• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    COUPLING EFFECT OF SEEPAGE FLOW AND RIVER FLOW ON THE BANK FAILURE*

    2011-05-08 05:55:24NGBo

    N?NG Bo

    College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China Nanjing Hydraulic Research ?nstitute, Nanjing 210029, China, E-mail: ningbo.lc@163.com

    WU Shi-qiang, TAN Ye-fei, X?E Xing-hua, YAN Jun

    Nanjing Hydraulic Research ?nstitute, Nanjing 210029, China

    YAN Zhong-min

    College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China GENG Yan-qiong

    Lian Yungang Technical College, Lian Yungang 222000, China

    COUPLING EFFECT OF SEEPAGE FLOW AND RIVER FLOW ON THE BANK FAILURE*

    N?NG Bo

    College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China Nanjing Hydraulic Research ?nstitute, Nanjing 210029, China, E-mail: ningbo.lc@163.com

    WU Shi-qiang, TAN Ye-fei, X?E Xing-hua, YAN Jun

    Nanjing Hydraulic Research ?nstitute, Nanjing 210029, China

    YAN Zhong-min

    College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China GENG Yan-qiong

    Lian Yungang Technical College, Lian Yungang 222000, China

    (Received May 9, 2011, Revised June 1, 2011)

    On the basis of the generalized physical model of the riverbank, the experiments were conducted to study the mechanisms of riverbank failure under the coupling effect of seepage flow and river flow. The experimental setup was specially designed, as well as test point location, parameters and procedures, and the main influencing factors were analyzed affecting riverbank failure based on the failure types, the variations of pore water pressure and soil displacement. The results indicated that the coupling effect has different influences on the bank failure in three aspects: the failure type, the process and the extent. ?n addition, the river flow played a more important role than the seepage flow in the coupling effect on the bank failure.

    bank failure, seepage flow, river flow, physical model test

    DO?: 10.1016/S1001-6058(10)60183-7

    Introduction

    Riverbank failure is a kind of natural disasters with great harmfulness. ?t causes the loss of beach and seriously threatens the safety of dikes, or directly leads to the floods for dike breaking. The riverbank failure exists in almost all the rivers in the world, such as the Mississippi River, the Rhine River and the middle-lower reaches of the Yangtze River. There are two factors of soil and water flow in the riverbank failure, which are related not only to the nature of soil and the seepage inside it, but also to the lateral erosion of water flow. So far, the mechanisms of riverbank failure have been investigated from the point of view of soil mechanics, river dynamics, or combination of them.

    There are three major theoretical statements based on soil mechanics. The first is that the bank failure is an expressive form of slope instability, which can be analyzed by the theory of slope stability. Thorne[1]developed slope-stability models to predict occurrence of failure earliest. He defined a Factor of Safety (FS) equal to the ratio of resisting to driving forces acting on the incipient failure block in their models. Osman and Thorne[2]adopted a new approach to predict bank stability response to lateral erosion or bed degradation. ?t represents an improvement over earlier work, which does not account for changes in bank geometry due to lateral erosion prior to mass failure. Zhang et al.[3]calculated anti-sliding safety coefficients of the slope from the results obtained by the two-phase flow simulation, and then analyzed the effect of the pore air pressure on the slope stability. The second is that the flow slide can lead to the bank failure. Christian et al.[4]thought that cyclic liquefa-ction during a large earthquake potentially causes the deformations, including lateral spreading, cyclic softening, and possibly flow sliding when investigating the western margin of the Fraser River delta in Canada. The third is that the seepage causes the bank failure. Rinaldi et al.[5]concluded that the soil pore-water pressure and the disappearance of apparent cohesion were sufficient conditions to trigger a mass failure in the riverbank after monitoring the pore water pressure changes during the flow in the Sieve River in ?taly. Fox et al.[6]quantified the impact of seepage undercutting on riverbank stability based upon measurements from two deeply incised streams in northern Mississippi: Little Topashaw Creek and Goodwin Creek. Chu-Agor et al.[7]investigated the underlying mechanisms of instability in laboratory studies by considering multiple seepage factors simultaneously.

