• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A self-made, low-cost infrared system for evaluating the sciatic functional index in mice

    2016-12-02 07:05:42LukasFrickerVincenzoPennaFlorianLampertBjoernStarkChristianWitzelGeorgiosKoulaxouzidis

    Lukas Fricker, Vincenzo Penna, Florian Lampert, G. Bjoern Stark, Christian Witzel, Georgios Koulaxouzidis,

    1 Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany

    2 Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Charité — Universit?tsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    RESEARCH ARTICLE

    A self-made, low-cost infrared system for evaluating the sciatic functional index in mice

    Lukas Fricker1, Vincenzo Penna1, Florian Lampert1, G. Bjoern Stark1, Christian Witzel2,#, Georgios Koulaxouzidis1,*,#

    1 Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany

    2 Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Charité — Universit?tsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    The sciatic functional index (SFI) is a popular parameter for peripheral nerve evaluation that relies on footprints obtained with ink and paper. Drawbacks include smearing artefacts and a lack of dynamic information during measurement. Modern applications use digitized systems that can deliver results with less analytical effort and fewer mice. However, the systems are expensive (€40,000). This study aimed to evaluate the applicability and precision of a self-made, low-cost infrared system for evaluating SFI in mice. Mice were subjected to unilateral sciatic nerve crush injury (crush group; n = 7) and sham operation (sham group; n = 4). They were evaluated on the day before surgery, the 2nd, 4thand 6thdays after injury, and then every day up to the 23rdday after injury. We compared two SFI evaluation methods, i.e., conventional inkand-paper SFI (C-SFI) and our infrared system (I-SFI). Our apparatus visualized footprints with totally internally reflected infrared light (950 nm) and a camera that can only detect this wavelength. Additionally we performed an analysis with the ladder beam walking test (LBWT) as a reference test. I-SFI assessment reduced the standard deviation by about 33 percent, from 11.6 to 7.8, and cut the variance around the baseline to 21 percent. The system thus requires fewer measurement repetitions and fewer animals, and cuts the cost of keeping the animals. The apparatus cost €321 to build. Our results show that the process of obtaining the SFI can be made more precise via digitization with a self-made, low-cost infrared system.

    #These authors contributed equally to this study.

    orcid: 0000-0001-5679-7686 (Georgios Koulaxouzidis)

    nerve regeneration; sciatic nerve; crush; frustrated total internal reflection; infrared; ladder beam walking test; error rate; mouse; peripheral nerve injury; neural regeneration

    Introduction

    Numerous tests exist for evaluating nerve regeneration in experimental animal models, and they can be assessed in very different ways (Navarro, 2016). There are many studies producing contradictory results (Nichols et al., 2004; Neubauer et al., 2010; Brushart, 2011). In view of the stagnation in improvements to clinical outcomes (Irintchev et al., 2005), we believe there is an urgent need to tackle this issue via specification and improved objectivity.

    The sciatic functional index (SFI) is a reliable, reproducible, quantitative and widely used test for assessing peripheral nerve recovery in rats and mice (de Medinaceli et al., 1982; Monte-Raso et al., 2008). It allows researchers to determine the state of functional regeneration after unilateral injury to the sciatic nerve by comparing footprints from the affected side with those from the unaffected side (Bain et al., 1989; Inserra et al., 1998; Yao et al., 1998).

    The conventional method of acquiring the SFI has two major disadvantages with regard to precision. First, as the footprints are obtained with ink and paper, distortions are frequent and smearing artefacts are unavoidable (Figure 1). Second, the researcher who selects the footprints for analysis does not have access to essential dynamic information (Dijkstra et al., 2000; Sarikcioglu et al., 2009), and so cannot relate the footprints to the circumstances under which they were made. The researcher will not know if a mouse was sitting, hesitating, constantly moving, running, or jumping. For example, every time an animal stops during a run, it presses down with its entire foot pad and heel, creating longer footprints than it would while walking. If the researcher chooses this kind of long footprint for evaluation, the variance will increase. These drawbacks mean that the experiments need numerous animals and involve considerable effort and expense.

    To address this issue, we built an infrared system that could digitize the SFI and thus allow us to record the footprints as well as the circumstances under which they were made (Figure 2). This easy-to-build, self-made apparatus is partly similar to a multi-touch display that uses the frustrated total internal reflection (FTIR) effect with infrared light (Han, 2005; Laufs et al., 2009).

