• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    DNA氧化損傷和結直腸癌發(fā)病風險的相關研究

    2014-08-13 01:38:54周少玉王澤民JamesKlaunig
    遵義醫(yī)科大學學報 2014年4期
    關鍵詞:直腸癌大學環(huán)境

    周少玉,王澤民,James E. Klaunig

    (印第安那大學 環(huán)境衛(wèi)生系,印第安那 布盧明頓 47408,美國)

    There is increasing body of studies supporting the role of oxidative stress and damage in carcinogenesis. Oxidative stress results from overproduction of reactive oxygen species and impaired detoxification in living cells.Increased production of reactive oxygen species causes damage to macromolecules such as DNA, protein and lipids, thus modulates the functions of the molecules involved[1-2]. Reactive oxygen species also play important roles in regulating intracellular signaling serving as a second messenger.

    Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide, and is the third most common cancer diagnosed in both men and women in the United States. According to the estimation of American Cancer Society, there will be 102480 new cases of colon cancer,and 40340 new cases of rectal cancer in the United States for 2013. While some (about 10%-15%) of CRC cases are attributed to inherited gene defects, majority (about 70%-80%) of the cases of CRC occur sporadically[3-4].

    Association between oxidative stress and CRC has been extensively studied over last decade. A number of studies have demonstrated increased level of reactive oxygen species nitric oxide, DNA damage such as 8-oxodG, and lipid peroxidation in both colorectal tumors[5-7], indicating an increased oxidative stress status of CRC tissues. Significant increase in oxidative DNA damage in the form of 8-oxodG DNA has also been reported in leukocytes, serum, and urine of CRC patients[6, 8-10]. In addition, reactive oxygen metabolites and antioxidant capacity were estimated in serum and found to be associated with increased risk for CRC[11]. However, there is little report on the direct measurement of oxidative DNA while implicating the molecular mechanism of oxidative stress into the carcinogenesis of colorectal cancers.

    The DNA damage can be prevented by intracellular antioxidant system or repaired by DNA base repair enzymes[1]. Environmental factors further modify the oxidative status. These factors include lifestyle, genetic makeup of an individual and vitamin supplements etc. It has been reported that smoking and alcohol are risk factors for CRC[12]and single nucleotide polymorphism influence the risk of CRC[13]. However, conclusion has never been made on the etiological role of oxidative stress because of complexity of environmental factors and inconsistent research.

    The present study investigated the correlation between total anti-oxidant capacity and DNA damage and the associated risk of developing colorectal cancer. DNA damage was directly measured by Comet assay, and oxidative DNA damage was determined by formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase(fpg)-modified comet assay using blood samples collected from healthy subjects, patients diagnosed with polyps and colorectal cancer. SNPs were examined on elected genes to correlate with the CRC risk.

    1 Materials and Methods

    1.1 Chemicals Deferoxaminemesylate,dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO),disodium EDTA,ethidium bromide,sodium chloride (NaCl),sodium hydroxide (NaOH),sodium lauryl sacrosinate,trizmabase,Triton X-100,HEPES potassium salt,potassium chloride (KCl),RPMI1640media,isopropanol and all other chemicals of analytical grade were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co.(St. Louis, MO, USA). Formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg) and Comet slides were purchased from Trevigen (Gaithersburg, MD, USA).

    1.2 Study population and data collection The present project was initiated in the year 2005 by Indiana University (IU) and funded by the Department of Defense.The objective ofthis project is to developsensitive biomarkers/molecular signatures and predictive models for early diagnosis, prevention, and to provide better care and treatment of colorectal cancer patients. Participants were enrolled in the Multidisciplinary Gastrointestinal Oncology Clinics at the Indiana University Simon Cancer Center (IUSCC) and the IU Medical Centers (IU Hospital, IU Cancer Center, Wishard Hospital and IU Health Arnett Hospital)for colonoscopies from April 2009 to November 2010.The study included 175 participants (80 healthy controls, 67 polyps and 28 colorectal cancer cases). Tissue, blood and plasma samples were collected from all patients during this period. All participants were informed with prior written consent and given a life style risk factor questionnaire. The patients were diagnosed as healthy control, polyps and colorectal cancer based on the colonoscopy results followed by histopathological confirmation by pathologists. Clinical data including demographics, life style, diet, smoking, alcohol consumption, height, weight, family history of colorectal cancer, medications, prior cancer therapy and occupational exposure, were obtained from questionnaires, patient records, pathology reports, and physician notes.

