• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Recent Russian remote sensing investigations in Antarctica within the framework of scientific traverses

    2015-02-06 08:30:17SergeyPopov
    Advances in Polar Science 2015年2期

    Sergey V. Popov*

    Polar Marine Geosurvey Expedition (PMGE), 24 Pobeda Str., St.-Petersburg, Lomonosov, 198412, Russia

    1 Preface: retrospective view to the first traverses

    For many centuries, the geographers of the antiquity and the Middle Ages assumed that an uncharted continent lay to the south of the known world. That continent was named Terra Incognita. On the map of Claudius Ptolemaeus (c. 90–168 AD), one of the greatest scientists of ancient Greece, this land mass extended as far south as the latitude of the African Great Lakes[1]. As years passed, the Age of Discovery pushed the boundary of the unknown continent farther and farther south. In 1773, the expedition of James Cook crossed the Antarctic Circle for the first time and casted doubt on the very existence of the Southern Land[2]. It was not until January 27 (January 15 on the Julian calendar), 1820 that Antarctica was first seen by human eyes[3-4]. On that auspicious day two Russian ships,Vostokcaptained by Faddey Bellingshausen,andMirnycaptained by Mikhail Lazarev, came very close to the new continent. The ships approached the Bellingshausen Ice Shelf on the Princess Martha Coast[4], but sea ice blocked their progress beyond 69°21′28′′S, 2°14′50′′W.

    The current phase of Russian Antarctic research started on November 30, 1955 when the shipObleft Kaliningrad for Antarctica. It was the first vessel of the First Complex Antarctic Expedition. The leader of the expedition was Mikhail Somov. On January 5, 1956 the ship reached Antarctica, and about a month later, on February 13, 1956, the Soviet Union state flag flew over the construction site of the first Soviet Antarctic station, Mirny. The station was named in honor of one of the first Russian ships to enter Antarctic waters[4-5]. Since that time Soviet, and later Russian, scientists have continuously studied the icy continent.

    The logistics and the scientific activities during the first decade fundamentally impacted the future Soviet, and later Russian, scientific research. Keystone stations and field bases were established at that time. They provided the foundation for geophysical, geological, and glaciological studies, and some of the stations are still operational today.

    The primary goal of the initial expeditions was the opening of Mirny Station along with three more stations located at two Antarctic poles: Vostok Station at the Geomagnetic Pole and Sovetskaya and Pole of Inaccessibility stations in the vicinity of the Pole of Inaccessibility. After preparatory work and reconnaissance flights, on April 2, 1956 the first Soviet traverse, led by Mikhail Somov, left Mirny for the inland (Figure 1a). This traverse (and most of the later traverses) combined logistics with basic scientific research.The vehicles stopped on May 4, 1956 having crossed about 400 km of the snowy and windy desert of the Antarctic plateau. Three weeks later, on May 27, 1956, the first Soviet inland Antarctic station Pionerskaya was opened[5]. Although providing logistics solutions was the main objective of the expedition, the implementation of the research program was also given high priority because ultimately, the primary goal of Antarctic expeditions is fundamental scientific research.Meteorological, glaciological, and geophysical studies were implemented during the traverse. Andrey Kapitsa performed 11 reflection seismic soundings between Mirny and Pionerskaya stations. He used analogue output seismographs with 24 channels[5]. Those surveys initiated Russian studies of the Antarctic bedrock and subglacial morphology. This first inland traverse during the austral autumn provided the pioneering scientists and logisticians with important experience for future projects.

    The goal of the Second Complex Antarctic Expedition was the opening of new inland stations and commencement of the expansive scientific investigations within the framework of the International Geophysical Year. The leader of the continental part of the expedition was Alexey Treshnikov.Three more stations were opened: Vostok-1 on April 12,1957; Komsomolskaya on November 6, 1957; and Vostok on December 16, 1957. Vostok-1 Station was initially set up as a stopover station on the route to the Geomagnetic Pole,to provide shelter from the harsh weather conditions in the Antarctic inland during the winter. At the end of the austral spring, the logistic traverse moved Vostok-1 Station to its target location (the Geomagnetic Pole) and it was renamed Vostok Station. However, for more than 50 years the original location of Vostok-1 continued to serve as a site for short recovery stopovers during logistic traverses supplying Vostok from Mirny.A number of scientific programs were performed during the traverse to move Vostok-1 Station to the Geomagnetic Pole[4,6-7].

    In retrospect, it is interesting to note that Vostok Station was fortuitously located. If that historical traverse had moved only 10 km farther, or had stopped 90 km earlier, the station would have been built beside the lake rather than over the lake. The borehole drilling performed by Russian scientists would have hit the lakeshore and Lake Vostok may not have been discovered for many years.

    The leader of the next Antarctic Expedition was Yevgeny Tolstikov. The main logistic achievement of the Third Antarctic Expedition was establishing the stations in the vicinity of the Pole of Inaccessibility. Sovetskaya Station was opened on February 16, 1958 and Pole of Inaccessibility Station on December 14, 1958[8-9]. The former was intended as an intermediate stopover location. The most important scientific achievement of that expedition was the discovery of the Gamburtsev Subglacial Mountains[8]. This geological discovery was of utmost importance and key to understanding the structure and evolution of East Antarctica and the Antarctic continent as a whole. Further data on the Gamburtsev Subglacial Mountains were not collected until 30 years later, when regional geophysical flights from the Russian Molodezhnaya Station to the American McMurdo Station commenced in 1987. Two years later, this area became the subject of a regional-scale airborne geophysical survey[10].The location chart is shown in Figure 2.