    On the other hand, some researchers focused on the impacts of river dynamics on the riverbank stability. They thought that the lateral erosion of water flow was an important factor in the bank failure, which could be analyzed by the theory of fluvial processes. Xia et al.[8]simulated the flood routing and bed deformation processes of the Lower Yellow River by means of coupling two sub-models (2-D flow-sediment and riverbank-erosion). Wang and Wen[9]investigated the migration process in alluvial curved rivers with the methods of flume experiment. Dai and Tang[10]presented a mathematical model of the plane evolution of alluvial meandering streams, through downstream migration and lateral expansion of meander loops. Yan et al.[11]presented an extended experimental work over erodible bed to understand the process of the landslide dam failure, and suggested that the experimental data could be used to test mathematical river models.

    Though a lot of researches were conducted, our knowledge of the bank failure remains limited due to a single angle. The interdisciplinary approach, therefore, was adopted by more and more scholars. Zhang et al.[12]investigated the stability of rock-fill dykes from the relationship between the rock size on cover layer and the incipient velocity of flow in the mountain river. He concluded that it was inappropriate to improve the stability by simply increasing the rock weight. Hu et al.[13]investigated the characteristics of the overflow and seepage over the concrete slab, and then he put forward the model applied in the structural design of the downstream protection slope for overflow earth-rock cofferdam. Xie and Liu[14]investigated the interactions between the seepage and tangential flow based on experimental results and simulations with software Fluent. Also, Zhang et al.[15]performed physical model test with large scale to study the mechanisms of the bank failure.

    ?n this study, a generalized physical model of the riverbank was established by considering the coupling effect of the seepage flow and river flow on the bank on the basis of soil mechanics and river dynamics. Utilizing the model, the types of the riverbank failure were discussed, and the variations of the pore water pressure and soil displacement in the process of collapsing were analyzed. Furthermore, based on the parameter indicator established in this study, two chief factors affecting riverbank failure were studied, including the seepage flow and erosion of river flow.

    1. Experimental setup and methodology

    1.1 Experimental setup

    The experiments were conducted in a flume with 2.5 m in length, 1.7 m in width, and 0.65 m in depth. Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of the experiment setup. The bank model was set in the centre of the flume, and it has the dimensions of 1.73 m in length, 0.5 m in depth and 1:2 in surface slope. The open channel was located in front of the bank and the seepage well was behind the bank. The flow from the pump passes through the channel and then gets away the plastic plate at the outlet. The water in the seepage well enters the bank through perforated wall with filter screen, which allows water to pass through but prevents sand from leaking into the well. Cement was used to build the upstream section (with 0.48 m in length) of the bank model in order to prevent the scouring caused by swirling flow. The prototype soil in the Yangtze River was used to build the downstream section (with 1.25 m in length). ?ts gradation curve is plotted in Fig.2 and its performance indicators are listed in Table 1. ?n the table, D is the particle size, dρ is the dry density, Dris the relative density andk is the hydraulic permeability.

    Fig.1 Plan view of the experimental setup

    Fig.2 Gradation curve of bank soil

    Table 1 Performance indicators of bank soil

    Fig.3 Test point locations (unit: m)

    Table 2 Experiment parameters with erosion of river flow

    1.2 Test point locations

    Thirty-five test points were set in the soil bank, among which three are for piezometers, five for displacement sensors and twenty-seven for water pressure sensors. All the sensors were buried in the centre section of the soil bank (0.6 m in length), while the other sections were used for transitioning, considering that the circulatory flow might emerge in the junction of the soil and cement banks. Specially, the displacement sensors were buried in soil with 0.02 m in depth (Fig.3).