    1.3 Sample collection Whole blood samples were collected from patients, who were fasted for 8 hours,prior to colonoscopy. An aliquot of 10 μl whole blood was mixed with 0.5 ml of comet solution (RPMI 1640containing 10% FBS, 10%DMSO, and 1 mMdeferoxamine),was step-frozen and stored at -80℃ for later analysis of oxidative DNA damage.Aliquots of plasma samples were prepared from blood samples by centrifuging at 1500g for 20 min, and stored at -80℃. Remaining blood samples were also stored at -80℃ for DNA isolation and SNP analysis.

    1.4 Measurement of total antioxidant capacity The Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC) is an assay to measure the overall antioxidants status in biological samples.TEAC was measured in plasma based on the ability of antioxidants in the plasma sample to scavenge the preformed radical monocation of 2,2'-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS·+), compared to water soluble analogue of vitaminE[14].Plasma samples (25 μl) or Trolox standards were incubated to react with ABTS·+(100 μl) at room temperature for 5 minutes, and the absorbance measured at 734 nm using TECAN Infinite M200 spectrophotometer (Tecan US, Durham, NC).TEAC was quantified from a Trolox standard curve, and expressed as Trolox equivalents.

    1.5 Measurement of direct and oxidative DNA damage by Comet assay Comet assay or single cell electrophoresis measures the DNA double strand breaks as well as single strand breaks. In this study, we used the modified method of comet assay as reported previously from our lab[15-16]. Briefly, the frozen blood samples in comet solution were thawed and 7μl of blood was mixed with 70 μl of 1% low-melting agarose.This suspension was applied and spread on CometSlides (Trevigen, Gaithersburg, MD) and incubated at 4 ℃ for solidification. Cells were lysed for 1 hour in lysis solution (100mM Na2EDTA, pH 10, 2.5M NaCl, 10mM Trizma base, 1% sodium lauryl sarcosinate, 1% Triton-X 100, 10% DMSO, and 1mM deferoxamine), incubated in alkali buffer (0.3M NaOH and 1mM Na2EDTA, pH>13) for 40 min and electrophoresed in same alkali buffer (25 V, 300 mA) for 30 min at 4℃.Slides were neutralized by incubating in neutralization buffer (0.4M Tris, pH 7.5) at 4 ℃ for 5 min, rinsed with deionized water and air dried for overnight in dark room. Slides were stained with ethidium bromide (25μl, 20μg/ml) and 100 randomly selected comets per sample were evaluated using Komet 5.5 imaging Software (Kinetic Imaging Ltd., Liverpool, UK) under fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Japan).

    Oxidative DNA damage was determined by modified alkaline comet assay as reported previously[16]. Briefly, lysed cells were washed in Fpg solution (40mM 4-[2-hydroxyethyl]piperazine-1-ethanesulfonic acid, 100mM KCl, 0.5mM Na2EDTA, and 0.2% bovine serum albumin; pH 8.0) and incubated either with Fpg enzyme or Fpg solution alone for 40 min at 37℃. Rest of the procedures was same as described above.Direct and oxidative DNA damage was measure dusing the formula,[tail mean-head mean] × tail%DNA/100 and expressed as comet (Olive) tail moment.

    1.6 Single nucleotide polymorphism analysis

    1.6.1 DNA Isolation Genomic DNA was isolated from 3 ml of whole blood samples using the QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valncia, CA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Isolated DNA was quantitated by UV spectrophotometry and stored at -80℃ until genotyping.

    1.6.2 Genotyping We selected SNPs in genes which previously showed a significant association with oxidative stress (rs1001179, rs1001179, rs4880, rs1799983,rs1065411, rs1695), DNA damage and repair (rs2307 486,rs1052133, rs25487, rs1042522),inflammation (rs1800796, rs4073, rs689466, rs5275),vitamin D status (rs1544410,rs1801725, rs2181874) and metabolism (rs2069522).The details of these SNP assays are listed in Table 1. Allelic discrimination assays of all SNPs variants were performed using primers supplied by Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). 100 ng of DNA samples were used in standard 96 well reaction plates and the probe fluorescence signals were detected by 7900HT Fast Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), following the manufacturer’s instructions.

