The relationship between embryo quality assessed using routine embryology or time-lapse videography and serum progesterone concentration on the day of ovulatory trigger in in vitro fertilization cycles

Yanhe Liu, Christopher Copeland, Vincent Chapple, Peter Roberts, Katie Feenan, Phillip Matson,

1Fertility North, Joondalup Private Hospital, Joondalup, Western Australia

2School of Medical Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia

3Canberra Fertility Centre, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

4Fertility East, Bondi Junction, New South Wales, Australia

The relationship between embryo quality assessed using routine embryology or time-lapse videography and serum progesterone concentration on the day of ovulatory trigger in in vitro fertilization cycles

Yanhe Liu1,2*, Christopher Copeland3,4, Vincent Chapple1, Peter Roberts2, Katie Feenan1, Phillip Matson1,2

1Fertility North, Joondalup Private Hospital, Joondalup, Western Australia

2School of Medical Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia

3Canberra Fertility Centre, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

4Fertility East, Bondi Junction, New South Wales, Australia

ARTICLE INFO

Article history:

Received 12 January 2015

Received in revised form 10 March 2015

Accepted 16 March 2015

Embryo

Time lapse

Progesterone

In vitro fertilization

Age

Objective:To investigate the relationship between elevated serum progesterone levels (EP) on the day of ovulatory trigger, live birth rates, and the growth of resulting embryos.Methods:A total of 836 in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles with 4 478 embryos in conventional culture were retrospectively analyzed, together with an additional 90 IVF cycles producing 618 embryos from culture and assessment using the Embryoscope? time-lapse system.Results:In cycles using conventional culture, serum progesterone per follicle ≥14 mm (median 0.42 nmol/L/ follicle, range 0.05-3.50 nmol/L/follicle) was a significant negative predictor of live-birth (ROC AUC = 0.395, 95% CI 0.345-0.445; P=0.000) as were progesterone/estradiol ratio (0.442, 0.391-0.494; P=0.027) and progesterone per oocyte (0.374, 0.326-0.421; P=0.000) but not progesterone alone (0.470, 0.419-0.521; P＞0.05). Women with an EP/follicle (＞0.42 nmol/ L/follicle) had reduced live birth rates if they were ≥35 yrs (14.4% vs. 24.2%, P＜0.05) but not ＜35 years (35.3% vs. 37.4%, ns). Despite reduced pregnancy rates, cycles with EP/follicle in women ≥35 years produced similar proportions of “good” and “top” quality embryos in conventional culture compared to women with low progesterone/follicle, and no difference in abnormalities of cleavage (direct cleavage or reverse cleavage), multinucleation or timings of division (pronuclear fading to 2-cell, 3-cell, 4-cell and 5-cell; cc2 and S2) observed with time-lapse videography.

Conclusions:EP/follicle ≥14 mm (＞0.42 nmol/L/follicle) adversely affects embryo implantation in women aged ≥35 years, but not ＜35 yrs. However, no adverse features were seen in the embryos from these affected cycles in terms of morphological appearance, abnormal patterns of cleavage, or morphokinetic timings.

1. Introduction

An elevated serum progesterone (EP) concentration on the day of ovulatory trigger was first reported in the early 1990’s[1], showing an adverse impact on the pregnancy outcome following in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. However, no conclusive consensus has been achieved in the last two decades due to inconsistent conclusions drawn by a large number of publications as summarized in a few recent meta-analysis review articles[2-4]. Furthermore, the controversy is also illustrated in these reviews as they came up with different conclusions depending on the period reviewed, reflecting continued debate between the emerging papers[2-4].Although the exact mechanism behind EP is still not clear[5, 6], the adverse impact of EP on the endometrial environment was supported by both direct[7-9] and indirect[3, 10] evidence. Whilst the majority of previous studies focussed on this apparent effect of endometrial asynchronicity, several have investigated the effect of EP on the quality of subsequent embryos via either direct static observations[11], indirect evidence with the use of subsequent frozen embryo transfer cycles[3, 10-12] or separation of the embryo and endometrium by studying donor oocyte cycles[3, 13]. Again, the conclusions were inconsistent, suggesting possible variability between different populations of patients, a limitation or insensitivity in the methods used to detect differences between embryos, or a combination of the two.

