• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Association between TSHR gene polymorphism and the risk of Graves' disease: a meta-analysis

    2016-04-18 11:17:05WeiQianKuanfengXuWentingJiaLingLanXuqinZhengXueyangYangDaiCui
    THE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH 2016年6期

    Wei Qian, Kuanfeng Xu, Wenting Jia, Ling Lan, Xuqin Zheng, Xueyang Yang, Dai Cui?

    1 Department of Endocrinology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, The First Aff i liated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing , Jiangsu 210029, China;

    2 Department of Endocrinology, Beijing Ji Shui Tan Hospital, The Forth Medical College of Peking University, Beijing 100035, China.

    Association between TSHR gene polymorphism and the risk of Graves' disease: a meta-analysis

    Wei Qian1,?, Kuanfeng Xu1,?, Wenting Jia1, Ling Lan2, Xuqin Zheng1, Xueyang Yang1, Dai Cui1?

    1 Department of Endocrinology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, The First Aff i liated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing , Jiangsu 210029, China;

    2 Department of Endocrinology, Beijing Ji Shui Tan Hospital, The Forth Medical College of Peking University, Beijing 100035, China.

    Thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) is thought to be a signif i cant candidate for genetic susceptibility to Graves' disease (GD). However, the association betweenTSHRgene polymorphism and the risk of GD remains controversial. In this study, we investigated the relationship between the two conditions by meta-analysis. We searched all relevant case-control studies in PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI and Wanfang for literature available until May 2015, and chose studies on two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs): rs179247 and rs12101255, withinTSHRintron-1. Bias of heterogeneity test among studies was determined by the f i xed or random effect pooled measure, and publication bias was examined by modif i ed Begg's and Egger's test. Eight eligible studies with 15 outcomes were involved in this meta-analysis, including 6,976 GD cases and 7,089 controls from China, Japan, Poland, UK and Brazil. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) for allelic comparisons showed that both TSHR rs179247A/G and rs12101255T/C polymorphism had signif i cant association with GD (OR=1.422, 95%CI=1.353–1.495,P<0.001,Pheterogeneity=0.448; OR=1.502, 95%CI: 1.410–1.600,P<0.001,Pheterogeneity=0.642), and the associations were the same under dominant, recessive and co-dominant models. In subgroup analyses, the conclusions are also consistent with all those in Asian, European and South America subgroups (P<0.001). Our meta-analysis revealed a signif i cant association between TSHR rs179247A/G and rs12101255T/C polymorphism with GD in f i ve different populations from Asia, Europe and South America. Further studies are needed in other ethnic backgrounds to independently con fi rm our fi ndings.

    Graves' disease, thyroid stimulating hormone receptor, polymorphism, meta-analysis

    Introduction

    Graves' disease (GD) is one of the most common organ-specific endocrine diseases, and also a multifactorial disease with genetic susceptibilities and environmental factors. It affects up to approximately 1% of the general population[1], and the studies in twins suggest that genetic factors contribute 80% to the etiology of GD[2]. Previous works have identified several gene loci that are associated with the risk to develop GD, which include human leukocyte antigen (HLA)[3-4], cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4)[5],thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR)[6-9], thyroglobulin (TG)[10-11], protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTPN) gene[12-13],CD40gene[14-16], Fc receptor-like protein 3 (FCRL3) gene[16], vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene[17], andinterleukin-1gene[18]. In recent years, a number of new genes have been reported which may be associated with the etiology of GD, including the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene[19],CD24gene[20], mannose-binding lectin2 (MBL2) gene[21], NACHT leucinerich repeat protein 1 (NLRP1) gene[22], and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) gene[23]. Among these genes, theTSHRgene is a significant candidate, and failure of tolerance to TSHR is central to the pathogenesis of GD.

    Many studies have investigated the association betweenTSHRgene polymorphism and the risk of GD, but yielded conflicting results. Early case-control studies mainly concentrated on three polymorphic sites, including D36H, P52T and D727E[24-26], but gave mixed results. Later studies focused on SNPs in intron-1, -7 and -8, and significant associations were found in multi-ethnic origins. In 2003, Hoet al.[27]firstly found the association of C/G+63IVS1 (in intron-1) with GD in a cohort of Singaporean patients of multi-ethnic origins. Later, association screening by two independent studies identified strong association withinTSHRintron-7 and -8 in Japanese[28]andTSHRintron-1 in UK Caucasian cohorts[29], which firstly provided convincing evidence for TSHR association with GD. Recent studies focus on two SNPs, including rs179247 and rs12101255[30-37], withinTSHRintron-1, in Asian, European and South America descents, but still generated conflicting results. To further examine their potential role in influencing the risk of GD, we performed a meta-analysis on case-control studies to investigate their effects in populations.