    Table1ListofgenesthatwereselectedforanalysisofSNPs

    SymbolGeneSNPOxidative stresCATCatalasers1001179SOD2Super oxide dismutasers4880NOS3Nitric oxide synthase 3rs1799983GSTM1Glutathione S-transferase M1 rs1065411GSTP1Glutathione S-transferase P1rs1695DNA damage & repairAPEX1APEX nuclease (multifunctional DNA repair enzyme) 1rs2307486OGG18-oxoguanine DNA glycosylasers1052133XRCC1X-ray repair complementing defective repair in Chinese hamster cells 1rs25487TP53Tumor protein P53rs1042522InflammationIL-6Interleukin-6rs1800796IL-8Interleukin-8rs4073PTGS2Prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (Prostaglandin G/H synthase and cyclooxygenase)rs689466PTGS2Prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (Prostaglandin G/H synthase and cyclooxygenase) Ex10rs5275Vitamin D statusVDRVitamin D receptorrs1544410CASR Calcium Sensing Receptorrs1801725CYP24A1cytochrome P450 (CYP) 24A1rs2181874MetabolismCYP1A2cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2rs2069522

    1.7 Statistical analysis of data Values for TEAC, alkaline DNA damage and oxidative DNA were presented as mean ± SD. Differences among multiple groups were evaluated using a one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test.Data of SNPs was presented as frequency and percentage for each allele, and differences among health, polyp, and colorectal cancer were analyzed by multi-table Chi Square. The level of significance was selected to beP<0.05.

    2 Results

    2.1 Demographic data We analyzed 175 blood samples for this study.The subjects included health individuals with average age 52.4 years (20-70 years), and patients diagnosed with polyps with average age 62.9 years (39-84) and CRC 53.7 years (27-86) at the time of diagnosis.

    2.2 Direct and oxidative DNA damage and antioxidant capacity There have been a number of studies on DNA damage in colorectal cancers. However, most of those studies focused on the analysis of 8-oxodG, indirectly indicating DNA damage. In this study, we utilized Comet assay to directly measure DNA damage. Direct DNA damage in leukocyte cells collected from health subjects, and patients diagnosed with polyp and colorectal cancer was measured by alkaline comet assay. Values were presented as the means ± SD in all the samples. As shown in Figure 1, there was a marginally significantly higher direct DNA strand breakage in colorectal cancer group compared to health population (P=0.071).

    *P=0.071 in comparison with control.Fig 1 DNA strand breakage among health, polyp and colorectal cancers

    We then analyzed samples with formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase(fpg) modified Comet assay, which indicates oxidative DNA damage. As shown in Figure 2, oxidative stress induced DNA damage was significantly higher in colon and colorectal cancers when compared to healthy controls.However, there was no significant difference observed in polyps compared to health group. Because of the small size, rectal cancers were not analyzed as a separate group. Furthermore, the total antioxidant capacity (TEAC) was analyzed. TEAC was measured in serum using a method based on the scavenging of the 2,2'-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) radical ABTS·+. Data was presented as means ± SD in all the samples. Statistical analysis was done by a one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test. As shown in Figure 3, there was a positive trend on polyps but not on colorectal cancer (P< 0.05).

    *Statistical significance as P<0.05 in comparison with Control group. Fig 2 Oxidative DNA damage among health,polyp and colorectal cancers

    2.3 Association of smoking, alcohol and CRC with DNA damage We analyzed smoking and alcohol status and correlated with DNA damage. There was an overall higher direct and oxidative DNA damage in smoking colorectal group compared to smoking control and polyps groups (Table 2). Further gender analysis showed that female smoking group with colorectal cancer had higher level of directly DNA damage compared to other smoking group. But, this is not the case for male groups. Overall, no significant difference in direct DNA damage or oxidative DNA damage was found in alcoholic colorectal patients compared to healthy control (data not shown).

    *Statistical significance as P<0.05 in comparison with Control group.Fig 3 Total antioxidant capacity (TEAC assay)

    Table2AssociationofDNAdamageandsmokingstatusamongdifferentgroups

    GroupsNumber(n)TEACDNA breakageOxidative DNA damageSmoking Males Healtyy Control155.83±0.150.95±0.081.55±0.39Polyps235.85±0.101.07±0.101.48±0.17CPC75.64±0.201.09±0.202.15±0.57Smoking FemalesHealthy Control215.66±0.150.90±0.081.62±0.25Polyps145.46±0.131.11±0.151.48±0.52CPC65.72±0.161.49±0.32*1.78±0.41AllControl365.65±0.091.11±0.071.32±0.16Smoking Polyps375.79±0.091.07±0.091.48±0.16Smoking CRC135.69±0.121.32±0.20*1.94±0.33*

    *P<0.05 compared to control group.

