• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Acute and joint toxicity of three agrochemicalsto Chinese tiger frog(Hoplobatrachus chinensis) tadpoles

    2014-09-21 01:12:06LiWEIWeiWeiSHAOGuoHuaDINGXiaoLiFANMiaoLingYUZhiHuaLIN
    Zoological Research 2014年4期

    Li WEI, Wei-Wei SHAO, Guo-Hua DING, Xiao-Li FAN, Miao-Ling YU, Zhi-Hua LIN*

    ?

    Acute and joint toxicity of three agrochemicalsto Chinese tiger frog() tadpoles

    Li WEI, Wei-Wei SHAO, Guo-Hua DING, Xiao-Li FAN, Miao-Ling YU, Zhi-Hua LIN

    College of Ecology, Lishui University, Lishui 323000, China

    We studied acute and joint toxicity of three different agrochemicals (chlorantraniliprole, flubendiamide-abamectin and penoxsulam) to Chinese tiger frog () tadpoles with the method of stability water tests. Results showed that the three agrochemicals increased tadpole mortality. For acute toxicity, the LCvalues after 24, 48 and 72 h of chlorantraniliprole, flubendiamide-abamectin and penoxsulam exposure were 5.37, 4.90 and 4.68 mg/L; 0.035, 0.025 and 0.021 mg/L; 1.74, 1.45 and 1.29 mg/L, respectively. The safety concentrations (SC) of chlorantraniliprole, flubendiamide-abamectin and penoxsulam to the tadpoles were 1.23, 0.30 and 0.003 mg/L, respectively. Based on these findings, chlorantraniliprole and penoxsulam were moderately toxic, while flubendiamide-abamectin was highly toxic. All pairwise joint toxicity tests showed moderate toxicity. The LCvalues after 24, 48 and 72 h of exposure were 7.08, 6.61 and 6.03 mg/L for chlorantra-niliprole+penoxsulam, with corresponding values of 2.455, 2.328 and 2.183 mg/L for chlorantraniliprole+flubendiamide-abamectin, and 1.132, 1.084 and 1.050 mg/L for penoxsulam+flubendiamide-abamectin, with safe concentrations of 1.73, 0.63 and 0.30 mg/L, respectively. For toxic evaluations of pairwise combinations of the three agrochemicals, only the joint toxicity of chlorantraniliprole and flubendiamide-abamectin after 24 h was found to be synergistic, whereas all other tests were antagonistic. Our findings provide valuable information on the toxic effects of agrochemicals on amphibians and how various types of agrochemicals can be reasonably used in agricultural areas.

    Agrochemical;Acute toxicity; Joint toxicity; LC; Safe concentration;

    Environmental degradation is one of the major causes of worldwide amphibian decline (Shuhaimi-Othman et al, 2012; Sparling & Fellers, 2009; Stuart et al, 2004; Vertucci & Corn, 1996) but is especially prominent in China, due to intensive agriculture. The influences of agricul-ture on the natural environment can manifest throughland conservation (Hecnar, 1995), habitat fragm-entation (Hayes et al, 2002) and agrochemical pollution (Blaus-tein et al, 2003; Davidson et al, 2002; Lavorato et al, 2013; Sparling et al, 2001). Thankfully, the wide use of agricultural chemicals and their toxicities to non-target organisms has gained increasing attention. In agricultural regions that use agrochemicals, both the redundancy and diversity of amphibians have decreased compared with those in adjacent non-agricultural regions, and even in certain areas, some species have become extinct (Bonin et al, 1997). Although agrochemicals are now generally applied within restricted areas, their application is still a global problem, and scientists have found significant and increasing agrochemical residues in frogs since the 1990s (Datta et al, 1998; Russell et al, 1997).