    Materials and methods

    Search strategy

    We performed an exhaustive search on studies that examined the association ofTSHRgene polymorphism with GD. Data were collected from PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI and Wanfang databases, and completed on May 2015. Search strategy was based on combinations of "TSHR", "thyroid stimulating hormone receptor", "gene", "polymorphism", "thyroid", "Graves", "Hashimoto", and "autoimmune thyroid disease" limited to humans without language restriction. All the searched studies were retrieved, and their references were checked as well for other relevant publications. All searches were conducted independently by two investigators.

    Study selection

    The following criteria were used for report selection for the meta-analysis: (a) studies evaluating the associations between either one or both of the twoTSHRSNPs (rs179247 and rs12101255) with GD risk; (b) in an case-control design; (c) with sufficient data available to estimate an odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (95%CI); (d) genotype distributions in the control group should be consistent with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE).

    Studies were excluded if one of the following was present: (a) case reports, review articles, abstracts and editorials; (b) reports with incomplete data; (c) studies with overlapping samples; (d) articles based on pedigree data; (e) genotype distribution of the controls deviated from HWE.

    Data extraction

    The following information was extracted from each study by two investigators independently and reached a consensus on all items: first author's name, year of publication, ethnicity, genotyping methods, number of cases and controls, available allele, and genotype frequencies. Not all the necessary statistics were reported directly in the papers; therefore, we had to estimate OR from the reported data as necessary. When studies included two or more populations, the data were extracted separately in all analyses. We defined no minimum number of patients to include a study in our meta-analysis.

    Statistical analysis

    We firstly assessed HWE in the controls for each study using a goodness-of-fit χ2analysis, andP<0.05 was considered as significant disequilibrium. Heterogeneity between the studies was evaluated with χ2-basedQstatistic andI2metric.P>0.1 indicated a lack of heterogeneity across studies, allowing for the use of a fixed-effects model. Otherwise, a randomeffects model was used. Association between GD and rs179247 and rs12101255 polymorphisms was estimated using OR, with the corresponding 95%CI. The significance of pooled OR was determined byZ-test, andP<0.05 was considered statistically significant. We performed primary analyses using the per-allele model for each polymorphism, and addressed a dominant model, a recessive model, and a co-dominant model as secondary analyses. We also carried out stratified analyses by ethnicity in rs179247. Sensitivity analysis was conducted by sequentially excluding a single study each time to identify the potential influence of individual data set to pooled ORs. Potential publication bias was estimated using modified Begg's and Egger's tests. Thesignificance of intercept was determined by thet-test suggested by Egger's test (P<0.05 was considered representative of statistically significant publication bias). All of the statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 11.0 (Stata, College Station, TX, USA).

    Results

    Study characteristics

    The detailed steps of our literature search are shown inFig. 1. According to the study inclusion criteria, a total of eight relevant case-control studies with different samples were selected in the meta-analysis, including 6,976 GD cases and 7,089 controls of five different populations. Studies had been carried out in China, Japan, Poland, UK and Brazil. One of these reports included three populations, and we included this report as three separate studies. Therefore, a total of 10 association studies were considered for association between the rs179247 and rs12101255 polymorphism and GD. Characteristics of each study are shown inTable 1andTable 2. These studies included 15 association outcomes; in which 10 examined association between rs179247 polymorphism (6,976 cases and 7,089 controls) and GD, and five for the rs12101255 polymorphism (4,430 cases and 4,512 controls). Among 10 studies, four were from Caucasians[30-31], five were from Asians[32-36], and one was from South America[37]. The allele and genotype distributions in the included studies are summarized inTable 1andTable 2for TSHR rs179247 and rs12101255 polymorphisms, respectively.

    Meta-analysis

    Fig. 1Selection of articles for inclusion and excluding in the meta-analysis.

    Fig. 2Stratified analysis pooled odds ratios for the association between the rs179247A/G polymorphism and susceptibility to GD risk.