    In this study, we compared conventional SFI (C-SFI) with a novel self-made infrared system (I-SFI). The ladder beam walking test serves as an external reference, since it assesses the combination of motor and sensory function and correlates with the SFI (Farr et al., 2006; Cummings et al., 2007; Rupp et al., 2007; Metz and Whishaw, 2009; Antonow-Schlorke et al., 2013). Our hypothesis was that the precision of the I-SFI would reduce the number of experimental animals used and the number of experiments needed for evaluation. Like commercial digital systems, this would cut the cost of keeping animals and, since they would haveto perform the test fewer times, put them under less stress compared to the conventional method. However, since our system is more affordable than commercial options, the likelihood of it being used is higher.

    Figure 2 Example of the processing of three frames recorded using the new infrared system.

    Figure 1 Disadvantages of conventional ink-and-paper sciatic functional index.

    Figure 3 The novel self-made infrared system (I-SFI) and the ladder beam walking test (LBWT).

    Figure 4 Diagram and principle of the infrared system (I-SFI) capturing apparatus.

    Figure 5 Statistical graphs.

    Materials and Methods

    Animals

    Eleven C57BL/6 mice (male and female) were used. They weighed between 22 and 34 g and were randomly divided into two groups. The approving authority of the Regional Commission of Freiburg approved all procedures used in this study. The animals were housed in individual cages, given food and water ad libitum and exposed to a cycle of 12-hour light/dark.

    Seven mice were subjected to a unilateral local crush lesion of the sciatic nerve (crush group). The remaining four mice were used as a control group and subjected to sham surgery (sham group). The sham group served as the control group for a stable baseline, while the crush group delivered the full deflection of the SFI spectrum.

    Surgical procedure

    The mice were heavily anaesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of a solution consisting of 16 mg/kg xylazine (Rompun?, Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) and 100 mg/kg ketamine (Ketavet?, Pfizer, Berlin, Germany) after induction with isoflurane (Furene?, Wiesbaden, Germany). After asepsis and trichotomy of the gluteus region, the sciatic nerve was either simply exposed via a longitudinal incision and isolated from the adjacent tissues (sham group; n = 4), or crushed 2 mm proximal to the trifurcation using a bulldog clamp and applying a constant force (2.4 N) at the tip of the clamp for 60 seconds (crush group; n = 7).

    Functional tests

    The animals in the crush group were evaluated on the day before surgery, on the 2nd, 4thand 6thdays after injury, and then every day up to the 23rdday after lesion (20 postoperative measurements in total). The animals in the sham group were evaluated on the day before surgery, on the 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 11th, 14th, 18th, and 23rddays after injury (9 measurements in total).

    Conventional obtained sciatic functional index (C-SFI)

    The numerical value of the SFI (Inserra et al., 1998) that we processed ranged from +10 to —110. Animals that dragged their toes were arbitrarily assigned a value of —100. The animals were made to walk in one direction through an acrylic corridor (70 cm × 20 cm × 4 cm) at least three times. The first three analyzable walks were evaluated, and any preceding walks were ignored. Two different methods were used to image the footprints. One used blue ink and white paper (conventional method) and the other used the apparatus we designed (infrared system). For the conventional method, the animals' hind feet were pressed onto an ink pad. After the mice walked through the corridor over A4 white printerpaper (80 g/m2), their footprints were measured with a ruler and rounded to the nearest 0.5 mm.

    Infrared system (I-SFI)

    The apparatus (Figure 3A) for the infrared method consisted of an acrylic sheet (35.7 cm × 20.7 cm × 1 cm) flooded with infrared light (950 nm) emitted by 36 light-emitting diodes (LEDs), 0.1 A, 1.3 V (Osram? SFH4516, Munich, Germany). The LEDs were evenly distributed along the edges of the acrylic sheet. A camera (Microsoft? HD Studio Webcam, USA) with a resolution of 1,024 × 786 at eight frames per second and fitted with a 52 mm infrared 950 nm bandpass filter (Neewer?, USA) was positioned beneath the sheet. The LEDs were wired in four series of nine bulbs with a resistor, 100 Ω (Yageo?, San Jose, CA, USA). The four series were wired in parallel to a LED transformer, 12 V, 15 W (Goobay?, Pillmannstra?e, Braunschweig, Germany) (Figure 4A). The light, which was shielded to the outside with aluminum foil, was only allowed to enter the acrylic sheet from the edges. Thus, the light was trapped between the two surfaces of the acrylic sheet because of frustrated total internal reflection (Figure 4B) (Han, 2005). When an object touched the surface of the acrylic sheet, the light was allowed to leave, thereby illuminating the object (Figure 4C). This is how the camera captured the footprints made by the mice. The researcher chose only the footprints made by a mouse walking steadily, and processed the prints frame by frame with ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA). Prints were selected if they were visible on a minimum of two and a maximum of five frames.