    Many amphibian species inhabit ponds, brooks and temporary water bodies that lay within agricultural regions. Likewise, their breeding and development in late spring and early summer coincides with the agroche-mical application period of highest frequency and dosage (Hayes et al, 2003; Sayim, 2008; Vertucci & Corn, 1996). However, information about the effects of agrochemicals on amphibians is still limited. Some studies have demon-strated that in agrochemical polluted habitats, amphi-bians are characterized with high mortality, high abnor-mality, low hatching success and small size at metamorp-hosis, which have induced physical problems in individ-ual survival, e.g. liver and kidney function attenuation, defor-m-ation, and paralysis (Harfenist et al, 1989; Kamrin, 1997; Mandrillon & Saglio, 2009; Ouellet et al, 1997; Relyea, 2005). Moreover, agrochemicals have also affected the growth, development, immunoreaction and behavior of tadpoles (Bridges, 2000; Broomhall, 2005; Brunelli et al, 2009; Christin et al, 2003; Lou et al, 2013; Zhao et al, 2013).

    As the most important component of vertebrate biomass, the effects of pollution has the potential to damage the balance of entire ecosystems (Sayim, 2008). Due to their easy exposure to agrochemical contaminated water and the permeability of their skins, tadpoles are considered to be a good bioindicator of pollution (Venturmo et al, 2003).

    The tiger frog() is an anuran species of the Ranidae family, inhabiting farml-and and surrounding ditches (Fei et al, 2009). Due to the extensive expansion of farmland, agrochemical abuse and over hunting, the wild resources of thisspecies have declined dramatically over the past few decades (Lin & Ji, 2005; Wang et al, 2008), and it is now classified as a Class II National Protected Species.

    To detect the toxicological effects of farmland and surrounding water bodies on the tiger frog, the acute and joint toxicities of two kinds of pesticide (chlorantran-iliprole and flubendiamide-abamectin) and a weedicide (penoxsulam) were analyzed. This study will provide information for the rational use of agrochemicals and the protections of amphibian species,

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Experimental agrochemicals

    The following were used in this study: Chlorantr-aniliprole (chlorantraniliprole suspension, 200 g/L) produ-ced by DuPont, based in the United States; Flubendi-amide-abamectin (AVI-fluoro-amide suspension with 10% active ingredients (6.7% flubendiamide, 3.3% aba-me-ctin)) produced by Bayer Crop Science (China), Ltd.; Penoxsulam (penox-sulam oil suspension, 25 g/L) produ-ced by Dow Agrosc-iences (Indonesia) Ltd.; de-chlorinated tap water (at least 48 hours), pH6.8.

    Experimental animals

    Experimental tiger frog tadpoles were obtained from the breeding ponds of the Laboratory of Herpeto-logy, Lishui University. Studied individuals were all in good health (swimming freely, with good reflexes), with homogenized size (average weight=0.03 g; average length=17.6 mm), and at G34-36 (Gosner, 1960).

    Acute toxicity experiment

    Pre-experiment

    A few wide concentration ranges were used in the pre-experiment. By observing tadpole reactions and mortalities 24 h and 48 h after the agrochemical treatm-ents, the lethal concentration with no mortality (LC) and with maximum mortality (LC) were calcula-ted and were then used as the concentration ranges in the follo-wing experiments (Xue et al, 2005).

    Acute toxicity experiment

    Based on the pre-experiment results, “static-water changing” was used in the toxicity experiment (Zhou & Zhang, 1989). For each agrochemical, chloran-tranili-prole, flubendiamide-abamectin and penoxsulam, six different concentration trials with logarithmic spacing (each trial was performed in triplicate) and one control trial were established. Totally, 10 experimental tadpoles were housed in a round 1 L plastic container with 800 mL agrochemical solution. The experimental conditions were air temperature of 29.0?29.8°C and water temp-erature of 27.8?28.5°C. During the experiment, the tadpoles were fasted and the agrochemical solutions were changed completely every 24 h, with mortalities recorded at 24, 48 and 72 h intervals. If a tadpole did not respond to pressure applied on its tail by a pair of forceps, it was considered dead (Xue et al, 2005).

