• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Changes in feed intake,nutrient digestion,plasma metabolites,and oxidative stress parameters in dairy cows with subacute ruminal acidosis and its regulation with pelleted beet pulp

    2014-03-25 03:15:23YongqingGuoXiaofengXuYangZouZhanshanYangShengliLiandZhijunCao
    關(guān)鍵詞:質(zhì)量數(shù)離子源條件

    Yongqing Guo,Xiaofeng Xu,Yang Zou,Zhanshan Yang,Shengli Liand Zhijun Cao

    Changes in feed intake,nutrient digestion,plasma metabolites,and oxidative stress parameters in dairy cows with subacute ruminal acidosis and its regulation with pelleted beet pulp

    Yongqing Guo?,Xiaofeng Xu?,Yang Zou,Zhanshan Yang,Shengli Li*and Zhijun Cao*

    The objectives of this study were to 1)determine the variation of nutrient digestion,plasma metabolites and oxidative stress parameters triggered by induced subacute ruminal acidosis(SARA);and 2)evaluate the ability of pelleted beet pulp(BP)as a replacement for ground corn to alleviate SARA.Eight Holstein-Friesian cows were fed four diets during four successive17-day periods∶1)total mixed ration(TMR)containing 0%finely ground wheat (FGW)(W0);2)TMR containing 10%FGW(W10);3)TMR containing 20%FGW(W20);and 4)TMR containing 10%BP as a replacement for 10%ground corn(BP10).The SARA induction protocol reduced the mean ruminal pH from 6.37 to 5.94,and the minimum ruminal pH decreased from 5.99 to 5.41 from baseline to challenge period.Mean ruminal pH increased from 5.94 to 6.05,and minimum daily ruminal pH increased from 5.41 to 5.63,when BP was substituted for corn.The apparent digestibility of nutrients was not affected by the dietary treatments,except that the digestibility of neutral detergent fibre(NDF)and acid detergent fibre(ADF)was reduced in cows fed the W20 diet compared with cows fed the W0 and W10 diets,and cows fed the BP10 diet had higher NDF and ADF digestibility than the cows fed the W20 diet.Cows fed the W20 diet had a lower plasma concentration of β-hydroxybutyrate(BHBA),non-esterified fatty acids(NEFA),cholesterol,triglyceride,and total antioxidative capacity(TAC),and a higher plasma concentration of glucose,insulin,malonaldehyde(MDA),super oxygen dehydrogenises(SOD),and glutathione peroxidase(GSH-Px)than cows fed the W0 diet.Substitution of BP for corn increased concentrations of plasma BHBA and TAC,but decreased concentrations of plasma MDA.Our results indicate that reduction of fibre digestion;the concomitant increase of plasma glucose and insulin;the decrease of plasma BHBA,NEFA,cholesterol,and triglyceride;and changes of plasma oxidative stress parameters are highly related to SARA induced by W20 diets.These variables may be alternative candidates for SARA diagnosis.We also suggest that the substitution of BP for corn could reduce the risk of SARA,increase fibre digestion,and improve the antioxidant status in dairy cows.

    Beet pulp,Dairy cow,Nutrient digestion,Oxidative status,Plasma metabolites,Subacute ruminal acidosis

    Introduction

    Subacute ruminal acidosis(SARA)is one of the most common chronic digestive disorders on intensive dairy farms,and is defined as periods of moderately depressed ruminal pH(the minimum pH varies between 5.2 and 5.6)[1].Clinical signs of SARA may include reduced dry matter intake(DMI)and milk fat content,rumenitis, laminitis,and liver abscesses,as well as increased death loss[2].Excessive feeding of nonfibrous carbohydrates (NFC),a rapid increase in levels of dietary NFC,or insufficient rumen buffering are important causes of this metabolic disorder[3].

    Measuring rumen fluid pH is the only reliable and accurate tool to diagnose SARA[4].Because of problems in obtaining samples of rumen fluid,diurnal variation of rumen metabolism,and the lack of pathognomonic signs, SARA is especially difficult to diagnose[5].Accordingly, there is continued interest in finding quick and simple indicators(e.g.,plasma metabolites)as potential diagnostic tools of rumen fermentation pattern and function[6]. Cellulolysis has shown to be impaired by pH below 6.0 to 6.2[7];therefore,total tract NDF digestibility might be reduced when rumen pH is lowered.Plasma metabolites were often used to monitor the health and metabolic status of dairy cows,and Ametaj et al.[8]indicated that dairy cows fed diets containing high rapidly fermentable carbohydrates could greatly perturb the patterns of plasma metabolites.However,there is limited information on the role of high-grain induced SARA on diurnal perturbations of plasma metabolites in dairy cows.Moreover,it is widely accepted that oxidative stress is positively related to high grain or high starch diets of ruminant animals[9],and that high-producing dairy cows exposed to a high-starch diet are more susceptible to inadequate antioxidant status [10],resulting in a poorly functioning immune system and increased risk of rumenitis as well as laminitis.Therefore, the oxidative stress index could be a general approach used in ruminant medicine in the future[11].

    Several dietary strategies proposed for use in preventing SARA,such as sodium bicarbonate and monensin,have been studied[12,13].However,neither of these methods has consistently maintained higher rumen pH values. Sugar beet pulp(BP)contains approximately 40%neutral detergent fibre(NDF)and is unique in its high content of soluble fibre(especially pectic substances).Soluble fibre fermentation is thought to produce less lactate and propionate than starch fermentation in the rumen,and it does not inhibit cellulose and hemicellulose digestion[14]. Thus,the substitution of corn grain with BP should prevent unfavourable pH decline in the rumen.The goal of this research was to test the hypothesis that SARA induced by increasing the levels of FGW in the diet is associated with alterations in feed intake,nutrient digestion, ruminal pH,selected plasma metabolites,and oxidative stress parameters.Another objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of pelleted BP as a replacement for ground corn to alleviate SARA in the long term.

