. To our knowledge, no previous study has reported the level of disability among infertile subjects.

    The reasons for the more prominent depressive and anxiety symptoms and greater impairment in the quality of life among employed women who are infertile compared to that in unemployed women who are infertile are unknown. Presumably this is related to the greater exposure employed women who are infertile have to social disapproval than unemployed women(who primarily work in the home as housewives), but further qualitative studies will be needed to clarify this issue.

    4.2. Limitations

    This study has several limitations. (a) The cross-sectional nature of the study made it impossible to identify causal relationships between infertility and the various psychological, functional, and quality of life measures assessed. (b) All measures employed were selfrated, so different types of reporting biases may have affected the results. (c) There was no formal diagnosis made of the patients or controls so the proportion that had psychological disorders that were severe enough to merit psychiatric intervention was unknown.(d) The sample was selected from married women with infertility being treated at an urban outpatient department, so the results may not be generalizable to all infertile women. (e) Sexual dysfunction, a common problem in infertile couples, was not considered among the eight aspects of quality of life assessed by the SF-36.(f) Several factors that may affect the psychosocial effects of infertility (e.g., duration of infertility, use of different fertility treatments, etc.) were not considered.Finally, (g) the sample of infertile patients was not large enough to employ multivariate linear regression analyses (or other multivariate techniques) to assess the relative importance of potential demographic and clinical treatment determinants of depression, anxiety,perceived disability, or quality of life.

    4.3 Importance

    This study found that the self-reported level of disability and levels of several measures of the quality of life of infertile married women in Turkey, particularly those who are currently employed, are significantly lower than those of fertile married women. However, the selfreported level of depressive and anxiety symptoms was not different between infertile and fertile women.This disconnect between psychological symptoms,functioning, and quality of life suggests that western assumptions about the causal relation of major psychosocial stressors (such as infertility) to common mental disorders may need to be adjusted when considering non-western cultures, where the meaning and psychological valence of specific types of stressors can be quite different. Only a minority of infertile participants had clinically significant depression (43%)or clinically significant anxiety (33%), so psychosocial interventions for infertile women should focus on social support and place somewhat less emphasis on psychiatric treatment. However, this is a small crosssectional study in one urban clinic in Turkey, so larger studies that enroll a broader spectrum of infertile patients and that follow them over time are needed to confirm the relevance of these findings.

    Funding

    This study received no financial support.

    Conflict of interest statement

    The authors report no conflict of interest related to this manuscript.

    Ethical review

    The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Rize, Turkey. (date of approval:25.02.2011; number: 2011/6)

    Informed consent

    Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

    Authors’ contributions

    HS and CH participated in the design of the study,in data collection, and drafted the manuscript. CH performed the statistical analysis and critically reviewed the manuscript. ESGG carried out the clinical diagnosis and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    1. Mosher WD, Pratt WF. Fecundity and infertility in the United States: incidence and trends. Fertil Steril. 1991; 56(2): 192-193

    2. Kraft AD, Palombo J, Mitchell D, Dean C, Meyers S, Schmidt AW. The psychological dimensions of infertility. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1980; 50(4): 618-628

    3. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. Synopsis of Psychiatry. 9th ed.Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003. p. 60-65

    4. Raphael-Leff J. Psychotherapy during the reproductive years.In Gabbard GO, Beck JS, Holmes J, editors. Oxford Textbook of Psychotherapy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005. p.367-379

    5. Nahar P, Richters A. Suffering of childless women in Bangladesh: the intersection of social identities of gender and class. Anthropol Med. 2011; 18(3): 327–338. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2011.615911

    6. Onat G, K?z?lkaya Beji N. Effects of infertility on gender differences in marital relationship and quality of life: a case control study of Turkish couples. Eur J Obst Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012; 165(2): 243-248. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.033

    7. Mahlstedt PP. The psychological component of infertility. Fertil Steril. 1985; 43(3): 335-346

    8. Chen TH, Chang SP, Tsai CF, Juang KD. Prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders in an assisted reproductive technique clinic. Hum Reprod. 2004; 19(10): 2313-2318. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh414

    9. King RB. Subfecundity and anxiety in a nationally representative sample. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 56(4): 739-741.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00069-2

    10. Klemetti R, Raitanen J, Sihvo S, Saarni S, Koponen P. Infertility,mental disorders and well-being: a nationwide survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010; 89(5): 677-682. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016341003623746

    11. Aydemir O, Guvenir T, Kuey L, Kultur S. [Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale]. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 1997; 8(3): 280-287. Turkish