濕式電除塵器設(shè)備是由陰接線和陽極管(沉淀極)組成的，其工作原理為煙氣通過高壓電場，高壓電場使煙氣中的煙塵和酸霧帶電，形成帶電離子，帶電離子向相反電荷的電極運動，帶電離子到達電極后進行放電，形成中性塵、霧顆粒，沉積于電極上凝集、依靠重力降落而被除去。濕式電除塵器設(shè)備除塵、霧的主要粒徑范圍為0.01～100 μm之間，煙塵、煙霧的比電阻范圍為3×106～1010Ω·cm.厘米。濕式電除塵器可有效去除雙氧水脫硫過程產(chǎn)生的細水霧、氣溶膠和其他顆粒物，有效減少煙氣拖尾的情況發(fā)生。

The developmental performance of embryos during in vitro culture is associated with both maternal and paternal factors. The use of implantation rates as an end-point is only informative about the best embryos that were selected for transfer, whereas the examination of the whole population of embryos obtained following controlled ovarian stimulation may well help to assess the full impact upon oocyte quality of a potentially disturbed hormonal milieu. In addition, paternal confounding factors are more likely to be present in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles if the treatment is indicated due to abnormal semen quality. Indeed, time-lapse study has shown the abnormal growth pattern of reverse cleavage (RC) following ICSI to be associated with reduced progressive sperm motility[14]. The vast majority of recently published largescale retrospective studies regarding EP, each with more than 1 000 cycles analyzed, included a mixture of conventional IVF and ICSI cycles [10-12, 15-18] thereby failing to acknowledge the confounding variable of semen quality. The effect of male factors could be largely eliminated if conventional IVF cycles alone were considered when using embryo development to reflect oocyte quality. Furthermore, time-lapse imaging has recently been introduced into human IVF practice providing more information about embryo growth through continuous monitoring[19]. Timing the parameters of early embryonic developmental events have been successfully linked with blastulation[20], euploidy status[20, 21], and implantation results[19], with abnormal cleavage division patterns of observed embryos also being associated with subsequent implantation potential[14, 22, 23]. Time-lapse videography would be ideally suited to assess embryos derived from oocytes obtained from different hormonal milieu.

The aims of the present study were therefore to 1) restrict analysis to IVF cycles to minimize paternal confounding variables, 2) determine the impact of EP upon live birth rates, 3) assess embryo quality in IVF cycles using both conventional and time-lapse culture systems, and 4) examine the relationship between embryo growth and the level of progesterone in maternal serum seen on the day of ovulatory trigger.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Patient management and gamete collection

Conventional embryology data were collected retrospectively from 617 patients with a total of 836 conventional IVF treatment cycles performed at 3 participating clinics, between January 2007 and June 2013. Retrospective morphokinetic embryology data were obtained using the Embryoscope? at one of these 3 clinics between July 2013 and October 2014, with a total of 90 IVF cycles included. Retrospective data analysis has been approved by the institutional research ethics committees, and informed consent was provided by both partners of couples using Embryoscope? as the culture option for the embryos.

Pituitary suppression was administrated in the female patients with the use of either GnRH agonist or antagonist as previously described[14]. Serum progesterone level was measured on the day of ovulatory trigger in all 3 laboratories using Siemens Centaur CP automated analyzers, and the number of ovarian follicles with a diameter ≥14 mm determined by transvaginal ultrasonography was noted. The oocyte-cumulus complexes (OCC) were collected under ultrasound guidance thirty-six hours after the ovulatory trigger injection with hCG, either 10 000 IU Pregnyl (Organon) or 500 IU Ovidrel (Merck Serono). Sperm samples were processed within 2 hours of oocyte collection from samples either collected by the male partners via masturbation with an abstinence period of 2-5 days, or thawed from cryopreserved donor samples. Sperm with good motility were separated from fresh ejaculates or the post-thaw frozen samples with the use of 95%:50% density gradients (Puresperm, Nidacon) centrifugation. Four to six hours post oocyte collection, the OCCs were mixed with the prepared sperm sample at a ratio of 50 000 sperm per oocyte, with a maximum 5 OCCs per dish, being co-incubated overnight within a tri-gas regulated MINC incubator (Cook Medical, Queensland, Australia) at 37 ℃. Fertilization was confirmed by the visualization of two pronuclei (2PN) 16-18 hours post insemination. Fertilized oocytes were then transferred to different types of incubators for further culture before replacement or storage.