    Another 20 years passed before researchers returned to this area. The first decade of the new century was marked by the first detailed radio-echo sounding (RES) survey of the Gamburtsev Subglacial Mountains by Chinese scientists in 2004/05 and 2007/08[11]. On January 27, 2009 the remarkable station Kunlun was established on the top of Argus Dome (Dome A), the highest ice feature in Antarctica and thought to be the coldest place on Earth. The establishment of Kunlun required a large amount of preparatory work and a number of traverses to the Antarctic inland[12]. The next major project was the airborne geophysical survey over the Gamburtsev Subglacial Mountains (2008/09) within the framework of the international project AGAP (Antarctica’s Gamburtsev Province). Without doubt, the data collected advanced the understanding of the structure of this vast region and East Antarctica as a whole.

    At this point, let’s turn our focus back to the late 1950s.The three early Antarctic Expeditions mentioned above were of utmost importance. Those expeditions initiated the Soviet,and later Russian, Antarctic pursuits and laid the foundation for all future research. The first three Russian expeditions achieved incredible success, even from today’s perspective.Not only was a network of inland stations established and a number of incredibly complex transport operations carried out, but also the methodology and procedures for future fieldwork in inland Antarctica were developed. These principles are still being used today. Regular traverses are carried out to supply the inland research stations. Three more scientific stations were opened during the four years after the third Antarctic Expedition (Lazarev Station on March 10, 1959; Novolazarevskaya Station on January 18, 1961;and Molodezhnaya Station on February 23, 1962). By 1965,a number of regional scientific traverses had been carried out,with the main focus on the structure of the East Antarctic inland.The most challenging traverse was led by Andrey Kapitsa and ran between Vostok and Molodezhnaya stations via Pole of Inaccessibility Station (Figure 2). It lasted 78 d from January 3 to March 21, 1965 and covered 3 300 km[13-14]. Meteorological,glaciological, and geophysical data were collected along the route. Analogue output seismographs with 24 channels were used to collect reflection seismic data. The first Atlas of Antarctica[15]was published in 1969 and is well known and respected in the scientific community. It reflected the knowledge about Antarctica amassed by Russian scientists at that time.

    Up to 1965, the main body of Soviet scientific research was conducted along the routes between Mirny Station and the South Pole via Vostok Station, between Mirny and Pole of Inaccessibility stations via Komsomolskaya Station, and between Vostok and Molodezhnaya stations via Pole of Inaccessibility Station. The data collected along these routes compiled with input from expeditions organized by other countries provided the initial insights into the ice thickness and the structure of the bedrock of Antarctica. Later, the data gathered by the first 10 Soviet expeditions were used to provide exclusive information about this vast area of the Antarctic inland as part of the important international project BEDMAP,which aimed to produce complete maps of the ice sheet and topography of the bedrock of Antarctica[16-17]. The results of the BEDMAP project formed the basis of the comprehensive interpretation charts the Tectonic map of Antarctica[18]and the first Geomorphological Atlas of Antarctica[19].

    Within that first decade of exploration, in January 1964,an ice radar designed by the Russian Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute (AARI) was tested in Antarctica for the first time. It was an RLS-100 pulse radar with analogue registration. The main frequency was 100 MHz, the following frequency was 100 kHz, the pulse power was 7 W, and the pulse width was 0.3 μs[20]. Since that time, the RES technique has become the most effective geophysical method to study ice sheet structure and sub-ice relief. It has been used by Russian researchers, not only in Antarctica but also in the Arctic and on mountain glaciers.

    The next series of RES investigations was performed from 1978 to 1984 between Mirny and Vostok stations and towards Ridge B, Denman Glacier, and Dome Concordia,under the leadership of A.N. Sheremetiev. These missions identified a number of subglacial water caves in the Ridge B area[20-21]. In addition, RES was used to measure the ice flow velocity in the area at about 1 m·s-1[22]. Wide-angle reflections were performed to measure the velocity of radiowave propagation in Ridge B at 165.9 ± 2.3 m·μs-1[23]. These investigations improved the calculation of the ice thickness based on the RES data. An RLS-60-74 pulse radar with analogue registration was used. The main frequency was 60 MHz, the following frequency was 0.4–2.0 kHz, the pulse power was 1–60 kW, and the pulse width was 0.3–1 μs[22].

    2 Recent ground-based remote sensing investigations in the Lake Vostok area

    Lake Vostok, about 300 km long and 60 km wide and covered by 4 km of ice, is one of the most incredible geological structures on Earth. To date, more than 400 subglacial lakes have been discovered in the Arctic and the Antarctic[24-28],but Lake Vostok remains the largest. The ice temperature in glaciers increases with depth and some of the subglacial lakes in Antarctica could have been formed because the thickness of the covering ice exceeds the limiting thickness.As glaciers become thicker, there is a point at which bottom melting occurs. This process is well described by Robin[29]and Zotikov[30-31]. Some of the lakes could have been formed by neotectonic processes, with local amplification of the heat flux in the area of deep crevasses in the Earth’s crust. Lake Vostok is situated along a rift zone, which was confirmed by airborne geophysical surveys[32-33], seismological observations[34], and geomorphological deductions[35-36].