    Joint toxicity experiment

    Based on the acute toxicity experiment results, the three agrochemicals were grouped into three pairs. For each pair, one control trial and six different concentration trials in arithmetic progression were established accor-ding to their common logarithm of concentration (each trial was conducted in triplicate)(Xue et al, 2005). Specifically, chlorantraniliprole/penoxsulam: 5.62 (4.01/1.61), 6.17 (4.41/1.76), 6.76 (4.83/1.93), 7.41 (5.29/2.12), 8.13 (5.81/2.32), 8.91 (6.36/2.55) mg/L; chlorantr-aniliprole/flubendiamide-abamectin: 2.04 (2.027/0.013), 2.19 (2.176/0.014), 2.34 (2.325/0.015), 2.51 (2.494/0.016), 2.69 (2.672/0.018), 2.88 (2.860/0.019) mg/L; and penoxsulam/flubendiamide-abamectin: 0.95 (0.935/0.015), 1.02 (1.004/0.016), 1.09 (1.073/0.017), 1.17 (1.151/0.019), 1.25 (1.230/0.020), 1.34 (1.319/0.021) mg/L. All other experimental settings, animals and procedures were the same as those in the acute toxicity experiment.

    Statistical analysis

    Mortalities of tadpoles under different agrochemical concentrations

    All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 16.0 (SPSS inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Prior to statistical analysis, all variables were tested for normality and homog-eneity. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparisons test were used to evaluate the effects of each agrochemical (single and joint) on the mortalities of tadpoles under different concentration and different exposure time. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to evaluate the correlated effects of concentration and exposure time of each agrochemical on the mortalities of tadpoles. All results were expressed as mean±, witha=0.05 taken as statistically significant.

    Half lethal concentration (LC) and safe concentra-tion (SC)

    The Karber method was used to determine the LCafter 24, 48, and 72 h exposure of the individual and paired agrochemicals, respectively.

    =(X?)/(?1) (1)

    Where,is the difference of the logarithms of the two adjacent concentration trials;Xis the logarithm of the higher concentration;is the logarithm of the lower concentration; andis the concentration trials.

    lg LC=X-(∑-0.5) (2)

    WhereXis the logarithm of the concentration with 100% mortality; d is the logarithmic interval; and ∑is the sum of the mortalities of all the trials (Xue et al, 2005).

    SC=(48 h LC×0.3)/(24 h LC/48 h LC)(Zhang et al, 2011) (3)

    According to the Environmental Safety Assessment of Agrochemical Test Guidelines provided by the Ministry of Enviro-nmental Protection of China (1989), the toxicities of agrochemicals to tadpoles were divided into low toxicity (LC>10.0 mg/L), moderate toxicity (LC=10.0?1.0 mg/L) and high toxicity (LC<1.0 mg/L) (Zhang et al, 2010).

    Joint toxicity evaluation

    Marking’s addictive index of the coeffects for aquatic toxicology was used to evaluate joint toxicities (Xiu et al, 1994).

    =(A/A)+(B/B) (4)

    Where,is the joint toxicity of the paired agroch-emicals; A and B are the experimental agrochemicals; Ais the LCof agrochemical A when used alone; Ais the LCof agrochemical A when used jointly; Bis the LCof agrochemical B when used alone; and Bis the LCof agrochemical B when used jointly.

    When≤1,AI=1/-1 (5)

    When>1, AI=-S+1 (6)

    When AI<0, the coeffects were taken as antago-nistic, when AI>0, the coeffects were taken as synergistic, when AI=0, the coeffects were taken as adding effects(Zhang et al, 2011).

    RESULTS

    Acute toxicities of chlorantraniliprole, flubendiamide-abamectin and penoxsulam on tadpoles when used alone

    When the agrochemicals were used individually, at the same exposure time point (24, 48 and 72 h), the mortalities of tadpoles increased with increasing concen-trations and significant differences were found between the trials (one-way ANOVA, all<0.001, Table 1). The LCof chlorantraniliprole, flubendiamide-abamectin and penoxsulam all decreased with increasing exposure time (24, 48 and 72 h), and their SCs were 1.23, 0.003, and 0.30 mg/L, respectively. Therefore, chlorantran-iliprole showed moderate toxicity, and flubendiamide-abamectin and penoxsulam showed high toxicity (Table 2).