One or two embryos were transferred on day 2, 3 or 5 after insemination depending on availability of embryo selection and treatment plan. All cycles with a positive pregnancy test (serum β hCG＞ 25 iu/L) 14 days after oocyte collection were followed up and the outcome of the pregnancy confirmed. Live birth rates were used to indicate a successful treatment outcome.

2.2. Embryology in MINC incubators

Fertilized oocytes were incubated in MINC incubators using premixed gas (6% CO2, 5% O2, balance N2) for 2 to 5 days of culture before replacement or storage. Embryos were observed daily for grading. A simple coding system has been employed which allows for more consistency between operators and between clinics. Theembryologist records the date and time of the observation and the number of intact blastomeres seen. The embryologist estimates the embryos as symmetrical or asymmetrical and also estimates the degree of fragmentation into 3 possible categories (＜10%, 10%-40% and ＞40% of the total volume of the embryo). A computer algorithm then grades each embryo into 4 possible grades with grade 1 being the best and grade 4 the worst quality embryos. This grading is based primarily on the principle of on-time cleavage and most emphasis is placed on this factor. Each embryology code is assigned a grade in priority order of cell numbers, fragmentation and symmetry. This system is a rudimentary morphokinetic system of grading.

2.3. Embryology in Embryoscope? time-lapse incubator

Fertilized oocytes were loaded into Embryoscope? timelapse incubator perfused with 6% CO2, 5% O2, balance N2as described previously[14] with images taken every 10 mins at 7 focal planes. Morphokinetic analysis of embryos was performed with the Embryoviewer? software, with time from insemination to pronuclear fading (tPNF), time from PNF to 2-(t2_pnf), 3-(t3_pnf), 4-(t4_pnf), and 5-cell (t5_pnf) stages, and time intervals between cell stages such as cc2 (t3-t2) and s2 (t4-t3) recorded. Abnormal biological events were also noted, including multinucleation (MN) in at least one blastomere at the 2- or 4-cell stage, RC as described in a previous publication[14], and direct cleavage 2-3 cells (DC) which is defined as cc2＜5 hours[23].

2.4. Statistical analysis

Proportion data were analyzed via Chi square or Fisher exact test. The predictive value of continuous data on live birth outcome was assessed with the use of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the ROC curve (AUC) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI). Continuous data were expressed as mean±SD, and compared via student t-test. All statistical analysis was carried out with the use of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 20.0 (SPSS). P＜0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Live birth rates and choice of progesterone threshold

AUC [95% CI] showed the overall occurrence of live birth could not be predicted at the time of ovulatory trigger by the serum progesterone concentration alone (AUC=0.470 [0.419-0.521], P＞0.05). However, negative predictors of live birth were the progesterone/estradiol ratio (AUC=0.442 [0.391-0.494], P=0.027), progesterone per follicle ≥14 mm (AUC=0.395 [0.345-0.445], P=0.000) and progesterone per oocyte (AUC=0.374 [0.326-0.421], P=0.000). Of the two strongest predictors, progesterone per follicle had the advantage that the information was available before the woman underwent surgery for the collection of oocytes, and was calculated using follicle number and size which is widely used to time the ovulatory trigger. Progesterone per follicle was therefore used in subsequent analyses with the median concentration of 0.42 nmol/L/follicle being chosen as the arbitrary threshold to separate high and low values. Further examination of the live birth rates per transfer, taking into account the women’s age, is shown in Table 1. Women ≥35 years had significantly reduced live birth rates compared to those ＜35 years whether the progesterone per follicle was low or high. Whilst rates were similar for the younger women between the two progesterone groups, the live birth rate per transfer for the older women was significantly reduced when the progesterone per follicle was high compared to their low progesterone counterparts.