    The existence of a large body of water in the area of Vostok Station was first proposed based on the analysis of airborne RES data[37]. However, the data was not investigated further for 20 a. It was only after a satellite altimetry survey by European Remote Sensing Satellite-1 (ERS-1)[38]that scientists reviewed the old data. The old and new data supported the presence of a vast body of water located under the ice to the northwest of Vostok Station[39]. Extensive historical reviews can be found in Zotikov[30]and Siegert et al.[40]

    Just after the discovery of Lake Vostok, the Polar Marine Geosurvey Expedition (PMGE) together with the Russian Antarctic Expedition (RAE) commenced a remote sensing survey to study this natural phenomenon. The mobile scientific laboratory Vityaz (Figure 1b) was established for these investigations. From 1995 to 2008, reflection seismic data were collected to measure the depth of the lake. A total of 318 measurements were carried out[41-42]. A Russian 24-channel SMOV-0-24 seismograph with analogue registration was used from 1995 to 1999. The range of the reflection seismic data acquisition recording was 6 s and 12 s, the noise of the channel was 0.3 pV, the cross-talk was higher than -36 dB, the frequency range of the recording was 10–200 Hz, and the dynamical range was 80 dB. The acoustic wave registration was performed using a Russian SV-20 geophone with an oscillation frequency of 20 Hz,fixed on the surface and covered by the snow. Since 2000, digital seismographs with the same technical specifications have been used[43].

    Between 1998 and 2008, RES investigations were carried out to study bedrock topography and the structure of the ice sheet. The total length of the RES profiles of Lake Vostok is about 5 190 km[44-47]. Since 1998, a 60-MHz RLS-60-98 ice radar with a repetition frequency of 600 Hz, a pulse length of 0.5 μs, a pulse power of 60 kW, a dynamical range of 180 dB, and a 3 MHz reception channel, has been used for ice thickness measurements. The reflected signals are digitized using an analog-digital transformation device (ADC) with a sample interval of 50 ns and a stacking rate of 256 traces[42-44]. Since 2008, a new RLS-60-06 ice radar with the same technical specification but increased power of up to 80 kW and an ADC with a 25 ns sample interval has been used[42].

    American researchers have made an important contribution to the study of Lake Vostok. During the 2000/01 austral summer field season, American scientists conducted an airborne geophysical survey including RES. In total, the flights covered 12 465 km[32]. In the previous year, Italian scientists carried out an airborne geophysical survey and produced a number of geophysical profiles[48]. The areas of the Russian and U.S. geophysical investigations are shown in Figure 3a.

    Two major challenges were faced in the geophysical investigations of the Lake Vostok area. The first was to accurately measure ice thickness in the vicinity of the 5G drilling site. This was crucial to penetrating the lake without incident. The second challenge was to improve RES and reflection seismic data acquisition. To address these challenges it was necessary to measure the velocity of acoustic and electromagnetic wave propagation in the local glacier, because only general estimates of these values were available at that time. Vertical seismic profiling and wide angle reflections were performed and acoustic velocities in meteoric ice and water were measured as 3 920 ± 20 m·s-1and 1 490 m·s-1, respectively. The average acoustic velocity in the glacier was measured as 3 810 ± 20 m·s-1[45], and the average velocity of the electromagnetic wave propagation in the glacier was 168.4 ± 0.5 m·μs-1[46]. Ice thickness in the drilling site vicinity was predicted to be 3 760 ± 30 m based on the seismic data, and 3 775 ± 15 m based on RES data[46]. During the penetration of Lake Vostok on February 5, 2012, the total ice core length was 3 769.3 ± 0.5 m and the ice thickness was 3 759 ± 3 m (V. Lipenkov, 2014; personal communication).Therefore, the reflection seismic data was extremely accurate.However, the RES data was less accurate than expected, and the reason for this requires further investigation.

    Following the completion of the reflection seismic and RES studies, Russian and U.S.[32]remote sensing data collected in the Lake Vostok area were compiled. The data were used to map the ice thickness, the ice base, the depth of the lake, and the bedrock topography[42,44]. The ice thickness in the Lake Vostok area ranges from 1 950 to 4 350 m. Absolute heights of the lake water table range from approximately -600 m in the north to-150 m in the south. The total volume of Lake Vostok is about 6 100 km3, the average depth is about 400 m, and the maximum depth is 1 200 m[42-44]. The most important charts are shown in Figure 3. Based on the bedrock topography, an orographic chart was compiled as the first step in the geomorphological interpretation of this area[35-36]. This was the next step to understanding the structure and evolution of the bedrock.

    Another important scientific challenge in the preparation for the penetration of Lake Vostok was the charting of its coastline. It was important to determine whether the lake is isolated and separated from the rest of the Antarctic subglacial hydrological network. If the lake were connected to the network, the entire hydrological system could be contaminated in the case of an unsuccessful penetration of the lake. The grounding line was defined by 621 points from the joint Russian and U.S.[32]dataset. It revealed that the lake is completely isolated (Figure 3), with a total area of 15 790 km2,excluding 365 km2occupied by 11 islands[47].

    Fifty-six isolated subglacial water caves have been identified outside Lake Vostok. Most were represented by just one radio-echo profile that crosses the cave and the typical size of the caves is about 2.8 km[47]. Russian studies used 60 kW and later 80 kW deep-penetrating pulse radars[42].Theoretically, these radars have enough power to register a mirror reflection from the bottom of freshwater basins not deeper than 15 m[49]. However, it was found that only one radio-echo time-section could be interpreted as the bottom of a subglacial water cave (Figure 4). Therefore, there are three main possibilities: (1) the caves are deeper than 15 m,(2) the bottom surface is very rough, or (3) the water is not so fresh. The current level of understanding does not allow us to exclude any of these possibilities.