    Modified ladder beam walking test (LBWT)

    The slightly modified LBWT (Farr et al., 2006; Cummings et al., 2007; Metz and Whishaw, 2009; Antonow-Schlorke et al., 2013) consisted of two acrylic sheets (70 cm × 20 cm × 4 cm) fitted with metal rungs spaced at random intervals of between 0.5 cm and 2.5 cm (Figure 3B). The ladder was placed horizontally 20 cm above a mirror, which allowed the researcher to record the mouse's hind feet with a camera (Canon FS11, software: VirtualDub 1.10.4 after conversion to ★.avi using MPEG Streamclip 1.2) while the animal walked from one end of the ladder to the other. The researcher counted the steps of the mouse's hind feet, as well as the incorrect steps. Only steps within a complete step sequence — one step on the affected side and one on the non-affected side — were counted. The error rate was expressed as a percent of all steps, ranging from 0 to 100 percent. Incorrect steps included a slip (the foot was placed on a rung but slipped off), a miss (the foot was placed between two rungs), a drag (the back of the foot was placed on a rung), a lateral glide, and every correction of these errors. A lateral glide means that the mouse's foot slipped backwards and touched the rung behind. This was counted as an error if the angle between the hind foot and a line running parallel to the ladder exceeded 30 degrees at any time during the step. After an error occurred, the next step sequence was ignored.

    Data analysis

    Statistical analysis was carried out with the software products R (R Core Team, 2015) and OpenOffice Calc 4.1.1 (Apache, Houston, Texas, USA). The significance level was set at 0.05. In a first step, we analyzed and compared the two methods of obtaining SFI. We performed a descriptive statistic for each test and compared the standard deviations (Figure 5A, B). To analyze and compare the means, we used the two-sided Welch two-sample t-test. To analyze variance, we used the two-sided two-sample F-test. We analyzed the correlation of C-SFI, I-SFI and LWBT and, after a curve fit test indicating linearity, performed linear regressions. Using the respective regression equations, we calculated a mean regression equation and then assessed the degree of correlation between the results from both regression equations and the mean (Figure 5C, D). The results are presented as scatter plots (Figure 5E, F) (direct comparison of two tests in a Cartesian coordinate system) and mountain plots (Figure 5A—D) (also known as folded empirical cumulative distribution plots) (Krouwer and Monti, 1995). Mountain plots are an easy way of comparing two tests. The center and the tails are important; the closer the center lies to the y-axis and the closer the tails are to each other, the more precise the test is compared to the other. To aid interpretation, it is possible to superpose the center (50thpercentile) and compare the areas underneath the curves. The smaller they are, the more precise the test is compared to the other.

    Results

    C-SFI versus I-SFI

    Correlation analysis (Spearman's rank correlation and Pearson's correlation) of all postoperative data was performed. Spearman's rank correlation and Pearson's correlation analyses provided identical results, with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.99 (P value = 8.42e—06 and 1.51e—14 respectively; 19 degrees of freedom (DF)).

    Standard deviations (SDs) and correlation analysis results of both SFI evaluation methods in the crush group

    All data from the 7thpostoperative day were used for analysis because the SFI was constantly obtainable at that time point. The separate consideration of each test run for each mouse provided three footprints, which were analyzed to calculate the SFI. The SD of the three SFI values, which were averaged, showed how precise each test method was. The average SD was 11.6 (range: 1.1—36.9) for C-SFI and 7.8 (range: 0.9—23.6) for I-SFI. Figure 5A provides a visual comparison of the ranges. The average SD of I-SFI was 33.2 percent lower than it was for C-SFI. The absolute reduction was 3.8 (95%CI: 2.5—5.2; P = 1.25e—07; 212 DF). The numerical reduction was only 1.4 of the SDs of the averaged SFI values in the crush group (95%CI: —2.3—4.8; P = 0.49; 40 DF).