    2.4 Oxidative DNA repair and antioxidant enzyme SNPs and CRC We analyzed the SNPs variants in genes which previously showed a significant association with oxidative stress, DNA damage and repair, inflammation, vitamin D status and metabolism as listed in Table 1. Allelic discrimination assays of all SNPs were performed using primers from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA), and the probe fluorescence signals were detected by 7900HT fast Real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Figure 4 shows allelic discrimination plot genotyping oxoguaninegly cosylase 1 (Ogg1) with probe rs1052133 for the DNA samples.

    Fig 4 Allelic discrimination plot showing the genotyping of Ogg1 for all the samples

    We observed that the mutant phenotype CC in DNA damage repair enzyme OGG1 (Ser326Cys), 8-Oxoguanine DNA glycosylase,was significantly higher in colorectal cancers (78.9%) than controls and polyps, which were 56.3% and 52.7%, respectively (Table 3, and Fig 4), while the mutant phenotype KK for GSTM1, an antioxidant enzyme, was significantly higher in colorectal cancers(22.9%) than healthy people and people with polyps (Table 3). No statistical difference was found in other genes analyzed in the present study.

    Table3FrequencyofSNPsinOgg1andGSTM1amongdifferentgroups

    PhenotypeOGG1(S326C)SSSCC%oftotalGSTM1 (N173K)NNNKKK%oftotalControl6.836.956.355.630.913.6Polyp5.541.852.742.030.415.0Colorectal5.315.878.9*37.114.022.9*

    *P< 0.05 compared to control group.

    3 Discussion

    Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent human cancers, and is the third most common cancer diagnosed in both men and women in the United States[17]. Increasing evidence supports a critical role of oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species generation in the pathological progress of all the three stages, initiation, promotion and progression, of human cancers including colorectal cancer. Investigation on oxidative stress and antioxidant status has been a focus of many researchers for a long time in order to predict and prevent human colorectal cancers. However, dissecting the exact role of oxidative stress in the development of colorectal cancer is complicated and remains a challenge.No any specific biochemical marker has been identified yet up to date.

    Increased reactive oxygen species generation and DNA damage has been reported in both tumor tissue and leukocytes of colorectal cancer patients[5-7]. However, limited studies have been conducted on direct measurement of DNA damage in relation to colorectal cancers.In the present study,we employed Comet assay, and directly measured DNA strand breakage of leukocytes from normal individuals, patients diagnosed with polyps and colorectal cancers. We found significantly higher DNA damage in the leukocytes of colorectal cancer patients compared to normal control, suggesting a status of oxidative stress. Furthermore, we employed formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase modified (oxidative DNA damage) Comet assay to evaluate the oxidative DNA damage, and found a similar pattern as the direct DNA damage, i.e., higher level of oxidative DNA damage was found in colorectal cancer patients than the normal control group. All these demonstrated that an increased oxidative stress is associated with colorectal cancer.

    Although oxidative stress is proposed to be involved in the mechanism of carcinogenesis, it is still being debated whether oxidative stress plays a causal role in pathological progression.Our results in the present study with human population clearly demonstrated a positive association between oxidative stress and development of colorectal cancer. Since tumor cells possess high capacity of generating reactive oxygen species, we cannot determine whether increased DNA damage in the colorectal cancer subject is a cause or consequence of colorectal cancers. Indeed, elevated level of oxidative lesions has been well documented in tumor tissues in animal studies and population investigation, yet the effectiveness of intervention of cancer using antioxidants has been limited in a number of clinical trials[18-20]. From the perspective of causative etiology, we would expect increased oxidative stress in early stage of carcinogenesis.Results from the subjects of polyp sin the present study showed no increase in the level of both DNA breakage damage or oxidative damage compared to normal subjects, suggesting that the increased oxidative DNA damage might be a consequence of late carcinogenesis rather than a causative factor.