    It is important to mention the current and future Russian remote sensing projects. Upon the conclusion of reflection seismic studies in 2009, Russian researchers commenced the accumulation of refraction seismic data to measure acoustic velocities in the Lake Vostok area. These data will enable a better understanding of the geological structure of this region.

    A new direction in Russian scientific activity is ground penetrating radar (GPR) investigations. These investigations were carried out for the first time during the 2012/13 austral summer field season to study the structure of the snow-firn layer. The investigations were concentrated in the mega dune area east of Vostok Station and within Lake Vostok. Regional profiles have also been surveyed between Vostok and Progress stations and in the vicinity of Progress Station[50].

    3 Mirny-Vostok scientific traverses

    In 2004, Russian scientists recommenced regional scientific traverses to perform RES and glaciological observations in the East Antarctic inland. Initially they operated between Mirny and Vostok stations (a distance of 1 410 km).Subsequently, the main logistic base was moved from Mirny to Progress Station for the five austral summerfield seasons of the 49th to 53rd Russian Antarctic Expeditions(2004–2008). Old Russian vehicles were used for those traverses (Figures 1b, 1c). During this period about 3 000 km of RES profiles were constructed using the same RLS- 60- 98 and RLS-60- 06 deep-penetrating ice radars used in the Lake Vostok investigations (Figure 2). Almost all of the RES profiles were obtained together with glaciological observations and geodetic measurements conducted to study the ice sheet[51].

    The profile between Mirny and Vostok stations crosses five major orographic regions (Figure 5). The lowland extends from the coast to 205 km inland. The height of this area is just above or below sea level. The bedrock is very rough with a slope of about 7–10 degrees. The Golitsyna Mountains are located south of the lowland in the 205 to 420 km section of the traverse. Two main ridges with peak heights of 850 m and 1 350 m are located in that area. Relative heights are often more than 550 m. A number of deep valleys and canyons (800 m and deeper) cut across the mountains. The Shmidt Subglacial Basin extends to the 990 km point of the traverse. The bedrock is weakly rough and the average height is about 200 m. The Vostok Mountains extend up to Lake Vostok. They also consist of two ridges with peak heights of about 600 m and 820 m, and are crossed by deep valleys and canyons. Lake Vostok and the spurs of the Vostok Mountains lie to the south of the end of the section. This area was well described in earlier studies.

    The most significant outcome of these scientific traverses was the collection of data on the ice sheet structure and the bedrock formation between Mirny and Vostok stations. The radio-echo time-section and the ice sheet section are shown in Figure 5. These studies resulted in the discovery of a lake located about 50 km north of Komsomolskaya Station (Figures 2 and 5). It is 5 km long and is named Komsomolskoe Subglacial Lake[52-53].

    In addition, a system of subglacial lakes was discovered in the vicinity of Pionerskaya Station (Figures 2 and 5).The main lake, which is located underneath the station, is named Pionerskoe Subglacial Lake[54]. During the 2005 and 2006 austral summer field seasons, an area of 17 × 22 km2was superimposed with ground-based survey data with an interval of 2 km between the main profiles[54-55]. The ice thickness in this area ranged from 1 450 to 2 450 m, and the bedrock elevation was estimated to be from 300 to 1 300 m. A reflection seismic sounding survey was carried out in the field season of 2007/08. According to this survey, the depth of the lake is about 30 m and the bottom of the lake is covered by sediments about 300 m thick[55]. The flat tops of the subglacial landforms point toward intensive ice abrasion secondary to relatively fast movement of the ice sheet (about 20 m·a-1)[56].The border of Pionerskoe Subglacial Lake has been plotted at 21 points. The area of the lake is about 26.5 km2, and its dimensions are about 9.0 × 2.5 km2. Four more small water caves have been identified in the area and two of them have been fully mapped[54-55].

    4 Progress-Vostok scientific traverses

    According to the strategy of Russian exploration in Antarctica, the main logistic base has been moved from Mirny Station to Progress Station. The K?ssbohrer Pisten Bully (Figure 1d) is now used for logistic and scientific traverses instead of the older Russian vehicles (Ishimbay,STT-1 Kharkovchanka, STT-2 Kharkovchanka-2, and ATT).In 2007, the first cargo of fuel drums was brought to Vostok Station from Progress Station. In addition to logistic tasks,the extensive glaciological and geodetic scientific program was completed. Since that time, traverses deliver cargo and fuel to Vostok Station twice perfield season. As a rule,scientific research is carried out within the framework of the traverses, and includes RES, glaciological observations, and geodetic measurements. Geophysical profiles are located within the broad band encompassing the main logistic route.The total length of the RES profiles is 4 426 km, and they are concentrated in an area about a 1 000 km from the coast(Figure 2).

    Figure 3 shows a section of the scientific traverse from Komsomolskaya Station to a point about 300 km from the coast. This 550 km section is most interesting because of its novelty. According to the RES data, there is a mountainous area beneath the ice. The bedrock height varies from -200 m to 1 100 m. The subglacial landscape is very rough and some valleys are more than 800 m deep. There is a wide subglacial hill or mountain ridge located between the Grove Mountains and the Vostok Mountains, indicating that perhaps these formations belong to one bigger mountain ridge. Currently,there is insufficient geophysical data to make any definite conclusions but the recently published Antarctic Moho depth map[57]indirectly supports this possibility. The area of the intended subglacial ridge is correlated with increased Moho depth. Antarctic bedrock topography maps compiled within the framework of the BEDMAP2 project[58]provide further support for this expansive mountain ridge.

