• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    COUPLING EFFECT OF SEEPAGE FLOW AND RIVER FLOW ON THE BANK FAILURE*

    2011-05-08 05:55:24NGBo

    N?NG Bo

    College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China Nanjing Hydraulic Research ?nstitute, Nanjing 210029, China, E-mail: ningbo.lc@163.com

    WU Shi-qiang, TAN Ye-fei, X?E Xing-hua, YAN Jun

    Nanjing Hydraulic Research ?nstitute, Nanjing 210029, China

    YAN Zhong-min

    College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China GENG Yan-qiong

    Lian Yungang Technical College, Lian Yungang 222000, China

    COUPLING EFFECT OF SEEPAGE FLOW AND RIVER FLOW ON THE BANK FAILURE*

    N?NG Bo

    College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China Nanjing Hydraulic Research ?nstitute, Nanjing 210029, China, E-mail: ningbo.lc@163.com

    WU Shi-qiang, TAN Ye-fei, X?E Xing-hua, YAN Jun

    Nanjing Hydraulic Research ?nstitute, Nanjing 210029, China

    YAN Zhong-min

    College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China GENG Yan-qiong

    Lian Yungang Technical College, Lian Yungang 222000, China

    (Received May 9, 2011, Revised June 1, 2011)

    On the basis of the generalized physical model of the riverbank, the experiments were conducted to study the mechanisms of riverbank failure under the coupling effect of seepage flow and river flow. The experimental setup was specially designed, as well as test point location, parameters and procedures, and the main influencing factors were analyzed affecting riverbank failure based on the failure types, the variations of pore water pressure and soil displacement. The results indicated that the coupling effect has different influences on the bank failure in three aspects: the failure type, the process and the extent. ?n addition, the river flow played a more important role than the seepage flow in the coupling effect on the bank failure.

    bank failure, seepage flow, river flow, physical model test

    DO?: 10.1016/S1001-6058(10)60183-7

    Introduction

    Riverbank failure is a kind of natural disasters with great harmfulness. ?t causes the loss of beach and seriously threatens the safety of dikes, or directly leads to the floods for dike breaking. The riverbank failure exists in almost all the rivers in the world, such as the Mississippi River, the Rhine River and the middle-lower reaches of the Yangtze River. There are two factors of soil and water flow in the riverbank failure, which are related not only to the nature of soil and the seepage inside it, but also to the lateral erosion of water flow. So far, the mechanisms of riverbank failure have been investigated from the point of view of soil mechanics, river dynamics, or combination of them.

    There are three major theoretical statements based on soil mechanics. The first is that the bank failure is an expressive form of slope instability, which can be analyzed by the theory of slope stability. Thorne[1]developed slope-stability models to predict occurrence of failure earliest. He defined a Factor of Safety (FS) equal to the ratio of resisting to driving forces acting on the incipient failure block in their models. Osman and Thorne[2]adopted a new approach to predict bank stability response to lateral erosion or bed degradation. ?t represents an improvement over earlier work, which does not account for changes in bank geometry due to lateral erosion prior to mass failure. Zhang et al.[3]calculated anti-sliding safety coefficients of the slope from the results obtained by the two-phase flow simulation, and then analyzed the effect of the pore air pressure on the slope stability. The second is that the flow slide can lead to the bank failure. Christian et al.[4]thought that cyclic liquefa-ction during a large earthquake potentially causes the deformations, including lateral spreading, cyclic softening, and possibly flow sliding when investigating the western margin of the Fraser River delta in Canada. The third is that the seepage causes the bank failure. Rinaldi et al.[5]concluded that the soil pore-water pressure and the disappearance of apparent cohesion were sufficient conditions to trigger a mass failure in the riverbank after monitoring the pore water pressure changes during the flow in the Sieve River in ?taly. Fox et al.[6]quantified the impact of seepage undercutting on riverbank stability based upon measurements from two deeply incised streams in northern Mississippi: Little Topashaw Creek and Goodwin Creek. Chu-Agor et al.[7]investigated the underlying mechanisms of instability in laboratory studies by considering multiple seepage factors simultaneously.