Table 1 Live birth rates for women with low (≤0.42 nmol/L/follicle) or high (＞0.42 nmol/L/follicle) progesterone per follicle ≥14 mm on the day of ovulatory trigger according to their age at egg collection.

3.2. Prevalence of high progesterone per follicle

Table 2 shows the prevalence of EP/follicle on the day of ovulatory trigger in 617 patients according to the number of repeat treatment cycles. Approximately half (314/617, 50.9%) of the women experienced an elevated progesterone per follicle in at least one cycle. Of the 137 women having two or more cycles, 48 (35.0%) were affected by EP in all repeat cycles.

Table 2 Prevalence of elevated serum progesterone concentration per follicle ≥14 mm(＞0.42 nmol/L/follicle) on the day of ovulatory trigger in 836 IVF cycles from 617 patients and its incidence in repeat treatment cycles.

3.3. Patients and cycles

Table 3 demonstrates the clinical features and outcomes of all 836 IVF cycles using conventional embryo culture. In both age groups (＜35 and ≥35 years), the EP/follicle group was significantly older, had a significantly lower serum oestradiol concentration, higher serum progesterone concentration, and lower number of oocytes collected, although there was no difference in the proportion of oocytes fertilized.

3.4. Embryo quality and growth

As shown in Table 3, the younger women with EP/follicle had a significantly higher proportion of embryos with better morphology but no difference in the proportion that gave rise to live babies. Conversely, the older women with EP/follicle had similar embryo quality to their low progesterone counterparts but a reduced proportion that went on to become a baby. Table 4 shows the embryo development and incidences of abnormal biological events whichwere detected by the time-lapse analysis in a further 90 IVF cycles. There was no difference for either age range between the high and low progesterone/follicle groups for the proportion of embryos reaching ≥6 cells by Day 3, or showing abnormal patterns of cleavage namely reverse cleavage, direct cleavage or multinucleation. However, EP/follicle in the younger women was associated with a slower time from insemination to PNF, slower times from PNF to 3-cell, 4-cell and 5-cell, and an extended cell cycle time from 2- to 3-cell. For the older age range, EP/follicle was associated with a quicker time from insemination to PNF but all other morphokinetic parameters were similar.

Table 3 Clinical features and outcomes of 836 IVF cycles between January 2007 and June 2013 according to whether or not serum progesterone (P4) concentration per follicle ≥14 mm was high (＞0.42 nmol/L/follicle) or not on the day of ovulatory trigger.

Table 4 Embryo development and incidences of abnormal biological events of embryos cultured in an Embryoscope? time-lapse incubator from an additional 90 IVF cycles between July2013 and October 2014 according to whether or not serum progesterone (P4) concentration per follicle≥14 mm was high (＞0.42 nmol/L/follicle) or not on the day of ovulatory trigger.

4. Discussion

EP is a potentially abnormal hormonal profile which has received much attention over the years. Originally thought to be a result of premature luteinisation[24], EP can occur in the presence of low LH[25], although reduced implantation can occur with the advancing of the endometrium by elevated circulating progesterone in the absence of a classical LH surge[26]. There are many definitions of EP used by different authors, and the prevalence varies according to the cut-off values used for the progesterone level[3, 10] although one must be cautious about comparing thresholds as different commercial progesterone assays do show different performance characteristics [27, 28], the expression of progesterone concentration on its own or as a ratio with estradiol[29], and the population of women investigated [11, 12, 16, 17, 30-33]. Furthermore, the degree of ovarian response has been identified as a factor in affecting the impact of EP, with a sliding scale of cut-off values being proposed according to the number of oocytes collected[11, 15]. The present study did not see a clear clinical effect of elevated progesterone alone, but the effect of EP expressed per follicle did and this may well reflect the influence of the ovarian response (as gauged by the number of follicles ≥14 mm) when used as a denominator. This adjustment allowed a clearer analysis of pregnancy rates according to age, and indeed an EP/ follicle was seen to be associated with lower implantation rates in the older women but not the younger women. Apart from examining the prevalence of EP in consecutive treatment cycles, the present study also investigated its occurrence in the repeat cycles of the same patients. Only 48/137 (35.0%) women were affected by EP in all cycles suggesting that the phenomenon is cycle rather than patient specific.