    To summarize the published data, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis.Table 3shows the pooled ORs and heterogeneity tests from different analysis models. We firstly pooled overall effects for rs179247A/G polymorphism and GD risk in 10 studies with a total of 6,976 cases and 7,089 controls. A significant association between the TSHR rs179247 A/G polymorphism and GD was found, and the pooled OR for allelic frequency comparison showed that A allele significantly increased the risk of GD in people from China, Japan, Poland, UK and Brazil, with OR=1.422, 95%CI=1.353–1.495,P<0.001,Pheterogeneity=0.448. Moreover, this significant association was found in all genetic models (dominant model: OR=1.632, 95%CI=1.484–1.796,P<0.001,Pheterogeneity=0.537; recessive model: OR=1.552, 95%CI=1.445–1.667,P<0.001,Pheterogeneity=0.264; and co-dominant model: OR=2.022, 95%CI=1.816–2.252,P<0.001,Pheterogeneity=0.653). Then, subgroups analysis for ethnicityt was performed, and the results were similar that rs179247 A/G polymorphism was also significantly associated with increased GD risk both in two Asian populations (OR=1.426, 95%CI: 1.310–1.553,P<0.001,Pheterogeneity=0.133), two European populations (OR=1.415, 95%CI: 1.327–1.508,P<0.001,Pheterogeneity=0.662) and one South America population (OR=1.503, 95%CI: 1.183–1.910,P<0.001,Pheterogeneity=0), and the association was the same under dominant, recessive and co-dominant models. Furthermore, whatever we calculated the pooled OR for rs179247 A/G polymorphism and GD risk under random or fixed effects model risk, the results were similar. It indicated that there was no significant heterogeneity among these studies (Table 1,3andFig. 2).

    The association between rs12101255 T/C polymorphism and GD was investigated in five studies with a total of 4,430 cases and 4,512 controls. For rs12101255 T/C polymorphism, T allele displayed an increased frequency in GD cases from these four different counties. There was a significant association between rs12101255 T/C polymorphism and GD risk in additive (OR=1.502, 95%CI: 1.410–1.600,P<0.001,Pheterogeneity=0.642), dominant (OR=1.672, 95%CI: 1.525–1.834,P<0.001,Pheterogeneity=0.528), recessive (OR=1.741,95%, CI:1.548–1.957,P<0.001,Pheterogeneity=0.766) and co-dominant (FEM OR=2.236 , 95%CI: 1.956–2.556,P<0.001,Pheterogeneity=0.882) models (Table 2,3andFig. 3).

    In conclusion, our meta-analysis revealed significant association between TSHR rs179247A/G and rs12101255T/C polymorphisms with GD in four different populations from Asia and Europea.

    Heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses

    Fig. 3Stratified analysis pooled odds ratios for the association between the rs12101255T/C polymorphism and susceptibility to GD risk.

    Fig. 4Sensitivity analyses for rs179247A/G polymorphisms in GD.

    As shown inTable 3, no significant heterogeneity was observed among studies for rs179247A/G and rs12101255 T/C polymorphisms in all models in overall populations. However, when the data were stratified by ethnicity, the heterogeneity among studies of rs179247A/G polymorphism was eliminated in Asian descents in allele and recessive models. Therefore, in these two models, we chose a fixed-effects model, and in the other models, a random-effects model was used.

    Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess whether each individual study influenced the final results (Fig. 4andFig. 5). In the sensitivity analysis, the influence of each study on the pooled OR was examined by repeating the meta-analysis while omitting each study, one at a time. The results showed no significant changes in the pooled OR, indicating that the results of our meta-analysis were reliable and stable.

    Evaluation of publication bias

    Publication bias was performed using Egger's test (Table 4) and Begg's funnel plots. The funnel plots were asymmetrical and the statistical results showed no publication biases for any of the polymorphisms examined (rs179247A/G:P=0.898; rs12101255 T/C:P=0.688), indicating that our results were statistically reliable.

    Discussion

    Fig. 5Sensitivity analyses for rs12101255T/C polymorphisms in GD.

    TSHR is primarily expressed on thyroid follicular cell surface membrane, andviaits ligand, TSH, regulates thyroid growth and hormone production. However, in autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) patients, the body produces auto-antibodies including thyroid-stimulating antibody (TSAb) and TSH-stimulation blocking antibody (TSBAb) against TSHR, and TSAb have a predominant effect in GD affecting thyroid cell growth and differentiation and finally leading to thyroid dysfunction[38]. Genetic variation within TSHR region may influence TSHR structure, expression and/or post-translational processing, which in turn could initiate or exacerbate autoimmune response against TSHR in GD.