    Oxidative DNA damage is the consequence of imbalance between oxidants and defense mechanisms. There are a number of defense mechanisms in the living organism to remove harmful reactive oxygen species. Oxidative stress occurs only when the critical balance between oxidants and antioxidants is disrupted due to the depletion of antioxidants or excessive accumulation of the reactive oxygen species. Interestingly, we found higher antioxidant capacity (TEAC) in polyps but not in colorectal cancers when compared to normal control (Fig 3). We postulate this as an oxidative stress-induced defense mechanism. Oxidative stress condition induces increased antioxidant capacity in people with polyps, therefore, confers a protection against DNA damage under stress. As such, no increased DNA damage was found in the polyps subjects. However, as continuous and persistent oxidative stress occurs, oxidative DNA damage may arise as seen in the late stage of colorectal cancer subjects found in the present study. It is worthy to mention that we measured both DNA damage and antioxidant capacity simultaneously, which may provide a better profile explaining the cause of accumulation of both direct and oxidative DNA damage found in the colorectal cancer subjects. Nonetheless, our finding could not conclusively differentiate between increased DNA damage as a cause or the consequence of the carcinogenesis of colorectal cancers.

    Many environmental and lifestyle factors, such as alcohol and smoking,affect oxidative status. Cigarette smoking is an important environmental factor contributing to the development of a variety of human cancer, and it has been well established that tobacco smoke contains thousands of chemicals and causes inflammation[2, 21]. It is also known that reactive oxygen species are generated during the combustion of tobacco products, thus cause oxidative DNA damage resulting in genemu tations or modifying signaling transduction pathways that lead to cancer[22-25]. We have found both direct DNA damage and oxidative DNA damage were significantly higher in the smoking colorectal patients than smoking control subjects. Further stratified analysis of gender found that increased DNA damage was associated with female smoking colorectal cancer patients, but not male smoking subject. We are however unable to explain the gender difference in light of the DNA damage since the increased DNA damage level is not the consequence of single mechanism, but may be influenced by a wide range of environmental factors.

    It has been well established that inherited factors such as familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC) contribute to the development of colorectal cancer[26-29]. More recently, single nucleotide polymorphisms are realized to interact with environmental factors predisposing to a number of human cancers[2]. We determined SNPs in genes that have significant association with oxidative stress such asCAT,SOD2,NOS3,GSTM1, andGSTP1. We also determined SNPs in genes in DNA damage and repair (APEX1,OGG1,XECC1, andTP53).All these genes are highly related to oxidative DNA damage. In addition, we determined SNPs in genes of inflammation, metabolism, and genes that influence vitamin D status. We indeed found that colorectal cancer patients had a higher percentage carrying mutant genotype in antioxidant geneGSTM1compared to normal subjects. Also a significantly higher percentage of mutant genotype in DNA repair geneOGG1was observed in the colorectal cancer patients than normal population. These positive associations strongly support a role of DNA damage and repair in the development of colorectal cancers.

    In conclusion, we reported here both increased direct and oxidative DNA damage are associated with colorectal cancer. Environmental factor such as smoking, and genetic background such as DNA repair and antioxidant enzymes are strongly associated with high risk of colorectal cancers. This study suggests that high level of oxidative stress induced DNA damage is associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer, and may be a potential good biomarker.However, the relatively small cohort of subjects limits our further analysis of interactions between environmental factors and genetic background in the role of DNA damage and modification on colorectal cancer development. Nonetheless, the measurement of both direct and oxidative DNA damage combined with the simultaneous determination of antioxidant capacity provides a new clue into the role of oxidative stress and DNA damage in the development of colorectal cancer.

    [References]

    [1] Klaunig J E, Kamendulis L M, Hocevar B A. Oxidative stress and oxidative damage in carcinogenesis[J]. Toxicol Pathol, 2010,38(1):96-109.

    [2] Klaunig J E, Wang Z,Pu X,et al. Oxidative stress and oxidative damage in chemical carcinogenesis[J]. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol,2011,254(2): 86-99.

    [3] Souglakos J. Genetic alterations in sporadic and hereditary colorectalcancer:implementations for screening and follow-up[J]. Dig Dis,2007,25(1):9-19.

    [4] Per?e M. Oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer: cause or consequence?[J].Biomed Res Int, 2013,2013: 725710.