    Variance analysis results of the sham group

    All postoperative data were used for analysis. Both C-SFIand I-SFI evaluation methods showed that the sham group was not affected. Equal footprints on both sides led to an SFI value of —7.5. The mean of the sham group was —7.69 for C-SFI and —7.47 for I-SFI (Figure 5B). Both values are very close to the baseline value of —7.5, but the variance was remarkably different. The quotient of the variance (F-test) for the individual values was 0.48 (95%CI: 0.24—0.96; P = 0.039), and 0.21 (95%CI: 0.05—0.95; P = 0.043) for the mean values of the sham group. I-SFI led to a significant reduction of up to 21 percent of the variance of the conventional method.

    Correlation analysis and linear regression results of the SFI methods with the LBWT in the crush group

    All postoperative data were used for analysis. Table 1 shows the correlation between two SFI evaluation methods and the reference test. All results show similarly high correlations and are statistically significant.

    Table 1 Correlation of SFI evaluation methods with the LBWT

    Linear regression results

    Linear regression revealed the following relationships (19 DF):

    C-SFI: y-intercept: —12.32 (P = 0.00078); slope: —1.99 (P = 3.27e—11)

    I-SFI: y-intercept: —10.29 (P = 0.0014); slope: —2.03 (P = 3.02e—12)

    The average common regression of both methods was therefore SFI(X): —2.01 X — 11.305. For a better visual assessment, the values of the C-SFI and I-SFI were compared with the common mean of their linear regressions. To achieve this, the C-SFI and I-SFI values were inserted in their linear regression formula. Then the difference from the above mentioned average common regression of the SFI values with the LBWT was compared for the crush group (Figure 5C) and the sham group (Figure 5D).

    Discussion

    The C-SFI obtaining method, which uses ink and paper, is a popular test for assessing nerve recovery in rats and mice (de Medinaceli et al., 1982; Monte-Raso et al., 2008). It indicates the state of functional regeneration after unilateral sciatic nerve injury (Bain et al., 1989; Inserra et al., 1998; Yao et al., 1998). However, disruptive artefacts are common and a lack of dynamic information makes it hard for researchers to objectively select footprints for analysis, as they do not know the circumstances under which the prints were made. These uncertainties reduce precision and mean that the experiments require numerous animals and involve considerable effort and expense (Dijkstra et al., 2000; Sarikcioglu et al., 2009).

    Commercially available complete solutions that automatically record SFI and other parameters are a very good option for improving the abovementioned problems. However, a search of Pubmed showed that, out of 1,742 papers published in the last 10 years taking “mice” and “sciatic nerve” as the retrieval words, only four were associated with complete solutions such as “catwalk,” “runwayscan” and “gaitlab.” One reason could be the expense of these types of automated gait analysis systems: in 2013, costs stood at between €35,000 and€40,000.

    This study presents an infrared apparatus (I-SFI) that is easy to build and whose parts cost €321. It excludes smearing artefacts, records how footprints are made and estimates the velocity of the mice to the necessary degree.

    The aim of our study was to compare two methods of recording mouse footprints to validate I-SFI and a reference test, the LBWT was used. The correlations with the LBWT are very high for both methods and hardly differ from one another. What does differ, however, is the consistency with the mean of the linear regressions. Here, the infrared system demonstrates an advantage over C-SFI.

    As the high correlations show, the SFI results of the crush group predominantly agree. Since both methods (I-SFI and C-SFI) measure the same thing, this agreement was a precondition for further investigation. The mean SD of I-SFI is 33.2 percent lower than it is for C-SFI. The results of the sham group also indicate that I-SFI is better. The infrared system reduces the variance to 0.2 times the variance of the conventional method. This suggests that our I-SFI evaluation method increases precision. Another sign of this is that the I-SFI is more consistent with the mean of the linear regression of the LBWT than the C-SFI is. We can therefore assume that I-SFI will require fewer animals to reach a sufficient level of significance.