    Joint toxicities of chlorantraniliprole, flubendiamide-abamectin and penoxsulam on tadpoles

    When the agrochemicals were used in pairs, at the same exposure time point (24, 48 and 72 h), significant differences in the mortalities of tadpoles were also found between the trials (One-way ANOVA, all<0.001, Table 3). The LCof the agrochemicals in each pair decreased with increasing exposure time. All the three joint pairs, chlorantraniliprole/penoxsulam, chlorantran-ili-prole/flubendiamide-abamectin and penoxsulam/flub-en-diamide-abamectin exhibited moderate toxicity and their LCat 24, 48 and 72 h were 7.08, 6.61 and 6.03 mg/L; 2.455, 2.328 and 2.183 mg/L; and 1.132, 1.084 and 1.050 mg/L, respectively, whereas their corresponding SCs were 1.73, 0.63 and 0.30 mg/L, respectively (Table 2). Compared with the acute toxicity experiment, all paired LCvalues decreased, except for that of penoxsulam in the chlorantraniliprole/penoxsulam pair. According to Marking’s addictive index, all agrochemical pairwise were antagonistic, except for that ofchlorantran-iliprole/flube-ndiamide-abamectin, which was synergistic at 24 h (Table 4).

    Table 1 Acute toxicity for three agrochemicals on H. chinensis tadpoles (n=10)

    <0.001; Types with different superscripts differ significantly (Tukey’s test, α=0.05, a>b>c>d>e); NS: not significant.

    Table 2 Half lethal concentration (LC50) and safe concentration (SC) of the three agrochemicals administered individually and in conjunction

    Effects of agrochemical concentration, exposure time and their correlated effects on tadpole mortalities

    According to the repeated measures ANOVA, both agrochemical concentration and exposure time signific-antlyaffected the mortalities of tadpoles. All trials showed significantly correlated effects on the mortalities of tadpoles, except for the flubendiamide-abamectin/pe-no-xsulam pair (Table 5).

    Table 3 Toxicity of paired agrochemicals on H. chinensis tadpoles (n=10)

    <0.001; Types with different superscripts differ significantly (Tukey’s test, α=0.05, a>b>c>d>e); NS: not significant.

    Table 4 Evaluations of paired agrochemical toxicity

    DISCUSSION

    This study evaluated the acute and joint toxicities of chlorantraniliprole, flubendiamide-abamectin and penox-sulam to tiger frog tadpoles. Chlorantraniliprole has been used for rice pest control in China since 2008. The LCof chlorantraniliprole in our study differed from previous findings. Huang et al (2011) found that chlorantra-niliprole exhibited low toxicity in controllingat different developmental stages and its LCwas between 2.00 and 18.70 ng. Barbee et al (2010) also found low toxicity (LC=951 μg/L at 96 h) in an acute toxicity experiment on, and no effects from chlorantraniliprole on either the mortal-ities or behaviors ofwere found. In our study, the LCof chlorantraniliprole on tiger frog tadpoles at 24, 48, and 72 h were 7.08, 6.61, and 6.03 mg/L, respectively, which were much higher than those onandAccording to the Environ-mental Safety Assessment of Agrochemical Test Guide-lines, chlorantraniliprole showed moderate toxicity to tiger frog tadpoles.

    Table 5 Effects of agrochemical concentration, exposure time and their interactions on mortality of H. chinensis tadpoles

    :<0.05;:<0.001; I, II, III, IV, V and VI: six different concentrations of each agrochemical (see details in materials and methods); Types with different superscripts differ significantly (Tukey’s test, α=0.05, a>b>c>d>e); NS: not significant.

    Flubendiamide-abamectin has been available since 2010 forcontrol. Lin (2012) reported it as highly toxic, with 99.64% mortality on(10%, 30 mL/667 m). Our study also showed that it was highly toxic, with LCvalues at 24, 48 and 72 h of 0.035, 0.025 and 0.021 mg/L, respectively.

    Penoxsulam is a broad-spectrum weedicide, used to control species such as(Glomski & Netherland, 2008), but its toxicity on animals is little understood. Our study found that penoxsulam exhibited moderate toxicity, withLCvalues at 24, 48 and 72 h of 1.74, 1.45 and 1.29 mg/L, respectively.

