• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Changes in feed intake,nutrient digestion,plasma metabolites,and oxidative stress parameters in dairy cows with subacute ruminal acidosis and its regulation with pelleted beet pulp

    2014-03-25 03:15:23YongqingGuoXiaofengXuYangZouZhanshanYangShengliLiandZhijunCao
    關(guān)鍵詞:質(zhì)量數(shù)離子源條件

    Yongqing Guo,Xiaofeng Xu,Yang Zou,Zhanshan Yang,Shengli Liand Zhijun Cao

    Changes in feed intake,nutrient digestion,plasma metabolites,and oxidative stress parameters in dairy cows with subacute ruminal acidosis and its regulation with pelleted beet pulp

    Yongqing Guo?,Xiaofeng Xu?,Yang Zou,Zhanshan Yang,Shengli Li*and Zhijun Cao*

    The objectives of this study were to 1)determine the variation of nutrient digestion,plasma metabolites and oxidative stress parameters triggered by induced subacute ruminal acidosis(SARA);and 2)evaluate the ability of pelleted beet pulp(BP)as a replacement for ground corn to alleviate SARA.Eight Holstein-Friesian cows were fed four diets during four successive17-day periods∶1)total mixed ration(TMR)containing 0%finely ground wheat (FGW)(W0);2)TMR containing 10%FGW(W10);3)TMR containing 20%FGW(W20);and 4)TMR containing 10%BP as a replacement for 10%ground corn(BP10).The SARA induction protocol reduced the mean ruminal pH from 6.37 to 5.94,and the minimum ruminal pH decreased from 5.99 to 5.41 from baseline to challenge period.Mean ruminal pH increased from 5.94 to 6.05,and minimum daily ruminal pH increased from 5.41 to 5.63,when BP was substituted for corn.The apparent digestibility of nutrients was not affected by the dietary treatments,except that the digestibility of neutral detergent fibre(NDF)and acid detergent fibre(ADF)was reduced in cows fed the W20 diet compared with cows fed the W0 and W10 diets,and cows fed the BP10 diet had higher NDF and ADF digestibility than the cows fed the W20 diet.Cows fed the W20 diet had a lower plasma concentration of β-hydroxybutyrate(BHBA),non-esterified fatty acids(NEFA),cholesterol,triglyceride,and total antioxidative capacity(TAC),and a higher plasma concentration of glucose,insulin,malonaldehyde(MDA),super oxygen dehydrogenises(SOD),and glutathione peroxidase(GSH-Px)than cows fed the W0 diet.Substitution of BP for corn increased concentrations of plasma BHBA and TAC,but decreased concentrations of plasma MDA.Our results indicate that reduction of fibre digestion;the concomitant increase of plasma glucose and insulin;the decrease of plasma BHBA,NEFA,cholesterol,and triglyceride;and changes of plasma oxidative stress parameters are highly related to SARA induced by W20 diets.These variables may be alternative candidates for SARA diagnosis.We also suggest that the substitution of BP for corn could reduce the risk of SARA,increase fibre digestion,and improve the antioxidant status in dairy cows.

    Beet pulp,Dairy cow,Nutrient digestion,Oxidative status,Plasma metabolites,Subacute ruminal acidosis

    Introduction

    Subacute ruminal acidosis(SARA)is one of the most common chronic digestive disorders on intensive dairy farms,and is defined as periods of moderately depressed ruminal pH(the minimum pH varies between 5.2 and 5.6)[1].Clinical signs of SARA may include reduced dry matter intake(DMI)and milk fat content,rumenitis, laminitis,and liver abscesses,as well as increased death loss[2].Excessive feeding of nonfibrous carbohydrates (NFC),a rapid increase in levels of dietary NFC,or insufficient rumen buffering are important causes of this metabolic disorder[3].

    Measuring rumen fluid pH is the only reliable and accurate tool to diagnose SARA[4].Because of problems in obtaining samples of rumen fluid,diurnal variation of rumen metabolism,and the lack of pathognomonic signs, SARA is especially difficult to diagnose[5].Accordingly, there is continued interest in finding quick and simple indicators(e.g.,plasma metabolites)as potential diagnostic tools of rumen fermentation pattern and function[6]. Cellulolysis has shown to be impaired by pH below 6.0 to 6.2[7];therefore,total tract NDF digestibility might be reduced when rumen pH is lowered.Plasma metabolites were often used to monitor the health and metabolic status of dairy cows,and Ametaj et al.[8]indicated that dairy cows fed diets containing high rapidly fermentable carbohydrates could greatly perturb the patterns of plasma metabolites.However,there is limited information on the role of high-grain induced SARA on diurnal perturbations of plasma metabolites in dairy cows.Moreover,it is widely accepted that oxidative stress is positively related to high grain or high starch diets of ruminant animals[9],and that high-producing dairy cows exposed to a high-starch diet are more susceptible to inadequate antioxidant status [10],resulting in a poorly functioning immune system and increased risk of rumenitis as well as laminitis.Therefore, the oxidative stress index could be a general approach used in ruminant medicine in the future[11].

    Several dietary strategies proposed for use in preventing SARA,such as sodium bicarbonate and monensin,have been studied[12,13].However,neither of these methods has consistently maintained higher rumen pH values. Sugar beet pulp(BP)contains approximately 40%neutral detergent fibre(NDF)and is unique in its high content of soluble fibre(especially pectic substances).Soluble fibre fermentation is thought to produce less lactate and propionate than starch fermentation in the rumen,and it does not inhibit cellulose and hemicellulose digestion[14]. Thus,the substitution of corn grain with BP should prevent unfavourable pH decline in the rumen.The goal of this research was to test the hypothesis that SARA induced by increasing the levels of FGW in the diet is associated with alterations in feed intake,nutrient digestion, ruminal pH,selected plasma metabolites,and oxidative stress parameters.Another objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of pelleted BP as a replacement for ground corn to alleviate SARA in the long term.