    Table 3 Experiment parameters with coupling effect of seepage flow and river flow

    1.3 Parameters and procedures

    The experiments were conducted according to two different current conditions. One is only the river flow acting upon the bank, including 12 cases (Table 2). The other is the coupling effect of seepage flow and river flow, including 24 cases (Table 3). ?n those two tables, E-case is that of erosion of river flow, and C-case is that of coupling effect, in which Hcis the water head in channel, Hwis the water head inseepage well, and Vcis the velocity of river flow.

    The most important preparatory work before the experiments is to form the current conditions pre-designed. A steady flow is first achieved by regulating the tailgate opening at the outlet of the flume and putting the materials near the inlet for energy dissipation, whose velocity should be high enough to start the particles of soil. Then, the seepage flow comes into the bank by regulating the water head differences between the channel and the seepage well.

    Fig.4 Cross section of the broken bank under different current conditions

    After that, the process of the bank failure is recorded by starting the cameras located in side-looking and over-looking angles. At the same time, the variations of the soil pore water pressure and the displacement are monitored by corresponding sensors. The data from the experiments are obtained using a intelligent signal collection device (type ?NV306U) connected to six dynamic resistance strain gauges (type YD-28A), and are processed by the DASP-V10 software every 0.195 s. The velocity of river flow is measured by the propeller type current-meter, and its location is 0.15 m away from the centerline of the banks both upstream and downstream. The piezometric head is measured using a self-developed device, which consists of a multimeter, a probe and a laser transmitter. All the parameter indicators are monitored continuously for 5 min-10 min after the bank failure. And then, the bank is taken photograph and rebuilt for the next experimental case.

    2. Results

    2.1 Failure type

    The experimental results showed that there were obvious differences for the appearance of cross section of the broken bank under the different current conditions (Fig.4). According to the present experiments, the riverbank failure could be classified into flat breaking and curved sliding. The former’s undercutting shows a straight line or a gentle curve from the side view (Figs.4(a) and 4(b)), while the latter’s demonstrates a complete curve from the side view (Figs.4(c) and 4(d)).

    There are two kinds of flat breaks according to their appearances. One is that the failure plane is essentially parallel with the surface of the slope. The undercutting tilted in a small angle and its depth is very little (Fig.4(a)). The other is that the failure plane is unparallel with the surface of the slope. The undercutting is vertically downwards and its depth was obvious (Fig.4(c)).

    2.2 Variation of pore water pressure

    Figure 5 is the variation of the pore water pressure under the two conditions, in which Pwis the pore water pressure. ?t could be seen that there are the obvious differences between only river flow and coupling effect of seepage flow and river flow in the process of failure.

    Under the conditipon of only river flow acted on the bank, take Case 11 as an example, the pore water pressure with time showed that the stability of the pore water pressure was kept from the beginning to the end of the experiment (Fig.5(a)). The phenomenon expressed that there was no seepage force existing in the bank. After the process of failure, there are still no remarkable impacts on the variation of the pore water pressure.

    When the bank was acted by the coupling effect of seepage flow and river flow, take Case 17 as an example, it could be seen that the pore water pressure grows fast in the beginning, then the rate of the growth decreased gradually, and finally it reached a steady state. Moreover, for the test point close to the bank surface, such as Point 5, the growth rate of the pore water pressure was more lower (Fig.5(b)). This results illustrated that a stable seepage filed toward the bank surface was gradually formed inside the bank.

    Fig.5 Variation of pore water pressure with time

    2.3 Variation in displacement

    Figure 6 is the variation of soil displacement with time, in which Dsis the soil displacement of the test point. The four processes of the failure could be observed, i.e., stable, gradual change, sudden change and ladder change.

    The stable curve showed that the soil displacement was kept in the whole process (Fig.6(a)). This phenomenon appeared in all the cases. There may be two reasons. One is no failure in the location of the test point. The other is the sensor buried to exceed the range of the variation.

    The gradual change demonstrated that the soil displacement gradually increased with time before a steady state (Fig.6(b)). ?t may result from the following situations. The river flow velocity acted on the bank is too small to start the movement of the soil, and the coupling effect is not obvious of seepage flow and river flow acted on the bank due to the low head difference.