    [5] Haklar G, Sayin-Ozveri E, Yüksel M,et al. Different kinds of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species were detected in colon and breast tumors[J]. Cancer Lett, 2001, 165(2):219-224.

    [6] Guz J, Foksinski M, Siomek A, et al. The relationship between 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine level and extent of cytosine methylation in leukocytes DNA of healthy subjects and in patients with colon adenomas and carcinomas[J]. Mutat Res, 2008,640(1-2): 170-173.

    [7] Rainis T, Maor I, Lanir A, et al. Enhanced oxidative stress and leucocyte activation in neoplastic tissues of the colon[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2007,52(2): 526-530.

    [8] Chang D, Wang F, Zhao Y S, et al. Evaluation of oxidative stress in colorectal cancer patients[J]. Biomed Environ Sci, 2008, 21(4): 286-289.

    [9] Sato T, Takeda H, Otake S, et al. Increased plasma levels of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine are associated with development of colorectal tumors[J]. J Clin Biochem Nutr, 2010, 47(1): 59-63.

    [10] Dincer Y, Himmetoglu S, Akcay T, et al. Prognostic significances of oxidative DNA damage evaluated by 8-hydroxy-deoxyguanosine and antioxidant enzymes in patients undergoing resection of gastric and colon carcinoma[J]. Neoplasma, 2007, 54(2):131-136.

    [11] Leufkens A M, van Duijnhoven F J, Woudt S H, et al. Biomarkers of oxidative stress and risk of developing colorectal cancer: a cohort-nested case-control study in the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition[J]. Am J Epidemiol, 2012,175(7): 653-663.

    [12] Tsong W H, Koh W P, Yuan J M, et al.Cigarettes and alcohol in relation to colorectal cancer: the Singapore Chinese Health Study[J]. Br J Cancer, 2007, 96(5): 821-827.

    [13] Stern M C, Conti D V, Siegmund K D, et al. DNA repair single-nucleotide polymorphisms in colorectal cancer and their role as modifiers of the effect of cigarette smoking and alcohol in the Singapore Chinese Health Study[J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2007, 16(11): 2363-2372.

    [14] Miller N J, Rice-Evans C, Davies M J,et al. A new method for measuring antioxidant activity[J]. Biochem Soc Trans, 1993,21(2): 95.

    [15] Harvilchuck J A, Pu X, Klaunig J E, et al.Indicators of oxidative stress and apoptosis in mouse whole lung and Clara cells following exposure to styrene and its metabolites[J]. Toxicology, 2009, 264(3): 171-178.

    [16] Pu X, Kamendulis L M, Klaunig J E.Acrylonitrile-induced oxidative stress and oxidative DNA damage in male Sprague-Dawley rats[J]. Toxicol Sci, 2009, 111(1): 64-71.

    [17] Leufkens A M, Van Duijnhoven F J, Boshuizen H C, et al.Educational level and risk of colorectal cancer in EPIC with specific reference to tumor location[J]. Int J Cancer, 2012, 130(3):622-630.

    [18] Bairati I, Meyer F, Gélinas M, et al.A randomized trial of antioxidant vitamins to prevent second primary cancers in head and neck cancer patients[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2005, 97(7): 481-488.

    [19] Hennekens C H, Buring J E, Manson J E, et al. Lack of effect of long-term supplementation with beta carotene on the incidence of malignant neoplasms and cardiovascular disease[J]. N Engl J Med, 1996, 334(18): 1145-1149.

    [20] Poulsen H E. Oxidative DNA modifications[J]. Exp Toxicol Pathol, 2005,57(1):161-169.

    [21] Hecht S S. Cigarette smoking and lung cancer: chemical mechanisms and approaches to prevention[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2002, 3(8):461-469.

    [22] Cederblad L, Thunberg U, Engstr?m M, et al. The combined effects of single-nucleotide polymorphisms, tobacco products, and ethanol on normal resting blood mononuclear cells[J]. Nicotine Tob Res, 2013,15(5):890-895.

    [23] Cheng G, Shi Y, Sturla S J, et al. Reactions of formaldehyde plus acetaldehyde with deoxyguanosine and DNA: formation of cyclic deoxyguanosine adducts and formaldehyde cross-links[J]. Chem Res Toxicol, 2003, 16(2): 145-152.