    Materials and methods

    Experimental design and animal management

    Animal care and procedures were approved and conducted under established standards of the College of Animal Science&Technology,China Agricultural University.

    Eight multiparous Holstein-Friesian cows(568.5±34.7 kg of BW;164±15 DIM;mean±SD),four of which were fitted with ruminal cannulas(10 i.d;Bar Diamond,Parma,ID), were fed a series of diets(Table 1)during four successive periods in this experiment∶an initial baseline period with 0%finely ground wheat(FGW,geometric mean particle sizes∶600 μm)and starch provided as ground corn,a slowly fermented starch diet(W0 treatment,Baseline period);a second period with 10%FGW,a section of rapidly fermented starch diet(W10 treatment);a third period with 20%FGW,a diet containing a large amount of rapidly fermented starch(W20 treatment,Challenge period);and a final period in which the W20 diet was amended by replacing 10%ground corn with 10%dried,pelleted BP (BP10 treatment).The specific diets were fed sequentially to all eight cows over four 17-d periods(12d adaptation, 5d of measuring),because previous reports suggest that SARA was not immediately and easily reversible[15,16], making other experimental designs(e.g.,a Latin square) problematic(e.g.,carry-over effects).

    The four diets(Table 1)were formulated to meet or exceed the NRC[3]guidelines for 600 kg multiparous Holstein dairy cows producing 27 kg of milk/d with 4.0%fat.The diets were fed as a total mixed ration(TMR)(CAU-mixer wagon model JZC-200,Beijing,China),and the forage component of the diet was a mixture of corn silage,chopped alfalfa hay,and Chinese wild rye.The moisture content of corn silage was determined weekly and used to adjust the ration.During each data collection period,the particle size distribution of TMR(Table 2)was determined using a Penn State Particle Separator(PSPS)as described by Lammers et al.[17].

    The experiment was conducted at the dairy farm of the State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition(Beijing,China). The cows were housed in individual tie-stalls bedded with rubber mattresses,and had free access to drinking water throughout the trial.They were fed twice daily,in equal amounts,at 0700 and 1900 h.The diets were fed ad libitum to allow for at least 5-10%orts on an as-fed basis. The cows were milked twice daily at 0630 and 1830 h.

    Sampling and analytical procedures

    Nutrient intake and digestibility

    During d13-d17 of each period,the diets and ort samples of individual cows were harvested daily to calculatenutrient intake.Faecal grab samples(300-500 g fresh basis)were collected on 12 occasions∶d14 at 0400,0900, 1400,1900 h;d15 at 0500,1000,1500,2000 h;and d16 at 0600,1100,1700,and 2200 h.The daily diets,orts,and faecal matter were pooled by dietary treatment and cows, and stored at-20°C until analysis.After the experiment,all the samples were dried at 65°C in a forced-air oven (Model 2000;Experimental Mill,Beijing,China)for 48 h to a constant weight,ground through a 1-mm screen using a Wiley mill(standard model 4;Arthur H.Thomas Co.,Philadelphia,PA),and analysed for dry matter(DM), acid detergent fibre(ADF)(method 973.18;AOAC 1990) [18],and starch[19].The NDF was measured by the method of Van Soest et al.[20]with heat-stable α-amylase (A-3306;Sigma Chemical Co.,St.Louis,MO),and the sodium sulfite and ash concentration was corrected for the Ankom 200 fibre Analyzer(Ankom Technology,Fairport, NY).The CP was determined by the micro-Kjeldahl method(method 4.2.08;AOAC 1990).Ether extract (method 920.85;AOAC 1990),ash(942.05;AOAC 1990), calcium and phosphorus(method 945.46;AOAC 1990) were also analysed.The chemical composition of the TMR was calculated from the chemical composition of the concentrate mix and the individual forage in the diets. The diets had a similar chemical composition,except for the higher levels of starch and NFC,and the lower levels of NDF in the higher FGW diets.

    Table 1 Ingredient composition and chemical analyses of experimental diets

    Table 2 Particle size distribution of the experimental diets(%retained,as-fed basis)2

    The acid-insoluble ash(AIA)was used as an intrinsic digestibility marker to estimate nutrient digestibility in the total tract.The AIA in the diets and the faeces were analysed according to Van Keulen and Young[21],using the equation described by Zhong et al.[22]to calculate the apparent digestibility of a nutrient in the gastrointestinal tract.The equation is as follows∶D=[1-(Ad× Nf)/(Af×Nd)]×100,where Ad(g/kg)and Af(g/kg) represent the AIA in the diet and faeces,respectively, and Nd(g/kg)and Nf(g/kg)represent the nutrient in the diet and faeces,respectively.

    Ruminal pH,plasma metabolites and oxidative stress parameters

    Ruminal samples were collected for pH analysis.The ruminal fluid(100 mL)was sampled at 0700(before the meal), 1000,1300,1600,and 1900 h at d15 and d16.The samples were collected manually from the anterior dorsal,anterior ventral,medial ventral,posterior dorsal,and posterior ventral locations within the rumen and composited by cow. They were filtered through four layers of cheesecloth.At

    each sampling time,the pH was measured immediately after collection using a handheld pH electrode(Model pH B-4;Shanghai Chemical,Shanghai,China).