    On the other hand, some researchers focused on the impacts of river dynamics on the riverbank stability. They thought that the lateral erosion of water flow was an important factor in the bank failure, which could be analyzed by the theory of fluvial processes. Xia et al.[8]simulated the flood routing and bed deformation processes of the Lower Yellow River by means of coupling two sub-models (2-D flow-sediment and riverbank-erosion). Wang and Wen[9]investigated the migration process in alluvial curved rivers with the methods of flume experiment. Dai and Tang[10]presented a mathematical model of the plane evolution of alluvial meandering streams, through downstream migration and lateral expansion of meander loops. Yan et al.[11]presented an extended experimental work over erodible bed to understand the process of the landslide dam failure, and suggested that the experimental data could be used to test mathematical river models.

    Though a lot of researches were conducted, our knowledge of the bank failure remains limited due to a single angle. The interdisciplinary approach, therefore, was adopted by more and more scholars. Zhang et al.[12]investigated the stability of rock-fill dykes from the relationship between the rock size on cover layer and the incipient velocity of flow in the mountain river. He concluded that it was inappropriate to improve the stability by simply increasing the rock weight. Hu et al.[13]investigated the characteristics of the overflow and seepage over the concrete slab, and then he put forward the model applied in the structural design of the downstream protection slope for overflow earth-rock cofferdam. Xie and Liu[14]investigated the interactions between the seepage and tangential flow based on experimental results and simulations with software Fluent. Also, Zhang et al.[15]performed physical model test with large scale to study the mechanisms of the bank failure.

    ?n this study, a generalized physical model of the riverbank was established by considering the coupling effect of the seepage flow and river flow on the bank on the basis of soil mechanics and river dynamics. Utilizing the model, the types of the riverbank failure were discussed, and the variations of the pore water pressure and soil displacement in the process of collapsing were analyzed. Furthermore, based on the parameter indicator established in this study, two chief factors affecting riverbank failure were studied, including the seepage flow and erosion of river flow.

    1. Experimental setup and methodology

    1.1 Experimental setup

    The experiments were conducted in a flume with 2.5 m in length, 1.7 m in width, and 0.65 m in depth. Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of the experiment setup. The bank model was set in the centre of the flume, and it has the dimensions of 1.73 m in length, 0.5 m in depth and 1:2 in surface slope. The open channel was located in front of the bank and the seepage well was behind the bank. The flow from the pump passes through the channel and then gets away the plastic plate at the outlet. The water in the seepage well enters the bank through perforated wall with filter screen, which allows water to pass through but prevents sand from leaking into the well. Cement was used to build the upstream section (with 0.48 m in length) of the bank model in order to prevent the scouring caused by swirling flow. The prototype soil in the Yangtze River was used to build the downstream section (with 1.25 m in length). ?ts gradation curve is plotted in Fig.2 and its performance indicators are listed in Table 1. ?n the table, D is the particle size, dρ is the dry density, Dris the relative density andk is the hydraulic permeability.

    Fig.1 Plan view of the experimental setup

    Fig.2 Gradation curve of bank soil

    Table 1 Performance indicators of bank soil

    Fig.3 Test point locations (unit: m)

    Table 2 Experiment parameters with erosion of river flow

    1.2 Test point locations

    Thirty-five test points were set in the soil bank, among which three are for piezometers, five for displacement sensors and twenty-seven for water pressure sensors. All the sensors were buried in the centre section of the soil bank (0.6 m in length), while the other sections were used for transitioning, considering that the circulatory flow might emerge in the junction of the soil and cement banks. Specially, the displacement sensors were buried in soil with 0.02 m in depth (Fig.3).