    [24] Wang M, Cheng G, Sturla J, et al.Identification of adducts formed by pyridyloxobutylation of deoxyguanosine and DNA by 4-(acetoxymethylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone, a chemically activated form of tobacco specific carcinogens[J]. Chem Res Toxicol, 2003, 16(5): 616-626.

    [25] Boysen G, Kenney P M, Upadhyaya P, et al. Effects of benzyl isothiocyanate and 2-phenethyl isothiocyanate on benzo[a]pyrene and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone metabolism in F-344 rats[J]. Carcinogenesis, 2003,24(3): 517-525.

    [26] Pineda M, González S, Lázaro C, et al. Detection of genetic alterations in hereditary colorectal cancer screening[J]. Mutat Res, 2010, 693(1-2): 19-31.

    [27] Gryfe R.Inherited colorectal cancer syndromes[J]. Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 2009,22(4):198-208.

    [28] Gryfe R.Overview of colorectal cancer genetics[J]. Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 2009, 18(4):573-583.

    [29] Burn J,Mathers J, Bishop D T.Genetics, inheritance and strategies for prevention in populations at high risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) [J]. Recent Results Cancer Res,2013,191:157-183.

    猜你喜歡
    直腸癌大學環(huán)境
    “留白”是個大學問
    長期鍛煉創(chuàng)造體內抑癌環(huán)境
    《大學》
    大學(2021年2期)2021-06-11 01:13:12
    一種用于自主學習的虛擬仿真環(huán)境
    48歲的她,跨越千里再讀大學
    海峽姐妹(2020年12期)2021-01-18 05:53:08
    大學求學的遺憾
    孕期遠離容易致畸的環(huán)境
    環(huán)境
    腹腔鏡下直腸癌前側切除術治療直腸癌的效果觀察
    直腸癌術前放療的研究進展
    啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| h日本视频在线播放| 赤兔流量卡办理| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 综合色av麻豆| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 亚洲av成人av| 草草在线视频免费看| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 1000部很黄的大片| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 黄色一级大片看看| 色综合婷婷激情| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 窝窝影院91人妻| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 波多野结衣高清作品| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| www日本黄色视频网| 日日啪夜夜撸| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| av在线蜜桃| 久久香蕉精品热| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 欧美人与善性xxx| 亚洲无线观看免费| 国产色婷婷99| 国产成人a区在线观看| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 一级黄片播放器| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 国产精品三级大全| 少妇的逼好多水| 天堂动漫精品| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 黄片wwwwww| 黄片wwwwww| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 精品国产三级普通话版| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 成年版毛片免费区| 精品福利观看| 熟女电影av网| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 永久网站在线| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 91久久精品电影网| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 免费观看在线日韩| 国产老妇女一区| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 国产精品永久免费网站| 内地一区二区视频在线| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 欧美三级亚洲精品| av.在线天堂| 亚洲成人久久性| 97碰自拍视频| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 深夜精品福利| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 中文字幕久久专区| 在线播放无遮挡| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 嫩草影院入口| 毛片女人毛片| 性色avwww在线观看| xxxwww97欧美| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 亚洲第一电影网av| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| av在线亚洲专区| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 99热网站在线观看| 十八禁网站免费在线| 嫩草影院精品99| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 久久久久国内视频| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 如何舔出高潮| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 国产探花极品一区二区| av福利片在线观看| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| av在线观看视频网站免费| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 久久久久久久久中文| 亚洲不卡免费看| 能在线免费观看的黄片| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 免费在线观看日本一区| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久av| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | www.色视频.com| 免费av不卡在线播放| 99热精品在线国产| 在线看三级毛片| 久久久色成人| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 91在线观看av| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 悠悠久久av| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| a级毛片a级免费在线| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 日本a在线网址| 欧美色视频一区免费| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| av黄色大香蕉| av在线亚洲专区| 黄色一级大片看看| 黄色配什么色好看| 亚洲成人久久性| 深夜a级毛片| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 乱人视频在线观看| 午夜精品在线福利| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 久久久精品大字幕| 国产探花极品一区二区| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 禁无遮挡网站| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 久久人妻av系列| av在线亚洲专区| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 国产精品,欧美在线| 观看美女的网站| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 免费看光身美女| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 天堂动漫精品| 夜夜爽天天搞| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 免费av观看视频| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 高清在线国产一区| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国产在视频线在精品| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 色5月婷婷丁香| 91在线观看av| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 天堂网av新在线| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 久久久久久久久久成人| 精品福利观看| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 久久久色成人| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 男人舔奶头视频| www日本黄色视频网| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 午夜激情欧美在线| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 国产乱人伦免费视频| .