    On d17 of each experimental period,10 mL of blood was collected via tail venipuncture at 0,3,6,9,and 12 h after the morning feeding,into vacutainer tubes(Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes,NJ)containing sodium heparin anticoagulant.The plasma was collected after centrifugation at 3,000×g for 10 min,separated into several aliquots, frozen at-20°C,and later analyzed for determination of glucose,insulin,non-esterified fatty acids(NEFA), β-hydroxybutyrate(BHBA),triglycerides,and cholesterol.All plasma-related measurements were analysed in duplicate.The levels of glucose,triglycerides,and cholesterol in plasma were analysed using a clinical auto-Analyzer(CobasIntegra,C701;Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.,Basel,Switzerland).The glucose concentrations were determined using the GOD/PAP test kit (Merit Choice Bioengineering Co.,Ltd.,Beijing,China). Triglycerides and total cholesterol concentrations were determined following the kit instructions(Shensuo Unf Medical Diagnostic Article Co.,Ltd.,Shanghai,China), using the enzymatic method.NEFA and BHBA concentrations in plasma were analysed with a Hitachi 7600 automated biochemistry Analyzer(Hitachi Co.,Tokyo,Japan). The NEFA concentration was determined using a commercially available kit(Sekisui Medical Co.,Ltd.,Tokyo, Japan).BHBA dehydrogenase was used for quantifying the plasma concentrations of BHBA using a commercially available kit(Jingyuan Medical Co.,Ltd.,Shanghai,China). Plasma insulin levels were determined using an insulin radioimmunoassay kit(Beijing North Institute of Biological Technology,Beijing,China)and with a radioimmunoassay system(xh6080;Xi’an Nuclear Instrument Factory,Xi’an, China)according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    The plasma samples collected at 0 and 6 h after the morning feeding were used to test the levels of total antioxidative capacity(TAC),malonaldehyde(MDA) super oxygen dehydrogenises(SOD),glutathione peroxidase(GSH-Px)with colorimetric assay kits(Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute,Jiangsu,China)following the manufacturer’s instructions,using a UV visible Recording Spectrophotometer(UV3600,Daojin Corp., Japan).All samples were tested in duplicate.The TAC level was determined by the reaction of phenanthroline and Fe2+using Spectrophotometer at 520 nm[23].The MDA level was measured by the thiobarbituric acid method[24].The SOD activity was determined by inhibition of nitroblue tetrazolium reduction due to superoxide anion generation by a xanthine-xanthine oxidase system.The GSH-Px level was determined by using a direct measurement of the remaining GSH after the enzyme-catalysed reaction as described by Hafeman et al.[25].

    Statistical analysis

    Data on feed intake and digestibility were analysed using the Proc Mixed SAS procedure(SAS Institute,2002) using the following model∶Yij=μ+Ti+Cj+εij,where Yij=the dependent variable,μ=the overall mean,Ti= the fixed effect of treatment group,Cj=the random animal effect,and εij=the residual error term.

    Measurements of ruminal pH,plasma metabolites and oxidative stress parameters were analysed as repeated measures using Proc Mixed SAS procedure(SAS Institute, 2002)using the following model∶Yijk=μ+Ti+Cj+Hk+ HTik+εijk,where Yijk=the dependent variable;μ=the overall mean;Ti=the effect of treatment i;Cj=the effect of cow j;Hk=the effect of hours post-feeding analysed as repeated measures;HTik=the interactions between hour k and treatment i,and εijk=the random residual error.All the above data were compared with Tukey’s range test. Treatment effects were declared significant at P≤0.05,and tendencies from P>0.05 to≤0.10.The P-values indicated in Tables 2,3,and 4 refer to the overall diet effects.

    Results

    Nutrient intake and digestibility

    Total DM and ether extract intake were not significantly affected by dietary treatments(Table 3);however,cows fed the W20 diet had a lower NDF and ADF intake (P<0.01),and a higher CP and starch intake(P<0.01)than the cows fed the W0 diet.The substitution of BP for ground corn increased NDF and ADF intake(P<0.01),anddecreased starch intake(P<0.01).Apparent digestibility of DM,CP,ether extract,and starch was not affected by dietary treatments.However,apparent digestibility of NDF and ADF was lower(P<0.01)for cows fed the W20 diet than for cows fed the W0 diet,and cows fed the BP10 diet had a higher(P<0.01)NDF and ADF digestibility than the cows fed the W20 diet.

    Table 3 Effect of dietary treatments on nutrient intake and digestibility in dairy cows1,2

    Table 4 Effect of dietary treatments on ruminal pH and plasma metabolite profiles in dairy cows2,3

    Ruminal pH,plasma metabolites and oxidative stress parameters

    Figure 1Effect of dietary treatments on diurnal patterns of ruminal pH in dairy cows.Data are expressed as mean±SE.

    Ruminal pH profiles on d15 and d16 are illustrated in Table 4 and Figure 1.This SARA induction protocol reduced mean ruminal pH from 6.37 during the baseline period to 5.94 during the challenge period(P<0.01);the minimum ruminal pH decreased from baseline to challenge period(5.99 vs.5.41).Based on the definition of SARA as daily episodes of low rumen pH between 5.2 and 5.6 for at least 180 min/d[1],the most severe rumen pH depression was obtained from cows fed the W20 diet.Ruminal pH from 3 to 9 h after morning feeding was significantly lower (P<0.01)for cows fed the W20 diet than for cows fed the other diets.Cows fed the BP10 diet had a higher daily mean ruminal pH(6.05 vs.5.94)and minimum ruminal pH(5.63 vs.5.41)than the cows fed the W20 diet.The effects of time and the treatment×time interaction on average ruminal pH were significant(P<0.01 and P=0.01, respectively).

    Data on diurnal changes of plasma metabolite parameters and oxidative stress parameters are given in Tables 4 and 5, and Figure 2.Compared with the cows fed the W0 diet, cows fed the W20 diet had a lower concentrations of the plasma BHBA (P<0.01),NEFA (P=0.01),cholesterol (P<0.01),triglyceride(P<0.01),and TAC(P<0.01),and higher concentrations of plasma glucose(P<0.01),insulin (P<0.01),MDA(P<0.01),SOD(P<0.01),and GSH-Px (P=0.02).The substitution of BP for ground corn increased (P<0.01)plasma concentrations of BHBA and TAC,but decreased(P<0.01)plasma concentration of MDA.Time after morning feeding had an effect(P<0.01)on all plasma metabolite profiles,except the concentration of plasma cholesterol.There was no effect of the treatment×time interaction with respect to all plasma metabolite profiles. The effects of time and the treatment×time interactionon plasma TAC were significant(P<0.01).There were no effects of time and the treatment×time interaction with respect to plasma concentrations of MDA,SOD,and GSH-Px,except the concentration of plasma MDA was affected by the treatment×time interaction(P<0.01).