    12. Kaplan I. [The relationship between mental disorders and disability in patients admitted to the semi-rural health centers]. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 1995; 6(2): 169-179. Turkish

    13. Ko?yigit H, Aydemir O, Fisek G, Olmez N, Memis A. [The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Short Form-36(SF-36)]. ?la? ve Tedavi Dergisi. 1999; 12(3): 102-106. Turkish

    14. Aydemir O, Koroglu E. [Clinical scales used in psychiatry].Hekimler Yay?n Birli?i. 2006; 138-139: 346-347. Turkish

    15. Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE Jr. The MOS Short-Form General Health Survey: reliability and validity in a patient population.Med Care. 1988; 26(7): 724-735

    16. Anderson KM, Sharpe M, Rattray A, Irvine DS. Distress and concerns in couples referred to a specialist infertility clinic.J Psychosom Res. 2003; 54(4): 353-355. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00398-7

    17. Domar AD, Zuttermeister PC, Seibel M, Benson H.Psychological improvement in infertile women after behavioral treatment: a replication. Fertil Steril. 1992; 58(1):144-147

    18. Lukse MP, Vacc NA. Grief, depression and coping in women undergoing infertility treatment. Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 93(2):245-251

    19. Drosdzol A, Skrzypulec V. Depression and anxiety among Polish infertile couples-an evaluative prevalence study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2009; 30(1): 11-20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01674820902830276

    20. Guz H, Ozkan A, Sar?soy G, Yanik F, Yanik A. Psychiatric symptoms in Turkish infertile women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2003; 24(4): 267-271

    21. Gulseren L, Cetinay P, Tokatl?oglu B, Sar?kaya OO, Gulseren S, Kurt S. Depression and anxiety levels in infertile Turkish women. J Reprod Med. 2006; 51(5): 421-426

    22. Ashkani H, Akbari A, Heydari ST. Epidemiology of depression among infertile and fertile couples in Shiraz, Southern Iran.Indian J Med Sci. 2006; 60(10): 399-406.

    23. Beutel M, Kupfer J, Kirchmeyer P, Kehde S, Kohn FM,Schroeder-Printzen I. Treatment related stresses and depression in couples undergoing assisted reproductive treatment by IVF or ICSI. Andrologia. 1999; 31(1): 27-35. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.1999.tb02839.x

    24. Heredia M, Tenías JM, Rocio R, Amparo F, Calleja MA, Valenzuela JC. Quality of life and predictive factors in patients undergoing assisted reproduction techniques. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013; 167(2): 176-180. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.12.011

    25. Monga M, Bogdan A, Katz SE, Stein M, Ganiats T. Impact of infertility on quality of life, marital adjustment and sexual function. Urology. 2004; 63(1): 126-130. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.015

    26. Fekkes M, Buitendijk SE, Verrips GH, Braat DD, Brewaeys AM, Dolfing JG, et al. Health-related quality of life in relation to gender and age in couples planning IVF treatment.Hum Reprod. 2003; 18(7): 1536-1543. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg276

    27. Hassanin IM, Abd-El-Raheem T, Shahin AY. Primary infertility and health-related quality of life in Upper Egypt. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2010; 110(2): 118-121. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.02.015

    28. Abbey A, Andrews FM, Halman LJ. Provision and receipt of social support and disregard: what is their impact on the marital life quality of infertile and fertile couples? J Personality Soc Psychol. 1995; 68(3): 455-469. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.455

    29. Andrews FM, Abbey A, Halman LJ. Is fertility problem stress different? The dynamics of stress in fertile and infertile couples. Fertil Steril. 1992; 57(6): 1247-1253

    30. Andrews FM, Abbey A, Halman LJ. Stress from infertility,marriage factors, and subjective well-being of wives and husbands. J Health Soc Behav. 1991; 32(3): 238-253

    31. Ragni G, Mosconi P, Baldini MP. Health-related quality of life and need for IVF in 1000 Italian infertile couples.Hum Reprod. 2005; 20(5): 1286-1291. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh788

    32. Weaver SM, Clifford E, Douglas MH, Robinson J. Psychosocial adjustment to unsuccessful IVF and GIFT treatment.Patient Educ Couns. 1997; 31(1): 7-18. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(97)01005-7

    33. Hearn MT, Yuzpe AA, Brown SE. Psychological characteristics of in vitro fertilization participants. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1987; 156(1): 269-274