    Our results showed that the toxicities of the three agrochemicals, from high to low, were flubendiamide-abamectin, penoxsulam and chlorantraniliprole, with SCs of 0.003, 0.30, and 1.23 mg/L, respectively (Table 2). Concentration, exposure time, and their interaction effects had significant influences on the mortalities of tiger frog tadpoles, except for the flubendiamide-abamectin/pen-oxsulam pair (Table 5).

    Previous studies demonstrated that the joint toxicities of different agrochemicals and heavy metals on amp-hibians, such as(Zhang et al, 2010) and(Guo et al, 2005; Nian et al, 2009), are usually synergistic. In our joint toxicity experiment, at same exposure time, all concentration trials of each pair had significant effects on the mortalities of tadpoles (Table 3). The LCof the chlorantraniliprol-e/penoxsu-lam pair after24, 48, and 72 h were7.08, 6.61, and 6.03 mg/L, respectively, whereas, their individual LCwhen used jointly were 5.01/2.04, 4.68/1.91, and 4.27/1.74 mg/L, respectively. The LCof chlorantra-niliprole in this pair was lower than that in the acute experiment; however, the situation was opposite for penoxsulam (Table 2, 4). This pair was antagonistic in toxicity evaluation (Table 4).

    The LCof the chlorantraniliprole/flubendiamide-abamectin pair after 24, 48 and 72 h were2.455, 2.328 and 2.183 mg/L, respectively, whereas, their individual LCwhen used jointly were 2.45/0.017, 2.34/0.0166, and 2.32/0.0165 mg/L, respectively. The LCof both agrochemicals were lower than those in the acute expe-riment(Table 2, 4). This pair was synergistic at 24 h, but antagonistic at 48 and 72 h in toxicity evaluation (Table 4).

    The LCof the penoxsulam/flubendiamide-abame-ctinpair after24, 48 and 72 h were1.132, 1.084 and 1.050 mg/L, respectively, whereas, their individual LCwhen used jointly were 1.114/0.0187, 1.067/0.0182, and 1.033/0.0177 mg/L, respectively. The LCof both agro-ch-e-micals were lower than those in the acute experiment(Table 2, 4). This pair was antagonistic in toxicity evalu-ation (Table 4). As a result, the response of tiger frog tadpoles to these agrochemicals (individually or jointly) is complicated as these antagonisticphenomena are correlated with animal developmental stage, as well as exposure time and concentration of chemicals (Berrill et al, 1993).

    Amphibians play important roles in pest control and in the aquatic and terrestrial food webs. However, due to environmental and habitat degeneration, amphibian resources have declined dramatically in recent years. Agrochemicals can change both the quantity and quality of amphibian habitats and food resources (Berrill et al, 1993), and induce mutations during development, such as retardation and deformation, as well as abnormal behaviors (Pawar et al, 1983; Sayim, 2008). Lethal and or sub-lethal toxicities of agrochemicals might affect the natural adjustment procedures of amphibian species (especially newborn or juvenile groups), and may help explain population decline. The rational application of agrochemicals is, therefore, critical for environmental and amphibian protection.

    Acknowledgements: We would like to thank Fang LIU and Dan WU for their assistance with the exper-iments.

    Barbee GC, McClain WR, Lanka SK, Stout MJ. 2010. Acute toxicity of chlorantraniliprole to non-target crayfish () associated with rice-crayfish cropping systems. Pest Management Science, 66(9): 996-1001.

    Berrill M, Bertham S, Wilson A, Louis S, Brigham D, Stromberg C. 1993. Lethal and sublethal impacts of insecticides on amphibian embryos and tadpoles. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 12(3): 525-539.

    Blaustein AR, Romansic JM, Kiesecker JM, Hatch AC. 2003. Ultraviolet radiation, toxic chemicals and amphibian population declines. Diversity and Distributions, 9(2): 123-140.

    Bonin J, DesGrange JL, Rodrigued M, Quellet M. 1997. Anuran species rochiness in agricultural land scapes of Quebec: foreseeing long-term results of road call surveys. Pages 141-149 in Green DM editor. Amphibians in decline: Canadian studies of a global problem. St, Louis, Missouri: Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles.

    Bridges CM. 2000. Long-term effects of pesticides epoxure at various life stages of the southern leopard frog (). Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 39(1): 91-96.