    TSHRgene is located on chromosome 14q31 and contained 10 exons and 9 introns. Early case-control studies onTSHRgene single nucleotide polymorphisms mainly concentrated on three polymorphic sites, including D36H, P52T and D727E[24-26], and no associations of GD were found with all the three polymorphisms. Later studies turned to focus on SNPs in intron-1, -7 and -8, and significant associations were found in multi-ethnic origins. In 2003, Hoet al.[27]found the association of C/ G+63IVS1 (in intron-1) with GD in a cohort of mixed Chinese, Indian and Malay ancestry. In 2005, Hirataniet al.[28]found that the strong association within TSHR intron-7 and -8 in Japanese (especially rs2268475, rs1990595 and rs3783938), and the study also investigated three variants within intron-1 and identified some evidence of association with TSHR intron-1 SNP, rs2268474 (P=0.026) in the Japanese, andTSHRgene became the first GD’s specific locus. Later, Dechairoet al.[29]found that the strongest association for SNP was rs2268458 in intron-1 in a large Caucasian cohort, and it is the first time that the association of TSHR rs2268458with GD was demonstrated in a large sample cohort. More recently, several case-control studies provided a comprehensive analysis of TSHR association, with the strongest SNP associations at rs179247 and rs12101255.

    Table 4Egger's publication bias test for rs179247A/G and rs12101255T/C polymorphisms in GD.

    rs179247 and rs12101255 were both in intron-1, and although early genetic studies provided inconclusive evidence of TSHR association with GD, our results indicated that rs179247 and rs12101255 polymorphisms were GD susceptibility loci in five populations (Chinese, Japanese, Polish, British and Brazil). The associations were the same under all genetic models. In subgroup analyses, the conclusion is also consistent with those in Asian, European and South America subgroups. However, according to another case-control cohort study in China[39], which involved 199 GD patients and 208 control subjects, three SNPs (rs179247, rs12101255 and rs2268458) were not involved in the pathogenesis of GD in a northern Chinese population. This difference may be attributed to its small sample size. In one of the included studies, Liuet al.[33]detected five SNPs (rs179247, rs12101255, rs2268475, rs1990595, and rs3783938) inTSHRgene to evaluate the association between SNP of TSHR and AITD in a Chinese Han population. However, none of the three SNPs in intron-7 and -8 (rs2268475, rs1990595, and rs3783938) was associated with GD pathogenesis, and these were different from those on the Japanese population[28], which investigated 22 intronic SNPs across the TSHR region and identified single SNP association with GD primarily located within intron-7 of TSHR. However, in Liu’ study, the result suggested rs3783938 within intron-8 was significantly increased in HT patients. In another study, Brandet al.[30]screened an extended region of TSHR (800Kb) and investigated a combined panel of 98 SNPs in a UK Caucasian cohort. In this study, 28 SNPs revealed evidence of association with GD (P<0.05), all of which were located within a 340 kb window spanning TSHR intron-1 and neighbouring C14ORF145. The strongest SNP associations were all located within intron-1 of TSHR and were separated by just 18.5 kb; it ruled out any association within intron-7 and -8 in Caucasians. This once again serves to highlight the presence of geographical genetic variation and the need for detailed analysis in different populations; therefore, further studies are now required in Japanese and other ethnic backgrounds to independently confirm previous reports of association within TSHR intron-7 and -8.

    Furthermore, recently a new study drew an conclusion that allele A of rs179247 polymorphism inTSHRgene was associated with lower risk of Graves’ orbitopathy (GO) in GD patients, but only in young patients, not in either elderly patients or the group analyzed as a whole[40]. However, our article showed that allele A of rs179247 polymorphism inTSHRgene can increase the risk of GD. This should also be focused as a new research subject for us to study next step and find out association betweenTSHRgene polymorphism and the risk of GO.

    Since rs179247 and rs12101255 are located 18.5Kb apart within TSHR intron-1, it is necessary to resolve if the two SNPs had independent effects or if the effect of one SNP was secondary to linkage disequilibrium (LD) with the other. Logistic regression was unable to split association between rs179247 and rs12101255, and different studies suggested different conclusions. The case-control studies in three European Caucasian cohorts[31]and in a Chinese Han population from seaboard in Shandong[35]suggested that association at rs179247 may be driven by rs12101255 or that rs12101255 was in stronger LD with the aetiological variants within the region, while another study on Chinese cohort[32]suggested that rs179247 may be the major susceptibility locus. Diversity of races or other different elements were possible problems, and interactions with other SNPs that have not been reported cannot be ignored. One of the included studies[31]revealed that a number of SNPs were in strong LD (r2>.0.80) with rs17927, locating within 5 kb of rs179247 itself within TSHR intron-1. At least four additional SNPs were in strong LD (r2>0.80) with rs12101255, and all located within the proposed 40 kb region, separated by just 18.5 kb from rs12101255.