    Materials and methods

    Experimental design and animal management

    Animal care and procedures were approved and conducted under established standards of the College of Animal Science&Technology,China Agricultural University.

    Eight multiparous Holstein-Friesian cows(568.5±34.7 kg of BW;164±15 DIM;mean±SD),four of which were fitted with ruminal cannulas(10 i.d;Bar Diamond,Parma,ID), were fed a series of diets(Table 1)during four successive periods in this experiment∶an initial baseline period with 0%finely ground wheat(FGW,geometric mean particle sizes∶600 μm)and starch provided as ground corn,a slowly fermented starch diet(W0 treatment,Baseline period);a second period with 10%FGW,a section of rapidly fermented starch diet(W10 treatment);a third period with 20%FGW,a diet containing a large amount of rapidly fermented starch(W20 treatment,Challenge period);and a final period in which the W20 diet was amended by replacing 10%ground corn with 10%dried,pelleted BP (BP10 treatment).The specific diets were fed sequentially to all eight cows over four 17-d periods(12d adaptation, 5d of measuring),because previous reports suggest that SARA was not immediately and easily reversible[15,16], making other experimental designs(e.g.,a Latin square) problematic(e.g.,carry-over effects).

    The four diets(Table 1)were formulated to meet or exceed the NRC[3]guidelines for 600 kg multiparous Holstein dairy cows producing 27 kg of milk/d with 4.0%fat.The diets were fed as a total mixed ration(TMR)(CAU-mixer wagon model JZC-200,Beijing,China),and the forage component of the diet was a mixture of corn silage,chopped alfalfa hay,and Chinese wild rye.The moisture content of corn silage was determined weekly and used to adjust the ration.During each data collection period,the particle size distribution of TMR(Table 2)was determined using a Penn State Particle Separator(PSPS)as described by Lammers et al.[17].

    The experiment was conducted at the dairy farm of the State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition(Beijing,China). The cows were housed in individual tie-stalls bedded with rubber mattresses,and had free access to drinking water throughout the trial.They were fed twice daily,in equal amounts,at 0700 and 1900 h.The diets were fed ad libitum to allow for at least 5-10%orts on an as-fed basis. The cows were milked twice daily at 0630 and 1830 h.

    Sampling and analytical procedures

    Nutrient intake and digestibility

    During d13-d17 of each period,the diets and ort samples of individual cows were harvested daily to calculatenutrient intake.Faecal grab samples(300-500 g fresh basis)were collected on 12 occasions∶d14 at 0400,0900, 1400,1900 h;d15 at 0500,1000,1500,2000 h;and d16 at 0600,1100,1700,and 2200 h.The daily diets,orts,and faecal matter were pooled by dietary treatment and cows, and stored at-20°C until analysis.After the experiment,all the samples were dried at 65°C in a forced-air oven (Model 2000;Experimental Mill,Beijing,China)for 48 h to a constant weight,ground through a 1-mm screen using a Wiley mill(standard model 4;Arthur H.Thomas Co.,Philadelphia,PA),and analysed for dry matter(DM), acid detergent fibre(ADF)(method 973.18;AOAC 1990) [18],and starch[19].The NDF was measured by the method of Van Soest et al.[20]with heat-stable α-amylase (A-3306;Sigma Chemical Co.,St.Louis,MO),and the sodium sulfite and ash concentration was corrected for the Ankom 200 fibre Analyzer(Ankom Technology,Fairport, NY).The CP was determined by the micro-Kjeldahl method(method 4.2.08;AOAC 1990).Ether extract (method 920.85;AOAC 1990),ash(942.05;AOAC 1990), calcium and phosphorus(method 945.46;AOAC 1990) were also analysed.The chemical composition of the TMR was calculated from the chemical composition of the concentrate mix and the individual forage in the diets. The diets had a similar chemical composition,except for the higher levels of starch and NFC,and the lower levels of NDF in the higher FGW diets.

    Table 1 Ingredient composition and chemical analyses of experimental diets

    Table 2 Particle size distribution of the experimental diets(%retained,as-fed basis)2

    The acid-insoluble ash(AIA)was used as an intrinsic digestibility marker to estimate nutrient digestibility in the total tract.The AIA in the diets and the faeces were analysed according to Van Keulen and Young[21],using the equation described by Zhong et al.[22]to calculate the apparent digestibility of a nutrient in the gastrointestinal tract.The equation is as follows∶D=[1-(Ad× Nf)/(Af×Nd)]×100,where Ad(g/kg)and Af(g/kg) represent the AIA in the diet and faeces,respectively, and Nd(g/kg)and Nf(g/kg)represent the nutrient in the diet and faeces,respectively.

    Ruminal pH,plasma metabolites and oxidative stress parameters

    Ruminal samples were collected for pH analysis.The ruminal fluid(100 mL)was sampled at 0700(before the meal), 1000,1300,1600,and 1900 h at d15 and d16.The samples were collected manually from the anterior dorsal,anterior ventral,medial ventral,posterior dorsal,and posterior ventral locations within the rumen and composited by cow. They were filtered through four layers of cheesecloth.At

    each sampling time,the pH was measured immediately after collection using a handheld pH electrode(Model pH B-4;Shanghai Chemical,Shanghai,China).