    34. Onat G, Kizilkaya Beji N. Effects of infertility on gender differences in marital relationship and quality of life: a casecontrol study of Turkish couples. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012; 165(2): 243-248. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.033

    35. Lau JT, Wang Q, Cheng Y, Kim JH, Yang X, Tsui HY. Infertilityrelated perceptions and responses and their associations with quality of life among rural Chinese infertile couples. J Sex Marital Ther. 2008; 34(3): 248-267. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00926230701866117

    36. Smith JF, Walsh TJ, Shindel AF. Sexual, marital and social impact of a man’s perceived infertility diagnosis. J Sex Med.2009; 6(9): 2505-2515. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01383.x

    37. Mosalanejad L, Abdolahifard K, Jahromi MG.Therapeutic vaccines: hope therapy and its effects on psychiatric symptoms among infertile women. Glob J Health Sci. 2013; 6(1): 192-200. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v6n1p192

    38. Carter J, Applegarth L, Josephs L, Grill E. A cross-sectional cohort study of infertile women awaiting oocyte donation:the emotional, sexual, and quality-of-life impact. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95(2): 711-6.e1. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.10.004

    (received, 2016-02-04, accepted, 2016-02-20)

    Dr. Hacer Sezgin obtained a medical degree in 2005 from Karadeniz Technical University and received postgraduate training in family medicine between 2010 and 2013 at the Department of Family Medicine at the Medical School of Recep Tayyip Erdogan University in Rize, Turkey. She is currently a specialist physician in the Department of Family Medicine at ?ay?rli State Hospital in Erzincan,Turkey. Her research interests are female infertility and its psychological impact, polycystic ovarian syndrome, diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance, and Hashimoto thyroiditis.

    不育婦女的功能障礙、精神病癥狀和生活質(zhì)量:一項(xiàng)來自土耳其橫斷面研究

    Sezgin H, Hocaoglu C, Guvendag-Guven ES

    背景:不孕不育是一種重大的生活危機(jī),它可以導(dǎo)致精神病癥狀的發(fā)展并且對夫妻的生活質(zhì)量產(chǎn)生負(fù)面影響,但其影響程度可能取決于文化背景。目標(biāo):我們比較了土耳其城市中生育婦女和不孕婦女的精神病癥狀程度、功能障礙水平和生活質(zhì)量。方法:該橫斷面研究納入了100名在里澤教育和研究醫(yī)院的婦產(chǎn)科門診治療不孕不育的已婚女性和100名已婚已育的婦女作為對照組。對所有參與者均采用社會人口信息篩查表、醫(yī)院焦慮抑郁量表(Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS)、簡單功能障礙問卷 (Brief Disability Questionnaire, BDQ) 和健康狀況問卷 (Short Form Health Survey , SF-36) 進(jìn)行評估。結(jié)果:不育女性的平均焦慮分量表得分和抑郁分量表得分稍高于對照組,但差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。不孕組婦女中有顯著臨床焦慮癥狀的比例(即焦慮分量表得分> 11)顯著高于育齡婦女 (31% v. 17%,X2=5.37, p=0.020),但有顯著臨床抑郁癥狀的比例(即抑郁分量表評分HADS > 8)在兩組間沒有顯著性差異 (43% v. 33%, X2=2.12, p=0.145)。不育女性自我報(bào)告前一個(gè)月的功能障礙顯著比對照組嚴(yán)重,并且不育女性在SF-36的8個(gè)分量表中4個(gè)(一般健康、活力、社會功能和心理健康)顯著差于對照組。與目前工作的不育女性相比,目前沒有工作的女性不育患者報(bào)告的抑郁和焦慮程度較輕,且一般健康狀況、活力和心理健康狀況較好。結(jié)論:未發(fā)現(xiàn)土耳其城市地區(qū)中尋求治療的不孕不育已婚女性并比已婚已育婦女有更嚴(yán)重的抑郁癥狀,但他們確實(shí)報(bào)告有較大的軀體和心理障礙并且生活質(zhì)量較差。不孕不育的負(fù)面影響對在職不孕女性婦女比無業(yè)的不孕婦女更嚴(yán)重。西方國家這通常報(bào)告不孕患者抑郁和焦慮的患病率更高,我們需要更大規(guī)模的隨訪研究以評估這些結(jié)果與西方國家報(bào)告的結(jié)果不同的原因。

    不育;生活質(zhì)量;功能障礙;精神病癥狀;橫斷面研究;土耳其

    本文全文中文版從2016年8月25日起在

    http://dx.doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.216014可供免費(fèi)閱覽下載