    Discussion

    Nutrient intake and digestibility

    The findings of this study concur with the results of others[4,26];DMI was not different between the dietary treatments.Paradoxically,reduced DMI was seen as aclinical sign of SARA[27],and several researchers have shown that DMI decreased during induced SARA experiments[28,29].The effects of induced SARA on DMI were inconsistent,and the causes of this are unclear, probably because of the variance of SARA induction protocol,the severity of SARA,or the individual difference of the cows.Moreover,higher intake and high concentrate included in the W20 diet may have confounded the results.The variation in intakes of CP,NDF,ADF, and starch with changes in the ratio of forage to concentrate(F∶C)reflected the chemical composition of the diet consumed because DMI was not affected by F∶C.

    Table 5 Effect of dietary treatments on oxidative stress parameters in dairy cows2,3

    Here,total tract digestibility of NDF and ADF were reduced in cows fed the W20 diet,although the NDF and ADF intakes were lower than those fed the other diets. This result may be reflected by higher ruminal fermentation of wheat starch of the W20 diet,as well as the negative-associated effects of fibre degradability in the rumen with dietary fermentable carbohydrates[30,31]. Excessively low ruminal pH values can be a problem in dairy cows receiving a diet with large amounts of concentrate or fermentable starch when volatile fatty acid (VFA)production exceeds the buffering ability of the rumen contents.Moreover,fibre digestion can be reduced at pH 6 or less in the rumen[6].An in vitro study by Stensig et al.[32]showed that with the higher levels of dietary fermentable starch(wheat),NDF digestion and passage rate were reduced.During the control periods and SARA periods,the 24-and 48-h in situ NDF degradabilities of corn silage were reduced from 44.0 to 37.2%and from 56.1 to 44.8%,respectively[33].The total tract digestibility of NDF and ADF increased in cows fed the BP10 diet compared with cows fed the W20 diet,and the results might be due to the higher ruminal pH of cows fed the diet inclusion of BP.Our results were consistent with a previous study,which showed that substitution of BP for barley grain in a lowforage diet exhibited a higher apparent digestibility of NDF in dairy cows[34].Wheat grain exhibits faster and more extensive starch and CP degradation in the rumen[35],and it was expected that total tract starch digestibility would be greater in cows fed the higher FGW diets;however,total tract digestibility of CP and starch were not different among treatments.This was unexpected and is difficult to explain.

    Ruminal pH and plasma metabolites

    MS條件:EI源,電子能量70 eV;離子源溫度200℃,四級桿溫度150℃,質(zhì)量數(shù)掃描范圍35~350 amu。

    Low ruminal pH was observed in cows fed the W20 diet; the minimum ruminal pH was around 5.4,which was consistent with SARA[1].SARA induced by increasing the levels of starch and reducing the F∶C ratio of the diet results in the accumulation of organic acids(mainly short-chain VFA)in the rumen,as well as reduction in chewing capacity and rumination activity.This in turn leads to an increase in rumen acidity and a decrease in rumen buffering capacity[2].Increasing ruminal pH with the inclusion of BP in the diet was attributed to the lower production of lactate and propionate from pectic substances in the rumen than the inclusion of corn in the diet[14].Moreover,compared with the W20 diet, the BP10 diet could increase the levels of NDF and peNDF in dietary DM in our study,and then would increase chewing time and salivary secretion.

    The concentrations of plasma BHBA,cholesterol and triglyceride were lower in cows fed the W20 diet throughout the daytime,and the results reveal that SARA had a significant effect on diurnal fluctuations in plasma metabolites.Similarly,a previous study showed that dairy cows fed increasing levels of barley grain were associated with lower concentrations of plasma BHBA and cholesterol[8].Plasma BHBA comes from the NEFA oxidation in hepatic tissue[36]or from absorbed butyrate[37].The lower concentration of plasma BHBA is probably due to the variation of its sources and the higher energy density of the W20 diet than that of the other diets.The diurnal fluctuations of plasma BHBA showed the reverse trend compared with those of plasma NEFA in our study,and this is partly explained by the fact that plasma BHBA is produced in the liver and in the rumen epithelium[38].That is,the higher plasma NEFA concentration in the morning hours could enhance the production of BHBA from NEFA in hepatic tissue,so as to compensate for the relatively low production of BHBA by rumen epithelial cells.The substitution of BP for ground corn increased the concentration of

    plasma BHBA(mean BHBA concentrations were within the normal range),probably because of the variation of pH value and the fermentation acid concentration in the rumen between the two diets.

    Figure 2Effect of dietary treatments on diurnal patterns of plasma metabolites in dairy cows.Data are expressed as mean±SE.

    Low plasma cholesterol is associated with disturbances of plasma amino acids and severity of the acute phase response[39].Previous researchers have demonstrated that dairy cows fed large amounts of concentrate or grain-induced SARA often show changes in the composition of rumen microbiota and a rapid accumulation of large amounts of bacterial endotoxin(or lipopolysaccharide,LPS)in the rumen[28,40].The inverse relationships were found between the concentration of rumen endotoxin and the concentration of plasma cholesterol [6],and low plasma cholesterol levels in cows fed the W20 diets could be related to the systemic inflammatory response triggered by release of endotoxin into the peripheral circulation[28].Lower plasma triglyceride concentrations were found in cows fed the W20 diet.This is probably due to decreased lipolysis and ruminal biohydrogenation of dietary unsaturated FA at low ruminal pH[41]or higher energy density of the W20 diet,thereby reducing saturated NEFA from the rumen and triglyceride levels in peripheral blood circulation.