    Table 3 Experiment parameters with coupling effect of seepage flow and river flow

    1.3 Parameters and procedures

    The experiments were conducted according to two different current conditions. One is only the river flow acting upon the bank, including 12 cases (Table 2). The other is the coupling effect of seepage flow and river flow, including 24 cases (Table 3). ?n those two tables, E-case is that of erosion of river flow, and C-case is that of coupling effect, in which Hcis the water head in channel, Hwis the water head inseepage well, and Vcis the velocity of river flow.

    The most important preparatory work before the experiments is to form the current conditions pre-designed. A steady flow is first achieved by regulating the tailgate opening at the outlet of the flume and putting the materials near the inlet for energy dissipation, whose velocity should be high enough to start the particles of soil. Then, the seepage flow comes into the bank by regulating the water head differences between the channel and the seepage well.

    Fig.4 Cross section of the broken bank under different current conditions

    After that, the process of the bank failure is recorded by starting the cameras located in side-looking and over-looking angles. At the same time, the variations of the soil pore water pressure and the displacement are monitored by corresponding sensors. The data from the experiments are obtained using a intelligent signal collection device (type ?NV306U) connected to six dynamic resistance strain gauges (type YD-28A), and are processed by the DASP-V10 software every 0.195 s. The velocity of river flow is measured by the propeller type current-meter, and its location is 0.15 m away from the centerline of the banks both upstream and downstream. The piezometric head is measured using a self-developed device, which consists of a multimeter, a probe and a laser transmitter. All the parameter indicators are monitored continuously for 5 min-10 min after the bank failure. And then, the bank is taken photograph and rebuilt for the next experimental case.

    2. Results

    2.1 Failure type

    The experimental results showed that there were obvious differences for the appearance of cross section of the broken bank under the different current conditions (Fig.4). According to the present experiments, the riverbank failure could be classified into flat breaking and curved sliding. The former’s undercutting shows a straight line or a gentle curve from the side view (Figs.4(a) and 4(b)), while the latter’s demonstrates a complete curve from the side view (Figs.4(c) and 4(d)).

    There are two kinds of flat breaks according to their appearances. One is that the failure plane is essentially parallel with the surface of the slope. The undercutting tilted in a small angle and its depth is very little (Fig.4(a)). The other is that the failure plane is unparallel with the surface of the slope. The undercutting is vertically downwards and its depth was obvious (Fig.4(c)).

    2.2 Variation of pore water pressure

    Figure 5 is the variation of the pore water pressure under the two conditions, in which Pwis the pore water pressure. ?t could be seen that there are the obvious differences between only river flow and coupling effect of seepage flow and river flow in the process of failure.

    Under the conditipon of only river flow acted on the bank, take Case 11 as an example, the pore water pressure with time showed that the stability of the pore water pressure was kept from the beginning to the end of the experiment (Fig.5(a)). The phenomenon expressed that there was no seepage force existing in the bank. After the process of failure, there are still no remarkable impacts on the variation of the pore water pressure.

    When the bank was acted by the coupling effect of seepage flow and river flow, take Case 17 as an example, it could be seen that the pore water pressure grows fast in the beginning, then the rate of the growth decreased gradually, and finally it reached a steady state. Moreover, for the test point close to the bank surface, such as Point 5, the growth rate of the pore water pressure was more lower (Fig.5(b)). This results illustrated that a stable seepage filed toward the bank surface was gradually formed inside the bank.

    Fig.5 Variation of pore water pressure with time

    2.3 Variation in displacement

    Figure 6 is the variation of soil displacement with time, in which Dsis the soil displacement of the test point. The four processes of the failure could be observed, i.e., stable, gradual change, sudden change and ladder change.

    The stable curve showed that the soil displacement was kept in the whole process (Fig.6(a)). This phenomenon appeared in all the cases. There may be two reasons. One is no failure in the location of the test point. The other is the sensor buried to exceed the range of the variation.