    Background:Infertility is a major life crisis which can lead to the development of psychiatric symptoms and negative effects on the quality of life of affected couples, but the magnitude of the effects may vary depending on cultural expectations.Aim:We compare the level of psychiatric symptoms, disability, and quality of life in fertile and infertile women in urban Turkey.Methods:This cross-sectional study enrolled 100 married women being treated for infertility at the outpatient department of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of the Rize Education and Research Hospital and a control group of 100 fertile married women. All study participants were evaluated with a socio-demographic data screening form, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Brief Disability Questionnaire (BDQ), and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36).Results:The mean anxiety subscale score and depression subscale score of HADS were slightly higher in the infertile group than in controls, but the differences were not statistically significant. The proportion of subjects with clinically significant anxiety (i.e., anxiety subscale score of HADS >11) was significantly higher in infertile women than in fertile women (31% v. 17%, X2=5.37, p=0.020), but the proportion with clinically significant depressive symptoms (i.e., depression subscale score of HADS >8) was not significantly different(43% v. 33%, X2=2.12, p=0.145). Self-reported disability over the prior month was significantly worse in the infertile group than in the controls, and 4 of the 8 subscales of the SF-36 – general health, vitality, social functioning, and mental health – were significantly worse in the infertile group. Compared to infertile women who were currently working, infertile women who were not currently working reported less severe depression and anxiety and better general health, vitality, and mental health.Conclusions:Married women from urban Turkey seeking treatment for infertility do not have significantly more severe depressive symptoms than fertile married controls, but they do report greater physical and psychological disability and a poorer quality of life. The negative effects of infertility were more severe in infertile women who were employed than in those who were not employed. Larger follow-up studies are needed to assess the reasons for the differences between these results and those reported in western countries which usually report a higher prevalence of depression and anxiety in infertile patients.

    [Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2016; 28(2): 86-94.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.216014]

    1Department of Family Medicine, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University School of Medicine, Rize, Turkey

    2Department of Psychiatry, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University School of Medicine, Rize, Turkey

    3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karadeniz Technical University, School of Medicine, Trabzon, Turkey

    *correspondence: Dr. Cicek Hocaoglu, Department of Psychiatry, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University School of Medicine, Rize, Turkey.E-mail: cicekh@gmail.com

    A full-text Chinese translation of this article will be available at http://dx.doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.216014 on August 25, 2016.