    The plasma NEFA level has always been used as an indicator of energy status in dairy cows[42].Cows fed the W20 diet had reduced concentrations of plasma NEFA compared with the other three diets.This finding was similar to the observations of Ametaj et al.[8],who demonstrated that the levels of plasma NEFA were lower in cows

    fed high-grain(barely)diets.The release of NEFA in plasma is based on their mobilization from the adipose triacylglycerol(TG)stores through the process of lipolysis. Increasing the proportion of FGW in the diet could potentially improve the energy balance of dairy cows.Moreover, the abundant availability of ruminal propionate(data not shown)and a higher plasma insulin concentration in our study might have contributed to the reduced concentration of plasma NEFA due to a propionate and insulin inhibitory effect on the NEFA release by adipose tissue[43].

    Data from this research showed that cows fed the W20 diet had the greatest concentrations of plasma glucose and insulin.This result can be explained by the enhanced production of ruminal propionate as well as the conversion to the end product in the liver through the process of hepatic glucogenesis[44].This finding is in accordance with a previous report from Ametaj et al. [8],who suggested that feeding diets containing large amounts of fermentable carbohydrates is related to a greater concentration of plasma glucose in dairy cows. Ruminal propionate and plasma glucose are secretagogues for pancreatic release of insulin,and insulin is reported to inhibit hepatic gluconeogenesis[45].Thus, the increased plasma insulin concentration in cows fed the W20 diet,in the present study,is due to high concentration of ruminal propionate and plasma glucose associated with high FGW induced SARA.

    Oxidative stress parameters

    Moreover,diets rich in readily available carbohydrates adversely affect rumen metabolism,which is associated with an increase in the yield of harmful and toxic substances(e.g.,lactate,ethanol,histamine,tyramine,and endotoxin)in the rumen[51],and potentially causes systemic immune suppression and metabolic changes in dairy cows[1].Therefore,there is a large possibility that oxidative stress plays a major role in the inflammation and immune dysfunction that occurs after induced SARA in dairy cows.The higher concentration of plasma TAC and lower concentration of plasma MDA in the cows fed the BP10 diet than the cows fed the W20 diet could be related to the higher ruminal pH than the induced SARA,and thus would decrease the negative effects of a more intensive fermentation of easily fermentable carbohydrates in the rumen.

    SOD is involved in the conversion of oxygen radicals to peroxides,and GSH-Px is involved in removing the peroxides produced by SOD enzyme and converting them into water[52].Here,a higher concentration of plasma MDA and lower concentration of plasma TAC in cows fed the W20 diet resulted in greater SOD and GSH-Px activity in plasma.It might be necessary for both enzymes to be active for adequate removal of end products of lipid peroxidation(e.g.,MDA),to alleviate some of the toxic effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS),and to increase the antioxidant status of the animal[53].A negative relationship between the activity of plasma SOD and GSH-Px and the production of plasma MDA in early lactation dairy cows was also found by Sharma et al.[54].

    Conclusions

    SARA induced by high FGW diets resulted in strong modifications of fibre digestion,plasma metabolites,and oxidative status of dairy cows.The reduction of fibre digestion,the alterations of concentrations of selected metabolites related to carbohydrate and lipid metabolism (e.g.,cholesterol,BHBA,NEFA,and triglyceride),and the changes of oxidative stress parameters(e.g.,MDA,TAC, and SOD)in the plasma,are alternative candidates for diagnosis of SARA in cows of the same physiological state and environment.Substitution of pelleted BP for ground corn could reduce the risk of SARA,increase fibre digestion,and improve antioxidant status in dairy cows.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authors’contributions

    YG,XX,YZ,and ZY carried out the experiments.SL and ZC participated in the design of the study,performed the statistical analysis,and drafted the manuscript.All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Acknowledgment

    This experiment was financially supported by funds from the National Key Basic Research Program of China(Project No.2011CB100801).

    Received∶19 March 2013 Accepted∶13 August 2013

    Published∶16 August 2013

    1. Gozho GN,Plaizier JC,Krause DO,Kennedy AD,Wittenberg KM∶Subacute ruminal acidosis induces ruminal lipopolysaccharide endotoxin release and triggers an inflammatory response.J Dairy Sci 2005,88∶1399-1403.

    2. Plaizier JC,Krause DO,Gozho GN,McBride BW∶Subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows∶the physiological causes,incidence and consequences.Vet J 2008,176∶21-31.

    3. National Research Council(NRC)∶Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle.7th edition.Washington,DC∶National Academy Press;2001.

    4. Keunen JE,Plaizier JC,Kyriazakis L,Duffield TF,Widowski TM,Lindinger MI, McBride BW∶Effects of a subacute ruminal acidosis model on the diet selection of dairy cows.J Dairy Sci 2002,85∶3304-3313.

    5. Gianesella M,Morgante M,Stelletta C,Ravarotto L,Giudice E,Van Saun RJ∶Evaluating the effects of rumenocentesis on health and performance in dairy cows.Acta Vet Brno 2010,79∶459-468.

    6. Zebeli Q,Dunn SM,Ametaj BN∶Perturbations of plasma metabolites correlated with the rise of rumen endotoxin in dairy cows fed diets rich in easily degradable carbohydrates.J Dairy Sci 2011,94∶2374-2382.

    7. Mould FL,?rskov ER∶Manipulation of rumen fluid pH and its influence on cellulolysis in Sacco,dry matter degradation and the rumen microflora of sheep offered either hay or concentrate.Anim Feed Sci Tech 1983,10∶1-14.