    Broomhall SD. 2005. Measuring chemical impacts on amphibians: Ecotoxicology and behavioural data in governmental regulation. Applied Herpetology, 2(3): 259-285.

    Brunelli E, Bernabò I, Berg C, Lundstedt-Enkel K, Bonacci A, Tripepi S. 2009. Environmentally relevant concentrations of endosulfan impair development, metamorphosis and behaviour intadpoles. Aquatic Toxicology, 91(2): 135-142.

    Christin MS, Gendron AD, Brousseau P, Menard L, Marcogliese DJ, Cyr D, Ruby S, Fourner M. 2003. Effects of agricultural pesticides on the immune system ofand on its resistance of parasitic infection. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 22(5): 1127-1133.

    Datta S, Hansen L, McConnell L, Baker J, Le Nior J, Seiber JN. 1998. Pesticides and PCB contaminants in fish and tadpoles from the Kaweah River basin California. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 60(6): 829-836.

    Davidson C, Shaffer HB, Jennings MR. 2002. Spatial tests of the pesticides droft habitat destruction, UV-B, and climate–change hypothesis for California amphibian declinces. Conservation Biology, 16(6): 1588-1601.

    Fei L, Hu SQ, Ye CY, Huang YZ. 2009. Fauna Sinica Amphibia, Vol. 2, Anura. Beijing: Science Press.

    Glomski LM, Netherland MD. 2008. Efficacy of fluridone, penoxsulam, and bispyribac-sodium on variable-leaf milfoil. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management, 46(1): 193-196.

    Gosner KL. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica, 16(3): 183-190.

    Guo ZY, He W, He ZB. 2005. Jonit-toxicity of clomazone and cadmiun on. Wuyi Science Journal, 21(1): 113-116.

    Harfenist A, Power T, Clark KL, Peakall DB. 1989. A review and evaluation of the amphibian toxicological literature. Technical Report Series No.61. Ottawa: Canadian Wildlife Service.

    Hayes T, Haston K, Tsui M, Hoang A, Haefelle C, Vonk A. 2003. Atrazine induced hermorphropdism at 0.1 ppb in American leopard frogs (): Laboratory and field evidence. Environmental Health Perspectives, 111(4): 568-575.

    Hayes TB, Collins A, Lee M, Mendoza M, Noriega N, Stuart AA, Vonk A. 2002. Hermaphroditic, demasculinized forgs after exposure to the herbicide atrazine at low ecologically relevant doses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99(8): 5476-6480.

    Hecnar SD. 1995. Acute and chronic toxicity of ammonium nitrate fertilizer to amphibians form southern Onataro. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 14(12): 2131-2137.

    Huang J, Wu SF, Ye GY. 2011. Evaluation of lethal effects of chlorantraniliprole onand its larval parasitoid,. Agricultural Sciences in China, 10(7): 1134-1138.

    Kamrin MA. 1997. Pesticides profiles toxicity, environmental impact, and fate. New York: Lewes.

    Lavorato M, Bernabò H, Crescente A, Deno?l M, Tripepi S, Brunelli E. 2013. Endosulfan effects ontadpoles: Quantitative developmental and behavioural analysis. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 64(2): 253-262.

    Lin ZF. 2012. Study on efficacy trials to control rice stem borer by pesticide. North Rice, 42(1): 38-39.

    Lin ZH, Ji X. 2005. Sexual dimorphism in morphological traits and food habits in tiger frogs,in Lishui, Zhejiang. Zoological Research, 26(3): 255-262.

    Lou QQ, Zhang YF, Zhou Z, Shi YL, Ge YN, Ren DK, Xu HM, Zhao YX, Wei WJ, Qin ZF. 2013. Effects of perfluorooctanesulfonate and perfluorobutanesulfonate on the growth and sexual development of. Ecotoxicology, 22(7): 1133-1144.

    Mandrillon AL, Saglio P. 2009. Effects of single and combined Embryonic exposures to herbicide and conspecific chemical alarm cues on hatching and larval traits in the common frog (). Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 56(3): 566-576.