    Sudden change showed that the soil displacement increased suddenly at one time and then tended to steady immediately (Fig.6(c)). ?t could be explained that, the river flow velocity was large enough and there was the coupling effect of seepage flow and river flow with high head difference.

    Ladder change stated that the soil displacement increased at intervals in the whole process and each increment decreased with time (Fig.6(d)). After previous part of soil fell down due to the coupling effect, the bank was in the state of unstable equilibrium. The soil in the failure surface continued to slide under the effect of the seepage flow. With the development of the failure along the slope, the velocity of the sliding became slow until the soil was washed away completely.

    Fig.6 Variation of the soil displacement with time

    3. Discussions

    Zhang et al.[16]categorized riverbank collapses as shallow failure, plane failure, rotational failure or compound failure according to their modes of failure, and as erosion collapse, crash collapse, slide collapse or flow slide according to the collapse formation conditions. The present experimental results demonstrate that the failure type is related to the current conditions. ?n contrast to their study, it could be found that, the flat breaking occurs when only river flow acts on the bank. Moreover, the failure is similar to shallow failure or erosion collapse if the velocity of river flow is lower. The failure takes place similar to plane failure or crash collapse at high velocity. And the failure is similar to rotational failure or slide collapse under the coupling effect on the bank.

    Zhang et al.[15]divided the process of the pore water pressure into three stages: seepage-formation, failure and seepage-stabilization. The present workshowed that, sometimes the bank failure takes place at the formation of the stable seepage flow and there is no a sharp division between the first two stages (Fig.7). This difference might be related to the test design, that is, the locations of the test points.

    Fig.7 Variations of pore water pressure and the soil displacement in Case 17

    Previous researches[2,15,17]indicated that the river flow and seepage flow were the main influencing factors leading to the bank failure. ?n order to investigate the influences of the two factors quantitatively, the parameter indicator expressing the failure process was established. The ratio of soil displacement to the duration of the failure is defined as the Failure ?ntensity (FI), which reflects the rate of failure to different failure extent.

    Fig.8 Curve of failure intensity-velocity of river flow

    Table 4 Detail information of four series

    At only river flow on the bank, the failure usually takes place as long as the flow velocity is greater than the starting velocity of soil particles. Those values are at a range of 0.2284 m/s-0.2697 m/s. The soil falls down evenly and the bank line recedes gradually. Moreover, the velocity has significant effects on the extent of the bank failure. Figure 8 is the relationship between failure intensity and the velocity of river flow, and the detail information is listed in Table 4. The results indicate that the failure intensity appears exponent relation to the velocity of river flow.

    Where the influence of seepage was concerned, the development process of failure displays the several longitudinal cracks on some parts of the bank surface, then breaking of small-scale, and finally sliding of large-scale. The shearing strength of soil decreases when the pore water pressure increases, and the failure occurs in some parts of the soil owing to intrinsic heterogeneity of soil. ?n addition, the occurrence of bank failure is more vulnerable to the coupling effect of seepage flow and river flow. The larger the hydraulic gradient is, the earlier the failure takes place, and the wider its range is in the same time under the same velocity of river flow but various osmotic pressures. Furthmore, the strength of the seepage flow has an obvious impact on the extent of the bank failure. The relationship between the failure intensity and the hydraulic gradient shows that the failure intensity increases with hydraulic gradient (J). ?t is possible that the seepage flow has effects on the bank failure based on the critical hydraulic gradient (Fig.9). At J< 0.1, the growth is comparatively slow, and the influence of seepage flow could be neglected on the bank failure. After J>0.1, F? raised rapidly, indicating relatively great influence of the seepage flow on it.

