王善軍,劉小剛,張 偉,周 帥(.濰坊市益都中心醫(yī)院神經(jīng)外科,山東濰坊 6500;.濱州醫(yī)學(xué)院人體解剖與組織胚胎學(xué)研究所,山東濱州 56603)
納美芬聯(lián)合單唾液酸四己糖神經(jīng)節(jié)苷脂鈉用于腦腫瘤手術(shù)患者的臨床觀察Δ
王善軍1*,劉小剛1,張偉1,周帥2(1.濰坊市益都中心醫(yī)院神經(jīng)外科,山東濰坊262500;2.濱州醫(yī)學(xué)院人體解剖與組織胚胎學(xué)研究所,山東濱州256603)
目的:探討納美芬聯(lián)合單唾液酸四己糖神經(jīng)節(jié)苷脂鈉用于腦腫瘤手術(shù)患者的臨床療效及安全性。方法:64例腦腫瘤手術(shù)患者按計(jì)算機(jī)隨機(jī)化程序分為觀察組和對照組,各32例。對照組患者采用腦細(xì)胞保護(hù)、降低顱內(nèi)壓、抗感染、擴(kuò)血管等常規(guī)治療方法;觀察組患者在對照組治療基礎(chǔ)上,于術(shù)后第1天開始持續(xù)靜脈泵注納美芬0.7 μg/(kg·h)與單唾液酸四己糖神經(jīng)節(jié)苷脂鈉100 mg/d,連續(xù)使用7 d。觀察兩組患者治療前與治療后3、7 d血漿皮質(zhì)醇、促腎上腺皮質(zhì)激素(ACTH),血清白細(xì)胞介素(IL)6、腫瘤壞死因子(TNF)α和巴氏指數(shù)(BI)的變化,并觀察神經(jīng)功能改善情況和不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生情況;隨訪90 d,使用卡氏(KPS)評分評估患者的生活自理能力。結(jié)果:治療后,兩組患者血漿皮質(zhì)醇、ACTH含量及血清TNF-α、IL-6水平均較治療前顯著下降,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05);觀察組患者在治療后3、7 d的皮質(zhì)醇、ACTH、TNF-α水平,以及治療后7 d的IL-6水平均較對照組降低得更為明顯,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。治療后,兩組患者的BI評分均較治療前顯著提高,且觀察組較對照組提高得更為明顯,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。治療后7 d,觀察組患者的神經(jīng)功能改善率為50.00%,明顯高于對照組(18.75%),差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。觀察期間,兩組患者均未見明顯不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生。術(shù)后隨訪90 d,觀察組患者KPS評分不低于70分者占比為71.88%,明顯高于對照組(46.87%),差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。結(jié)論:納美芬聯(lián)合單唾液酸四己糖神經(jīng)節(jié)苷脂鈉能促進(jìn)腦腫瘤患者恢復(fù),降低患者皮質(zhì)醇、ACTH、IL-6和TNF-α水平,并能改善患者預(yù)后。
納美芬;單唾液酸四己糖神經(jīng)節(jié)苷脂鈉;腦腫瘤手術(shù);神經(jīng)功能
腦腫瘤手術(shù)為有創(chuàng)治療,這種創(chuàng)傷刺激會在術(shù)后引起患者強(qiáng)烈的應(yīng)激反應(yīng)和炎癥反應(yīng),從而加重顱腦中樞神經(jīng)的損傷程度[1]。因此,降低術(shù)后應(yīng)激反應(yīng)和保護(hù)中樞神經(jīng)系統(tǒng)對改善患者預(yù)后、提高其康復(fù)水平具有重要意義。納美芬和單唾液酸四己糖神經(jīng)節(jié)苷脂鈉是臨床治療中樞神經(jīng)損傷的常用藥,本研究主要探討了兩藥聯(lián)用對腦腫瘤手術(shù)患者的臨床療效及對白細(xì)胞介素(IL)6和腫瘤壞死因子(TNF)α的影響。
1.1納入與排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn)
納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn):(1)經(jīng)CT、磁共振(MRI)輔助檢查及臨床診斷為腦占位性病變,并經(jīng)術(shù)后病理診斷證實(shí)為腦腫瘤的患者;(2)患者或其家屬知情同意并簽署知情同意書。
排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn):(1)對納美芬或單唾液酸四己糖神經(jīng)節(jié)苷脂鈉存在使用禁忌者;(2)術(shù)前長期服用阿片類藥物者;(3)有既往開顱手術(shù)史者;(4)合并其他嚴(yán)重臟器功能障礙者。