    Nian Y, Yang ZF, Wei QQ. 2009. Study on toxicity of triazophos, trichlorphon and imidacloprid ontadpole. Journal of Anhui Agriculture Science, 37(18): 8538-8540.

    Ouellet M, Bonin J, Rodrigue J, DesGranges J, Lair S. 1997. Hind limb deformities (ectromelia, ectrodactyly) in free living anurans from agricultural habitats. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 33(1): 95-104.

    Pawar KR, Ghate HV, Katdare M. 1983. Effect of malathion on embryonic development of the frog. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 31(2): 170-176.

    Relyea RA. 2005. The lethal impacts of Roundup and predatory stress on six species of North American tadpoles. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 48(3): 351-357.

    Russell RW, Gillan KA, Hafner GD. 1997. Polychlorinated biphenyls and chlorinated pesticides in sourthern Ontario, Canada, green frogs. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 16(11): 2258-2263.

    Sayim F. 2008. Acute toxic effects of malathion on the 21st stage larvae of the marsh frog. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 32(1): 99-106.

    Shuhaimi-Othman M, Nadzifah Y, Umirah NS, Ahmad AK. 2012. Toxicity of metals to tadpoles of the common Sunda toad,. Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, 94(2): 364-376.

    Sparling DW, Fellers GM. 2009. Toxicity of two insecticides to California, USA, anurans and its relevance to declining amphibian populations. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 28(8): 1696-1703.

    Sparling DW, Fellers GM, McConnell LL. 2001. Pesticides and amphibian population declines in California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 20(7): 1591-1595.

    Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues AS, Fischman DL, Waller RW. 2004. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science, 306(5702): 1783-1786.

    Venturmo A, Rosenbaum E, De Casho AC, Anguiano OL, Gana l, De Schroder TF, De Castro AC, Anguiano OL, Gauna L, De Schrodeder TF, De Angelo AMP. 2003. Biomarkers of effect in toads and frogs. Biomarkers, 8(3-4): 167-186.

    Vertucci FA, Corn PS. 1996. Evaluation of episodol acidification and amphibian declines in the rocky mountains. Ecological Applications, 6(2): 449-457.

    Wang Y, Shao C, Wang XT. 2008. A study on relative fatness of tiger frog () in Zhejiang province. Ecological Science, 27(6): 490-493.

    Xiu RQ, Xu YX, Fu YC, Gao SR, Ren GY, J Z. 1994. Additive index of coeffects for aquatic toxicology. Environmental Chemistry, 13(3): 269-271.

    Xue QQ, Yao D, Huang ZY, Ke Q, Wen X, Geng BL. 2005. Acute toxicity of pesticide dichlorvos and herbicide butachlor totadpoles. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 24(2): 209-212.

    Zhang YL, Yuan J, Chen LP, Shao H. 2011. Joint toxicity experiment of three heavy metal on fry of. Heibei Fisheries, 39(2): 24-27.

    Zhang YP, Fang XW, Lu XY. 2010. Co-toxicity research of pesticides ruigao and feiwang totadpole. Hubei Agriculture Science, 49(2): 354-356.

    Zhao HF, Chai LH, Wang HY. 2013. Effects of fluoride on metamorphosis, thyroid and skeletal development intadpoles. Ecotoxicology, 22(7): 1123-1132.

    Zhou YX, Zhang ZS. 1989. Toxicity testing methods of aquatic organism. Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Press.

    04 December 2013; Accepted: 20 February 2014

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31270443) and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LY13C030004).

    , E-mail:zhlin1015@126.com

    庆阳市| 舟山市| 大关县| 林州市| 梨树县| 大港区| 香格里拉县| 安泽县| 扬中市| 侯马市| 阳西县| 横峰县| 方正县| 金秀| 岳阳市| 漾濞| 大连市| 宜宾市| 安阳市| 怀化市| 丹阳市| 大竹县| 靖州| 监利县| 大方县| 伊宁市| 钟祥市| 马关县| 平罗县| 花莲市| 抚顺县| 满洲里市| 平安县| 维西| 调兵山市| 乳山市| 酉阳| 临汾市| 东宁县| 绩溪县| 讷河市|