    The gradual change demonstrated that the soil displacement gradually increased with time before a steady state (Fig.6(b)). ?t may result from the following situations. The river flow velocity acted on the bank is too small to start the movement of the soil, and the coupling effect is not obvious of seepage flow and river flow acted on the bank due to the low head difference.

    Sudden change showed that the soil displacement increased suddenly at one time and then tended to steady immediately (Fig.6(c)). ?t could be explained that, the river flow velocity was large enough and there was the coupling effect of seepage flow and river flow with high head difference.

    Ladder change stated that the soil displacement increased at intervals in the whole process and each increment decreased with time (Fig.6(d)). After previous part of soil fell down due to the coupling effect, the bank was in the state of unstable equilibrium. The soil in the failure surface continued to slide under the effect of the seepage flow. With the development of the failure along the slope, the velocity of the sliding became slow until the soil was washed away completely.

    Fig.6 Variation of the soil displacement with time

    3. Discussions

    Zhang et al.[16]categorized riverbank collapses as shallow failure, plane failure, rotational failure or compound failure according to their modes of failure, and as erosion collapse, crash collapse, slide collapse or flow slide according to the collapse formation conditions. The present experimental results demonstrate that the failure type is related to the current conditions. ?n contrast to their study, it could be found that, the flat breaking occurs when only river flow acts on the bank. Moreover, the failure is similar to shallow failure or erosion collapse if the velocity of river flow is lower. The failure takes place similar to plane failure or crash collapse at high velocity. And the failure is similar to rotational failure or slide collapse under the coupling effect on the bank.

    Zhang et al.[15]divided the process of the pore water pressure into three stages: seepage-formation, failure and seepage-stabilization. The present workshowed that, sometimes the bank failure takes place at the formation of the stable seepage flow and there is no a sharp division between the first two stages (Fig.7). This difference might be related to the test design, that is, the locations of the test points.

    Fig.7 Variations of pore water pressure and the soil displacement in Case 17

    Previous researches[2,15,17]indicated that the river flow and seepage flow were the main influencing factors leading to the bank failure. ?n order to investigate the influences of the two factors quantitatively, the parameter indicator expressing the failure process was established. The ratio of soil displacement to the duration of the failure is defined as the Failure ?ntensity (FI), which reflects the rate of failure to different failure extent.

    Fig.8 Curve of failure intensity-velocity of river flow

    Table 4 Detail information of four series

    At only river flow on the bank, the failure usually takes place as long as the flow velocity is greater than the starting velocity of soil particles. Those values are at a range of 0.2284 m/s-0.2697 m/s. The soil falls down evenly and the bank line recedes gradually. Moreover, the velocity has significant effects on the extent of the bank failure. Figure 8 is the relationship between failure intensity and the velocity of river flow, and the detail information is listed in Table 4. The results indicate that the failure intensity appears exponent relation to the velocity of river flow.

    Where the influence of seepage was concerned, the development process of failure displays the several longitudinal cracks on some parts of the bank surface, then breaking of small-scale, and finally sliding of large-scale. The shearing strength of soil decreases when the pore water pressure increases, and the failure occurs in some parts of the soil owing to intrinsic heterogeneity of soil. ?n addition, the occurrence of bank failure is more vulnerable to the coupling effect of seepage flow and river flow. The larger the hydraulic gradient is, the earlier the failure takes place, and the wider its range is in the same time under the same velocity of river flow but various osmotic pressures. Furthmore, the strength of the seepage flow has an obvious impact on the extent of the bank failure. The relationship between the failure intensity and the hydraulic gradient shows that the failure intensity increases with hydraulic gradient (J). ?t is possible that the seepage flow has effects on the bank failure based on the critical hydraulic gradient (Fig.9). At J< 0.1, the growth is comparatively slow, and the influence of seepage flow could be neglected on the bank failure. After J>0.1, F? raised rapidly, indicating relatively great influence of the seepage flow on it.