1.2研究對象
本研究方案經(jīng)濰坊市益都中心醫(yī)院(以下簡稱“我院”)醫(yī)學(xué)倫理委員會審核批準(zhǔn)后,選取我院神經(jīng)外科2011年2月-2015年3月收治的擇期行腦腫瘤手術(shù)的患者64例為研究對象,包括良性腫瘤患者48例、惡性腫瘤患者11例、轉(zhuǎn)移癌患者5例;男性35例,女性29例;年齡19~69歲,平均年齡(43.06± 14.65)歲;平均體質(zhì)量(63.43±12.05)kg。根據(jù)計(jì)算機(jī)隨機(jī)化程序,將入選患者隨機(jī)分為觀察組和對照組,各32例。兩組患者的性別、年齡、體質(zhì)量、腫瘤類型等一般資料比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05),具有可比性,詳見表1。
表1 兩組患者一般資料比較(±s)Tab 1 Comparison of general information between 2 groups (±s)
表1 兩組患者一般資料比較(±s)Tab 1 Comparison of general information between 2 groups (±s)
腫瘤類型(良性/惡性/轉(zhuǎn)移性),例24/6/2 24/5/3組別對照組觀察組n 32 32性別(男/女),例18/14 17/15年齡,歲45.03±16.54 41.54±13.35體質(zhì)量,kg 61.67±11.09 65.08±15.68
1.3治療方法
兩組患者均行常規(guī)治療,包括腦細(xì)胞保護(hù)、降低顱內(nèi)壓、抗感染、擴(kuò)血管等,并給予保障患者呼吸循環(huán)功能、維持酸堿平衡和對癥治療。觀察組患者在常規(guī)治療基礎(chǔ)上,于術(shù)后第1天開始持續(xù)靜脈泵注鹽酸納美芬注射液(靈寶市豫西藥業(yè)有限責(zé)任公司,批準(zhǔn)文號:國藥準(zhǔn)字H20080805,規(guī)格:1 ml∶0.1 mg)0.7 μg/(kg·h)和注射用單唾液酸四己糖神經(jīng)節(jié)苷脂鈉(哈爾濱醫(yī)大藥業(yè)股份有限公司,批準(zhǔn)文號:國藥準(zhǔn)字H20060422,規(guī)格:20 mg)100 mg/d,連續(xù)使用7 d。
1.4檢測指標(biāo)
于術(shù)后第1天藥物治療前及術(shù)后第3、7天清晨分別采集患者空腹靜脈血4~6 ml,經(jīng)肝素抗凝處理后,以離心半徑5 cm、轉(zhuǎn)速4 000 r/min離心10 min,分離出血漿和血清,置于-80℃低溫保存。采用電化學(xué)發(fā)光法對分離出的血漿標(biāo)本中皮質(zhì)醇和促腎上腺皮質(zhì)激素(ACTH)水平進(jìn)行測定,試劑盒購自美國DPC公司;采用酶聯(lián)免疫吸附法對分離出的血清標(biāo)本中IL-6 和TNF-α水平進(jìn)行測定,試劑盒購自上海活樂生物科技有限公司。所有測量過程均嚴(yán)格按照試劑盒說明書要求操作。
1.5觀察指標(biāo)
(1)于術(shù)后第1天藥物治療前及術(shù)后第3、7天,采用巴氏指數(shù)(BI)評估患者的神經(jīng)功能改善情況,治療后BI評分不低于治療前或不少于60分認(rèn)定為神經(jīng)功能改善,計(jì)算神經(jīng)功能改善率。(2)隨訪90 d,使用卡氏(KPS)評分評估患者的生活自理能力,KPS評分不低于70分認(rèn)定為生活自理能力較好,并計(jì)算患者比例。(3)觀察用藥過程中的不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生情況。
1.6統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法
采用SPSS 19.0軟件對數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)分析。計(jì)量資料以±s表示,組內(nèi)及組間比較采用t檢驗(yàn);計(jì)數(shù)資料以率表示,組間比較采用χ2檢驗(yàn)。P<0.05表示差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2.1兩組患者治療前后血漿皮質(zhì)醇和ACTH變化
治療前,兩組患者血漿皮質(zhì)醇和ACTH含量比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。治療后3、7 d,兩組患者皮質(zhì)醇和ACTH含量均顯著下降,且觀察組患者較對照組下降得更為明顯,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。兩組患者治療前后血漿皮質(zhì)醇和ACTH變化見表2。
2.2兩組患者治療前后IL-6和TNF-α變化