    On d17 of each experimental period,10 mL of blood was collected via tail venipuncture at 0,3,6,9,and 12 h after the morning feeding,into vacutainer tubes(Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes,NJ)containing sodium heparin anticoagulant.The plasma was collected after centrifugation at 3,000×g for 10 min,separated into several aliquots, frozen at-20°C,and later analyzed for determination of glucose,insulin,non-esterified fatty acids(NEFA), β-hydroxybutyrate(BHBA),triglycerides,and cholesterol.All plasma-related measurements were analysed in duplicate.The levels of glucose,triglycerides,and cholesterol in plasma were analysed using a clinical auto-Analyzer(CobasIntegra,C701;Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.,Basel,Switzerland).The glucose concentrations were determined using the GOD/PAP test kit (Merit Choice Bioengineering Co.,Ltd.,Beijing,China). Triglycerides and total cholesterol concentrations were determined following the kit instructions(Shensuo Unf Medical Diagnostic Article Co.,Ltd.,Shanghai,China), using the enzymatic method.NEFA and BHBA concentrations in plasma were analysed with a Hitachi 7600 automated biochemistry Analyzer(Hitachi Co.,Tokyo,Japan). The NEFA concentration was determined using a commercially available kit(Sekisui Medical Co.,Ltd.,Tokyo, Japan).BHBA dehydrogenase was used for quantifying the plasma concentrations of BHBA using a commercially available kit(Jingyuan Medical Co.,Ltd.,Shanghai,China). Plasma insulin levels were determined using an insulin radioimmunoassay kit(Beijing North Institute of Biological Technology,Beijing,China)and with a radioimmunoassay system(xh6080;Xi’an Nuclear Instrument Factory,Xi’an, China)according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    The plasma samples collected at 0 and 6 h after the morning feeding were used to test the levels of total antioxidative capacity(TAC),malonaldehyde(MDA) super oxygen dehydrogenises(SOD),glutathione peroxidase(GSH-Px)with colorimetric assay kits(Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute,Jiangsu,China)following the manufacturer’s instructions,using a UV visible Recording Spectrophotometer(UV3600,Daojin Corp., Japan).All samples were tested in duplicate.The TAC level was determined by the reaction of phenanthroline and Fe2+using Spectrophotometer at 520 nm[23].The MDA level was measured by the thiobarbituric acid method[24].The SOD activity was determined by inhibition of nitroblue tetrazolium reduction due to superoxide anion generation by a xanthine-xanthine oxidase system.The GSH-Px level was determined by using a direct measurement of the remaining GSH after the enzyme-catalysed reaction as described by Hafeman et al.[25].

    Statistical analysis

    Data on feed intake and digestibility were analysed using the Proc Mixed SAS procedure(SAS Institute,2002) using the following model∶Yij=μ+Ti+Cj+εij,where Yij=the dependent variable,μ=the overall mean,Ti= the fixed effect of treatment group,Cj=the random animal effect,and εij=the residual error term.

    Measurements of ruminal pH,plasma metabolites and oxidative stress parameters were analysed as repeated measures using Proc Mixed SAS procedure(SAS Institute, 2002)using the following model∶Yijk=μ+Ti+Cj+Hk+ HTik+εijk,where Yijk=the dependent variable;μ=the overall mean;Ti=the effect of treatment i;Cj=the effect of cow j;Hk=the effect of hours post-feeding analysed as repeated measures;HTik=the interactions between hour k and treatment i,and εijk=the random residual error.All the above data were compared with Tukey’s range test. Treatment effects were declared significant at P≤0.05,and tendencies from P>0.05 to≤0.10.The P-values indicated in Tables 2,3,and 4 refer to the overall diet effects.

    Results

    Nutrient intake and digestibility

    Total DM and ether extract intake were not significantly affected by dietary treatments(Table 3);however,cows fed the W20 diet had a lower NDF and ADF intake (P<0.01),and a higher CP and starch intake(P<0.01)than the cows fed the W0 diet.The substitution of BP for ground corn increased NDF and ADF intake(P<0.01),anddecreased starch intake(P<0.01).Apparent digestibility of DM,CP,ether extract,and starch was not affected by dietary treatments.However,apparent digestibility of NDF and ADF was lower(P<0.01)for cows fed the W20 diet than for cows fed the W0 diet,and cows fed the BP10 diet had a higher(P<0.01)NDF and ADF digestibility than the cows fed the W20 diet.

    Table 3 Effect of dietary treatments on nutrient intake and digestibility in dairy cows1,2

    Table 4 Effect of dietary treatments on ruminal pH and plasma metabolite profiles in dairy cows2,3

    Ruminal pH,plasma metabolites and oxidative stress parameters

    Figure 1Effect of dietary treatments on diurnal patterns of ruminal pH in dairy cows.Data are expressed as mean±SE.

    Ruminal pH profiles on d15 and d16 are illustrated in Table 4 and Figure 1.This SARA induction protocol reduced mean ruminal pH from 6.37 during the baseline period to 5.94 during the challenge period(P<0.01);the minimum ruminal pH decreased from baseline to challenge period(5.99 vs.5.41).Based on the definition of SARA as daily episodes of low rumen pH between 5.2 and 5.6 for at least 180 min/d[1],the most severe rumen pH depression was obtained from cows fed the W20 diet.Ruminal pH from 3 to 9 h after morning feeding was significantly lower (P<0.01)for cows fed the W20 diet than for cows fed the other diets.Cows fed the BP10 diet had a higher daily mean ruminal pH(6.05 vs.5.94)and minimum ruminal pH(5.63 vs.5.41)than the cows fed the W20 diet.The effects of time and the treatment×time interaction on average ruminal pH were significant(P<0.01 and P=0.01, respectively).

    Data on diurnal changes of plasma metabolite parameters and oxidative stress parameters are given in Tables 4 and 5, and Figure 2.Compared with the cows fed the W0 diet, cows fed the W20 diet had a lower concentrations of the plasma BHBA (P<0.01),NEFA (P=0.01),cholesterol (P<0.01),triglyceride(P<0.01),and TAC(P<0.01),and higher concentrations of plasma glucose(P<0.01),insulin (P<0.01),MDA(P<0.01),SOD(P<0.01),and GSH-Px (P=0.02).The substitution of BP for ground corn increased (P<0.01)plasma concentrations of BHBA and TAC,but decreased(P<0.01)plasma concentration of MDA.Time after morning feeding had an effect(P<0.01)on all plasma metabolite profiles,except the concentration of plasma cholesterol.There was no effect of the treatment×time interaction with respect to all plasma metabolite profiles. The effects of time and the treatment×time interactionon plasma TAC were significant(P<0.01).There were no effects of time and the treatment×time interaction with respect to plasma concentrations of MDA,SOD,and GSH-Px,except the concentration of plasma MDA was affected by the treatment×time interaction(P<0.01).