    5 Concluding remarks

    Scientific traverses are a key component in the study of the Antarctic environment. Glaciological, geodetic,meteorological, and certain geophysical data could not be collected by any other means. Soviet and Russian logistic and scientific traverses (which traditionally run jointly) have a long and glorious history. It is impossible to do justice to this history in one paper. Rather, this is a topic deserving of a book. Nonetheless, here the author has attempted to highlight the most important historical events in Soviet and Russian Antarctic exploration and to provide a snap shot of Soviet and Russian scientific activities from the past to the present.

    AcknowledgementsThe author wishes to thank the Russian Antarctic Expedition for great help with the acquisition of remote sensing data for the Lake Vostok area and for the framework of the logistic and scientific traverses, the AARI for providing technical reports from storage, and Dr. A.Dyuysekina, my old friend and Dr. J. Horsburgh, for proof reading thefinal text. This paper was partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), research project No. 14-05-00234-a.

    1 Thrower N J W. Maps and civilization: cartography in culture and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999, 1–97

    2 Beaglehole J C. The life of captain James cook. Stanford, Calif.:Stanford University Press, 1974, 1–760

    3 Belov M I. Otchetnaya karta pervoy russkoy antarkticheskoy ekspeditsii [Reported map of the first Russian Antarctic Expedition].Bull SAE, 1961, 31: 5–14 (in Russian)

    4 Treshnikov A F. Istoriya otkrytiya i issledovaniya Antarktidy [History of the discovery and exploration of Antarctica]. Moscow: Geografgiz,1963 (in Russian)

    5 Pervaya kontinental'naya ekspeditsiya 1955–57 gg. [The First Continental Expedition of 1955–57]. SAE Reports, 1959, 1: 1–212 (in Russian)

    6 Vtoraya kontinental'naya ekspeditsiya 1956–58 gg. [The second continental expedition of 1956–58]. SAE Reports, 1960, 8: 1–206 (in Russian)

    7 Kondrat'ev O K, Lopatin S S, Manilov S A. Metodika i nekotorye predvaritel'nye rezul'taty seysmoglyatsiologicheskih issledovaniy v Antarktide [The methodology and some preliminary results of the seysmoglaciologial research in Antarctica]. SAE Reports, 1960, 10:37–95 (in Russian)

    8 Tret'ya kontinental'naya ekspeditsiya 1957–59 gg. [The third continental expedition of 1957–59]. SAE Reports, 1962, 16: 1–327 (in Russian)

    9 Otchet o rabote stantsii Sovetskaya i stantsii Polyus Nedostupnosti[Report on the work of the Sovetskaya Station and Pole of Inaccessibility Station]. Technical report No 0–823, Leningrad, AARI,1959 (in Russian)

    10 Popov S V. Overview of Russian Radio Echo Sounding and ground reflection seismic investigations in Antarctica from 1970 to the present day // Antarctica and global change: interactions and impacts.Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. 1997: 156

    11 Bo S, Siegert M J, Mudd S M, et al. The Gamburtsev mountains and the origin and early evolution of the Antarctic Ice Sheet. Nature,2009, 459(7247): 690–693, doi: 10.1038/nature08024

    12 Chinese Arctic and Antarctic Administration. Proposed construction and operation of the new Chinese Dome A Station, Dome A,Antarctica. Final comprehensive environmental evaluation. August 2008

    13 Kapitsa A P, Sorohtin O G. Ice thickness measurements on the Vostok-Molodezhnaya scientific traverse [Izmereniya tolshchiny lednikovogo pokrova v pohode po marshrutu Vostok-Molodezhnaya]. Bull SAE,1965, 51: 19–23 (in Russian)

    14 Kapitsa A P. Scientific traverse on the route Vostok-Pole of Inaccessibility-Molodezhnaya in 1964 [Pohod po marshrutu Vostok-Polyus Nedostupnosti-Molodezhnaya v 1964 g]. Bull SAE, 1965, 51:13–18 (in Russian)

    15 Atlas Antarktiki [Atlas of Antarctica]. Moscow-Leningrad: GUGK,Vol. 1, 1966 (in Russian with English Summary)

    16 Lythe M B, Vaughan D G, the BEDMAP Consortium. BEDMAP: A new ice thickness and subglacial topographic model of Antarctica. J Geophys Res, 2001, 106(B6): 11335–11351

    17 Lythe M B, Vaughan D G, the BEDMAP Consortium. BEDMAP- bed topography of the Antarctic, 1: 10 000 000 scale map. BAS (Misc) 9.Cambridge: British Antarctic Survey, 2000

    18 Grikurov G E, Leychenkov G. Tectonic map of Antarctica, scale 1: 10 000 000. CCGM-CGMW 2012

    19 Geomorfologicheskiy atlas Antarktidy [Geomorphological Atlas of Antarctica]. St.-Petersburg: ZAO “Karta”, 2011 (in Russian with English Summary)

    20 Bogorodsky V V, Bentley C R, Gudmandsen P E. Radioglaciology.Berlin: Springer, 1985

    21 Bogorodskiy V V, Sheremet'ev A N. Podlednikovye ozera Antarktidy[Antarctic subglacial lakes]. Priroda, 1981, 12: 49–51 (in Russian)