    Although the studies have identified two highly associated-SNPs with GD, the pathogenesis of AITD has not been fully elucidated. It has been suggested that TSHR sometimes undergoes post-translational intra-molecular cleavage into distinct A and B subunits[41], and that TSHR A-subunit is the critical autoantigen and shedding of the A subunit may result in the production of TSAb[42]. ST4 and ST5, two of the truncated TSHR mRNA transcripts, encode the majority of soluble A-subunit directly. Thus, increased ST4 and ST5 transcription may enhance the generation of a shed A subunit and trigger autoimmune response and the production of TSHR autoantibodies[40]. Furthermore, it has been found that genotypes of GD-associated SNPs were associated with expression of ST4 and ST5[30]. In rs179247 polymorphism ofTSHRgene, the frequency of AA genotype and A allele was higher among GD patients compared with controls, and ST4 expression was higher in AA genotype compared with GG genotype as well. A similar trend of expression was found between ST5 and rs179247 genotypes, although not significant. The other SNP highly associated with GD, rs12101255, also revealed higher ST4 and ST5 mRNA expression with genotype, and GD-associated TT genotype revealed a higher expression of ST4 and ST5. These may support the hypothesis for GD pathogenesis.

    In conclusion, our meta-analysis confirmed strong association of TSHR intron-1 rs179247 and rs12101255 polymorphisms with GD in five different populations from Asian, European and South America. Further studies are required in other ethnic backgrounds to independently confirm previous reports of association within TSHR intron, which may lead to advances towards developing TSHR targeted therapeutics.

    Acknowledgements

    Author contribution statement

    This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81102032).

    [1] Hollowell JG, Staehling NW, Flanders WD, et al. Serum TSH, T(4), and thyroid antibodies in the United States population (1988 to 1994): National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III)[J].J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2002, 87(2): 489-499.

    [2] Brix TH, Kyvik KO, Christensen K, et al. Evidence for a major role of heredity in Graves’ disease: a population-based study of two Danish twin cohorts[J].J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2001, 86(2): 930-934.

    [3] Li Y, Yao Y, Yang M, et al. Association between HLA-B*46 allele and Graves’ disease in Asian populations: a meta-analysis[J].Int J Med Sci,2013,10(2): 164-170.

    [4] Hodge SE, Ban Y, Strug LJ, et al. Possible interaction between HLA-DRbeta1 and thyroglobulin variants in Graves’ disease[J].Thyroid,2006,16(4): 351-355.

    [5] Du L, Yang J, Huang J, et al. The associations between the polymorphisms in the CTLA-4 gene and the risk of Graves’ disease in the Chinese population[J].BMC Med Genet,2013,14(46): 2-8.

    [6] Shao L, Jiang H, Liang J, et al. Study on the relationship between TSHR gene and thyroid diseases[J].Cell Biochem Biophys,2011,61(2): 377-382.

    [7] Drexhage HA. Are there more than antibodies to the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor that meet the eye in Graves’ disease[J].Endocrinology,2006, 147(1): 9-12.

    [8] Chistiakov DA. Thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor and its role in Graves’ disease[J].Mol Genet Metab,2003,80(4): 377-388.

    [9] Yin X, Latif R, Bahn R, et al. Influence of the TSH receptor gene on susceptibility to Graves’ disease and Graves’ophthalmopathy[J].Thyroid,2008, 18(11): 1201-1206.

    [10] Ban Y, Tozaki T, Taniyama M, et al. Multiple SNPs in intron 41 of thyroglobulin gene are associated with autoimmune thyroid disease in the Japanese population[J].PLoS One,2012, 7(5): e37501.

    [11] Caputo M, Rivolta CM, Mories T, et al. Analysis of thyroglobulin gene polymorphisms in patients with autoimmune thyroiditis[J].Endocrine,2010, 37(3): 389-395.

    [12] Zeitlin AA, Heward JM, Brand OJ, et al. Use of Tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to screen PTPN21: no association with Graves’ disease[J].Clin Endocrinol (Oxf),2006, 65(3): 380-384.

    [13] Chabchoub G, Teixiera EP, Maalej A, et al. The R620W polymorphism of the protein tyrosine phosphatase 22 gene in autoimmune thyroid diseases and rheumatoid arthritis in the Tunisian population[J].Ann Hum Biol,2009, 36(3): 342-349.