表2 兩組患者治療前后血漿皮質(zhì)醇和ACTH變化(±s)Tab 2 Changes of serum cortisol andACTH between 2groups before and after treatmen(t±s)
表2 兩組患者治療前后血漿皮質(zhì)醇和ACTH變化(±s)Tab 2 Changes of serum cortisol andACTH between 2groups before and after treatmen(t±s)
注:與治療前比較,#P<0.05;與對照組治療后比較,*P<0.05Note:vs.before treatment,#P<0.05;vs.control group after treatment,*P<0.05
組別對照組觀察組n 皮質(zhì)醇,g/L ACTH,pg/ml 32 32治療前40.07±8.48 37.66±7.27治療后3 d 37.81±8.53#32.65±6.12#*治療后7 d 35.36±8.65#27.15±6.99#*治療前152.53±10.66 150.00±12.92治療后3 d 127.04±12.89#117.70±11.17#*治療后7 d 72.51±12.99#62.79±12.56#*
治療前,兩組患者血清IL-6和TNF-α水平比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。治療后3、7 d,兩組患者IL-6和TNF-α水平均顯著下降,且觀察組患者的IL-6(治療后7 d)和TNF-α(治療后3、7 d)水平較對照組下降得更為明顯,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。兩組患者治療前后IL-6和TNF-α變化見表3。
2.3兩組患者治療前后BI評分變化
表3 兩組患者治療前后IL-6和TNF-α變化(±s,ng/L)Tab 3 Changes of IL-6 and TNF-α between 2groups before and after treatmen(t±s,ng/L)
表3 兩組患者治療前后IL-6和TNF-α變化(±s,ng/L)Tab 3 Changes of IL-6 and TNF-α between 2groups before and after treatmen(t±s,ng/L)
注:與治療前比較,#P<0.05;與對照組治療后比較,*P<0.05Note:vs.before treatment,#P<0.05;vs.control group after treatment,*P<0.05
組別對照組觀察組n IL-6 TNF-α 32 32治療前136.66±5.62 136.63±5.75治療后3 d 121.62±12.57#116.53±12.86#治療后7 d 107.38±17.24#96.09±20.54#*治療前165.83±7.93 163.94±6.64治療后3 d 151.87±14.16#142.24±12.73#*治療后7 d 133.13±15.76#119.2±17.31#*
治療前,兩組患者BI評分比較,差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。治療后,兩組患者BI評分均有較大提高,且觀察組患者較對照組提高得更為明顯,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P< 0.05)。治療后第7天,觀察組患者的神經(jīng)功能改善率為50.00%,明顯大于對照組(18.75%),差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(χ2= 12.65,P<0.01)。兩組患者治療前后BI評分變化及神經(jīng)功能改善率見表4。
表4 兩組患者治療前后BI評分變化及神經(jīng)功能改善率(±s)Tab 4 BI score changes and improvement rate of neurological function between 2 groups before and after treatmen(t±s)
表4 兩組患者治療前后BI評分變化及神經(jīng)功能改善率(±s)Tab 4 BI score changes and improvement rate of neurological function between 2 groups before and after treatmen(t±s)
注:與治療前比較,#P<0.05;與對照組治療后比較,*P<0.05Note:vs.before treatment,#P<0.05;vs.control group after treatment,*P<0.05
神經(jīng)功能改善率,%(例)18.75(3)50.00(16)*組別對照組觀察組n BI評分,分32 32治療前37.15±6.72 39.73±6.49治療后3 d 42.68±6.74#49.93±6.99#*治療后7 d 50.90±9.34#60.10±8.92#*