    8. Ametaj BN,Emmanuel DG,Zebeli Q,Dunn SM∶Feeding high proportions of barley grain in a total mixed ration perturbs diurnal patterns of plasma metabolites in lactating dairy cows.J Dairy Sci 2009,92∶1084-1091.

    9. Sgorlon S,Stradaioli G,Gabai G,Stefanon B∶Variation of starch and fat in the diet affects metabolic status and oxidative stress in ewes.Small Ruminant Res 2008,74∶123-129.

    10.Lohrke B,Viergutz T,Kanitz W,Gollnitz K,Becker F,Hurtienne A,Schweigert FJ∶High milk yield in dairy cows associated with oxidant stress.Online J Vet Res 2004,8∶70-78.

    11.Celi P∶Biomarkers of oxidative stress in ruminant medicine. Immunopharm Immunot 2011,33∶233-240.

    12.Paton LJ,Beauchemin KA,Veira DM,von Keyserlingk MAG∶Use of sodium bicarbonate,offered free choice or blended into the ration,to reduce the risk of ruminal acidosis in cattle.Can J Anim Sci 2006,86∶429-437.

    13.Mutsvangwa T,Walton JP,Plaizier JC,Duffield TF,Bagg R,Dick P,Vessie G, McBride BW∶Effects of a monensin controlled-release capsule or premix on attenuation of subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows.J Dairy Sci 2002,85∶3454-3461.

    14.Marounek M,Bartos S,Brezina P∶Factors influencing the production of volatile fatty acids from hemicellulose,pectin and starch by mixed culture of rumen microorganisms.Zeitschrift für Tierphysiologie Tierern?hrung und Futtermittelkunde 1985,53∶50-58.

    15.Krause KM,Oetzel GR∶Inducing subacute ruminal acidosis in lactating dairy cows.J Dairy Sci 2005,88∶3633-3639.

    16.Enjalbert F,Videau Y,Nicot MC,Troegeler-Meynadier A∶Effects of induced subacute ruminal acidosis on milk fat content and milk fatty acid profile. J Anim Physiol An N 2008,92∶284-291.

    17.Lammers BP,Buckmaster DR,Heinrichs AJ∶A simple method for the analysis of particle sizes of forage and total mixed rations.J Dairy Sci 1996,79∶922-928.

    18.AOAC∶Official methods of analysis.15th edition.Washington,DC∶Association of Official Analytical Chemists;1990.

    19.Bal MA,Shaver RD,Jirovec AG,Shinners KJ,Coors JG∶Crop processing and chop length of corn silage∶effects on intake,digestion,and milk production by dairy cows.J Dairy Sci 2000,83∶1264-1273.

    20.Van Soest PJ,Robertson JB,Lewis BA∶Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber,and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.J Dairy Sci 1991,74∶3583-3597.

    21.Van Keulen J,Young BA∶Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies.J Anim Sci 1977,44∶282-287.

    22.Zhong RZ,Li JG,Gao YX,Tan ZL,Ren GP∶Effects of substitution of different levels of steam-flaked corn for finely ground corn on lactation and digestion in early lactation dairy cows.J Dairy Sci 2008,91∶3931-3937.

    23.Yang R,Le G,Li A,Zheng J,Shi Y∶Effect of antioxidant capacity on blood lipid metabolism and lipoprotein lipase activity of rats fed a high-fat diet.Nutrition 2006,22∶1185-1191.

    24.Richard MJ,Portal B,Meo J,Coudray C,Hadjian A,Favier A∶Malondialdehyde kit evaluated for determining plasma and lipoprotein fractions that react with thiobarbituric acid.Clin Chem 1992,38∶704-709.

    25.Hafeman DG,Sunde RA,Hoekstra WG∶Effect of dietary selenium on erythrocyte and liver glutathione peroxidase in the rat.J Nutr 1974,104∶580-587.

    26.AlZahal O,Or-Rashid MM,Greenwood SL,McBride BW∶Effect of subacute ruminal acidosis on milk fat concentration,yield and fatty acid profile of dairy cows receiving soybean oil.J Dairy Res 2010,77∶376-384.

    27.Enemark J∶The monitoring,prevention and treatment of sub-acute ruminal acidosis(SARA)∶a review.Vet J 2008,176∶32-43.

    28.Khafipour E,Krause DO,Plaizier JC∶A grain-based subacute ruminal acidosis challenge causes translocation of lipopolysaccharide and triggers inflammation.J Dairy Sci 2009,92∶1060-1070.

    29.Cottee G,Kyriazakis I,Widowski TM,Lindinger MI,Cant JP,Duffield TF, Osborne VR,McBride BW∶The effects of subacute ruminal acidosis on sodium bicarbonate-supplemented water intake for lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2004,87∶2248-2253.

    30.Leddin CM,Stockdale CR,Hill J,Heard JW,Doyle PT∶Increasing amounts of crushed wheat fed with pasture hay reduced dietary fiber digestibility in lactating dairy cows.J Dairy Sci 2009,92∶2747-2757.

    31.Firkins JL∶Effects of feeding nonforage fiber sources on site of fiber digestion.J Dairy Sci 1997,80∶1426-1437.

    32.Stensig T,Weisbjerg MR,Hvelplund T∶Digestion and passage kinetics of fibre in dairy cows as affected by the proportion of wheat starch or sucrose in the diet.Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica A—Animal Sciences 1998, 48∶129-140.

    33.Krajcarski-Hunt H,Plaizier JC,Walton JP,Spratt R,McBride BW∶Short communication∶effect of subacute ruminal acidosis on in situ fiber digestion in lactating dairy cows.J Dairy Sci 2002,85∶570-573.

    34.Mojtahedi M,Danesh Mesgaran M∶Effects of the inclusion of dried molassed sugar beet pulp in a low-forage diet on the digestive process and blood biochemical parameters of Holstein steers.Livest Sci 2011, 141∶95-103.