    Fig.9 Curve of failure intensity-hydraulic gradient

    Fig.10 Amplitude of failure intensity under the changes of the influencing factors

    The sensitivity analysis was conducted in order to understand the influences of the factors on the coupling effect. Figure 10 is the relationship between the amplitude of failure intensity and the different changes of the influencing factors, in which ΔFI is the amplitude of failure intensity, ΔVcis the change of velocity of river flow, and ΔJ is the change of hydraulic gradient. ?t could be shown that the curve of Δ Vcis more steeper than the curve of ΔJ, i.e., theriver flow has more obvious effects than the seepage flow

    4. Conclusion

    ?n this study, a generalized physical model of the riverbank was established to study the coupling effect of seepage flow and river flow on the bank failure. ?t is necessary to consider the coupling effect on the bank failure due to the influences of the coupling effect on the bank failure in three aspects: the failure type, the process and the extent. Under the condition of only river flow acting on the bank, the failure type is flat breaking, and the soil falls down evenly and the bank line recedes gradually. The F? has exponent relation to the velocity of river flow (Vc). When the coupling effect of seepage flow and river flow are acted on the bank, the failure type is the curved sliding, and there are the several longitudinal cracks on some parts of the bank surface, then breaking of small-scale, and finally sliding of large-scale. Also, the occurrence of bank failure is vulnerable to the coupling effect of the seepage flow and river flow. The strength of the seepage flow has an obvious impact on the extent of the bank failure. The river flow plays more important role than the seepage flow in the coupling effect.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by the Nanjing Hydraulic Research ?nstitute Science Fund Program (Grant No. Y110001).

    [1] THORNE C. R. Processes and mechanisms of river bank erosion[C]. Gravel-Bed River, Fluvial Processes, Engineering and Management. Gregynog, UK, 1982, 227-271.

    [2] OSMAN A. M., THORNE C. R. Riverbank stability analysis ?: Theory[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1988, 114(2): 134-150.

    [3] ZHANG Xiao-yue, ZHU Yue-ming and FANG Chunhui. The role fore air flow in soil slope stability analysis[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2009, 21(5): 640-646.

    [4] CHR?ST?AN H. A., MOSHER D. C. and MULDER T. et al. Geomorphology and potential slope in stability on the Fraser River delta foreslope, Vancouver, British Columbia[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1997, 34(3): 432-446.

    [5] R?NALD? M., CASAGL? N. and DAPPORTO S. et al. Monitoring and modeling of pore water pressure changes and riverbank stability during flow events[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2004, 29(2): 237-254.

    [6] FOX G. A., CHU-AGOR M. L. and W?LSON G. V. Seepage EROS?ON: A significant mechanism of stream bank failure[C]. Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) World Environmental and Water Resources Congress. Tampa, USA, 2007.

    [7] CHU-AGOR M. L., FOX G. A. and CANC?ENNE R. M. et al. Seepage caused tension failures and erosion undercutting of hillslopes[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2008, 359(3-4): 247-259.

    [8] X?A Jun-qiang, WANG Guang-qian and ZHANG Hongwu. Numerical simulation of the flood routing and bed deformation processes in the wandering reach of the lower Yellow River[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. A, 2003, 18(3): 306-313(in Chinese).

    [9] WANG Ping-yi, WEN Cen. Experimental study on migration process in alluvial curved rivers[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. A, 2001, 16(3): 312-318(in Chinese).

    [10] DA? Wen-hong, TANG Hong-wu. A mathematical model of migration and expansion of mander loopss[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2010, 22(2): 214-220.

    [11] YAN Jun, CAO Zhi-xian and L?U Huai-han et al. Experimental study of landslide dam-break flood over erodible bed in open channels[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2009, 21(1): 124-130.

    [12] ZHANG Wei, L?U Huai-han and QU Ling-feng et al. Analysis on stability of rock-fill dykes in a mountain river[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2004, 16(6): 665-668.