    Discussion

    Nutrient intake and digestibility

    The findings of this study concur with the results of others[4,26];DMI was not different between the dietary treatments.Paradoxically,reduced DMI was seen as aclinical sign of SARA[27],and several researchers have shown that DMI decreased during induced SARA experiments[28,29].The effects of induced SARA on DMI were inconsistent,and the causes of this are unclear, probably because of the variance of SARA induction protocol,the severity of SARA,or the individual difference of the cows.Moreover,higher intake and high concentrate included in the W20 diet may have confounded the results.The variation in intakes of CP,NDF,ADF, and starch with changes in the ratio of forage to concentrate(F∶C)reflected the chemical composition of the diet consumed because DMI was not affected by F∶C.

    Table 5 Effect of dietary treatments on oxidative stress parameters in dairy cows2,3

    Here,total tract digestibility of NDF and ADF were reduced in cows fed the W20 diet,although the NDF and ADF intakes were lower than those fed the other diets. This result may be reflected by higher ruminal fermentation of wheat starch of the W20 diet,as well as the negative-associated effects of fibre degradability in the rumen with dietary fermentable carbohydrates[30,31]. Excessively low ruminal pH values can be a problem in dairy cows receiving a diet with large amounts of concentrate or fermentable starch when volatile fatty acid (VFA)production exceeds the buffering ability of the rumen contents.Moreover,fibre digestion can be reduced at pH 6 or less in the rumen[6].An in vitro study by Stensig et al.[32]showed that with the higher levels of dietary fermentable starch(wheat),NDF digestion and passage rate were reduced.During the control periods and SARA periods,the 24-and 48-h in situ NDF degradabilities of corn silage were reduced from 44.0 to 37.2%and from 56.1 to 44.8%,respectively[33].The total tract digestibility of NDF and ADF increased in cows fed the BP10 diet compared with cows fed the W20 diet,and the results might be due to the higher ruminal pH of cows fed the diet inclusion of BP.Our results were consistent with a previous study,which showed that substitution of BP for barley grain in a lowforage diet exhibited a higher apparent digestibility of NDF in dairy cows[34].Wheat grain exhibits faster and more extensive starch and CP degradation in the rumen[35],and it was expected that total tract starch digestibility would be greater in cows fed the higher FGW diets;however,total tract digestibility of CP and starch were not different among treatments.This was unexpected and is difficult to explain.

    Ruminal pH and plasma metabolites

    MS條件:EI源,電子能量70 eV;離子源溫度200℃,四級桿溫度150℃,質(zhì)量數(shù)掃描范圍35~350 amu。

    Low ruminal pH was observed in cows fed the W20 diet; the minimum ruminal pH was around 5.4,which was consistent with SARA[1].SARA induced by increasing the levels of starch and reducing the F∶C ratio of the diet results in the accumulation of organic acids(mainly short-chain VFA)in the rumen,as well as reduction in chewing capacity and rumination activity.This in turn leads to an increase in rumen acidity and a decrease in rumen buffering capacity[2].Increasing ruminal pH with the inclusion of BP in the diet was attributed to the lower production of lactate and propionate from pectic substances in the rumen than the inclusion of corn in the diet[14].Moreover,compared with the W20 diet, the BP10 diet could increase the levels of NDF and peNDF in dietary DM in our study,and then would increase chewing time and salivary secretion.

    The concentrations of plasma BHBA,cholesterol and triglyceride were lower in cows fed the W20 diet throughout the daytime,and the results reveal that SARA had a significant effect on diurnal fluctuations in plasma metabolites.Similarly,a previous study showed that dairy cows fed increasing levels of barley grain were associated with lower concentrations of plasma BHBA and cholesterol[8].Plasma BHBA comes from the NEFA oxidation in hepatic tissue[36]or from absorbed butyrate[37].The lower concentration of plasma BHBA is probably due to the variation of its sources and the higher energy density of the W20 diet than that of the other diets.The diurnal fluctuations of plasma BHBA showed the reverse trend compared with those of plasma NEFA in our study,and this is partly explained by the fact that plasma BHBA is produced in the liver and in the rumen epithelium[38].That is,the higher plasma NEFA concentration in the morning hours could enhance the production of BHBA from NEFA in hepatic tissue,so as to compensate for the relatively low production of BHBA by rumen epithelial cells.The substitution of BP for ground corn increased the concentration of

    plasma BHBA(mean BHBA concentrations were within the normal range),probably because of the variation of pH value and the fermentation acid concentration in the rumen between the two diets.

    Figure 2Effect of dietary treatments on diurnal patterns of plasma metabolites in dairy cows.Data are expressed as mean±SE.

    Low plasma cholesterol is associated with disturbances of plasma amino acids and severity of the acute phase response[39].Previous researchers have demonstrated that dairy cows fed large amounts of concentrate or grain-induced SARA often show changes in the composition of rumen microbiota and a rapid accumulation of large amounts of bacterial endotoxin(or lipopolysaccharide,LPS)in the rumen[28,40].The inverse relationships were found between the concentration of rumen endotoxin and the concentration of plasma cholesterol [6],and low plasma cholesterol levels in cows fed the W20 diets could be related to the systemic inflammatory response triggered by release of endotoxin into the peripheral circulation[28].Lower plasma triglyceride concentrations were found in cows fed the W20 diet.This is probably due to decreased lipolysis and ruminal biohydrogenation of dietary unsaturated FA at low ruminal pH[41]or higher energy density of the W20 diet,thereby reducing saturated NEFA from the rumen and triglyceride levels in peripheral blood circulation.