    Fig.9 Curve of failure intensity-hydraulic gradient

    Fig.10 Amplitude of failure intensity under the changes of the influencing factors

    The sensitivity analysis was conducted in order to understand the influences of the factors on the coupling effect. Figure 10 is the relationship between the amplitude of failure intensity and the different changes of the influencing factors, in which ΔFI is the amplitude of failure intensity, ΔVcis the change of velocity of river flow, and ΔJ is the change of hydraulic gradient. ?t could be shown that the curve of Δ Vcis more steeper than the curve of ΔJ, i.e., theriver flow has more obvious effects than the seepage flow

    4. Conclusion

    ?n this study, a generalized physical model of the riverbank was established to study the coupling effect of seepage flow and river flow on the bank failure. ?t is necessary to consider the coupling effect on the bank failure due to the influences of the coupling effect on the bank failure in three aspects: the failure type, the process and the extent. Under the condition of only river flow acting on the bank, the failure type is flat breaking, and the soil falls down evenly and the bank line recedes gradually. The F? has exponent relation to the velocity of river flow (Vc). When the coupling effect of seepage flow and river flow are acted on the bank, the failure type is the curved sliding, and there are the several longitudinal cracks on some parts of the bank surface, then breaking of small-scale, and finally sliding of large-scale. Also, the occurrence of bank failure is vulnerable to the coupling effect of the seepage flow and river flow. The strength of the seepage flow has an obvious impact on the extent of the bank failure. The river flow plays more important role than the seepage flow in the coupling effect.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by the Nanjing Hydraulic Research ?nstitute Science Fund Program (Grant No. Y110001).

    [1] THORNE C. R. Processes and mechanisms of river bank erosion[C]. Gravel-Bed River, Fluvial Processes, Engineering and Management. Gregynog, UK, 1982, 227-271.

    [2] OSMAN A. M., THORNE C. R. Riverbank stability analysis ?: Theory[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1988, 114(2): 134-150.

    [3] ZHANG Xiao-yue, ZHU Yue-ming and FANG Chunhui. The role fore air flow in soil slope stability analysis[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2009, 21(5): 640-646.

    [4] CHR?ST?AN H. A., MOSHER D. C. and MULDER T. et al. Geomorphology and potential slope in stability on the Fraser River delta foreslope, Vancouver, British Columbia[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1997, 34(3): 432-446.

    [5] R?NALD? M., CASAGL? N. and DAPPORTO S. et al. Monitoring and modeling of pore water pressure changes and riverbank stability during flow events[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2004, 29(2): 237-254.

    [6] FOX G. A., CHU-AGOR M. L. and W?LSON G. V. Seepage EROS?ON: A significant mechanism of stream bank failure[C]. Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) World Environmental and Water Resources Congress. Tampa, USA, 2007.

    [7] CHU-AGOR M. L., FOX G. A. and CANC?ENNE R. M. et al. Seepage caused tension failures and erosion undercutting of hillslopes[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2008, 359(3-4): 247-259.

    [8] X?A Jun-qiang, WANG Guang-qian and ZHANG Hongwu. Numerical simulation of the flood routing and bed deformation processes in the wandering reach of the lower Yellow River[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. A, 2003, 18(3): 306-313(in Chinese).

    [9] WANG Ping-yi, WEN Cen. Experimental study on migration process in alluvial curved rivers[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. A, 2001, 16(3): 312-318(in Chinese).

    [10] DA? Wen-hong, TANG Hong-wu. A mathematical model of migration and expansion of mander loopss[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2010, 22(2): 214-220.

    [11] YAN Jun, CAO Zhi-xian and L?U Huai-han et al. Experimental study of landslide dam-break flood over erodible bed in open channels[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2009, 21(1): 124-130.

    [12] ZHANG Wei, L?U Huai-han and QU Ling-feng et al. Analysis on stability of rock-fill dykes in a mountain river[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2004, 16(6): 665-668.

    [13] HU Zhi-gen, FAN Xi-e and HUA? Wen-xin et al. Coupling effect between reliability of bedding layer and stability of downstream concrete slab of overflow earthrock cofferdam[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 2007, 19(5): 613-622.