    [13] HU Zhi-gen, FAN Xi-e and HUA? Wen-xin et al. Coupling effect between reliability of bedding layer and stability of downstream concrete slab of overflow earthrock cofferdam[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 2007, 19(5): 613-622.

    [14] X?E Li-quan, L?U Shu-guang. Mechanism analysis of interactions between seepage and tangential flow[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2010, 38(7): 982-985, 1022(in Chinese).

    [15] ZHANG Xing-nong, Y?NG Qiang and CHEN Changying. Generalized model study on mechanism of riverbank failure[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2009, 40(3): 263-267(in Chinese).

    [16] ZHANG Xing-nong, Y?NG Qiang and CHEN Changying. Forecast and prevention measurement on some kinds of bank collapses in the middle-lower reach of the Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2007, (s1): 246-250(in Chinese).

    [17] ZHANG Fang-zhi, CHEN Xiao-ping. Study of river scour effect on seepage flow and deformation and stability of embankments[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(2): 441-447(in Chinese).

    * Project supported by the Chinese Key Technology R and D Program of the Eleventh Five-year Plan (Grant No. 2008BAB29B04), the Non-Profit ?ndustry Financial Program of Ministry of Water Resources (Grant Nos. 200801030, S111001).

    Biography: N?NG Bo (1983-), Male, Ph. D. Candidate

    WU Shi-qiang, E-mail: sqwu@nhri.cn

    国产高清videossex| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 成人国产av品久久久| 黄片小视频在线播放| 日本a在线网址| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产视频首页在线观看| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 美女午夜性视频免费| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 日本色播在线视频| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 成人手机av| 大码成人一级视频| 电影成人av| 99热全是精品| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 午夜两性在线视频| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 性色av一级| 亚洲伊人色综图| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站 | 熟女av电影| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 波野结衣二区三区在线| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 999精品在线视频| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 久久狼人影院| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| a级毛片黄视频| 国产在线观看jvid| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 考比视频在线观看| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 两个人看的免费小视频| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 国产三级黄色录像| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 亚洲第一青青草原| 日本色播在线视频| netflix在线观看网站| av天堂在线播放| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 成人国语在线视频| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 色网站视频免费| 桃花免费在线播放| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 免费在线观看影片大全网站 | 久久久精品94久久精品| 在线观看www视频免费| 成年动漫av网址| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产av精品麻豆| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 国产精品.久久久| 色网站视频免费| 香蕉丝袜av| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 视频区图区小说| 桃花免费在线播放| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 日日夜夜操网爽| 美国免费a级毛片| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 蜜桃在线观看..| 深夜精品福利| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| tube8黄色片| 成年av动漫网址| 国产成人系列免费观看| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 精品国产国语对白av| av国产精品久久久久影院| av网站在线播放免费| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 精品一区二区三卡| 蜜桃在线观看..| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲av美国av| 在线观看人妻少妇| 丁香六月天网| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 香蕉丝袜av| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 亚洲精品第二区| 国产在视频线精品| 两个人看的免费小视频| 久久久久久久精品精品| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 观看av在线不卡| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 精品久久久精品久久久| 丁香六月欧美| 一级毛片 在线播放| 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲国产av新网站| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| kizo精华| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 久久久久久久国产电影| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产精品免费视频内射| 美女午夜性视频免费| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 久久久久久久精品精品| 欧美日韩av久久| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 国产成人精品在线电影| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产1区2区3区精品| 自线自在国产av| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产成人系列免费观看| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三 | 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 成年动漫av网址| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 搡老乐熟女国产| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| tube8黄色片| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 操美女的视频在线观看| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 日本91视频免费播放| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 国产成人精品在线电影| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 一本久久精品| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 宅男免费午夜| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 久久久精品区二区三区| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 成人免费观看视频高清| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 蜜桃在线观看..