    22 Sheremet'ev A N. Izmerenie tolshchiny i skorosti dvizheniya lednikovogo pokrova v rayone marshruta Mirnyy – Komsomol'skaya–kupol "B" [Ice thickness and ice movement measurements on the profile of Mirny Komsomolskaya – Ridge B]. SAE Reports, 1986, 78:127–132 (in Russian)

    23 Sheremet'ev A N. Izmerenie skorosti rasprostraneniya elektromagnitnyh voln v lednike na Kupole "B" v Antarktide[Measurements of electromagnetic waves propagation in ice at Ridge B in Antarctica] // Bogorodskiy V V, Gavrilo V P. Elektrofizicheskie i fiziko-mehanicheskie svoystva l'da [Electrical and mechanical properties of ice]. Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1989: 59–64 (in Russian)

    24 Siegert M J, Carter S, Tabacco I, et al. A revised inventory of Antarctic subglacial lakes. Antarctic Sci, 2005, 17(3): 453–460

    25 Wright A, Siegert M J. The identification and physiographical setting of Antarctic subglacial lakes: an update based on recent geophysical data for Subglacial Antarctic aquatic environments //Siegert M, Kennicutt C, Bindschadler B. Subglacial Antarctic aquatic environments, AGU Geophysical Monograph 192. Washington DC:AGU, 2011: 9–26

    26 Bj?rnsson H. Subglacial lakes and j?kulhlaups in Iceland. Global Planet Change, 2003, 35(3–4): 255–271, doi: 10.1016/S0921-8181(02)00130-3

    27 Palmer S J, Dowdeswell J A, Christoffersen P, et al. Greenland subglacial lakes detected by radar. Geophys Res Lett, 2013, 40(23):6154–6159, doi: 10.1002/2013GL058383

    28 Wolovick M J, Bell R E, Creyts T T, et al. Identification and control of subglacial water networks under Dome A, Antarctica. J Geophys Res: Earth Surf, 2013, 118(1): 140–154, doi: 10.1029/2012JF002555

    29 Robin G, De Q. Ice movement and temperature distribution in glaciers and ice sheets. J Glaciol, 1955, 2(18): 523–532

    30 Zotikov I A. The Antarctic subglacial Lake Vostok. Berlin,Heidelberg: Springer, 2006, doi: 10.1007/3-540-37723-9

    31 Zotikov I A. Bottom melting in the central zone of Antarctic’s ice sheet and its influence on modern balance. International Association of Scientific Hydrology Publication, Colloque d’Obergurgle,Belgique, 1963, 1: 36–44

    32 Studinger M, Bell R E, Karner G D, et al. Ice cover, landscape setting and geological framework of Lake Vostok, East Antarctica. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2003, 205(3–4): 195–210

    33 Studinger M, Karner G D, Bell R E, et al. Geophysical models for the tectonic frameworks of the Lake Vostok region, East Antarctica. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2003, 216(4): 663–677

    34 Isanina E V, Krupnova N A, Popov S V, et al. Deep structure of the Vostok Basin, East Antarctica as deduced from seismological observations. Geotectonics, 2009, 43(3): 221–225, doi: 10.1134/S0016852109030042

    35 Popov S V, Lunev P I. Orografiya korennogo rel'efa rayona podlednikovogo ozera Vostok (Vostochnaya Antarktida) [Orography of the bedrock relief of subglacial lake Vostok and its vicinity (East Antarctic)]. Geomorphology, 2012, 1: 81–92 (in Russian with English Summary)

    36 Popov S V, Lastochkin A N, Masolov V N, et al. Morphology of the subglacial bed relief of Lake Vostok basin area (Central East Antarctica) based on RES and seismic data // Fütterer D K, Damaske D, Kleinschmidt G, et al. Antarctica – Contributions to Global Earth Sciences. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2006: 141–146

    37 Oswald G K A, Robin G de Q. Lakes beneath the Antarctic ice sheet.Nature, 1973, 245(5423): 251–254

    38 Ridley J K, Cudlip W, Laxon W. Identification of subglacial lakes using ERS-1 radar altimeter. J Glaciol, 1993, 73(133): 625–634

    39 Kapitsa A P, Ridley J K, Robin G de Q, et al. A large deep freshwater lake beneath the ice of central East Antarctica. Nature, 1996,381(6584): 684–686

    40 Siegert M, Popov S V, Studinger M. Vostok subglacial lake: a review of geophysical data regarding its physiographical setting. Geophys Monogr Ser, 2011, 192: 45–60

    41 Masolov V N, Popov S V, Lukin V V, et al. The bottom topography and subglacial Lake Vostok water body, East Antarctica. Dokl Earth Sci,2010, 433(2): 1092–1097

    42 Popov S V, Masolov V N, Lukin V V. Ozero Vostok, Vostochnaya Antarktida: moshchnost' lednika, glubina ozera, podlednyy i korennoy rel'ef. [Vostok Lake, East Antarctica: ice thickness, lake depth, ice base and bedrock topography]. Ice and Snow, 2011, 1(113): 25–35 (in Russian with English Summary)

    43 Masolov V N, Popov S V, Lukin V V, et al. Russian geophysical studies of Lake Vostok, Central East Antarctica // Fütterer D K,Damaske D, Kleinschmidt G, et al. Antarctica – Contributions to Global Earth Sciences. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2006: 135–140