    We used the number of frames at a given frame rate to preselect a range for the animals' velocity. The sciatic static index for mice (SSIm) was developed to rule out the problem of velocity (Bervar, 2000; Baptista et al., 2007). The SSIm correlates with the SFI and is also based on footprints. Unlike the SFI, however, the mouse stands still, thus eliminating the problem of changes in speed. The authors obtained the SSIm with a camera placed beneath an acrylic sheet, and evaluated the footprints with the help of anatomical features. Evaluating the prints in this way is a weak point, but it can easily be improved upon by combining the footprint-visualizing apparatus and the SSIm. This would reduce the number of uncertainties that impact the precision of the assessment.

    Conclusion

    Our easy-to-build apparatus reduced the amount of humaneffort required, and removed some of the stress from the animals because there was no need to stain their hind feet with ink. The reduction of the SD of the regeneration curve (crush group) by about a third (33.2%) and that of the baseline variance (sham group) by nearly 80 percent are significant and might reduce the number of animals needed for such experiments. Our hypothesis is that this inexpensive method of digitization can help minimize artefacts and can increase analytical objectivity by making it easier to select suitable footprints and reject those that are unsuitable. Complete solutions consisting of hardware and associated software are available and can be used for the gait analysis of mice (Vogelaar et al., 2004). However, the solutions are too expensive for small study groups, they can be prone to interference from ambient light, and they have rarely been used, despite having been available for more than 10 years.

    Author contributions: LF, CW and GK designed the study and performed the research. VP, FL and GBS interpreted the data and critically reviewed the paper for important intellectual content. LF was also responsible for data collection and statistical analysis, and wrote the paper. All authors approved the final version of the paper.

    Conflicts of interest: None declared.

    Plagiarism check: This paper was screened twice using Cross-Check to verify originality before publication.

    Peer review: This paper was double-blinded and stringently reviewed by international expert reviewers.

    Antonow-Schlorke I, Ehrhardt J, Knieling M (2013) Modification of the ladder rung walking task-new options for analysis of skilled movements. Stroke Res Treat 2013:418627.

    Bain JR, Mackinnon SE, Hunter DA (1989) Functional evaluation of complete sciatic, peroneal, and posterior tibial nerve lesions in the rat. Plast Reconstr Surg 83:129-138.

    Baptista AF, Gomes JR, Oliveira JT, Santos SM, Vannier-Santos MA, Martinez AM (2007) A new approach to assess function after sciatic nerve lesion in the mouse - adaptation of the sciatic static index. J Neurosci Methods 161:259-264.

    Bervar M (2000) Video analysis of standing--an alternative footprint analysis to assess functional loss following injury to the rat sciatic nerve. J Neurosci Methods 102:109-116.

    Brushart TM (2011) Nerve repair. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Cummings BJ, Engesser-Cesar C, Cadena G, Anderson AJ (2007) Adaptation of a ladder beam walking task to assess locomotor recovery in mice following spinal cord injury. Behav Brain Res 177:232-241.

    de Medinaceli L, Freed WJ, Wyatt RJ (1982) An index of the functional condition of rat sciatic nerve based on measurements made from walking tracks. Exp Neurol 77:634-643.

    Dijkstra JR, Meek MF, Robinson PH, Gramsbergen A (2000) Methods to evaluate functional nerve recovery in adult rats: walking track analysis, video analysis and the withdrawal reflex. J Neurosci Methods 96:89-96.

    Farr TD, Liu L, Colwell KL, Whishaw IQ, Metz GA (2006) Bilateral alteration in stepping pattern after unilateral motor cortex injury: A new test strategy for analysis of skilled limb movements in neurological mouse models. J Neurosci Methods 153:104-113.

    Han JY (2005) Low-cost multi-touch sensing through frustrated total internal reflection. In: the 18th annual ACM symposium (Baudisch P, Czerwinski M, Olsen D, eds), pp115. ACM, New York, NY, USA.

    Inserra MM, Bloch DA, Terris DJ (1998) Functional indices for sciatic, peroneal, and posterior tibial nerve lesions in the mouse. Microsurgery 18:119-124.

    Irintchev A, Simova O, Eberhardt KA, Morellini F, Schachner M (2005) Impacts of lesion severity and tyrosine kinase receptor B deficiency on functional outcome of femoral nerve injury assessed by a novel single-frame motion analysis in mice. Eur J Neurosci 22:802-808.

    Krouwer JS, Monti KL (1995) A simple, graphical method to evaluate laboratory assays. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 33:525-527.