    The plasma NEFA level has always been used as an indicator of energy status in dairy cows[42].Cows fed the W20 diet had reduced concentrations of plasma NEFA compared with the other three diets.This finding was similar to the observations of Ametaj et al.[8],who demonstrated that the levels of plasma NEFA were lower in cows

    fed high-grain(barely)diets.The release of NEFA in plasma is based on their mobilization from the adipose triacylglycerol(TG)stores through the process of lipolysis. Increasing the proportion of FGW in the diet could potentially improve the energy balance of dairy cows.Moreover, the abundant availability of ruminal propionate(data not shown)and a higher plasma insulin concentration in our study might have contributed to the reduced concentration of plasma NEFA due to a propionate and insulin inhibitory effect on the NEFA release by adipose tissue[43].

    Data from this research showed that cows fed the W20 diet had the greatest concentrations of plasma glucose and insulin.This result can be explained by the enhanced production of ruminal propionate as well as the conversion to the end product in the liver through the process of hepatic glucogenesis[44].This finding is in accordance with a previous report from Ametaj et al. [8],who suggested that feeding diets containing large amounts of fermentable carbohydrates is related to a greater concentration of plasma glucose in dairy cows. Ruminal propionate and plasma glucose are secretagogues for pancreatic release of insulin,and insulin is reported to inhibit hepatic gluconeogenesis[45].Thus, the increased plasma insulin concentration in cows fed the W20 diet,in the present study,is due to high concentration of ruminal propionate and plasma glucose associated with high FGW induced SARA.

    Oxidative stress parameters

    Moreover,diets rich in readily available carbohydrates adversely affect rumen metabolism,which is associated with an increase in the yield of harmful and toxic substances(e.g.,lactate,ethanol,histamine,tyramine,and endotoxin)in the rumen[51],and potentially causes systemic immune suppression and metabolic changes in dairy cows[1].Therefore,there is a large possibility that oxidative stress plays a major role in the inflammation and immune dysfunction that occurs after induced SARA in dairy cows.The higher concentration of plasma TAC and lower concentration of plasma MDA in the cows fed the BP10 diet than the cows fed the W20 diet could be related to the higher ruminal pH than the induced SARA,and thus would decrease the negative effects of a more intensive fermentation of easily fermentable carbohydrates in the rumen.

    SOD is involved in the conversion of oxygen radicals to peroxides,and GSH-Px is involved in removing the peroxides produced by SOD enzyme and converting them into water[52].Here,a higher concentration of plasma MDA and lower concentration of plasma TAC in cows fed the W20 diet resulted in greater SOD and GSH-Px activity in plasma.It might be necessary for both enzymes to be active for adequate removal of end products of lipid peroxidation(e.g.,MDA),to alleviate some of the toxic effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS),and to increase the antioxidant status of the animal[53].A negative relationship between the activity of plasma SOD and GSH-Px and the production of plasma MDA in early lactation dairy cows was also found by Sharma et al.[54].

    Conclusions

    SARA induced by high FGW diets resulted in strong modifications of fibre digestion,plasma metabolites,and oxidative status of dairy cows.The reduction of fibre digestion,the alterations of concentrations of selected metabolites related to carbohydrate and lipid metabolism (e.g.,cholesterol,BHBA,NEFA,and triglyceride),and the changes of oxidative stress parameters(e.g.,MDA,TAC, and SOD)in the plasma,are alternative candidates for diagnosis of SARA in cows of the same physiological state and environment.Substitution of pelleted BP for ground corn could reduce the risk of SARA,increase fibre digestion,and improve antioxidant status in dairy cows.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authors’contributions

    YG,XX,YZ,and ZY carried out the experiments.SL and ZC participated in the design of the study,performed the statistical analysis,and drafted the manuscript.All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Acknowledgment

    This experiment was financially supported by funds from the National Key Basic Research Program of China(Project No.2011CB100801).

    Received∶19 March 2013 Accepted∶13 August 2013

    Published∶16 August 2013

    1. Gozho GN,Plaizier JC,Krause DO,Kennedy AD,Wittenberg KM∶Subacute ruminal acidosis induces ruminal lipopolysaccharide endotoxin release and triggers an inflammatory response.J Dairy Sci 2005,88∶1399-1403.

    2. Plaizier JC,Krause DO,Gozho GN,McBride BW∶Subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows∶the physiological causes,incidence and consequences.Vet J 2008,176∶21-31.

    3. National Research Council(NRC)∶Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle.7th edition.Washington,DC∶National Academy Press;2001.

    4. Keunen JE,Plaizier JC,Kyriazakis L,Duffield TF,Widowski TM,Lindinger MI, McBride BW∶Effects of a subacute ruminal acidosis model on the diet selection of dairy cows.J Dairy Sci 2002,85∶3304-3313.

    5. Gianesella M,Morgante M,Stelletta C,Ravarotto L,Giudice E,Van Saun RJ∶Evaluating the effects of rumenocentesis on health and performance in dairy cows.Acta Vet Brno 2010,79∶459-468.

    6. Zebeli Q,Dunn SM,Ametaj BN∶Perturbations of plasma metabolites correlated with the rise of rumen endotoxin in dairy cows fed diets rich in easily degradable carbohydrates.J Dairy Sci 2011,94∶2374-2382.

    7. Mould FL,?rskov ER∶Manipulation of rumen fluid pH and its influence on cellulolysis in Sacco,dry matter degradation and the rumen microflora of sheep offered either hay or concentrate.Anim Feed Sci Tech 1983,10∶1-14.

    8. Ametaj BN,Emmanuel DG,Zebeli Q,Dunn SM∶Feeding high proportions of barley grain in a total mixed ration perturbs diurnal patterns of plasma metabolites in lactating dairy cows.J Dairy Sci 2009,92∶1084-1091.

    9. Sgorlon S,Stradaioli G,Gabai G,Stefanon B∶Variation of starch and fat in the diet affects metabolic status and oxidative stress in ewes.Small Ruminant Res 2008,74∶123-129.

    10.Lohrke B,Viergutz T,Kanitz W,Gollnitz K,Becker F,Hurtienne A,Schweigert FJ∶High milk yield in dairy cows associated with oxidant stress.Online J Vet Res 2004,8∶70-78.