Whilst high progesterone levels have been shown to affect oocyte maturation in-vitro using a mouse model[34], the effect on oocytes and embryos of elevated progesterone in the human is not clear. Using oocyte donors and recipients as a means of separating the potential effects of progesterone upon oocyte and endometrium, pregnancy rates in the recipients were either not affected[35, 36] or even improved[37]. The examination of subsequent frozen embryo transfer in patients has also been used to try and separate the potential effects in the original cycle, and a simple analysis of pregnancy rates showed no difference when the embryos originated from a high progesterone cycle[38], but a more comprehensive appraisal of cumulative pregnancy rates did show a significant reduction in implantation with embryos exposed to a higher progesterone level in the original cycle[15]. Whilst there has been very little in the literature looking at the impact of elevated progesterone on embryo development other than blastulation rates [39], the present study has shown using continuous monitoring during culture within the Embryoscope?time-lapse incubator no evidence of embryo morphokinetics usually indicative of reduced implantation potential in the older women despite a reduced pregnancy rate. Indeed, there was a short time to PNF in the older EP/follicle group and this is allegedly associated with either better subsequent embryo quality judged by time-lapse monitoring[40, 41] or higher implantation potential in a conventional embryo culture system[42]. There was also no difference in the occurrence of abnormal patterns of cleavage associated with reduced implantation potential such as multinucleation[43-45] and reverse cleavage[14].

In conclusion, EP/follicle ≥14 mm adversely affects embryo implantation in women aged ≥35 years, but not ＜35 yrs. However, no adverse features were seen in the embryos from these affected cycles in terms of morphological appearance, abnormal patterns of cleavage, or morphokinetic timings.

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

The assistance and support from the embryology teams at three participating clinics are gratefully acknowledged.

[1] Schoolcraft W, Sinton E, Schlenker T, Huynh D, Hamilton F, Meldrum DR. Lower pregnancy rate with premature luteinization during pituitary suppression with leuprolide acetate. Fertil Steril 1991; 55: 563-566.

[2] Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Bontis J, Tarlatzis BC. Significantly lower pregnancy rates in the presence of progesterone elevation in patients treated with GnRH antagonists and gonadotrophins: a systematic reviewand meta-analysis. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2012; 13: 464-470.

[3] Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Bosdou JK, Tarlatzis BC. Progesterone elevation and probability of pregnancy after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 60 000 cycles. Hum Reprod Update 2013; 19: 433-457.

[4] Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Papanikolaou E, Bontis J, Devroey P, Tarlatzis BC. Is progesterone elevation on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration associated with the probability of pregnancy in in vitro fertilization? A systematic review and metaanalysis. Hum Reprod Update 2007; 13: 343-355.

[5] Kasum M, Radakovic B, Simunic V, Oreskovic S. Preovulatory progesterone rise during ovarian stimulation for IVF. Gynecol Endocrinol 2013; 29: 744-748.

[6] Elnashar AM. Progesterone rise on the day of HCG administration (premature luteinization) in IVF: an overdue update. J Assist Reprod Genet 2010; 27: 149-155.

[7] Labarta E, Martinez-Conejero JA, Alama P, Horcajadas JA, Pellicer A, Simon C, et al. Endometrial receptivity is affected in women with high circulating progesterone levels at the end of the follicular phase: a functional genomics analysis. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 1813-1825.

[8] Li R, Qiao J, Wang L, Li L, Zhen X, Liu P, et al. MicroRNA array and microarray evaluation of endometrial receptivity in patients with high serum progesterone levels on the day of hCG administration. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2011; 9: 29.

[9] Van Vaerenbergh I, Fatemi HM, Blockeel C, Van Lommel L, In’t Veld P, Schuit F, et al. Progesterone rise on HCG day in GnRH antagonist/rFSH stimulated cycles affects endometrial gene expression. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 22: 263-271.

[10] Huang R, Fang C, Xu S, Yi Y, Liang X. Premature progesterone rise negatively correlated with live birth rate in IVF cycles with GnRH agonist: an analysis of 2,566 cycles. Fertil Steril 2012; 98: 664-70 e2.