    Laufs U, Block M, Link J, Ardilio A, Schuller A, Bierkandt J (2009) In: Studie Multi-Touch — Technologie, Hard-/Software und deren Anwendungsszenarien (Spath D, Weisbecker A, eds). Beteiligt. Fraunhofer IAO.

    Metz GA, Whishaw IQ (2009) The ladder rung walking task: a scoring system and its practical application. J Vis Exp pii: 1204.

    Monte-Raso VV, Barbieri CH, Mazzer N, Yamasita AC, Barbieri G (2008) Is the Sciatic Functional Index always reliable and reproducible? J Neurosci Methods 170:255-261.

    Navarro X (2016) Functional evaluation of peripheral nerve regeneration and target reinnervation in animal models: a critical overview. Eur J Neurosci 43:271-286.

    Neubauer D, Graham JB, Muir D (2010) Nerve grafts with various sensory and motor fiber compositions are equally effective for the repair of a mixed nerve defect. Exp Neurol 223:203-206.

    Nichols CM, Brenner MJ, Fox IK, Tung TH, Hunter DA, Rickman SR, Mackinnon SE (2004) Effects of motor versus sensory nerve grafts on peripheral nerve regeneration. Exp Neurol 190:347-355.

    R Core Team (2015) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org.

    Rupp A, Dornseifer U, Fischer A, Schmahl W, Rodenacker K, Jütting U, Gais P, Biemer E, Papadopulos N, Matiasek K (2007) Electrophysiologic assessment of sciatic nerve regeneration in the rat: surrounding limb muscles feature strongly in recordings from the gastrocnemius muscle. J Neurosci Methods 166:266-277.

    Sarikcioglu L, Demirel BM, Utuk A (2009) Walking track analysis: an assessment method for functional recovery after sciatic nerve injury in the rat. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 68:1-7.

    Vogelaar CF, Vrinten DH, Hoekman MF, Brakkee JH, Burbach JP, Hamers FP (2004) Sciatic nerve regeneration in mice and rats: recovery of sensory innervation is followed by a slowly retreating neuropathic pain-like syndrome. Brain Res 1027:67-72.

    Yao M, Inserra MM, Duh MJ, Terris DJ (1998) A longitudinal, functional study of peripheral nerve recovery in the mouse. Laryngoscope 108:1141-1145.

    Copyedited by Gundogdu C, Haastert-Talini K, Li CH, Song LP, Zhao M

    10.4103/1673-5374.182712 http://www.nrronline.org/

    How to cite this article: Fricker L, Penna V, Lampert F, Stark GB, Witzel C, Koulaxouzidis G (2016) A self-made, low-cost infrared system for evaluating the sciatic functional index in mice. Neural Regen Res 11(5)∶829-834.

    Accepted: 2016-02-02

    *Correspondence to: Georgios Koulaxouzidis, M.D., georgios.koulaxouzidis@ uniklinik-freiburg.de.