    11.Celi P∶Biomarkers of oxidative stress in ruminant medicine. Immunopharm Immunot 2011,33∶233-240.

    12.Paton LJ,Beauchemin KA,Veira DM,von Keyserlingk MAG∶Use of sodium bicarbonate,offered free choice or blended into the ration,to reduce the risk of ruminal acidosis in cattle.Can J Anim Sci 2006,86∶429-437.

    13.Mutsvangwa T,Walton JP,Plaizier JC,Duffield TF,Bagg R,Dick P,Vessie G, McBride BW∶Effects of a monensin controlled-release capsule or premix on attenuation of subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows.J Dairy Sci 2002,85∶3454-3461.

    14.Marounek M,Bartos S,Brezina P∶Factors influencing the production of volatile fatty acids from hemicellulose,pectin and starch by mixed culture of rumen microorganisms.Zeitschrift für Tierphysiologie Tierern?hrung und Futtermittelkunde 1985,53∶50-58.

    15.Krause KM,Oetzel GR∶Inducing subacute ruminal acidosis in lactating dairy cows.J Dairy Sci 2005,88∶3633-3639.

    16.Enjalbert F,Videau Y,Nicot MC,Troegeler-Meynadier A∶Effects of induced subacute ruminal acidosis on milk fat content and milk fatty acid profile. J Anim Physiol An N 2008,92∶284-291.

    17.Lammers BP,Buckmaster DR,Heinrichs AJ∶A simple method for the analysis of particle sizes of forage and total mixed rations.J Dairy Sci 1996,79∶922-928.

    18.AOAC∶Official methods of analysis.15th edition.Washington,DC∶Association of Official Analytical Chemists;1990.

    19.Bal MA,Shaver RD,Jirovec AG,Shinners KJ,Coors JG∶Crop processing and chop length of corn silage∶effects on intake,digestion,and milk production by dairy cows.J Dairy Sci 2000,83∶1264-1273.

    20.Van Soest PJ,Robertson JB,Lewis BA∶Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber,and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.J Dairy Sci 1991,74∶3583-3597.

    21.Van Keulen J,Young BA∶Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies.J Anim Sci 1977,44∶282-287.

    22.Zhong RZ,Li JG,Gao YX,Tan ZL,Ren GP∶Effects of substitution of different levels of steam-flaked corn for finely ground corn on lactation and digestion in early lactation dairy cows.J Dairy Sci 2008,91∶3931-3937.

    23.Yang R,Le G,Li A,Zheng J,Shi Y∶Effect of antioxidant capacity on blood lipid metabolism and lipoprotein lipase activity of rats fed a high-fat diet.Nutrition 2006,22∶1185-1191.

    24.Richard MJ,Portal B,Meo J,Coudray C,Hadjian A,Favier A∶Malondialdehyde kit evaluated for determining plasma and lipoprotein fractions that react with thiobarbituric acid.Clin Chem 1992,38∶704-709.

    25.Hafeman DG,Sunde RA,Hoekstra WG∶Effect of dietary selenium on erythrocyte and liver glutathione peroxidase in the rat.J Nutr 1974,104∶580-587.

    26.AlZahal O,Or-Rashid MM,Greenwood SL,McBride BW∶Effect of subacute ruminal acidosis on milk fat concentration,yield and fatty acid profile of dairy cows receiving soybean oil.J Dairy Res 2010,77∶376-384.

    27.Enemark J∶The monitoring,prevention and treatment of sub-acute ruminal acidosis(SARA)∶a review.Vet J 2008,176∶32-43.

    28.Khafipour E,Krause DO,Plaizier JC∶A grain-based subacute ruminal acidosis challenge causes translocation of lipopolysaccharide and triggers inflammation.J Dairy Sci 2009,92∶1060-1070.

    29.Cottee G,Kyriazakis I,Widowski TM,Lindinger MI,Cant JP,Duffield TF, Osborne VR,McBride BW∶The effects of subacute ruminal acidosis on sodium bicarbonate-supplemented water intake for lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2004,87∶2248-2253.

    30.Leddin CM,Stockdale CR,Hill J,Heard JW,Doyle PT∶Increasing amounts of crushed wheat fed with pasture hay reduced dietary fiber digestibility in lactating dairy cows.J Dairy Sci 2009,92∶2747-2757.

    31.Firkins JL∶Effects of feeding nonforage fiber sources on site of fiber digestion.J Dairy Sci 1997,80∶1426-1437.

    32.Stensig T,Weisbjerg MR,Hvelplund T∶Digestion and passage kinetics of fibre in dairy cows as affected by the proportion of wheat starch or sucrose in the diet.Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica A—Animal Sciences 1998, 48∶129-140.

    33.Krajcarski-Hunt H,Plaizier JC,Walton JP,Spratt R,McBride BW∶Short communication∶effect of subacute ruminal acidosis on in situ fiber digestion in lactating dairy cows.J Dairy Sci 2002,85∶570-573.

    34.Mojtahedi M,Danesh Mesgaran M∶Effects of the inclusion of dried molassed sugar beet pulp in a low-forage diet on the digestive process and blood biochemical parameters of Holstein steers.Livest Sci 2011, 141∶95-103.

    35.Herrera-Saldana RE,Huber JT,Poore MH∶Dry matter,crude protein, and starch degradability of five cereal grains.J Dairy Sci 1990, 73∶2386-2393.

    36.Roche JR,Sheahan AJ,Chagas LM,Boston RC∶Short communication∶change in plasma ghrelin in dairy cows following an intravenous glucose challenge.J Dairy Sci 2008,91∶1005-1010.

    37.Andersson L,Lundstroem K∶Effect of feeding silage with high butyric acid content on ketone body formation and milk yield in postparturient dairy cows.Zentralblatt fuer Veterinaermedizin 1985,32∶15-23.