    44 Popov S V, Masolov V N, Lukin V V, et al. Otechestvennye seysmicheskie, radiolokatsionnye i seysmologicheskie issledovaniya podlednikovogo ozera Vostok. [Russian seismic, radio-echo and seismological investigations of Vostok Lake], Ice and Snow, 2012,4(120): 31–38 (in Russian with English Summary)

    45 Masolov V N, Lukin V V, Sheremetyev A N, et al. Geophysical investigations of the subglacial lake Vostok in Eastern Antarctica.Dokl Earth Sci, 2001, 379A(6): 734–738

    46 Popov S V, Sheremet'ev A N, Masolov V N, et al. Velocity of radiowave propagation in ice at Vostok station, Antarctica. J Glaciol, 2003,49(165): 179–183

    47 Popov S V, Chernoglazov Yu B. Podlednikovoe ozero Vostok,Vostochnaya Antarktida: beregovaya liniya i okruzhayushchie vodoemy. [Vostok Lake, East Antarctica: shore line and surrounding subglacial water cavities]. Ice and Snow, 2011, 1(113): 13–24 (in Russian with English Summary)

    48 Tabacco I E, Bianchi C, Zirizzotti A, et al. Airborne radar survey above Vostok region, East Antarctica: ice thickness and VSL geometry. J Glaciol, 2002, 48(160): 62–69

    49 Popov S V. Radiolokatsionnoe zondirovanie neglubokih podlednikovyh vodoemov: teoreticheskie predposylki i prakticheskie rezul'taty [Radio-echo sounding of shallow subglacial reservoirs:theoretical background and practical results]. Ice and Snow, 2010,4(112): 5–14 (in Russian with English Summary)

    50 Popov S V, Eberlein L. Opyt primeneniya georadara dlya izucheniya stroeniya snezhno-firnovoy tolshchi i grunta Vostochnoy Antarktidy[Investigation of snow-firn thickness and ground in the East Antarctica by GPR]. Ice and Snow, 2014, 4(128): 95-106 (in Russian with English Summary)

    51 Richter A, Fedorov D V, Dvoryanenko A K, et al. Observation of iceflow vectors on inner-continental traverses in East Antarctica. Ice Snow, 2010, 1(109): 30–35

    52 Popov S V, Masolov V N. Forty-seven new subglacial lakes in the 0°– 110°E sector of East Antarctica. J Glaciol, 2007, 53(181): 289–297

    53 Popov S V, Masolov V N, Lukin V V, et al. Sovremennye otechestvennye seysmo-radiolokatsionnye issledovaniya v Tsentral'noy Antarktide v preddverii Mezhdunarodnogo Polyarnogo Goda 2007–2008 [Modern Russian seismic and radio-echo sounding investigations in Central Antarctica before the International Polar Year 2007–08]. Mater Glaciol Data, 2007, 103: 107–117 (in Russian with English summary)

    54 Popov S V, Chernoglazov Yu B. Ob otkrytii podlednikovogo ozera v rayone stantsii Pionerskaya (Vostochnaya Antarktida) [About discovering the subglacial lake in Pionerskaya Station vicinity (East Antarctica)]. Mater Glaciol Data, 2006, 100: 165–167 (in Russian with English summary)

    55 Popov S V, Popkov A M. Seysmo-radiolokatsionnye issledovaniya rayona podlednikovogo ozera Pionerskoe, Vostochnaya Antarktida[Reflection seismic and radio-echo sounding investigations of the subglacial lake Pionerskoe, East Antarctica]. Earth’s Cryos, 2014 (in Russian with English summary)

    56 Salamatin A N, Smirnov K E, Sheremet'ev A N. Primenenie matematicheskoy modeli statsionarnogo lednika k raschetu termogidrodinamicheskih harakteristik lednikovogo pokrova Antarktidy v rayone ot Mirnogo k kupolu B [Application of the mathematical model to calculate the steady-state hermohydrodynamic characteristics of the Antarctic ice sheet in the area between Mirny and Ridge B]. Mater Glaciol Data, 1982, 44: 39–49 (in Russian with English summary)

    57 Baranov A, Morelli A. The Moho depth map of the Antarctica region.Tectonophysics, 2013, 609: 299–313, doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2012.12.023

    58 Fretwell P, Pritchard H D, Vaughan D G, et al. Bedmap2: improved ice bed, surface and thickness datasets for Antarctica. The Cryosphere,2013, 7(1): 375– 393

    59 Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research. Antarctic Digital Database (ADD), Version 2.0. Manual and bibliography, Cambridge:Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, British Antarctic Survey,1998

    60 Liu H, Jezek K, Li B, et al. Radarsat Antarctic Mapping Project digital elevation model version 2. Boulder, Colorado USA: National Snow and Ice Data Center, Digital media. [2001-11-01]. http://nsidc.org/data/docs/daac/nsidc0082_ramp_dem_v2.gd.html