[11] Xu B, Li Z, Zhang H, Jin L, Li Y, Ai J, et al. Serum progesterone level effects on the outcome of in vitro fertilization in patients with different ovarian response: an analysis of more than 10,000 cycles. Fertil Steril 2012; 97: 1321-7 e1-4.

[12] Wu Z, Li R, Ma Y, Deng B, Zhang X, Meng Y, et al. Effect of HCG-day serum progesterone and oestradiol concentrations on pregnancy outcomes in GnRH agonist cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2012; 24: 511-20.

[13] Check JH, Wilson C, Choe JK, Amui J, Brasile D. Evidence that high serum progesterone (P) levels on day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection have no adverse effect on the embryo itself as determined by pregnancy outcome following embryo transfer using donated eggs. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2010; 37: 179-180.

[14] Liu Y, Chapple V, Roberts P, Matson P. Prevalence, consequence, and significance of reverse cleavage by human embryos viewed with the use of the Embryoscope time-lapse video system. Fertil Steril 2014; 102: 1295-300.

[15] Bu Z, Zhao F, Wang K, Guo Y, Su Y, Zhai J, et al. Serum progesterone elevation adversely affects cumulative live birth rate in different ovarian responders during in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a large retrospective study. PLoS One 2014; 9: e100011.

[16] Ochsenkuhn R, Arzberger A, von Schonfeldt V, Gallwas J, Rogenhofer N, Crispin A, et al. Subtle progesterone rise on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration is associated with lower live birth rates in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology: a retrospective study with 2 555 fresh embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 2012; 98: 347-354. [17] Requena A, Cruz M, Bosch E, Meseguer M, Garcia-Velasco JA. High progesterone levels in women with high ovarian response do not affect clinical outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014; 12: 69.

[18] Santos-Ribeiro S, Polyzos NP, Haentjens P, Smitz J, Camus M, Tournaye H, et al. Live birth rates after IVF are reduced by both low and high progesterone levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration. Hum Reprod 2014;29:1698-1705.

[19] Meseguer M, Herrero J, Tejera A, Hilligsoe KM, Ramsing NB, Remohi J. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 2658-2671.

[20] Wong CC, Loewke KE, Bossert NL, Behr B, De Jonge CJ, Baer TM, et al. Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage. Nat Biotechnol 2010; 28: 1115-1121.

[21] Campbell A, Fishel S, Bowman N, Duffy S, Sedler M, Hickman CF. Modelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics. Reprod Biomed Online 2013; 26: 477-485.

[22] Athayde Wirka K, Chen AA, Conaghan J, Ivani K, Gvakharia M, Behr B, et al. Atypical embryo phenotypes identified by time-lapse microscopy: high prevalence and association with embryo development. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: 1637-48 e1-5.

[23] Rubio I, Kuhlmann R, Agerholm I, Kirk J, Herrero J, Escriba MJ, et al. Limited implantation success of direct-cleaved human zygotes: a timelapse study. Fertil Steril 2012; 98: 1458-1463.

[24] Ubaldi F, Camus M, Smitz J, Bennink HC, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. Premature luteinization in in vitro fertilization cycles using gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and GnRH-a and urinary FSH. Fertil Steril 1996; 66: 275-80.

[25] Werner MD, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Franasiak JM, Molinaro TA, Scott RT, Jr. Defining the “sweet spot” for administered luteinizing hormoneto-follicle-stimulating hormone gonadotropin ratios during ovarian stimulation to protect against a clinically significant late follicular increase in progesterone: an analysis of 10,280 first in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 2014; 102: 1312-7.

[26] Ubaldi F, Bourgain C, Tournaye H, Smitz J, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. Endometrial evaluation by aspiration biopsy on the day of oocyte retrieval in the embryo transfer cycles in patients with serumprogesterone rise during the follicular phase. Fertil Steril 1997; 67: 521-526.