    38.Heitmann RN,Fernandez JM∶Autoregulation of alimentary and hepatic ketogenesis in sheep.J Dairy Sci 1986,69∶1270-1281.

    39.Chiarla C,Giovannini I,Siegel JH∶The relationship between plasma cholesterol,amino acids and acute phase proteins in sepsis.Amino Acids 2004,27∶97-100.

    40.Gozho GN,Krause DO,Plaizier JC∶Rumen lipopolysaccharide and inflammation during grain adaptation and subacute ruminal acidosis in steers.J Dairy Sci 2006,89∶4404-4413.

    41.Van Nevel CJ,Demeyer DI∶Influence of pH on lipolysis and biohydrogenation of soybean oil by rumen contents in vitro.Reprod Nutr Dev 1996,36∶53-63.

    42.Staples CR,Thatcher WW,Clark JH∶Relationship between ovarian activity and energy status during the early postpartum period of high producing dairy cows.J Dairy Sci 1990,73∶938-947.

    43.Van Knegsel A,Van den Brand H,Graat E,Dijkstra J,Jorritsma R,Decuypere E, Tamminga S,Kemp B∶Dietary energy source in dairy cows in early lactation∶metabolites and metabolic hormones.J Dairy Sci 2007,90∶1477-1485.

    44.Reynolds CK∶Production and metabolic effects of site of starch digestion in dairy cattle.Anim Feed Sci Tech 2006,130∶78-94.

    45.Brockman RP∶Role of insulin in regulating hepatic gluconeogenesis in sheep.Can J Physiol Pharm 1985,63∶1460-1464.

    46.Sordillo LM∶Factors affecting mammary gland immunity and mastitis susceptibility.Livest Prod Sci 2005,98∶89-99.

    47.Halliwell B,Whiteman M∶Measuring reactive species and oxidative damage in vivo and in cell culture∶how should you do it and what do the results mean?Brit J Pharmacol 2009,142∶231-255.

    48.Ghiselli A,Serafini M,Natella F,Scaccini C∶Total antioxidant capacity as a tool to assess redox status∶critical view and experimental data.Free Radical Bio Med 2000,29∶1106-1114.

    49.Hou Z,Wang Z,Chai T,Jia Y,Gong Q,Ma J,Wang Y∶Effects of forage to concentrate ratio on homeostasis of rumen and oxidative stress in cows. Chinese Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences 2008,39∶455-459.

    50.Gabai G,Testoni S,Piccinini R,Marinelli L,Stradaioli G∶Oxidative stress in primiparous cows in relation to dietary starch and the progress of lactation.Anim Sci 2004,79∶99-108.

    51.Ametaj BN,Zebeli Q,Saleem F,Psychogios N,Lewis MJ,Dunn SM,Xia JG, Wishart DS∶Metabolomics reveals unhealthy alterations in rumen metabolism with increased proportion of cereal grain in the diet of dairy cows.Metabolomics 2010,6∶583-594.

    52.Yu BP∶Cellular defenses against damage from reactive oxygen species. Physiol Rev 1994,74∶139-162.

    53.Collins AR∶Assays for oxidative stress and antioxidant status∶applications to research into the biological effectiveness of polyphenols.Am J Clin Nutr 2005,81∶261S-267S.

    54.Sharma N,Singh NK,Singh OP,Pandey V,Verma PK∶Oxidative stress and antioxidant status during transition period in dairy cows.Asian Austral J Anim 2011,24∶479-484.

    doi∶10.1186/2049-1891-4-31

    Cite this article as:Guo et al.∶Changes in feed intake,nutrient digestion, plasma metabolites,and oxidative stress parameters in dairy cows with subacute ruminal acidosis and its regulation with pelleted beet pulp. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 2013 4∶31.

    Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of:

    · Convenient online submission

    · Thorough peer review

    · No space constraints or color fi gure charges

    · Immediate publication on acceptance

    · Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar

    · Research which is freely available for redistribution

    Submit your manuscript at www.biomedcentral.com/submit

    *Correspondence∶lisheng0677@163.com;caozhijun@cau.edu.cn

    ?Equal contributors

    State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition,College of Animal Science& Technology,China Agricultural University,Beijing 100193,China

    ?2013 Guo et al.;licensee BioMed Central Ltd.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative

    Commons Attribution License(http∶//creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0),which permits unrestricted use,distribution,and reproduction in any medium,provided the original work is properly cited.