    [14] Hsiao JY, Hsieh MC, Hsiao CT, et al. Association of CD40 and thyroglobulin genes with later-onset Graves’ disease in Taiwanese patients[J].Eur J Endocrinol,2008, 159(5): 617-621.

    [15] Tomer Y, Concepcion E, Greenberg DA. A C/T single-nucleotide polymorphism in the region of the CD40 gene is associated with Graves’ disease[J].Thyroid,2002, 12(12): 1129-1135.

    [16] Inoue N, Watanabe M, Yamada H, et al. Associations between autoimmune thyroid disease prognosis and functional polymorphisms of susceptibility genes, CTLA4, PTPN22, CD40, FCRL3, and ZFAT, previously revealed in genome-wide association studies[J].J Clin Immunol,2012, 32(6): 1243-1252.

    [17] Chen RH, Chang CT, Chen HY, et al. Association between vitamin-D receptor gene FokI polymorphism and Graves’disease among Taiwanese Chinese[J].J Clin Lab Anal,2007, 21(3): 173-177.

    [18] Liu N, Li X, Liu C, et al. The association of interleukin-1alpha and interleukin-1beta polymorphisms with the risk of Graves’ disease in a case-control study and meta-analysis[J].Hum Immunol,2010, 71(4): 397-401.

    [19] Mao R, Fan Y, Zuo L, et al. Association study between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms and Graves’ disease[J].Cell Biochem Funct,2010, 28(7): 585-590.

    [20] Inoue N, Watanabe M, Hayashi F, et al. The association between a functional polymorphism in the CD24 gene and the development of autoimmune thyroid diseases[J].Tissue Antigens,2013, 81(3): 161-163.

    [21] Filho CB, Rodrigues FF, Segat L, et al. Association of MBL2 gene exon 1 variants with autoimmune thyroid disease in Brazilian patients[J].Int J Immunogenet,2012, 39(4): 357-361.

    [22] Alkhateeb A, Jarun Y, Tashtoush R. Polymorphisms in NLRP1 gene and susceptibility to autoimmune thyroid disease[J].Autoimmunity,2013, 46(3): 215-221.

    [23] Xiao L, Muhali FS, Cai TT, et al. Association of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the STAT3 gene with autoimmune thyroid disease in Chinese individuals[J].Funct Integr Genomics,2013, 13(4): 455-461.

    [24] Ban Y, Greenberg DA, Concepcion ES, et al. A germline single nucleotide polymorphism at the intracellular domain of the human thyrotropin receptor does not have a major effect on the development of Graves’ disease[J].Thyroid,2012, 12(12): 1079-1083.

    [25] Muhlberg T, Herrmann K, Joba W, et al. Lack of association of nonautoimmune hyperfunctioning thyroid disorders and a germline polymorphism of codon 727 of the human thyrotropin receptor in a European Caucasian population[J].J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2000, 85(8): 2640-2643.

    [26] Chistiakov DA, Savost’anov KV, Turakulov RI, et al. Further studies of genetic susceptibility to Graves’ disease in a Russian population[J].Med Sci Monit,2002, 8(3): 180-184.

    [27] Ho SC, Goh SS, Khoo DH. Association of Graves’ disease with intragenic polymorphism of the thyrotropin receptorgene in a cohort of Singapore patients of multi-ethnic origins[J].Thyroid,2003, 13(6): 523-528.

    [28] Hiratani H, Bowden DW, Ikegami S, et al. Multiple SNPs in intron 7 of thyrotropin receptor are associated with Graves’ disease[J].J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2005, 90(5): 2898-2903.

    [29] Dechairo BM, Zabaneh D, Collins J, et al. Association of the TSHR gene with Graves’ disease: the first disease specific locus[J].Eur J Hum Genet,2005, 13(11): 1223-1230.

    [30] Brand OJ, Barrett JC, Simmonds MJ, et al. Association of the thyroid stimulating hormone receptor gene (TSHR) with Graves’ disease[J].Hum Mol Genet,2009, 18(9): 1704-1713.

    [31] Ploski R, Brand OJ, Jurecka-Lubieniecka B, et al. Thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) intron 1 variants are major risk factors for Graves’ disease in three European Caucasian cohorts[J].PLoS One,2010(11), 5e15512.

    [32] Yang SY, Liu W, Xue LQ. Association between TSHR gene intron1 polymorphisms and Graves’ disease[J].Chin J Endocrinol Metab(in Chinese), 2011, 27(3): 478-481.