| 日本av免费视频播放| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 亚洲成色77777| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 亚洲精品一二三| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 精品人妻1区二区| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索 | 天天添夜夜摸| 777米奇影视久久| 日韩一区二区三区影片| www.999成人在线观看| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| svipshipincom国产片| 老司机靠b影院| 国产精品二区激情视频| 制服诱惑二区| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 亚洲精品在线美女| 岛国毛片在线播放| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 精品一区在线观看国产| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密 | 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 精品久久久精品久久久| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 国产1区2区3区精品| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 人人澡人人妻人| 美女午夜性视频免费| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 五月开心婷婷网| 在线观看国产h片| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 一区二区av电影网| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 一区二区三区精品91| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 久久久久视频综合| av在线app专区| 一区在线观看完整版| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 国产又爽黄色视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 日本欧美视频一区| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产一级毛片在线| 中文欧美无线码| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看 | 男人操女人黄网站| 婷婷成人精品国产| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 99久久综合免费| 九草在线视频观看| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 免费少妇av软件| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 亚洲 国产 在线| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 99国产精品99久久久久| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| xxx大片免费视频| 日本91视频免费播放| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 香蕉国产在线看| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 久久久久网色| 国产精品 国内视频| 手机成人av网站| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 9色porny在线观看| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 一级毛片女人18水好多 | 一级毛片我不卡| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 色播在线永久视频| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 婷婷色综合www| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 99九九在线精品视频| 色网站视频免费| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 一本综合久久免费| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 一级片'在线观看视频| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 国产精品二区激情视频| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 一级毛片我不卡| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 日韩伦理黄色片| 91字幕亚洲| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 国产男女内射视频| 亚洲国产精品999| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 午夜av观看不卡| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 男女国产视频网站| 深夜精品福利| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 操出白浆在线播放| tube8黄色片| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 视频区图区小说| videos熟女内射| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 制服人妻中文乱码| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 一级毛片我不卡| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 丝袜美足系列| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 97在线人人人人妻| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 午夜福利,免费看| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 久久精品成人免费网站| 18禁观看日本| 91麻豆av在线| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 99国产精品99久久久久| 满18在线观看网站| 亚洲精品在线美女| 免费不卡黄色视频| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 满18在线观看网站| 在线观看www视频免费| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 在线观看人妻少妇| 国产高清videossex| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 午夜激情av网站| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 黄色视频不卡| 高清欧美精品videossex| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 自线自在国产av| 成人三级做爰电影| 国产精品二区激情视频| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 久久精品成人免费网站| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 久久久国产一区二区| 亚洲av美国av| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 999精品在线视频| 桃花免费在线播放| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 黄片播放在线免费| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 国产高清视频在线播放一区 | 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 国产精品成人在线| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 色网站视频免费| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 国产成人av教育| 精品一区二区三卡| 91老司机精品| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 欧美黑人精品巨大| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 满18在线观看网站| 午夜视频精品福利| 一级片'在线观看视频| 捣出白浆h1v1| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 欧美在线黄色| 久久青草综合色| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 在现免费观看毛片| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 久久久久久久精品精品| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 中文字幕色久视频| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 天堂8中文在线网| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 脱女人内裤的视频| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 久久久久久久国产电影| 欧美另类一区| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 少妇 在线观看| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 中文字幕色久视频| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 欧美日韩av久久| 精品国产一区二区久久| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三 | 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 亚洲av美国av| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三 | 一级黄片播放器| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 视频区图区小说| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 精品人妻1区二区| 91老司机精品| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 日本五十路高清| 人人澡人人妻人| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| www.自偷自拍.com| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 91字幕亚洲| 久久影院123| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 好男人电影高清在线观看| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 国产精品免费大片| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 黄色 视频免费看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 美女午夜性视频免费| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 最黄视频免费看| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 高清欧美精品videossex| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲国产精品999| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 九草在线视频观看| 午夜两性在线视频| 一级片'在线观看视频|