    午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 亚洲国产看品久久| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 97碰自拍视频| 免费看a级黄色片| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 看免费av毛片| 香蕉丝袜av| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 宅男免费午夜| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 深夜精品福利| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 成人手机av| 制服诱惑二区| 久久香蕉激情| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 国产精品 国内视频| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 久9热在线精品视频| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 青草久久国产| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 88av欧美| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| av有码第一页| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 深夜精品福利| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 热re99久久国产66热| 怎么达到女性高潮| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 久久久久久大精品| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 日韩免费av在线播放| 天堂√8在线中文| 91国产中文字幕| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 国产精品 国内视频| 午夜久久久在线观看| 岛国在线观看网站| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 国产高清videossex| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 久久中文看片网| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 一本综合久久免费| 日本 av在线| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 久9热在线精品视频| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲成人久久性| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 超色免费av| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 满18在线观看网站| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 成人三级黄色视频| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 国产av在哪里看| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 亚洲中文av在线| 国产麻豆69| 香蕉久久夜色| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| av视频免费观看在线观看| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 久久伊人香网站| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| www.999成人在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 一进一出抽搐动态| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 国产精品野战在线观看 | 国产高清videossex| 999精品在线视频| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 日韩欧美三级三区| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 久久中文字幕一级| 国产精品永久免费网站| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 一级片免费观看大全| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 在线视频色国产色| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 久久这里只有精品19| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 国产av又大| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 制服诱惑二区| 久久热在线av| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 老司机靠b影院| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 日韩欧美三级三区| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 国产高清videossex| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 1024视频免费在线观看| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 麻豆av在线久日| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 久久精品影院6| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 搡老乐熟女国产| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| a在线观看视频网站| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 国产片内射在线| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| av中文乱码字幕在线| 久久精品影院6| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 在线观看免费高清a一片| av在线播放免费不卡| 99香蕉大伊视频| 岛国在线观看网站| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 99re在线观看精品视频| 久久久国产成人免费| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 午夜视频精品福利| 亚洲人成电影观看| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 怎么达到女性高潮| 一a级毛片在线观看| 热99re8久久精品国产| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 日韩欧美免费精品| 热re99久久国产66热| 亚洲精品一二三| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 91在线观看av| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 高清在线国产一区| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 免费观看人在逋| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 国产精华一区二区三区| 成年版毛片免费区| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 久久影院123| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| bbb黄色大片| 一区二区三区激情视频| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 高清在线国产一区| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 热re99久久国产66热| a级毛片黄视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 中文欧美无线码| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 黄色成人免费大全| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 久9热在线精品视频| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| av视频免费观看在线观看| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 国产成年人精品一区二区 | 91成人精品电影| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 成人三级黄色视频| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 亚洲国产欧美网| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 看免费av毛片| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 9191精品国产免费久久| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 久久人人精品亚洲av| av网站免费在线观看视频| 热re99久久国产66热| 另类亚洲欧美激情| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| tocl精华| 亚洲成人久久性| 午夜精品在线福利| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 国产精品成人在线| 黄色 视频免费看| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 午夜两性在线视频| 中文欧美无线码| 久久精品91蜜桃| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 久久久久九九精品影院| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 国产成人欧美| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 18禁观看日本| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 日韩有码中文字幕| 亚洲伊人色综图| aaaaa片日本免费| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 日本wwww免费看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 久99久视频精品免费| 午夜视频精品福利| 精品久久久久久电影网| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产精品九九99| 成人精品一区二区免费| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 超色免费av| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 国产av又大| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 视频区图区小说| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影 | 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 久久久久国内视频| 身体一侧抽搐| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 十八禁网站免费在线| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 露出奶头的视频| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| av网站免费在线观看视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 999久久久国产精品视频| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 美女大奶头视频| 久久久国产一区二区| 日本 av在线| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 黄色视频不卡| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| av福利片在线| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 免费av中文字幕在线| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 脱女人内裤的视频| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| av网站免费在线观看视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 宅男免费午夜| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 久久国产精品影院| 在线观看日韩欧美| 一夜夜www| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 精品久久久久久,| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | www国产在线视频色| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 91成年电影在线观看| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲精品在线美女| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 亚洲片人在线观看| 看免费av毛片| 日本免费a在线| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 国产激情欧美一区二区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 在线观看日韩欧美| 亚洲第一av免费看| 搡老乐熟女国产| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 两性夫妻黄色片| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 香蕉久久夜色| 久久久久国内视频| 一夜夜www| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 91精品三级在线观看| 9色porny在线观看| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| www.精华液| 久热这里只有精品99| 校园春色视频在线观看| 免费少妇av软件| 在线av久久热| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 一区在线观看完整版| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 超色免费av| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 久久精品成人免费网站| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 级片在线观看| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 欧美午夜高清在线| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 在线天堂中文资源库| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 宅男免费午夜| av电影中文网址| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产av在哪里看| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 久久香蕉精品热| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 日本 av在线| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 电影成人av| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 色播在线永久视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 久久国产精品影院| aaaaa片日本免费| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 精品久久久久久,| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 满18在线观看网站| 91字幕亚洲| 国产精品永久免费网站| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 制服诱惑二区| 午夜a级毛片| 久久久久久久久中文| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 精品久久久久久,| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 日韩免费av在线播放| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 久久精品91蜜桃| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 久久香蕉国产精品| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| www日本在线高清视频| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 国产高清激情床上av| 91在线观看av| tocl精华| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 亚洲全国av大片| 成人影院久久| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲全国av大片| 两个人看的免费小视频| cao死你这个sao货| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 麻豆av在线久日| 国产成人系列免费观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 一a级毛片在线观看| 午夜91福利影院| 香蕉国产在线看| av视频免费观看在线观看| 超碰成人久久| 国产麻豆69| 免费高清视频大片| 欧美日韩av久久|