    [33] Liu L, Wu HQ, Wang Q, et al. Association between thyroid stimulating hormone receptor gene intron polymorphisms and autoimmune thyroid disease in a Chinese Han population[J].Endocr J,2012, 59(8): 717-723.

    [34] Wang R, Zhang XM, Liu BL, et al. Association between thyroid stimulating hormone receptor gene1 intron polymorphisms and Graves’ disease[J].Chin J Endocrinol Metab(in Chinese), 2012, 28(4): 306-310.

    [35] Wang HL, Yang LH, Jia ZT. Association between thyroid stimulating hormone receptor gene polymorphisms and autoimmune thyroid disease in a Chinese Han population from seaboard in Shangdong provience[J].Chin J Endocrinol Metab(in Chinese), 2013, 29(4): 108-111.

    [36] Inoue N, Watanabe M, Katsumata Y, et al. Different genotypes of a functional polymorphism of the TSHR gene are associated with the development and severity of Graves’and Hashimoto’s diseases[J].Tissue Antigens,2013, 82(4): 288-290.

    [37] Bufalo NE, Dos Santos RB, Marcello MA, et al. TSHR intronic polymorphisms (rs179247 and rs12885526) and their role in the susceptibility of the Brazilian population to Graves’ disease and Graves’ ophthalmopathy[J].J Endocrinol Invest, 2015, 38(5): 555-561

    [38] Smith BR, Sanders J, Furmaniak J. TSH receptor antibodies[J].Thyroid,2007, 17(10): 923-938.

    [39] Xu LD, Zhang XL, Sun HM, et al. Lack of association between thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor haplotypes and Graves’ disease in a northern Chinese population. [J]Tissue Antigens,2011(1), 77: 2.

    [40] Beata JL, Rafal P, Dorota K. Association between Polymorphisms in the TSHR Gene and Graves’Orbitopathy[J].PLOS ONE, 2014, 9(7): e102653.

    [41] Brand OJ, Gough SC. Genetics of thyroid autoimmunity and the role of the TSHR[J].Mol Cell Endocrinol,2010, 322(1-2): 135-143.

    [42] Chen CR, Pichurin P, Nagayama Y, et al. The thyrotropin receptor autoantigen in Graves’ disease is the culprit as well as the victim[J].J Clin Invest,2003, 111(12): 1897-1904.

    ?These authors contributed equally to this work.

    ?Corresponding author: Dai Cui, MD, PhD, Department of Endocrinology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, The First Aff i liated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Guangzhou Road 300#, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China, Tel/Fax: +86-25-68136983/+86-25-83715525, E-mail: cui_dai@163.com.

    ? 2016 by the Journal of Biomedical Research. All rights reserved.

    Received 30 November 2014, Revised 04 February 2015, Accepted 31 May 2015, Epub 03 September 2015

    R581.1, Document code: A

    The authors reported no conf l ict of interests.