    35.Herrera-Saldana RE,Huber JT,Poore MH∶Dry matter,crude protein, and starch degradability of five cereal grains.J Dairy Sci 1990, 73∶2386-2393.

    36.Roche JR,Sheahan AJ,Chagas LM,Boston RC∶Short communication∶change in plasma ghrelin in dairy cows following an intravenous glucose challenge.J Dairy Sci 2008,91∶1005-1010.

    37.Andersson L,Lundstroem K∶Effect of feeding silage with high butyric acid content on ketone body formation and milk yield in postparturient dairy cows.Zentralblatt fuer Veterinaermedizin 1985,32∶15-23.

    38.Heitmann RN,Fernandez JM∶Autoregulation of alimentary and hepatic ketogenesis in sheep.J Dairy Sci 1986,69∶1270-1281.

    39.Chiarla C,Giovannini I,Siegel JH∶The relationship between plasma cholesterol,amino acids and acute phase proteins in sepsis.Amino Acids 2004,27∶97-100.

    40.Gozho GN,Krause DO,Plaizier JC∶Rumen lipopolysaccharide and inflammation during grain adaptation and subacute ruminal acidosis in steers.J Dairy Sci 2006,89∶4404-4413.

    41.Van Nevel CJ,Demeyer DI∶Influence of pH on lipolysis and biohydrogenation of soybean oil by rumen contents in vitro.Reprod Nutr Dev 1996,36∶53-63.

    42.Staples CR,Thatcher WW,Clark JH∶Relationship between ovarian activity and energy status during the early postpartum period of high producing dairy cows.J Dairy Sci 1990,73∶938-947.

    43.Van Knegsel A,Van den Brand H,Graat E,Dijkstra J,Jorritsma R,Decuypere E, Tamminga S,Kemp B∶Dietary energy source in dairy cows in early lactation∶metabolites and metabolic hormones.J Dairy Sci 2007,90∶1477-1485.

    44.Reynolds CK∶Production and metabolic effects of site of starch digestion in dairy cattle.Anim Feed Sci Tech 2006,130∶78-94.

    45.Brockman RP∶Role of insulin in regulating hepatic gluconeogenesis in sheep.Can J Physiol Pharm 1985,63∶1460-1464.

    46.Sordillo LM∶Factors affecting mammary gland immunity and mastitis susceptibility.Livest Prod Sci 2005,98∶89-99.

    47.Halliwell B,Whiteman M∶Measuring reactive species and oxidative damage in vivo and in cell culture∶how should you do it and what do the results mean?Brit J Pharmacol 2009,142∶231-255.

    48.Ghiselli A,Serafini M,Natella F,Scaccini C∶Total antioxidant capacity as a tool to assess redox status∶critical view and experimental data.Free Radical Bio Med 2000,29∶1106-1114.

    49.Hou Z,Wang Z,Chai T,Jia Y,Gong Q,Ma J,Wang Y∶Effects of forage to concentrate ratio on homeostasis of rumen and oxidative stress in cows. Chinese Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences 2008,39∶455-459.

    50.Gabai G,Testoni S,Piccinini R,Marinelli L,Stradaioli G∶Oxidative stress in primiparous cows in relation to dietary starch and the progress of lactation.Anim Sci 2004,79∶99-108.

    51.Ametaj BN,Zebeli Q,Saleem F,Psychogios N,Lewis MJ,Dunn SM,Xia JG, Wishart DS∶Metabolomics reveals unhealthy alterations in rumen metabolism with increased proportion of cereal grain in the diet of dairy cows.Metabolomics 2010,6∶583-594.

    52.Yu BP∶Cellular defenses against damage from reactive oxygen species. Physiol Rev 1994,74∶139-162.

    53.Collins AR∶Assays for oxidative stress and antioxidant status∶applications to research into the biological effectiveness of polyphenols.Am J Clin Nutr 2005,81∶261S-267S.

    54.Sharma N,Singh NK,Singh OP,Pandey V,Verma PK∶Oxidative stress and antioxidant status during transition period in dairy cows.Asian Austral J Anim 2011,24∶479-484.

    doi∶10.1186/2049-1891-4-31

    Cite this article as:Guo et al.∶Changes in feed intake,nutrient digestion, plasma metabolites,and oxidative stress parameters in dairy cows with subacute ruminal acidosis and its regulation with pelleted beet pulp. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 2013 4∶31.

    Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of:

    · Convenient online submission

    · Thorough peer review

    · No space constraints or color fi gure charges

    · Immediate publication on acceptance

    · Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar

    · Research which is freely available for redistribution

    Submit your manuscript at www.biomedcentral.com/submit

    *Correspondence∶lisheng0677@163.com;caozhijun@cau.edu.cn

    ?Equal contributors

    State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition,College of Animal Science& Technology,China Agricultural University,Beijing 100193,China

    ?2013 Guo et al.;licensee BioMed Central Ltd.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative

    Commons Attribution License(http∶//creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0),which permits unrestricted use,distribution,and reproduction in any medium,provided the original work is properly cited.