国产精品久久| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲 国产 在线| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 深爱激情五月婷婷| av视频在线观看入口| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 毛片女人毛片| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 久久久久久久久中文| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 午夜a级毛片| 免费观看人在逋| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 91麻豆av在线| netflix在线观看网站| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 国产精品,欧美在线| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 在线国产一区二区在线| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| av在线天堂中文字幕| 51国产日韩欧美| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| av天堂中文字幕网| 天堂动漫精品| 国产成人aa在线观看| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| xxxwww97欧美| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 深爱激情五月婷婷| xxxwww97欧美| 欧美+日韩+精品| 在线天堂最新版资源| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 日本 av在线| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 一本久久中文字幕| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 久久久久久久久久成人| 午夜福利18| 国产成人福利小说| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产色婷婷99| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 欧美zozozo另类| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 亚洲av熟女| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 97超视频在线观看视频| 97热精品久久久久久| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 69人妻影院| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 精品日产1卡2卡| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 天堂√8在线中文| 国产成人av教育| 成人精品一区二区免费| 精品人妻1区二区| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| .国产精品久久| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 春色校园在线视频观看| 亚洲在线观看片| 我的老师免费观看完整版| av天堂在线播放| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲在线观看片| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 日本黄大片高清| 变态另类丝袜制服| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 在线看三级毛片| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 91在线观看av| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| ponron亚洲| 午夜福利欧美成人| 有码 亚洲区| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 免费观看精品视频网站| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 午夜a级毛片| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| videossex国产| 在线播放国产精品三级| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| www.色视频.com| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 中文字幕久久专区| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 亚州av有码| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 国产高清激情床上av| 色播亚洲综合网| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 美女大奶头视频| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 久久久久久久久中文| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 国产av不卡久久| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区 | 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 91av网一区二区| 我要搜黄色片| 日本在线视频免费播放| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| www.色视频.com| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 欧美潮喷喷水| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 亚洲18禁久久av| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 精品福利观看| 成人国产麻豆网| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 成人二区视频| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 夜夜爽天天搞| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 久久久久久久久久久丰满 | 国产一区二区三区视频了| 综合色av麻豆| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 我要搜黄色片| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 欧美zozozo另类| 中文字幕久久专区| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 亚洲av熟女| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 长腿黑丝高跟| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 露出奶头的视频| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 免费大片18禁| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 嫩草影视91久久| 十八禁网站免费在线| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 天堂网av新在线| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 九色国产91popny在线| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 99久国产av精品| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 精品人妻视频免费看| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 精品日产1卡2卡| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 欧美+日韩+精品| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 国产在视频线在精品| 99久久精品热视频| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 国产av不卡久久| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 免费大片18禁| 色视频www国产| h日本视频在线播放| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲图色成人| av在线观看视频网站免费| a在线观看视频网站| 伦精品一区二区三区| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 直男gayav资源| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 一本精品99久久精品77| 日本五十路高清| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 色综合色国产| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲在线观看片| 久久这里只有精品中国| 欧美色视频一区免费| 黄色日韩在线| 日韩欧美免费精品| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 精品日产1卡2卡| 免费看a级黄色片| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 欧美区成人在线视频| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 久99久视频精品免费| 欧美区成人在线视频| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 欧美3d第一页| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 春色校园在线视频观看| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 精品久久久噜噜| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 日本五十路高清| 热99re8久久精品国产| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 欧美成人a在线观看| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 国产在视频线在精品| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 日本 欧美在线| 成人国产综合亚洲| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 久久久久久大精品| 99热只有精品国产| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 日本在线视频免费播放| 嫩草影视91久久| 色播亚洲综合网| 欧美潮喷喷水| 精品人妻1区二区| 一夜夜www| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 免费看a级黄色片| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| av黄色大香蕉| 91久久精品电影网| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 国产三级中文精品| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 老司机福利观看| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 成年免费大片在线观看| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产视频内射| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 欧美3d第一页| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 久久草成人影院| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 欧美bdsm另类| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 黄色女人牲交| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 国产不卡一卡二| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 日本色播在线视频| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 成人三级黄色视频| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 精品久久久久久成人av| 日韩中字成人| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9|