    一区二区av电影网| 亚洲图色成人| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 国产片内射在线| 99久久综合免费| 久久久久久人人人人人| 91精品三级在线观看| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲综合色网址| 一级毛片我不卡| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 黄色一级大片看看| 日本免费在线观看一区| 中文字幕色久视频| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 高清av免费在线| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 99久国产av精品国产电影| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 18在线观看网站| 大码成人一级视频| 久久久久网色| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 久久精品夜色国产| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 制服诱惑二区| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 老司机影院成人| 亚洲国产欧美网| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 日本91视频免费播放| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 久久99一区二区三区| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久热久热在线精品观看| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 免费观看在线日韩| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 春色校园在线视频观看| av在线老鸭窝| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 一级毛片电影观看| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 国产成人精品福利久久| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 国产精品.久久久| 99香蕉大伊视频| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 成年av动漫网址| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产成人精品福利久久| 一级黄片播放器| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 99热全是精品| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 久久久久国产网址| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 色吧在线观看| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 亚洲av男天堂| 中国三级夫妇交换| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 曰老女人黄片| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 只有这里有精品99| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 乱人伦中国视频| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 色视频在线一区二区三区| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 色网站视频免费| av网站在线播放免费| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| xxx大片免费视频| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 亚洲中文av在线| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 九草在线视频观看| 国产成人精品婷婷| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 免费av中文字幕在线| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 久久久久视频综合| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 美女福利国产在线| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产成人91sexporn| 国产 精品1| 亚洲在久久综合| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 成人二区视频| 天天影视国产精品| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 久久免费观看电影| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 久久精品夜色国产| 成年动漫av网址| 满18在线观看网站| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 97在线人人人人妻| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 国产精品三级大全| 老熟女久久久| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 99九九在线精品视频| av电影中文网址| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 熟女电影av网| 99香蕉大伊视频| 免费观看性生交大片5| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久av网站| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 乱人伦中国视频| 麻豆av在线久日| 综合色丁香网| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 蜜桃在线观看..| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 美女中出高潮动态图| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| xxx大片免费视频| 美女福利国产在线| 中文字幕制服av| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 国产乱来视频区| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 天堂8中文在线网| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 考比视频在线观看| 1024视频免费在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 在线看a的网站| 日日撸夜夜添| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 综合色丁香网| 久久久久久人妻| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 亚洲伊人色综图| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 日本av免费视频播放| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲精品在线美女| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 国产成人欧美| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 99久久人妻综合| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 中文字幕制服av| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 777米奇影视久久| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 人人澡人人妻人| 久久久久久人人人人人| 在线天堂最新版资源| 午夜久久久在线观看| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 捣出白浆h1v1| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲四区av| kizo精华| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| av视频免费观看在线观看| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 99久久综合免费| 自线自在国产av| 久久av网站| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 少妇 在线观看| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 国产 一区精品| 午夜福利视频精品| 日本欧美视频一区| 尾随美女入室| 在线天堂中文资源库| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 亚洲国产欧美网| 老女人水多毛片| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 精品国产国语对白av| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 777米奇影视久久| 国产一级毛片在线| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 一级毛片电影观看| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 深夜精品福利| 久久99精品国语久久久| 免费av中文字幕在线| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 熟女av电影| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 99久久综合免费| 国产又爽黄色视频| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 欧美97在线视频| 日本wwww免费看| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 天天影视国产精品| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 大码成人一级视频| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 99九九在线精品视频| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 亚洲国产色片| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 成人国语在线视频| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| av视频免费观看在线观看| 97在线视频观看| 赤兔流量卡办理| 男女国产视频网站| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 午夜激情av网站| 中文天堂在线官网| 国产精品免费视频内射| 18在线观看网站| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 青草久久国产| 久热久热在线精品观看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 18禁观看日本| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 日韩av免费高清视频| 午夜免费观看性视频| 午夜久久久在线观看| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 99久久综合免费| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 一本久久精品| 中文天堂在线官网| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 制服诱惑二区| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 午夜免费观看性视频| 少妇人妻 视频| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 最黄视频免费看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| av国产精品久久久久影院| 日本欧美视频一区| av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| videos熟女内射| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 免费观看性生交大片5| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 日本色播在线视频| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 人人澡人人妻人| 日韩电影二区| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 国产精品三级大全| 精品亚洲成国产av| 香蕉国产在线看| 午夜激情av网站| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 人妻系列 视频| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 多毛熟女@视频| 欧美+日韩+精品| av卡一久久| 永久网站在线| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| videos熟女内射| 亚洲内射少妇av| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 美女国产视频在线观看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 久热久热在线精品观看| 中国三级夫妇交换| 宅男免费午夜| 亚洲国产欧美网| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 成人二区视频| 中国三级夫妇交换| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久午夜福利片| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 最近手机中文字幕大全| 1024视频免费在线观看| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 性色av一级| 国产成人91sexporn| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 午夜影院在线不卡| 观看美女的网站| 在线天堂最新版资源| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| av片东京热男人的天堂| 日日啪夜夜爽| 久久久久久伊人网av| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 日韩中字成人| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 不卡av一区二区三区| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产视频首页在线观看| 中文字幕制服av| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 青草久久国产| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 人妻系列 视频| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产成人欧美| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 老女人水多毛片| 亚洲内射少妇av| av视频免费观看在线观看| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| av电影中文网址| 在线看a的网站| 久久久久精品性色| 男女边摸边吃奶| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 91国产中文字幕| 另类精品久久| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 国产又爽黄色视频| 国产激情久久老熟女| 18+在线观看网站| 99九九在线精品视频| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 岛国毛片在线播放| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 日本色播在线视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 免费少妇av软件| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 国产一级毛片在线| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 性色av一级| 一区在线观看完整版| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 自线自在国产av| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 在线天堂最新版资源| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 国产野战对白在线观看| 97在线视频观看| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 蜜桃在线观看..| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| videos熟女内射| 精品一区在线观看国产| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 午夜免费观看性视频| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| a级毛片黄视频| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 桃花免费在线播放| 国产色婷婷99| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 成人国语在线视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产综合精华液| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区|