2.4不良反應(yīng)
觀察期間,兩組患者均未見明顯不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生。
2.5兩組患者KPS評分比較
術(shù)后隨訪90 d,觀察組中KPS評分不低于70分者占71.88%(23/32),對照組占46.87%(15/32),組間比較差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(χ2=4.15,P=0.04)。
腦腫瘤手術(shù)作為一種創(chuàng)傷刺激,會刺激機(jī)體產(chǎn)生應(yīng)激反應(yīng),從而釋放大量興奮性神經(jīng)遞質(zhì)、炎癥因子和含氧化合物等,造成中樞神經(jīng)系統(tǒng)的繼發(fā)性損傷[2]。皮質(zhì)醇、促腎上腺皮質(zhì)激素聯(lián)合評價(jià)可以較好地顯示下丘腦-垂體-腎上腺皮質(zhì)軸的功能狀態(tài)[3]。另有研究顯示,IL-6、TNF-α等因子也參與了腦腫瘤手術(shù)患者顱腦損傷后的繼發(fā)性病理過程,可以作為炎性反應(yīng)的標(biāo)志物[4-6]。
納美芬是一種純度較高的阿片類受體拮抗藥,對興奮性神經(jīng)遞質(zhì)具有強(qiáng)拮抗作用;此外,納美芬還可以穩(wěn)定細(xì)胞生物膜,對減少損傷性細(xì)胞因子、修復(fù)受損神經(jīng)元細(xì)胞、逆轉(zhuǎn)神經(jīng)功能障礙以及改善微循環(huán)等均有作用[7-9]。單唾液酸四己糖神經(jīng)節(jié)苷脂鈉是一種中樞神經(jīng)損傷治療藥,可以通過受損的血腦屏障進(jìn)入中樞神經(jīng)系統(tǒng)內(nèi),從而具有抗氧化和修復(fù)神經(jīng)元兩大作用,能有效降低腦水腫和腦出血的發(fā)生率[10]。
本研究結(jié)果顯示,治療后觀察組患者的皮質(zhì)醇、ACTH含量和IL-6、TNF-α水平均顯著下降,其原因可能為:單唾液酸四己糖神經(jīng)節(jié)苷脂鈉可以進(jìn)入中樞神經(jīng)元細(xì)胞內(nèi)保護(hù)細(xì)胞膜的穩(wěn)定性,降低IL-6、TNF-α等炎性因子水平,拮抗氧自由基和興奮性神經(jīng)遞質(zhì)的毒副作用;納美芬可以減少阿片類受體信號傳導(dǎo),降低神經(jīng)系統(tǒng)興奮性,減少應(yīng)激性激素皮質(zhì)醇、ACTH的分泌。觀察組患者的BI評分和神經(jīng)功能改善率均明顯高于對照組,其原因可能與納美芬和單唾液酸四己糖神經(jīng)節(jié)苷脂鈉的修復(fù)作用有關(guān),其可以修復(fù)缺損細(xì)胞膜、減少氧化反應(yīng)、加強(qiáng)神經(jīng)元自我修復(fù)能力。觀察組患者的KPS評分明顯高于對照組,其原因可能為聯(lián)合用藥能減輕患者創(chuàng)傷性應(yīng)激反應(yīng),使由應(yīng)激產(chǎn)生的不良反應(yīng)減少,從而減輕了對機(jī)體顱腦的損傷程度,提高了患者的生活自理能力。
綜上所述,納美芬聯(lián)合單唾液酸四己糖神經(jīng)節(jié)苷脂鈉用于腦腫瘤手術(shù)患者具有良好療效,其機(jī)制可能與降低應(yīng)激性激素皮質(zhì)醇、ACTH的含量以及炎性因子IL-6、TNF-α的水平,從而抑制創(chuàng)傷后應(yīng)激反應(yīng)和炎性反應(yīng)程度密切相關(guān)。但是,由于本研究樣本量較小、研究時(shí)間較短,在用藥劑量安全性和遠(yuǎn)期預(yù)后效果方面尚需要進(jìn)一步證實(shí)。
[1]鄧民強(qiáng),田仁副,潘柯,等.納美芬對腦腫瘤術(shù)后患者血漿皮質(zhì)醇、促腎上腺皮質(zhì)激素及葡萄糖水平的影響[J].重慶醫(yī)學(xué),2013,42(2):160.
[2]Masson EA,Sibille E,Martine L,et al.Apprehending ganglioside diversity:a comprehensive methodological approach[J].J Lipid Res,2015,56(9):1 821.
[3]Zhang JZ,Jing L,Ma Y,et al.Monosialotetrahexosy-1 ganglioside attenuates diabetes-enhanced brain damage after transient forebrain ischemia and suppresses phosphorylation of ERK1/2 in the rat brain[J].Brain Res,2010,1 344 (1):200.