    [14] X?E Li-quan, L?U Shu-guang. Mechanism analysis of interactions between seepage and tangential flow[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2010, 38(7): 982-985, 1022(in Chinese).

    [15] ZHANG Xing-nong, Y?NG Qiang and CHEN Changying. Generalized model study on mechanism of riverbank failure[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2009, 40(3): 263-267(in Chinese).

    [16] ZHANG Xing-nong, Y?NG Qiang and CHEN Changying. Forecast and prevention measurement on some kinds of bank collapses in the middle-lower reach of the Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2007, (s1): 246-250(in Chinese).

    [17] ZHANG Fang-zhi, CHEN Xiao-ping. Study of river scour effect on seepage flow and deformation and stability of embankments[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(2): 441-447(in Chinese).

    * Project supported by the Chinese Key Technology R and D Program of the Eleventh Five-year Plan (Grant No. 2008BAB29B04), the Non-Profit ?ndustry Financial Program of Ministry of Water Resources (Grant Nos. 200801030, S111001).

    Biography: N?NG Bo (1983-), Male, Ph. D. Candidate

    WU Shi-qiang, E-mail: sqwu@nhri.cn

    男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 国产淫语在线视频| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 美女主播在线视频| 久久影院123| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 91字幕亚洲| 日本欧美视频一区| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 国产高清videossex| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 一个人免费看片子| 国产av精品麻豆| 女警被强在线播放| av在线播放精品| 在线观看www视频免费| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 超碰成人久久| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 亚洲图色成人| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 日韩电影二区| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 飞空精品影院首页| 国产成人一区二区在线| 青草久久国产| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 国产激情久久老熟女| 美国免费a级毛片| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 在线观看www视频免费| 久久人人爽人人片av| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 99久久综合免费| 成人影院久久| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 黄频高清免费视频| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 乱人伦中国视频| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 国产成人影院久久av| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 五月开心婷婷网| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 一级毛片我不卡| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 大香蕉久久成人网| 中国国产av一级| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 9热在线视频观看99| 国产又爽黄色视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 蜜桃在线观看..| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 午夜久久久在线观看| 久久久久网色| 久热这里只有精品99| 国产成人精品无人区| 大码成人一级视频| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 天天影视国产精品| av网站免费在线观看视频| 久久久久视频综合| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 色播在线永久视频| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 亚洲九九香蕉| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 欧美日韩精品网址| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产成人影院久久av| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 日韩视频在线欧美| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 国产精品一国产av| av在线播放精品| 自线自在国产av| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 国产成人影院久久av| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 亚洲图色成人| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 一级黄色大片毛片| 在线天堂中文资源库| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产欧美亚洲国产| av片东京热男人的天堂| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡 | 99国产综合亚洲精品| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 操出白浆在线播放| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 制服诱惑二区| 一级毛片我不卡| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 精品一区二区三卡| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 青草久久国产| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 欧美日韩av久久| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 悠悠久久av| 国产一级毛片在线| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 赤兔流量卡办理| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 国产免费现黄频在线看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产三级黄色录像| 一级毛片 在线播放| 五月天丁香电影| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久这里只有精品19| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| videos熟女内射| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 欧美人与善性xxx| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 丝袜美足系列| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| av一本久久久久| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 国产精品免费视频内射| 老司机靠b影院| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 免费观看av网站的网址| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 国产麻豆69| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 岛国毛片在线播放| 日本av免费视频播放| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 飞空精品影院首页| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 久久中文字幕一级| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| a级毛片黄视频| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 丁香六月欧美| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 国产成人系列免费观看| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| h视频一区二区三区| 国产成人av教育| 一级黄片播放器| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 亚洲国产看品久久| bbb黄色大片| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 日日夜夜操网爽| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 视频区图区小说| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片 | 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 老司机影院毛片| 91老司机精品| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 亚洲九九香蕉| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 