    猜你喜歡
    質(zhì)量數(shù)離子源條件
    兆瓦級強流離子源長脈沖運行分析及實驗研究
    核技術(shù)(2022年7期)2022-07-22 09:25:06
    排除多余的條件
    選擇合適的條件
    如何選擇ICP-MS中測定水質(zhì)中可溶性鈦合適的質(zhì)量數(shù)
    單電極介質(zhì)阻擋放電離子源的消電子技術(shù)研究
    物質(zhì)結(jié)構(gòu)與元素周期律
    為什么夏天的雨最多
    一次進樣分析氧氣中碳、硫化物和質(zhì)量數(shù)豐度值與比值
    分析儀器(2016年1期)2016-03-04 11:17:00
    一次進樣分析氬氣中碳、硫化物和質(zhì)量數(shù)豐度值與比值
    分析儀器(2015年3期)2015-05-09 02:11:01
    高頻離子源形成的HD+離子束中H3+比例實測研究
    亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 水蜜桃什么品种好| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 久久免费观看电影| 午夜福利,免费看| 99热这里只有精品一区| 一本久久精品| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产色婷婷99| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 赤兔流量卡办理| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 亚洲成人手机| 精品久久久久久久久av| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区 | 插阴视频在线观看视频| 免费av中文字幕在线| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 婷婷成人精品国产| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 天堂8中文在线网| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 亚洲成色77777| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 久久久久久人妻| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 精品少妇内射三级| 在线观看国产h片| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 日本av免费视频播放| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 午夜视频国产福利| 97在线人人人人妻| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 99九九在线精品视频| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 91久久精品电影网| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 精品午夜福利在线看| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 色94色欧美一区二区| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 精品亚洲成国产av| 久久久久久人妻| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 亚洲av福利一区| 看免费成人av毛片| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 免费看光身美女| av视频免费观看在线观看| 老女人水多毛片| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| a级毛色黄片| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 成人无遮挡网站| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| kizo精华| 久热这里只有精品99| 久久久欧美国产精品| h视频一区二区三区| 秋霞伦理黄片| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 午夜福利,免费看| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 少妇的逼水好多| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 伦精品一区二区三区| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 麻豆成人av视频| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| freevideosex欧美| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 一区二区三区精品91| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 精品久久久久久电影网| 91国产中文字幕| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 色94色欧美一区二区| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 高清av免费在线| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡 | 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| av黄色大香蕉| 赤兔流量卡办理| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 在线看a的网站| 超色免费av| 视频区图区小说| 一级毛片 在线播放| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 一级片'在线观看视频| 中国国产av一级| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 精品少妇内射三级| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 99九九在线精品视频| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 丁香六月天网| 久久婷婷青草| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 黄色配什么色好看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产精品无大码| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 国产永久视频网站| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 91精品三级在线观看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 高清av免费在线| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 热re99久久国产66热| 一本久久精品| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| videos熟女内射| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 在线看a的网站| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 精品久久久噜噜| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 久久精品夜色国产| 自线自在国产av| 亚洲性久久影院| 在线看a的网站| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 久久久久久久久大av| 亚洲av福利一区| 免费大片18禁| 高清欧美精品videossex| 另类精品久久| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产精品.久久久| 国产成人精品无人区| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 99热网站在线观看| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 午夜91福利影院| 青春草国产在线视频| 91成人精品电影| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 大香蕉久久网| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 日本色播在线视频| 中国国产av一级| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 性色av一级| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 只有这里有精品99| 亚州av有码| 午夜福利视频精品| 一级黄片播放器| 97在线人人人人妻| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 99热网站在线观看| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 久久狼人影院| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 久久久国产一区二区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 精品少妇内射三级| 在线观看www视频免费| 美女中出高潮动态图| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 国产男女内射视频| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | a 毛片基地| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产色婷婷99| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲av男天堂| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 午夜免费观看性视频| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 国产片内射在线| 亚洲综合精品二区| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 18禁观看日本| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 午夜福利视频精品| 婷婷成人精品国产| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产成人精品无人区| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| av电影中文网址| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | av在线app专区| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 日本黄色片子视频| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 一区二区av电影网| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 韩国av在线不卡| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 丰满乱子伦码专区| a 毛片基地| 丁香六月天网| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 中文欧美无线码| 制服人妻中文乱码| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 在线天堂最新版资源| 午夜久久久在线观看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 国产av国产精品国产| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| av在线老鸭窝| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 三级国产精品片| 国产毛片在线视频| 超色免费av| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 水蜜桃什么品种好| h视频一区二区三区| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| av线在线观看网站| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 成人国语在线视频| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 考比视频在线观看| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 午夜福利视频精品| 久热久热在线精品观看| 老司机影院毛片| 九色成人免费人妻av| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 国产成人精品在线电影| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 嫩草影院入口| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 一区二区av电影网| 嫩草影院入口| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 久久久久久伊人网av| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 色94色欧美一区二区| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 成人无遮挡网站| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 插阴视频在线观看视频| videos熟女内射| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| a级毛片黄视频| h视频一区二区三区| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 考比视频在线观看| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 9色porny在线观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 日本av免费视频播放| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 99热网站在线观看| 高清欧美精品videossex| 美女中出高潮动态图| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 亚洲精品视频女| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 永久免费av网站大全| 最黄视频免费看| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| videossex国产| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 777米奇影视久久| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 亚洲在久久综合| 成人国产av品久久久| 久久久久久人妻| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡 | 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 日本色播在线视频| 春色校园在线视频观看| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲国产av新网站| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 国产精品三级大全| 久久久久久人妻| 久久热精品热| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 一区二区av电影网| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 黄片播放在线免费| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 桃花免费在线播放| 亚洲图色成人| av网站免费在线观看视频| 美女福利国产在线| 久热这里只有精品99| 久久久久国产网址| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 多毛熟女@视频| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 日韩视频在线欧美| 日韩伦理黄色片| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 欧美人与善性xxx| av免费在线看不卡| 青春草国产在线视频| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 成人影院久久| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 在现免费观看毛片| 91精品三级在线观看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 另类精品久久| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 考比视频在线观看| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 欧美日韩av久久| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 国产黄频视频在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 亚洲国产精品999| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 久久97久久精品| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 成人国产麻豆网| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 9色porny在线观看| 一级爰片在线观看| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 国产精品一国产av| 欧美日韩av久久| 色网站视频免费| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 色94色欧美一区二区| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| tube8黄色片| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| .国产精品久久| 天堂8中文在线网| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产成人91sexporn| 久久久精品区二区三区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 赤兔流量卡办理| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | av电影中文网址| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 成人影院久久| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 18在线观看网站| 老司机影院成人| .国产精品久久| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 制服人妻中文乱码| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 少妇丰满av| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国内精品宾馆在线| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 久久 成人 亚洲| 午夜福利,免费看| 免费av中文字幕在线| 精品久久久噜噜| 一级毛片 在线播放| 亚洲不卡免费看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 在线观看三级黄色| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 美女国产视频在线观看| 99热这里只有精品一区| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 成人二区视频| 只有这里有精品99| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 久久免费观看电影| a 毛片基地| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 五月天丁香电影| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 丝袜美足系列| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 久久久久久久久久成人| 久久影院123| 日韩成人伦理影院| 男女国产视频网站| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| av黄色大香蕉| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 乱人伦中国视频| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| av在线app专区| 色吧在线观看| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 午夜影院在线不卡| 亚洲av福利一区| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 一级毛片我不卡| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 美女主播在线视频| 精品亚洲成国产av| 有码 亚洲区|