[4]Piao H,Kuan CT,Chandramohan V,et al.Affinity-matured recombinant immunotoxin targeting gangliosides 3′-isoLM1 and 3′,6′-isoLD1 on malignant gliomas[J].MAbs,2013,5(5):748.
[5] 張林峰,鄭小玲.納美芬聯(lián)合神經(jīng)節(jié)苷脂GM1治療急性卒中的有效性及安全性觀察[J].現(xiàn)代診斷與治療,2015,26(1):70.
[6]焦園園,劉紅,張艷華.9家腫瘤??漆t(yī)院激素類抗腫瘤藥應(yīng)用情況及處方合理性分析[J].中國藥房,2014,25 (26):2 410.
[7]Zhang YP,Huang QL,Zhao CM,et al.GM1 improves neurofascin155 association with lipid rafts and prevents rat brain myelin injury after hypoxia-ischemia[J].Braz J Med Biol Res,2011,44(6):553.
[8]Seyfried TN,Mukherjee P.Ganglioside GM3 is antiangiogenic in malignant brain cancer[J].J Oncol,2013,405 (23):7 321.
[9]馬笑宇.神經(jīng)節(jié)苷脂鈉聯(lián)用納美芬對急性重型顱腦損傷患者氧化應(yīng)激狀態(tài)的影響[J].抗感染藥學(xué),2011,8(4):296.
[10]Kobayashi Y,da Silva R,Kumanogoh H,et al.Ganglioside contained in the neuronal tissue-enriched acidic protein of 22 kDa(NAP-22)fraction prepared from the detergent-resistant membrane microdomain of rat brain inhibits the phosphatase activity of calcineurin[J].J Neurosci Res,2015,93(9):1 462.
(編輯:胡曉霖)
Clinical Observation of Nalmefene Combined with Monosialotetrahexosylganglioside Sodium in the Treatment of Patients in Brain Tumor Operation
WANG Shanjun1,LIU Xiaogang1,ZHANG Wei1,ZHOU Shuai2(1.Dept.of Neurosurgery,Yidu Central Hospital of Weifang,Shangdong Weifang 262500,China;2.The Institution of Human Anatomy and Embryology,Binzhou Medical University,Shandong Binzhou 256603,China)
OBJECTIVE:To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of nalmefene combined with monosialotetrahexosylganglioside sodium in the treatment of patients in brain tumor operation.METHODS:64 patients in brain tumor operation were randomly divided into observation group and control group,32 cases in each group.Control group received brain cell protection,reducing intracranial pressure,anti-infective,vasodilator and other conventional treatment;observation group additionally received 0.7 μg/(kg· h)nalmefene combined with 100 mg/d monosialotetrahexosylganglioside sodium from the first day of operation,for continuous 7 d.The plasma cortisol,adrenocorticotropic hormone(ACTH)before and 3,7 d after treatment,changes of serum IL-6,TNF-α and Barthel index(BI)in 2 groups were observed,improvement of neurological function and ADR were observed;Karnofsky (KPS)score was determined after 90 d follow-up used to assess the patient’s ability to take care of themselves.RESULTS:After treatment,plasma cortisol and ACTH content,serum TNF-α and IL-6 levels in 2 groups significantly decreased than before,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);cortisol,ACTH and TNF-α levels 3,7 d after treatment,IL-6 level 7 d after treatment in observation group decreased more significantly than control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After treatment,BI score in 2 groups significantly increased,and observation group increased more significantly than control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).7 d after treatment,improvement rate of neurological function was 50.00%,which was significantly higher than that of the control group(18.75%),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant ADR occurred of 2 groups in the study.Following-up for 90 d,the KPS score in observation group with not less than 70 points accounted for 71.88%,which was significantly higher than the control group(46.87%),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).CONCLUSIONS:Nalmefene combined with monosialotetrahexosylganglioside sodium can promote the recovery of patients in brain tumor operation,reduce cortisol,ACTH,IL-6 and TNF-α levels and improve prognosis of patients.
Nalmefene;Monosialotetrahexosylganglioside sodium;Brain tumor operation;Neurological function
R749.1+4文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)志碼A
1001-0408(2016)23-3221-03
10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2016.23.18
山東省自然科學(xué)基金資助項(xiàng)目(No.2014ZRB14674)
*住院醫(yī)師,碩士。研究方向:神經(jīng)外科學(xué)。電話:0536-3275657。E-mail:yanruiyun81@126.com
2015-09-17
2015-11-11)