    猜你喜歡
    質(zhì)量數(shù)離子源條件
    兆瓦級強流離子源長脈沖運行分析及實驗研究
    核技術(shù)(2022年7期)2022-07-22 09:25:06
    排除多余的條件
    選擇合適的條件
    如何選擇ICP-MS中測定水質(zhì)中可溶性鈦合適的質(zhì)量數(shù)
    單電極介質(zhì)阻擋放電離子源的消電子技術(shù)研究
    物質(zhì)結(jié)構(gòu)與元素周期律
    為什么夏天的雨最多
    一次進樣分析氧氣中碳、硫化物和質(zhì)量數(shù)豐度值與比值
    分析儀器(2016年1期)2016-03-04 11:17:00
    一次進樣分析氬氣中碳、硫化物和質(zhì)量數(shù)豐度值與比值
    分析儀器(2015年3期)2015-05-09 02:11:01
    高頻離子源形成的HD+離子束中H3+比例實測研究
    精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 99热只有精品国产| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 极品教师在线免费播放| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 午夜激情欧美在线| 宅男免费午夜| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 1000部很黄的大片| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 国产精品,欧美在线| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 99热这里只有是精品50| 青草久久国产| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 免费看光身美女| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 亚洲在线自拍视频| av片东京热男人的天堂| 国产成人精品无人区| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 亚洲av熟女| a级毛片a级免费在线| 深夜精品福利| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 亚洲av美国av| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 色视频www国产| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 99久国产av精品| 国产日本99.免费观看| 深夜精品福利| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 久久国产精品影院| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 变态另类丝袜制服| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 色视频www国产| 三级毛片av免费| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 国产视频内射| 操出白浆在线播放| a级毛片在线看网站| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 精品久久久久久久末码| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 日本黄大片高清| 亚洲最大成人中文| 免费观看精品视频网站| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 国产精品 国内视频| 免费大片18禁| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 一区二区三区激情视频| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 免费观看精品视频网站| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人 | 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 亚洲av免费在线观看| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| netflix在线观看网站| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 丁香六月欧美| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 中出人妻视频一区二区| www.www免费av| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 脱女人内裤的视频| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 99热6这里只有精品| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 久久性视频一级片| 成人av在线播放网站| bbb黄色大片| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| av黄色大香蕉| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 色在线成人网| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 日本免费a在线| 亚洲五月天丁香| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 美女高潮的动态| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 亚洲国产色片| 性欧美人与动物交配| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 999精品在线视频| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 三级毛片av免费| 91麻豆av在线| 国产综合懂色| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 一级黄色大片毛片| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 国产成人福利小说| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 悠悠久久av| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 女警被强在线播放| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 亚洲av熟女| a在线观看视频网站| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 午夜激情欧美在线| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 丁香六月欧美| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 熟女电影av网| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 国产视频内射| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| av片东京热男人的天堂| 国产69精品久久久久777片 | 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 午夜视频精品福利| 91字幕亚洲| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 999精品在线视频| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 在线a可以看的网站| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 黄色 视频免费看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 国产激情久久老熟女| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| ponron亚洲| 久久精品人妻少妇| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 久久九九热精品免费| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 99热这里只有是精品50| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 欧美日韩黄片免| 午夜a级毛片| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 午夜精品在线福利| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 一区福利在线观看| 久久中文字幕一级| 国产美女午夜福利| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 小说图片视频综合网站| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 天堂√8在线中文| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆 | 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 精品日产1卡2卡| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 香蕉av资源在线| 极品教师在线免费播放| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 久久草成人影院| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 宅男免费午夜| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 宅男免费午夜| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 18禁观看日本| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 国产真实乱freesex| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 午夜精品在线福利| 91老司机精品| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 欧美色视频一区免费| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 精品电影一区二区在线| 草草在线视频免费看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 1024香蕉在线观看| 国产成人影院久久av| 色av中文字幕| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 一区二区三区激情视频| 午夜a级毛片| 一夜夜www| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 美女黄网站色视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 日韩欧美三级三区| 91av网站免费观看| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 中文资源天堂在线| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 久久草成人影院| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 香蕉国产在线看| www国产在线视频色| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 成人三级黄色视频| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 久久久久性生活片| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 男人舔奶头视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 在线观看一区二区三区| 性色avwww在线观看| 99热这里只有是精品50| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 草草在线视频免费看| 观看美女的网站| 性色avwww在线观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 99热精品在线国产| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 久久久久久人人人人人| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 色播亚洲综合网| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 美女免费视频网站| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月 | 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 丁香欧美五月| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 综合色av麻豆| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 精品电影一区二区在线| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| av福利片在线观看| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 国产乱人视频| 国产成人福利小说| 成人av在线播放网站| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 男人舔奶头视频| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| xxx96com| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 69av精品久久久久久| 日本一本二区三区精品| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 亚洲 国产 在线| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 一本久久中文字幕| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 极品教师在线免费播放| 很黄的视频免费| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 一本精品99久久精品77| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 九色国产91popny在线| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| cao死你这个sao货| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 美女免费视频网站| tocl精华| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 十八禁网站免费在线| 老司机福利观看| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 成人18禁在线播放| 午夜福利高清视频| 久久亚洲真实| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 欧美激情在线99| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 国产美女午夜福利| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| or卡值多少钱| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 999久久久国产精品视频| 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 在线视频色国产色| 麻豆国产av国片精品| av福利片在线观看| 舔av片在线| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 热99re8久久精品国产| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 一本综合久久免费| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲激情在线av| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 日韩免费av在线播放| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| netflix在线观看网站| 黄片小视频在线播放| 日本黄色片子视频| 日本黄大片高清| av视频在线观看入口| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 亚洲片人在线观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 国产精品久久视频播放| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 一级黄色大片毛片| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 午夜视频精品福利| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 嫩草影院精品99| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 嫩草影视91久久| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看 | 怎么达到女性高潮| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 999久久久国产精品视频| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 国产成人精品无人区| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 日本一本二区三区精品| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 91av网一区二区| 亚洲av美国av| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 午夜视频精品福利| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 欧美zozozo另类| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 91av网站免费观看| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 看片在线看免费视频| 变态另类丝袜制服| 看免费av毛片| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 免费在线观看日本一区| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 色吧在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 国产69精品久久久久777片 | 麻豆av在线久日| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 免费av不卡在线播放| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 一本久久中文字幕| 亚洲精品在线美女| 在线观看日韩欧美| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 日韩免费av在线播放| 久久这里只有精品19| 在线视频色国产色| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 午夜福利欧美成人| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 级片在线观看| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 免费看光身美女| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 在线a可以看的网站|