91麻豆av在线| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 男女之事视频高清在线观看 | a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 成人国语在线视频| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 无限看片的www在线观看| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 久热这里只有精品99| 亚洲伊人色综图| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| av有码第一页| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 美女午夜性视频免费| 男人操女人黄网站| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 美女午夜性视频免费| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 免费看十八禁软件| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 制服人妻中文乱码| 欧美成人午夜精品| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 国产色视频综合| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 咕卡用的链子| avwww免费| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 9色porny在线观看| 一区福利在线观看| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 丝袜脚勾引网站| www.av在线官网国产| 成人三级做爰电影| 另类精品久久| 深夜精品福利| 日韩大片免费观看网站| a级毛片黄视频| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 久久久久久久精品精品| 免费少妇av软件| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| av电影中文网址| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 美女主播在线视频| 国产在视频线精品| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 乱人伦中国视频| 久9热在线精品视频| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 久久九九热精品免费| 五月天丁香电影| 黄色视频不卡| 一级毛片 在线播放| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 精品一区在线观看国产| 午夜影院在线不卡| 电影成人av| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 美女中出高潮动态图| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 国产三级黄色录像| 久久这里只有精品19| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 国产在线观看jvid| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片 | 国产一级毛片在线| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲伊人色综图| bbb黄色大片| xxx大片免费视频| 91国产中文字幕| 尾随美女入室| 男女边摸边吃奶| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 日本欧美视频一区| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| av线在线观看网站| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 满18在线观看网站| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 手机成人av网站| 久久久久久人人人人人| tube8黄色片| www.av在线官网国产| 久久精品成人免费网站| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 性色av一级| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 欧美日韩黄片免| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 不卡av一区二区三区| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久99精品国语久久久| av在线播放精品| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 日本午夜av视频| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产主播在线观看一区二区 | 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 久久人人爽人人片av| 成年动漫av网址| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 午夜久久久在线观看| 午夜激情av网站| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 大型av网站在线播放| 国产精品免费大片| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 9热在线视频观看99| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 日本色播在线视频| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| tube8黄色片| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 欧美97在线视频| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 美女主播在线视频| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 精品高清国产在线一区| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产精品 国内视频| 色播在线永久视频| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 中文欧美无线码| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 又大又爽又粗| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 国精品久久久久久国模美| 日韩视频在线欧美| 久9热在线精品视频| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 赤兔流量卡办理| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 久久av网站| 免费不卡黄色视频| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 成人三级做爰电影| 悠悠久久av| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 曰老女人黄片| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 777米奇影视久久| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 免费观看人在逋| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 国产成人系列免费观看| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| a级毛片黄视频| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 老司机影院成人| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 久久久久久久精品精品| 一区福利在线观看| 国产麻豆69| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 精品久久久精品久久久| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 日本色播在线视频| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 国产在视频线精品| 国产av精品麻豆| 在线观看国产h片| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 久久久久视频综合| 国产野战对白在线观看| 日本午夜av视频| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 精品福利永久在线观看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 捣出白浆h1v1| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 亚洲国产看品久久| 免费不卡黄色视频| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 大香蕉久久成人网| 欧美日韩精品网址| 免费观看av网站的网址| 午夜福利视频精品| 捣出白浆h1v1| 9色porny在线观看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 免费观看人在逋| 精品久久久精品久久久| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 熟女av电影| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 首页视频小说图片口味搜索 | 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 成人国产一区最新在线观看 | www.自偷自拍.com| 一区二区av电影网| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 国产又爽黄色视频| 中文字幕色久视频| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 操美女的视频在线观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 成人国产一区最新在线观看 | 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 免费观看人在逋| 无限看片的www在线观看| kizo精华| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 国产激情久久老熟女| 中文字幕制服av| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 久久人人爽人人片av| 国产av精品麻豆| 婷婷色综合www| 国产精品二区激情视频| 久久青草综合色| 欧美在线黄色| 亚洲av美国av| 久久久久视频综合| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 在线观看免费高清a一片|