    10.7555/JBR.30.20140144

    久久性视频一级片| 十八禁网站免费在线| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 亚洲成人久久性| 亚洲av成人av| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 很黄的视频免费| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产精品免费视频内射| 中文字幕色久视频| 天天添夜夜摸| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| av中文乱码字幕在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 日本欧美视频一区| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 天天添夜夜摸| 午夜影院日韩av| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 黄色成人免费大全| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 曰老女人黄片| 免费av中文字幕在线| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 国产高清激情床上av| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 日韩免费av在线播放| www国产在线视频色| 91成年电影在线观看| 在线观看66精品国产| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 中国美女看黄片| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 一级毛片女人18水好多| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产精品成人在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 色播在线永久视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 嫩草影院精品99| 亚洲片人在线观看| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 午夜久久久在线观看| videosex国产| www日本在线高清视频| 日本a在线网址| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| av国产精品久久久久影院| 两个人看的免费小视频| 91大片在线观看| 我的亚洲天堂| 精品久久久精品久久久| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 麻豆av在线久日| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 色播在线永久视频| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 久久狼人影院| 国产精品永久免费网站| 亚洲av成人av| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 在线播放国产精品三级| 黄片小视频在线播放| 美女福利国产在线| 国产精品久久视频播放| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 一夜夜www| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av | 国产视频一区二区在线看| 夫妻午夜视频| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| a级毛片在线看网站| 久久亚洲真实| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 制服诱惑二区| a级毛片在线看网站| 天堂动漫精品| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 国产精品久久视频播放| av有码第一页| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 久久香蕉国产精品| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 久久草成人影院| 露出奶头的视频| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 亚洲,欧美精品.| av天堂在线播放| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产精品免费视频内射| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 在线播放国产精品三级| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 99久久国产精品久久久| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 电影成人av| 亚洲五月天丁香| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 久热这里只有精品99| 精品久久久久久,| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 制服人妻中文乱码| 又大又爽又粗| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 国产成人av教育| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| av国产精品久久久久影院| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 丰满的人妻完整版| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 久久久久久大精品| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产av在哪里看| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久精品91蜜桃| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 91大片在线观看| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 国产麻豆69| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 久久香蕉国产精品| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 香蕉久久夜色| 久久伊人香网站| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产精品永久免费网站| 久久草成人影院| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 国产精品永久免费网站| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 99久久国产精品久久久| 成人手机av| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 久久中文字幕一级| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 亚洲激情在线av| 一a级毛片在线观看| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 久久香蕉精品热| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 精品第一国产精品| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 91麻豆av在线| xxx96com| av国产精品久久久久影院| 久久伊人香网站| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 中文字幕色久视频| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| a级毛片在线看网站| 日本五十路高清| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 91大片在线观看| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 久久人妻av系列| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 欧美大码av| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 国产高清videossex| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 日韩高清综合在线| 日韩高清综合在线| 日韩高清综合在线| 一区二区三区精品91| 黄频高清免费视频| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 1024视频免费在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 满18在线观看网站| 久久亚洲真实| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 麻豆av在线久日| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 欧美色视频一区免费| 自线自在国产av| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 9热在线视频观看99| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 午夜a级毛片| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 麻豆av在线久日| 看免费av毛片| 咕卡用的链子| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产激情欧美一区二区| av免费在线观看网站| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 88av欧美| 成人手机av| 香蕉丝袜av| 成人手机av| 大码成人一级视频| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 亚洲第一av免费看| 黄色女人牲交| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 久久精品成人免费网站| 午夜老司机福利片| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 久久久久久大精品| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 久久精品影院6| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 日韩欧美三级三区| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | av网站免费在线观看视频| 久久久久国内视频| 91国产中文字幕| 午夜精品在线福利| 一区在线观看完整版| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 视频区图区小说| 国产麻豆69| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 级片在线观看| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 日本五十路高清| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 在线天堂中文资源库| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 热99re8久久精品国产| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | av网站在线播放免费| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 成年版毛片免费区| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 香蕉国产在线看| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 免费高清视频大片| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 99香蕉大伊视频| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 精品第一国产精品| 精品久久久精品久久久| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 在线看a的网站| 久久性视频一级片| 性少妇av在线| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 我的亚洲天堂| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产1区2区3区精品| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 久久性视频一级片| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 级片在线观看| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 久久香蕉精品热| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 长腿黑丝高跟| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 精品第一国产精品| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 久久狼人影院| 1024视频免费在线观看| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 久久精品成人免费网站| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 18禁观看日本| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 美女大奶头视频| 日本a在线网址| 看免费av毛片| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 满18在线观看网站| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 黄色 视频免费看| 99热只有精品国产| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 国产精品二区激情视频| 亚洲成人久久性| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 精品久久久久久电影网| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 精品久久久久久,| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 午夜视频精品福利| 久久中文字幕一级| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 18禁观看日本| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 午夜精品在线福利| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产成年人精品一区二区 | 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 91成人精品电影| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 中国美女看黄片| 三级毛片av免费| 在线播放国产精品三级| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 在线观看66精品国产| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 美女福利国产在线| xxx96com| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 国产三级在线视频| 久久亚洲真实| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 亚洲片人在线观看| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 麻豆成人av在线观看| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 国产1区2区3区精品| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 精品国产国语对白av| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 国产成人欧美| 午夜免费观看网址| 天堂√8在线中文| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产片内射在线| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| av中文乱码字幕在线| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 男人操女人黄网站| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久久青草综合色| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 一区福利在线观看| 精品福利永久在线观看| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 久久这里只有精品19| 99国产精品99久久久久| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 久久99一区二区三区| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 搡老岳熟女国产| 亚洲九九香蕉| 国产成人av教育| 国产免费男女视频| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 国产精品av久久久久免费| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 免费观看人在逋| 免费不卡黄色视频| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 自线自在国产av| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 在线播放国产精品三级| av天堂在线播放| 久久香蕉激情| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 91成年电影在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 咕卡用的链子| 免费高清视频大片| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 一区二区三区激情视频| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 18禁观看日本| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 国产片内射在线| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 在线天堂中文资源库| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 成人免费观看视频高清| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 久久久久久久久中文| 久久精品影院6| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 色播在线永久视频| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频|