[27] Coucke W, Devleeschouwer N, Libeer JC, Schiettecatte J, Martin M, Smitz J. Accuracy and reproducibility of automated estradiol-17beta and progesterone assays using native serum samples: results obtained in the Belgian external assessment scheme. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 3204-3209. [28] Fleming R. Progesterone elevation on the day of hCG: methodological issues. Human Reprod Update 2008; 14: 391-392.

[29] Lee FK, Lai TH, Lin TK, Horng SG, Chen SC. Relationship of progesterone/estradiol ratio on day of hCG administration and pregnancy outcomes in high responders undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 1284-1289.

[30] Bosch E, Labarta E, Crespo J, Simon C, Remohi J, Jenkins J, et al. Circulating progesterone levels and ongoing pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles for in vitro fertilization: analysis of over 4000 cycles. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 2092-2100.

[31] Orvieto R, Nahum R, Meltzer S, Liberty G, Anteby EY, Zohav E. GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation: the role of elevated peak serum progesterone levels. Gynecol Endocrinol 2013; 29: 843-845.

[32] Papanikolaou EG, Pados G, Grimbizis G, Bili E, Kyriazi L, Polyzos NP, et al. GnRH-agonist versus GnRH-antagonist IVF cycles: is the reproductive outcome affected by the incidence of progesterone elevation on the day of HCG triggering? A randomized prospective study. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 1822-1828.

[33] Fanchin R, Righini C, Olivennes F, Ferreira AL, de Ziegler D, Frydman R. Consequences of premature progesterone elevation on the outcome of in vitro fertilization: insights into a controversy. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 799-805.

[34] Tyler JP, Smith DM, Biggers JD. Effect of steroids on oocyte maturation and atresia in mouse ovarian fragments in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1980; 58: 203-312.

[35] Fanchin R, Righini C, Olivennes F, de Ziegler D, Selva J, Frydman R. Premature progesterone elevation does not alter oocyte quality in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 1178-1183.

[36] Hofmann GE, Bentzien F, Bergh PA, Garrisi GJ, Williams MC, Guzman I, et al. Premature luteinization in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation has no adverse effect on oocyte and embryo quality. Fertil Steril 1993; 60: 675-679.

[37] Legro RS, Ary BA, Paulson RJ, Stanczyk FZ, Sauer MV. Premature luteinization as detected by elevated serum progesterone is associated with a higher pregnancy rate in donor oocyte in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1506-1511.

[38] Silverberg KM, Martin M, Olive DL, Burns WN, Schenken RS. Elevated serum progesterone levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration in in vitro fertilization cycles do not adversely affect embryo quality. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 508-513.

[39] Fanchin R, Hourvitz A, Olivennes F, Taieb J, Hazout A, Frydman R. Premature progesterone elevation spares blastulation but not pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization with coculture. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 648-652.

[40] Liu Y, Chapple V, Roberts P, Ali J, Matson P. Time-lapse videography of human oocytes following intracytoplasmic sperm injection: Events up to the first cleavage division. Reprod Biol 2014; 14: 249-256.

[41] Lemmen JG, Agerholm I, Ziebe S. Kinetic markers of human embryo quality using time-lapse recordings of IVF/ICSI-fertilized oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 17: 385-391.

[42] Fancsovits P, Toth L, Takacs ZF, Murber A, Papp Z, Urbancsek J. Early pronuclear breakdown is a good indicator of embryo quality and viability. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: 881-887.

[43] Ergin EG, Caliskan E, Yalcinkaya E, Oztel Z, Cokelez K, Ozay A, et al. Frequency of embryo multinucleation detected by time-lapse system and its impact on pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril 2014; 102: 1029-1033.

[44] Pelinck MJ, De Vos M, Dekens M, Van der Elst J, De Sutter P, Dhont M. Embryos cultured in vitro with multinucleated blastomeres have poor implantation potential in human in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 960-963.

[45] Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, Vercruyssen M, De Neubourg D, Valkenburg M, Ryckaert G, et al. Multinucleation in cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1062-1069.

ment heading

doi:10.1016/S2305-0500(15)30011-7

*Corresponding author: Yanhe Liu, Fertility North, Joondalup Private Hospital, Joondalup, Western Australia.

Tel: +61-8-9301 1075

E-mail: yanhe.liu@fertilitynorth.com.au