    猜你喜歡
    橫斷面精神病土耳其
    土耳其T-129攻擊直升機(jī)
    軍事文摘(2022年15期)2022-08-17 02:19:24
    完形填空專練(五)
    城市道路橫斷面設(shè)計(jì)研究
    非典型抗精神病藥物導(dǎo)致的代謝紊亂
    精神病
    都有精神病
    文苑(2018年19期)2018-11-09 01:30:28
    我也叫“土耳其”
    廣州市健康體檢人群種植修復(fù)情況的橫斷面研究
    土耳其政變?yōu)楹我允「娼K
    海外星云(2016年15期)2016-12-01 04:18:13
    土耳其醫(yī)改后來居上
    亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 香蕉丝袜av| 午夜视频精品福利| 精品第一国产精品| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 91老司机精品| 午夜免费激情av| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 亚洲色图av天堂| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2 | 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 不卡一级毛片| av片东京热男人的天堂| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 日韩欧美在线二视频| cao死你这个sao货| 丁香欧美五月| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久, | 女性被躁到高潮视频| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 夜夜爽天天搞| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 身体一侧抽搐| 成人三级做爰电影| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| www.自偷自拍.com| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| av有码第一页| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| www.精华液| 久久精品成人免费网站| 男人舔奶头视频| av电影中文网址| 免费看十八禁软件| 国产精品二区激情视频| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 欧美成人午夜精品| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 久久热在线av| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 成人精品一区二区免费| av福利片在线| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 自线自在国产av| 午夜两性在线视频| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 不卡av一区二区三区| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 国产片内射在线| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲第一电影网av| 大香蕉久久成人网| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 91大片在线观看| 91国产中文字幕| 丁香欧美五月| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产精品九九99| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 青草久久国产| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 女警被强在线播放| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 黄色视频不卡| 在线视频色国产色| 怎么达到女性高潮| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 99热只有精品国产| 午夜激情av网站| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 丁香六月欧美| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 日韩欧美免费精品| 香蕉av资源在线| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| av免费在线观看网站| 精品第一国产精品| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| a在线观看视频网站| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 黄色成人免费大全| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲第一电影网av| 国产区一区二久久| 禁无遮挡网站| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| videosex国产| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 亚洲全国av大片| 一本综合久久免费| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 日韩有码中文字幕| 男人操女人黄网站| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | www.熟女人妻精品国产| xxxwww97欧美| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 午夜影院日韩av| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 91在线观看av| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| www.www免费av| 一夜夜www| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 宅男免费午夜| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 91成人精品电影| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 热re99久久国产66热| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 久久国产精品影院| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 午夜久久久在线观看| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 色播亚洲综合网| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 久久中文看片网| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 精品久久久久久,| 精品久久久久久,| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 悠悠久久av| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 变态另类丝袜制服| 午夜福利在线在线| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看 | 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 午夜老司机福利片| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 免费看十八禁软件| tocl精华| av福利片在线| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 极品教师在线免费播放| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 91九色精品人成在线观看| netflix在线观看网站| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 9191精品国产免费久久| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 一级黄色大片毛片| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 国产高清videossex| 成人18禁在线播放| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| www.精华液| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 色在线成人网| 久久狼人影院| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 69av精品久久久久久| 午夜精品在线福利| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产单亲对白刺激| 99国产精品99久久久久| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产成人系列免费观看| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产野战对白在线观看| 一区福利在线观看| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 男人舔奶头视频| 欧美在线黄色| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | www.999成人在线观看| 88av欧美| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 又大又爽又粗| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 一级片免费观看大全| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 露出奶头的视频| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 色播亚洲综合网| 麻豆av在线久日| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 欧美日本视频| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 午夜视频精品福利| 亚洲第一av免费看| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 99热只有精品国产| 88av欧美| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 亚洲全国av大片| 日本 av在线| 久久香蕉国产精品| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 国产色视频综合| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 国产精品免费视频内射| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 日本 av在线| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| a级毛片a级免费在线| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 日日夜夜操网爽| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| av欧美777| 在线天堂中文资源库| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 99热6这里只有精品| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看 | 一进一出好大好爽视频| 日韩欧美免费精品| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 国产熟女xx| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 最好的美女福利视频网| 免费av毛片视频| 一夜夜www| 国产色视频综合| 国产区一区二久久| 性欧美人与动物交配| 精品第一国产精品| 不卡av一区二区三区| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 91字幕亚洲| 黄色女人牲交| 欧美黑人巨大hd| www.www免费av| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 欧美日本视频| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 国产av不卡久久| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 深夜精品福利| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| aaaaa片日本免费| 精品高清国产在线一区| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 1024视频免费在线观看| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 成人免费观看视频高清| 免费看日本二区| netflix在线观看网站| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 91在线观看av| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 在线天堂中文资源库| www.www免费av| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 国产精品免费视频内射| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 一区二区三区精品91| 人人澡人人妻人| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 久久精品影院6| 悠悠久久av| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 日本一本二区三区精品| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 国产精品九九99| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 国产免费男女视频| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 久9热在线精品视频| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 黄色 视频免费看| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲国产看品久久| 69av精品久久久久久| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观 | 午夜免费激情av| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 日本a在线网址| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 亚洲九九香蕉| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 69av精品久久久久久| svipshipincom国产片| 久久香蕉精品热| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 免费看十八禁软件| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 亚洲av美国av| 欧美色视频一区免费| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 午夜福利在线在线| 黄频高清免费视频| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久香蕉精品热| 亚洲中文av在线| 青草久久国产| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 露出奶头的视频| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国产野战对白在线观看| 久久精品成人免费网站| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产三级黄色录像| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 国产不卡一卡二| 1024视频免费在线观看| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 日韩免费av在线播放| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 伦理电影免费视频| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 色av中文字幕| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 国产精品影院久久| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| www.精华液| 国产99白浆流出| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 久久久国产成人免费| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 亚洲片人在线观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 一级毛片精品| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 一级片免费观看大全| 在线播放国产精品三级| 男人舔奶头视频| 天天添夜夜摸| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 日本成人三级电影网站| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 久久久久久大精品| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 大型av网站在线播放| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲国产看品久久| 操出白浆在线播放| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 高清在线国产一区| 97碰自拍视频| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 我的亚洲天堂| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 精品电影一区二区在线| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲片人在线观看| 亚洲第一电影网av| 日本 av在线| 九色国产91popny在线| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 日韩有码中文字幕| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 在线看三级毛片| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 在线观看一区二区三区| xxx96com| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 无限看片的www在线观看| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 国产成人精品无人区| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 久久香蕉激情|